JP2011065446A - Web content diagnostic device - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a web content diagnostic device which updates web content and can reduce diagnostic operation of the web content when rediagnosing the accessibility. <P>SOLUTION: A web content diagnostic device includes: an update source diagnostic result list obtaining means to obtain an update source diagnostic result list which is a list of a diagnostic result of the update source; an update destination diagnostic result list obtaining means to obtain an update destination diagnostic result list which is a list of diagnostic result in the update destination; an update determination means to determine whether updates the update source diagnostic result in the update source diagnostic result list to the update destination diagnostic result in the update destination diagnostic result list; and a diagnostic result update means which update the update destination diagnostic result by the update source diagnostic result according to the determination by the update determination means. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2011,JPO&INPIT

Description

  According to the present invention, in order to update another arbitrary web content diagnosis result with a diagnosis result of an arbitrary web content, according to a predetermined condition regarding a diagnosis item in each of the update source diagnosis result list and the update destination diagnosis result list Thus, the present invention relates to a diagnostic result update technique for determining whether or not to update an update destination diagnosis result list with an update source diagnosis result list.

  Due to the development of information and communication equipment, the Internet has become widespread in recent years. Along with this, information distribution using the Internet has become an important social core technology. For this reason, web contents are required to be accessible to users (web viewers) having various characteristics such as elderly people and visually impaired persons, that is, considering accessibility. Therefore, a web accessibility guideline (hereinafter referred to as “guideline”) has been issued that describes matters to be considered from the viewpoint of accessibility.

  Typical guidelines are WCAG 2.0 (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0) by W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) and JIS X 8341-3 “Design Guidelines for Consideration of the Elderly and Persons with Disabilities—Information Communication Equipment , Software, and service ”(hereinafter referred to as“ JIS ”).

  Diagnose whether the considerations described in the guidelines (hereinafter referred to as “diagnostic items”) are satisfied in order to confirm that the web content is accessible (hereinafter referred to as “accessibility diagnostics”) It is necessary to. JIS is scheduled to be revised this year, and the JIS that is scheduled to be revised requires a document that proves that web content satisfies accessibility, that is, the diagnosis results are compiled into a checklist called an “implementation checklist”. Demands.

Umegaki Masahiro "Test Method Using the Revised JIS X 8341-3" UAI Seminar, May 22, 2009 (URL: http://www.umegaki.jp/presentation/uai-20090522-test.html) ( URL: http://www.slideshare.net/ume3jan/uai-20090522-test)

  Accessibility diagnosis has a large number of diagnosis items. For example, in WCAG 2.0, 200 or more checkpoints are described. In addition, there are many locations in the web content that are the targets of each checkpoint. For example, there are also diagnostic items that target all images in the web content. Therefore, there is a problem that performing an accessibility diagnosis requires a great deal of effort.

  On the other hand, regardless of whether it is newly created web content or a revision of existing web content, it is required to perform accessibility diagnosis for all items of the guideline before publishing.

  In general, web content provided by companies and local governments is frequently updated on a daily or weekly basis, such as update information and news releases, etc. There is a problem that it is a heavy burden to execute.

  An object of the present invention is to provide a web content diagnostic apparatus that can reduce the work of diagnosing web content when updating web content and rediagnosing accessibility.

  The present invention is a web content diagnostic apparatus that updates a diagnostic result before updating and diagnoses only an updated part in the web content when updating web content and rediagnosing accessibility.

  According to the present invention, when the web content is updated and accessibility is re-diagnosed, the diagnostic result before the update is updated, and only the updated portion in the web content is diagnosed. There is an effect that can be reduced.

1 is a block diagram illustrating a web content diagnosis apparatus 1 that is Embodiment 1 of the present invention. 6 is a flowchart illustrating a diagnostic result update processing procedure in the first embodiment. In Example 1, it is a figure which shows the update origin diagnostic result list | wrist acquired. In Example 1, it is a figure which shows the update destination diagnostic result list | wrist acquired. It is a figure which shows the example of the update destination diagnostic result list updated in Example 1. FIG. It is a flowchart which shows the diagnostic result update process sequence in Example 2 of this invention. In Example 2, it is a figure which shows the update origin diagnostic result list | wrist acquired. In Example 2, it is a figure which shows the update origin diagnostic result list which added the target location text. It is a figure which shows the update destination diagnostic result list | wrist in Example 2. FIG. In Example 2, it is a figure which shows the update destination diagnostic result list which added the target location text. In Example 2, it is a figure which shows the update destination diagnostic result list | wrist updated. It is a flowchart which shows the diagnostic result update process sequence in Example 3 of this invention. In Example 3, it is a figure which shows the update origin diagnostic result list | wrist acquired. In Example 3, it is a figure which shows the update destination diagnostic result list | wrist acquired. It is a figure which shows the example of the update destination diagnostic result list updated in Example 3. FIG. 14 is a flowchart illustrating a diagnostic result update processing procedure in the fourth embodiment. In Example 4, it is a figure which shows the update origin diagnostic result list | wrist acquired. In Example 4, it is a figure which shows the update destination diagnostic result list | wrist acquired. In Example 4, it is a figure which shows the example of the update destination diagnostic result list | wrist updated. 10 is a flowchart illustrating a diagnostic result update processing procedure in the fifth embodiment. In Example 5, it is a figure which shows the update origin diagnostic result list | wrist acquired. In Example 5, it is a figure which shows the update destination diagnostic result list | wrist acquired. In Example 5, it is a figure which shows the update destination diagnostic result list | wrist updated.

  The modes for carrying out the invention are the following examples.

  FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a web content diagnosis apparatus 1 that is Embodiment 1 of the present invention.

  The web content diagnosis apparatus 1 includes a CPU, an HDD, an OS, and the like, and includes a control unit 10 that performs calculation and control of each unit and apparatus, a storage unit 20, and a temporary storage unit 30, for example, a computer device It is.

  The web content diagnosis apparatus 1 is actually realized by one computer or a plurality of computers. That is, each functional block constituting the web content diagnosis apparatus 1 is realized by hardware resources and software resources of a computer.

  In the first embodiment, the update destination diagnosis result for the single diagnosis item specified by the user as the update destination is updated in the update source diagnosis result list for the single diagnosis item specified by the user as the update source. That is, the update destination diagnosis result is updated in the update source diagnosis result list for the same diagnosis item.

  The control unit 10 includes an update source diagnosis result list acquisition unit 11, an update destination diagnosis result list acquisition unit 12, an update determination unit 13, and a diagnosis result update unit 14.

  The update source diagnosis result list acquisition unit 11 acquires, for example, the update source diagnosis result list shown in FIG. 3 and stores it in the temporary storage unit 30 such as a RAM. The update source diagnosis result list is a list of diagnosis results at the update source.

  The update destination diagnosis result list acquisition unit 12 acquires, for example, the update destination diagnosis result list shown in FIG. 4 and stores it in the temporary storage unit 30 or the like. The update destination diagnosis result list is a list of diagnosis results at the update destination.

  The update determination unit 13 individually determines whether or not to update the update destination diagnosis result in the update destination diagnosis result list with the update source diagnosis result in the acquired update source diagnosis result list. That is, the update determination unit 13 determines whether or not to update the update source diagnosis result in the update source diagnosis result list to the update destination diagnosis result in the update destination diagnosis result list.

  The diagnosis result update unit 14 updates the update destination diagnosis result with the update source diagnosis result according to the determination result of the update determination unit 13.

  The storage unit 20 is a unit that stores an update source diagnosis result list and an update destination diagnosis result list, and includes an HDD or the like.

  FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating the diagnostic result update processing procedure according to the first embodiment.

  FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating the acquired update source diagnosis result list in the first embodiment.

  First, in S101, the update source diagnosis result list designated by the user is acquired from the storage unit 20.

  Each diagnosis result in the diagnosis result list includes a diagnosis result ID that is an individually assigned identifier, a target portion text that is a character string in an HTML source that constitutes a web content that is a diagnosis target, and a diagnosis result. With a certain diagnostic value. The diagnostic values are not limited by numbers or character strings, but are indicated by ◯, Δ, and X in the first embodiment.

  FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating the acquired update destination diagnosis result list in the first embodiment.

  Next, the update destination diagnosis result list designated by the user is acquired from the storage unit 20 in S102.

  The update destination diagnosis result list shown in FIG. 4 has the same configuration as the update source diagnosis result list shown in FIG. 3, but shows the state before the diagnosis value is input, so the diagnosis value is not described.

  Next, in S103, it is searched whether or not the update source diagnosis result having the same target part text as the target part text of the update destination diagnosis result in the update destination diagnosis result list is included in the update source diagnosis result list. To do. If it is included in the update source diagnosis result list, in S104, the diagnosis value of the update source diagnosis result having the same target portion text is set (updated) as the diagnosis value of the update destination diagnosis result.

  FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of an updated update destination diagnosis result list in the first embodiment.

  The procedure of S103 is executed for all the diagnosis results in the update destination diagnosis result list, and the updated update destination diagnosis result shown in FIG. 5 is obtained. In the example shown in FIG. 4, the update destination diagnosis result whose diagnosis result ID is B1 is the same target part text “<img src =“ tilte.jpg ”alt =“ title ”>” in the update source diagnosis result list. Since there is an update source diagnosis result (diagnosis result ID: A1), the diagnosis value “◯” of the update source diagnosis result is set (updated) as the diagnosis value of the update destination diagnosis result. In addition, for each of the update destination diagnosis results whose diagnosis result IDs are B2 and B120 in the update destination diagnosis result list, the diagnosis values “×” and “Δ” of the update source diagnosis result are set.

  In addition, since there is no update source diagnostic result having the same target part text for the update destination diagnostic results whose diagnostic result IDs are B3 and B4, no diagnostic value is set.

  According to the first embodiment, when the web content is updated and accessibility is re-diagnosed, as described above, only the changed part in the web content is diagnosed by updating the diagnostic result before the update. Diagnostic work at the time of web content update can be reduced.

  In the first embodiment, the update determination unit 13 updates the character string in the document to be diagnosed at the update source and the character string in the document to be diagnosed at the update destination if they are the same. This is an example of means for determining.

  Example 1 has a target part text as a diagnosis result, but Example 2 of the present invention has position information (start position, end position) of the target part instead of having the target part text. It is an Example which acquires object location text based on this.

  FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating a diagnostic result update processing procedure according to the second embodiment of the present invention.

  In step S <b> 201, the update source diagnosis result list designated by the user is acquired from the storage unit 20.

  FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an example of the obtained update source diagnosis result list in the second embodiment.

  Each diagnosis result in the update source diagnosis result list includes a diagnosis result ID that is an individually assigned identifier, and a diagnosis target location start position that is the position of a character string in the HTML source that constitutes the web content to be diagnosed The diagnosis target location end position and the diagnosis value that is the result of the diagnosis are configured. The diagnostic values are not limited by numbers, character strings, etc., but are indicated by ◯, Δ, and X in the second embodiment.

  FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an update source diagnosis result list to which target part text is added in the second embodiment.

  Next, the diagnosis target location start position of each diagnosis result in the acquired update source diagnosis result list and the character string in the HTML source designated as the diagnosis target location end position are acquired, and in S202, shown in FIG. As described above, the target part text is added to the update source diagnosis result list.

  FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating an update destination diagnosis result list according to the second embodiment.

  FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an update destination diagnosis result list in which the target part text is added in the second embodiment.

  Next, with respect to the update destination diagnosis result list, the update destination diagnosis result list shown in FIG. 9 is acquired from the storage unit 20 in S203, and in S204, as shown in FIG. Generate a list.

  FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating an update destination diagnosis result list according to the second embodiment.

  Next, in S205 and S206, as in S103 and S104, a diagnostic value is set while comparing the target portion text. An update destination diagnosis result list shown in FIG. 11 is obtained. In other words, in S205, it is searched whether or not the update source diagnosis result having the same target part text as the target part text of the update destination diagnosis result in the update destination diagnosis result list is included in the update source diagnosis result list. . If it is included in the update source diagnosis result list, in S206, the diagnosis value of the update source diagnosis result having the same target portion text is set (updated) as the diagnosis value of the update destination diagnosis result.

  In S207, it is determined whether or not the processing of S205 has been completed for all the diagnostic results in the update destination diagnostic result list. If not completed, the process proceeds to the next update destination diagnostic result in S208 and the processing of S205 is executed. To do.

  Note that no diagnostic value is set for an update destination diagnosis result having no update source diagnosis result having the same target part text.

  When updating web content and re-diagnosis accessibility, as described above, by updating the diagnostic results before the update, only the changed part in the web content is diagnosed. Work can be reduced.

  Embodiment 3 of the present invention is an embodiment in which an update source diagnosis result list relating to a plurality of diagnosis items designated by the user as an update source is updated to update destination diagnosis results relating to a plurality of diagnosis items designated by the user as an update destination. It is.

  The configuration of the web content diagnostic apparatus according to the third embodiment is the same as that of the web content diagnostic apparatus 1 shown in FIG.

  The web content diagnosis apparatus according to the third embodiment includes a plurality of functional blocks, and is actually realized by one computer or a plurality of computers. That is, each functional block is realized by computer hardware resources and software resources.

  Next, a diagnostic result update process procedure according to the third embodiment of the present invention will be described.

  Example 3 is an example in which a diagnosis result list in which a plurality of diagnosis items are described is updated. That is, in Example 3, since it is extracted from a plurality of diagnostic items, when updating, it is necessary to update the results relating to the same diagnostic item, so the diagnostic item ID is described in the diagnostic result list. In addition, since the diagnosis result list of Example 1 shown in FIG. 3 is a list regarding a single diagnosis item, it is not necessary to include a diagnosis item ID.

  FIG. 12 is a flowchart illustrating a diagnostic result update processing procedure according to the third embodiment of the present invention. First, in S301, the update source diagnosis result list designated by the user is acquired from the storage unit 20.

  FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating the obtained update source diagnosis result list in the third embodiment.

  Each diagnosis result in the diagnosis result list includes a diagnosis result ID that is an individually assigned identifier, a diagnosis item ID that is an identifier of a diagnosis item that has executed diagnosis, and an HTML source that constitutes a target web content. It is comprised by the object location text which is a character string of, and the diagnostic value which is a result of a diagnosis. Although there are no restrictions such as numbers and character strings, the diagnostic values are indicated by A, B, C, D, and E in the third embodiment.

  Next, in step S <b> 302, an update destination diagnosis result list designated by the user is acquired from the storage unit 20.

  FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating the acquired update destination diagnosis result list in the third embodiment.

  The update destination diagnosis result list shown in FIG. 14 has the same diagnosis items as the update source diagnosis result list shown in FIG. 13, but shows the state before the diagnosis value is input, and thus the diagnosis value is not described.

  Next, in S303, the update source diagnosis result list having the same combination as the combination of the diagnosis item ID of the update destination diagnosis result in the update destination diagnosis result list and the target part text is included in the update source diagnosis result list. Explore whether or not. If the update source diagnosis result having the same combination is included in the update source diagnosis result list, the diagnosis value of the update source diagnosis result having the same combination is set as the diagnosis value of the update destination diagnosis result ( Update).

  FIG. 15 is a diagram illustrating an example of the update destination diagnosis result list updated in the third embodiment.

  The procedure of S303 and S304 is executed for all the diagnosis results in the update destination diagnosis result list, and the updated update destination diagnosis result shown in FIG. 15 is obtained.

  In other words, the update destination diagnosis result whose diagnosis result ID is B4 includes the diagnosis item ID R2 and the target part text <img src = “dishes.jpg” alt = “plate” in the update source diagnosis result list. Since there is an update source diagnosis result (diagnosis result ID: A3) having the same combination with “>”, the diagnosis value D of the update source diagnosis result is set as the diagnosis value of the update destination diagnosis result. (Update).

  For the update destination diagnosis result whose diagnosis result ID is B30 in the update destination diagnosis result list, R3 which is the diagnosis item ID and <table> which is the target location text in the update source diagnosis result list. / Table> and the update source diagnostic result (diagnosis result ID: A4) having the same combination, E is set as the diagnostic value of the update destination diagnostic result. To do.

  For the update destination diagnosis results whose diagnosis result IDs are B1, B2, and B3, there is no update source diagnosis result having the same combination as the combination of the diagnosis item ID and the target location text. Do not set as a value (do not update).

  When updating web content and re-diagnosis accessibility, as described above, by updating the diagnostic results before the update, only the changed part in the web content is diagnosed. Work can be reduced.

  In the third embodiment, the update determination unit 13 is an example of a unit that determines to update when a diagnosis item diagnosed at the update source and a diagnosis item diagnosed at the update destination are the same.

  The fourth embodiment updates the diagnosis result when the target location texts of the update source diagnosis result and the update destination diagnosis result designated by the user match each other and the difference between the diagnosis dates and times is within a certain range. Furthermore, this is an embodiment in which the diagnostic value of the update source diagnostic result is set only when the diagnostic value of the update destination diagnostic result is not set.

  The configuration of the web content diagnosis apparatus according to the fourth embodiment is the same as that of the web content diagnosis apparatus 1 shown in FIG.

  The web content diagnosis apparatus according to the fourth embodiment includes a plurality of functional blocks, and is actually realized by one computer or a plurality of computers. That is, each functional block is realized by computer hardware resources and software resources.

  FIG. 16 is a flowchart illustrating the diagnostic result update processing procedure according to the fourth embodiment.

  First, in step S <b> 401, the update source diagnosis result list designated by the user is acquired from the storage unit 20.

  FIG. 17 is a diagram illustrating the obtained update source diagnosis result list in the fourth embodiment.

  The update source diagnosis result list includes a diagnosis result ID that is an individually assigned identifier, a diagnosis date and time that is the date and time when the diagnosis is executed, and a target location that is a character string in the HTML source that constitutes the web content to be diagnosed It has text and a diagnostic value that is the result of the diagnosis. The diagnosis date / time is the year / month / date / time, such as “2009/07/30 11:20”, but any format may be used as long as the date / time can be identified. Moreover, although a diagnostic value is a number of 1-100, there are no restrictions, such as a number and a character string.

  In step S <b> 402, an update destination diagnosis result list designated by the user is acquired from the storage unit 20.

  FIG. 18 is a diagram illustrating the acquired update destination diagnosis result list in the fourth embodiment.

  The configuration of the update destination diagnosis result list shown in FIG. 18 is the same as the configuration of the update source diagnosis result list shown in FIG. Assume that only a part of the diagnosis values are set as the diagnosis values in the update destination diagnosis result list shown in FIG.

  Next, in S403, it is searched whether an update source diagnosis result having the same text as the target portion text in the update destination diagnosis result list is included in the update source diagnosis result list. In S404, if it is determined in S403 that there is an update source diagnosis result having the same text, the diagnosis date and time To of the update source diagnosis result and the diagnosis date and time Tt of the update destination diagnosis result are acquired, and the following conditions are satisfied. Check if it meets.

0 <Tt-To <Td (1)
Td is a time difference designated in advance, and is a time difference that allows updating.

  Next, in S406, if it is determined in S404 that the condition is satisfied, it is checked whether or not the setting value of the update destination diagnosis result is set.

  Next, in S407, if it is determined in S406 that the setting value is set, the diagnosis date and time and the diagnosis value of the update source diagnosis result are set (updated) as the diagnosis value of the update destination diagnosis result. . For example, if there is an old judgment date and time, a misunderstanding occurs when the diagnosis was made on the old date and time. In order to eliminate this misunderstanding, the diagnosis date and time is also updated.

  FIG. 19 is a diagram illustrating an example of an updated update destination diagnosis result list in the fourth embodiment.

  The procedures of S403, S404, S405, and S406 are executed for all the diagnosis results in the update destination diagnosis result list, and the updated update destination diagnosis results shown in FIG. 19 are obtained. The result shown in FIG. 19 is a result when the value of Td in the above formula (1) is one day (24 hours = 1440 minutes = 86400 seconds). Since the diagnosis results with the diagnosis result IDs B1 and B3 in the update destination diagnosis result list satisfy the condition shown in the above equation (1), the diagnosis date and time and the diagnosis value are updated. The diagnostic value with the diagnostic result ID B2 is set with the diagnostic value of the update destination diagnostic result. The diagnostic result with the diagnostic result ID B4 does not satisfy the condition of the diagnostic date and time of S404, and the diagnostic result ID is B5. The diagnosis result is not updated because the target part text in S403 does not match.

  In the fourth embodiment, the update determination unit 13 is an example of a unit that determines to update if the difference between the diagnosis date and time of the update source diagnosis and the diagnosis date and time of the update destination diagnosis is equal to or less than a predetermined value. The diagnostic result update unit 14 is an example of a unit that sets the diagnostic value of the update source diagnosis to the diagnostic value of the update destination diagnosis only when the diagnostic value of the update destination diagnosis is not set.

  In the fifth embodiment of the present invention, the update source diagnosis is performed only when the target location texts of the update source diagnosis and the update destination diagnosis specified by the user match each other, and the diagnosists who executed each diagnosis match each other. It is an Example which sets the diagnostic value of.

  The configuration of the web content diagnosis apparatus according to the fifth embodiment is the same as that of the web content diagnosis apparatus 1 according to the first embodiment.

  The web content diagnosis apparatus is composed of functional blocks. In practice, the web content diagnosis apparatus is realized by one computer or a plurality of computers. That is, each functional block is realized by computer hardware resources and software resources.

  Next, a diagnostic result update processing procedure in the fifth embodiment will be described.

  FIG. 20 is a flowchart illustrating the diagnostic result update processing procedure according to the fifth embodiment.

  FIG. 21 is a diagram illustrating the acquired update source diagnosis result list in the fifth embodiment.

  First, in S501, the update source diagnosis result list designated by the user is acquired from the storage unit 20, as shown in FIG. Each diagnosis result in the update source diagnosis result list includes a diagnosis result ID that is an individually assigned identifier, a diagnoser that is the person who executed the diagnosis, and a character string in the HTML source that constitutes the target web content Are the target location text and the diagnostic value which is the result of the diagnosis. Although the name is described in alphabets as a diagnostician, other names may be used as long as the diagnostician can be identified. Moreover, although the diagnostic value is (circle), (triangle | delta), x, anything, such as a numerical value and a character, may be sufficient.

  In step S <b> 502, an update destination diagnosis result list designated by the user is acquired from the storage unit 20.

  FIG. 22 is a diagram illustrating the acquired update destination diagnosis result list in the fifth embodiment.

  The update destination diagnosis result list shown in FIG. 22 is the same as the update source diagnosis result list shown in FIG. 21, but the diagnosis values are set only for some of the diagnosis results.

  Next, in S503, it is searched whether or not the update source diagnosis result having the same combination as the combination of the diagnostician and the target part text in the update destination diagnosis result list is included in the update source diagnosis result list.

  Next, if it is determined in S503, it is checked in S504 whether the setting value of the update destination diagnosis result is set.

  Next, when it is determined in S504 that the set value is set, in S505, the diagnosis date and time and the diagnosis value of the update source diagnosis result are set (updated) as the diagnosis value of the update destination diagnosis result. .

  FIG. 23 is a diagram illustrating an updated update destination diagnosis result list in the fifth embodiment.

  The procedures of S503, S504, and S505 are executed for all the diagnosis results in the update destination diagnosis result list (S506), and the updated update destination diagnosis result list shown in FIG. 23 is obtained. Since the diagnosis result IDs B2 and B3 in the updated update destination diagnosis result list satisfy the conditions, the diagnosis date and time and the diagnosis value are updated. The diagnostic value with the diagnostic result ID B30 is set (updated) as the diagnostic value of the update destination diagnostic result, and the diagnostic result with the diagnostic result ID B1 and B4 does not match the combination of the diagnostician and the target content Therefore, the diagnosis date and time and the diagnosis value are not updated.

  According to the above embodiment, when the web content is updated and accessibility is re-diagnosed, only the changed part in the web content is diagnosed, so that the diagnostic work at the time of updating the web content can be reduced.

  In other words, traditionally, all accessibility tests are performed from the beginning even if the homepage has been changed slightly. However, since doing so is inefficient, in each of the above embodiments, the previous diagnosis result is used for a portion that has not been changed (the same description portion as the previous time).

  According to the above-described embodiment, when diagnosis is performed at the time of updating in many cases, it is expected that the web contents considering accessibility are spread because the diagnosis work at the time of updating is reduced. As a result, while a web content user such as an elderly person or a disabled person uses the web content, the possibility that the web content user encounters a failure can be efficiently reduced. Therefore, inquiries and complaints from users to web contents are reduced, and operations spent for handling can be reduced.

  In the fifth embodiment, the update determination unit 13 is an example of a unit that determines to update if the diagnosing person of the update source diagnosis and the diagnosing person of the update destination diagnosis are the same. The diagnostic result update means 14 is an example of means for setting the diagnostic value of the update source diagnosis to the diagnostic value of the update destination diagnosis only when the diagnostic value of the update destination diagnosis is not set.

  A program that causes a computer to function can be assumed as means for configuring each of the embodiments. That is, it is possible to assume a program that causes a computer to function as each means constituting the web content diagnosis apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 6.

1 ... Web content diagnosis device,
10: Control means,
11 ... Update source diagnosis result list acquisition means,
12 ... Update destination diagnosis result list acquisition means,
13 ... Update determination means,
14 ... diagnostic result update means,
20 ... storage means,
30: Temporary storage means.

Claims (7)

Update source diagnostic result list acquisition means for acquiring an update source diagnostic result list which is a list of diagnostic results at the update source;
Update destination diagnosis result list acquisition means for acquiring an update destination diagnosis result list which is a list of diagnosis results at the update destination;
Update determination means for determining whether or not to update the update source diagnosis result in the update source diagnosis result list to the update destination diagnosis result in the update destination diagnosis result list;
Diagnostic result update means for updating the update destination diagnosis result with the update source diagnosis result according to the determination by the determination update determination means;
A web content diagnosis apparatus comprising: In claim 1,
The update determination unit is a unit that determines to update if the character string in the document that is the object of diagnosis at the update source is the same as the character string in the document that is the object of diagnosis at the update destination. A web content diagnosis apparatus characterized by In claim 2,
The web content diagnosis apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the update determination unit determines to update when a diagnosis item diagnosed at the update source and a diagnosis item diagnosed at the update destination are the same. In claim 2,
The update determination means is means for determining to update if the difference between the diagnosis date and time of the update source diagnosis and the diagnosis date and time of the update destination diagnosis is not more than a predetermined value. apparatus. In claim 2,
The web content diagnosis apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the update determination unit is a unit that determines that the update source diagnosis and the update destination diagnosis diagnostics are updated if they are the same. In claim 2,
The diagnostic result updating means is means for setting the diagnostic value of the update source diagnosis to the diagnostic value of the update destination diagnosis only when the diagnostic value of the update destination diagnosis is not set. Web content diagnostic device.   The program which makes a computer function as each means which comprises the web content diagnostic apparatus of any one of Claims 1-6.

Images