JP2020116597A - Three-electrode single-sided gas shielded arc welding method - Google Patents
Three-electrode single-sided gas shielded arc welding method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP2020116597A JP2020116597A JP2019008604A JP2019008604A JP2020116597A JP 2020116597 A JP2020116597 A JP 2020116597A JP 2019008604 A JP2019008604 A JP 2019008604A JP 2019008604 A JP2019008604 A JP 2019008604A JP 2020116597 A JP2020116597 A JP 2020116597A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- wire
- electrode wire
- pole
- electrode
- arc welding
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Abstract
Description
本発明は、被溶接材により形成された開先の3電極片面ガスシールドアーク溶接方法に関し、特に板厚が22mmを超える被溶接材の溶接において、裏ビード及び表ビード形状が良好で、スパッタ発生量が少なく、溶接欠陥が無い健全な溶接金属が高能率に得られる3電極片面ガスシールドアーク溶接方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a grooved three-electrode single-sided gas shielded arc welding method formed by a material to be welded, and particularly in welding a material to be welded having a plate thickness exceeding 22 mm, a back bead and a front bead shape are good, and spatter is generated. TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a three-electrode single-sided gas shielded arc welding method capable of highly efficiently obtaining a sound weld metal having a small amount and no welding defects.
各種溶接構造物の建造時の溶接において、合理化及び効率化のために種々の高能率溶接法が採用されている。中でも突合せ溶接の比率が高い造船や橋梁等では片面溶接が適用されている。 Various high-efficiency welding methods are used for rationalization and efficiency in welding of various welded structures during construction. Above all, single-sided welding is applied to shipbuilding and bridges where the ratio of butt welding is high.
片面溶接方法としては、従来からサブマージアーク溶接方法が造船の板継溶接として盛んに実施されている。例えば特許文献1には片面サブマージアーク溶接装置が開示されており、特許文献2や特許文献3には、3電極または4電極を使用して片面サブマージアーク溶接する方法が開示されている。
As a one-sided welding method, a submerged arc welding method has been widely used as a plate joint welding for shipbuilding. For example, Patent Document 1 discloses a single-sided submerged arc welding device, and
しかし、特許文献1に開示されている片面サブマージアーク溶接装置は、実施設備が大がかりとなり、短尺溶接では煩雑で適用できない等の問題がある。 However, the single-sided submerged arc welding device disclosed in Patent Document 1 has a problem in that it requires large-scale equipment and is not applicable to short-length welding because it is complicated.
一方、短尺溶接が可能な片面ガスシールドアーク溶接方法が実用化されている。特許文献4〜6には、開先裏面に裏当材を当接して先行電極にソリッドワイヤまたはフラックス入りワイヤ、後行電極にフラックス入りワイヤを用いてガスシールドアーク溶接で片面溶接する技術の開示がある。これらは被溶接材の板厚12〜25mmを2電極で片面ガスシールドアーク溶接するというものである。しかし、特許文献4〜6の開示技術においても、被溶接材の板厚が22mmを超えると、裏ビードが出ない場合や裏ビードの形状が不良になる場合があり、また初層と2層目の間に融合不良が生じたり、さらに、初層に高温割れが生じる場合が多く、実際の施工においては種々の問題があった。
On the other hand, a single-sided gas shielded arc welding method capable of short length welding has been put into practical use.
そこで本発明は、上述した問題点に鑑みて案出されたものであり、特に被溶接材の板厚が22mmを超える短尺から長尺の溶接において、裏ビード及び表ビード形状が良好で、スパッタ発生量が少なく、溶接欠陥が無い健全な溶接金属が高能率に得られる3電極片面ガスシールドアーク溶接方法を提供することを目的とする。 Therefore, the present invention has been devised in view of the above-mentioned problems, and particularly in short to long welding in which the plate thickness of the material to be welded exceeds 22 mm, the back bead and front bead shape are good, and spatter An object of the present invention is to provide a three-electrode single-sided gas shielded arc welding method capable of producing a sound weld metal with a small amount of generation and no welding defects with high efficiency.
本発明の要旨は、被溶接材における開先角度30〜55°のVまたはY形状の開先裏面に裏当材を当接して3電極片面ガスシールドアーク溶接する3電極片面ガスシールドアーク溶接方法であって、該開先内に鋼粒を被溶接材板厚の1/5〜1/2の高さまで充填し、先行電極ワイヤと中間電極ワイヤとの電極間距離、及び中間電極ワイヤと後行電極ワイヤとの電極間距離をそれぞれ80〜300mmとし、先行電極ワイヤの溶接電流密度を250A/mm2以上、中間電極ワイヤの溶接電流密度を220A/mm2以上及び後行電極ワイヤの溶接電流密度を200A/mm2以上とし、かつ先行電極ワイヤの揺動を65〜115回/分、中間電極ワイヤと後行電極ワイヤの揺動をそれぞれ30〜90回/分で溶接することを特徴とする。 The gist of the present invention is a three-electrode single-sided gas shielded arc welding method in which a backing material is brought into contact with a V- or Y-shaped grooved rear surface having a groove angle of 30 to 55° in a material to be welded to perform three-electrode single-sided gas shielded arc welding. And filling the inside of the groove with steel particles to a height of 1/5 to 1/2 of the thickness of the material to be welded, the distance between the electrodes of the leading electrode wire and the intermediate electrode wire, and the intermediate electrode wire and the rear electrode wire. The distance between electrodes with the row electrode wire is 80 to 300 mm, the welding current density of the leading electrode wire is 250 A/mm 2 or more, the welding current density of the intermediate electrode wire is 220 A/mm 2 or more, and the welding current of the trailing electrode wire is The density is 200 A/mm 2 or more, and the oscillation of the leading electrode wire is welded at 65 to 115 times/minute, and the oscillation of the intermediate electrode wire and the trailing electrode wire is welded at 30 to 90 times/minute, respectively. To do.
また、先行電極ワイヤはソリッドワイヤ、中間電極ワイヤはワイヤ全質量に対してスラグ形成剤の合計が1質量%以下であるメタル系フラックス入りワイヤ、後行電極ワイヤはワイヤ全質量に対してスラグ形成剤の合計を4〜9質量%含むルチール系フラックス入りワイヤを用いることを特徴とする。 Further, the leading electrode wire is a solid wire, the intermediate electrode wire is a metal flux-cored wire in which the total amount of the slag forming agent is 1 mass% or less based on the total mass of the wire, and the trailing electrode wire is slag forming against the total mass of the wire. A rutile flux-cored wire containing 4 to 9 mass% of the total amount of the agent is used.
さらに、中間電極ワイヤの極性はワイヤマイナスであることも特徴とする3電極片面ガスシールドアーク溶接方法にある。 Further, the polarity of the intermediate electrode wire is a wire minus, which is a three-electrode single-sided gas shielded arc welding method.
本発明の3電極片面ガスシールドアーク溶接方法によれば、特に被溶接材の板厚が22mmを超える短尺から長尺の溶接において、裏ビード及び表ビード形状が良好で、スパッタ発生量が少なく、融合不良やスラグ巻き込みなどの溶接欠陥が無い健全な溶接金属が高能率に得られる。 According to the three-electrode single-sided gas shielded arc welding method of the present invention, particularly in the welding of a short to long plate thickness of the material to be welded exceeding 22 mm, the back bead and the front bead shape are good, and the amount of spatter generation is small, A sound weld metal without welding defects such as poor fusion and slag inclusion can be obtained with high efficiency.
本発明者らは、上記課題を解決するために、板厚が22mmを超える被溶接材の3電極片面ガスシールドアーク溶接方法について、裏ビード及び表ビード形状が良好で、スパッタ発生量が少なく、融合不良やスラグ巻き込み等の溶接欠陥が無い健全な溶接金属を高能率に得るべく詳細に検討した。 In order to solve the above problems, the inventors of the present invention have a three-electrode single-sided gas shielded arc welding method for a material to be welded having a plate thickness of more than 22 mm, the back bead and the front bead shape are good, and the amount of spatter is small, Detailed studies were conducted in order to obtain a sound weld metal with high efficiency without welding defects such as fusion failure and slag inclusion.
図1は、本発明を適用した3電極片面ガスシールドアーク溶接方法に用いる被溶接材の開先部を示す。被溶接材1の裏面1aに裏当材2を当接し、被溶接材1を開先角度θの開先とし鋼粒3を開先底部4に充填する。なお、Gはギャップを示す。
FIG. 1 shows a groove portion of a material to be welded used in a three-electrode single-sided gas shielded arc welding method to which the present invention is applied. The
前記被溶接材1を用いて種々検討した結果、被溶接材1の裏面1aに裏当材2を当接し、開先角度θ、鋼粒充填高さ、電極間距離、各電極の溶接電流密度及び各電極の揺動回数を限定することによって、裏ビード及び表ビード形状が良好で、スパッタ発生量が少なく、融合不良やスラグ巻き込み等の溶接欠陥が無い健全な溶接金属が高能率に得られることを見出した。
As a result of various studies using the material to be welded 1, the
また、先行電極ワイヤ、中間電極ワイヤ及び後行電極ワイヤの種類及びスラグ形成剤の量を限定することによって、裏ビード及び表ビードの形状、耐欠陥性がさらに良好で、中間電極の極性をワイヤマイナスとすることによって、さらにスパッタ発生量が少なくなることも見出した。 Further, by limiting the types of the leading electrode wire, the intermediate electrode wire and the trailing electrode wire and the amount of the slag forming agent, the shape of the back bead and the front bead, the defect resistance is further improved, and the polarity of the intermediate electrode is set to the wire. It was also found that the amount of spatter generated is further reduced by setting it to a negative value.
以下、本発明の3電極片面ガスシールドアーク溶接方法の各限定理由について詳細に説明する。 Hereinafter, each limitation reason of the three-electrode one-sided gas shielded arc welding method of the present invention will be described in detail.
[開先角度30〜55°のVまたはY形状の開先]
被溶接材1の開先角度θを30〜55°とすることによって、裏ビードが均一で形状も良好となる。開先角度θが30°未満である場合、裏ビードが出ないかビード形状が不均一で不良となる。また開先角度θが30°未満である場合には、高温割れも生じやすくなる。一方、被溶接材1の開先角度θが55°を超えると、裏ビードが出すぎて溶け落ちが生じやすくなる。また被溶接材1の開先角度θが55°を超えると、開先断面積が大きくなるので3電極1パス溶接で片面ガスシールドアーク溶接するのが困難となる。したがって、被溶接材1の開先角度θは30〜55°とする。
[V- or Y-shaped groove with a groove angle of 30 to 55°]
By setting the groove angle θ of the material to be welded 1 to 30 to 55°, the back bead is uniform and the shape is also good. If the groove angle θ is less than 30°, no back bead appears or the bead shape is non-uniform, resulting in a defect. Further, when the groove angle θ is less than 30°, hot cracking easily occurs. On the other hand, when the groove angle θ of the material to be welded 1 exceeds 55°, the back bead comes out too much and the melt-through easily occurs. Further, when the groove angle θ of the material to be welded 1 exceeds 55°, the groove cross-sectional area becomes large, so that it becomes difficult to perform single-sided gas shield arc welding by three-electrode one-pass welding. Therefore, the groove angle θ of the workpiece 1 is set to 30 to 55°.
なお、開先底部にギャップGを設ける場合は5mm以下とする。ギャップGが5mmを超えると、裏ビードが出すぎて溶け落ちが生じやすくなる。また、Y開先の場合のルートフェイスは3mm以下とする。ルートフェイスが3mmを超えると、裏ビードが均一に出なくなりやすい。さらに、開先面に仮付けをする場合は、裏ビードを安定して出すために被溶接材1の裏面1aから7mm以下とすることが好ましい。
When the gap G is provided at the bottom of the groove, the gap is 5 mm or less. If the gap G exceeds 5 mm, the back bead tends to come out too much, and melt-through tends to occur. In addition, the root face in the case of the Y groove is 3 mm or less. If the root face exceeds 3 mm, the back bead tends to be uneven. Furthermore, when the groove surface is temporarily attached, it is preferable that the distance from the
裏当材2は、セラミック固形裏当材を使用するのがマグネットや拘束治具を用いる必要がないので好ましいが、ガラステープ併用の銅板裏当材またはフラックス銅裏当材を用いても同様の効果が得られる。
It is preferable to use a ceramic solid backing material as the
[鋼粒を被溶接材板厚の1/5〜1/2まで充填]
鋼粒3を被溶接材の1/5〜1/2まで開先内に充填することによって、アークが安定して裏ビードが均一で形状も良好となる。鋼粒3の開先内への充填が被溶接材1における板厚tの1/5未満であると、裏ビードが出すぎて溶け落ちが生じやすくなる。一方、鋼粒3の開先内への充填が被溶接材1における板厚tの1/2を超えると、裏ビードが出ないか裏ビード形状が不良となる。
[Filling steel particles to 1/5 to 1/2 of the thickness of the material to be welded]
By filling the groove with 1 to 5 to 1/2 of the material to be welded, the arc is stable, the back bead is uniform, and the shape is good. When the filling of the
なお、鋼粒3の粒度は、粒径1.5mm以下であることがアークの安定性及び裏ビードの形状を良好にすることから好ましい。また、成分は主にFeからなるが、耐割れ性から鋼粒3の全質量に対する質量%でCは0.10質量%以下、S及びPは0.020質量%以下が好ましく、他の成分は、溶接金属の強度及び靭性を考慮してSi、Mn、Mo、その他脱酸剤や合金剤を含有させることもできる。以上の粒度と成分を満足すれば、各種サイズの鋼ワイヤをカットした粒状体でもよい。
The grain size of the
[先行電極ワイヤと中間電極ワイヤとの電極間距離、及び中間電極ワイヤと後行電極ワイヤとの電極間距離をそれぞれ80〜300mm]
先行電極ワイヤ(以下、L極という。)と中間電極ワイヤ(以下、T1極という。)の電極間距離が80〜300mmであると、L極及びT1極のアークが安定しスパッタ発生量が少なくなり、また裏ビードが均一で形状も良好となる。L極とT1極の電極間距離が80mm未満であると、L極及びT1極のアークが不安定になってスパッタ発生量が多くなる。一方、L極とT1極の電極間距離が300mmを超えると、溶接装置が大きくなるので好ましくない。したがって、先行電極ワイヤと中間電極ワイヤの電極間距離は、80〜300mmとする。
[The electrode distance between the leading electrode wire and the intermediate electrode wire and the electrode distance between the intermediate electrode wire and the trailing electrode wire are 80 to 300 mm, respectively]
When the distance between the electrodes of the preceding electrode wire (hereinafter referred to as the L pole) and the intermediate electrode wire (hereinafter referred to as the T1 pole) is 80 to 300 mm, the arcs of the L pole and the T1 pole are stable and the amount of spatter generation is small. In addition, the back bead is uniform and the shape is good. If the distance between the electrodes of the L pole and the T1 pole is less than 80 mm, the arc of the L pole and the T1 pole becomes unstable, and the amount of spatter generated increases. On the other hand, if the distance between the electrodes of the L pole and the T1 pole exceeds 300 mm, the welding device becomes large, which is not preferable. Therefore, the inter-electrode distance between the leading electrode wire and the intermediate electrode wire is 80 to 300 mm.
T1極と後行電極ワイヤ(以下、T2極という。)の電極間距離が80〜300mmであると、特にT1極のアークが安定してスパッタ発生量が少なくなる。T1極とT2極の電極間距離が80mm未満であると、T1極のアークが不安定となりスパッタ発生量が多くなる。一方、T1極とT2極の電極間距離が300mmを超えると、溶接装置が大きくなるので好ましくない。したがって、中間電極ワイヤと後行電極ワイヤとの電極間距離は、80〜300mmとする。 When the electrode distance between the T1 pole and the trailing electrode wire (hereinafter referred to as the T2 pole) is 80 to 300 mm, the arc of the T1 pole is particularly stable and the amount of spatter is reduced. If the distance between the electrodes of the T1 pole and the T2 pole is less than 80 mm, the arc of the T1 pole becomes unstable and the amount of spatter generated increases. On the other hand, if the distance between the electrodes of the T1 pole and the T2 pole exceeds 300 mm, the welding apparatus becomes large, which is not preferable. Therefore, the inter-electrode distance between the intermediate electrode wire and the trailing electrode wire is 80 to 300 mm.
[先行電極ワイヤの電流密度:250A/mm2以上]
L極の電流密度を250A/mm2以上にすることによって、裏ビードが均一でビード形状も良好となる。L極の電流密度が250A/mm2未満であると、裏ビード形状が不良となる。なお、L極の電流密度の上限は、耐割れ性から350A/mm2であることが好ましい。また、L極のワイヤ径は、ワイヤ断面積当たりの溶接電流密度が高いことと耐割れ性から1.4〜1.6mmであることが好ましい。
[Current density of the leading electrode wire: 250 A/mm 2 or more]
By setting the current density of the L pole to 250 A/mm 2 or more, the back bead is uniform and the bead shape is good. If the current density of the L pole is less than 250 A/mm 2 , the back bead shape becomes defective. The upper limit of the current density of the L pole is preferably 350 A/mm 2 in terms of crack resistance. Further, the wire diameter of the L pole is preferably 1.4 to 1.6 mm from the viewpoint of high welding current density per wire cross-sectional area and crack resistance.
[中間極ワイヤの電流密度:220A/mm2以上]
T1極の電流密度を220A/mm2以上にすることによって、L極の溶接金属の開先止端部を完全に溶かして融合不良が生じることを防止できる。T1極の電流密度が220A/mm2未満であると、L極の溶接金属の開先止端部に融合不良が生じやすくなる。
[Current density of intermediate pole wire: 220 A/mm 2 or more]
By setting the current density of the T1 electrode to 220 A/mm 2 or more, it is possible to prevent the groove toe portion of the weld metal of the L electrode from being completely melted and causing fusion failure. If the current density of the T1 pole is less than 220 A/mm 2 , fusion failure easily occurs at the groove toe of the weld metal of the L pole.
なお、T1極の電流密度の上限は、スパッタ発生量の抑制から320A/mm2以下であることが好ましい。また、T1極のワイヤ径は、ワイヤ断面積当たりの溶接電流密度が比較的高くアークを安定にするために1.2〜1.6mmであることが好ましい。 The upper limit of the current density of the T1 pole is preferably 320 A/mm 2 or less in order to suppress the spatter generation amount. Further, the wire diameter of the T1 pole is preferably 1.2 to 1.6 mm so that the welding current density per wire sectional area is relatively high and the arc is stabilized.
[後行極ワイヤの電流密度:200A/mm2以上]
T2極の電流密度を200A/mm2以上にすることによって、T1極の溶接金属の開先止端部を完全に溶かして融合不良が生じることを防止できる。T2極の電流密度が200A/mm2未満であると、T1極の溶接金属の開先止端部に融合不良が生じやすくなる。
[Current density of trailing electrode wire: 200 A/mm 2 or more]
By setting the current density of the T2 pole to 200 A/mm 2 or more, it is possible to prevent the groove toe of the weld metal of the T1 pole from being completely melted and causing fusion failure. If the current density of the T2 pole is less than 200 A/mm 2 , fusion failure is likely to occur at the groove toe of the weld metal of the T1 pole.
なお、T2極の電流密度の上限は、表ビードの形状を良好にすることから300A/mm2以下であることが好ましい。また、T2極のワイヤ径は、表ビード形状を良好にするために1.2〜1.6mmであることが好ましい。 The upper limit of the current density of the T2 pole is preferably 300 A/mm 2 or less in order to improve the shape of the front bead. The wire diameter of the T2 pole is preferably 1.2 to 1.6 mm in order to improve the shape of the front bead.
[先行電極ワイヤの揺動:65〜115回/分]
L極の揺動を65〜115回/分とすることによって、裏ビードが均一に出てビード形状も良好となる。L極の揺動が65回/分未満であると、裏ビードの波形が粗くなり良好な裏ビードが得られない。一方、L極の揺動が115回/分を超えると、アークが不安定になり良好な裏ビードが得られない。
[Pulsating of the preceding electrode wire: 65 to 115 times/minute]
By setting the swing of the L pole to 65 to 115 times/minute, the back bead is uniformly exposed and the bead shape is also improved. If the oscillation of the L pole is less than 65 times/minute, the waveform of the back bead becomes rough and a good back bead cannot be obtained. On the other hand, when the swing of the L pole exceeds 115 times/minute, the arc becomes unstable and a good back bead cannot be obtained.
なお、揺動回数は、L極の一往復動を1回とする。また、L極の揺動幅(オシレート幅)は、良好な裏ビードを得るために3〜5mmであることが好ましい。 The number of times of rocking is one reciprocating motion of the L pole. The swing width (oscillate width) of the L pole is preferably 3 to 5 mm in order to obtain a good back bead.
[中間電極ワイヤの揺動:30〜90回/分]
T1極の揺動を30〜90回/分とすることによって、L極の溶接金属の開先止端部を完全に溶かして融合不良が生じることを防止できる。T1極の揺動が30回/分未満であると、L極の溶接金属の開先止端部に融合不良が生じやすくなる。一方、T1極の揺動が90回/分を超えると、アークが不安定になりスパッタ発生量が多くなる。
[Wobble of intermediate electrode wire: 30 to 90 times/minute]
By setting the oscillation of the T1 pole to 30 to 90 times/minute, it is possible to prevent the groove toe of the weld metal of the L pole from being completely melted and causing a fusion failure. When the swing of the T1 pole is less than 30 times/minute, fusion failure easily occurs at the groove toe of the weld metal of the L pole. On the other hand, when the oscillation of the T1 pole exceeds 90 times/minute, the arc becomes unstable and the amount of spatter generated increases.
なお、T1極の揺動幅は、L極の溶接金属の開先止端部を完全に溶かすために6〜10mmであることが好ましい。 The swing width of the T1 pole is preferably 6 to 10 mm in order to completely melt the groove toe of the weld metal of the L pole.
[後行電極ワイヤの揺動:30〜90回/分]
T2極の揺動を30〜90回/分とすることによって、表ビードの形状が良好となる。T2極の揺動が30回/分未満であると、表ビードの波形が粗くなりビード形状が不良となる。一方、T2極の揺動が90回/分を超えると、アークが不安定になり表ビードの形状が不良となる。
[Following electrode wire swing: 30 to 90 times/minute]
By setting the oscillation of the T2 pole at 30 to 90 times/minute, the shape of the front bead becomes good. If the oscillation of the T2 pole is less than 30 times/minute, the waveform of the front bead becomes rough and the bead shape becomes defective. On the other hand, when the oscillation of the T2 pole exceeds 90 times/minute, the arc becomes unstable and the shape of the front bead becomes defective.
なお、T2極の揺動幅は、T1極の溶接金属の開先止端部を完全に溶かすために6〜10mmであることが好ましい。 The swing width of the T2 pole is preferably 6 to 10 mm in order to completely melt the groove toe of the weld metal of the T1 pole.
[先行電極ワイヤ:ソリッドワイヤ]
L極をソリッドワイヤとすることによって、裏ビードが出やすくビード形状が安定するのでより好ましい。L極にメタル系フラックス入りワイヤを用いた場合、良好な裏ビード形状が得られる条件範囲がやや狭くなる。また、L極にルチール系フラックス入りワイヤを用いた場合、裏ビードが出なくなるかビード形状が不良となりやすくなる。したがって先行電極ワイヤは、ソリッドワイヤとすることが好ましいが、これに限定されるものではない。
[Leading electrode wire: solid wire]
It is more preferable to use a solid wire for the L pole because the back bead is likely to come out and the bead shape is stabilized. When a metal-based flux-cored wire is used for the L pole, the range of conditions for obtaining a good back bead shape is somewhat narrowed. In addition, when a rutile flux-cored wire is used for the L pole, the back bead is not likely to come out or the bead shape tends to be defective. Therefore, the leading electrode wire is preferably a solid wire, but is not limited to this.
なお、ソリッドワイヤ成分は、ワイヤ全質量に対して、Cを耐割れ性から0.10質量%以下、Siを脱酸剤及びビード形状の改善から0.5〜1.5質量%、Mnを脱酸剤、耐割れ性及び機械的性能から1.5〜2.5質量%、Tiを溶接金属の靭性確保から0.1〜0.5質量%含むことが好ましい。さらに、溶接金属の強度確保からMoを1.5質量%以下、溶接金属の靭性確保からBを0.01質量%以下含むことも好ましい。 In the solid wire component, C is 0.10 mass% or less from the crack resistance, Si is 0.5 to 1.5 mass% from the improvement of the deoxidizing agent and the bead shape, and Mn is based on the total mass of the wire. It is preferable that the deoxidizer, crack resistance and mechanical performance are contained in an amount of 1.5 to 2.5% by mass, and that Ti is contained in an amount of 0.1 to 0.5% by mass in order to secure the toughness of the weld metal. Further, it is also preferable that Mo is contained in an amount of 1.5% by mass or less in order to secure the strength of the weld metal, and that B is contained in an amount of 0.01% by mass or less in order to secure the toughness of the weld metal.
[中間電極ワイヤ:スラグ形成剤の合計がワイヤ全質量に対して1質量%以下のメタル系フラックス入りワイヤ]
T1極は、アークが最も不安定になりやすいので、酸化物及び弗素化合物からなるスラグ形成剤の合計をワイヤ全質量に対して1質量%以下のメタル系フラックス入りワイヤを用いることが好ましい。酸化物及び弗素化合物からなるスラグ形成剤の合計が1%を超えると、スラグ生成量が多くなって、T2極でスラグを完全に溶融できない場合がありスラグ巻き込み欠陥が生じやすくなる。一方、T1極にソリッドワイヤを用いると、アークが不安定となってスパッタ発生量が多くなる。したがって、中間電極ワイヤは、スラグ形成剤の合計がワイヤ全質量に対して1質量%以下のメタル系フラックス入りワイヤとされていることが好ましいが、これに限定されるものではない。
[Intermediate electrode wire: Metal-based flux-cored wire in which the total amount of slag forming agent is 1% by mass or less based on the total mass of the wire]
Since the arc is most likely to become unstable at the T1 pole, it is preferable to use a metal-based flux-cored wire in which the total amount of the slag forming agent composed of an oxide and a fluorine compound is 1% by mass or less based on the total mass of the wire. If the total amount of the slag forming agent composed of an oxide and a fluorine compound exceeds 1%, the amount of slag produced increases, and the slag may not be completely melted at the T2 pole, and slag entrainment defects are likely to occur. On the other hand, when a solid wire is used for the T1 pole, the arc becomes unstable and the amount of spatter generated increases. Therefore, the intermediate electrode wire is preferably a metal-based flux-cored wire in which the total amount of the slag forming agent is 1% by mass or less with respect to the total mass of the wire, but the present invention is not limited to this.
なお、スラグ形成剤は、SiO2、TiO2、Al2O3、Na2O、K2Oなどの酸化物と、NaF、AlF3、Na3AlF6、Na2SiF6等の弗素化合物の合計をいう。メタル系フラックス入りワイヤのその他は、金属Si,Fe−Si、金属Mn、Fe−Mn、Fe−Si−Mn、Fe−Ti、Fe−Al、Al−Mg、鉄粉等の金属及び合金粉である。 The slag forming agent includes oxides such as SiO 2 , TiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 , Na 2 O and K 2 O and fluorine compounds such as NaF, AlF 3 , Na 3 AlF 6 and Na 2 SiF 6 . It means the total. Others of the metal-based flux-cored wire are metal Si, Fe-Si, metal Mn, Fe-Mn, Fe-Si-Mn, Fe-Ti, Fe-Al, Al-Mg, iron powder and other metal and alloy powders. is there.
[後行電極ワイヤ:ワイヤ全質量に対してスラグ形成剤の合計を4〜9質量%含むルチール系フラックス入りワイヤ]
T2極は、表ビードの形状を良好にするためにスラグ形成剤の合計をワイヤ全質量に対して4〜9質量%含むルチール系フラックス入りワイヤを用いることが好ましい。スラグ形成剤の合計が4質量%未満であると、スラグ被包性が悪くなり表ビードの形状が不良となる。一方、スラグ形成剤の合計が9質量%を超えると、スラグ生成量が多くなってスラグ巻き込み欠陥が生じやすくなる。したがって、後行電極ワイヤは、ワイヤ全質量に対してスラグ形成剤の合計を4〜9質量%含むルチール系フラックス入りワイヤとされていることが好ましいが、これに限定されるものではない。
[Subsequent electrode wire: rutile flux-cored wire containing 4 to 9 mass% of the total amount of slag-forming agent with respect to the total mass of the wire]
For the T2 pole, it is preferable to use a rutile-based flux-cored wire containing the total amount of the slag forming agent in an amount of 4 to 9 mass% with respect to the total mass of the wire in order to improve the shape of the surface bead. If the total amount of the slag forming agent is less than 4% by mass, the slag encapsulation property will be poor and the shape of the surface bead will be poor. On the other hand, when the total amount of the slag forming agent exceeds 9% by mass, the amount of slag produced increases and the slag entrapment defect is likely to occur. Therefore, it is preferable that the trailing electrode wire is a rutile-based flux-cored wire containing the total amount of the slag forming agent in an amount of 4 to 9 mass% with respect to the total mass of the wire, but is not limited thereto.
なお、スラグ形成剤は、TiO2を3〜6質量%含み、その他はSiO2、Al2O3、Na2O、K2Oなどの酸化物と、NaF、AlF3、Na3AlF6、Na2SiF6等の弗素化合物の合計をいう。また、ルチール系フラックス入りワイヤには、溶接金属の強度及び靭性を調整するために、前記酸化物及び弗素化合物の他、金属Si、Fe−Si、金属Mn、Fe−Mn、Fe−Si−Mn、Fe−Ti、Fe−Al、Al−Mg、鉄粉等の金属及び合金粉を含む。 The slag forming agent contains TiO 2 in an amount of 3 to 6% by mass, and the others include oxides such as SiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 , Na 2 O and K 2 O, NaF, AlF 3 , Na 3 AlF 6 , The total of fluorine compounds such as Na 2 SiF 6 . In addition, in order to adjust the strength and toughness of the weld metal, the rutile-based flux-cored wire may be made of metal Si, Fe-Si, metal Mn, Fe-Mn, Fe-Si-Mn in addition to the oxide and fluorine compound. , Fe-Ti, Fe-Al, Al-Mg, iron powder and other metal and alloy powders.
[中間電極ワイヤの極性はワイヤマイナス]
ガスシールドアーク溶接の電極の極性は、一般的に溶接作業性が良好で溶け込み深さが得られるワイヤプラス(以下、DCEPという。)が用いられるが、本発明の3電極片面ガスシールドアーク溶接方法においては、T1極でアークが不安定でスパッタ発生量が多くなるので、T1極の極性はワイヤマイナス(以下、DCENという。)としてアークを安定させスパッタ発生量を抑制することが好ましい。
[The polarity of the intermediate electrode wire is minus wire]
The polarity of the electrode of gas shielded arc welding is generally wire plus (hereinafter referred to as DCEP), which has good welding workability and provides a penetration depth. The three-electrode single-sided gas shielded arc welding method of the present invention is used. In the above, since the arc is unstable at the T1 pole and the amount of spatter is increased, it is preferable that the polarity of the T1 is wire minus (hereinafter referred to as DCEN) to stabilize the arc and suppress the amount of spatter.
なお、本発明を適用した3電極片面ガスシールドアーク溶接方法において使用するシールドガスはCO2ガス等である。 The shield gas used in the three-electrode one-sided gas shielded arc welding method to which the present invention is applied is CO 2 gas or the like.
以下、実施例により本発明の効果を具体的に説明する。 Hereinafter, the effects of the present invention will be specifically described with reference to examples.
表1に示す成分の鋼板を表6及び表7に示すVまたはY開先に加工してセラミック固形裏当材を開先裏面に当接して表2に示す成分鋼粒を開先内に充填して、表3に示すソリッドワイヤ、表4に示すメタル系フラックス入りワイヤ及び表5に示すルチール系フラックス入りワイヤを用いて、表6及び表7に示す各種条件で3電極片面ガスシールドアーク溶接を実施した。なお、シールドガスは炭酸ガスを用い、流量は各電極50リットル/分とした。試験体の長さは1500mmとした。なお、表6、7において、先行電極ワイヤ(L)と中間電極ワイヤ(T1)との電極間距離は、T1の欄に、中間電極ワイヤ(T1)と後行電極ワイヤ(T2)との電極間距離は、T1の欄に、それぞれ記載している。 The steel plate having the composition shown in Table 1 is processed into the V or Y groove shown in Tables 6 and 7, and the ceramic solid backing material is brought into contact with the groove back surface, and the steel particles of the composition shown in Table 2 are filled in the groove. Then, using the solid wire shown in Table 3, the metal flux-cored wire shown in Table 4 and the rutile flux-cored wire shown in Table 5, three-electrode single-sided gas shielded arc welding under various conditions shown in Table 6 and Table 7. Was carried out. Carbon dioxide was used as the shield gas, and the flow rate was 50 l/min for each electrode. The length of the test body was 1500 mm. In Tables 6 and 7, the inter-electrode distance between the leading electrode wire (L) and the intermediate electrode wire (T1) is shown in the column of T1 between the intermediate electrode wire (T1) and the trailing electrode wire (T2). The distance between each is described in the column of T1.
調査項目は、各電極のアークの安定性とスパッタ発生量、裏ビード及び表ビード形状を調査した後、X線透過試験を実施して溶接欠陥の有無を調査した。なお、欠陥があった試験は欠陥箇所を切断して欠陥の発生位置及び欠陥の種類を調査した。それらの結果を表8に示す。 The items investigated were the stability of the arc of each electrode, the amount of spatter, the shape of the back bead, and the shape of the front bead, and then an X-ray transmission test was conducted to examine the presence or absence of welding defects. In the test with a defect, the defect location was cut and the defect occurrence position and the defect type were investigated. The results are shown in Table 8.
表6及び表8中試験No.1〜試験No.9は本発明例、表7及び表8中試験No.10〜試験No.20は比較例である。本発明例である試験No.1、試験No.2及び試験No.6〜試験No.9は、開先角度、鋼粒充填高さ、L極とT1極の電極間距離、T1極とT2極の電極間距離、L極の電流密度と揺動回数、T1極の電流密度と揺動回数及びT2極の電流密度と揺動回数が本発明において規定した範囲内であり、L極にソリッドワイヤ、T1極にスラグ形成剤の合計を適量含むメタル系フラックス入りワイヤ及びT2極にスラグ形成剤の合計が適量なルチール系フラックス入りワイヤを用い、T1極の極性がDCENであるので、各電極ともアークが安定してスパッタ発生量が少なく、裏ビード及び表ビードの形状が良好で溶接欠陥がなく、極めて満足な結果であった。 Test Nos. in Tables 6 and 8 1-test No. Test No. 9 in the invention example, Table 7 and Table 8. 10-Test No. 20 is a comparative example. Test No. which is an example of the present invention. 1, test No. 2 and test No. 6-test No. 9 is the groove angle, the height of filling of steel grains, the distance between the electrodes of the L pole and the T1 pole, the distance between the electrodes of the T1 pole and the T2 pole, the current density of the L pole and the number of oscillations, the current density of the T1 pole and the oscillation. The number of movements, the current density and the number of oscillations of the T2 pole are within the ranges specified in the present invention, the L pole is a solid wire, the T1 pole is a metal-based flux-cored wire containing an appropriate amount of a slag forming agent, and the T2 pole is a slag. Using a rutile flux cored wire with an appropriate amount of forming agent, and the polarity of the T1 pole is DCEN, the arc is stable at each electrode, the amount of spatter is small, and the shapes of the back bead and front bead are good and welded. There were no defects and the results were extremely satisfactory.
なお、試験No.3は、L極にワイヤ記号M2のメタル系フラックス入りワイヤを用いたので、裏ビード形状がやや不安定であった。また、試験No.4は、T1極にワイヤ記号S2のソリッドワイヤを用いたので、T1極のスパッタ発生量がやや多かった。さらに、試験No.5は、T1極の極性がDCEPであるので、T1極のアークがやや不安定でスパッタ発生量がやや多かった。 The test No. In No. 3, since the metal-based flux-cored wire having the wire symbol M2 was used for the L pole, the back bead shape was somewhat unstable. In addition, the test No. In No. 4, since the solid wire with the wire symbol S2 was used for the T1 pole, the amount of spatter generated in the T1 pole was rather large. Furthermore, the test No. In No. 5, since the polarity of the T1 pole was DCEP, the arc of the T1 pole was rather unstable and the amount of spatter generated was rather large.
また、試験No.1〜試験No.9につき、別途溶接金属の機械的性能を調査した結果、引張試験(JIS Z 2201 A2号)は板厚中央部の引張強さが550〜620MPa、衝撃試験(JIS Z 2202 4号)は表側表面下2mmの吸収エネルギーが試験温度0℃で100〜140J、裏面下2mmの吸収エネルギーが0℃で60〜100J得られた。 In addition, the test No. 1-test No. As a result of separately investigating the mechanical performance of the weld metal for No. 9, the tensile test (JIS Z 2201 A2) has a tensile strength of 550 to 620 MPa in the central portion of the plate thickness, and the impact test (JIS Z 22024 No.) has a front surface. The absorbed energy of 2 mm below was 100 to 140 J at a test temperature of 0° C., and the absorbed energy of 2 mm below the back surface was 60 to 100 J at 0° C.
比較例中試験No.10は、開先角度θが狭いので、裏ビード形状が不均一で、高温割れも生じた。また、T1極の極性がDCEPであるので、T1極のアークがやや不安定でスパッタ発生量がやや多かった。 Comparative Example Medium Test No. In No. 10, since the groove angle θ was narrow, the shape of the back bead was not uniform and hot cracking occurred. Further, since the polarity of the T1 pole is DCEP, the arc of the T1 pole was rather unstable and the amount of spatter generated was rather large.
試験No.11は、開先角度θが広いので、裏ビードが出すぎて溶け落ちが生じたので溶接を中止した。 Test No. For No. 11, since the groove angle θ was wide, the back bead came out too much and melted down, so welding was stopped.
試験No.12は、鋼粒の充填高さが低いので、裏ビードが出すぎて溶け落ちが生じたので溶接を中止した。 Test No. In No. 12, since the filling height of the steel grains was low, the back bead came out too much and melted down. Therefore, welding was stopped.
試験No.13は、鋼粒の充填高さが高いので、裏ビードが出なかった。また、T2極のワイヤ記号F6のルチール系フラックス入りワイヤのスラグ形成剤の合計が多いので、最終層開先部にスラグ巻き込み欠陥が生じた。 Test No. In No. 13, since the filling height of the steel particles was high, the back bead did not come out. Further, since the total amount of the slag forming agent of the rutile flux-cored wire having the wire symbol F6 of the T2 pole was large, a slag inclusion defect was generated in the groove portion of the final layer.
試験No.14は、L極とT1極の電極間距離が短いので、L極及びT1極のアークが不安定でスパッタ発生量が多かった。また、T1極にワイヤ記号M4のスラグ形成剤の合計が多いメタル系フラックス入りワイヤを用いたので、最終層開先部にスラグ巻き込み欠陥が生じた。 Test No. In No. 14, since the distance between the electrodes of the L pole and the T1 pole was short, the arc of the L pole and the T1 pole was unstable, and the amount of spatter generated was large. Further, since the metal flux-cored wire containing a large amount of the slag forming agent with the wire symbol M4 was used for the T1 pole, a slag inclusion defect was generated in the groove portion of the final layer.
試験No.15は、T1極とT2極の電極間距離が短いので、T1極のアークが不安定でスパッタ発生量が多かった。また、L極にワイヤ記号F1のルチール系フラックス入りワイヤを用いたので、裏ビードの形状が不良であった。さらに、T2極にワイヤ記号F5のスラグ形成剤の少ないルチール系フラックス入りワイヤを用いたので、表ビードの形状が不良であった。 Test No. In No. 15, since the electrode distance between the T1 pole and the T2 pole was short, the arc of the T1 pole was unstable and the amount of spatter generated was large. Further, since the rutile flux-cored wire having the wire symbol F1 was used for the L pole, the shape of the back bead was poor. Further, since the rutile flux-cored wire with a small slag forming agent having the wire symbol F5 was used for the T2 pole, the shape of the front bead was poor.
試験No.16は、L極の電流密度が低いので、裏ビードが出なかった。また、T1極の揺動回数が少ないので、2層目の開先部に融合不良が生じた。さらに、T1極の極性がDCEPであるので、T1極のアークがやや不安定でスパッタ発生量がやや多かった。 Test No. In No. 16, since the current density of the L pole was low, the back bead did not appear. Further, since the number of times the T1 pole rocked was small, fusion failure occurred in the groove portion of the second layer. Furthermore, since the polarity of the T1 pole is DCEP, the arc of the T1 pole was rather unstable and the amount of spatter generated was rather large.
試験No.17は、T1極の電流密度が低いので、2層目の開先部に融合不良が生じた。また、L極にワイヤ記号M2のメタル系フラックス入りワイヤを用いたので、裏ビードが安定しなかった。 Test No. In No. 17, since the current density of the T1 pole was low, fusion failure occurred in the groove portion of the second layer. Moreover, since the metal flux cored wire with the wire symbol M2 was used for the L pole, the back bead was not stable.
試験No.18は、T2極の電流密度が低いので、最終層開先部に融合不良が生じた。また、T1極の揺動回数が多いので、アークが不安定でスパッタ発生量が多かった。 Test No. In No. 18, since the current density of the T2 pole was low, fusion failure occurred in the groove portion of the final layer. Further, since the T1 pole oscillates frequently, the arc is unstable and the amount of spatter is large.
試験No.19は、L極の揺動回数が少ないので、裏ビードの波形が粗くなった。また、T2極の揺動回数が少ないので、表ビードの波形が粗くなった。 Test No. In No. 19, the number of oscillations of the L pole was small, so the waveform of the back bead became rough. Further, since the number of times the T2 pole rocked was small, the waveform of the front bead became rough.
試験No.20は、L極の揺動回数が多いので、L極のアークが不安定で裏ビード形状が不良であった。また、T2極の揺動回数が多いので、T2極のアークが不安定で表ビードの形状が不良であった。 Test No. In No. 20, since the L pole oscillated many times, the arc of the L pole was unstable and the shape of the back bead was poor. In addition, since the T2 pole was oscillated many times, the arc of the T2 pole was unstable and the shape of the front bead was poor.
1 被溶接材
2 裏当材
3 鋼粒
4 開先底部
1 Welded
Claims (3)
該開先内に鋼粒を被溶接材板厚の1/5〜1/2の高さまで充填し、
先行電極ワイヤと中間電極ワイヤとの電極間距離、及び中間電極ワイヤと後行電極ワイヤとの電極間距離をそれぞれ80〜300mmとし、
先行電極ワイヤの溶接電流密度を250A/mm2以上、中間電極ワイヤの溶接電流密度を220A/mm2以上及び後行電極ワイヤの溶接電流密度を200A/mm2以上とし、
かつ先行電極ワイヤの揺動を65〜115回/分、中間電極ワイヤと後行電極ワイヤの揺動をそれぞれ30〜90回/分で溶接することを特徴とする3電極片面ガスシールドアーク溶接方法。 A three-electrode single-sided gas shielded arc welding method, in which a backing material is brought into contact with a V- or Y-shaped grooved rear surface having a groove angle of 30 to 55° in a welded material to perform three-electrode single-sided gas shielded arc welding,
Filling the groove with steel grains to a height of 1/5 to 1/2 of the thickness of the material to be welded,
The electrode distance between the leading electrode wire and the intermediate electrode wire, and the electrode distance between the intermediate electrode wire and the trailing electrode wire are each 80 to 300 mm,
The welding current density of the leading electrode wire is 250 A/mm 2 or more, the welding current density of the intermediate electrode wire is 220 A/mm 2 or more, and the welding current density of the trailing electrode wire is 200 A/mm 2 or more,
And a three-electrode single-sided gas shielded arc welding method, characterized in that the oscillation of the leading electrode wire is welded at 65 to 115 times/minute and the oscillation of the intermediate electrode wire and the trailing electrode wire are welded at 30 to 90 times/minute, respectively. ..
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2019008604A JP7244283B2 (en) | 2019-01-22 | 2019-01-22 | 3-electrode single-sided gas-shielded arc welding method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2019008604A JP7244283B2 (en) | 2019-01-22 | 2019-01-22 | 3-electrode single-sided gas-shielded arc welding method |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JP2020116597A true JP2020116597A (en) | 2020-08-06 |
JP7244283B2 JP7244283B2 (en) | 2023-03-22 |
Family
ID=71889498
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP2019008604A Active JP7244283B2 (en) | 2019-01-22 | 2019-01-22 | 3-electrode single-sided gas-shielded arc welding method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP7244283B2 (en) |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH0985446A (en) * | 1995-09-28 | 1997-03-31 | Mitsui Eng & Shipbuild Co Ltd | Gas shielded arc welding method |
JPH0994693A (en) * | 1995-09-28 | 1997-04-08 | Kobe Steel Ltd | Flux cored wire for gas shielded arc welding |
JPH11156545A (en) * | 1997-12-01 | 1999-06-15 | Nippon Steel Weld Prod & Eng Co Ltd | One side gas shield arc welding method |
JPH11170051A (en) * | 1997-12-03 | 1999-06-29 | Kobe Steel Ltd | One side multiple electrode gas shielded arc welding method |
JP2009255164A (en) * | 2008-03-26 | 2009-11-05 | Nippon Steel & Sumikin Welding Co Ltd | METAL-BASED FLUX CORED WIRE FOR Ar-CO2 MIXED GAS SHIELDED ARC WELDING |
-
2019
- 2019-01-22 JP JP2019008604A patent/JP7244283B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH0985446A (en) * | 1995-09-28 | 1997-03-31 | Mitsui Eng & Shipbuild Co Ltd | Gas shielded arc welding method |
JPH0994693A (en) * | 1995-09-28 | 1997-04-08 | Kobe Steel Ltd | Flux cored wire for gas shielded arc welding |
JPH11156545A (en) * | 1997-12-01 | 1999-06-15 | Nippon Steel Weld Prod & Eng Co Ltd | One side gas shield arc welding method |
JPH11170051A (en) * | 1997-12-03 | 1999-06-29 | Kobe Steel Ltd | One side multiple electrode gas shielded arc welding method |
JP2009255164A (en) * | 2008-03-26 | 2009-11-05 | Nippon Steel & Sumikin Welding Co Ltd | METAL-BASED FLUX CORED WIRE FOR Ar-CO2 MIXED GAS SHIELDED ARC WELDING |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP7244283B2 (en) | 2023-03-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2402106B1 (en) | Method of and machine for arc welding combining gas-shield arc welding with submerged arc welding | |
KR100733804B1 (en) | Cored electrode, method of forming a weld bead, and arc stabilizing component | |
JP5205115B2 (en) | MIG flux-cored wire for pure Ar shield gas welding and MIG arc welding method | |
JP5968855B2 (en) | Ni-based alloy flux cored wire | |
US11426824B2 (en) | Aluminum-containing welding electrode | |
EP2610361B1 (en) | Flux-cored welding wire for carbon steel and process for arc welding | |
US9511454B2 (en) | Welding activated flux for structural alloy steels | |
US10799974B2 (en) | Electrodes for forming austenitic and duplex steel weld metal | |
JP5869066B2 (en) | Bond flux for multi-electrode single-sided submerged arc welding | |
JP3529359B2 (en) | Flux-cored wire for welding galvanized steel sheet with excellent pit and blow hole resistance | |
CN104772580B (en) | Multi-electrode single-side submerged-arc welding bond flux | |
JP6188626B2 (en) | Two-electrode horizontal fillet gas shielded arc welding method | |
JP7244283B2 (en) | 3-electrode single-sided gas-shielded arc welding method | |
JPH09206945A (en) | Multi-electrode gas shielded one-side welding method | |
JPS6216747B2 (en) | ||
JP6951285B2 (en) | Pulse MAG multi-layer welding method | |
JP5669684B2 (en) | Flux-cored wire for horizontal fillet gas shielded arc welding | |
JP7160090B2 (en) | Composite welding method for metallic materials and butt welding member for metallic materials | |
JP2023049932A (en) | Single-sided butt welding method and manufacturing method of weld joint | |
JPH11226735A (en) | Gas shield arc welding method | |
JP3574038B2 (en) | High-speed MAG welding method | |
JP2795992B2 (en) | Flux-cored wire for gas shielded arc welding | |
JP2020175399A (en) | Flux-cored wire for electrogas arc welding | |
JP2015136719A (en) | Two electrode horizontal fillet gas shield arc welding method | |
JPH0237837B2 (en) |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20211215 |
|
A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20220921 |
|
A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20221108 |
|
TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20230307 |
|
A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20230309 |
|
R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 7244283 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |