JP2008246036A - External noise improved speech voice analysis system - Google Patents

External noise improved speech voice analysis system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2008246036A
JP2008246036A JP2007092826A JP2007092826A JP2008246036A JP 2008246036 A JP2008246036 A JP 2008246036A JP 2007092826 A JP2007092826 A JP 2007092826A JP 2007092826 A JP2007092826 A JP 2007092826A JP 2008246036 A JP2008246036 A JP 2008246036A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
speech
noise
utterance
voice
microphone
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2007092826A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP5050180B2 (en
Inventor
Kiyoshi Sato
清 佐藤
Mitsugi Sawa
貢 澤
Naoki Mizukami
直樹 水上
Ayako Suzuki
綾子 鈴木
Kakuichi Shiomi
格一 塩見
Shigeo Kaizu
成男 海津
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Celebrar Dynamics Kk
Railway Technical Research Institute
Electronic Navigation Research Institute
Original Assignee
Celebrar Dynamics Kk
Railway Technical Research Institute
Electronic Navigation Research Institute
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Celebrar Dynamics Kk, Railway Technical Research Institute, Electronic Navigation Research Institute filed Critical Celebrar Dynamics Kk
Priority to JP2007092826A priority Critical patent/JP5050180B2/en
Publication of JP2008246036A publication Critical patent/JP2008246036A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5050180B2 publication Critical patent/JP5050180B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Measurement Of The Respiration, Hearing Ability, Form, And Blood Characteristics Of Living Organisms (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an external noise improved speech voice analysis system capable of improving reliability in the operation of a chaotic speech voice analyzer by simultaneously calculating an index value (reliability information) for evaluating the reliability for a diagnostic value calculated by the chaotic speech voice analyzer. <P>SOLUTION: The external noise improved speech voice analysis system is provided with a user's voice gathering microphone 1 for recording speech voice, an ambient noise gathering microphone 2 for monitoring the noise conditions of a speech environment, a speech voice analyzer (chaotic speech voice analyzer) 5 and an ambient noise analyzer 6. On the basis of a user's voice diagnostic value A from the speech voice analyzer (chaotic speech voice analyzer) 5 and an ambient noise evaluated value B from the ambient noise analyzer 6, the user's voice diagnostic value A from the speech voice analyzer (chaotic speech voice analyzer) 5 is evaluated in a diagnostic value comparing and judging apparatus 7. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2009,JPO&INPIT

Description

本発明は、発話音声から発話者の覚醒状態(脳活性状態)を評価するための発話音声分析システムに係り、特に、そのシステムの外部雑音を改善する外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システムに関するものである。   The present invention relates to an utterance speech analysis system for evaluating a speaker's arousal state (brain active state) from an utterance speech, and more particularly to an external noise-improved utterance speech analysis system for improving external noise of the system. is there.

本発明者らは、既に、カオス論的発話音声分析装置とその応用について先行して開発し、提案している(下記特許文献1〜4)。   The present inventors have already developed and proposed a chaotic speech analysis apparatus and its application in advance (Patent Documents 1 to 4 below).

そのカオス論的発話音声分析装置(以下、一般名称としての発話音声分析装置との区別を明確にするために、本発明に係る装置については、特にカオス論的発話音声分析装置という)は、発話音声の有するカオス性を評価し、発話者の大脳新皮質の活性度と高い相関を示すと考えられる診断値を算出する装置である。   The chaos utterance speech analysis device (hereinafter referred to as a chaos theory utterance speech analysis device for the device according to the present invention in order to clarify the distinction from the utterance speech analysis device as a general name) This is a device that evaluates the chaotic nature of speech and calculates a diagnostic value that is considered to be highly correlated with the activity of the cerebral neocortex of the speaker.

このカオス論的発話音声分析装置の特徴は、一つの発話音声に対して唯一つの診断値を返すことにあり、一般市場において様々に提供されている発話音声分析装置や、ポリグラフ装置のように多数の診断値やグラフを経験的に解釈して感情レベル等を診断する装置に比較して、恣意性を排除した客観的な診断が容易であることを特徴としている。   The characteristic of this chaotic utterance speech analysis device is that it returns a single diagnostic value for one utterance speech, and many utterance speech analysis devices and polygraph devices are provided in the general market. Compared to a device that empirically interprets the diagnostic values and graphs and diagnoses the emotion level and the like, it is characterized by easy objective diagnosis that excludes arbitraryness.

なお、ポリグラフ装置等においても、知識情報処理の技術を利用することにより、利用者の経験等を要さない診断を可能とするものは存在するが、知識処理システムそのものが強い恣意性を含む構造を有しており、このような装置で最終的に利用者の恣意性が排除されることと、カオス論的発話音声分析装置が原理的に恣意性を有さないことは、全く別次元の客観的な信頼性を実現し得ることにおいて、明確に区別されるべき事柄である。
特願2006−093267号 特願2006−093268号 特願2006−097389号 特願2006−097391号
In addition, there are some polygraph devices that enable diagnosis that does not require user experience by using knowledge information processing technology, but the knowledge processing system itself has a strong arbitrary structure. The fact that the user's arbitraryness is finally eliminated by such a device, and that the chaotic speech analysis device is not arbitrarily arbitrary in principle are completely different. This is something that should be clearly distinguished in that objective reliability can be achieved.
Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-093267 Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-093268 Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-097389 Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-097391

しかしながら、逆にカオス論的発話音声分析装置は、一つの発話音声に対して唯一つの診断値(誤解の無いように述べれば、信号処理パラメータを変更すれば、異なる診断値を算出するが、設定が固定されれば、唯一つの診断値が算出される。)のみを算出するため、その入力された音声信号の品質が悪いこと等により診断値の信頼性が低い場合であっても、音声信号の品質が十分に良好な場合と同様の診断値を算出する場合があり、カオス論的発話音声分析装置の運用における信頼性の確保を困難にしている。   However, conversely, the chaos utterance speech analysis device calculates only one diagnosis value for one utterance speech (if there is no misunderstanding, if the signal processing parameter is changed, a different diagnosis value is calculated. Is fixed, only one diagnostic value is calculated.) Since only the diagnostic value is calculated, even if the reliability of the diagnostic value is low due to the poor quality of the input audio signal, etc. In some cases, the same diagnostic value as that when the quality of the speech is sufficiently good is calculated, making it difficult to ensure reliability in the operation of the chaotic speech analysis apparatus.

具体的には、例えば、カオス論的発話音声分析装置がそれぞれの入力音声に対して200〜1000の間の診断値を返すとすれば、入力音声の品質が十分に高い場合には、眠くてボンヤリしている状態で300前後の診断値を返し、事務作業等を行っている状態で400〜600の診断値を返し、緊張状態や疲労しているにも拘らず作業をしなければならない状況では700程度以上の診断値を返すとすれば、空調機やモーター等による特徴的な周波数スペクトルを有する騒音が強い場合には、緊張しているにも拘らず300程度の低い診断値や、500程度の健常状態と判断される診断値を返す場合がある。また、明確な周波数スペクトルを有さない白色雑音のレベルが高い場合には、その雑音レベルに依存して診断値が高い方にずれて、ボンヤリしているにも拘らず500以上の診断値が返されたり、極めて雑音レベルが高い場合には1000以上の診断値が算出されたりする場合がある。   Specifically, for example, if the chaotic utterance speech analyzer returns a diagnostic value between 200 and 1000 for each input speech, if the quality of the input speech is sufficiently high, it is sleepy. Situation where the diagnostic value of around 300 is returned in the deflated state, the diagnostic value of 400 to 600 is returned in the office work, etc., and the work must be done despite being tense or fatigued If a diagnostic value of about 700 or more is returned, if the noise having a characteristic frequency spectrum by an air conditioner, a motor, or the like is strong, a low diagnostic value of about 300 or 500 despite the tension. It may return a diagnostic value that is determined to be about a healthy state. In addition, when the level of white noise that does not have a clear frequency spectrum is high, the diagnostic value shifts to a higher level depending on the noise level, and a diagnostic value of 500 or more is obtained despite being ridiculous. Or a diagnostic value of 1000 or more may be calculated if the noise level is extremely high.

本発明は、上記状況に鑑みて、カオス論的発話音声分析装置の算出する診断値に対してその信頼性を評価する指標値を同時に算出することにより、カオス論的発話音声分析装置の運用における信頼性の向上を図ることができる外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システムを提供することを目的とする。   In view of the above situation, the present invention simultaneously calculates an index value for evaluating the reliability of the diagnostic value calculated by the chaotic speech analysis apparatus, thereby enabling the operation of the chaotic speech analysis apparatus. An object of the present invention is to provide an external noise-improved utterance speech analysis system capable of improving reliability.

本発明は、上記目的を達成するために、
〔1〕外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システムにおいて、発話音声を収録する利用者音声収集用マイクロフォンと、発話環境の雑音状況をモニターする環境雑音収集用マイクロフォンと、カオス論的発話音声分析装置と、環境雑音分析装置とを具備し、前記カオス論的発話音声分析装置からの利用者音声診断値と前記環境雑音分析装置からの環境雑音評価値とに基づいて、前記カオス論的発話音声分析装置からの利用者音声診断値を評価することを特徴とする。
In order to achieve the above object, the present invention provides
[1] In an external noise improvement type speech analysis system, a user speech collection microphone for recording speech speech, an environmental noise collection microphone for monitoring the noise situation of speech environment, a chaotic speech analysis device, An environmental noise analyzer, based on a user voice diagnostic value from the chaotic speech analyzer and an environmental noise evaluation value from the environmental noise analyzer, from the chaotic speech analyzer It is characterized by evaluating a user voice diagnosis value.

〔2〕外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システムにおいて、発話音声を収録する利用者音声収集用マイクロフォンと、発話環境の雑音状況をモニターする環境雑音収集用マイクロフォンと、カオス論的発話音声分析装置と、環境雑音分析装置とを具備し、前記カオス論的発話音声分析装置からの利用者音声診断値と前記環境雑音分析装置からの環境雑音評価値とに基づいて、カオス論的発話音声を評価した指標値を出力するカオス論的発話音声指標値出力評価装置とを具備することを特徴とする。   [2] In an external noise improvement type utterance voice analysis system, a user voice collection microphone for recording utterance voice, an environmental noise collection microphone for monitoring the noise situation of the utterance environment, a chaotic utterance voice analysis apparatus, An indicator for evaluating chaotic speech based on a user voice diagnostic value from the chaotic speech analysis device and an environmental noise evaluation value from the environmental noise analysis device And a chaotic utterance voice index value output evaluation device for outputting a value.

〔3〕上記〔1〕または〔2〕記載の外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システムにおいて、前記発話音声を収録する利用者音声収集用マイクロフォンは単一指向性マイクロフォンであり、前記発話環境の雑音状況をモニターする環境雑音収集用マイクロフォンは無指向性マイクロフォンであることを特徴とする。   [3] In the external noise-improving speech analysis system according to [1] or [2], the user speech collection microphone for recording the speech is a unidirectional microphone, and the noise situation of the speech environment The microphone for collecting environmental noise for monitoring the above is an omnidirectional microphone.

〔4〕上記〔1〕または〔2〕記載の外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システムにおいて、発話環境が自動車の運転席である場合、前記発話音声を収録する利用者音声収集用マイクロフォンは運転士の口元に配置し、前記発話環境の雑音状況をモニターする環境雑音収集用マイクロフォンは前記運転席から離れた場所に設置し、前記発話音声を収録する利用者音声収集用マイクロフォンと前記発話環境の雑音状況をモニターする環境雑音収集用マイクロフォンの両方を同一の指向特性を有するマイクロフォンとすることを特徴とする。   [4] In the external noise-improving utterance voice analysis system according to [1] or [2], when the utterance environment is a driver's seat of a car, a user voice collection microphone for recording the utterance voice is a driver's microphone. An environmental noise collecting microphone that is placed at the mouth and monitors the noise situation of the utterance environment is installed at a location away from the driver's seat, and a user voice collection microphone that records the utterance voice and the noise situation of the utterance environment Both of the environmental noise collecting microphones for monitoring the above are microphones having the same directivity characteristics.

〔5〕上記〔4〕記載の外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システムにおいて、前記発話環境の雑音状況をモニターする環境雑音収集用マイクロフォンに代えて振動センサーを備えることを特徴とする。   [5] The external noise-improving speech analysis system according to [4], wherein a vibration sensor is provided instead of the environmental noise collection microphone for monitoring the noise state of the speech environment.

本発明によれば、カオス論的発話音声分析装置の算出する診断値に対してその信頼性を評価する指標値(信頼性情報)を同時に算出することにより、カオス論的発話音声分析装置の運用における信頼性の向上を図ることができる。   According to the present invention, by simultaneously calculating an index value (reliability information) for evaluating the reliability of the diagnostic value calculated by the chaotic speech analysis apparatus, the operation of the chaotic speech analysis apparatus is performed. Reliability can be improved.

本発明の外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システムは、発話音声を収録する利用者音声収集用マイクロフォンと、発話環境の雑音状況をモニターする環境雑音収集用マイクロフォンと、発話音声分析装置(カオス論的発話音声分析装置)と、環境雑音分析装置とを具備し、前記発話音声分析装置(カオス論的発話音声分析装置)からの利用者音声診断値と前記環境雑音分析装置からの環境雑音評価値とに基づいて、前記発話音声分析装置(カオス論的発話音声分析装置)からの利用者音声診断値を評価する。   The external noise-improving utterance speech analysis system of the present invention includes a user speech collection microphone for recording speech speech, an environmental noise collection microphone for monitoring a noise situation in the speech environment, and a speech speech analysis device (chaotic speech). A voice analysis device) and an environmental noise analysis device, and a user voice diagnosis value from the utterance voice analysis device (chaotic utterance voice analysis device) and an environmental noise evaluation value from the environmental noise analysis device. Based on the utterance voice analysis device (chaotic utterance voice analysis device), the user voice diagnosis value is evaluated.

以下、本発明の実施の形態について詳細に説明する。   Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail.

図1は本発明の第1実施例を示す外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システムのブロック図である。   FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an external noise improvement type speech analysis system showing a first embodiment of the present invention.

この図において、1は発話音声を収録する利用者音声収集用マイクロフォン、2はその発話環境の雑音状況をモニターする環境雑音収集用マイクロフォン、3は利用者音声収集用マイクロフォン1に接続されるアンプ、4は環境雑音収集用マイクロフォン2に接続されるアンプ、5はアンプ3に接続される発話音声分析装置(カオス論的発話音声分析装置)、6はアンプ4に接続される環境雑音分析装置、7は発話音声分析装置5に接続され、利用者音声診断値Aが入力されるとともに、環境雑音分析装置6に接続され、環境雑音分析装置6からの環境雑音評価値Bが入力される診断値比較判定装置、8は発話音声分析装置5に接続され、利用者音声診断値Aが入力されるとともに、診断値比較判定装置7に接続されて、診断値の信頼性情報Cが入力される診断情報表示、及び警告等の報知装置である。   In this figure, 1 is a user voice collecting microphone for recording speech voice, 2 is an environmental noise collecting microphone for monitoring the noise situation of the speech environment, 3 is an amplifier connected to the user voice collecting microphone 1, 4 is an amplifier connected to the environmental noise collecting microphone 2, 5 is an utterance voice analysis device (chaos chaotic speech analysis device) connected to the amplifier 3, 6 is an environmental noise analysis device connected to the amplifier 4, 7 Is connected to the utterance voice analysis device 5, and the user voice diagnosis value A is input, and also connected to the environmental noise analysis device 6, and the environmental noise evaluation value B from the environmental noise analysis device 6 is input. The determination device 8 is connected to the utterance voice analysis device 5, and the user voice diagnosis value A is input and also connected to the diagnosis value comparison determination device 7, and reliability information of the diagnosis value There diagnostic information display input, and a notification device alerts the like.

図2は本発明の第1実施例を示す外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システムの動作フローチャートである。   FIG. 2 is an operational flowchart of the external noise-improved utterance speech analysis system according to the first embodiment of the present invention.

この図から明らかなように、このシステムでは、比較判定演算部11では利用者音声診断値Aと環境雑音評価値Bとが考慮されて、信頼性情報Cが生成される。その信頼性情報Cは運用基準部12によって有効の場合は、警告等の報知情報Dを出力し、無効な場合には再診断Eを要求する。   As is clear from this figure, in this system, the comparison determination calculation unit 11 generates the reliability information C in consideration of the user voice diagnosis value A and the environmental noise evaluation value B. If the reliability information C is valid by the operation reference unit 12, the notification information D such as a warning is output, and if it is invalid, the re-diagnosis E is requested.

発話音声の収録時に、発話音声を収録する利用者音声収集用マイクロフォン1と共に、発話環境の雑音状況をモニターする環境雑音収集用マイクロフォン2を併設し、発話音声分析装置(カオス論的発話音声分析装置)5による利用者音声診断値Aと、環境雑音分析装置6からの環境雑音評価値Bとを同時に評価する。そして、発話音声分析装置(カオス論的発話音声分析装置)5の算出する利用者音声診断値Aに対して、環境雑音評価値Bを考慮してその信頼性を評価する信頼性指標値(信頼性情報)Cを同時に算出するようにした。これにより、発話音声分析装置(カオス論的発話音声分析装置)5の利用者音声診断値Aの信頼性が低い場合でも、その利用者音声診断値Aの評価を行い、補償するように構成した。   An utterance voice analysis device (chaotic utterance speech analysis device) is provided along with a user voice collection microphone 1 that records utterance speech and an environmental noise collection microphone 2 that monitors the noise situation of the utterance environment when recording the utterance speech. ) The user voice diagnosis value A by 5 and the environmental noise evaluation value B from the environmental noise analyzer 6 are simultaneously evaluated. Then, a reliability index value (reliability) for evaluating the reliability of the user speech diagnosis value A calculated by the speech speech analysis device (chaotic speech speech analysis device) 5 in consideration of the environmental noise evaluation value B. Sex information) C was calculated at the same time. Thereby, even when the reliability of the user voice diagnosis value A of the utterance voice analysis device (chaotic utterance voice analysis device) 5 is low, the user voice diagnosis value A is evaluated and compensated. .

なお、発話音声分析装置(カオス論的発話音声分析装置)5からの診断値はそれなりに出力させ、環境雑音分析装置6の環境雑音評価値Bが大きい場合には、監視者が人的にその診断値による判断を中止(警告等の報知)を行うようにしてもよい。   The diagnostic value from the utterance voice analysis device (chaos chaotic utterance voice analysis device) 5 is output as it is. When the environmental noise evaluation value B of the environmental noise analysis device 6 is large, the supervisor manually The determination based on the diagnostic value may be stopped (warning or other notification).

上記のような、発話音声を収録する利用者音声収集用マイクロフォン1と共に、発話環境の雑音状況をモニターする環境雑音収集用マイクロフォン2を組み合わせる際、両者を近接して設置する必要がある場合には、発話音声を収録する利用者音声収集用マイクロフォン1を単一指向性マイクロフォンとし、発話環境の雑音状況をモニターする環境雑音収集用マイクロフォン2を無指向性マイクロフォンとすれば、十分に利用可能である。   When combining the user sound collection microphone 1 for recording speech speech as described above with the environmental noise collection microphone 2 for monitoring the noise situation of the speech environment, when both must be installed close to each other If the microphone 1 for collecting user's voice for recording speech is a unidirectional microphone and the microphone 2 for collecting environmental noise for monitoring the noise situation in the speech environment is a non-directional microphone, the microphone can be used sufficiently. .

図3は本発明の外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システムの実験例(その1)、図4は本発明の外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システムの実験例(その2)、図5は本発明の外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システムの実験例(その3)を示す図である。   FIG. 3 shows an experimental example (part 1) of the external noise-improved utterance voice analysis system of the present invention, FIG. 4 shows an experimental example (part 2) of the external noise-improved utterance voice analysis system of the present invention, and FIG. It is a figure which shows the experimental example (the 3) of an external noise improvement type | formula speech analysis system.

図3において、実線Aで示されているのは利用者の口元の発話波形、薄い線Bで示されているのは少し強い雑音である。この程度であれば、口元の発話波形を採用し、その発話波形を評価できる。   In FIG. 3, the solid line A indicates the speech waveform of the user's mouth, and the thin line B indicates a slightly strong noise. If it is this level, the speech waveform of the mouth can be adopted and the speech waveform can be evaluated.

図4においては、実線Cで示されているのは利用者の口元の発話波形、薄い線Dで示されているのは弱い雑音である。このように軽度な弱い雑音であれば、口元の発話波形を採用し、評価するのに問題はない。   In FIG. 4, the solid line C indicates the speech waveform of the user's mouth, and the thin line D indicates weak noise. If it is such a mild weak noise, there is no problem in evaluating the speech waveform of the mouth.

図5において、実線Eで示されているのは利用者の口元の発話波形、薄い線Fで示されているのは強い雑音である。このように、強い雑音がある場合には、発話波形の採用には、外部条件を改善する必要があり、再診断を要求するようにする。   In FIG. 5, the solid line E indicates the speech waveform of the user's mouth, and the thin line F indicates strong noise. As described above, when there is strong noise, it is necessary to improve the external condition and to request rediagnosis in order to employ the speech waveform.

図6は本発明の第2実施例を示す外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システムのブロック図である。   FIG. 6 is a block diagram of an external noise improvement type speech analysis system showing a second embodiment of the present invention.

この図において、21は車両、22は運転席、23は発話音声を収録する利用者音声収集用マイクロフォン、24は運転士、25は発話音声分析装置(カオス論的発話音声分析装置)、26は発話環境の雑音状況をモニターする環境雑音収集用マイクロフォン、27は環境雑音収集用マイクロフォン26に接続される環境雑音分析装置、28は発話音声分析装置(カオス論的発話音声分析装置)25から出力される診断値に環境雑音分析装置27から出力される環境雑音評価値を考慮して、カオス論的発話音声分析の評価を行い指標値を出力するカオス論的発話音声指標値出力装置である。   In this figure, 21 is a vehicle, 22 is a driver's seat, 23 is a user voice collecting microphone for recording speech, 24 is a driver, 25 is a speech analysis device (chaos chaotic speech analysis device), and 26 is The environmental noise collecting microphone 27 monitors the noise situation of the utterance environment, 27 is an environmental noise analyzing device connected to the environmental noise collecting microphone 26, and 28 is outputted from the utterance voice analyzing device (chaotic utterance speech analyzing device) 25. The chaos utterance speech index value output device outputs the index value by evaluating the chaos theory utterance speech analysis in consideration of the environmental noise evaluation value output from the environment noise analysis device 27 in the diagnosis value.

このように,車両21の運転席22等の一様な雑音環境であれば、発話音声を収録する利用者音声収集用マイクロフォン23を運転士24の口元に、発話環境の雑音状況をモニターする環境雑音収集用マイクロフォン26を運転席22から離れた場所に設置することとすれば、両方とも同一の指向特性を有するマイクロフォンであっても構わない。   In this way, in a uniform noise environment such as the driver's seat 22 of the vehicle 21, an environment in which the noise situation of the utterance environment is monitored with the user voice collecting microphone 23 that records the utterance voice as the mouth of the driver 24. If the noise collecting microphone 26 is installed at a location away from the driver's seat 22, both may be microphones having the same directivity characteristics.

特に、自動車の運転席においてエンジン騒音や路面による騒音を問題とする場合には、発話環境の雑音状況をモニターする環境雑音収集用マイクロフォンとして振動センサー等を利用しても、同様な診断値の評価を行うことは可能である。   In particular, when engine noise or road surface noise is a problem in the driver's seat of an automobile, the same diagnostic value can be evaluated even if a vibration sensor or the like is used as an environmental noise collecting microphone for monitoring the noise situation of the speech environment. It is possible to do.

なお、本発明は上記実施例に限定されるものではなく、本発明の趣旨に基づき種々の変形が可能であり、これらを本発明の範囲から排除するものではない。   In addition, this invention is not limited to the said Example, Based on the meaning of this invention, a various deformation | transformation is possible and these are not excluded from the scope of the present invention.

本発明の外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システムは、外部雑音が問題となる発話環境においても、その指標値の信頼性を高めることができる発話音声分析システムとして利用することができる。   The utterance speech analysis system with improved external noise according to the present invention can be used as an utterance speech analysis system that can improve the reliability of the index value even in an utterance environment in which external noise is a problem.

本発明の第1実施例を示す外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システムのブロック図である。1 is a block diagram of an external noise improvement type speech analysis system showing a first embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 本発明の第1実施例を示す外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システムの動作フローチャートである。It is an operation | movement flowchart of the external noise improvement type | mold speech analysis system which shows 1st Example of this invention. 本発明の外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システムの実験例(その1)を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the experiment example (the 1) of the external noise improvement type | mold speech analysis system of this invention. 本発明の外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システムの実験例(その2)を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the experiment example (the 2) of the external noise improvement type | mold speech analysis system of this invention. 本発明の外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システムの実験例(その3)を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the experiment example (the 3) of the external noise improvement type | mold speech analysis system of this invention. 本発明の第2実施例を示す外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システムのブロック図である。It is a block diagram of an external noise improvement type speech analysis system showing a second embodiment of the present invention.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1,23 発話音声を収録する利用者音声収集用マイクロフォン
2,26 発話環境の雑音状況をモニターする環境雑音収集用マイクロフォン
3 利用者音声収集用マイクロフォンに接続されるアンプ
4 環境雑音収集用マイクロフォンに接続されるアンプ
5,25 発話音声分析装置(カオス論的発話音声分析装置)
6,27 環境雑音分析装置
7 診断値比較判定装置
8 診断情報表示、及び警告等の報知装置
11 比較判定演算部
A 利用者音声診断値
B 環境雑音評価値
C 信頼性情報
12 運用基準部
D 報知情報
E 再診断
21 車両
22 運転席
24 運転士
28 カオス論的発話音声指標値出力装置
1,23 Microphone for collecting user's voice to record uttered voice 2,26 Microphone for collecting environmental noise to monitor the noise situation of utterance environment 3 Amplifier connected to microphone for collecting user's voice 4 Connect to microphone for collecting environmental noise 5,25 utterance speech analyzer (chaotic utterance speech analyzer)
6, 27 Environmental noise analysis device 7 Diagnostic value comparison / determination device 8 Diagnostic information display and warning and other notification device 11 Comparison determination operation unit A User voice diagnostic value B Environmental noise evaluation value C Reliability information 12 Operation reference unit D Notification Information E Re-diagnosis 21 Vehicle 22 Driver's seat 24 Driver 28 Chaotic utterance speech index value output device

Claims (5)

(a)発話音声を収録する利用者音声収集用マイクロフォンと、
(b)発話環境の雑音状況をモニターする環境雑音収集用マイクロフォンと、
(c)カオス論的発話音声分析装置と、
(d)環境雑音分析装置とを具備し、
(e)前記カオス論的発話音声分析装置からの利用者音声診断値と前記環境雑音分析装置からの環境雑音評価値とに基づいて、前記カオス論的発話音声分析装置からの利用者音声診断値を評価することを特徴とする外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システム。
(A) a microphone for collecting user voice for recording uttered voice;
(B) an environmental noise collecting microphone for monitoring the noise situation of the speech environment;
(C) a chaotic speech analysis device;
(D) an environmental noise analyzer,
(E) a user voice diagnostic value from the chaotic utterance speech analyzer based on a user voice diagnostic value from the chaotic utterance speech analyzer and an environmental noise evaluation value from the environmental noise analyzer Speech noise analysis system with improved external noise, characterized by
(a)発話音声を収録する利用者音声収集用マイクロフォンと、
(b)発話環境の雑音状況をモニターする環境雑音収集用マイクロフォンと、
(c)カオス論的発話音声分析装置と、
(d)環境雑音分析装置とを具備し、
(e)前記カオス論的発話音声分析装置からの利用者音声診断値と前記環境雑音分析装置からの環境雑音評価値とに基づいて、カオス論的発話音声を評価した指標値を出力するカオス論的発話音声指標値出力評価装置とを具備することを特徴とする外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システム。
(A) a microphone for collecting user voice for recording uttered voice;
(B) an environmental noise collecting microphone for monitoring the noise situation of the speech environment;
(C) a chaotic speech analysis device;
(D) an environmental noise analyzer,
(E) Chaos theory that outputs an index value that evaluates chaotic speech based on a user speech diagnostic value from the chaotic speech analysis device and an environmental noise evaluation value from the environmental noise analysis device An external noise-improved utterance speech analysis system, characterized by comprising a speech utterance index value output evaluation device.
請求項1または2記載の外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システムにおいて、前記発話音声を収録する利用者音声収集用マイクロフォンは単一指向性マイクロフォンであり、前記発話環境の雑音状況をモニターする環境雑音収集用マイクロフォンは無指向性マイクロフォンであることを特徴とする外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システム。   3. The external noise improving utterance voice analysis system according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the user voice collection microphone for recording the utterance voice is a unidirectional microphone, and environmental noise collection for monitoring a noise situation of the utterance environment. A speech analysis system with improved external noise, characterized in that the microphone is an omnidirectional microphone. 請求項1または2記載の外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システムにおいて、発話環境が自動車の運転席である場合、前記発話音声を収録する利用者音声収集用マイクロフォンは運転士の口元に配置し、前記発話環境の雑音状況をモニターする環境雑音収集用マイクロフォンは前記運転席から離れた場所に設置し、前記発話音声を収録する利用者音声収集用マイクロフォンと前記発話環境の雑音状況をモニターする環境雑音収集用マイクロフォンの両方を同一の指向特性を有するマイクロフォンとすることを特徴とする外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システム。   In the external noise improvement type utterance voice analysis system according to claim 1 or 2, when the utterance environment is a driver's seat of an automobile, a user voice collection microphone for recording the utterance voice is arranged in a driver's mouth, An environmental noise collection microphone for monitoring the noise situation of the speech environment is installed at a location away from the driver's seat, and a user voice collection microphone for recording the speech voice and an environmental noise collection for monitoring the noise situation of the speech environment An external noise improvement type speech analysis system characterized in that both microphones are microphones having the same directivity characteristics. 請求項4記載の外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システムにおいて、前記発話環境の雑音状況をモニターする環境雑音収集用マイクロフォンに代えて振動センサーを備えることを特徴とする外部雑音改善型発話音声分析システム。   5. The external noise-improved utterance voice analysis system according to claim 4, further comprising a vibration sensor instead of the environmental noise collection microphone for monitoring the noise situation of the utterance environment.
JP2007092826A 2007-03-30 2007-03-30 External noise improvement type speech analysis system Expired - Fee Related JP5050180B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2007092826A JP5050180B2 (en) 2007-03-30 2007-03-30 External noise improvement type speech analysis system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2007092826A JP5050180B2 (en) 2007-03-30 2007-03-30 External noise improvement type speech analysis system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2008246036A true JP2008246036A (en) 2008-10-16
JP5050180B2 JP5050180B2 (en) 2012-10-17

Family

ID=39971696

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2007092826A Expired - Fee Related JP5050180B2 (en) 2007-03-30 2007-03-30 External noise improvement type speech analysis system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5050180B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11551671B2 (en) 2019-05-16 2023-01-10 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Electronic device and method of controlling thereof

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0683387A (en) * 1992-09-04 1994-03-25 Fujitsu Ten Ltd Noise reducing circuit for speech recognition device
JPH11161294A (en) * 1997-11-26 1999-06-18 Kanda Tsushin Kogyo Co Ltd Voice signal transmitting device
JP2000338991A (en) * 1999-05-25 2000-12-08 Nec Saitama Ltd Voice operation telephone device with recognition rate reliability display function and voice recognizing method thereof
JP2002306492A (en) * 2001-04-16 2002-10-22 Electronic Navigation Research Institute Human factor evaluator by chaos theory
JP2003114700A (en) * 2001-10-05 2003-04-18 Fujitsu Ltd Speech recognition device

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0683387A (en) * 1992-09-04 1994-03-25 Fujitsu Ten Ltd Noise reducing circuit for speech recognition device
JPH11161294A (en) * 1997-11-26 1999-06-18 Kanda Tsushin Kogyo Co Ltd Voice signal transmitting device
JP2000338991A (en) * 1999-05-25 2000-12-08 Nec Saitama Ltd Voice operation telephone device with recognition rate reliability display function and voice recognizing method thereof
JP2002306492A (en) * 2001-04-16 2002-10-22 Electronic Navigation Research Institute Human factor evaluator by chaos theory
JP2003114700A (en) * 2001-10-05 2003-04-18 Fujitsu Ltd Speech recognition device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP5050180B2 (en) 2012-10-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP4725236B2 (en) Outside alarm sound notification device
JP6627361B2 (en) Driving information recording device, driving information reproducing device, control device, driving information recording method, and driving information recording program
CN101951468B (en) Video recording device for vehicle and installation state informing method thereof
JP2006264390A (en) Acoustic alarming device of vehicle
TW201341775A (en) Method and system for diagnosing breakdown cause of vehicle and computer-readable storage medium storing the method
US9744809B2 (en) Enhanced sound generation for quiet vehicles
US11393444B2 (en) Noise suppressor for a vehicle and noise suppressing method for a vehicle
CN110376589A (en) For carrying out the method for environment sensing and for the environmental sensing system of motor vehicle
JP2008149917A (en) Ambient sound informing device for vehicle
JP2009113659A (en) Vehicular noise cancellation device
JP7371751B2 (en) Sound collection and emission method
JP4360308B2 (en) In-vehicle acoustic control system and AI agent
JP2005316704A (en) Surrounding state notification device and method for notifying surrounding state
JP2019016971A (en) Sound output device
JP5050180B2 (en) External noise improvement type speech analysis system
JP2009120013A (en) Equipment control device for vehicle
JPWO2020039678A1 (en) Head-up display device
JP5056466B2 (en) Method for judging abnormal noise
JP2012129704A (en) Failure detection device, vehicle existence notification device, and program
JP2010241371A (en) Driving state detection apparatus
JP2009073417A (en) Apparatus and method for controlling noise
JP2014209077A (en) Chattering noise evaluation method
WO2015145731A1 (en) Vehicle information notification device
WO2005104950A1 (en) Cerebrum evaluation device
WO2019176356A1 (en) Onboard device, traveling state estimation method, server device, information processing method, and traveling state estimation system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A711 Notification of change in applicant

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A711

Effective date: 20100317

A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20100318

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821

Effective date: 20100318

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20111228

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20120124

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20120323

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20120619

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20120621

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5050180

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20150803

Year of fee payment: 3

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

S111 Request for change of ownership or part of ownership

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313115

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees