JP2008093707A - Resistance spot welding method - Google Patents

Resistance spot welding method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2008093707A
JP2008093707A JP2006278905A JP2006278905A JP2008093707A JP 2008093707 A JP2008093707 A JP 2008093707A JP 2006278905 A JP2006278905 A JP 2006278905A JP 2006278905 A JP2006278905 A JP 2006278905A JP 2008093707 A JP2008093707 A JP 2008093707A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
electrode
plate
welding
nugget
spot welding
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2006278905A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP5187806B2 (en
Inventor
Takashi Shinmyo
高史 新明
Ryo Kikuchi
陵 菊池
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd filed Critical Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd
Priority to JP2006278905A priority Critical patent/JP5187806B2/en
Publication of JP2008093707A publication Critical patent/JP2008093707A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5187806B2 publication Critical patent/JP5187806B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a resistance spot welding method capable of forming a nugget of a sufficient size at an appropriate position in a plate assembly having a large plate thickness ratio, and capable of performing the welding work, which is accompanied by formation of the nugget, with remarkably simple equipment and control. <P>SOLUTION: A plate assembly 3 consists of a plurality of metal plates 4, 5 superimposed on each other, and a thinnest plate 4 among the metal plates is arranged as one of the outermost layers of the assembly 3. Resistance spot welding is applied to the assembly 3 by energizing it while holding it between a pair of electrodes 1, 2 and pressurizing it. The tip end of the electrode 1 is formed into the shape of a convex curve surface, and a depression 6 is formed on the tip end of the electrode 2. The pressure energization is performed while bringing the electrode 2 with the depression 6 into contact with a thick plate 5 that is arranged as the other of the outermost layers of the assembly 3. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2008,JPO&INPIT

Description

本発明は、抵抗スポット溶接方法に関し、特に板厚の異なる複数の金属板を重ね合わせてなる板組みに対して良好なナゲット形成を可能とする抵抗スポット溶接方法に関する。   The present invention relates to a resistance spot welding method, and more particularly to a resistance spot welding method that enables good nugget formation on a plate assembly formed by superposing a plurality of metal plates having different plate thicknesses.

一般に、重ね合わせた複数枚の金属板の接合には、重ね抵抗溶接法の一種である抵抗スポット溶接方法が用いられる。この溶接方法は、複数枚の金属板を重ね合わせてなる板組みを一対の電極で挟み、当該一対の電極で加圧通電することで、ナゲットと呼ばれる溶接部を得る手段である。そのため、近年では、自動車のボデーの溶接等、多数の溶接を要し、かつ溶接作業の高速化が求められる分野に好適に用いられる傾向にある。   In general, a resistance spot welding method, which is a kind of a lap resistance welding method, is used for joining a plurality of stacked metal plates. This welding method is a means for obtaining a welded portion called a nugget by sandwiching a plate assembly formed by superposing a plurality of metal plates between a pair of electrodes, and applying a pressure current with the pair of electrodes. For this reason, in recent years, there is a tendency to be used favorably in fields that require a large number of weldings, such as automobile body welding, and where high-speed welding work is required.

また、近年、自動車製造業の分野などにおいては、車体の衝突安全性の向上という要求の高まりから、例えば、車両のフロア部を構成する、フロアパネルとメンバーとの間にリインフォースメントを挟み込んだ構造が採用されるようになっている。この構造では、従来の単純な二枚重ねの鋼板をスポット溶接する場合と異なり、3枚以上の鋼板を重ね合わせてスポット溶接することが要求される。   Also, in recent years, in the field of automobile manufacturing, etc., due to the increasing demand for improved collision safety of the vehicle body, for example, a structure in which a reinforcement is sandwiched between a floor panel and a member constituting a floor portion of a vehicle. Has been adopted. In this structure, unlike the conventional simple two-ply steel plate spot-welded, it is required that three or more steel plates be superposed and spot-welded.

さらに、最近では、車体の衝突安全性の更なる向上要求に伴い、リインフォースメ
ントなどの高強度化、厚肉化が進み、一方側に板厚の薄いフロアパネル(薄板)を配置し、他方側に板厚の厚い1枚又は複数枚のメンバー、リインフォースメント(厚板)を組み合わせた板組みをスポット溶接することが必要となる場合も多い。
Furthermore, recently, with the demand for further improvement in the collision safety of the car body, the reinforcement and the thickening of reinforcement etc. have progressed, and a floor panel (thin plate) with a thin plate thickness has been placed on one side, In many cases, it is necessary to spot weld a plate assembly in which one or a plurality of thick members and reinforcements (thick plates) are combined.

このような板厚比(=板組みの総厚/最も薄い金属板の板厚)の大きな板組みに対して、従来の如く、加圧力、通電量を一定の値に保ってスポット溶接を行った場合には一番外側(電極と接触する側)の薄板と厚板の間に必要なサイズのナゲットが形成され難い。そのため、上述の板組みに対しては十分な接合強度が得られないのが実情であった。   Spot welding is performed on a plate assembly with such a large thickness ratio (= total thickness of the plate assembly / thickness of the thinnest metal plate) while maintaining a constant value of applied pressure and energization as in the past. In this case, it is difficult to form a nugget of a necessary size between the thin plate and the thick plate on the outermost side (the side in contact with the electrode). Therefore, the actual situation is that sufficient bonding strength cannot be obtained for the above-described plate assembly.

かかる問題を解決するための手段として、例えば特開2003-251468号公報には、2枚の厚板の上に薄板を重ね合わせたワークを一対の電極により挟んでスポット溶接するに際し、薄板側に位置する一方の電極とワークとの接触面積が、厚板側に位置する他方の電極とワークとの接触面積よりも小さくなるようにして溶接を行うことを特徴とする抵抗スポット溶接方法が提案されている(特許文献1を参照)。   As a means for solving such a problem, for example, in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2003-251468, when spot welding is performed by sandwiching a workpiece in which a thin plate is stacked on two thick plates with a pair of electrodes, A resistance spot welding method is proposed in which welding is performed such that the contact area between one electrode located on the workpiece and the workpiece is smaller than the contact area between the other electrode located on the thick plate side and the workpiece. (See Patent Document 1).

また、特開2006−55898号公報には、重ね合わせた2枚以上の厚金属板の一方に薄金属板を重ね合わせた板組みを一対の電極で挟み、抵抗スポット溶接により溶接接合するにあたり、一対の電極のうちの一方の、薄金属板に接する電極を先端が所定の曲率半径R1を有する曲面である電極とし、他方の厚金属板に接する電極を先端が平面又は薄金属板に接する電極の先端の曲率半径R1より大きな曲率半径を有する曲面である電極とし、抵抗スポット溶接を第一段および第二段の二段階からなる溶接とし、第二段の溶接が第一段の溶接に比べ高加圧力の溶接とすることを特徴とする抵抗スポット溶接方法が提案されている(特許文献2を参照)。
特開2003−251468号公報 特開2006−55898号公報
In addition, in JP 2006-55898 A, a plate assembly in which a thin metal plate is superimposed on one of two or more stacked thick metal plates is sandwiched between a pair of electrodes and welded by resistance spot welding. One of the pair of electrodes, the electrode in contact with the thin metal plate is an electrode whose tip is a curved surface having a predetermined radius of curvature R1, and the electrode in contact with the other thick metal plate is an electrode with the tip in contact with the flat or thin metal plate The electrode is a curved surface having a radius of curvature larger than the radius of curvature R1 of the tip, and resistance spot welding is a two-stage welding of the first stage and the second stage, and the second stage welding is compared to the first stage welding. A resistance spot welding method characterized by high-pressure welding is proposed (see Patent Document 2).
JP 2003-251468 A JP 2006-55898 A

しかし、特許文献1に記載の方法は、薄板を含めて3枚の金属板からなる板組みを溶接対象としたものである。そのため、単に薄板に当接する電極の先端径を、厚板に当接する電極の先端径より小さくしただけでは、板厚比が大きい板組み、例えば板厚比が5を超えるような場合には、薄板側にまで到る大きさのナゲットを形成することは難しい。   However, the method described in Patent Document 1 is intended for welding a plate assembly including three metal plates including a thin plate. Therefore, simply by making the tip diameter of the electrode in contact with the thin plate smaller than the tip diameter of the electrode in contact with the thick plate, a plate assembly having a large plate thickness ratio, for example, when the plate thickness ratio exceeds 5, It is difficult to form a nugget that reaches the thin plate side.

また、特許文献2に記載の方法であっても溶接可能な板厚比は6〜7程度である。そのため、さらに板厚比の大きい板組み(例えば10程度)に対して、薄板側に到る適正な大きさのナゲットを形成するとなると、この方法では不十分である。また、上述の方法は、初期加圧力を高める等、加圧力の変更、制御を必須とするものであるから、制御の設定に手間がかかり、また高い加圧力を付与するための設備の増大を招く。設備スペースの増大は溶接箇所の制約につながり、これにより設計自由度の低下を招く恐れが生じる。   Moreover, even if it is the method of patent document 2, the plate | board thickness ratio which can be welded is about 6-7. Therefore, when a nugget having an appropriate size reaching the thin plate side is formed on a plate assembly having a larger plate thickness ratio (for example, about 10), this method is insufficient. In addition, since the above-mentioned method requires a change in the applied pressure and control, such as increasing the initial applied pressure, it takes time to set the control and increases the equipment for applying a high applied pressure. Invite. An increase in equipment space leads to restrictions on the welding location, which may lead to a reduction in design freedom.

以上の事情に鑑み、本発明では、板厚比の大きい板組みに対しても十分な大きさのナゲットを適正な位置に形成することができ、かつこのナゲットの形成を伴う溶接作業を非常に簡易な設備および制御で行い得る抵抗スポット溶接方法を提供することを技術的課題とする。   In view of the above circumstances, in the present invention, a nugget having a sufficient size can be formed at an appropriate position even for a plate assembly having a large plate thickness ratio, and the welding operation accompanied by the formation of this nugget is extremely performed. It is a technical problem to provide a resistance spot welding method that can be performed with simple equipment and control.

前記課題を解決するため、本発明は、重ね合わせた複数の金属板のうち、最も薄い金属板を一方の最外層に配してなる板組みを一対の電極で挟み、加圧しながら通電することで溶接を行う抵抗スポット溶接方法において、一対の電極のうち、一方の電極にその先端を凸曲面状としたものを、他方の電極にその先端を窪ませたものをそれぞれ用い、かつ、窪みを設けた電極を板組みの他方の最外層と接触させた状態で加圧通電することを特徴とする抵抗スポット溶接方法を提供する。   In order to solve the above-mentioned problem, the present invention encloses a plate assembly in which the thinnest metal plate is arranged on one outermost layer among a plurality of stacked metal plates between a pair of electrodes, and energizes while applying pressure. In the resistance spot welding method in which welding is carried out, one of the pair of electrodes, one of which has a convex curved end on one electrode, and the other electrode whose depression is recessed, and Provided is a resistance spot welding method characterized in that pressurization energization is performed in a state where the provided electrode is in contact with the other outermost layer of the plate assembly.

このように、本発明は、板組みの加圧通電に際し、先端が凸曲面をなす電極と先端に窪みを設けた電極とを用い、かつ窪みを設けた側の電極を厚板側に配した点を技術的特徴とするものである。すなわち、通電初期において、薄板側では、凸曲面状の先端を有する電極が点状に接触する一方、厚板側では、先端の窪み周縁が金属板表面に接触するため、電極は環状に接触し易い。この場合、厚板側に比べて薄板側では電極との接触面積が小さくなり、その分電流密度が高まるため、薄板側に優先的に発熱が生じる。それ故に、薄板側においてもナゲットが形成され易くなる。加えて、厚板側では環状の接触状態が生じることで、従来とは異なる過程を経てナゲットの核となる部分が形成され、成長することになる。そのため、結果としてナゲットが広範囲にわたって成長し、薄板側で確実かつ強固な接合が生じると共に、非常に大径の(表面積の大きい)ナゲットを得ることができる。   As described above, the present invention uses an electrode having a convex curved surface at the tip and an electrode provided with a dent at the tip when the plate assembly is pressurized and energized, and the electrode on the side provided with the dent is arranged on the thick plate side. The point is a technical feature. That is, at the initial stage of energization, on the thin plate side, the electrode having the convex curved tip contacts in a dotted manner, whereas on the thick plate side, the recessed peripheral edge of the tip contacts the metal plate surface, so that the electrode contacts in an annular shape. easy. In this case, the contact area with the electrode is smaller on the thin plate side than on the thick plate side, and the current density is increased accordingly, so heat is generated preferentially on the thin plate side. Therefore, the nugget is easily formed even on the thin plate side. In addition, an annular contact state occurs on the thick plate side, so that a portion that becomes the nucleus of the nugget is formed and grows through a process different from the conventional one. Therefore, as a result, the nugget grows over a wide range, and a reliable and strong bonding occurs on the thin plate side, and a nugget with a very large diameter (a large surface area) can be obtained.

また、この方法であれば、加圧力、通電量(電流量)を一定に保った状態であっても適正なナゲットを形成することができるので、製品ごとの溶接品質のばらつきを小さくして、高品質の溶接作業を安定的に行うことができる。また、従来の方法だと、加圧力の調整および制御の設定に手間やコストがかかるが、今回の方法であれば、上述の理由から特段の制御や設備を必要としないので、簡易な設備および制御でもって容易に溶接を行うことができる。また、かかる方法であれば、それほど高い加圧力を必要としないので、加圧設備に要するスペースも小さくて済む。また、溶接箇所の制約を受けることがないため、設計自由度を向上させることができる。   Also, with this method, it is possible to form an appropriate nugget even in a state where the applied pressure and the energization amount (current amount) are kept constant, so the variation in welding quality for each product is reduced, High quality welding work can be performed stably. In addition, the conventional method requires labor and cost for adjusting the pressure and setting the control. However, with this method, no special control or equipment is required for the above-mentioned reasons. Welding can be easily performed with control. In addition, such a method does not require a high pressurizing force, so that the space required for the pressurizing equipment can be reduced. Moreover, since there is no restriction on the welding location, the degree of freedom in design can be improved.

上述の如く、窪みを設けた電極を用いて板組みの溶接を行う場合、板組みの最外層に位置し、窪みを設けた電極と接触する厚板の表面には、通常、溶接痕と呼ばれる突出部が形成される。この際、溶接痕の高さとナゲット径(溶接の良否)との間には、一定の相関が認められることから、本発明者らは、窪みに応じて形成される溶接痕の形状でもって例えば目視で、より正確には溶接痕の高さでもって溶接の良否(薄板側にまで到るナゲットが形成されているか否か)を判定することができるとの知見を得るに到った。   As described above, when a plate assembly is welded using an electrode provided with a recess, the surface of the thick plate that is located in the outermost layer of the plate assembly and contacts the electrode provided with the recess is usually called a welding mark. A protrusion is formed. At this time, since a certain correlation is recognized between the height of the welding mark and the nugget diameter (welding quality), the inventors have, for example, the shape of the welding mark formed according to the depression. The inventors have obtained the knowledge that the quality of welding (whether or not a nugget reaching the thin plate side is formed) can be judged by visual observation, more precisely, by the height of the welding mark.

従い、窪みの深さを、適正にナゲットが形成された場合に、窪みを設けた電極との接触面に形成される溶接痕の高さに相当する大きさに設定しておくのがよい。かかるサイズの窪みを設けた電極を用いて溶接を行うことで、適正にナゲットが形成された場合、溶接痕が窪みに倣った形状に形成される。そのため、容易に溶接の良否を目視で確認することができる。また、好ましくは、窪みの底部に形成されたマーカー(一種の目印)に対応した模様が溶接痕に形成されるように窪みを形成しておくのがよい。窪み底面に設けたマーカーに対応するマークが溶接痕に形成されることで、目視でもってより容易に溶接の良否を確認することができる。なお、ここでいう「適正にナゲットが形成される」とは、薄板を含め、板組みを構成する全ての金属板にわたってナゲットが形成されることを意味する。   Therefore, when the nugget is properly formed, the depth of the recess is preferably set to a size corresponding to the height of the welding mark formed on the contact surface with the electrode provided with the recess. When the nugget is appropriately formed by performing welding using an electrode provided with such a dent, a welding mark is formed in a shape following the dent. Therefore, the quality of welding can be easily confirmed visually. Preferably, the depression is formed so that a pattern corresponding to a marker (a kind of mark) formed on the bottom of the depression is formed on the welding mark. By forming a mark corresponding to the marker provided on the bottom surface of the recess in the welding mark, it is possible to more easily confirm the quality of the welding by visual observation. Here, “appropriate nugget is formed” means that the nugget is formed over all the metal plates constituting the plate assembly including the thin plate.

また、溶接時におけるワーク(板組み)の抵抗から、溶接の良否を定量的に判定することも可能である。すなわち、窪みを設けた電極を用いて抵抗スポット溶接を行う場合、通電開始時からワークの抵抗(電気抵抗)は徐々に低下していき、適正にナゲットが形成された状態では平衡状態に至る傾向が知られている。よって、この知見に基づき判定を行うことで、具体的には、溶接時に計測される抵抗値が平衡状態に至ったことを確認することで、適正なナゲット形成が適正に行われたものと判断することができる。また、この判定作業は、予め平衡状態の判断基準を求めておくことで、電気抵抗の計測値に基づき容易かつ自動的に行うことができる。かかる手段によれば、溶接の良否判定、ひいては溶接部の品質管理を容易かつ高精度に行うことができるので、量産加工に対して非常に好適である。もちろん、この判定手段を、前述の目視による判定手段と組み合わせて用いてもよい。   It is also possible to quantitatively determine the quality of welding from the resistance of the workpiece (plate assembly) during welding. That is, when resistance spot welding is performed using an electrode with a depression, the resistance (electrical resistance) of the workpiece gradually decreases from the start of energization, and tends to reach an equilibrium state when the nugget is properly formed. It has been known. Therefore, by making a determination based on this knowledge, specifically, by confirming that the resistance value measured during welding has reached an equilibrium state, it is determined that proper nugget formation has been performed properly. can do. In addition, this determination work can be easily and automatically performed based on the measured value of electrical resistance by obtaining a determination criterion for the equilibrium state in advance. According to such means, it is possible to easily and accurately determine the quality of welding, and consequently the quality control of the welded portion, and therefore it is very suitable for mass production processing. Of course, this determination means may be used in combination with the visual determination means described above.

このように、本発明によれば、板厚比の大きい板組みに対しても、例えば板厚比が10となるような板組みに対しても、十分な大きさのナゲットを適正な位置に形成することができる。併せて、このナゲットの形成を伴う溶接作業を非常に簡易な設備および簡単な制御で行うことができ、これにより、接合部品質の安定化、および設計自由度の向上を図ることができる。   As described above, according to the present invention, a sufficiently large nugget is placed at an appropriate position even for a plate assembly having a large thickness ratio, for example, a plate assembly having a plate thickness ratio of 10. Can be formed. In addition, the welding operation involving the formation of the nugget can be performed with very simple equipment and simple control, thereby stabilizing the joint quality and improving the degree of design freedom.

また、窪みを設けた電極に設ける窪みの深さを、ナゲットが適正に形成された際の、金属板表面に形成される溶接痕の高さに応じて設定することで、溶接部の品質管理を容易かつ高精度に行うことができる。   In addition, by setting the depth of the recess provided in the electrode provided with the recess according to the height of the weld mark formed on the surface of the metal plate when the nugget is properly formed, quality control of the welded portion Can be performed easily and with high accuracy.

以下、本発明に係る抵抗スポット溶接方法の一実施形態を図面に基づいて説明する。   Hereinafter, an embodiment of a resistance spot welding method according to the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

図1は、本発明の一実施形態に係る溶接方法を概念的に示している。同図に示すように、この溶接方法は、一対の電極1、2で、複数の金属板からなるワークとしての板組み3を挟持し、加圧しながら通電することでスポット溶接を行うものである。   FIG. 1 conceptually shows a welding method according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in the figure, this welding method is to perform spot welding by sandwiching a plate assembly 3 as a work made of a plurality of metal plates with a pair of electrodes 1 and 2 and energizing them while applying pressure. .

溶接対象となる板組み3は、複数の金属板、詳細には、互いに板厚の異なる複数の金属板4、5を重ね合わせてなる。ここで、重ね合わせた複数の金属板4、5のうち、最も板厚の薄いもの(以下、薄板4という。)は、板組み3の一方の最外層に配置されており、他方の最外層には、薄板4以外の金属板(以下、厚板5という。)が配置されている。ここで、板組み3は、互いに板厚の異なる2枚以上の金属板からなり、薄板4が一方の最外層に配されていればよく、厚板5の枚数は問わない。また、複数枚の厚板5が用いられる場合、各厚板5、5間で板厚が異なっていてもよい。   The plate assembly 3 to be welded is formed by superposing a plurality of metal plates, specifically a plurality of metal plates 4 and 5 having different plate thicknesses. Here, among the superposed metal plates 4 and 5, the thinnest plate (hereinafter referred to as the thin plate 4) is arranged in one outermost layer of the plate assembly 3, and the other outermost layer. A metal plate other than the thin plate 4 (hereinafter referred to as a thick plate 5) is disposed. Here, the plate assembly 3 is composed of two or more metal plates having different plate thicknesses, and the thin plate 4 may be disposed on one outermost layer, and the number of the thick plates 5 is not limited. Further, when a plurality of thick plates 5 are used, the thicknesses of the thick plates 5 and 5 may be different.

一対の電極1、2は、所定のピッチを介して、板組み3をその厚み方向に挟む位置に配設されており、図示しない適当な加圧制御手段によって板組み3を加圧しながら通電するようになっている。一対の電極1、2のうち、一方の電極1には、その先端を凸曲面状としたものが用いられると共に、他方の電極2には、その先端に窪み6を設けたものが用いられる。この実施形態では、双方の電極1、2共に、先端を凸球面形状とし、他方の電極2のみ、その中央(頂部)に円状の窪み6を設けている。   The pair of electrodes 1 and 2 is disposed at a position sandwiching the plate assembly 3 in the thickness direction through a predetermined pitch, and is energized while applying pressure to the plate assembly 3 by an appropriate pressure control means (not shown). It is like that. Of the pair of electrodes 1 and 2, one electrode 1 having a convex curved end is used, and the other electrode 2 having a depression 6 at the tip is used. In this embodiment, both the electrodes 1 and 2 have a convex spherical tip, and only the other electrode 2 is provided with a circular recess 6 at the center (top) thereof.

上記構成の電極1、2のうち、一方の電極1は、板組み3の最外層を構成する厚板5の表面5aと接触し、かつ、窪み6を設けた電極2は、薄板4の表面4aに接触するように配置される。   Of the electrodes 1 and 2 having the above configuration, one electrode 1 is in contact with the surface 5 a of the thick plate 5 constituting the outermost layer of the plate assembly 3, and the electrode 2 provided with the recess 6 is the surface of the thin plate 4. It arrange | positions so that 4a may be contacted.

この状態から、図示しない加圧制御手段により一対の電極1、2を板組み3に押し付ける(加圧する)と共に、同じく図示しない電流制御手段により一対の電極1、2間に挟持した板組み3に通電する。ここで、一方の電極1と薄板4の表面4aとは、図2(a)に示す接触状態にある(同図中、C1で示す領域において接触している)。また、先端に窪み6を設けた他方の電極2と、最外層に位置する厚板5の表面5aとは、図2(b)に示す接触状態にある(同図中、C2で示す領域において接触している)。すなわち、通電初期において、凸曲面状の先端をなす電極1は薄板4と点状に接触するのに対し、窪み6を設けた電極2はその窪み6の周縁でもって厚板5と接触する。そのため、厚板5側に比べて薄板4側では電極との接触面積が小さくなり、薄板4の側で電流密度が高まる。さらに、厚板5側で環状の接触領域C2が形成されることで、ナゲットの形成、成長もこの接触領域C2に応じて進行する。これらの理由から、図3に示すように、薄板4側にまで到る大径のナゲット7が得られ、これにより、薄板4と厚板5との間に強固な接合部を得ることが可能となる。   From this state, the pair of electrodes 1 and 2 are pressed (pressurized) against the plate assembly 3 by a pressure control means (not shown), and the plate assembly 3 is sandwiched between the pair of electrodes 1 and 2 by a current control means (not shown). Energize. Here, one electrode 1 and the surface 4a of the thin plate 4 are in the contact state shown in FIG. 2 (a) (in the same figure, they are in contact with each other at a region indicated by C1). Further, the other electrode 2 provided with the depression 6 at the tip and the surface 5a of the thick plate 5 located in the outermost layer are in a contact state shown in FIG. 2B (in the region indicated by C2 in the same figure). Contact). That is, in the initial stage of energization, the electrode 1 having a convex curved tip contacts the thin plate 4 in a point-like manner, whereas the electrode 2 provided with the recess 6 contacts the thick plate 5 at the periphery of the recess 6. Therefore, the contact area with the electrode is smaller on the thin plate 4 side than on the thick plate 5 side, and the current density is increased on the thin plate 4 side. Furthermore, by forming the annular contact area C2 on the thick plate 5 side, the formation and growth of the nugget also proceeds according to the contact area C2. For these reasons, as shown in FIG. 3, a large-diameter nugget 7 that reaches the thin plate 4 side can be obtained, whereby a strong joint can be obtained between the thin plate 4 and the thick plate 5. It becomes.

また、この方法であれば、例えば、加圧力、通電量(電流量)を一定とする加圧通電でもって適正にナゲット7を形成することができる。そのため、溶接部の品質のばらつきを小さくして、高品質の溶接部を安定して形成することが可能となる。また、この方法によれば、簡易な設備および制御でもって容易に溶接を行うことができるので、例えば加圧設備に要するスペースに関しても小さくできる。従って、溶接箇所の制約を受けることなく溶接作業を行うことができ、溶接自由度の向上、ひいては溶接可能品種の拡大を図ることが可能となる。   In addition, with this method, for example, the nugget 7 can be appropriately formed by pressurization energization with a constant pressure and energization amount (current amount). Therefore, it is possible to reduce the variation in quality of the welded portion and stably form a high-quality welded portion. Further, according to this method, since welding can be easily performed with simple equipment and control, for example, the space required for the pressure equipment can be reduced. Therefore, the welding operation can be performed without being restricted by the welding location, and it is possible to improve the degree of freedom of welding and consequently to expand the types of weldable products.

なお、通電パターンに関し、上述の溶接方法であれば最も単純な一段通電であっても特に問題なく溶接可能であるが、例えば多段通電など、通電期間中に電流量を変化させて通電を行っても構わない。   Regarding the energization pattern, even the simplest single-stage energization can be welded without any particular problems with the above-described welding method, but energization is performed by changing the amount of current during the energization period, such as multi-stage energization. It doesn't matter.

また、上記構成の電極1、2を用いて加圧通電を行う場合、電極2と接する厚板5の表面5aの、窪み6に対応する位置には、図3に示すように、溶接痕8が突出して形成される。ここで、図4に示すように、窪み6の深さdpを、適正にナゲット7が形成された場合に、窪み6を設けた電極2との接触面(表面5a)に形成される溶接痕8の高さhに相当する大きさに設定しておけば、溶接痕8の高さhでもってナゲット7の形成良否を判定することができる。つまり、かかるサイズ(深さdp=高さh)の窪み6を設けた電極2を厚板5の側に用いて溶接を行うことで、適正にナゲット7が形成された場合、溶接痕8が窪み6に倣った形状に形成される。そのため、容易に溶接の良否を目視で確認することができる。   Further, in the case where pressurization energization is performed using the electrodes 1 and 2 having the above-described configuration, a welding mark 8 is formed at a position corresponding to the depression 6 on the surface 5a of the thick plate 5 in contact with the electrode 2 as shown in FIG. Is formed protruding. Here, as shown in FIG. 4, when the nugget 7 is appropriately formed with a depth dp of the depression 6, a welding mark formed on the contact surface (surface 5 a) with the electrode 2 provided with the depression 6. If it is set to a size corresponding to a height h of 8, the formation quality of the nugget 7 can be determined by the height h of the welding mark 8. That is, when the nugget 7 is appropriately formed by performing welding using the electrode 2 provided with the depression 6 having such a size (depth dp = height h) on the thick plate 5 side, It is formed in a shape that follows the recess 6. Therefore, the quality of welding can be easily confirmed visually.

この場合、窪み6の底面6aを例えば平坦に形成しておくことで、図4に示すように、底面6aに倣って平坦な面8aを有する溶接痕8が形成される。従い、窪み6の底面6aが溶接痕8に対する一種のマーカーとして機能し、より容易に目視で溶接の良否を確認することができる。マーカーの形状は特に問わないが、平坦な底面6aをマーカーとすれば、溶接痕8の高さhの目測およびマークの確認が非常に容易となるため、好適である。   In this case, by forming the bottom surface 6a of the recess 6 flat, for example, as shown in FIG. 4, a welding mark 8 having a flat surface 8a following the bottom surface 6a is formed. Accordingly, the bottom surface 6a of the recess 6 functions as a kind of marker for the welding mark 8, and the quality of the welding can be more easily confirmed visually. The shape of the marker is not particularly limited, but it is preferable to use the flat bottom surface 6a as a marker because it is very easy to measure the height h of the welding mark 8 and confirm the mark.

このように、溶接作業後、溶接痕8から得られる情報に基づき溶接良否判定を行うことができるが、この他に、溶接時におけるワーク(板組み3)の抵抗に基づき溶接の良否を判定することも可能である。この判定手段の概念は、例えば図5に示す通電時間と電気抵抗との相関図を用いて説明することができる。すなわち、図5に示すように、通電開始に伴い、板組み3間で計測される電気抵抗は徐々に低下していくが、上述の如くナゲット7が適正に形成され、またこのことに対応した溶接痕8が形成されると、かかる抵抗は平衡状態に至る。従い、この溶接良否判定手段では、電気抵抗が平衡状態に至る点を判定基準とし、通電中における抵抗の変動をチェックすることで、ナゲット7が適正に形成されたことを確認することができる。この判定手段であれば、板組み3間の電気抵抗の計測値に基づき判定を行うことができるので、かかる良否判定を自動的に、さらには溶接時に行うことができる。そのため、溶接部の良否判定、ひいては溶接部の品質管理を容易かつ高精度に行うことができ、量産加工に非常に好適である。   As described above, after the welding operation, it is possible to determine the quality of the welding based on the information obtained from the welding mark 8, but in addition to this, the quality of the welding is determined based on the resistance of the workpiece (plate assembly 3) during welding. It is also possible. The concept of this determination means can be described using, for example, a correlation diagram between energization time and electrical resistance shown in FIG. That is, as shown in FIG. 5, the electrical resistance measured between the plate assemblies 3 gradually decreases with the start of energization, but the nugget 7 is properly formed as described above, and this has been dealt with. When the weld mark 8 is formed, the resistance reaches an equilibrium state. Therefore, in this welding pass / fail judgment means, it is possible to confirm that the nugget 7 is properly formed by checking the fluctuation of resistance during energization using the point where the electrical resistance reaches the equilibrium state as a judgment criterion. If it is this determination means, since determination can be performed based on the measured value of the electrical resistance between the plate assemblies 3, such pass / fail determination can be performed automatically and further during welding. Therefore, it is possible to easily and highly accurately determine the quality of the welded part, and hence the quality control of the welded part, which is very suitable for mass production processing.

もちろん、より溶接部の品質管理を確実かつ高精度に行いたいのであれば、この抵抗に基づく判定手段を、先述の溶接痕8の態様に基づく判定手段と組み合わせて使用することもできる。この際、抵抗が平衡状態にあることと、電極窪みの底面に設けられたマーカーによって溶接痕に対応するマークが形成されていることとの間には一定の相関が見られることを利用して溶接の良否を判定することもできる。   Of course, if it is desired to perform quality control of the welded part more reliably and with high accuracy, the determination means based on the resistance can be used in combination with the determination means based on the aspect of the weld mark 8 described above. At this time, utilizing the fact that a certain correlation is seen between the resistance being in an equilibrium state and the mark corresponding to the welding mark being formed by the marker provided on the bottom surface of the electrode recess. The quality of welding can also be determined.

なお、かかる判定手段を用いて溶接の良否判定を行う場合には、平衡状態の判断基準をどのように設定するかが問題となる。具体的には、抵抗値の上下幅(変動幅)および平衡状態とみなす期間(図中、Teで示す期間)でもって平衡状態を規定する必要があるが、これらは、溶接する金属板(薄板4、厚板5)の種類や厚み、あるいはこれらの重ね合わせの順序等によっても変化する。そのため、各々の溶接態様に応じて予め校正を取っておき、これに基づき、実際の溶接作業における平衡状態の判定基準を定めるのがよい。   In addition, when performing the quality determination of welding using such a determination means, it becomes a problem how to set the determination criterion of an equilibrium state. Specifically, it is necessary to define the equilibrium state by the vertical width (variation range) of the resistance value and the period (period indicated by Te in the figure) regarded as the equilibrium state. 4. It varies depending on the type and thickness of the thick plate 5) or the order of superposition thereof. Therefore, it is preferable to calibrate in advance according to each welding mode, and to determine a determination criterion for an equilibrium state in an actual welding operation based on the calibration.

以上の説明では、抵抗スポット溶接用の電極として、図1に示す形状の電極1、2、すなわち、双方の電極1、2共に先端を凸球面形状とし、他方の電極2のみ、その中央(頂部)に円状の窪み6を設けたものを例示したが、これに限る必要はない。薄板4の側で使用する電極1に関していえば、先端が凸曲面形状をなすものである限り、任意形状の電極を使用することができる。また、厚板5の側で使用する電極2に関していえば、先端に窪み6を設けたものである限り、特に制限なく任意形状の電極(例えば、平坦面に窪み6を設けたものであってもよい)を使用することができる。もちろん、上述の実施形態の如く、それほど加圧力を高めることなく、かつ一段通電でもって良好なナゲットを形成するのであれば、電流密度を適度に高めるような構成とするのが好ましい。すなわち、図1に示すように、電極2の先端形状を凸曲面とし、この中央部(頂部)に窪みを設けた形状とすれば、初期通電時、窪み6の周縁部が優先的に接触し、かつその際の接触面積(図2で示す領域C2の面積)を適度な大きさに抑えることができる。   In the above description, as the electrode for resistance spot welding, the electrodes 1 and 2 having the shape shown in FIG. 1, that is, both the electrodes 1 and 2 have a convex spherical tip, and only the other electrode 2 has its center (top). ) Is provided with a circular recess 6, but it is not necessary to be limited to this. Regarding the electrode 1 used on the thin plate 4 side, an electrode having an arbitrary shape can be used as long as the tip has a convex curved surface shape. Further, as far as the electrode 2 used on the thick plate 5 side is concerned, as long as the dent 6 is provided at the tip, an electrode of any shape (for example, the dent 6 provided on a flat surface without any limitation) May be used). Of course, as in the above-described embodiment, if a good nugget is formed by one-stage energization without increasing the applied pressure so much, it is preferable that the current density be appropriately increased. That is, as shown in FIG. 1, if the tip shape of the electrode 2 is a convex curved surface and the center portion (top portion) has a recess, the peripheral portion of the recess 6 is preferentially brought into contact during initial energization. And the contact area (area C2 shown in FIG. 2) at that time can be suppressed to an appropriate size.

本発明の有用性について検証を行うため、本発明に係る溶接方法で得られた接合体と、従来の方法で得られた接合体とにつき、ナゲットの良否判定を行った。以下に詳細を記す。   In order to verify the usefulness of the present invention, the quality of the nugget was determined for the joined body obtained by the welding method according to the present invention and the joined body obtained by the conventional method. Details are described below.

本発明に係る方法、従来方法共に、ワークとしての板組みには、厚板としての4枚の金属板(何れもSCGA590 厚み1.6mm)を重ね合わせたものに、薄板としての1枚の金属板(SCGA270 厚み0.65mm)さらに重ね合わせたものを使用した。この場合の板厚比は10.8であった。   In both of the method according to the present invention and the conventional method, a plate as a work is overlapped with four metal plates as thick plates (both SCGA590 thickness 1.6 mm), and one metal as a thin plate. A plate (SCGA270 thickness: 0.65 mm) and a further overlapped plate were used. The thickness ratio in this case was 10.8.

また、本発明に係る方法に使用する電極として、厚板側に配して使用する電極には、図6に示す先端形状をなすものを使用した。薄板側に配して使用する電極には、図6に示す先端形状であって、窪みに対応する箇所を取り除いた形状(先端は、破線で示すように凸球面状)のものを使用した。これに対して、従来方法に使用する電極には、双方の電極共に、図6中窪みを取り除いた形状をなすものを使用した。   Moreover, as an electrode used in the method according to the present invention, an electrode having a tip shape shown in FIG. 6 was used as an electrode arranged on the thick plate side. The electrode used by being arranged on the thin plate side has a tip shape shown in FIG. 6 and has a shape (a tip is a convex spherical shape as shown by a broken line) from which a portion corresponding to a depression is removed. On the other hand, as the electrodes used in the conventional method, those having a shape from which the depressions in FIG. 6 were removed were used for both electrodes.

また、加圧通電条件に関し、本発明に係る方法、従来方法共に、加圧力:300kgf、1段通電(通電時間:28cycle 1cycle=1/60sec)とした。一段通電時の電流値に関しては、それぞれ本発明方法:9.6kA、従来方法:7.4kAとした。なお、電流値は、散りが発生する直前の電流値とした。   Further, regarding the pressurization energization conditions, both the method according to the present invention and the conventional method were applied pressure: 300 kgf, one-stage energization (energization time: 28 cycle 1 cycle = 1/60 sec). Regarding the current value at the time of one-stage energization, the method of the present invention: 9.6 kA and the conventional method: 7.4 kA, respectively. The current value was the current value immediately before scattering occurred.

図7に、従来方法で溶接された板組み内部に形成されたナゲットの断面写真を、図8に、本発明に係る方法で溶接されたナゲットの断面写真をそれぞれ示す。これらの結果から、従来の方法で得られたナゲットは、最外層に位置する薄板にまで至ることなく形成されているのに対し、本発明に係る方法で得られたナゲットは、厚板はもちろん、最外層の薄板に到るまで板組みの全厚み方向にわたって形成されていることがわかる。また、ナゲット径(通常、板の延展方向における大きさ)に関しても、本発明に係る方法で得られたナゲットは、薄板側で最も大きく、またナゲット径が最も小さい厚み方向中央においても、十分な大きさのナゲット径を有していることがわかる。   FIG. 7 shows a cross-sectional photograph of the nugget formed inside the plate assembly welded by the conventional method, and FIG. 8 shows a cross-sectional photograph of the nugget welded by the method according to the present invention. From these results, the nugget obtained by the conventional method is formed without reaching the thin plate located in the outermost layer, whereas the nugget obtained by the method according to the present invention is not only a thick plate. It can be seen that the plate is formed over the entire thickness direction until reaching the outermost thin plate. In addition, regarding the nugget diameter (usually the size in the extending direction of the plate), the nugget obtained by the method according to the present invention is the largest on the thin plate side, and is sufficient even in the center in the thickness direction where the nugget diameter is the smallest. It can be seen that it has a large nugget diameter.

本発明の一実施形態に係る抵抗スポット溶接方法を概念的に示す断面図である。It is sectional drawing which shows notionally the resistance spot welding method which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. (a)は図1中矢印aの方向から薄板の電極との接触部分を見た図、(b)は図1中矢印bの方向から厚板の電極との接触部分を見た図である。(A) is the figure which looked at the contact part with the electrode of a thin plate from the direction of arrow a in FIG. 1, (b) is the figure which looked at the contact part with the electrode of a thick plate from the direction of arrow b in FIG. . 適正なナゲットが形成された場合の板組みの断面図である。It is sectional drawing of the board assembly when an appropriate nugget is formed. 電極の窪みとこれにより形成される溶接痕との関係を示す拡大図である。It is an enlarged view which shows the relationship between the hollow of an electrode and the welding trace formed by this. 通電時間と電気抵抗との関係を示す相関図である。It is a correlation diagram which shows the relationship between electricity supply time and an electrical resistance. 実施例に使用する電極の先端形状を示す側面図である。It is a side view which shows the front-end | tip shape of the electrode used for an Example. 従来方法で得られたナゲットの断面写真である。It is a cross-sectional photograph of the nugget obtained by the conventional method. 本発明に係る方法で得られたナゲットの断面写真である。It is a cross-sectional photograph of the nugget obtained by the method according to the present invention.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1 電極(薄板側)
2 電極(厚板側)
3 板組み
4 薄板
5 厚板
6 窪み
6a 底面
7 ナゲット
8 溶接痕
C1 接触領域(薄板)
C2 接触領域(厚板)
1 Electrode (thin plate side)
2 electrodes (thick plate side)
3 Plate assembly 4 Thin plate 5 Thick plate 6 Recess 6a Bottom surface 7 Nugget 8 Weld mark C1 Contact area (thin plate)
C2 contact area (thick plate)

Claims (2)

重ね合わせた複数の金属板のうち、最も薄い金属板を一方の最外層に配してなる板組みを一対の電極で挟み、加圧しながら通電することで溶接を行う抵抗スポット溶接方法において、
前記一対の電極のうち、一方の電極にその先端を凸曲面状としたものを、他方の電極にその先端を窪ませたものをそれぞれ用い、かつ、
前記窪みを設けた電極を前記板組みの他方の最外層と接触させた状態で加圧通電することを特徴とする抵抗スポット溶接方法。
In the resistance spot welding method of performing welding by energizing while sandwiching a plate assembly formed by arranging the thinnest metal plate in one outermost layer among a plurality of superimposed metal plates,
Of the pair of electrodes, one electrode having a tip with a convex curved surface, the other electrode having a recessed tip, and
A resistance spot welding method, wherein the electrode provided with the depression is pressed and energized in a state where the electrode is in contact with the other outermost layer of the plate assembly.
前記窪みの深さを、適正にナゲットが形成された場合に、前記窪みを設けた電極との接触面に形成される溶接痕の高さに相当する大きさに設定した請求項1記載の抵抗スポット溶接方法。   The resistance according to claim 1, wherein the depth of the recess is set to a size corresponding to a height of a welding mark formed on a contact surface with the electrode provided with the recess when the nugget is appropriately formed. Spot welding method.
JP2006278905A 2006-10-12 2006-10-12 Resistance spot welding method Active JP5187806B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006278905A JP5187806B2 (en) 2006-10-12 2006-10-12 Resistance spot welding method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006278905A JP5187806B2 (en) 2006-10-12 2006-10-12 Resistance spot welding method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2008093707A true JP2008093707A (en) 2008-04-24
JP5187806B2 JP5187806B2 (en) 2013-04-24

Family

ID=39377110

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2006278905A Active JP5187806B2 (en) 2006-10-12 2006-10-12 Resistance spot welding method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5187806B2 (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2010087508A1 (en) * 2009-01-29 2010-08-05 Jfeスチール株式会社 Indirect spot welding method
JP2013193129A (en) * 2012-03-19 2013-09-30 Shoji Aoyama Method for welding projection bolt, and the bolt
JP2014188584A (en) * 2013-03-28 2014-10-06 Honda Motor Co Ltd Spot welding method and spot welding device
WO2014179547A1 (en) 2013-05-03 2014-11-06 Magna Internatonal Inc. Aluminum spot welding method
CN104842058A (en) * 2014-02-14 2015-08-19 通用汽车环球科技运作有限责任公司 Electrode for resistance spot welding of dissimilar metals
JP2017060994A (en) * 2015-09-25 2017-03-30 Jfeスチール株式会社 Resistance spot weld joint, resistance spot welding method, and manufacturing method for resistance spot weld joint
JP2017060995A (en) * 2015-09-25 2017-03-30 Jfeスチール株式会社 Resistance spot weld joint, resistance spot welding method, and manufacturing method for resistance spot weld joint
CN107160022A (en) * 2016-03-01 2017-09-15 通用汽车环球科技运作有限责任公司 For aluminium workpiece and steel workpiece resistance spot welding match somebody with somebody composite electrode

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0446684A (en) * 1990-06-13 1992-02-17 Toyota Motor Corp Spot resistance welding electrode
JPH11342477A (en) * 1998-06-01 1999-12-14 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Spot welding method
GB2358826A (en) * 2000-02-02 2001-08-08 Ford Motor Co A resistance welding electrode formed with a recess
JP2005193298A (en) * 2003-12-10 2005-07-21 Honda Motor Co Ltd Electrode for resistance welding, method for resistance welding and welding structure
JP2006035237A (en) * 2004-07-22 2006-02-09 Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd Spot welding evaluation method and spot welding evaluation system

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0446684A (en) * 1990-06-13 1992-02-17 Toyota Motor Corp Spot resistance welding electrode
JPH11342477A (en) * 1998-06-01 1999-12-14 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Spot welding method
GB2358826A (en) * 2000-02-02 2001-08-08 Ford Motor Co A resistance welding electrode formed with a recess
JP2005193298A (en) * 2003-12-10 2005-07-21 Honda Motor Co Ltd Electrode for resistance welding, method for resistance welding and welding structure
JP2006035237A (en) * 2004-07-22 2006-02-09 Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd Spot welding evaluation method and spot welding evaluation system

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2010194609A (en) * 2009-01-29 2010-09-09 Jfe Steel Corp Indirect spot welding method
US9089924B2 (en) 2009-01-29 2015-07-28 Jfe Steel Corporation Indirect spot welding method
WO2010087508A1 (en) * 2009-01-29 2010-08-05 Jfeスチール株式会社 Indirect spot welding method
JP2013193129A (en) * 2012-03-19 2013-09-30 Shoji Aoyama Method for welding projection bolt, and the bolt
JP2014188584A (en) * 2013-03-28 2014-10-06 Honda Motor Co Ltd Spot welding method and spot welding device
CN105451924B (en) * 2013-05-03 2019-01-04 麦格纳国际公司 Spot welding aluminum method
WO2014179547A1 (en) 2013-05-03 2014-11-06 Magna Internatonal Inc. Aluminum spot welding method
CN105451924A (en) * 2013-05-03 2016-03-30 麦格纳国际公司 Aluminum spot welding method
EP2991797A4 (en) * 2013-05-03 2016-05-18 Magna Int Inc Aluminum spot welding method
US10668555B2 (en) 2013-05-03 2020-06-02 Magna International Inc. Aluminum spot welding method
CN104842058A (en) * 2014-02-14 2015-08-19 通用汽车环球科技运作有限责任公司 Electrode for resistance spot welding of dissimilar metals
US10010966B2 (en) 2014-02-14 2018-07-03 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Electrode for resistance spot welding of dissimilar metals
JP2017060995A (en) * 2015-09-25 2017-03-30 Jfeスチール株式会社 Resistance spot weld joint, resistance spot welding method, and manufacturing method for resistance spot weld joint
JP2017060994A (en) * 2015-09-25 2017-03-30 Jfeスチール株式会社 Resistance spot weld joint, resistance spot welding method, and manufacturing method for resistance spot weld joint
CN107160022A (en) * 2016-03-01 2017-09-15 通用汽车环球科技运作有限责任公司 For aluminium workpiece and steel workpiece resistance spot welding match somebody with somebody composite electrode

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP5187806B2 (en) 2013-04-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5187806B2 (en) Resistance spot welding method
JP6108030B2 (en) Resistance spot welding method
JP5599553B2 (en) Resistance spot welding method
JP4543823B2 (en) Resistance spot welding method
JP5999293B1 (en) Resistance spot welding method and resistance spot welding joint manufacturing method
JP2009255179A (en) Material for welding, weld product and automobile body
JP5261984B2 (en) Resistance spot welding method
JP5057557B2 (en) Series spot welding method and welding apparatus
JP2005262259A (en) Method for manufacturing resistance spot welded joint
JP5045238B2 (en) Resistance spot welding method
JP5609966B2 (en) Resistance spot welding method
JP2009226446A (en) Spot welding method of dissimilar plates
JP4786401B2 (en) Method for manufacturing butt-welded metal sheet
JP6762445B1 (en) Spot welding method for aluminum material
JP6892038B1 (en) Resistance spot welding method and welding member manufacturing method
JP2021126702A (en) Manufacturing method of spot welded joint and spot welded joint
JP6904479B2 (en) Resistance spot welding method and welding member manufacturing method
JP5082249B2 (en) Resistance spot welding method
JP6892039B1 (en) Resistance spot welding method and welding member manufacturing method
WO2021039866A1 (en) Resistance spot welding method and method for manufacturing welded member
JP2022148636A (en) Manufacturing method of spot welding member and spot welding member
JP6903386B2 (en) Indirect spot welding method
JP6451463B2 (en) Stack spot welding electrode of steel plates with different thickness and spot welding method using the electrode
JP2022035673A (en) Method for setting welding condition
JP2016030291A (en) Method for joining plate-like members

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20090610

RD04 Notification of resignation of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7424

Effective date: 20091111

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20111117

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20120111

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20120509

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20120706

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20130117

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20130117

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20160201

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Ref document number: 5187806

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250