JP2023060198A - Building soundness verification system - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a building soundness verification system, a method for verifying a building soundness, and a method for manufacturing a building soundness verification system that can further increase the reliability.

SOLUTION: The building soundness verification system includes a first verification unit and a second verification unit. The first verification unit verifies the soundness of the building on the basis of measurement data of a first-system vibration detection sensor provided in each of the floors of the building. The second verification unit verifies the soundness of the building on the basis of measurement data of a second-system vibration detection sensor provided in each of the floors of the building, which are the same or different at least partially from the first-system vibration detection sensor.

SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

COPYRIGHT: (C)2023,JPO&INPIT

Description

The present invention relates to a building health verification system, a building health verification method, and a manufacturing method for a building health verification system.

In recent years, there has been growing interest in methods for verifying the soundness of buildings after an earthquake. For example, there has been proposed a building safety verification system that evaluates the soundness of a building based on the detection results of sensors installed on each floor of the building (see Patent Document 1, for example).

JP 2014-134436 A

By the way, if the system that verifies the soundness of the building is a single-system system, it will be difficult to verify the building if there is a failure in part of the system, such as a sensor failure, and if an earthquake occurs coincidentally. may become For this reason, the building soundness verification system has room for improvement in terms of further improving reliability.

The present invention has been made in view of such circumstances, and provides a building soundness verification system, a building soundness verification method, and a manufacturing method of a building soundness verification system that can further improve reliability. intended to

One aspect of the present invention for solving the above-described problems is a first verification unit that verifies the soundness of the building based on the measurement data of the vibration detection sensors of the first system provided on each of a plurality of floors of the building. and verifying the soundness of the building based on the measurement data of the vibration detection sensors of the second system provided on the plurality of floors of the building that are the same as or at least partially different from the vibration detection sensors of the first system. and a second verification unit.

Further, in the building soundness verification system described above, the building includes a first layer and a second layer adjacent to the first layer, and the vibration detection sensor of the first system includes the first layer and the A first vibration detection sensor and a second vibration detection sensor arranged to sandwich a second layer, wherein the vibration detection sensor of the second system includes at least a third vibration detection sensor arranged to sandwich the first layer A detection sensor and a fourth vibration detection sensor are included.

Further, in the building soundness verification system described above, the first verification section collectively verifies damage to the first and second layers, and the second verification section verifies damage to at least the first layer. verify.

Further, in the building soundness verification system described above, the building includes a first floor, a second floor adjacent to the first floor, and a second floor adjacent to the first floor from the opposite side of the second floor. a third layer, wherein the vibration detection sensor of the first system includes a first vibration detection sensor and a second vibration detection sensor arranged to sandwich the first layer and the second layer; The two systems of vibration detection sensors include a third vibration detection sensor and a fourth vibration detection sensor arranged to sandwich the first layer and the third layer.

Further, in the building soundness verification system described above, the first verification unit collectively verifies damage to the first and second layers, and the second verification unit collectively verifies damage to the first and third layers. Layer damage is verified collectively.

In the building soundness verification system described above, the vibration detection sensors of the first system and the vibration detection sensors of the second system are alternately provided in the height direction of the building.

Further, in the building soundness verification system described above, the first verification unit includes a first verification unit for writing information indicating a plurality of floors of the building on which the vibration detection sensors of the first system are installed in the first storage unit. An input unit is provided, and the second verification unit has a second input unit for writing information indicating a plurality of floors of the building where the vibration detection sensors of the second system are installed to a second storage unit.

Further, in the building soundness verification system described above, the first verification unit has a first output unit that outputs a first verification result based on the vibration detection sensor of the first system, and the second verification unit includes and a second output section for outputting a second verification result based on the vibration detection sensor of the second system.

Further, in the above-described building soundness verification system, the verification result using the measurement data of the vibration detection sensor of the first system by the first verification unit and the vibration detection sensor of the second system by the second verification unit A verification result output unit for outputting a soundness verification result of the building based on the verification result using the measurement data.

Further, in the building soundness verification system described above, the first verification unit and the second verification unit perform the first verification based on the verification result of the first verification unit and the verification result of the second verification unit. Diagnostic criteria for diagnosing the quality of each verification unit of the verification unit and the second verification unit are determined in advance.

Further, in the building soundness verification system described above, the building has a plurality of layers in which only one of the first system vibration detection sensor and the second system vibration detection sensor is arranged.

Another aspect of the present invention for solving the above-described problems is to evaluate the soundness of the building based on measurement data of a first system vibration detection sensor provided on each of a plurality of floors of the building, and Building soundness, which verifies the soundness of the building based on the measured data of the second-system vibration detection sensors provided on the plurality of floors of the building that are the same as or at least partially different from the first-system vibration detection sensors. It is a sex verification method.

Another aspect of the present invention for solving the above-described problems is a building soundness verification system including a first verification unit that verifies the soundness of a building, and a second verification unit that verifies the soundness of the building. and a process of allocating the plurality of sensors provided in the building to either the first verification section associated with a first group of floors or the second verification section associated with a second group of floors. A method of manufacturing a building health verification system comprising:

Advantageous Effects of Invention According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a building soundness verification system, a building soundness verification method, and a manufacturing method of a building soundness verification system capable of improving reliability.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS It is a figure which shows the structural example of the building soundness verification system of 1st Embodiment. It is a block diagram showing the functional configuration of the building soundness verification system of the first embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the content of the verification result displayed on the display apparatus of 1st Embodiment. It is a figure which shows the structural example of the building soundness verification system before repair. It is a figure which shows an example of the process of renovating the building soundness verification system before repair to the building soundness verification system of 1st Embodiment. It is a figure which shows the structural example of the building soundness verification system of 2nd Embodiment. It is a block diagram which shows the functional structure of the building soundness verification system of 2nd Embodiment. It is a figure for demonstrating an example of the verification content of the comprehensive verification part of 2nd Embodiment. FIG. 11 is a diagram for explaining an example of the contents of a fault diagnosis by a fault diagnosis unit according to the second embodiment; FIG. It is a figure which shows the structural example of the building soundness verification system of 3rd Embodiment. It is a figure which shows the structural example of the building soundness verification system of a 1st modification. It is a figure which shows the structural example of the building soundness verification system of a 2nd modification. It is a figure which shows the structural example of the building soundness verification system of a 3rd modification. It is a figure which shows the structural example of the building soundness verification system of a 4th modification.

Hereinafter, a building soundness verification system, a building soundness verification method, and a manufacturing method of a building soundness verification system according to embodiments will be described with reference to the drawings. In the following description, the same reference numerals are given to components having the same or similar functions. Duplicate descriptions of these configurations may be omitted.

(First embodiment)
First, the first embodiment will be explained. The building soundness verification system 1 of this embodiment is, for example, a system that verifies the soundness of a building after an earthquake. Note that the "building" referred to in the present application is not limited to a building or a house, but may be a bridge or other structure. In addition, the term "building layer" used in the present application means a portion of a building that can be treated as an integral part when considering the deformation properties of the building. A “building layer” means, for example, each floor of a building (a portion composed of floors, beams, pillars, walls, etc. of each floor).

<1. Overall configuration>
FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration example of a building soundness verification system 1 of this embodiment. The building soundness verification system 1 includes, for example, a first sensor group 10A, a second sensor group 10B, a first information processing device 20A including a first verification unit 300A, and a second information processing device including a second verification unit 300B. and a device 20B. In the present embodiment, the first sensor group 10A and the first verification unit 300A constitute a first system building integrity verification subsystem 1a. Also, the second sensor group 10B and the second verification unit 300B constitute a second system building integrity verification subsystem 1b. The building soundness verification subsystem 1a of the first system and the building soundness verification subsystem 1b of the second system can be operated independently of each other. These configurations will be described below.

<2. Building>
In the example shown in FIG. 1, the building 1000 is a 13-story building, for example, and has a first floor (1F) 101, a second floor (2F) 102, a third floor (3F) 103, . . . and a roof 100R. However, the building 1000 may be a building with 12 stories or less, or a building with 14 stories or more. The first floor 101 is an example of the “base floor (eg, the lowest floor on the ground floor)” of the building 1000 . The reference layer is a layer that causes the same shaking (same seismic intensity) as the ground when seismic motion is input to the building 1000 . The reference layer is, for example, the first floor 101 of the building 1000 , but may be the basement floor of the building 1000 or the foundation of the building 1000 . Therefore, in a modified example of the building 1000, the layer numbered 102 may be the first floor (1F), and the layer numbered 101 may be the basement floor (or the foundation).

<3. First Sensor Group and Second Sensor Group>
<3.1 Arrangement of First Sensor Group and Second Sensor Group>
Next, the first sensor group 10A and the second sensor group 10B will be described. The first sensor group 10A and the second sensor group 10B are provided in a building 1000 whose soundness is to be verified.

The first sensor group 10A includes, for example, first to seventh sensors SA1 to SA7. The first sensor SA1 is installed on the floor of the first floor 101, for example. The second to seventh sensors SA2 to SA7 are installed on the floors of the odd-numbered floors of the building 1000, for example. That is, the second sensor SA2 is installed on the floor of the third floor 103, for example. The third sensor SA3 is installed on the floor of the fifth floor 105, for example. Similarly, the fourth to seventh sensors SA4 to SA7 are installed, for example, on the floors of the 7th floor 107, 9th floor 109, . The first sensor group 10A may have an eighth sensor SA8 installed on the roof 100R. This also applies to all embodiments and modifications described later. Hereinafter, the sensors SA1 to SA7 included in the first sensor group 10A are simply referred to as "sensor SA" when they are not distinguished from each other. The sensor SA is a sensor capable of detecting vibrations occurring in each floor of the building 1000, such as an acceleration sensor. The sensor SA is an example of a “first-system vibration detection sensor”.

In this application, "installed on the floor" is not limited to installation on the floor surface, but installed inside the floor (between the floor surface of a certain floor and the ceiling surface of the next floor) including cases where Further, each sensor SA is not limited to the floor of each floor, and may be provided on the ceiling, beams, walls, etc. of each floor. This also applies to the second sensor group 10B.

The first to seventh sensors SA1 to SA7 included in the first sensor group 10A are cascade-connected by cables CA. That is, the seventh sensor SA7 is connected to the sixth sensor SA6 by the cable CA. The sixth sensor SA6 is connected to the fifth sensor SA5 by a cable CA. Similarly, the fifth to third sensors SA5-SA3 are connected by cables CA to the sensors SA on the lower odd-numbered floors. The second sensor SA2 is connected to the first sensor SA1 by a cable CA. The first sensor SA1 is connected to the first information processing device 20A by a cable CA. In other words, the second to seventh sensors SA2-SA7 are not directly connected to the first information processing device 20A. For example, the detection result (measurement data) of the seventh sensor SA7 passes through the sixth sensor SA6, the fifth sensor SA5, the fourth sensor SA4, the third sensor SA3, the second sensor SA2, and the first sensor SA1 in order. , is output to the first information processing device 20A. The detection result of the seventh sensor SA7 is associated with identification information (such as the ID of the seventh sensor SA7) indicating the detection result of the seventh sensor SA7, and is sent from the seventh sensor SA7 to the first information processing device 20A. sent. These are the same for other sensors SA.

The second sensor group 10B includes, for example, first to eighth sensors SB1 to SB8. The first sensor SB1 is installed, for example, on the floor of the first floor 101, like the first sensor SA1 of the first sensor group 10A. On the other hand, the second to seventh sensors SB2 to SB7 are installed, for example, on even-numbered floors of the building 1000 . That is, the second sensor SB2 is installed on the floor of the second floor 102, for example. The third sensor SB3 is installed on the floor of the fourth floor 104, for example. Similarly, the fourth to seventh sensors SB4 to SB7 are installed on the floors of the 6th floor 106, the 8th floor 108, . The eighth sensor SB8 is installed on the roof 100R. Hereinafter, the sensors SB1 to SB8 included in the second sensor group 10B are simply referred to as "sensor SB" when they are not distinguished from each other. The sensor SB is a sensor capable of detecting vibrations occurring in each floor of the building, such as an acceleration sensor. The sensor SB is an example of a "second-system vibration detection sensor." In this embodiment, the sensors SB are provided on multiple floors of the building 1000 at least partially different from the sensors SA.

The first to eighth sensors SB1 to SB8 included in the second sensor group 10B are cascade-connected by cables CB. That is, the eighth sensor SB8 is connected to the seventh sensor SB7 by the cable CB. The seventh sensor SB7 is connected to the sixth sensor SB6 by a cable CB. Similarly, the sixth to third sensors SB6 to SB3 are connected by cables CB to the even-numbered floor sensor SB one floor below. The second sensor SB2 is connected to the first sensor SB1 by a cable CB. The first sensor SB1 is connected to the second information processing device 20B by a cable CB. In other words, the second to eighth sensors SB2 to SB8 are not directly connected to the second information processing device 20B. For example, the detection results (measurement data) of the eighth sensor SB8 are the seventh sensor SB7, the sixth sensor SB6, the fifth sensor SB5, the fourth sensor SB4, the third sensor SB3, the second sensor SB2, and the first sensor SB1. , and is output to the second information processing device 20B. The detection result of the eighth sensor SB8 is associated with identification information (such as the ID of the eighth sensor SA) indicating the detection result of the eighth sensor SB8, and is transmitted from the eighth sensor SB8 to the second information processing device 20B. sent. These are the same for other sensors SB.

As described above, in this embodiment, the sensors SA and SB are alternately provided in the height direction of the building 1000 . The building 1000 has a plurality of floors in which only one of the first system sensor SA and the second system sensor SB is arranged.

Sensor SA and sensor SB are installed at approximately the same location on each floor. For example, when the sensor SA is installed on the floor of each floor, the sensor SB is also installed on the floor of each floor. When the sensor SA is installed on the ceiling of each floor, the sensor SB is also installed on the ceiling of each floor. Moreover, it is preferable that the sensor SA and the sensor SB are installed at approximately the same place in the planar direction of each floor. For example, when viewed from above, one or more sensors SA and one or more sensors SB are positioned to overlap each other.

<3.2 Arrangement example of sensors SA and SB from a certain point of view>
Here, an arrangement example of the sensors SA and SB from a certain point of view will be described. Building 1000 includes a first floor (eg, third floor 103) and a second floor (eg, fourth floor 104) adjacent to the first floor. The first system of sensors SA includes a first vibration detection sensor (eg, second sensor SA2) and a second vibration detection sensor (eg, third sensor SA3) arranged to sandwich the first and second layers. . The second system of sensors SB includes at least a third vibration detection sensor (for example, second sensor SB2) and a fourth vibration detection sensor (for example, third sensor SB3) arranged to sandwich the first layer. From this point of view, the second sensor SB<b>2 is not limited to being provided on the floor of the second floor 102 , and may be provided on the floor of the third floor 103 .

Here, in the present application, "so as to sandwich the layers" means "so as to sandwich at least a part of the layers". That is, for example, the third floor 103 is sandwiched between the second sensor SA2 provided on the floor of the third floor 103 and the third sensor SA3 provided on the floor of the fifth floor 105 .

<3.3 Arrangement Example of Sensors SA and SB from Another Viewpoint>
An arrangement example of the sensors SA and SB from another viewpoint will be described. The building 1000 includes a first floor (for example, the third floor 103), a second floor (for example, the fourth floor 104) adjacent to the first floor, and a third floor adjacent to the first floor from the opposite side to the second floor. layer (second floor 102). The first system of sensors SA includes a first vibration detection sensor (eg, second sensor SA2) and a second vibration detection sensor (eg, third sensor SA3) arranged to sandwich the first and second layers. . The second system of sensors SB includes a third vibration detection sensor (for example, second sensor SB2) and a fourth vibration detection sensor (for example, third sensor SB3) arranged to sandwich the first and third layers. .

<4. First Information Processing Device and Second Information Processing Device>
Next, the first information processing device 20A and the second information processing device 20B will be described. Each of the first information processing device 20A and the second information processing device 20B is, for example, an information processing device such as a personal computer. Each of the first information processing device 20A and the second information processing device 20B includes an operation unit 100 (see FIG. 2) and a display device 200 (see FIG. 2). The operation unit 100 may be, for example, a keyboard, a mouse, or the like, or may be a touch input type (touch panel type) input device provided integrally with the display device 200 . The display device 200 is a liquid crystal display, an organic EL (Electro-Luminescence) display, a plasma display, or the like, and has a display screen on which images and videos are displayed. The first information processing device 20A and the second information processing device 20B are installed, for example, on the first floor 101 of the building 1000, like the sensors SA1 and SB1. Note that the first information processing device 20A and the second information processing device 20B may be provided outside the building 1000 (for example, a data monitoring room that exists separately from the building 1000).

<5. Functional Configuration of Building Integrity Verification System>
FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing the functional configuration of the building soundness verification system 1. As shown in FIG. In this embodiment, the first information processing device 20A and the second information processing device 20B are not connected to each other and are completely independent. In addition, the first information processing apparatus 20A and the second information processing apparatus 20B are set to have different timings for restarting software and updating software. The first information processing device 20A includes a first verification section 300A. On the other hand, the second information processing device 20B includes a second verification section 300B.

<5.1 First verification unit>
First, the first verification section 300A will be described. The first verification unit 300A has, for example, a first information processing unit 302A, a first input unit 304A, a first output unit 306A, and a first storage unit 308A. Some or all of the functional units of the first verification unit 300A (eg, the first information processing unit 302A, the first input unit 304A, and the first output unit 306A) are mounted on the first information processing device 20A, for example. A processor such as a CPU (Central Processing Unit) executes a program (software) stored in the first storage unit 308A. Some or all of these functional units may be realized by hardware such as LSI (Large Scale Integration), ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuit), and FPGA (Field-Programmable Gate Array), or may be realized by software. It may be realized by cooperation of hardware. The first storage unit 308A is implemented by, for example, a semiconductor storage device such as an HDD (Hard Disk Drive) or flash memory.

First, the first input section 304A and the first storage section 308A will be described. The first input unit 304A writes the installation floor information 308Aa of the sensor SA of the first system to the first storage unit 308A based on the administrator's (user's) operation on the operation unit 100 of the first information processing device 20A. The first-system sensor SA installation floor information 308Aa is information indicating a plurality of floors of the building 1000 where the first-system sensors SA (first to seventh sensors SA1 to SA7) are installed (that is, Among them, information indicating on which floor the sensor SA is installed).

Next, the first information processing section 302A will be described. When an earthquake motion is input to the building 1000, the first information processing section 302A calculates the seismic intensity of the earthquake at the point where the building 1000 is located based on the measurement data of the first sensor SA1 of the first system. The method for calculating the seismic intensity of an earthquake is, for example, a method similar to that used by the Japan Meteorological Agency to calculate the seismic intensity. Information indicating the seismic intensity calculated by the first information processing unit 302A is sent to the first output unit 306A.

Further, when seismic motion is input to the building 1000, the first information processing unit 302A determines the soundness of each floor of the building 1000 based on the measurement data of the first system sensors SA (first to seventh sensors SA1 to SA7). verify. In this embodiment, the first information processing unit 302A stores the measurement data of the first system sensors SA (first to seventh sensors SA1 to SA7) and the first system sensor SA stored in the first storage unit 308A. The soundness of each floor of the building 1000 is verified based on the installation floor information 308Aa. In the present application, "verify the soundness of each floor" means the soundness of a plurality of layers (for example, 3F103 and 4F104) sandwiched between two adjacent sensors included in the same system of the first system and the second system. It includes the case of verifying all together.

In the present embodiment, the first information processing unit 302A performs 1 The soundness of the floor 101 and the second floor 102 (for example, the presence or absence and degree of damage) is verified collectively. Similarly, the first information processing unit 302A, based on the measurement data of the second sensor SA2 and the third sensor SA3, and the installation floor information 308Aa indicating the installation floor of the second sensor SA2 and the third sensor SA3, the third floor 103 and the soundness of the fourth floor 104 (for example, presence or absence and degree of damage) are collectively verified. In addition, the first information processing unit 302A, based on the measurement data of the third sensor SA3 and the fourth sensor SA4, and the installation floor information 308Aa indicating the installation floor of the third sensor SA3 and the fourth sensor SA4, the fifth floor 105 and The soundness of the sixth floor 106 (for example, the presence or absence and degree of damage) is collectively verified. The same applies to other floors. Information indicating the soundness of each floor verified by the first information processing section 302A is sent to the first output section 306A.

Here, an example of a soundness verification method for a certain floor (for example, the third floor 103) is as follows. For example, by integrating twice the acceleration included in the measurement data of the two sensors SA2 and SA3 arranged so as to sandwich the floor to be verified (third floor 103), the acceleration at the installation location of each sensor SA2 and SA3 A directional displacement is calculated. Also, the distance in the height direction between the two sensors SA2 and SA3 is calculated based on the installation floor information 308Aa. Then, by dividing the difference in displacement in the direction of acceleration at the locations where the two sensors SA2 and SA3 are installed by the distance in the height direction between the two sensors SA2 and SA3, the third floor 103 and the fourth floor 104 are combined into one. An inter-layer deformation angle Δ (radian) is calculated for each layer. The first information processing unit compares the calculated inter-story deformation angle Δ (radian) with a predetermined threshold value stored in the first storage unit 308A to determine the soundness of the third floor 103 and the fourth floor 104 (for example, the degree of damage). Presence or absence and degree).

Details and modifications of the soundness verification method for each floor are previously proposed by the present applicant in "Building Safety Verification System and Building Safety Verification Method (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2014-134436)", "Building Soundness evaluation system and building soundness evaluation method (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2017-227507); Alternatively, the soundness of each floor may be verified by performing simulation analysis using a mass model of the building 1000 .

When the method disclosed in the above document is applied, each of the sensor group 10A of the first system and the sensor group 10B of the second system has a microvibration sensor and a tilt sensor provided on the roof 100R. may In this case, the micro-vibration sensor and the tilt sensor included in the sensor group 10A of the first system are cascade-connected to the sensor SA of the first system, for example. Further, the micro-vibration sensor and the tilt sensor included in the sensor group 10B of the second system are cascade-connected to the sensor SB of the second system, for example.

The first output unit 306A outputs information indicating the seismic intensity of the earthquake calculated by the first information processing unit 302A and the soundness (for example, the presence or absence and degree of damage) of each floor verified (determined) by the first information processing unit 302A. is displayed on the display device 200 of the first information processing device 20A. The information displayed on the display device 200 of the first information processing device 20A is an example of the first verification result based on the sensor SA of the first system.

FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of the contents of verification results displayed on the display device 200. As shown in FIG. In this embodiment, the same content is displayed for the soundness of multiple floors (multiple layers) collectively verified by the first information processing unit 302A. For example, when it is determined that the third floor 103 and the fourth floor 104 are severely damaged based on the measurement data of the second sensor SA2 and the third sensor SA3, the display device 200 displays the damage on the third floor 103 and the fourth floor 104. Information IM1 indicating that the degree of is large is displayed. Details and modifications of the contents displayed on the display device 200 are, for example, the above three documents (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open Nos. 2014-134436, 2017-227507, and 2014-16249). More than one disclosed material can be used.

<5.2 Second verification unit>
Next, the second verification section 300B will be described. The second verification unit 300B has, for example, a second information processing unit 302B, a second input unit 304B, a second output unit 306B, and a second storage unit 308B. A part or all of each functional unit of the second verification unit 300B (for example, the second information processing unit 302B, the second input unit 304B, and the second output unit 306B) is a CPU installed in the second information processing device 20B. It is implemented by a processor such as executing a program (software) stored in the second storage unit 308B. Some or all of these functional units may be implemented by hardware such as LSI, ASIC, and FPGA, or may be implemented by cooperation of software and hardware. The second storage unit 308B is implemented by a semiconductor storage device such as an HDD or flash memory, for example.

First, the second input section 304B and the second storage section 308B will be described. The second input unit 304B writes the installation floor information 308Ba of the sensor SB of the second system to the second storage unit 308B based on the administrator's operation on the operation unit 100 of the second information processing device 20B. The installation floor information 308Ba of the second system sensor SB is information indicating a plurality of floors of the building 1000 where the second system sensor SB (first to eighth sensors SB1 to SB8) is installed (that is, Among them, information indicating on which floor the sensor SB is installed).

Next, the second information processing section 302B will be described. When seismic motion is input to the building 1000, the second information processing section 302B calculates the seismic intensity of the earthquake at the point where the building 1000 is located based on the measurement data of the first sensor SB1 of the second system. The method for calculating the seismic intensity of an earthquake is, for example, a method similar to that used by the Japan Meteorological Agency to calculate the seismic intensity. Information indicating the seismic intensity calculated by the second information processing unit 302B is sent to the second output unit 306B.

Further, when seismic motion is input to the building 1000, the second information processing unit 302B determines the soundness of each floor of the building 1000 based on the measurement data of the second system sensors SB (first to eighth sensors SB1 to SB8). verify. In this embodiment, the second information processing unit 302B stores the measurement data of the second system sensors SB (first to eighth sensors SB1 to SB8) and the second system sensor SB stored in the second storage unit 308B. The soundness of each floor of the building 1000 is verified based on the installation floor information 308Ba.

In the present embodiment, the second information processing unit 302B performs 1 The soundness of the floor 101 (for example, the presence and degree of damage) is verified. In addition, the second information processing unit 302B, based on the measurement data of the second sensor SB2 and the third sensor SB3, and the installation floor information 308Ba indicating the installation floor of the second sensor SB2 and the third sensor SB3, The soundness of the third floor 103 (for example, the presence or absence and degree of damage) is collectively verified. Similarly, the second information processing unit 302B, based on the measurement data of the third sensor SB3 and the fourth sensor SB4, and the installation floor information 308Ba indicating the installation floor of the third sensor SB3 and the fourth sensor SB4, the fourth floor 104 and the soundness of the fifth floor 105 (for example, the presence or absence and degree of damage). The same applies to other floors. Information indicating the soundness of each floor verified by the second information processing section 302B is sent to the second output section 306B. The soundness verification method by the second information processing unit 302B is the same as the soundness detection method by the first information processing unit 302A.

The second output unit 306B outputs information indicating the seismic intensity of the earthquake calculated by the second information processing unit 302B and the soundness (for example, the presence or absence and degree of damage) of each floor verified (determined) by the second information processing unit 302B. is displayed on the display device 200 of the second information processing device 20B. The content displayed on the display device 200 of the second information processing device 20B by the second output unit 306B is the same as the content displayed on the display device 200 of the first information processing device 20A by the first output unit 306A. . The information displayed on the display device 200 of the second information processing device 20B is an example of the second verification result based on the second system sensor SB.

The processes by the first information processing device 20A and the second information processing device 20B described above are performed independently of each other (for example, in parallel with each other) when seismic motion is input to the building 1000 . Then, the verification result by the first information processing device 20A (the verification result by the first system) is displayed on the display device 200 of the first information processing device 20A. The verification result by the second information processing device 20B (the verification result by the second system) is displayed on the display screen of the second information processing device 20B. The administrator confirms one or both of the content displayed on the display device 200 of the first information processing device 20A and the content displayed on the display device 200 of the second information processing device 20B, and It is possible to grasp the health of 1000 (for example, the presence or absence and degree of damage).

<6. Manufacturing Method of Building Integrity Verification System>
Next, a method for manufacturing the building soundness verification system 1 will be described. Here, a method of renovating the building 1000 from a state in which a plurality of sensors S (sensors S1 to S14) are already installed to a state in which the building soundness verification system 1 is installed will be described.

FIG. 4 is a diagram showing a configuration example of the soundness verification system Z before repair. The building soundness verification system Z before renovation includes, for example, a sensor group 10 and an information processing device 20 including a verification section 300 . The sensor group 10 includes, for example, sensors S1 to S14. Sensors S1 to S14 are arranged one by one on each floor (eg, all floors) of building 1000 . In the following, the sensors S1 to S14 are simply referred to as "sensors S" when they are not distinguished from each other. The sensor S is a sensor capable of detecting vibrations occurring in each floor of the building 1000, such as an acceleration sensor. The sensor S is an example of a "vibration detection sensor." The sensors S1-S14 are cascaded by a cable C.

The information processing device 20 includes an operation unit 100 , a display device 200 and a verification unit 300 . The verification unit 300 verifies the soundness of each floor of the building 1000 based on the measurement data of the sensors S1 to S14. Verification unit 300 is an example of a “first verification unit” in one aspect.

FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of the process of refurbishing the building health verification system Z before refurbishment to the building health verification system 1. As shown in FIG. As shown in FIG. 5, in this renovation, one sensor SB1 for the second system is newly installed on the 1st floor 101 of the building 1000 . Also, on the first floor 101 of the building 1000, a second information processing device 20B is installed. Then, software (program) necessary for realizing the first verification unit 300A is installed in the information processing device 20 (first information processing investment 20A). Similarly, the software (program) necessary for realizing the second verification unit 300B is installed in the second information processing device 20B. Note that if the first verification unit 300A can be implemented by software that has already been installed in the information processing apparatus 20 to implement the verification unit 300, the above installation is unnecessary.

In this modification, the existing sensors S1 to S14 are divided into the first system sensor SA and the second system sensor SB. This sorting is performed based on, for example, information input using the operation unit 100 of the information processing device 20 (first information processing device 20A), and the sensor used as the sensor SA of the first system among the sensors S1 to S14. is registered in the first storage unit 308A of the information processing device 20 (first information processing device 20A), and based on the information input using the operation unit 100 of the second information processing device 20B, among the sensors S1 to S14 is registered in the second storage unit 308B of the second information processing device 20B. In this embodiment, among the sensors S1 to S14, S1, S3, S5, S7, S9, S11 and S13 are registered as sensors SA1, SA2, SA3, SA4, SA5, SA6 and SA7 of the first system. Among the sensors S1 to S14, S2, S4, S6, S8, S10, S12 and S14 are registered as sensors SB2, SB3, SB4, SB5, SB6, SB7 and SB8 of the second system.

Further, the sensors SA1 to SA7 of the first system and the information processing device 20 (the first information processing device 20A) are cascade-connected by a cable CA, as shown in FIG. Similarly, the sensors SB1 to SB8 of the second system and the second information processing unit 20B are cascade-connected by a cable CB as shown in FIG. As a result, the building soundness verification system Z is modified to the building soundness verification system 1 .

In addition, the manufacturing method of the building soundness verification system 1 is not limited to the above example. For example, the sensors SA, SB and the information processing devices 20A, 20B may all be newly installed in the building 1000 . Further, for example, a building soundness verification system can be obtained by additionally installing a second system of sensors SB and an information processing device 20B to a building soundness verification system Z in which the first system of sensors SA and an information processing device 20A are already installed. 1 may be implemented. These several manufacturing methods are similarly applicable to all embodiments and modifications described later.

According to the configuration of the first embodiment described above, it is possible to further improve the reliability of the building soundness verification system that verifies the soundness of the building. Here, if the building soundness verification system is a single-system system, there is no redundancy, and if a problem such as a sensor failure occurs in a part of the system, there is a risk that the monitoring of the building cannot be continued. In other words, it may be difficult to verify a building when an earthquake occurs coincidentally with a failure of a part of the system such as a sensor failure. In addition, if the building integrity verification system is a single system, verification of the building may become difficult if an earthquake coincides with the restart of the software for maintenance of the system or the update of the software. can be.

Therefore, in this embodiment, the building soundness verification system 1 verifies the soundness of each floor of the building 1000 based on the measurement data of the sensors SA of the first system provided on each of the multiple floors of the building 1000. The soundness of each floor of the building 1000 is checked based on the measurement data of the verification unit 300A and the sensors SB of the second system provided on a plurality of floors of the building 1000 which are the same as or at least partially different from the sensors SA of the first system. and a second verification unit 300B for verification. According to such a configuration, there is a possibility that either one of the first system and the second system will be temporarily unable to continue monitoring the building 1000 when a malfunction occurs in a part of the system such as a sensor failure. However, monitoring of building 1000 can continue through another line. Further, by shifting the timing of restarting or updating the software between the information processing device 20A of the first system and the information processing device 20B of the second system, it is possible to accidentally restart or update the software of one of the systems. Even if multiple earthquakes occur, the soundness of the building 1000 can be verified by another system. Thereby, the reliability of the building soundness verification system 1 can be further improved.

Here, in order to transmit the detection results of the sensors SA and SB installed on each floor of the building 1000 to the information processing apparatuses 20A and 20B, the cables connected to the sensors SA and SB are directly connected to the information processing apparatuses 20A and SB, respectively. Extending to 20B is also conceivable. However, in this case, the number of cables increases as the hierarchy goes down, which may lead to an increase in man-hours and layout restrictions. On the other hand, in this embodiment, the sensors SA and SB installed on each floor are connected to the information processing devices 20A and 20B using the cascade connection as described above. With such a configuration, it is possible to reduce the number of man-hours required for the work, and to reduce layout restrictions.

However, in the case of the cascade connection, if one of the sensors SA and SB serving as relay points fails, there is a possibility that the detection result of the sensor will not reach from the floor above the failed sensor. However, in the present embodiment, the sensor SA of the first system and the sensor SB of the second system are each independently connected to the first information processing device 20A or the second information processing device 20B. According to such a configuration, even if one sensor included in one system fails, the detection results of the sensors included in the other system are normally sent to the information processing device. Therefore, the reliability of the building soundness verification system 1 can be further improved while reducing the number of man-hours and layout restrictions by cascade connection.

(Second embodiment)
Next, a second embodiment will be described. In the second embodiment, at least one of the first information processing device 20A and the second information processing device 20B is provided with the soundness verification result by the first information processing unit 302A and the soundness verification by the second information processing unit 302B. This differs from the first embodiment in that a comprehensive verification unit 3022 is provided to perform more detailed verification of the soundness of the building 1000 based on comparison with the results. Configurations other than those described below are the same as those of the first embodiment.

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing a configuration example of the building soundness verification system 1 of the second embodiment. In this embodiment, a cable CC that electrically connects the first information processing device 20A and the second information processing device 20B is provided. That is, the first information processing device 20A and the second information processing device 20B can communicate with each other through the cable CC.

FIG. 7 is a block diagram showing the functional configuration of the building soundness verification system 1 of the second embodiment. First, the second information processing device 20B will be described. The second information processing section 302B of the second information processing device 20B of this embodiment includes a second system verification section 3031 . The second system verification section 3031 has the same function as the second information processing section 302B of the first embodiment. That is, when seismic motion is input to the building 1000, the second system verification unit 3031 calculates the seismic intensity of the earthquake at the point where the building 1000 is located based on the measurement data of the first sensor SB1 of the second system. Further, when seismic motion is input to the building 1000, the second system verification unit 3031 stores the measurement data of the sensors SB (first to eighth sensors SB1 to SB8) of the second system and the data stored in the second storage unit 308B. Based on the installed floor information 308Ba of the second system sensor SB, the soundness of each floor of the building 1000 (for example, the presence or absence and degree of damage) is verified. The calculation result and verification result by the second system verification unit 3031 are output to the first information processing unit 302A of the first information processing device 20A via the cable CC.

Next, the first information processing device 20A will be described. The first information processing unit 302A of the first information processing device 20A of the present embodiment has, for example, a first system verification unit 3021, a comprehensive verification unit 3022, and a fault diagnosis unit 3023.

The first system verification section 3021 has the same function as the first information processing section 302A of the first embodiment. That is, when seismic motion is input to the building 1000, the first system verification unit 3021 calculates the seismic intensity of the earthquake at the point where the building 1000 is located based on the measurement data of the first sensor SA1 of the first system. Further, when seismic motion is input to the building 1000, the first information processing unit 302A stores the measurement data of the first system sensors SA (first to seventh sensors SA1 to SA7) and the data stored in the first storage unit 308A. Based on the installed floor information 308Aa of the sensor SA of the first system, the soundness of each floor of the building 1000 (for example, the presence or absence and degree of damage) is verified. The calculation result and verification result by first system verification section 3021 are output to comprehensive verification section 3022 .

Next, the general verification section 3022 will be described. The comprehensive verification unit 3022 obtains the verification result using the measurement data of the sensor SA of the first system by the first system verification unit 3021 and the verification result using the measurement data of the sensor SB of the second system by the second system verification unit 3031. Based on this, the soundness of each floor of the building 1000 (for example, the presence or absence and degree of damage) is comprehensively verified.

FIG. 8 is a diagram for explaining an example of verification contents of the comprehensive verification unit 3022. As shown in FIG. In FIG. 8 , “results of verification by the first system” indicate results of soundness verification of each floor of the building 1000 by the first system verification unit 3021 using the measurement data of the sensor SA of the first system. “Second-system verification result” indicates the soundness verification result of each floor of the building 1000 using the measurement data of the second-system sensor SB by the second-system verification unit 3031 . “Comprehensive verification result” indicates the verification result by the comprehensive verification unit 3022 .

The comprehensive verification unit 3022 compares the verification result by the first system verification unit 3021 and the verification result by the second system verification unit 3031, and compares the plurality of floors ( Among the multiple floors (multiple layers) whose soundness has been collectively verified by the second system verification unit 3031, it is possible to determine which floor (which layer) is actually damaged. Validate with high accuracy. For example, the comprehensive verification unit 3022 compares the verification result by the first system verification unit 3021 and the verification result by the second system verification unit 3031 for each floor (each layer). When the verification result by the first system verification unit 3021 and the verification result by the second system verification unit 3031 are different (for example, when the degree of damage is different), the comprehensive verification unit 3022, for example, , the smaller verification result of the verification result by the first system verification unit 3021 and the verification result by the second system verification unit 3031 is taken as the comprehensive verification result for the floor (that layer). On the other hand, when the verification result by the first system verification unit 3021 and the verification result by the second system verification unit 3031 are the same for the floor (layer) to be verified (for example, when the degree of damage is the same), for example, the first The verification result by the system verification unit 3021 (or the verification result by the second system verification unit 3031) is used as the comprehensive verification result for that floor (that layer).

In the example shown in FIG. 8, in the verification result by the first system verification unit 3021, the 9th floor 109 and the 10th floor 110 are collectively verified and the degree of damage is determined to be "large". On the other hand, in the verification result by the second system verification unit 3031, the 8th floor 108 and the 9th floor 109 are collectively verified and the degree of damage is determined to be "large", and the 10th floor 110 and the 11th floor 111 are They were collectively verified and the degree of damage was judged to be "medium". In this case, the comprehensive verification unit 3022 determines that the damage level of the 9th floor 109 is "large" and the damage level of the 10th floor 110 is "medium". In other words, for example, if a structural member on the 9th floor 109 is damaged, based on the detection results of the second system sensor SB6 installed on the 10th floor 110 and the first system sensor SA6 installed on the 11th floor 111 , the damaged floor can be identified. The verification result by the comprehensive verification section 3022 is output to the first output section 306A.

However, the verification method by the comprehensive verification unit 3022 is not limited to the above example. For example, when the verification result by the first system verification unit 3021 and the verification result by the second system verification unit 3031 are different (for example, when the degree of damage is different), the comprehensive verification unit 3022 For example, the larger verification result between the verification result by the first system verification unit 3021 and the verification result by the second system verification unit 3031 may be used as the comprehensive verification result for the floor (layer). In this case, in the example shown in FIG. 8, the degree of damage on the eighth floor 108 to the tenth floor 110 may be determined to be "large".

Next, the fault diagnosis section 3023 will be explained. Based on the verification result of the first verification unit 300A (detection result of the first system verification unit 3021) and the verification result of the second verification unit 300B (verification result of the second system verification unit 3031), the fault diagnosis unit 3023 The quality of each verification unit of the first verification unit 300A and the second verification unit 300B is diagnosed. In the present embodiment, the fault diagnosis unit 3023 compares the verification result of the first system verification unit 3021 and the verification result of the second system verification unit 3031, the first system verification unit 3021 and the second system verification unit 3031 Diagnose the quality of The quality diagnosis described below may be performed at a predetermined cycle even in normal times, or may be performed when an earthquake motion is input to the building 1000 . This diagnosis can be carried out even in normal times because the sensors SA and SB receive micro-vibrations of the building 1000 caused by the wind even in normal times.

For example, the fault diagnosis unit 3023 may check the verification results (for example, degree of damage) of each floor of the building 1000 by the first system verification unit 3021 and the verification results of each floor of the building 1000 by the second system verification unit 3031 (degree of damage to the building). ). In these comparison results, the failure diagnosis unit 3023 determines that the difference between the verification result of the building 1000 by the first system verification unit 3021 and the verification result of the same floor of the building 1000 by the second system verification unit 3031 is If it is equal to or greater than the threshold, it is diagnosed that there is an abnormality in sensor SA or sensor SB corresponding to that floor.

FIG. 9 is a diagram for explaining an example of failure diagnosis contents of the failure diagnosis unit 3023. As shown in FIG. In FIG. 9, for example, the verification result (for example, degree of damage) of each floor of the building 1000 by the first system verification unit 3021 and the verification result (degree of damage of the building) of each floor of the building 1000 by the second system verification unit 3031 A graph plots the difference value d of . A line BL in FIG. 9 indicates a reference line where the difference value d is zero. Lines th1 and th2 positioned on both sides of the line BL indicate threshold values for determining whether the sensors SA and SB are abnormal. Lines th1 and th2 are used for "diagnosing the quality of each of the first verification section 300A and the second verification section 300B based on the verification result of the first verification section 300A and the verification result of the second verification section 300B. This is an example of "diagnostic criteria for The diagnostic criteria (values of lines th1 and th2) are stored as diagnostic criteria information 308Ab in, for example, the first storage unit 308A.

In the example shown in FIG. 9, the difference value da between the verification result of the 5th to 8th floors 105 to 108 by the first system verification unit 3021 and the verification result of the 5th to 8th floors 105 to 108 by the second system verification unit 3031 exceeds the threshold th2. On the other hand, the difference value d between the verification result of the fourth floor 104 and the ninth floor 109 by the first system verification unit 3021 and the verification result of the fourth floor 104 and the ninth floor 109 by the second system verification unit 3031 is the threshold th1 and the threshold It is within the range between th2. In this case, the failure diagnosis unit 3023 detects the sensor SB4 installed on the 6th floor 106 (the sensor that affects the verification result of the 4th floor 104) and the sensor SB5 installed on the 8th floor 108 (the sensor that affects the verification result of the 9th floor 109). The sensor SA4 located on the 7th floor 107 is diagnosed as having an abnormality. The diagnosis result by fault diagnosis section 3023 is output to first output section 306A and comprehensive verification section 3022 .

When the fault diagnosis unit 3023 diagnoses that there is an abnormality in a specific sensor, the comprehensive verification unit 3022 selects the result of the verification by the first system verification unit 3021 and the verification result by the second system verification unit 3031 that indicates that there is an abnormality. Ignore the verification results related to the sensors diagnosed as , and verify the soundness of each floor of the building 1000 . For example, in the example shown in FIG. 9 (an example in which the sensor SA4 placed on the 7th floor 107 is diagnosed as having an abnormality), the comprehensive verification unit 3022 checks the data from the 5th floor to the 8th floor 105 to 108 by the first system verification unit 3021. The verification results are ignored, and the verification results of the fifth to eighth floors 105 to 108 by the second system verification section 3031 are adopted as the verification results of the building 1000 by the comprehensive verification section 3022 . If one of the sensors SA and SB is provided on each floor as in the present embodiment, it is possible to reduce the range affected by the failure of one sensor.

The first output unit 306A outputs information indicating the soundness (for example, the presence or absence and degree of damage) of each floor of the building 1000 verified by the comprehensive verification unit 3022 to the display device 200 of the first information processing device 20A for display. . That is, the first output unit 306A outputs "a verification result using the measurement data of the sensor SA of the first system by the first verification unit 300A and the measurement data of the sensor SB of the second system by the second verification unit 300B. It is an example of a "verification result output unit that outputs the soundness verification result of the building based on the verification result."

Further, the first output unit 306A causes the display device 200 of the first information processing device 20A to display information indicating the diagnosis result by the failure diagnosis unit 3023. FIG. The information displayed on the display device 200 by the first output unit 306A may be accompanied by information indicating the presence/absence of an abnormality in each of the sensors SA and SB diagnosed by the failure diagnosis unit 3023, or as shown in FIG. only graphs may be displayed. In the case where only graphs are displayed, the administrator can check whether there is an abnormality in the sensors SA and SB by looking at the graphs. In addition, the first output unit 306A displays information indicating the soundness (for example, the presence or absence and degree of damage) of each floor of the building 1000 verified by the comprehensive verification unit 3022 and information indicating the diagnosis result by the failure diagnosis unit 3023. Alternatively/in addition to displaying the information on paper, the information may be printed on paper.

According to such a configuration, the reliability of the building soundness verification system 1 can be further improved as in the first embodiment. Further, in the present embodiment, the verification result using the measurement data of the first system sensor SA by the first verification unit 300A and the verification result using the measurement data of the second system sensor SB by the second verification unit 300B The soundness verification result of the building 1000 based on this is output. According to such a configuration, the verification result using the measurement data of the first system sensor SA by the first verification unit 300A and the verification result using the measurement data of the second system sensor SB by the second verification unit 300B It is possible to obtain information with higher accuracy (for example, information with higher resolution) than when looking at each of them individually.

In the present embodiment, the first verification unit 300A and the second verification unit 300B generate the first verification unit 300A and the second verification unit 300A based on the verification result of the first verification unit 300A and the verification result of the second verification unit 300B. Diagnostic criteria for diagnosing whether each verification unit of 300B is good or bad are determined in advance. According to such a configuration, mutual failures can be discovered early using the first verification section 300A and the second verification section 300B.

(Third Embodiment)
Next, a third embodiment will be described. The third embodiment differs from the second embodiment in that a third information processing device 40 is provided in addition to the first information processing device 20A and the second information processing device 20B. Configurations other than those described below are the same as those of the second embodiment.

FIG. 10 is a diagram showing a configuration example of the building soundness verification system 1 of the third embodiment. In this embodiment, the building soundness verification system 1 has a first information processing device 20A', a second information processing device 20B', and a third information processing device 40, for example. The first information processing device 20A' has a first verification section 300A, but does not have the operation section 100 and the display device 200. FIG. The verification result of the first verification unit 300A (the verification result by the first system verification unit 3021) is output to the third information processing device 40. FIG. Similarly, the second information processing apparatus 20B' has a second verification section 300B, but does not have the operation section 100 and the display device 200. FIG. The verification result of the second verification unit 300</b>B (the verification result of the second system verification unit 3031 ) is output to the third information processing device 40 .

The third information processing device 40 has, for example, an information processing section 402 , an input section 404 , an output section 406 and a storage section 408 . A processor such as a CPU installed in the third information processing device 40 stores part or all of each functional unit (for example, the information processing unit 402, the input unit 404, and the output unit 406) of the third information processing device 40. It is realized by executing a program (software) stored in the unit 408 . Some or all of these functional units may be implemented by hardware such as LSI, ASIC, and FPGA, or may be implemented by cooperation of software and hardware. The second storage unit 308B is implemented by a semiconductor storage device such as an HDD or flash memory, for example.

The information processing section 402 includes a comprehensive verification section 3022 and a failure diagnosis section 3023 . Details of the processing of the comprehensive verification unit 3022 and the fault diagnosis unit 3023 are the same as those of the second embodiment.

The input unit 404 writes the installation floor information 308Aa of the first system sensor SA to the first storage unit 308A of the first information processing device 20A based on the operation of the administrator on the operation unit 100, and also writes the second system sensor SB to the first storage unit 308A. is written into the second storage unit 308B of the second information processing device 20B.

The output unit 406 outputs information indicating the seismic intensity of the earthquake calculated by the first information processing unit 302A and the soundness (for example, the presence or absence and degree of damage) of each floor verified (determined) by the first information processing unit 302A, Displayed on the display device 200 of the third information processing device 40 . In addition, the output unit 406 outputs information indicating the seismic intensity of the earthquake calculated by the second information processing unit 302B, and the soundness (for example, the presence or absence and degree of damage) of each floor verified (determined) by the second information processing unit 302B. is displayed on the display device 200 of the third information processing device 40 .

Also, in place of/in addition to the above contents, the output unit 406, similarly to the first output unit 306A of the second embodiment, verifies the soundness of each floor of the building 1000 (for example, the presence or absence of damage) of the building 1000 verified by the comprehensive verification unit 3022. degree) is displayed on the display device 200 of the third information processing device 40 . Further, similarly to the first output unit 306A of the second embodiment, the first output unit 306A outputs information indicating the diagnosis result by the fault diagnosis unit 3023 to the display device 200 of the first information processing device 20A for display. .

According to such a configuration, the reliability of the building soundness verification system 1 can be further improved as in the second embodiment.

(Modification)
Next, modifications of the first to third embodiments will be described with reference to FIGS. 11 to 14. FIG.

(First modification)
As shown in FIG. 11, the sensors SA (or sensors SB) need not be provided on every other floor of the building 1000, but may be placed on every second floor, every third floor, or more. . In the example shown in FIG. 11, a sensor SB is provided on a floor (layer) where no sensor SA is provided. However, building 1000 may have floors (layers) that do not have both sensors SA and SB.

(Second modification)
As shown in FIG. 12, the sensors SA (or sensors SB) may be provided at uneven intervals with respect to a plurality of floors (layers). For example, sensors SA (or sensors SB) are provided every other floor or every second floor for some floors (tiers) and every third floor or more for other floors (tiers). may be placed.

(Third modification)
As shown in FIG. 13, the sensors SB (or sensors SA) do not have to be installed over the entire height of the building 1000, and may be installed intensively in parts of the building 1000 that are likely to be damaged. . For example, in the example shown in FIG. 13, a rough verification of the entire building 1000 can be performed by the sensor SA of the first system. On the other hand, the sensors SB of the second system can be used to intensively verify portions of the building 1000 that are likely to be damaged.

(Fourth modification)
As shown in FIG. 14, sensors SA and sensors SB may be provided on all floors (all layers) of building 1000, respectively.

Although the building soundness verification system 1, the building soundness evaluation method, and the manufacturing method of the building soundness verification system 1 according to the embodiment and modifications have been described above, the embodiment is not limited to the above examples. In addition, "based on XX" in the present application means "based on at least XX", and includes cases based on other elements in addition to XX. Moreover, "based on XX" is not limited to the case of using XX directly, but also includes the case of being based on what has been calculated or processed with respect to XX. "XX" is an arbitrary element (for example, arbitrary information).

Reference Signs List 1 Building soundness verification system 20A First information processing device 20B Second information processing device 40 Third information processing device 300A First verification unit 302A First information processing unit 304A Third 1 input unit 306A first output unit 308A first storage unit 300B second verification unit 302B second information processing unit 304B second input unit 306B second output unit 308B second 2 storage units 1000 building 3021 first system verification unit 3022 comprehensive verification unit 3023 failure diagnosis unit 3031 second system verification unit SA (SA1 to SA7) first system sensor SB (SB1 to SB8) . . . sensors of the second system.

The present invention relates to a building health verification system .

One aspect of the present invention for solving the above-described problems is a first verification unit that verifies the soundness of the building based on the measurement data of the vibration detection sensors of the first system provided on each of a plurality of floors of the building. and a second system vibration detection sensor provided on each of a plurality of floors of the building that is the same as or at least partially different from the first system vibration detection sensor. a second information processing device including a second verification unit that verifies the soundness of the building, wherein the first information processing device and the second information processing device are at the timing of software restart or software update. are set at different times, and when either the first information processing device or the second information processing device restarts the software or updates the software, the first information processing device and the second information processing device A building health verification system in which the building is continuously monitored by the other of the information processing equipment .

In the building soundness verification system described above, the plurality of vibration detection sensors of the second system are arranged separately on a plurality of floors of the building at least partially different from the vibration detection sensors of the first system. .

Further, in the above building soundness verification system, the plurality of vibration detection sensors of the first system are two vibration detection sensors arranged separately on a plurality of floors of the building with one or more floors skipped between each other. The first verification unit collectively verifies the soundness of two or more floors of the building, and the two or more floors collectively verified by the first verification unit and the second The floors verified by the verification unit include at least one same floor.

Further, in the building soundness verification system, a verification result using measurement data of the vibration detection sensor of the first system by the first verification unit and measurement of the vibration detection sensor of the second system by the second verification unit By comparing the results of verification using data, a plurality of floors whose soundness has been collectively verified by the first verification unit and a plurality of floors whose soundness has been collectively verified by the second verification unit. It further comprises a general verification section that verifies which floor is actually damaged.

Further, in the building soundness verification system, the plurality of vibration detection sensors of the first system are connected using a cascade connection over the plurality of floors on which the vibration detection sensors of the first system are respectively provided, The plurality of vibration detection sensors of the second system are connected using a cascade connection over the plurality of floors on which the vibration detection sensors of the second system are respectively provided.

Another aspect of the present invention includes a first verification unit that verifies the soundness of the building based on measurement data of vibration detection sensors of a first system provided on each of a plurality of floors of the building; A second verification unit that verifies the soundness of the building based on the measurement data of the vibration detection sensors of the second system provided on the plurality of floors of the building that are the same as or at least partially different from the vibration detection sensors of wherein the plurality of vibration detection sensors of the first system are connected using a cascade connection over the plurality of floors on which the vibration detection sensors of the first system are respectively provided, and the plurality of vibration detection sensors of the second system The detection sensor is a building soundness verification system that is connected using a cascade connection over the plurality of floors on which the vibration detection sensors of the second system are respectively provided.

ADVANTAGE OF THE INVENTION According to this invention, the building soundness verification system which can aim at improvement in reliability can be provided.

Claims (13)

a first verification unit that verifies the soundness of the building based on the measurement data of the vibration detection sensors of the first system provided on each of a plurality of floors of the building;
A second system for verifying the soundness of the building based on the measurement data of the second system of vibration detection sensors provided on a plurality of floors of the building that are the same as or at least partially different from the first system of vibration detection sensors. a verification unit;
A building health verification system comprising: The building includes a first layer and a second layer adjacent to the first layer,
The vibration detection sensor of the first system includes a first vibration detection sensor and a second vibration detection sensor arranged to sandwich the first layer and the second layer,
The vibration detection sensor of the second system includes at least a third vibration detection sensor and a fourth vibration detection sensor arranged to sandwich the first layer,
The building health verification system according to claim 1. The first verification unit collectively verifies the damage of the first layer and the second layer,
The second verification unit verifies damage of at least the first layer,
The building soundness verification system according to claim 2. The building includes a first layer, a second layer adjacent to the first layer, and a third layer adjacent to the first layer from the opposite side of the second layer,
The vibration detection sensor of the first system includes a first vibration detection sensor and a second vibration detection sensor arranged to sandwich the first layer and the second layer,
The vibration detection sensor of the second system includes a third vibration detection sensor and a fourth vibration detection sensor arranged to sandwich the first layer and the third layer,
The building health verification system according to claim 1. The first verification unit collectively verifies the damage of the first layer and the second layer,
The second verification unit collectively verifies the damage of the first layer and the third layer,
The building soundness verification system according to claim 4. The vibration detection sensor of the first system and the vibration detection sensor of the second system are
alternately provided in the height direction of the building,
The building soundness verification system according to any one of claims 1 to 5. The first verification unit has a first input unit for writing information indicating a plurality of floors of the building on which the vibration detection sensors of the first system are installed into a first storage unit,
The second verification unit has a second input unit for writing information indicating a plurality of floors of the building where the vibration detection sensor of the second system is installed into a second storage unit,
The building soundness verification system according to any one of claims 1 to 6. The first verification unit has a first output unit that outputs a first verification result based on the vibration detection sensor of the first system,
The second verification unit has a second output unit that outputs a second verification result based on the vibration detection sensor of the second system,
The building soundness verification system according to any one of claims 1 to 7. Based on the verification result using the measurement data of the vibration detection sensor of the first system by the first verification unit and the verification result using the measurement data of the vibration detection sensor of the second system by the second verification unit A verification result output unit that outputs a soundness verification result of the building,
The building soundness verification system according to any one of claims 1 to 8. The first verification unit and the second verification unit are
A diagnostic criterion for diagnosing whether each verification unit of the first verification unit and the second verification unit is good or bad based on the verification result of the first verification unit and the verification result of the second verification unit is determined in advance. ing,
The building soundness verification system according to any one of claims 1 to 9. The building has a plurality of floors on which only one of the first system vibration detection sensor and the second system vibration detection sensor is arranged.
The building soundness verification system according to any one of claims 1 to 10. Evaluating the soundness of the building based on the measurement data of the vibration detection sensors of the first system provided on each floor of the building,
Verifying the soundness of the building based on the measurement data of the second system of vibration detection sensors provided on a plurality of floors of the building that are the same as or at least partially different from the first system of vibration detection sensors,
Building soundness verification method. adding a second verification unit for verifying the soundness of the building to a building soundness verification system including a first verification unit for verifying the soundness of the building;
a process of allocating the plurality of sensors provided in the building to either the first verification section associated with a first group of floors or the second verification section associated with a second group of floors;
A method of manufacturing a building health verification system comprising:

Images