JP2008093711A - Continuous casting method of steel - Google Patents

Continuous casting method of steel Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2008093711A
JP2008093711A JP2006279116A JP2006279116A JP2008093711A JP 2008093711 A JP2008093711 A JP 2008093711A JP 2006279116 A JP2006279116 A JP 2006279116A JP 2006279116 A JP2006279116 A JP 2006279116A JP 2008093711 A JP2008093711 A JP 2008093711A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
reduction
rolling
slab
amount
pairs
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2006279116A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP4598742B2 (en
Inventor
Yoshiki Ito
義起 伊藤
Michikazu Koga
道和 古賀
Shinsuke Watanabe
信輔 渡辺
Takeshi Mishima
健士 三島
Yoshinori Tanizawa
好徳 谷澤
Kingo Sasame
欽吾 笹目
Hiroshi Sazuka
宏史 佐塚
Tadayasu Kawamura
忠康 河村
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd filed Critical Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd
Priority to JP2006279116A priority Critical patent/JP4598742B2/en
Publication of JP2008093711A publication Critical patent/JP2008093711A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4598742B2 publication Critical patent/JP4598742B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To obtain sufficient improvement effect of internal quality of steel without requiring complicated device configuration. <P>SOLUTION: In the continuous casting method of the steel, the amount and the thrusting force of rolling reduction are controlled for each pair of reduction rolls or for each segment including a plurality of pairs of reduction rolls, when conducting rolling-reduction of a cast slab 2 along a thickness direction using a plurality of pairs of reduction rolls in the upstream side and the downstream side of a crater end where solidification in the inner part of a cast slab is completed. When applying rolling-reduction to the cast slab 2, the rolling-reduction is conducted such that the amount of the rolling-reduction of the cast slab 2 executed by each of four pairs of reduction rolls or each of segments 1a, 1b reaches the target amount of rolling-reduction. Thereafter, the pressure thrusting value acting on each of four pairs of reduction rolls or each of segments 1a, 1b is controlled so as to become the target pressure thrusting value, by increasing or decreasing the amount of the rolling-reduction of the cast slab 2 executed by each of four pairs of reduction rolls or each of segments 1a, 1b. Thus, generation of center segregation and porosity are effectively prevented, so that a cast slab having excellent internal quality is obtained. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2008,JPO&INPIT

Description

本発明は、炭素鋼、ステンレス鋼、高合金鋼を対象に、鋳片の中心部に発生する偏析、ポロシティの低減を図る鋼の連続鋳造方法に関するものである。   The present invention relates to a continuous casting method of steel intended to reduce segregation and porosity generated at the center of a cast slab for carbon steel, stainless steel, and high alloy steel.

連続鋳造によって鋳片を製造する場合、厚み中心部に中心偏析やセンターポロシティ(以下、単にポロシティという。)と称する内部欠陥が発生する。   When a slab is manufactured by continuous casting, an internal defect called center segregation or center porosity (hereinafter, simply referred to as porosity) occurs in the thickness center portion.

このうち、中心偏析は、鋳片の最終凝固部である厚さ方向の中心部にC,S,PおよびMnなどの溶鋼成分が濃化し、正偏析する現象であり、鋼材の靭性低下の原因となる。
一方、ポロシティは、最終凝固部では溶鋼が流動しにくいので、凝固時の体積収縮によって生じる狭い隙間に溶鋼が補給されずに凝固が完了するために発生する。
Among these, center segregation is a phenomenon in which molten steel components such as C, S, P, and Mn are concentrated in the central portion in the thickness direction, which is the final solidified portion of the slab, and is segregated positively. It becomes.
On the other hand, the porosity is generated because the molten steel hardly flows in the final solidified portion, and solidification is completed without the molten steel being replenished in a narrow gap caused by volume shrinkage during solidification.

このポロシティ、例えば硬鋼線材用のブルーム鋳片に発生したポロシティは、熱間圧延後の線材の中心部に欠陥として残存する。このような欠陥が残存した線材を冷間で伸線加工すると、カッピー破断と言われる断線事故が発生する。   This porosity, for example, the porosity generated in the bloom slab for hard steel wire rod, remains as a defect in the center of the wire rod after hot rolling. When a wire rod in which such a defect remains is cold drawn, a disconnection accident referred to as “cappy rupture” occurs.

また、ポロシティが発生した鋳片を熱間圧延して棒鋼に加工した場合にも、鋳片のポロシティは棒鋼の中心部に欠陥として残存し、この棒鋼を冷間で押し出し加工する際に、シェブロンクラックといわれる欠陥が発生する。   Also, when the slab with porosity is hot-rolled and processed into a steel bar, the porosity of the slab remains as a defect in the center of the steel bar. Defects called cracks occur.

このように、中心偏析やポロシティと称する内部欠陥が発生した鋳片は、圧延しても内部品質の良い製品を得ることはできない。   As described above, a slab in which an internal defect called center segregation or porosity has occurred cannot obtain a product with good internal quality even if it is rolled.

そこで、このような中心偏析やポロシティの発生を防止する方法が採られており、その中では、鋳片の軽圧下方法が一般的である。軽圧下における圧下量制御の具体例としては、鋳片に当接するロール群を、油圧シリンダーを介して押圧するとともに、前記油圧シリンダーの押圧を抑止する挿入用スペーサーでロール群の位置決めを行う軽圧下制御方法が特許文献1で開示されている。
特開平3−90261号公報
Therefore, a method for preventing the occurrence of such center segregation and porosity is employed, and among these, a light reduction method for a slab is common. As a specific example of the control of the amount of reduction under light pressure, the roll group in contact with the slab is pressed through a hydraulic cylinder, and the roll group is positioned by an insertion spacer that suppresses pressing of the hydraulic cylinder. A control method is disclosed in Patent Document 1.
Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 3-90261

しかしながら、特許文献1で開示された方法では、挿入用スペーサーの厚みによってロールの圧下量が決定されることになる。従って、鋳片の寸法バラツキや周辺温度の変化に伴う鋳片の硬さのバラツキ、鋳片の材質など、鋳片を圧下しようとする場合の操業条件の変化に応じて、挿入用スペーサーの厚みを変化することが望ましいが、挿入用スペーサーの厚みを変化することはできない。   However, in the method disclosed in Patent Document 1, the amount of roll reduction is determined by the thickness of the insertion spacer. Therefore, the thickness of the insertion spacer depends on changes in the operating conditions when trying to reduce the slab, such as slab dimensional variation, slab hardness variation due to changes in ambient temperature, and slab material. However, the thickness of the insertion spacer cannot be changed.

そこで、近年では、鋳片の圧延前に挿入用スペーサーを複数枚挿入して、ロールの位置を複数段階に調整可能とすることにより、ロールを好ましい位置に固定して軽圧下することも考えられている。   Therefore, in recent years, by inserting a plurality of insertion spacers before rolling the slab and making the position of the roll adjustable in multiple stages, it is possible to fix the roll at a preferred position and lightly reduce it. ing.

ところで、ロールの位置は、鋳片への圧下状況に追従して変更する必要があるため、頻繁に挿入用スペーサーを抜き差しすることになるが、挿入用スペーサーを一旦抜き取ると、再び挿入することが難しい。従って、挿入用スペーサーをオンラインで挿入するためには、装置構成が複雑になって、過大な設備が必要になる。   By the way, it is necessary to change the position of the roll in accordance with the state of reduction to the slab, so the insertion spacer is frequently inserted and removed, but once the insertion spacer is removed, it can be inserted again. difficult. Therefore, in order to insert the insertion spacer online, the device configuration becomes complicated and excessive equipment is required.

他の方法として、特許文献2では、操業条件の変動に対応して、軽圧下する位置を変化させる装置を開示している。すなわち、鋳片に当接するロール群の位置を監視して油圧シリンダーを制御し、ロール群の位置を所定位置に調整しながら軽圧下する方法が開示されている。
特開平5−8004号公報
As another method, Patent Document 2 discloses an apparatus that changes the position of light pressure reduction in response to fluctuations in operating conditions. That is, a method is disclosed in which the position of a roll group in contact with a slab is monitored to control a hydraulic cylinder, and the roll group is lightly reduced while adjusting the position of the roll group to a predetermined position.
Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 5-8004

ところで、連続鋳造においては、鋳造速度変動、外気温度変動などによって同じ位置のセグメントであっても、凝固シェルの厚みや中心固相率が変化するために、適正な圧下量は変化する。   By the way, in continuous casting, even if the segments are at the same position due to fluctuations in casting speed, outside air temperature, and the like, the thickness of the solidified shell and the central solid phase ratio change, so that the appropriate reduction amount changes.

しかしながら、特許文献2で開示された方法は、常に一定の圧下量を与えるように制御するので、鋳片状況によっては過圧下となって内部割れが発生する場合や、逆に圧下不足により十分な内質改善効果が得られないという問題がある。   However, since the method disclosed in Patent Document 2 is controlled so as to always give a constant amount of reduction, depending on the slab situation, internal cracking may occur due to overpressure, or conversely, sufficient due to insufficient reduction. There is a problem that the quality improvement effect cannot be obtained.

上述したように、特許文献1で開示された方法では、特許文献2で開示された方法に比較して圧下量が一定し安定しているものの、鋳造条件の変動に追従するには、装置構成が複雑になって、過大な設備が必要になる。   As described above, in the method disclosed in Patent Document 1, although the reduction amount is constant and stable as compared with the method disclosed in Patent Document 2, in order to follow the fluctuation of casting conditions, the device configuration Becomes complicated and requires excessive equipment.

一方、特許文献2で開示された方法では、任意に圧下量を調整できるものの、常に一定の圧下量を与えるように制御するので、鋳片状況によっては過圧下もしくは圧下不足となって十分な内質改善効果が得られず、安定性にかけるという問題がある。   On the other hand, in the method disclosed in Patent Document 2, although the reduction amount can be arbitrarily adjusted, control is performed so as to always provide a constant reduction amount. There is a problem that the quality improvement effect cannot be obtained and stability is applied.

本発明が解決しようとする問題点は、従来の連続鋳造方法で、鋳片の中心部に発生する偏析、ポロシティの低減を図るには、装置構成が複雑になって、過大な設備が必要になったり、十分な内質改善効果が得られず安定性にかけるという点である。   The problem to be solved by the present invention is that in the conventional continuous casting method, in order to reduce the segregation and porosity generated in the center of the slab, the apparatus configuration becomes complicated and excessive equipment is required. Or a sufficient internal quality improvement effect cannot be obtained and stability is applied.

本発明の鋼の連続鋳造方法は、
複雑な装置構成を必要とせずに、十分な内質改善効果を得るようにするために、
鋳片内部の凝固が完了するクレータエンドの上流側および下流側で、複数の圧下ロール対を用いて鋳片を厚み方向に圧下するに際し、各圧下ロール対毎に、または複数の圧下ロール対を配置した各セグメント毎に、圧下量および圧下推進力を制御して鋼を連続鋳造する方法であって、
鋳片を圧下する際には、
先ず、各圧下ロール対または各セグメントによる鋳片の圧下量が、目標とする圧下量になるように鋳片を圧下し、
その後、各圧下ロール対または各セグメントによる鋳片の圧下量を増加または減少することにより、各圧下ロール対または各セグメントに作用する圧力推進値が目標の圧力推進値となるように制御することを最も主要な特徴としている。
The steel continuous casting method of the present invention is
In order to obtain a sufficient quality improvement effect without requiring a complicated device configuration,
When rolling down the slab in the thickness direction using a plurality of reduction roll pairs on the upstream side and downstream side of the crater end where solidification inside the slab is completed, for each reduction roll pair or a plurality of reduction roll pairs A method of continuously casting steel by controlling the amount of reduction and the reduction driving force for each arranged segment,
When rolling down the slab,
First, the slab is squeezed so that the reduction amount of the slab by each reduction roll pair or each segment becomes the target reduction amount,
Thereafter, by increasing or decreasing the reduction amount of the slab by each rolling roll pair or each segment, it is possible to control so that the pressure driving value acting on each rolling roll pair or each segment becomes the target pressure driving value. The most important feature.

本発明は、複雑な装置構成を必要とする圧下量を制御するのではなく、各圧下ロール対または各セグメントに作用する圧力推進値を設定範囲となるように制御することで、鋳片の圧下時の状況変化に応じて最適の圧下量を付与でき、中心偏析やポロシティの発生を効果的に防止でき、内部品質の良好な鋳片を得ることができる。   The present invention does not control the amount of reduction that requires a complicated apparatus configuration, but controls the pressure driving value acting on each reduction roll pair or each segment to be within a set range, thereby reducing the reduction of the slab. The optimum amount of reduction can be applied according to the change of the situation at the time, the occurrence of center segregation and porosity can be effectively prevented, and a slab having good internal quality can be obtained.

以下、本発明を実施するための最良の形態について、発明成立に至るまでの過程と共に添付図面に基づいて詳細に説明する。   Hereinafter, the best mode for carrying out the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings together with the processes until the invention is established.

発明者らは、上述の課題を解決するために、従来の問題点を踏まえて、圧下技術を用いた中心偏析およびポロシティの発生解消方法について検討を行った。その結果、圧下シリンダーによって圧下ロール対(各セグメント)を介して鋳片に加えられる圧力値を制御することが、中心偏析およびポロシティの低減に極めて有効であることを知見し、本発明の成立に至った。   In order to solve the above-described problems, the inventors have studied a method for eliminating the occurrence of center segregation and porosity using a reduction technique based on the conventional problems. As a result, it was found that controlling the pressure value applied to the slab via the rolling roll pair (each segment) by the rolling cylinder is extremely effective in reducing the center segregation and the porosity, and the present invention has been realized. It came.

前述した通り、従来の圧下制御方法では、鋳片の寸法のバラツキや、周辺温度の変化に伴う鋳片の硬さのバラツキや、鋳片の材質など、鋳片を圧下しようとする場合の操業条件の変化に応じて圧下量を変化させるためには、装置構成が複雑になって、過大な設備が必要になったり、変化させても鋳片状況に応じた圧下量を与えることが困難であった。   As described above, the conventional reduction control method is used to reduce the size of the slab, the hardness of the slab due to changes in ambient temperature, and the material of the slab. In order to change the amount of reduction according to the change of conditions, the equipment configuration becomes complicated, and excessive equipment is required, or it is difficult to give the amount of reduction according to the slab condition even if it is changed. there were.

そこで、発明者らは、圧下量以外の指標として何を制御すれば内質が安定するかについて、鋭意研究を重ねた結果、各圧下ロール対または各セグメントに加わる圧力値、例えば油圧シリンダーに加わる圧力値を設定範囲に制御することができれば、操業条件が変化した場合においても、内質が安定することを確認した。   Thus, as a result of earnest research on what is controlled as an index other than the reduction amount, the inventors have made extensive studies, and as a result, pressure values applied to each reduction roll pair or each segment, for example, applied to a hydraulic cylinder If the pressure value could be controlled within the set range, it was confirmed that the internal quality was stable even when the operating conditions were changed.

本発明は、以上の知見に基づいてなされたもので、
鋳片内部の凝固が完了するクレータエンドの上流側および下流側で、複数の圧下ロール対を用いて鋳片を厚み方向に圧下するに際し、各圧下ロール対毎に、または複数の圧下ロール対を配置した各セグメント毎に、圧下量および圧下推進力を制御して鋼を連続鋳造する方法であって、
鋳片を圧下する際には、
先ず、各圧下ロール対または各セグメントによる鋳片の圧下量が、目標とする圧下量になるように鋳片を圧下し、
その後、各圧下ロール対または各セグメントによる鋳片の圧下量を増加または減少することにより、各圧下ロール対または各セグメントに作用する圧力推進値が目標の圧力推進値となるように制御する鋼の連続鋳造方法である。
The present invention has been made based on the above findings,
When rolling down the slab in the thickness direction using a plurality of reduction roll pairs on the upstream side and downstream side of the crater end where solidification inside the slab is completed, for each reduction roll pair or a plurality of reduction roll pairs A method of continuously casting steel by controlling the amount of reduction and the reduction driving force for each arranged segment,
When rolling down the slab,
First, the slab is squeezed so that the reduction amount of the slab by each reduction roll pair or each segment becomes the target reduction amount,
After that, by increasing or decreasing the rolling reduction amount of each slab by each rolling roll pair or each segment, the steel is controlled so that the pressure driving value acting on each rolling roll pair or each segment becomes the target pressure driving value. It is a continuous casting method.

この本発明の鋼の連続鋳造方法は、例えば図4に示す連続鋳造設備の鋳片内部の凝固が完了するクレータエンドの上流側および下流側(図4のA〜Dで示す位置)に、図1〜図3に示す圧下装置を設置して実施する。
図1はセグメントの上面から見た図、図2はセグメントの側面から見た図と斜視図、図3は圧下量を制御するための構成を説明する図、図4は連続鋳造設備を示す図である。
This steel continuous casting method according to the present invention is, for example, shown on the upstream side and downstream side (positions indicated by A to D in FIG. 4) of the crater end where solidification inside the slab of the continuous casting equipment shown in FIG. 1 to 3 is carried out by installing a reduction device.
1 is a view from the top of the segment, FIG. 2 is a view and a perspective view from the side of the segment, FIG. 3 is a view for explaining a configuration for controlling the amount of reduction, and FIG. 4 is a view showing a continuous casting facility It is.

図1〜図3に示すセグメント1a,1bは、図4のA〜Dで示す、鋳片2内部の凝固が完了するクレータエンドの上流側および下流側に配置されるものである。そして、少なくとも2対以上(図2の例では、上フレーム3aと下フレーム3bに各6個で6対)の圧下ロール4が、回転が自在なように取り付けられ、また上フレーム3aの4隅には位置制御付のシリンダー5が設置されている。この位置制御付のシリンダー5はいわゆる油圧ステッピングシリンダーと呼ばれるもので、連続鋳造設備のモールド幅可変装置として広く使用されているものである。   The segments 1a and 1b shown in FIGS. 1 to 3 are arranged on the upstream side and the downstream side of the crater end, which is indicated by A to D in FIG. Then, at least two pairs or more (in the example of FIG. 2, six pairs of six on the upper frame 3a and the lower frame 3b) are attached so as to be freely rotatable, and the four corners of the upper frame 3a are mounted. Is provided with a cylinder 5 with position control. The cylinder 5 with position control is called a so-called hydraulic stepping cylinder, and is widely used as a mold width variable device for continuous casting equipment.

上フレーム3aの4隅に設置された前記4つのシリンダー5は独立して制御できるようになされている。例えば油圧ユニット6とシリンダー5を繋ぐ配管7の途中にサーボバルブ8を介設することで、各シリンダー5に供給する油量を制御し、各シリンダー5のロッド移動量を制御する。このような制御によって、上フレーム3aの傾きを変化させることにより、鋳片2にテーパをつけたり、もしくは段差圧下することが可能になる。   The four cylinders 5 installed at the four corners of the upper frame 3a can be controlled independently. For example, by providing a servo valve 8 in the middle of a pipe 7 connecting the hydraulic unit 6 and the cylinder 5, the amount of oil supplied to each cylinder 5 is controlled, and the amount of rod movement of each cylinder 5 is controlled. By changing the inclination of the upper frame 3a by such control, the slab 2 can be tapered or stepped down.

本発明では、各セグメント1a,1bによる鋳片2の圧下を実施する際に、目標とする圧下量が得られるように、位置制御により圧下を開始する。そして、各セグメント1a,1bが所定の圧下位置に到達した後は、各セグメント1a,1bに作用する圧力推進値が、目標とする圧力推進値の範囲内になるように、常に例えばシリンダー5の制御を行って、各セグメント1a,1bによる鋳片2の圧下量を増減しながら鋳造する。   In the present invention, when the slab 2 is reduced by the segments 1a and 1b, the reduction starts by position control so that a target reduction amount is obtained. Then, after each segment 1a, 1b reaches a predetermined reduction position, for example, the cylinder 5 is always set so that the pressure driving value acting on each segment 1a, 1b falls within the target pressure driving value range. Control is performed, and casting is performed while increasing or decreasing the amount of rolling of the slab 2 by the segments 1a and 1b.

例えば鋳造速度が速くなって、所定の圧下位置の未凝固厚みが増加した場合は、圧下量一定の場合は、圧下による液相の絞りだしが不十分となって偏析が残存するが、本発明方法のように、圧下推進値を一定とすれば、実際に加わる圧下量は増加することになり、偏析が改善されることになる。   For example, when the casting speed is increased and the unsolidified thickness at a predetermined reduction position is increased, if the amount of reduction is constant, liquid phase squeezing due to reduction is insufficient and segregation remains. If the reduction propulsion value is made constant as in the method, the amount of reduction actually applied increases, and segregation is improved.

目標とする圧力推進値としては、内部品質(例えば鋳片中心偏析度、ポロシティ発生有無など)の成績良好時の実績圧力値のデータから統計的解析を行って算出された圧力値を設定するのが望ましい。もしくは、実績圧力値の標準偏差1σ以内となるように目標とする圧力推進値を設定するのが望ましい。   As the target pressure propulsion value, set the pressure value calculated by statistical analysis from the data of the actual pressure value when the quality of internal quality (for example, slab center segregation degree, porosity occurrence etc.) is good Is desirable. Alternatively, it is desirable to set the target pressure propulsion value so that the standard deviation of the actual pressure value is within 1σ.

目標とする圧力推進値の制御範囲については、鋼種によって相違するので特に限定しないが、高炭素鋼を用いた発明者らの実験結果によれば、目標とする圧力推進値±3トンとすることで望ましい結果が得られた。目標とする圧力推進値+3トンを超える場合は過圧下となって内部割れが発生した。また、目標とする圧力推進値−3トン未満となると圧下不足となる場合が発生した。なお、この値は鋳片形状が異なっても変らず、圧下ロール対単独で制御する場合も、セグメントを制御する場合も同じである。   The control range of the target pressure propulsion value is not particularly limited because it differs depending on the steel type, but according to the experimental results of the inventors using high carbon steel, the target pressure propulsion value should be ± 3 tons. The desired result was obtained. When exceeding the target pressure propulsion value +3 tons, internal cracking occurred due to overpressure. Moreover, when the target pressure propulsion value was less than -3 tons, there was a case where the reduction was insufficient. This value does not change even if the shape of the slab is different, and is the same whether the segment is controlled by the roll-down roll pair alone or the segment.

本発明では、同一セグメントにおける、鋳造方向に対する入側2軸及び出側2軸(図2(b)参照)の目標とする圧力推進値は、それぞれ同一の値を設定してもよいし、4軸別々の値を設定してもよい。   In the present invention, in the same segment, the target pressure propulsion values of the inlet two axes and the outlet two axes (see FIG. 2B) with respect to the casting direction may be set to the same value, respectively. A separate value may be set for each axis.

以下、本発明の効果を検証するために行った実験結果について説明する。
図1〜図4に示した圧下装置、連続鋳造設備を用いて、高炭素鋼(質量%で、C:1.0%、Si:0.2〜0.3%、Mn:0.3〜0.45%、P:0.08〜0.015%、S:0.05〜0.02%)溶鋼から、幅400mm、厚み300mmの鋳片を鋳造した。その際の鋳造速度は0.7〜0.8m/minの範囲、二次冷却水の比水量は0.3l/kg・steelで一定であった。
Hereinafter, experimental results performed to verify the effects of the present invention will be described.
Using the reduction device and continuous casting equipment shown in FIGS. 1 to 4, high carbon steel (mass%, C: 1.0%, Si: 0.2 to 0.3%, Mn: 0.3 to 0.45%, P: 0.08 to 0.015%, S: 0.05 to 0.02%) A cast piece having a width of 400 mm and a thickness of 300 mm was cast from the molten steel. The casting speed at that time was in the range of 0.7 to 0.8 m / min, and the specific amount of secondary cooling water was constant at 0.3 l / kg · steel.

鋳片内部の凝固が完了するクレータエンドの上流側および下流側(図4にA〜Dで示す圧下ゾーン)において、5対の圧下ロール対を備えた、ゾーン長が2mの各ゾーンにおいて、それぞれ1.0mm/mの圧下量(合計の圧下量は8mm)で、鋳片がテーパ状となるような圧下を実施した。   In each zone with a zone length of 2 m, including 5 pairs of rolling rolls, on the upstream side and downstream side of the crater end where the solidification inside the slab is completed (the rolling zone indicated by A to D in FIG. 4) The rolling was performed such that the slab was tapered with a rolling amount of 1.0 mm / m (the total rolling amount was 8 mm).

シリンダーに加わる圧力推進値については、内部品質(鋳片中心偏析度、ポロシティ発生有無)良好時の実績圧力推進値のデータから統計的解析を行い、圧下ゾーンA、Bは30トン、Cは40トン、Dは50トンに設定して制御した。
下記表1に試験条件および試験結果を示す。
The pressure propulsion value applied to the cylinder is statistically analyzed from the data of the actual pressure propulsion value when the internal quality (slab center segregation degree, presence or absence of porosity) is good, the reduction zones A and B are 30 tons, and C is 40 Ton and D were set to 50 tons and controlled.
Table 1 below shows test conditions and test results.

Figure 2008093711
Figure 2008093711

鋳造後の鋳片から内部調査用に長さ800mmの鋳片を採取して、長手方向に等間隔に5枚の横断面サンプルを採取し、そのサルファープリントにより内部割れの発生の有無を調査した。   An 800 mm long slab was taken from the cast slab for internal investigation, and five cross-sectional samples were taken at equal intervals in the longitudinal direction, and the presence or absence of internal cracks was investigated by the sulfur print. .

内部割れは、長さ5mm以上の場合を「内部割れ有り」とし、長さ5mm未満の場合を「内部割れ無し」とした。また、ポロシティについては、サルファープリントにより調査し、直径2mm以上の場合を「ポロシティ残存有り」とし、直径2mm未満の場合を「ポロシティ残存無し」とした。また、炭素濃度中心偏析比は、鋳片の厚さ方向中心部に相当する位置の26箇所から7mmピッチで直径2mmのドリル刃により切り粉を採取し、その分析値C(質量%)を取鍋分析値Co(質量%)で除してC/Coを求め、これらの平均値を算出して中心偏析比とした。   The internal crack was defined as “with internal crack” when the length was 5 mm or more, and “no internal crack” when the length was less than 5 mm. Further, the porosity was investigated by sulfur printing, and when the diameter was 2 mm or more, “porosity remained” was determined, and when the diameter was less than 2 mm, “no porosity remained”. The carbon concentration center segregation ratio is determined by taking the analysis value C (mass%) of 26 chips from a position corresponding to the center of the slab in the thickness direction with a 7 mm diameter drill blade with a 2 mm diameter drill blade. C / Co was determined by dividing by the pan analysis value Co (mass%), and the average value was calculated as the center segregation ratio.

試験番号1〜2は、発明例についての試験であり、試験番号3〜6は、本発明で規定する条件の少なくとも1つが満たされない比較例についての試験である。   Test numbers 1 and 2 are tests for the inventive examples, and test numbers 3 to 6 are tests for the comparative examples in which at least one of the conditions defined in the present invention is not satisfied.

試験番号3は、圧下ゾーンAにおいてシリンダーに加わる圧力推進値についての制御をしなかった場合であるが、圧力推進値についての制御をしなかったために、設定圧下量に到達した際の圧力推進値が22トンと低く、偏析が悪化した。   Test No. 3 is a case where the pressure propulsion value applied to the cylinder in the reduction zone A was not controlled, but because the pressure propulsion value was not controlled, the pressure propulsion value when the set reduction amount was reached. Was as low as 22 tons, and segregation deteriorated.

試験番号4は、圧下ゾーンDにおいてシリンダーに加わる圧力推進値についての制御をしなかった場合であるが、この場合も圧力推進値についての制御をしなかったために、設定圧下量に到達した際の圧力値が31トンと低く、ポロシティが悪化した。   Test No. 4 is a case where the pressure propulsion value applied to the cylinder in the reduction zone D was not controlled, but also in this case, the pressure propulsion value was not controlled. The pressure value was as low as 31 tons, and the porosity deteriorated.

試験番号5は、全てのゾーンおいてシリンダーに加わる圧力推進値についての制御をしなかった場合であるが、全てのゾーンで圧力推進値が外れており、内部割れが発生すると共にポロシティが残存し、偏析が悪化した。   Test No. 5 is the case where the pressure propulsion value applied to the cylinder was not controlled in all zones, but the pressure propulsion value was deviated in all zones, internal cracks occurred and porosity remained. Segregation worsened.

なお、この試験番号5において、圧下ゾーンAおよびCでは圧下力が設定値よりも増大し、圧下ゾーンBおよびDでは低下した原因は、以下の通りである。   In Test No. 5, the cause of the reduction in the reduction zones A and C being higher than the set value and the decrease in the reduction zones B and D is as follows.

セグメントは定期的に交換し、交換時に間隔初期設定を行うが、その際に初期値がずれると、設定した圧下量と実際の圧下量が異なる場合が起こり得る。試験番号5では、圧下ゾーンAおよびCでは、設定した圧下量より実際には多く圧下しているため、圧下力が増大し、反対に圧下ゾーンBおよびDでは、設定した圧下量より実際の圧下量が少なくなっているため、圧下力が減少したのである。   The segments are periodically replaced, and the interval is initially set at the time of replacement. However, if the initial value is deviated at that time, the set reduction amount and the actual reduction amount may be different. In test number 5, in the reduction zones A and C, since the actual reduction is greater than the set reduction amount, the reduction force increases. On the contrary, in the reduction zones B and D, the actual reduction is less than the set reduction amount. Because the amount is small, the rolling force has decreased.

以上の試験番号3〜5の比較例に対して、試験番号1〜2の発明例は、いずれもシリンダーに加わる圧力推進値を、4ゾーン全てで設定範囲内に制御したことにより、内部割れの発生およびポロシティの残存はなく、偏析についても良好であった。   In contrast to the above comparative examples of test numbers 3 to 5, the invention examples of test numbers 1 and 2 all controlled the pressure propulsion value applied to the cylinder within the set range in all four zones. There was no generation or porosity remaining, and segregation was also good.

すなわち、同じ圧下量を付与しても、外気温、二次冷却水温、セグメント交換時の初期値設定による間隔値の誤差などにより品質が変わってしまうが、発明例では、設定圧下量になるように間隔調整した時に、鋳片からの情報である圧下反力が、目標とする圧力推進値と比べて差がある場合には、圧下量を増減して目標とする圧力推進値になるように制御するので、内部割れの発生およびポロシティの残存がなくなるのである。   That is, even if the same amount of reduction is applied, the quality will change due to the outside air temperature, the secondary cooling water temperature, the error of the interval value due to the initial value setting at the time of segment replacement, etc. When the reduction reaction force, which is information from the slab, is different from the target pressure propulsion value when the interval is adjusted, the reduction amount is increased or decreased so as to reach the target pressure propulsion value. Since it is controlled, the occurrence of internal cracks and no residual porosity are eliminated.

本発明は上記の例に限らず、各請求項に記載された技術的思想の範疇内であれば、適宜実施の形態を変更しても良いことは言うまでもない。   The present invention is not limited to the above-described example, and it goes without saying that the embodiments may be appropriately changed within the scope of the technical idea described in each claim.

例えば図2では、6対の圧下ロールを有するセグメントにより圧下を行うものを示したが、単一の圧下ロールにより圧下を行う場合であってもよい。   For example, FIG. 2 shows a case where the reduction is performed by a segment having six pairs of reduction rolls, but the reduction may be performed by a single reduction roll.

本発明は、実施例に示したような高炭素鋼鋳片のみならず低炭素鋼や中炭素鋼、ステンレス鋼、高合金鋼などの連続鋳造にも適用できる。   The present invention can be applied not only to high carbon steel slabs as shown in the Examples but also to continuous casting of low carbon steel, medium carbon steel, stainless steel, high alloy steel, and the like.

圧下セグメントの上面を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the upper surface of a rolling-down segment. (a)は圧下セグメントの側面を示す図、(b)は圧下セグメントの斜視図である。(A) is a figure which shows the side surface of a rolling-down segment, (b) is a perspective view of a rolling-down segment. 圧下量制御を説明する図である。It is a figure explaining rolling-down amount control. 連続鋳造設備を示す図である。It is a figure which shows a continuous casting installation.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1a,1b セグメント
2 鋳片
3a 上フレーム
3b 下フレーム
4 圧下ロール
5 位置制御付のシリンダー
6 油圧ユニット
8 サーボバルブ
1a, 1b Segment 2 Cast pieces 3a Upper frame 3b Lower frame 4 Rolling-down roll 5 Cylinder with position control 6 Hydraulic unit 8 Servo valve

Claims (1)

鋳片内部の凝固が完了するクレータエンドの上流側および下流側で、複数の圧下ロール対を用いて鋳片を厚み方向に圧下するに際し、各圧下ロール対毎に、または複数の圧下ロール対を配置した各セグメント毎に、圧下量および圧下推進力を制御して鋼を連続鋳造する方法であって、
鋳片を圧下する際には、
先ず、各圧下ロール対または各セグメントによる鋳片の圧下量が、目標とする圧下量になるように鋳片を圧下し、
その後、各圧下ロール対または各セグメントによる鋳片の圧下量を増加または減少することにより、各圧下ロール対または各セグメントに作用する圧力推進値が目標の圧力推進値となるように制御することを特徴とする鋼の連続鋳造方法。
When rolling down the slab in the thickness direction using a plurality of reduction roll pairs on the upstream side and downstream side of the crater end where solidification inside the slab is completed, for each reduction roll pair or a plurality of reduction roll pairs A method of continuously casting steel by controlling the amount of reduction and the reduction driving force for each arranged segment,
When rolling down the slab,
First, the slab is squeezed so that the reduction amount of the slab by each reduction roll pair or each segment becomes the target reduction amount,
Thereafter, by increasing or decreasing the reduction amount of the slab by each rolling roll pair or each segment, it is possible to control so that the pressure driving value acting on each rolling roll pair or each segment becomes the target pressure driving value. A method for continuous casting of steel.
JP2006279116A 2006-10-12 2006-10-12 Steel continuous casting method Active JP4598742B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006279116A JP4598742B2 (en) 2006-10-12 2006-10-12 Steel continuous casting method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006279116A JP4598742B2 (en) 2006-10-12 2006-10-12 Steel continuous casting method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2008093711A true JP2008093711A (en) 2008-04-24
JP4598742B2 JP4598742B2 (en) 2010-12-15

Family

ID=39377112

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2006279116A Active JP4598742B2 (en) 2006-10-12 2006-10-12 Steel continuous casting method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4598742B2 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101148876B1 (en) * 2009-06-26 2012-05-29 현대제철 주식회사 Method for controlling starting of continuous casting
JP2013173159A (en) * 2012-02-24 2013-09-05 Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corp CONTINUOUS CASTING METHOD OF HIGH-C HIGH-Mn NONMAGNETIC STEEL

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101148876B1 (en) * 2009-06-26 2012-05-29 현대제철 주식회사 Method for controlling starting of continuous casting
JP2013173159A (en) * 2012-02-24 2013-09-05 Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corp CONTINUOUS CASTING METHOD OF HIGH-C HIGH-Mn NONMAGNETIC STEEL

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4598742B2 (en) 2010-12-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR20110033873A (en) Process and system for manufacturing metal strips and sheets without a break of continuity between continuous casting and rolling
RU2678112C2 (en) Continuous steel casting method
EP1356880B1 (en) Continuous casting method, continuous casting apparatus and continuoulsly cast steel slab
JPH08132206A (en) Continuous casting method
JP2809186B2 (en) Continuous casting method
EP3305437A1 (en) Continuous casting and rolling apparatus and continuous casting and rolling method
JP4598742B2 (en) Steel continuous casting method
JP5012294B2 (en) Steel continuous casting method
JPH10193064A (en) Method for executing rolling reduction of non-solidified part in cast slab
JPS62275556A (en) Continuous casting method
JPH038864B2 (en)
JP3511973B2 (en) Continuous casting method
JP2001062551A (en) Continuous casting method
JPH08238550A (en) Method for continuously casting steel
CN101410195B (en) Method for manufacturing seamless pipe
JP2004167561A (en) Method for continuously casting high carbon steel bloom
JP6394271B2 (en) Slab pressing device for continuous casting and continuous casting method
JP3319379B2 (en) Continuous casting method of steel billet
JPH10128512A (en) Unsolidified reduction rolling method for round billet
JP4285288B2 (en) Steel continuous casting method
EP3782747A1 (en) Continuous casting method of steel
JP4364852B2 (en) Continuous casting equipment and continuous casting method for slab slabs
JPH11179509A (en) Continuous casting method of billet cast slab
JPS62158554A (en) Continuous casting method
JP4417899B2 (en) Continuous casting method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20080917

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20081014

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20081205

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20090210

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20090330

A911 Transfer of reconsideration by examiner before appeal (zenchi)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A911

Effective date: 20090427

A912 Removal of reconsideration by examiner before appeal (zenchi)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A912

Effective date: 20090529

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20100924

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4598742

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131001

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131001

Year of fee payment: 3

S111 Request for change of ownership or part of ownership

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313111

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131001

Year of fee payment: 3

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350