JP2013012133A - Calculation support system for repair cost of generator and transformer and calculation support method for the same - Google Patents
Calculation support system for repair cost of generator and transformer and calculation support method for the same Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP2013012133A JP2013012133A JP2011145627A JP2011145627A JP2013012133A JP 2013012133 A JP2013012133 A JP 2013012133A JP 2011145627 A JP2011145627 A JP 2011145627A JP 2011145627 A JP2011145627 A JP 2011145627A JP 2013012133 A JP2013012133 A JP 2013012133A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- unit price
- repair
- accuracy
- equipment
- determined
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 228
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 121
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 24
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 43
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 claims description 76
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 claims description 53
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 claims description 36
- 238000010248 power generation Methods 0.000 claims description 33
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 claims description 25
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 18
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000002776 aggregation Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000004220 aggregation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000001131 transforming effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000005856 abnormality Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012217 deletion Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000037430 deletion Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007257 malfunction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010365 information processing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004973 liquid crystal related substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010422 painting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y04—INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
- Y04S—SYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
- Y04S10/00—Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
- Y04S10/50—Systems or methods supporting the power network operation or management, involving a certain degree of interaction with the load-side end user applications
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Description
本発明は、発変電機器を修繕する費用の算定技術に係り、特に発変電機器を修繕する際の修繕費用の算定の精度の向上を図る発変電機器修繕費用算定支援システム及びその算定支援方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a technology for calculating costs for repairing power generating and substation equipment, and more particularly to a power generation and substation equipment repair cost calculating support system and a calculation support method for improving the accuracy of calculation of repair costs when repairing power generating and substation equipment. .
発電所、変電所には、機械設備、電気設備、制御装置等の種々の発変電機器が設けられている。例えば、変圧器、遮断器、断路器、避雷器、電線、電力ケーブル、配電盤・機器制御盤などの発変電機器がある。これらの発変電機器は、経年変化等によって特性変化や異常が発生することがある。これらの機器に異常等が発生すると、発変電設備から供給する電力の信頼性、例えば停電を発生したり、電圧や周波数等の電力の質が低下するおそれがある。そこで、発変電機器では、供給する電力の信頼性が低下するのを防止するために定期的に各設備の点検と共に修繕を行っている。 Various power generating / transforming devices such as mechanical equipment, electrical equipment, and control devices are provided at power plants and substations. Examples include transformers, circuit breakers, disconnectors, lightning arresters, electric wires, power cables, switchboards / equipment control panels, and the like. These power generating and transforming devices may have characteristic changes and abnormalities due to changes over time. If an abnormality or the like occurs in these devices, there is a risk that the reliability of the power supplied from the power generation / transformation facility, for example, a power failure may occur, or the quality of power such as voltage or frequency may be reduced. Therefore, in the power generation / transformation equipment, in order to prevent the reliability of the supplied power from being lowered, repairs are performed along with the inspection of each facility periodically.
そこで、点検計画・修繕計画を策定し、その修繕の費用を算定する際に、従来では必要な項目についてソフトウェア（システム）を用いて策定していた。例えば、図１５の概要説明図に示すように、先ず、設備仕様、点検管理については、設備保全システム等のソフトウェアを用いて点検計画を策定していた。発変電機器の修繕費用を算定する際には、修繕計画と設備仕様からあらかじめ決められた単価を自動付与するシステムはあった。しかし、実際には自動付与する単価精度はまちまちであり、費用算定精度の向上のためには、人手での再検討が必要であった。しかし、その再検討は多数の対象修繕作業から経験により選び出し、費用の再算定を行なっていた。因みに、ここでの費用算定とは中計(中期計画)での予算算定をいう。また、このような予算立ての作業は、図１１の業務フローに示すような手順で終了させる。 Therefore, when an inspection plan / repair plan is formulated and the cost of the repair is calculated, conventionally, necessary items have been formulated using software (system). For example, as shown in the schematic explanatory diagram of FIG. 15, first, for equipment specifications and inspection management, an inspection plan is formulated using software such as an equipment maintenance system. When calculating repair costs for power generation and transformation equipment, there was a system that automatically assigned a unit price determined in advance from the repair plan and equipment specifications. However, the unit price accuracy that is automatically assigned varies, and manual review was necessary to improve the cost calculation accuracy. However, the re-examination was selected based on experience from a large number of repair work, and the cost was recalculated. By the way, the cost calculation here means the budget calculation in the mid-term plan (medium-term plan). Further, such budgeting work is terminated according to the procedure shown in the business flow of FIG.
また、作成者の作成した修繕費用について、発変電機器の点検・修繕を担当する作業部門の課長などの権限を有する上長が確認・承認していた。しかし、多数の対象修繕作業の効果的な確認を支援するシステムはなく、上長やベテランの作業員がその経験による抜取りで確認していた。 In addition, the repair manager created by the creator was confirmed and approved by a supervisor who had authority such as the section manager of the work department in charge of inspection and repair of power generation and transformation equipment. However, there is no system that supports the effective verification of a large number of target repair work, and senior managers and experienced workers confirmed it by sampling based on their experience.
発変電機器のような複数の既設機器間の相対的重要度の概念を使い、費用を考慮した計画最適化を含む作業計画を立てるための技術は種々提案されている。例えば、特許文献１の特開２０１０−２３９７３１号公報「発変電機器・停電計画支援システム及びその計画支援方法」のように、委託者側の点検のための停電調整と受託者側の稼働作業員の確保とを自動的に調整することにより、点検計画、作業平準化、工量票について精度の高い計画を迅速に策定でき、その作成労力を大幅に削減することができる発変電器点検・停電計画支援システム及びその計画支援方法が提案されている。 Various techniques have been proposed for making a work plan including a plan optimization considering costs by using the concept of relative importance between a plurality of existing devices such as power generation and transformation devices. For example, as described in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2010-239731 of “Patent Document 1”, “Power generation / transformation equipment / power outage plan support system and plan support method thereof”, power outage adjustment for inspection on the consignor side and operation worker on the contractor side By automatically adjusting the maintenance of power generation and inspection, power generator inspections and power outages can be made quickly with high accuracy for inspection plans, work leveling, and work schedules, and the production effort can be greatly reduced. A planning support system and a planning support method have been proposed.
また、特許文献２の特開２００２-２９７８１１号公報「設備保全計画作成支援システム」のように、算出期間内の作業費用の合計額が算出期間の設備投資の予算以下で、かつ、最も算出期間内の設備投資の総予算に近くなるように、暫定的な設備保全計画案を作成する処理と、算出期間内の各単位期間について資金計画を充足するように最適化した設備保全計画を作成する処理を備えており、長期及び短期で予算を充足する設備保全計画案が提示されるから、設備保全計画の作成における作成者の労力を大幅に軽減することができる支援システムが提案されている。 Further, as in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2002-297811 “Equipment Maintenance Plan Creation Support System” of Patent Document 2, the total amount of work costs within the calculation period is equal to or less than the budget for capital investment during the calculation period, and the calculation period is the longest. Process to create a provisional equipment maintenance plan so that it is close to the total budget for capital investment in the company, and create an equipment maintenance plan that is optimized to satisfy the financial plan for each unit period within the calculation period Since a facility maintenance plan that includes processing and satisfies the budget in the long and short term is presented, a support system that can significantly reduce the labor of the creator in creating the facility maintenance plan has been proposed.
しかし、上述した作成者が算定した修繕費用の算定精度の向上を図るための再検討について、多数の対象作業を経験により手作業で対象作業の抽出・費用の再検討していた。この対象作業の抽出・費用の再検討は、修正する部分が多く、煩雑な作業であった。しかも、これらの再検討は、手間がかかる作業であるために、熟練度による精度の差が生じやすいという問題を有していた。 However, with regard to the reexamination for improving the calculation accuracy of the repair cost calculated by the creator, the target work was manually extracted and the cost was reexamined based on experience. The extraction and reexamination of the target work was a complicated work with many parts to be corrected. In addition, these reexaminations are troublesome operations, and thus have a problem that a difference in accuracy easily occurs depending on the skill level.
また、担当の部門の上長等による対象作業の抽出・費用の確認・承認においては、経験による抜取りで確認しているので、その確認・承認できる範囲が限定されず精度の向上には不十分であるという問題を有していた。 In addition, because the supervisor of the department in charge, etc., extracts the target work, confirms and approves the costs, it is confirmed by sampling based on experience, so the range that can be confirmed and approved is not limited and is insufficient to improve accuracy Had the problem of being.
本発明は、かかる問題点を解決するために創案されたものである。すなわち、本発明の目的は、算定した修繕費用について全てを再検討するのではなく、算定した修繕費用を単価精度に応じて再検討することで、修繕費算定確認の効率化と容易化を図ることができ、その修繕費の精度を向上させ、更に修繕計画の漏れを軽減することができる発変電機器修繕費用算定支援システム及びその算定支援方法を提供することにある。 The present invention has been developed to solve such problems. In other words, the object of the present invention is not to reconsider all the calculated repair costs, but to review the calculated repair costs in accordance with the unit price accuracy, thereby improving the efficiency and facilitation of the repair cost calculation confirmation. It is an object of the present invention to provide a substation equipment repair cost calculation support system and a calculation support method thereof that can improve the accuracy of repair costs and reduce the omission of repair plans.
本発明の費用算定支援システムは、発変電所に備えられた発変電器の設備、機器について修繕する費用を算定する発変電機器修繕費用算定支援システム（１００）であって、算定が必要な点検・修繕の対象になる設備・機器に関する設備・機器情報データベース（１１）、点検・修繕情報データベース（１２）、修繕種別の単価・単価精度情報データベース（１３）および確認・修正内容情報データベース（１４）が格納されたデータベース（１０）と、前記データベース（１０）の情報の演算処理を行う処理装置（２０）と、入力装置（３０）と、から成り、前記データベース（１０）との間でデータを送受信することにより、修繕する設備・機器の修繕費用について、単価契約で単価修正が必要か否かを判断し、数量等の確認・修正が必要か否かを判断し、次にこれらの単価および単価の相対標準偏差に基づく単価精度に基づき再検討の要否を判断する初期値を自動算定する修繕費算定手段（２１）と、前記算定された修繕費の費用構成を、単価精度、単価分類ごとに表示する修繕費表示手段（２２）と、を備え、操作者により、点検・修繕情報が入力装置（３０）を用いて点検・修繕データベース（１０）に格納され、点検・修繕情報が点検・修繕情報データベース（１０）に格納されると、前記修繕費算定手段（２１）により修繕種別の単価・単価精度が自動算定され、算定された単価・単価精度に基づく修繕費用を算定し、その再検討値の妥当性を確認し得るように、前記修繕費表示手段（２２）により再検討・修正する箇所と優先順位が明示されて修繕種別の費用構成と単価分類の初期値として表示されることを特徴とする。 The cost calculation support system of the present invention is a power generation / transformation equipment repair cost calculation support system (100) for calculating the cost of repairing the facilities and equipment of the power generation / transformation equipment provided in the power generation / substation, and the inspection that needs to be calculated.・ Facility / equipment information database (11), inspection / repair information database (12), repair type unit price / unit price accuracy information database (13) and confirmation / modification information database (14) related to facilities / equipment to be repaired Is stored in the database (10), a processing device (20) that performs arithmetic processing of information in the database (10), and an input device (30). By sending and receiving, it is judged whether the unit price needs to be corrected in the unit price contract for the repair cost of the equipment and equipment to be repaired, and the quantity etc. must be confirmed and corrected. A repair cost calculating means (21) for automatically calculating an initial value for determining whether or not reconsideration is necessary based on the unit price accuracy based on the unit price and the relative standard deviation of the unit price. Repair cost display means (22) for displaying the cost composition of the repair cost for each unit price accuracy and unit price classification, and an inspection / repair information is input by the operator using the input device (30). When the inspection / repair information is stored in (10) and stored in the inspection / repair information database (10), the repair cost calculation means (21) automatically calculates and calculates the unit price and unit price accuracy of the repair type. Repair cost based on unit price and unit price accuracy is calculated, and the repair cost display means (22) clearly indicates the location and priority to be reviewed and corrected so that the reconsideration value can be confirmed. Cost structure Characterized in that it is displayed as an initial value of the unit price classification.
例えば、前記修繕算定手段（２１）により前記初期値が自動算定される際に、前記点検・修繕情報を修繕の実績があるか否かが判断され、実績が無い場合には、個別の算定が必要と判断され、実績が有る場合には、単価精度が表示され、前記単価精度が個別に再検討するものか否かが判断される。
また、前記修繕算定手段（２１）により前記初期値が自動算定される際に、入力された単価と単価の相対標準偏差について、単価契約で単価修正が必要か否かについて判断され、単価修正が不要のときは、更に数量等の確認・修正が必要か否かについて判断され、数量等の確認・修正の必要がない場合は、再検討されない単価精度Ａと判断され、また確認・修正が必要な場合は、再検討される単価精度Ｂと判断され、単価契約以外で単価修正が必要なときは、単価の相対標準偏差が５％以下か否かについて判断され、５％以下のときは、再検討されない単価精度Ｃと判断される。
更に、前記修繕算定手段（２１）により前記初期値が自動算定される際に、入力された単価について、単価の相対標準偏差が５％より大きく１５％以下か否かについて判断され、５％より大きく１５％以下のときは単価精度Ｄと判断され、単価が１００万円未満のときは再検討が不要と判断され、１００万円未満でないときは再検討が必要と判断され、単価の相対標準偏差が１５％より大きく３５％以下か否かについて判断され、１５％より大きく３５％以下のときは単価精度Ｅと判断され、単価が５０万円未満のときは再検討が不要と判断され、単価が５０万円以上１００万円未満のときは再検討が必要と判断され、更に、単価が１００万円以上のときは優先的に再検討が必要と判断され、単価の相対標準偏差が３５％より大きいか否かについて判断され、３５％より大きいときは単価精度Ｆと判断され、単価が２０万円未満のときは再検討が不要と判断され、単価が２０万円以上５０万円未満のときは再検討が必要と判断され、更に、単価が５０万円以上のときは優先的に再検討が必要と判断される。
For example, when the initial value is automatically calculated by the repair calculation means (21), it is determined whether or not the inspection / repair information has a track record of repair. If it is determined that it is necessary and there is a record, the unit price accuracy is displayed, and it is determined whether the unit price accuracy is to be individually reviewed.
Further, when the initial value is automatically calculated by the repair calculating means (21), it is determined whether or not the unit price contract needs to be corrected for the input standard unit price and the relative standard deviation of the unit price. When it is not necessary, it is judged whether further confirmation / correction of the quantity, etc. is necessary. When confirmation / correction of the quantity, etc. is not necessary, it is judged that the unit price accuracy A is not reconsidered, and confirmation / correction is necessary. If it is determined that the unit price accuracy B is to be reconsidered, and the unit price correction is necessary outside the unit price contract, it is determined whether the relative standard deviation of the unit price is 5% or less. It is determined that the unit price accuracy C is not reviewed.
Further, when the initial value is automatically calculated by the repair calculation means (21), it is determined whether the relative standard deviation of the unit price is greater than 5% and less than 15% for the input unit price. When it is large and less than 15%, it is judged as unit price accuracy D. When the unit price is less than 1 million yen, it is judged that review is unnecessary, and when it is less than 1 million yen, it is judged that review is necessary. It is judged whether the deviation is greater than 15% and less than 35%. When the deviation is greater than 15% and less than 35%, it is judged as unit price accuracy E, and when the unit price is less than 500,000 yen, it is judged that the review is unnecessary. When the unit price is 500,000 yen or more and less than 1 million yen, it is judged that reconsideration is necessary, and when the unit price is 1 million yen or more, it is judged that reconsideration is necessary, and the relative standard deviation of unit price is 35 Whether it is greater than% If the unit price is less than 200,000 yen, it is judged that the review is unnecessary. If the unit price is 200,000 yen or more and less than 500,000 yen, the review is made. It is determined that it is necessary, and if the unit price is 500,000 yen or more, it is determined that it is necessary to reexamine it.
前記修繕費表示手段（２２）では、費用算定外の計画については表示しないようにする。
前記修繕費算定手段（２１）に、停電等の条件により、打合せ・試充電等の間接項目を追加することができる。
The repair cost display means (22) does not display a plan other than the cost calculation.
Indirect items such as meetings and trial charging can be added to the repair cost calculation means (21) depending on conditions such as a power failure.
本発明の費用算定支援方法は、発変電所に備えられた発変電器の設備、機器について修繕する費用を算定する発変電機器修繕費用算定方法であって、予め、前記発変電器の設備、機器に関する設備・機器情報（１１）と、それらの設備、機器について、過去に実施した点検・修繕に関する単価・単価精度情報（１３）とその点検・修繕に関する点検・修繕情報（１２）が記憶されるデータベース（１０）を作成し、発変電器の点検・修繕する費用を算定する際に、前記データベース（１０）を参照し、設備・機器の修繕費用について、単価契約で単価修正が必要か否かを判断し、数量等の確認・修正が必要か否かを判断し、次にこれらの単価精度について、単価の相対標準偏差に基づき再検討の要否を判断する初期値を自動算定し、修繕種別の費用構成と単価分類を再検討・修正する箇所と優先順位を明示して表示し、表示された初期値について、手作業での再検討・修正を行い、その再検討値の妥当性を確認する、ことを特徴とする。 The cost calculation support method of the present invention is a generator and substation equipment repair cost calculation method for calculating the cost of repairing the equipment and equipment of the generator and transformer provided in the substation, and the equipment of the generator and transformer in advance, Equipment / equipment information (11) related to equipment, unit price / unit price accuracy information (13) related to inspections / repairs conducted in the past, and inspection / repair information (12) related to the inspection / repair are stored. The database (10), and when calculating the expenses for inspection and repair of the generator / substation, refer to the database (10), and whether or not the unit price contract needs to be corrected for the repair costs of equipment / equipment To determine whether it is necessary to confirm and correct the quantity, etc., and then automatically calculate the initial value for determining the necessity of review based on the relative standard deviation of the unit price for these unit price accuracy, Repair type The cost structure and unit price classification are re-examined and indicated in the priority order, and the initial values displayed are reviewed and corrected manually, and the validity of the re-examined values is confirmed. It is characterized by that.
前記表示された初期値について、再検討値の妥当性を確認する際に、単価精度の優先度の高いものから確認することが好ましい。
前記再検討値の妥当性を確認したものを最終値として、この最終値の妥当性を確認する際に、単価精度の優先度の高いものから確認することが好ましい。
前記で再検討された最終値について、最終値の妥当性を確認する際に、増減金額の大きいものから確認することが好ましい。
Regarding the displayed initial value, it is preferable to confirm the validity of the reconsideration value from the one with high unit price accuracy priority.
When the validity of the reconsideration value is confirmed as a final value, the validity of the final value is preferably confirmed from the one with high unit price accuracy priority.
Regarding the final value reviewed above, it is preferable to confirm the final value from the one with the largest increase / decrease amount when confirming the validity of the final value.
例えば、前記初期値が自動算定される際に、前記点検・修繕情報を修繕の実績があるか否かが判断され、実績が無い場合には、個別の算定が必要とされ、実績が有る場合には、単価精度が表示され、前記単価が個別に単価を計上するものか否かが判断され、計上しない場合には再検討は不要と判断され、単価を計上する場合には各単価精度に応じて修繕費用の再検討が必要と判断される。また、前記初期値が自動算定される際に、前記修繕種別ごとの単価精度について、単価契約で単価修正が必要か否かについて判断され、単価修正が不要のときは、更に数量等の確認・修正が必要か否かについて判断され、数量等の確認・修正の必要がない場合は、再検討されない単価精度Ａと判断され、また確認・修正が必要な場合は、再検討する単価精度Ｂと判断され、単価契約以外で単価修正が必要なときは、単価の相対標準偏差が５％以下か否かについて判断され、５％以下のときは、再検討しない単価精度Ｃと判断される。 For example, when the initial value is automatically calculated, it is determined whether or not the inspection / repair information has a track record of repair, and if there is no track record, individual calculation is required and there is a track record. The unit price accuracy is displayed and it is determined whether or not the unit price is to be individually recorded. If it is not recorded, it is determined that the review is unnecessary. Accordingly, it is judged that the repair cost needs to be reexamined. In addition, when the initial value is automatically calculated, it is determined whether or not a unit price correction is required in the unit price contract for the unit price accuracy for each repair type. When it is determined whether or not correction is necessary, and it is not necessary to confirm / correct the quantity, etc., it is determined that the unit price accuracy A is not reconsidered. If it is determined that the unit price correction is necessary except for the unit price contract, it is determined whether or not the relative standard deviation of the unit price is 5% or less. If it is 5% or less, it is determined that the unit price accuracy C is not reconsidered.
更に、前記初期値が自動算定される際に、前記修繕種別ごとの単価精度について、単価の相対標準偏差が５％より大きく１５％以下か否かについて判断され、５％より大きく１５％以下のときは単価精度Ｄと判断し、単価が１００万円未満のときは再検討が不要と判断され、１００万円未満でないときは再検討が必要と判断され、単価の相対標準偏差が１５％より大きく３５％以下か否かについて判断され、１５％より大きく３５％以下のときは単価精度Ｅと判断され、単価が５０万円未満のときは再検討が不要と判断され、単価が５０万円以上１００万円未満のときは再検討が必要と判断され、更に、単価が１００万円以上のときは優先的に再検討が必要と判断され、単価の相対標準偏差が３５％より大きいか否かについて判断され、３５％より大きいときは単価精度Ｆと判断され、単価が２０万円未満のときは再検討が不要と判断され、単価が２０万円以上５０万円未満のときは再検討が必要と判断され、更に、単価が５０万円以上のときは優先的に再検討が必要と判断される。 Further, when the initial value is automatically calculated, it is determined whether the relative standard deviation of the unit price is greater than 5% and not more than 15% for the unit price accuracy for each repair type. When the unit price is less than 1 million yen, it is determined that no review is necessary, and when it is not less than 1 million yen, it is determined that a review is necessary, and the relative standard deviation of the unit price is more than 15%. It is judged whether or not it is 35% or less. When it is larger than 15% and 35% or less, it is judged as unit price accuracy E. When the unit price is less than 500,000 yen, it is judged that reexamination is unnecessary, and the unit price is 500,000 yen. If it is less than 1 million yen, it is judged that re-examination is necessary, and if the unit price is 1 million yen or more, it is judged that re-examination is necessary, and whether the relative standard deviation of the unit price is greater than 35%. It is judged about 35 When it is larger, it is judged as unit price accuracy F, when unit price is less than 200,000 yen, it is judged that review is unnecessary, and when unit price is more than 200,000 yen but less than 500,000 yen, it is judged that review is necessary. When the unit price is 500,000 yen or more, it is determined that a re-examination is necessary.
前記初期値が自動算定される際に、費用算定外の計画については、表示しないようにする。
前記初期値が自動算定される際に、停電等の条件により、打合せ・試充電等の間接項目を追加することができる。
When the initial value is automatically calculated, the plan other than the cost calculation is not displayed.
When the initial value is automatically calculated, indirect items such as a meeting and a trial charge can be added depending on conditions such as a power failure.
本発明の発変電機器修繕費用算定支援システムおよび算定支援方法では、発変電所に備えられた発変電器の設備、機器について修繕する費用の算定および再検討に必要なデータを格納したデータベース（１０）との間でデータを送受信し、自動算定された修繕費用を単価精度に応じて費用を手作業で再検討することにより、修繕費算定確認の効率化と容易化を図ることができ、その修繕費の精度を向上させることができる。特に、修繕費算に関するデータベース（１０）が管理されているので、修繕計画の漏れをなくすことができる。 In the power generation / substation equipment repair cost calculation support system and the calculation support method according to the present invention, a database (10 that stores data necessary for calculating and reviewing the cost of repairing the equipment and equipment of the power generation / transformation equipment provided in the power generation / substation )), And by manually reviewing the repair costs calculated automatically according to the unit price accuracy, the repair cost calculation confirmation can be made more efficient and easier. The accuracy of repair costs can be improved. In particular, since the database (10) relating to the repair cost calculation is managed, it is possible to eliminate omissions in the repair plan.
また、点検・修繕すべき発変電器の設備、機器に関する情報を修繕費算定に関するデータベース（１０）で検索管理されているので、修繕計画の漏れをなくすことができる。 In addition, since information relating to the facilities and equipment of the generator / transformer to be inspected / repaired is retrieved and managed in the database (10) relating to the repair cost calculation, omissions in the repair plan can be eliminated.
更に、各システム間の連系を自動的にすることにより、発変電器の点検・修繕計画に際して、ヒューマンエラーをなくし、修繕費を算定策定できる。更に修繕費の再検討をすることにより精度の向上化を図ることができる。 Furthermore, by automatically linking the systems, it is possible to eliminate human errors and to calculate and formulate repair costs in the inspection and repair plan for generators and transformers. Furthermore, it is possible to improve accuracy by reexamining repair costs.
本発明の発変電機器修繕費用算定支援システムは、発変電所に備えられた発変電器の設備、機器について修繕する費用を算定するシステムである。 The substation equipment repair cost calculation support system according to the present invention is a system for calculating the cost of repairing the facilities and equipment of the substation equipment provided in the substation.
以下、本発明の好ましい実施の形態を図面を参照して説明する。
図１は実施例１の発変電機器修繕費用算定支援システムを示すブロック図である。
＜発変電機器修繕費用算定支援システムの機能＞
実施例１の発変電機器修繕費用算定支援システム１００は、図１に示すように、データベース１０、修繕費算定手段２１および修繕費表示手段２２を主な構成要素としている。修繕費算定手段２１および修繕費表示手段２２は、コンピュータシステムおよびその周辺機器により構成され、コンピュータシステムおよびその周辺機器がアプリケーションプログラムに従って動作することにより、各手段の機能を発揮するようになっている。
Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a power generation / transformation equipment repair cost calculation support system according to the first embodiment.
<Function of power generation equipment repair cost calculation support system>
As shown in FIG. 1, the power generation / transformation equipment repair cost calculation support system 100 according to the first embodiment includes a database 10, a repair cost calculation unit 21 and a repair cost display unit 22 as main components. The repair cost calculation means 21 and the repair cost display means 22 are composed of a computer system and its peripheral devices, and the functions of the respective means are exhibited when the computer system and its peripheral devices operate according to the application program. .
実施例１の点検算定支援システム１００は、発変電所における発変電機器の設備・機器情報と、作業種別情報のデータ等を入力する入力装置３０と、修繕種別作業のために点検・修繕の費用を算定し、再検討の有無の判断などを行う処理装置２０と、設備・機器情報と、作業種別の点検・修繕情報などの情報を記憶するデータベース１０とから成り、この処理装置２０によって算出された発変電器の設備、機器について算定した点検・修繕費用情報を表示する表示装置４０とを備えたシステムである。 The inspection calculation support system 100 according to the first embodiment includes an input device 30 that inputs facility / equipment information of power generation / transformation equipment and data of work type information at the power generation / substation, and the cost of inspection / repair for the repair work. Is calculated by the processing device 20 for determining whether or not to review, and the database 10 for storing information such as facility / equipment information and work type inspection / repair information. It is a system provided with a display device 40 for displaying inspection / repair cost information calculated for the facilities and equipment of the generator and transformer.
入力装置３０は、例えばキーボードやマウスなどの情報入力装置によって構成され、ユーザインタフェースとして用いられる。表示装置４０は、例えば液晶表示装置などの情報表示装置によって構成される。 The input device 30 is configured by an information input device such as a keyboard and a mouse, and is used as a user interface. The display device 40 is configured by an information display device such as a liquid crystal display device.
処理装置２０は、例えばＣＰＵなどの情報処理装置によって構成され、発変電機器に含まれる電力設備のうち、点検・修繕を行う設備又は機器に関する機種、仕様を入力する機種・仕様入力手段２４と、修繕する設備・機器の修繕費用の初期値を自動算定する修繕費算定手段２１と、表示装置４０に表示させるデータを生成する表示データ生成手段２５と、算定された修繕費およびその費用構成を、単価精度、単価分類、確認・修正内容ごとに表示する修繕費表示手段２２とを含む。 The processing device 20 is constituted by an information processing device such as a CPU, for example, among power facilities included in the power generation and transformation equipment, a model or specification input means 24 for inputting a model or specification related to a facility or equipment to be inspected or repaired, The repair cost calculation means 21 for automatically calculating the initial value of the repair cost of the equipment and equipment to be repaired, the display data generation means 25 for generating data to be displayed on the display device 40, the calculated repair cost and its cost composition, And repair cost display means 22 for displaying each unit price accuracy, unit price classification, and confirmation / correction contents.
データベース１０は、発変電機器の設備機器の点検・修繕に必要なデータを格納した部分であり、ハードディスク記憶装置等の大容量記憶装置を含んで構成される。また、機種・仕様入力手段２４と、修繕費算定手段２１と、表示データ生成手段２５と、修繕費表示手段２２は、このデータベース１０との間でデータを送受信することにより、各手段としての動作を行うようになっている。 The database 10 is a part that stores data necessary for inspection / repair of the equipment of the power generating / transforming equipment, and includes a large-capacity storage device such as a hard disk storage device. The model / specification input means 24, the repair cost calculation means 21, the display data generation means 25, and the repair cost display means 22 operate as each means by transmitting and receiving data to and from the database 10. Is supposed to do.
データベース１０は、例えば情報記憶装置によって構成され、対象となる発変電機器が設置された発変電所の設備・機器に関する設備・機器情報データベース１１（名称、区分、設備名称、設備仕様など）と、その修繕の算定に必要な点検・修繕情報データベース１２と、修繕種別の単価・単価精度情報データベース１３と確認・修正内容情報データベース１４が格納されたデータベースである。 The database 10 is composed of, for example, an information storage device, and a facility / equipment information database 11 (name, classification, facility name, facility specification, etc.) regarding facilities / equipment of a substation where a target substation / equipment is installed; This is a database in which an inspection / repair information database 12 necessary for calculation of the repair, a unit price / unit price accuracy information database 13 of a repair type, and a confirmation / correction content information database 14 are stored.
初期値を表示する修繕費表示手段２２では、費用算定外の計画については、表示しないことにすることができる。初期値を自動算定する修繕費算定手段２１に、停電等の条件により、打合せ・試充電等の間接項目を追加することができる。 In the repair cost display means 22 for displaying the initial value, it is possible not to display the plan other than the cost calculation. Indirect items such as meetings and trial charging can be added to the repair cost calculation means 21 that automatically calculates the initial value depending on conditions such as a power failure.
図２はデータベースに格納された修繕費の単価情報の一例を示す表である。
上記したデータベース１０には、図２に示すような修繕費の単価情報が格納される。この単価情報を示す表は、その左から発変電所、設備区分、設備仕様、点検区分、単価精度、確認・修正内容、請負代と資材代を含む単価（単位：千円）、係数および処理計画・同種対策件名から成る。
「設備区分」としては、変圧器、遮断器、断路器、避雷器、電線、電力ケーブル、配電盤・機器制御盤などがある。「点検区分」としては、普通、普通（油）、細密、臨時、処理計画、同種対策などがある。
FIG. 2 is a table showing an example of unit price information of repair costs stored in the database.
The above-described database 10 stores repair unit price information as shown in FIG. The table showing unit price information is from left to right, substation, facility classification, facility specification, inspection category, unit price accuracy, confirmation / correction contents, unit price including contract fee and material cost (unit: thousand yen), coefficient and processing Consists of subject of plan and similar measures.
“Equipment classification” includes transformers, circuit breakers, disconnectors, lightning arresters, electric wires, power cables, switchboards and equipment control panels. “Inspection categories” include normal, normal (oil), fine, temporary, treatment plan, and similar measures.
「単価精度」としては、Ａ、Ｂ、Ｃ、Ｄ、Ｅ、Ｆ、Ｇ、Ｘなどの各精度段階がある。
「確認・修正内容」としては、「○」は優先的に単価の再検討が必要であること、「△」は数量等の確認が必要なもの、対象作業が多いため当該作業種別の小計金額が多く、総合計への影響が多い場合に単価の再検討が必要であること、「×」は単価の再確認は不要であることをそれぞれ意味している。
「単価 (単位：千円) 」としては、請負代と資材代とが含まれる。「係数」としては単価の単位と設備の単位が異なる場合に補正する係数である。単価と設備が１対１で対応しているものについての補正は不要であるが、単価の単位が「千円／組」であり、３台で１組の設備が１台ずつ登録されているような場合で単価と設備が１対１に対応していない場合の補正に必要である。「処理計画・同種対策件名」としては、「漏油修理」などのように個別の機器に対して行われる処理計画と，「ガス遮断器遮断部不具合対策」のように同型機器での不調再発防止のため同型機に対して水平展開される同種対策などがある。
“Unit price accuracy” includes accuracy levels such as A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and X.
As for “confirmation / correction”, “○” indicates that the unit price needs to be reconsidered preferentially, “△” indicates that confirmation of quantity, etc., is necessary, and there are many target operations, so the subtotal amount for that operation type In many cases, the unit price needs to be re-examined when there is a large impact on the total, and “×” means that the unit price need not be reconfirmed.
“Unit price (unit: 1,000 yen)” includes contract fee and material fee. “Coefficient” is a coefficient to be corrected when the unit of unit price is different from the unit of equipment. There is no need to make corrections for one-to-one correspondence between the unit price and equipment, but the unit of unit price is “1000 yen / set”, and one set of equipment is registered for each set of three. In such a case, it is necessary for correction when the unit price and equipment do not correspond one-to-one. The “Processing Plan / Same Type of Measures Subject” includes processing plans for individual equipment such as “Oil Leak Repair”, and malfunction recurrence in the same type of equipment such as “Countermeasures for gas circuit breaker breaker faults”. To prevent this, there are the same types of countermeasures that are deployed horizontally to the same type machine.
図３は修繕費算定手段２１によって算定された修繕費算出シートの一例を示すものである。シート全体は１図面に収まらないので途中で上下に２分割して示している。
上記したデータベース１０には、図３に示すような修繕費算出に必要な情報について設備関係情報が設備・機器情報データベース１１に、点検関係情報が点検・修繕情報データベース１２に、単価関係情報が単価・単価精度情報データ１３にそれぞれ格納される。この修繕費算出情報を示す表は、表の左から発変電所、点検ブロック名称、設備区分、設備名称、設備仕様、点検区分、単価精度、確認・修正内容、請負代と資材代を含む単価（単位：千円）、係数、初期値(単位：千円)は、 請負代と資材代を含む、最終値(単位：千円)は、 請負代と資材代を含み、増減(単位：千円)は、 請負代と資材代を含む、処理計画・同種対策である。
FIG. 3 shows an example of a repair cost calculation sheet calculated by the repair cost calculation means 21. Since the entire sheet does not fit in one drawing, it is shown divided into two vertically in the middle.
In the database 10 described above, the facility-related information is stored in the facility / equipment information database 11, the inspection-related information is stored in the inspection / repair information database 12, and the unit price-related information is stored in the unit price for information necessary for calculating repair costs as shown in FIG. Stored in the unit price accuracy information data 13 respectively. The table showing this repair cost calculation information is from the left side of the table, substation, inspection block name, equipment classification, equipment name, equipment specification, inspection classification, unit price accuracy, confirmation / correction contents, unit price including contract fee and material cost (Unit: thousand yen), coefficient, initial value (unit: thousand yen) includes contract fee and material fee, final value (unit: thousand yen) includes contract fee and material fee, increase / decrease (unit: thousand) (Yen) is a treatment plan and similar measures including contract costs and material costs.
「点検ブロック名称」としては、１号変圧器関係、６６ＫＶ Ａ送電線１号関係などがある。この「点検ブロック名称」は、同じ名称のものが一つの作業を意味する。「設備区分」としては、変圧器、遮断器、断路器、避雷器、電線、電力ケーブル、配電盤・機器制御盤などがある。 “Inspection block names” include No. 1 transformer relation, 66KVA transmission line No. 1 relation, and the like. This “inspection block name” means that one work has the same name. “Equipment classification” includes transformers, circuit breakers, disconnectors, lightning arresters, electric wires, power cables, switchboards and equipment control panels.
「設備名称」としては、１号変圧器、６６ＫＶ Ａ送電線１号遮断器などがある。この「設備名称」は、個々の機器の識別のためについている設備の名称である。 “Equipment name” includes No. 1 transformer, 66 KVA transmission line No. 1 breaker, and the like. This “facility name” is the name of the facility attached for identification of each device.
「設備仕様」としては、定格電圧（７２ｋＶ、６．６ｋＶなど）や、据付方式（屋外、屋外など）や稼動状態（常用、予備など）などがある。「点検区分」としては、普通、普通（油）、細密、臨時、処理計画、同種対策などがある。 “Equipment specifications” include a rated voltage (72 kV, 6.6 kV, etc.), an installation method (outdoor, outdoor, etc.) and an operating state (normal, spare, etc.). “Inspection categories” include normal, normal (oil), fine, temporary, treatment plan, and similar measures.
単価は、その単位を千円で表記している。係数（単位なし）。初期値(単位：千円)は、請負代と資材代を含む。最終値(単位：千円)は、請負代 資材代を含む。増減(単位：千円) は、請負代 資材代を含む。
単価精度、確認・修正内容、請負代と資材代を含む単価（単位：千円）、係数は、単価表によりそれぞれ自動付与される。
初期値欄は、自動付与後は固定とし、修正されない。最終値欄は初期値として初期値欄のデータを自動的にコピーされる。その後、担当者は最終値の必要な箇所（確認・修正内容が○／△のデータ）を再検討し、データ修正する。
増減(単位：千円) は、増減＝最終値−初期値の数値である。その確認方法としては、上長等は増減のあるもの、確認・修正内容が△／○のものを確認する。
The unit price is expressed in thousand yen. Factor (no unit). The initial value (unit: 1,000 yen) includes contract fee and material fee. The final value (unit: 1,000 yen) includes the contract fee and material fee. Increase / decrease (unit: 1,000 yen) includes contract fee and material fee.
Unit price accuracy, details of confirmation / correction, unit price including contract fee and material cost (unit: 1,000 yen), and coefficient are automatically assigned according to the unit price table.
The initial value column is fixed after automatic assignment and is not corrected. The data in the initial value column is automatically copied in the final value column as the initial value. After that, the person in charge reexamines the location where the final value is necessary (data with confirmation / correction contents of ○ / △) and corrects the data.
Increase / decrease (unit: 1,000 yen) is a numerical value of increase / decrease = final value-initial value. As a confirmation method, confirm that the upper manager has an increase / decrease and the confirmation / correction contents are △ / ○.
処理計画・同種対策としては、「漏油修理」などのように個別の機器に対して行われる処理計画と、「ガス遮断器遮断部不具合対策」のように同型機器での不調再発防止のため同型機に対して水平展開される同種対策などがある。 Treatment plans and similar countermeasures include the treatment plan for individual equipment such as “leakage oil repair” and the prevention of malfunction recurrence in the same type of equipment such as “countermeasures for gas circuit breaker breaker faults”. There are similar measures that are deployed horizontally on the same model.
図４は再検討支援のための単価精度、単価、確認・修正内容を示す表である。
実施例１の発変電機器修繕費用算定支援システムでは、修繕費用の各単価は単価精度データを有し、単価精度により単価をランク付けした。図４に示すように、例えば単価精度が高いＡランク（単価精度Ａ）から、Ｂランク（単価精度Ｂ）、Ｃランク（単価精度Ｃ）、Ｄランク（単価精度Ｄ）、Ｅランク（単価精度Ｅ）、Ｆランク（単価精度Ｆ）、Ｇランク（単価精度Ｇ）、Ｘランク（単価精度Ｘ）と低くなるようにした。
FIG. 4 is a table showing unit price accuracy, unit price, and confirmation / correction contents for review support.
In the power generation / transformation equipment repair cost calculation support system of Example 1, each unit price of the repair cost has unit price accuracy data, and the unit price is ranked by unit price accuracy. As shown in FIG. 4, for example, from A rank (unit price accuracy A) having high unit price accuracy to B rank (unit price accuracy B), C rank (unit price accuracy C), D rank (unit price accuracy D), E rank (unit price accuracy) E), F rank (unit price accuracy F), G rank (unit price accuracy G), and X rank (unit price accuracy X).
図５は実施例１の発変電機器修繕費用算定支援システムが実行する点検・修繕の自動算定の第１段階を示すフローチャートである。
〈単価精度Ｇと単価精度Ｘ〉
点検・修繕情報が点検・修繕情報データベース１０に格納されると、修繕費算定手段２１により修繕種別の単価・単価精度が自動算定され、さらに修繕費が算定される。算定された単価・単価精度、修繕費が、修繕費表示手段２２により修繕費算出シート、修繕費集約表、再検討優先度一覧表が表示される。
この修繕費算定手段２１により自動算定される際に、点検・修繕情報を修繕の実績があるか否かが判断され、実績が無い場合には単価精度Ｇと判断され、個別の算定が必要と判断される。
FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing a first stage of automatic inspection / repair calculation executed by the power generation / transformation equipment repair cost calculation support system according to the first embodiment.
<Unit price accuracy G and Unit price accuracy X>
When the inspection / repair information is stored in the inspection / repair information database 10, the repair cost calculation means 21 automatically calculates the unit price and unit price accuracy of the repair type, and further calculates the repair cost. The calculated unit price / unit price accuracy and repair cost are displayed by the repair cost display means 22 on a repair cost calculation sheet, a repair cost aggregation table, and a review priority list.
When the repair cost calculation means 21 automatically calculates, it is determined whether or not the inspection / repair information has a track record of repair. If there is no track record, it is determined that the unit price accuracy is G, and individual calculation is required. To be judged.
修繕の実績がある場合には、続いて個別に単価を計上するものか否かが判断され、計上しない場合には単価精度Ｘと判断され、再検討が不要と判断される。例えば、直営で費用のない物や、親機器で一括計上するため、個別に計上しないものがこれに該当する。 If there is a track record of repair, it is subsequently determined whether or not the unit price is to be individually recorded. Otherwise, it is determined that the unit price accuracy is X, and it is determined that reexamination is unnecessary. For example, items that are directly managed at no cost, or that are not counted individually because they are accounted for by the parent device at one time.
〈単価精度Ａ、単価精度Ｂと単価精度Ｃ〉
図６は実施例１の発変電機器修繕費用算定支援システムが実行する点検・修繕の自動算定の第２段階を示すフローチャートである。
図６に示すように、例えば修繕算定手段２１により初期値が自動算定される際に、入力された単価、相対標準偏差について、単価契約以外か否かについて判断され、単価契約以外ではないときは、更に数量等の確認・修正が必要か否かについて判断され、確認・修正の必要がない場合は、再検討されない単価精度Ａと判断される。また確認・修正が必要な場合は、再検討される単価精度Ｂと判断される。
単価契約以外のときは、単価の相対標準偏差が５％以下か否かについて判断され、５％以下のときは、再検討されない単価精度Ｃと判断される。５％以下ではないときは、他の確認・修正内容、図７に示す第３段階へ行く。
<Unit price accuracy A, Unit price accuracy B and Unit price accuracy C>
FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating a second stage of automatic inspection / repair calculation performed by the power generation / transformation equipment repair cost calculation support system according to the first embodiment.
As shown in FIG. 6, for example, when the initial value is automatically calculated by the repair calculation means 21, it is determined whether or not the input unit price and relative standard deviation are other than the unit price contract. Further, it is determined whether or not confirmation / correction of the quantity or the like is necessary. If confirmation / correction is not necessary, it is determined that the unit price accuracy A is not reconsidered. If confirmation / correction is necessary, it is determined that the unit price accuracy B to be reviewed.
When the contract is not a unit price contract, it is determined whether the relative standard deviation of the unit price is 5% or less, and when it is 5% or less, it is determined that the unit price accuracy C is not reconsidered. If it is not less than 5%, go to the third stage shown in FIG.
〈単価精度Ｄと単価精度Ｅ〉
図７は実施例１の発変電機器修繕費用算定支援システムが実行する点検・修繕の自動算定の第３段階を示すフローチャートである。
図７に示すように、例えば修繕算定手段２１により初期値が自動算定される際に、入力された単価について、単価の相対標準偏差が５％より大きく１５％以下か否かについて判断され、５％より大きく１５％以下のときは単価精度Ｄと判断される。次に単価が１００万円未満のときは再検討が不要と判断され、１００万円未満でないときは再検討が必要と判断される。例えば、対象作業が多いため合計金額が多く、総合計への影響が多い場合に再検討すると判断される。
更に、単価の相対標準偏差が１５％より大きく３５％以下か否かについて判断され、１５％より大きく３５％以下のときは単価精度Ｅと判断される。次に単価が５０万円未満のときは再検討が不要と判断され、単価が５０万円以上１００万円未満のときは再検討が必要と判断される。
更に、単価が１００万円以上のときは優先的に再検討が必要と判断される。
相対標準偏差が１５％より大きく３５％以下ではないときは、他の確認・修正内容、図８に示す第４段階へ行く。
<Unit price accuracy D and Unit price accuracy E>
FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating a third stage of automatic inspection / repair calculation performed by the power generation / transformation equipment repair cost calculation support system according to the first embodiment.
As shown in FIG. 7, for example, when the initial value is automatically calculated by the repair calculation means 21, it is determined whether the relative standard deviation of the unit price is greater than 5% and not more than 15% for the input unit price. The unit price accuracy D is determined when the value is greater than% and equal to or less than 15%. Next, when the unit price is less than 1 million yen, it is determined that the review is unnecessary, and when it is not less than 1 million yen, it is determined that the review is necessary. For example, since there are many target tasks, the total amount is large, and it is determined that reconsideration is made when there is a large impact on the total.
Further, it is determined whether or not the relative standard deviation of the unit price is greater than 15% and not more than 35%. When the relative standard deviation is greater than 15% and not more than 35%, the unit price accuracy E is determined. Next, when the unit price is less than 500,000 yen, it is determined that reexamination is unnecessary, and when the unit price is 500,000 yen or more and less than 1 million yen, it is determined that reexamination is necessary.
Furthermore, when the unit price is 1 million yen or more, it is determined that a re-examination is necessary.
If the relative standard deviation is greater than 15% and not less than 35%, the flow proceeds to the fourth stage shown in FIG.
〈単価精度Ｆ〉
図８は実施例１の発変電機器修繕費用算定支援システムが実行する点検・修繕の自動算定の第４段階を示すフローチャートである。
図８に示すように、例えば修繕算定手段２１により初期値が自動算定される際に、入力された単価の相対標準偏差について、３５％より大きいときは単価精度Ｆと判断される。
次に、単価が２０万円未満か否かについて判断され、２０万円未満のときは再検討が不要と判断される。２０万円未満でないときは、単価が２０万円以上５０万円未満か否かについて判断され、２０万円以上５０万円未満のときは、再検討が必要と判断される。例えば、対象作業が多いため合計金額が多く、総合計への影響が多い場合に再検討すると判断される。
２０万円以上５０万円未満でないときは、優先的に再検討が必要であると判断される。
<Unit price accuracy F>
FIG. 8 is a flowchart illustrating a fourth stage of automatic inspection / repair calculation performed by the power generation / transformation equipment repair cost calculation support system according to the first embodiment.
As shown in FIG. 8, for example, when the initial value is automatically calculated by the repair calculation means 21, if the relative standard deviation of the input unit price is greater than 35%, it is determined that the unit price accuracy F.
Next, it is determined whether or not the unit price is less than 200,000 yen. If it is less than 200,000 yen, it is determined that reexamination is unnecessary. If it is not less than 200,000 yen, it is judged whether the unit price is 200,000 yen or more and less than 500,000 yen. If it is 200,000 yen or more and less than 500,000 yen, it is judged that reexamination is necessary. For example, since there are many target tasks, the total amount is large, and it is determined that reconsideration is made when there is a large impact on the total.
When it is not 200,000 yen or more and less than 500,000 yen, it is judged that reexamination is necessary with priority.
図９は本発明の発変電機器修繕費用算定支援システムにおける自動算定した単価精度、確認・修正内容、初期値合計、最終値合計とその増減の合計を表示した修繕費集約表である。図１０は修繕費構成を示す表の一例であり、再検討優先順位を示すものである。
本発明の発変電機器修繕費用算定支援システムにより算定した単価精度、確認・修正内容、初期値合計、最終値合計とその増減の合計を、修繕費表示手段２２により修繕費集約表を表示した。
この図９には、上段に図３に示す詳細な修繕費構成から各数値を把握する。
中段にこの詳細な修繕費構成から単価精度および再検討が不要なもの、再検討が必要になる場合があるもの、更に必ず再検討をするものにまとめた構成を左側に示した。その右側に、棒グラフでそれぞれの割合を示した。
下段に再検討が不要なもの、再検討が必要になる場合があるもの、更に必ず再検討をするもののパーセンテージを示した。
FIG. 9 is a repair cost aggregation table displaying unit price accuracy, confirmation / correction contents, initial value total, final value total and total increase / decrease calculated automatically in the power generation / transformation equipment repair cost calculation support system of the present invention. FIG. 10 is an example of a table showing the repair cost composition, and shows the review priority.
The unit cost accuracy calculated by the power generation / transformation equipment repair cost calculation support system of the present invention, the contents of confirmation / correction, the initial value total, the final value total and the total of the increase / decrease are displayed by the repair cost display means 22 on the repair cost aggregation table.
In FIG. 9, each numerical value is grasped from the detailed repair cost composition shown in FIG.
On the left side, the composition of the detailed repair costs is shown on the left, where the unit price accuracy and re-examination are not required, the case where re-examination may be required, and the case where re-examination is necessary. On the right side, the ratio is shown by a bar graph.
The lower part shows the percentage of items that do not need to be reviewed, may need to be reviewed, and must be reviewed again.
これらの分類ごとの構成比を表示することにより，単価再検討による精度向上可能性の大まかな予想ができる。すなはち，確認・修正内容に×が多く○が少なければ予算精度は高く，再検討による精度向上余地は少なく、逆に×が少なく○が多ければ再検討による精度向上余地が大きいと言え、単価精度向上にかける業務の判断材料とできる。そこで、確認者は優先順位の高いものについて、図３の修繕費算出シートの確認・修正内容欄が△／○のもの使いながら、図１０に示される再検討優先順位を参考にしながら再検討を進めることができる。このようにして効果的な再検討をすることにより、修繕費の精度の向上することができ、業務の効率化・迅速化を図ることができる。 By displaying the composition ratio for each classification, it is possible to roughly predict the possibility of improving accuracy by reviewing the unit price. In other words, if there are many Xs in the confirmation / correction contents and a small ○, the budget accuracy is high, and there is little room for improving accuracy by reconsideration. It can be used as a judgment material for work to improve the unit price accuracy. Therefore, the confirmer reexamines the items with high priority while referring to the reconsideration priority shown in Fig. 10 while using the confirmation / correction contents column of △ / ○ in the repair cost calculation sheet of Fig. 3. Can proceed. By conducting an effective review in this way, the accuracy of repair costs can be improved, and the efficiency and speed of operations can be improved.
この図１０は修繕費構成の表は、表の左から欄を設け、単価精度、確認・修正内容、設備区分、設備仕様、点検区分、処理計画・同種対策件名、合計（単位：千円）および請負代と資材代を含む初期値（単位：千円）から成る。
この表では、単価精度/確認・修正内容ごとに分けて表示される。設備区分、設備仕様、点検区分、処理計画・同種件名対策別に表示される。合計では、「単価×係数」の高いものから数個（任意設定）とその他合計を表示し，修正優先度順を視覚化している。例えば、「優先的に再検討」が必要なものは、「赤色」の塗り分けにし、「再検討」が必要なものは、「黄色」の塗り分けにし、「再検討」が不要なものは、「青色」の塗り分けにした。同じ各単価精度、確認修正内容であれば単価の大きいものほど1回の再検討での精度向上の余地は大きいため、「単価×係数」の大きい順に表示することにより、単価面からの再検討優先順位を示すことができる。また、図１０は小計順に表示することもでき、小計面からの再検討優先順位をも示すことができる。
図示例では「単価×係数」順に表示した。なお、「単価×係数」順でなく、小計順に表示するよう切り替えることも可能である。
担当者は優先順位の高いものについて、修繕費算出シートの確認・修正内容が△／○のもの使いながら、図１０に示される再検討優先順位を参考にしながら単価を再検討することができる。また，上長等は優先順位の高いものについて、修繕費算出シートの増減欄や確認・修正内容が△／○のもの使いながら、図１０に示される再検討優先順位を参考にしながら再検討値の妥当性を確認することができる。修繕費の精度の向上と修繕計画漏れを回避することができ、業務の効率化・迅速化を図ることができる。
This figure is a table of repair cost composition, with columns from the left of the table, unit price accuracy, confirmation / correction contents, equipment classification, equipment specification, inspection classification, treatment plan / same countermeasure subject, total (unit: 1,000 yen) The initial value (unit: 1,000 yen) including the contract fee and material fee.
In this table, the price accuracy / confirmation / correction contents are displayed separately. It is displayed by equipment category, equipment specification, inspection category, treatment plan and similar subject matter countermeasures. As for the total, several items (arbitrary setting) from the highest “unit price × coefficient” and other totals are displayed, and the order of correction priority is visualized. For example, if “priority review” is required, “red” is applied separately, if “reconsideration” is required, “yellow” is applied separately, and “reconsideration” is not required. , “Blue” was applied separately. For the same unit price accuracy and confirmation correction contents, the larger the unit price, the greater the room for improvement of accuracy in a single review, so reexamination from the unit price side by displaying in order of "unit price x coefficient" Priorities can be indicated. FIG. 10 can also be displayed in the order of subtotals, and the review priority from the subtotal surface can also be shown.
In the illustrated example, they are displayed in the order of “unit price × coefficient”. It is also possible to switch to display in subtotal order instead of “unit price × coefficient” order.
The person in charge can review the unit price with reference to the reconsideration priority shown in FIG. 10 while using the one with a high priority of the confirmation / correction contents of the repair cost calculation sheet of Δ / ○. In addition, for senior managers, etc., the reconsideration value with reference to the reconsideration priority shown in Fig. 10 while using the increase / decrease column of the repair cost calculation sheet and the confirmation / correction contents of △ / ○ Can be confirmed. Improvement in the accuracy of repair costs and omission of repair plans can be avoided, and work efficiency and speed can be improved.
図１１は予算算定の作業の流れを示す業務フロー図である。
次に、図９の修繕費集約表と図１０の修繕費構成表を用いて、図１１の業務フロー図に示すように、本システムでの算定後に手作業で再検討・修正を行い、上長等はその再検討値の妥当性を確認する。本発明による自動算定、その結果については△の一部と○を手算定で修正する。その結果については、その作業した人の上長等に確認をしてもらい、これで「本年度」の計画策定は終了する。
引き続き「翌年度」には計画の実施として、積算・発注および点検を実施する。その後、設備・点検計画データを更新し、また単価データを更新する。
FIG. 11 is a business flow diagram showing the flow of budget calculation work.
Next, using the repair cost summary table in FIG. 9 and the repair cost composition table in FIG. 10, as shown in the business flow diagram in FIG. The length etc. confirms the validity of the review value. In the automatic calculation according to the present invention, the result is corrected by a part of Δ and ○ by manual calculation. The results of this work are confirmed by the supervisor of the person who worked, and the planning for this year ends.
In the “next year”, we will continue to estimate, place orders and check as part of the plan. Thereafter, the equipment / inspection plan data is updated, and the unit price data is updated.
図１２は単価算定シートを示す表である。
この単価算定シートは、設備区分、設備仕様、点検区分、処理計画・同種対策件名、単価精度、確認・修正 内容から成る。データ０１からデータ１２について、変電所の所名、年度、請負代、資材代と合計がそれぞれ表された実データと、請負ＵＰ率と資材ＵＰ率の年度補正を登録することにより、請負代、資材代と合計がそれぞれ表された補正後データが表わされる。
実データでは、請負代が１，０８３円、資材代が１，４５６円、合計で２，５３９円、相対標準偏差が６％である。データ０１からデータ０８に記載されたデータより、単価を作成する。本単価と単価精度シートから単価シートに連動し、Ａ〜Ｘ、○〜×を自動付与する。そこで、図示するように、補正後データ、請負代が１，１４８円、資材代が１，５５４円、合計が２，７０２円、標準偏差８％、確認・修正内容△が自動付与される。
FIG. 12 is a table showing a unit price calculation sheet.
This unit price calculation sheet consists of equipment category, equipment specification, inspection category, treatment plan / same type of countermeasures, unit price accuracy, and confirmation / correction details. For data 01 to data 12, by registering the actual data showing the substation's name, year, contract fee, material cost and total, and the contract correction rate and material UP rate year correction, The corrected data showing the material cost and total are shown.
In actual data, the contract fee is 1,083 yen, the material fee is 1,456 yen, the total is 2,539 yen, and the relative standard deviation is 6%. A unit price is created from data described in data 01 to data 08. A to X and ○ to x are automatically assigned in conjunction with the unit price sheet from the unit price and the unit price accuracy sheet. Therefore, as shown in the figure, the corrected data, the contract fee is 1,148 yen, the material fee is 1,554 yen, the total is 2,702 yen, the standard deviation is 8%, and the confirmation / correction contents Δ are automatically given.
図１３は費用算定外の計画で，表示しない情報を示す表である。
上記したデータベース１０には、図１３に示すような削除リスト情報が格納される。この削除リスト情報は、変電所単位で行なうもの、個別単価でなく、一括単価になるもの、他に含まれている等の理由で、個別に計画・算定する必要のないものが該当する。この表は、表の左から欄を設け、発変電所、点検ブロック、設備区分、設備名称、設備仕様、点検区分、点検周期、周期区分、および処理計画・同種対策から成る。
ここで、「設備区分」の例としてはとしては、ブッシング変流器が該当する。「点検区分」には、設備診断、現物照合、塗装調査が該当する。
FIG. 13 is a table showing information that is not displayed in a plan other than cost calculation.
The database 10 stores deletion list information as shown in FIG. This deletion list information corresponds to information that is performed on a substation basis, is not an individual unit price, has a unit price, and is not included in other plans because it is included elsewhere. This table has columns from the left of the table, and consists of substations, inspection blocks, equipment classifications, equipment names, equipment specifications, inspection classifications, inspection periods, periodic classifications, and treatment plans / similar measures.
Here, as an example of “equipment classification”, a bushing current transformer is applicable. “Inspection category” includes equipment diagnosis, physical verification, and painting survey.
図１４は試充電他追加情報を示す表である。
上記したデータベース１０には、図１４に示すような試充電他追加情報が格納される。この表では、表の左から発変電所、点検ブロック、設備区分、設備名称、設備仕様、点検区分、単価精度、請負代と資材代を含む単価（単位：千円）、係数、および処理計画・同種対策件名から成る。
本追加情報は、発変電所，点検ブロック毎に追加する。点検・修理等の直接設備に対する作業でないが、打合せ・試充電等に付帯して点検ブロックごとに発生する項目を追加する。
FIG. 14 is a table showing additional information such as trial charging.
The above-described database 10 stores additional information such as trial charging as shown in FIG. In this table, from the left of the table, substation, inspection block, equipment classification, equipment name, equipment specification, inspection classification, unit price accuracy, unit price including contract fee and material cost (unit: 1,000 yen), coefficient, and processing plan -Consists of the same type of countermeasure subject.
This additional information is added for each substation and inspection block. Although it is not work for direct equipment such as inspection and repair, items that occur for each inspection block are added to the meeting and trial charging.
なお、本発明は、算定した修繕費用について全てを再検討するのではなく、算定した修繕費用を単価精度等に応じて再検討することで、修繕費算定確認の効率化と容易化を図ることができ、その修繕費の精度を向上させ、更に修繕計画の漏れを軽減することができれば、上述した発明の実施の形態に限定されず、本発明の要旨を逸脱しない範囲で種々変更できることは勿論である。 It should be noted that the present invention does not review all the calculated repair costs, but rather reviews the calculated repair costs according to the unit price accuracy, etc., thereby improving the efficiency and facilitation of the repair cost calculation confirmation. If the accuracy of the repair cost can be improved, and the omission of the repair plan can be further reduced, the present invention is not limited to the embodiment of the invention described above, and various modifications can be made without departing from the gist of the present invention. It is.
本発明の発変電機器修繕費用算定支援システム及びその算定支援方法は、発電機、変電器を有する発変電所に限定されず、点検、修理を定期的に実施するプラントであれはこのシステムと方法を利用することができる。 The power generation / transformation equipment repair cost calculation support system and the calculation support method according to the present invention are not limited to a power generation / transformation station having a generator and a transformer, and this system and method is applicable to a plant that regularly performs inspection and repair. Can be used.
１００ 点検・停電算定支援システム
１０ データベース
１１ 設備・機器情報データベース
１２ 点検・修繕情報データベース
１３ 単価・単価精度情報データベース
１４ 確認・修正内容情報データベース
２０ 処理装置
２１ 修繕費算定手段
２２ 修繕費表示手段
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 100 Inspection / power failure calculation support system 10 Database 11 Equipment / equipment information database 12 Inspection / repair information database 13 Unit price / unit price accuracy information database 14 Confirmation / correction content information database 20 Processing device 21 Repair cost calculation means 22 Repair cost display means
Claims (15)
算定が必要な点検・修繕の対象になる設備・機器に関する設備・機器情報データベース（１１）、点検・修繕情報データベース（１２）、修繕種別の単価・単価精度情報データベース（１３）および確認・修正内容情報データベース（１４）が格納されたデータベース（１０）と、
前記データベース（１０）の情報の演算処理を行う処理装置（２０）と、入力装置（３０）と、から成り、
前記データベース（１０）との間でデータを送受信することにより、修繕する設備・機器の修繕費用について、単価契約で単価修正が必要か否かを判断し、数量等の確認・修正が必要か否かを判断し、次にこれらの単価および単価の相対標準偏差に基づく単価精度に基づき再検討の要否を判断する初期値を自動算定する修繕費算定手段（２１）と、
前記算定された修繕費の費用構成を、単価精度、単価分類ごとに表示する修繕費表示手段（２２）と、を備え、
操作者により、点検・修繕情報が入力装置（３０）を用いて点検・修繕データベース（１０）に格納され、
点検・修繕情報が点検・修繕情報データベース（１０）に格納されると、前記修繕費算定手段（２１）により修繕種別の単価・単価精度が自動算定され、
算定された単価・単価精度に基づく修繕費用を算定し、その再検討値の妥当性を確認し得るように、前記修繕費表示手段（２２）により再検討・修正する箇所と優先順位が明示されて修繕種別の費用構成と単価分類の初期値として表示される、ことを特徴とする発変電機器修繕費用算定支援システム。 It is a substation equipment repair cost calculation support system (100) that calculates the cost of repairing the facilities and equipment of the substation and transformer provided in the substation,
Facility / equipment information database (11), inspection / repair information database (12), repair type unit price / unit price accuracy information database (13), and confirmation / correction details related to facilities / equipment subject to inspection / repair requiring calculation A database (10) in which an information database (14) is stored;
A processing device (20) that performs calculation processing of information in the database (10), and an input device (30),
By sending and receiving data to and from the database (10), it is judged whether or not the unit price contract needs to be corrected for repair costs for equipment and equipment to be repaired, and whether or not the quantity etc. needs to be confirmed / corrected A repair cost calculation means (21) for automatically calculating an initial value for determining whether or not reconsideration is necessary based on the unit price accuracy based on the unit price and the relative standard deviation of the unit price;
Repair cost display means (22) for displaying the calculated cost composition of the repair cost for each unit price accuracy and unit price classification,
The operator stores the inspection / repair information in the inspection / repair database (10) using the input device (30),
When the inspection / repair information is stored in the inspection / repair information database (10), the repair cost calculation means (21) automatically calculates the unit price and unit price accuracy of the repair type,
The repair cost display means (22) clearly indicates the locations and priorities for review and correction so that repair costs based on the calculated unit price and unit price accuracy can be calculated and the reconsideration value can be confirmed. The power generation / repair equipment repair cost calculation support system, which is displayed as an initial value of the cost structure and unit price classification of the repair type.
前記点検・修繕情報を修繕の実績があるか否かが判断され、実績が無い場合には、個別の算定が必要と判断され、実績が有る場合には、単価精度が表示され、
前記単価精度が個別に再検討するものか否かが判断される、ことを特徴とする請求項１の発変電機器修繕費用算定支援システム。 When the initial value is automatically calculated by the repair calculation means (21),
It is determined whether or not there is a track record of repairing the inspection / repair information. If there is no track record, it is determined that individual calculation is necessary, and if there is a track record, unit price accuracy is displayed.
2. The substation equipment repair cost calculation support system according to claim 1, wherein whether or not the unit price accuracy is individually reviewed is determined.
入力された単価と単価の相対標準偏差について、単価契約で単価修正が必要か否かについて判断され、単価修正が不要のときは、更に数量等の確認・修正が必要か否かについて判断され、数量等の確認・修正の必要がない場合は、再検討されない単価精度Ａと判断され、また確認・修正が必要な場合は、再検討される単価精度Ｂと判断され、
単価契約以外で単価修正が必要なときは、単価の相対標準偏差が５％以下か否かについて判断され、
５％以下のときは、再検討されない単価精度Ｃと判断される、ことを特徴とする請求項１の発変電機器修繕費用算定支援システム。 When the initial value is automatically calculated by the repair calculation means (21),
About the input unit price and the relative standard deviation of the unit price, it is judged whether the unit price correction is necessary in the unit price contract, and when the unit price correction is unnecessary, it is judged whether further confirmation / correction of the quantity etc. is necessary, If there is no need for confirmation / correction of the quantity, etc., it is determined that the unit price accuracy A is not reviewed, and if confirmation / correction is necessary, it is determined that the unit price accuracy B is reviewed,
When a unit price correction is required outside of the unit price contract, it is determined whether the relative standard deviation of the unit price is 5% or less,
2. The substation equipment repair cost calculation support system according to claim 1, wherein when it is 5% or less, it is determined that the unit price accuracy C is not reconsidered.
入力された単価について、単価の相対標準偏差が５％より大きく１５％以下か否かについて判断され、５％より大きく１５％以下のときは単価精度Ｄと判断され、単価が１００万円未満のときは再検討が不要と判断され、１００万円未満でないときは再検討が必要と判断され、
単価の相対標準偏差が１５％より大きく３５％以下か否かについて判断され、１５％より大きく３５％以下のときは単価精度Ｅと判断され、単価が５０万円未満のときは再検討が不要と判断され、単価が５０万円以上１００万円未満のときは再検討が必要と判断され、
更に、単価が１００万円以上のときは優先的に再検討が必要と判断され、
単価の相対標準偏差が３５％より大きいか否かについて判断され、３５％より大きいときは単価精度Ｆと判断され、単価が２０万円未満のときは再検討が不要と判断され、単価が２０万円以上５０万円未満のときは再検討が必要と判断され、
更に、単価が５０万円以上のときは優先的に再検討が必要と判断される、ことを特徴とする請求項１の発変電機器修繕費用算定支援システム。 When the initial value is automatically calculated by the repair calculation means (21),
For the entered unit price, it is determined whether the relative standard deviation of the unit price is greater than 5% and not more than 15%. If it is greater than 5% and not more than 15%, it is determined as unit price accuracy D, and the unit price is less than 1 million yen Sometimes it is judged that review is unnecessary, and when it is not less than 1 million yen, it is judged that review is necessary,
It is judged whether the relative standard deviation of the unit price is greater than 15% and less than 35%. When the unit price is greater than 15% and less than 35%, it is judged as unit price accuracy E. When the unit price is less than 500,000 yen, reexamination is unnecessary. If the unit price is between 500,000 yen and less than 1 million yen,
Furthermore, when the unit price is 1 million yen or more, it is determined that a re-examination is necessary,
It is determined whether or not the relative standard deviation of the unit price is greater than 35%. If it is greater than 35%, it is determined that the unit price accuracy is F. If the unit price is less than 200,000 yen, it is determined that no reexamination is required. When it is more than 10,000 yen and less than 500,000 yen, it is judged that reexamination is necessary,
Furthermore, it is judged that a reconsideration is required preferentially when the unit price is 500,000 yen or more, and the power generation / transformation equipment repair cost calculation support system according to claim 1.
予め、前記発変電器の設備、機器に関する設備・機器情報（１１）と、それらの設備、機器について、過去に実施した点検・修繕に関する単価・単価精度情報（１３）とその点検・修繕に関する点検・修繕情報（１２）が記憶されるデータベース（１０）を作成し、
発変電器の点検・修繕する費用を算定する際に、前記データベース（１０）を参照し、設備・機器の修繕費用について、単価契約で単価修正が必要か否かを判断し、数量等の確認・修正が必要か否かを判断し、次にこれらの単価精度について、単価の相対標準偏差に基づき再検討の要否を判断する初期値を自動算定し、修繕種別の費用構成と単価分類を再検討・修正する箇所と優先順位を明示して表示し、
表示された初期値について、手作業での再検討・修正を行い、その再検討値の妥当性を確認する、ことを特徴とする発変電機器修繕費用算定支援方法。 A method for calculating repair costs for substation equipment that calculates the cost of repairing facilities and equipment of substations and substations provided in substations,
Equipment / equipment information (11) regarding the facilities and equipment of the above-mentioned transformer / substation in advance, unit price / unit price accuracy information (13) regarding inspections / repairs performed in the past, and inspections regarding the inspection / repairs・ Create a database (10) in which repair information (12) is stored,
When calculating costs for inspection and repair of generators and transformers, refer to the database (10) above, determine whether repair costs for facilities and equipment need to be adjusted in the unit price contract, and check the quantity, etc.・ Determine whether or not correction is necessary, and then automatically calculate the initial value for determining the necessity of reexamination based on the relative standard deviation of the unit price for these unit price accuracy, and determine the cost composition and unit price classification of the repair type The part to be reviewed and corrected and the priority order are clearly displayed.
A method for supporting the calculation of repair costs for power generation and substation equipment, characterized in that the displayed initial values are reviewed and corrected manually, and the validity of the reviewed values is confirmed.
前記点検・修繕情報を修繕の実績があるか否かが判断され、実績が無い場合には、個別の算定が必要とされ、実績が有る場合には、単価精度が表示され、
前記単価が個別に単価を計上するものか否かが判断され、計上しない場合には再検討は不要と判断され、
単価を計上する場合には各単価精度に応じて修繕費用の再検討が必要と判断される、ことを特徴とする請求項７の発変電機器修繕費用算定支援方法。 When the initial value is automatically calculated,
It is determined whether or not the inspection / repair information has a track record of repair. If there is no track record, individual calculation is required. If there is a track record, the unit price accuracy is displayed.
It is determined whether or not the unit price individually records the unit price. If it is not recorded, it is determined that the review is unnecessary,
8. The method for calculating repair costs for substation equipment according to claim 7, wherein it is determined that the repair cost needs to be reexamined according to the accuracy of each unit price.
前記修繕種別ごとの単価精度について、単価契約で単価修正が必要か否かについて判断され、単価修正が不要のときは、更に数量等の確認・修正が必要か否かについて判断され、数量等の確認・修正の必要がない場合は、再検討されない単価精度Ａと判断され、また確認・修正が必要な場合は、再検討する単価精度Ｂと判断され、
単価契約以外で単価修正が必要なときは、単価の相対標準偏差が５％以下か否かについて判断され、
５％以下のときは、再検討しない単価精度Ｃと判断される、ことを特徴とする請求項７の発変電機器修繕費用算定支援方法。 When the initial value is automatically calculated,
About the unit price accuracy for each repair type, it is determined whether or not the unit price correction is necessary in the unit price contract. When the unit price correction is not necessary, it is determined whether or not the quantity confirmation / correction is necessary. If confirmation / correction is not required, it is determined that unit price accuracy A is not reviewed, and if confirmation / correction is necessary, unit price accuracy B is determined to be reviewed,
When a unit price correction is required outside of the unit price contract, it is determined whether the relative standard deviation of the unit price is 5% or less,
8. The substation equipment repair cost calculation support method according to claim 7, wherein when it is 5% or less, it is determined that the unit price accuracy C is not reconsidered.
前記修繕種別ごとの単価精度について、単価の相対標準偏差が５％より大きく１５％以下か否かについて判断され、５％より大きく１５％以下のときは単価精度Ｄと判断し、単価が１００万円未満のときは再検討が不要と判断され、１００万円未満でないときは再検討が必要と判断され、
単価の相対標準偏差が１５％より大きく３５％以下か否かについて判断され、１５％より大きく３５％以下のときは単価精度Ｅと判断され、単価が５０万円未満のときは再検討が不要と判断され、単価が５０万円以上１００万円未満のときは再検討が必要と判断され、
更に、単価が１００万円以上のときは優先的に再検討が必要と判断され、
単価の相対標準偏差が３５％より大きいか否かについて判断され、３５％より大きいときは単価精度Ｆと判断され、単価が２０万円未満のときは再検討が不要と判断され、単価が２０万円以上５０万円未満のときは再検討が必要と判断され、
更に、単価が５０万円以上のときは優先的に再検討が必要と判断される、ことを特徴とする請求項７の発変電機器修繕費用算定支援システム。 When the initial value is automatically calculated,
With respect to the unit price accuracy for each repair type, it is determined whether the relative standard deviation of the unit price is greater than 5% and 15% or less. If the relative standard deviation is greater than 5% and less than 15%, it is determined as unit price accuracy D, and the unit price is 1 million. If it is less than JPY, it is determined that no review is required. If it is not less than 1 million JPY, it is determined that review is necessary.
It is judged whether the relative standard deviation of the unit price is greater than 15% and less than 35%. When the unit price is greater than 15% and less than 35%, it is judged as unit price accuracy E. When the unit price is less than 500,000 yen, reexamination is unnecessary. If the unit price is between 500,000 yen and less than 1 million yen,
Furthermore, when the unit price is 1 million yen or more, it is determined that a re-examination is necessary,
It is determined whether or not the relative standard deviation of the unit price is greater than 35%. If it is greater than 35%, it is determined that the unit price accuracy is F. If the unit price is less than 200,000 yen, it is determined that no reexamination is required. When it is more than 10,000 yen and less than 500,000 yen, it is judged that reexamination is necessary,
Furthermore, when the unit price is 500,000 yen or more, it is determined that the reconsideration is preferentially performed, and the system for calculating repair costs for power generation and transformation equipment according to claim 7 is characterized.
費用算定外の計画については、表示しない、ことを特徴とする請求項７の発変電機器修繕費用算定支援方法。 When the initial value is automatically calculated,
The method for supporting the calculation of repair costs for substation equipment according to claim 7, wherein plans that are not calculated are not displayed.
停電等の条件により、打合せ・試充電等の間接項目を追加する、ことを特徴とする請求項７の発変電機器修繕費用算定支援方法。 When the initial value is automatically calculated,
The method for supporting the calculation of repair costs for substation equipment according to claim 7, wherein indirect items such as meetings and trial charging are added according to conditions such as a power failure.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2011145627A JP2013012133A (en) | 2011-06-30 | 2011-06-30 | Calculation support system for repair cost of generator and transformer and calculation support method for the same |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2011145627A JP2013012133A (en) | 2011-06-30 | 2011-06-30 | Calculation support system for repair cost of generator and transformer and calculation support method for the same |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2013012133A true JP2013012133A (en) | 2013-01-17 |
Family
ID=47685943
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2011145627A Withdrawn JP2013012133A (en) | 2011-06-30 | 2011-06-30 | Calculation support system for repair cost of generator and transformer and calculation support method for the same |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP2013012133A (en) |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106651151A (en) * | 2016-12-05 | 2017-05-10 | 国网山东省电力公司日照供电公司 | Post-evaluation method for electric energy substitute item |
| CN114819417A (en) * | 2022-06-28 | 2022-07-29 | 北京航空航天大学 | Aero-engine overhaul cost prediction method and system based on correlation between costs |
-
2011
- 2011-06-30 JP JP2011145627A patent/JP2013012133A/en not_active Withdrawn
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106651151A (en) * | 2016-12-05 | 2017-05-10 | 国网山东省电力公司日照供电公司 | Post-evaluation method for electric energy substitute item |
| CN114819417A (en) * | 2022-06-28 | 2022-07-29 | 北京航空航天大学 | Aero-engine overhaul cost prediction method and system based on correlation between costs |
| CN114819417B (en) * | 2022-06-28 | 2022-09-16 | 北京航空航天大学 | Aero-engine overhaul cost prediction method and system based on correlation between costs |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US8423397B2 (en) | Asset management systems and methods | |
| JP3968039B2 (en) | Maintenance planning support method and apparatus | |
| US8639646B1 (en) | System to build, analyze and manage a computer generated risk assessment model and perform layer of protection analysis using a real world model in software of a safety instrumented system architecture | |
| JP2010073121A (en) | Repair work schedule preparation method and repair work schedule preparation system for plant equipment | |
| JP5171715B2 (en) | Power generation equipment inspection and power failure plan support system and plan support method thereof | |
| JP5868688B2 (en) | Substation equipment repair plan support system and repair plan support method thereof | |
| JP5398271B2 (en) | Design evaluation support system and design evaluation support method for substation equipment system | |
| JP2013012133A (en) | Calculation support system for repair cost of generator and transformer and calculation support method for the same | |
| Mahmoudi et al. | A maintenance optimzation policy for an electric power distribution system: case of the HV/MV substations | |
| JP2014026403A (en) | Repair plan support system for power station/substation equipment, and repair plan support system for power station/substation equipment | |
| Swe et al. | Maintenance Management Plan of Heavy Machinery | |
| Rahman et al. | Using QFD and FMEA to improve maintenance effectiveness in a petroleum refinery | |
| Joe et al. | Developing a strategy for full nuclear plant modernization | |
| JP5084774B2 (en) | Screen operation method for power transformer inspection and power outage plan support processing | |
| Lucke | Start-up and performance test | |
| Al Issa et al. | Databases Case Study in Substantiation of Reconstruction of Power Distribution Networks Objects | |
| Volos et al. | NPP MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR RISK MANAGEMENT: THE CASE OF RUSSIA | |
| Utami et al. | Six sigma implementation in production process in electronic company Malaysia | |
| JP2005130658A (en) | Programming system and method for supply power purchase | |
| Paulsen et al. | Information flow in a decision support system for maintenance planning | |
| Yong et al. | Development and application of an off-site maintenance system in the petrochemical industry | |
| Hafkamp et al. | Designing and implementing a maintenance management system with an expert support system: methodology, implementation, expert IT-system, achieved cost reductions | |
| Ho | Challenges of Adopting Knowledge-based Building Information Modeling for E & M Asset Management Supplemented with Mobile Solutions–A Case Study in Public Sewage Pumping Facilities | |
| JP2022161779A (en) | Business method obtained by combining cost burden in periodical maintenance inspection and load test of emergency generator with cost reduction in switching to new power source | |
| Van Houtte et al. | ITER RAMI analysis program |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A300 | Application deemed to be withdrawn because no request for examination was validly filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A300 Effective date: 20140902 |