JP2020166046A - Thinking power/judgment training system - Google Patents

Abstract

To provide a thinking power/judgment training system that can train thinking power for accurately understanding contents of language information having a plurality of meanings, or judgment on the content of the information on the basis of an own experience or known peripheral information with respect to the language information.SOLUTION: A system server and a learner terminal are connected mutually communicatively with a public communication line. The system server is configured to server as a thinking power/judgment training system that comprises: practice issue storage means that stores a plurality of practice issues to be offered to a learner; learning history storage means that stores a training result for each learner; practice issue determination means that offers a practice guidance in accordance with a learning level of the learner to the learner on the basis of the learning history storage means, and determine a practice issue in accordance with the practice guidance the learner selects from the plurality of practice issues stored in the practice issue storage means; and answer result registration means that registers an answer result of the learner with respect to the practice issue determined by the practice issue determination means in the learning history storage means for each learner as a thinking power/judgment training result.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 3

Description

The present invention relates to a training system for training thinking ability and judgment ability for accurately recognizing the contents of linguistic information.

In recent years, with the development of information technology (ICT (Information and Communication Technology)) related to computers and data communications, the environment surrounding society has changed significantly. In particular, various information (also called mobile terminals, laptop computers, smartphones, tablet terminals, etc.) has been improved due to the improvement of infrastructure such as the Internet and communication technology (communication speed), and the spread of personal computers and small mobile terminals (also called mobile terminals). Video, images, text information, etc.) can be easily obtained anytime, anywhere via the Internet line.

In such a society where ICT has developed, users can easily acquire a large amount of information, but it is necessary to select the correct and necessary information that they need from the flood of large amount of information. For this purpose, it is indispensable to develop the thinking ability to think about the content that the information is to inform and the judgment ability to accurately judge the content of the thought information (the original meaning and truth of the information).

However, in elementary and secondary education (elementary school upper grades to junior high school), there is no learning curriculum itself that cultivates thinking ability and judgment ability for linguistic information (hereinafter referred to as linguistic information), which should be the most important learning area. Is the current situation. In particular, there are no effective exercises in Japanese language education, which should be responsible for training the ability to think and judge linguistic information. In other words, in school education, training to develop thinking ability and judgment ability for linguistic information is not provided.

Therefore, apart from school education, in order to obtain sufficient "problem-solving ability" necessary for people to survive in the real world, it is possible to carry out training to improve their reasoning ability and thinking ability, which are their basic abilities. A method for developing intellectual ability is disclosed (see, for example, Patent Document 1).

JP-A-2002-175004

The reasoning ability and thinking ability up training of Patent Document 1 is at least one of the work of moving, rotating, synthesizing, or disassembling the plan view picture in a plane (or three-dimensional) and thinking, or the image counting work. It does one or the other. In other words, training to improve reasoning ability and thinking ability is performed based on a picture showing figures, numbers, calculation formulas, and the like.

However, the large amount of information that can be easily acquired by the above-mentioned ICT may be an image or a moving image, but the subject is linguistic information composed of languages. That is, as in Patent Document 1, by moving, rotating, synthesizing, or disassembling the plane drawing, the ability to infer and think about the hidden part of the plane drawing can be enhanced, but the linguistic information informs. It does not lead to the development of the ability to think about the content to be intended (thinking ability) and the ability to accurately judge the content of the thought information (the original meaning and truth of the information) (judgment ability).

In general, the language that is the source of linguistic information has multiple meanings. Therefore, in order to understand linguistic information accurately, it is necessary to think about the content from a plurality of meanings of the language and to accurately judge the content of the information from the meaning of the thought language.

In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, the present invention correctly corrects the contents based on one's own experience and peripheral information that is already known when touching linguistic information such as words and sentences having a plurality of meanings. The purpose is to provide a thinking ability / judgment ability training system that makes it possible to develop thinking ability for recognition and judgment ability about the content of information from recognition.

In order to achieve the above object, the present invention is a thinking ability / judgment ability training system in which a system server and a learner terminal owned by a plurality of learners are connected to each other so as to be able to communicate with each other via a public communication network. The system server includes an exercise problem storage means for storing a plurality of exercises of different difficulty levels provided to the learner, and a learning history storage means for storing the thinking ability / judgment ability training result for each learner. , Based on the learning history storage means, the learning level of the learner is analyzed, and exercise guidance according to the learned learner's learning level is provided to the learner, and the exercise guidance selected by the learner is met. The exercise problem determining means for determining the exercises from a plurality of exercises with different difficulty levels stored in the exercises storage means, and the correct answer rate of the learner for the exercises determined by the exercises determining means. The thinking ability / judgment ability training system is characterized by having an answer result registration means for each learner to calculate and register as a result of the thinking ability / judgment ability training in the learning history storage means.

In addition, the plurality of exercises with different difficulty levels stored in the exercise storage means are classified into a plurality of functions according to the characteristics of the language function, and the plurality of classified functions are closely related to each other. It is divided into modules, and each of the plurality of modules is characterized by being composed of a plurality of exercises having different difficulty levels.

Further, the exercises transmitted to the learner terminal are provided with an answer column for the exercises and a learner's evaluation column for the exercises, and the answer result evaluation means is provided with the correct answer rate of the exercises. It is characterized in that each learner is registered in the learning history storage means as a result of thinking ability / judgment ability training based on the learner's evaluation of the exercise.

According to the present invention, a learner repeatedly answers (that is, learns) to exercises of different difficulty levels that can develop thinking ability and judgment ability, thereby providing linguistic information such as words and sentences having multiple meanings. When you touch it, it is possible to develop the ability to think to correctly recognize the content based on your own experience and the surrounding information you already know, and the ability to make accurate judgments about the content of the information from the recognition. It will be possible. As a result, it is possible to select the correct and necessary information that oneself needs from a large amount of linguistic information, and it is possible to effectively utilize it.

It is a figure which shows the structure of the thinking ability / judgment ability training system of this embodiment. It is a block diagram which shows the electric structure of the system server of the thinking ability / judgment ability training system of this embodiment. It is a flowchart explaining the outline of the processing of the thinking ability / judgment ability training system of this embodiment. It is a flowchart explaining the process of the thinking ability / judgment ability training system of this embodiment. It is a flowchart explaining the process of the thinking ability / judgment ability training system of this embodiment.

The present invention is a thinking ability / judgment ability training system in which a system server and a learner terminal owned by a plurality of learners are connected to each other so as to be able to communicate with each other via a public communication network, and the system server is the learning. Based on the exercise problem storage means for memorizing a plurality of exercises with different difficulty levels provided to the person, the learning history storage means for storing the thinking ability / judgment training result for each learner, and the learning history storage means. In addition to analyzing the learning level of the learner, the exercise guidance according to the learned learner's learning level is provided to the learner, and the exercises according to the exercise guidance selected by the learner are stored in the exercise problem memory. The learning ability / judgment ability by calculating the correct answer rate of the learner for the exercise question determining means determined by the exercise question determining means and the exercise question determined by the exercise question determining means, which are determined from a plurality of exercises with different difficulty levels stored in the means. The present invention relates to a thinking ability / judgment ability training system characterized in that each learner is provided with an answer result registration means registered in the learning history storage means as a result of training.

Hereinafter, an example of the thinking ability / judgment ability training system according to the present embodiment will be described with reference to the drawings. In this embodiment, a case where a learner at the elementary and secondary education (elementary school upper grades to junior high school) level utilizes a thinking ability / judgment ability training system will be described as an example. FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration of a thinking ability / judgment ability training system of the present embodiment. FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing an electrical configuration of a system server of the thinking / judgment training system of the present embodiment. 3 to 5 are flowcharts explaining the processing of the thinking ability / judgment ability training system of this embodiment.

[1. Thinking / judgment training system configuration]
As shown in FIG. 1, the thinking ability / judgment ability training system 1 includes a system server 10 managed by a system operator 100 that operates the thinking ability / judgment ability training system 1, and a plurality of learners 200 possessed by the system server 10. The system server 10 and the learner terminal 20 are connected to each other so as to be able to communicate with each other via the public communication network 50.

A well-known computer (server, desktop personal computer, or the like) is preferably used as the system server 10, but it may be any one having a function of being able to communicate with the learner terminal 20 via the public communication network 50. .. Further, the learner terminal 20 is a well-known desktop personal computer, notebook personal computer, smartphone, tablet terminal or the like having a function of being able to communicate with the system server 10 via the public communication network 50. The public communication line network 50 is a well-known Internet line, mobile phone communication line, telephone line, communication satellite line, or the like.

In the above configuration, the learner 200 who uses the thinking ability / judgment ability training system 1 is registered in the system server 10 in advance, and at the time of registration, a dedicated user ID and password are issued to the plurality of learners 200. When the learner 200 accesses the system server 10 from the learner terminal 20 with the user ID and password, the use of the thinking ability / judgment ability training system 1 is started. That is, the thinking / judgment training system 1 can be appropriately used at the discretion of the learner 200 at any time and place as long as it can be connected to the public communication network 50.

The system server 10 includes an exercise problem storage means for storing a plurality of exercises having different difficulty levels provided to the learner 200, and a learning history storage means for storing the thinking ability / judgment ability training result for each learner 200. There is. Further, the system server 10 analyzes the learning level of the learner 200 based on the learning history storage means, and provides the learner with exercise guidance according to the learning level of the analyzed learner 200. Exercises for determining exercises according to the selected exercise guidance from multiple exercises with different difficulty levels stored in the exercise storage means, and learning for the exercises determined by the exercises determination means It is provided with an answer result registration means for calculating the correct answer rate of a person and registering it in the learning history storage means for each learner 200 as a result of thinking ability / judgment ability training.

That is, although the details will be described later, the system server 10 accessed from the learner terminal 20 analyzes the learner 200 based on the learning history storage means, and exercise guidance according to the learning level of the analyzed learner 200. Is provided to the learner 200, and an exercise according to the exercise guidance selected by the learner 200 is determined from a plurality of exercises having different difficulty levels stored in the exercise storage means. The exercises determined here are transmitted from the system server 10 to the learner terminal 20. In addition, the correct answers of a plurality of exercises are also stored in the exercise storage means in association with the exercises.

The learner 200 answers the exercises received by the learner terminal 20, and transmits the answers to the system server 10. The system server 10 that receives the answer of the exercise from the learner terminal 20 calculates the correct answer rate of the exercise by the answer result registration means, and uses it as a learning history storage means for each learner 200 as a thinking ability / judgment ability training result. sign up.

The learner terminal 20 is provided with a display means (such as a liquid crystal display device) for displaying the exercises received from the system server 10, and the learner 200 is provided with the exercises (for example, texts) displayed on the display means. (Data) is confirmed (recognized), and the answer of the exercise is entered in the predetermined answer column attached to this exercise. As an example, the answer to the exercise in the present embodiment is a method in which the correct answer is appropriately selected from a plurality of (for example, 5) answers. The answer to the exercise may be directly input by the learner 200 as text data in the answer column.

In addition, an evaluation column of the learner 200 for the exercise is also attached to the exercise so that the learner's evaluation for the exercise can be input. The learner 200 evaluates a specific exercise by selecting one from a plurality of options such as "easy", "normal", and "difficult". The answers and evaluations for the learning questions selected by the learner 200 are transmitted from the learner terminal 20 to the system server 10, and the exercises are based on the correct answer rate and the evaluation of the learning questions calculated by the answer result registration means. The result of the training is determined and registered in the learning history storage means for each learner 200. Specifically, even if the correct answer rate of the learner 200 for the learning problem is high, if the evaluation of the exercise problem by the learner 200 is, for example, "difficult", the learner 200 is confident (or convinced). It cannot be said that the answer was given with), and there is a possibility that the answer was correct when selecting the answer. In this way, by determining the thinking ability / judgment ability training result for the exercise, for example, it is possible to omit the fluke when selecting the answer, analyze whether the learner 200 answered with confidence, and add it to the result. By doing so, it can be used as a reference for determining the learning level of the learner 200.

Exercises of the system server 10 Exercises of different difficulty levels stored in the storage means classify the language into a plurality of (for example, 8) functions according to the characteristics of the language functions, and classify the eight functions. Are divided into a plurality of (for example, 4) modules that are closely related to each other, and each of these 4 modules is composed of a plurality of exercises with different difficulty levels. In other words, by classifying the introspective functions of the language (excavation and excavation function, compass function) included in the language information into multiple (for example, 8) functions according to their characteristics, exercises based on the introspective functions of the language. It becomes possible to construct the problem.

That is, in the present embodiment, the excavation and excavation function, which is an introspective function of the language, can dig up the impressions, impressions, thoughts, thoughts, etc. of the language, and the learner 200 has already obtained it by the compass function. It is possible to measure the validity and reality of the unearthed concept by comparing it with the peripheral concepts and similar concepts of the language. In this way, by constructing exercises based on the characteristics of the introspective function of language, it is possible to develop thinking ability and judgment ability for language.

In addition, the functions of the eight classified languages are divided into multiple (for example, four) modules that are closely related to each other, and multiple exercises with different difficulty levels are configured for each of these four modules. By doing so, it is possible to efficiently construct exercises that develop the ability to think and judge linguistic information based on the characteristics of the introspective function of the language.

Furthermore, multiple exercises with different difficulty levels for each of multiple modules (for example, 4) for beginner / intermediate (for upper elementary school) and advanced (for junior high school students) can be multiple even for the same beginner, intermediate, and advanced. It consists of different exercises. Then, the exercises provided to the learner 200 are learned by eliminating the familiarity of the learner 200 with the exercises by preventing the same problem from being repeated even for the beginner learner 200, for example. We are trying to improve motivation. In addition, it is desirable to review the exercises on a regular basis. For example, even in the beginner's exercises, by regularly replacing the exercises or replacing them with new exercises, the learner 200 can always provide new exercises.

In the present embodiment, the system server 10 provides the learner 200 with exercise guidance according to the learning level of the learner 200, and the learner 200 selects a desired direction from the provided exercise guidance. , The exercises according to the learning level of the learner 200 are provided to the learner 200. Then, the learner 200 repeatedly answers the provided exercise questions until a predetermined correct answer rate is reached, so that the learner 200's thinking ability and judgment ability with respect to the linguistic information are trained.

As described above, according to the thinking / judgment training system 1 of the present embodiment, the correct information required by the learner 200 is selected from a large amount of linguistic information in a society in which ICT has developed. In order to be able to do it, it is necessary to develop the thinking ability to think about the content that the information is trying to inform, and the judgment ability to accurately judge the content of the thought information (the original meaning and truth of the information). It will be possible.

[2. Electrical configuration of system server]
Hereinafter, the electrical configuration of the system server 10 in the thinking / judgment training system 1 of the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. As shown in FIG. 2, the system server 10 is composed of a storage unit 11, an input / output control unit 12, a control unit 13, an external communication I / F (Interface) control unit 14, and the like.

The storage unit 11 is composed of a large-capacity storage device such as an HDD (Hard Disk Drive) or a flash memory. The storage unit 11 stores a plurality of exercises having different difficulty levels and a learning history which is a result of training of thinking ability / judgment ability for each learner. That is, the storage unit 11 functions as an exercise problem storage means and a learning history storage means for each learner in the present embodiment.

The input / output control unit 12 controls communication with a liquid crystal display device (not shown) connected to the system server 10 and an external input / output device such as a keyboard / mouse.

The control unit 13 includes a CPU (Central Processing Unit) (not shown), a ROM (Read Only Memory), a RAM (Random Access Memory), a flash memory, and the like. Further, the CPU of the control unit 13 executes various programs stored in advance in the ROM or the storage unit 11 to execute the exercise problem determination means (exercise problem determination process) and the answer result registration means (answer) in the present embodiment. It will function as various means (various processes) such as result registration process).

The external communication I / F control unit 14 is connected to the external public communication network 50 and controls communication with a plurality of learner terminals 20 in the thinking / judgment training system 1 based on the instruction of the control unit 13. To do. That is, although the details will be described later, the external communication I / F control unit 14 controls the transmission of the exercise problem to the learner terminal 20, the reception of the answer to the exercise problem, and the like based on the instruction of the control unit 13.

[3. Outline of processing of thinking / judgment training system]
Hereinafter, with reference to FIG. 3, an outline of processing of a series of thinking / judgment training systems executed by the system server 10 and the learner terminal 20 of the thinking / judgment training system 1 of the present embodiment will be described. ..

First, the learner 200 accesses the system server 10 by the learner terminal 20 via the public communication network 50 (for example, an Internet line) (step S1). The learner 200 who uses the thinking ability / judgment ability training system 1 of the present embodiment is registered in the system server 10 in advance, and a dedicated user ID and password are issued from the system server 10 at the time of registration. The learner 200 inputs a user ID and a password from the learner terminal 20 to access the system server 10 (so-called login). After that, the system server 10 and the learner terminal 20 are connected to each other via the public communication network 50 (for example, an Internet line). For access from the learner terminal 20 to the system server 10, a dedicated icon is downloaded from the system server 10 to the learner terminal 20 when the learner 200 is registered in the system server 10, and thereafter, the learner 200 learns. The system server 10 may be made accessible only by selecting (so-called clicking) a dedicated icon displayed on the display means (liquid crystal display device or the like) of the personal terminal 20.

The system server 10 accessed (logged in) from the learner terminal 20 recognizes the learner 200 and starts training for training the learner 200 to think and judge linguistic information. (Step S2). The system server 10 executes an exercise problem determination process for determining an exercise problem to be provided for each of the accessed learners 200 (step S3). This exercise problem determination process is an exercise problem determination means in the present embodiment, and although details will be described later, exercise guidance is provided for each learner 200, and the exercise problem of the learner 200 is determined according to the provided exercise guidance. To do.

The system server 10 transmits the determined exercise to the learner terminal 20 (step S4). Here, as an example, the exercises transmitted to the learner terminal 20 and displayed on the display means (liquid crystal display device, etc.) of the learner terminal 20 include a sentence as a problem and a plurality (for example, 5) of the sentences. ), Multiple (for example, 5) answers to this question, multiple (for example, 5) answer fields in which the learner selects and inputs the correct answer from these answers, and learning for the exercise. It is composed of the evaluation column of the person 200. As described above, in the present embodiment, the learner 200 selects a correct answer from a plurality of answers prepared according to a plurality of questions and inputs them into a plurality of answer fields. In addition, the evaluation of the learner 200 for the exercise (for example, "1: easy", "2: normal", "3: difficult") is also selected at the same time and input to the evaluation field.

The learner terminal 20 receives the exercise from the system server 10 (step S5). The exercises displayed on the display means (liquid crystal display device, etc.) of the learner terminal 20 are a sentence (text data) as a problem and a plurality of (for example, 5) problems (also text data) for this sentence. And multiple (for example, 5) answers to this question (also text data, but with selectable numbers (symbols) attached to the text data), and the learner's correct answer from this answer It is composed of a plurality of answer columns (for example, 5 places) for selecting and inputting, and an evaluation column for the learner 200 for the exercise. The learner 200 answers the exercise (step S6). Specifically, the learner 200 reads the sentences of the exercises displayed on the display means, and then reads a plurality of (for example, five) questions. Then, the answer to the plurality of questions (the number (symbol) attached to the answer) is selected from the plurality of answers corresponding to the plurality of questions and entered in the answer column. Next, the learner 200 selects the text of the exercise and the evaluation for the problem (the number (symbol) attached to the evaluation) and inputs it into the evaluation field.

When the answer to the exercise and the evaluation of the problem by the learner 200 are completed, the answer and the evaluation to the exercise are transmitted from the learner terminal 20 to the system server 10 (step S7). The system server 10 receives the answers and evaluations to the exercises by the learner 200 (step S8). The system server 10 executes the answer result registration process (step S9). This answer result registration process is the answer result registration means in the present embodiment, and although the details will be described later, the correctness judgment and the correct answer rate for the answer are calculated based on the answer and the evaluation for the exercise by the learner 200. , Thinking ability / judgment ability As a result of training, each learner 200 is registered in the learning history storage means.

The system server 10 transmits the result of the answer result registration process (step S9) described above (that is, the result of determining whether the answer to the exercise by the learner 200 is correct or incorrect) to the learner terminal 20 (step S10). The learner terminal 20 receives the result of the answer result registration process (step S9) (step S11). Here, the result of the received answer result registration process (step S9) is displayed on the display means of the learner terminal 20, and the learner 200 recognizes the correctness of the answer to the exercise.

The learner 200 determines whether or not to continue using the thinking ability / judgment ability training system 1 (that is, thinking ability / judgment ability training) in the learner terminal 20 (step S12). When continuing to use the thinking / judgment training system 1 (step S12: Yes), that fact is transmitted to the system server 10. On the other hand, when the use of the thinking ability / judgment ability training system 1 is not continued (step S12: No), the learner 200 terminates the connection between the learner terminal 20 and the system server 10 (so-called logout). As a result, the connection state between the system server 10 and the learner terminal 20 via the public communication line network 50 (for example, the Internet line) is disconnected, and the learner 200 ends the use of the thinking ability / judgment ability training system 1. ..

When the system server 10 receives the continuation of use of the thinking ability / judgment ability training system 1 by the learner (step S13), the system server 10 repeats the processes from steps S3 to S13 described above.

As described above, the thinking / judgment training system 1 of the present embodiment can be connected to the public communication network 50 at any time and place at the discretion of the learner 200 at any place and time. It is available, and the continuation or termination of the use is decided by the judgment of the learner 200, and the training of thinking ability / judgment ability can be executed under the initiative of the learner 200. As a result, the learner 200 can arbitrarily perform training of thinking ability / judgment ability by using his / her free time, and thus realizes a thinking ability / judgment ability training system 1 that is easy for the learner 200 to use. be able to.

[4. Exercise question determination process]
Hereinafter, the exercise problem determination process in the thinking ability / judgment ability training system 1 of the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. This process functions as a means for determining exercises in the present embodiment. The exercise problem determination process is a process executed by the control unit 13 (hereinafter, simply referred to as the control unit 13) of the system server 10 described above. Further, the exercise question determination process is a process executed in step S3 of the outline of the process of the above-mentioned thinking ability / judgment ability training system.

As shown in FIG. 4, the control unit 13 creates learning guidance for the learner 200 (step S20). This learning guidance acquires the learning history for each learner 200 from the learning history storage means registered (memorized) in the storage unit 11, and the learning level of the learner 200 (that is, the learning achievement level of the learner 200). This is for the learner to select the exercises according to the situation. Further, this learning guidance is composed of a plurality of choices by the learner 200. For example, when the learner 200 does not reach a certain level of the answer result to the beginner's exercise, the learner 200 may proceed with the learning of the same beginner's exercise or the learning of the intermediate exercise one level higher. In addition, when the learner 200 has reached a certain level in the answer results to the beginner's exercises, he / she advances the learning of the intermediate exercises one level higher or advances the higher advanced exercises. In this way, by preparing the learning guidance having a plurality of options for the learner 200, the options of the exercises by the learner 200 in the thinking ability / judgment ability training system 1 can be increased, and the learner 200 can increase the options. It enables training for thinking and judgment that never gets tired.

The control unit 13 transmits the learning guidance for the learner 200 to the learner terminal 20 (step S21). The control unit 13 determines whether or not the selection by the learner 200 for the learning guidance transmitted to the learner terminal 20 has been received (step S22). When the control unit 13 determines that the selection by the learner 200 for the learning guidance transmitted to the learner terminal 20 has been received (step S22: Yes), the process shifts to step S23. On the other hand, when the control unit 13 determines that the selection by the learner 200 for the learning guidance transmitted to the learner terminal 20 has not been received (step S22: No), this step is repeated to learn by the learner 200. Wait for the guidance selection to be received.

The control unit 13 determines an exercise according to the learning guidance selected by the learner 200 (step S23). As described above, the exercise problem storage means stored in the storage unit 11 of the present embodiment is composed of a plurality of different exercises even if the exercises are at the same level (beginner / intermediate / advanced). .. Therefore, even the beginner learner 200 is prevented from repeating the same problem. That is, the learning history storage means for each learner 200 stored in the storage unit 11 also stores the history of the exercises provided to the learner 200 so that the same exercises are not provided. In this way, by constantly providing the learner 200 with new exercises, it is possible to eliminate the learner 200's familiarity with the exercises and improve the learning motivation. Furthermore, the exercises are regularly reviewed, and the exercises are regularly replaced or replaced with new exercises (updated with new ones) to constantly provide new exercises for the learner 200. be able to. When this process is completed, the exercise question determination process is completed.

The exercises determined here are transmitted to the learner terminal 20 in step S4 of the outline of the processing of the above-mentioned thinking ability / judgment ability training system 1, and the answer of the exercises by the learner 200 (thinking ability for language). Judgment training) will be carried out.

[5. Answer result registration process]
Hereinafter, the answer result registration process in the thinking ability / judgment ability training system 1 of the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. This process functions as an answer result registration means in the present embodiment. The answer result registration process is a process executed by the control unit 13 (hereinafter, simply referred to as the control unit 13) of the system server 10 described above. Further, the answer result registration process is a process executed in step S9 of the outline of the process of the above-mentioned thinking ability / judgment ability training system.

As shown in FIG. 5, the control unit 13 determines whether the answer to the exercise of the learner 200 is correct or incorrect, and calculates the correct answer rate (step S30). In this process, the control unit 13 acquires the correct answer of the exercise question from the exercise problem storage means registered (memorized) in the storage unit 11, and determines the correctness by comparing it with the answer to the exercise problem of the learner 200. To do. In addition, since one exercise is composed of a plurality of (for example, 5) questions, the correct answer rate is also calculated. Specifically, if 4 out of 5 questions are correct, an 80% correct answer rate is calculated.

The control unit 13 determines the learning level of the learner 200 from the evaluation and the correct answer rate for the exercises of the learner 200. (Step S31). In this process, the control unit 13 determines the learning level of the learner 200 based on the evaluation and the correct answer rate for the exercises of the learner 200. Specifically, if the correct answer rate of the exercise is 70% or more, the learning level of the learner 200 for this exercise is determined to be reached. However, if the learner 200's evaluation of the exercises is, for example, the learner 200 evaluates the three-stage exercises of "easy", "normal", and "difficult" as "difficult". It cannot be said that the learner 200 has answered the exercise with confidence, and there is a possibility of a fluke when selecting an answer (correct answer) from a plurality of answers to the plurality of questions in the exercise. Therefore, for example, when the evaluation of the learner 200 is "difficult", it is determined that the learning level of the learner 200 for this exercise has not been reached even if the correct answer rate of the exercise is 70% or more. In this way, by determining the learning level of the learner 200 from the evaluation of the exercises of the learner 200 and the correct answer rate, the learning level of the learner 200 can be accurately determined.

The control unit 13 stores and updates the learning level for the exercise of the learner 200 determined in step S31 in the learning history storage means (step S32). When this process is completed, the answer result registration process is completed.

As described above, the learning history storage means stored in the storage unit 11 of the present embodiment is composed of a plurality of exercises at different levels (beginner / intermediate / advanced). Therefore, the learning level for the exercises of the learner 200 memorized here is referred to in the exercise problem determination process described above, and for example, when the beginner is memorized as reaching, the learning guidance of the next learner 200 In, it is decided to proceed with intermediate or advanced exercises. In this way, by providing the exercises according to the learning level of the learner 200, the learner 200 can efficiently learn the exercises in the thinking ability / judgment ability training system 1 (thinking ability / judgment ability for linguistic information). Training) can be performed.

In addition, it is not only the learning level that is updated in the learning history storage means, for example, for each learner 200, the history of the learned exercises, the evaluation of the learned exercises, the correctness of the multiple problems of the exercises, etc. Detailed data of is also stored and updated.

[5. Exercise structure]
Hereinafter, the configuration of the exercises in the thinking / judgment training system 1 of the present embodiment will be described. As described above, the plurality of exercises of different difficulty levels stored in the exercise storage means of the storage unit 11 of the system server 10 have a plurality of (for example, eight) functions according to the characteristics of the language function. It is classified. These eight classifications are, for example, "1: planar consideration", "2: three-dimensional consideration", "3: dynamic consideration", "4: rational consideration", "5: logical consideration", " They are classified based on the introspective functions of the language: "concrete consideration (concrete consideration)", "7: abstract consideration (abstract consideration)", and "8: emotional consideration".

"1: Planar consideration" is "observing the object of language and grasping its characteristics". It is a classification for executing training of thinking ability and judgment ability for linguistic information for the characteristic of the introspective function of the language, "If there are multiple, the common and the common ones are identified." "2: Three-dimensional consideration" is the ability to think about linguistic information with respect to the characteristic of the introspective function of the language, "Assemble objects beyond the two-dimensional consideration three-dimensionally and grasp their structure and composition."・ It is a classification for performing judgment training.

"3: Dynamic consideration" refers to the characteristic of the introspective function of the language, "searching for the movement or change of the object, observing the state, and finding the form of the movement from the recognition." It is a classification for executing training of thinking ability and judgment ability. "4: Rational consideration" refers to the ability to think about linguistic information with respect to the characteristic of the introspective function of the language, which is "to check the rationality and contradiction of the development of investigation, the assembly of recognition and expression." It is a classification for performing judgment training.

"5: Logical consideration" is linguistic information for the characteristic of the introspective function of the language, "examine the development process of cognition and its expression, and confirm its validity and logic." It is a classification for carrying out training of thinking ability and judgment ability. "6: Concrete consideration (concrete consideration)" is linguistic information for the characteristic of the internal function of the language, "going back to the process of extracting abstract ideas and concepts and exploring their origin and reality." It is a classification for carrying out training of thinking ability and judgment ability.

"7: Abstract consideration (abstract consideration)" is a characteristic of the introspective function of the language, "Peel off the surface layer, camouflage, and protective film of the phenomenon, explore its substance and reality, and create a conceptual grasp." On the other hand, it is a classification for executing training of thinking ability and judgment ability for linguistic information. "8: Kansei consideration" is the ability to think about linguistic information with respect to the characteristic of the introspective function of the language, which is "to briefly describe or impress the things sensed by the five senses and the natural appearance."・ It is a classification for performing judgment training.

Further, the eight functions classified above are classified into a plurality of (for example, four) modules having a close relationship with each other. The four modules, for example, M1 (module 1), are classified as "1: planar consideration", "2: three-dimensional consideration", and "3: dynamic consideration" as closely related. This M1 (module 1) corresponds to training of basic methods of thinking ability and judgment ability. M2 (module 2) is classified into "4: rational consideration" and "5: logical consideration" as closely related. This M2 (module 2) corresponds to training of thinking ability / judgment ability and strengthening training of applied ability.

M3 (module 3) is classified into "6: concrete consideration (concrete consideration)" and "7: abstract consideration (abstract consideration)" as closely related. This M3 (module 3) corresponds to training for delving into the analytical power and cognitive power of the recognition target. In M4 (module 4), "8: Kansei consideration" is classified. This M4 (module 4) corresponds to training for recognition / expression expansion and acquisition of abundance in the emotional / emotional domain.

The above four modules (M1 to M4) can be said that M1 is the most rudimentary training of thinking ability and judgment ability for linguistic information, and thinking ability and judgment ability for linguistic information that becomes more difficult as M2 and M3 progress. It can be said that M4 is a training of thinking ability and judgment ability for linguistic information based on information and impressions felt by the five senses.

As described above, in the exercises of the present embodiment, the introspective functions (excavation and excavation function, compass function) of the language included in the language information are classified into a plurality of (for example, eight) functions according to their characteristics. Furthermore, by dividing into four modules and constructing multiple exercises with different difficulty levels for each of these four modules, the ability to think about linguistic information and the ability to think about linguistic information based on the characteristics of the introspective function of the language It constitutes exercises that can develop judgment.

Although the present invention has been described above through the above embodiments, the present invention is not limited thereto. Further, each of the above-mentioned effects is merely a list of the most preferable effects arising from the present invention, and the effects according to the present invention are not limited to those described in the present embodiment.

1 Thinking / judgment training system 10 System server 20 Learner terminal 10 Control unit 11 Storage unit 12 Input / output control unit 13 Control unit 14 External communication I / F control unit

Claims (3)

It is a thinking / judgment training system in which the system server and the learner terminals owned by multiple learners are connected to each other so that they can communicate with each other via a public communication network.
The system server
Exercise storage means for storing a plurality of exercises of different difficulty provided to the learner, and
Learning history storage means for storing the thinking ability / judgment ability training results for each learner, and
Based on the learning history storage means, the learning level of the learner is analyzed, and exercise guidance according to the learned learner's learning level is provided to the learner, and exercises according to the exercise guidance selected by the learner. An exercise problem determining means for determining a question from a plurality of exercises having different difficulty levels stored in the exercise problem storage means,
An answer result registration means for calculating the correct answer rate of the learner for the exercise determined by the exercise question determining means and registering each learner in the learning history storage means as a result of thinking ability / judgment ability training.
A thinking and judgment training system that is characterized by being equipped with. A plurality of exercises with different difficulty levels stored in the exercise storage means are classified into a plurality of functions according to the characteristics of the language function, and the classified functions are divided into a plurality of modules that are closely related to each other. The thinking ability / judgment ability training system according to claim 1, wherein the system is divided into a plurality of modules and each of the plurality of modules is composed of a plurality of exercises having different difficulty levels. The exercises transmitted to the learner terminal are provided with an answer column for the exercises and a learner's evaluation column for the exercises.
The answer result evaluation means is characterized in that each learner is registered in the learning history storage means as a thinking ability / judgment ability training result based on the learner's evaluation of the exercise, together with the correct answer rate of the exercise. The thinking / judgment training system according to claim 1 or 2.

Images