JP2010242665A - Blower impeller - Google Patents

Blower impeller Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2010242665A
JP2010242665A JP2009093833A JP2009093833A JP2010242665A JP 2010242665 A JP2010242665 A JP 2010242665A JP 2009093833 A JP2009093833 A JP 2009093833A JP 2009093833 A JP2009093833 A JP 2009093833A JP 2010242665 A JP2010242665 A JP 2010242665A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
blade
shape
blower impeller
hub
impeller
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2009093833A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Koichi Sakai
浩一 酒井
Hiroyuki Takeuchi
裕幸 武内
Yoshiaki Tsuji
義昭 辻
Shiro Otani
史郎 大谷
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Panasonic Corp
Original Assignee
Panasonic Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Panasonic Corp filed Critical Panasonic Corp
Priority to JP2009093833A priority Critical patent/JP2010242665A/en
Priority to CN201010156463A priority patent/CN101858362A/en
Publication of JP2010242665A publication Critical patent/JP2010242665A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Structures Of Non-Positive Displacement Pumps (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To solve the following problems: when a thin-walled portion is formed on the vacuum surface of each vane in order to reduce the weight of a blower impeller having thick-walled airfoil vanes, promotion of slight separation occurs, thereby causing a turbulent flow to deteriorate air volume performance and also to increase noise by the noise of the turbulent flow, and further, since the impeller has a thick-walled peripheral portion, productivity by resin molding is deteriorated. <P>SOLUTION: This blower impeller 2 includes a hub 3 rotatively driven by receiving torque from the outside, and a plurality of vanes 4 radially extending around the hub 3. The portion of each vane 4 on the side of a leading edge 5 has an airfoil shape, and the portion of each vane 4 on the side of a trailing edge 6 is formed to have a constant thick-walled shape. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2011,JPO&amp;INPIT

Description

本発明は、ファン効率向上及び風量性能向上と低騒音化と軽量化を図ることができる送風機羽根車に関するものである。   The present invention relates to a fan impeller capable of improving fan efficiency, improving air flow performance, reducing noise, and reducing weight.

従来技術を以下に示す。図8は、従来の送風機羽根車の斜視図である。図9〜11は同送風機羽根車の羽根の断面図である。羽根車2は、略円柱上のハブ部3に羽根4が備えられている。そして、羽根4の負圧面側の所定の範囲に、羽根4の肉厚を薄くしたエグリ1が設けてある。羽根車2のハブ部3にモーターシャフトを固定し、適切なケーシングに納め、モーターにより矢印の方向に回転させることで送風作用を生じる。この時、空気は羽根2の前縁5より侵入し後縁6より流出する。そこで、前記負圧面側のエグリ1には3方にテーパ部8,9を設けてあるので、エグリ1形状がスムースなために、羽根2の負圧面側に特徴的な剥離を助長させず、その結果で騒音が増加することは非常に少ない。そのため、厚肉の翼型の低騒音効果をそのまま維持できる。
特開平7−189985号公報
The prior art is shown below. FIG. 8 is a perspective view of a conventional blower impeller. 9 to 11 are sectional views of blades of the blower impeller. The impeller 2 is provided with blades 4 in a hub portion 3 on a substantially cylindrical shape. Then, an aegri 1 in which the thickness of the blade 4 is reduced is provided in a predetermined range on the suction surface side of the blade 4. A motor shaft is fixed to the hub portion 3 of the impeller 2, and is placed in an appropriate casing, and is rotated in the direction of the arrow by the motor to produce a blowing action. At this time, air enters from the front edge 5 of the blade 2 and flows out from the rear edge 6. Therefore, since the tapered portion 8, 9 is provided in the suction surface 3 on the suction surface side in three directions, the shape of the contact surface 1 is smooth, so that the characteristic peeling on the suction surface side of the blade 2 is not promoted. As a result, there is very little increase in noise. Therefore, the low noise effect of the thick airfoil can be maintained as it is.
JP-A-7-189985

従来技術による送風機羽根車のエグリの効果は、軽量化には役立つことができる。しかし、厚肉の翼型羽根車の低騒音効果及び風量性能向上の効果を減退することになる。すなわち、負圧面側にエグリを入れる場合、多少の剥離の助長を招き、それにより乱流が発生して風量性能の劣化に繋がる。また、乱流騒音により、若干の騒音増加となる。さらに、羽根の肉厚が常に変化することや、この技術のみでは羽根車のチップ部(外周部)の肉厚が大きいことにより、生産性(樹脂成形)の劣化となる。   The effect of the agitation of the blower impeller according to the prior art can be useful for weight reduction. However, the low noise effect and the effect of improving the air flow performance of the thick blade type impeller are reduced. In other words, when the eggplant is put on the suction surface side, some peeling is promoted, and turbulence is generated thereby leading to deterioration of the air flow performance. Moreover, the noise increases slightly due to turbulent noise. Furthermore, since the thickness of the blade always changes and the thickness of the tip portion (outer peripheral portion) of the impeller is large only with this technique, the productivity (resin molding) is deteriorated.

本発明は、軽量化を行っても上記従来の問題点を抑制することができる送風機羽根車を提供することを目的とする。   An object of this invention is to provide the air blower impeller which can suppress the said conventional problem even if it reduces in weight.

前記課題を解決するために、本発明の送風機羽根車は、外部より回転力を受けて回転駆動されるハブと、前記ハブの周囲に放射状に延び出してなる複数枚の羽根を有し、前記羽根の円周方向の断面形状において、前縁側を翼型形状に形成し、後縁側を一定肉厚形状に形成して構成されていることを特徴とする。これにより、羽根の全体を翼形形状にした厚翼に比べて軽量化を行うことができるとともに、送風機羽根車の羽根の前縁側においては翼形状を成しているため気流の前縁剥離が抑制されて乱れが減少し、風量性能が劣化することがない。さらに、前縁から発生する流体騒音の低減にも繋がる。また、後縁側においては羽根が一定な肉厚形状を成しており、樹脂成型が容易となり安定した成型及び生産が可能となる。   In order to solve the above problems, a blower impeller of the present invention has a hub that is rotationally driven by receiving a rotational force from the outside, and a plurality of blades that extend radially around the hub, In the cross-sectional shape of the blade in the circumferential direction, the front edge side is formed in an airfoil shape, and the rear edge side is formed in a constant thickness shape. As a result, it is possible to reduce the weight of the blade compared to a thick blade having an airfoil shape as a whole. It is suppressed and the turbulence is reduced, and the air flow performance does not deteriorate. Furthermore, the fluid noise generated from the leading edge is also reduced. In addition, the blade has a constant thickness on the trailing edge side, which facilitates resin molding and enables stable molding and production.

本願発明の送風機羽根車においては、羽根を軽量化することによっても風量性能が劣化したり乱流騒音が増加したりすることを抑制し、生産性の劣化も抑制することができる。   In the blower impeller of the present invention, it is possible to suppress deterioration in air flow performance or increase in turbulent noise by reducing the weight of the blades, and to suppress deterioration in productivity.

第1の発明は、外部より回転力を受けて回転駆動されるハブと、前記ハブの周囲に放射状に延び出してなる複数枚の羽根を有し、前記羽根の円周方向の断面形状において、前縁側を翼型形状に形成し、後縁側を一定肉厚形状に形成して構成されていることを特徴とす
る送風機羽根車である。これにより、気流の前縁剥離が抑制されて乱れが減少して風量性能が向上し、さらに流体騒音が低減され低騒音化に繋がる。後縁側においては、羽根が一定な肉厚形状を成しており、安定した成型及び生産が可能となる。
The first invention has a hub that is rotationally driven by receiving a rotational force from the outside, and a plurality of blades extending radially around the hub. In the circumferential cross-sectional shape of the blade, The blower impeller is characterized in that a leading edge side is formed in an airfoil shape and a trailing edge side is formed in a constant thickness shape. Thereby, the leading edge separation of the airflow is suppressed, the turbulence is reduced, the air flow performance is improved, the fluid noise is further reduced, and the noise is reduced. On the trailing edge side, the blades have a constant thickness, and stable molding and production are possible.

第2の発明は、特に第1の発明において、前縁側の翼型形状は、羽根の前縁から後縁までの50%〜85%の位置まで形成されていることを特徴とする送風機羽根車である。これにより、気流の前縁剥離がかなり抑制され、風量性能の向上と低騒音化が図れる。   According to a second aspect of the present invention, in particular, in the first aspect, the airfoil shape on the leading edge side is formed to a position of 50% to 85% from the leading edge to the trailing edge of the blade. It is. Thereby, the leading edge separation of the airflow is considerably suppressed, and the airflow performance can be improved and the noise can be reduced.

第3の発明は、特に第1または第2の発明において、羽根の後縁近傍の断面形状を、徐々に薄くなる形状に形成することを特徴とする送風機羽根車である。これにより、気流の後縁剥離が抑制されて乱れが減少し、風量性能の向上と低騒音化が図れる。   A third aspect of the invention is a blower impeller characterized in that, in the first or second aspect of the invention, the cross-sectional shape in the vicinity of the trailing edge of the blade is formed into a gradually thinning shape. As a result, the trailing edge separation of the airflow is suppressed, the turbulence is reduced, and the airflow performance can be improved and the noise can be reduced.

第4の発明は、特に第1から第3のいずれかの発明において、羽根の前縁の翼型形状部分において、ハブとの接合部の羽根の付け根の肉厚を大きく形成したことを特徴とする送風機羽根車である。これにより強度アップが図られ、回転時の遠心力に対して頑丈な送風機羽根車となる。   The fourth invention is characterized in that, in any one of the first to third inventions, the thickness of the base of the blade at the joint with the hub is formed large in the airfoil-shaped portion of the leading edge of the blade. It is a blower impeller. As a result, the strength is increased, and the blower impeller is strong against the centrifugal force during rotation.

以下に本発明の実施の形態を図1から図9までに沿って説明する。   Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to FIGS.

(実施の形態1)
図1は本発明の実施の形態1における送風機羽根車の斜視図である。図2は同送風機羽根車の側面図、図3は同送風機羽根車の正面図、図4および図5は同送風機羽根車の羽根上の等流量ラインA1−A2にほぼ沿った円周方向の断面形状を示したものである。
(Embodiment 1)
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a blower impeller according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention. 2 is a side view of the blower impeller, FIG. 3 is a front view of the blower impeller, and FIGS. 4 and 5 are circumferential directions substantially along an equal flow line A1-A2 on the blades of the blower impeller. A cross-sectional shape is shown.

図1〜図3において、送風機羽根車2は、略円柱状のハブ3に羽根4が複数枚(3枚)備えられている。なお、本実施の形態ではハブを円柱状としたが、これに限定するものではなく、円錐台状のハブとしたり、円柱状と円錐台状とを組み合わせたりしてもよい。   1 to 3, the blower impeller 2 is provided with a plurality of blades 4 (three) on a substantially cylindrical hub 3. In the present embodiment, the hub is cylindrical, but the present invention is not limited to this, and a truncated cone-shaped hub or a combination of a cylindrical shape and a truncated cone shape may be used.

羽根4はそれぞれ、風上側である前縁5から風下側の後縁6に向けて位置5M(5M(50%),5M(85%))まで厚肉で厚みが変化する翼型形状に形成し、位置5Mより後縁6までは一定の肉厚形状に形成して構成されている。なお、図3に示すように、前縁5の外周側で前方に突出して形成された三角チップ部4aは無視して前縁5を直線と考え、位置5Mを羽根4の内周側から外周側まで同じ比率で形成している。   Each of the blades 4 is formed into an airfoil shape whose thickness changes from a leading edge 5 on the windward side to a trailing edge 6 on the leeward side to a position 5M (5M (50%), 5M (85%)) with a thickness. The portion from the position 5M to the rear edge 6 is formed with a constant thickness. As shown in FIG. 3, the triangular tip portion 4a formed to protrude forward on the outer peripheral side of the front edge 5 is ignored, and the front edge 5 is considered as a straight line, and the position 5M is the outer periphery from the inner peripheral side of the blade 4. The same ratio is formed up to the side.

具体的な断面を図4,図5に示すが、図4は、羽根4の前縁5から後縁6までの翼弦長の50%の位置を位置5M(50%)として、位置5M(50%)までの領域において最大肉厚tmaxを有した翼型形状に形成したものである。また、図5は、羽根4の前縁5から後縁6までの翼弦長の85%の位置を位置5M(85%)として、位置5M(85%)までの領域において最大肉厚tmaxを有した翼型形状に形成したものである。位置5Mから後縁6まではいずれも一定の肉厚形状(t1=t2)に形成している。   4 and 5 show specific cross sections. In FIG. 4, the position of 50% of the chord length from the leading edge 5 to the trailing edge 6 of the blade 4 is defined as a position 5M (50%). 50%) is formed into an airfoil shape having a maximum wall thickness tmax. FIG. 5 shows that the position of 85% of the chord length from the leading edge 5 to the trailing edge 6 of the blade 4 is a position 5M (85%), and the maximum wall thickness tmax in the region up to the position 5M (85%). The airfoil shape is formed. All from the position 5M to the rear edge 6 are formed in a constant thickness shape (t1 = t2).

これらの形状により、最大肉厚tmaxが同じで羽根4全体が翼型形状である厚翼と比較して、薄く軽量化が図れる。このような構成により、気流の前縁剥離が抑制されて、円滑な流れ場が形成される。よって、風量性能が向上して、乱流騒音が低減される。なお、位置5Mを羽根4の内周側から外周側まで同じ比率で形成することに限定するものではなく、内周側から外周側にかけて徐々に比率を変化させて構成しても良い。   With these shapes, the maximum thickness tmax is the same, and the blade 4 as a whole can be made thinner and lighter than a thick blade having an airfoil shape. With such a configuration, the leading edge separation of the air current is suppressed, and a smooth flow field is formed. Therefore, the air flow performance is improved and turbulent noise is reduced. In addition, it is not limited to forming the position 5M at the same ratio from the inner peripheral side to the outer peripheral side of the blade 4, but the ratio may be gradually changed from the inner peripheral side to the outer peripheral side.

なお、前縁から後縁までの翼弦長の約50%以内の領域が前縁剥離が発生し易い。そのため、この領域を翼型形状にすることが、気流の前縁剥離を抑制して風量性能の向上と乱流騒音の低減を図るためには有効である。また、一定の肉厚形状に形成する領域を、羽根
4の前縁5から後縁6までの翼弦長の85%を超える位置を位置5Mとして構成しても、もはや全体を翼型形状とした羽根との差がほとんどなくなり、余り有効ではない。従って、位置5Mは、羽根4の前縁5から後縁6までの翼弦長の50%〜85%の位置が好適である。
It should be noted that leading edge peeling is likely to occur in a region within about 50% of the chord length from the leading edge to the trailing edge. Therefore, it is effective to make this region an airfoil shape in order to improve the air flow performance and reduce the turbulence noise by suppressing the leading edge separation of the air flow. Further, even if the region that is formed to have a constant wall thickness is configured as a position 5M that exceeds 85% of the chord length from the leading edge 5 to the trailing edge 6 of the blade 4, the entire shape is no longer an airfoil shape. There is almost no difference from the blades that were made, and it is not very effective. Accordingly, the position 5M is preferably 50% to 85% of the chord length from the leading edge 5 to the trailing edge 6 of the blade 4.

また、後縁6の断面形状を円弧形状または楕円円弧形状など、面取りするようにして徐々に薄くなる形状に形成する。これによって、気流の後縁剥離が抑制されて風量性能が向上するとともに、乱流騒音が低減される。さらに、先端の形状がエッジでないため安定した成型が可能となり、生産性が向上する。   Further, the trailing edge 6 is formed into a shape that gradually becomes thinner, such as an arc shape or an elliptical arc shape, as a cross-sectional shape. As a result, separation of the trailing edge of the airflow is suppressed, airflow performance is improved, and turbulent noise is reduced. Furthermore, since the shape of the tip is not an edge, stable molding is possible, and productivity is improved.

(実施の形態2)
図6は、本発明の実施の形態2における送風機羽根車の斜視図、図7は同送風機羽根車の側面図である。送風機羽根車2は、実施の形態1と同様にハブ3に羽根4が備えられ、前縁5から後縁6に向けて位置5Mまで翼型形状に形成され、位置5Mより後縁6までは一定の肉厚形状(t1=t2)に形成されている。
(Embodiment 2)
FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a blower impeller according to Embodiment 2 of the present invention, and FIG. 7 is a side view of the blower impeller. As in the first embodiment, the fan impeller 2 is provided with blades 4 on the hub 3 and is formed in an airfoil shape from the front edge 5 toward the rear edge 6 to a position 5M, and from the position 5M to the rear edge 6. It is formed in a constant thickness shape (t1 = t2).

図6において、羽根4の翼型形状に形成された部分のハブ3への付け根部分4bの肉厚を大きくする。羽根4の前縁5の付け根部分4bは、送風機羽根車2の回転によって羽根4に大きな遠心力が加わった時に、最も破壊を起こし易い部分である。従って、付け根部分4bの肉厚を大きくして補強することによって、翼型にすることによる重量増加、すなわち回転時の遠心力の増大による破壊を抑制することができる。なお、羽根4の付け根部分4bの補強については、図6,図7のように前縁5近傍だけでも大きな効果が得られるが、図1〜図3に示すように付け根部分4b全体を補強しても良い。   In FIG. 6, the thickness of the base portion 4b of the portion of the blade 4 formed in the airfoil shape to the hub 3 is increased. The base portion 4 b of the leading edge 5 of the blade 4 is the portion most easily broken when a large centrifugal force is applied to the blade 4 by the rotation of the blower impeller 2. Therefore, by increasing the thickness of the root portion 4b and reinforcing it, it is possible to suppress an increase in weight due to the wing shape, that is, a break due to an increase in centrifugal force during rotation. As shown in FIGS. 6 and 7, the reinforcement of the base portion 4 b of the blade 4 is effective even in the vicinity of the front edge 5. However, as shown in FIGS. 1 to 3, the entire base portion 4 b is reinforced. May be.

以上のように、本発明にかかる送風機羽根車は、斜流送風機及び軸流送風機の送風機羽根車において、羽根の前縁側のみを翼型形状に形成することによる送風性能の向上と乱流騒音の低減が図れる。また、羽根の全体が薄肉で一定の肉厚形状の翼に近い生産性の安定と軽量化を確保できる。さらに、荷重が大きくかかる箇所のみの強度アップにより、軽くて強い斜流型羽根車等の用途に適用することができる。   As described above, in the fan impeller according to the present invention, in the fan impeller of the mixed flow fan and the axial flow fan, only the leading edge side of the blade is formed into an airfoil shape and the blast flow noise is improved. Reduction can be achieved. In addition, the stability of the productivity and weight reduction that are close to those of a blade having a constant thickness and a thin blade as a whole can be ensured. Furthermore, by increasing the strength of only the portion where the load is large, it can be applied to applications such as a light and strong mixed flow impeller.

本発明の実施の形態1における送風機羽根車の斜視図The perspective view of the fan impeller in Embodiment 1 of this invention 本発明の実施の形態1における送風機羽根車の正面図Front view of blower impeller in Embodiment 1 of the present invention 本発明の実施の形態1における送風機羽根車の側面図Side view of blower impeller in Embodiment 1 of the present invention 本発明の実施の形態1における送風機羽根車の羽根の断面図Sectional drawing of the blade | wing of the fan impeller in Embodiment 1 of this invention 本発明の実施の形態1における他の送風機羽根車の羽根の断面図Sectional drawing of the blade | wing of the other air blower impeller in Embodiment 1 of this invention 本発明の実施の形態2における送風機羽根車の斜視図The perspective view of the fan impeller in Embodiment 2 of this invention 本発明の実施の形態2における送風機羽根車の側面図Side view of blower impeller in Embodiment 2 of the present invention 従来の送風機羽根車の斜視図A perspective view of a conventional blower impeller 従来の送風機羽根車の平面図Plan view of a conventional blower impeller 従来の送風機羽根車の断面図Cross-sectional view of a conventional blower impeller 従来の送風機羽根車の断面図Cross-sectional view of a conventional blower impeller

2 送風機羽根車
3 ハブ
4 羽根
4a 三角チップ部
4b 付け根部分
5 前縁
6 後縁
2 Blower impeller 3 Hub 4 Blade 4a Triangular tip part 4b Base part 5 Front edge 6 Rear edge

Claims (4)

外部より回転力を受けて回転駆動されるハブと、前記ハブの周囲に放射状に延び出してなる複数枚の羽根を有し、前記羽根の円周方向の断面形状において、前縁側を翼型形状に形成し、後縁側を一定肉厚形状に形成して構成されていることを特徴とする送風機羽根車。 It has a hub that is driven to rotate by receiving a rotational force from the outside, and a plurality of blades extending radially around the hub, and in the circumferential cross-sectional shape of the blade, the leading edge side is an airfoil shape A blower impeller characterized in that the rear edge side is formed in a constant thickness shape. 前縁側の翼型形状は、羽根の前縁から後縁までの50%〜85%の位置まで形成されていることを特徴とする請求項1記載の送風機羽根車。 The blower impeller according to claim 1, wherein the airfoil shape on the front edge side is formed to a position of 50% to 85% from the front edge to the rear edge of the blade. 羽根の後縁近傍の断面形状を、徐々に薄くなる形状に形成することを特徴とする請求項1または2記載の送風機羽根車。 The blower impeller according to claim 1 or 2, wherein a cross-sectional shape in the vicinity of the trailing edge of the blade is formed into a gradually thinning shape. 羽根の前縁側の翼型形状部分において、ハブとの接合部の羽根の付け根の肉厚を大きく形成したことを特徴とする請求項1から3のうちいずれか一項記載の送風機羽根車。 The blower impeller according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein a thickness of a base of the blade at a joint portion with the hub is formed large in an airfoil shape portion on a leading edge side of the blade.
JP2009093833A 2009-04-08 2009-04-08 Blower impeller Pending JP2010242665A (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2009093833A JP2010242665A (en) 2009-04-08 2009-04-08 Blower impeller
CN201010156463A CN101858362A (en) 2009-04-08 2010-04-07 Air feeder vane wheel

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2009093833A JP2010242665A (en) 2009-04-08 2009-04-08 Blower impeller

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2010242665A true JP2010242665A (en) 2010-10-28

Family

ID=42944458

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2009093833A Pending JP2010242665A (en) 2009-04-08 2009-04-08 Blower impeller

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2010242665A (en)
CN (1) CN101858362A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2014025426A (en) * 2012-07-27 2014-02-06 Panasonic Corp Blower
WO2017094233A1 (en) * 2015-12-02 2017-06-08 パナソニックIpマネジメント株式会社 Blower impeller

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6536631B2 (en) * 2017-06-19 2019-07-03 ダイキン工業株式会社 Propeller fan

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5315113U (en) * 1976-07-20 1978-02-08
JPH0874790A (en) * 1994-09-12 1996-03-19 Daikin Ind Ltd Propeller fan
JPH09137797A (en) * 1995-09-12 1997-05-27 Daikin Ind Ltd Impeller for blower

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3365374B2 (en) * 1999-10-20 2003-01-08 ダイキン工業株式会社 Axial fan impeller
CN1276186C (en) * 2002-04-19 2006-09-20 松下电器产业株式会社 Draft fan impeller for air conditioner
JP2006291735A (en) * 2005-04-06 2006-10-26 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Blower impeller
GB0513187D0 (en) * 2005-06-29 2005-08-03 Rolls Royce Plc A blade and a rotor arrangement
JP2009008014A (en) * 2007-06-28 2009-01-15 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Axial flow fan

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5315113U (en) * 1976-07-20 1978-02-08
JPH0874790A (en) * 1994-09-12 1996-03-19 Daikin Ind Ltd Propeller fan
JPH09137797A (en) * 1995-09-12 1997-05-27 Daikin Ind Ltd Impeller for blower

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2014025426A (en) * 2012-07-27 2014-02-06 Panasonic Corp Blower
WO2017094233A1 (en) * 2015-12-02 2017-06-08 パナソニックIpマネジメント株式会社 Blower impeller
JP2017101597A (en) * 2015-12-02 2017-06-08 パナソニックIpマネジメント株式会社 Blower impeller

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN101858362A (en) 2010-10-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5905985B1 (en) Axial flow fan and serial type axial flow fan
JP6428833B2 (en) Propeller fan
JP2013249763A (en) Axial flow blower
WO2015092924A1 (en) Axial flow fan
JP2011144804A (en) Counter-rotating axial blower
WO2010047001A1 (en) Propeller fan, fluid feeder and mold
WO2018123519A1 (en) Propeller fan
JP2010203409A (en) Blade body for fluid machine
JP2008184999A (en) Blower impeller
JP6621194B2 (en) Turbofan and blower using the turbofan
JP2012052443A (en) Propeller fan
JP4910534B2 (en) Blower impeller
JP2010242665A (en) Blower impeller
JP2006322378A (en) Blower impeller
JP4388993B1 (en) Propeller fan, fluid feeder and mold
JP2012107538A (en) Axial-flow fan or diagonal-flow fan, and air conditioner mounted outdoor unit with the same
JP5114845B2 (en) Blower impeller
JP6544463B2 (en) Propeller fan
KR20170102097A (en) Fan of axial flow suppress for vortex and leakage flow
WO2018228066A1 (en) Axial flow wind turbine and air-conditioner
JP6458248B2 (en) Blower impeller
JP2014025426A (en) Blower
JP2019019758A (en) Centrifugal fan impeller and centrifugal fan with centrifugal fan impeller
JP2006200457A (en) Blower
JP2005155579A (en) Multiblade blower fan

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20120313

RD01 Notification of change of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7421

Effective date: 20121214

A977 Report on retrieval

Effective date: 20130115

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Effective date: 20130122

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20130604