JP2014038490A - Progress management system and program - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a progress management system in which a time expected to be taken until a processing executor completes all items in a progress table in accordance with a processing state of another processing executor without previously calculating it.SOLUTION: On the basis of information related to a work time included in response data acquired by an acquisition part 110, an average work time calculation part 111 calculates the average work time needed until a responsible person in an organization having completed all the responses, takes to complete a response for each item in a question table. Then, for an organization having one or more items in the question table which are unanswered, a total of average work times for items which the organization has not responded to yet, from calculated average work times, is calculated as a completion estimated work time of the organization.

Description

  The present invention relates to a progress management system and a program.

  Patent Document 1 discloses a technique for calculating a probability distribution of required time based on statistics of required time required for a plurality of processes for processing and assembling members constituting a product and calculating a delay probability with respect to the delivery date of the product. Is disclosed.

Japanese Patent Laying-Open No. 2005-71136

  An object of the present invention is to calculate a predicted time until a process executor completes processing of all items in the progress table according to the processing status of another process executor without calculating in advance. It is to provide a progress management system and program capable of doing this.

The present invention according to claim 1 is an acquisition means for acquiring information relating to the time required for each of a plurality of process performers to complete the processing of each item from a progress table configured by a plurality of items;
First calculation means for calculating an average time required for the process executor to complete the process for each item of the progress table based on information on the time acquired by the acquisition means;
For a process executor having one or more unprocessed items in the progress table, out of the average times calculated by the first calculation means, the sum of the average times of the items not processed by the process executor, A second calculating means for calculating as a predicted completion time which is a remaining time until the processing performer completes the processing of all unprocessed items;
It is a progress management system having

  According to a second aspect of the present invention, in the progress management system according to the first aspect, the information on the time is a man-hour required for the plurality of process performers to complete the processing of each item in the progress table. is there.

The present invention according to claim 3 is a time limit management means for managing a time limit for completing processing of all items of the progress table;
Refer to the time limit managed by the time limit management means, compare the predicted completion time calculated by the second calculation means with the time from the current time to the time limit, A notification means for notifying when the time is exceeded,
It is a progress management system of Claim 1 or 2 which has these.

  The present invention according to claim 4 is the progress management system according to claim 3, wherein the notification means changes the notification method according to the difference between the predicted completion time and the time from the present to the deadline.

  In the present invention according to claim 5, the notification means notifies that when the shortage time, which is the amount of time that exceeds the time from the present to the deadline, is a predetermined threshold or more, The progress management system according to claim 3 or 4, wherein when the shortage time increases, the frequency of notification is increased in accordance with the magnitude of the shortage time.

According to a sixth aspect of the present invention, when the first calculating unit calculates an average time, a coefficient is added to the information about the time acquired by the acquiring unit according to the attribute of each of the plurality of process performers. Set and calculate the average time by weighted average,
For the process executor having one or more unprocessed items in the progress table, the second calculation means is unprocessed among the average times calculated by the first calculation means. 6. The progress management system according to claim 1, wherein a total sum of average times of items is calculated as a predicted completion time of the process executor.

The present invention according to claim 7 is a step of acquiring information relating to the time required for each of a plurality of process performers to complete the processing of each item from a progress table configured by a plurality of items;
Calculating an average time required for the process executor to complete the process for each item of the progress table based on the information about the acquired time;
For a process executor with one or more unprocessed items in the progress table, the sum of the average times of items that have not been processed by the process executor out of the calculated average times is unprocessed by the process executor. Calculating as a predicted completion time which is the remaining time until processing of all items of
Is a program for causing a computer to execute.

  According to the first aspect of the present invention, the time estimated until the process executor completes the processing of all items in the progress table can be changed to the process status of another process executor without calculating in advance. It is possible to provide a progress management system that can be calculated accordingly.

  According to the second aspect of the present invention, in addition to the effect obtained by the first aspect of the invention, the man-hours that are predicted until the process executor completes the processing of all items in the progress table are calculated in advance. It is possible to provide a progress management system that can be calculated in accordance with the processing status of other process performers without having to do this.

  According to the third aspect of the present invention, in addition to the effect obtained by the first or second aspect of the present invention, it is possible to provide a progress management system capable of notifying that when the deadline is not met. it can.

  According to the fourth aspect of the present invention, in addition to the effect obtained by the third aspect of the invention, the notification method is changed as necessary when the estimated completion time is large or the time from the present to the deadline is short. It is possible to provide a progress management system that can do this.

  According to the present invention according to claim 5, in addition to the effect obtained by the present invention according to claim 3 or 4, it is possible to change the notification frequency as necessary for a process performer who does not meet the deadline. Can provide a simple progress management system.

  According to the sixth aspect of the present invention, in addition to the effect obtained by the invention according to any one of the first to fifth aspects, the progress management capable of calculating the predicted completion time in consideration of the processing speed of the process executor. A system can be provided.

  According to the seventh aspect of the present invention, the time estimated until the process executor completes the processing of all items in the progress table can be changed to the process status of another process executor without calculating in advance. A program that can be calculated accordingly can be provided.

It is a figure which shows the progress management system in one Embodiment of this invention. It is a block diagram which shows the hardware constitutions of the host server 1 in one Embodiment of this invention. It is a block diagram which shows the function structure of the host server 1 in one Embodiment of this invention. It is an example of the table | surface which shows the organization name and delivery date which the delivery date management part 115 in one Embodiment of this invention manages. It is an example of the reply to the questionnaire in one Embodiment of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows the whole operation | movement of the host server 1 in one Embodiment of this invention. It is an example of the table | surface which shows the question number, the question content, and average work time which the average work time management part 112 in one Embodiment of this invention manages. It is a flowchart which shows the calculation method of the completion estimated work time in one Embodiment of this invention. It is an example of the table | surface which shows the delivery date and completion estimated work time of each structure | tissue in one Embodiment of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows the determination method of whether to notify in one Embodiment of this invention. It is an example of the table | surface which shows the reply condition and completion risk of each organization displayed by the terminal device 117 in one Embodiment of this invention. It is an example of the reminder displayed by the terminal devices 3-6 in one Embodiment of this invention. It is an example of the table | surface which shows the reply condition and completion risk of each organization displayed by the terminal device 117 in one Embodiment of this invention. It is an example of the table | surface which shows the reply condition and notification frequency of each structure | tissue displayed by the terminal device 117 in one Embodiment of this invention. It is an example of the table | surface which shows the reply condition and notification frequency of each structure | tissue displayed by the terminal device 117 in one Embodiment of this invention.

  Next, an embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.

  FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a progress management system in the present embodiment.

  As shown in FIG. 1, in the progress management system according to this embodiment, a host server 1, terminal devices 3 to 6, and a terminal device 117 are connected to each other via a network 2.

  The host server 1 transmits data of a questionnaire (progress table) composed of a plurality of items to the terminal devices 3 to 6 via the network 2. Then, the host server 1 receives response (processing) data for each item of the questionnaire from the terminal devices 3 to 6. Further, the host server 1 and the terminal device 117 are installed in an evaluation organization that evaluates whether or not the response data from the terminal devices 3 to 6 is a correct answer.

  The terminal device 117 displays the answer status of the questionnaire by the terminal devices 3-6.

  The terminal devices 3 to 6 are installed in four organizations, ie, a development department, a sales department, a planning department, and an accounting department, respectively, and display questionnaire data transmitted by the host server 1. In addition, the terminal devices 3 to 6 transmit the answer data of each item of the questionnaire to the host server 1.

  Next, the hardware configuration of the host server 1 in this embodiment will be described in detail with reference to FIG.

  As shown in FIG. 2, the host server 1 transmits and receives data to and from the terminal devices 3 to 6 via the CPU 11, the memory 12, the storage device 13 such as a hard disk drive (HDD), and the network 2. A communication interface (IF) 14 is included. These components are connected to each other via a control bus 15.

  The CPU 11 controls the operation of the host server 1 by executing predetermined processing based on a control program stored in the memory 12 or the storage device 13. In the present embodiment, the CPU 11 has been described as reading and executing a control program stored in the memory 12 or the storage device 13, but the program is stored in a storage medium such as a CD-ROM and stored in the CPU 11. It is also possible to provide.

  FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing a functional configuration of the host server 1 realized by executing the control program.

  As shown in FIG. 3, the host server 1 includes a work time acquisition unit 110, an average work time calculation unit 111, an average work time management unit 112, a specification unit 113, a completion predicted work time calculation unit 114, a delivery date management unit 115, and a notification. The unit 116 is configured.

  The work time acquisition unit 110 stores information on the work time required for each person in charge of the development department, the sales department, the planning department, and the accounting department (the process executor) to complete the answer to each item in the questionnaire. Get from ~ 6.

  The average work time calculation unit 111 calculates the average work time required until the person in charge completes the answer for each item of the questionnaire based on the information about the work time acquired by the work time acquisition unit 110. In addition, when a person in charge in an organization completes an answer for an unanswered item, the average work time calculation unit 111 calculates the average work time of the items for which information related to the work time is newly acquired by the work time acquisition unit 110. Is calculated again. That is, the average work time calculation unit 111 dynamically calculates the average work time of each item according to the response status of the person in charge in a plurality of organizations.

  The average work time management unit 112 manages the average work time calculated by the average work time calculation unit 111. Further, the average work time management unit 112 updates the average work time of the items for which the average work time is calculated again by the average work time calculation unit 111.

  The specifying unit 113 specifies an organization having one or more unanswered items in the questionnaire among the development unit, the sales unit, the planning unit, and the accounting unit.

  Completion predicted work time calculation unit 114 has an unanswered organization out of the average work time calculated by average work time calculation unit 111 for an organization with one or more unanswered items specified by specifying unit 113. Is calculated as the estimated completion work time (predicted completion time), which is the remaining work time until the organization completes the answer for all unanswered items.

  As shown in the table of FIG. 4, the delivery date management unit 115 manages the organization name and the delivery date (time limit) for completing the answers to all items in the questionnaire in association with each other.

  The notification unit 116 refers to the delivery date managed by the delivery date management unit 115, compares the estimated completion work time calculated by the completion prediction work time calculation unit 114 with the time from the current time to the delivery date, When the predicted completion work time exceeds the time from the current time to the delivery date, a notification to that effect is sent to the terminal device installed in the organization specified by the specifying unit 113 via the network 2.

  Next, the questionnaire in this embodiment will be described with reference to FIG.

  The question table in the present embodiment is a table in which questions about whether or not the work related to the business is completed for the business performed in the company organization or the like.

  As shown in FIG. 5, the questionnaire in this embodiment includes a plurality of items and is displayed by the terminal devices 3 to 6. Each item of the questionnaire is provided with columns of “question number”, “question content”, “answer”, “comment”, “trail”, “evaluation”, and “working time”.

  As shown in FIG. 5, a question number is assigned to each item in the question number column, and a question regarding whether or not the work to be performed by each organization is described in the question content column.

  In addition, the person in charge of each organization, when answering each question, completes the work in accordance with the question described in the question content column, and then answers by operating the terminal device installed in each organization Change the answer column of the item from “unanswered” to “Yes”.

  In addition, when the person in charge of each organization answers the question of each item, the contents of the work performed in the comment column are input, and the evidence of the operation entered in the comment column is input in the trail column. In the present embodiment, description will be made on the assumption that a link destination URL is input as evidence of work in the trail column.

  In the evaluation field, the evaluation organization confirms the link destination input in the trail field, and the result of evaluating whether or not the work in accordance with the question is correctly completed is input. Specifically, when the link destination entered in the trail field is confirmed by the person in charge of the evaluation organization, if each organization has successfully completed the work according to the question, “OK” is completed. If not, “NG” is displayed.

  In addition, when the person in charge of each organization answers the question of each item, the work time column starts from the work according to the question described in the question content column of each item of the questionnaire, and completes the answer Enter the work time required for.

  When the above-described series of processing is completed, the terminal devices 3 to 6 transmit response data indicating information input for each item of the questionnaire to the host server 1. The answer data includes the work time input in the work time column as information related to the work time.

  Specifically, first, the person in charge of the accounting department operates the terminal device 6 to display the questionnaire sent from the host server 1. Then, as shown in FIG. 5, with respect to the question “Whether the settlement process is correctly defined” written in the question content column of question number 6, the work based on this question content is spent 0.2 days from the start. If the response is completed by creating a manual, the response column is changed from “unanswered” to “Yes”, the comment column is “Expanding manual”, the trail column is “Manual expansion site” URL, Enter “0.2 days” in the work time column. When the above series of processing is completed, the terminal device 6 transmits response data indicating the input information to the host server 1. Then, the person in charge of the evaluation organization confirms that the work in accordance with the question described in the question content column is correctly completed based on the comment column and the trail column of the transmitted response data. The terminal device 117 is operated to instruct the terminal device 6 to display “OK” in the evaluation column of the questionnaire.

  Next, the overall operation of the host server 1 in this embodiment will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG.

  First, the work time acquisition unit 110 acquires the work time from the answer data received from the terminal devices 3 to 6 (step S101).

  Next, the average work time calculation unit 111 calculates the average work time for each item as shown in FIG. 7 based on the work time acquired by the work time acquisition unit 110 (step S102). Here, the average work time is calculated by dividing the total work time acquired for each item by the work time acquisition unit 110 by the number of organizations that have completed responses. Specifically, for the item of the question number 6, when the working time of 0.5 days from the terminal device 4 and 0.2 days from the terminal device 5 is acquired, the average work time calculation unit 111 5 and dividing the total work time of the question number 6 obtained from 5 by 0.7 by the number of organizations that have completed the answer, the average work time of the question number 6 is 0.35 as shown in FIG. Calculate the day. The average work time calculated as described above is managed by the average work time management unit 112.

  In addition, after calculating the average work time once, when the work time of 0.2 days is newly acquired from the terminal device 6 for the question number 6, the average work time calculation unit 111 is acquired from the terminal devices 4 to 6. The total work time of the question number 6 is divided by 0.9 and the average work time of the question number 6 is calculated again by dividing the total of 0.9 days of the work time of the question number 6 by the number of organizations that have completed the answer.

  Then, the specifying unit 113 specifies an organization having one or more unanswered items (step S103). If an organization with one or more unanswered items is identified, the process proceeds to step S105. If an organization with one or more unanswered items does not exist and is not identified, The process ends (step S104). Specifically, in the answer status of the questionnaire in the accounting department, when the answer to question number 7 is not completed as shown in FIG. 5, the identifying part 113 is an organization with one or more unanswered items. Identify the accounting department.

  Next, when an organization with one or more unanswered items is identified by the identifying unit 113 (yes in step S104), the predicted completion work time calculation unit 114 calculates the predicted completion task time of the identified organization. Calculate (step S105). A detailed calculation method of the predicted completion work time will be described later.

  Then, the notification unit 116 determines whether or not to perform notification based on the time from the current time to the delivery date managed by the delivery date management unit 115 and the estimated completion work time calculated in step S105 ( Step S106). If notification is to be performed, the process proceeds to step S108. If notification is not to be performed, the process ends (step S107). A detailed determination method for determining whether or not to perform notification will be described later.

  Finally, when it is determined that notification is to be made (yes in step S107), the notification unit 116 notifies the terminal device installed in the organization having one or more unanswered items (step S108). ).

  Next, a detailed calculation method of the predicted completion work time in step S105 will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG.

  First, the predicted completion work time calculation unit 114 sets the question number to 1 as a target for calculating the predicted completion work time (step S201).

  Next, the predicted completion work time calculation unit 114 determines whether or not the question number item set as a target is an unanswered item (step S202). Here, whether or not the item is an unanswered item is determined based on whether or not the work time acquisition unit 110 has received answer data from the terminal device of the organization specified by the specifying unit 113 for the item.

  If it is determined that the item has been answered (No in step S202), the process proceeds to step S204.

  When it is determined that the item is an unanswered item (Yes in step S202), the predicted completion work time calculation unit 114 acquires the average work time of the target question number from the average work time management unit 112 ( Step S203). For example, when the target question number is 6, as shown in FIG. 7, information that the average work time of question number 6 is 0.35 days is acquired.

  Next, the completion predicted work time calculation unit 114 determines whether or not the target question number is the last item in the question table (step S204). If the target question number is not the last item in the questionnaire (No in step S204), the predicted completion work time calculation unit 114 adds 1 to the target question number (step S205), and step S201. Repeat the process of step S204. When the target question number is the last item in the questionnaire (yes in step S204), the process proceeds to step S206.

  When it is determined in step S204 that the target question number is the last item in the questionnaire, the completion predicted work time calculation unit 114, as shown in the table of FIG. 9, calculates the average work acquired in step S203. The total time is calculated as the predicted completion work time of the organization specified by the specifying unit 113 (step S206).

  Next, a method for determining whether to perform notification in step S106 will be described in detail with reference to the flowchart of FIG.

  First, the notification unit 116 acquires the current time (step S301). Here, with respect to a method for acquiring the current time, for example, it may be acquired by installing a clock device or the like inside the notification unit 116, or may be acquired by receiving a time signal from the outside. May be.

  Next, the notification unit 116 makes an inquiry to the delivery date management unit 115, acquires information on the delivery date of the organization specified by the specifying unit 113, and calculates the time from the current time to the delivery date (step S302). For example, when the organization specified by the specifying unit is the development unit, information indicating that the delivery date of the development unit is 5:00 pm on May 7 is obtained as shown in FIG. Calculate the time until 5:00 p.m.

  Then, the notification unit 116 compares the time from the current time to the delivery date with the predicted completion work time (step S303). When the predicted completion work time exceeds the time from the present to the delivery date, the process proceeds to step S305, and when the predicted completion work time is equal to or less than the time from the current time to the delivery date, the process proceeds to step S309 (step S304).

  If the predicted completion work time exceeds the time from the current time to the delivery date (no in step S304), the notification unit 116 notifies the terminal device of the organization specified by the specification unit 113 for the first time. It is determined whether or not (step S305). Here, when the notification to the terminal device of the organization specified by the specifying unit 113 is the first time, the process proceeds to step S308.

  If the notification to the terminal device of the organization specified by the specification unit 113 is not the first time (no in step S305), the notification unit 116 indicates that the estimated completion work time exceeds the time from the current time to the delivery date. Insufficient work time, which is the time of, is calculated (step 306).

  Next, the notification unit 116 determines whether or not the insufficient work time exceeds a preset threshold (step S306). If the insufficient work time exceeds the threshold, the process proceeds to step S308, and if the insufficient work time is equal to or less than the threshold, the process proceeds to step S309.

  If the insufficient work time exceeds the threshold (yes in step S307), the notification unit 116 issues a notification instruction to the terminal device of the organization specified by the specifying unit 113 (step S308). In addition, the notification unit 116 provides a notification instruction when the predicted completion work time is equal to or less than the time from the current time to the delivery date (yes in step S304), or when the shortage work time is equal to or less than the threshold (no in step S307). Is not performed (step S309).

  Specifically, the current time is 5:00 pm on May 4th, and as shown in FIG. 9 in the development department, the delivery date of the questionnaire is 5:00 pm on May 7th, and the estimated completion work time is 6th. The case where the threshold of the shortage work time is 2 days will be described. In this case, the time from the current time to the delivery date is 3 days, the estimated time to complete the answer is 6 days, and the insufficient work time 3 days exceeds the threshold value 2 days. Notification is made to the terminal device 3 of the development department.

  Next, a specific example of notification performed by the above processing will be described with reference to FIGS.

[Specific example of notification 1]
FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating an example of an answer status and a completion risk of each organization displayed by the terminal device 117 based on a notification instruction performed by the notification unit 116. As shown in FIG. 11, the terminal device 117 displays the response status and completion risk for each organization of the development department, sales department, planning department, and accounting department. The status column displays “answer completed” and the organization that has not completed the response displays “answering” in the response status column.

  In addition, the completion risk column displays the possibility that responses will not be completed for all items in the questionnaire by the due date for the organization that has not completed responses in three stages: high, medium, and low. doing. Here, the notification unit 116 indicates that the completion risk column is “high” when the shortage work time exceeds the threshold, and the completion risk column is “medium” when the shortage work time is equal to or shorter than the threshold but is not in time for the delivery date. If no notification instruction is given, the terminal device 117 is instructed to display “low” in the completion risk column.

  And when the notification instruction | indication is performed, the notification part 116 instruct | indicates to display the reminder as shown in FIG. 12 with respect to the terminal devices 3-6.

  Also, for example, at 5 pm on May 4, the accounting department completes the responses for all items in the questionnaire, and based on the information on the work time included in the response data transmitted from the terminal device 6, the average work As a result of the reduction of the average work time of each item calculated by the time calculation unit 111, the development department obtained the sum of the average work time of the unanswered items. Assume that it was updated on the 4th. In such a case, the time from the current time to the delivery date of the development department is 3 days, the estimated time to complete the response is 4 days, and the shortage work time 1 day is less than the threshold 2 days. The notification unit 116 instructs the terminal device 117 to change the answer status of the accounting unit to “answer completed” and to change the completion risk column of the development unit to “medium” as shown in FIG. .

[Specific example 2 of notification]
FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating a second example displayed by the display device 117 based on a notification instruction made by the notification unit 116.

  As shown in FIG. 14, the display device 117 displays the response status and notification frequency for each organization of the development department, sales department, planning department, and accounting department. In the status column, “Reply completed” is displayed, and for an organization that has not completed a response, the response status column is displayed as “Replying”.

  In addition, the notification frequency column displays the frequency of notifications in three stages of “high”, “medium”, and “none” according to the amount of insufficient work time for organizations that have not yet responded. Yes. Here, when a notification instruction is issued by the notification unit 116, the terminal device 117 sets the notification frequency column to “high” if the insufficient work time exceeds twice the threshold, and sets the threshold for the shortage work time. If it exceeds the threshold value but not more than twice the threshold, “medium” is displayed. If no notification instruction is given, the notification frequency column is displayed as “none”.

  Then, the notification unit 116 sends a reminder as shown in FIG. 12 to the terminal device of the organization whose notification frequency is “medium” every day for the terminal device of the organization whose notification frequency is “high”. Instruct the device to display every 3 days.

  In addition, for example, each answer calculated by the average work time calculation unit 111 based on the information on the work time included in the response data transmitted from the terminal device 3 is completed at 5 pm on May 4th. Assuming that the average work time of the item has increased, the accounting department has calculated the sum of the average work hours of the unanswered items, and as a result, the accounting department's estimated completion work time has been updated from the 5th to the 7th. In such a case, as shown in FIG. 4, the time from the current time of May 4 at 5:00 pm to the accounting department delivery date of May 6 at 5:00 pm is predicted to be completed by 2 days. Since the short time is 7 days and the shortage work time of 5 days exceeds twice the threshold of 2 days, the notification unit 116 sets the notification frequency column to “terminal” as shown in FIG. ”To“ High ”.

  In the present embodiment, the questionnaire is used as the progress chart, but the present invention is not limited to the questionnaire. For example, in the case of managing the learning progress, it may be a learning progress table configured by a plurality of problems in a certain subject.

  Further, in the present embodiment, when calculating the average work time, it has been described as acquiring information on the work time actually required by each organization, but the present invention is based on the attributes of each organization, A coefficient may be set in the information on the acquired work time, and the average time may be calculated by a weighted average. In this case, the predicted completion work time calculation unit 114 determines whether the organization specified by the specification unit 113 is not yet out of the average work time calculated by the weighted average for the organization having one or more unanswered items in the questionnaire. What is necessary is just to calculate the sum total of the average work time of the item which is an answer as the completion predicted work time of the said organization.

  For example, if the coefficient of each organization is set to 1 for the development department, 2 for the sales department, 1 for the planning department, and 2 for the accounting department, the work of the sales department is obtained from information on the work time acquired for one item. It is assumed that information is acquired that the time is 0.3 days, the working time of the planning department is 0.2 days, and the working time of the accounting department is 0.2 days. In this case, the average work time calculation unit 114 multiplies each coefficient by the work time, the work time of the sales department is 0.6 days, the work time of the planning department is 0.2 days, and the work time of the accounting department is 0.4 days is calculated, and 0.4 days is calculated as an average work time by dividing the total of 1.2 days by the number of organizations that have completed the answer. In this case, the predicted completion work time calculation unit 114 calculates the sum of the average work times calculated as described above as the predicted completion work time of the organization specified by the specification unit 113. That's fine.

  In the present embodiment, it has been described that the work time required to complete the answer is included in the answer data. However, the work time is included in the answer data as the man-hours required to complete the answer. May be. In this case, for example, a person day or the like representing the number of personnel that require one day for a certain work may be used as a unit.

  In the present embodiment, whether the notification is the first notification to the specified organization when the predicted completion work time exceeds the time from the current time to the delivery date in determining whether to perform notification. The terminal is determined when it is determined that the predicted completion work time exceeds the time from the current time to the delivery date without determining whether or not it is the first notification. A notification instruction may be issued to the apparatus.

1 Host server 2 Network 3-6, 117 Terminal device 11 CPU
12 Memory 14 Communication IF
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 15 Control bus 110 Work time acquisition part 111 Average work time calculation part 112 Average work time management part 113 Specification part 114 Completion estimated work time calculation part 115 Delivery date management part 116 Notification part

Claims (7)

An acquisition means for acquiring information related to the time required for each of a plurality of process performers to complete the processing of each item from a progress table configured by a plurality of items;
First calculation means for calculating an average time required for the process executor to complete the process for each item of the progress table based on information on the time acquired by the acquisition means;
For a process executor having one or more unprocessed items in the progress table, out of the average times calculated by the first calculation means, the sum of the average times of the items not processed by the process executor, A second calculating means for calculating as a predicted completion time which is a remaining time until the processing performer completes the processing of all unprocessed items;
A progress management system.   The progress management system according to claim 1, wherein the information related to the time is a man-hour required for the plurality of process performers to complete the processing of each item in the progress table. Time limit management means for managing the time limit for completing the processing of all items of the progress table;
Refer to the time limit managed by the time limit management means, compare the predicted completion time calculated by the second calculation means with the time from the current time to the time limit, A notification means for notifying when the time is exceeded,
The progress management system according to claim 1, comprising:   The progress management system according to claim 3, wherein the notification unit changes a notification method according to a difference between a predicted completion time and a time from a present time to a deadline.   The notification means notifies the case when the shortage time that is a time that exceeds the time from the present to the deadline is a predetermined threshold or more, and when the shortage time increases, 5. The progress management system according to claim 3, wherein the frequency of notification is increased according to the amount of the shortage time. When calculating the average time, the first calculation unit sets a coefficient in the information about the time acquired by the acquisition unit according to the attribute of each of the plurality of process performers, and calculates the average time by weighted average. Calculate
The second calculation means is that the process executor is unprocessed in the average time calculated by the first calculation means for a process executor having one or more unprocessed items in the progress table. 6. The progress management system according to claim 1, wherein a total sum of average times of items is calculated as a predicted completion time of the process executor. A step of acquiring information related to the time required for each of a plurality of process performers to complete the processing of each item from a progress table configured by a plurality of items;
Calculating an average time required for the process executor to complete the process for each item of the progress table based on the information about the acquired time;
For a process executor with one or more unprocessed items in the progress table, the sum of the average times of items that have not been processed by the process executor out of the calculated average times is unprocessed by the process executor. A step of calculating as a predicted completion time which is the remaining time until the processing of all the items is completed;
A program that causes a computer to execute.

Images