JP2021152675A - Tutorial support system, method and program - Google Patents

Abstract

To provide a technique of supporting optimal matching between a student receiving a tutorial and an instructor.SOLUTION: A tutorial support system includes an instructor information management section prestoring instructor information associated with a learning history information representing a past learning history of the instructor, for each of the plurality of instructors, student information recording section for recording student information associated with a learning history information representing past learning history of the student, and a matching section presenting matching information based on a degree of accordance between the learning history of the instructor and the learning history of the student.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

The present invention relates to a technique for managing individual instruction in which an instructor individually teaches learning to a student who performs learning by using a computer system.

There are learning guidance services such as online English conversation, online tutors, and tutors that support the study of university entrance exams and qualification exams, where teachers and tutors interact with students through communication lines to provide individual guidance to students. Instructors may also be instructors, including instructors and tutors. In this type of learning instruction service, there is a compatibility between the student and the instructor. The better the student and the instructor are, the better the instruction will be and the more effective the learning will be.

Patent Document 1 discloses a technique for matching a lecturer and a student. The individual learning guidance system of Patent Document 1 includes a server that can be accessed by the client of the instructor and the client of the student through communication means. The server receives an instructor database for registering instructor information, an instructor information disclosure means for disclosing the registered contents of the instructor database to the student's client, and a desired instructor's nomination from the student's client, and the communication means. A matching means for inquiring the nominated instructor whether or not the nomination is approved through the instructor, a notification means for notifying the nominated student of the nominated instructor by the matching means through the communication means, and an instructor input from the student's client. It is provided with an evaluation management means for registering evaluation information for the instructor in the instructor database.

Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2004-279727

The individual learning guidance system of Patent Document 1 registers evaluation information indicating past evaluations of the instructor by the students or parents in the instructor database and uses it for matching between the students and the instructor.

However, the newly registered teachers have not been evaluated by past students or parents. Inexperienced teachers have little evaluation from past students and parents. On the other hand, if you are a veteran teacher, there are many evaluations from past students and parents. However, the evaluation may strongly reflect the instructor's ability rather than the compatibility with the students. In that case, students may concentrate on highly qualified teachers.

One object of the present disclosure is to provide a technique for supporting suitable matching between tutoring students and instructors.

The individual guidance support system according to one aspect of the present disclosure holds instructor information in advance for each of a plurality of instructors, which is associated with learning history information indicating the past learning history of the instructor. A management unit, a student information recording unit that records student information associated with learning history information indicating the student's past learning history, and a learning history of the instructor and a learning history of the student. It has a matching unit that presents matching information based on the degree of matching.

According to one aspect of the present disclosure, matching information is presented based on the degree of matching between the instructor and the student's past learning history, so that it is possible to support proper matching between the instructor and the instructor. can.

It is a block diagram of the individual guidance support system of an embodiment. It is a flowchart of the instructor student matching process of embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the attribute information of a leader in Example 1. FIG. It is a figure which shows an example of the learning history information of the instructor in Example 1. FIG. It is a figure which shows an example of the attribute information of a student in Example 1. FIG. It is a figure which shows the learning history information of the student in Example 1. FIG. It is a figure which shows the score calculation method for each item of attribute information. It is a figure which shows the score calculation method for each item of learning history information. It is a figure which shows an example of the learning history information of the instructor in Example 2. FIG. It is a figure which shows the learning history information of the student in Example 2. FIG. It is a block diagram which shows the hardware composition of the individual guidance support system of an embodiment.

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

As this embodiment, a computer system is used to provide individual guidance in which the instructor gives individual guidance regarding learning to students who are studying for junior high school, high school university, etc., national qualifications, private qualifications, etc., and civil service exams. The individual guidance support system that is used and supported will be explained.

In tutoring, compatibility between students and instructors is important. The tutoring support system of this embodiment supports good matching between students and instructors.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of the individual guidance support system of the present embodiment. FIG. 2 is a flowchart of the instructor-student matching process of the present embodiment.

Referring to FIG. 1, the individual guidance support system 10 has an instructor information management unit 11, a student information recording unit 12, a matching unit 13, and a presentation unit 14.

In step S101 of FIG. 2, the instructor information management unit 11 provides instructor information to each of the plurality of instructors, in which the instructor information associated with the learning history information indicating the past learning history of the instructor is associated with the instructor information. Register in the database (DB) 15 in advance.

In step S102, the student information recording unit 12 acquires student information associated with learning history information indicating the past learning history of the target student (hereinafter, also referred to as “target student”) to which the instructor is assigned. , Record in the student information DB 16. The student's past learning history may be input by the student himself, or the information declared by the student may be input to the individual guidance support system 10 by the manager.

In step S103, the matching unit 13 refers to the instructor information DB 15 and the student information DB 16, calculates the degree of matching between the learning history of each instructor and the learning history of the target student, and determines the degree of matching. Based on this, it generates matching information about the combination of target students and instructors. The matching information may include, for example, information indicating the degree of matching between the target student and each instructor. In addition, the matching information may include information indicating the ranking of the instructor according to the degree of matching with the target student.

In step S104, the presentation unit 14 displays a screen showing recommended information about the instructor to be assigned to the target student based on the matching information. The recommendation information may include a list of recommended instructors to be assigned to the target student. The list may be a list of leaders of high-ranking predetermined persons who have a high ranking of the degree of agreement.

According to the present embodiment, since matching information is presented based on the degree of matching between the instructor and the student's past learning history, it is possible to support proper matching between the individual instruction student and the instructor.

In the first embodiment, an individual guidance support system that supports learning guidance of a qualification test is illustrated.

The individual guidance support system 10 of the first embodiment basically has the configuration shown in FIG. 1 and executes the process shown in FIG.

The individual guidance support system 10 of the first embodiment uses not only the learning history of the student and the instructor but also the information on the attributes of the student and the instructor to measure the compatibility between the student and the instructor. Further, the individual guidance support system 10 of the first embodiment uses information suitable for determining the compatibility between the student and the instructor in the instruction of the qualification test as the learning history of the instructor and the student.

In step S101, the instructor information management unit 11 registers instructor information including attribute information and learning history information of each instructor in the instructor information DB 15.

FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of the attribute information of the leader in the first embodiment. Gender, address, age, educational background, appearance, cooking preference, hobby feat, and dream goal are registered in the attribute information 51 in association with the instructor number that individually identifies each instructor. For example, a leader with a leader number of 001 has attributes such as gender being male, address being Tokyo, age being 30 years old, educational background being a master's degree, and appearance being serious.

If the attributes of the items that the student emphasizes are similar to those of the instructor, the student and the instructor are likely to be compatible. For example, with regard to gender, some students have been taught by the same sex, while others have not. Regarding the address, the learning environment and the amount of information differ depending on the size of the city in which you live, whether it is a large city, a medium-sized city, or a rural area, and the method of learning that suits it also differs. Some students want their age to be taught by a leader who is close to their age, while others don't care about it. Some students want their educational background to be taught by a leader with the same educational background as themselves, while others are not particular about their educational background. As for appearance, some students want to have a leader who looks similar to them teach them, while others don't care about appearance. Regarding cooking preferences, conversations tend to be lively if the likes and dislikes of food are similar. However, students who are not interested in food do not care about their cooking taste. Conversations are easy to get excited when hobbies and special skills are close. However, students who do not talk much about hobbies and special skills do not stick to them. Regarding dream goals, conversations are easy to get excited if the future dreams and goals are the same. However, students who do not talk much about their dreams and goals do not stick to them.

FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of learning history information of the instructor in the first embodiment. In the learning history information 52, the occupation at the time of learning, the age at the time of learning, and the number of examinations are registered in association with the instructor number. For example, an instructor with an instructor number of 001 has a learning history that his occupation is a desk worker, his learning age is 26 years old, and he passed the first examination.

If a student's learning history in learning a qualification exam is similar to that of an instructor, the student and instructor are likely to be compatible. For example, with regard to occupations, working styles such as desk work or physical labor, working hours, and holidays differ depending on the occupation, so the effective way of studying the qualification test also differs. If the professions are similar, the experience of the instructor will be useful for instructing the students. As for the age at study, the suitable curriculum differs depending on the age because the memory ability differs depending on the age. If the learning age is close, the instructor can teach the curriculum with his own experience. Regarding the number of exams, the appropriate curriculum differs between learning for the first qualification exam and learning for the second and subsequent exams. The curriculum that I experienced differs depending on whether I passed the first challenge or the second and subsequent times. Instructors who pass the exam once are suitable for teaching learning for the first qualification exam. Instructors who pass the second and subsequent exams are suitable for teaching learning for the second and subsequent qualification exams.

In step S102, the student information recording unit 12 records the student information including the attribute information and the learning history information of the target student in the student information DB 16. Specifically, the student information recording unit 12 displays a questionnaire screen that prompts input of the learning history and the set of the attribute and the attribute weight, and based on the input from the questionnaire screen, the learning history, the attribute, and the attribute weight Is registered in the student information.

FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of student attribute information in the first embodiment. In the attribute information 61, the gender, address, age, educational background, appearance, cooking preference, hobby feat, dream goal, and the degree to which each item is emphasized are associated with the student number that individually identifies each student. And are registered. The degree to which each item is emphasized is the information acquired by the student himself / herself by inputting the answer to the questionnaire, and is indicated by A, B, and C in the right column of each item in FIG. A indicates that it is "very important". B indicates that "somewhat important". C indicates "not important".

Here, it is assumed that the student whose student number is 003 is the target student who newly inputs the attribute information. The student whose student number is 003 is male, very important to gender, address is Tokyo, very important to address, 32 years old, very important to age. , Educational background is a master, academic background is fairly important, appearance is serious, appearance is very important.

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing learning history information of the students in the first embodiment. In the learning history information 62, the occupation, age, and the number of examinations are registered in association with the student number. Since the profession is the profession of the student who is currently learning, it corresponds to the profession at the time of learning in the instructor shown in FIG. Since the age is the age of the student who is currently learning, it corresponds to the learning age of the instructor shown in FIG. In the first embodiment, the age of the student is the same in both the attribute information 61 of FIG. 5 and the learning history information 62 of FIG. However, you may register in only one of them and refer to it for the other.

In step S103, the matching unit 13 calculates a matching score indicating the degree of matching between the attribute information 51 and the learning history information 52 of the target student and the attribute information 61 and the learning history information 62 of each instructor.

The method of calculating the matching score is determined for the purpose of determining the compatibility between the student and the instructor. The matching score in this embodiment is the total value of the score of each item included in the attribute information and the score of each item included in the learning history information.

Since the influence of each item included in the attribute information on compatibility changes depending on whether or not the student attaches importance to the item, the score is weighted according to the degree of emphasis by the student. On the other hand, each item of the learning history information is not weighted according to the degree of emphasis by the student because the matching affects the compatibility regardless of whether or not the student emphasizes it.

The criteria for determining the match of each item included in the attribute information are individually determined for the purpose of determining the compatibility between the student and the instructor. For gender, the match is the match for the item and the mismatch is the mismatch for the item. Regarding address locations, in order to reflect differences in the learning environment and the amount of information, address locations are classified into large cities, medium-sized cities, and regions, and the match of the classification is regarded as the match of the item, and the mismatch of the classification is regarded as the mismatch of the item. do. Regarding the age, in order to reflect whether or not the leader is of the same age, if the age difference is within the predetermined value (for example, 5 years old), the item is considered to match, and if the age difference exceeds the predetermined value, the item is not matched. .. Educational background is classified into master's degree, university graduate, active graduate student, etc., and the matching of the classification is regarded as the matching of the item, and the mismatch of the classification is regarded as the mismatch of the item. Regarding appearance, cooking preferences, hobby feats, and dream goals, information shall be obtained by the students and instructors selecting the applicable ones from multiple options, and the matching of the options shall be the matching of the items, and the matching of the options shall be made. Mismatch is regarded as item mismatch.

FIG. 7 is a diagram showing a score calculation method for each item of attribute information. The score calculation table 71 of FIG. 7 is a list of scores for the combination of item weighting and match or mismatch. If the weighting of an item (degree of emphasis by the student) is A and the student and the instructor agree on that item, the score for that item will be 10 points. If the weighting of a certain item (degree of emphasis by the student) is A and the student and the instructor do not match the item, the score of the item is 0 points. If the weighting of an item (degree of emphasis by the student) is B and the student and the instructor agree on that item, the score for that item will be 5 points. If the weighting of an item (degree of emphasis by the student) is B and the student and the instructor do not match the item, the score of the item will be 0 points. If the weighting of an item (degree of emphasis by the student) is C, the score of the item will be 0 points regardless of whether the student and the instructor match the item.

The criteria for determining the match of each item included in the learning history information are also individually determined for the purpose of determining the compatibility between the student and the instructor. Regarding the profession of the instructor during learning and the profession of the student, information shall be obtained by the student and the instructor selecting the applicable one from multiple options, and the matching of the options shall be the matching of the items, and the options shall be matched. The mismatch of items is regarded as the mismatch of items. Regarding the learning age of the instructor and the age of the students, in order to reflect whether or not they are instructors of the same age, if the age difference is within a predetermined value (for example, 5 years old), the items are matched and the age difference is a predetermined value. If it exceeds, the item is considered to be inconsistent. Regarding the number of times the instructor has taken the exam and the number of times the student has taken the exam, the instructor who passed the first exam and the student who is studying for the first exam are compatible, and the instructor who passed the second and subsequent exams It is a good match for students who are studying for the second and subsequent exams. Therefore, the instructor who has taken the test once and the student who has taken the test 0 times are considered to be the same. In addition, the instructor who has taken the examination twice or more and the student who has taken the examination once or more are considered to be the same.

FIG. 8 is a diagram showing a score calculation method for each item of learning history information. The score calculation table 72 of FIG. 8 is a list of scores for whether the items match or do not match. If the student and the instructor match for an item, the item will be scored 10 points. If the student and the instructor do not match an item, the score for that item will be 0 points.

In step S104, the presentation unit 14 displays a screen showing recommended information regarding the instructor to be assigned to the target student based on the matching score between the target student and each instructor calculated by the matching unit 13. The recommendation information may include a list of recommended instructors to be assigned to the target student. The list may be a list of leaders of high-ranking predetermined persons who have a high ranking of the degree of agreement.

As described above, according to the present embodiment, the individual guidance support system 10 is a system that supports learning guidance of the qualification test. And the learning history of the instructor is the vocational information about the profession when learning for the qualification test, the age information about the age when learning for the qualification test, and the qualification test. Contains information on the number of times the test was taken, whether it passed the first time or after the second time. The student's learning history also includes vocational information about the profession, age information about the current age, and information about the number of times the student has taken the qualification test for the first time or for the second time or later. Then, the matching unit 13 calculates the degree of matching of the occupation information, the age information, and the number of examinations information for the instructor and the student, and totals the degree of matching to match the learning history. Calculate the degree.

Depending on the profession, the work style such as desk work or physical labor, working hours, holidays, etc. differ, so the method of learning that suits it differs. There is a difference in the memory ability to memorize knowledge depending on the age, and it is better to adopt the learning procedure according to each memory ability. In studying for the qualification test, the suitable curriculum changes depending on whether the test is taken for the first time or after the second time. By considering the degree of agreement, it is possible to support proper matching between the qualification examination leader and the student.

Further, in the present embodiment, the instructor information associates the instructor with the attribute information indicating the attribute of the instructor. The student information recording unit 12 further records the attribute information indicating the attributes of the student and the attribute weight, which is the degree to which the student attaches importance to the conformity of the attributes, in the student information. The matching unit 13 calculates the degree of matching of the learning history based on the learning history of the instructor and the learning history of the student, and matches the attributes based on the attributes of the instructor, the attributes of the student, and the attribute weight of the student. The degree of matching is calculated, and matching information is generated based on the degree of matching of learning history and the degree of matching of attributes.

The degree of matching of learning history between the instructor and the student is basically important in learning instruction, but the degree of matching of attributes is important when the student attaches importance to it. In this embodiment, the degree of agreement between the instructor and the student is calculated by considering whether or not the student attaches importance to the attribute and does not consider whether or not the student attaches importance to the learning history. It can support proper matching.

Further, in the present embodiment, the student information recording unit 12 displays a questionnaire screen prompting the input of the learning history and the set of the attribute and the attribute weight, and based on the input from the questionnaire screen, the learning history, the attribute and the attribute. Register the weight and in the student information.

Further, in this embodiment, the attribute weight is an index showing the degree of importance in three stages. Whether or not to emphasize the degree of matching of attributes with the instructor is used as basic information for matching as a three-step index that is sufficient and easy to select, and it is possible to obtain effective information for matching in the form of a questionnaire without burdening students. can.

Further, in this embodiment, the attributes of the instructor are gender information regarding gender, address information regarding address, age information regarding age, educational background information regarding educational background, appearance information regarding appearance, and food related to food preference. Includes hobby feat information about preference information, hobbies and / or feats, and goal information about future dreams or goals. Student attributes include gender information about gender, address information about address, age information about age, educational background information about educational background, appearance information about favorite appearance, food preference information about food preference, hobbies and / Or it contains hobby feat information about feats and goal information about future dreams or goals. The matching unit 13 calculates the degree of matching of gender information, address information, educational background information, appearance information, food preference information, hobby feat information, and target information for the instructor and the student, and the degree of matching thereof. By summing up, the degree of attribute matching is calculated.

In the second embodiment, an individual guidance support system that supports learning guidance for university entrance examinations will be illustrated.

The individual guidance support system 10 of the second embodiment basically has the configuration shown in FIG. 1 and executes the process shown in FIG. Further, in the individual guidance support system 10 of the second embodiment, as in the case of the first embodiment, the attributes of the target student and each instructor and the degree of matching of the learning history are integrated, and the target student and each instructor Generate matching information for. However, the individual guidance support system 10 of the second embodiment uses the same information as that of the first embodiment as the attribute information, but is suitable for determining the compatibility between the student and the instructor in the guidance of the university entrance examination as the learning history. Information is used.

FIG. 9 is a diagram showing an example of the learning history information of the instructor in the second embodiment. In the learning history information 52, information on the attributes of the high school from which the student was born, the preparatory school for the cram school, the club activities, and the active / ronin is registered in association with the instructor number. The home high school attribute is the home high school attribute and is selected from multiple options. The cram school prep school is a mature or prep school used for university entrance exams. Club activities are club activities that I belonged to in high school, and active / ronin passed the university or ronin.

For example, an instructor with an instructor number of 001 has a high-ranking private integrated school with high school attributes, a cram school or preparatory school used for university entrance exams is a □□ cram school, club activities in high school are in the science department, and active college is in the university. I have a learning history that I passed. If a student's learning history in college entrance exams is similar to that of an instructor, the student and instructor are likely to be compatible.

FIG. 10 is a diagram showing learning history information of the students in the second embodiment. In the learning history information 62, information on high school attributes, cram school preparatory schools, club activities, and active / ronin is registered in association with the student number. The high school attribute is the attribute of the high school from which you are from or attending school. The cram school prep school is the cram school or prep school you are currently using. Club activities are club activities that belong to high school. Active / Ronin is information on whether it is an active high school student or a ronin.

The criteria for determining the match of each item included in the learning history information are also individually determined for the purpose of determining the compatibility between the student and the instructor. Regarding the attributes of the high school from which the instructor came from, information shall be obtained by the student and the instructor selecting the applicable one from multiple options, the matching of the options shall be the matching of the item, and the mismatch of the options shall be the matching of the item. There is a discrepancy. Since the learning curriculum and level at high school differ depending on the attributes of the high school from which you are born, you can match the learning curriculum and levels at high school according to your options. For cram school prep schools, the match between the cram schools and prep schools used for university entrance exams is the match for the items, and the mismatch is the item mismatch. The instructor can teach students who are using the same cram school or prep school as to how to use the cram school or prep school. Regarding club activities, it may be a problem to balance studying for entrance exams and club activities when taking university entrance exams. Matching the presence or absence of participation in club activities is regarded as the matching of the item, and the mismatch of the presence or absence of participation is regarded as the mismatch of the item. Regarding active / ronin, the way of learning is different between active high school students and ronin. Instructors who have passed the active duty can provide learning guidance suitable for active high school students, and instructors who have passed the ronin can provide learning guidance suitable for the ronin.

The method of calculating the matching score by the matching unit 13 in step S103 is the same as that of the first embodiment. The attribute information is weighted according to the degree of emphasis of the student, and the score is calculated for the learning history information without considering the degree of emphasis of the student.

As described above, the individual guidance support system 10 of the first embodiment is a system that supports learning guidance for university entrance examinations. The instructor's learning history includes high school information about the high school from which he was born, club activity information about club activities at that high school, examination institution information about the examination guidance institution used, and ronin information about whether he passed or was a ronin in active duty. Includes. In addition, the student's learning history includes high school information about the high school they are enrolled in or from, club activities information about club activities in the high school, examination institution information about the examination guidance institution they are using, and active high school students or ronin. Includes ronin information about what you are doing. Then, the matching unit 13 calculates the degree of matching of the high school information, club activity information, examination institution information, and ronin information for the instructor and the student, and integrates the degree of matching to obtain the learning history. Calculate the degree of matching of.

The curriculum and level of learning differ greatly depending on the high school from which you are born. If there are similarities or similarities between the examination institutions such as preparatory schools and cram schools that you used, you can teach how to effectively utilize the examination institutions. Balancing learning and club activities tends to be an issue in university entrance exams. By considering the degree of agreement, it is possible to support proper matching between university entrance exam leaders and students.

FIG. 11 is a block diagram showing a hardware configuration of the individual guidance support system of the present embodiment.

The individual guidance support system 10 may be available from a terminal device such as a personal computer or a smart phone via a communication network such as the Internet. In that case, the user 90 connects to the individual guidance support system 10 using a browser on the terminal device and uses the service.

The individual guidance support system 10 has a processor 81, a main memory 82, a storage device 83, a communication device 84, an input device 85, and a display device 86 as hardware, and these are connected to the bus 87.

The storage device 83 stores data so that it can be written and read, and the storage device 83 realizes the instructor information DB 15 and the student information DB 16 shown in FIG. The processor 81 is a processor that reads the data stored in the storage device 83 into the main memory 82 and executes the processing of the software program using the main memory 82. When the processor 81 executes the software program, the instructor information management unit 11, the student information recording unit 12, the matching unit 13, and the presentation unit 14 shown in FIG. 1 are realized.

The communication device 84 transmits the information processed by the processor 81 via a communication network including wired, wireless, or both, and transmits the information received via the communication network to the processor 81. The received information is used by the processor 81 for software processing.

The input device 85 is a device that receives information input by an operator such as a keyboard or mouse, and the input information is used for software processing by the processor 81. For example, the questionnaire result is input to the storage device 83 via the communication device 84 and the input device 85. The display device 86 is a device that displays image or text information on a display screen as a result of software processing by the processor 81.

The above-described embodiments and examples of the present invention are examples for explaining the present invention, and the scope of the present invention is not limited to those embodiments and examples. One of ordinary skill in the art can practice the present invention in various other aspects without departing from the scope of the present invention.

10 ... Individual guidance support system, 11 ... Instructor information management department, 12 ... Student information recording department, 13 ... Matching department, 14 ... Presentation department, 15 ... Instructor information DB, 16 ... Student information DB, 51 ... Attribute information, 52 ... Learning history information, 61 ... Attribute information, 62 ... Learning history information, 71, 72 ... Score calculation table, 81 ... Processor, 82 ... Main memory, 83 ... Storage device, 84 ... Communication device, 85 ... Input device, 86 ... display device, 87 ... bus, 90 ... user

Claims (9)

An instructor information management unit that holds in advance instructor information associated with learning history information indicating the instructor's past learning history for each of a plurality of instructors.
A student information recording unit that records student information associated with learning history information indicating the student's past learning history, and a student information recording unit.
A matching unit that presents matching information based on the degree of matching between the learning history of the instructor and the learning history of the student, and
Individual guidance support system with. The individual guidance support system is a system that supports learning guidance for university entrance examinations.
The learning history of the instructor is related to high school information about the high school from which he was born, club activity information about club activities at the high school, examination institution information about the examination guidance institution used, and whether he passed or was a ronin in active duty. Including ronin information
The student's learning history includes high school information about the high school he / she is enrolled in or from, club activity information about club activities at the high school, examination institution information about the examination guidance institution he / she is using, and active examinees or ronin. Including ronin information about what you are doing
The matching unit calculates the degree of matching of the high school information, the club activity information, the examination institution information, and the ronin information for the instructor and the student, and integrates the degree of matching. To calculate the degree of matching of the learning history,
The individual guidance support system according to claim 1. The individual guidance support system is a system that supports learning guidance for qualification examinations.
The learning history of the instructor includes vocational information regarding the profession when learning for the qualification test, age information regarding the age when learning for the qualification test, and the qualification test. Includes information on the number of times you have taken the exam, whether you passed the exam the first time or after the second time.
The student's learning history includes vocational information regarding occupation, age information regarding the current age, and information on the number of times the student has taken the qualification test for the first time or for the second time or later.
The matching unit calculates the degree of matching of the vocational information, the age information, and the number of examinations information for the instructor and the student, and integrates the degree of matching to obtain the learning history. Calculate the degree of match,
The individual guidance support system according to claim 1. The leader information further associates the leader with attribute information indicating the attributes of the leader.
The student information recording unit further records the attribute information indicating the attributes of the student and the attribute weight, which is the degree to which the student attaches importance to the conformity of the attributes, to the student information. death,
The matching unit calculates the degree of matching of the learning history based on the learning history of the instructor and the learning history of the student, and sets the attributes of the instructor, the attributes of the student, and the attribute weight of the student. Based on this, the degree of matching of the attributes is calculated, and matching information based on the degree of matching of the learning history and the degree of matching of the attributes is generated.
The individual guidance support system according to claim 1. The student information recording unit displays a questionnaire screen that prompts input of the learning history and the attribute and the attribute weight set, and based on the input from the questionnaire screen, the learning history, the attribute, and the attribute. Register the weight and in the student information,
The individual guidance support system according to claim 4. The attribute weight is an index showing the degree of importance in three stages.
The individual guidance support system according to claim 5. The attributes of the leader are gender information regarding gender, address information regarding address, age information regarding age, educational background information regarding educational background, appearance information regarding appearance, food preference information regarding food preferences, hobbies and / or special skills. Includes hobby feat information about, and goal information about future dreams or goals,
The attributes of the students are gender information regarding gender, address information regarding address, age information regarding age, educational background information regarding educational background, appearance information regarding favorite appearance, food preference information regarding food preferences, hobbies and / or. Includes hobby feat information about feats and goal information about future dreams or goals
The matching unit calculates the degree of matching of the gender information, the address information, the educational background information, the appearance information, the food preference information, the hobby feat information, and the target information for the instructor and the student. Then, by summing up the degree of matching, the degree of matching of the attributes is calculated.
The individual guidance support system according to claim 4. For each of the plurality of instructors, the instructor information associated with the learning history information indicating the past learning history of the instructor is held in advance.
For the student, the student information associated with the learning history information indicating the student's past learning history is recorded, and the student information is recorded.
An individual instruction support method in which a computer executes to present matching information based on the degree of agreement between the learning history of the instructor and the learning history of the student. For each of the plurality of instructors, the instructor information associated with the learning history information indicating the past learning history of the instructor is held in advance.
For the student, the student information associated with the learning history information indicating the student's past learning history is recorded, and the student information is recorded.
An individual guidance support program for causing a computer to present matching information based on the degree of matching between the learning history of the instructor and the learning history of the student.

Images