JP2010164133A - Oscillating gear device - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To further reduce vibration and noise by enhancing the meshing rate of projecting teeth and recessed teeth of a pair of non-speed-reduction gears, in an oscillating gear device of single speed reduction where speed is reduced only by one of the two gear pairs. <P>SOLUTION: Of first to fourth conical bevel gears A1 to A4, the first gear A1 which is a fixed gear and the second gear A2 meshing therewith have a difference in number of teeth provided therebetween to form a speed reduction gear pair. On the other hand, no difference in number of teeth is provided between the fourth gear A4 which is an output gear and the third gear A3 meshing therewith, to form a non-speed-reduction gear pair. The depth L3 of a recessed tooth 5' of the third gear A3 is made relatively deep to enhance a meshing rate and reduce vibration and noise. The depth L2 of a recessed tooth 5 of the second gear A2 is approximately equal to the depth L1 of a recessed groove 4b that retains a roller 4a in a projecting tooth 4. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2010,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The present invention relates to an oscillating gear device in which a rotating body corresponding to a planetary gear is attached to an inclined portion of an input shaft and is rotated while being oscillated.

  Conventionally, this type of oscillating gear unit is also called a tilt gear reducer, and its principle has been known, but the tooth shape of a gear pair that meshes with each other is a spherical involute that is difficult to produce with high accuracy and low cost. It needs to have a tooth profile and has not been put to practical use. In this regard, the inventor of the present invention proposes that instead of the spherical involute tooth profile, one tooth shape of the gear pair is a convex tooth constituted by a roller-shaped roller, and the other tooth shape is a concave tooth meshing with the roller. (For example, refer to Patent Document 1).

  A schematic configuration and basic operation of the oscillating gear device according to this proposal will be described with reference to FIG. In the example shown in the figure, four conical bevel gears A1 to A4 are provided, and the first gear A1 fixed to the housing 6 and the fourth gear A4 attached to the output shaft 2 are opposed to the input shaft 1. They are arranged concentrically. In the middle of them, a rotary body 3 is supported on the input shaft 1, and a second gear A2 meshed with the first gear A1 and a third gear meshed with the fourth gear A4 at both axial ends of the rotary body 3, respectively. A3 is provided.

  The rotating body 3 is rotatably supported by an inclined portion 1a having an inclined axis H of a predetermined angle with respect to the axis G of the input shaft 1 (the inclination angle is between the gears of the gear pair engaged with each other. It is set to have an eccentric amount corresponding to the difference in the number of teeth, that is, the difference in the reference pitch circle diameter). Thus, when the inclined portion 1a swings due to the rotation of the input shaft 1, the rotating body 3 supported by the inclined portion 1a rotates while swinging around the rotating portion 3 to rotate the second gear A2 to the first gear. The third gear A3 and the fourth gear A4 are meshed with A1, respectively.

  At this time, the rotational speed of the rotating body 3 is defined by the meshing of the first and second gears A1 and A2, and the second gear A2 is in the first gear A1 for one cycle of swinging motion (one rotation of the input shaft 1). Is reduced by rotating the first gear A1 by an amount corresponding to the difference in the number of teeth. Similarly, it is possible to perform deceleration according to the difference in the number of teeth between the third gear A3 and the fourth gear A4, and in this way, two-stage deceleration is performed.

  Thus, if a difference in the number of teeth is given to each of the two pairs of gears to reduce the speed in two steps, the total reduction ratio R, that is, the rotation of the output shaft 2 when the input shaft 1 makes one rotation. The number is expressed as R = 1− (n1 × n3) / (n2 × n4) where n1 to n4 are the number of teeth of the first to fourth gears A1 to A4.

  More specifically, if n1 = 99, n2 = 100, n3 = 101, and n4 = 100, the reduction ratio R = 1/10000, and n1 = 9, n2 = 10, n3 = 11, and n4 = 10. Then, the reduction ratio R = 1/100. In this way, by setting the number of teeth of the four gears arbitrarily, a wide speed reduction ratio from high speed reduction to reduction speed can be obtained. If the difference in the number of teeth between the first and second gears A1 and A2 is 1, then the teeth meshing between the two gears A1 and A2 are shifted by one for one cycle of the swinging motion.

  The feature of the oscillating gear device according to the proposal is that the roller 4a is interposed in the meshing portion of each of the gears A1 to A4 as described above, and the meshing friction is absorbed by the rolling of the roller 4a. be able to. As schematically shown in FIG. 8, the roller 4a is rotatably disposed in a concave groove 4b formed in the first gear A1 (fourth gear A4) and protrudes from the concave groove 4b. Forms a substantially semi-cylindrical convex tooth 4. On the other hand, the second gear A2 (third gear A3) is formed with concave teeth 5 formed of concave grooves having a semicircular cross section.

  When the rotating body 3 that performs the swing motion as described above rotates as indicated by an arrow B in the drawing, the second gear A2 (third gear A3) moves in the direction indicated by the arrow C, and each concave tooth 5 And the convex teeth 4 are sequentially meshed. At this time, the sliding friction generated between each of the concave teeth 5 and the convex teeth 4 is absorbed by the rolling of the rollers 4a, and a constant pressure is applied to the meshing of the rollers 4a to reduce the backlash to zero. By doing so, it is possible to reduce the frictional resistance of the meshing portion and increase the transmission efficiency and positioning accuracy.

  By the way, this type of oscillating gear device can reduce the speed in two stages by giving a difference in the number of teeth to the two gear pairs as described above. If deceleration is performed, in principle, the inclination angle of the inclined portion 1a of the input shaft 1 must be set large, and accordingly, the amplitude of the oscillating motion of the rotating body 3 increases, causing vibration and noise. There is a tendency to grow.

In this regard, the inventor of the present invention gives a gear number difference between the first gear A1 and the second gear A2 to form a reduction gear pair, while the gear number difference between the third and fourth gears. This is a verification of a single-stage decelerating oscillating gear device that is a non-decelerating gear pair, and it is actually patented that the amplitude of the oscillating motion of the rotating body is reduced, which is advantageous for reducing vibration noise. This is disclosed in Document 2.
Japanese Examined Patent Publication No. 7-56324 JP 2008-303906 A

  However, as a result of further verification of the oscillating gear device with one-stage reduction as in the latter example (Patent Document 2), the present inventor has found that the third and fourth gears A3 and A4 are non-reducing gear pairs. It has been found that a new problem of vibration noise occurs as a result of the lowering of the meshing rate.

  This will be described with reference to FIG. 6 schematically showing the relative movement of the convex teeth 4 with respect to the concave teeth 5. First, in the reduction gear pair composed of the first and second gears A1 and A2, the rotation thereof Accordingly, the meshing positions of the convex teeth 4 and the concave teeth 5 are shifted one by one, so that the movement trajectories T1 to T3 of the center of the roller 4a of the convex teeth 4 have a waveform as shown in FIG. As a result, the chance of contact with the concave teeth 5 increases.

  This means that when the first and second gears A1 and A2 mesh with each other as shown in FIG. 8, the number of convex teeth 4 and concave teeth 5 meshing at the same time is relatively large (that is, the meshing rate increases). That's what it means.

  On the other hand, in the non-reducing gear pair having the same number of teeth, such as the third and fourth gears A3 and A4, the meshing position of both does not change, and the first gear meshes with an arbitrary concave tooth 5 of the third gear A3. Since the convex tooth 4 of the four gear A4 is always the same, the movement trajectory T of the center of the roller 4a of the convex tooth 4 is relatively deep with respect to the concave tooth 5 as shown in FIG. It becomes a substantially linear thing going in and out in the vertical direction. Therefore, there is less opportunity for them to contact at positions other than the maximum meshing position, and the meshing rate is lowered.

  The present invention has been made in view of such a point, and an object of the present invention is to provide a one-stage reduction oscillating gear device in which the speed is reduced by only one of two pairs of gears. The purpose of this is to further reduce vibration and noise by increasing the meshing rate of the teeth and concave teeth.

  In order to achieve the above object, in the present invention, the concave teeth are relatively moved so that the engagement ratio is as high as possible in the non-reducing gear pair in which the convex teeth relatively move only in the depth direction of the concave teeth. Deeply formed.

  Specifically, the invention according to claim 1 of the present application includes four conical bevel gears, and includes a first gear as a fixed gear having n1 teeth and a fourth gear as an output gear having n4 teeth. A rotating body that is disposed concentrically with the input shaft and is integrally provided with a second gear with n2 teeth and a third gear with n3 teeth, the second gear meshes with the first gear, and A third gear meshes with the fourth gear, and is rotatably supported on an inclined portion on the input shaft, and the rotating body performs a swinging motion on the inclined portion by the rotation of the input shaft. The oscillating gear device is an object.

  The first gear and the fourth gear are a plurality of concave grooves having a semicircular cross section extending radially from the center of the gear at equal intervals on the pitch cone, and a circle that is rotatably disposed in the concave grooves. The second and third gears are provided with concave teeth corresponding to the convex teeth, and the first and the second meshing gears are in meshing pairs. One of the second gear and the third and fourth gears is a reduction gear pair having a difference in the number of teeth, and the other is a non-reduction gear pair having no difference in the number of teeth, and this non-deceleration gear pair. The depth of the concave teeth in the gear pair is set to be equal to or greater than the depth of the concave grooves of the corresponding convex teeth.

  According to the above-described configuration, first, among the four gears, a difference in the number of teeth is not provided between the third gear and the fourth gear on the output side, and one stage between the first gear and the second gear on the fixed side is provided. By configuring so as to obtain the required reduction ratio by the deceleration action, the required reduction ratio can be obtained while making the inclination angle of the inclined portion of the input shaft relatively small. Therefore, the amplitude of the oscillating motion of the rotating body governed by the inclination angle becomes relatively small, which is advantageous for reducing vibration noise. Note that the first gear on the fixed side does not mean that it does not rotate at all, but means that it is a gear corresponding to the third shaft that is not any of the input / output shafts in the planetary gear mechanism. .

  Thus, if the number of teeth of the second gear is set to be larger than the number of teeth of the first gear so as to obtain a one-stage reduction action, and the shaft core is engaged with the shaft being eccentric, the time between the start of engagement and the end of engagement is obtained. Since the generatrix line between the gears intersects with the exception of the maximum meshing position and the convex teeth and the concave teeth are twisted with each other (see FIG. 4), the second gear is temporarily When the concave tooth is a simple arc tooth shape, the vicinity of the opening interferes with the convex tooth of the first gear, and an interference removing portion must be provided in the concave tooth.

  The interference portion becomes larger as the inclination angle becomes larger, and the shape thereof becomes complicated, requiring a special creation machine, which not only deteriorates productivity but also affects the degree of freedom of meshing accuracy. Therefore, as described above, it is possible to reduce the meshing interference portion (tooth direction, tooth root direction, tooth width direction) by reducing the inclination angle by reducing the inclination angle by using only the first and second gears. It is also preferable for simplifying the tooth profile and improving productivity and improving the meshing accuracy.

  On the other hand, between the third and fourth gears, which are non-reducing gear pairs, as described above with reference to FIG. 6 (b), the convex teeth and concave teeth having the same number of teeth are engaged with each other. Without changing, the convex teeth relatively move in and out in the depth direction of the concave teeth, so the interference between the convex teeth and the concave teeth does not occur, but the meshing rate is on the other hand. This tends to be low, which is disadvantageous in terms of vibration noise.

  Therefore, in the present invention, the depth of the concave teeth in the non-reducing gear pair is set to be greater than the depth of the concave grooves of the corresponding convex teeth, that is, relatively deep, and the opportunity to mesh with the convex teeth. In other words, the vibration noise is further reduced by increasing the engagement ratio between the two.

  Preferably, the depth of the concave tooth in the non-reducing gear pair is set to be equal to or larger than the radius of the corresponding convex tooth roller (Claim 2), and thus the meshing rate is set as described above. The effect of increasing and reducing vibration noise is sufficiently enhanced, and the torque transmission efficiency due to the meshing of convex teeth and concave teeth is increased, while the force in the direction along the rotation center line of the bevel gear (axial force) is It becomes small and becomes advantageous also in prevention of tooth skipping.

  If the concave teeth are deepened in this way, the depth of the concave grooves in the convex teeth is reduced accordingly, which is disadvantageous in that the rollers are held in the concave grooves. In the case of the above-described reduction gear pair, when the convex teeth and the concave teeth mesh with each other, the buses do not intersect and do not come into contact with each other due to the torsional position. hard.

  In other words, in the reduction gear pair, when the convex teeth and the concave teeth mesh with each other as described above, they come into contact with each other in a torsional positional relationship, and a force that squeezes them acts on the rollers of the convex teeth. Therefore, it can be said that it is safer not to make the meshing with the concave teeth too deep considering the dropping of this roller. Therefore, it is preferable to set the depth of the concave teeth in the speed reduction gear pair as much as the depth of the concave grooves of the corresponding convex teeth (Claim 3), and even in such a case, the engagement rate is originally high. There is no problem of vibration noise such as a non-reducing gear pair.

  On the other hand, if the concave gears are set deeper in the reduction gear pair, the meshing rate is further increased and this is advantageous in preventing tooth skipping. It is also possible to set the depth to be equal to or greater than the groove of the convex teeth in the same manner as described above. However, even in this case, it is preferable to form the concave teeth shallower than the non-reducing gear pair, and the depth should be smaller than the radius of the rollers constituting the convex teeth. .

  As described above, according to the oscillating gear device according to the present invention, in the one-stage reduction gear that is decelerated by only one of the two gear pairs, the depth of the concave tooth is not obtained in the non-reduction gear pair. By increasing the engagement depth, the meshing rate is increased and vibration noise is reduced. On the other hand, in the reduction gear pair, relatively shallow concave teeth are used to ensure the depth of the concave grooves of the convex teeth. Therefore, the reliability can be improved. In other words, paying attention to the difference in meshing state between the convex teeth and the concave teeth in each of the reduction gear pair and the non-reduction gear pair, in particular, by forming the concave teeth in the non-reduction gear pair deeper, reliability is improved. Silence can be improved while ensuring.

  Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. In addition, the following description of preferable embodiment is only an illustration essentially, and is not intending restrict | limiting this invention, its application thing, or its use. Moreover, in the following description, the same code | symbol is attached | subjected about the same thru | or equivalent part as the prior art example (patent document 1) mentioned above with reference to FIG.

(Overall configuration of oscillating gear device)
As shown in FIG. 1, the oscillating gear device according to the present invention has the first to fourth four gears set to the number of teeth corresponding to the reduction ratio, as in the conventional example (Patent Documents 1 and 2). Two conical bevel gears A1 to A4 are provided, and a speed reducing action is performed by two pairs of gears of the first gear A1 and the second gear A2, and the third gear A3 and the fourth gear A4. . The first and fourth gears A1 and A4 have convex teeth 4 made of a cylindrical roller 4a, and the second and third gears A2 and A3 meshing with them have concave teeth 5 and 5 'having a circular arc cross section. Yes.

  In the illustrated example, the input shaft 1 and the output shaft 2 are coaxially arranged, and a disk-shaped enlarged diameter portion is formed at the inner end (the left end in the figure) of the output shaft 2, and the center portion of the end face thereof. The inner end (right end in the figure) of the input shaft 1 is rotatably supported through a bearing 20 in a hollow portion that is open at the bottom. The first gear A1 is rotatably attached to the input shaft 1 through a bearing 10 at a substantially central portion in the longitudinal direction. The input shaft 1 is supported by the housing 6 through the first gear A1. On the other hand, the output shaft 2 is supported by the housing 6 by a bearing 21, and a fourth gear A4 is formed at a portion near the outer periphery of the enlarged diameter portion so as to face the first gear A1.

  Thus, the rotating body 3 is supported on the input shaft 1 in the middle of the first and fourth gears A1 and A4 that are concentrically arranged and opposed in the axial direction, and are respectively provided at both ends in the axial direction. The second and third gears A2 and A3 are engaged with the first and fourth gears A1 and A4, respectively. The rotating body 3 is provided integrally with the outer ring of the bearing 30 and is rotatably attached to an inclined portion 1 a having an axis H inclined at a predetermined angle with respect to the axis G of the input shaft 1. Is set to have a predetermined eccentricity corresponding to the difference in the number of teeth between the first and second gears A1, A2.

  The central point of the common spherical surface passing through each pitch circle of the first and second gears A1, A2 and the central point of the common spherical surface passing through each pitch circle of the third, fourth gears A3, A4 coincide. A point is the origin O, for example, the axis G of the input shaft is arranged on the X axis of the XY coordinates (orthogonal coordinates) in which the horizontal direction shown in the figure is the X axis and the vertical direction is the Y axis. When the axis H of the inclined portion 1a is arranged on the inclined axis, the meshing point of the first and second gears A1 and A2 is in the second quadrant of the coordinate plane and the fourth and fourth at the angular position shown in the figure. The meshing points of the three gears A3 and A4 are respectively located in the fourth quadrant.

  When the input shaft 1 rotates, the inclined portion 1a moves around the axis G so that the head swings, and the rotating body 3 supported by the inclined portion 1a swings around the inclined portion 1a. , And the second gear A2 is meshed with the first gear A1, and the third gear A3 is meshed with the fourth gear A4 (this also moves the meshing point). At this time, the second gear A2 rotates with respect to the first gear A1 by an amount corresponding to the difference in the number of teeth from the first gear A1 per one cycle of the swinging motion (one rotation of the input shaft 1). That is, one-stage deceleration is performed between the first gear A1 and the second gear A2. On the other hand, since there is no difference in the number of teeth between the third gear A3 and the fourth gear A4, the speed reduction action does not occur.

  As described above, when the difference between the number of teeth of the first gear A1 and the number of teeth of the second gear A2 is 1, when the oscillating motion advances by one cycle, the distance between the first gear A1 and the second gear A2 The teeth that mesh with each other shift. Further, when the difference in the number of teeth is 2, when the oscillating motion advances by one cycle, the teeth that are engaged with each other are shifted by two. Similarly, when the difference in the number of teeth is n, n meshing teeth are shifted.

  Here, the setting of the reduction ratio will be described in more detail. In this type of oscillating gear device, as described above with reference to FIGS. 7 and 8, a difference in the number of teeth is provided in at least one of the two pairs of gears. This gives a one-stage or two-stage speed reduction action, and a wide speed reduction ratio from high speed reduction to reduction speed is obtained, but in particular when the speed reduction ratio is used, the reference pitch circle diameter between the meshing gears is reduced. Since the difference tends to increase and the inclination angle of the inclined portion 1a of the input shaft 1 increases corresponding to this difference, the amplitude of the oscillating motion of the rotating body 3 increases, which is disadvantageous in terms of vibration.

  Such vibrations can be reduced by a balancer. However, this complicates the structure and increases the cost. Therefore, in this embodiment, the first and second of the two gear pairs are used. A difference in the number of teeth is given only to the gear pair of the gears A1 and A2, and a required reduction ratio is obtained by so-called one-stage reduction. As an example, if the number of teeth n1 to n4 of the first to fourth gears A1 to A4 is n1 = 99, n2 = 100, n3 = 100, n4 = 100, the final reduction ratio R is R = 1. / 100.

  In this way, if the speed is reduced by one step, the reference pitch circle diameter is larger than that of the two-step reduction, but the difference in the reference pitch circle diameter can be reduced, and the same reduction ratio can be obtained with a small inclination angle. Thus, by reducing the inclination angle, not only the vibration can be reduced, but also the distance between the first gear A1 and the fourth gear A4 can be shortened.

  Further, when the first speed reduction is performed between the first and second gears A1 and A2, the number of teeth of the third and fourth gears A3 and A4 may be the same and can be arbitrarily set without affecting the reduction ratio. If the number of teeth of the third and fourth gears A3 and A4 is the same as the number of teeth of the second gear A2 as described above, the number of three teeth of the four gears is the same. And contribute to the improvement of production efficiency. That is, both the second and third gears A2 and A3 are formed at the shaft end of the rotating body 3, and are formed by the same generating machine.

  Further, if the number of teeth of the second and third gears A2 and A3 is the same, the phase in the circumferential direction of the two gears A2 and A3 can be matched, and the meshing position of the first and second gears A1 and A2 Since the meshing positions of the third and fourth gears A3 and A4 are exactly 180 degrees, the load in the axis G direction (axial load) acts on the rotating body 3 at the same timing. This is advantageous in reducing the vibration.

  In order to achieve a one-stage reduction, it is only necessary to give a difference in the number of teeth to only one of the two pairs of gears. Even if the first and second gears A1 and A2 perform the reduction action, the third and fourth gears are used. Although the gears A3 and A4 may be used, it is preferable to reduce the speed between the first and second gears A1 and A2 as described above in order to maintain the lubricity of each part of the gear. This is because when the third and fourth gears A3 and A4 are decelerated, the meshing positions of the first and second gears A1 and A2 do not change and the rotating body 3 swings but rotates. This is because there is a possibility that the internal lubricant is biased to a specific position and supply to the meshing portions of the gears A1 to A4 is delayed.

(Tooth profile of first to fourth gears)
Next, the tooth profile of the first to fourth gears A1 to A4, which is a characteristic part of the present invention, will be described in detail. Since the first and fourth gears A1 and A4, which are convex teeth, are basically the same tooth shape, only the first gear A1 will be described as a representative, and only the fourth gear A4 will be described only for different parts. .

-Convex teeth-
As shown in FIG. 2, the convex teeth 4 of the first gear A1 are positioned and held in cylindrical grooves 4b in the concave grooves 4b, and are configured as contour teeth having the same tooth thickness and toothpickness in the direction of the teeth. . As shown along the axis G in FIG. 2A, the rollers 4a are provided by the number of teeth of the first gear A1, and are positioned by the retainers 7 and 8 at both ends in the direction of the teeth. . Further, the concave groove 4b for holding the roller 4a is formed as a so-called contoured concave tooth having a substantially uniform cross section in the entire tooth line direction on the pitch conical surface, and slidably holds the roller 4a.

  Each of the retainers 7 and 8 is ring-shaped, and locking claws that protrude from the outer retainer 7 are formed on the inner peripheral side, and the inner retainer 8 is formed on the outer peripheral side. Each locking claw is locked in the locking groove of the first gear A1. The retainers 7 and 8 are made of a polyamide-based or polyimide-based resin, and elastically allow displacement of the rollers 4a by being deformed by the action of a predetermined external force.

  The tooth length of the convex teeth 4 (rollers 4a) configured as described above is such that, as will be described in detail later, the meshing position with the concave teeth 5 is shifted in the tooth direction along with the swinging motion of the rotating body 3. (See FIG. 4), the effective meshing length is set to be longer than the streaks of the concave teeth 5. Since the roller 4a is locked at both ends in the tooth trace direction by the retainers 7 and 8 as described above, the length of the convex tooth 4 is further increased in consideration of the size of the locking of the roller 4a. Is set.

  That is, the tooth length of the convex teeth 4 is set as a dimension obtained by adding the difference of the effective tooth length to the length of the concave teeth 5 and the length of the retaining portions 7 and 8. Has been. Further, the outer diameter of the roller 4a is the same in the entire region of the tooth trace direction.

  On the other hand, the concave groove 4b for holding the roller 4a has a semi-circular shape with a substantially uniform cross-section, that is, the same width and the same depth as described above, as shown in FIG. As shown in a), it is preferably formed by multiple arcs. That is, it is only necessary to form two arcs having a radius longer than that of the roller 4a with the center of the arc being offset from the center of the roller 4a. In this way, the contact point P0 with the roller 4a is the opening of the groove 4b. The oil pool 4d is formed near the groove bottom by gradually moving away from the outer periphery of the roller 4a from the contact point P0 toward the groove bottom.

  Then, the cylindrical roller 4a is reliably supported at the contact point P0 with the concave groove 4b in the entire region of the tooth trace direction, and the support rigidity is increased, so that the roller 4a is firmly coupled to the concave groove 4b. A substantially integral convex tooth 4 is constructed. In addition, the support at the contact point P0 has an important meaning for increasing the degree of freedom of processing accuracy. In other words, if the contact with the roller 4a is the entire surface, the actual contact state will be a partial contact depending on the accuracy, and positioning may be inaccurate. If it is in a line contact state, it is easy to ensure the support rigidity relatively stably.

  Furthermore, as described above, the point of contact P0 with the roller 4a is closer to the opening of the groove 4b, which means that the contact angle θ1 (angle from the deepest part of the groove 4b to the contact point P0 with respect to the center of the roller 4a). Is relatively large, which contributes to the reliability of the convex teeth 4. That is, a load P acts between the roller 4a and the concave groove 4b combined as described above in the direction perpendicular to the tangent at the contact point P0. It can be decomposed into a rotational transmission force T which is a component force in a direction parallel to the pitch cone of A1 and an axial force F which is a component force in a direction perpendicular to the pitch cone.

  Since the axial force F acts to drop the roller 4a from the groove 4b, the larger the tooth force F, the more easily the convex tooth 4 is damaged. However, as is apparent from the figure, the contact point P0 is the groove 4b. The closer to the opening, that is, the greater the contact angle θ1, the smaller the axial force F and the greater the rotational transmission force T, improving both reliability and torque transmission efficiency. Note that the contact angle θ1 may be an angle larger than about 45 degrees.

  Further, from the viewpoint of reducing the axial force F and increasing the rotational transmission force T, it is desirable to deepen the concave groove 4b that holds the roller 4a. However, as is apparent from FIG. If the depth is increased, the depth of the concave teeth 5 must be reduced accordingly, and the possibility of tooth skipping increases. In consideration of this point, in this example, as will be described in detail later, the first and second gears A1 and A2 are provided with a groove 4b and a groove 5 of the teeth 4 as shown in FIG. The substantially same depth L1 = L2 is set.

  FIG. 4B shows the third and fourth gears A3 and A4. As will be described later, the third and fourth gears A3 and A4, which are non-reducing gear pairs, have a concave shape. The teeth 5 'are formed relatively deep, and the groove 4b is formed shallower by that amount.

-Concave tooth of reduction gear pair-
Next, the tooth profile of the concave tooth 5 of the second gear A2 that meshes with the first gear A1 to form a reduction gear pair will be described. The concave teeth 5 are basically in a circular arc shape corresponding to the convex teeth 4 (rollers 4a), but the second gear A2 has a difference in the number of teeth from the first gear A1. The inclined portion 1a of the input shaft 1 has a predetermined amount of eccentricity. For this reason, as schematically shown in FIG. 4, between the start of meshing and the end of meshing, the generatrix line intersects except for the maximum meshing position, so that the concave teeth 5 are temporarily in the direction of the meshing. In the case of a simple straight line, interference occurs in the vicinity of the opening.

  Therefore, the tooth profile of the second gear A2 is formed as a generating tooth obtained by creating and transferring the convex tooth 4 of the first gear A1 or an approximate generating tooth. As a specific method, as disclosed in detail in the previous patent application (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 10-235519) by the present inventor, the work held by the holding means is a swinging gear that is the subject of the present invention. It is configured to be driven through a mechanism equivalent to the apparatus, and by moving the cutter wheel in the tooth trace direction while swinging the workpiece, the portion that interferes with the convex teeth 4 is removed, and an appropriate Tooth forms.

  The shape of the concave tooth 5 created and transferred by such a method will be described in detail below. First, FIG. 4 shows that when the first and second gears A1 and A2 are engaged, the concave tooth 5 of the second gear A2 is assumed to have the same depth with respect to the contour tooth as the convex tooth 4 of the first gear A1. The relationship between the convex teeth 4 (rollers 4a) and the concave teeth 5 when the second gear A2 swings in the direction of the arrow with the same width as the concave teeth (virtual shape for explaining the interference situation). FIG.

  In this figure, the number of teeth of the second gear A2 is set to be larger than the number of teeth of the first gear A1, and the reference pitch circle diameter is set to be the difference in the number of teeth and larger, and is set to the center of the tooth line direction. The center of the first gear A1 is the axis G of the input shaft 1 (also the axis of the output shaft 2), while the center of rotation of the second gear A2 is the axis of the inclined portion 1a of the input shaft 1. H, and the center point H rotates eccentrically around the center point G.

  Therefore, when the second gear A2 swings in the direction of the arrow B together with the rotating body 3, that is, eccentrically rotates, the concave teeth 5 as the contour teeth and the rollers 4a are engaged in a predetermined angle range W. In this case, the rollers 4a and the concave teeth 5 are formed to have the same width (same diameter) in the direction of the teeth with respect to the buses M1 and M2, so that the proper meshing is achieved at the maximum meshing position W1 where the buses overlap. However, at the meshing angle positions before and after that, the bus lines intersect with each other, and the vicinity of the opening of the concave tooth 5 and the roller 4a interfere with each other in a twisted positional relationship.

  The crossing angle of the bus line becomes maximum at the meshing start position W2 and the meshing end position W3, and the crossing direction has a reverse inclination before and after the maximum meshing position W1. From the meshing start position W2 to the maximum meshing position W1, the outer side of the reference pitch circle diameter (PCD) appears on the rear side in the rotational direction of the concave teeth 5 (right side in the figure), while the reference pitch circle diameter On the inside, it appears on the front side in the direction of rotation (left side of the figure).

  Further, in the angle range from the maximum meshing position W1 to the meshing end position W3, the interference part appears on the opposite side to the rotational direction of the concave teeth 5 on the outer side and the inner side of the reference pitch circle diameter, respectively. Therefore, in the meshing range W from the meshing start position W2 to the meshing end position W3, a drum-shaped interference portion that expands in and out of the tooth stripe direction is generated at the opening of the concave tooth 5 from the reference pitch circle diameter as a base point. become.

  The size of the interference portion is affected by the difference in the reference pitch circle diameter of the first and second gears A1, A2, in other words, the inclination angle of the inclined portion 1a of the input shaft 1, and the smaller the inclination angle is, the smaller the interference portion is. (Both tooth direction, root direction, and tooth width direction) become smaller. Further, the interference part is also affected by the setting position of the tooth length of the concave tooth 5 and the reference pitch circle diameter, and as the tooth length becomes longer, the interference width at the end of the tooth direction increases. If the setting position of the reference pitch circle diameter is set at, for example, the inner end or the outer end in the tooth trace direction even if the tooth trace length is constant, the interference width at the opposite end becomes very large.

  Therefore, in order to prevent the interference part to be removed by the above-described creation processing from becoming too large, the setting of the streak length and the reference pitch circle diameter of the concave tooth 5 that governs the interference width is such that the interference width is minimized. It is desirable to optimize to. If the interference width is increased, the meshing angle range with the roller 4a, particularly the contact angle with the roller 4a at the meshing start position and the meshing end position is decreased, and accordingly, the axial force F is increased and the transmission efficiency is reduced. It is.

  Further, since the increase in the interference width also affects the degree of freedom of the machining mode and the degree of machining accuracy, in this embodiment, the inclination angle is set by setting only one-stage reduction between the first and second gears A1, A2. 1a is made smaller, the length of the concave tooth 5 of the second gear A2 is set to be significantly shorter than the convex tooth 4 of the first gear A1, and the reference pitch circle diameter is set to the center of the tooth. In this way, the size of the interference part is minimized, and both ensuring accuracy and ensuring flexibility in productivity are achieved.

  FIG. 5 shows an example of the tooth profile of the concave tooth 5 with the interference portion removed as described above, and this figure shows the five mesh positions before and after the maximum mesh position W1 in the mesh range W described above. The removal state of the interference part in is shown typically. That is, in the drawing, triangular areas E1 to E4 drawn from the tooth bottom to the opening end are interference removing portions from which the interference portions generated at the respective angular positions are removed, and are the first areas E1. Corresponds to the interference removal portion at the meshing start position, and is located on the front side and the rear side in the rotational direction across the reference pitch circle diameter PCD.

  The second area E2 indicates an area corresponding to an interference removing unit at an intermediate angle position between the meshing start position W2 and the maximum meshing position W1, and the third and fourth areas E3 and E4 are respectively the maximum meshing position W3. The interference removal area similar to the above-mentioned toward the end of meshing is shown. Area E5 is a non-interference removing portion where no interference occurs, and is an area where the outer peripheral surface of the roller 4a contacts at the maximum meshing position W1.

  As is clear from this figure, each interference canceling part expands radially inward and outward (inside and outside of the streak direction) with the reference pitch circle diameter as a base point, but in addition to the small inclination angle, the reference pitch circle diameter The enlargement ratio is kept relatively small due to the fact that the tooth is at the center and the tooth length is short. It should be noted that the areas E1 to E5 showing the interference removing units shown in the figure are originally continuous curved surfaces under continuous rotation, and there are no lines defining the areas, but for the convenience of explanation, the removal for each angular position is performed. This shows the area.

  As is clear from the above description, in this embodiment, the interference removal portion at both ends in the tooth trace direction is set by minimizing the inclination angle, shortening the tooth trace length, and setting the reference pitch circle diameter to the center portion of the tooth trace. Can be made relatively small, and accordingly, twisting with the roller 4a at the meshing start position and meshing end position is reduced, and transmission efficiency is improved.

  It should be noted that the position of the reference pitch circle diameter can be arranged slightly outside the center of the tooth trace. When the reference pitch circle diameter is set at the center of the tooth trace direction as described above, there is a difference in the interference width due to the difference in the module between the radially inner end and the outer end. There is a tendency to grow. In this regard, if the reference pitch circle diameter is set slightly outward from the center, the interference width of both can be made equal, and the interference removal portion at the outer end can be prevented from becoming too large.

  Further, in this embodiment, the basic cross-sectional shape of the concave tooth 5 is formed by multiple arcs as in the concave groove 4b described above, and meshes with the convex tooth 4 (roller 4a) as shown in FIG. Sometimes an oil reservoir 5b is formed near the bottom of the concave tooth 5, and the contact point P1 with the roller 4a is positioned closer to the opening of the concave tooth 5. Therefore, the rotational transmission force T, which is a component force of the load P acting on the roller 4a at the contact point P1, is increased, the torque transmission efficiency is increased, and the axial force that induces tooth skipping is reduced. It will be advantageous to secure.

  In addition, as described above, the depth L2 of the concave tooth 5 of the second gear A2 is set to be substantially the same as the depth L1 of the concave groove 4b of the convex tooth 4 of the first gear A1. That is, as is clear from FIG. 3, the depth of the concave teeth 5 and the depth of the concave grooves 4b of the convex teeth 4 are in a trade-off relationship. However, if the concave groove 4b is made deeper, the concave teeth 5 have to be made shallower.

  In this regard, between the first and second gears A1 and A2 having a difference in the number of teeth, as described above with reference to FIG. 4, the generating line 4 ( Since the roller 4a) and the concave tooth 5 are in a twisted relationship with each other, even if the interference part of both is removed, a force that strikes the roller 4a by the contact with the concave tooth 5 acts. Will do. Therefore, if the reliability of the convex teeth 4 is taken into consideration, it is desirable that the concave grooves 4b that hold the rollers 4a are formed deeper.

  On the other hand, considering the meshing state of the convex teeth 4 and the concave teeth 5, the meshing positions of the convex teeth 4 and the concave teeth 5 are shifted one by one between the first and second gears A1 and A2. Therefore, if the relative movement of the convex tooth 4 (roller 4a) and the concave tooth 5 in the meshing range W shown in FIG. 4 is viewed as the relative movement of the roller 4a relative to the concave tooth 5, FIG. As schematically shown in FIG. 6 (a), the center of the roller 4a draws waveform movement trajectories T1 to T3 (shown by broken lines) that move between the adjacent concave teeth 5 one by one.

  Here, the movement trajectory T1 indicates the trajectory of the outer end portion of the roller 4a, the trajectory T2 indicates the trajectory of the central portion in the longitudinal direction, and the trajectory T3 indicates the trajectory of the inner end portion, respectively. As described above, the rollers 4a are twisted with respect to the concave teeth 5 when engaged with each other, and the outer peripheral surface of the rollers 4a and the interference removing portion of the concave teeth 5 come into contact with each other. This increases the chance of contact between the rollers 4a and the concave teeth 5, and when the first and second gears A1 and A2 mesh as shown in FIG. 8, the teeth of the convex teeth 4 and the concave teeth 5 meshing simultaneously. The number is relatively large.

  That is, between the first and second gears A1 and A2 having a difference in the number of teeth, the meshing rate tends to be high originally, and in this respect, it is advantageous for suppressing vibration noise. Considering the dropping of the rollers 4a of the teeth 4, it can be said that it is desirable to form the concave grooves 4b that hold the rollers 4a deeper. Therefore, in consideration of securing the depth of the concave tooth 5 to such an extent that tooth skipping does not occur, in this embodiment, the depth L1 of the concave groove 4b of the convex tooth 4 of the first gear A1 and the second gear The depth L2 of the A2 concave tooth 5 is set to be substantially the same.

-Concave tooth of non-reducing gear pair-
Next, the tooth profile of the concave tooth 5 'of the third gear A3 will be described. This third gear A3 constitutes a non-reducing gear pair together with the fourth gear A4. The fourth gear A4 has the same number of teeth and the same reference pitch circle diameter, and the pitch cones of both gears A3 and A4. Are arranged so as to coincide with the origin O (the position where the eccentricity is zero). For this reason, in the meshing process of the third and fourth gears A3 and A4, the intersection of the generatrix in the direction of the tooth trace does not occur as in the meshing process of the first and second gears A1 and A2 described above (see FIG. 4). In other words, the convex teeth 4 and the concave teeth 5 'do not interfere with each other due to the twisted positional relationship.

  Therefore, the concave tooth 5 'of the third gear A3 does not need an interference removing portion like the concave tooth 5 of the second gear A2 described above, and its tooth shape corresponds to the roller 4a of the fourth gear A4. It is formed in an arc shape having substantially the same cross section in the stripe direction, more specifically in an arc shape composed of two multiple arcs like the concave groove 4b of the first gear A1 and the concave tooth 5 of the second gear A2. However, since the rotating body 3 rotates while swinging, strictly speaking, the tooth profile of the concave tooth 5 ′ is not processed linearly like the concave grooves 4b of the first and fourth gears A1 and A4. Like the concave tooth 5 of the second gear A3, it is formed by generating.

  By the way, since the number of teeth of the third and fourth gears A3 and A4 is the same as described above, the convex teeth 4 of the fourth gear A4 meshing with the arbitrary concave teeth 5 'of the third gear A3 are always the same. Therefore, the relative meshing position does not change between the gears A3 and A4. More specifically, the third gear A3 repeatedly engages and disengages with the fourth gear A4 along the cycloid curve as the rotating body 3 swings, but as schematically shown in FIG. 6 (b). Further, if the relative movement of the convex teeth 4 (rollers 4a) is seen with reference to the concave teeth 5 ', the center of the rollers 4a is a straight line entering and exiting in the depth direction of the concave teeth 5' in the substantial meshing process. A moving trajectory T is drawn.

  In this way, the convex teeth 4 move in and out in the depth direction relative to the concave teeth 5 ′, and only the meshing is repeated while drawing a linear movement trajectory T. Therefore, the third and fourth gears Between A3 and A4, there is less chance of contact between the convex teeth 4 and the concave teeth 5 'during meshing. That is, as shown in FIG. 8, the number of teeth meshing simultaneously decreases (that is, the meshing rate decreases). As a result, there is a possibility that a problem of vibration noise that may be caused by gearing or the like may occur.

  On the other hand, in this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 3 (b), the depth L3 of the concave tooth 5 'of the third gear A3 is only set deeper than the concave groove 4b of the corresponding convex tooth 4. In other words, the radius is set to be equal to or larger than the radius of the roller 4a of the convex tooth 4, and this causes the roller 4a, that is, the engagement with the convex tooth 4 of the fourth gear A4 to be sufficiently deep so that the two come into contact with each other. Opportunities increase and vibration noise is reduced by improving the engagement rate.

  In addition, the concave tooth 5 'formed deeper in this way is also constituted by two multiple arcs like the concave tooth 5 of the second gear A2 described above, and the contact angle .theta.2 with the roller 4a is shown in FIG. Since it becomes larger than the contact angle θ1 of the concave tooth 5 of the second gear A2 shown in (a), the rotational transmission force T due to the load P acting on the contact point P2 of both is increased, and the torque transmission efficiency is high. At the same time, the axial force F that induces tooth skipping is reduced.

  Further, when the concave tooth 5 'is formed deeply in this manner, the depth of the concave groove 4b of the convex tooth 4 is reduced accordingly, but the third and fourth gears A3 and A4 having no difference in the number of teeth are used. As described above, the roller 4a of the convex tooth 4 only enters and exits in the depth direction with respect to the concave tooth 5 ', and the concave tooth 5 is between the first and second gears A1 and A2. Since there is no contact in a twisted positional relationship, no rolling force acts on the roller 4a, and there is little fear that it will fall off.

  That is, between the third and fourth gears A3 and A4, which are non-reducing gear pairs, the groove 4b of the convex tooth 4 does not have to be so deep, but the meshing rate with the concave tooth 5 'is high. Focusing on the fact that the problem of vibration noise due to lowering is likely to occur, by forming the concave tooth 5 'relatively deeper, the chance of it engaging with the convex tooth 4 is increased, and the engagement rate of both is increased. It is what I did.

  As described above, according to the oscillating gear device according to this embodiment, first, among the four conical bevel gears A1 to A4, there is a difference in the number of teeth between the first and second gears A1 and A2. On the other hand, the inclination angle with respect to the input shaft core G of the shaft core H that is the rotation center of the rotating body 3 is set by the specification of the one-stage reduction that does not provide a difference in the number of teeth between the third and fourth gears A3 and A4. Since the amplitude of the oscillating motion of the rotating body 3 governed by the inclination angle is reduced, it is advantageous for reducing vibration noise.

  Further, in the case of the one-stage reduction in this way, in the third and fourth gears A3 and A4 which are non-reducing gear pairs, the depth of the concave teeth 5 'is relatively deepened to increase the meshing rate. Further reduction of vibration noise is achieved.

  On the other hand, in the first and second gears A1 and A2 which are the reduction gear pairs, the depth of the concave teeth 5 is made the same as the depth of the concave grooves 4b of the convex teeth 4, that is, the non-reduction gear pair. Compared to the above, forming the deep groove 4b for holding the roller 4a of the convex tooth 4 is advantageous for ensuring the reliability of the convex tooth 4.

  That is, according to the oscillating gear device according to the present invention, paying attention to the difference in meshing state between the convex teeth 4 and the concave teeth 5 and 5 ′ in each of the reduction gear pair and the non-reduction gear pair, By forming the concave teeth 5 'in the reduction gear pair deeper, it was possible to improve silence while ensuring reliability.

  In addition, the structure of the rocking | fluctuation type gear apparatus concerning this invention is not limited to the said embodiment, A various change is possible in the range which does not deviate from the summary of this invention. For example, in the above-described embodiment, the depth of the concave tooth 5 'is set to be equal to or larger than the radius of the roller 4a in the third and fourth gears A3 and A4 which are non-reducing gear pairs. You may just set it more than the depth of 4b.

  Further, in the first and second gears A1 and A2 that are the reduction gear pair, the depth of the concave tooth 5 is set to be substantially the same as the concave groove 4b of the convex tooth 4, but the depth of the concave tooth 5 is It may be set slightly shallower than the recessed groove 4b, or may be set slightly deeper.

  However, even when the depth of the concave tooth 5 is set slightly deeper than the concave groove 4b, it is preferable to make it shallower than the concave teeth 5 'of the third and fourth gears A3 and A4. The depth of the concave teeth 5 ′ is not less than the radius of the rollers 4 a, while the depth of the concave teeth 5 may be less than the radius of the rollers 4 a.

Sectional drawing of the rocking gear apparatus concerning this invention. The front view which looked at the 1st gearwheel along the input shaft core (a), and the figure (b) which expands and shows the part. Sectional drawing of the tooth profile which compares and shows a reduction gear pair and a non-reduction gear pair. The schematic diagram which shows in two dimensions the relationship between the convex tooth (roller) and concave tooth in mesh | engagement of a 1st and 2nd gearwheel. The enlarged perspective view which shows an example of the tooth profile of the concave tooth from which the interference part was removed. The figure which shows the relative motion of the convex tooth (roller) with respect to a concave tooth by contrasting a reduction gear pair and a non-reduction gear pair. Sectional drawing of the conventional oscillating gear apparatus (FIG. 1 equivalent view). Explanatory drawing of the meshing part of the conventional rocking | fluctuation type gear apparatus.

A1 to A4 1st to 4th conical bevel gear 1 Input shaft 1a Inclined portion 2 Output shaft 3 Rotating body 4 Convex tooth 4a Roller 4b Concave groove 5, 5 'Concave tooth

Claims (4)

Four conical bevel gears are provided, and a first gear as a fixed gear with n1 teeth and a fourth gear as an output gear with n4 teeth are arranged concentrically with the input shaft, facing each other, and the teeth A rotating body in which a second gear having a number n2 and a third gear having a number of teeth n3 are integrally provided so that the second gear meshes with the first gear and the third gear meshes with the fourth gear; An oscillating gear device that is rotatably supported on an inclined portion on the input shaft, and the rotating body performs an oscillating motion on the inclined portion by the rotation of the input shaft,
The first gear and the fourth gear each have a plurality of semicircular grooves having a semicircular cross section extending radially from the gear center at equal intervals on the pitch cone, and a cylindrical shape that is rotatably disposed in the grooves. The second and third gears are provided with concave teeth having a shape corresponding to the convex teeth, while having convex teeth as contour teeth, each consisting of a roller.
Any one of the first and second gears and the third and fourth gears that mesh with each other among the first to fourth gears is a reduction gear pair having a difference in the number of teeth, and the other is A non-reducing gear pair with no difference in the number of teeth, and the depth of the concave tooth in the non-reducing gear pair is set to be equal to or greater than the depth of the groove of the corresponding convex tooth. Mold gear device.   2. The oscillating gear device according to claim 1, wherein a depth of the concave tooth in the non-reducing gear pair is set to be equal to or larger than a radius of a corresponding convex tooth roller.   3. The oscillating gear device according to claim 1, wherein a depth of the concave teeth in the pair of reduction gears is set to be substantially the same as a depth of the concave grooves of the corresponding convex teeth.   The depth of the concave tooth in the reduction gear pair is set to be equal to or greater than the depth of the concave groove of the corresponding convex tooth and less than the radius of the roller of the convex tooth. Oscillating gear device.

Images