JP2015207107A - Information processor, mail transmission method and program - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an information processor, a mail transmission method and a program capable of reducing delay of reply.SOLUTION: The information processor includes: a transmission ordering table management section 37 that classifies plural registered persons into plural groups each has different priority based on the reply content and the reply time, and sets the transmission order within a group in which a registered person is included with respect to each of the registered persons; and a mail transmission control section 35 that, when transmitting the next safety confirmation mail, transmits a safety confirmation mail to an information terminal corresponding to the registered person according to the transmission order in the group from the group which has the higher priority.

Description

  The present invention relates to an information processing apparatus, a mail transmission method, and a program.

  A safety confirmation service is provided as one tool of BCM (Business Continuity Management: Business Continuity Management) when an event such as an earthquake occurs (see, for example, Patent Document 1).

  When an event occurs, the safety confirmation service immediately sends a safety confirmation e-mail to the registrant. The registrant who receives the safety confirmation e-mail returns a safety status (for example, safety, injury, etc.). Thus, an administrator (for example, a business owner) can make a subsequent business continuation determination according to the registrant's situation.

  In order to make a quick decision on business continuity, it is necessary to collect reply emails from registrants as soon as possible. However, there are those who respond lately due to problems with awareness and literacy. Those who have low awareness and literacy tend to reply more slowly as the reception timing of the safety confirmation mail is delayed, that is, as time elapses from the occurrence of the event.

  Even when safety confirmation emails are sent in a batch, the actual system sequentially sends emails. Therefore, as the number of registrants increases, the transmission time difference between the first and last mail increases. In particular, when an event occurs, a lot of information is exchanged, so the load on the network increases. For this reason, the transmission time difference is further increased.

JP 2007-188441 A

  In one aspect, an object of the present invention is to provide an information processing apparatus, a mail transmission method, and a program that can suppress a delay in a reply.

  In one aspect, the information processing device transmits a safety confirmation email to an information terminal corresponding to each registrant of a plurality of registrants, and confirms the safety status of the registrant based on the content of the reply to the safety confirmation email. An information processing apparatus for classifying the plurality of registrants into a plurality of groups having different priorities based on the contents of the reply, and a difference between a transmission time and a reply time of the safety confirmation mail Based on the reply time, for each registrant, the setting means for setting the transmission order within the group to which the registrant belongs, and when sending the next safety confirmation mail, from the group having the higher priority And transmitting means for transmitting the safety confirmation mail to the information terminal corresponding to the registrant in order according to the transmission order in the group, wherein the reply content is the registrant. Includes position information indicating the position, it is characterized in that.

  In one aspect, the mail transmission method transmits a safety confirmation email to an information terminal corresponding to each registrant of a plurality of registrants, and confirms the safety status of the registrant based on the content of the reply to the safety confirmation email. An information processing apparatus mail transmission method for classifying the plurality of registrants into a plurality of groups having different priorities based on the reply content including position information indicating the position of the registrant, and confirming the safety Based on a reply time that is a difference between a mail transmission time and a reply time, for each registrant, the transmission order within the group to which the registrant belongs is set, and when the next safety confirmation mail is transmitted The safety confirmation email is transmitted to the information terminal corresponding to the registrant in order from the group with the highest priority according to the transmission order within the group. There.

  In one aspect, the program transmits a safety confirmation email to an information terminal corresponding to each registrant of a plurality of registrants, and confirms the safety status of the registrant based on the reply content to the safety confirmation email. The computer of the processing device classifies the plurality of registrants into a plurality of groups having different priorities on the basis of the reply contents including the position information indicating the position of the registrant, and transmits the safety confirmation mail transmission time and reply. Based on a reply time that is a difference from the time, for each registrant, the transmission priority within the group to which the registrant belongs is set, and when the next safety confirmation mail is transmitted, the priority is high. In order from the group, according to the transmission order in the group, the safety confirmation mail is transmitted to the information terminal corresponding to the registrant. It is.

  In one aspect, reply delay can be suppressed.

It is a figure which shows the structural example of the safety confirmation system in Embodiment 1. FIG. It is a functional block diagram which shows the structural example of the safety confirmation server in Embodiment 1. FIG. It is a figure which shows the example of the safety confirmation mail in Embodiment 1. FIG. It is a figure which shows the example of the reply mail in Embodiment 1. FIG. It is a figure which shows the structural example of the memory | storage part of the safety confirmation server in Embodiment 1. FIG. It is a figure which shows the structural example of the registrant management table in Embodiment 1. FIG. It is a figure which shows the structural example of the base management table in Embodiment 1. FIG. It is a figure which shows the structural example of the area setting table in Embodiment 1. FIG. It is a figure which shows the structural example of the timer threshold value table in Embodiment 1. FIG. It is a figure which shows the structural example of the reply management table in Embodiment 1. FIG. FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of a transmission ranking table in the first embodiment, (A) is a diagram illustrating an initial setting state, and (B) is a state after an update when a certain event occurs. FIG. (A) is a figure which shows the state after an update when an event generate | occur | produces in the state shown to FIG. 11 (B), (B) is a figure which shows the state ranked regardless of a block. . 6 is a part of an example of a flowchart for explaining a flow of a safety confirmation mail transmission process in the first embodiment. 6 is another part of an example of a flowchart for explaining the flow of the safety confirmation mail transmission process in the first embodiment. 6 is a part of an example of a flowchart for explaining the flow of a reply management table update process in the first embodiment. 10 is another part of an example of a flowchart for explaining the flow of a reply management table update process in the first embodiment. 6 is a part of an example of a flowchart for explaining a flow of a transmission ranking table update process in the first embodiment. 6 is another part of an example of a flowchart for explaining the flow of the transmission ranking table update process in the first embodiment. It is a figure which shows the specific example for demonstrating the flow of a process in the safety confirmation system in Embodiment 1. FIG. It is a figure which shows the structural example of the transmission ranking table in Embodiment 2. 10 is a part of an example of a flowchart for explaining a flow of a safety confirmation mail transmission process in the second embodiment. 10 is an example of a flowchart for explaining a flow of A (or B) block transmission processing in the second embodiment. 10 is a part of an example of a flowchart for explaining a flow of a transmission ranking table update process in the second embodiment. It is a figure which shows the specific example of the reply management table in Embodiment 3. It is a figure which shows the specific example of the transmission ranking table in Embodiment 3. 10 is a first part of an example of a flowchart for explaining a flow of a reply management table update process in the third embodiment. 14 is a second part of an example of a flowchart for explaining a flow of a reply management table update process in the third embodiment. FIG. 14 is a third part of an example of a flowchart for explaining the flow of a reply management table update process in the third embodiment. 14 is a part of an example of a flowchart for explaining a flow of a transmission ranking table update process in the third embodiment. 10 is another part of an example of a flowchart for explaining a flow of a transmission ranking table update process in the third embodiment. It is a figure which shows the example of the hardware constitutions of the safety confirmation server in embodiment.

  Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.

(Embodiment 1)
FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of a safety confirmation system 100 according to the first embodiment. As shown in FIG. 1, the safety confirmation system 100 according to Embodiment 1 includes a plurality of information terminals 2, one or a plurality of administrator terminals 3, and a safety confirmation server 1. The terminal 2, the administrator terminal 3, and the safety confirmation server are connected via a network NW so that they can communicate with each other.

  The information terminal 2 is an information terminal device for a registrant registered to receive the provision of a safety confirmation service to receive a safety confirmation mail. For example, the information terminal 2 is a PHS (Personal Handyphone System), a mobile phone, or a high-performance mobile phone. These include telephones, tablets, and PCs (Personal Computers).

  The administrator terminal 3 is an information terminal device of the administrator of the organization that receives the provision of the safety confirmation service, and is managed by the administrator via the administrator terminal 3 for setting various tables that will be described in detail later. It is possible to confirm the reply contents from each registrant of the organization. Further, the administrator can instruct the safety confirmation server 1 to send a safety confirmation mail via the administrator terminal 3 when performing the disaster prevention training.

  Here, various organizations such as companies, offices, schools, and neighborhood associations are assumed as organizations that receive the safety confirmation service. Further, if it is a company, it may be a sales office unit, if it is a school, it may be a campus unit, and the unit of the organization is arbitrary.

  FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram illustrating a configuration example of the safety confirmation server 1 according to the first embodiment. The safety confirmation server 1 according to the first embodiment is a device that transmits a safety confirmation mail to a registrant of a safety confirmation service when an event such as an earthquake occurs. As shown in FIG. 10, a storage unit 20, and a control unit 30.

  The communication unit 10 includes a communication module and the like, and transmits and receives data to and from the information terminal 2 or the administrator terminal 3 that constitutes the safety confirmation system 100. For example, the communication unit 10 transmits a safety confirmation mail to the information terminal 2 and receives a reply mail from the information terminal 2.

  Here, FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of a safety confirmation mail in the first embodiment, and FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an example of a reply mail in the first embodiment. The reply mail illustrated in FIG. 4 is an example in the case where position information is added to the text, and the added position information is an example in the case of a GGA sentence in the NMEA (National Marine Electronics Association) -0813 format. is there. Normally, positioning information output from GPS (Global Positioning System) is positioning information in the NMEA-0813 format.

  Returning to FIG. 2, the storage unit 20 includes a RAM (Random Access Memory), a ROM (Read Only Memory), an HDD (Hard Disk Drive), and the like. The storage unit 20 functions as a program area in which various programs such as a work area of a CPU (Central Processing Unit) and an operation program for controlling the safety confirmation server 1 are configured. Further, the storage unit 20 functions as a data area for storing various data such as a value of a monitoring timer 33 (details will be described later), a template of a body text of a safety confirmation mail, and various tables such as a registrant management table T1.

  Here, the tables stored in the data area of the storage unit 20 will be described with reference to FIGS. FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of the storage unit 20 of the safety confirmation server 1 according to the first embodiment. In the data area of the storage unit 20 of the first embodiment, as shown in FIG. 5, the registrant management table T1, the site management table T2, the area setting table T3, the timer threshold value table T4, and the reply management table T5. And a transmission ranking table T6.

  FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of the registrant management table T1 in the first embodiment. The registrant management table T1 in the first embodiment is a table set by the administrator via the administrator terminal 3, and as shown in FIG. 6, "registration number", "name", and "mail" This is a table in which “address” and “affiliation” are associated with each other.

  The “registration number” is an identifier that can uniquely identify the registrant of the organization managed by the administrator, and the “name” is the name of the registrant that is the target of sending the safety confirmation mail. The “mail address” is a mail address that is a destination of the safety confirmation mail. “Affiliation” is the affiliation of the corresponding registrant. For example, if the organization is a company, it is the office or sales office to which the registrant belongs. If the organization is a university, the registrant This is the campus where you go to school.

  FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of the base management table T2 in the first embodiment. The site management table T2 in the first embodiment is a table set by the administrator via the administrator terminal 3, and as shown in FIG. 7, “location information” is associated with each “site name”. It is a table that has been.

  “Location name” is the name of the location to which the registrant belonging to the managed organization belongs, and “Location information” is location information that can identify the location of the corresponding location. For example, the location of the location For example, a combination of latitude and longitude. That is, the base management table T2 is a table that manages the position of the base to which the registrant belongs.

  FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of the area setting table T3 according to the first embodiment. The area setting table T3 in the first embodiment is a table set by the administrator via the administrator terminal 3, and as shown in FIG. 8, “area number”, “area definition”, “area” This is a table in which “name” and “correction coefficient” are associated with each other.

  The “area number” is an identifier that can uniquely identify the area set by the administrator. The “area definition” is a definition of each area that can be assumed as a location of a registrant belonging to an organization managed by the administrator when an event occurs. For example, if the organization is a company, business offices, sales offices, business partners, nearby shelters, and other areas are assumed. Further, for example, if the organization is a school, it is assumed that it is in a school premises, in a school district, a nearby evacuation shelter, other areas, and the like.

  The “correction coefficient” is a coefficient in the range of 0 to 1 used when calculating the priority, which will be described in detail later, and is set according to a standard determined by the administrator. For example, the value is set to increase as the distance from the base of the organization managed by the administrator increases.

  FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of the timer threshold value table T4 according to the first embodiment. The timer threshold value table T4 in the first embodiment is a table set by the administrator via the administrator terminal 3, and as shown in FIG. 9, “monitoring timer threshold value”, “update timer threshold value”, It is a table that manages.

  The “monitoring timer threshold value” is a threshold value used in determining whether safety confirmation mails are transmitted in the order of blocks or whether safety confirmation mails are transmitted in descending order of the average priority regardless of the blocks.

  The “update timer threshold value” is a threshold value for determining a period during which the content of the reply mail is reflected in the reply management table T5. When the value of the update timer 34 exceeds the update timer threshold value, the reply management table management unit 36 (for details) For an unanswered person, a process of storing “unanswered” in the “answer content” column of the reply management table T5 is performed.

  FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of the reply management table T6 according to the first embodiment. The reply management table T6 according to the first embodiment is a table managed by the mail transmission control unit 35 (described later in detail) and the reply management table management unit 36. As shown in FIG. “Send time”, “Reply time”, “Reply time”, “Response contents”, “Location information”, “Area number”, “Flag”, and “Number of times” are associated with each other. It is a table.

  “Transmission time” is the time when the safety confirmation mail is transmitted, and “Reply time” is the time when the reply mail is replied. “Reply time” is the time required for replying the response of the safety confirmation mail, specifically, the difference between the reply time of the reply mail and the transmission time of the safety confirmation mail.

  “Reply contents” is an answer of the safety status in the reply mail, and stores any one of “safe”, “injury”, and “unanswered”. “Position information” is, for example, position information added to the reply mail, and “area number” is an area number of an area including a point indicated by the corresponding position information.

  “Flag” is a flag indicating whether or not the corresponding registrant is at the affiliated site. In the first embodiment, the flag value “0” indicates that the affiliated registrant is not at the affiliated site. The flag value “1” indicates that the user is at the affiliated site.

  “Number of times” is the number of times a safety confirmation email has been sent to the corresponding registrant. However, when the reply mail is “injured”, the number of transmissions is not counted in the first embodiment. For example, referring to FIG. 10, since the response content of “Jiro Kawasaki” is “injured”, the corresponding “number of times” of “Jiro Kawasaki” does not reflect the current transmission of the safety confirmation email.

  FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of the transmission ranking table T6 in the first embodiment, FIG. 11A is a diagram illustrating an initial setting state, and FIG. It is a figure which shows the state after the update at the time of generating. FIG. 12A is a diagram showing a state after updating the transmission ranking table T6 when an event occurs in the state shown in FIG. 11B, and FIG. 12B shows the ranking regardless of the block. It is a figure which shows the state of the attached transmission ranking table T6.

  The transmission ranking table T6 according to the first embodiment is a table managed by a transmission ranking table management unit 37 (described later in detail). As shown in FIG. , “Transmission order”, “priority (average value)”, and “transmission target flag” are associated with each other.

  In the first embodiment, “block” is used to classify registrants managed by the administrator into a group of registrants at the affiliated site and a group of registrants not at the affiliated site. Yes, the A block indicates that the corresponding registrant is not at the affiliated site, and the B block indicates that the corresponding registrant is at the affiliated site.

  The “transmission order” is the order in which the safety confirmation mail is transmitted, and the “priority (average value)” is the average value of priorities calculated by the transmission ordering table management unit 37. The “transmission target flag” is a flag indicating whether or not a safety confirmation mail is transmitted to the corresponding registrant. In the first embodiment, the flag value “0” is not a safety confirmation mail transmission target. The flag value “1” indicates that the safety confirmation mail is to be transmitted. That is, the mail transmission control unit 35 transmits a safety confirmation mail to a registrant whose flag value of “transmission target flag” is “1”.

  Returning to FIG. 2, the control unit 30 includes, for example, a CPU and executes an operation program stored in the program area of the storage unit 20, and as shown in FIG. 2, an event monitoring unit 31, a timer Functions of the control unit 32, the monitoring timer 33, the update timer 34, the mail transmission control unit 35, the reply management table management unit 36, and the transmission ranking table management unit 37 are realized, and the safety confirmation server 1 as a whole. A control process for controlling the process and a process such as a safety confirmation mail transmission process described later in detail are executed.

  The event monitoring unit 31 monitors, for example, an emergency early warning issued from a national instantaneous warning system by a public organization such as the Japan Meteorological Agency, or sends a safety confirmation email input via the administrator terminal 3 By monitoring the reception of events, the occurrence of events such as earthquakes including disaster drills is detected.

  The timer control unit 32 controls the monitoring timer 33 and the update timer 34. More specifically, when an event is detected by the event monitoring unit 31, the timer control unit 32 stores the value of the monitoring timer 33 in the data area of the storage unit 20, and then resets the monitoring timer 33, Start it. In addition, the timer control unit 32 resets and starts the update timer 34.

  The monitoring timer 33 is a timer for measuring an event occurrence interval, and is controlled by the timer control unit 32 as described above.

  The update timer 34 is a timer for managing a period during which the reply content to the safety confirmation mail is reflected in the reply management table T5, and is controlled by the timer control unit 32 as described above.

  The mail transmission control unit 35 controls the transmission of the safety confirmation mail. More specifically, when sending a safety confirmation mail to an organization that receives a safety confirmation service for the first time, the email transmission control unit 35 sets the transmission order that is initially set by the administrator of the organization. A safety confirmation mail is transmitted according to the transmission order of the table T6 (illustrated in FIG. 11A). For example, the mail transmission control unit 35 determines that the transmission is the first transmission when the “block” field of the transmission ranking table T6 is blank, and determines that the transmission is the second or subsequent transmission when it is not blank.

  The values before the reset of the monitoring timer 33 stored in the data area of the storage unit 20 in the second and subsequent transmissions of the safety confirmation mail to the organization receiving the safety confirmation service are the timer threshold value table T4. If it is equal to or greater than the monitoring timer threshold value registered in, the mail transmission control unit 35, as shown in FIG. The transmission order of the attachment table T6 is updated. Then, the mail transmission control unit 35 sets all “transmission target flags” in the transmission ranking table T6 to “1” and transmits a safety confirmation mail according to the updated transmission order.

  In the example of FIG. 12 (B), the mail transmission control unit 35 includes “Shiro Kawasaki”, “Saburo Yokohama”, “Ichiro Yokohama”, “Jiro Yokohama”, “Saburo Kawasaki”, “Taro Kawasaki”, “Jiro Kawasaki”. Send safety confirmation emails in the order of.

  In this way, it is possible that the location of each registrant has changed if a certain amount of time has passed since the last event occurred, without sending a safety confirmation e-mail without distinguishing between blocks. Because it is expensive.

  On the other hand, the value before the reset of the monitoring timer 33 stored in the data area of the storage unit 20, which is the second or later transmission of the safety confirmation mail, to the organization receiving the safety confirmation service is the timer threshold value. When it is less than the monitoring timer threshold value registered in the table T4, the mail transmission control unit 35 transmits a safety confirmation mail to the A block registrant according to the transmission order, and then the B block registrant. On the other hand, a safety confirmation mail is transmitted according to the transmission order. At this time, the registrant whose safety response to the safety confirmation email in the previous event was “injured” is excluded from the current safety confirmation email transmission target. In this way, registrants whose responses in the previous event were “injured” are excluded if the remaining time has not passed since the previous event occurred. This is because the nature is extremely low.

  For example, referring to FIG. 12A, the flag value of “transmission target flag” corresponding to “Jiro Kawasaki” is “0”, and the response in the event immediately before “Jiro Kawasaki” is “Injury”. It shows that. Therefore, in this case, the mail transmission control unit 35 transmits safety confirmation mails in the order of “Shiro Kawasaki”, “Saburo Yokohama”, “Ichiro Yokohama”, “Saburo Kawasaki”, “Jiro Yokohama”, and “Taro Kawasaki”.

  In this way, because the safety confirmation email is sent separately for each block, it is unlikely that the location of each registrant has changed since the extra time has not elapsed since the occurrence of the previous event. It is possible.

  The reply management table management unit 36 manages the reply management table T5. More specifically, the reply management table management unit 36 stores the time when the mail transmission control unit 35 transmitted the safety confirmation mail in the “transmission time” column of the reply management table T5.

  When the reply management table management unit 36 receives the reply mail for the safety confirmation mail, the reply management table 36 analyzes the reply mail. For example, if the safety confirmation mail is illustrated in FIG. 3, the reply management table 36 The first character in the text is specified, and the answer content of safety is specified based on the first character. Then, the reply management table management unit 36 stores the identified answer contents in the corresponding “answer contents” column of the reply management table T5. At this time, if it is not possible to specify the answer content of safety, the reply management table management unit 36 stores “unanswered” in the corresponding “answer content” column of the reply management table T5.

  If the specified response content is “safe” or the response content cannot be specified, the reply management table management unit 36 increments the corresponding “number of times” in the response management table T5. Then, the reply management table management unit 36 stores the reply time of the reply mail in the corresponding “reply time” column of the reply management table T5, calculates the reply time, and calculates the computed reply time in the reply management table T5. Store in the corresponding “Reply Time” field.

  Then, the reply management table management unit 36 stores the position information added to the body of the reply mail in the corresponding “position information” column of the reply management table T5, and refers to the area setting table T3 to reply mail. The area including the point indicated by the position information added to the body text is specified, and the area number of the specified area is stored in the corresponding “area number” column of the reply management table T5.

  Then, the reply management table management unit 36 sets a corresponding “flag” in the reply management table T5. More specifically, referring to the registrant management table T1, if the identified area is the base of the corresponding registrant's affiliation, the reply management table management unit 36 sets the flag value “1”. However, if the identified area is not the location to which the corresponding registrant belongs, the flag value “0” is set.

  In addition, the reply management table management unit 36 still returns a reply mail when the value of the update timer 34 becomes equal to or greater than the update timer threshold registered in the timer threshold value table T4, that is, when the update timer 34 times out. If there is a registrant who has not responded (hereinafter referred to as a non-reply person), “unanswered” is stored in the “reply” column of the reply management table T5 corresponding to the non-reply person. Then, the reply management table management unit 36 sets the “flag” of the reply management table T5 corresponding to the unreplyed person to “0” and increments the corresponding “number of times”.

  For example, the reply management table T5 shown in FIG. 10 shows a case where “Shiro Kawasaki” is an unreplyed person.

  Returning to FIG. 2, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 manages the transmission ranking table T6. More specifically, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 refers to the reply management table T5 to identify the entry to be processed, and when the flag value of the “flag” of the identified entry is “1”. Then, “B” is stored in the corresponding “block” column of the transmission ranking table T6. On the other hand, when the flag value of “flag” of the specified entry is “0”, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 stores “A” in the corresponding “block” column of the transmission ranking table T6.

  Then, when the “response contents” of the identified entry is “safe”, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 refers to the area setting table T3 and selects “correction” corresponding to the “area number” of the identified entry. Get the coefficient. Then, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 calculates the current priority according to Equation 1 below. The reply time in the formula is a value converted into seconds.

(Formula 1)
(Current priority) = (Reply time) x (Correction coefficient)

  Then, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 calculates the average value of the priorities according to the following formula 2, and the corresponding “priority (average value)” in the transmission ranking table T6 is calculated with the calculated average value of the priorities. "Column is updated, and the corresponding" transmission target flag "is set to" 1 ".

(Formula 2)
(Average value of priorities) = [(Average value of priorities up to the previous event) x (Number of times before increment) + (Current priority)] / (Number of times after increment)

  When the “response content” of the identified entry is “unanswered”, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 sets the current priority to the maximum value, and the average value of the priorities according to the above-described equation 2. And the corresponding “priority (average value)” column of the transmission ranking table T6 is updated with the calculated average value of priority, and the corresponding “transmission target flag” is set to “1”.

  Here, the maximum value of the priority is, for example, a value set in accordance with the update timer threshold. For example, the update timer threshold (4 hours) in the timer threshold table T4 illustrated in FIG. 9 is 4 × 60. A value exceeding x60 = 14400 is set. In the first embodiment, the maximum priority is “999999”. By doing so, it becomes possible to preferentially send a safety confirmation mail when a next event occurs to a registrant whose “answer content” is “unanswered”.

  When the “response content” of the identified entry is “injury”, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 calculates the corresponding “transmission target flag” in the transmission ranking table T6 without calculating the average value of the priorities. Is set to “0”. That is, when the “answer content” is “injured”, the average value of the priority is not updated. This is because the response time when “injured” is considered to be significantly different from the response time when the registrant is “safe”. This is because if it is reflected, there is a possibility that the transmission order of the person who originally responded quickly will be raised.

  For example, the transmission ranking table T6 shown in FIG. 12A shows a case where “Jiro Kawasaki” is “injured”.

  Then, when the processing of all registrants is completed, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 sorts the entries in the transmission ranking table T6 for each block, and further sets the transmission ranking in descending order of the average priority value for each block. Set. Then, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 rearranges the entries in the transmission ranking table T6 according to the transmission ranking for each block.

  Next, the flow of the safety confirmation mail transmission process in the first embodiment will be described with reference to FIGS. FIGS. 13 and 14 are a part of an example of a flowchart for explaining the flow of the safety confirmation mail transmission process according to the first embodiment and another part, respectively. This safety confirmation mail transmission process is started with the detection of an event as a trigger. Note that when an event occurs, this processing is executed in parallel for a plurality of organizations that receive the safety confirmation service. Here, the processing for one organization will be described.

  The event monitoring unit 31 determines whether or not the occurrence of an event has been detected (step S001). If the event monitoring unit 31 determines that the occurrence of an event has not yet been detected (step S001; NO), the process repeats the process of step S001 and waits for the occurrence of the event to be detected.

  On the other hand, when the event monitoring unit 31 determines that the occurrence of the event has been detected (step S001; YES), the timer control unit 32 stores the value of the monitoring timer 33 in the data area of the storage unit 20 (step S01). In step S002, the monitoring timer 33 is reset and started (step S003), and the update timer 34 is reset and started (step S004).

  Then, the mail transmission control unit 35 refers to the transmission ranking table T6 and determines whether or not the first safety confirmation mail is transmitted to the organization to be processed (step S005). If it is determined that the transmission is the first transmission (step S005; YES), the mail transmission control unit 35 transmits a safety confirmation mail according to the transmission order of the transmission ranking table T6 (step S006).

  Then, the reply management table management unit 36 stores the transmission time of the safety confirmation mail in the “transmission time” column of the reply management table T5 (step S007), and executes the reply management table update process (step S008). Then, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 executes a transmission ranking table update process (step S009), and then the process returns to the process of step S001 and repeats the above-described process.

  On the other hand, when it is determined in the process of step S005 that the transmission is the second or subsequent transmission (step S005; NO), the mail transmission control unit 35 further performs the pre-reset stored in the data area of the storage unit 20. It is determined whether or not the value of the monitoring timer 33 is greater than or equal to the monitoring timer threshold (step S101).

  If it is determined that the value is equal to or greater than the monitoring timer threshold value (step S101; YES), the mail transmission control unit 35 does not distinguish each block, and “transmission” in the transmission ranking table T6 in descending order of the average priority value. The “rank” is updated (step S102). Then, the mail transmission control unit 35 sets all “transmission target flags” in the transmission ranking table T6 to “1” (step S103), and transmits a safety confirmation mail according to the updated transmission order (step S104). ). And a process progresses to the process of step S007.

  On the other hand, if it is determined that it is less than the monitoring timer threshold (step S101; NO), the mail transmission control unit 35 transmits a safety confirmation mail to the A block registrant according to the transmission order (step S105). Thereafter, a safety confirmation mail is transmitted to the registrant of the B block according to the transmission order (step S106). At this time, the registrant whose safety response to the safety confirmation email in the previous event was “injured” is excluded from the subject of this safety confirmation email because the “transmission target flag” is “0”. The And a process progresses to the process of step S007.

  Next, with reference to FIG. 15 and FIG. 16, the flow of the reply management table update process in the first embodiment will be described. FIGS. 15 and 16 are a part of an example of a flowchart for explaining the flow of the reply management table update process in the first embodiment and another part, respectively. This reply management table update process is a process corresponding to the process in step S008 of the above-described safety confirmation mail transmission process. Note that when an event occurs, this processing is executed in parallel for a plurality of organizations that receive the safety confirmation service. Here, the processing for one organization will be described.

  The reply management table management unit 36 determines whether or not a reply mail has been received (step S201). If the reply management table management unit 36 determines that it has not been received yet (step S201; NO), the process repeats the process of step S201 and waits for reception of a reply mail.

  On the other hand, when it determines with having received (step S201; YES), the reply management table management part 36 analyzes the received reply mail, and specifies the answer content of safety (step S202). Then, the reply management table management unit 36 determines whether or not the identified answer is “safe” (step S203), and when it is determined that the identified answer is “safe” (step S203; YES) ), “Safe” is stored in the corresponding “answer content” column of the reply management table T5 (step S204).

  Then, the reply management table management unit 36 increments the corresponding “number of times” in the reply management table T5 (step S205), and the process proceeds to the process of step S209 described later.

  On the other hand, when it is determined in step S203 that the identified answer is other than “safe” (step S203; NO), the reply management table management unit 36 further sets the identified “answer” to “injury”. (Step S206). If it is determined that the identified answer is not “injured” (step S206; NO), “not yet” is displayed in the corresponding “answer content” column of the reply management table T5. “Answer” is stored (step S207). And a process progresses to the process of step S205.

  On the other hand, when it is determined that the identified answer is “injury” (step S206; YES), the reply management table management unit 36 stores “injury” in the corresponding “answer content” column of the reply management table T5. (Step S208).

  Then, the reply management table management unit 36 stores the reply time of the received reply mail in the corresponding “reply time” column of the reply management table T5 (step S209), calculates the reply time (step S210), The calculated reply time is stored in the corresponding “reply time” field of the reply management table T5 (step S211).

  Then, the reply management table management unit 36 stores the position information added to the text of the reply mail in the corresponding “position information” column of the reply management table T5 (step S212). Then, the reply management table management unit 36 refers to the area setting table T3, identifies the area based on the position information added to the body of the reply mail (step S213), and determines the area number of the identified area. Stored in the corresponding “area number” column of the reply management table T5 (step S214).

  Then, the reply management table management unit 36 sets a corresponding “flag” in the reply management table T5 (step S215), and determines whether or not reply mails from all registrants in the processing target organization have been received (step S215). Step S216). If the reply management table management unit 36 determines that the reply mails of all registrants have been received (step S216; YES), this process ends and the process proceeds to step S009 of the safety confirmation mail transmission process. move on.

  On the other hand, when it is determined that the reply mails of all registrants have not been received yet (step S216; NO), the reply management table management unit 36 further determines whether or not the update timer 34 has timed out ( Step S217). If the reply management table management unit 36 determines that the update timer 34 has not yet timed out (step S217; NO), the process returns to the process of step S201, and the above-described process is repeated.

  On the other hand, when it is determined that the update timer 34 has timed out (step S217; YES), the reply management table management unit 36 sets “unanswered” in the “answer” column of the reply management table T5 corresponding to the unreplyed person. Store (step S218), set “flag” in the reply management table T5 corresponding to the unreplyed person to “0” (step S219), and increment the corresponding “number of times” (step S220). Then, this process ends, and the process proceeds to the process of step S009 of the safety confirmation mail transmission process.

  Next, with reference to FIGS. 17 and 18, the flow of the transmission ranking table update processing in the first embodiment will be described. FIGS. 17 and 18 are a part of an example of a flowchart for explaining the flow of the transmission ordering table update process in the first embodiment, and another part, respectively. This transmission ranking table update process is a process corresponding to the process of step S009 of the above-described safety confirmation mail transmission process. Note that when an event occurs, this processing is executed in parallel for a plurality of organizations that receive the safety confirmation service. Here, the processing for one organization will be described.

  The transmission ranking table management unit 37 refers to the reply management table T5, identifies an entry to be processed (step S301), and determines whether the flag value of the “flag” of the identified entry is “1”. Determination is made (step S302).

  When it is determined that the flag value of the “flag” of the identified entry is “1” (step S302; YES), the transmission ranking table management unit 37 corresponds to the “block” column of the transmission ranking table T6. “B” is stored in (Step S303), and the process proceeds to the process of Step S305 described later.

  On the other hand, when it is determined that the flag value of the “flag” of the identified entry is “0” (step S302; NO), the transmission ranking table management unit 37 selects the corresponding “block” in the transmission ranking table T6. "A" is stored in the "" column (step S304).

  Then, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 determines whether or not the “response content” of the identified entry is “injury” (step S305), and the “response content” of the identified entry is other than “injury”. If it is determined that there is (step S305; NO), it is further determined whether or not the “response content” of the identified entry is “unanswered” (step S306).

  When it is determined that the “answer content” of the identified entry is “unanswered” (step S306; YES), the transmission ranking table management unit 37 sets the current priority to the maximum value (step S309). ), The process proceeds to the process of step S310 described later.

  On the other hand, when it is determined that the “response content” of the identified entry is “safe” (step S306; NO), the transmission ranking table management unit 37 refers to the area setting table T3 and identifies the identified entry. The “correction coefficient” corresponding to the “area number” is acquired (step S307), and the current priority is calculated according to the above equation 1 (step S308).

  Then, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 calculates the average value of the priorities according to the above-described formula 2 (step S310), and the corresponding “priority” in the transmission ranking table T6 is calculated with the calculated average values of the priorities. The (average value) field is updated (step S311), and the corresponding “transmission target flag” is set to “1” (step S312). Then, the process proceeds to step S313 described later.

  On the other hand, in the process of step S305, when it is determined that the “response content” of the identified entry is “injury” (step S305; YES), the transmission ranking table management unit 37 stores the transmission ranking table T6. The corresponding “transmission target flag” is set to “0” (step S401).

  Then, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 determines whether all entries have been processed (step S313). If the transmission ranking table management unit 37 determines that there are unprocessed entries, (Step S313; NO), the process returns to the process of Step S301, and the above-described process is repeated.

  On the other hand, if it is determined that all entries have been processed (step S313; YES), the transmission ranking table management unit 37 sorts the entries in the transmission ranking table T6 for each block (step S314), and for each block. Are set in descending order of the average priority (step S315), and the entries in the transmission ranking table T6 are rearranged according to the transmission order for each block (step S316). And this process is complete | finished and it returns to the process of step S001 of a safety confirmation mail transmission process.

  Next, with reference to FIG. 19, the flow of processing of the safety confirmation system 100 when an event occurs in the first embodiment will be described. FIG. 19 is a diagram illustrating a specific example for explaining the flow of processing in the safety confirmation system 100 according to the first embodiment.

  When the safety confirmation server 1 detects the occurrence of an event, the safety confirmation server 1 transmits a safety confirmation mail according to the transmission order of the transmission ordering table T6. Each user, when receiving the safety confirmation mail at the information terminal 2, generates a reply mail and returns a reply mail including the reply time, safety situation, and location information.

  When the safety confirmation server 1 receives the reply mail, it updates the reply management table T5, and then updates the transmission ranking table T6 based on the registered contents of the updated reply management table T5.

  When the occurrence of the next event is detected and the interval with the immediately preceding event is less than the monitoring timer threshold, the safety confirmation server 1 determines the A block registrant according to the priority order of the transmission ranking table T6. Then, the safety confirmation mail is transmitted, and then the safety confirmation mail is transmitted to the registrant of the B block according to the priority order of the transmission ranking table T6. At this time, the safety confirmation server 1 excludes the registrant whose answer in the previous event is “injury” from the transmission target of the safety confirmation mail.

  When the occurrence of the next event is detected and the interval with the immediately preceding event is equal to or greater than the monitoring timer threshold, the safety confirmation server 1 does not distinguish each block and registers all in order from the highest priority value A safety confirmation email is sent to the person.

  According to the first embodiment, the safety confirmation server 1 classifies the persons to be sent (registrants) of the safety confirmation mail into a plurality of groups having different priorities based on the reply content and the reply time for the safety confirmation mail. Set the transmission order within the group. When the safety confirmation server 1 transmits the safety confirmation mail at the next event, the safety confirmation server 1 transmits the safety confirmation mail in order from the group with the highest priority according to the transmission order within the group. By configuring in this way, for example, a safety confirmation mail can be transmitted quickly to a person who tends to be late in reply, and the reply delay can be suppressed.

  Further, according to the first embodiment, the safety confirmation server 1 determines that the safety response content in the immediately preceding event is “injured” when the interval from the immediately preceding event is less than the predetermined monitoring timer threshold. , Exclude from sending. When the interval from the immediately preceding event is short, the possibility that the “injury” has recovered is extremely low. Therefore, by configuring in this way, it is possible to prevent the “injury” person from being burdened. It is also possible to reduce the load on the network.

  Further, according to the first embodiment, the safety confirmation server 1 confirms the safety confirmation in descending order of the average priority value regardless of the group, when the interval from the previous event is equal to or greater than the predetermined monitoring timer threshold. send an email. When a certain amount of time has passed since the event occurred, it is highly likely that the status of the sender is changed from the previous reply, so this configuration makes it possible to confirm the safety confirmation mail according to a more suitable order. Can be transmitted.

  Moreover, according to the said Embodiment 1, the safety confirmation server 1 correct | amends a reply time based on a positional infomation, and sets the transmission order in a group based on the reply time after correction | amendment. With this configuration, it is possible to set the transmission order by using an index including not only the reply time but also the positional relationship.

(Embodiment 2)
In the transmission ranking table update processing according to the first embodiment, when the “response content” of the identified entry is “injury” (step S305; YES), the corresponding “transmission target flag” in the transmission ranking table T6 is set. It is configured to be set to “0” (step S401).

  In the second embodiment, even when the “answer content” of the specified entry is “injury” (step S305; YES), when the transmission ranking table T6 is updated, the corresponding “transmission target flag” Is configured to be set to “1”, and when sending a safety confirmation mail, the “transmission target flag” is reset to “0” as necessary to exclude it from the transmission target. To do.

  The basic configuration of the safety confirmation server 1 in the second embodiment is the same as that in the first embodiment. However, the configuration of the transmission ranking table T6 is different from that in the first embodiment. Further, the functions performed by the mail transmission control unit 35 and the transmission ranking table management unit 37 are slightly different from those in the first embodiment.

  FIG. 20 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of the transmission ranking table T6 according to the second embodiment. The transmission ranking table T6 according to the second embodiment further includes an “injury flag” as shown in FIG.

  The “injury flag” is a flag indicating whether or not the “response content” of the reply mail is “injury”. In the second embodiment, the flag value “0” indicates that it is other than “injury”. The flag value “1” indicates “injury”.

  The mail transmission control unit 35 in the second embodiment controls the transmission of the safety confirmation mail. More specifically, when sending a safety confirmation mail to an organization that receives a safety confirmation service for the first time, the email transmission control unit 35 sets the transmission order that is initially set by the administrator of the organization. A safety confirmation mail is transmitted according to the transmission order of the table T6. For example, the mail transmission control unit 35 determines that the transmission is the first transmission when the “block” field of the transmission ranking table T6 is blank, and determines that the transmission is the second or subsequent transmission when it is not blank.

  The values before the reset of the monitoring timer 33 stored in the data area of the storage unit 20 in the second and subsequent transmissions of the safety confirmation mail to the organization receiving the safety confirmation service are the timer threshold value table T4. If it is equal to or greater than the monitoring timer threshold value registered in, the mail transmission control unit 35 updates the transmission order in the transmission ranking table T6 in descending order of the average priority value without distinguishing each block, A safety confirmation email is sent according to the updated sending order.

  On the other hand, the value before the reset of the monitoring timer 33 stored in the data area of the storage unit 20, which is the second or later transmission of the safety confirmation mail, to the organization receiving the safety confirmation service is the timer threshold value. If it is less than the monitoring timer threshold value registered in the table T4, the mail transmission control unit 35 searches for the “injury flag” in the transmission ranking table T6, and among the registrants of the A block, It is determined whether or not there is a person whose “answer content” is “injured”.

  If there is no “injured” person, the mail transmission control unit 35 transmits a safety confirmation mail to the A block registrant according to the transmission order of the transmission ordering table T6. On the other hand, if there is a person who is injured, the mail transmission control unit 35 sets the “transmission target flag” in the transmission ranking table T6 corresponding to the “injured” registrant to “0”. A safety confirmation mail is transmitted to the A block registrant according to the transmission order of the transmission ordering table T6. In other words, in this case, the mail transmission control unit 35 excludes the “injured” registrant from the transmission target of the safety confirmation mail.

  After transmitting the safety confirmation mail to the A block registrant, the mail transmission control unit 35 transmits the safety confirmation mail to the B block registrant according to the same method as in the A block.

  The transmission ranking table management unit 37 in the second embodiment manages the transmission ranking table T6. More specifically, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 refers to the reply management table T5 to identify the entry to be processed, and when the flag value of the “flag” of the identified entry is “1”. Then, “B” is stored in the corresponding “block” column of the transmission ranking table T6. On the other hand, when the flag value of “flag” of the specified entry is “0”, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 stores “A” in the corresponding “block” column of the transmission ranking table T6.

  Then, when the “response contents” of the identified entry is “safe”, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 refers to the area setting table T3 and selects “correction” corresponding to the “area number” of the identified entry. Get the coefficient. Then, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 calculates the current priority according to the above equation 1.

  Then, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 calculates the average value of the priorities according to the above-described formula 2, and the corresponding “priority (average value)” in the transmission ranking table T6 is calculated using the calculated average priority values. "" Column is updated. Then, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 sets the corresponding “injury flag” in the transmission ranking table T6 to “0” and sets the corresponding “transmission target flag” to “1”.

  When the “response content” of the identified entry is “unanswered”, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 sets the current priority to the maximum value, and the average value of the priorities according to the above-described equation 2. And the corresponding “priority (average value)” column of the transmission ranking table T6 is updated with the calculated average value of priorities. Then, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 sets the corresponding “injury flag” in the transmission ranking table T6 to “0” and sets the corresponding “transmission target flag” to “1”.

  When the “response content” of the identified entry is “injury”, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 sets the corresponding “injury flag” in the transmission ranking table T6 without calculating the average priority. In addition to setting “1”, the corresponding “transmission target flag” is set to “1”.

  For example, in the transmission ranking table T6 shown in FIG. 20, “Jiro Kawasaki” is “injured”.

  Then, when the processing of all registrants is completed, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 sorts the entries in the transmission ranking table T6 for each block, and further sets the transmission ranking in descending order of the average priority value for each block. Set. Then, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 rearranges the entries in the transmission ranking table T6 according to the transmission ranking for each block.

  Next, the flow of the safety confirmation mail transmission process in the second embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 21 is a part of an example of a flowchart for explaining the flow of the safety confirmation mail transmission process according to the second embodiment. This safety confirmation mail transmission process is started with the detection of an event as a trigger.

  Note that when an event occurs, this processing is executed in parallel for a plurality of organizations that receive the safety confirmation service. Here, the processing for one organization will be described. Here, the characteristic part of the safety confirmation mail transmission process in the second embodiment will be mainly described.

  The mail transmission control unit 35 determines whether or not the value of the monitoring timer 33 before reset stored in the data area of the storage unit 20 is greater than or equal to the monitoring timer threshold (step S101).

  If it is determined that the value is equal to or greater than the monitoring timer threshold value (step S101; YES), the mail transmission control unit 35 does not distinguish each block, and the transmission rank in the transmission ranking table T6 in descending order of the average priority value. Is updated (step S102), and a safety confirmation mail is transmitted according to the updated transmission order (step S104). And a process progresses to the process of step S007.

  On the other hand, if it is determined that it is less than the monitoring timer threshold (step S101; NO), the mail transmission control unit 35 performs A block transmission processing (step S501), and then performs B block transmission processing (step S502). ). And a process progresses to the process of step S007.

  Next, the flow of A (or B) block transmission processing in the second embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 22 is an example of a flowchart for explaining the flow of A (or B) block transmission processing in the second embodiment. This A (or B) block transmission process is a process corresponding to the process of step S501 (or step S502) of the safety confirmation mail transmission process in the second embodiment.

  Note that when an event occurs, this processing is executed in parallel for a plurality of organizations that receive the safety confirmation service. Here, the processing for one organization will be described. Since the main process for the A block and the main process for the B block are the same, the process for the A block will be described here.

  The mail transmission control unit 35 searches for the “injury flag” in the transmission ordering table T6, and determines whether there is a person whose “response content” in the previous event is “injured” among the registrants of the A block. Determination is made (step S601).

  If it is determined that there is no “injured” person (step S601; NO), the mail transmission control unit 35 sends a safety confirmation mail to the A block registrant according to the transmission order of the transmission ranking table T6. Transmit (step S603). Then, this process ends, and the process proceeds to step S502 of the safety confirmation mail transmission process in the second embodiment.

  On the other hand, if it is determined that there is a “injured” person (step S601; YES), the mail transmission control unit 35 sets the “transmission target flag” in the transmission ranking table T6 corresponding to the “injured” registrant. “0” is set (step S602), and then a safety confirmation mail is transmitted to the A block registrant in accordance with the transmission order of the transmission ranking table T6 (step S603). In other words, in this case, the mail transmission control unit 35 excludes the “injured” registrant from the transmission target of the safety confirmation mail. Then, this process ends, and the process proceeds to step S502 of the safety confirmation mail transmission process in the second embodiment.

  Next, with reference to FIG. 23, the flow of the transmission ranking table update process in the second embodiment will be described. FIG. 23 is a part of an example of a flowchart for explaining the flow of the transmission ranking table update processing in the second embodiment. This transmission ranking table update process is a process corresponding to the process of step S009 of the safety confirmation mail transmission process.

  Note that when an event occurs, this processing is executed in parallel for a plurality of organizations that receive the safety confirmation service. Here, the processing for one organization will be described. Here, the characteristic part of the transmission ranking table update process in the second embodiment will be mainly described.

  The transmission ranking table management unit 37 calculates the average value of the priorities in accordance with the above-described equation 2 (step S310), and the corresponding “priority (average) in the transmission ranking table T6 with the calculated average value of the priorities. Value) "column is updated (step S311). Then, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 sets the corresponding “injury flag” in the transmission ranking table T6 to “0” (step S701), and sets the corresponding “transmission target flag” to “1” (step S701). Step S312). Then, the process proceeds to step S313 described later.

  On the other hand, in the process of step S305, when it is determined that the “response content” of the identified entry is “injury” (step S305; YES), the transmission ranking table management unit 37 stores the transmission ranking table T6. The corresponding “injury flag” is set to “1” (step S702), and the corresponding “transmission target flag” is set to “1” (step S312).

  Then, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 determines whether all entries have been processed (step S313). If the transmission ranking table management unit 37 determines that there are unprocessed entries, (Step S313; NO), the process returns to the process of Step S301, and the above-described process is repeated.

  On the other hand, if it is determined that all entries have been processed (step S313; YES), the transmission ranking table management unit 37 sorts the entries in the transmission ranking table T6 for each block (step S314), and for each block. Are set in descending order of the average priority (step S315), and the entries in the transmission ranking table T6 are rearranged according to the transmission order for each block (step S316). And this process is complete | finished and it returns to the process of step S001 of a safety confirmation mail transmission process.

(Embodiment 3)
In the first and second embodiments, the average value of the priorities is updated even when the registrant is at the affiliated site. In the third embodiment, when the registrant is at the affiliated site, the average value of the priority is not updated. That is, the priority when the registrant is at the affiliated site is not reflected in the average value.

  Note that the configuration of the third embodiment can be applied to both the first and second embodiments, but here, a case where the configuration is applied to the first embodiment will be described.

  The basic configuration of the safety confirmation server 1 in the third embodiment is the same as that in the first embodiment. However, the functions performed by the reply management table management unit 36 and the transmission ranking table management unit 37 are slightly different from those in the first embodiment.

  The reply management table management unit 36 in the third embodiment manages the reply management table T5. More specifically, the reply management table management unit 36 stores the time when the mail transmission control unit 35 transmitted the safety confirmation mail in the “transmission time” column of the reply management table T5.

  When the reply management table management unit 36 receives the reply mail for the safety confirmation mail, the reply management table 36 analyzes the reply mail. For example, if the safety confirmation mail is illustrated in FIG. 3, the reply management table 36 The first character in the text is specified, and the answer content of safety is specified based on the first character. Then, the reply management table management unit 36 stores the identified answer contents in the corresponding “answer contents” column of the reply management table T5. At this time, if it is not possible to specify the answer content of safety, the reply management table management unit 36 stores “unanswered” in the corresponding “answer content” column of the reply management table T5.

  Then, the reply management table management unit 36 stores the reply time of the reply mail in the corresponding “reply time” column of the reply management table T5, calculates the reply time, and calculates the computed reply time in the reply management table T5. Store in the corresponding “Reply Time” field.

  Then, the reply management table management unit 36 stores the position information added to the body of the reply mail in the corresponding “position information” column of the reply management table T5, and refers to the area setting table T3 to reply mail. The area including the point indicated by the position information added to the body text is specified, and the area number of the specified area is stored in the corresponding “area number” column of the reply management table T5.

  Then, the reply management table management unit 36, when the “response content” is “unanswered”, or when the “response content” is “safe” and the registrant is not at the affiliated site, The corresponding “number of times” in the reply management table T5 is incremented. In other words, when the “response content” is “injury” and when the “response content” is “safe”, the corresponding “number of times” in the reply management table T5 is set in the base where the registrant belongs. Do not increment.

  For example, in the reply management table T5 shown in FIG. 24, “Yokohama Jiro” and “Taro Kawasaki” are located at the affiliation base, and “Jiro Kawasaki” is “injured”. . That is, the “number of times” in the reply management table T5 corresponding to them is not incremented in the third embodiment. Here, FIG. 24 is a diagram showing a specific example of the reply management table T5 in the third embodiment.

  Then, the reply management table management unit 36 sets a corresponding “flag” in the reply management table T5. More specifically, referring to the registrant management table T1, if the identified area is the base of the corresponding registrant's affiliation, the reply management table management unit 36 sets the flag value “1”. However, if the identified area is not the location to which the corresponding registrant belongs, the flag value “0” is set.

  Further, the reply management table management unit 36 does not yet reply when the value of the update timer 34 becomes equal to or greater than the update timer threshold registered in the timer threshold table T4, that is, when the update timer 34 times out. When there is a person, “unanswered” is stored in the “answer” column of the reply management table T5 corresponding to the unanswered person. Then, the reply management table management unit 36 sets the “flag” of the reply management table T5 corresponding to the unreplyed person to “0” and increments the corresponding “number of times”.

  The transmission ranking table management unit 37 according to the third embodiment manages the transmission ranking table T6. More specifically, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 refers to the reply management table T5 to identify the entry to be processed, and when the flag value of the “flag” of the identified entry is “1”. Then, “B” is stored in the corresponding “block” column of the transmission ranking table T6.

  Then, when the “response content” of the identified entry is other than “injury”, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 sets the corresponding “transmission target flag” in the transmission ranking table T6 to “1”, When the “response content” of the identified entry is “injury”, the corresponding “transmission target flag” in the transmission ranking table T6 is set to “0”. That is, in the third embodiment, the average value of the priority is not updated for the registrant of the B block. This is because if the registrant is at the location of the affiliation, there is a possibility that the registrant is replying faster than usual because the registrant was prompted to reply, so the priority in this case is reflected in the average value. This is in order not to let them.

  For example, the transmission ranking table T6 shown in FIG. 25 shows a case where “Jiro Yokohama” and “Taro Kawasaki” are at the affiliated sites. That is, the “priority (average value)” in the transmission ranking table T6 corresponding to them is not updated in the third embodiment. Here, FIG. 25 is a diagram showing a specific example of the transmission ranking table T6 in the third embodiment.

  On the other hand, when the flag value of “flag” of the specified entry is “0”, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 stores “A” in the corresponding “block” column of the transmission ranking table T6. Then, when the “response contents” of the identified entry is “safe”, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 refers to the area setting table T3 and selects “correction” corresponding to the “area number” of the identified entry. Get the coefficient. Then, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 calculates the current priority according to the above equation 1.

  Then, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 calculates the average value of the priorities according to the above-described formula 2, and the corresponding “priority (average value)” in the transmission ranking table T6 is calculated using the calculated average priority values. "Column is updated, and the corresponding" transmission target flag "is set to" 1 ".

  When the “response content” of the identified entry is “unanswered”, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 sets the current priority to the maximum value, and the average value of the priorities according to the above-described equation 2. And the corresponding “priority (average value)” column of the transmission ranking table T6 is updated with the calculated average value of priority, and the corresponding “transmission target flag” is set to “1”.

  When the “response content” of the identified entry is “injury”, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 calculates the corresponding “transmission target flag” in the transmission ranking table T6 without calculating the average value of the priorities. Is set to “0”.

  Then, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 sorts the entries in the transmission ranking table T6 for each block after the processing of all registrants is completed. Then, the transmission ordering table management unit 37 sets the transmission order for blocks A in descending order of the average priority, and sets the transmission order for blocks B in descending order of the current transmission time. To do. Then, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 rearranges the entries in the transmission ranking table T6 according to the transmission ranking for each block.

  Next, with reference to FIGS. 26 to 28, the flow of the reply management table update process in the third embodiment will be described. 26 to 28 are a first part, a second part, and a third part of an example of a flowchart for explaining the flow of the reply management table update process in the third embodiment, respectively. This reply management table update process is a process corresponding to the process in step S008 of the above-described safety confirmation mail transmission process. Note that when an event occurs, this processing is executed in parallel for a plurality of organizations that receive the safety confirmation service. Here, the processing for one organization will be described.

  The reply management table management unit 36 determines whether or not a reply mail has been received (step S201). If the reply management table management unit 36 determines that it has not been received yet (step S201; NO), the process repeats the process of step S201 and waits for reception of a reply mail.

  On the other hand, when it determines with having received (step S201; YES), the reply management table management part 36 analyzes the received reply mail, and specifies the answer content of safety (step S202). Then, the reply management table management unit 36 determines whether or not the identified answer is “safe” (step S203), and when it is determined that the identified answer is “safe” (step S203; YES) ), “Safe” is stored in the corresponding “answer content” column of the reply management table T5 (step S204). And a process progresses to the process of below-mentioned step S209.

  On the other hand, when it is determined in step S203 that the identified answer is other than “safe” (step S203; NO), the reply management table management unit 36 further sets the identified “answer” to “injury”. (Step S206). If it is determined that the identified answer is not “injured” (step S206; NO), “not yet” is displayed in the corresponding “answer content” column of the reply management table T5. “Answer” is stored (step S207). And a process progresses to the process of below-mentioned step S209.

  On the other hand, when it is determined that the identified answer is “injury” (step S206; YES), the reply management table management unit 36 stores “injury” in the corresponding “answer content” column of the reply management table T5. (Step S208).

  Then, the reply management table management unit 36 stores the reply time of the received reply mail in the corresponding “reply time” column of the reply management table T5 (step S209), calculates the reply time (step S210), The calculated reply time is stored in the corresponding “reply time” field of the reply management table T5 (step S211).

  Then, the reply management table management unit 36 stores the position information added to the text of the reply mail in the corresponding “position information” column of the reply management table T5 (step S212). Then, the reply management table management unit 36 refers to the area setting table T3, identifies the area based on the position information added to the body of the reply mail (step S213), and determines the area number of the identified area. Stored in the corresponding “area number” column of the reply management table T5 (step S214).

  Then, the reply management table management unit 36 determines whether or not “response content” is “unanswered” (step S801), and determines that “response content” is “unanswered” ( Step S801; YES), the corresponding “number of times” in the reply management table T5 is incremented (Step S802). And a process progresses to the process of step S215 mentioned later.

  On the other hand, when it is determined that the “response content” is other than “unanswered” (step S801; NO), the reply management table management unit 36 further determines whether the “response content” is “safe”. Is determined (step S803). If it is determined that the “response content” is “injury” (step S803; NO), the corresponding “number of times” in the reply management table T5 is not incremented, and the process proceeds to the process of step S215 described later. move on.

  On the other hand, when it is determined that the “response content” is “safe” (step S803; YES), the reply management table management unit 36 further refers to the registrant management table T1 and the base management table T2 to determine the area. Based on the number, it is determined whether or not the corresponding registrant is at the affiliated site (step S804).

  If it is determined that the corresponding registrant is not at the affiliated site (step S804; NO), the reply management table management unit 36 increments the corresponding “number of times” in the reply management table T5 (step S802). . And a process progresses to the process of step S215 mentioned later.

  On the other hand, if it is determined that the corresponding registrant is at the site of the affiliation (step S804; YES), the corresponding “number of times” in the reply management table T5 is not incremented, and the process proceeds to step S215 described later. Proceed to processing.

  Then, the reply management table management unit 36 sets a corresponding “flag” in the reply management table T5 (step S215), and determines whether or not reply mails from all registrants in the processing target organization have been received (step S215). Step S216). If the reply management table management unit 36 determines that the reply mails of all registrants have been received (step S216; YES), this process ends and the process proceeds to step S009 of the safety confirmation mail transmission process. move on.

  On the other hand, when it is determined that the reply mails of all registrants have not been received yet (step S216; NO), the reply management table management unit 36 further determines whether or not the update timer 34 has timed out ( Step S217). If the reply management table management unit 36 determines that the update timer 34 has not yet timed out (step S217; NO), the process returns to the process of step S201, and the above-described process is repeated.

  On the other hand, when it is determined that the update timer 34 has timed out (step S217; YES), the reply management table management unit 36 sets “unanswered” in the “answer” column of the reply management table T5 corresponding to the unreplyed person. Store (step S218), set “flag” in the reply management table T5 corresponding to the unreplyed person to “0” (step S219), and increment the corresponding “number of times” (step S220). Then, this process ends, and the process proceeds to the process of step S009 of the safety confirmation mail transmission process.

  Next, with reference to FIG. 29 and FIG. 30, the flow of the transmission ranking table update process in the third embodiment will be described. FIG. 29 and FIG. 30 are a part of an example of a flowchart for explaining the flow of the transmission ranking table update process in the third embodiment and another part, respectively. This transmission ranking table update process is a process corresponding to the process of step S009 of the above-described safety confirmation mail transmission process. Note that when an event occurs, this processing is executed in parallel for a plurality of organizations that receive the safety confirmation service. Here, the processing for one organization will be described.

  The transmission ranking table management unit 37 refers to the reply management table T5, identifies an entry to be processed (step S301), and determines whether the flag value of the “flag” of the identified entry is “1”. Determination is made (step S302).

  When it is determined that the flag value of the “flag” of the identified entry is “1” (step S302; YES), the transmission ranking table management unit 37 corresponds to the “block” column of the transmission ranking table T6. “B” is stored in (step S303), and it is determined whether or not the “answer content” of the identified entry is “injury” (step S901).

  If the transmission ranking table management unit 37 determines that the “answer content” of the identified entry is “injury” (step S901; YES), the process proceeds to the process of step S401 described later, If it is determined that the “answer content” of the entry is other than “injury” (step S901; NO), the process proceeds to step S312 described later.

  On the other hand, when it is determined that the flag value of the “flag” of the identified entry is “0” (step S302; NO), the transmission ranking table management unit 37 selects the corresponding “block” in the transmission ranking table T6. "A" is stored in the "" column (step S304).

  Then, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 determines whether or not the “response content” of the identified entry is “injury” (step S305), and the “response content” of the identified entry is other than “injury”. If it is determined that there is (step S305; NO), it is further determined whether or not the “response content” of the identified entry is “unanswered” (step S306).

  When it is determined that the “answer content” of the identified entry is “unanswered” (step S306; YES), the transmission ranking table management unit 37 sets the current priority to the maximum value (step S309). ), The process proceeds to the process of step S310 described later.

  On the other hand, when it is determined that the “response content” of the identified entry is “safe” (step S306; NO), the transmission ranking table management unit 37 refers to the area setting table T3 and identifies the identified entry. The “correction coefficient” corresponding to the “area number” is acquired (step S307), and the current priority is calculated according to the above equation 1 (step S308).

  Then, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 calculates the average value of the priorities according to the above-described formula 2 (step S310), and the corresponding “priority” in the transmission ranking table T6 is calculated with the calculated average values of the priorities. The (average value) field is updated (step S311), and the corresponding “transmission target flag” is set to “1” (step S312). Then, the process proceeds to step S313 described later.

  On the other hand, in the process of step S305, when it is determined that the “response content” of the identified entry is “injury” (step S305; YES), the transmission ranking table management unit 37 stores the transmission ranking table T6. The corresponding “transmission target flag” is set to “0” (step S401).

  Then, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 determines whether all entries have been processed (step S313). If the transmission ranking table management unit 37 determines that there are unprocessed entries, (Step S313; NO), the process returns to the process of Step S301, and the above-described process is repeated.

  On the other hand, if it is determined that all entries have been processed (step S313; YES), the transmission ranking table management unit 37 sorts the entries in the transmission ranking table T6 for each block (step S314).

  Then, the transmission ordering table management unit 37 sets the transmission order for the A block in descending order of the average priority (step S902), and for the B block in the order of the latest reply time. A transmission order is set (step S903). Then, the transmission ranking table management unit 37 rearranges the entries of the transmission ranking table T6 according to the transmission ranking for each block (step S316). And this process is complete | finished and it returns to the process of step S001 of a safety confirmation mail transmission process.

  According to the third embodiment, the safety confirmation server 1 does not update the average value of the priority when the registrant is at the location to which the affiliation belongs. Set the transmission order in ascending order. By configuring in this way, for example, if the registrant is at the base of the affiliation, there is a possibility that other registrants are prompting a reply, so the priority in this case is averaged. By not reflecting the values, it is possible to perform more appropriate transmission ranking.

  In the first to third embodiments, when the registrant is at the base of the organization to which the registrant belongs, the average priority value may not be updated.

  In the first to third embodiments, the registrant is described as being divided into the A block and the B block. However, the present invention is not limited to this, and the registrant may be divided into three or more groups. For example, it may be configured to be divided into a group of registrants at a base location of affiliation, a group of registrants at a base of an organization other than the affiliation destination, and a group of registrants at other locations.

  In the first to third embodiments, the safety confirmation service has been described as an example. However, the present invention is not limited to this. For example, an email that requires an answer such as a questionnaire for participants who participated in an event such as an exhibition. Applicable when transmitting.

  Further, in the first to third embodiments, it has been described that a safety response and position information are transmitted to the safety confirmation server 1 by a reply mail. However, the present invention is not limited to this, and for example, using a dedicated application, You may comprise so that an answer and position information may be acquired. In this case, the position information may be configured to prepare a dedicated column and add GPS positioning information, for example.

  FIG. 31 is a diagram illustrating an example of a hardware configuration of the safety confirmation server 1 in each embodiment. The safety confirmation server 1 illustrated in FIG. 2 may be realized by various hardware illustrated in FIG. 31, for example. In the example of FIG. 31, the safety confirmation server 1 includes a CPU 201, a RAM 202, a ROM 203, an HDD 204, a device interface 205 for connecting an external device, a communication module 206, and a reading device 207. Connected through.

  The CPU 201 loads an operation program stored in the HDD 204 into the RAM 202 and executes various processes while using the RAM 202 as a working memory. The CPU 201 can realize each functional unit of the control unit 30 illustrated in FIG. 2 by executing the operation program.

  Note that an operation program for executing the above operation is a computer-readable recording medium such as a flexible disk, a CD-ROM (Compact Disk-Read Only Memory), a DVD (Digital Versatile Disk), or an MO (Magneto Optical disk). 209 may be stored and distributed, read by the reading device 207 of the safety confirmation server 1, and installed in a computer to execute the above-described processing. Furthermore, an operation program may be stored in a disk device or the like of a server device on the Internet, and the operation program may be downloaded to the computer of the safety confirmation server 1 via the communication module 206.

  Depending on the embodiment, other types of storage devices other than the RAM 202, the ROM 203, and the HDD 204 may be used. For example, the safety confirmation server 1 may include a storage device such as a CAM (Content Addressable Memory), an SRAM (Static Random Access Memory), or an SDRAM (Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory).

  Depending on the embodiment, the hardware configuration of the safety confirmation server 1 may be different from that in FIG. 31, and other hardware other than the standard / type illustrated in FIG. 31 is applied to the safety confirmation server 1. You can also.

  For example, each functional unit of the control unit 30 of the safety confirmation server 1 illustrated in FIG. 2 may be realized by a hardware circuit. Specifically, each functional unit of the control unit 30 shown in FIG. 2 is realized by a reconfigurable circuit such as an FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array) or an ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuit) instead of the CPU 201. Also good. Of course, these functional units may be realized by both the CPU 201 and the hardware circuit.

  Moreover, each function part of the safety confirmation server 1 shown in FIG. 2 may be implement | achieved by the apparatus which has several independent housing | casing. For example, each functional unit of the safety confirmation server 1 illustrated in FIG. 2 may be realized by a plurality of server devices and an external storage device.

  In the above, several embodiments have been described. However, the embodiments are not limited to the above-described embodiments, and should be understood as including various modifications and alternatives of the above-described embodiments. For example, it will be understood that various embodiments can be embodied by modifying the components without departing from the spirit and scope thereof. It will be understood that various embodiments can be made by appropriately combining a plurality of components disclosed in the above-described embodiments. Further, various embodiments may be implemented by deleting or replacing some components from all the components shown in the embodiments, or adding some components to the components shown in the embodiments. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that this can be done.

The following additional notes are further disclosed with respect to the embodiments including the first to third embodiments.
(Appendix 1)
An information processing apparatus that transmits a safety confirmation email to an information terminal corresponding to each registrant of a plurality of registrants, and confirms the safety status of the registrant based on the reply content to the safety confirmation email,
Classification means for classifying the plurality of registrants into a plurality of groups having different priorities based on the reply content;
A setting means for setting, for each registrant, a transmission order within the group to which the registrant belongs, based on a reply time that is a difference between a transmission time of the safety confirmation mail and a reply time;
Transmission means for transmitting the safety confirmation mail to the information terminal corresponding to the registrant when transmitting the next safety confirmation mail in order from the group with the highest priority according to the transmission order in the group. When,
With
The reply content includes location information indicating the location of the information terminal corresponding to the registrant.
An information processing apparatus characterized by that.
(Appendix 2)
A correction means for correcting the reply time based on the position information is further provided,
The setting means sets the transmission order based on the reply time after correction.
The information processing apparatus according to appendix 1, wherein
(Appendix 3)
For each of the registrants, further comprising a calculation means for calculating an average value of the reply times after correction up to this time,
The setting means sets the transmission order in descending order of the average value;
The information processing apparatus according to Supplementary Note 2, wherein
(Appendix 4)
The calculating means calculates the average value by excluding the reply time when the safety situation is injured.
The information processing apparatus according to supplementary note 3, wherein
(Appendix 5)
The correction means corrects the reply time so that a next transmission order of the safety confirmation mail is higher for the registrant who cannot specify the safety situation.
The information processing apparatus according to any one of appendices 2 to 4, characterized in that:
(Appendix 6)
The correction means is for an unreplyed person who has not responded to the safety confirmation mail when the elapsed time from the occurrence of an event that triggers transmission of the safety confirmation mail exceeds a predetermined first threshold. , Correct the reply time so that the next transmission order of the safety confirmation email is higher,
The information processing apparatus according to any one of appendices 2 to 5, characterized in that:
(Appendix 7)
When the occurrence interval of the event that triggers the transmission of the safety confirmation email is equal to or greater than a predetermined second threshold, regardless of the group distinction, based on the reply time or the corrected reply time, Resetting means for resetting the transmission order, further comprising:
The transmission means transmits the safety confirmation email to the information terminal corresponding to the registrant according to the transmission order after resetting.
The information processing apparatus according to any one of supplementary notes 1 to 6, wherein:
(Appendix 8)
The transmission means corresponds to the registrant corresponding to the registrant whose safety situation in the previous event is injured when an occurrence interval of an event that triggers transmission of the safety confirmation mail is less than a predetermined second threshold. Exclude information terminals from being sent,
The information processing apparatus according to any one of appendices 1 to 7, characterized in that:
(Appendix 9)
One group of the plurality of groups is a group of the registrant whose location indicated by the location information is a base of an organization to which the registrant belongs.
The information processing apparatus according to any one of appendices 1 to 8, characterized in that:
(Appendix 10)
The setting means sets the transmission order in the group in the order in which the reply time is long for the group of the registrant whose position indicated by the position information is the base of the organization to which the registrant belongs.
The information processing apparatus according to appendix 9, wherein:
(Appendix 11)
A mail transmission method of an information processing apparatus that transmits a safety confirmation email to an information terminal corresponding to each registrant of a plurality of registrants and confirms the safety status of the registrant based on the reply content to the safety confirmation email. There,
Classifying the plurality of registrants into a plurality of groups having different priorities based on the reply content including the position information indicating the position of the registrant;
Based on the reply time that is the difference between the sending time of the safety confirmation email and the reply time, for each registrant, set the sending order within the group to which the registrant belongs,
When transmitting the next safety confirmation mail, the safety confirmation mail is transmitted to the information terminal corresponding to the registrant in order from the group with the highest priority according to the transmission order in the group.
A mail transmission method characterized by the above.
(Appendix 12)
To a computer of an information processing apparatus that transmits a safety confirmation email to an information terminal corresponding to each registrant of a plurality of registrants and confirms the safety status of the registrant based on the reply content to the safety confirmation email.
Classifying the plurality of registrants into a plurality of groups having different priorities based on the reply content including the position information indicating the position of the registrant;
Based on the reply time that is the difference between the sending time of the safety confirmation email and the reply time, for each registrant, set the sending order within the group to which the registrant belongs,
When transmitting the next safety confirmation mail, the safety confirmation mail is transmitted to the information terminal corresponding to the registrant in order from the group with the highest priority according to the transmission order in the group.
To execute the process,
A program characterized by that.
(Appendix 13)
To a computer of an information processing apparatus that transmits a safety confirmation email to an information terminal corresponding to each registrant of a plurality of registrants and confirms the safety status of the registrant based on the reply content to the safety confirmation email.
Classifying the plurality of registrants into a plurality of groups having different priorities based on the reply content including the position information indicating the position of the registrant;
Based on the reply time that is the difference between the sending time of the safety confirmation email and the reply time, for each registrant, set the sending order within the group to which the registrant belongs,
When transmitting the next safety confirmation mail, the safety confirmation mail is transmitted to the information terminal corresponding to the registrant in order from the group with the highest priority according to the transmission order in the group.
A recording medium storing a program for executing processing.

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 100 Safety confirmation system 1 Safety confirmation server 10 Communication part 20 Storage part T1 Registrant management table T2 Base management table T3 Area setting table T4 Timer threshold value table T5 Reply management table T6 Transmission ranking table 30 Control part 31 Event monitoring part 32 Timer control Unit 33 Monitoring timer 34 Update timer 35 Mail transmission control unit 36 Reply management table management unit 37 Transmission ranking table management unit 2 Information terminal 3 Administrator terminal NW network 201 CPU
202 RAM
203 ROM
204 HDD
205 Device Interface 206 Communication Module 207 Reading Device 208 Bus 209 Recording Medium

Claims (12)

An information processing apparatus that transmits a safety confirmation email to an information terminal corresponding to each registrant of a plurality of registrants, and confirms the safety status of the registrant based on the reply content to the safety confirmation email,
Classification means for classifying the plurality of registrants into a plurality of groups having different priorities based on the reply content;
A setting means for setting, for each registrant, a transmission order within the group to which the registrant belongs, based on a reply time that is a difference between a transmission time of the safety confirmation mail and a reply time;
Transmission means for transmitting the safety confirmation mail to the information terminal corresponding to the registrant when transmitting the next safety confirmation mail in order from the group with the highest priority according to the transmission order in the group. When,
With
The reply content includes location information indicating the location of the information terminal corresponding to the registrant.
An information processing apparatus characterized by that. A correction means for correcting the reply time based on the position information is further provided,
The setting means sets the transmission order based on the reply time after correction.
The information processing apparatus according to claim 1. For each of the registrants, further comprising a calculation means for calculating an average value of the reply times after correction up to this time,
The setting means sets the transmission order in descending order of the average value;
The information processing apparatus according to claim 2. The calculating means calculates the average value by excluding the reply time when the safety situation is injured.
The information processing apparatus according to claim 3. The correction means corrects the reply time so that a next transmission order of the safety confirmation mail is higher for the registrant who cannot specify the safety situation.
The information processing apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the information processing apparatus is an information processing apparatus. The correction means is for an unreplyed person who has not responded to the safety confirmation mail when the elapsed time from the occurrence of an event that triggers transmission of the safety confirmation mail exceeds a predetermined first threshold. , Correct the reply time so that the next transmission order of the safety confirmation email is higher,
The information processing apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the information processing apparatus is an information processing apparatus. When the occurrence interval of the event that triggers the transmission of the safety confirmation email is equal to or greater than a predetermined second threshold, regardless of the group distinction, based on the reply time or the corrected reply time, Resetting means for resetting the transmission order, further comprising:
The transmission means transmits the safety confirmation email to the information terminal corresponding to the registrant according to the transmission order after resetting.
The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the information processing apparatus is an information processing apparatus. The transmission means corresponds to the registrant corresponding to the registrant whose safety situation in the previous event is injured when an occurrence interval of an event that triggers transmission of the safety confirmation mail is less than a predetermined second threshold. Exclude information terminals from being sent,
The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the information processing apparatus is an information processing apparatus. One group of the plurality of groups is a group of the registrant whose location indicated by the location information is a base of an organization to which the registrant belongs.
The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the information processing apparatus is an information processing apparatus. The setting means sets the transmission order in the group in the order in which the reply time is long for the group of the registrant whose position indicated by the position information is the base of the organization to which the registrant belongs.
The information processing apparatus according to claim 9. A mail transmission method of an information processing apparatus that transmits a safety confirmation email to an information terminal corresponding to each registrant of a plurality of registrants and confirms the safety status of the registrant based on the reply content to the safety confirmation email. There,
Classifying the plurality of registrants into a plurality of groups having different priorities based on the reply content including the position information indicating the position of the registrant;
Based on the reply time that is the difference between the sending time of the safety confirmation email and the reply time, for each registrant, set the sending order within the group to which the registrant belongs,
When transmitting the next safety confirmation mail, the safety confirmation mail is transmitted to the information terminal corresponding to the registrant in order from the group with the highest priority according to the transmission order in the group.
A mail transmission method characterized by the above. To a computer of an information processing apparatus that transmits a safety confirmation email to an information terminal corresponding to each registrant of a plurality of registrants and confirms the safety status of the registrant based on the reply content to the safety confirmation email.
Classifying the plurality of registrants into a plurality of groups having different priorities based on the reply content including the position information indicating the position of the registrant;
Based on the reply time that is the difference between the sending time of the safety confirmation email and the reply time, for each registrant, set the sending order within the group to which the registrant belongs,
When transmitting the next safety confirmation mail, the safety confirmation mail is transmitted to the information terminal corresponding to the registrant in order from the group with the highest priority according to the transmission order in the group.
To execute the process,
A program characterized by that.