JP2012256255A - Evaluation device, evaluation method and program - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an evaluation device capable of outputting an evaluation on an evaluation object performed by multiple evaluators after optimizing it in consideration of attributes of each evaluator.SOLUTION: The evaluation device includes: an evaluation information storage part 11 for storing multiple pieces of evaluation information each of which includes an item evaluation value which is a value indicating a result of each evaluation on one or more evaluation items for one or more evaluation objects performed by multiple evaluators, and evaluator attribute information which is information indicating attributes of each evaluator who has performed the evaluation; an attribute weighting storage part 13 for storing attribute weighting information having the evaluator attribute information and weighting values which are values used for weighting each attribute; an overall evaluation value acquisition part 16 for weighting item evaluation values included in one or more pieces of evaluation information by using the weighting values stored in the attribute weighting storage part 13 in association with the evaluator attribute information included in the evaluation information and acquiring an overall evaluation value which is an evaluation value of each evaluation object as a whole; and an output part 17 for outputting the overall evaluation value.

Description

  The present invention relates to an evaluation apparatus for evaluating an evaluation object.

  In the conventional evaluation system, the average value and standard deviation of personnel evaluation scores over multiple periods can be evaluated in consideration of their relative weights, and the trend coefficient indicating the tendency of changes in personnel evaluation scores is considered. What can be evaluated is known. (For example, refer to Patent Document 1).

JP 2004-70433 A (first page, FIG. 1 etc.)

  However, in the conventional evaluation apparatus, there is a problem that the evaluation on the evaluation object cannot be optimized in consideration of the attribute of the evaluator who performed the evaluation.

  The evaluation apparatus according to the present invention includes an item evaluation value that is a value indicating an evaluation result of one or more evaluation items performed by a plurality of evaluators for one or more evaluation targets, and each evaluator who performed the evaluation. Attribute information having a plurality of evaluation information, each of which includes information indicating the attribute of the evaluation information storage unit, the evaluator attribute information, and a weight value that is a value used for weighting The attribute-by-attribute weighting storage unit storing weighting information and the item evaluation value included in one or more evaluation information are associated with the evaluator attribute information included in the evaluation information and stored in the attribute-by-attribute weighting storage unit. An evaluation apparatus comprising a global evaluation value acquisition unit that performs weighting using a weighting value and acquires an overall evaluation value that is an evaluation value of the entire evaluation object for each evaluation object, and an output unit that outputs the overall evaluation value In .

  With this configuration, it is possible to optimize and output the evaluations performed by the plurality of evaluators on the evaluation target in consideration of the attributes and the like of each evaluator.

  Moreover, the evaluation apparatus of the present invention further includes an item-by-item weight storage unit in which an item weight value, which is one or more weight values used for weighting an item evaluation value corresponding to each evaluation item, is stored in the evaluation apparatus. The overall evaluation value acquisition unit is an evaluation device that further weights an item evaluation value included in one or more pieces of evaluation information with an item weighting value corresponding to an evaluation item corresponding to the item evaluation value, and acquires an overall evaluation value. is there.

  With this configuration, the item evaluation value for each evaluation item can be weighted and output for the evaluation item.

  In the evaluation apparatus according to the present invention, in the evaluation apparatus, the evaluation information further includes evaluation period information that is information on a period to be evaluated, and the overall evaluation value acquisition unit performs an evaluation period for each evaluation object. The evaluation apparatus calculates an overall evaluation value for each period indicated by the information, and adds the overall evaluation value for each calculated period according to the ratio of each period to obtain the overall evaluation value.

  With this configuration, it is possible to appropriately add the overall evaluation values having different evaluation target periods and obtain the overall evaluation values throughout the entire period.

  The evaluation apparatus according to the present invention is the evaluation apparatus, wherein the evaluation information further includes evaluation object attribute information that is information indicating an attribute of the evaluation object, and the item weighting includes evaluation object attribute information and an item weighting value. A weighted storage unit for each item that stores management information is further provided, and the overall evaluation value acquisition unit associates an item evaluation value included in one or more pieces of evaluation information with evaluation target attribute information included in the evaluation information. It is an evaluation device that obtains an overall evaluation value by further weighting with an item weighting value.

  With this configuration, it is possible to obtain an appropriate overall evaluation value for the evaluation target by weighting the item evaluation value with the item weighting value corresponding to the evaluation target.

  In the evaluation apparatus according to the present invention, in the evaluation apparatus, the evaluation information further includes attribute period information that is information of a period in which the evaluation target attribute information is constant, and the overall evaluation value acquisition unit is provided for each evaluation target. In addition, the evaluation apparatus calculates an overall evaluation value for each period indicated by the attribute period information, and adds the overall evaluation value for each calculated period according to the ratio of each period to obtain the overall evaluation value.

  With this configuration, the overall evaluation value can be acquired in consideration of the change in the attribute of the evaluation target within the period that is the target of evaluation.

  Further, the evaluation device of the present invention is the evaluation device, wherein the evaluation item has a hierarchical structure of two or more layers, node identification information for identifying one node of the evaluation item hierarchy, an item weighting value, And an item-by-item weight storage unit for storing item weight management information, and the overall evaluation value acquisition unit corresponds to the node identification information of each node to which the evaluation item corresponding to the item evaluation value belongs. It is an evaluation device that obtains the overall evaluation value by weighting with the assigned item weighting value.

  With this configuration, the overall evaluation value can be obtained by weighting the item evaluation value according to the hierarchical structure of the evaluation item, and an appropriate overall evaluation value can be obtained.

  In the evaluation apparatus according to the present invention, in the evaluation apparatus, the evaluation item has a hierarchical structure of two or more hierarchies, and the evaluation information further includes evaluation target period information that is information on a period related to the evaluation target. A first level node of the evaluation item, an item weight value that is a weight value used for weighting the item evaluation value corresponding to the node of the first level, and period designation information that is information for designating a period related to the evaluation target A weighted storage unit for each period in which the weighted management information for each period is stored, and the overall evaluation value acquisition unit indicates the period indicated by the period designation information of the weighted management information for each period in the evaluation information It is an evaluation device that determines whether or not and uses the item weighting value associated with the period designation information according to the determination result to acquire the overall evaluation value.

  With this configuration, it is possible to change the weight of one node in the first hierarchy according to the evaluation target period information.

  In the evaluation apparatus of the present invention, in the evaluation apparatus, the item evaluation value and the overall evaluation value are values indicating personnel evaluation for the employee to be evaluated, and the evaluator attribute information identifies the position of the evaluator. Information that identifies the job title, and information that indicates the hierarchical relationship between the evaluator and the evaluation target. The employee identification information that is the employee identification information that is hierarchized to indicate the employee's hierarchical relationship, and the job title of the employee A personnel database in which personnel information having position identification information that is identification information is stored, an evaluation related reception unit that receives evaluation related information including evaluator identification information and evaluation target identification information, and an evaluation related reception unit An evaluation information acquisition unit that acquires evaluator attribute information from the personnel database using the received evaluation related information and accumulates evaluation information including the evaluator attribute information in the evaluation information storage unit is updated. An evaluation device equipped.

  With this configuration, evaluation information including evaluator attribute information can be acquired from evaluation-related information including evaluator identification information and evaluation target identification information.

  In the evaluation apparatus of the present invention, in the evaluation apparatus, the item evaluation value and the overall evaluation value are values indicating personnel evaluations for the employee to be evaluated, and the employees are hierarchized to indicate the hierarchical relationship of the employees HR database that stores personnel information including employee identification information that is identification information of the employee and position identification information that is information that identifies the position of the employee, and evaluation that receives evaluation object identification information that is identification information of the evaluation object Acquire one or more employee identification information corresponding to the evaluation target identification information received by the evaluation target identification information receiving unit as evaluator identification information that is the evaluator identification information according to the target identification information reception unit and a rule specified in advance. An evaluation apparatus further comprising: an evaluator identification information acquisition unit that performs an evaluator identification information output unit that outputs the evaluator identification information acquired by the evaluator identification information acquisition unit

  With this configuration, an evaluator who evaluates an evaluation target can be automatically selected from the personnel database.

  In the evaluation apparatus of the present invention, in the evaluation apparatus, the item evaluation value and the overall evaluation value are values indicating personnel evaluations for the employee to be evaluated, and the employees are hierarchized to indicate the hierarchical relationship of the employees Personnel database storing personnel information including employee identification information that is employee identification information, position identification information that is information identifying the position of the employee, and work-related information that is information related to the work of the employee, and personnel information The evaluator detection unit that detects one or more employee identification information as the evaluator identification information, and one or more corresponding to the evaluator identification information detected by the evaluator detection unit from the personnel information according to a rule specified in advance. Acquire employee identification information as evaluation target identification information, acquire business-related information corresponding to evaluation target identification information from personnel information, and send it to the destination corresponding to the evaluator identification information And personnel information transmitting unit that is a further evaluation device equipped with.

  With this configuration, the evaluator is automatically detected from the personnel database, the evaluation target to be evaluated by this evaluator is automatically selected, and the work-related information of the selected evaluator is transmitted to the corresponding evaluator. Can do.

  According to the evaluation apparatus and the like according to the present invention, it is possible to optimize and output evaluations performed by a plurality of evaluators on an evaluation target in consideration of attributes and the like of each evaluator.

The block diagram of the evaluation apparatus in Embodiment 1 of this invention Flow chart showing operation of the evaluation apparatus Flow chart showing operation of the evaluation apparatus Flow chart showing operation of the evaluation apparatus The figure which shows an example of the item evaluation management information of the evaluation apparatus The figure which shows the evaluation content information of the evaluation apparatus The figure which shows an example of the evaluator management information of the evaluation apparatus Schematic diagram showing the hierarchical structure of the evaluation items of the evaluation device The figure which shows an example of the hierarchy information of the evaluation apparatus The figure which shows the item weighting management information of the evaluation apparatus The figure which shows the weighting information according to attribute of the evaluation apparatus The figure which shows the weighting management information according to period of the evaluation apparatus The figure which shows the evaluation value management information according to evaluator of the evaluation apparatus The figure which shows the output example of the same evaluation device The block diagram which shows the structure of the evaluation apparatus in Embodiment 2 of this invention. Flow chart showing operation of the evaluation apparatus The figure which shows the figure which shows the personnel information of the evaluation apparatus Diagram showing personnel hierarchy information of the evaluation device Schematic diagram showing the employee hierarchy of the evaluation device The figure which shows the evaluation related information of the evaluation apparatus The figure which shows an example of the external appearance of the computer system in each embodiment of this invention The figure which shows an example of a structure of the computer system

  Hereinafter, embodiments of an evaluation apparatus and the like will be described with reference to the drawings. In addition, since the component which attached | subjected the same code | symbol in embodiment performs the same operation | movement, description may be abbreviate | omitted again.

(Embodiment 1)
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an evaluation apparatus 1 in the present embodiment.
The evaluation device 1 includes an evaluation information storage unit 11, a hierarchy information storage unit 12, an item weight storage unit 14, a period weight storage unit 15, an attribute weight storage unit 13, an overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16, and an output unit 17. ing.

  The evaluation information storage unit 11 stores a plurality of evaluation information. The plurality of pieces of evaluation information stored in the evaluation information storage unit 11 includes an item evaluation value indicating an evaluation result of one or more evaluation items performed by each of a plurality of evaluators on one or more evaluation targets, and an evaluation. Evaluator attribute information indicating the attributes of each performed evaluator. Each evaluation information obtained for one evaluation object is evaluated with, for example, an item evaluation value indicating a result of each of two or more different evaluators evaluating one evaluation object for one or more evaluation items. Evaluator attribute information indicating the attributes of each evaluator. For example, a plurality of pieces of evaluation information obtained for one evaluation object is evaluation information having different evaluator attribute information. However, when there is a possibility that the evaluator attribute information for different evaluators may match, the evaluation information is the evaluator's identification information so that the evaluation information including the evaluation result evaluated by each evaluator can be identified. Some evaluator identification information may be included. The evaluation information storage unit 11 may include evaluation information for a plurality of evaluation targets.

  The evaluation target is an evaluation target, and is, for example, an object, a person, an event, or the like. For example, the evaluation target may be an employee or a staff member belonging to a company or a public institution. The evaluation target may be anything as long as it can be evaluated. Evaluation means judging the value of an evaluation target. The evaluation here is, for example, a determination that finally obtains a result that can be quantified. An evaluation item is an item to be evaluated, and is associated with the content to be evaluated, for example. The evaluation item itself may represent the content to be evaluated. When evaluation information for a plurality of evaluation objects is stored in the evaluation information storage unit 11, the evaluation object identification information that is identification information of the evaluation object can be identified so that the evaluation information is the evaluation information about which evaluation object. Is preferably included.

  The item evaluation value is a value indicating an evaluation result for each item which is performed for each of one or more evaluation items by the evaluator. The item evaluation value is a numerical value indicating the evaluation result, for example. However, the item evaluation value only needs to be information that can be numerically converted as a result. For example, “good”, “bad”, and “A evaluation” associated with numerical values prepared in advance are used. , “B evaluation” or other character string information. The item evaluation value is preferably associated with the evaluation item. Therefore, for example, the evaluation information may include item identification information that is identification information of an evaluation item associated with each item evaluation value.

  An evaluator is a person who has evaluated an evaluation target. For example, if the evaluation target is an employee or an employee belonging to a company, a public organization, or the like, the evaluator is a senior or manager of the employee or the employee who is the evaluation target. The evaluator attribute information is information indicating the evaluator's attributes. The evaluator attribute is, for example, an attribute related to the evaluation performed by the evaluator. For example, the evaluator attribute information may be information indicating the position of the evaluator. The post described here is a concept including, for example, employee responsibilities, grades, ranks, categories, and the like. Also, the evaluator attribute information may be an evaluator identifier (for example, name, ID, etc.). The evaluator attribute information may be information indicating an experience amount (for example, years of service) related to the evaluation contents of the evaluator. The evaluator attribute information may be an attribute indicating the relationship between the evaluator and the evaluation target, for example. For example, the evaluator attribute information may be information indicating whether or not the evaluator is a direct supervisor of the evaluation target, or information indicating whether or not the evaluation target is a superior supervisor. Further, it may be information indicating whether the evaluator and the evaluation target are the same section, department, or group employee. Alternatively, the evaluator attribute information may be information that can be used to determine these attributes. The evaluator attribute information may include information indicating a plurality of attributes among the information indicating attributes as described above, or may include only one. The evaluator attribute information may include, for example, position identification information for identifying the evaluator's position as described above. The evaluator attribute information may include, for example, hierarchical relationship information that is information indicating the hierarchical relationship between the evaluator and the evaluation target person.

  An evaluation item used for evaluation of an evaluation target may have a hierarchical structure of two or more levels. The two hierarchies described here are the number of hierarchies in a case where a route including the entire so-called evaluation item is not counted as a hierarchy. The fact that the evaluation items have a hierarchical structure may be considered that the evaluation items are nested. Each evaluation item corresponds to one node such as a tree structure indicating a hierarchical structure. A node is, for example, a node or vertex of a hierarchical structure. Each evaluation item is associated with the lowest node in the case where, for example, the nodes connected by links are sequentially traced down the hierarchy from the root. The node itself may be considered as an evaluation item. The position (hierarchy) in the hierarchical structure of each evaluation item is specified by, for example, hierarchical information stored in the hierarchical information storage unit 12 described later. Hierarchical information is information indicating the position of the evaluation item in the hierarchical structure. For example, the hierarchy information includes item identification information of an evaluation item and hierarchy designation information that is information indicating a path traced from the root to a node corresponding to the evaluation item. The path is indicated by a node that passes from the root until reaching the node corresponding to the evaluation item. For example, when each node included in the hierarchical structure is represented by node identification information indicated by a combination of “alphabet” and “number” such as “N1”, “N2”, etc., from the root to one evaluation item Assuming that the node N1 and the node N11 are passed before reaching the corresponding node N111, the hierarchical information corresponding to the evaluation item is represented by “/ N1 / N11 / N111”. Note that the hierarchy information may be information indicating a link relationship between nodes. The link relationship may be considered as a parent-child relationship. For example, if the node N11 is a directly subordinate node (child node) of the node N1, and the node N111 is a subordinate node (child node) of the node N11, the hierarchical information is the node N1. Information having node N11, information having node N11 and node N111, information having node N111 and evaluation item, and information having item identification information which is identification information of node 111 and evaluation item. May be.

  The evaluation information may further include evaluation period information that is information on a period to be evaluated. Evaluation period information is information which shows the period used as evaluation object of evaluation, for example. The information indicating the period here is, for example, information including information indicating the start date and end date of the period, information indicating the start date or end date of the period, the length of the period (for example, the number of days), and the like. Or the information which shows the day and month which comprise a period may be sufficient. Here, a start month or an end month may be used instead of the start date or the end date. Alternatively, the information indicating the period here may be identification information of a period such as the first period, the second period, the upper quarter, or the lower quarter.

  The evaluation information may further include evaluation target attribute information that is information indicating the evaluation target attribute. Since the evaluation target attribute information is the same information as the evaluator attribute information except that the attribute target is not the evaluator but the evaluation target, description thereof is omitted here.

  Further, when the evaluation information includes evaluation target attribute information, the evaluation information may further include attribute period information that is information of a period during which the evaluation target attribute information is constant. For example, it may be considered as information indicating a period during which the evaluation target attribute information included in the evaluation information is valid. This evaluation target attribute information is the same information as the evaluation period information described above.

  The evaluation information may further include evaluation target period information that is information on a period related to the evaluation target. The evaluation target period information is, for example, information indicating whether the evaluation information is information acquired when the evaluation target is in what period. The evaluation target period information may be information indicating a period after the evaluation target becomes the evaluation target, for example. The evaluation target period information is, for example, information indicating that the elapsed time since the employee who is the evaluation target has joined the company is three months, or information indicating that the elapsed time is less than three years. The evaluation target period information may be information indicating the same period as the above evaluation period information (for example, the elapsed time since joining the company, 4 months, etc.), or the period related to the evaluation target may be any category. It may be information (for example, less than one year after entering the company, etc.) indicating whether or not the current period.

  The storage here is a concept including temporary storage. The evaluation information storage unit 11 is preferably a non-volatile recording medium, but can also be realized by a volatile recording medium.

  The hierarchy information storage unit 12 stores hierarchy information that is information indicating the position of each evaluation item in evaluation items having a hierarchical structure. The hierarchy information is information including node identification information of a node corresponding to each evaluation item in the hierarchy structure, for example. In the hierarchy information storage unit 12, for example, as described above, a hierarchy having item identification information of an evaluation item and hierarchy designation information which is information indicating a path traced from the root to a node corresponding to the evaluation item Information is stored. Further, the hierarchy information includes, for example, node identification information of the node corresponding to the evaluation item. However, hierarchical information other than this hierarchical information may be stored as long as the information can indicate the position of each evaluation item in the hierarchical structure. The hierarchical information storage unit 12 is preferably a non-volatile recording medium, but can also be realized by a volatile recording medium.

  The attribute-by-attribute weight storage unit 13 stores one or more attribute-by-attribute weighting information. The attribute-specific weighting information includes evaluator attribute information and a weighting value that is a value used for weighting. The weighting value here is, for example, an item evaluation corresponding to one evaluator attribute information when obtaining an overall evaluation value described later from an item evaluation value included in the evaluation information associated with the evaluator attribute information. It is a weighting value used when weighting a value obtained using the value. The weighting value is, for example, a coefficient for weighting. For example, you may think that it is a value for weighting the value which shows the evaluation result of one evaluator.

  The attribute-specific weight storage unit 13 is preferably a non-volatile recording medium, but can also be realized by a volatile recording medium.

  The item-by-item weighting storage unit 14 stores one or more item weighting values. The item weighting value is one or more weighting values used for weighting the item evaluation value corresponding to each evaluation item. The item weighting value is a coefficient for weighting, for example. The item weighting value is stored in association with the evaluation item, for example. The item weighting value does not necessarily have to be used to directly weight the corresponding item evaluation value. For example, a pre-designated calculation result performed using information including one item evaluation value may be weighted using an item weighting value corresponding to this one item evaluation value. Considering that one item evaluation value is weighted, it may be considered that one item evaluation value is weighted. The item-by-item weighting storage unit 14 includes, for example, one or more item weighting management information including the item identification information described above and an item weighting value used for weighting an item evaluation value for the evaluation item indicated by the item identification information. Stored. Here, this item weight management information is referred to as first item weight management information.

  Moreover, when the evaluation information mentioned above has evaluation object attribute information, even if one or more item weight management information which has evaluation object attribute information and an item weight value is stored in the item weighting storage part 14, Good. This item weight management information preferably further includes item identification information corresponding to the item evaluation value weighted by each item weight value. This item weighting management information is for, for example, using different item weighting values depending on the attributes to be evaluated. Here, this item weighting management information is referred to as second item weighting management information.

  When the evaluation item has a hierarchical structure, the item-by-item weighting storage unit 14 includes, in place of the above item weighting management information, node identification information for identifying one node of the evaluation item hierarchy, an item weighting value, , One or more item weighting management information may be stored. Here, this item weighting management information is referred to as third item weighting management information.

  The period-specific weight storage unit 15 includes a first-level node of evaluation items having a hierarchical structure, an item weight value that is a weight value used for weighting an item evaluation value corresponding to the first-level node, Period-by-period weighting management information having period designation information that is information for designating a period related to the evaluation target is stored. Here, the first layer node may be considered as node identification information of the first layer node. Here, the first hierarchy in the node is assumed to be a node immediately below the root. An item evaluation value corresponding to a node in the first hierarchy is an item evaluation value corresponding to an evaluation item corresponding to a node in a hierarchy immediately below the node in the first hierarchy. The period designation information may be considered as a condition for determining whether or not to apply a corresponding item weighting value to weighting. The period-by-period weighting storage unit 15 may have a plurality of period-by-period weighting management information having a common first layer node and different periods indicated by the period designation information. If the evaluation item does not have a hierarchical structure, the period-by-period weighting storage unit 15 may be omitted.

  The period-specific weight storage 15 is preferably a non-volatile recording medium, but can also be realized by a volatile recording medium.

  The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 uses the weight values stored in the attribute-specific weight storage unit 13 in association with the item evaluation values included in the one or more pieces of evaluation information and the evaluator attribute information included in the evaluation information. The overall evaluation value is obtained for each evaluation target. The overall evaluation value is an evaluation value of the entire evaluation target. The overall evaluation value is not an item evaluation value for each evaluation item for one evaluation object, but an evaluation value obtained by evaluating one evaluation object as a whole. The overall evaluation value may be considered as an evaluation value obtained by comprehensively evaluating one evaluation object, that is, a comprehensive evaluation value.

  The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 uses, for example, item evaluation values included in the evaluation information for one or more evaluation objects among the evaluation information stored in the evaluation information storage unit 11 for each of a plurality of evaluators. In addition, an evaluation value for each of the one or more evaluation objects is acquired. This evaluation value is referred to herein as an evaluator-specific evaluation value. Then, the weighting value corresponding to the evaluator attribute information of each evaluator is read from the attribute weighting information stored in the attribute-specific weighting storage unit 14 and corresponding to each evaluator attribute information using the read weighting value. The entire evaluation result by a plurality of evaluators with respect to the entire evaluation target by weighting the obtained evaluation value for each evaluator and performing a predetermined calculation using the plurality of weighted evaluation values Get evaluation value.

  Obtaining an evaluation value for each evaluator may mean obtaining an evaluation value for each evaluator attribute information when the evaluator attribute information is different for each evaluator. Alternatively, when the evaluation information includes the evaluator identification information, the evaluation value may be acquired for each evaluator identification information instead of acquiring the evaluation value for each of the plurality of evaluator attribute information.

  For each evaluator, the process of acquiring the evaluation value for each evaluator for one evaluation object is, for example, from the evaluation information corresponding to one evaluation object stored in the evaluation information storage unit 11 to one evaluator. The process is performed by obtaining the associated evaluation information and obtaining the evaluation value using the obtained evaluation information for each evaluator corresponding to the evaluation information corresponding to one evaluation object. The process of obtaining evaluation information associated with one evaluator is performed by, for example, evaluating evaluation information having one evaluator attribute information or evaluation information having one evaluator identification information with respect to one evaluator. This process is acquired from information.

  The calculation designated in advance here is, for example, a calculation for calculating the sum or average (that is, weighted average) of all the weighted evaluation values or two or more numbers specified in advance. Further, the sum or average may be a value obtained by indexing or normalizing by a predetermined calculation. The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 assigns, for example, a weighting value corresponding to the evaluator attribute information of each evaluator and corresponding to the evaluator attribute information that matches (or is included) to the attribute-specific weight storage unit 14. Is obtained from the attribute weighting information stored in. When there are a plurality of evaluator attribute information for each evaluator, for example, a weight value corresponding to each evaluator attribute information may be acquired, or a weight value corresponding to all of the plurality of evaluator attribute information may be acquired. May be. When there are a plurality of weighting values corresponding to one evaluator acquired using the evaluator attribute information, the overall evaluation value acquiring unit 16 uses these weighting values to obtain evaluation values for each evaluator. You may make it weight. For example, only the largest weighting value of a plurality of weighting values may be used. Moreover, you may make it weight using the average value of a some weighting value. Further, weighting may be performed by sequentially using all of the plurality of weighting values. For example, after the evaluator-specific evaluation value is weighted with one weighting value of a plurality of weighting values, the weighted result may be similarly weighted sequentially with the remaining weighting values. As a specific example, a plurality of weighting values may be multiplied by the evaluator-specific evaluation values. The same applies to other item weight value values and the like.

  How the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 acquires the evaluation value for each evaluator using the evaluation information associated with one evaluator acquired from the evaluation information corresponding to one evaluation object Does not matter. For example, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 obtains a value obtained by performing a predetermined operation on one or more item evaluation values included in the evaluation information associated with one evaluator for each evaluator. It may be acquired as an evaluation value. The calculation designated in advance is, for example, a process of adding one or more item evaluation values.

  The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 further weights the item evaluation values included in the one or more pieces of evaluation information with the item weighting values corresponding to the evaluation items corresponding to the item evaluation values, and acquires the overall evaluation values. May be. For example, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 acquires one or more evaluation information associated with each evaluator from the evaluation information corresponding to one evaluation object, and one or more evaluations associated with each evaluator. Each item evaluation value included in the information is further weighted with an item weighting value corresponding to the evaluation item corresponding to each item evaluation value to obtain an evaluation value for each evaluator. Using this evaluation value for each evaluator, The overall evaluation value may be acquired in the same manner as described above.

  For example, as described above, when the item identification information corresponding to the item evaluation value is included in the evaluation information, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 sets the item weighting value corresponding to each item identification information included in the evaluation information. Are read from the first item weighting management information stored in the item-by-item weighting storage unit 14, and the item evaluation value indicated by each item identification information is weighted by the read item weighting value. The evaluation value for each evaluator may be acquired by performing a previously specified calculation on the value in the same manner as described above. Obtaining an item weighting value corresponding to each item identification information means obtaining an item weighting value possessed by the first item weighting management information having the same item identification information as each item identification information. The same applies to the following.

  When evaluation object attribute information is further included in the evaluation information, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 converts the item evaluation value included in one or more evaluation information into the evaluation object attribute information included in the evaluation information. The overall evaluation value may be acquired by further weighting with the associated item weighting value. For example, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 acquires one or more evaluation information associated with each evaluator from the evaluation information corresponding to one evaluation object, and one or more evaluations associated with each evaluator. Each item evaluation value included in the information is further weighted with an item weighting value corresponding to the evaluation item corresponding to each item evaluation value and the evaluation target attribute information included in this evaluation information, and an evaluation value for each evaluator is obtained. Then, using this evaluation value for each evaluator, the overall evaluation value may be acquired in the same manner as described above.

  For example, when evaluation object attribute information is further included in the evaluation information, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 is included in the evaluation information from the second item weight management information corresponding to the evaluation object attribute information included in the evaluation information. The item weighting value corresponding to each item identification information to be read, respectively, with the read item weighting value, the item evaluation value indicated by each item identification information is weighted, and the weighted item evaluation value is similar to the above, An evaluation value for each evaluator is obtained by performing a calculation specified in advance. Then, the overall evaluation value may be acquired using the evaluation value for each evaluator in the same manner as described above.

  When the evaluation item has a hierarchical structure including two or more layers, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 identifies each item evaluation value as the node identification of the node to which the evaluation item corresponding to the item evaluation value belongs. The overall evaluation value may be acquired by weighting with the item weighting value associated with the information. For example, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 acquires one or more evaluation information associated with each evaluator from the evaluation information corresponding to one evaluation object, and one or more evaluations associated with each evaluator. Each item evaluation value included in the information is further weighted with an item weighting value corresponding to the node identification information of the node to which the evaluation item corresponding to each item evaluation value belongs, and an evaluation value for each evaluator is obtained. An overall evaluation value may be acquired using the evaluation value in the same manner as described above. The node to which each evaluation item belongs is one or more of a node corresponding to each evaluation item indicated by the hierarchy information and a node to which this node is subordinate. The node to which each evaluation item belongs may be considered as one or more of a node corresponding to each evaluation item indicated by the hierarchical information and a direct node passing from this node to the root of the hierarchical structure.

  In this case, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 acquires the overall evaluation value as follows, for example. For example, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 evaluates each item evaluation value included in the evaluation information corresponding to one evaluator among the evaluation information corresponding to one evaluation object, corresponding to this item evaluation value. The node identification information of the node to which the item corresponds and the identification information of all the nodes that pass from the root to this node are acquired. Then, the item weight values respectively corresponding to the acquired one or more node identification information are read from the above-described third item weight management information. And each item evaluation value is weighted using the 1 or more item weighting value acquired about each item evaluation value. For example, each weighted item evaluation value is acquired by sequentially multiplying each item evaluation value by one or more item weighting values acquired for each item evaluation value. And the evaluation value according to evaluator by one evaluator about one evaluation object is acquired by adding these. And the evaluation value according to evaluator of another evaluator about the same evaluation object is acquired similarly, and the whole evaluation value is acquired similarly to the above using these evaluation values according to evaluator.

  In this case, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 may acquire the overall evaluation value as follows, for example. If the evaluation item has a hierarchical structure of p layers (p is an integer of 2 or more), the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 includes, for example, the evaluation information corresponding to one evaluation object. In the evaluation information corresponding to one evaluator, the item evaluation value of each evaluation item associated with the node identification information of each node of the p-th hierarchy indicated by the above-described evaluation information, that is, the terminal hierarchy, is described above. Weighting is performed using an item weight value corresponding to the node identification information read from the item weight management information. For example, the item weight value is multiplied. Here, the value obtained by weighting for each node is referred to as a node evaluation value. Next, the node evaluation value of one or more subordinate nodes is added to each node in the hierarchy one level higher than the p hierarchy (p-1 hierarchy), and the node identification of each node is added to the value obtained by the addition. A node evaluation value of each node of the p-1 hierarchy is obtained by weighting with an item weighting value corresponding to the information. The same process is repeated until the node evaluation value of each node of the first hierarchy is obtained while raising the hierarchy one by one, and by adding all the node evaluation values of the first hierarchy, The evaluation value according to the evaluator by one evaluator is acquired. And the evaluation value according to evaluator of another evaluator about the same evaluation object is acquired similarly, and the whole evaluation value is acquired similarly to the above using these evaluation values according to evaluator.

  In addition, when the plurality of pieces of evaluation information stored in the evaluation information storage unit 11 includes evaluation information about a plurality of evaluation objects, the above processing is performed for each evaluation object, and the entire evaluation object What is necessary is just to acquire an evaluation value. Specifically, the evaluation object identification information may be included in the evaluation information, and the above-described process for obtaining the overall evaluation value may be performed for each evaluation information that matches the evaluation object identification information.

  Moreover, although the process which acquires the whole evaluation value performed using each 1st-3rd item weighting management information was demonstrated above, two or more of these 1st-3rd item weighting management information is suitably used. Needless to say, the combined item weighting management information is prepared, and the overall evaluation value may be acquired by appropriately combining the above processing.

  For example, item weight management information including evaluation object identification information, item identification information, and item weight values, which is a combination of first item weight management information and second item weight management information, is prepared in advance. At the same time, the evaluation information includes evaluation object identification information and item identification information corresponding to the item evaluation value, and the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 converts the evaluation object identification information and the item identification information included in the evaluation information. It goes without saying that the associated item weighting value may be read from the item weighting management information and the overall evaluation value may be obtained using the weighting value in the same manner as described above.

  Similarly, for example, item weighting management information including evaluation target identification information, node identification information, and item weighting values, which is a combination of second item weighting management information and third item weighting management information, is prepared in advance. In addition, the evaluation information has evaluation object identification information, and the evaluation items have a hierarchical structure of two or more layers, so that the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 includes evaluation object identification information included in the evaluation information, The item weighting value associated with the node identification information of the node to which the evaluation item belongs may be read from the item weighting management information, and the overall evaluation value may be acquired in the same manner as described above using this weighting value. Needless to say.

  Moreover, when evaluation information has evaluation period information, the whole evaluation value acquisition part 16 calculates a whole evaluation value about each period which evaluation period information shows for every evaluation object, respectively, and calculated every period The overall evaluation values may be added up according to the ratio of each period to obtain the overall evaluation value. For example, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 acquires overall evaluation values for one evaluation object in the same manner as described above using evaluation information with different evaluation period information. Here, let this whole evaluation value be a whole evaluation value for every period. Then, the acquired overall evaluation values are added together at the ratio of the lengths of the periods indicated by the corresponding evaluation period information, thereby obtaining the overall evaluation values. For example, the value of the overall evaluation value for each period obtained for the first period is a, the value of the overall evaluation value for each period obtained for the second period is b, and the length of the first period is If A and the length of the second period are B, the final overall evaluation value is (a × A + b × B) / (A + B).

  Further, when the evaluation information includes attribute period information, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 calculates an overall evaluation value for each period indicated by the attribute period information for each evaluation target, and for each calculated period. These overall evaluation values may be added according to the ratio of each period to obtain the overall evaluation value. For example, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 acquires the overall evaluation value for each period indicated by the attribute period information in the same manner as described above, using evaluation information with different attribute period information for each evaluation target. Then, as in the case of the evaluation period information described above, the acquired overall evaluation values are added together at the ratio of the lengths of the periods indicated by the corresponding attribute period information to obtain the overall evaluation value.

  In the case where the evaluation item has a hierarchical structure of two or more layers, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 weights each period in which the evaluation target period information of the evaluation information is stored in the period weighting storage unit 15. It is determined whether or not the period indicated by the period designation information in the management information is indicated, and an overall evaluation value is acquired using an item weighting value associated with the period designation information according to the determination result. good. For example, when the period indicated by the evaluation target period information of the evaluation information coincides with or is included in the period indicated by the period specifying information, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 indicates that the evaluation target period information indicates the period indicated by the period specifying information. to decide. Further, for example, when a part of the period indicated by the evaluation target period information of the evaluation information is included in the period indicated by the period specifying information, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 sets the evaluation target period information as the period indicated by the period specifying information. May be determined. For example, when the evaluation target period information obtains a determination result that the evaluation target period information indicates the period indicated by the period designation information, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 stores the period weighting management stored in the period weighting storage unit 15. The item weighting value corresponding to this period designation information is acquired from the information, and this is the item weighting value of the node associated with this period designation information, and the item of this node previously stored in the item weighting management information An overall evaluation value is obtained by using as a substitute for the weighting value. The node associated with the period designation information is, for example, a node indicated by the node ID stored in the period-specific weighting management information together with the period designation information. When it is not determined that the evaluation target period information indicates the period indicated by the period designation information, the overall evaluation value is acquired using the item weighting value of this node stored in the item weighting management information in advance. In addition, when the evaluation target period information obtains a determination result that is determined to indicate the period indicated by the period designation information, the period designation information is changed from the period weight management information stored in the period weight storage unit 15. Instead of obtaining the corresponding item weighting value, if the determination result for determining that the evaluation target period information indicates the period indicated by the period designation information is not obtained, the period-specific weight management information is changed to this period designation information. A corresponding item weight value may be acquired.

  In the process in which the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 acquires the overall evaluation value, as long as the same overall evaluation value as described above is obtained as a result, the processing order is changed or the order of operations is changed. Needless to say, such a change may be made, and the process in which such a change is made is considered to be included in the process in which the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 acquires the overall evaluation value.

  The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 can usually be realized by an MPU, a memory, or the like. The processing procedure of the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 is usually realized by software, and the software is recorded in a recording medium such as a ROM. However, it may be realized by hardware (dedicated circuit).

  The output unit 17 outputs the overall evaluation value acquired by the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16. The output here is a concept including display on a display, printing on a printer, transmission to an external device, accumulation in a recording medium, delivery of a processing result to another processing device or another program, and the like. is there. The output unit 17 may or may not include an output device such as a display or a speaker. The output unit 17 can be realized by output device driver software, or output device driver software and an output device.

  Next, operation | movement of the evaluation apparatus 1 is demonstrated using the flowchart of FIG. Here, a case where the evaluation item has a hierarchical structure of two or more levels will be described as an example. The evaluation information includes evaluation target identification information and evaluator identification information.

  (Step S201) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 determines whether to acquire an overall evaluation value. For example, when an instruction to acquire overall evaluation information is received from a reception unit (not shown) or the like, it is determined to acquire an overall evaluation value. If it is determined to acquire, the process proceeds to step S202. If it is determined not to acquire, the process returns to step S201.

  (Step S202) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 substitutes 1 for the value of the counter n.

  (Step S203) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 determines whether or not the plurality of evaluation information stored in the evaluation information storage unit 11 includes the nth evaluation target identification information. If there is, the process proceeds to step S203, and if not, the process proceeds to step S219.

  (Step S204) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 evaluates the evaluation information corresponding to the nth evaluation target identification information from the plurality of evaluation information stored in the evaluation information storage unit 11, that is, the nth evaluation target identification information. The evaluation information having is acquired. The acquired evaluation information is temporarily stored in a storage medium (not shown).

  (Step S205) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 determines whether or not the evaluation information acquired in Step S204 has different evaluation period information. If so, the process proceeds to step S206. If not, the process proceeds to step S215.

  (Step S206) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 substitutes 1 for the value of the counter i.

  (Step S207) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 determines whether or not the i-th evaluation period information is included in the evaluation information acquired in Step S204. If there is, the process proceeds to step S208, and if not, the process proceeds to step S213.

  (Step S208) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 acquires evaluation information having i-th evaluation period information from the evaluation information acquired in step S204. The acquired evaluation information is temporarily stored in a storage medium (not shown).

  (Step S209) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 determines whether there is different attribute period information in the evaluation information acquired in Step S208. If there is, the process proceeds to step S210; otherwise, the process proceeds to step S211.

  (Step S210) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 acquires an evaluation value for evaluation information having different attribute period information. Details of this processing will be described later. Then, the process proceeds to step S212. Here, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 stores the acquired evaluation value in a storage medium or the like (not shown) in association with the i-th evaluation period information, for example.

  (Step S211) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 performs a process of acquiring an evaluation value. The evaluation value acquired here is, for example, an overall evaluation value for each different evaluation period. Details of this processing will be described later. Then, the process proceeds to step S212. Here, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 accumulates the acquired overall evaluation value in a storage medium (not shown) in association with, for example, the i-th evaluation period information.

  (Step S212) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 accumulates the overall evaluation value acquired in the immediately preceding step, for example, in a storage medium (not shown) in association with the i-th evaluation period information, and calculates the value of the counter i. Increment by one. Then, the process returns to step S207.

  (Step S213) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 adds up the overall evaluation values acquired for each evaluation period information according to the ratio of the evaluation periods, and acquires the overall evaluation value.

  (Step S214) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 increments the value of the counter n by 1. Then, the process returns to step S203.

  (Step S215) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 determines whether or not the evaluation information acquired in Step S204 has different attribute period information. If so, the process proceeds to step S216. If not, the process proceeds to step S217.

  (Step S216) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 acquires an evaluation value for evaluation information having different attribute period information. This process is the same as step S210. Then, the process proceeds to step S218.

  (Step S217) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 performs a process of acquiring an evaluation value. This process is the same as step S211. Then, the process proceeds to step S218.

  (Step S218) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 increments the value of the counter n by 1.

  (Step S219) The output unit 17 outputs the overall evaluation value for each processing target acquired by the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16. Then, the process ends.

  Next, details of processing in which the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 of the evaluation apparatus 1 acquires the overall evaluation value will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG. This process corresponds to step S211 and step S217 in FIG.

  (Step S301) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 substitutes 1 for the value of the counter k.

  (Step S <b> 302) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 determines whether or not the k-th evaluator identification information is included in the evaluation information acquired in the immediately preceding upper process. If there is, the process proceeds to step S303, and if not, the process proceeds to step S316.

  (Step S303) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 acquires evaluation information corresponding to the kth evaluator identification information, that is, evaluation information having the kth evaluator identification information from the evaluation information acquired immediately before.

  (Step S304) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 substitutes 1 for the value of the counter j.

  (Step S305) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 determines whether or not the evaluation information acquired in Step S303 includes the jth item evaluation value. If there is, the process proceeds to step S306, and if not, the process proceeds to step S311.

  (Step S306) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 corresponds to each node to which the jth item evaluation value belongs from among the item weighting values corresponding to the evaluation target attribute information included in the evaluation information acquired in the immediately preceding processing step. Get the item weighting value. For example, the item weight value associated with the node identification information is acquired.

  (Step S307) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 determines whether or not the evaluation target period information included in the evaluation information indicates a period indicated by one or more of the period designation information stored in the period-specific weighting management information. to decide. If one or more periods are satisfied, the process proceeds to step S308. If not satisfied, the process proceeds to step S309.

  (Step S308) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 weights each period by identifying the identification information of the first layer node associated with the period designation information determined to indicate the period in Step S307 and the item weighting value. Obtain from information. And the item weight value of the node which the node identification information acquired from the weight management information classified by period among the item weight values acquired by step S306 is updated with the item weight value acquired from the weight management information classified by period. For example, overwrite.

  (Step S309) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 uses the item weight value of each node acquired in Step S306 as the j-th item evaluation value, or the item weight value updated in Step S308. Weight. For example, the j-th item evaluation value is multiplied by all item weight values of each node. The multiplied value is temporarily stored in a storage medium (not shown).

  (Step S310) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 increments the value of the counter j by 1. Then, the process returns to step S305.

  (Step S311) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 adds the weighted item evaluation values acquired in step S309, and acquires the evaluation value for each evaluator.

  (Step S312) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 acquires evaluator attribute information corresponding to the kth evaluator identification information, that is, evaluator attribute information included in the evaluation information including the kth evaluator identification information. To do.

  (Step S313) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 acquires a weighting value corresponding to the evaluator attribute information acquired in Step S312 from the attribute-specific weighting information.

  (Step S314) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 associates the weighting value acquired in step S312 with the evaluation value for each evaluator acquired in step S311 and stores it in a storage medium (not shown).

  (Step S315) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 increments the value of the counter k by 1. Then, the process returns to step S302.

  (Step S316) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 weights each evaluator-specific evaluation value with the weighted value accumulated together with each evaluator-specific evaluation value in step S314. For example, a weight value is multiplied.

  (Step S317) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 acquires an overall evaluation value using the evaluation value for each evaluator weighted in step S316. For example, the average of the evaluation values for each evaluator weighted in step S316 is calculated, and the overall evaluation value is acquired. The acquired overall evaluation value is temporarily stored in a storage medium (not shown). Then, the process returns to the upper process.

  Next, details of processing in which the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 of the evaluation device 1 acquires evaluation values for attribute period information will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG. This process is a process corresponding to step S210 and step S216 of FIG.

  (Step S401) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 increments the value of the counter s by 1.

  (Step S402) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 determines whether or not the s-th attribute period information is included in the evaluation information acquired immediately before in the upper process. If included, the process proceeds to step S403, and if not included, the process proceeds to step S406.

  (Step S403) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 acquires evaluation information corresponding to the s-th attribute period information, that is, evaluation information having the i-th attribute period information.

  (Step S404) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 performs processing for acquiring an evaluation value. This process is the same as the process shown in FIG. The acquired overall evaluation value is stored in a storage medium (not shown) in association with the sth attribute period information.

  (Step S405) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 increments the value of the counter s by 1. Then, the process returns to step S402.

  (Step S406) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 acquires the length of the period indicated by the attribute period information corresponding to the overall evaluation value acquired in Step S404, and the overall evaluation value is the ratio of the length of the acquired period. Add up according to Then, the process returns to the upper process.

  Hereinafter, a specific operation of the evaluation apparatus 1 in the present embodiment will be described. Here, a case will be described in which the evaluator and the evaluation target are employees of the company, and the content of the evaluation is an evaluation of business results and the like.

  FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of item evaluation management information for managing item evaluation values and the like constituting the evaluation information stored in the evaluation information storage unit 11. The item evaluation management information includes items of “evaluation value group ID”, “item ID”, and “evaluation value”. “Evaluation value group ID” is identification information of an evaluation value group. An evaluation value group is a group composed of one or more item evaluation values obtained by an evaluation performed by one evaluator on one evaluation object. The “evaluation value group ID” may be considered as management information for managing one or more item evaluation values obtained by an evaluation performed by one evaluator on one evaluation object. “Item ID” is item identification information of an evaluation item. The “item evaluation value” is an item evaluation value for the table or item indicated by the corresponding “item ID”. Here, the item evaluation value is a value indicating the result of 10-level evaluation for the evaluation item, and the higher the value, the higher the evaluation.

  FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating evaluation content information indicating the content of one or more evaluation items used for evaluation of an evaluation target. The evaluation content information includes an item “item ID” corresponding to the “item ID” in FIG. 5 and an item “evaluation content” which is information indicating the content of the evaluation item. This evaluation content management information is used at the time of evaluation, and is not necessarily provided in the evaluation apparatus 1.

  FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an example of evaluator management information for managing evaluator attribute information and the like constituting the evaluation information stored in the evaluation information storage unit 11. The evaluator management information includes “evaluation value group ID”, “evaluator ID”, “evaluator attribute”, “evaluation target ID”, “evaluation target attribute”, “evaluation period”, and “attribute “Period” and “evaluation target period”. The “evaluation value group ID” is identification information of the evaluation value group, and corresponds to the “evaluation value group ID” in FIG. Here, the evaluator management information may be considered as identification information for managing each record (row) of the evaluator management information. “Evaluator ID” is evaluator identification information of an evaluator who performed evaluation for obtaining the item evaluation value indicated by the corresponding “evaluation value group ID”. Here, the evaluator identification information is, for example, employee identification information (employee ID) such as an employee number of an employee who is an evaluator. “Evaluator attribute” is evaluator attribute information. Here, the “evaluator attribute” further includes items of “position ID” and “hierarchy relation”. “Position ID” is position identification information, and indicates the titles of titles such as “section manager” and “section chief”. “Hierarchy related” is information indicating a hierarchical relationship between the evaluator and the evaluation target. For example, “direct hierarchy difference 1” indicates that the corresponding evaluation target is a hierarchy directly below the corresponding evaluator, and the hierarchy difference is “1”. That is, the evaluation target is directly dependent on the evaluator. “Evaluation target ID” is evaluation target identification information. Here, it is assumed that the evaluation target identification information is employee identification information (employee ID) such as an employee number of an employee to be evaluated, for example. “Evaluation target attribute” is evaluation target attribute information, and here indicates the classification of the employee. The “evaluation period” is evaluation period information, and is indicated, for example, in the range of the evaluation start date and the evaluation end date. The “attribute period” is attribute period information. Here, within the period indicated by the “evaluation period”, the period during which the evaluation target attribute information to be evaluated was the value indicated by the “evaluation target attribute” is started. It shows in the range of the date and the end date. The “evaluation target period” is evaluation target period information. Here, it is assumed that the evaluation target is information indicating a period (month that has passed) since the evaluation target. For example, it is assumed that the evaluation target is information indicating an elapsed period since joining the company. However, the “evaluation target period” is not an essential item. Here, it is assumed that the evaluation information is configured by the item evaluation management information of FIG. 5 and the evaluator management information of FIG.

  In FIG. 7, two records each having “G8” as the “evaluation value group ID” and two records each having “G9” are included. It is assumed that there is a change within one evaluation period, and that the evaluation for this employee is performed collectively for one evaluation period regardless of changes in the attributes of the employee.

  FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram showing a hierarchical structure of the evaluation items shown in FIG. Here, the hierarchical structure of evaluation items is shown as a tree structure. In the figure, the node identification information of each node in the hierarchical structure is shown here by a combination of “N” and “number”. The number of digits in the “number” part indicates the number of hierarchical levels (hierarchy depth) of the node. For example, the node N1 indicates a first layer node, and the node N211 indicates a third layer node. Further, the value indicated by parentheses after each node identification information of the lowest hierarchy is the item identification information of the evaluation item corresponding to the node indicated by each node identification information. Corresponds to “ID”. For example, the node N111 corresponds to an evaluation item whose “item ID” is “E1”.

  FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating an example of the hierarchy information stored in the hierarchy information storage unit 12. The hierarchy information has items of “item ID” and “hierarchy designation information”. The “item ID” is item identification information similar to the “item ID” in FIG. “Hierarchy designation information” is hierarchy designation information indicating the hierarchy relationship of corresponding item identification information. For example, it corresponds to the item identification information indicated by “item ID” from the root in the hierarchy structure as shown in FIG. The path to the attached node is represented using the above-described node identification information (hereinafter referred to as node ID). In “hierarchy designation information”, the expression “node A / node B” means that node A and node B are in a parent-child relationship, and node B is a child of node A (subordinate to node A, or It is a node that is a direct hierarchy of node A). Here, the leftmost “node ID” in the “hierarchy designation information” is the node identification information of the node corresponding to the evaluation item indicated by the “item ID”. Here, the hierarchical structure of evaluation items as shown in FIG. 8 is managed by hierarchical information having such hierarchical designation information.

  FIG. 10 is a diagram showing item weighting management information stored in the item-by-item weighting storage unit 14. This item weighting management information is a combination of the above-described second item weighting management information and third item weighting management information. The item weighting management information includes items of “evaluation target attribute”, “node ID”, and “item weighting value”. The “evaluation target attribute” is evaluation target attribute information and corresponds to the “evaluation target attribute” in FIG. “Node ID” is node identification information in the hierarchical structure of evaluation items, and corresponds to the node ID of “hierarchy designation information” in FIG. The “item weighting value” is an item weighting value. By this item weighting management information, the item weighting value is managed in association with each node of evaluation items having a hierarchical structure and evaluation target attribute information to be evaluated.

  FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating the attribute-specific weighting information stored in the attribute-specific weight storage unit 13. The attribute-specific weighting information has items of “attribute type”, “evaluator attribute”, and “weighting value”. The “attribute type” is information indicating the type of the evaluator attribute. Here, for example, as illustrated in FIG. 7, the “evaluator attribute” includes an item “position ID” and “hierarchy related”. Since the item has an attribute value, the value of the “attribute type” is one of two values “position ID” and “hierarchy related”. The “evaluator attribute” is evaluator attribute information, and here corresponds to the values of the item “position ID” and the item “hierarchy related” in the “evaluator attribute” of FIG. 5. The “weighting value” is a weighting value corresponding to the evaluator attribute identification information.

  FIG. 12 is a diagram showing period-by-period weight management information stored in the period-by-period weight storage unit 15. The period-by-period weighting management information includes “period designation”, “node ID”, and “item weighting value”. “Period designation” is period designation information, and here, the period elapsed since the employee joined the company is expressed in months. “Node ID” is a node ID. The “item weighting value” is an item weighting value applied to the node indicated by the “node ID”.

  First, it is assumed that the user gives an instruction for obtaining an overall evaluation to the evaluation apparatus 1 using the evaluation information stored in the evaluation information storage unit 11 via an input unit (not shown).

  First, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 detects “B1001” that is one “evaluation target ID” from the value of the “evaluation target ID” of the evaluator management information illustrated in FIG. 7. Then, from this evaluator management information, a record (column) whose value of “evaluation target ID” is “B1001” is read out to a storage medium such as a memory (not shown). For example, the records from the top to the third column in FIG. 7 are read. Further, the “evaluation value group ID” values “G1”, “G2”, and “G3” of each read record are acquired, and the value of the “evaluation value group ID” is obtained from the item evaluation value management information shown in FIG. However, the record that matches the values “G1”, “G2”, and “G3” acquired here is read out to a storage medium such as a memory (not shown).

  Next, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 determines whether or not the “evaluation period” values of the read records match. That is, it is determined whether or not the read evaluation information has different evaluation period information. Here, since the values of the “evaluation period” of the records from the top to the third column in FIG. 7 match, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 determines that the values of the “evaluation period” match. That is, it is determined that the read evaluation information does not have different evaluation period information.

  Next, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 similarly determines whether or not the “attribute period” values of the read records match. Here, it is determined that they match, and the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 determines that the read evaluation information does not have different attribute period information.

  Next, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 performs a process of acquiring the overall evaluation value for each evaluator identification information in the evaluation information read above.

  First, for example, “A101” is detected as one “evaluator ID” from the “evaluator ID” included in the records from the top to the third line read from the evaluator management information in FIG. Then, the record whose “evaluator ID” is “A101” is further read into a storage medium such as a memory. This record is the record on the first line in FIG. Then, “general employee” as “evaluation target attribute” and “24” as “evaluation target period” included in the record are acquired. Also, “G1”, which is “evaluator group ID” included in this record, is acquired, and the record whose “evaluator group ID” is “G1” is read from the record read from the item evaluation value management information above. And so on. Note that the “evaluation target period” is not an essential item, and when the “evaluation target period” is not included in the evaluator management information, the process of reading the “evaluation target period” described here may be omitted. The same applies to the following.

  Next, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 sets “E1” which is the “item ID” of the first record among the records whose “evaluator group ID” is “G1” read from the item evaluation value management information. get. Then, a record whose “item ID” is “E1” is detected from the hierarchical information shown in FIG. 9 stored in the hierarchical information storage unit 12, and “/ N1 /” which is the “hierarchy designation information” of this record is detected. N11 / N111 "is acquired. Then, all node IDs included in the hierarchy designation information, that is, “N1”, “N11”, and “N111” are acquired. Then, from the item weighting management information shown in FIG. 9, the “evaluation target attribute” is “general employee” acquired above, and the “node ID” is “N1”, “N11”, and “N111”, respectively. “Item weighting values” included in a record are sequentially acquired. Here, “1”, “1.5”, and “1.2” can be acquired as the item weight values.

  Next, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 sets “24”, which is the “evaluation target period” acquired above, to any one or more of the “period specification” of the period-specific weighting management information illustrated in FIG. It is sequentially judged whether or not it falls within the range indicated by the value. Here, it is assumed that “period specification” to which “24” applies is not detected. For this reason, no change is made to the item weight values acquired for each node above.

  Here, it is assumed that the acquired “evaluation target period” is “4” and is within the range of “less than 6” that is “period specification” of the first record from the top of the weight management information by period shown in FIG. If it is determined that it enters, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 acquires the value “N2” of “node ID” and the value “0” of “item weighting value” from the first record. Among the item weight values acquired for each node, the item weight value acquired for the node having “N2” as the “node ID” is updated to the value “0” acquired here. Thus, since the item weight value of the node of the first hierarchy can be changed according to the evaluation target period, the item weight value can be flexibly changed according to the evaluation target period.

  Here, since the item weight values are not changed, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 sets all the item weight values “1”, “1.5”, and “1.2” acquired above as the items. The item evaluation value is weighted by sequentially multiplying the item evaluation value “8” of the first record of the records whose “evaluator group ID” is “G1” read from the evaluation value management information. To do. For example, the weighted item evaluation value is “8 × 1 × 1.5 × 1.2 = 14.4”. Then, the weighted item evaluation value is temporarily stored in a storage medium (not shown) or the like.

  Hereinafter, the same processing is performed for the other records after the second column of the record whose “evaluator group ID” read from the item evaluation value management information is “G1”. For example, for the item evaluation value “9” acquired from the record whose “item ID” is “E2”, “1”, “1.5”, and “1.5” can be acquired as the item weight values, As a result, the weighted item evaluation value is “9 × 1 × 1.5 × 1.5 = 20.25”.

  Then, all the obtained item evaluation values are added to obtain an evaluation value for each evaluator corresponding to the evaluator whose “evaluator ID” is “A101”. For example, it is assumed here that the acquired evaluation value for each evaluator is “125”. Then, the evaluation value for each evaluator “125” is temporarily stored in a storage medium (not shown) in association with the evaluator ID “A101”.

  Here, if the evaluation target attribute read from one record of “evaluator ID” included in the records from the top to the third column read from the evaluator management information in FIG. 7 is not “general employee”. For example, if it is “contract employee”, in the process of obtaining “item weighting value” corresponding to the node ID included in the hierarchy designation information in the above process, the “evaluation target attribute” is “contract employee”. The “item weighting value” corresponding to each node ID is acquired from among the records. Other processing is the same as described above.

  After the evaluation value “125” for each evaluator is accumulated in association with the evaluator ID “A101”, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 further reads out the evaluator management information of FIG. Of the records up to the eye, for each record where the value of “evaluator ID” is a value other than “A101”, the same processing as described above is repeated, and the obtained evaluation value for each evaluator, the evaluator ID, Are added to a storage medium (not shown).

  FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating the evaluator-specific evaluation value management information for managing the evaluator-specific evaluation values acquired and accumulated by the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16. The evaluation value management information for each evaluator has items of “evaluator ID” that is evaluator identification information and “evaluation value for each evaluator” that is an evaluation value for each evaluator.

  Next, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 acquires “A101”, which is the “evaluator ID” of the first record of the evaluation value management information by evaluator shown in FIG. 13, and the evaluator of FIG. In the records from the top to the third column read from the management information, a record whose value of “evaluator ID” is “A101” is detected. Then, “person in charge” as “position ID” of the detected record and “direct hierarchy difference 1” as “hierarchy relation” are acquired. First, in the attribute-specific weighting information shown in FIG. 11, a record in which the value of “attribute type” matches “position ID” and the value of “evaluator attribute” matches “person in charge” is detected. The value “1” of the “weighting value” of the recorded record is acquired. Furthermore, in the attribute-specific weighting information shown in FIG. 11, a record in which the value of “attribute type” matches “hierarchy related” and the value of “evaluator attribute” matches “direct hierarchy difference 1” is detected, The value “2” of the “weighting value” of the detected record is acquired. Then, the acquired “weighting values” are multiplied to obtain a weighting value “1 × 2 = 2” for weighting the evaluation value for each evaluator associated with the evaluator ID “A101”.

  Similarly, a weighting value is acquired for the value of “evaluator ID” of each of the second and subsequent records of the evaluator-specific evaluation value management information shown in FIG. For example, “1.5” and “1” are acquired as weight values corresponding to the evaluator IDs “A102” and “A103”, respectively.

  And the weighted average using the weighting value acquired about the evaluator ID contained in each record above as a weighting value with respect to "evaluation value according to evaluator" of each record of the evaluation value management information classified by evaluator shown in FIG. To obtain an overall evaluation value. For example, “evaluator-specific evaluation value” and “weighting value” corresponding to the evaluator ID “A101” are “125” and “2”, and “evaluator-specific evaluation value corresponding to the evaluator ID“ A102 ”. "And" weighting value "are" 105 "and" 1.5 ", and" evaluator-specific evaluation value "and" weighting value "corresponding to the evaluator ID" A103 "are" 132 "and" 1 ". Therefore, the weighted average expression is “(125 × 2 + 105 × 1.5 + 132 × 1) / (2 + 1.5 + 1)”, and the calculated overall evaluation value is “119.9”. That is, the overall evaluation value is a value obtained by multiplying the evaluation value of each evaluator for one evaluation object by the weight value of each evaluator, and dividing the sum by the total weight value of each evaluator. It becomes. Then, the overall evaluation value is temporarily stored in a storage medium or the like (not shown) in association with “B1001” that is an “evaluation target ID”.

  Similarly, the same processing is repeated for the other “evaluation target IDs” of the evaluator management information shown in FIG.

  Here, for example, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 stores a record (column) whose value of “evaluation target ID” is “B1002” from the evaluator management information shown in FIG. From the item evaluation value management information shown in FIG. 5, records whose “evaluation value group ID” values match the values “G4”, “G5”, “G6”, and “G7” acquired here. It is assumed that data is read out to a storage medium such as a memory (not shown). Then, as a result of determining whether or not the values of the “evaluation period” of the read records match, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 determines that the read evaluation information has different evaluation period information. To do. For example, in the record whose “evaluation target ID” value read from FIG. 7 is “B1002”, the records whose “evaluation value group ID” is “G4” and “G6”, and “G5” and “G7” "Is different from the value indicated by" evaluation period ". For this reason, in the evaluation information read out above (that is, the item evaluation value management information and the evaluator management information), the evaluation information with the same “evaluation period” is used for each “evaluation period” and the same as described above. Then, the overall evaluation value is calculated. Specifically, using the evaluation information whose “evaluation value group ID” is “G4” and “G6”, an overall evaluation value is calculated by the same process as described above, and further, the “evaluation value group ID” is Using the evaluation information “G5” and “G7”, the overall evaluation value is calculated by the same processing as described above. For example, the overall evaluation value calculated using the evaluation information whose “evaluation value group ID” is “G4” and “G6” is temporarily “150”, and the “evaluation value group ID” is “G5” and “G7”. Assume that the overall evaluation value calculated using the evaluation information is “120”. Next, from “2011-1 to 2011/6” which is an “evaluation period” included in the evaluation information whose “evaluation value group ID” is “G4” and “G6”, the length of the period is “6”. Calculate the month. Similarly, from “2011/7 to 2011/9”, which is the “evaluation period” included in the evaluation information whose “evaluation value group ID” is “G5” and “G7”, the length of the period is “3”. Calculate the month. Then, the overall evaluation value “150” for each period acquired for the evaluation information whose “evaluation value group ID” is “G4” and “G6”, and the “evaluation value group ID” are “G5” and “G7”. The overall evaluation value “120” for each period acquired for the evaluation information is added together at the ratio of the length of the period indicated by the “evaluation period” corresponding to each evaluation information to calculate the overall evaluation value. Specifically, the formula for calculating the overall evaluation value is “(150 × 6 + 120 × 3) / (6 + 3)”, and the overall evaluation value calculated from this is “140”. Then, this overall evaluation value is added to a storage medium or the like (not shown) in association with “B1002” which is the “evaluation target ID”. In this way, it is possible to appropriately add together the overall evaluation values with different periods to be evaluated, and obtain the overall evaluation values throughout the entire period.

  Here, for example, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 stores a record (column) in which the value of “evaluation target ID” is “B1003” from the evaluator management information shown in FIG. From the item evaluation value management information shown in FIG. 5, records whose “evaluation value group ID” values match the values “G8” and “G9” acquired here are stored in a storage medium such as a memory (not shown). Suppose that it is read out. Then, as a result of determining whether or not the value of the “attribute period” of each read record matches, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 determines that the read evaluation information has different attribute period information. To do. For example, in four records whose “evaluation target ID” value read from FIG. 7 is “B1003”, two records whose “evaluation target attribute” is “contract employee” and “evaluation target attribute” are The value indicated by the “attribute period” differs between the two records “general employee”. For this reason, among the evaluation information read out above (that is, the item evaluation value management information and the evaluator management information), the evaluation information having the same “attribute period” is used for each “attribute period” and the same as described above. Then, the overall evaluation value is calculated. Specifically, using the evaluation information whose “evaluation target attribute” is “contract employee”, the overall evaluation value is calculated by the same process as described above, and the “evaluation target attribute” is “general employee”. An overall evaluation value is calculated by the same processing as described above using certain evaluation information. For example, two evaluation information whose overall evaluation value calculated using evaluation information whose “evaluation target attribute” is “contract employee” is “100” and whose “evaluation target attribute” is “general employee” are used. It is assumed that the overall evaluation value calculated in this way is “140”. Next, “9” months which is the length of the period is calculated from “2011-1 to 2011/9” which is “attribute period” included in the evaluation information whose “evaluation target attribute” is “contract employee”. To do. Similarly, “3” months, which is the length of the period, is calculated from “2011-10 to 2011/12” which is the “attribute period” included in the evaluation information whose “evaluation target attribute” is “general employee”. To do. Then, the overall evaluation value “100” for each period acquired for the evaluation information whose “evaluation target attribute” is “contract employee” and the period acquired for the evaluation information whose “evaluation target attribute” is “general employee” Another overall evaluation value “140” is added together with the ratio of the length of the period indicated by the “attribute period” corresponding to each evaluation information to calculate the overall evaluation value. Specifically, the formula for calculating the overall evaluation value is “(100 × 9 + 140 × 3) / (9 + 3)”, and the overall evaluation value calculated from this is “110”. Then, this overall evaluation value is added to a storage medium or the like (not shown) in association with “B1003” which is the “evaluation target ID”. Thereby, the overall evaluation value can be acquired in consideration of the change in the attribute of the evaluation target within the period that is the target of the evaluation.

In this way, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 acquires overall evaluation values corresponding to all “evaluation target IDs” of the evaluator management information illustrated in FIG. 7.
Then, the output unit 17 outputs the acquired overall evaluation value to a monitor or the like in association with the corresponding “evaluation target ID” value.

  FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating an output example by the output unit 17.

  As described above, according to the present embodiment, the evaluation performed by the plurality of evaluators on the evaluation target can be weighted according to the attribute of each evaluator, and the plurality of evaluators performed the evaluation target. The evaluation can be optimized and output in consideration of the attributes of each evaluator.

  Moreover, according to this Embodiment, according to the attribute of evaluation object, an evaluation result can be optimized and output.

  In the above specific example, one item evaluation value is multiplied by all the item weight values associated with the nodes passing through the path from the node corresponding to this item evaluation value to the route. Although the example in which the evaluation value for each evaluator for one evaluation object is obtained by weighting and adding the item evaluation values has been shown, in the present embodiment, for example, as follows An evaluation value may be acquired.

  First, the item evaluation value corresponding to the terminal node is multiplied by the item weighting value associated with this node. Next, for each node in the hierarchy one level above, all the weighted item weight values of the child nodes are added, and the item weight value associated with the node is multiplied. Further, for each node in the hierarchy one level above, the item weight value added and weighted as described above of the child node is added, and the item weight value associated with the node is added. Multiply. By repeating this process until the route is reached, an evaluation value for each evaluator for one evaluation object may be acquired.

(Embodiment 2)
In the evaluation apparatus 2 according to the second embodiment, the evaluation apparatus according to the first embodiment may acquire the evaluator attribute information included in the evaluation information from the information stored in the personnel database, The person and the evaluation target are acquired from information stored in the personnel database.
FIG. 15 is a block diagram showing a configuration of the evaluation apparatus 2 according to the second embodiment of the present invention.
The evaluation apparatus 1 includes an evaluation information storage unit 11, a hierarchy information storage unit 12, an attribute weighting storage unit 13, an item weighting storage unit 14, a period weighting storage unit 15, an overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16, an output unit 17, and an evaluation unit. Related reception unit 18, personnel database 19, evaluation information acquisition unit 20, evaluation object identification information reception unit 21, evaluator identification information acquisition unit 22, evaluator identification information output unit 23, evaluator detection unit 24, personnel information transmission unit 25 Is provided.

  Regarding the configuration of the evaluation information storage unit 11, the hierarchy information storage unit 12, the item-specific weight storage unit 14, the period-specific weight storage unit 15, the attribute-specific weight storage unit 13, the overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16, the output unit 17, etc. Since it is the same as that of Embodiment 1, description is abbreviate | omitted here.

  In this embodiment, particularly, a case will be described in which the evaluator and the evaluation target are company employees (including officers), and the item evaluation value and the overall evaluation value are values indicating personnel evaluation.

  The evaluation related reception unit 18 receives evaluation related information having evaluator identification information and evaluation target identification information. The evaluation-related reception unit 18 further includes an item evaluation value indicating an evaluation result of one or more evaluation items for the evaluation target indicated by the evaluation target identification information by the evaluator indicated by the evaluator identification information, and an item evaluation value. Evaluation-related information having item identification information about the corresponding evaluation item, evaluation period information, and the like may be received. The evaluator identification information included in the evaluation related information received by the evaluation related reception unit 18 and the evaluation target identification information are the evaluator identification information included in the evaluation information stored in the evaluation information storage unit 11, and the evaluation target identification. It may be information. However, the evaluation information in this case does not have the evaluator identification information and the evaluation target identification information, but instead is evaluation information having the evaluator identification information and the evaluation target identification information. There may be. That is, incomplete evaluation information may be used. The evaluator identification information only needs to be information that can identify the evaluator. For example, the evaluator's name and the evaluator identification information include the evaluator's employee number, staff number, mobile phone number, and e-mail address. Etc. The evaluation target identification information only needs to be information that can identify the evaluation target. For example, the same information as the evaluator identification information can be used.

  The reception described here refers to reception of information input from an input device such as a keyboard, mouse, touch panel, reception of information transmitted via a wired or wireless communication line, recording on an optical disk, magnetic disk, semiconductor memory, or the like. It is a concept including reception of information read from a medium. The evaluation-related reception unit 18 can be realized by, for example, a device driver for input means such as a numeric keypad or a keyboard, control software for a menu screen, and the like.

  The personnel database 19 includes one or more personnel information including employee identification information that is hierarchized employee identification information and position identification information that is information for identifying the employee's position. Stored. The employee identification information is, for example, an employee number or an employee email address. The post identification information is, for example, a character string (including numbers) indicating the post name or post. In the personnel database 19, for example, information for managing the hierarchical relationship of employee identification information may be stored. As the information for managing the hierarchical relationship, for example, the same information as the hierarchical information described in the first embodiment can be used. The information for managing the hierarchical relationship includes, for example, the node identification information of the nodes constituting the hierarchical structure, the employee identification information corresponding to the node indicated by the node identification information, and the subordinate relationship (parent-child relationship) indicated by the node identification information. ) May also be information. Information for managing the hierarchical relationship may be included in the personnel information.

  The personnel database 19 may store personnel information that further includes business-related information that is information related to the business of the employee. The work-related information is information related to employee work that can be used for employee personnel evaluation. The business-related information is, for example, information indicating the content of business execution of employees, the status of business execution, the results of business execution, the results of business, and the like. Further, the business related information may be an employee business report, daily report, monthly report, attendance information, or the like.

  The personnel database 19 can usually be realized by an MPU, a memory, or the like. The processing procedure of the personnel database 19 is usually realized by software, and the software is recorded on a recording medium such as a ROM. However, it may be realized by hardware (dedicated circuit).

  The evaluation information acquisition unit 20 acquires the evaluator attribute information from the personnel database 19 using the evaluation related information having the evaluator identification information and the evaluation target identification information received by the evaluation related reception unit 18. Obtaining from the personnel database 19 may be considered as obtaining information from personnel information stored in the personnel database 19, for example. The same applies to the following. Then, evaluation information including the evaluation value attribute information is accumulated in the evaluation information storage unit 11. For example, the evaluation information acquisition unit 20 acquires evaluation information including the evaluator attribute information acquired from the personnel database 19 and the item evaluation value included in the evaluation related information received by the evaluation related reception unit 18, and the acquired evaluation Information is accumulated in the evaluation information storage unit 11. Further, the evaluation information acquisition unit 20 may acquire evaluation information further including item identification information included in the evaluation related information received by the evaluation related reception unit 18 and evaluation period information. Further, the evaluation information acquisition unit 20 may acquire the evaluator attribute information from the personnel database 19 using the evaluation target identification information included in the evaluation related information received by the evaluation related reception unit 18.

  Note that the evaluation information stored in the evaluation information storage unit 11 is incomplete including the evaluator identification information and the evaluation target identification information instead of the evaluator identification information and the evaluation target identification information. In the case of evaluation information, etc., the evaluation information acquisition unit 20 acquires evaluator identification information and evaluation target identification information from the incomplete evaluation information, and uses these to evaluate the evaluation acquired from the personnel database. Evaluation information including person attribute information and item evaluation values included in the incomplete evaluation information may be acquired and accumulated.

  The evaluator attribute information acquired by the evaluation information acquisition unit 20 from the personnel database 19 is, for example, information having at least one of position identification information indicating the position of the evaluator and information indicating a hierarchical relationship between the evaluator and the evaluation object It is. For example, the evaluation information acquisition unit 20 acquires the job title identification information corresponding to the evaluator identification information received by the evaluation related reception unit 18 from the personnel database 19. For example, the evaluation information acquisition unit 20 acquires job title identification information from personnel information having the same evaluator identification information as the evaluator identification information received by the evaluation related reception unit 18. Further, the evaluation information acquisition unit 20 is a hierarchy of the evaluator indicated by the evaluator identification information and the evaluation object indicated by the evaluation object identification information according to the evaluator identification information and the evaluation object identification information received by the evaluation related reception unit 18. Acquire information indicating the relationship. The information indicating the hierarchical relationship is, for example, information indicating a difference in the number of layers between the evaluator and the evaluation target, whether the evaluator and the evaluation target are in a parent-child relationship, and whether they are direct. . For example, from the information managing the hierarchical relationship of employees included in the personnel database 19, the position in the hierarchical structure of the employee who is the evaluator indicated by the evaluator identification information and the hierarchical structure of the employee being the evaluation target indicated by the evaluation target identification information The information indicating the position in is acquired, and the information indicating the hierarchical relationship is acquired from the information indicating the position. For example, the evaluator's hierarchy is the third hierarchy, the evaluation target hierarchy is the fifth hierarchy, and the evaluator corresponds to the path from the root to the node corresponding to the evaluation target while descending the hierarchy. When the node is included, the evaluation information acquisition unit 20 acquires, for example, information indicating a hierarchical relationship indicating that the evaluator is a direct employee of the hierarchy on the second hierarchy to be evaluated.

  Further, when the evaluation information acquisition unit 20 acquires the evaluator attribute information from the personnel database 19 using the evaluation object identification information included in the evaluation related information, the same processing as described above can be used.

  The evaluation information acquisition unit 20 can usually be realized by an MPU, a memory, or the like. The processing procedure of the personnel database 19 is usually realized by software, and the software is recorded on a recording medium such as a ROM. However, it may be realized by hardware (dedicated circuit).

  The evaluation target identification information receiving unit 21 receives evaluation target identification information which is evaluation target identification information. The reception here may be considered as automatically acquiring one or more employee identification information from the personnel information stored in the personnel database 19. For example, the evaluation target identification information receiving unit 21 may automatically acquire one or more employee identification information from the personnel information in accordance with a rule specified in advance. For example, according to a predesignated rule, only employee identification information having a predesignated attribute (for example, photo identification information associated with predesignated job identification information) may be selectively acquired. . Further, only employee identification information associated with a node in a child hierarchy of a node designated in advance may be acquired. Further, only employee identification information associated with a node of a hierarchy designated in advance may be acquired. Such rules may be stored in advance in a storage medium (not shown). The evaluation object identification information input means may be anything such as a numeric keypad, keyboard, mouse, or menu screen. The evaluation target identification information receiving unit 21 can be realized by a device driver of an input unit such as a numeric keypad or a keyboard, control software for a menu screen, or the like.

  The evaluator identification information acquisition unit 22 determines one or more employee identification information corresponding to the evaluation target identification information received by the evaluation target identification information reception unit 21 according to a rule specified in advance as evaluator identification information that is the evaluator identification information. For example, the information is acquired from personnel information stored in the personnel database 19. The rule designated in advance is, for example, a rule for acquiring employee identification information having a hierarchical relationship designated in advance for an employee who is an evaluation target indicated by the evaluation target identification information. The rules specified in advance may be stored in advance in a storage medium (not shown). The same applies to other rules.

  The evaluator identification information acquisition unit 22 can usually be realized by an MPU, a memory, or the like. The processing procedure of the evaluator identification information acquisition unit 22 is usually realized by software, and the software is recorded in a recording medium such as a ROM. However, it may be realized by hardware (dedicated circuit).

  The evaluator identification information output unit 23 outputs the evaluator identification information acquired by the evaluator identification information acquisition unit 22. For example, the evaluation target identification information received by the evaluation target identification information receiving unit 21 may be output in association with the evaluator identification information. Output described here includes display on a display, printing on a printer, sound output, transmission to an external device, storage in a recording medium, delivery of processing results to another processing device or other program, etc. It is a concept that includes. The evaluator identification information output unit 23 may or may not include an output device such as a display or a speaker. The evaluator identification information output unit 23 can be implemented by output device driver software, or output device driver software and an output device.

  The evaluator detection unit 24 detects one or more employee identification information as evaluator identification information from the personnel information. The detection here may be considered as acquisition of evaluator identification information. The evaluator detection unit 24 may acquire one or more employee identification information in any way. For example, employee identification information is detected according to a rule specified in advance. For example, employee identification information associated with one or more pre-specified title identification information is detected from personnel information. Moreover, the rule which detects the employee identification information which has the hierarchical relationship designated beforehand may be sufficient. For example, employee identification information in which employee identification information is associated with one level directly below may be detected. As this rule, a rule similar to the rule used when the evaluation target identification information receiving unit 21 automatically acquires one or more employee identification information from the personnel information stored in the personnel database 19 can be used. .

  The evaluator detection unit 24 can usually be realized by an MPU, a memory, or the like. The processing procedure of the evaluator detection unit 24 is usually realized by software, and the software is recorded in a recording medium such as a ROM. However, it may be realized by hardware (dedicated circuit).

  The personnel information transmission unit 25 acquires, as evaluation object identification information, one or more employee identification information corresponding to the evaluator identification information detected by the evaluator detection unit 24 from the personnel information according to a rule specified in advance. The business related information corresponding to the identification information is acquired from the personnel information and transmitted to the transmission destination corresponding to the evaluator identification information. The rule designated in advance is, for example, a rule for acquiring employee identification information having a hierarchical relationship designated in advance for an employee who is an evaluation target indicated by the evaluation target identification information. The transmission here is, for example, transmission by e-mail, an in-house data communication system, or the like. However, a medium (for example, a recording disk such as paper or an optical disk) on which business-related information is recorded and a delivery destination are output, and the information is accumulated in a recording medium or the like. Sending an instruction to transmit information or an instruction to acquire information may also be considered transmission.

  The personnel information transmission unit 25 may acquire information on a destination indicating a transmission destination corresponding to the evaluator identification information. For example, when the evaluator identification information is the e-mail address of the evaluator, this e-mail address may be acquired as destination information. Further, information such as an employee's department indicated by the employee identification information corresponding to the evaluator identification information stored in the personnel information or the like may be acquired as destination information. Delivery of a medium in which information is recorded in the company can be performed by, for example, a combination of a department or the like and employee identification information.

  The personnel information transmission unit 25 is usually realized by a wireless or wired communication means, but may be realized by a broadcasting means. The personnel information transmission unit 25 may or may not include a communication device.

  Next, operation | movement of the evaluation apparatus 2 is demonstrated using the flowchart of FIG.

  (Step S1601) The evaluation related receiving unit 18 determines whether or not one or more evaluation related information has been received. If accepted, the process proceeds to step S1602, and if not accepted, the process proceeds to step S1608.

  (Step S1602) The evaluation information acquisition unit 20 substitutes 1 for the value of the counter r.

  (Step S1603) The evaluation information acquisition unit 20 determines whether or not the evaluation related information received in step S1601 includes the rth evaluation related information. If there is, the process proceeds to step S1604. If not, the process returns to step S1601.

  (Step S1604) The evaluation information acquisition unit 20 acquires evaluator attribute information using the r-th evaluation related information. For example, evaluator attribute information including position identification information and information indicating a hierarchical relationship is acquired.

  (Step S1605) The evaluation information acquisition unit 20 acquires evaluation target attribute information using the r-th evaluation related information.

  (Step S 1606) The evaluation information acquisition unit 20 acquires evaluation information including the evaluator attribute information and evaluation target attribute information acquired in steps S 1604 and S 1605, and accumulates them in the evaluation information storage unit 11. For example, the item evaluation value of the evaluation information is acquired from the evaluation related information. The accumulation here is, for example, additional writing.

  (Step S1607) The evaluation information acquisition unit 20 increments the value of the counter r by 1. Then, the process returns to step S1601.

  (Step S1608) The evaluation target identification information receiving unit 21 determines whether or not to acquire evaluation target identification information. For example, when receiving an instruction to be acquired by a reception unit (not shown) or the like, it is determined to acquire the instruction. When acquiring, it progresses to step S1609, and when not acquiring, it progresses to step S1615.

  (Step S1609) The evaluation target identification information receiving unit 21 determines whether or not new evaluation target identification information has been detected in the personnel information. For example, the evaluation target identification information receiving unit 21 detects employee identification information that satisfies a rule specified in advance as evaluation target identification information. If the evaluation target identification information can be detected, the process proceeds to step S1610. If the evaluation target identification information cannot be detected, the process proceeds to step S1613.

  (Step S1610) The evaluation target identification information receiving unit 21 acquires the detected evaluation target identification information. Here, the acquisition of the evaluation object identification information is considered as reception.

  (Step S1611) The evaluation target identification information receiving unit 21 acquires the evaluator identification information from the personnel information using the evaluation target identification information received in step S1610. For example, with respect to the evaluation target identification information, employee identification information that satisfies a rule specified in advance is acquired as evaluator identification information. The evaluator identification information acquired here may be plural.

  (Step S1612) The evaluation target identification information receiving unit 21 stores the evaluator target identification information acquired in step S1610 in a storage medium or the like (not shown) in association with the evaluator identification information acquired in step S1611. Then, the process returns to step S1609.

  (Step S1613) The evaluator identification information output unit 23 determines whether or not one or more evaluator target identification information and evaluator identification information have been acquired. If acquired, the process proceeds to step S1604. If not acquired, the process returns to step S1601.

  (Step S1614) The evaluator identification information output unit 23 outputs the acquired one or more evaluator target identification information and the evaluator identification information. Then, the process returns to step S1601.

  (Step S1615) The evaluator detection unit 24 determines whether or not the evaluator identification information is detected. For example, when an instruction detected by a reception unit (not shown) is received, it is determined to detect. When it detects, it progresses to step S1616, and when it does not detect, it progresses to step S1620.

  (Step S1616) The evaluator detection unit 24 determines whether or not new evaluator identification information has been detected in the personnel information. For example, the evaluator detection unit 24 detects employee identification information that satisfies a rule specified in advance as evaluator identification information. If new evaluation target identification information can be detected, the detected evaluator identification information is acquired and the process proceeds to step S1617. If not detected, the process returns to step S1601.

  (Step S1617) The evaluator detection unit 24 acquires evaluation object identification information from personnel information using the evaluator identification information detected in step S1616. For example, with respect to the evaluator identification information, employee identification information that satisfies a rule specified in advance is acquired as evaluation target identification information. There may be a plurality of pieces of evaluation object identification information acquired here.

  (Step S1618) The evaluator detection unit 24 acquires business-related information corresponding to each evaluation target identification information acquired in step S1617 from personnel information.

  (Step S1619) The evaluator detection unit 24 associates the business-related information acquired in step S1618, the evaluator identification information detected in step S1616, and the evaluation target identification information acquired in step S1617 to identify the evaluator. Send to the evaluator indicated by the information. For example, an e-mail address associated with the evaluator identification information is acquired from personnel information or the like, and the above information is transmitted to this e-mail address. Then, the process returns to step S1616.

  (Step S1620) The overall evaluation value acquisition unit 16 determines whether to acquire an overall evaluation value. When acquiring, it progresses to step S1621, and when not acquiring, it returns to step S1601.

  (Step S1621) The evaluation device 2 acquires overall evaluation information using the evaluation information. This process corresponds to the process from step S202 to step S219 in FIG. 2, and the description thereof is omitted here. Then, the process returns to step S1601.

Hereinafter, a specific example of the evaluation apparatus 2 of the present embodiment will be described.
FIG. 17 is a diagram showing personnel information stored in the personnel database 19. The personnel information includes items of “employee ID”, “position ID”, “business related information”, and “email address”. In addition to this, the personnel information may include attribute period information, evaluation target period information, and the like. “Employee ID” is employee identification information. “Position ID” is position identification information. “Business-related information” is business-related information, and here, the file name of the file having the business-related information is shown. When acquiring business-related information, a file with this file name is read. “Mail address” is the mail address of the employee indicated by the employee identification information.

  FIG. 18 is a diagram showing personnel hierarchy information stored in the personnel database 19 for managing the employee hierarchy. The personnel hierarchy information includes “employee ID” and “hierarchy designation information”. The “hierarchy designation information” is the same as the “hierarchy designation information” of the hierarchy information shown in FIG.

  FIG. 19 is a schematic diagram showing a hierarchical structure of employees managed by personnel hierarchy information. Here, the hierarchical structure of employees is shown as a tree structure. In the figure, the node identification information of each node in the hierarchical structure is shown here by a combination of “N” and “number”. The number of digits in the “number” part indicates the number of hierarchical levels (hierarchy depth) of the node. For example, the node N1 indicates a first layer node, and the node N211 indicates a third layer node. In addition, the value indicated in parentheses after each node identification information is the employee identification information of the employee corresponding to the node indicated by each node identification information, and corresponds to the “employee ID” in FIG. 17 and FIG. is doing. For example, the node N111 corresponds to an employee whose “employee ID” is “A1003”.

  FIG. 20 is a diagram illustrating the evaluation related information received by the evaluation related receiving unit 18. The evaluation value related information includes “evaluator ID” which is evaluator identification information, “evaluation target ID” which is evaluation object identification information, and “evaluation value group ID” of the item evaluation value management information shown in FIG. It has the same “evaluation value group ID”. The evaluation related information received by the evaluation related receiving unit 18 further includes item evaluation value management information similar to the item evaluation value management information shown in FIG. Except for the fact that the “evaluation value group ID” corresponds to the “evaluation value group ID” in FIG. 20, it is the same as the item evaluation value management information shown in FIG. To do.

  First, when the evaluation related receiving unit 18 receives evaluation related information as shown in FIG. 20, the evaluation information acquiring unit 20 performs a process of acquiring evaluator attribute information for the first record of the evaluation related information.

  The evaluation information acquisition unit 20 first acquires “A1002”, which is the “evaluator ID” of the first record, and records that “evaluator ID” matches “A1002” from the personnel information shown in FIG. And “position ID” of the detected record is acquired. Here, since the “evaluator ID” of the record in the first row matches “A1002” in the personnel information of FIG. 17, the “section manager” that is the “position ID” of this record is set in the evaluator attribute information. Acquired as position identification information.

  Furthermore, “A1004” that is the “evaluation target ID” is acquired from the first record of the evaluation related information. Next, “/ N1 / N11” which is “hierarchy designation information” of the record whose “employee ID” matches the evaluator ID “A1002” is acquired from the personnel hierarchy information of FIG. It can be seen that the node ID of the node corresponding to the evaluator indicated by the “evaluator ID” is “N11” at the end of the hierarchy designation information “/ N1 / N11”. Further, from the personnel hierarchy information of FIG. 18, “employee ID” of the record that matches the evaluation target ID “A1004” is acquired. Then, “N11” that is the node ID of the evaluator ID “A1002” is It is determined whether or not it is included in the hierarchy designation information “/ N1 / N11 / N111 / N1111” of the evaluation target ID “A1004”. If included, the evaluation information acquisition unit 20 determines that the employee indicated by the evaluation target ID “A1004” is a direct employee of the employee indicated by the evaluator ID “A1002”. If it is not included, it is determined that it is not direct. Since it is included here, it is determined that the employee is a direct employee. Further, from the hierarchy designation information “/ N1 / N11” acquired for the evaluator ID “A1002”, the hierarchy of the evaluator ID “A1002” is the second hierarchy, and the hierarchy designation information acquired for the evaluation target ID “A1004”. From “/ N1 / N11 / N111 / N1111”, it is determined that the hierarchy of the evaluation target ID “A1004” is the fourth hierarchy. Then, the difference between the two levels is calculated. Here, the hierarchy difference “2” is acquired. Thereby, the evaluation information acquisition unit 20 acquires “direct hierarchy difference 2” as an attribute indicating the hierarchical relationship of the evaluator attribute information. This value corresponds to “hierarchy related” in the evaluator management information of FIG.

  Moreover, the evaluation information acquisition unit 20 detects a record that matches “A1004” that is the “evaluation target ID” acquired from the first record of the evaluation-related information from the personnel information shown in FIG. “General employee” which is the “post ID” is acquired as evaluation target attribute information.

  As a result, for the first record of the evaluation related information, the evaluator attribute information “section manager” and “direct hierarchy difference 2” and the evaluation object identification information “general employee” are acquired. Then, evaluation information including the acquired evaluator attribute information, evaluation object identification information, and item evaluation values included in the evaluation related information is accumulated (added) in the evaluation information storage unit 11.

  The same processing is performed for other evaluation related information.

  Next, when the evaluation device 2 receives an instruction to acquire evaluation target identification information, the evaluation target identification information receiving unit 21 is a rule for acquiring evaluation target identification information stored in advance in a storage medium (not shown). Is read. This rule is, for example, a rule that “employee identification information of an employee whose“ position ID ”is“ general employee ”is acquired as evaluation target identification information from personnel information”. Then, the evaluation target identification information receiving unit 21 first evaluates “A1004”, which is one of the employee identification information of the employees whose “position ID” is “general employee”, from the personnel information shown in FIG. Assuming that it was acquired and accepted as

  Next, the evaluator identification information acquisition unit 22 reads a rule for acquiring evaluator identification information stored in advance in a storage medium (not shown). This rule is, for example, “employee identification information that is the parent of evaluation target identification information received (acquired by the evaluation target identification information receiving unit 21) and employee identification information that is the parent of this employee identification information. It is assumed that the rule is “obtained as evaluator identification information”. From the personnel hierarchy information shown in FIG. 18, the evaluator identification information acquisition unit 22 determines from the record that “employee ID” matches “A1004” that is the evaluation target identification information received by the evaluation target identification information reception unit 21. “/ N1 / N11 / N111 / N1111” which is “hierarchy designation information” is acquired. In this hierarchy designation information, since the node ID of the node corresponding to the employee indicated by the evaluation target identification information “A1004” is “N1111” at the end, the node ID one hierarchy above “N1111” is obtained from this hierarchy designation information. “N111” and the node ID “N11” on the one hierarchy are acquired, and the node IDs at the end of “hierarchy designation information” are “N111” and “N11” from the personnel hierarchy information shown in FIG. Are detected, and “A1003” and “A1002”, which are “employee IDs” of the detected records, are acquired as evaluator identification information. The acquired evaluator identification information is stored in a storage medium (not shown) in association with the evaluation target identification information acquired above.

  Further, the evaluation target identification information receiving unit 21 acquires employee identification information whose “position ID” is “general employee” from the personnel information shown in FIG. 17 as evaluation target identification information, and the evaluator identification information acquiring unit 22 The process of acquiring the evaluator identification information corresponding to is performed until new evaluation target identification information cannot be acquired, and the combination of the acquired evaluation target identification information and the evaluator identification information is not illustrated. Output (accumulate) to a storage medium or the like. For example, this information is useful in determining employee evaluators.

  If the evaluation device 2 receives an instruction to detect evaluator identification information, the evaluator detection unit 24 reads a rule for acquiring evaluator identification information stored in advance in a storage medium (not shown). This rule is, for example, a rule that “employee identification information of an employee whose“ position ID ”is“ section manager ”is acquired as evaluator identification information from personnel information”. Then, the evaluator detection unit 24 first detects “A1002” as one of the employee identification information of the employee whose “position ID” is “section manager” from the personnel information shown in FIG. 17 as evaluator identification information. And

  Next, the personnel information transmission unit 25 reads a rule for acquiring evaluation target identification information stored in advance in a storage medium (not shown). This rule is, for example, a rule of “acquiring all employee identification information that is directly below the evaluator identification information detected by the evaluator detection unit 24 as evaluation target identification information”. The personnel information transmission unit 25 detects “hierarchy designation information” corresponding to the employee ID “A1002” from the personnel information shown in FIG. 17, and sets the node ID “N11” at the end as the employee ID “A1002”. As a node ID corresponding to. Then, a record having “hierarchy designation information” including “N11” as a node ID other than the terminal ID is detected from the personnel information shown in FIG. 17, and the employee ID of the record is acquired as evaluation target identification information. For example, since the hierarchy designation information corresponding to the employee ID “A1003” includes “N11”, the employee ID “A1003” is acquired as the evaluation target identification information. Then, from the record whose “evaluation target ID” of the personnel information shown in FIG. 17 is “A1003”, the file “fileA0003” of the business related information indicated by “business related information” is acquired. Further, “A1002 @ company....” That is “email address” is acquired from the record whose “evaluator ID” of the personnel information shown in FIG. 17 is “A1002”, and this e-mail address is acquired as described above. The evaluation target identification information “A1003” and the business related information file “fileA0003” are transmitted. Accordingly, it is possible to notify the evaluator that the evaluation target is “A1003”, and it is possible to transmit the work-related information “fileA0003” that is a material used when evaluating the evaluation target. Similarly, other records having “hierarchy designation information” including “N11” as a node ID other than the terminal ID are detected from the personnel information shown in FIG. 17 and the same processing is performed.

  Furthermore, the same processing is performed by detecting other employee identification information whose “position ID” is “section manager” from the personnel information shown in FIG. 17 as evaluator identification information.

  Further, when the evaluation device 2 receives an instruction to acquire the overall evaluation value, the same processing as in the specific example of the first embodiment is performed.

  As described above, the evaluator attribute information and the evaluation target attribute information can be acquired from the evaluator identification information and the evaluation target identification information, and the evaluation information can be acquired. Therefore, the evaluation can be easily performed only by determining the evaluator and the evaluation target. Information can be acquired.

  Moreover, according to this invention, the evaluator who evaluates evaluation object can be automatically set from personnel information.

  Further, according to the present invention, the evaluation target corresponding to the evaluator is automatically set from the personnel information, and then the evaluator can be informed of the evaluation target, and useful information for evaluating the evaluation target is provided. Can be sent.

  Further, according to the present invention, an evaluation object and an evaluator can be automatically determined from personnel information.

  In each of the above embodiments, each process (each function) may be realized by centralized processing by a single device (system), or by distributed processing by a plurality of devices. May be.

  In each of the above-described embodiments, the case where the evaluation apparatus is a stand-alone has been described. However, the evaluation apparatus may be a stand-alone apparatus or a server apparatus in a server / client system. In the latter case, the output unit or the reception unit receives an input or outputs a screen via a communication line.

  Note that the software that realizes the evaluation device in each of the above embodiments is the following program. That is, this program includes an item evaluation value that is a value indicating an evaluation result of one or more evaluation items performed by a plurality of evaluators for one or more evaluation targets, and each evaluator who performed the evaluation. Attribute-specific weighting having an evaluation information storage unit that stores a plurality of evaluation information each including evaluator attribute information that is information indicating an attribute, evaluator attribute information, and a weighting value that is a value used for weighting The attribute-specific weight storage unit for storing information, and the computer accessible to the item evaluation value included in the one or more evaluation information are associated with the evaluator attribute information included in the evaluation information, and the attribute-specific weight storage An overall evaluation value acquisition unit that performs weighting using the weighting values stored in the unit and acquires, for each evaluation object, an overall evaluation value that is an evaluation value of the entire evaluation object, and an overall evaluation value Is a program for functioning as an output unit for outputting.

  In the program, the functions realized by the program do not include functions that can be realized only by hardware. For example, a function that can be realized only by hardware such as a modem or an interface card in an acquisition unit that acquires information or an output unit that outputs information is not included in the function realized by the program.

  Further, the computer that executes this program may be singular or plural. That is, centralized processing may be performed, or distributed processing may be performed.

  FIG. 21 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of the external appearance of a computer that executes the program and realizes the evaluation apparatus according to the embodiment. The above-described embodiment can be realized by computer hardware and a computer program executed on the computer hardware.

  In FIG. 21, a computer system 900 includes a computer 901 including a CD-ROM (Compact Disk Read Only Memory) drive 905, an FD (Floppy (registered trademark) Disk) drive 906, a keyboard 902, a mouse 903, a monitor 904, and the like. Is provided.

  FIG. 22 is a diagram showing an internal configuration of the computer system 900. In FIG. 22, in addition to the CD-ROM drive 905 and the FD drive 906, a computer 901 is connected to an MPU (Micro Processing Unit) 911, a ROM 912 for storing a program such as a bootup program, and the MPU 911. A RAM (Random Access Memory) 913 that temporarily stores program instructions and provides a temporary storage space, a hard disk 914 that stores application programs, system programs, and data, and an MPU 911 and a ROM 912 are interconnected. And a bus 915. The computer 901 may include a network card (not shown) that provides connection to the LAN.

  A program that causes the computer system 900 to execute the functions of the evaluation apparatus and the like according to the above-described embodiment is stored in the CD-ROM 921 or the FD 922, inserted into the CD-ROM drive 905 or the FD drive 906, and transferred to the hard disk 914. May be. Instead, the program may be transmitted to the computer 901 via a network (not shown) and stored in the hard disk 914. The program is loaded into the RAM 913 when executed. The program may be loaded directly from the CD-ROM 921, the FD 922, or the network.

  The program does not necessarily include an operating system (OS) or a third-party program that causes the computer 901 to execute the functions of the evaluation apparatus according to the above-described embodiment. The program may include only a part of an instruction that calls an appropriate function (module) in a controlled manner and obtains a desired result. How the computer system 900 operates is well known and will not be described in detail.

  The present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments, and various modifications are possible, and it goes without saying that these are also included in the scope of the present invention.

  As described above, the evaluation apparatus according to the present invention is suitable as an apparatus for evaluating an evaluation object, and is particularly useful as an apparatus for acquiring an evaluation value from the results of evaluation performed by a plurality of evaluators. is there.

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1, 2 Evaluation apparatus 11 Evaluation information storage part 12 Hierarchical information storage part 13 Weight storage part according to attribute 14 Weight storage part according to item 15 Weight storage part according to period 16 Overall evaluation value acquisition part 17 Output part 18 Evaluation related reception part 19 Personnel database DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 20 Evaluation information acquisition part 21 Evaluation object identification information reception part 22 Evaluator identification information acquisition part 23 Evaluator identification information output part 24 Evaluator detection part 25 Personnel information transmission part

Claims (12)

An item evaluation value that is a value indicating the result of evaluation for one or more evaluation items performed by a plurality of evaluators on one or more evaluation targets, and information indicating the attributes of each evaluator who performed the evaluation A plurality of evaluation information each having a certain evaluator attribute information,
An attribute-specific weight storage unit that stores attribute-specific weight information including evaluator attribute information and a weight value that is a value used for weighting;
The item evaluation value included in the one or more evaluation information is weighted using a weighting value associated with the evaluator attribute information included in the evaluation information and stored in the attribute-specific weight storage unit, For each evaluation object, an overall evaluation value acquisition unit that acquires an overall evaluation value that is an evaluation value of the entire evaluation object;
An evaluation apparatus comprising: an output unit that outputs the overall evaluation value. An item-by-item weight storage unit that stores an item weight value that is one or more weight values used for weighting an item evaluation value corresponding to each evaluation item;
The overall evaluation value acquisition unit obtains the overall evaluation value by further weighting an item evaluation value included in the one or more pieces of evaluation information with an item weighting value corresponding to an evaluation item corresponding to the item evaluation value. The evaluation apparatus according to claim 1. The evaluation information further includes evaluation period information that is information of a period to be evaluated,
The overall evaluation value acquisition unit calculates an overall evaluation value for each period indicated by the evaluation period information for each evaluation object, and determines the overall evaluation value for each calculated period according to a ratio of each period. The evaluation apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the overall evaluation value is obtained by adding together. The evaluation information further includes evaluation target attribute information which is information indicating an evaluation target attribute,
An item-by-item weighting storage unit that stores item weighting management information having evaluation target attribute information and the item weighting value;
The overall evaluation value acquisition unit further weights the item evaluation value included in the one or more evaluation information with an item weighting value associated with the evaluation target attribute information included in the evaluation information, and the overall evaluation value The evaluation apparatus of Claim 2 which acquires. The evaluation information further includes attribute period information that is information of a period during which the evaluation target attribute information is constant,
The overall evaluation value acquisition unit calculates an overall evaluation value for each period indicated by the attribute period information for each evaluation object, and calculates the overall evaluation value for each calculated period according to a ratio of each period. The evaluation apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the total evaluation value is obtained by adding together. The evaluation item has a hierarchical structure of two or more levels,
An item weighting storage unit for storing item weighting management information having node identification information for identifying one node of the hierarchy of the evaluation items and the item weighting value;
The overall evaluation value acquisition unit weights each item evaluation value with an item weighting value associated with node identification information of a node to which the evaluation item corresponding to the item evaluation value belongs, and acquires the overall evaluation value The evaluation apparatus according to claim 2. The evaluation item has a hierarchical structure of two or more levels,
The evaluation information further includes evaluation target period information that is information on a period related to the evaluation target;
A first level node of the evaluation item, an item weight value that is a weight value used for weighting an item evaluation value corresponding to the first level node, and period designation information that is information for designating a period related to the evaluation target A weighting storage unit for each period in which weighting management information for each period is stored,
The overall evaluation value acquisition unit determines whether or not the evaluation target period information of the evaluation information indicates a period indicated by the period specifying information of the weighted management information by period, and specifies the period according to the determination result The evaluation apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the overall evaluation value is acquired using an item weighting value associated with information. The item evaluation value and the overall evaluation value are values indicating personnel evaluation with respect to an employee to be evaluated,
The evaluator attribute information is position identification information that is information for identifying the evaluator's position, and information indicating a hierarchical relationship between the evaluator and the evaluation target,
A personnel database in which personnel information having employee identification information that is hierarchized employee identification information and job identification information that identifies the position of the employee is stored;
An evaluation-related receiving unit that receives evaluation-related information including the evaluator identification information and evaluation target identification information;
The evaluation information acquisition unit that acquires the evaluator attribute information from the personnel database using the evaluation related information received by the evaluation related reception unit, and accumulates the evaluation information including the evaluator attribute information in the evaluation information storage unit The evaluation apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising: The item evaluation value and the overall evaluation value are values indicating personnel evaluation with respect to an employee to be evaluated,
A personnel database in which personnel information having employee identification information that is hierarchized employee identification information and job identification information that identifies the position of the employee is stored;
An evaluation target identification information receiving unit that receives evaluation target identification information that is identification target identification information;
Evaluator identification information acquisition that acquires one or more employee identification information corresponding to the evaluation object identification information received by the evaluation object identification information receiving unit as evaluator identification information that is the evaluator identification information in accordance with a rule specified in advance And
The evaluation apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising: an evaluator identification information output unit that outputs the evaluator identification information acquired by the evaluator identification information acquisition unit. The item evaluation value and the overall evaluation value are values indicating personnel evaluation with respect to an employee to be evaluated,
Employee identification information that is hierarchized employee identification information to indicate the employee's hierarchical relationship, job identification information that identifies the employee's job title, and business related information that is information related to the employee's work A personnel database in which personnel information is stored;
From the personnel information, an evaluator detection unit that detects one or more employee identification information as evaluator identification information;
According to a rule specified in advance, one or more employee identification information corresponding to the evaluator identification information detected by the evaluator detection unit is acquired as evaluation target identification information from the personnel information, and corresponds to the evaluation target identification information. The evaluation apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising: a personnel information transmission unit that acquires business-related information from the personnel information and transmits it to a transmission destination corresponding to the evaluator identification information. An item evaluation value that is a value indicating the result of evaluation for one or more evaluation items performed by a plurality of evaluators on one or more evaluation targets, and information indicating the attributes of each evaluator who performed the evaluation Attribute information storage unit storing a plurality of evaluation information each having a certain evaluator attribute information, evaluator attribute information, and attribute-specific weighting information having a weighting value that is a value used for weighting are stored An evaluation method performed using an attribute-specific weighting storage unit, an overall evaluation value acquisition unit, and an overall evaluation value acquisition unit,
The overall evaluation value acquisition unit associates the item evaluation value included in the one or more evaluation information with the evaluator attribute information included in the evaluation information and is stored in the attribute-specific weight storage unit The overall evaluation value acquisition step for obtaining the overall evaluation value, which is the evaluation value of the entire evaluation object, for each evaluation object,
An output method, wherein the output unit includes an output step of outputting the overall evaluation value. An item evaluation value that is a value indicating the result of evaluation for one or more evaluation items performed by a plurality of evaluators on one or more evaluation targets, and information indicating the attributes of each evaluator who performed the evaluation Attribute information storage unit storing a plurality of evaluation information each having a certain evaluator attribute information, evaluator attribute information, and attribute-specific weighting information having weighting values that are values used for weighting are stored Computers accessible to the attribute-specific weight storage,
The item evaluation value included in the one or more evaluation information is weighted using a weighting value associated with the evaluator attribute information included in the evaluation information and stored in the attribute-specific weight storage unit, For each evaluation object, an overall evaluation value acquisition unit that acquires an overall evaluation value that is an evaluation value of the entire evaluation object;
A program for functioning as an output unit that outputs the overall evaluation value.

Images