JP2013105382A - Building quality evaluation device, method for evaluating the same, program and storage medium - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a building quality evaluation technique for properly evaluating the quality of individual buildings by making the most of computerized member information for building and civil engineering.SOLUTION: A building quality evaluation device 100 includes: an acquisition section 111 for acquiring member information of members included in an evaluation object building; a storage section 150 for storing a member quality management master table MQMT including the member information of the building and member quality management information associated with the member information; a quality evaluation section 112 for extracting the corresponding member quality management information referring to the member quality management master table on the basis of the acquired member information and generating evaluation of the evaluation object building including the extracted member quality management information.

Description

  The present invention relates to a building quality evaluation apparatus, a method thereof, a program, and a storage medium.

  Traditionally, the asset value of a building is properly certified at the time of new construction, but even if the building is well maintained and managed, the asset value is assessed as zero for a certain number of years (for example, 10 years, 20 years, etc.) There are many cases. However, even if a building has been built for 30 years, it can be bought and sold as long as it is in good condition, with a borrower as a rental property, good living comfort, and sufficient asset value. There are also properties. Even in such a situation, it is customary for financial institutions to certify the asset value only for the land, not for the building itself, when lending for the sale of used properties, Such rules are also defined in the in-house manual. In addition, when a new property is bought and sold and the owner changes it, it becomes a second-hand property, and the asset value may decrease significantly even though the substantial quality of the building has not changed.

  However, in recent years, due to improvements in the durability of building materials, materials, etc., maintenance technology, building structures, etc., even for wooden properties, in a long period of 30 or 40 years, if the maintenance status is good Even if there are properties that can be used as residences or offices, promote the distribution of such buildings, eliminate the waste of demolition and waste of new construction, and use the buildings as effectively as possible. The development of the law is progressing, and social momentum is also increasing.

  In this way, when buying and selling to make effective use of old buildings, it is necessary to evaluate the asset value by some method, set the collateral value, and set the loanable amount. Thus, except for historical ones, it is customarily considered that all buildings such as old houses, offices, and office buildings are considered worthless, so there are almost no effective evaluation methods. There wasn't.

  For example, as a conventional technique, a technique for evaluating the value of real estate (see Patent Document 1) has been proposed. However, this method is mainly intended to evaluate the location, that is, the land where the building is located, and does not evaluate the asset value of the building.

JP 2007-323239 A

  As mentioned above, land has been properly evaluated and techniques have been developed in the past, but there are few techniques for comprehensive evaluation of the building itself, and as a result, for buildings that have been aged, especially for residential use. Buildings are judged to be worthless, and there is a problem that asset values at the time of distribution, mortgage value, etc. cannot be properly evaluated. In order to calculate the asset value and mortgage value of a building, it is indispensable to properly evaluate the quality of the building, regardless of whether it is new or aged. The technique to do is not developed.

  On the other hand, in the construction industry and the construction industry, computerization has progressed, and it is common to create drawings with three-dimensional CAD, and to create estimation information and integration information based on the unit price of members and units, the unit price of construction, etc. It is becoming. Such computerized drawing information and member information attached thereto, or accumulated information, estimated information, accumulated estimated information, etc. will be used until construction or construction is completed, but will be used effectively thereafter. There were few.

  In view of such a situation, the present inventors have skillfully utilized existing computerized construction and civil engineering member information in order to overcome the drawbacks of the conventional methods, and thus the situation of each individual building. We came up with a technique for obtaining an appropriately evaluated building quality evaluation.

  Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to utilize a computerized building and civil engineering member information to appropriately evaluate the building quality of an individual building, a building quality evaluation device, It is to provide a method, a program and a storage medium.

In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, the building quality evaluation apparatus according to the first invention
An acquisition unit that acquires member information (for example, a name indicating a member, a code, etc., preferably including a quantity of the member; may include member maintenance information) for the member included in the building to be evaluated;
A storage unit for storing a member quality control master table including member information of the building and member quality control information associated with the member information;
Based on the acquired member information, refer to the member quality management master table, extract the corresponding member quality management information, and generate the evaluation of the evaluation target building including the extracted member quality management information And
Have
The member information of the building includes, for example, a name indicating the member, specifications, quality, product number, model number, code, and the like.
The material quality control information includes, for example, durability, service life, frequency of periodic inspection required for maintaining quality, degree of quality deterioration due to aging (10 when new, 8 after 3 years, 7 after 3 years, etc.) ), Parts replacement frequency limit, operation time limit, usage frequency limit, installation year / time, quality status score, index, ranking, stage, etc. Alternatively, the member quality management information is risk information indicating a risk to the disaster, for example, a score indicating the strength against a disaster such as a fire, an earthquake, a tsunami, a flood, a landslide disaster, an index, a ranking, or the like.

Moreover, the building quality evaluation apparatus according to the second invention is
The acquisition unit
Member maintenance information (maintenance management information of members, such as new products, number of months since replacement, years, number of replacements, replacement history, time since inspection, number of months, time until periodic inspection, number of months, etc.) Including the member information including,
The quality evaluation unit
Based on the member information including the acquired member maintenance information, the member quality management master table is referred to extract the corresponding member quality management information, and the evaluation of the evaluation target building including the extracted member quality management information Generate
It is characterized by that.

Moreover, the building quality evaluation apparatus according to the third invention is
The member quality control information includes a numerical value, index or ranking indicating the quality information of the member,
The quality evaluation unit
Based on the acquired member information, refer to the member quality management master table, extract the corresponding member quality management information, and the evaluation object based on the numerical value, index or ranking included in the extracted member quality management information Generate building evaluations (for example, aggregate values of numbers, average values of numerical values and rankings, etc.)
It is characterized by that.

Moreover, the building quality evaluation apparatus according to the fourth invention is:
The storage unit
Risk including the member information and risk information indicating a risk for a disaster associated with the member information (for example, a score indicating a strength against a disaster such as a fire, an earthquake, a tsunami, a flood, a landslide disaster, ranking, etc.) Store more master tables,
The quality evaluation unit
Based on the acquired member information, refer to the risk master table, extract corresponding risk information, and generate an evaluation of the evaluation target building further including the extracted risk information.
It is characterized by that.

Moreover, the building quality evaluation apparatus according to the fifth invention is
The risk information includes a numerical value, an index or a ranking indicating the risk;
The quality evaluation unit
Based on the acquired member information, the risk master table is referred to, the corresponding risk information is extracted, the numerical value indicating the risk included in the extracted risk information, the index or the ranking of the building to be evaluated based on the ranking Generate evaluations (e.g., aggregate values of numbers, average values of numbers and rankings, etc.)
It is characterized by that.

Moreover, the building quality evaluation apparatus according to the sixth invention is:
The storage unit
Further storing a first price evaluation rule for generating a current price based on the evaluation of the building and the price;
The acquisition unit
Obtain an initial amount which is the amount at the time of construction or purchase of the building to be evaluated,
The quality evaluation unit
Based on the initial amount and the evaluation of the building to be evaluated, the first amount evaluation rule is used to determine a current amount (e.g., asset value, mortgage amount, loan) for the current building to be evaluated. (E.g. target amount) (may be included in the evaluation or generated)
It is characterized by that.
The first monetary value evaluation rule can be, for example, a calculation formula or a table.

The building quality evaluation apparatus according to the seventh invention
The storage unit
A member amount table that is the current member amount related to a building member or a plurality of members (amount corresponding to a member market price or a construction cost market price or a cost price including a plurality of members (for example, a unit price of a bathroom unit, a steel material) The price including the market price, carpenter's wage price, etc.)
The quality evaluation unit
Based on the initial price and the evaluation of the building to be evaluated, the first price evaluation rule is used to generate a current price that is the current evaluation price for the building to be evaluated, and the member price. Refer to the table and adjust the current amount based on the current member amount.
It is characterized by that.

Moreover, the building quality evaluation apparatus according to the eighth invention is
The storage unit
Further storing a second price evaluation rule for generating a current price based on the building rating and a plurality of prices;
The acquisition unit
Initial amount that is the amount at the time of construction or purchase of the building to be evaluated, and reform, maintenance, and environmental equipment (living environment, safety, convenience, environmental measures, It is preferable to include the amount of renovation and maintenance (material costs, equipment costs, and construction costs) related to equipment and devices that reduce energy costs, for example, seismic isolation equipment, vibration control equipment, etc. Is)
The quality evaluation unit
Based on the initial amount, the renovation / maintenance amount, and the evaluation of the building to be evaluated, the second amount evaluation rule is used to determine a current amount (current amount) that is an evaluation amount for the current building to be evaluated ( For example, generate asset value after renovation or maintenance, mortgage amount, loan target amount, etc. (may be generated or output as part of evaluation)
It is characterized by that.
The second monetary value evaluation rule can be, for example, a calculation formula or a table.

Moreover, the building quality evaluation apparatus according to the ninth invention is
The storage unit
A money amount master table that stores the evaluation of the building to be evaluated or the items included in the evaluation and the amount associated with the evaluation or the item included in the evaluation;
The quality evaluation unit
Based on the evaluation of the building to be evaluated, referring to the amount master table, the corresponding amount is extracted, and based on the extracted amount, the evaluation amount for the building to be evaluated (mortgage amount, loan target amount, etc.) Generate (may be generated or output in the evaluation)
It is characterized by that.
Preferably, a factor related to the amount is output instead of the amount, and the amount is generated or output based on the separately provided land price or the amount of the real estate market price in the region and the factor. The amount can be a mortgage amount or a loan amount.
In addition, the quality evaluation unit refers to the amount master table based on the evaluation of the building to be evaluated, extracts the corresponding amount, and based on the extracted amount, the initial amount and the renovation / maintenance amount An evaluation amount (mortgage amount, loan target amount, etc.) for the building may be generated (may be generated or output in the evaluation).

Moreover, the building quality evaluation apparatus according to the tenth invention is
The storage unit
Further storing an insurance master table including building evaluations and insurance-related information associated with the evaluations (such as insurance premiums such as non-life insurance and life insurance, and weights and ranks for insurance premiums);
The building quality evaluation device
Based on the evaluation of the building to be evaluated, the insurance master table is referred to, and an insurance information extracting unit that extracts the relevant insurance related information (further, the premium related to the building to be evaluated is extracted from the extracted insurance related information. Insurance premium calculation unit to calculate or insurance premium calculation unit to calculate the premium related to the building to be evaluated from the basic insurance premium and extracted insurance related information with reference to the basic premium calculated by the conventional procedure May further be provided),
It is characterized by that.

Moreover, the building quality evaluation apparatus according to the eleventh invention is
The acquisition unit
The member information including 3D CAD information including a plurality of objects for the building to be evaluated and / or CAD related information (BIM information, integration information, estimate information, etc.) associated with the 3D CAD information is acquired. And
The storage unit
Structure indicating at least one structure information of an object position, an object shape, an object dimension, a connection state of a plurality of objects, and an arrangement state of a plurality of objects, and a degree of influence on a disaster associated with the structure information Further stores a structural risk master table that contains the at-risk risk information;
The quality evaluation unit
Based on the three-dimensional CAD information included in the acquired member information and / or CAD related information associated with the three-dimensional CAD information, the corresponding structural risk information is extracted by referring to the structural risk master table And generating an evaluation of the evaluation target building further including the extracted structure-derived risk information,
It is characterized by that.

Moreover, the building quality evaluation apparatus according to the twelfth invention is
The acquisition unit
Further obtaining geographical information (geographic coordinates, geographical coordinates including altitude, address, region) related to the geographical position of the building to be evaluated;
The storage unit
Geographic information (geographic coordinates, geographical coordinates including altitude, address, region) and earthquakes, explosions, volcanic activity, radiation exposure, typhoons, fires, liquefaction phenomena, floods, high waves associated with the geographical information A hazard map containing geographic hazard information resulting from disasters (natural disasters and man-made disasters) including at least one of tsunami, landslide disasters,
The quality evaluation unit
Based on the acquired geographical information, refer to the hazard map, extract corresponding geographical danger information, and generate an evaluation of the building to be evaluated further including the extracted geographical danger information.
It is characterized by that.

Moreover, the building quality evaluation apparatus according to the thirteenth invention is
The storage unit
Member information of a building (one member (equipment, device, equipment, etc.), a group of a plurality of members, or a structure or configuration constituted by arrangement or combination of a plurality of members) and the member information Further storing a member rating master table including member rating information,
The quality evaluation unit
Based on the acquired member information, refer to the member quality control master table, extract the corresponding member quality control information,
Based on the acquired member information, refer to the member rating master table, extract the corresponding member rating information,
Generating an evaluation of the building to be evaluated including the extracted member quality control information and member rating information;
It is characterized by that.
Alternatively, the evaluation of the evaluation target building may be re-evaluated using the extracted member rating information. Further, the current amount may be generated using the extracted member rating information and at least one of the initial amount, the reform amount, the maintenance amount, and the like.

Moreover, the building quality evaluation apparatus according to the fourteenth invention is
The acquisition unit
It further acquires at least one building external evaluation information of information classified by structure class, housing performance information, housing history information, some building external rating information related to the evaluation of the building to be evaluated,
The storage unit
At least one building external evaluation information of structural class-related information, housing performance information, housing history information, some building external rating information related to building evaluation, and disaster associated with the building external evaluation information Further storing an external evaluation master table including external evaluation impact information indicating the impact level,
The quality evaluation unit
Based on the acquired at least one building external evaluation information, the external evaluation master table is referred to extract corresponding external evaluation influence information, and the evaluation target building is extracted based on the extracted external evaluation influence information. (E.g. increase / decrease number, rise / decrease rank)
It is characterized by that.

  As described above, the solution of the present invention has been described as an apparatus. However, the present invention can be realized as a method, a program, and a storage medium storing the program, which are substantially equivalent thereto, and the scope of the present invention. It should be understood that these are also included. Each step of the following methods and programs uses an arithmetic processing unit such as a CPU or DSP as needed for data processing. The input data, processed / generated data, etc. It is stored in a storage device such as an HDD or a memory.

A program according to the fifteenth aspect of the present invention that realizes the present invention as a program is:
It is a building quality evaluation program for functioning a computer as a building quality evaluation apparatus according to any one of the first to fourteenth inventions.

A storage medium according to a sixteenth aspect of the present invention that realizes the present invention as a storage medium is
A computer-readable storage medium storing the building quality evaluation program according to the fifteenth invention.

Moreover, the building quality evaluation method using the computer according to the seventeenth aspect of the present invention, which is realized as a method,
An acquisition step of acquiring member information for members included in the building to be evaluated;
A storage step in which the storage unit stores a member quality management master table including member information of the building and member quality management information associated with the member information;
The arithmetic unit refers to the member quality management master table based on the acquired member information, extracts the corresponding member quality management information, and evaluates the evaluation target building including the extracted member quality management information. A quality evaluation step to generate,
Have

The building quality evaluation method according to the eighteenth invention is
The obtaining step comprises
Obtaining the member information including member maintenance information;
The quality evaluation step includes
Based on the member information including the acquired member maintenance information, the member quality management master table is referred to extract the corresponding member quality management information, and the evaluation of the evaluation target building including the extracted member quality management information Generate
It is characterized by that.

Moreover, the building quality evaluation method according to the nineteenth invention is
The member quality control information includes a numerical value, index or ranking indicating the quality information of the member,
The quality evaluation step includes
Based on the acquired member information, refer to the member quality management master table, extract the corresponding member quality management information, and the evaluation object based on the numerical value, index or ranking included in the extracted member quality management information Generate building evaluations,
It is characterized by that.

The building quality evaluation method according to the twentieth invention is
The storing step includes
A storage unit further comprising: storing a risk master table including the member information and risk information indicating a risk with respect to a disaster associated with the member information;
The quality evaluation step includes
Based on the acquired member information, refer to the risk master table, extract corresponding risk information, and generate an evaluation of the evaluation target building further including the extracted risk information.
It is characterized by that.

Moreover, the building quality evaluation method according to the twenty-first invention is
The risk information includes a numerical value, an index or a ranking indicating the risk;
The quality evaluation step includes
Based on the acquired member information, the risk master table is referred to, the corresponding risk information is extracted, the numerical value indicating the risk included in the extracted risk information, the index or the ranking of the building to be evaluated based on the ranking Generate a rating,
It is characterized by

Moreover, the building quality evaluation method according to the twenty-second invention is
The storing step includes
The storage unit further stores a first price evaluation rule for generating a current price based on the evaluation of the building and the price;
The obtaining step comprises
Obtain an initial amount which is the amount at the time of construction or purchase of the building to be evaluated,
The quality evaluation step includes
Based on the initial amount and the evaluation of the building to be evaluated, the first amount evaluation rule is used to determine the current amount (e.g., asset value, mortgage amount, loan target) for the current building to be evaluated. (E.g., money) (may be generated or output as part of the evaluation)
It is characterized by that.

Moreover, the building quality evaluation method according to the twenty-third invention is
The storing step includes
The storage unit is a member price table that is a current member price related to a building member or a plurality of members (an amount corresponding to a member market price or a construction cost market price or a cost price including a plurality of members (for example, a bathroom unit) ) Including the unit price, steel price, carpenter's wage price, etc.)
The quality evaluation step includes
Based on the initial price and the evaluation of the building to be evaluated, the first price evaluation rule is used to generate a current price that is the current evaluation price for the building to be evaluated, and the member price. Refer to the table and adjust the current amount based on the current member amount.
It is characterized by that.

A building quality evaluation method according to the twenty-fourth invention is
The storing step includes
The storage unit further stores a second price evaluation rule for generating a current price based on the evaluation of the building and the price;
The obtaining step comprises
Initial amount that is the amount at the time of construction or purchase of the building to be evaluated, and reform, maintenance, and environmental equipment (living environment, safety, convenience, environmental measures, Renovation and maintenance costs (preferably including equipment costs and construction costs) related to equipment and devices that reduce energy costs, such as seismic isolation equipment and vibration control equipment) Acquired,
The quality evaluation step includes
Based on the initial amount, the renovation / maintenance amount, and the evaluation of the building to be evaluated, the second amount evaluation rule is used to determine a current amount (current amount) that is an evaluation amount for the current building to be evaluated ( For example, generate asset value after renovation or maintenance, mortgage amount, loan target amount, etc. (may be generated or output as part of evaluation)
It is characterized by that.

Moreover, the building quality evaluation method according to the twenty-fifth aspect of the present invention is
The storing step includes
The storage unit further comprising a step of storing an amount master table for storing an evaluation of the building or an item included in the evaluation and an amount associated with the evaluation or the item included in the evaluation;
The quality evaluation step includes
Based on the evaluation of the building to be evaluated, referring to the amount master table, extract a corresponding amount, and generate an evaluation amount for the building to be evaluated based on the extracted amount.
It is characterized by that.

Moreover, the building quality evaluation method according to the twenty-sixth aspect of the present invention is
The storing step includes
The storage unit further comprising storing an insurance master table including a rating of the building and premium related information associated with the rating;
The building quality evaluation method is
The arithmetic unit further includes an insurance information extraction step of extracting relevant insurance related information with reference to the insurance master table based on the evaluation of the evaluation target building.
It is characterized by that.

Moreover, the building quality evaluation method according to the twenty-seventh aspect of the invention is
The obtaining step comprises
Obtaining 3D CAD information including a plurality of objects for the building to be evaluated and / or the member information including CAD related information associated with the 3D CAD information;
The storing step includes
The storage unit has at least one structure information of the position of the object, the shape of the object, the size of the object, the connection status of the plurality of objects, the arrangement status of the plurality of objects, and the influence on the disaster associated with the structure information Further storing a structural risk master table that includes structural risk information indicating degrees;
The quality evaluation step includes
Based on the three-dimensional CAD information included in the acquired member information and / or CAD related information associated with the three-dimensional CAD information, the corresponding structural risk information is extracted by referring to the structural risk master table And generating an evaluation of the evaluation target building further including the extracted structure-derived risk information,
It is characterized by that.

Moreover, the building quality evaluation method according to the twenty-eighth aspect of the invention is
The obtaining step comprises
Further acquiring geographical information related to the geographical position of the building to be evaluated;
The storing step includes
A disaster in which the storage unit includes at least one of geographical information and an earthquake, explosion, volcanic activity, radiation exposure, typhoon, fire, liquefaction phenomenon, flood, high wave, tsunami, landslide disaster associated with the geographical information Further storing a hazard map including geographic risk information resulting from
The quality evaluation step includes
Based on the acquired geographical information, refer to the hazard map, extract corresponding geographical danger information, and generate an evaluation of the building to be evaluated further including the extracted geographical danger information.
It is characterized by that.

The building quality evaluation method according to the twenty-ninth invention is
The storing step includes
A storage unit is a member information of a building (one member (equipment, apparatus, equipment, etc.), a group of a plurality of members, or a structure or configuration constituted by arrangement or combination of a plurality of members) and the member Further storing a member rating master table including member rating information associated with the information;
The quality evaluation step includes
Based on the acquired member information, refer to the member quality control master table, extract the corresponding member quality control information,
Based on the acquired member information, refer to the member rating master table, extract the corresponding member rating information,
Generating an evaluation of the building to be evaluated including the extracted member quality control information and member rating information;
It is characterized by that.
Alternatively, the evaluation of the evaluation target building may be re-evaluated using the extracted member rating information.

Moreover, the building quality evaluation method according to the thirtieth invention is
The obtaining step includes
It further acquires at least one building external evaluation information of information classified by structure class, housing performance information, housing history information, some building external rating information related to the evaluation of the building to be evaluated,
The storing step includes
A storage unit is associated with at least one building external evaluation information among structural class-related information, housing performance information, housing history information, and some building external rating information related to building evaluation, and the building external evaluation information An external evaluation master table including external evaluation impact information indicating the degree of impact on a given disaster;
The quality evaluation step includes
Based on the acquired at least one building external evaluation information, the external evaluation master table is referred to extract corresponding external evaluation influence information, and the evaluation target building is extracted based on the extracted external evaluation influence information. (E.g. increase / decrease number, rise / decrease rank)
It is characterized by that.

  According to the present invention, it is possible to appropriately evaluate the building quality of individual buildings by utilizing computerized building and civil engineering member information. That is, according to the present invention, it is possible to easily obtain the quality of individual buildings by utilizing computerized building and civil engineering integration information and estimation information (or CAD information). Or it becomes possible to obtain | require the quality of an individual building simply using CAD information. In addition, for example, it is possible to appropriately evaluate the disaster impact level (risk that a disaster has on a building) of an individual building. Furthermore, according to the present invention, it becomes possible to determine a risk subdivided loan amount, asset assessment, collateral assessment, mortgage assessment, etc., which has been impossible in the past. It is also possible to set the impact level and insurance premium for insurance.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an outline of a building quality evaluation apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing an example of processing executed by the building quality evaluation apparatus shown in FIG. FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the member quality management master table MQMT used in the processing of the flowchart of FIG. FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing an example of processing executed by the building quality evaluation apparatus shown in FIG. FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing an example of processing executed by the building quality evaluation apparatus shown in FIG. FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing an example of processing executed by the building quality evaluation apparatus shown in FIG. FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing an example of processing executed by the building quality evaluation apparatus shown in FIG. FIG. 8 is a block diagram showing an outline of a building quality evaluation apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 9 is a flowchart showing an example of processing executed by the building quality evaluation apparatus shown in FIG. FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an insurance master table IMT used in the process of the flowchart of FIG. FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing an example of processing executed by the building quality evaluation apparatus shown in FIG. FIG. 12 is a diagram showing the structural risk master table SRMT used in the processing of the flowchart of FIG. FIG. 13 is a block diagram showing an outline of a building quality evaluation apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 14 is a flowchart showing an example of processing executed by the building quality evaluation apparatus shown in FIG. FIG. 15 is a flowchart showing a modification of the process of FIG. FIG. 16 is a diagram showing a hazard map for liquefaction phenomenon used in the processing of the flowchart of FIG. 14 or FIG. FIG. 17 is a diagram showing a fire hazard map used in the processing of the flowchart of FIG. 14 or FIG. FIG. 18 is a diagram showing an earthquake hazard map used in the processing of the flowchart of FIG. 14 or FIG. FIG. 19 is a schematic diagram for explaining a function of efficiently extracting a required object using a layer of CAD information and attribute information. FIG. 20 is a block diagram showing an outline of a building quality evaluation apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 21 is a flowchart showing an example of processing executed by the building quality evaluation apparatus shown in FIG. FIG. 22 is a graph showing the transition of the current amount generated by the building quality evaluation apparatus shown in FIG. FIG. 23 is a diagram illustrating a house history information certificate that is an example of building external evaluation information. FIG. 24 is a graph showing changes in the current amount generated by the building quality evaluation apparatus shown in FIG.

  Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.

  FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an outline of a building quality evaluation apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in the figure, the building quality evaluation apparatus 100 (BQED) includes a control unit (CPU, processor) 110, an input unit 120, an output unit 130, a communication unit 140, a storage unit 150, and a display unit 160. The storage unit 150 includes building member information (for example, name, specification, quality, product number, model number, code, etc. indicating the member), and member quality management information (durability, useful life, quality) associated with the member information. Periodical inspection frequency required for maintenance, degree of quality deterioration due to aging (10 for new products, 8 for 1 year, 7 for 3 years, etc.), parts replacement frequency limit, operating time limit, usage frequency limit, Installation year / time, quality status score, index, ranking, stage, etc., or risk information indicating disaster risk, for example, fire, earthquake, tsunami, flood, landslide disaster strength score , Index, ranking, etc.) is stored.

  The control unit 110 acquires member information (for example, a name indicating a member, a code, etc., preferably including the number of members. The member maintenance information may be included) for the members included in the evaluation target building. Based on the acquisition unit 111 and the acquired member information, the member quality management master table MQMT is referred to extract the corresponding member quality management information, and the evaluation object building including the extracted member quality management information is evaluated. And a quality evaluation unit 112 to be generated. The member information acquired by the acquisition unit 111 and three-dimensional CAD information described later are preferably stored in the member information storage area MIR of the storage unit 150. The member information and the three-dimensional CAD information acquired by the acquisition unit 111 are acquired from, for example, a CAD information server CADIS or a terminal PC via the network NET and the communication unit 140.

  Preferably, the acquisition unit 111 includes member maintenance information (maintenance management information of the member, for example, whether the member is new or a replacement, the number of months since the replacement, the number of years, the number of replacements, the replacement history, from the time of inspection. Member information including the time, number of months, time to periodic inspection, number of months, etc.), and the quality evaluation unit 112 refers to the member quality management master table MQMT based on the member information including the acquired member maintenance information. Then, the corresponding member quality management information is extracted, and the evaluation of the evaluation target building including the extracted member quality management information is generated.

  Preferably, the member quality management information includes a numerical value, an index or a ranking indicating the quality information of the member, and the quality evaluation unit 112 responds by referring to the member quality management master table MQMT based on the acquired member information. The quality of the material to be evaluated, and the evaluation of the building to be evaluated based on the numerical value, index or ranking included in the extracted material quality management information (for example, the aggregate value of the numerical value, the average value of the numerical value and ranking, the quality Generate or output a summary table of numbers, items, etc.).

  The building quality evaluation apparatus 100 is a terminal PC1 possessed by a financial institution server FS such as a bank or an insurance company, or an insurance business or financial industry employee such as an employee of a bank or insurance agency, via a communication unit 140 and a network NET. , PC2, mobile terminal PDA1, mobile phone terminal MS1, etc., and exchange information such as transmitting information generated by the apparatus 100 and acquiring information necessary for processing of the apparatus 100 . The output unit 130 can output information stored in the apparatus or generated information to the printer PRN. The display unit 160 can also display information stored in the apparatus and generated information. The input unit 120 receives an operation instruction or information input that is input via the mouse MUS or the keyboard KBD. In this way, the generated information and intermediate data and acquired data are transmitted to the outside, displayed on the display unit, and the generated information and intermediate data and acquired data are stored in the storage unit. It should be noted that other actual modes described later are possible as well.

  The storage unit 150 includes member information and risk information indicating a risk associated with the disaster associated with the member information (for example, a score indicating the strength against a disaster such as a fire, an earthquake, a tsunami, a flood, a landslide disaster, ranking, and the like). The risk master table RMT including these is further stored. Although the risk information may be stored in the member quality management master table, it is more convenient to separately construct the risk information as a risk master table RMT. Based on the acquired member information, the quality evaluation unit 112 extracts the corresponding risk information with reference to the risk master table RMT, and generates an evaluation of the evaluation target building further including the extracted risk information. In addition, when the risk information includes a numerical value, an index, or a ranking indicating the risk, the quality evaluation unit 112 refers to the risk master table RMT based on the acquired member information, and extracts the corresponding risk information, It is possible to generate or output an evaluation of the building to be evaluated based on a numerical value, index or ranking indicating the risk included in the extracted risk information (for example, an aggregate value of numerical values, an average value of numerical values or ranking, etc.) It becomes. That is, this apparatus can function as a building risk evaluation apparatus.

  The storage unit 150 further stores an amount master table MMT for storing the evaluation of the building to be evaluated or an item included in the evaluation and an amount associated with the evaluation or the item included in the evaluation, and a quality evaluation unit 112 refers to the amount master table MMT based on the evaluation of the evaluation target building, extracts the corresponding amount, and based on the extracted amount, the evaluation amount (mortgage amount, loan target amount, etc.) for the evaluation target building ) Is generated or output (or may be included in the evaluation).

  The apparatus has a computer such as a general-purpose computer, a special-purpose computer, a server, or a PC, or a program module that implements (executes) the function and processing procedure (method) of the system on the computer. It is preferable to construct this apparatus on a computer by holding it in a CPU, processor, storage unit, or reading from an external server or storage, and the same applies to each of the following embodiments.

  FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing an example of processing executed by the building quality evaluation apparatus shown in FIG. As shown in the figure, in step S11, the acquisition unit 111 includes member information (for example, a name indicating a member, a code, etc.) for a member included in the evaluation target building. Preferably, the member also includes the number of members. Maintenance information may be included). Next, in step S12, the storage unit 150 includes building member information (for example, name, specification, quality, product number, model number, code, etc. indicating the member) and member quality management information (durability) associated with the member information. Performance, service life, periodic inspection frequency required to maintain quality, degree of quality deterioration due to secular change (10 when new, 8 after 3 years, 7 after 7 years, etc.), parts replacement frequency limit, operating time Limit, number of times of use, year of installation, time, points indicating quality status, index, ranking, stage, etc., or risk information indicating risk to disaster, for example, disaster such as fire, earthquake, tsunami, flood, landslide disaster The member quality management master table MQMT including a score indicating the strength of the key, an index, a ranking, and the like is stored.

  And in step S13, the quality evaluation part 112 refers to a member quality management master table based on the acquired member information, extracts corresponding member quality management information, and the evaluation object containing this extracted member quality management information Generate building ratings. As the member information, attribute information included in the object of the CAD data may be used. Preferably, the integrated database for the building to be evaluated, the estimated database, the integrated estimated database that combines these, or these Obtained from the CAD information server CADIS, which is a server that manages the database of the database. Alternatively, for example, it is preferable to use information that is adjusted, corrected, or added to systematic member information by a BIM server or the like. For example, the member information and attribute information include the part number and product name of the member. Using the information of the BIM server and the server of the building material distributor, the material, material, It is possible to obtain various data such as fire resistance, earthquake resistance, seismic control, seismic isolation, earthquake resistance grade, etc. Based on these data, member quality control information is obtained, and the member quality control master table MQMT is preliminarily obtained. It is preferable to construct the above. If the storing step such as step S12 is performed once, it is not necessary to re-execute until the information is changed. Alternatively, the storing step becomes unnecessary by installing a memory such as a ROM or flash memory storing the information in the apparatus or computer. The same applies to the subsequent embodiments.

  FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the member quality management master table MQMT used in the processing of the flowchart of FIG. As shown in the figure, for example, for the member information including the member code and the member name, the inspection frequency, the numerical value indicating the quality at the time of a new product, the numerical value indicating the quality when aged, the periodic inspection when aged is passed The member quality control information such as the numerical value of the case, the fire resistance, the numerical value of the earthquake resistance, and the service life (replacement time) is associated. The numerical values of fire resistance and earthquake resistance are risk information, and may be stored separately from the member quality management master table MQMT as the risk master table RMT.

  In this table, the member code of the drainage equipment is ZZ101, and can be searched by, for example, the member code ZZ101 acquired from the integration / estimation database. , 5 in 10 years, 3 in 15 years (replacement time), large fire resistance (incombustible, fire resistance point 10), earthquake resistance n / a (not applicable)). That is, the quality evaluation unit 112 can easily extract the relevant quality management information with reference to the member quality management master table MQMT based on the member code ZZ101 of the acquired member information.

  In addition, there is concrete as a material or material member, and the member names “reinforcement in concrete” and “member code ZZ201” which are member information are quality control information indicating the risk / impact of disaster, that is, risk information ( Fire resistance: large (fire resistance point 10), earthquake resistance: large (seismic point 10), quality evaluation unit 112, based on the acquired member information: member name "rebar in concrete" By referring to the quality control master table MQMT, risk information (fire resistance point 10 and earthquake resistance point 10) is extracted from the corresponding quality control information, and the quality extracted based on several pieces of member information in this way. Total of fire resistance points of management information (risk information), total of earthquake resistance points, and disaster recovery for the building to be evaluated from these numerical values (risk information) For example, the higher the total number of fire resistance points (risk information), the higher the fire resistance, the lower the total number, the lower the fire resistance, and the total number of earthquake resistance points The higher the earthquake resistance, the higher the earthquake resistance, and the lower the total value, the lower the earthquake resistance.

  FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the evaluation of the evaluation target building output by the building quality evaluation apparatus shown in FIG. As shown in the figure, the evaluation table EV1 is evaluated by numerical values, and is evaluated by the total value, average value, fire resistance point, average value of earthquake resistance points, total value, average of ranking, etc. indicating quality. Has been.

  Acquired part maintenance information (maintenance management information of the member, for example, new article, number of months since replacement, year, number of replacements, replacement history, time since inspection, number of months, time until periodic inspection, month The quality evaluation unit refers to the member quality management master table based on the member information including the acquired member maintenance information, and obtains the corresponding member quality management information. It is possible to extract and generate an evaluation of the evaluation target building including the extracted member quality management information. At this time, as in the evaluation table EV2, an evaluation of “total quality value at new article = 300, average value 10, aging, and total quality value when considering periodic inspection = 200, average value = 7” is generated. It becomes possible.

  FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing an example of processing executed by the building quality evaluation apparatus shown in FIG. In this aspect, a case where member information includes member maintenance information will be described. As shown in the figure, in step S21, the acquisition unit 111 acquires member information including member maintenance information for members included in the evaluation target building. The member maintenance information includes, for example, member maintenance management information, for example, new article, number of months since replacement, year, number of replacements, replacement history, time since inspection, number of months, time until periodic inspection, month Numbers are included. Next, in step S22, the storage unit 150 causes the building member information (for example, name, specification, quality, product number, model number, code, etc. indicating the member) and member quality management information (durability) associated with the member information. Performance, service life, periodic inspection frequency required to maintain quality, degree of quality deterioration due to secular change (10 when new, 8 after 3 years, 7 after 7 years, etc.), parts replacement frequency limit, operating time Limit, number of times of use, year of installation, time, points indicating quality status, index, ranking, stage, etc., or risk information indicating risk to disaster, for example, disaster such as fire, earthquake, tsunami, flood, landslide disaster The member quality management master table MQMT including a score indicating the strength of the key, an index, a ranking, and the like is stored.

  And finally in step S23, the quality evaluation part 112 extracts the corresponding member quality management information with reference to a member quality management master table based on the member information containing the acquired member maintenance information, and this extracted member Generate an evaluation of the building to be evaluated including quality control information. The evaluation table EV2 in FIG. 3 is extracted and output in this way.

  FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing an example of processing executed by the building quality evaluation apparatus shown in FIG. In this aspect, a case will be described in which member maintenance information is included in the member information, and an evaluation including member quality management information and risk information is generated or output. As shown in the figure, in step S31, the acquisition unit 111 acquires member information including member maintenance information for members included in the evaluation target building. Next, in step S32, the storage unit 150 causes the building member information (for example, name, specification, quality, product number, model number, code, etc. indicating the member) and member quality management information (durability) associated with the member information. Performance, service life, periodic inspection frequency required to maintain quality, degree of quality deterioration due to secular change (10 when new, 8 after 3 years, 7 after 7 years, etc.), parts replacement frequency limit, operating time Limit, number of times of use, year of installation, time, points indicating quality status, index, ranking, stage, etc., or risk information indicating risk to disaster, for example, disaster such as fire, earthquake, tsunami, flood, landslide disaster A member quality control master table MQMT including a score indicating the strength of the member, an index, a ranking, etc.), and a member information and a risk indicating a risk associated with the member information. Further storing risk master table RMT including the click information. And finally in step S33, the quality evaluation part 112 extracts the corresponding member quality management information with reference to the member quality management master table MQMT based on the member information containing the acquired member maintenance information, and also acquires Based on the obtained member information, the corresponding risk information is extracted with reference to the risk master table RMT, and the evaluation of the evaluation target building including the extracted member quality management information and the risk information is generated. What is extracted and output in this way is in the form of, for example, the evaluation table EV1 in FIG. Although an evaluation document can be generated or output as a total value or an average value as shown in FIG. 3, it may be output in a table format with all the extracted items as items.

  FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing an example of processing executed by the building quality evaluation apparatus shown in FIG. In this aspect, a case where an evaluation for a building is output as an amount or a factor related to the amount will be described. As shown in the figure, in step S41, the acquisition unit 111 acquires member information for members included in the evaluation target building. Next, in step S42, the storage unit 150 stores a member quality management master table MQMT including the member information of the building and the member quality management information associated with the member information, and is used for the evaluation of the building or the evaluation. An amount master table MMT that stores the included items and the amount associated with the evaluation or the amount associated with the item included in the evaluation or the amount of money is further stored. Finally, in step S43, the quality evaluation unit 112 refers to the member quality management master table MQMT based on the acquired member information, extracts the corresponding member quality management information, and outputs the evaluation of the evaluation target building. Alternatively, based on the output or the generated evaluation of the building to be evaluated, the amount master table MMT is referred to extract a corresponding amount or a factor affecting the amount, and the extracted amount or amount is affected. Based on the factors that affect valuation, generate or output an evaluation amount for the building to be evaluated or a factor that affects the amount (mortgage amount, loan amount, asset amount, factors related to the amount, etc.). Alternatively, the evaluation of the evaluation target building including this amount may be output. If the generated or output factor is a factor that affects the amount, the storage unit of this apparatus, the financial institution server FS, or an external real estate company server (not shown) depending on the factor or the aggregate value or average value of the factor ), Etc., to generate or output settings for asset amount, loan amount, and mortgage amount by multiplying various data such as standard market price, land price, neighborhood market price, etc. stored in It is possible.

  FIG. 8 is a block diagram showing an outline of a building quality evaluation apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in the figure, the building quality evaluation apparatus 200 (BQED) includes a control unit (CPU, processor) 210, an input unit 220, an output unit 230, a communication unit 240, a storage unit 250, and a display unit 260. In this embodiment, unless otherwise noted, the functional unit (acquisition unit, quality evaluation unit, output unit, control unit, etc.) and storage unit shown in the embodiment of FIG. 1 are included, and processing by the functional unit and storage unit is also performed. It is possible to execute the same thing, and it is possible to obtain the same processing result using the flowchart of FIG. 2-7 and the master table, or the processing result obtained by adding the processing of this embodiment. Please be careful.

  The storage unit 250 stores a member quality management master table MQMT including member information of the building and member quality management information associated with the member information. The control unit 210 extracts the corresponding member quality management information with reference to the member quality management master table MQMT based on the acquisition unit 211 that acquires the member information for the member included in the evaluation target building and the acquired member information. And a quality evaluation unit 212 that generates an evaluation of the evaluation target building including the extracted member quality management information. The member information acquired by the acquisition unit 211 and three-dimensional CAD information described later are preferably stored in the member information storage area MIR of the storage unit 250. The member information and the three-dimensional CAD information acquired by the acquisition unit 211 are acquired from, for example, a CAD information server CADIS or a terminal PC via the network NET and the communication unit 240.

  Preferably, the acquisition unit 211 has member maintenance information (maintenance management information of the member, for example, whether the member is new or replacement, the number of months since the replacement, the number of years, the number of replacements, the replacement history, from the time of inspection. Member information including the time, number of months, time until periodic inspection, number of months, etc.), and the quality evaluation unit 212 refers to the member quality management master table MQMT based on the member information including the acquired member maintenance information. Then, the corresponding member quality management information is extracted, and the evaluation of the evaluation target building including the extracted member quality management information is generated.

  Preferably, the member quality management information includes a numerical value, an index or a ranking indicating the quality information of the member, and the quality evaluation unit 212 refers to the member quality management master table MQMT on the basis of the acquired member information. The quality of the material to be evaluated, and the evaluation of the building to be evaluated based on the numerical value, index or ranking included in the extracted material quality management information (for example, the aggregate value of the numerical value, the average value of the numerical value and ranking, the quality Generate or output a summary table of numbers, items, etc.).

  The building quality evaluation apparatus 200 is a terminal PC1 possessed by a financial institution server FS such as a bank or an insurance company, or an insurance business or financial industry employee such as an employee of a bank or insurance agency, via a communication unit 240 and a network NET. , PC2, mobile terminal PDA1, mobile phone terminal MS1, etc., and exchange information such as transmitting information generated by the apparatus 200 and acquiring information necessary for processing of the apparatus 100 . The output unit 130 can output information stored in the apparatus or generated information to the printer PRN. The display unit 260 can also display information stored in the apparatus and generated information.

  The storage unit 250 further stores a risk master table RMT including member information and risk information indicating a risk with respect to a disaster associated with the member information. Although the risk information may be stored in the member quality management master table, it is more convenient to separately construct the risk information as a risk master table RMT. Based on the acquired member information, the quality evaluation unit 212 extracts the corresponding risk information with reference to the risk master table RMT, and generates an evaluation of the evaluation target building further including the extracted risk information. In addition, when the risk information includes a numerical value, an index or a ranking indicating risk, the quality evaluation unit 212 extracts the corresponding risk information with reference to the risk master table RMT based on the acquired member information, It is possible to generate or output an evaluation of the building to be evaluated based on a numerical value, index or ranking indicating the risk included in the extracted risk information (for example, an aggregate value of numerical values, an average value of numerical values or ranking, etc.) It becomes.

  The storage unit 250 further stores an amount master table MMT for storing the evaluation of the building to be evaluated or an item included in the evaluation and an amount associated with the evaluation or the item included in the evaluation, and a quality evaluation unit 212 refers to the amount master table MMT based on the evaluation of the evaluation target building, extracts the corresponding amount, and based on the extracted amount, the evaluation amount for the evaluation target building (mortgage amount, loan target amount, etc.) ) Is generated or output (or may be generated or output in the evaluation).

  In this embodiment, the storage unit 250 evaluates the building (quality evaluation, risk evaluation, quality and risk evaluation, etc.) and premium-related information (life insurance and life insurance) associated with the evaluation. The insurance master table IMT including the insurance premiums such as the above, and the numerical values and ranks for weighting the insurance premiums) is further stored. The control unit 210 refers to the insurance master table IMT based on the evaluation of the evaluation target building, and extracts the relevant insurance related information 213 (further, from the extracted insurance related information to the evaluation target building Calculate the premium related to the building to be evaluated from the basic premium and the extracted insurance-related information with reference to the basic premium calculated by the conventional procedure or the premium calculation unit that calculates the related premium An insurance premium calculation unit may be provided. In this embodiment, non-life insurance such as fire insurance, earthquake insurance, and building insurance is mainly assumed, but it can also be applied to life insurance. For example, in the case of life insurance, there is a premium rate that takes into account the risk of death by occupation, but the premium rate that takes into account the disaster risk in the building of the workplace where you live, the residential building, and insurance-related It is possible to prescribe numerical values in insurance-related information, and to evaluate and calculate life insurance premiums and illness premiums related to the building to be evaluated in consideration of such risks by the insurance information extraction unit 213 Become.

  In the present embodiment, the acquisition unit 211 includes, in addition to the function of the acquisition unit 111, 3D CAD information including a plurality of objects for the building to be evaluated and / or CAD related information associated with the 3D CAD information. It is possible to acquire member information including (BIM information, integration information, estimate information, etc.). The storage unit 250 has at least one structure information among an object position, an object shape, an object dimension, a plurality of object connection states, and a plurality of object arrangement states, and a disaster associated with the structure information. A structure risk master table SRMT including structure-derived risk information indicating the degree of influence (risk) is further stored. The quality evaluation unit 212 refers to the structure risk master table SRMT based on the 3D CAD information included in the acquired member information and / or the CAD related information associated with the 3D CAD information, and the corresponding structure The derived risk information is extracted, and an evaluation of the evaluation target building further including the extracted structure-derived risk information is generated.

  In the case of life insurance risks, taking into account life risks such as landslide disasters, tsunamis, floods, etc., if you work or live in a reinforced concrete building on the 3rd floor or higher, you must use a hazard map. Even so, the risk is greatly reduced, so the structural risk information that shows the impact (risk) on the disaster in the structural risk master table, or the numerical value and rank of the insurance master table is low (low risk, or It is preferable to set the insurance amount to a low amount. In addition, it is preferable to set factors such as reinforced concrete, buildings with three or more floors, depending on the degree of risk (for example, assumed tsunamis of 3 m and 10 m) in the area.

  FIG. 9 is a flowchart showing an example of processing executed by the building quality evaluation apparatus shown in FIG. In this aspect, a case will be described in which the quality of a building is evaluated as disaster resistance / risk and is generated and output as insurance-related information for the resistance / risk. As shown in the figure, first, in step S51, the acquisition unit 111 acquires member information for members included in the evaluation target building, but this step is the same processing as step S11 in FIG. Subsequent steps S52 and S53 are the same processes as S12 and S13 in FIG. Next, in step S54, the storage unit further stores an insurance master table IMT including the evaluation of the building and the insurance fee related information associated with the evaluation. Finally, in step S55, the insurance information extraction unit 213 refers to the insurance master table IMT based on the generated building evaluation, and extracts corresponding insurance related information.

  FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an insurance master table IMT used in the process of the flowchart of FIG. As shown in the figure, in the insurance master table IMT, for example, when the fire resistance point is 200 or more, the insurance premium is 100 yen / square meter and the fire resistance point is 100 or more and less than 200. In this case, the insurance premium is 150 yen / square meter, and when the fire resistance point is less than 100, the insurance premium is 250 yen / square meter. The insurance master table also includes, for example, the impact of earthquake resistance. If the earthquake resistance point is 200 or more, the insurance premium is 10 yen / square meter, and if the earthquake resistance point is 100 or more and less than 200, the insurance premium is Is 13 yen / sqm, and if the earthquake resistance is less than 100, the insurance premium is 20 yen / sqm. The number of points and the amount of money are examples, and the earthquake resistance and fire resistance are defined in three stages, but can be defined in any stage. Insurance premiums based on the impact of floods, typhoons, tsunamis, etc. may be specified. Further, in this example, the insurance amount is defined, but it may be defined by a weighted numerical value for the existing insurance premium. For example, when the damage is predicted to be large due to the degree of influence, the weight is set to 1.2. When the medium is predicted, the weight is set to 1.0. When the damage is predicted to be low, the weight is set to 0.8. And For example, the quality evaluation unit 212 refers to the member quality management master table EQMT based on the acquired member information or the acquired member information, extracts the corresponding risk information, and evaluates the building to be evaluated from the extracted risk information. Assess the risk of disaster for at least some of the objects (preferably the entire building). In this way, the quality evaluation unit 212 uses the member quality management master table EQMT to obtain the total of the corresponding fire resistance points, refers to the insurance master table IMT in FIG. 10, identifies the corresponding insurance premium, It can be generated or output. This insurance master table IMT may refer to an external database, for example, a financial institution server FS and use information stored therein.

  FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing an example of processing executed by the building quality evaluation apparatus shown in FIG. In this aspect, reference is made to the process of finally extracting insurance-related information using CAD data of a building, and as an example, attribute information and structure information, which are information included in an object, are used as member information. To do. Up to now, the member information has been described in a format acquired from an integration database, an estimation database, or a server storing these. However, as shown in this example, the BIM includes 3D CAD data or CAD data comprehensively. Member information can also be obtained from a database or a BIM server. In addition, some processes similar to the processes included in the other flowcharts described above are included, but are the same as the other processes unless otherwise specified. In addition, it is assumed that an insurance master table IMT including an influence degree (risk) of a building and insurance fee related information associated with the influence degree is stored in the storage unit in advance. As shown in the figure, in step S61, the storage unit 250 stores a member quality management master table MQMT including attribute information of the object and influence degree information indicating the influence degree with respect to the disaster associated with the attribute information. Instead of MQMT, the risk master table RMT including the attribute information of the object and the risk information indicating the degree of influence on the disaster associated with the attribute information is stored, and the risk master table RMT is referred to in the subsequent processing. Extraction or arithmetic processing may be performed. Next, in step S62, the storage unit 250 stores at least one structure information among the position of the object, the shape of the object, the dimensions of the object, the connection status of the plurality of objects, the arrangement status of the plurality of objects, and the structure information. Further, a structural risk master table SRMT including structure-derived risk information indicating the degree of influence on the disaster associated with is stored. Next, in step S63, the acquisition unit 211 acquires three-dimensional CAD information including a plurality of objects for the evaluation target building as member information. In step S64, the quality evaluation unit 212 extracts a corresponding risk by further referring to the member quality management master table MQMT based on at least one piece of information regarding a plurality of objects included in the acquired three-dimensional CAD information. Based on at least one structure information regarding a plurality of objects included in the acquired three-dimensional CAD information, the structure master table SRMT is referred to extract corresponding structure-derived influence information, and the extracted risk and structure-derived influence are extracted. Assess the risk of disaster for at least a part of the building to be evaluated from the degree information. Finally, in step S65, the quality evaluation unit 212 extracts relevant insurance-related information with reference to the insurance master table IMT based on the evaluated risk.

  FIG. 12 is a diagram showing the structural risk master table SRMT used in the processing of the flowchart of FIG. As shown in the figure, in the structural risk master table SRMT, for example, an object having a thickness of 15 cm (this numerical value can be arbitrarily set) extending in the vertical direction is basically a “concrete wall material”. Such structure information is associated with structure-derived risk information “fire resistance: large (fire resistance point 10), earthquake resistance: large (earthquake resistance point 10)” indicating the degree of impact on the disaster. Besides, for example, an object having a thickness of 12 cm or more (this value can be arbitrarily set) is highly likely to be a concrete bearing wall. It is assumed that it is a reinforcing bar. Of such structure information of the bar-shaped object, structure-derived risk information indicating the degree of influence on the disaster is associated with each stage of reinforcing bar thickness and pitch (arrangement frequency). In addition, the “bar object protruding in the ground (downward)” in the foundation part, which is the lower part of the building, has a high probability of being a “pile” for fixing the building to the ground. Among them, the structure-derived risk information indicating the degree of influence on the disaster is associated with each stage according to the thickness and pitch (arrangement frequency) of the piles. These are merely examples, and it is possible to define the degree of influence / risk caused by various structures.

  In many cases, layer information is attached to CAD information. By using this layer information, necessary “structure information” and “attribute information” can be easily extracted from the CAD information, and members It can be used as information. Here, the layer information may be included in the attribute information of the object, or may exist as external information that associates the object of each layer with the outside of the object. For example, the attribute information includes “layer information field: 1”, “layer information field: 2”, “layer information field: 3”, or “layer information field: basic structure (main structure)”, “layer information field: interior ”,“ Layer information field: basic structure ”, and“ Layer information field: joinery ”. If the CAD user designates layer 1, it is possible to extract only objects having layer 1 attribute information from a large number of objects. By using this, it is possible to efficiently extract only objects that affect earthquake resistance or objects that have a high tendency to affect earthquake resistance. For example, layer information field: basic structure for earthquake resistance When (main structure) "or" layer information field: basic structure "is selected and extracted as a layer, it is possible to extract an object that is very relevant to earthquake resistance. The acquisition unit 211 or the quality evaluation unit 212 has a function of efficiently extracting necessary objects by designating numerical values and character information of appropriate layers among such layers.

  FIG. 13 is a block diagram showing an outline of a building quality evaluation apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention. As illustrated, the building quality evaluation apparatus 300 (BQED) includes a control unit (CPU, processor) 310, an input unit 320, an output unit 330, a communication unit 340, a storage unit 350, and a display unit 360. In this embodiment, unless otherwise noted, the functional unit (acquisition unit, quality evaluation unit, output unit, control unit, etc.) and storage unit shown in the embodiment of FIG. 1 and FIG. It is possible to execute the same processing as described above, and it is possible to obtain the same processing result using the flowchart and the master table described above, or the processing result obtained by adding the processing of this embodiment. Please be careful.

  In this embodiment, the acquisition unit 311 is related to the geographical position of the building to be evaluated from the geographic information server GIS of the map information company or the Internet search site, for example, outside via the communication unit 340 and the network NET. To obtain further geographical information (geographic coordinates, geographical coordinates including altitude, address, region). The storage unit 350 stores geographical information (geographic coordinates, geographical coordinates including altitude, address, region) and earthquakes, explosions, volcanic activities, radiation exposure, typhoons, fires, liquefactions associated with the geographical information. Further stored is a hazard map HZM including geographical risk information resulting from a disaster (natural disaster or man-made disaster) including at least one of a phenomenon, flood, high wave, tsunami, and earth and sand disaster. Based on the acquired geographical information, the quality evaluation unit 312 refers to the hazard map HZM, extracts the corresponding geographical danger information, and generates an evaluation of the evaluation target building further including the extracted geographical risk information To do. Alternatively, when the acquired member information is a plurality of objects included in the three-dimensional CAD information, the quality evaluation unit (risk evaluation unit) 312 refers to the risk master table RMT based on at least one object, and applies The risk information to be extracted is extracted, the hazard map HZM is referred to based on the acquired geographical information, the corresponding geographical risk information is extracted, and the evaluation target building is extracted from the extracted risk information and the geographical risk information. Assess at least some disaster risk.

  Moreover, in this embodiment, the acquisition part 311 is at least 1 building evaluation information of the structure classification information, housing performance information, housing history information, and some building rating information relevant to the evaluation of the building to be evaluated. Get more. The storage unit 350 includes at least one building external evaluation information among the structural class-related information, housing performance information, housing history information, and some building external rating information related to building evaluation, and the building external evaluation information. An external evaluation master table OEMT including external evaluation influence degree information indicating the degree of influence on the associated disaster is further stored. Based on the acquired at least one building external evaluation information, the quality evaluation unit 312 refers to the external evaluation master table OEMT, extracts the relevant external evaluation influence information, and extracts the extracted external evaluation influence information. The evaluation of the evaluation target building is further generated, for example, the evaluation of the evaluation target building is adjusted based on the external evaluation influence degree information (increase / decrease in numerical value, increase / decrease in rank, etc.).

  FIG. 23 is a diagram illustrating a house history information certificate that is an example of building external evaluation information. In the figure, (a) is a house history information certificate, and (b) is a list of documents stored as house history information. This is a certificate issued by an IT company approved by the supervisory authority, and the documents (CAD drawings, inspection certificates, etc.) stored are a list of genuine documents that have not been tampered with. It is preferable to obtain at least a part of the document presented in the list as building external evaluation information. Therefore, in the present embodiment, in the case of a building for which such house history information is provided, a function is provided for adjusting the evaluation rank to be one level or several levels higher. The evaluation may be lowered depending on the history information stored. At that time, the stored document may be acquired as a part of the member information. However, it is easier to process the document by evaluating it separately as building external evaluation information and using it as adjustment information for final evaluation. Simple.

  The storage unit 350 evaluates the impact of the building and the insurance premium-related information associated with the impact assessment (such as insurance premiums such as non-life insurance and life insurance, and numerical values and ranks for weighting the premiums). A further insurance master table IMT is stored. Then, the control unit 310 refers to the insurance master table IMT based on the evaluated disaster risk, extracts corresponding insurance related information, and generates or outputs the insurance information extracting unit 313 (or the extracted insurance related information). Calculate the premium related to the building to be evaluated from the information, refer to the premium calculation unit (not shown) to generate or output, or the basic premium calculated by the conventional procedure, and the basic premium An insurance premium calculation unit (not shown) for calculating and generating or outputting an insurance premium related to the building to be evaluated from the extracted insurance-related information may be further provided.

  The storage unit 350 stores at least one structure information among the position of the object, the shape of the object, the dimensions of the object, the connection status of the plurality of objects, the arrangement status of the plurality of objects, and the disaster associated with the structure information. A structure risk master table SRMT including structure-derived risk information indicating the degree of influence is further stored. The quality evaluation unit 312 refers to the risk master table EMT based on at least one piece of information regarding a plurality of objects included in the acquired three-dimensional CAD information, extracts the corresponding risk information, and obtains the acquired three-dimensional CAD information. Based on at least one structural information regarding a plurality of included objects, the structural risk master table SRMT is further referred to, and the corresponding structural risk information is extracted. From the extracted risk information and structural risk information, the building to be evaluated is extracted. Calculate the risk of disaster for at least a part.

  FIG. 14 is a flowchart showing an example of processing executed by the building quality evaluation apparatus shown in FIG. Also in this aspect, the member information is obtained from three-dimensional CAD data or an object included in the CAD data, but may be obtained from an integration database. In addition, some processes similar to the processes included in the other flowcharts described above are included, but are the same as the other processes unless otherwise specified. In addition, the insurance master table IMT including the degree of influence (risk) of the building and the insurance fee related information associated with the degree of influence in advance, the member information of the building, and the member associated with the member information It is assumed that a member quality management master table MQMT including quality management information is stored in the storage unit. As shown in the figure, in step S71, the storage unit 350 stores geographical information (geographic coordinates, geographical coordinates including altitude, address, region) and earthquakes, explosions, volcanoes associated with the geographical information. Geography resulting from disasters (natural disasters, man-made disasters, accidents such as factories and power plants) including at least one of activities, radiation exposure, typhoons, fires, liquefaction phenomena, floods, high waves, tsunamis, landslides The hazard map HZM including the risk information is further stored. The hazard map HZM is preferably obtained from a risk information providing server (not shown) of an external public organization (local government, government research institute, university, etc.) via the Internet. Alternatively, the hazard map information may be read directly from an external server and used directly every time the impact / risk and quality are evaluated.

  Next, in step S72, the acquisition unit 311 acquires member information of the evaluation target building, and further, geographical information related to the geographical position of the evaluation target building (geographic coordinates, geographical coordinates including altitude). , Address, region). Alternatively, three-dimensional CAD information including a plurality of objects for the building to be evaluated may be acquired as member information. The geographical information is preferably acquired from the outside via the Internet, but may be acquired from the storage unit 350 (not shown). As the geographical information, the acquisition unit may acquire position information at the time of shooting, which is obtained from a GPS satellite GPS signal, a mobile phone base station signal, or the like and embedded in the image information. Moreover, you may use the image information at this time as a factor at the time of extracting insurance relevant information. In other words, the image information of the building to be evaluated includes the status of the adjacent land, the status of the adjacent house, the actual actual building status, the maintenance status, and the usage status (housing usage, factory usage, office usage, etc.). It can also be used to determine.

  In step S73, the quality evaluation unit 312 refers to the member quality management master table MQMT based on the acquired member information, extracts the corresponding member quality management information, and outputs or generates an evaluation of the evaluation target building. Based on the acquired geographical information, the hazard map HZM is referred to, the corresponding geographical risk information is extracted, and at least a part of the building to be evaluated is extracted from the extracted influence information and geographical risk information. Evaluate the impact (risk) of disasters. Finally, in step S74, the quality evaluation unit 312 refers to the insurance master table based on the evaluated degree of influence, and extracts corresponding insurance related information. An evaluation process based on the structure information may be applied to this flowchart. In addition, multiple hazard maps can be used such as earthquake hazard maps, fire hazard maps, flood hazard maps, etc., and one hazard map that includes two or more disaster effects is used. May be.

  FIG. 15 is a flowchart showing a modification of the process of FIG. In this aspect, reference is made to the process of extracting insurance-related information from CAD data of a building, and as an example, attribute information is used as information included in an object of CAD data. This attribute information is handled as member information. In addition, the member quality control master table has a format different from that described above. FIG. 15 includes the same processes as those included in the above-described flowchart, but is the same as those processes unless otherwise specified. In addition, it is assumed that several master tables described above are stored in the storage unit in advance. As shown in the figure, in step S81, the storage unit 350 stores a member quality management master table MQMT including attribute information of the object and influence degree information indicating the influence degree with respect to the disaster associated with the attribute information. Next, in step S82, the storage unit 350 stores the geographical information (geographic coordinates, geographical coordinates including altitude, address, region) and the earthquake, explosion, volcanic activity, radiation exposure associated with the geographical information. Geographical risk information due to disasters (natural disasters, man-made disasters, accidents such as factories and power plants) including at least one of storm, typhoon, fire, liquefaction phenomenon, flood, high wave, tsunami, sediment disaster The hazard map HZM including the above is further stored. Next, in step S83, the acquisition unit 311 acquires three-dimensional CAD information including a plurality of objects for the evaluation target building, and further, geographical information (geographic coordinates) related to the geographical position of the evaluation target building. , Get geographical coordinates (including altitude, address, region). The geographical information is preferably acquired from the outside via the Internet, but the information stored in the storage unit 350 may be acquired. In step S84, the quality evaluation unit 312 refers to the member quality management master table MQMT on the basis of at least one piece of information regarding a plurality of objects included in the acquired three-dimensional CAD information, and extracts the corresponding influence degree information. Based on the acquired geographical information, the hazard map HZM is referred to, the corresponding geographical risk information is extracted, and at least a part of the building to be evaluated is extracted from the extracted influence information and geographical risk information. Assess the impact of disaster. Finally, in step S85, the insurance information extraction unit 313 (or may be a quality evaluation unit) extracts relevant insurance-related information with reference to the insurance master table IMT based on the evaluated degree of influence. An evaluation process based on the structure information may be applied to this flowchart. In addition, multiple hazard maps can be used such as earthquake hazard maps, fire hazard maps, flood hazard maps, etc., and one hazard map that includes two or more disaster effects is used. May be.

  FIG. 16 is a diagram showing a hazard map for liquefaction phenomenon used in the processing of the flowchart of FIG. 14 or FIG. As shown in the figure, in the hazard map for liquefaction phenomenon HZM1, the risk area AR11 is defined by geographical coordinates (longitude, latitude) or address display. This area is associated with geographical risk information caused by a natural disaster such as a liquefaction phenomenon easily caused by an earthquake or the like. In addition, in the hazard map for liquefaction phenomenon HZM1, the risk area AR12 is defined by geographical coordinates (longitude, latitude) or address display. In this area, liquefaction phenomena are extremely likely to occur due to earthquakes, etc., or geographical hazard information caused by natural disasters such as liquefaction occurrence risk values by seismic intensity value, risk index, etc. is associated with this area. ing. Such a risk area is generally a lowland area of sandy land, and is often land filled with sandbars and lakes. If such a hazard map for liquefaction phenomena is used in conjunction with an earthquake hazard map that specifies the frequency of occurrence of earthquakes, active faults, etc., the risk of liquefaction phenomena at the time of an earthquake occurrence can be brought to the geographical location of the building being evaluated. It becomes possible to evaluate accordingly. This device can very easily individually evaluate how much the building itself is affected by the risk of liquefaction disasters caused by such an earthquake. When determining the amount of insurance based on whether it has asset value, collateral value, loan limit, how much insurance should be insured, or how much insurance premium should be It is possible to generate or output with an evaluation index of. The hazard map is preferably expressed as a map as shown in FIG. 16, but geographical information based on addresses and coordinates may be associated with geographical risk information resulting from natural disasters or the like. . For example, “… prefecture… ward… town… chome; liquefaction phenomenon is likely to occur”, “region of radius 1 km from the coordinates of xx degrees east longitude and yy degrees north latitude: liquefaction phenomenon occurs at seismic intensity 3 with a probability of 20%, It may be in the form of “occurrence with 60% probability at seismic intensity 5 and 90% probability with seismic intensity 6”. The same applies to the subsequent hazard map.

  FIG. 17 is a diagram showing a fire hazard map used in the processing of the flowchart of FIG. 14 or FIG. As shown in the figure, in the hazard map for fire HZM2, the risk area AR21 is defined by geographical coordinates (longitude, latitude) or address display. This area is associated with geographical risk level information caused by a disaster such as a large-scale fire that easily spreads when a fire occurs in the area. Such a risk area is generally an area where old wooden houses are densely populated, and is often an area where roads are narrow and easy to spread. The device can very easily individually assess how much impact the building itself has on such fire risks, and should ultimately be insured at what premium. Alternatively, it can be generated or output by an evaluation index or the like when determining the insurance premium, depending on how much the insurance premium should be. In addition, as shown in this figure, when there is map information in which the status of adjacent land and the status of adjacent houses are drawn, it is also possible to determine whether or not fire damage is likely to occur. For example, the distance between the building to be evaluated and the adjacent building can be one of the factors that determine the insurance rate.

  FIG. 18 is a diagram showing an earthquake hazard map used in the processing of the flowchart of FIG. 14 or FIG. As shown in the figure, in the hazard map for earthquake HZM3, the risk area AR31 is defined by geographical coordinates (longitude, latitude) or address display. This area is associated with geographical risk level information caused by a natural disaster such as “prone to earthquakes”. Further, in the hazard map for earthquake HZM3, the risk area AR32 is defined by geographical coordinates (longitude, latitude) or address display. This area is associated with geographic risk information resulting from natural disasters such as earthquakes that are extremely likely to occur. In general, such a risk area is often a land or area where there is an active fault, energy has been accumulated because there has been no earthquake for a long time, and the ground is weak and easily shaken. For example, if other hazard maps are used in combination with such an earthquake hazard map, it is possible to comprehensively evaluate several risks associated with the occurrence of an earthquake according to the geographical position of the building to be evaluated. This device can very easily individually evaluate how much the building itself has to be affected by the disaster risk caused by such an earthquake. It can be generated or output by an evaluation index or the like when determining insurance premiums, depending on whether the insurance of the building should be taken out or how much the insurance premium should be paid.

  FIG. 19 is a schematic diagram for explaining a function of efficiently extracting a required object using a layer of CAD information and attribute information. As shown in the figure, an object OB10 that is CAD information includes a plurality of objects constituting one building. The acquisition unit or the risk evaluation unit can extract only objects of an arbitrary layer. For example, as shown in the figure, it is possible to extract only the layer of the main structure part, and the object OB11 of only the main structure part such as a roof, a wall, and a pillar (not shown) is extracted. In this way, it is possible to efficiently extract an object that is highly relevant to earthquake resistance, and it is possible to efficiently and appropriately evaluate the subsequent influence degree. Further, the acquisition unit or the risk evaluation unit can extract only the fireproof material and the fireproof material layer other than the main structure, and the object OB12 including only the fireproof material and the fireproof material is extracted. When the fireproof material is used on the ceiling of each room and the upper part of the wall connected to the ceiling like the object OB12, it is possible to considerably improve the fire resistance even in a wooden building. Therefore, a fireproof point is set high for such an object OB12, and the evaluated degree of influence is also evaluated as a building that is relatively fireproof and difficult to burn as a wooden building. In this way, it is possible to efficiently extract an object that is very relevant to a fire, and it is possible to efficiently and appropriately evaluate subsequent influences. In particular, the fire impact level for wooden buildings can be evaluated very efficiently and appropriately using this method, and ultimately it is possible to properly evaluate and calculate insurance premiums. To do. The object OB13 is an object filtered by a layer including only a seismic isolation member, a seismic isolation device, a seismic isolation device, and a member that accommodates these. Using the objects acquired in this layer, it is possible to easily evaluate the quality and risk related to earthquake resistance. Further, in addition to extraction based on such layer specification, an object can be extracted efficiently and appropriately even if character information in attribute information is specified as an extraction keyword. However, since the character information of the attribute information may contain noise in rare cases, use layer information that does not generate noise structurally, or pre-processing that removes noise when creating CAD information or BIM information It is more preferable to standardize the character information of the attribute information.

  FIG. 20 is a block diagram showing an outline of a building quality evaluation apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention. In this embodiment, a specific example of evaluating the current monetary value of a building / construction using a monetary value evaluation rule is presented. As illustrated, the building quality evaluation apparatus 400 (BQED) includes a control unit (CPU, processor) 410, an input unit 420, an output unit 430, a communication unit 440, a storage unit 450, and a display unit 460. In this embodiment, unless otherwise noted, the functional unit (acquisition unit, quality evaluation unit, output unit, control unit, etc.) and storage unit shown in the embodiments of FIGS. 1, 8, and 13 are included. It is possible to execute the same processing by the storage unit and the same processing result using the above-described flowchart and each master table, or a processing result obtained by adding the processing of this embodiment can be obtained. Please note that.

  In this embodiment, the storage unit 450 further stores a first price evaluation rule MER1 for generating a current price based on the evaluation of the building and the price. The acquisition unit 411 acquires an initial amount that is the amount at the time of construction or purchase of the evaluation target building. Then, the quality evaluation unit 412 uses the first amount evaluation rule MER1 based on the initial amount and the evaluation of the evaluation target building, and uses the first amount evaluation rule MER1 as a current amount (for example, asset value) for the current evaluation target building. Mortgage amount, loan target amount, etc.) (may be generated or output in the evaluation).

The first monetary value evaluation rule MER1 can be, for example, a calculation formula or a table.
For example, the calculation formula is as follows.
Current amount = initial amount x evaluation rank A, B, C from the highest evaluation rank, amount x 0.9 for evaluation rank A, amount x 0.7 for evaluation rank B, evaluation rank C In some cases, the coefficient to be multiplied by the amount, such as amount × 0.5, is gradually decreased from the higher value to the lower value in the order of evaluation.

  Moreover, in this embodiment, the memory | storage part 450 further stores the 2nd money amount evaluation rule for producing | generating a present amount based on evaluation of a building and a some amount of money. The acquisition unit 411 improves the initial amount that is the amount at the time of construction or purchase of the building to be evaluated, and the reform, maintenance, and environmental equipment (living environment, safety, convenience, and environmental measures) of the building to be evaluated Remodeling / maintenance costs (equipment costs and construction costs are included) related to equipment and devices that reduce CO2 and energy costs, such as seismic isolation equipment, vibration control equipment, etc. Is preferred). In addition, the quality evaluation unit 412 uses the second price evaluation rule MER2 based on the initial price, the renovation / maintenance price, and the evaluation of the evaluation target building to evaluate the current evaluation price for the evaluation target building. (For example, asset value after renovation or maintenance, mortgage amount, loan target amount, etc.) are generated (may be generated or output in the evaluation).

The second monetary value evaluation rule MER2 can be, for example, a calculation formula or a table.
For example, the calculation formula is as follows.
Current amount = Initial amount × Evaluation rank after renovation + Renovation / maintenance amount or
Current amount = Initial amount x Evaluation rank before renovation + Reform / maintenance amount Evaluation rank after renovation Current amount = (Initial amount + Reform / maintenance amount) Evaluation rank after renovation Like the sixth invention, the evaluation rank is high In the case of A, B, and C, the money amount x 0.9 for evaluation rank A, the money amount 0.7 for evaluation rank B, the money amount 0.5 for evaluation rank C, etc. The coefficient to be multiplied by is gradually decreased from the highest value to the lowest value in the evaluation order.

  In the present embodiment, the storage unit 450 is configured by building member information (one member (equipment, apparatus, equipment, etc.), a group of a plurality of members, or an arrangement or combination of a plurality of members. And a member rating master table MEMT including member rating information associated with the member information. The quality evaluation unit 412 extracts the corresponding member quality management information by referring to the member quality management master table MQMT based on the acquired member information, and further refers to the member rating master table MEMT based on the acquired member information. And corresponding member rating information is extracted, and the evaluation of the said evaluation object building containing the extracted member quality control information and member rating information is produced | generated. Alternatively, the evaluation of the evaluation target building may be re-evaluated using the extracted member rating information. Further, the current amount may be generated using the extracted member rating information and at least one of the initial amount, the reform amount, the maintenance amount, and the like.

  FIG. 21 is a flowchart showing an example of processing executed by the building quality evaluation apparatus shown in FIG. In this aspect, the initial amount is obtained from the CAD information server CADIS including the integration database and the estimate database, but may be obtained separately from another server or database. In addition, some processes similar to the processes included in the other flowcharts described above are included, but are the same as the other processes unless otherwise specified. As shown in FIG. 21A, in step S91, the storage unit 450 further stores a first price evaluation rule MER1 for generating a current price based on the evaluation of the building and the price. In Step S92, acquisition part 411 acquires the initial amount which is the amount at the time of construction of an evaluation object building, or purchase. In step S93, the quality evaluation unit 412 uses the first amount evaluation rule MER1 based on the initial amount and the evaluation of the evaluation target building, and the current amount that is the evaluation amount for the current evaluation target building. (For example, asset value, mortgage amount, loan target amount, etc.) are generated (may be generated or output in the evaluation).

  As shown in FIG. 21B, in step S101, the storage unit 450 further stores a second price evaluation rule for generating a current price based on the building evaluation and a plurality of prices. . In step S102, the acquisition unit 411 reforms the building to be evaluated, performs maintenance, and environmental equipment (such as equipment and devices that improve the living environment, safety, convenience, environmental measures, reduce CO2 and energy costs, etc.) For example, a renovation / maintenance amount (preferably including an equipment cost and a construction cost), which is an amount related to a seismic isolation device, a vibration control device, or the like, is acquired. In step S103, the quality evaluation unit 412 uses the second amount evaluation rule MER2 based on the initial amount, the reform / maintenance amount, and the evaluation of the building to be evaluated, to evaluate the current evaluation target. A current amount (for example, an asset value after renovation or maintenance, a mortgage amount, a loan target amount, etc.) that is an evaluation amount for a building is generated (may be generated or output in an evaluation).

  FIG. 22 is a graph showing the transition of the current amount generated by the building quality evaluation apparatus shown in FIG. As shown in (a) of FIG. 22, the current price curve PML is evaluated as the evaluation of the evaluation target building decreases with the passage of time from the initial price IP of the time t1 at the time of new construction. The current amount of buildings will also decline. For example, between the time t3 and t4, when the main member reaches the end of its useful life and no maintenance is performed, the evaluation drops sharply, and the current price also drops sharply due to the sudden drop. To do. The current amount curve PML is: material quality control master table MQMT, risk master table RMT, amount master table MMT, amount evaluation rules MER1, MER2, structural risk master table SRMT, hazard map HZM, external evaluation master table OEMT, member rating master table It can be determined using at least one, two or more HEMTs.

Some examples of formulas for actually obtaining evaluations and amounts are shown below.
f (evaluation value of building, evaluation rank, etc.) = component quality (Σa1, a2, ..., an) x geographical disaster risk (Σdis1, dis2, ..., disn)
f (evaluation value of building, evaluation rank, etc.) = member quality (Σa1, a2, ..., an) x geographical disaster risk (Σdis1, dis2, ..., disn) + member quality after renovation and maintenance f (monetary value of building) = f (evaluation of building) × initial amount f (monetary value of building) = money conversion index × f (evaluation of building) × initial amount + renovation / maintenance amount f (Monetary value of building) = Amount conversion index x f (Evaluation of building) x Initial amount x Investment effect index x Renovation and maintenance amount

  (B) of FIG. 22 is a diagram showing a current money amount curve PML when renovation is performed with replacement of a main member whose lifetime has expired at time t4. It can be observed that a recovery amount m2 exceeding the price difference m1 is obtained by the investment of the reform cost r1. Then, it can be understood that a price difference m4 occurs at a later time than when no maintenance is performed. As described above, it is possible to appropriately evaluate the fact that appropriate renovation and maintenance have been performed at an appropriate time, and to evaluate the asset value of the building.

  It is preferable to construct monetary evaluation rules, external evaluation master tables, member rating master tables, insurance master tables, etc., which are individually customized by financial institutions, and such tables are provided on an external server for use. You may comprise this apparatus in an aspect.

  FIG. 24 is a graph showing changes in the current amount generated by the building quality evaluation apparatus shown in FIG. In this example, a mode of evaluating the current price of a building in consideration of steel materials and labor costs using the member price table MPT stored in the storage unit 450 of FIG. 20 will be described. The storage unit 450 is a member amount table MPT (a member price table MPT (amount price corresponding to a member market price or a construction cost market price) or a cost market price including a plurality of members (for example, a bathroom price). Amount including unit price per unit, steel price, carpenter's wage price, etc.) is also stored. The quality evaluation unit 412 generates a current amount that is an evaluation amount for the current evaluation target building using the first amount evaluation rule based on the initial amount of the member and the evaluation of the evaluation target building, and the member The current amount is adjusted based on the current member amount with reference to the amount table MPT.

  As shown in (a) of FIG. 24, the current price curve PML is evaluated as the evaluation of the building to be evaluated decreases with the passage of time from the initial price IP of the time t1 at the time of new construction. The current amount of buildings will also decline. That is, (a) in the figure is a graph showing a current amount curve when the member amount is not evaluated, and (b) is a graph showing a current amount curve when the member amount is evaluated. As shown in (b), for example, when the member amount average curve MMML increases after the time t3, the current amount is a graph that is not evaluated at the time t4 according to the increase in the member amount (a). It has risen compared to. Compared with the case where the price of the component price is not taken into account, the higher the price difference m11, the higher the price is evaluated. As described above, the present apparatus can appropriately evaluate the current asset value of a building using various factors as elements. In this example, in order to simplify the explanation, the average value of the member amount was used, but it is also possible to extract the member of the building to be evaluated and evaluate it with the sum of the member amount of the extracted member. is there.

  Although the present invention has been described based on the drawings and examples, it should be noted that those skilled in the art can easily make various modifications and corrections based on the present disclosure. Therefore, it should be noted that these variations and modifications are included in the scope of the present invention. For example, the processes and functions included in each unit and each step can be rearranged so as not to be logically contradictory, and a plurality of means / units and steps can be combined or divided into one. Is possible. Alternatively, it should be noted that some components, functions, processes, steps, etc. of the apparatus, method, program, etc. according to the present invention can be located in a remote server, terminal, PC, etc.

100 Building quality evaluation system (BQED)
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 110 Control part 111 Acquisition part 112 Quality evaluation part 120 Input part 130 Output part 140 Communication part 150 Storage part 160 Display part 200 Building quality evaluation apparatus 210 Control part 211 Acquisition part 212 Quality evaluation part 213 Insurance information extraction part 220 Input part 230 Output unit 240 Communication unit 250 Storage unit 260 Display unit 300 Building quality evaluation apparatus 310 Control unit 311 Acquisition unit 312 Quality evaluation unit 313 Insurance information extraction unit 320 Input unit 330 Output unit 340 Communication unit 350 Storage unit 360 Display unit AR11 Risk area AR12 Risk area AR21 Risk area AR31 Risk area AR32 Risk area CADIS CAD information server EV1 Evaluation table EV2 Evaluation table FS Financial institution server GIS Geographic information server HZM Hazard map HZM1 Hazard map for liquefaction phenomenon HZM2 Fire hazard Drmap HZM3 Earthquake hazard map IMT Insurance master table KBD Keyboard MIR Member information storage area MMT Amount master table MQMT Member quality control master table MS1 Mobile phone terminal MUS Mouse NET Network OB10 Object OB11 Object OB12 Object OB12 Object OB13 Object OEMT External evaluation master table PC terminal PC1 terminal PDA1 portable terminal PRN printer RMT risk master table SRMT structure risk master table 400 building quality evaluation device 410 control unit 411 acquisition unit 412 quality evaluation unit 413 insurance information extraction unit 420 input unit 430 output unit 440 communication unit 450 storage Part 460 Display part

Claims (30)

A building quality evaluation device,
An acquisition unit for acquiring member information for members included in the building to be evaluated;
A storage unit for storing a member quality control master table including member information of the building and member quality control information associated with the member information;
Based on the acquired member information, refer to the member quality management master table, extract the corresponding member quality management information, and generate the evaluation of the evaluation target building including the extracted member quality management information And
Building quality evaluation device. In the building quality evaluation apparatus according to claim 1,
The acquisition unit
Obtaining the member information including member maintenance information;
The quality evaluation unit
Based on the member information including the acquired member maintenance information, the member quality management master table is referred to extract the corresponding member quality management information, and the evaluation of the evaluation target building including the extracted member quality management information Generate
A building quality evaluation device characterized by that. In the building quality evaluation apparatus according to claim 1 or 2,
The member quality control information includes a numerical value, index or ranking indicating the quality information of the member,
The quality evaluation unit
Based on the acquired member information, refer to the member quality management master table, extract the corresponding member quality management information, and the evaluation object based on the numerical value, index or ranking included in the extracted member quality management information Generate building evaluations,
A building quality evaluation device characterized by that. In the building quality evaluation apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 3,
The storage unit
Further storing a risk master table including the member information and risk information indicating a risk to a disaster associated with the member information;
The quality evaluation unit
Based on the acquired member information, refer to the risk master table, extract corresponding risk information, and generate an evaluation of the evaluation target building further including the extracted risk information.
A building quality evaluation device characterized by that. In the building quality evaluation apparatus according to claim 4,
The risk information includes a numerical value, an index or a ranking indicating the risk;
The quality evaluation unit
Based on the acquired member information, the risk master table is referred to, the corresponding risk information is extracted, the numerical value indicating the risk included in the extracted risk information, the index or the ranking of the building to be evaluated based on the ranking Generate a rating,
A building quality evaluation device characterized by that. In the building quality evaluation apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 5,
The storage unit
Further storing a first price evaluation rule for generating a current price based on the evaluation of the building and the price;
The quality evaluation unit
Based on the initial price and the evaluation of the building to be evaluated, the first price evaluation rule is used to generate a current price that is an evaluation price for the current building to be evaluated.
A building quality evaluation device characterized by that. In the building quality evaluation apparatus according to claim 6,
The storage unit
Further storing a member amount table that is a current member amount related to a building member or a plurality of members;
The quality evaluation unit
Based on the initial price and the evaluation of the building to be evaluated, the first price evaluation rule is used to generate a current price that is the current evaluation price for the building to be evaluated, and the member price. Refer to the table and adjust the current amount based on the current member amount.
A building quality evaluation device characterized by that. In the building quality evaluation apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 7,
The storage unit
Further storing a second price evaluation rule for generating a current price based on the building rating and a plurality of prices;
The acquisition unit
Obtain the initial amount that is the amount at the time of construction or purchase of the building to be evaluated, and the reform and maintenance amount that is the amount related to the remodeling, maintenance, and environmental equipment of the building to be evaluated,
The quality evaluation unit
Based on the initial amount, the renovation / maintenance amount, and the evaluation of the building to be evaluated, the second amount evaluation rule is used to determine a current amount that is an evaluation amount for the current building to be evaluated. Generate,
A building quality evaluation device characterized by that. In the building quality evaluation apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 8,
The storage unit
Further storing an amount master table for storing a building evaluation or an item included in the evaluation and an amount associated with the evaluation or the item included in the evaluation;
The quality evaluation unit
Based on the evaluation of the building to be evaluated, referring to the amount master table, extract a corresponding amount, and generate an evaluation amount for the building to be evaluated based on the extracted amount.
A building quality evaluation device characterized by that. In the building quality evaluation apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 9,
The storage unit
Further storing an insurance master table that includes building assessments and premium related information associated with the assessments;
The building quality evaluation device
Further comprising an insurance information extraction unit that extracts the relevant insurance related information with reference to the insurance master table based on the evaluation of the building to be evaluated,
A building quality evaluation device characterized by that. In the building quality evaluation apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 10,
The acquisition unit
Obtaining 3D CAD information including a plurality of objects for the building to be evaluated and / or the member information including CAD related information associated with the 3D CAD information;
The storage unit
Structure indicating at least one structure information of an object position, an object shape, an object dimension, a connection state of a plurality of objects, and an arrangement state of a plurality of objects, and a degree of influence on a disaster associated with the structure information Further stores a structural risk master table that contains the at-risk risk information;
The quality evaluation unit
Based on the three-dimensional CAD information included in the acquired member information and / or CAD related information associated with the three-dimensional CAD information, the corresponding structural risk information is extracted by referring to the structural risk master table And generating an evaluation of the evaluation target building further including the extracted structure-derived risk information,
A building quality evaluation device characterized by that. In the building quality evaluation apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 11,
The acquisition unit
Further acquiring geographical information related to the geographical position of the building to be evaluated;
The storage unit
Geographic information and geography resulting from disasters including at least one of earthquakes, explosions, volcanic activities, radiation exposure, typhoons, fires, liquefaction phenomena, floods, high waves, tsunamis, landslides associated with the geographical information Further storing hazard maps containing information on risk levels,
The quality evaluation unit
Based on the acquired geographical information, refer to the hazard map, extract corresponding geographical danger information, and generate an evaluation of the building to be evaluated further including the extracted geographical danger information.
A building quality evaluation device characterized by that. In the building quality evaluation apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 12,
The storage unit
Further storing a member rating master table including member information of the building and member rating information associated with the member information;
The quality evaluation unit
Based on the acquired member information, refer to the member quality control master table, extract the corresponding member quality control information,
Based on the acquired member information, refer to the member rating master table, extract the corresponding member rating information,
Generating an evaluation of the building to be evaluated including the extracted member quality control information and member rating information;
A building quality evaluation device characterized by that. In the building quality evaluation apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 13,
The acquisition unit
It further acquires at least one building external evaluation information of information classified by structure class, housing performance information, housing history information, some building external rating information related to the evaluation of the building to be evaluated,
The storage unit
At least one building external evaluation information of structural class-related information, housing performance information, housing history information, some building external rating information related to building evaluation, and disaster associated with the building external evaluation information Further storing an external evaluation master table including external evaluation impact information indicating the impact level,
The quality evaluation unit
Based on the acquired at least one building external evaluation information, the external evaluation master table is referred to extract corresponding external evaluation influence information, and the evaluation target building is extracted based on the extracted external evaluation influence information. Adjust the rating of the
A building quality evaluation device characterized by that.   The building quality evaluation program for functioning a computer as a building quality evaluation apparatus of any one of Claims 1-14.   A computer-readable storage medium storing the building quality evaluation program according to claim 15. A building quality evaluation method using a computer,
An acquisition step of acquiring member information for members included in the building to be evaluated;
A storage step in which the storage unit stores a member quality management master table including member information of the building and member quality management information associated with the member information;
The arithmetic unit refers to the member quality management master table based on the acquired member information, extracts the corresponding member quality management information, and evaluates the evaluation target building including the extracted member quality management information. A quality evaluation step to generate,
A building quality evaluation method. In the building quality evaluation method according to claim 17,
The obtaining step comprises
Obtaining the member information including member maintenance information;
The quality evaluation step includes
Based on the member information including the acquired member maintenance information, the member quality management master table is referred to extract the corresponding member quality management information, and the evaluation of the evaluation target building including the extracted member quality management information Generate
Building quality evaluation method characterized by this. In the building quality evaluation method according to claim 17 or 18,
The member quality control information includes a numerical value, index or ranking indicating the quality information of the member,
The quality evaluation step includes
Based on the acquired member information, refer to the member quality management master table, extract the corresponding member quality management information, and the evaluation object based on the numerical value, index or ranking included in the extracted member quality management information Generate building evaluations,
Building quality evaluation method characterized by this. In the building quality evaluation method according to any one of claims 17 to 19,
The storing step includes
A storage unit further comprising: storing a risk master table including the member information and risk information indicating a risk with respect to a disaster associated with the member information;
The quality evaluation step includes
Based on the acquired member information, refer to the risk master table, extract corresponding risk information, and generate an evaluation of the evaluation target building further including the extracted risk information.
Building quality evaluation method characterized by this. In the building quality evaluation method according to claim 20,
The risk information includes a numerical value, an index or a ranking indicating the risk;
The quality evaluation step includes
Based on the acquired member information, the risk master table is referred to, the corresponding risk information is extracted, the numerical value indicating the risk included in the extracted risk information, the index or the ranking of the building to be evaluated based on the ranking Generate a rating,
Building quality evaluation method characterized by this. In the building quality evaluation method according to any one of claims 17 to 21,
The storing step includes
The storage unit further stores a first price evaluation rule for generating a current price based on the evaluation of the building and the price;
The obtaining step comprises
Obtain an initial amount which is the amount at the time of construction or purchase of the building to be evaluated,
The quality evaluation step includes
Based on the initial price and the evaluation of the building to be evaluated, the first price evaluation rule is used to generate a current price that is an evaluation price for the current building to be evaluated.
Building quality evaluation method characterized by this. In the building quality evaluation method according to claim 22,
The storing step includes
The storage unit further stores a member amount table that is a current member amount related to a building member or a plurality of members,
The quality evaluation step includes
Based on the initial price and the evaluation of the building to be evaluated, the first price evaluation rule is used to generate a current price that is the current evaluation price for the building to be evaluated, and the member price. Refer to the table and adjust the current amount based on the current member amount.
Building quality evaluation method characterized by this. In the building quality evaluation method according to any one of claims 17 to 23,
The storing step includes
The storage unit further stores a second price evaluation rule for generating a current price based on the evaluation of the building and the price;
The obtaining step comprises
Obtain the initial amount that is the amount at the time of construction or purchase of the building to be evaluated, and the reform and maintenance amount that is the amount related to the remodeling, maintenance, and environmental equipment of the building to be evaluated,
The quality evaluation step includes
Based on the initial amount, the renovation / maintenance amount, and the evaluation of the building to be evaluated, the second amount evaluation rule is used to determine a current amount that is an evaluation amount for the current building to be evaluated. Generate,
Building quality evaluation method characterized by this. In the building quality evaluation method according to any one of claims 17 to 24,
The storing step includes
The storage unit further comprising a step of storing an amount master table for storing an evaluation of the building or an item included in the evaluation and an amount associated with the evaluation or the item included in the evaluation;
The quality evaluation step includes
Based on the evaluation of the building to be evaluated, referring to the amount master table, extract a corresponding amount, and generate an evaluation amount for the building to be evaluated based on the extracted amount.
Building quality evaluation method characterized by this. In the building quality evaluation method according to any one of claims 17 to 25,
The storing step includes
The storage unit further comprising storing an insurance master table including a rating of the building and premium related information associated with the rating;
The building quality evaluation method is
The arithmetic unit further includes an insurance information extraction step of extracting relevant insurance related information with reference to the insurance master table based on the evaluation of the evaluation target building.
Building quality evaluation method characterized by this. In the building quality evaluation method according to any one of claims 17 to 26,
The obtaining step comprises
Obtaining 3D CAD information including a plurality of objects for the building to be evaluated and / or the member information including CAD related information associated with the 3D CAD information;
The storing step includes
The storage unit has at least one structure information of the position of the object, the shape of the object, the size of the object, the connection status of the plurality of objects, the arrangement status of the plurality of objects, and the influence on the disaster associated with the structure information Further storing a structural risk master table that includes structural risk information indicating degrees;
The quality evaluation step includes
Based on the three-dimensional CAD information included in the acquired member information and / or CAD related information associated with the three-dimensional CAD information, the corresponding structural risk information is extracted by referring to the structural risk master table And generating an evaluation of the evaluation target building further including the extracted structure-derived risk information,
Building quality evaluation method characterized by this. In the building quality evaluation method according to any one of claims 17 to 27,
The obtaining step comprises
Further acquiring geographical information related to the geographical position of the building to be evaluated;
The storing step includes
A disaster in which the storage unit includes at least one of geographical information and an earthquake, explosion, volcanic activity, radiation exposure, typhoon, fire, liquefaction phenomenon, flood, high wave, tsunami, landslide disaster associated with the geographical information Further storing a hazard map including geographic risk information resulting from
The quality evaluation step includes
Based on the acquired geographical information, refer to the hazard map, extract corresponding geographical danger information, and generate an evaluation of the building to be evaluated further including the extracted geographical danger information.
Building quality evaluation method characterized by this. In the building quality evaluation method according to any one of claims 17 to 28,
The storing step includes
The storage unit further stores a member rating master table including member information of the building and member rating information associated with the member information,
The quality evaluation step includes
Based on the acquired member information, refer to the member quality control master table, extract the corresponding member quality control information,
Based on the acquired member information, refer to the member rating master table, extract the corresponding member rating information,
Generating an evaluation of the building to be evaluated including the extracted member quality control information and member rating information;
Building quality evaluation method characterized by this. The building quality evaluation method according to any one of claims 17 to 29,
The obtaining step includes
It further acquires at least one building external evaluation information of information classified by structure class, housing performance information, housing history information, some building external rating information related to the evaluation of the building to be evaluated,
The storing step includes
A storage unit is associated with at least one building external evaluation information among structural class-related information, housing performance information, housing history information, and some building external rating information related to building evaluation, and the building external evaluation information An external evaluation master table including external evaluation impact information indicating the degree of impact on a given disaster;
The quality evaluation step includes
Based on the acquired at least one building external evaluation information, the external evaluation master table is referred to extract corresponding external evaluation influence information, and the evaluation target building is extracted based on the extracted external evaluation influence information. Adjust the rating of the
Building quality evaluation method characterized by this.

Images