JP2013168135A - Evaluation system for ecological system conservation and recovery - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To perform evaluation after efforts ecological system conservation and recovery by systematically dealing with the ecological system conservation and recovery on the basis of an ecological system potential in a present status.SOLUTION: The evaluation system includes: site environment total score calculation means 100 for calculating site environment total scores as a latent ecological system potential; initial habitat total score calculation means 110 for calculating initial habitat total scores as an initial actual ecological system potential; ecological system conservation/recovery dealing determination means 120 for determining whether to execute efforts of ecological system conservation/recovery; and target habitat total score setting means 130 for, when executing the efforts of the ecological system conversation/recovery, setting target habitat total scores which are not less than the initial habitat total scores.

Description

  The present invention relates to an ecosystem conservation and restoration evaluation system.For example, when performing a green space improvement plan or a greening plan, by evaluating the potential and actual ecosystem potential and habitat in the current situation, It relates to a system for presenting ecosystem conservation and recovery goals.

  In recent years, as environmental conservation has become a problem as a measure against global warming, biodiversity has been attracting attention as a concept for green space improvement plans and greening plans. Realization of a rich natural environment is desired. For this reason, conventionally, various techniques for performing ecosystem evaluation have been proposed (see, for example, Patent Document 1, Patent Document 2, and Patent Document 3).

  The technique described in Patent Document 1 relates to a biodiversity improvement effect prediction system for quantitatively predicting the effect of improving the diversity of species of habitat species. In this biodiversity improvement effect prediction system, the vegetation environment information after the realization of the vegetation environment information and the plan based on the tree planting plan are included as input information for the area targeted for urban greening. Then, the processing unit acquires and analyzes the current status and planned vegetation environment analysis information and species group diversity prediction analysis information, and outputs vegetation environment improvement information. Also, based on the habitat prediction analysis and species diversity prediction analysis for each species before and after the plan, a difference diagram of the analysis results is formed, and the species group habitability improvement evaluation map and species diversity improvement evaluation are used as species group diversity improvement information. Output the map.

  The technology described in Patent Document 2 relates to an ecosystem network evaluation method that comprehensively evaluates the ease of inhabiting for a plurality of organisms having different habitability. This ecosystem network evaluation method is based on the remote sensing data of the target area, the forest patch that is the land parcel covered by the forest, the grass patch that is the land parcel covered by the grassland, and the land parcel consisting of the green space existing on the waterside. Extraction process to extract a certain waterside green patch, forest use biohabitat suitability index calculation process to calculate habitat suitability index of forest use organism corresponding to each forest patch, and grassland use ability corresponding to each grassland patch A grassland-use biohabitat suitability index calculation step for calculating a habitat suitability index for a living organism, and a waterside green space use organism habitat suitability index calculation step for calculating a habitat suitability index for a waterside green space use organism corresponding to each waterside green space patch, and have.

  The technology described in Patent Document 3 is the environmental information necessary for the environmental policy and plan such as the initial design of the development plan and the environmental design that is lacking in the survey area in order to avoid the risks to the environment and society in the survey area. It is related with the environmental evaluation system which presents. This environmental assessment system sets three major items: regional green space assessment, environmental risk assessment, and local activity assessment. In the regional green zone assessment, consumption activities such as population and number of households obtained from administrative data and survey data in the survey area. The scarcity is evaluated from the comparison between the required green space area estimated from the environmental capacity estimated from the actual area and the actual area of the survey area, and the green space ratio, and this evaluation result is used as information for setting the priority of environmental risk evaluation. In environmental risk assessment, the distribution range and data of the survey area are generated as map information for each evaluation item, the risk level is calculated, and the distribution range with high environmental risk based on the priority set initially for this evaluation item. Perform environmental conservation layout.

JP 2009-136265 A JP 2011-165112 A Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 10-198269

  However, the conventional technology for assessing ecosystems is only to evaluate the current ecosystem and predict the improvement effect of biodiversity. is not.

  For example, the conventional technique described in Patent Document 1 is a system that predicts the relationship between the distribution of vegetation groups and biodiversity, but does not take into account the dependency in the diet of inhabited animals. On the other hand, there are data groups on specific species and their habitats, but diversity is not evaluated by combining birds and butterflies. In other words, the conventional technique described in Patent Document 1 is not a system that has been systematized until a specific evaluation is made after determination of the conservation and restoration of ecosystems.

  Moreover, although the conventional technique described in Patent Document 2 evaluates an ecosystem network using only remote sensing data, it does not evaluate the plant species level on which living organisms depend. For this reason, it is difficult to say that it is possible to effectively and efficiently tackle conservation and restoration of ecosystems.

  Moreover, the conventional technique described in Patent Document 3 is not limited to assessing environmental risks, and cannot present ecosystem conservation and recovery. For this reason, it is difficult to say that it is possible to effectively and efficiently tackle conservation and restoration of ecosystems.

  In this way, the conventional technology for ecosystem assessment does not have logic for actions from conservation efforts and restoration efforts to maintenance management based on the current ecosystem assessment. However, it is not possible to make recommendations for realistic ecosystem conservation and restoration. Also, in terms of greening and biodiversity, ignoring the relationship between the target organisms and the food plant that is most closely related, there is a correlation between the evaluation of the green space and the evaluation of ecosystem conservation and biodiversity. It is difficult to get sex.

  The present invention has been proposed in view of the above-mentioned circumstances. Based on the current ecosystem potential, the systematic approach to the conservation and restoration of the ecosystem is performed, and the evaluation after the approach to the conservation and restoration of the ecosystem is performed. The purpose is to provide an evaluation system for ecosystem conservation and recovery that has been made possible. In addition, the present invention is aimed at attracting familiar living groups such as birds and butterflies in particular, and thereby expects synergistic attraction of other living groups, and comprehensively increases biodiversity. The objective is to provide an assessment system for ecosystem conservation and recovery that can be secured.

  The ecosystem conservation and recovery evaluation system of the present invention has the following features in order to achieve the above-described object. That is, the ecosystem conservation and restoration evaluation system of the present invention performs the ecosystem conservation and presents the objective of ecosystem conservation and restoration by evaluating the potential and actual ecosystem potential and habitat in the present situation. And an evaluation system for recovery, comprising local environmental total score calculation means, initial habitat total score calculation means, ecosystem conservation recovery effort determination means, and target habitat total score setting means It is.

  The local environmental total score calculation means at least evaluates the site area, land use status, green coverage rate, distance to the core biological habitat, and distance to the sub core biological habitat. As an item, it is a means to calculate the local environmental total score, which is a potential ecosystem potential, for these evaluation items. The initial Habitat total score calculation means evaluates at least the green space composition of the site to be evaluated, the type of low stem grass, the type of high stem grass / vine vegetation / shrub, the type of high tree, the aquatic plants in the water area, and the area As an item, these evaluation items are means for calculating the initial total habitat score, which is the actual actual ecosystem potential. The ecological conservation restoration effort judgment means is a means for judging that an effort to restore and preserve the ecosystem is carried out when the local environmental total score is a predetermined value or more. The target habitat total score setting means is a means for setting a target habitat total score that is equal to or higher than the initial habitat total score when it is determined that an effort to restore and preserve ecosystems is to be implemented.

  In addition, the initial Habitat total score calculating means initially performs, for each evaluation item, at least the number of dependent plant species and the area as input values, and adds a weight index and a hierarchy balance index to the input values as necessary. While calculating the Habitat score, it is possible to calculate the initial Habitat score as the sum of the calculated initial Habitat scores.

  When conducting initial biodiversity survey and post-measure biodiversity survey, in addition to each of the above-mentioned means, it shall be configured with initial biodiversity score calculation means and target habitat total score adjustment means. Is possible.

  The initial biodiversity score calculation means is a means for calculating an initial biodiversity score based on the number of species of living organisms. The target habitat total score adjustment means is a means for adjusting a score for each predetermined evaluation item, which has been given a priority in advance, so as to be the set target habitat total score. .

  In addition, a configuration equipped with a biodiversity survey implementation determination unit that determines that an initial biodiversity survey and a post-measure biodiversity survey are to be performed when at least one of the initial Habitat total score or the target Habitat total score is a predetermined value or more Is possible.

  Moreover, it is preferable that the organisms to be evaluated for ecosystem conservation and recovery include at least birds and butterflies.

  The ecosystem conservation and restoration evaluation system constructed in this way evaluates the potential and actual ecosystem potential and habitat in the current situation at the time of green space improvement planning and greening planning, and optimizes the ecosystem in that environment. It becomes a series of systems that can present the approach method that should be targeted in order to perform maintenance and recovery.

  In addition, when efforts are made to preserve and restore ecosystems, it is possible to evaluate biodiversity through ecosystem surveys and to evaluate the correlation between biodiversity and habitat. At this time, it is possible to evaluate the current status of the dietary plants and the target habitat of the common species of birds and butterflies in Japan as a specific organism group.

  According to the ecosystem conservation and restoration evaluation system of the present invention, based on the current ecosystem potential, the ecosystem conservation and restoration efforts are systematically performed, and the biodiversity after the efforts is accurately evaluated. It becomes possible.

  In addition, by incorporating familiar biological groups such as birds and butterflies into the evaluation target, synergistic attraction of other biological groups can be expected, and overall, the implementation of this evaluation system It is possible to secure biodiversity in the entire target area.

The block diagram which shows the structure of the ecosystem maintenance and recovery evaluation system which concerns on embodiment of this invention. Explanatory drawing which shows the outline | summary of the evaluation system of the ecosystem maintenance and recovery which concerns on embodiment of this invention. Explanatory drawing which shows an example of a local environmental score table. Explanatory drawing explaining the concept of calculation of an initial Habitat total score. Explanatory drawing which shows an example of an initial Habitat score table. Explanatory drawing which shows the structural example of the grass and food tree database of a butterfly. Explanatory drawing which shows the structural example of the dietary plant database of birds. Explanatory drawing which shows the structural example of a specific and cautionary foreign organism database. Explanatory drawing which shows an example of an initial biodiversity investigation score table. Explanatory drawing which shows an example of a target habitat score table. Explanatory drawing which shows the structural example of a vegetation management information database. Explanatory drawing which shows the structural example of a water area management information database. Explanatory drawing which shows the structural example of an education and enlightenment information database.

<Outline of Ecosystem Conservation and Recovery Evaluation System>
Hereinafter, an embodiment of an ecosystem maintenance and recovery evaluation system of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the configuration of an ecosystem conservation and recovery evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram showing an overview of the ecosystem maintenance and recovery evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention. is there.

  In the following description, each means is constituted by a program for realizing calculation or processing of information in accordance with each purpose by cooperating with a hardware resource such as a CPU in a computer. Further, the program includes not only software that exhibits its function but also a logic circuit that can exhibit an equivalent function by being stored in a RAM or the like and executed by a hardware resource such as a CPU. It is a concept.

  As shown in FIG. 2, an ecosystem maintenance and recovery evaluation system 10 according to an embodiment of the present invention (hereinafter sometimes abbreviated as “evaluation system 10”) is a local environmental score sheet for conducting an initial local environmental survey. The initial Habitat score sheet is created to evaluate the habitat, and evaluate the efforts to preserve and restore the ecosystem. In these surveys and evaluations, as shown in FIG. 1, the local environmental total score calculating means 100, the initial habitat total score calculating means 110, the ecosystem conservation recovery approach determining means 120, and the target habitat total score setting means 130 Are the respective functional means.

  Furthermore, as shown in Fig. 2, when tackling conservation and restoration of ecosystems, an initial biodiversity survey score sheet was prepared to conduct an initial biodiversity survey, and an ecosystem conservation and restoration plan was formulated. In order to set the target habitat evaluation setting, a target habitat score table is created. In these evaluations and the like, as shown in FIG. 1, the initial biodiversity score calculating means 150 and the target habitat total score adjusting means 180 are the respective functional means.

  Then, reflecting the created design, implement ecosystem conservation and recovery measures, and conduct post-implementation maintenance and management of the biological environment, education and enlightenment, post-measurement habitat evaluation, and post-measurement biodiversity surveys. Do.

  In the evaluation system according to the present embodiment, data is collected by performing a field survey according to the characteristics of each step shown in FIG. 2, or a calculation is performed by each functional means using the collected data or the field survey. Each step is performed by combining the calculation using each function means. At this time, the remote sensing data can be used to ascertain the size of the green space, the mode of use, the green coverage rate, the distance to the biological habitat, and the like.

<Specific examples of ecosystem conservation and recovery>
As shown in FIG. 1, an ecosystem maintenance and recovery evaluation system 10 according to an embodiment of the present invention is a system including a computer and its accessory devices, and includes a central control unit 11 as main components, ROM 12, RAM 13, HDD 14, input device 17 and output device 18, and further, as essential functional means of the present invention, local environmental total score calculating means 100, initial habitat total score calculating means 110, ecosystem conservation recovery An approach determination unit 120 and a target habitat total score setting unit 130 are provided. Moreover, the ecosystem maintenance and recovery evaluation system 10 of the present embodiment can include a biodiversity survey execution determination unit 140, an initial biodiversity score calculation unit 150, and a target habitat total score adjustment unit 160.

<Central control means>
The central control unit 11 is a unit for comprehensively controlling the evaluation system 10 of the present embodiment, and is configured by, for example, a CPU and its peripheral devices, and the CPU or the like operates according to a program stored in the ROM 12 or the like. Thus, the control function can be exhibited.

<ROM / RAM>
The ROM 12 is a device for storing program data and numerical data for controlling each device constituting the evaluation system 10 of the present embodiment, and is configured by a semiconductor memory, for example. The RAM 13 is a device that functions as a temporary storage area for temporarily storing programs and various data.

<HDD>
The HDD 14 functions as a large-capacity storage device. In the evaluation system 10 of the present embodiment, the butterfly herbaceous / food tree database 210, the bird food plant database 220, the specific / careful foreign organism database 230, etc. Various databases are stored.

<Input device>
The input device 17 is a device for inputting various data to the evaluation system 10 of the present embodiment, and is connected to the bus line via the input I / F 15. The input device 17 includes, for example, a keyboard, a pointing device, a touch input tablet, and the like.

<Output device>
The output device 18 is a device for outputting various data generated by the evaluation system of this embodiment, and is connected to the bus line via the output I / F 16. The output device 18 includes, for example, a liquid crystal display device or a printer.

<Local environmental total score calculation method>
The local environmental total score calculation means 100 at least determines the area of the area to be evaluated, the land use status, the green coverage rate, the distance to the core biological habitat, and the distance to the subhabit biological habitat. As an evaluation item, it consists of a program for calculating a local environmental total score that is a potential ecosystem potential for these evaluation items.

  In the local environmental total score calculation means 100, as described above, the evaluation items that are the calculation criteria of the local environmental total score are the area size, land use status, green coverage rate (including water area) of the area to be evaluated, The distance to the core habitat and the distance to the sub-core habitat, but other evaluation items may be added depending on the characteristics of the area to be evaluated for ecosystem conservation and restoration. .

  FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the local environmental score table. As shown in FIG. 3, in each evaluation item, a score is set according to a plurality of attributes, and a score corresponding to the attribute input for each evaluation item and a total score that is a total score thereof are as follows. Calculated. The calculation result in the local environmental total score calculation means 100 can be displayed on a display screen of a display device or printed by a printer.

The core biological habitat is a green area (including water) of 30 ha or more in the area to be evaluated, and the sub-habitat is 1,000 m in the area to be evaluated. ^{It is} a green space (including water area) or corridor (river / street tree path) of ² or more and less than 30ha.

<Initial Habitat Total Score Calculation Method>
Initially, the Habitat total score calculating means 110 calculates at least the green space composition in the site to be evaluated, the type of low stem grass, the type of high stem grass / vine vegetation / shrub, the type of high tree, the aquatic plant in the water area, and the area. As an evaluation item, it consists of a program for calculating the initial Habitat total score that is the actual actual ecosystem potential for these evaluation items. Further, the evaluation items are not limited to those described above, and other evaluation items such as biological growth factors may be added.

  This initial habitat total score calculation means 110 refers to the butterfly herbaceous / food tree database 210, the bird's dietary plant database 220, and the specific and cautionary exotic organism database 230, and refers to the types of low stem grass and high stem grass.・ Calculate scores for vine vegetation / shrub types, high tree types, and aquatic plants in waters. FIG. 6 to FIG. 8 show configuration examples of the butterfly herbivore / food tree database 210, the bird food plant database 220, and the specific / careful foreign organism database 230 referred to by the initial habitat total score calculation means 110. Note that the butterfly herbaceous / food tree database 210 has target data on plants that are subject to feeding by butterfly larvae, and plants that are subject to butterfly adult density, etc.

  In the initial habitat total score calculation means 110, as described above, the evaluation items that are the calculation criteria for the initial habitat total score are the green space composition, the type of low stem grass, the high stem grass, and the vine vegetation in the site to be evaluated.・ Other types of evaluation items such as aquatic animals and biological growth factors in the water area, depending on the characteristics of the area to be evaluated for ecosystem conservation and restoration May be added.

  In the calculation of the initial habitat total score in the initial habitat total score calculation means 110, at least the number of dependent plant species and the area are input values for each evaluation item, and the weight index and the hierarchy balance index are added to the input values as necessary. It is possible to calculate the initial Habitat score by performing the above-described calculation, and to calculate the initial Habitat score as the sum of the calculated initial Habitat scores.

  With reference to FIG. 4, the concept of calculating the initial habitat total score in the initial habitat total score calculation means 110 will be described. FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram for explaining the concept of calculating the initial Habitat total score. As shown in FIG. 4, the initial Habitat total score calculation means 110 considers quality, quantity, weight, and hierarchical balance for each evaluation item of low stem grass, high stem grass / vine plant / shrub, and high tree, respectively. For the evaluation items of aquatic plants, the initial habitat score of each evaluation item is calculated by calculating the quality and quantity, and the sum of these is set as the initial habitat total score.

  Specifically, for the evaluation items of low stem grass, high stem grass / vine plant / shrub, and high tree, the product of the number of dependent plant species, the vegetation area, the weight index, and the hierarchy balance index, respectively, was obtained. Calculate the initial Habitat score for each item. For the evaluation items of aquatic plants, the initial habitat score is calculated by calculating the product of the number of aquatic plant species and the water area. The weight index and the number of hierarchy balances can be set as appropriate based on the characteristics of the area to be evaluated.

  Here, the dependent plants are, for example, larvae and adult dense plants of butterflies, and plants that produce fruits and seeds forage by birds. The calculation result in the initial Habitat total score calculation means 110 can be displayed on a display screen of a display device or printed by a printer.

  Further, in the initial Habitat total score calculation means 110, as shown in FIG. 5, for each evaluation item, a score is set according to a plurality of attributes, and a score corresponding to the attribute input for each evaluation item, Based on the total score that is the total score, the initial Habitat total score may be calculated. FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the initial Habitat score table.

  The low stem grass is a herbaceous plant having a plant height of approximately 50 cm or less and forming a meadow, and the high stem grass is a herbaceous plant having a plant height of approximately 50 cm or more and forming a cocoon. A vine plant is a plant that grows in contact with other plants and walls and forms a cocoon, and a shrub is a plant that has a tree height of approximately 2 m or less and forms a cocoon. Yes, a tall tree is a plant having a tree height of approximately 2 m or more and forming a forest. The biological growth factor is so-called eco-up or eco-stack, and is a device installed for the purpose of intentionally increasing the number of organisms. This biological growth element is composed of, for example, a dead tree, a stone pile, a sandbox or the like.

<Ecosystem Conservation Recovery Assessment Judgment Method>
Ecosystem conservation recovery action determination means 120 includes a program for determining that an approach to ecosystem conservation recovery is to be implemented when the local environmental total score is a predetermined value or more. For example, when the total environmental score is 50 or more, the ecosystem conservation recovery approach determination means 120 determines that it is necessary to protect and recover the ecosystem, and that the approach should be implemented. Note that the reference value for determination can be changed as appropriate according to the characteristics of the region to be evaluated for ecosystem conservation and recovery.

<Target Habitat total score setting means>
The target habitat total score setting means 130 includes a program for setting a target habitat total score that is equal to or higher than the initial habitat total score when it is determined that an effort to restore and preserve ecosystems is to be implemented. For example, as shown in FIG. 5, when the initial Habitat total score is 56 points, the target Habitat total score setting unit 130 sets the target Habitat total score to 80 points. The target Habitat total score can be changed as appropriate according to the characteristics of the area to be evaluated for ecosystem conservation and recovery.

<Biodiversity survey implementation judgment means>
The biodiversity survey execution determination means 140 is a program for determining that an initial biodiversity survey and a post-measure biodiversity survey are to be performed when at least one of the initial habitat total score or the target habitat total score is a predetermined value or more. Consists of. This biodiversity survey execution determination means 140 is an additional component of the ecosystem maintenance and recovery evaluation system according to the present invention.

  In the target habitat total score setting means 130, for example, when at least one of the initial habitat total score or the target habitat total score is 80 or more, it is determined that the initial biodiversity survey and the post-measure biodiversity survey are performed. The reference value of the initial Habitat total score or the target Habitat total score used to determine whether to conduct the initial biodiversity survey and post-measure biodiversity survey is based on the characteristics of the area to be evaluated for ecosystem conservation and recovery. It can be changed as appropriate.

<Initial biodiversity score calculation method>
The initial biodiversity score calculation means 150 includes a program for calculating an initial biodiversity score based on at least the number of species of living organisms. This initial biodiversity score calculation means 150 is an additional component of the ecosystem maintenance and recovery evaluation system according to the present invention. In the present embodiment, the organisms for which the initial biodiversity score is calculated include at least birds and butterflies. In addition to the birds and butterflies, the organisms that were initially subject to calculation of biodiversity scores are those other than amphibians, reptiles, mammals, and butterflies, depending on the characteristics of the region to be evaluated for ecosystem conservation and recovery. Insects and the like may be targeted.

  FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the initial biodiversity survey score table. As shown in FIG. 9, in each evaluation item, a score is set according to a plurality of attributes, and a score corresponding to the attribute input for each evaluation item and a total score that is a total score thereof are as follows. Calculated. The calculation result in the initial biodiversity score calculation means 150 can be displayed on the display screen of the display device or printed by a printer.

  The input data in the initial biodiversity score calculation means 150 is based on, for example, the root census method, and the time for one survey is 3 hours in the morning. In the bird survey and the butterfly survey, for example, the survey is conducted twice in total, once in winter and in summer. Other animal surveys will be conducted in conjunction with bird surveys and butterfly surveys. At this time, for convenience of investigation, for example, it is preferable to target animals having a body length of about 10 mm or more or an open length of about 20 mm or more. Note that the number of surveys, the survey period, etc. can be changed as appropriate according to the characteristics of the area to be evaluated for ecosystem conservation and recovery.

<Target Habitat Total Score Adjustment Method>
The target habitat total score adjusting means 160 is a program for adjusting a score according to each priority for a predetermined evaluation item to which a priority is given in advance so that the set target habitat total score is obtained. Become. The target habitat total score adjustment means 160 is an additional component of the ecosystem maintenance and recovery evaluation system according to the present invention.

  The target habitat total score adjusting means 160 adjusts the score to be added to each of the evaluation items to which the priorities are assigned in advance so that the target habitat total score is 80 as the set value. For example, priorities are given to the target site green cover ratio, green cover ratio composition, low stem grass type, eco stack and other evaluation items in this order so that the target Habitat total score becomes the set value In addition, a process for adjusting the score for each evaluation item is performed. That is, the grades to be added are adjusted for evaluation items such as target site green cover ratio, green cover ratio composition, low stem grass type, and eco stack so that a target habitat score table as shown in FIG. 10 is created. And set.

  FIG. 10 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the target habitat score table. As shown in FIG. 10, in each evaluation item, a score is set according to a plurality of attributes, and a score corresponding to the attribute input for each evaluation item and a total score that is a total score thereof are as follows. Calculated. The calculation result in the target habitat total score adjustment means 160 can be displayed on a display screen of a display device or printed by a printer.

  The definition of low stem grass, high stem grass, vine plant, shrub, and tree in the target habitat score table created by the target habitat total score adjustment unit 160 is the same as the definition in the initial habitat total score calculation unit 110 described above. The database referred to by the target habitat total score adjustment means 160 is the same as the database referred to by the initial habitat total score calculation means 110 described above. In addition, the target habitat total score adjustment means 160 may add other evaluation items according to the characteristics of the region to be evaluated for ecosystem conservation and recovery.

<Maintenance and management of biological environment>
Biological environment maintenance management includes vegetation management and water area management. The maintenance of this biological environment will be carried out by providing appropriate maintenance guides according to the local conditions for ecosystem conservation and recovery.

  In the maintenance of biological environment, referring to the vegetation management information database and the water area management information database, output appropriate vegetation management information and water area management information according to the characteristics of the area to be evaluated for ecosystem conservation and recovery. It is possible to provide biological environment maintenance information presenting means 170 for doing this. According to the function of this biological environment maintenance information presentation means 170 (biological environment maintenance management program), appropriate vegetation management information and water area management information for the user according to the characteristics of the region to be evaluated for ecosystem conservation and recovery. (See FIG. 2).

  Vegetation management information and water area management information can be displayed on a display screen of a display device or printed by a printer. FIG. 11 is an explanatory diagram showing a configuration example of the vegetation management information database, and FIG. 12 is an explanatory diagram showing a configuration example of the water area management information database. The vegetation management information database and the water area management information database are stored in the HDD 14 like other databases. The vegetation management information database is a database configured by associating vegetation management information and its presentation time, and each information can be presented at a predetermined presentation time. In addition, the water area management information database is a database configured by associating water area management information and its presentation time, and can present each information at a predetermined presentation time.

  When the biological environment maintenance information presenting means 170 is provided, the function of the biological environment maintenance information presenting means 170 refers to the vegetation management information database and the water area management information database, and the management corresponding to the presentation time specified in each database. Present information. As described above, the management information is presented on the display screen of the display device or printed by a printer.

<Education / Enlightenment>
Education and enlightenment will be implemented by providing guidance for those who are involved in maintenance and education and enlightenment, as appropriate, depending on the local conditions for ecosystem conservation and restoration.

  In education and enlightenment, referring to the education and enlightenment information database, education and enlightenment information presentation means for outputting appropriate education and enlightenment information according to the characteristics of the region to be evaluated for ecosystem conservation and restoration 180 can be provided. With the function of this education / enlightenment information presentation means 180 (education / enlightenment information presentation program), appropriate education / enlightenment information is provided to the user according to the characteristics of the region to be evaluated for ecosystem conservation and recovery. (See FIG. 2).

  Education / enlightenment information can be displayed on a display screen of a display device or printed by a printer. FIG. 13 is an explanatory diagram showing a configuration example of an education / enlightenment information database. The education / enlightenment information database is stored in the HDD 14 like other databases. The education / enlightenment information database is a database configured by associating education / enlightenment information and the presentation time thereof, and each information can be presented at a predetermined presentation time.

  If the education / enlightenment information presentation means 180 is provided, the function of the education / enlightenment information presentation means 180 refers to the education / enlightenment information database and presents the corresponding management information at the presentation time specified in the database. To do. As described above, the management information is presented on the display screen of the display device or printed by a printer.

<Measured Habitat Evaluation / Measured Biodiversity Survey>
Furthermore, in the ecosystem conservation and recovery evaluation system 10 according to the present invention, after taking measures against ecosystem conservation and recovery, after a predetermined period (for example, one year) has elapsed, and thereafter periodically after-measurement habitat evaluation and measures. It is preferable to conduct a post-biodiversity survey. Based on this post-countermeasure habitat assessment and post-countermeasure biodiversity survey, efforts to conserve and restore ecosystems can be reviewed.

  For post-measurement habitat evaluation, post-measurement habitat total score calculation means 190 having the same function as the above-mentioned initial habitat total score calculation means 110 can be used. The post-measure biodiversity score calculating means 200 having the same function as the biodiversity score calculating means 150 can be used (see FIG. 2).

10 Ecosystem conservation and recovery assessment system 11 Central control means 12 ROM
13 RAM
14 HDD
15 input I / F
16 output I / F
17 Input device 18 Output device 100 Local environmental total score calculation means 110 Initial Habitat total score calculation means 120 Ecosystem conservation recovery approach determination means 130 Target Habitat total score setting means 140 Biodiversity survey execution determination means 150 Initial biodiversity score calculation means 150 Means 160 Target Habitat Total Score Adjustment Means 170 Biological Environment Maintenance Information Presenting Means 180 Education / Enlightenment Information Presenting Means 190 Countermeasure Habitat Total Score Calculation Means 200 Countermeasure Biodiversity Score Calculation Means 210 Butterfly Grass and Food Tree Database 220 Avian dietary plant database 230 Specified / Cautious Alien Database

Claims (5)

An ecosystem conservation and recovery assessment system to present ecosystem conservation and recovery goals by assessing potential and explicit ecosystem potential and habitat in the current situation,
Regarding these evaluation items, at least the area size, land use status, green coverage rate, distance to the core biohabitat, and distance to the subcore habitat are evaluated as the evaluation items. , A local environmental total score calculation means for calculating a local environmental total score that is a potential ecosystem potential,
At a minimum, the green space composition of the site to be evaluated, the type of low stem grass, the type of high stem grass / vine vegetation / shrub, the type of high tree, aquatic plants in the water area, and the area are evaluated items. An initial Habitat total score calculating means for calculating an initial Habitat total score that is an actual actual ecosystem potential;
Ecosystem conservation recovery approach determination means for determining that an ecological conservation recovery effort is to be performed when the local environmental total score is equal to or greater than a predetermined value;
A target habitat total score setting means for setting a target habitat total score equal to or higher than the initial habitat total score when it is determined to implement an ecological conservation recovery;
Ecosystem conservation and recovery evaluation system characterized by comprising   The initial habitat total score calculation means, for each of the evaluation items, at least the number of dependent plant species, the area as an input value, and optionally performing an operation of adding a weight index and a hierarchy balance index to the input value The ecosystem maintenance and recovery evaluation system according to claim 1, wherein the Habitat score is calculated, and the initial Habitat score is calculated as a sum of the calculated initial Habitat scores. In conducting the initial biodiversity survey and post-measure biodiversity survey,
An initial biodiversity score calculating means for calculating an initial biodiversity score based on at least the number of species of living organisms;
Target habitat total score adjusting means for adjusting the score according to the priority order for the predetermined evaluation items that have been given priority in advance so as to be the set target habitat total score,
The ecosystem maintenance and restoration evaluation system according to claim 1 or 2, characterized by comprising:   Provided with biodiversity survey execution determination means for determining that an initial biodiversity survey and a post-measure biodiversity survey are to be performed when at least one of the initial habitat total score or the target habitat total score is a predetermined value or more The evaluation system for ecosystem conservation and recovery according to any one of claims 1 to 3.   5. The ecosystem conservation and recovery evaluation system according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the organisms to be evaluated for ecosystem conservation and recovery include at least birds and butterflies.

Images