JP2021028755A - System and matching method - Google Patents

Abstract

To provide a system and a matching method that realize a company matching technology with high fairness and transparency.SOLUTION: A system for performing work using an unmanned aerial vehicle includes: an unmanned aerial vehicle service management system that performs company matching for providing at least one of an apparatus and data; and an unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system that manages the execution of the work using the apparatus and the data provided by a company. The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system holds company management information for storing data about companies and evaluation management information for storing evaluation data that represents evaluations of companies, refers to the company management information based on work information to search for companies required to realize the work when receiving a matching request including the work information, selects the company from the searched companies based on integrated system evaluation data and integrated user evaluation data generated based on the evaluation management information, and presents it to a user.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

The present invention relates to a matching technique in a system that realizes work using an unmanned aerial vehicle (drone).

Unmanned aerial vehicles called drones are used for various tasks such as inspection and monitoring of equipment, spraying pesticides, and collecting information on dangerous areas. In work using unmanned aerial vehicles, it is required to avoid crashes of unmanned aerial vehicles, collisions of unmanned aerial vehicles with buildings, etc., and appropriate operation management of unmanned aerial vehicles.

As a system for managing the operation of an unmanned aerial vehicle, a technique as described in Patent Document 1 is known. Patent Document 1 states that "the unmanned aircraft management device 10 acquires the scheduled flight route of the unmanned aircraft and the map data of the area including the scheduled flight route. The acquisition unit 11 and the map data are used to obtain the scheduled flight route. The division setting unit 12 that divides the area including the above and sets a plurality of divisions, and among the plurality of divisions, the division including the planned flight route and the division corresponding to the area where the flight of unmanned aircraft is prohibited. The determination unit 14 determines whether or not there is a matching division by comparing the division identification unit 13 to be specified with the division including the planned flight route and the division corresponding to the area where flight is prohibited. And, it is equipped. "

JP-A-2019-038479 International Publication No. 2018/173934

In recent years, UTM (Unmanned Traffic Management) has been attracting attention as a platform for centrally managing the operation of unmanned aerial vehicles. UTM will procure equipment and data necessary for working with unmanned aerial vehicles from external companies. Since there are many companies that provide equipment and data, it is necessary to appropriately select the company according to the request of the user who orders the work.

As a technique for matching a user with a company that provides an unmanned aerial vehicle or dispatches a pilot, for example, the technique described in Patent Document 2 is known. Patent Document 2 states that "the information processing device refers to the job information acquisition means for acquiring job information regarding the date, time, place and purpose of using the drone, and the drone management database to refer to the job information acquired by the job information acquisition means. It is provided with a drone identification means for identifying a suitable drone and a transmission means for transmitting data corresponding to job information to the drone specified by the drone identification means. "

However, the technique described in Patent Document 2 does not consider the matching technique when UTM is used. In addition, there is a need not only to meet the user's request but also to select a company by referring to the evaluation of the company such as past achievements. As a company evaluation method, it is conceivable to use questionnaires and reviews by users. However, fairness and transparency cannot always be guaranteed because the evaluation of companies by users is biased.

The present invention realizes a company matching technique with high fairness and transparency in a system in which a UTM that manages the execution of work using an unmanned aerial vehicle exists.

A typical example of the invention disclosed in the present application is as follows. That is, an unmanned aircraft service management system that is a system for performing work using an unmanned aircraft and that matches companies that provide at least one of the equipment and data necessary for the work, and an order for the work from a user. The unmanned aircraft service management system includes an unmanned aircraft operation management system that receives and manages the execution of the work using the equipment and data necessary for the work provided by each of the plurality of companies. The company management information that stores the data about the company and the evaluation management information that stores the evaluation data representing the evaluation of the company are held, and the evaluation data stored in the evaluation management information is a specific unmanned aircraft operation. The unmanned aircraft service management includes system evaluation data including an evaluation value indicating the high evaluation value of the management system for the company and user evaluation data including an evaluation value indicating the high evaluation value of the specific user for the company. When the system receives a matching request from the user including work information representing the user's request for the first work, the system refers to the company management information based on the work information and is necessary for realizing the first work. Company is searched, integrated system evaluation data is generated from at least one system evaluation data of the searched company based on the evaluation management information, and integrated system evaluation data is generated from at least one user evaluation data of the searched company. The integrated user evaluation data is generated, the company to be presented to the user is selected from the searched companies based on the integrated system evaluation data and the integrated user evaluation data, and the selected company is selected as the user. Present to.

According to the present invention, in a system in which an unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system (UTM) exists, it is possible to realize a matching technique of a company having high fairness and transparency. Issues, configurations and effects other than those mentioned above will be clarified by the description of the following examples.

It is a figure which shows an example of the configuration of the system of Example 1. It is a figure which shows an example of the hardware configuration and software configuration of the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system of Example 1. It is a figure which shows an example of the hardware configuration and software configuration of the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system of Example 1. It is a figure which shows an example of the data structure of the enterprise management information of Example 1. FIG. It is a figure which shows an example of the data structure of the work request management information of Example 1. FIG. It is a figure which shows an example of the data structure of the work request management information of Example 1. FIG. It is a figure which shows an example of the data structure of the performance management information of Example 1. FIG. It is a figure which shows an example of the data structure of the evaluation management information of Example 1. FIG. It is a flowchart explaining an example of the process executed by the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system of Example 1. It is a flowchart explaining an example of the process executed by the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system of Example 1. It is a flowchart explaining an example of the matching process executed by the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system of Example 1. It is a figure which shows an example of the input screen displayed by the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system of Example 1. FIG. It is a figure which shows an example of the output screen displayed by the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system of Example 1. It is a flowchart explaining an example of the evaluation integrated processing executed by the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system of Example 1.

Hereinafter, examples of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. However, the present invention is not construed as being limited to the contents of the examples shown below. It is easily understood by those skilled in the art that a specific configuration thereof can be changed without departing from the idea or purpose of the present invention.

In the configurations of the invention described below, the same or similar configurations or functions are designated by the same reference numerals, and duplicate description will be omitted.

The notations such as "first", "second", and "third" in the present specification and the like are attached to identify the constituent elements, and do not necessarily limit the number or order.

The position, size, shape, range, etc. of each configuration shown in the drawings and the like may not represent the actual position, size, shape, range, etc., in order to facilitate understanding of the invention. Therefore, the present invention is not limited to the position, size, shape, range, etc. disclosed in the drawings and the like.

FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an example of the configuration of the system of the first embodiment.

The systems include a plurality of unmanned aerial vehicle operation management systems 100, an unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101, a plurality of user terminals 102, a plurality of weather data providing systems 103, a plurality of communication management systems 104, a plurality of route map management systems 105, and a plurality of systems. Includes unmanned aerial vehicle delivery system 106.

In the following description, when the meteorological data providing system 103, the communication management system 104, the route map management system 105, and the unmanned aerial vehicle providing system 106 are not distinguished, they are referred to as providing systems. The weather data providing system 103, the communication management system 104, the route map management system 105, and the unmanned aerial vehicle providing system 106 are examples of the providing systems, and are not limited thereto.

The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 connects to a plurality of user terminals 102 via the network 110. The unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 connects to a plurality of providing systems via the network 111. The unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 and the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 are connected to each other directly or via a network (not shown).

The networks 110 and 111 are, for example, WAN (Wide Area Network) and LAN (Local Area Network). The present invention is not limited to the types of networks 110 and 111. The connection type of the networks 110 and 111 may be either wired or wireless.

The unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 may be connected to a plurality of user terminals 102 via a network, and the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 may be connected to a plurality of providing systems via a network. Good.

The user terminal 102 is a terminal operated by a user who requests work using an unmanned aerial vehicle. The user terminal 102 is, for example, a personal computer, a tablet, a smartphone, or the like. Users who request work using unmanned aerial vehicles include individuals, logistics companies, security companies, insurance companies, infrastructure companies, and local governments.

The providing system is a system operated by a company that provides the equipment and data necessary to realize the work required by the user.

The weather data providing system 103 provides data on the weather in the flight area of the unmanned aerial vehicle. The communication management system 104 provides data related to communication such as the radio wave environment of the flight area of the unmanned aerial vehicle. The route map management system 105 provides three-dimensional map data of the flight area of the unmanned aerial vehicle. The unmanned aerial vehicle delivery system 106 provides an unmanned aerial vehicle. As a form of providing the unmanned aerial vehicle, either sales or rental of the unmanned aerial vehicle can be considered.

The unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 is a system that realizes UTM (Unmanned Traffic Management). The unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 receives the equipment, data, and the like necessary for realizing the work required by the user from the company through the providing system. In addition, the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 performs applications necessary for work, management of flight routes of unmanned aerial vehicles, real-time monitoring of unmanned aerial vehicles, and collection and analysis of data. The unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 may function as a providing system.

The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 matches companies that provide the equipment and data necessary to realize the work required by the user.

Here, the flow of transactions on the system from the user ordering the work to receiving the result of the work will be described.

The user transmits a matching request including work information to the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101. Here, the work information is information that defines a user's request for work, and includes work contents, work conditions, and selection conditions. The work content indicates the target and classification of the work, and the work condition indicates the date and time, place, budget, etc. In addition, the selection condition indicates the selection condition of the company based on the evaluation of the company.

The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 selects a candidate company and presents the candidate company to the user.

The user selects a company and creates at least one draft work plan based on the information presented by the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101. The user sends a quotation request including at least one draft work plan to the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100. If there is a selectable unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100, an estimate request may be transmitted to one or more unmanned aerial vehicle operation management systems 100.

When the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 receives the quotation request, the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 creates a quotation of the work plan draft included in the quotation request and transmits it to the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 and the user.

The user selects one work plan as a formal work plan based on the quotation, and requests the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 to carry out the work via the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101.

The unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 acquires equipment and data from a company through a providing system in accordance with a work plan, generates a flight plan, and applies for a flight. The unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 executes work using equipment, data, and the like acquired from a company. The unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 transmits the work result to the user.

The above is an overview of the flow of transactions on the system.

FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of a hardware configuration and a software configuration of the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 of the first embodiment.

The unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 is a system composed of one or more computers. FIG. 2 shows an unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 composed of one computer. The computer has a processor 201, a network interface 202, a memory 203, and a storage device 204. The calculator may have an IO interface for connecting an input device such as a keyboard, a mouse, and a touch panel, and an output device such as a display and a printer.

The processor 201 executes a program stored in the memory 203. When the processor 201 executes processing according to a program, it operates as a functional unit (module) that realizes a specific function. In the following description, when the process is described with the functional unit as the subject, it is shown that the processor 201 is executing the program that realizes the module.

The network interface 202 is an interface for communicating with an external device via a network.

The memory 203 stores a program executed by the processor 201 and information used by the program. The memory 203 is also used as a work area temporarily used by the program. A program for realizing the operation management unit 210 is stored in the memory 203. The operation management unit 210 realizes each function of the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100.

The storage device 204 is an HDD (Hard Disk Drive), an SSD (Solid State Drive), or the like, and stores data permanently. The storage device 204 stores flight plan management information 220, operation record management information 221 and analysis data management information 222.

The flight plan management information 220 is information for managing the flight plan. For example, the flight plan management information 220 stores information on flight routes, flight times, and the like of unmanned aerial vehicles.

The operation record management information 221 is information for managing the result of work and the like. The operation record management information 221 is the same information as the record management information 322 described later.

The analysis data management information 222 is information for managing the analysis result and the like of the data acquired in the work. The analysis data management information 222 stores the analysis result of the image data and the like.

FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of the hardware configuration and software configuration of the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 of the first embodiment.

The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 is a system composed of one or more computers. FIG. 3 shows an unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 composed of one computer. The computer includes a processor 301, a network interface 302, a memory 303, and a storage device 304. The calculator may have an IO interface for connecting an input device such as a keyboard, a mouse, and a touch panel, and an output device such as a display and a printer.

Since the processor 301, the network interface 302, the memory 303, and the storage device 304 are the same as the processor 201, the network interface 202, the memory 203, and the storage device 204, the description thereof will be omitted.

The program that realizes the matching processing unit 310 is stored in the memory 303. Further, the storage device 304 stores company management information 320, work request management information 321 and performance management information 322, and evaluation management information 323. The memory 303 may store a program that controls the entire unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101.

The matching processing unit 310 executes a matching process for recommending a company that meets the user's request. The details of the matching process will be described later.

The company management information 320 is information for managing a company that operates the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 and the providing system. The data structure of the company management information 320 will be described with reference to FIG.

The work request management information 321 is information for managing the contents of the work request. The data structure of the work request management information 321 will be described with reference to FIGS. 5A and 5B.

The performance management information 322 is information for managing the result of work and the like. The data structure of the performance management information 322 will be described with reference to FIG.

The evaluation management information 323 is information for managing the evaluation of the company. The data structure of the evaluation management information 323 will be described with reference to FIG.

FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of the data structure of the company management information 320 of the first embodiment.

The company management information 320 stores an entry composed of ID 401, company name 402, basic information 403, provided business 404, work record 405, unmanned aerial vehicle information 406, and remark 407. There is one entry for one company. The field included in the entry is an example and is not limited to this.

The ID 401 is a field for storing the identification information of the entry stored in the company management information 320. The company name 402 is a field for storing the name of the company. The basic information 403 is a field for storing basic information of the company such as capital, sales, employees, and location.

The provided business 404 is a field for storing the type of business provided by the company. For example, an entry in which the service provided 404 is UTM indicates that the company operates the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100. When a plurality of values are stored in the provision service 404, it indicates that the company operates the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 or a system in which each provision system is combined.

The work record 405 is a field for storing information regarding the record of work performed by the company. In the case of a company that is not actively involved in work using an unmanned aerial vehicle, such as providing information, the work record 405 is blank.

Unmanned aerial vehicle information 406 is a field for storing information about unmanned aerial vehicles owned by a company. If the company does not own an unmanned aerial vehicle, the unmanned aerial vehicle information 406 will be blank. Remark 407 is a field for storing features and the like related to business or company.

5A and 5B are diagrams showing an example of the data structure of the work request management information 321 of the first embodiment.

The work request management information 321 stores an entry composed of ID 501, user name 502, date and time 503, place 504, work category 505, outline 506, budget 507, and selection condition 508. There is one entry for one task. For the sake of explanation, one entry is divided into two drawings. The field included in the entry is an example and is not limited to this.

ID 501 is a field for storing the identification information of the entry stored in the work request management information 321. The user name 502 is a field for storing the name of the user who requested the work. The date and time 503 is a field for storing the date and time when the work is performed. Location 504 is a field that stores a location where work is performed.

The work division 505 is a field for storing the work division. The work division 505 stores a set of a large division and a small division. For example, in the work division 505 of the first entry, a set of a large division "inspection" and a minor division "transmission line" is stored.

The outline 506 is a field for storing an outline of the work content. Budget 507 is a field that stores the budget for work.

The selection condition 508 is a field for storing a condition related to the evaluation of the company used for selecting the company. The selection condition 508 stores the ranking of evaluation items and special notes.

In Example 1, there are four evaluation items: price, safety, quality, and delivery date. Price 511, safety 512, quality 513, and delivery date 514 are fields for storing the priority of each evaluation item. "1" has the highest priority and "4" has the lowest priority.

Special note 515 is a field for storing items to be considered in the matching process.

The values stored in the work category 505 and the outline 506 correspond to the work contents, the values stored in the date and time 503, the place 504, and the budget 507 correspond to the work conditions, and the values stored in the selection condition 508 are the selection conditions. Corresponds to.

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of the data structure of the performance management information 322 of the first embodiment.

The performance management information 322 stores an entry composed of ID 601, reference work ID 602, date and time 603, flight time 604, UTM 605, aircraft used 606, estimated price 607, contract price 608, and state 609. There is one entry for one task. The field included in the entry is an example and is not limited to this.

ID601 is a field for storing the identification information of the entry stored in the performance management information 322. The reference work ID 602 is a field for storing the identification information of the entry of the work request management information 321. The value set in ID 501 is stored in the reference work ID 602. The work request content and the actual result are linked and managed via the reference work ID 602.

The date and time 603 is a field that stores the date and time when the work was performed. The flight time 604 is a field for storing the flight time of the unmanned aerial vehicle used in the work. When a plurality of unmanned aerial vehicles are in flight, the flight time 604 may store the flight time of each unmanned aerial vehicle, or may store the average value of the flight times of the plurality of unmanned aerial vehicles.

The UTM605 stores the identification information of the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 for which the user has requested the execution of the work. The UTM605 may store the name of the company that operates the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100, or may store the identification information of the entry of the company management information 320. The aircraft used 606 is a field for storing information on the type, equipment, etc. of the unmanned aerial vehicle scheduled to be used or used in the work.

The estimated price 607 is a field for storing the estimated price. The contract price 608 is a field for storing the contract price.

The state 609 is a field for storing information indicating the progress of work. In the first embodiment, the numbers from "1" to "9" are stored in the state 609. “1” indicates a state in which the matching request has been accepted. “2” indicates a state in which the quotation request has been accepted. “3” indicates a state in which the quotation has been sent to the user. “4” indicates a state of waiting for a reply to the implementation request. “5” indicates a state in which a work implementation request has been accepted. “6” indicates a state in which the work request has been canceled. “7” indicates the state in which the work is being executed. “8” indicates a state in which the work has been completed. “9” indicates a state in which the report of the work result has been completed.

FIG. 7 is a diagram showing an example of the data structure of the evaluation management information 323 of the first embodiment.

The evaluation management information 323 stores an entry composed of the ID 701, the reference company ID 702, the reference work ID 703, the evaluator 704, and the evaluation value 705. There is one entry for one evaluation data. The field included in the entry is an example and is not limited to this.

ID701 is a field for storing the identification information of the entry stored in the evaluation management information 323. The reference company ID 702 is a field for storing the identification information of the company to be evaluated. The value set in ID 401 is stored in the reference company ID 702. The reference work ID 703 is a field for storing identification information of the work to be evaluated. The value set in ID 501 is stored in the reference work ID 703.

The evaluator 704 is a field for storing the evaluator's identification information. The entry in which the identification information of the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 is set in the evaluator 704 is the evaluation data indicating the high evaluation of the company registered in the company management information 320 of the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 (third party). Is. The entry in which the user's identification information is set in the evaluator 704 is evaluation data indicating the high evaluation of the company registered in the user's company management information 320.

In the following description, the evaluation data corresponding to the entry in which the identification information of the unmanned aircraft operation management system 100 is set in the evaluator 704 is described as the system evaluation data, and the entry in which the user identification information is set in the evaluator 704 is described. The corresponding evaluation data is described as user evaluation data. For example, the entry whose ID 701 is "1" and "3" is the system evaluation data, and the entry whose ID 701 is "2" is the user evaluation data.

The evaluation value 705 is a group of fields for storing the evaluation value indicating the high evaluation of the company by the evaluator. In the example shown in FIG. 7, the evaluation value 705 includes a field for storing the evaluation values of the four evaluation items of price 711, safety 712, quality 713, delivery date 714, and special note 715.

Numerical values from "1" to "5" are stored in the price 711, the safety 712, the quality 713, and the delivery date 714. “1” is the value with the lowest evaluation, and “5” is the value with the highest evaluation. Special note 715 is a field for storing comments regarding evaluation. Special notes 715 may be left blank. The evaluation value 705 may include evaluation items other than the above-mentioned evaluation items such as evaluation items related to the work process.

In the following description, the evaluation value of each evaluation item included in the system evaluation data is described as the system evaluation value, and the evaluation value of each evaluation item included in the user evaluation data is described as the user evaluation value.

8A and 8B are flowcharts illustrating an example of processing executed by the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 of the first embodiment.

After activation, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 shifts to a waiting state in which input from the outside can be accepted. When the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 receives an input from the outside, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 executes the process described below. In the first embodiment, there are eight types of inputs: company registration request, matching request, quotation request, quotation completion notification, work execution request, work completion notification, work report, and evaluation request.

The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 determines whether or not the received input is a company registration request (step S101). The company registration request includes the company name, basic information, business, achievements, and the like. The company registration request may include information on unmanned aerial vehicles and information on business or company characteristics.

When it is determined that the received input is a company registration request, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 updates the company management information 320 (step S102), and then shifts to the waiting state.

Specifically, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 adds an entry to the company management information 320, and sets the identification information in the ID 401 of the added entry. In addition, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 sets the information included in the company registration request in each field of the added entry.

When it is determined that the received input is not a company registration request, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 determines whether or not the received input is a matching request (step S103).

When it is determined that the received input is a matching request, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 executes the matching process (step S104), and then shifts to the waiting state. The details of the matching process will be described later.

If it is determined that the received input is not a matching request, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 determines whether or not the received input is an estimate request (step S105).

When it is determined that the received input is an estimate request, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 updates the performance management information 322 (step S106), and then shifts to the waiting state. The quotation request includes identification information of the entry of work request management information 321 and at least one draft work plan.

Specifically, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 refers to the performance management information 322 and searches for an entry whose reference work ID 602 matches the identification information of the entry included in the quotation request. The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 sets the state 609 of the searched entry to "2".

At this time, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 transmits the estimate request to the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 together with the work information included in the matching request. The work information is acquired from the work request management information 321. When the quotation request includes information designating the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 transmits the quotation request to the designated unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100. If the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 is not specified, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 transmits an estimate request to a plurality of unmanned aerial vehicle operation management systems 100. The unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 may randomly select the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 and send an estimate request to the selected unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100.

When it is determined that the received input is not a quotation request, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 determines whether or not the received input is a quotation completion notification (step S107).

When it is determined that the received input is the estimation completion notification, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 updates the performance management information 322 (step S108), and then shifts to the waiting state. The quotation completion notification includes identification information of the entry of the work request management information 321 and the quotation.

Specifically, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 refers to the performance management information 322 and searches for an entry whose reference work ID 602 matches the identification information of the entry included in the estimation completion notification. The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 sets the state 609 of the searched entry to "3". The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 updates the state 609 of the searched entry to "4" when a certain period of time has elapsed after the state 609 is updated.

At this time, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 transmits the estimation completion notification to the user terminal 102.

When it is determined that the received input is not the estimate completion notification, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 determines whether or not the received input is a work execution request (step S109).

When it is determined that the received input is a work execution request, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 updates the performance management information 322 (step S110), and then shifts to the waiting state. The work execution request includes the identification information of the quotation or the work plan. Further, the work execution request includes the identification information of the entry of the work request management information 321 and the identification information of the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100. Specifically, the following processing is executed.

The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 refers to the performance management information 322 and searches for an entry whose reference work ID 602 matches the identification information of the entry included in the work execution request. The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 sets the state 609 of the searched entry to "5". The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 updates the state 609 of the searched entry to "7" when a certain period of time has elapsed after the state 609 is updated. When the work request is canceled, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 updates the state 609 of the searched entry to "6".

At this time, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 transmits the work execution request to the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100. Further, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 sets the identification information of the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 in the UTM605 of the searched entry. When a contract is made between the user and the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 receives the contract contents from the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100, and uses the aircraft 606, the estimated price 607, and the contract price 608. Set the value to.

When it is determined that the received input is not a work execution request, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 determines whether or not the received input is a work completion notification (step S111).

When it is determined that the received input is the work completion notification, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 updates the performance management information 322 (step S112), and then shifts to the waiting state. The work completion notification includes identification information of the entry of the work request management information 321.

Specifically, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 refers to the performance management information 322 and searches for an entry whose reference work ID 602 matches the identification information of the entry included in the work completion notification. The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 sets the state 609 of the searched entry to "8".

At this time, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 transmits a work completion notification to the user terminal 102.

If it is determined that the received input is not a work completion notification, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 determines whether or not the received input is a work report (step S113).

When it is determined that the received input is a work report, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 updates the performance management information 322 (step S114), and then shifts to the waiting state. The work report includes identification information of the entry of the work request management information 321 and the work result.

Specifically, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 refers to the performance management information 322 and searches for an entry whose reference work ID 602 matches the identification information of the entry included in the work report. The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 sets the state 609 of the searched entry to "9".

At this time, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 transmits the work report to the user terminal 102. Further, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 sets values for the date and time 603 of the searched entry, the flight time 604, the aircraft used 606, and the like based on the work report.

When it is determined that the received input is not a work report, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 determines whether or not the received input is an evaluation request (step S115).

If it is determined that the received input is not an evaluation request, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 shifts to the waiting state.

If it is determined that the received input is an evaluation request, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 updates the evaluation management information 323 (step S116), and then shifts to the waiting state. The evaluation request includes the identification information of the evaluator, the identification information of the entry of the work request management information 321, the identification information of the company to be evaluated, and the evaluation value of the evaluation item.

Specifically, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 adds an entry to the evaluation management information 323 and sets the identification information in the ID 701 of the added entry. The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 sets the company identification information in the reference company ID 702 of the added entry, sets the identification information of the entry of the work request management information 321 in the reference work ID 703, and evaluates the evaluator 704. Set the identification information of the person. The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 sets the evaluation value of each evaluation item in the evaluation value 705 of the added entry.

FIG. 9 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a matching process executed by the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 of the first embodiment. FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of an input screen displayed by the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 of the first embodiment. FIG. 11 is a diagram showing an example of an output screen displayed by the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 of the first embodiment.

When the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 receives the matching request, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 displays the input screen 1000 as shown in FIG. 10 on the user terminal 102.

The input screen 1000 has a work category input field 1001, an outline input field 1002, a budget input field 1003, a date and time input field 1004, a place input field 1005, a matching target input field 1006, an additional button 1007, a selection condition input field 1008, and a matching start. Includes button 1009.

The work classification input field 1001 is a field for inputting a work classification. The major division and the minor division of the work are input in the work division input field 1001. The summary input field 1002 is a field for inputting a summary of work. The budget input field 1003 is a field for inputting a budget. The date and time input field 1004 is a field for inputting the work execution date and time. The place input field 1005 is a field for inputting a place where work is performed.

The matching target input field 1006 is a field for inputting a business type. The add button 1007 is an operation button for adding an input field of the matching target input field 1006.

The selection condition input field 1008 is a field for inputting the priority of evaluation items and special notes as selection conditions. Price 1011, safety 1012, quality 1013, and delivery date 1014 are fields for evaluation items, and values indicating priorities are input. Special note 1015 is a column for inputting items to be considered in the matching process.

The matching start button 1009 is an operation button for starting the matching process. When the user operates the matching start button 1009, a matching request including the value set in each input field and the user's identification information is transmitted to the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101.

The summary input field 1002, the budget input field 1003, the date and time input field 1004, and the place input field 1005 may be blank.

Returning to the description of FIG.

The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 updates the work request management information 321 (step S201) and updates the performance management information 322 (step S202). Specifically, the following processing is executed.

The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 adds an entry to the work request management information 321 and sets the identification information in the ID 501 of the added entry. The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 sets the work information included in the matching request in each field of the added entry.

The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 adds an entry to the performance management information 322, and sets the identification information in the ID 601 of the added entry. The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 sets the reference work ID 602 of the added entry with the identification information set in the ID 501 of the entry added to the work request management information 321. The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 sets the state 609 of the added entry to "1".

The above is the description of the processes of steps S201 and S202.

Next, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 refers to the company management information 320 and searches for a company having a work record that matches the work category included in the matching request (step S203).

Specifically, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 searches for a company of a business type specified by the user with reference to the providing business 404. Further, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 refers to the work record 405 of the searched entry and searches for an entry that matches the major category of the work specified by the user.

When the place where the work is performed is specified, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 may select a company whose distance between the place and the place is smaller than the threshold value. Further, when the work information includes special notes, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 may perform a search in consideration of the special notes. Further, if a specific budget can be estimated, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 may perform a search in consideration of the budget.

Next, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 executes the evaluation integrated process for the searched company (step S204). By executing the evaluation integrated process, the integrated system evaluation data (see FIG. 12) representing the evaluation of the company on the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 side and the integrated user evaluation data (see FIG. 12) representing the evaluation of the company on the user side. And are generated. The details of the evaluation integration process will be described later.

Next, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 selects a candidate company from the searched companies based on the result of the evaluation integration process (step S205). For example, the following two selection methods can be considered.

(Selection method 1)
The unmanned aircraft service management system 101 acquires the integrated system evaluation value (see FIG. 12) or the estimated system evaluation value (see FIG. 12) of the evaluation items having the priorities “1” and “2” from the integrated system evaluation data. In addition, the integrated user evaluation value (see FIG. 12) or the estimated user evaluation value (see FIG. 12) of the evaluation items having the priorities of "1" and "2" is acquired from the integrated user evaluation data.

The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 calculates an integrated evaluation score based on the acquired evaluation value. For example, in the unmanned aircraft service management system 101, a value obtained by multiplying the evaluation value of an evaluation item having an integrated system evaluation data priority of "1" by 1.3 and an evaluation having an integrated user evaluation data priority of "1". The evaluation value of the item is multiplied by 1.2, the evaluation value of the evaluation item whose priority is "2" is multiplied by 1.1, and the priority of the integrated user evaluation data is "2". The total value of the evaluation value of the evaluation item of "2" multiplied by 1 is calculated as the integrated evaluation score.

The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 selects a predetermined number of companies as candidate companies in descending order of the integrated evaluation score.

The method for calculating the integrated evaluation value described above is an example and is not limited to this. For example, the unmanned aircraft service management system 101 may integrate the integrated system evaluation data and the integrated user evaluation data into one evaluation data, and calculate the integrated evaluation value using the evaluation values of each evaluation item of the integrated evaluation data. Good.

(Selection method 2)
The unmanned aircraft service management system 101 calculates the comprehensive evaluation value of each evaluation item based on the integrated system evaluation value of each evaluation item of the integrated system evaluation data and the integrated user evaluation value of each evaluation item of the integrated user evaluation data. For example, the average value of the evaluation values is calculated as the comprehensive evaluation value. The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 generates data composed of comprehensive evaluation values of each evaluation item as integrated evaluation data.

The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 sorts the companies in descending order of the overall evaluation value of the evaluation items having the priority of "1". Further, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 sorts the companies in descending order of the total evaluation value of the evaluation items having the priority of "2". The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 selects a predetermined number of companies as candidate companies in the order of sorting.

The above is the description of the process of step S205. The above-mentioned selection method is an example and is not limited to this. Any process may be used as long as it is a process using the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 and the evaluation (evaluation data) of the user's company.

Next, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 presents a candidate company to the user (step S206). After that, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 ends the matching process.

For example, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 generates display information for displaying the output screen 1100 as shown in FIG. 11 and transmits it to the user terminal 102.

The output screen 1100 includes a candidate company display field 1101, a work plan draft setting field 1102, and an estimate button 1103.

The candidate company display field 1101 is a field for displaying the candidate companies searched by the matching process. The candidate company display field 1101 includes the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system display field 1110 and the provision system display field 1111.

The unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system display column 1110 is a column for displaying the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 from which an estimate can be requested. If a specific unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 is not selected at the time of the matching request, all the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management systems 100 registered in the company management information 320 are displayed in the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system display field 1110. ..

The provided system display field 1111 is a field for displaying the companies searched by the matching process. When the matching process is performed for a plurality of businesses, the candidate company display field 1101 includes the provision system display field 1111 for each business.

The work plan draft setting column 1102 is a column for setting a work plan draft. The work plan draft setting column 1102 includes a work plan draft setting table 1120 and an additional button 1121.

The work plan draft setting table 1120 includes a row for designating a company for each business type. The work plan draft setting table 1120 may include a row for designating the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100. One work plan draft setting table 1120 corresponds to one work plan draft.

The add button 1121 is an operation button for adding the work plan draft setting table 1120.

The quotation button 1103 is an operation button for outputting a quotation request. When the user operates the quotation button 1103, a quotation request including the work plan draft set in the work plan draft setting field 1102 is transmitted to the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101.

The present invention is characterized in that a company is selected based on the evaluations of both the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 and the user. In the case of user-only evaluation, the evaluation may be biased. In addition, there are some items that are difficult to evaluate from the user's point of view. The unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 can evaluate a company from a different point of view from the user and in detail. Further, since the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 centrally manages the flight record using the equipment and data provided by the providing system, it is possible to calculate an index indicating an objective evaluation of the providing system. Therefore, by utilizing the evaluation of the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 as the evaluation of a third party, it is possible to realize matching of companies with high fairness and transparency.

FIG. 12 is a flowchart illustrating an example of the evaluation integrated process executed by the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 of the first embodiment.

The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 selects a target company from the companies searched in step S203 (step S301). The present invention is not limited to the method of selecting a target company.

The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 refers to the evaluation management information 323 and determines whether or not the system evaluation data of the target company exists (step S302).

Specifically, does the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 have an entry in which the identification information of the target company is stored in the reference company ID 702 and the identification information of the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 is stored in the evaluator 704? Judge whether or not.

When it is determined that the system evaluation data of the target company exists, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 calculates the integrated system evaluation value of each evaluation item based on the system evaluation data (step S303), and then steps S305. Proceed to.

Specifically, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 selects a target evaluation item and calculates an average value of the system evaluation values of the target evaluation items of each system evaluation data as an integrated system evaluation value of the target evaluation items. The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 executes the same processing for all the evaluation items. The method of calculating the integrated system evaluation value is an example and is not limited to this.

The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 outputs data composed of integrated system evaluation values of a plurality of evaluation items as integrated system evaluation data indicating the high evaluation of the company on the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 side.

If it is determined that the system evaluation data of the target company does not exist, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 calculates the estimated system evaluation value of each evaluation item (step S304), and then proceeds to step S305. For example, the following calculation method can be considered.

(Calculation Method 1) The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 sets a fixed value as an estimation system evaluation value of each evaluation item. Different fixed values may be set for each evaluation item.

(Calculation method 2) The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 refers to the basic information 403 of the company management information 320, the work record 405, the unmanned aerial vehicle information 406, and the like, and searches for a company having a company size similar to that of the target company. The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 refers to the evaluation management information 323 and searches the system evaluation data of the searched company. The unmanned aircraft service management system 101 calculates the integrated system evaluation value as the estimated system evaluation value of each evaluation item of the target company based on the system evaluation value of each evaluation item of the searched system evaluation data. The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 may calculate a value obtained by multiplying the integrated system evaluation value by a coefficient as an estimation system evaluation value.

The above-mentioned calculation method is an example and is not limited to this.

The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 outputs data composed of estimation system evaluation values of a plurality of evaluation items as integrated system evaluation data indicating the high evaluation of the company on the unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 side.

In step S305, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 refers to the evaluation management information 323 and determines whether or not the user evaluation data of the target company exists (step S305).

When it is determined that the user evaluation data of the target company exists, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 calculates the integrated user evaluation value of each evaluation item based on the user evaluation data (step S306), and then steps S308. Proceed to.

Specifically, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 selects a target evaluation item and calculates the average value of the user evaluation values of the target evaluation items of each user evaluation data as the integrated user evaluation value of the target evaluation items. The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 executes the same processing for all the evaluation items. The method of calculating the integrated user evaluation value is an example and is not limited to this.

The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 outputs data composed of integrated user evaluation values of a plurality of evaluation items as integrated user evaluation data indicating the high evaluation of the company on the user side.

If it is determined that the user evaluation data of the target company does not exist, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 calculates the estimated user evaluation value of each evaluation item (step S307), and then proceeds to step S308. As the calculation method, the same method as in step S304 can be considered.

The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 outputs data composed of estimated user evaluation values of a plurality of evaluation items as integrated user evaluation data indicating the high evaluation of the company on the user side.

In step S308, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 determines whether or not the processing of all the companies searched in step S203 has been completed (step S308).

If it is determined that the processing of all the companies searched in step S203 has not been completed, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 returns to step S301 and executes the same processing.

When it is determined that the processing of all the companies searched in step S203 is completed, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 ends the company evaluation value calculation processing.

By integrating the system evaluation data, it is possible to obtain the evaluation of each company that is not biased toward the evaluation of the specific unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100. Further, by integrating the user evaluation data, it is possible to obtain the evaluation of each user without being biased to the evaluation of a specific user. This can enhance fairness and transparency.

A newly registered company or a company that does not have a work record is not selected as a candidate company because there is no evaluation data. Therefore, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 calculates an estimated value as an evaluation value of the evaluation item. As a result, a newly registered company or a company having no work record is also selected as a candidate company, so that it is possible to provide a business opportunity to the company. For the candidate companies selected based on the estimated value, information indicating that the estimated value is used may be presented to the user.

(Modification example)
The unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 may also be evaluated. In this case, an unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 and an evaluation system for evaluating companies are provided. The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system 101 may be set as the evaluation system. As a result, appropriate unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system 100 and company matching can be realized while further enhancing fairness and transparency.

The present invention is not limited to the above-mentioned examples, and includes various modifications. Further, for example, the above-described embodiment describes the configuration in detail in order to explain the present invention in an easy-to-understand manner, and is not necessarily limited to the one including all the described configurations. Further, it is possible to add, delete, or replace a part of the configuration of each embodiment with other configurations.

Further, each of the above configurations, functions, processing units, processing means and the like may be realized by hardware by designing a part or all of them by, for example, an integrated circuit. The present invention can also be realized by a program code of software that realizes the functions of the examples. In this case, a storage medium in which the program code is recorded is provided to the computer, and the processor included in the computer reads the program code stored in the storage medium. In this case, the program code itself read from the storage medium realizes the functions of the above-described embodiment, and the program code itself and the storage medium storing the program code itself constitute the present invention. Examples of the storage medium for supplying such a program code include a flexible disk, a CD-ROM, a DVD-ROM, a hard disk, an SSD (Solid State Drive), an optical disk, a magneto-optical disk, a CD-R, and a magnetic tape. Non-volatile memory cards, ROMs, etc. are used.

In addition, the program code that realizes the functions described in this embodiment can be implemented in a wide range of programs or script languages such as assembler, C / C ++, perl, Shell, PHP, Python, and Java (registered trademark).

Further, by distributing the program code of the software that realizes the functions of the examples via the network, it is stored in a storage means such as a hard disk or memory of a computer or a storage medium such as a CD-RW or a CD-R. , The processor provided in the computer may read and execute the program code stored in the storage means or the storage medium.

In the above-described embodiment, the control lines and information lines show what is considered necessary for explanation, and do not necessarily indicate all the control lines and information lines in the product. All configurations may be interconnected.

100 Unmanned aircraft operation management system 101 Unmanned aircraft service management system 102 User terminal 103 Meteorological data provision system 104 Communication management system 105 Route map management system 106 Unmanned aircraft provision system 110, 111 Network 201, 301 Processor 202, 302 Network interface 203, 303 Memory 204, 304 Storage device 210 Operation management department 220 Flight plan management information 221 Performance management information 222 Analysis data management information 310 Matching processing department 320 Company management information 321 Work request management information 322 Performance management information 323 Evaluation management information 1000 Input screen 1100 Output screen

Claims (10)

A system for working with unmanned aerial vehicles
An unmanned aerial vehicle service management system that matches companies that provide at least one of the equipment and data required for the work.
It is equipped with an unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system that accepts orders for the work from users and manages the execution of the work using the equipment and data required for the work provided by each of a plurality of companies.
The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system holds company management information that stores data related to the plurality of companies and evaluation management information that stores evaluation data that represents the evaluation of the companies.
The evaluation data stored in the evaluation management information includes system evaluation data including an evaluation value indicating the high evaluation of the specific unmanned aircraft operation management system for the company, and the high evaluation of the specific user for the company. Includes user evaluation data including evaluation values representing
The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system
When a matching request including work information representing the user's request for the first work is received from the user, the company required to realize the first work is selected by referring to the company management information based on the work information. Search and
Based on the evaluation management information, integrated system evaluation data is generated from at least one system evaluation data of the searched company, and integrated user evaluation data is generated from at least one user evaluation data of the searched company. And
Based on the integrated system evaluation data and the integrated user evaluation data, the company to be presented to the user is selected from the searched companies.
A system comprising presenting the selected company to the user. The system according to claim 1.
The system evaluation data and the user evaluation data include the evaluation values of a plurality of evaluation items.
The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system
A target company is selected from the searched companies, and the evaluation values of the plurality of evaluation items included in the integrated system evaluation data of the target company and the plurality of evaluation values included in the integrated user evaluation data of the target company. The integrated evaluation score of the target company is calculated based on the evaluation value of the evaluation item of
A system comprising selecting the company to be presented to the user based on the magnitude of the integrated evaluation score of the searched company. The system according to claim 1.
The system evaluation data and the user evaluation data include the evaluation values of a plurality of evaluation items.
The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system
The target company is selected from the searched companies, and includes the integrated evaluation value of the plurality of evaluation items calculated based on the integrated system evaluation data of the target company and the integrated user evaluation data. Generate integrated evaluation data for
A system characterized in that the company to be presented to the user is selected based on the magnitude of the integrated evaluation value of at least one evaluation item included in the integrated evaluation data of the searched company. The system according to claim 2 or 3.
The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system
When the system evaluation data of the searched company does not exist, an estimated system evaluation value which is an estimated value of the evaluation height of the searched company of the unmanned aircraft operation management system is calculated, and the estimated system evaluation value is calculated. Generate the integrated system evaluation data including
When the user evaluation data of the searched company does not exist, an estimated user evaluation value which is an estimated value of the evaluation height of the searched company is calculated, and the integration including the estimated user evaluation value is calculated. A system characterized by generating user evaluation data. The system according to claim 4.
The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system
If the system evaluation data of the searched company does not exist, the company management information is referred to to identify a company having a company size similar to that of the searched company, and the system evaluation data of the specified company is specified. Calculate the estimation system evaluation value based on
When the user evaluation data of the searched company does not exist, the company management information is referred to to identify a company having a company size similar to that of the searched company, and the user evaluation data of the specified company is specified. A system characterized in that the estimated user evaluation value is calculated based on the above. A matching method performed by an unmanned aerial vehicle service management system that matches companies that provide at least one of the equipment and data needed to work with unmanned aerial vehicles.
The unmanned aerial vehicle service management system
It receives orders for the work from users and connects to an unmanned aerial vehicle operation management system that manages the performance of the work using the equipment and data required for the work provided by each of the plurality of companies.
It holds company management information that stores data related to the plurality of companies and evaluation management information that stores evaluation data that represents the evaluation of the company.
The evaluation data stored in the evaluation management information includes system evaluation data including an evaluation value indicating the high evaluation of the specific unmanned aircraft operation management system for the company, and the high evaluation of the specific user for the company. Includes user evaluation data including evaluation values representing
The matching method is
When the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system receives a matching request from the user including work information representing the user's request for the first work, the first work is referred to based on the work information. The first step in finding the companies you need to get the job done,
The unmanned aircraft service management system generates integrated system evaluation data from at least one system evaluation data of the searched company based on the evaluation management information, and at least one user evaluation of the searched company. The second step of generating integrated user evaluation data from the data,
A third step in which the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system selects the company to be presented to the user from the searched companies based on the integrated system evaluation data and the integrated user evaluation data.
A matching method comprising the fourth step, wherein the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system presents the selected company to the user. The matching method according to claim 6.
The system evaluation data and the user evaluation data include the evaluation values of a plurality of evaluation items.
The third step is
The unmanned aircraft service management system selects a target company from the searched companies, and the evaluation values of the plurality of evaluation items included in the integrated system evaluation data of the target company and the integration of the target company. A step of calculating the integrated evaluation score of the target company based on the evaluation values of the plurality of evaluation items included in the user evaluation data, and
A matching method, wherein the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system includes a step of selecting the company to be presented to the user based on the magnitude of the integrated evaluation score of the searched company. The matching method according to claim 6.
The system evaluation data and the user evaluation data include the evaluation values of a plurality of evaluation items.
The third step is
The unmanned aircraft service management system selects a target company from the searched companies, and integrates the plurality of evaluation items calculated based on the integrated system evaluation data and the integrated user evaluation data of the target company. A step to generate integrated evaluation data of the target company including the evaluation value, and
A step in which the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system selects the company to be presented to the user based on the magnitude of the integrated evaluation value of at least one evaluation item included in the integrated evaluation data of the searched company. A matching method characterized by including and. The matching method according to claim 7 or 8.
The second step is
When the system evaluation data of the searched company does not exist, the unmanned aircraft service management system obtains an estimated system evaluation value which is an estimated value of the evaluation height of the unmanned aircraft operation management system for the searched company. A fifth step of calculating and generating the integrated system evaluation data including the estimated system evaluation value, and
When the user evaluation data of the searched company does not exist, the unmanned aerial vehicle service management system calculates an estimated user evaluation value which is an estimated value of the evaluation of the user for the searched company, and the said A matching method comprising a sixth step of generating the integrated user evaluation data including an estimated user evaluation value. The matching method according to claim 9.
In the fifth step, the unmanned aircraft service management system refers to the company management information to identify a company having a company size similar to that of the searched company, and the system evaluation data of the specified company. Including the step of calculating the estimation system evaluation value based on
In the sixth step, the unmanned aircraft service management system refers to the company management information to identify a company having a company size similar to that of the searched company, and the user evaluation data of the specified company. A matching method comprising a step of calculating the estimated user evaluation value based on the above.

Images