JP2018174724A - Cut material obtained from fish meat heated-and-dried product - Google Patents

Cut material obtained from fish meat heated-and-dried product Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2018174724A
JP2018174724A JP2017074318A JP2017074318A JP2018174724A JP 2018174724 A JP2018174724 A JP 2018174724A JP 2017074318 A JP2017074318 A JP 2017074318A JP 2017074318 A JP2017074318 A JP 2017074318A JP 2018174724 A JP2018174724 A JP 2018174724A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
particle size
less
fish meat
cutting
product
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2017074318A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP6994228B2 (en
Inventor
恵理 岩井
Eri Iwai
恵理 岩井
渡辺 浩一
Koichi Watanabe
浩一 渡辺
光作 桑田
Mitsusaku Kuwata
光作 桑田
昌治 坂川
Shoji Sakakawa
昌治 坂川
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Yamaki Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Yamaki Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Yamaki Co Ltd filed Critical Yamaki Co Ltd
Priority to JP2017074318A priority Critical patent/JP6994228B2/en
Publication of JP2018174724A publication Critical patent/JP2018174724A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP6994228B2 publication Critical patent/JP6994228B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Meat, Egg Or Seafood Products (AREA)

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a fish meat heated-and-dried product having excellent in-mouth meltability, for example, a cut material from a dried fish or the like; and to provide a production method thereof.SOLUTION: There is provided a cut material obtained from a fish meat heated-and-dried product. In the cut material, (1) a particle size in suspension obtained by suspending the cut material into water is, in terms of median size (50%D), 0.35 μm or more and 12 μm or less, and a cumulative 90% size (90%D) is 0.4 μm or more and 18 μm or less, and (2) a bulk specific gravity thereof is 0.09 g/mL or more and 0.268 g/mL or less.SELECTED DRAWING: None

Description

本発明は、魚節や魚肉加熱乾燥品の切削物であって、口どけの良い切削物を得ることに関する。   The present invention relates to a cut product of dried fish scale and dried fish meat, which has a good mouth feel.

魚の頭や内臓を取り除いた魚肉を煮熟して焙乾して得られる魚節や、もしくは、魚肉をミンチ状に加工し場合によっては調味料なども加えて形成して加熱しその後乾燥および燻付けなどをして得られる魚肉の加熱乾燥品(以後、魚節および魚肉の加熱乾燥品を「魚肉加熱乾燥品」という)は、味や風味に優れており、魚の栄養成分が含まれ、また、水分が少ないため保存性にも優れた、我が国の伝統食品である。
魚肉加熱乾燥品は、焙乾や乾燥工程で魚肉タンパク質が非常に硬質となるため、切削したり粉砕したりして利用される。これら切削物や粉砕物は、だし汁を取るために用いられるだけでなく、乾燥していて取り回しが良く調理時に扱いやすいことから、料理のトッピング素材やふりかけ、おにぎりの具など、直接食する用途としても日常的に利用されている。
A fish node obtained by boiling, ripening and drying the fish meat from which the head and organs of the fish have been removed, or processing the fish meat into a minced form and optionally adding a seasoning, etc. The heat-dried product of fish meat obtained by adding (hereinafter referred to as “fish-dried product of dried fish section and fish meat as“ heat-dried product of fish meat ”) is excellent in taste and flavor, contains nutritional components of fish, and It is a traditional food of our country, which is excellent in preservation because it contains less water.
Fish meat heating and drying products are used by cutting and crushing because fish meat proteins become very hard in a drying and drying process. These cuttings and crushed materials are not only used for taking soup stock, but are also dry and easy to handle, so they are easy to handle during cooking, and are used as food topping materials, sprinkles, rice balls, etc., for direct eating. Is also used on a daily basis.

ところが一方で、あまりに硬質であるため、食したときに口中にざらつき感が残り、口どけの点で必ずしも良好とはいえない側面もあった。
切削物の口どけを良好にするためには、切削物の厚さは薄い方が好ましいことは言うまでもなく、さらには、節を削り出すときの、筋繊維に対する鉋刃の角度によって口当たりが変わることも知られている(非特許文献1)。とはいえ、例えば、綿菓子やクリームほどの口どけ感は実現できていなかった。
そこで、より一層口あたりを良好にするためには、さらに細かい粒度の切削物とすれば良いことが考えられる。
例えば、特許文献1には、粒径が50μm以下である魚節微粉末を含有させたつゆの食感がざらつかないことが記述されている。
また、特許文献2には、液体調味料の風味増強を目的として魚節粉末を添加する場合、魚節粉末は、累積50%径(50%D;メジアン径)が0.37μm以上5.5μm以下、かつ、累積90%径(90%D)が0.74μm以上19.7μm以下のものを使用することで、魚節粉末由来のざらつき感を抑制出来たとする旨が記述されている。
However, on the other hand, it is too hard to feel greasy in the mouth when eating, and there was also a side that is not necessarily good in terms of nodding.
Needless to say, it is preferable that the thickness of the cutting material is thin in order to improve the biting of the cutting material, and furthermore, that the mouthfeel changes depending on the angle of the cutting blade to the muscle fiber when cutting out the nodes It is also known (non-patent document 1). However, for example, it has not been possible to realize the mouthfeel like cotton candy and cream.
Therefore, in order to further improve the mouth feel, it may be considered that a cutting material with a finer particle size may be used.
For example, Patent Document 1 describes that the texture of a soup containing fish segment fine powder having a particle size of 50 μm or less is not rough.
Moreover, when adding fish node powder to the patent document 2 for the purpose of flavor enhancement of a liquid seasoning, a fish node powder has a 50% of a diameter (50% D; median diameter) is 0.37 micrometer or more and 5.5 micrometers or more. In the following, it is described that the graininess derived from fish node powder can be suppressed by using one having a cumulative 90% diameter (90% D) of 0.74 μm or more and 19.7 μm or less.

削りへのこだわり,横削り,ヤマキ株式会社,[2016.12.26検索],インターネットHP,http://www.yamaki.co.jp/kezuribushi/kodawari/kezuri/Commitment to shaving, side milling, Yamaki Co., Ltd., [2016.12.26 search], Internet HP, http://www.yamaki.co.jp/kezuribushi/kodawari/kezuri/

特許第3397936号公報Patent No. 3397936 gazette 特許第6045870号公報Patent No. 6045870 国際公開第2013/047839号International Publication No. 2013/047839

しかしながら上記特許文献1及び2に記載の技術は、つゆなどの液体中であらかじめ十分に分散した状態にある魚節粉末の粒度とざらつき感に関する知見であり、これら特許文献1や2で示されたような粒子径の粉砕物であったとしても、トッピング用途などで使用して直接食した場合には、必ずしも口どけが良好になるとは言えないという問題点があった。
加えて、上述のような微粉末の場合、粒径が非常に小さく体積も小さいため、料理のトッピングやふりかけ、おかかの主材料などとして使用する際に、適量を摘まみ上げたり、また、和えたりするといった、取り扱いやすさの点で、簡便とは言い難いという問題点もあった。
一方、口当たりを良好にするための他の手段として、対象に空気を含ませて密度を低くして、食感を改善することも考えられる。特許文献3には、チーズに含気させてその密度を1.0g/mL以下にすることで口どけを改善する方法が開示されている。しかしながらこの知見は魚肉加熱乾燥品よりも脂肪分が高いチーズに関するものであるとともに、切削せずに食する場合の知見でもあり、含気され密度が低いものを切削したとしても、口どけが良い切削物が得られるかは不明であった。
そこで、本発明においては、魚肉加熱乾燥品の切削物について、簡便にトッピングなどに用いることができる、口どけが良い切削物の提供を課題とする。
However, the techniques described in Patent Documents 1 and 2 above are findings on particle size and graininess of fish node powder in a state of being sufficiently dispersed in liquid such as soup, and the techniques described in these Patent Documents 1 and 2 Even if it is a pulverized material having such a particle diameter, there is a problem that it can not always be said that the mouth rest is good when directly eaten for use in topping applications and the like.
In addition, in the case of the fine powder as described above, the particle size is very small and the volume is also small, so when using it as a food topping or sprinkle, or as a main material for a dish, etc. There is also a problem that it is difficult to say that it is easy in terms of handling ease.
On the other hand, as another means for improving the mouth feel, it is also conceivable to improve the texture by including air in the object to reduce the density. Patent Document 3 discloses a method of improving mouthfeel by allowing a cheese to be aerated to have a density of 1.0 g / mL or less. However, this finding relates to cheese with a higher fat content than fish meat-dried products, and is also a finding in the case of eating without cutting, and even if it is cut with low air content and low density, the mouth rest is good It was unclear whether a cut could be obtained.
Therefore, in the present invention, it is an object of the present invention to provide a cut product which can be easily used as a topping and the like for a cut product of a dried fish meat dried product.

本発明者らは、鋭意研究の結果、魚肉加熱乾燥品の切削物の口どけを良好にするためには、切削物が以下の要件を有することが必要であることを見出し、本発明を完成するに至った。
即ち本発明は、魚肉加熱乾燥品から得られる切削物であって、
1)前記切削物を水に懸濁して得た懸濁液中の切削物の粒度が、メジアン径(50%D)0.35μm以上12μm以下、及び、累積90%径(90%D)0.4μm以上18μm以下であり、且つ
2)0.09g/mL以上0.268g/mL以下の嵩比重を有する、
前記切削物に関する。
また本発明は、前記魚肉加熱乾燥品は、カツオ又はマグロを原料とすることを特徴とする、前述の切削物に関する。
また本発明は、前記魚肉加熱乾燥品は、0MPa以上0.1MPa以下のもとで細断混合して得られるミンチ状魚肉を原料とすることを特徴とする、前述の切削物に関する。
また本発明は、前記ミンチ状魚肉は、調味料、結合剤及び酸化防止剤から成る群より選択される少なくとも1種が混合されたミンチ状魚肉であることを特徴とする、前述の切削物に関する。
また本発明は、前述の魚肉加熱乾燥品は、水分が5質量%以上26質量%以下であることを特徴とする、切削物にも関する。
また本発明は、前述の切削物を調味料で味付けしたおかかにも関する。
さらにまた本発明は、魚肉加熱乾燥品の切削物の製造方法であって、前記魚肉加熱乾燥品を、厚さ0.1mm以下の切削片を得る切削装置で切削した後に、粉砕して、目開きが直径10mm以下の篩を通過させることによって、下記1)及び2)の条件:
1)前記切削物を水に懸濁して得た懸濁液中の切削物の粒度が、メジアン径(50%D)0.35μm以上12μm以下、及び、累積90%径(90%D)0.4μm以上18μm以下であり、且つ
2)0.09g/mL以上0.268g/mL以下の嵩比重を有する;
を満たす切削物を得ることを特徴とする、前記魚肉加熱乾燥品の切削物の製造方法にも関する。
As a result of earnest research, the present inventors have found that in order to improve the finish of the dried fish meat-dried product, it is necessary for the cut material to have the following requirements, and the present invention has been completed. It came to
That is, the present invention is a cutting material obtained from fish meat heating and drying products,
1) The particle size of the cutting material in the suspension obtained by suspending the cutting material in water is: median diameter (50% D) 0.35 μm or more and 12 μm or less; and cumulative 90% diameter (90% D) 0 And has a bulk specific gravity of not less than 0.09 g / mL and not more than 0.268 g / mL.
It relates to the said cutting material.
Further, the present invention relates to the above-mentioned cutting material, wherein the above-mentioned fish meat heating and drying product is made from bonito or tuna as a raw material.
Further, the present invention relates to the above-mentioned cutting material, wherein the above-mentioned fish meat heating and drying product is characterized by using minced fish meat obtained by shredding and mixing under 0 MPa or more and 0.1 MPa or less as a raw material.
Further, the present invention relates to the above-mentioned cutting material, wherein the minced fish meat is minced fish meat mixed with at least one selected from the group consisting of a seasoning, a binder and an antioxidant. .
The present invention also relates to a cut material characterized in that the above-mentioned fish meat dried product has a moisture content of 5% by mass or more and 26% by mass or less.
The present invention also relates to a dish in which the above-mentioned cutting material is seasoned with a seasoning.
Furthermore, the present invention is a method for producing a cut product of a fish meat heat-dried product, wherein the fish meat heat-dried product is ground after being cut by a cutting device for obtaining a cut piece having a thickness of 0.1 mm or less By passing through a sieve having a diameter of 10 mm or less, the following conditions 1) and 2):
1) The particle size of the cutting material in the suspension obtained by suspending the cutting material in water is: median diameter (50% D) 0.35 μm or more and 12 μm or less; and cumulative 90% diameter (90% D) 0 .4 and not more than 18 .mu.m, and 2) having a bulk specific gravity of not less than 0.09 g / mL and not more than 0.268 g / mL;
The present invention also relates to a method for producing a cut product of the fish meat-dried product, which is characterized in that a cut product satisfying the above is obtained.

1)上記解決手段を見出した経緯
詳細は後述するが、鋭意研究の結果、切削物や粉砕物の口どけは、それらの粒子径と関係すると考えられた。
ここで、粒子径は粒度分布として示されることが多い。粒度分布は乾式篩法やレーザ回折法などで測定され、メジアン径(μm)(以後「50%D(μm)」という)や累積90%径(μm)(以後「90%D(μm)」という)という指標で表される。
50%Dや90%Dが小さいほど、粒度が小さいものの集団であることを示している。50%Dや90%Dの他、累積10%径(μm)を示す10%Dなどが用いられることもある。
我々は、魚肉加熱乾燥品の切削物の口どけを良好にするため、様々な切削物について粒度分布を測定しデータを収集していた。その中で、切削物の粒度分布は口どけの良し悪しとある程度は関連するものの、予想外にも、50%Dや90%Dが小さいものが、常に、口どけが良好になるとは限らないという結果を得た。
1) History of finding the above solution As will be described in detail later, as a result of earnest research, it was thought that the mouth of the cut or crushed material was related to the particle diameter of those.
Here, the particle size is often expressed as a particle size distribution. The particle size distribution is measured by a dry sieve method or a laser diffraction method, and the median diameter (μm) (hereinafter referred to as "50% D (μm)") and the cumulative 90% diameter (μm) (hereinafter referred to as "90% D (μm)") It is expressed by the indicator that
The smaller the 50% D or 90% D, the smaller the particle size, indicating that the group is. In addition to 50% D and 90% D, 10% D having a cumulative 10% diameter (μm) may be used.
We measured particle size distribution and collected data on various cuttings in order to improve the quality of the cuttings of fish heat-dried products. Among them, although the particle size distribution of the cutting material is related to some extent to the goodness and badness of the humming, unexpectedly, although 50% D and 90% D are small, the humming does not always become good I got the result.

ところで、粒度分布をレーザ回折によって測定する場合、測定対象試料を希釈して測定する場合がある。特に、測定対象試料が液状のW/Oエマルジョンなどの場合、希釈したことで、測定中に、経時的に、粒度分布が変化する懸念があることが知られている(高濃度サンプルを希釈せず測定するメリット,株式会社島津製作所,http://www.an.shimadzu.co.jp/powder/lecture/practice/p01/lesson29.htm)。
魚肉加熱乾燥品の切削物は固形物であるが、意外にも、切削物の粒度分布の測定中にこれが変化する現象を認める場合があった。
そこで、サンプルを水に希釈して測定を開始し、初期の段階で得られた粒度データ(以降、初期粒度(50%D)、初期粒度(90%D)という)と、水中に一定時間懸濁させた後の粒度データ(以後、懸濁後粒度(50%D)、懸濁後粒度(90%D)という)を収集したところ、初期粒度に比べて懸濁後粒度が小さくなる切削物と、小さくなったとしても一定値以下にはならない切削物と、ほとんど小さくならない切削物とに分類できることを見出し、このことが口どけの良し悪しと関係する可能性があることを見出したのである。
By the way, when measuring particle size distribution by laser diffraction, it may dilute and measure a sample for measurement. In particular, when the sample to be measured is a liquid W / O emulsion or the like, it is known that there is a concern that the particle size distribution may change over time during measurement due to dilution (dilution of high concentration sample) Merit to measure, Shimadzu Corporation, http://www.an.shimadzu.co.jp/powder/lecture/practice/p01/lesson29.htm).
Although the cut product of the fish meat dried product is a solid, it was unexpectedly found that this phenomenon may change during the measurement of the particle size distribution of the cut product.
Therefore, the sample is diluted in water and measurement is started, and the particle size data obtained in the initial stage (hereinafter referred to as initial particle size (50% D), initial particle size (90% D)) When the particle size data after turbidity (hereinafter referred to as the particle size after suspension (50% D), the particle size after suspension (90% D)) is collected, the cutting material whose particle size after suspension is smaller than the initial particle size They found that they could be classified into cuttings that did not fall below a certain value even if they became smaller and cuttings that didn't get much smaller, and that they could have something to do with good and bad mouthing .

そしてさらに検討を進めた結果、口どけは、切削する前の魚肉加熱乾燥品の密度に関係するというよりは、魚肉加熱乾燥品を切削した後の切削物の嵩比重の低さに関係する可能性があることも見出されたのである。
この結果、懸濁後粒度(50%D)および懸濁後粒度(90%D)がそれぞれ一定値以下であり、かつ、切削物の嵩比重が一定値以下であることを同時に満たすことが、口どけの良い切削物であるために必要であることを見出した。また、初期粒度が一定値以上であればさらに確実に口どけの良い切削物と認識される可能性があるとも思われた。
またこれらの可能性は、特にカツオやマグロ由来の魚肉加熱乾燥品を、特定の切削・粉砕方法で得た切削物について、特に強く認められた。
以下、2)実験 の部にて、上記知見をより具体的に説明する。
And as a result of further investigation, it is possible to relate the low specific gravity of the cut material after cutting the fish heat dried product, rather than related to the density of the fish heat dried product before cutting It was also found that there was sex.
As a result, simultaneously satisfying that the particle size after suspension (50% D) and the particle size after suspension (90% D) are respectively equal to or less than a predetermined value and the bulk specific gravity of the cut object is equal to or less than a predetermined value I found it necessary to be a good cutting material. Moreover, it was also considered that if the initial particle size is equal to or more than a certain value, it may be recognized more reliably as a mouth-watering cutting material.
Moreover, these possibilities were particularly strongly recognized for cut products obtained by heat-drying dried fish meat derived from bonito and tuna, in particular, by a specific cutting and crushing method.
The above findings will be more specifically described below in the section of 2) Experiment.

2)上記知見を見出した実験
≪実験方法≫
<切削物の試作方法>
カツオ、マグロ、タラなどを原料として数種類の魚肉加熱乾燥品を作成し、切削し、粉砕して(場合によっては切削のみ行って)、篩を通過させて、試作物(S1〜S12)を得た。S1からS12までは表1のように試作した。

Figure 2018174724

2) Experiment that finds out the above findings «Experimental method»
<Prototype method of cutting material>
Several kinds of fish meat heating and drying products are prepared using bonito, tuna, cod etc. as raw materials, cut and crushed (in some cases, only cutting) and passed through a sieve to obtain prototypes (S1 to S12). The S1 to S12 were prototyped as shown in Table 1.
Figure 2018174724

<測定方法>
<魚肉加熱乾燥品の密度の測定方法>
魚肉加熱乾燥品(切削前)の密度は、質量を測定するとともに、ガラスビーズを用いた体積置換法にて体積を測定して、密度を求めた。
<Measurement method>
<Method of measuring the density of dried fish meat>
The density of the dried fish meat (before cutting) was determined by measuring the volume and measuring the volume by a volume displacement method using glass beads, as well as measuring the mass.

<粒度分布の測定方法>
切削サンプルの粒度分布の測定は(株)島津製作所社製レーザ回折式粒子径分布測定装置SALD−3000Sを用いて測定した。粒度分布は、試料展開用の溶媒として蒸留水をセットした分散槽へ試料を投与して測定する。レーザ回折・散乱法を用いた粒子径分布の測定では、試料濃度は光強度が適正に得られる範囲であればよく、数10〜数100ppmで測定する。測定により粒度分布データと共に10%D(μm)、50%D(μm)、90%D(μm)値が得られる。
<Method of measuring particle size distribution>
The measurement of the particle size distribution of the cutting sample was measured using a laser diffraction particle size distribution measuring device SALD-3000S manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation. The particle size distribution is measured by administering a sample to a dispersion tank in which distilled water is set as a solvent for sample development. In the measurement of particle size distribution using the laser diffraction / scattering method, the sample concentration may be in the range where light intensity can be properly obtained, and is measured in several tens to several hundreds ppm. The measurements give 10% D (μm), 50% D (μm), 90% D (μm) values together with the particle size distribution data.

<初期粒度分布の測定>
試料を分散漕に投与し3分以内に粒度分布を測定し、得られた50%Dおよび90%Dをそれぞれ、初期粒度(50%D)および初期粒度(90%D)とした。
<懸濁後粒度分布の測定>
試料を分散槽内に投与し5分間以上10分間以内の間懸濁させた後に粒度分布を測定し、得られた50%Dおよび90%Dを、それぞれ、懸濁後粒度(50%D)および懸濁後粒度(90%D)とした。
<Measurement of initial particle size distribution>
The sample was administered to a dispersion vessel and the particle size distribution was measured within 3 minutes, and the obtained 50% D and 90% D were respectively taken as the initial particle size (50% D) and the initial particle size (90% D).
<Measurement of particle size distribution after suspension>
The sample is administered into the dispersion tank and suspended for 5 minutes or more and 10 minutes or less, and the particle size distribution is measured, and the obtained 50% D and 90% D, respectively, the particle size after suspension (50% D) And particle size after suspension (90% D).

<口どけの評価>
口どけについては、削りぶしの開発に従事する専門パネル4名によって官能評価した。各試作物を0.2g程度口に含み、口どけ感を4段階(0:口どけ感が良好ではない、1:口どけ感が良好であるとも良好でないともいえない、2:口どけ感が良好である、3:口どけ感が大変良好である)で評価し平均値を求めた。平均値が0以上0.75未満を×、0.75以上1.5未満を△、1.5以上2.25未満を○、2.25以上〜3以下を◎で示した。したがって、○もしくは◎であれば、口どけは良好であることを示している。
<Evaluation of mouth-to-mouth>
The garnish was sensory evaluated by four expert panels engaged in the development of shavings. Each prototype contains about 0.2g of mouth, and there are 4 steps of mouthfeel (0: not good for mouthfeel, 1: not good for mouthfeel or not good, 2: 2: mouthfeel) Is good, 3: the feeling of biting is very good. The average value is 0 or more and less than 0.75, ×, 0.75 or more and less than 1.5, Δ, 1.5 or more and less than 2.25 as ○, and 2.25 or more and 3 or less as ◎. Therefore, if it is ◎ or 口, it indicates that the mouth rest is good.

<摘まみ上げやすさの評価>
摘まみ上げやすさについては、各試作物0.5g程度を箸で摘まみとり醤油を数mL滴下して和え、掴みとりやすさや和えやすさという観点で総合的に評価した。評価は市販のカツオパックをコントロール(3点)とした相対評価により、0〜3点の4段階(0:またっく摘まみ上げられない、1:コントロールと比べて摘まみ上げにくい、2:コントロールよりは摘まみ上げにくいが許容である、3:コントロールと同じ程度の摘まみ上げやすさである)で行い、平均値を求めた(パネルは4名)。平均値が0以上1未満を×、1以上2未満を△、2以上3以下を○で示した。したがって、○であれば、摘まみ上げやすさは良好であることを示している。
<Evaluation of ease of picking up>
The ease of picking and picking up was about 0.5 g of each prototype with a broom and dripped with several mL of soy sauce and mixed, and it was comprehensively evaluated in terms of ease of gripping and ease of mixing. According to the relative evaluation with the commercially available bonito pack as a control (3 points), 0 to 3 points (0: can not be picked up again, 1: is difficult to pick up compared to a control, 2 :: It was harder to pick up than the control, but it was acceptable (3: it was as easy to pick up as the control), and the average value was determined (4 people panel). The average value was 0 or more and less than 1 as x, 1 or more and less than 2 as Δ, and 2 or more and 3 or less as ○. Therefore, if ○, it indicates that the ease of picking up is good.

≪結果≫
≪表2の説明≫
表2に、上記の試作物それぞれの、(ア)原料魚、(イ)原料魚肉の調整方法、(ウ)加熱・乾燥方法、(エ)魚肉加熱乾燥品(切削前)の密度(g/mL)、(オ)切削物の調整方法、(カ)切削物の初期粒度(50%D(μm)および90%D(μm))、(キ)切削物の口どけ評価結果、(ク)切削物の摘まみ上げやすさの評価結果を示す。

Figure 2018174724

«Results»
«Description of Table 2»
Table 2 shows the (a) raw material fish, (i) raw material fish preparation method, (c) heating and drying method, and (d) density of dried and dried fish meat (before cutting) (g / m) of each of the above-mentioned prototypes. mL), (E) Preparation method of cutting material, (F) Initial particle size of cutting material (50% D (μm) and 90% D (μm)), (G) Evaluation result of cutting edge, (G) The evaluation results of the ease of picking up the cutting material are shown.
Figure 2018174724

<結果と考察>
前述のとおり、特許文献2の記載によれば、液体調味料の風味増強を目的として魚節粉末を添加する場合、魚節粉末は50%Dが0.37μm以上5.5μm以下、かつ、90%Dが0.74μm以上19.7μm以下のものを使用することで、魚節粉末由来のざらつき感を抑制出来たとされていることから、粒度が小さいものほど口どけは良くなると考えられてきた。
<Results and Discussion>
As described above, according to the description of Patent Document 2, when adding fish node powder for the purpose of enhancing the flavor of liquid seasoning, the fish node powder has a 50% D of 0.37 μm or more and 5.5 μm or less, and 90 It is thought that the smaller the particle size is, the better the mouth rest will be, since it is said that the graininess derived from fish node powder could be suppressed by using the one having% D of 0.74 μm or more and 19.7 μm or less. .

しかしながら、切削物を直接的に食した場合、例えば、試作物S2の口どけ評価と初期粒度(50%D)=1.07μm、初期粒度(90%D)=1.63μmの結果からも分かるとおり、より小さいものが必ずしも口どけが良いという結果にはならなかった。   However, when the cutting material is eaten directly, for example, it can be understood from the results of evaluation of the prototype S2 in terms of mouthfeel and initial particle size (50% D) = 1.07 μm and initial particle size (90% D) = 1.63 μm. Yes, smaller ones did not necessarily result in good mouths.

粒度を小さくしさえすれば口どけが良好になるわけではないことは、試作物S8、S9、S10を比較しても示された。すなわち、S8、S9、S10は、この順でより細かい粒子径の粉砕物が得られるように試作したものであり、初期粒度(50%D)も初期粒度(90%D)もこの順で小さくなっている。しかしながら、粒度が細かいほど口どけ感がとりわけ良くなるというわけではなかった。   It has also been shown by comparing the prototypes S8, S9, S10 that even if the particle size is reduced, the improvement in mouthfeel will not be good. That is, S8, S9, and S10 are prototyped to obtain a pulverized material having a finer particle diameter in this order, and both the initial particle size (50% D) and the initial particle size (90% D) are small in this order It has become. However, the finer the particle size, the better not to feel particularly bad.

また、試作物S11は、その初期粒度(50%D、90%Dともに)がS10の初期粒度よりも大きいにもかかわらず、口どけはS11のほうが良好であった。
他にも、S5とS9などの比較においても同様の結果が観察された。S9方がS5よりも初期粒度(50%D)および初期粒度(90%D)は小さいにもかからず、口どけはS9のほうが悪かった。
したがって、粒度を小さくするだけでは、口どけ感を直接的に向上させることは困難であることが明らかとなった。
In addition, although the initial particle size (both 50% D and 90% D) of the prototype S11 was larger than the initial particle size of S10, the texture was better in S11.
Besides, similar results were observed in comparison of S5 and S9. Although S9 had smaller initial particle size (50% D) and initial particle size (90% D) than S5, mouth noise was worse in S9.
Therefore, it was revealed that it is difficult to directly improve the feeling of hump just by reducing the particle size.

さらにまた、特許文献3によれば、含気させてチーズの密度を1.0g/mL以下にすることで口どけが改善されるとされているが、表2(エ)の魚肉加熱乾燥品(切削前)の密度に示すとおり、試作物S2やS9の試作に供した魚肉加熱乾燥品(切削前)は、密度が1.0g/mL以下であったにもかかわらず、これら切削物の口どけが良好であるとは認められなかった。   Furthermore, according to Patent Document 3, it is said that by setting the density of the cheese at 1.0 g / mL or less by aeration, the mouth rest is improved, but the dried fish meat of Table 2 (d) As shown in the density (before cutting), the fish meat-heated dried product (before cutting) used for trial production of the prototypes S2 and S9 had a density of 1.0 g / mL or less. It was not recognized that the mouth rest was good.

そこで、各試作物について、数10〜数100質量ppm濃度で水に5分以上10分以内の間懸濁して得られた懸濁液の液中の切削物の粒度を測定した。結果を表2内の(ケ)切削物の水への懸濁時間および懸濁後粒度の項に、懸濁させていた時間、懸濁後粒度(50%D)、懸濁後粒度(90%D)を示す。さらにまた、各試作物の嵩比重(g/mL)の測定結果を表2(コ)切削物嵩比重の項に示す。   Therefore, for each prototype, the particle size of the cutting material in the liquid of the suspension obtained by suspending in water at a concentration of several tens to several hundreds mass ppm for not less than 10 minutes was measured. The results are shown in Table 2. Suspension time in water of (f) cuttings and particle size after suspension, suspension time, particle size after suspension (50% D), particle size after suspension (90) % D) is shown. Furthermore, the measurement result of the bulk specific gravity (g / mL) of each prototype is shown in the term of Table 2 (co) cut material bulk specific gravity.

ここで一例として試作物S5を取り上げると、S5は次のような特徴を有することを示している。すなわち、初期粒度(50%D)=216.23μm、初期粒度(90%D)=377.97μmであるが、口どけ評価は◎(口どけ感として大変良好)であり、摘まみ上げやすさは○であり、9.85分間懸濁させた後の懸濁液中の粒子の粒度については、懸濁後粒度(50%D)=6.50μm、懸濁後粒度(90%D)=9.71μmのように小さくなり、かつ、切削物の嵩比重は0.149g/mLであった、ということを示している。   Here, taking the prototype S5 as an example, it is shown that S5 has the following features. That is, although the initial particle size (50% D) = 216.23 μm and the initial particle size (90% D) = 377.97 μm, the mouth drop evaluation is ◎ (very good as a mouth feel), and it is easy to pick up Is ○, and the particle size of the particles in the suspension after suspension for 9.85 minutes, the particle size after suspension (50% D) = 6.50 μm, the particle size after suspension (90% D) = It shows that it became as small as 9.71 micrometers and the bulk specific gravity of the cutting material was 0.149 g / mL.

各試作物の懸濁後粒度を調べると、懸濁後粒度においても、粒度が小さければ口どけが良いという結果にはならなかった。試作物S2は懸濁後粒度(50%D)=0.32μmおよび懸濁後粒度(90%D)=0.39μmと非常に細かいものであったにもかかわらず、口どけが良いとは評価されなかった。試作物S10の懸濁後粒度は、懸濁後粒度(50%D)=1.13μmおよび懸濁後粒度(90%D)=1.72μmであったにもかかわらず、口どけが良いとは評価されなかった。   When the particle size after suspension of each prototype was examined, even with the particle size after suspension, smaller particle sizes did not result in good mouthfeel. Although the prototype S2 is very fine with a particle size after suspension (50% D) = 0.32 μm and a particle size after suspension (90% D) = 0.39 μm, it is said that it has good mouthfeel It was not evaluated. The post-suspension particle size of the prototype S10 was good after all in spite of the post-suspension particle size (50% D) = 1.13 μm and the post-suspension particle size (90% D) = 1.72 μm. Was not evaluated.

しかしながら、口どけ評価が「◎」もしくは「○」と評価された試作物S1、S3、S5、S6、S7、S11を詳細に見ると、これらは、懸濁後粒度(50%D)が12μm以下であるということと、懸濁後粒度(90%D)が18μm以下であるということ、そしてさらに切削物の嵩比重が0.268g/mL以下であるということを同時に満たしているという共通性が見出された。   However, looking at the prototypes S1, S3, S5, S6, S7, and S11, which have been evaluated as "◎" or "○", their post-suspension particle size (50% D) is 12 μm. The commonality that the following conditions are satisfied, the particle size after suspension (90% D) is 18 μm or less, and the bulk specific gravity of the cutting material is 0.268 g / mL or less at the same time Was found.

懸濁後粒度について、50%Dが12μm以下、90%Dが18μm以下であることが必要であることは、50%Dが12.01以上、90%Dが18.39以上の場合に、試作物の口どけ評価は必ず「△」か「×」と評価されることから示唆された。なお、より好ましい範囲としては50%Dは0.35μm以上12μm以下、90%Dは0.4μm以上18μm以下であり、さらに好ましい範囲は50%Dは0.35μm以上7μm以下、90%Dは0.4μm以上10μm以下であることが認められた。
また、切削物の嵩比重が0.268g/mL以下が必要であることは、この値よりも大きい場合に、口どけは必ず「△」か「×」と評価されることから示唆された。なお、切削物の嵩比重が0.25g/mL以下であればより確実に好ましいと認められた。
As for the particle size after suspension, it is necessary that 50% D is 12 μm or less and 90% D is 18 μm or less, when 50% D is 12.01 or more and 90% D is 18.39 or more. It is suggested that the evaluation of taste of prototypes is always evaluated as "△" or "×". As a more preferable range, 50% D is 0.35 μm or more and 12 μm or less, 90% D is 0.4 μm or more and 18 μm or less, and a further more preferable range is 50% D is 0.35 μm or more and 7 μm or less, 90% D It was found to be 0.4 μm or more and 10 μm or less.
In addition, it is suggested that the mouthpiece is always evaluated as "Δ" or "×" if the bulk specific gravity of the cutting material is required to be 0.268 g / mL or less, if the value is larger than this value. In addition, if the bulk specific gravity of a cut object is 0.25 g / mL or less, it was recognized as preferable more reliably.

そこで、表2では、懸濁後粒度(50%D)と懸濁後粒度(90%D)について、それぞれ12μm以下、18μm以下である箇所を網掛け表示した。さらに、切削物嵩比重が0.268g/mL以下である箇所に網掛け表示した。つまり、各試作物ごとに、懸濁後粒度(50%D)、懸濁後粒度(90%D)、および切削物嵩比重の3つが全てが網掛けされているものだけが、口どけ評価結果が◎もしくは○と認められたということを示している。
これに対して、試作物S2、S4、S8、S9、S10、S12は口どけ評価は△もしくは×であり、表2の(ケ)の懸濁後粒度(50%D)および懸濁後粒度(90%D)と、(コ)切削物嵩比重のいずれか、もしくは複数が、網掛けされていない状態、すなわち、上記条件のいずれか、もしくは複数を満たしていない状態であったことが分かる。
以上のことから、切削物の懸濁後粒度(50%D)が12μm以下であり、かつ、懸濁後粒度(90%D)が18μm以下であり、かつ、切削物嵩比重が0.268g/mL以下であることの全てを満たすことで、口どけの良好な切削物となることが明らかとなった。
Therefore, in Table 2, the portions having a particle size after suspension (50% D) and a particle size after suspension (90% D) of 12 μm or less and 18 μm or less, respectively, are shaded. Furthermore, it displayed by hatching in the location whose cutting material bulk specific gravity is 0.268 g / mL or less. That is, for each prototype, only those in which all three of the particle size after suspension (50% D), the particle size after suspension (90% D), and the bulk specific gravity of cut material are shaded It indicates that the result was recognized as ◎ or ○.
On the other hand, in the prototypes S2, S4, S8, S9, S10 and S12, the mouthfeel evaluation is Δ or ×, and the post-suspended particle size (50% D) and post-suspended particle size of (f) in Table 2 It can be seen that (90% D) and / or (k) cutting material bulk specific gravity is in a non-shaded state, that is, it is in a state in which one or more of the above conditions are not satisfied. .
From the above, the particle size after suspension (50% D) of the cutting material is 12 μm or less, and the particle size after suspension (90% D) is 18 μm or less, and the bulk specific gravity of the cutting material is 0.268 g It became clear that it becomes a good cutting material of mouth rest by satisfying all that it is / mL or less.

なお、初期粒度を加味すれば、より確実に口どけ感が良好で、また、摘まみ上げやすい切削物を得ることができると思われる。一般に、口どけ感は、粒子の大きなものが小さくなった時に、より口どけを感じるとも考えられる。また粒子の大きいものの方がより摘まみ上げやすい。そこで、切削物の初期粒度について、初期粒度(50%D)が70μm以上、もしくは、初期粒度(90%D)が140μm以上であれば、より確実に口どけ感を良好にでき、また、摘まみ上げやすさなども向上すると思われる。   It should be noted that if the initial particle size is taken into consideration, it is believed that it is possible to more surely obtain a mouth feel better and to obtain a cutting material that is easy to pick up. In general, it is thought that the feeling of mouthfeel is more pronounced when the large particles become smaller. Also, larger particles are easier to pick up. Therefore, with regard to the initial particle size of the cutting material, if the initial particle size (50% D) is 70 μm or more, or the initial particle size (90% D) is 140 μm or more, a good mouth feel can be achieved more reliably, and the pluck It seems that the ease of mowing up will also improve.

前記ミンチ状魚肉には、調味料を混合することも可能である。
上記の試作物S7は、魚肉に3質量%の食塩と3質量%のグルタミン酸ナトリウムを添加して試作したものである。一般に、2〜3質量%程度の食塩が添加されて混合された魚肉は、ゲル強度が高まることが知られている。つまり試作物S7の結果は、ゲル強度が高まるような物質であるところの食塩が添加されたミンチ状魚肉を用いて作られた魚肉加熱乾燥品の切削物であっても、上記口どけ感を向上させる要素が適用できることを示している。したがって、例えば、トランスグルタミナーゼのような結着剤をミンチ状魚肉に混合した場合にも本技術は適用可能である。トランスグルタミナーゼのような結着剤の使用量としては、魚肉に対して、トランスグルタミナーゼ製剤として0.2〜0.4質量%程度であることが知られている。また、さとうや醤油など、魚肉のゲル強度に対して食塩ほど影響を与えない他の調味料をミンチ状魚肉に添加したとしても、本条件を満たすことで口どけ感は向上する。さらにまた、本発明において、前記ミンチ状魚肉には、変色・風味劣化防止のため、酸化防止剤を添加することもできる。使用できる酸化防止剤は、食品用途であればよく、ビタミンCやビタミンE等を挙げることができる。使用量としては酸化を防止しうる量であればよく、対象の脂肪量に従って調整される。
It is also possible to mix seasonings with the minced fish meat.
The above prototype S7 is produced by adding 3% by mass of sodium chloride and 3% by mass of sodium glutamate to fish meat. Generally, it is known that fish meat mixed with 2 to 3% by mass of sodium chloride added has higher gel strength. That is, the result of the prototype S7 is that the above-mentioned feeling of mouth movement is felt even if it is a cut product of a fish heat-dried product made using minced fish meat to which sodium chloride, which is a substance that increases gel strength, is added. It indicates that the elements to be improved can be applied. Therefore, for example, the present technology is applicable also when a binding agent such as transglutaminase is mixed with minced fish meat. As a usage-amount of binding agents like transglutaminase, it is known with respect to fish meat that it is about 0.2-0.4 mass% as a transglutaminase preparation. Also, even if other seasonings, such as sugar and soy sauce, which have less influence on the gel strength of fish meat than salt, are added to the minced fish meat, the mouthfeeling feeling is improved by satisfying this condition. Furthermore, in the present invention, an antioxidant can be added to the minced fish meat to prevent discoloration and flavor deterioration. The antioxidant which can be used should just be food use, and vitamin C, vitamin E, etc. can be mentioned. The amount used may be any amount that can prevent oxidation, and is adjusted according to the fat content of the subject.

切削に供する魚肉加熱乾燥品について、試作物S5、S6、S7の結果からミンチ状魚肉は0MPa以上0.1MPa以下のもとで細断混合した魚肉を用いれば、さらに確実に口どけの良い切削物が得られることが判明した。ミンチ状魚肉を0MPa以上0.1MPa下で細断混合するには、例えば、真空細断混合装置などが使用できる。大気圧下(0.1MPa)で細断混合したカツオのミンチを使用した試作物S1と、真空細断混合装置を使用して0.02MPaで細断混合したカツオのミンチを使用した試作物S6を比べると、切削・粉砕方法は同一で、初期粒度も同程度であるが、懸濁後粒度および切削物嵩比重については、試作物S6の方がより小さく、口どけも好ましいと評価された。
なお、魚肉加熱乾燥品は、その水分が、当該乾燥品の質量に基づき5質量%以上26質量%以下であることが望ましい。水分5質量%未満では切削時の歩留りが低下してしまうおそれがあり、他方、26質量%を超える場合は、魚肉加熱乾燥品における微生物繁殖が懸念されるためである。
According to the results of prototypes S5, S6, and S7, the heat-dried fish meat to be cut is minced fish meat, which can be cut with even better firmness by using fish meat chopped and mixed under 0 MPa or more and 0.1 MPa or less It turned out that a thing was obtained. In order to shredded minced fish meat under 0 MPa or more and under 0.1 MPa, for example, a vacuum shredder mixing device can be used. A prototype S1 using bonito minced chopped under atmospheric pressure (0.1 MPa) and a prototype S6 using bonito minced shredded at 0.02 MPa using a vacuum shredder mixing device Although the method of cutting and crushing was the same, and the initial particle size was also comparable, the particle size after suspension and the bulk specific gravity of the cut object were evaluated to be smaller for the prototype S6, and the mouth rest was preferable. .
In addition, as for the fish meat heat-dried goods, it is desirable for the water | moisture content to be 5 mass% or more and 26 mass% or less based on the mass of the said dried goods. If the water content is less than 5% by mass, the yield at the time of cutting may be reduced. On the other hand, if the water content exceeds 26% by mass, microbial growth in a fish meat-dried product may be concerned.

ミンチ状魚肉を得るため魚肉を細断混合するときに脱気することが有効である理由は明らかではないが、空気が含まれた状態で魚肉を細断した場合、魚肉中での空気の存在が魚肉の細断混合を妨げる要素になっているとも考えられる。つまり、魚肉のかたまりを、空気がより含まれない状態で細断することで、魚肉は擂り潰されるように細断混合され、結果、魚肉粒子は小さくなり、ざらつき感のより少ないものになると考えられる。   The reason why degassing when shredding fish meat to obtain minced fish meat is effective is unclear, but when shredded fish meat with air included, the presence of air in the fish meat Is considered to be an impediment to shredding of fish meat. In other words, by chopping fish meat in a state containing less air, fish meat is shredded and mixed so as to be crushed, and as a result, it is thought that fish meat particles become smaller and graininess becomes smaller. Be

切削物の製造にあたっては、試作物S1、S3、S5、S6、S7、S11の結果から、前記切削物は、厚さ0.1mm以下の切削片を得る切削装置で切削した後に、カッターミルで粉砕して、目開きが直径10mm以下の篩を通過させることで、より一層、確実に口どけの良い切削物が得られることが判明した。
厚さ0.1mm以下の切削片を得る切削装置としては、いわゆる「削りぶし薄削り」を製造する装置の鉋刃について、厚さ0.1mm以下の切削物を得るように調整することで切削に使用することができる。
From the results of the prototypes S1, S3, S5, S6, S7 and S11, the cut material is cut by a cutting machine which obtains a cut piece having a thickness of 0.1 mm or less, and then it is cut by a cutter mill. It was found that by grinding and passing through a sieve having an opening of 10 mm or less in diameter, it is possible to obtain a more clearly cut material with a clear mouth.
As a cutting device for obtaining a cutting piece having a thickness of 0.1 mm or less, the cutting blade of the device for producing a so-called "shaving and thinning" is adjusted to obtain a cutting object having a thickness of 0.1 mm or less. It can be used.

粉砕装置としてはカッターミルが好適である。カッターミルとは、鋭いカッターなどを取り付けたロータを高速回転させて、せん断力あるいは切断力によって破砕・粉砕を行う装置であり、対象物をカッターで切るように破砕するため、遠心力で円周方向に移動する間にピンによる衝撃力で粉砕する「ピンミル」のような衝撃方式のミルと異なり、引きちぎりや叩きつけが少ないことから、粉の発生が比較的少ない粗砕物が得られることが知られている。この点で、破砕後の形状を粉末形状とさせずに破砕片を効率よく得ることができるカッターミルが、粉砕には好ましい。
その後、製品の粒度を整えるために、篩を通過させる。篩の目のサイズは10mm以下であればよいが、あまりに細かすぎると、粉末のみの製品となってしまい、簡便に摘まみ上げるなどの利便性が損なわれる。
A cutter mill is suitable as a grinding device. A cutter mill is a device that performs high-speed rotation of a rotor equipped with a sharp cutter, etc., and performs crushing / crushing by shear force or cutting force. Unlike impact-type mills, such as “pin mills,” which are crushed by the impact force of a pin while moving in the direction, they are known to be able to obtain coarse fragments with relatively little generation of powder due to less tearing and tapping. It is done. In this respect, a cutter mill capable of efficiently obtaining crushed pieces without making the shape after crushing into powder shape is preferable for crushing.
Thereafter, it is passed through a sieve to adjust the particle size of the product. The size of the sieve may be 10 mm or less, but if it is too fine, it will be a product of powder only, and convenience such as picking up easily is lost.

切削物の利用方法としては、そのまま食することはもちろんのこと、上記条件を満たす魚肉加熱乾燥品の切削物を用いて製造された「おかか」においても、口どけは良好になる。   As a method of using a cut, not only eating as it is, but also in "Fly" manufactured using a cut of a heated and dried fish meat satisfying the above-mentioned condition, the mouth rest becomes good.

本発明によれば、従来のものよりも口どけのよい魚肉加熱乾燥品の切削物、及びその製造方法を得ることが出来るという効果を奏している。   ADVANTAGE OF THE INVENTION According to this invention, it is effective in the ability to obtain the cut material of a heat-dried fish-mealed product which has a better mouth feel than the conventional thing, and its manufacturing method.

図1は、実施例1の切削物についての初期粒度分布及び懸濁後粒度分布を表すグラフである。FIG. 1 is a graph showing the initial particle size distribution and the particle size distribution after suspension for the cutting material of Example 1. 図2は、実施例2の切削物についての初期粒度分布及び懸濁後粒度分布を表すグラフである。FIG. 2 is a graph showing the initial particle size distribution and the particle size distribution after suspension for the cutting material of Example 2. 図3は、実施例3の切削物についての初期粒度分布及び懸濁後粒度分布を表すグラフである。FIG. 3 is a graph showing the initial particle size distribution and the particle size distribution after suspension for the cutting material of Example 3. 図4は、実施例4の切削物についての初期粒度分布及び懸濁後粒度分布を表すグラフである。FIG. 4 is a graph showing the initial particle size distribution and the particle size distribution after suspension for the cutting material of Example 4. 図5は、実施例5の切削物についての初期粒度分布及び懸濁後粒度分布を表すグラフである。FIG. 5 is a graph showing the initial particle size distribution and the particle size distribution after suspension for the cutting material of Example 5. 図6は、比較例1の切削物についての初期粒度分布及び懸濁後粒度分布を表すグラフである。FIG. 6 is a graph showing the initial particle size distribution and the particle size distribution after suspension for the cutting material of Comparative Example 1. 図7は、比較例2の切削物についての初期粒度分布及び懸濁後粒度分布を表すグラフである。FIG. 7 is a graph showing the initial particle size distribution and the particle size distribution after suspension for the cutting material of Comparative Example 2. 図8(a)は、実施例6の切削物についての初期粒度分布及び懸濁後粒度分布を表すグラフであり、図8(b)は、市販の削りぶしについての初期粒度分布及び懸濁後粒度分布を表すグラフである。Fig. 8 (a) is a graph showing the initial particle size distribution and the particle size distribution after suspension for the cutting material of Example 6, and Fig. 8 (b) is the initial particle size distribution and particle size after suspension for a commercially available shaving material. It is a graph showing distribution.

以下、各実施例について説明する。
実施例1(実施例品1の作成と評価)
<切削物の試作方法および評価方法>
カツオの肉部を大気圧下で10分間細断混合し、得られたミンチ肉を5cm×3cm×3cm程度に形成し、95±3℃で30分間加熱し、その後焙乾して、水分9.55%の鰹肉加熱乾燥品を得た。
これを、切削を良好に行う目的および表面殺菌する目的で110±10℃で10分間加熱した。その後、厚さ0.1mm以下の切削物を得ることができる切削装置で切削し、得られた切削片について、カッターミルを用いて粉砕し、目開き5mmの篩を通過させて、「実施例品1」とした。
得られた実施例品1の初期粒度分布及び懸濁後粒度分布についてのグラフを、図1に示す。なお図中、横軸は粒子径(μm)を対数表示で示しており、棒グラフは各粒子径の頻度(%)を表し、左側縦軸によって値が示される。また折れ線グラフは各粒子径の頻度の積算(%)を表し、右側縦軸によって値が示される。また粒子径10μmの位置にy軸に平行な破線を付した(以降、図2〜図8において同じ)。
Each embodiment will be described below.
Example 1 (creation and evaluation of example product 1)
<Prototype method and evaluation method of cutting material>
The bonito meat portion is shredded and mixed under atmospheric pressure for 10 minutes, and the obtained minced meat is formed into about 5 cm × 3 cm × 3 cm, heated at 95 ± 3 ° C. for 30 minutes, and then dried to dryness; A heat-dried product of .55% minced meat was obtained.
This was heated at 110 ± 10 ° C. for 10 minutes for the purpose of good cutting and surface sterilization. After that, cutting is performed using a cutting device capable of obtaining a cut object having a thickness of 0.1 mm or less, and the obtained cutting piece is crushed using a cutter mill and passed through a sieve with a 5 mm opening. Product 1 ".
A graph of the initial particle size distribution and the particle size distribution after suspension of the obtained example product 1 is shown in FIG. In the figure, the horizontal axis indicates the particle diameter (μm) in logarithm, the bar graph indicates the frequency (%) of each particle diameter, and the value is indicated by the left vertical axis. The line graph represents the integration (%) of the frequency of each particle diameter, and the value is indicated by the right vertical axis. Moreover, the broken line parallel to the y-axis was attached to the position of 10 micrometers of particle diameters (following, the same in FIGS. 2-8).

得られた実施例品1の初期粒度と懸濁後粒度のそれぞれの粒度分布グラフ、10%D(μm)、50%D(μm)、90%D(μm)は図1に示したとおり、懸濁後粒度(50%D)は12μm以下であり、懸濁後粒度(90%D)は18μm以下である。また、切削物の嵩比重は0.242g/mLであり、0.268g/mL以下である。
得られた1の口どけ感評価を前記<実験>と同様に官能評価した。
<結果>
官能評価の結果、口どけ評価は「○」と評され、口どけは良好であった。摘まみ上げやすさも「○」と評され良好であった。
As shown in FIG. 1, the particle size distribution graph, 10% D (μm), 50% D (μm) and 90% D (μm) of each of the initial particle size and the particle size after suspension of the obtained Example 1 The post-suspension particle size (50% D) is less than 12 μm and the post-suspension particle size (90% D) is less than 18 μm. Moreover, the bulk specific gravity of a cutting material is 0.242 g / mL, and is 0.268 g / mL or less.
The mouth feel evaluation of the obtained 1 was sensory-evaluated similarly to the above-mentioned <experiment>.
<Result>
As a result of the sensory evaluation, the evaluation of mouthfeel was rated as "o", and the feeling of mouth palate was good. Ease of picking was also described as "○" and was good.

実施例2(実施例品2の作成と評価)
<切削物の試作方法および評価方法>
マグロの肉部を原料として、「実施例品1」と同様に作成し、「実施例品2」とした。
得られた実施例品2の初期粒度と懸濁後粒度のそれぞれの粒度分布グラフ、10%D(μm)、50%D(μm)、90%D(μm)は図2に示したとおり、懸濁後粒度(50%D)は12μm以下であり、懸濁後粒度(90%D)は18μm以下である。また、切削物の嵩比重は0.105g/mLであり、0.268g/mL以下である。
得られた実施例品2の口どけ感評価を前記<実験>と同様に官能評価した。
<結果>
官能評価の結果、口どけ評価は「○」と評され、口どけは良好であった。摘まみ上げやすさも「○」と評され良好であった。
Example 2 (preparation and evaluation of example product 2)
<Prototype method and evaluation method of cutting material>
Using the meat portion of tuna as a raw material, it was prepared in the same manner as in "Example product 1" to obtain "Example product 2".
As shown in FIG. 2, the particle size distribution graph, 10% D (μm), 50% D (μm) and 90% D (μm) of each of the initial particle size and the particle size after suspension of the obtained example product 2 The post-suspension particle size (50% D) is less than 12 μm and the post-suspension particle size (90% D) is less than 18 μm. Moreover, the bulk specific gravity of a cutting material is 0.105 g / mL, and is 0.268 g / mL or less.
The mouthfeel evaluation of the obtained example product 2 was evaluated sensoryily in the same manner as the above <experiment>.
<Result>
As a result of the sensory evaluation, the evaluation of mouthfeel was rated as "o", and the feeling of mouth palate was good. Ease of picking was also described as "○" and was good.

実施例3(実施例品3の作成と評価)
<切削物の試作方法および評価方法>
カツオの肉部を0.02MPa下で脱気しながら10分間細断混合し、得られたミンチ肉を5cm×3cm×3cm程度に形成し、95±3℃で30分間加熱し、その後焙乾して、水分8.67%の鰹肉加熱乾燥品を得た。
これを、切削を良好に行う目的および表面殺菌する目的で110±10℃で10分間加熱した。その後、厚さ0.1mm以下の切削物を得ることができる切削装置で切削し、得られた切削片について、カッターミルを用いて粉砕し、目開き10mmの篩を通過させて、「実施例品3」とした。
Example 3 (preparation and evaluation of example product 3)
<Prototype method and evaluation method of cutting material>
The bonito meat is shredded and mixed for 10 minutes while degassing under 0.02 MPa, and the obtained minced meat is formed into about 5 cm × 3 cm × 3 cm, heated at 95 ± 3 ° C. for 30 minutes, and then dried. As a result, a dried product of dried salmon meat having a water content of 8.67% was obtained.
This was heated at 110 ± 10 ° C. for 10 minutes for the purpose of good cutting and surface sterilization. After that, cutting is performed using a cutting device capable of obtaining a cut object having a thickness of 0.1 mm or less, and the obtained cutting piece is crushed using a cutter mill and passed through a sieve having an opening of 10 mm. Product 3 ".

得られた実施例品3の初期粒度と懸濁後粒度のそれぞれの粒度分布グラフ、10%D(μm)、50%D(μm)、90%D(μm)は図3に示したとおり、懸濁後粒度(50%D)は12μm以下であり、懸濁後粒度(90%D)は18μm以下である。また、切削物の嵩比重は0.149g/mLであり、0.268g/mL以下である。
得られた実施例品3の口どけ感評価を前記<実験>と同様に官能評価した。
<結果>
官能評価の結果、口どけ評価は「◎」と評され、口どけは大変良好であった。摘まみ上げやすさも「○」と評され良好であった。
As shown in FIG. 3, the particle size distribution graph, 10% D (μm), 50% D (μm) and 90% D (μm) of each of the initial particle size and the particle size after suspension of the obtained example product 3 The post-suspension particle size (50% D) is less than 12 μm and the post-suspension particle size (90% D) is less than 18 μm. Moreover, the bulk specific gravity of a cutting material is 0.149 g / mL, and is 0.268 g / mL or less.
The mouthfeel evaluation of the obtained example product 3 was sensory-evaluated in the same manner as the above <experiment>.
<Result>
As a result of the sensory evaluation, the mouthfeel evaluation was described as "◎", and the mouth throat was very good. Ease of picking was also described as "○" and was good.

実施例4(実施例品4の作成と評価)
<切削物の試作方法および評価方法>
「実施例品3」と同様に試作した。ただし、粉砕後に使用した篩は目開き5mmのものを使用して、「実施例品4」とした。
得られた実施例品4の初期粒度と懸濁後粒度のそれぞれの粒度分布グラフ、10%D(μm)、50%D(μm)、90%D(μm)は図4に示したとおり、懸濁後粒度(50%D)は12μm以下であり、懸濁後粒度(90%D)は18μm以下である。また、切削物の嵩比重は0.095g/mLであり、0.268g/mL以下である。
得られた実施例品4の口どけ感評価を前記<実験>と同様に官能評価した。
<結果>
官能評価の結果、口どけ評価は「◎」と評され、口どけは大変良好であった。摘まみ上げやすさも「○」と評され良好であった。
Example 4 (preparation and evaluation of example product 4)
<Prototype method and evaluation method of cutting material>
A prototype was produced in the same manner as "Example product 3". However, the sieve used after pulverization used "the example article 4" using the thing of 5 mm of openings.
As shown in FIG. 4, the particle size distribution graph, 10% D (μm), 50% D (μm) and 90% D (μm), of the initial particle size and the particle size after suspension of the obtained example product 4 The post-suspension particle size (50% D) is less than 12 μm and the post-suspension particle size (90% D) is less than 18 μm. Moreover, the bulk specific gravity of a cutting material is 0.095 g / mL, and is 0.268 g / mL or less.
The mouthfeel evaluation of the obtained example product 4 was sensory-evaluated in the same manner as the above <experiment>.
<Result>
As a result of the sensory evaluation, the mouthfeel evaluation was described as "◎", and the mouth throat was very good. Ease of picking was also described as "○" and was good.

実施例5(実施例品5の作成と評価)
<切削物の試作方法および評価方法>
常法でかつおの荒節を製造した。水分は19%であった。
これを、切削を良好に行う目的および表面殺菌する目的で110±10℃で10分間加熱した。その後、厚さ0.1mm以下の切削物を得ることができる切削装置で切削し、得られた切削片について、カッターミルを用いて粉砕し、目開き5mmの篩を通過させて、「実施例品5」とした。
Example 5 (preparation and evaluation of example product 5)
<Prototype method and evaluation method of cutting material>
Produced bonito bonito in the usual way. The water content was 19%.
This was heated at 110 ± 10 ° C. for 10 minutes for the purpose of good cutting and surface sterilization. After that, cutting is performed using a cutting device capable of obtaining a cut object having a thickness of 0.1 mm or less, and the obtained cutting piece is crushed using a cutter mill and passed through a sieve with a 5 mm opening. Product 5 ".

得られた実施例品5の初期粒度と懸濁後粒度のそれぞれの粒度分布グラフ、10%D(μm)、50%D(μm)、90%D(μm)は図5に示したとおり、懸濁後粒度(50%D)は12μm以下であり、懸濁後粒度(90%D)は18μm以下である。また、切削物の嵩比重は0.150g/mLであり、0.268g/mL以下である。
得られた実施例品5の口どけ感評価を前記<実験>と同様に官能評価した。
<結果>
官能評価の結果、口どけ評価は「○」と評され、口どけは良好であった。摘まみ上げやすさも「○」と評され良好であった。
As shown in FIG. 5, the particle size distribution graph, 10% D (μm), 50% D (μm), and 90% D (μm) of the initial particle size and the particle size after suspension of the obtained example product 5 are as shown in FIG. The post-suspension particle size (50% D) is less than 12 μm and the post-suspension particle size (90% D) is less than 18 μm. Moreover, the bulk specific gravity of a cutting material is 0.150 g / mL, and is 0.268 g / mL or less.
The mouthfeel evaluation of the obtained example product 5 was sensory-evaluated in the same manner as the above <experiment>.
<Result>
As a result of the sensory evaluation, the evaluation of mouthfeel was rated as "o", and the feeling of mouth palate was good. Ease of picking was also described as "○" and was good.

比較例1(比較例品1の作成と評価)
<切削物の試作方法および評価方法>
常法でかつおの荒節を製造した。水分は19%であった。
これを、切削を良好に行う目的および表面殺菌する目的で110±10℃で10分間加熱した。その後、厚さ0.1mm以下の切削物を得ることができる切削装置で切削し、得られた切削片を目開き2mmの篩を通過させて、「比較例品1」とした。
Comparative Example 1 (Production and Evaluation of Comparative Example Item 1)
<Prototype method and evaluation method of cutting material>
Produced bonito bonito in the usual way. The water content was 19%.
This was heated at 110 ± 10 ° C. for 10 minutes for the purpose of good cutting and surface sterilization. Then, it cut by the cutting device which can obtain the cut object of thickness 0.1 mm or less, made the obtained cutting piece pass the sieve of 2 mm of openings, and was set as "comparative example goods 1".

得られた比較例品1の初期粒度と懸濁後粒度のそれぞれの粒度分布グラフ、10%D(μm)、50%D(μm)、90%D(μm)は図6に示したとおり、懸濁後粒度(50%D)は12μmより大きく、懸濁後粒度(90%D)も18μmより大きい。なお、切削物の嵩比重は0.107g/mLであり、0.268g/mL以下である。
得られた比較例品1の口どけ感評価を前記<実験>と同様に官能評価した。
<結果>
評価の結果、摘まみ上げやすさは「○」と評され良好であったものの、口どけ評価は「×」と評され、口どけは好ましくなかった。
As shown in FIG. 6, the particle size distribution graph, 10% D (μm), 50% D (μm) and 90% D (μm) of the initial particle size and the particle size after suspension of the obtained Comparative Example 1, respectively. The post-suspension particle size (50% D) is greater than 12 μm and the post-suspension particle size (90% D) is also greater than 18 μm. The bulk specific gravity of the cutting material is 0.107 g / mL and is 0.268 g / mL or less.
The mouthfeel evaluation of the obtained Comparative Example 1 was sensory-evaluated in the same manner as in the above <Experiment>.
<Result>
As a result of the evaluation, although easiness to pick up was described as “o” and was good, the chute evaluation was evaluated as “x”, and churn was not preferable.

比較例2(比較例品2の作成と評価)
<切削物の試作方法および評価方法>
常法でかつおの荒節を製造した。水分は19%であった。
これを、切削を良好に行う目的および表面殺菌する目的で110±10℃で10分間加熱した。その後、厚さ0.15mm以上0.25mm以下の切削物を得ることができる切削装置で切削し、得られた切削片について、カッターミルを用いて粉砕し、目開き5mmの篩を通過させて、「比較例品2」とした。
Comparative Example 2 (Production and Evaluation of Comparative Example Item 2)
<Prototype method and evaluation method of cutting material>
Produced bonito bonito in the usual way. The water content was 19%.
This was heated at 110 ± 10 ° C. for 10 minutes for the purpose of good cutting and surface sterilization. Thereafter, cutting is performed using a cutting device capable of obtaining a cut of 0.15 mm or more and 0.25 mm or less in thickness, and the obtained cutting piece is crushed using a cutter mill and passed through a sieve with an opening of 5 mm. , “Comparative example product 2”.

得られた比較例品2の初期粒度と懸濁後粒度のそれぞれの粒度分布グラフ、10%D(μm)、50%D(μm)、90%D(μm)は図7に示したとおり、懸濁後粒度(50%D)は12μmより大きく、懸濁後粒度(90%D)も18μmより大きい。また、切削物の嵩比重は0.555g/mLであり、0.268g/mLより大きい。
得られた比較例品2の口どけ感評価を前記<実験>と同様に官能評価した。
<結果>
評価の結果、摘まみ上げやすさは「△」であり、口どけ評価は「×」と評され好ましくなかった。
As shown in FIG. 7, the particle size distribution graph, 10% D (μm), 50% D (μm), and 90% D (μm) of the initial particle size and the particle size after suspension of the obtained Comparative Example 2 as shown in FIG. The post-suspension particle size (50% D) is greater than 12 μm and the post-suspension particle size (90% D) is also greater than 18 μm. Also, the bulk specific gravity of the cutting material is 0.555 g / mL, which is larger than 0.268 g / mL.
The mouthfeel evaluation of the obtained Comparative Example 2 was sensory-evaluated in the same manner as the above <experiment>.
<Result>
As a result of the evaluation, easiness to pick up was “」 ”, and the evaluation of chute was not good, being described as“ x ”.

実施例6(実施例品6の作成と評価)
<切削物の試作方法および評価方法>
カツオの肉部100質量部あたりトランスグルタミナーゼ(味の素(株)製「アクティバ」)を0.375質量部およびビタミンE(エーザイフード・ケミカル(株)製「イーミックス」を0.05質量部加え、0.02MPa下で脱気しながら10分間細断混合し、得られたミンチ肉を5cm×3cm×3cm程度に形成し、95±3℃で30分間加熱し、その後焙乾して、水分8.67%の鰹肉加熱乾燥品を得た。
これを、切削を良好に行う目的および表面殺菌する目的で110±10℃で10分間加熱した。その後、厚さ0.1mm以下の切削物を得ることができる切削装置で切削し、得られた切削片について、カッターミルを用いて粉砕し、目開き5mmの篩を通過させて、「実施例品6」とした。
Example 6 (preparation and evaluation of example product 6)
<Prototype method and evaluation method of cutting material>
Add 0.375 parts by mass of transglutaminase (“Akinomoto Co., Ltd.“ Activa ”) and 0.05 parts by mass of vitamin E (Eisai Food Chemical Co., Ltd.)“ Emix ”per 100 parts by mass of bonito meat Shred and mix for 10 minutes while degassing under 0.02 MPa, form the obtained minced meat into about 5 cm × 3 cm × 3 cm, heat at 95 ± 3 ° C. for 30 minutes, and then dry to dryness; Heated and dried product of .67% of minced meat was obtained.
This was heated at 110 ± 10 ° C. for 10 minutes for the purpose of good cutting and surface sterilization. After that, cutting is performed using a cutting device capable of obtaining a cut object having a thickness of 0.1 mm or less, and the obtained cutting piece is crushed using a cutter mill and passed through a sieve with a 5 mm opening. Product 6 ".

得られた実施例品6の初期粒度と懸濁後粒度のそれぞれの粒度分布グラフ、10%D(μm)、50%D(μm)、90%D(μm)は図8(a)に示したとおり、懸濁後粒度(50%D)は12μm以下であり、懸濁後粒度(90%D)は18μm以下である。また、切削物の嵩比重は0.095g/mLであり、0.268g/mL以下である。
得られた実施例品6の口どけ感評価を前記<実験>と同様に官能評価した。
The particle size distribution graph, 10% D (μm), 50% D (μm) and 90% D (μm) of each of the initial particle size and the particle size after suspension of the obtained example product 6 are shown in FIG. As can be seen, the post-suspension particle size (50% D) is less than 12 μm and the post-suspension particle size (90% D) is less than 18 μm. Moreover, the bulk specific gravity of a cutting material is 0.095 g / mL, and is 0.268 g / mL or less.
The mouthfeel evaluation of the obtained example product 6 was sensory-evaluated in the same manner as the above <experiment>.

<実施例品6を使用したおかかの作成と評価>
「実施例品6を用いたおかか」と、「市販の削りぶし(カツオパック)を用いたおかか」をそれぞれ試作し、口どけを比較した。おかかの材料組成を表3に示す。

Figure 2018174724

<Creation and evaluation of a stomach using Example product 6>
The “Hoka using Example product 6” and the “Hoka using a commercially available shaving pack (topo pack)” were respectively produced as a trial, and their miso were compared. The material composition of the meat is shown in Table 3.
Figure 2018174724

数g程度のおかかを口に含み、前記<実験>での評価基準で口どけ感を評価し比較した。なお、「市販の削りぶし(カツオパック)を用いたおかか」に使用した市販の削りぶし(カツオパック)の粒度分布は図8(b)に示したとおり、懸濁後粒度(50%D)は12μmより大きく、懸濁後粒度(90%D)は18μmより大きいが、嵩比重は0.087g/mLであり、0.268g/mL以下である。   A mouth of several g or so was included in the mouth, and the feeling of chewing was evaluated and compared by the evaluation criteria in the above <experiment>. In addition, the particle size distribution of the commercially available shaving (soybean paste) used for "steaming using a commercially available shaving (soybean paste)" is shown in FIG. 8 (b), and the particle size after suspension (50% D) is 12 μm. Larger, the post-suspending particle size (90% D) is greater than 18 μm, but the bulk specific gravity is 0.087 g / mL, not more than 0.268 g / mL.

<結果>
官能評価の結果、実施例品6の口どけ評価は「◎」と評され、口どけは大変良好であり、摘まみ上げやすさも「○」と評され良好であった。ちなみに、「市販の削りぶし(カツオパック)を用いたおかか」に使用した市販の削りぶし(カツオパック)は、摘まみ上げやすさは「○」と評され良好であったものの、口どけは「×」と評価され、口どけは好ましくなかった。
さらに「実施例品6を用いたおかか」と、「市販の削りぶし(カツオパック)を用いたおかか」の口どけの評価結果を表3の下部に示す。結果、「市販の削りぶし(カツオパック)を用いたおかか」は摘まみ上げやすさは「○」と評され良好であったものの、口どけは×であり、これに対して、実施例品6を用いたおかかは口どけが大変良好(◎)であり、摘まみ上げやすさも「○」と評価された。
<Result>
As a result of sensory evaluation, the evaluation of the mouth of the example product 6 was evaluated as "◎", the mouth movement was very good, and the ease of picking up was also evaluated as "○" and was good. By the way, although the commercially available shavings used for "steaming with commercially available shavings (tsubo packs)" (katsuo packs) were easy to pick up and rated as "○" and were good, the mouth was "X" It was evaluated as ", and a mouth rest was not preferred.
Furthermore, the evaluation results of the tastes of "okaka using Example product 6" and "kaoka using a commercially available shaving pack (topo pack)" are shown in the lower part of Table 3. As a result, although the ease of picking up of "steamed bonito using a commercially available shaving (cassette pack)" was described as "○" and was good, the mouth rest was ×, in contrast to this, Example product 6 The taste of the mouth was very good (◎), and the ease of picking up was also evaluated as "○".

Claims (7)

魚肉加熱乾燥品から得られる切削物であって、
1)前記切削物を水に懸濁して得た懸濁液中の切削物の粒度が、メジアン径(50%D)0.35μm以上12μm以下、及び、累積90%径(90%D)0.4μm以上18μm以下であり、且つ
2)0.09g/mL以上0.268g/mL以下の嵩比重を有する、
前記切削物。
It is a cutting material obtained from fish meat heating and drying products,
1) The particle size of the cutting material in the suspension obtained by suspending the cutting material in water is: median diameter (50% D) 0.35 μm or more and 12 μm or less; and cumulative 90% diameter (90% D) 0 And has a bulk specific gravity of not less than 0.09 g / mL and not more than 0.268 g / mL.
Said cuttings.
前記魚肉加熱乾燥品は、カツオ又はマグロを原料とすることを特徴とする、請求項1に記載の切削物。 The cut material according to claim 1, wherein the dried fish meat product is made from bonito or tuna. 前記魚肉加熱乾燥品は、0MPa以上0.1MPa以下のもとで細断混合して得られるミンチ状魚肉を原料とすることを特徴とする、請求項1又は2に記載の切削物。 The cut material according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the heat-dried product of fish meat uses minced fish meat obtained by shredding and mixing under 0 MPa or more and 0.1 MPa or less. 前記ミンチ状魚肉は、調味料、結合剤及び酸化防止剤から成る群より選択される少なくとも1種が混合されたミンチ状魚肉であることを特徴とする、請求項3に記載の切削物。 The cut material according to claim 3, wherein the minced fish meat is minced fish meat mixed with at least one selected from the group consisting of a seasoning, a binder and an antioxidant. 前記魚肉加熱乾燥品は、水分が5質量%以上26質量%以下であることを特徴とする、請求項1乃至4のうちいずれか1項に記載の切削物。 The cutting material according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the heat-dried fish meat has a water content of 5% by mass or more and 26% by mass or less. 請求項1乃至5のうちいずれか1項に記載の切削物を調味料で味付けしたおかか。 Or it seasoned the cutting material of any one of Claim 1 thru | or 5 with a seasoning. 魚肉加熱乾燥品の切削物の製造方法であって、前記魚肉加熱乾燥品を、厚さ0.1mm以下の切削片を得る切削装置で切削した後に、粉砕して、目開きが直径10mm以下の篩を通過させることによって、下記1)及び2)の条件:
1)前記切削物を水に懸濁して得た懸濁液中の切削物の粒度が、メジアン径(50%D)0.35μm以上12μm以下、及び、累積90%径(90%D)0.4μm以上18μm以下であり、且つ
2)0.09g/mL以上0.268g/mL以下の嵩比重を有する;
を満たす切削物を得ることを特徴とする、前記魚肉加熱乾燥品の切削物の製造方法。
A method for producing a cut product of fish meat heating / drying product, wherein said fish meat heating / drying product is cut by a cutting device for obtaining a cutting piece having a thickness of 0.1 mm or less, and then crushed to have an opening of 10 mm or less in diameter By passing the sieve, the following conditions 1) and 2):
1) The particle size of the cutting material in the suspension obtained by suspending the cutting material in water is: median diameter (50% D) 0.35 μm or more and 12 μm or less; and cumulative 90% diameter (90% D) 0 .4 and not more than 18 .mu.m, and 2) having a bulk specific gravity of not less than 0.09 g / mL and not more than 0.268 g / mL;
A method for producing a cut product of the fish meat heating and drying product, characterized in that a cut product satisfying the above is obtained.
JP2017074318A 2017-04-04 2017-04-04 Manufacturing method of cuttings of red fish meat heat-dried products and manufacturing method of dried bonito using cutting products of lean fish meat heating-dried products Active JP6994228B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2017074318A JP6994228B2 (en) 2017-04-04 2017-04-04 Manufacturing method of cuttings of red fish meat heat-dried products and manufacturing method of dried bonito using cutting products of lean fish meat heating-dried products

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2017074318A JP6994228B2 (en) 2017-04-04 2017-04-04 Manufacturing method of cuttings of red fish meat heat-dried products and manufacturing method of dried bonito using cutting products of lean fish meat heating-dried products

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2018174724A true JP2018174724A (en) 2018-11-15
JP6994228B2 JP6994228B2 (en) 2022-01-14

Family

ID=64279648

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2017074318A Active JP6994228B2 (en) 2017-04-04 2017-04-04 Manufacturing method of cuttings of red fish meat heat-dried products and manufacturing method of dried bonito using cutting products of lean fish meat heating-dried products

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6994228B2 (en)

Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS53121960A (en) * 1977-03-31 1978-10-24 Naoki Hara Packaged flakes of dried bonito
JPS59187732A (en) * 1983-04-08 1984-10-24 Ninben:Kk Preparation of dried fish
JPH08308526A (en) * 1995-05-17 1996-11-26 Nisshin Flour Milling Co Ltd Soup
JP2006042720A (en) * 2004-08-06 2006-02-16 Nissin Food Prod Co Ltd Solid seasoning food having easily collapsing property and method for producing the same
WO2008004512A1 (en) * 2006-07-03 2008-01-10 Fuji Oil Company, Limited Method for producing high-protein soybean snack food
JP2008086206A (en) * 2006-09-29 2008-04-17 Ihi Corp Rice bran tablet and method for producing the rice bran tablet
JP2010119332A (en) * 2008-11-19 2010-06-03 Riken Vitamin Co Ltd Method for producing crush-formed dried fish
WO2013047839A1 (en) * 2011-09-30 2013-04-04 株式会社明治 Cheese and manufacturing method therefor
JP2014068639A (en) * 2012-10-02 2014-04-21 Mitsukan Group Honsha:Kk Dried fish impalpable powder-containing liquid seasoning, manufacturing method of the same, composition for enhancing soup stock flavor of liquid seasoning, and method for enhancing soup stock flavor of liquid seasoning
JP2015188375A (en) * 2014-03-28 2015-11-02 株式会社Mizkan Holdings Liquid seasoning including fine powder of dried fish, and method for improving the flavor thereof
JP2017018047A (en) * 2015-07-13 2017-01-26 焼津水産化学工業株式会社 Manufacturing method of broth pack and broth
JP2017112864A (en) * 2015-12-22 2017-06-29 株式会社Mizkan Holdings Liquid seasoning and manufacturing method therefor

Patent Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS53121960A (en) * 1977-03-31 1978-10-24 Naoki Hara Packaged flakes of dried bonito
JPS59187732A (en) * 1983-04-08 1984-10-24 Ninben:Kk Preparation of dried fish
JPH08308526A (en) * 1995-05-17 1996-11-26 Nisshin Flour Milling Co Ltd Soup
JP2006042720A (en) * 2004-08-06 2006-02-16 Nissin Food Prod Co Ltd Solid seasoning food having easily collapsing property and method for producing the same
WO2008004512A1 (en) * 2006-07-03 2008-01-10 Fuji Oil Company, Limited Method for producing high-protein soybean snack food
JP2008086206A (en) * 2006-09-29 2008-04-17 Ihi Corp Rice bran tablet and method for producing the rice bran tablet
JP2010119332A (en) * 2008-11-19 2010-06-03 Riken Vitamin Co Ltd Method for producing crush-formed dried fish
WO2013047839A1 (en) * 2011-09-30 2013-04-04 株式会社明治 Cheese and manufacturing method therefor
JP2014068639A (en) * 2012-10-02 2014-04-21 Mitsukan Group Honsha:Kk Dried fish impalpable powder-containing liquid seasoning, manufacturing method of the same, composition for enhancing soup stock flavor of liquid seasoning, and method for enhancing soup stock flavor of liquid seasoning
JP2015188375A (en) * 2014-03-28 2015-11-02 株式会社Mizkan Holdings Liquid seasoning including fine powder of dried fish, and method for improving the flavor thereof
JP2017018047A (en) * 2015-07-13 2017-01-26 焼津水産化学工業株式会社 Manufacturing method of broth pack and broth
JP2017112864A (en) * 2015-12-22 2017-06-29 株式会社Mizkan Holdings Liquid seasoning and manufacturing method therefor

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP6994228B2 (en) 2022-01-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6511588B2 (en) Food fine particle-containing fat and oil composition and method for producing the same
JP5345491B2 (en) Raw pasta manufacturing method, boiled pasta manufacturing method, frozen boiled pasta manufacturing method, and pasta
CN107205457A (en) Edible fungus
Bose et al. The effect of chickpea (Cicer arietinim) husk on the properties of cracker biscuits
JP2022526730A (en) Field Bean Protein Composition
Idowu et al. Whole wheat cracker fortified with biocalcium and protein hydrolysate powders from salmon frame: characteristics and nutritional value
CN106720396B (en) Stabilizer, processed cheese and preparation method thereof
JP6915975B2 (en) Meat products, methods for reducing the odor of meat products, and agents for reducing the odor of meat products
Pudtikajorn et al. Characterisation of fish tofu fortified with skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) eyeball scleral cartilage biocalcium
JP3229838B2 (en) Ryu&#39;s manufacturing method
JP2018174724A (en) Cut material obtained from fish meat heated-and-dried product
JP3354717B2 (en) Noodle flour and noodles
US5599575A (en) Process for the production of creamed coconut and creamed coconut product
JP2011036172A (en) Method for producing furikake
US20100272856A1 (en) Method for preparing processed vegetable foodstuffs and processed vegetable foodstuffs
JP7018273B2 (en) Composition for improving the quality of noodles, its manufacturing method, and noodles
JP3280620B2 (en) Manufacturing method of processed cheese products
JP2002101835A (en) Method for producing noodles and noodle quality improver
JP2009112253A (en) Method for producing buckwheat flour which can improve texture and flavor of buckwheat noodle
JP7355513B2 (en) Processed cheese manufacturing method
JP4326161B2 (en) Production method of starch crackers
JPH0847366A (en) Production of dried fish for shaving
JP4474591B2 (en) Aggregate dashi and method for producing the same
JP4129385B2 (en) Method for producing dried potato powder
JP4772026B2 (en) White sauce with ingredients

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20200406

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20210212

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20210224

A601 Written request for extension of time

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A601

Effective date: 20210426

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20210624

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20211110

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20211206

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 6994228

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150