JP2011202956A - Failure determination method of lightning arrester - Google Patents

Failure determination method of lightning arrester Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2011202956A
JP2011202956A JP2010067493A JP2010067493A JP2011202956A JP 2011202956 A JP2011202956 A JP 2011202956A JP 2010067493 A JP2010067493 A JP 2010067493A JP 2010067493 A JP2010067493 A JP 2010067493A JP 2011202956 A JP2011202956 A JP 2011202956A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
lightning arrester
khz
side terminal
sample
terminal voltage
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2010067493A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP5539762B2 (en
JP2011202956A5 (en
Inventor
Masahiro Kozuka
正裕 小塚
Hironao Kawamura
裕直 川村
Naoki Itamoto
直樹 板本
Yasuhiko Nakata
保彦 中田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hokuriku Electric Power Co
Original Assignee
Hokuriku Electric Power Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hokuriku Electric Power Co filed Critical Hokuriku Electric Power Co
Priority to JP2010067493A priority Critical patent/JP5539762B2/en
Publication of JP2011202956A publication Critical patent/JP2011202956A/en
Publication of JP2011202956A5 publication Critical patent/JP2011202956A5/ja
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5539762B2 publication Critical patent/JP5539762B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Testing Electric Properties And Detecting Electric Faults (AREA)
  • Thermistors And Varistors (AREA)

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a failure determination method for accurately determining the failure of partial destruction without disabling non-defective products in a device where pieces of equipment including a dynamic current cut-off function are connected in series.SOLUTION: The failure determination method of a lightning arrester goes through steps of: applying an input signal from less than approximately 1 kHz to more than approximately 1 MHz, and leading impedance of a sample lightning arrester from output signals of an earth-side terminal voltage Vin and a line-side terminal voltage Vout; leading a phase difference between the earth-side terminal voltage Vin and the line-side terminal voltage Vout; leading a serial component resistance value; obtaining a frequency characteristic curve peculiar to the sample lightning arrester by plotting the led serial component resistance value at log-log axes; and determining a case where a deviation of not less than a set amount is recognized in a frequency characteristic curve peculiar to the sample arrester and in the frequency characteristic curve of a non-defective arrester, and the deviation is confirmed at not more than 1 kHz and a case where the deviation is not confirmed at not more than 1 kHz and is recognized at not less than 100 kHz.

Description

本発明は、電力設備に用いられる避雷装置、特に、続流遮断機能を有する複数個の酸化亜鉛素子を直列に接続した避雷装置における、保守・メンテナンス技術に関する。   The present invention relates to a lightning arrester used for electric power equipment, and more particularly to maintenance / maintenance technology in a lightning arrester in which a plurality of zinc oxide elements having a continuity blocking function are connected in series.

避雷装置が備える複数の素子は、雷撃により全てが同時に破損するわけではないため、雷撃によっては、完全破壊(全素子破壊)に至らず、部分破壊(一部素子破損)に留まる例も少なく無い。
部分破壊している避雷装置は、導入当初の性能を有していないため、電力設備に対する信頼度の低下を招く。
Multiple elements of a lightning arrester are not all damaged at the same time by lightning strikes, so there are many cases where lightning strikes do not result in complete destruction (all element destruction) but partial destruction (partial element damage). .
Since the lightning arrester that has been partially destroyed does not have the performance at the time of introduction, the reliability of the power equipment is reduced.

従来の故障を判定する方法のひとつとして、絶縁抵抗を測定する手法が挙げられる。
絶縁抵抗を測定する手法は、全てが完全に破損したときに初めて判定が可能となる。
よって、部分破壊の状態を判定するには、解体作業が必要であり、全ての避雷装置に実施するには多大な労力を要する。その上、部分破壊の状態を判定すると、正常品であっても、再度使用する事が不可能となり、結果として避雷装置の交換を余儀なくされる事態となる。
以上の如く、上記故障判定方法ではこの部分破壊の状態を判定することができない。
One conventional method for determining a failure is to measure the insulation resistance.
The method of measuring the insulation resistance can be determined only when everything is completely damaged.
Therefore, disassembling work is required to determine the state of partial destruction, and a great deal of labor is required to implement all lightning arresters. In addition, when the state of partial destruction is determined, even if it is a normal product, it cannot be used again, and as a result, the lightning arrester must be replaced.
As described above, the partial failure state cannot be determined by the failure determination method.

一方、避雷装置に流れる電流を測定する手法(例えば下記特許文献参照)も存在するが、部分破壊品と正常品との間で必ずしも大きな較差が出るとは限らず、故障を正確に検出することはできないこととなる。   On the other hand, there is a method for measuring the current flowing through the lightning arrester (see the following patent document, for example), but there is not always a large difference between the partially destroyed product and the normal product, and the failure is detected accurately. It will not be possible.

特開平5−159909号公報JP-A-5-159909

本発明は上記実情に鑑みてなされたものであって、続流遮断機能を有する機器を直列に接続した装置において、正常品を使用不能とすることなく部分破壊の故障判定を正確に行なうことが出来る故障判定方法の提供を目的とする。   The present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, and in a device in which devices having a continuity blocking function are connected in series, it is possible to accurately perform failure determination of partial destruction without disabling normal products. The purpose is to provide a possible failure determination method.

上記課題を解決するためになされた本発明による避雷装置の故障判定方法は、試料避雷装置のアース側端子とライン側端子に信号源を接続して約1kHz未満から約1MHzを超える周波数に至る入力信号を印加し、それによって得た出力信号を数値化し、特性カーブ化して判定に用いるものである。   A lightning arrester failure determination method according to the present invention made to solve the above-mentioned problems is achieved by connecting a signal source to the ground-side terminal and the line-side terminal of the sample lightning arrester and inputting an input frequency from less than about 1 kHz to more than about 1 MHz. A signal is applied, and an output signal obtained thereby is digitized, converted into a characteristic curve, and used for determination.

即ち、入力信号の印加によって得たアース側端子電圧Vinとライン側端子電圧Voutの出力信号から、

Figure 2011202956

により試料避雷装置のインピーダンスを導くステップと、
Figure 2011202956
により試料避雷装置のアース側端子電圧Vinとライン側端子電圧Vout間の位相差を導くステップと、
Figure 2011202956
により試料避雷装置の直列成分抵抗値を導くステップと、
導かれた直列成分抵抗値を約1kHz未満から約1MHzを超える周波数に至るまで両対数軸にプロットし試料避雷装置固有の周波数特性カーブを得るステップと、
試料避雷装置固有の周波数特性カーブと正常品避雷装置の周波数特性カーブに設定量以上の偏差が認められ、且つ
その偏差が1kHz以下で確認された場合には完全破壊品と判定する一方、
その偏差が1kHz以下で確認されず、且つ100kHz以上で確認された場合には部分破壊品と判定するステップとを経ることを特徴とする。 That is, from the output signals of the ground side terminal voltage Vin and the line side terminal voltage Vout obtained by applying the input signal,
Figure 2011202956

To derive the impedance of the sample lightning arrester by
Figure 2011202956
A step of deriving a phase difference between the ground side terminal voltage Vin and the line side terminal voltage Vout of the sample lightning arrester;
Figure 2011202956
The step of deriving the series component resistance value of the sample lightning arrester by
Plotting the derived series component resistance values on a logarithmic axis from less than about 1 kHz to frequencies exceeding about 1 MHz to obtain a frequency characteristic curve specific to the sample arrester;
When the deviation of more than the set amount is recognized in the frequency characteristic curve specific to the sample lightning arrester and the frequency characteristic curve of the normal lightning arrester, and the deviation is confirmed at 1 kHz or less,
If the deviation is not confirmed at 1 kHz or less and is confirmed at 100 kHz or more, a step of determining a partially destroyed product is performed.

約1kHz未満から約1MHzを超える周波数に至る入力信号とは、避雷装置の仕様に応じて異なるものの、数Hz、数十Hz、又は数百Hzから数MHz、数十MHz、又は数百MHzと、適宜変更可能である。   An input signal that reaches a frequency that is less than about 1 kHz to more than about 1 MHz differs depending on the specifications of the lightning arrester, but is several Hz, several tens Hz, or several hundred Hz to several MHz, several tens MHz, or several hundred MHz. These can be changed as appropriate.

入力信号の周波数領域における出力信号を数値化したサンプリング数、及びプロット数については、実用的な演算速度を得る点で演算手段の能力が許容する限りにおいて、サンプルを数多く採取する事が望ましい。一方で、実用的な判定精度が得られる限り、必要以上に多くのサンプルを採取する必要は無い。従って、少なくとも正常品の周波数特性カーブを得た際のサンプリング数を確保し、少なくとも正常品の周波数特性カーブを得た際におけるサンプル取得時の周波数の全範囲にわたるサンプルを採取することが望ましい。   As for the number of samplings and the number of plots obtained by quantifying the output signal in the frequency domain of the input signal, it is desirable to take a large number of samples as long as the capability of the calculation means allows to obtain a practical calculation speed. On the other hand, as long as practical judgment accuracy is obtained, it is not necessary to collect more samples than necessary. Therefore, it is desirable to secure at least the number of samplings when obtaining the frequency characteristic curve of a normal product and to collect samples over the entire range of frequencies at the time of sample acquisition when obtaining at least the frequency characteristic curve of a normal product.

判定するステップにおいて、その偏差が1kHz以下で確認された場合とは、1kHz以下のどの点で確認されても良く、100kHz以上で確認された場合とは、100kHz以上のどの点で確認されても良い。   In the determination step, when the deviation is confirmed at 1 kHz or less, it may be confirmed at any point of 1 kHz or less, and when it is confirmed at 100 kHz or more, it may be confirmed at any point of 100 kHz or more. good.

以上の如く、本発明による避雷装置の故障判定方法によれば、単なる数値の比較のみならず、特定周波数帯域の抵抗値格差を比較する処理を採用したことから、従来に増して正確な判定結果を得ることができるので、電力設備に用いられる避雷装置の保守・メンテナンスの技術向上及び効率化が図られる。
また、部分破壊に至っている避雷装置を発見することにより、電力設備の信頼度維持が図られる。
As described above, according to the lightning arrester failure determination method according to the present invention, not only a simple numerical comparison but also a process of comparing resistance value disparities in specific frequency bands is adopted. Therefore, the technical improvement and efficiency improvement of the lightning arrester used for electric power equipment can be achieved.
Moreover, the reliability of electric power equipment can be maintained by finding a lightning arrester that has been partially destroyed.

本発明による避雷装置の故障判定方法が用いられる避雷装置の内部等価回路である。It is an internal equivalent circuit of the lightning arrester in which the failure determination method of the lightning arrester by this invention is used. 本発明による避雷装置の故障判定方法が用いられる避雷装置の周波数に対する直列成分抵抗値(計算値)の一例を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows an example of the serial component resistance value (calculated value) with respect to the frequency of the lightning arrester in which the failure determination method of the lightning arrester by this invention is used. 本発明による避雷装置の故障判定方法が用いられる避雷装置(実送電線路に適用されていたもの)の周波数に対する直列成分抵抗値(実測値)の一例を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows an example of the serial component resistance value (measured value) with respect to the frequency of the lightning arrester (what was applied to the actual power transmission line) in which the failure determination method of the lightning arrester by this invention is used. 本発明による避雷装置の故障判定方法に用いる測定器の一例を示すブロック図である。It is a block diagram which shows an example of the measuring device used for the failure determination method of the lightning arrester by this invention. 本発明による避雷装置の故障判定方法に用いる測定回路の一例を示す電気回路図である。It is an electric circuit diagram which shows an example of the measurement circuit used for the failure determination method of the lightning arrester by this invention.

以下、本発明による続流遮断機能を有する機器を直列に接続した装置(以下避雷装置と記す)の故障判定方法の実施の形態を図面に基づき説明する。
本発明は、避雷装置の電気的特性を測定することにより、部分破壊に至っている避雷装置の状態の判定を可能とする。
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Embodiments of a failure determination method for a device (hereinafter referred to as a lightning arrester) in which devices having a continuity blocking function according to the present invention are connected in series will be described below with reference to the drawings.
The present invention makes it possible to determine the state of a lightning arrester that has been partially destroyed by measuring the electrical characteristics of the lightning arrester.

通常、避雷装置には、複数個の酸化亜鉛素子(以下素子と記す)を直列に接続してあり、図1に示す内部等価回路で表すことができる。
これは、抵抗分と静電容量分を並列に接続した回路であるが、複数個の素子を直列接続してなる避雷装置の等価回路は、これらを全て一括した直列成分抵抗値と、直列成分リアクタンス値に変換した形で表現することもできる。
Usually, a lightning arrester has a plurality of zinc oxide elements (hereinafter referred to as elements) connected in series, and can be represented by an internal equivalent circuit shown in FIG.
This is a circuit in which a resistance component and a capacitance component are connected in parallel. An equivalent circuit of a lightning arrester in which a plurality of elements are connected in series is a series component resistance value and a series component. It can also be expressed in a form converted to a reactance value.

その際、素子一個分の直列成分抵抗値と直列成分リアクタンス値は下記式1に示すものとなり、複数子の素子を直列接続した場合の直列成分抵抗値と直列成分リアクタンス値は下記式2に示すものとなる。   At that time, the series component resistance value and the series component reactance value for one element are as shown in the following formula 1, and the series component resistance value and the series component reactance value when a plurality of elements are connected in series are shown in the following formula 2. It will be a thing.

Figure 2011202956
(酸化亜鉛素子一個分)
Figure 2011202956
(For one zinc oxide element)

Figure 2011202956
Figure 2011202956

この式の直列成分抵抗値を用いて、正常品、完全破壊品、及び部分破壊品について計算し推定した結果を図2に示す。
尚、この測定結果は、
正常品(抵抗値20MΩ/素子:静電容量値120pF)、
完全破壊品(抵抗値160MΩ/素子:静電容量値120pF)、
部分破壊品(抵抗値4kΩ/素子:静電容量値120pF
一個の素子のみ破壊
その他の素子は正常品と同様)を用いてのものである。
FIG. 2 shows the results of calculation and estimation of normal products, completely destroyed products, and partially destroyed products using the series component resistance values of this equation.
This measurement result is
Normal product (resistance value 20 MΩ / element: capacitance value 120 pF),
Completely destroyed product (resistance value 160MΩ / element: capacitance value 120pF),
Partially destroyed product (resistance value 4 kΩ / element: capacitance value 120 pF)
Only one element is destroyed. Other elements are the same as normal products).

破壊された素子は閃絡により抵抗値が低下すると仮定すると、正常品とは、全ての素子の抵抗値が低下していない避雷装置であり、完全破壊品とは、全ての素子の抵抗値が低下している避雷装置であり、部分破壊品とは、素子の抵抗値が低下しているものと低下していないものが混在する避雷装置であるということになる。   Assuming that the resistance value of the destroyed element is reduced by a flashover, the normal product is a lightning arrester in which the resistance value of all elements is not reduced, and the complete destruction product is the resistance value of all elements. A lightning arrester that has been reduced, and a partially destroyed product is a lightning arrester in which a device whose resistance value has decreased and a device that has not decreased are mixed.

そうすると、正常品では、周波数の増加に伴い静電容量分の抵抗値が低下していくことによって、直列抵抗成分が低下していく(図2参照)。
完全破壊品では、全ての素子が破壊され抵抗値が低下しているために、周波数が増加しても抵抗値が変化せず一定となる。
部分破壊品では、破壊されている素子と破壊されていない素子が直列に接続されて混在しており、各素子の特性の遷移点が異なるため、低い周波数では正常品と同様の傾向を示しているものの、高い周波数では完全破壊品と同様の傾向を示し、正常品との差異がはっきりしてくる。
以上の特性の相異を用いることにより、部分破壊に至っている避雷装置の判定が可能となる。
Then, in a normal product, the resistance value corresponding to the capacitance decreases as the frequency increases, so that the series resistance component decreases (see FIG. 2).
In a completely destroyed product, since all elements are destroyed and the resistance value is lowered, the resistance value does not change even if the frequency is increased and becomes constant.
In the partially destroyed product, the elements that are destroyed and the elements that are not destroyed are connected in series and mixed, and the transition point of the characteristics of each element is different. However, the high frequency shows the same tendency as the completely destroyed product, and the difference from the normal product becomes clear.
By using the difference in characteristics described above, it is possible to determine a lightning arrester that has been partially destroyed.

以下、本発明による避雷装置の故障判定方法の流れを具体的に説明する。
本実施の形態における故障判定方法は、試料を収集すると共に、測定器(図4参照)を準備し、図5に示す測定回路で測定した直列成分抵抗値−周波数特性(以下周波数特性と記す)を取得するものである。
The flow of the lightning arrester failure determination method according to the present invention will be specifically described below.
The failure determination method according to the present embodiment collects a sample, prepares a measuring instrument (see FIG. 4), and measures the series component resistance value-frequency characteristics (hereinafter referred to as frequency characteristics) measured by the measurement circuit shown in FIG. Is something to get.

測定器は、約1Hzから約1000MHzに至る交流信号を連続的に発生し得るジェネレータ1と、その入力信号に対する出力信号を検出するプローブ2と、出力信号に対して演算を施す演算手段3と、演算結果を共通の両対数軸にプロットした周波数特性カーブをメモリー上、又は画面上に実現するプロッタ4と、設定周波数以下及び、設定周波数以上の領域において正常品と試料の直流成分抵抗値格差を導く比較部5と、その比較結果から、正常品、部分破壊品、又は完全破壊品の判断を出力する判定部6とで構成される。   The measuring instrument includes a generator 1 that can continuously generate an AC signal from about 1 Hz to about 1000 MHz, a probe 2 that detects an output signal corresponding to the input signal, an arithmetic means 3 that performs an operation on the output signal, The plotter 4 that realizes the frequency characteristic curve plotting the calculation result on the common logarithmic axis on the memory or on the screen, and the difference in DC component resistance between the normal product and the sample in the region below the set frequency and above the set frequency. The comparison unit 5 leads and a determination unit 6 that outputs a determination of a normal product, a partially destroyed product, or a completely destroyed product from the comparison result.

周波数特性は、送電線から切り離した避雷装置の両端へ測定器を接続し、ジェネレータ1によって、100Hzから100MHzまで周波数を変化させつつ信号を供給する。
出力信号をプローブ2を経て検出し、演算手段3にて上記数式(1)乃至(3)により抵抗値を導く。
As for the frequency characteristics, measuring devices are connected to both ends of a lightning arrester separated from a power transmission line, and a signal is supplied by the generator 1 while changing the frequency from 100 Hz to 100 MHz.
The output signal is detected through the probe 2 and the resistance value is derived by the arithmetic means 3 by the above formulas (1) to (3).

プロッタ4は、導かれた抵抗値を、メモリー上及びディスプレー上で仮想の両対数軸にプロットし、試料固有の周波数特性カーブを得る。   The plotter 4 plots the derived resistance value on a virtual logarithmic axis on the memory and on the display to obtain a frequency characteristic curve specific to the sample.

比較部5は、試料の実測周波数特性カーブを、予め保持していた正常品の特性カーブと比較し、判定部6は、相対的に、トレンドのズレ及び抵抗値の著しい増加、又は減少等の変化の相違を着眼点として、予め設定した判断基準に基づき判定を行なう。尚、正常品の特性カーブとは、試料と同様の手順を以って得た正常品の周波数特性を共通の両対数軸にプロットして得たものである。   The comparison unit 5 compares the measured frequency characteristic curve of the sample with the characteristic curve of a normal product that has been held in advance, and the determination unit 6 relatively detects a trend shift and a significant increase or decrease in the resistance value. The determination is made based on a predetermined criterion based on the difference in change. The characteristic curve of the normal product is obtained by plotting the frequency characteristics of the normal product obtained by the same procedure as the sample on the common logarithmic axis.

本実施の形態における判断基準は、試料と正常品の特性カーブに設定量以上の偏差が認められた時、
(1)その偏差が1kHz以下で確認された場合には完全破壊品と判定する。
(2)その偏差が1kHz以下で確認されず、100kHz以上で確認された場合には、部分破壊品と判定する。
というものである。
The criterion in the present embodiment is that when a deviation of a set amount or more is recognized in the characteristic curve of the sample and the normal product,
(1) When the deviation is confirmed at 1 kHz or less, it is determined that the product is completely destroyed.
(2) When the deviation is not confirmed at 1 kHz or less and is confirmed at 100 kHz or more, it is determined as a partially destroyed product.
That's it.

これらの判断基準を反映する周波数及び抵抗値の偏差に関し、比較部5は、予め定めた設定値又は設定量を基準として比較する。基準の例としては、完全破壊品の判断における1kHz以下の周波数帯においては、抵抗値の実測値の百倍程度であり、部分破壊品の判断における100kHz以上の周波数帯においては、抵抗値の正常値(実測周波数において正常値として予め定められた値)の五倍程度である。   Regarding the deviation of the frequency and the resistance value reflecting these determination criteria, the comparison unit 5 compares them with a predetermined set value or set amount as a reference. As an example of the reference, in the frequency band of 1 kHz or less in the determination of the completely destroyed product, the resistance value is about 100 times the measured value, and in the frequency band of 100 kHz or more in the determination of the partially destroyed product, the normal value of the resistance value. It is about five times the value (a value predetermined as a normal value at the actually measured frequency).

判定部6は、その比較結果を受けて上記判断基準に基づき正常品、完全破壊品、又は部分破壊品に振り分ける判定処理を行なうものである。
上記基準の例を用いれば、1kHz以下の周波数帯において抵抗値の実測値と正常値の間に実測値の百倍程度以上の偏差が断続的又は継続的にあれば(適宜分割した周波数帯域の平均値で判断しても良い)完全破壊品と判定し、100kHz以上において抵抗値の実測値と正常値の間に正常値の五倍程度以上の偏差が断続的又は継続的にあれば部分破壊品と判定する。判定結果は、アラーム又は表示など種々の手法を採ることが可能である。
The determination unit 6 receives the comparison result, and performs a determination process of allocating to a normal product, a completely destroyed product, or a partially destroyed product based on the above determination criteria.
If the example of the above standard is used, if there is a deviation of about 100 times or more of the measured value between the measured value and the normal value of the resistance value intermittently or continuously in the frequency band of 1 kHz or less (the average of the frequency bands divided as appropriate) (It may be judged by the value) If it is judged as a completely destroyed product, and there is an intermittent or continuous deviation of about 5 times the normal value between the measured value and the normal value of the resistance value at 100 kHz or higher, it is a partially destroyed product. Is determined. As the determination result, various methods such as alarm or display can be adopted.

尚、これらの比較処理及び判定処理は、測定者が目視で行うことも可能である。目視の場合は、必ずしも周波数に対する抵抗値の格差を判断する事を要せず、感覚的に正常品の周波数特性カーブと試料の周波数特性カーブとの隔たりで判断すれば良い。   It should be noted that these comparison processing and determination processing can be performed visually by the measurer. In the case of visual observation, it is not always necessary to determine the difference in resistance value with respect to the frequency, and it may be determined sensuously by the difference between the frequency characteristic curve of the normal product and the frequency characteristic curve of the sample.

図3は、実送電線に取り付けられていた避雷装置の特性試験結果である。
完全破壊品においては、1kHz以下で正常品では2MΩ以上あることが実測からも確認されており、放爆品においては2kΩ程度が確認されている。
部分破壊品においては、理論式(図2参照)では破損した素子の抵抗値を2kΩと仮定した場合、100kHzにおいて10倍程度の偏差が確認でき、また、実績(図3参照)においても、周波数の増加に伴い抵抗値の格差が増加しており、且つ同周波数において5〜10倍程度の偏差が確認できる特性変化の状況から、試料は部分破壊品であると確認することができる。
FIG. 3 shows the result of a characteristic test of the lightning arrester attached to the actual power transmission line.
It has also been confirmed from actual measurements that a completely destroyed product is 1 kHz or less and a normal product is 2 MΩ or more, and an explosive product has been confirmed to be about 2 kΩ.
For a partially destroyed product, the theoretical formula (see Fig. 2) assumes a deviation of about 10 times at 100 kHz, assuming that the resistance value of the damaged element is 2 kΩ. It can be confirmed that the sample is a partially destructive product from the situation of a characteristic change in which the difference in resistance value increases with the increase of and the deviation of about 5 to 10 times can be confirmed at the same frequency.

1 ジェネレータ,2 プローブ,3 演算手段,4 プロッタ,
5 比較部,6 判定部,
1 generator, 2 probe, 3 calculation means, 4 plotter,
5 comparison part, 6 judgment part,

Claims (1)

試料避雷装置のアース側端子とライン側端子に信号源を接続して約1kHz未満から約1MHzを超える周波数に至る入力信号を印加し、入力信号の印加によって得たアース側端子電圧Vinとライン側端子電圧Voutの出力信号から、
Figure 2011202956
により試料避雷装置のインピーダンスを導くステップと、
Figure 2011202956
により試料避雷装置のアース側端子電圧Vinとライン側端子電圧Vout間の位相差を導くステップと、
Figure 2011202956
により試料避雷装置の直列成分抵抗値を導くステップと、
導かれた直列成分抵抗値を約1kHz未満から約1MHzを超える周波数に至るまで両対数軸にプロットし試料避雷装置固有の周波数特性カーブを得るステップと、
試料避雷装置固有の周波数特性カーブと正常品避雷装置の周波数特性カーブに設定量以上の相異が認められ、且つ
その相異が1kHz以下で確認された場合には完全破壊品と判定する一方、
その相異が1kHz以下で確認されず、且つ100kHz以上で確認された場合には部分破壊品と判定するステップと、
を経ることを特徴とする避雷装置の故障判定方法。
Connect a signal source to the ground side terminal and line side terminal of the sample lightning arrester, apply an input signal that reaches a frequency of less than about 1 kHz to more than about 1 MHz, and obtain the ground side terminal voltage Vin obtained by applying the input signal and the line side From the output signal of terminal voltage Vout,
Figure 2011202956
To derive the impedance of the sample lightning arrester by
Figure 2011202956
A step of deriving a phase difference between the ground side terminal voltage Vin and the line side terminal voltage Vout of the sample lightning arrester;
Figure 2011202956
The step of deriving the series component resistance value of the sample lightning arrester by
Plotting the derived series component resistance values on a logarithmic axis from less than about 1 kHz to frequencies exceeding about 1 MHz to obtain a frequency characteristic curve specific to the sample arrester;
If the difference between the frequency characteristic curve specific to the sample lightning arrester and the frequency characteristic curve of the normal lightning arrester is greater than the set amount, and the difference is confirmed at 1 kHz or less,
If the difference is not confirmed at 1 kHz or less and is confirmed at 100 kHz or more, a step of determining a partially destroyed product;
A method for determining a failure of a lightning arrester, characterized by undergoing
JP2010067493A 2010-03-24 2010-03-24 Lightning arrester failure determination method Expired - Fee Related JP5539762B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2010067493A JP5539762B2 (en) 2010-03-24 2010-03-24 Lightning arrester failure determination method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2010067493A JP5539762B2 (en) 2010-03-24 2010-03-24 Lightning arrester failure determination method

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2011202956A true JP2011202956A (en) 2011-10-13
JP2011202956A5 JP2011202956A5 (en) 2012-08-30
JP5539762B2 JP5539762B2 (en) 2014-07-02

Family

ID=44879785

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2010067493A Expired - Fee Related JP5539762B2 (en) 2010-03-24 2010-03-24 Lightning arrester failure determination method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5539762B2 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2013221823A (en) * 2012-04-16 2013-10-28 Hioki Ee Corp Packaged state discrimination apparatus and packaged state discrimination method
JP2014013164A (en) * 2012-07-04 2014-01-23 Hokuriku Electric Power Co Inc:The Failure detection method of lightning protection device
US10114526B2 (en) 2011-12-07 2018-10-30 International Business Machines Corporation Displaying an electronic document
CN113721100A (en) * 2021-09-18 2021-11-30 国网安徽省电力有限公司马鞍山供电公司 Lightning arrester online monitoring device capable of performing fault early warning and control method thereof
CN113804979A (en) * 2021-09-03 2021-12-17 青岛鼎信通讯股份有限公司 Lightning waveform identification method based on feeder terminal
CN114062810A (en) * 2021-11-11 2022-02-18 国网湖南省电力有限公司 Fracture prediction method for zinc oxide line arrester

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH05159909A (en) * 1991-12-10 1993-06-25 Fuji Electric Co Ltd Fault monitor for lightning arrestor
JP2006284247A (en) * 2005-03-31 2006-10-19 Jfe Steel Kk Method for diagnosing degradation of thyristor element
JP2009162501A (en) * 2007-12-28 2009-07-23 Nhv Corporation Integrity test method of high-voltage rectifier stack

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH05159909A (en) * 1991-12-10 1993-06-25 Fuji Electric Co Ltd Fault monitor for lightning arrestor
JP2006284247A (en) * 2005-03-31 2006-10-19 Jfe Steel Kk Method for diagnosing degradation of thyristor element
JP2009162501A (en) * 2007-12-28 2009-07-23 Nhv Corporation Integrity test method of high-voltage rectifier stack

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10114526B2 (en) 2011-12-07 2018-10-30 International Business Machines Corporation Displaying an electronic document
JP2013221823A (en) * 2012-04-16 2013-10-28 Hioki Ee Corp Packaged state discrimination apparatus and packaged state discrimination method
JP2014013164A (en) * 2012-07-04 2014-01-23 Hokuriku Electric Power Co Inc:The Failure detection method of lightning protection device
CN113804979A (en) * 2021-09-03 2021-12-17 青岛鼎信通讯股份有限公司 Lightning waveform identification method based on feeder terminal
CN113804979B (en) * 2021-09-03 2023-06-16 青岛鼎信通讯股份有限公司 Lightning stroke waveform identification method based on feeder terminal
CN113721100A (en) * 2021-09-18 2021-11-30 国网安徽省电力有限公司马鞍山供电公司 Lightning arrester online monitoring device capable of performing fault early warning and control method thereof
CN114062810A (en) * 2021-11-11 2022-02-18 国网湖南省电力有限公司 Fracture prediction method for zinc oxide line arrester
CN114062810B (en) * 2021-11-11 2023-07-25 国网湖南省电力有限公司 Fracture prediction method for zinc oxide line lightning arrester

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP5539762B2 (en) 2014-07-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
James et al. Development of computer-based measurements and their application to PD pattern analysis
JP5539762B2 (en) Lightning arrester failure determination method
CN104714155A (en) Detection and evaluation device and method for partial discharge of direct current XLPE cables
JP6489651B2 (en) Partial discharge measuring device, partial discharge measuring method, and program
WO2016065959A1 (en) Diagnostic method for ferromagnetic resonance in 10 kv neutral ungrounded system
CN106771895A (en) A kind of cable degradation detecting method based on magnetic field harmonics detection
Lee et al. A new on-line leakage current monitoring system of ZnO surge arresters
JP7041896B2 (en) Rotating machine winding insulation deterioration diagnostic device
JP5690171B2 (en) Fault diagnosis method and fault diagnosis device for lightning arrester
Khayam et al. Design of RC circuit as partial discharge detector
CN106526406A (en) Inter-tern short-circuit detection device, analysis method and device for voltage transformer
CN107918092A (en) A kind of temporary electric discharge quantity measuring method of partial discharge of switchgear
JP7290566B2 (en) Method and apparatus for predicting splice life cycle
CN110988444A (en) Zinc oxide lightning arrester voltage divider, overvoltage detection lightning arrester and detection method
JP2014013164A (en) Failure detection method of lightning protection device
JP2019045401A (en) Partial discharge diagnostic device and partial discharge diagnostic method
KR20120008823A (en) System for measuring ground impedance in high frequency band
WO2014130806A1 (en) Method and apparatus for monitoring condition of a splice
US20170038421A1 (en) Method and apparatus for predicting life cycle of a splice
JP2014010073A (en) Deterioration inspection device and deterioration inspection method
Martins et al. Evaluation and diagnosis technique for surge arresters
AU3555201A (en) Method and device for controlling a telecommunication cable
CN105572489A (en) Live-line tester for lightning arrester
CN205484539U (en) Resistive current measuring system of metal oxide arrester
De Mata-Castrejón et al. Evaluation of progressive deterioration of a squirrel-cage rotor, with a condition monitoring system that implements the sideband methodology

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20100409

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821

Effective date: 20100409

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20120711

A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20130123

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20140110

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20140121

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20140319

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20140408

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5539762

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20140501

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees