JP2020038218A - Control method, inspection system, program and storage medium - Google Patents

Abstract

To provide a control method, an inspection system, a program and a storage medium that can set an angle of an ultrasonic wave transmitted toward an object to a more appropriate value in inspection.SOLUTION: A control method comprises: a detection step St2 that detects intensity of a reflection wave from an object at a plurality of points arranged along a second direction intersecting with a first direction in which an ultrasonic wave is transmitted, and a third direction intersecting with a plane including the first direction and the second direction; a calculation step St3a that calculates gradient of the intensity at each of the plurality of points and a calculation step St3b that calculates an inclination angle indicating inclination of the object on the basis of the gradient of a plurality of pieces of intensity; and a display step that causes a display unit to display the inclination angle at each of the plurality of points arranged along the second direction and the third direction.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 5

Description

  Embodiments of the present invention relate to a control method, an inspection system, a program, and a storage medium.

  There is an inspection method in which an ultrasonic wave is transmitted toward an object and the state of the object is inspected based on the reflected wave. With respect to this inspection method, it is desired to develop a control technique capable of transmitting ultrasonic waves toward an object at a more appropriate angle.

JP 2011-117877 A

  The problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a control method, an inspection system, a program, and a storage medium that can set an angle of an ultrasonic wave transmitted toward an object to a more appropriate value in an inspection. is there.

  The control method according to the embodiment includes a plurality of lines arranged along a second direction intersecting a first direction in which ultrasonic waves are transmitted, and a third direction intersecting a plane including the first direction and the second direction. And detecting the intensity of the reflected wave from the object at the point. The control method further includes a calculating step of calculating an intensity gradient for each of the plurality of points, and calculating an inclination angle indicating the inclination of the object based on the plurality of intensity gradients. The control method further includes a display step of displaying the inclination angle at each of a plurality of points arranged along the second direction and the third direction on a display unit.

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an inspection system according to a first embodiment. It is a perspective view showing a part of inspection system concerning a 1st embodiment. It is a schematic diagram showing the internal structure of the probe tip. FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating a configuration of an inspection system according to a first embodiment. 5 is a flowchart illustrating a control method according to the first embodiment. FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram for explaining a control method according to the first embodiment. FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram for explaining a control method according to the first embodiment. It is a schematic diagram which illustrates the image of a welding part vicinity. It is a schematic diagram which illustrates the image of a welding part vicinity. FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram for explaining a control method according to the first embodiment. It is a schematic diagram showing the inspection system according to the second embodiment. 6 is a flowchart illustrating a control method according to a second embodiment. It is an example of a display by the inspection system concerning a 2nd embodiment. It is an example of a display by the inspection system concerning a 2nd embodiment. 9 is a flowchart illustrating a control method according to a third embodiment. It is a mimetic diagram showing the composition of the inspection system concerning a 3rd embodiment.

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
The drawings are schematic or conceptual, and the relationship between the thickness and the width of each part, the size ratio between the parts, and the like are not necessarily the same as actual ones. Even when the same part is represented, the dimensions and ratios may be represented differently depending on the drawings.
In the specification and the drawings of the present application, the same elements as those already described are denoted by the same reference numerals, and detailed description will be appropriately omitted.

(1st Embodiment)
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an inspection system according to the first embodiment.
FIG. 2 is a perspective view illustrating a part of the inspection system according to the first embodiment.

  As shown in FIG. 1, the inspection system 100 according to the first embodiment includes an inspection device 1 and a processing unit 2. The inspection device 1 includes a probe 10, an imaging unit 20, an application unit 30, and a robot arm (hereinafter, referred to as an arm) 40.

  In welding, a part of two or more members is melted and joined to produce one member. The inspection system 100 performs a non-destructive inspection on whether a welded portion (hereinafter, referred to as a welded portion) is appropriately joined.

  The probe 10 includes a plurality of sensors. The plurality of sensors transmit ultrasonic waves toward the inspection target (welded portion) and receive reflected waves from the target. The imaging unit 20 captures an image of the welded member and acquires an image. The imaging unit 20 extracts welding marks from the image and detects the position of the weld. The application section 30 applies the couplant to the upper surface of the welding section. The couplant is used for acoustic matching of ultrasonic waves between the probe 10 and the object. The couplant may be liquid or gel.

  The probe 10, the imaging unit 20, and the application unit 30 are provided at the tip of the arm 40 as shown in FIG. The arm 40 is, for example, an articulated robot. By driving the arm 40, the positions of the probe 10, the imaging unit 20, and the coating unit 30 can be changed.

  The processing unit 2 executes various processes based on the information acquired by the inspection device 1. The processing unit 2 controls the operation of each component included in the inspection device 1 based on information obtained by the processing. The processing unit 2 includes, for example, a central processing unit (CPU).

  The inspection device 1 is connected to the processing unit 2 by wire communication or wireless communication. The inspection device 1 may be connected to the processing unit 2 via a network. Alternatively, the processing unit 2 may be incorporated in the inspection apparatus 1 to realize the inspection system 100.

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram showing the internal structure of the probe tip.
A matrix sensor 11 is provided inside the tip of the probe 10 as shown in FIG. The matrix sensor 11 includes a plurality of sensors 12. The sensor 12 is capable of transmitting and receiving ultrasonic waves. The sensor 12 is, for example, a transducer.

  The plurality of sensors 12 are arranged along a second direction intersecting the first direction in which the ultrasonic wave is transmitted, and a third direction intersecting a plane parallel to the first direction and the second direction. In the example of FIG. 3, the first direction corresponds to the z direction. The second direction and the third direction correspond to the x direction and the y direction, respectively. Hereinafter, a case will be described in which the first direction, the second direction, and the third direction respectively correspond to the z direction, the x direction, and the y direction that are orthogonal to each other.

  FIG. 3 shows a state in which the welded portion 93 of the member 90 is inspected for proper welding. The member 90 is manufactured by spot welding a first member 91 and a second member 92 at a welding portion 93. The welded portion 93 includes a solidified portion 94. The solidified portion 94 is formed by melting a part of the first member 91 and a part of the second member 92, mixing and solidifying. Each sensor 12 transmits an ultrasonic wave US toward the member 90 on which the couplant 95 is applied, and receives a reflected wave RW from the member 90.

  As a specific example, as shown in FIG. 3, the ultrasonic waves US are transmitted from the plurality of sensors 12 to the welding portion 93. For example, by transmitting the ultrasonic waves US from each sensor 12 simultaneously in the z direction, an ultrasonic beam traveling in the z direction is formed. The ultrasonic wave US is reflected on the upper surface or the lower surface of the member 90. Each sensor 12 receives the reflected wave RW. The sensor 12 detects the intensity of the reflected wave a plurality of times at predetermined time intervals.

  In another example, one sensor 12 transmits the ultrasonic wave US toward the weld 93. Each sensor 12 receives the reflected wave RW and detects the intensity. Each sensor 12 sequentially transmits the ultrasonic wave US. Each time the ultrasonic wave US is transmitted from each sensor 12, the plurality of sensors 12 receive the reflected wave RW, and each sensor 12 detects the intensity.

  The processing unit 2 determines whether the first member 91 and the second member 92 are appropriately welded by the welding unit 93 based on the intensity of the reflected wave RW detected by each sensor 12.

FIG. 4 is a schematic view illustrating the configuration of the inspection system according to the first embodiment.
FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating a control method according to the first embodiment.
FIG. 6 and FIG. 7 are schematic diagrams for explaining the control method according to the first embodiment.

  As illustrated in FIG. 4, the processing unit 2 includes, for example, a control unit 2a, an acquisition unit 2b, a calculation unit 2c, and an end determination unit 2d.

  In Step St1, the control unit 2a sets a transmission angle when transmitting an ultrasonic wave toward an object. In step St1, the transmission angle is set to a preset reference angle. If the shape and posture of the object O are known, the reference angle is set to a value at which the ultrasonic wave is perpendicularly incident on the surface of the object. Alternatively, the reference angle may be set to a value obtained by adding a predetermined value to a value that is incident vertically. When the transmission angle is set, the control unit 2a transmits a control signal to the inspection device 1. When receiving the control signal, the inspection device 1 operates so that the ultrasonic wave is transmitted toward the transmission angle.

The angle information of the transmission angle θ is represented by the inclination (θ _x , θ _y ) with respect to the reference angle RA as shown in FIG. The reference angle RA is, for example, equal to the reference angle set as the transmission angle in Step St1.

  In the inspection device 1, the transmission angle is adjusted by changing the angle of the probe 10. Alternatively, the transmission angle may be adjusted by controlling the transmission direction of the ultrasonic beam. For example, the transmission direction of the ultrasonic beam may be adjusted by controlling the drive timing of the sensors 12 arranged in the probe 10 without changing the angle of the probe 10.

  In Step St2 (detection step), in a state where the probe 10 of the inspection device 1 is in contact with the welding portion 93, the ultrasonic wave is transmitted from the probe 10 to the target at the transmission angle set in Step St1. The probe 10 detects the intensity of the reflected wave from the target. Ultrasonic waves are strongly reflected at boundaries between materials having different acoustic impedances.

  For example, as shown in FIG. 7, the first member 91 has a first surface S1 and a second surface S2. The first surface S1 is located between the probe 10 and the second surface S2. The welding portion 93 has a third surface S3 and a fourth surface S4. The third surface S3 is located between the probe 10 and the fourth surface S4. Except for the welded portion 93, the ultrasonic waves US are strongly reflected on the first surface S1 and the second surface S2 of the first member 91. In the welded portion 93, the ultrasonic wave US is strongly reflected on the third surface S3 and the fourth surface S4.

  When the ultrasonic wave is strongly reflected on any surface and the reflected wave is received by the sensor 12, the reflected wave intensity temporarily increases. That is, each sensor 12 detects the peak of the reflected wave intensity. The time from when the ultrasonic wave is transmitted from the probe 10 to when the intensity peak of the reflected wave is detected by the probe 10 depends on the position of each surface in the z direction. Therefore, by detecting the peak of the reflected wave intensity with each sensor 12, the position of the surface where the ultrasonic wave is strongly reflected can be checked.

  The reflected wave RW is multiple-reflected between the first surface S1 and the second surface S2 of the first member 91 and between the third surface S3 and the fourth surface S4 of the weld 93. As a result, the sensor 12 detects the peak of the intensity of the reflected wave a plurality of times.

  The fourth surface S4 of the weld 93 may not be a flat surface. This is based on the fact that the welded portion 93 includes the solidified portion 94, deformation of the shape during the welding process, and the like. In this case, it is desirable that the ultrasonic waves US are transmitted in a direction perpendicular to the fourth surface S4 on average. Thereby, the ultrasonic waves are reflected more strongly on the fourth surface S4, and the accuracy of the inspection can be improved.

  The acquisition unit 2b acquires information including the transmission angle and the intensity of the reflected wave detected by each sensor 12 from the inspection device 1. The acquisition unit 2b may generate an image based on the acquired reflected wave intensity.

8A to 8C and FIG. 9 are schematic diagrams illustrating images near the welded portion.
FIG. 8A illustrates an image of the welded portion captured by the imaging unit 20. FIG. 8B shows an image corresponding to an AA ′ section in FIG. 8A. FIG. 8C shows an image corresponding to the BB ′ section in FIG. 8A. FIG. 9 shows the entire image. The image is volume data holding values at each of the three-dimensional positions, as shown in FIG.

  The image in FIG. 8B represents the reflected wave intensity at each point in the x direction and the z direction. Note that the position in the z direction corresponds to the time when the reflected wave intensity is detected. That is, the image in FIG. 8B is based on the result of detecting the reflected wave intensity a plurality of times by the plurality of sensors 12 arranged in the x direction. The image in FIG. 8C shows the reflected wave intensity at each point in the y direction and the z direction. As in FIG. 8B, in the image of FIG. 8C, the position in the z direction corresponds to the time when the reflected wave intensity is detected. The luminance of each point (pixel) included in the images of FIGS. 8B, 8C, and 9 corresponds to the intensity of the reflected wave. The higher the brightness and the whiter the color (the lower the density of dots), the higher the intensity of the reflected wave.

  In the image, there are portions where pixels having relatively high luminance are continuous in a direction intersecting with the z direction. FIG. 8B and FIG. 8C illustrate the parts p1 to p4 which are a part of those parts. Portions p1 to p4 indicate surfaces on which ultrasonic waves are strongly reflected.

  As can be seen from FIGS. 8B and 8C, the position in the z direction where the surface is detected is different between the welded portion 93 and other portions. For example, in the image of FIG. 8B, the position of the portion p1 in the z direction is different from the position of the portion p2 in the z direction. In the image of FIG. 8C, the position of the portion p3 in the z direction is different from the position of the portion p4 in the z direction. This is based on the fact that the position in the z direction of the bottom surface (second surface S2) of a portion other than the welded portion 93 is different from the position in the z direction of the bottom surface (fourth surface S4) of the welded portion 93.

  Further, as shown in FIG. 7, the distance between the first surface S1 and the second surface S2 of the first member 91 is equal to the distance between the third surface S3 and the fourth surface S4 of the welded portion 93. different. Therefore, the cycle in which the surface is detected in the z direction is different between the welded portion 93 and other portions.

  In step St3 (calculation step), the calculation unit 2c calculates a tilt angle indicating the tilt of the target object based on the gradient of the reflected wave intensity detected in step St2. Specifically, step St3 includes steps St3a and St3b.

  In step St3a, the gradient of the reflected wave intensity at each point is calculated in a predetermined area in the three-dimensional space including the x, y, and z directions. This processing corresponds to calculating the gradient of the pixel value for each pixel within a predetermined area when the images shown in FIGS. 8 and 9 are generated based on the reflected wave intensity.

  The intensity of the reflected wave at the coordinates (x, y, z) is defined as I (x, y, z). The predetermined area is an area indicated by coordinates that satisfy x1 ≦ x ≦ x2, y1 ≦ y ≦ y2, and z1 ≦ z ≦ z2 given using, for example, constants x1, x2, y1, y2, z1, and z2. . It is desirable that x1, x2, y1, and y2 be specified so that a predetermined area is included in the welded portion 93. Further, the external shape of the designated area may be rectangular, circular, or any other shape. Regarding the range in the z direction, for example, a region having a small depth is excluded because the bottom surface (the fourth surface S4) of the welded portion 93 is not reflected, and the multiple reflected wave reflected by the fourth surface S4 is reflected once. To be specified. In FIG. 8B and FIG. 8C, regions r1 and r2 show an example of the set region.

The gradient of the intensity of the reflected wave is calculated by the following equation (1).
(Equation 1)
G (x, y, z) = (I (x + 1, y, z) -I (x, y, z), I (x1, y + 1,
z) -I (x, y, z), I (x, y, z + 1) -I (x, y, z))
G (x, y, z) is a three-dimensional vector indicating the gradient of the reflected wave intensity in the x, y, and z directions at the coordinates (x, y, z). Equation 1 calculated the gradient by the forward difference. In addition, a general gradient calculation method such as a backward difference or a center difference may be used.

  In Step St3b, an inclination angle indicating the inclination of the welded portion 93 is calculated based on the gradient of the reflected wave intensity. First, the average of the gradient calculated in the above-described predetermined area is calculated. This is called the average gradient. The method of calculating the average gradient is not limited to a simple average, but may be a weighted average.

  For example, the weight is set to be greater as the x coordinate and the y coordinate are closer to the center of the predetermined area. The center of the predetermined region of the x coordinate and the y coordinate is represented by ((x1 + x2) / 2, (y1 + y2) / 2). Thereby, the influence of the region other than the welded portion 93 contributing to the averaging process can be reduced. Alternatively, a larger weight may be given to G (x, y, z) as the value increases. Alternatively, a weight may be given based on information about the inspection target. For example, a larger weight may be assigned to a position closer to the coordinates in the z direction where the fourth surface S4 of the welded portion 93 is expected to be projected. Thereby, the averaging process based on the reflected wave from the fourth surface S4 of the welded portion 93 becomes possible. Alternatively, the above-described averaging process may be replaced with a process for calculating a median.

The difference angle indicating the inclination of the welded portion 93 with respect to the transmission angle is calculated using the above average gradient. Here, the average gradient is described as GM. First, the scale information is excluded from the average gradient, and a two-dimensional vector of the following expression indicating the direction information is calculated.
(Equation 2)
(GM (x) / GM (z), GM (y) / GM (z))
GM (x), GM (y), and GM (z) are components of the average gradient in the x, y, and z directions, respectively. The θx component of the difference angle is calculated from the first component of Expression 2, and the θy component of the difference angle is calculated from the second component. For the calculation, a method of calculating backward from the detected pitch of the reflected wave intensity in the x, y, and z directions can be employed.
Alternatively, the welded portion 93 may be previously tilted at various angles, and the probe 10 may detect a reflected wave at each angle. Based on the detection result, the relationship between the first component and the second component of Expression 2 and the difference angle is tabulated. The angle is calculated using the table. Alternatively, the calculation relationship may be held in the form of a regression equation. Next, an inclination angle corresponding to the inclination of the target object is calculated from the sum of the angle obtained by inverting the sign of the difference angle and the current transmission angle.

  The arrow A1 shown in the image of FIG. 8B indicates the gradient of the reflected wave intensity on the XZ plane. Similarly, an arrow A2 shown in the image of FIG. 8C indicates the gradient of the reflected wave intensity on the XZ plane.

  The inclination angle may be an angle based on the reference angle RA as described above, or may be an angle obtained by inverting the sign of the difference angle with respect to the transmission angle at that time. For example, a difference between the transmission angle and the calculated inclination of the surface of the target object may be calculated as the inclination angle. Such a difference also substantially indicates the inclination of the object.

  In step St4 (determination step), the termination determination unit 2d determines whether or not to end the image acquisition. If it is not determined to end, Step St5 (setting step) is executed. In step St5, the control unit 2a sets the transmission angle again based on the inclination angle calculated in step St3. The control unit 2a transmits a control signal including the reset transmission angle to the inspection device 1. Thereby, step St2 is executed again. That is, the first loop including Step St2, Step St3, Step St4, and Step St5 is repeatedly executed until it is determined in Step St4 that the first loop is to be ended.

For example, in Step St4, if Step St2 or Step St3 has been repeated a predetermined number of times, it is determined that the process has ended.
In another example, the inclination angle calculated in step St3 is stored for each repetition. When it is determined that the calculation result of the inclination angle has converged, it is determined to end. For example, the first loop is executed a plurality of times, and the first tilt angle is calculated by the n-th step St3. The second tilt angle is calculated by the (n + 1) -th step St3. A difference between the second inclination angle and the first inclination angle is calculated, and when the difference is smaller than a predetermined value, it is determined that the operation is to be terminated. The difference between the second angle of inclination and the first inclination angle, for example, a sum of the absolute value of the difference between the absolute value and theta _y component of the difference theta _x component.

For example, in step St5, the inclination angle is used as it is as the newly set transmission angle θ _NEXT .
Alternatively, the transmission angle θ _NEXT may be set using the current transmission angle θ and the inclination angle. For example, the difference between the transmission angle θ _NEXT and the transmission angle θ may be determined to be larger than the difference between the tilt angle and the transmission angle θ. In this case, at least one of the difference theta _x component and theta _y components, to be larger. In this way, the inclination angle is calculated again at an angle different from the transmission angle θ and around the inclination angle predicted as the inclination of the welded portion 93. Thereby, the accuracy of the tilt angle calculated next can be improved. Further, when the calculated inclination angle is smaller than the actual inclination of the welded portion 93 due to factors such as the detection accuracy of the intensity of the reflected wave, the change amount of the angle can be increased. Thereby, the convergence of the repeatedly calculated inclination angle can be accelerated.

In particular, when the number of times the transmission angle θ _NEXT has been updated is small, the transmission angle θ often does not converge. Thus, steps St5 is executed a predetermined number of times, the transmission angle theta _NEXT, the difference between the transmission angle theta _NEXT transmission angle theta is set to be larger than the difference between the inclination angle and the transmission angle theta Is desirable. After the predetermined number of times, it is desirable to set the transmission angle θ _{NEXT so} that, for example, the difference between the transmission angle θ _NEXT and the transmission angle θ is the same as the difference between the tilt angle and the transmission angle θ.

FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram for explaining the control method according to the first embodiment.
10, the horizontal axis represents the theta _x component and the vertical axis represents theta _y component. FIG. 10A shows the transition of the transmission angle when the inclination angle calculated as the transmission angle θ _NEXT is used as it is. 10 (b) is in the transmission angle theta _NEXT setting for the first time, it transmits the angle theta _NEXT, as the difference between the transmission angle theta _NEXT transmission angle theta is twice the difference between the transmission angle theta and tilt angle Represents the transition of the transmission angle when set to.

  When the detection accuracy of the intensity of the reflected wave is low like the transmission angles θ, θ1, and θ2 shown in FIG. 10A, the transmission angle gradually converges toward the actual inclination angle θ0 of the welded portion 93. There are times when you do. In such a case, according to the above-described method, the transmission angle can be converged more quickly toward the inclination angle θ0 as in the transmission angles θ and θ3 shown in FIG. As a result, the number of times the first loop is executed can be reduced, and the time required for the inspection can be reduced.

As another example, the inclination angle for each repetition is stored, and the transmission angle θ _NEXT is calculated based on the inclination angle calculated within a predetermined number of repetitions. For example, θ _NEXT is calculated by averaging the inclination angles calculated within a predetermined number of repetitions.

  If it is determined in step St4 that the processing is to be ended, step St6 is executed. In step St6, it is determined whether step St2 has been executed with the transmission angle set to the derived angle. The derived angle is derived based on the tilt angle calculated so far, and is an angle that is estimated to correspond to the tilt of the object. For example, the inclination angle calculated immediately before is set as the derived angle. This is because the inclination angle calculated immediately before is considered to be closest to the actual inclination of the object. Alternatively, an average of a plurality of inclination angles calculated immediately before may be set as the estimated angle. If Step St2 has not been executed with the transmission angle set to the derived angle, Step St7 and Step St8 are executed. In Step St7, the transmission angle is set to the derived angle. In step St8, similarly to step St2, an ultrasonic wave is transmitted toward the target at the set transmission angle, and the intensity of the reflected wave is detected. An image may be generated based on the detection result of Step St8.

  After step St8, or when step St2 has been executed in a state where the transmission angle has been set to the derived angle by then, the inspection ends.

As described above, the angle of the ultrasonic wave transmitted toward the member 90 affects the inspection result in the inspection as to whether the welding is properly performed. If the inspection is performed in a state where the angle of the probe 10 is inappropriate, there is a possibility that it is determined that the probe 10 has not been joined even though it is properly joined. Therefore, it is desirable that the angle of the probe 10 be set to an appropriate value.
As the transmission angle of the ultrasonic wave is perpendicular to the surface of the object, the intensity of the ultrasonic wave reflected on the surface increases, and the position of the surface can be detected more accurately. Therefore, it is desirable that the transmission angle be set perpendicular to the surface of the welded portion 93 that is the object.

  According to the inspection system 100 and the control method according to the first embodiment, as described above, the inclination angle indicating the inclination of the inspection target is calculated based on the gradient of the intensity of the reflected wave. By using the gradient of the intensity of the reflected wave, an inclination angle close to the actual inclination of the target object can be calculated. By setting the transmission angle based on the calculated inclination angle, the angle of the ultrasonic wave transmitted toward the target can be set to a more appropriate value. Thereby, the accuracy of the inspection can be improved. Alternatively, when the transmission angle is reset until an appropriate inspection result is obtained, an appropriate transmission angle can be found more quickly, and the time required for the inspection can be reduced.

  Here, an example has been described in which the welded portion 93 is inspected using the inspection system 100 and the control method according to the first embodiment. According to the inspection system 100 and the control method according to the first embodiment, it is also possible to inspect other than the welded portion. For example, for a metal container whose back side cannot be visually recognized from the outside, an inspection for distortion of the back side or the like can be performed. In these inspections, according to the present embodiment, the accuracy of the inspection can be improved or the time required for the inspection can be reduced.

(2nd Embodiment)
FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram illustrating an inspection system according to the second embodiment.
FIG. 12 is a flowchart illustrating a control method according to the second embodiment.

  The inspection system 200 according to the second embodiment further includes a display unit 3. The display unit 3 is connected to, for example, the processing unit 2 by wire or wirelessly. The display unit 3 displays information obtained by the inspection device 1 or information processed by the processing unit 2. The display unit 3 includes, for example, a display, a touch panel, or a printer.

  The control method according to the second embodiment further includes Step St11 as shown in FIG. In step St11, each time step St2 is executed, at least one of the imaging angle and the transmission angle at that time is displayed on the display unit 3.

FIG. 13 and FIG. 14 are display examples of the inspection system according to the second embodiment.
For example, as shown in FIG. 13, the display of the display unit, a graph for plotting theta _x and theta _y indicating the transmission angle is displayed. Each time steps St2 and St3 are executed, the number of executions and the transmission angle are plotted. Thereby, the user can easily confirm the transition of the transmission angle. Similarly, the inclination angle may be plotted. Thereby, the user can easily confirm whether the inclination angle has converged and whether the inclination angle has been calculated with certainty. Alternatively, the history may be displayed in a text format other than the plotting method described above.

  As another display example, an inclination angle is calculated for each coordinate in the x direction and the y direction by the same processing as in step St3, and the inclination angle at each coordinate is displayed. FIG. 14 is an example. In FIG. 14, the brightness at each point indicates the slope at that point. At the lower right of FIG. 14, a legend L of the angle is displayed. FIG. 14 illustrates a state in which different inclination angles are calculated for the welded portion 93 at the center of the image and the non-welded portion around the welded portion. According to this display, the user can easily grasp the outer shape of the welded portion 93 (the inclination of the fourth surface S4).

  Both the graph shown in FIG. 13 and the image shown in FIG. 14 may be displayed. For example, when the fourth surface S4 of the welded portion 93 is curved, the number of times of calculation of the inclination angle may increase, and the inspection time may also increase. In this case, by displaying both the graph shown in FIG. 13 and the image shown in FIG. 14, the user can easily understand that the number of calculations is large and the reason why the number of calculations is large.

(Third embodiment)
FIG. 15 is a flowchart illustrating a control method according to the third embodiment.
The control method according to the third embodiment further includes steps St21, St22, and St23, as shown in FIG.

  In step St21, it is determined whether or not the detection result obtained in step St2 satisfies the inspection condition. If it is determined that the inspection is successful in step St21, the inspection is determined to be successful in step St22, and the process ends. If it is determined in step St21 that the test has failed, step St3 is executed. Step St23 is executed after Step St6 or St8. In Step St23, it is determined whether the detection result obtained in Step St8 satisfies the inspection condition.

  For example, it is set as the inspection condition that the distance between the adjacent peaks of the reflected wave intensity in the z direction is equal to or greater than a predetermined threshold. As shown in FIG. 3, the distance between the third surface S3 and the fourth surface S4 of the welded portion 93 is longer than the distance between the first surface S1 and the second surface S2 of the first member 91. . The peak of the intensity of the reflected wave in the z direction corresponds to the position of the surface. Therefore, when welding is performed appropriately, the distance between the peaks of the intensity of the detected reflected wave is longer than the distance between the peaks corresponding to the first surface S1 and the second surface S2 of the first member 91. The threshold value is set based on, for example, the distance between the first surface S1 and the second surface S2 of the first member 91 or the distance between the third surface S3 and the fourth surface S4 of the welded portion 93. .

  For example, the distance between the peaks of the reflected wave intensity detected at each point (each sensor 12) in the x direction and the y direction is compared with a predetermined threshold. Next, the number of points where the distance between the peaks is equal to or greater than the threshold is counted. Subsequently, when the count number is equal to or more than another preset threshold value, it is determined that the connection is properly performed.

  According to the method shown in FIG. 15, the inspection ends when the inspection conditions are passed. Therefore, the inspection can be completed earlier.

FIG. 16 is a schematic diagram illustrating a configuration of an inspection system according to the third embodiment.
In the inspection system 300 according to the third embodiment, the processing unit 2 further includes a pass / fail determination unit 2e. The pass / fail determination unit 2e performs steps St21, St22, and St23.

  In the example illustrated in FIG. 16, the inspection system 300 further includes the display unit 3. The display unit 3 displays the transition of the transmission angle or the inclination angle as described above. Further, the pass / fail determination unit 2e may transmit the determination result to the display unit 3. When receiving the determination result, the display unit 3 displays the determination result.

In the above example, the case where the reflected wave intensity is detected a plurality of times by the plurality of sensors 12 arranged in the first direction and the second direction has been described. According to this method, three-dimensional volume data is obtained. The embodiment is not limited to this example, and two-dimensional data may be acquired by the plurality of sensors 12. For example, the plurality of sensors 12 are arranged in the first direction or the second direction, and the reflected wave intensity is detected a plurality of times. In this case, components of the transmission angle is adjusted will either theta _x and theta _y. In this case, by using the method according to the embodiments described above, can be found more quickly and more appropriate theta _x or theta _y, it can shorten the time required for the inspection.

  According to each embodiment described above, it is possible to provide a control method and an inspection system that can set the angle of an ultrasonic wave transmitted toward an object in an inspection to a more appropriate value. In addition, by using a program for causing the system to execute the embodiments described above and a storage medium storing the program, the angle of the ultrasonic wave transmitted toward the target in the inspection is set to a more appropriate value. Can be set.

  In the specification of the present application, “vertical” and “parallel” include not only strictly vertical and strictly parallel, but also include, for example, variations in a manufacturing process, and may be substantially vertical and substantially parallel. Good.

  The embodiments of the invention have been described with reference to examples. However, embodiments of the present invention are not limited to these specific examples. For example, as for the specific configuration of each element such as the inspection apparatus and the processing unit, the present invention is similarly implemented by appropriately selecting from a known range by a person skilled in the art, and as long as the same effects can be obtained, Included in the scope of the invention.

  A combination of any two or more elements of each specific example within a technically possible range is also included in the scope of the present invention as long as the gist of the present invention is included.

  In addition, based on the control method, the inspection system, the program, and the storage medium described above as the embodiments of the present invention, all control methods, inspection systems, programs, and the like that can be appropriately modified and implemented by those skilled in the art. The storage medium also belongs to the scope of the present invention as long as it includes the gist of the present invention.

  In addition, within the scope of the concept of the present invention, those skilled in the art can come up with various modified examples and modified examples, and it is understood that these modified examples and modified examples also belong to the scope of the present invention. .

  Although several embodiments of the present invention have been described, these embodiments are provided by way of example and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. These new embodiments can be implemented in other various forms, and various omissions, replacements, and changes can be made without departing from the spirit of the invention. These embodiments and their modifications are included in the scope and gist of the invention, and are also included in the invention described in the claims and their equivalents.

  Reference Signs List 1 inspection device, 2 processing unit, 2a control unit, 2b acquisition unit, 2c calculation unit, 2d end determination unit, 2e pass / fail determination unit, 3 display unit, 10 probe, 11 matrix sensor, 12 sensor, 20 imaging unit, 30 coating Part, 40 arms, 90 members, 91 first member, 92 second member, 93 welded part, 94 solidified part, 95 couplant, θ, θ1 to θ3 transmission angle, θ0 inclination angle, 100, 200, 300 inspection system, A1 , A2 arrow, L legend, O object, RA reference angle, RW reflected wave, St1 to St8, St11, St21 to 23 steps, S1 first surface, S2 second surface, S3 third surface, S4 fourth surface, US ultrasound, p1-p4 part, r1, r2 area

Claims (4)

Reflection from the object at a plurality of points arranged along a second direction intersecting the first direction in which the ultrasonic wave is transmitted and a third direction intersecting a plane including the first direction and the second direction. A detecting step of detecting a wave intensity;
Calculating a gradient of intensity for each of the plurality of points, based on the plurality of gradients of intensity, calculating a tilt angle indicating the tilt of the object,
A display step of displaying the inclination angle at each of a plurality of points arranged along the second direction and the third direction on a display unit;
Control method with A probe including a sensor capable of transmitting and receiving ultrasonic waves,
Transmits an ultrasonic wave, a plurality of lines arranged along a second direction intersecting a first direction in which the ultrasonic wave is transmitted, and a third direction intersecting a plane including the first direction and the second direction. Detecting the intensity of the reflected wave from the object at the point,
Calculating the gradient of the intensity for each of the plurality of points, based on the plurality of gradients of the intensity, calculating a tilt angle indicating the tilt of the object,
Causing the display unit to display the inclination angle at each of a plurality of points arranged along the second direction and the third direction;
A processing unit;
Inspection system with In the processing section,
Reflection from the object at a plurality of points arranged along a second direction intersecting the first direction in which the ultrasonic wave is transmitted and a third direction intersecting a plane including the first direction and the second direction. A detecting step of detecting a wave intensity;
Calculating a gradient of intensity for each of the plurality of points, based on the plurality of gradients of intensity, calculating a tilt angle indicating the tilt of the object,
A display step of displaying the inclination angle at each of a plurality of points arranged along the second direction and the third direction on a display unit;
A program that executes   A storage medium storing the program according to claim 3.