JP2007285707A - Simplified test method for elution amount and content of toxic substance in soil - Google Patents

Simplified test method for elution amount and content of toxic substance in soil Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2007285707A
JP2007285707A JP2006109718A JP2006109718A JP2007285707A JP 2007285707 A JP2007285707 A JP 2007285707A JP 2006109718 A JP2006109718 A JP 2006109718A JP 2006109718 A JP2006109718 A JP 2006109718A JP 2007285707 A JP2007285707 A JP 2007285707A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
soil
test
elution
filter paper
content
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2006109718A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP4956037B2 (en
Inventor
Masaki Nakayama
正樹 仲山
Hideo Abe
英雄 安倍
Masaya Urano
真弥 浦野
Yuko Shimizu
優子 清水
Rusa Uno
流沙 宇野
Hidetoshi Nagamoto
英俊 長本
Takashi Kameya
隆志 亀屋
Kohei Urano
紘平 浦野
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
CENTRAL KAGAKU KK
Institute Of Envir0nment & Resource Systems
Original Assignee
CENTRAL KAGAKU KK
Institute Of Envir0nment & Resource Systems
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by CENTRAL KAGAKU KK, Institute Of Envir0nment & Resource Systems filed Critical CENTRAL KAGAKU KK
Priority to JP2006109718A priority Critical patent/JP4956037B2/en
Publication of JP2007285707A publication Critical patent/JP2007285707A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4956037B2 publication Critical patent/JP4956037B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analyzing Non-Biological Materials By The Use Of Chemical Means (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a simplified test method for the elution amount and the content of a toxic substance in a soil, capable of estimating easily a concentration corresponding to an official test method, in a sufficiently short time as compared with the official test method for a large number of specimens, without having to use organic solvents, and being usable for confirmation of the presence of contamination, search of a high concentration of contaminated point, or the like. <P>SOLUTION: The elution amount and the content of the toxic substances in the soil by the official test method are estimated, based on the analysis values of an elution amount testing specimen solution, obtained by collecting a relatively small amount of soil sample, by adding water of five times or more thereof thereto, to be shaken for about several minutes or shorter of a prescribed time, and by carrying out, thereafter, filtration with a plurality of layers of paper filters or the like, layered with a paper filter having 1 μm or larger pore size on a paper filter having 0.45 μm of pore size, and based on an analytical value for a content testing specimen solution obtained, by adding an acidic aqueous solution or a weak alkaline aqueous solution (in the case of Cr<SB>6+</SB>) of five times or more to the soil sample to be shaken in the same manner, and by carrying out thereafter filtration with a plurality of layers of similar paper filters. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2008,JPO&INPIT

Description

本発明は、土壌中に含有されている重金属などの有害物質の溶出量及び含有量の簡易で迅速な試験方法に係り、さらに詳しくは、簡便かつ速やかに調製した溶出試験用及び含有量試験用検液を分析した値から公定法による土壌中有害物質の溶出量及び含有量を推計する簡易試験方法、さらにはこのような方法に用いる土壌中有害物質の簡易試験キット並びに演算プログラム付き分析装置に関するものである。   The present invention relates to a simple and rapid test method for the elution amount and content of harmful substances such as heavy metals contained in soil, and more specifically, for an elution test and content test prepared simply and quickly. It relates to a simple test method for estimating the elution amount and content of harmful substances in soil from the value obtained by analyzing the test solution by an official method, and further to a simple test kit for harmful substances in soil used in such a method and an analyzer with a calculation program. Is.

土壌中に存在するPb(鉛)やCd(カドミウム)、Cr6+(六価クロム)、As(砒素)、F(フッ素)、B(ホウ素)等の有害物質は、土壌からの溶出による地下水汚染、あるいは直接摂取によって健康被害を引き起こす恐れがあることから、土壌汚染対策法等により、適用範囲、試験方法及び分析方法について基準が定められている。
しかし、土壌汚染対策法等で指定されている試験・分析方法、例えば環境庁告示第46号及び環境省告示第19号(以下、これらを「公定試験分析法」と称する)では、試料の乾燥、検液を得るための前処理(検液調製)において、乾燥に3日以上、前処理操作に1日以上を要する。また、0.45μmのろ紙によりろ過する際に、大型ろ紙を使用するか、あるいは事前に遠心分離しないと、目詰まりによって迅速なろ過が困難となることが多い。さらに、分析においても、高度な技術が必要であると共に、高価な分析機器を用いることが必要となるという問題がある。
Hazardous substances such as Pb (lead), Cd (cadmium), Cr 6+ (hexavalent chromium), As (arsenic), F (fluorine), and B (boron) present in soil are contaminated with groundwater by elution from the soil. In addition, since there is a risk of causing health damage by direct ingestion, standards for the scope of application, test method and analysis method are set by the Soil Contamination Countermeasures Law.
However, in the test and analysis methods specified in the Soil Contamination Countermeasures Law, for example, the Environment Agency Notification No. 46 and the Ministry of the Environment Notification No. 19 (hereinafter referred to as “official test analysis methods”), the drying of samples In the pretreatment for preparing a test solution (preparation of test solution), it takes 3 days or more for drying and 1 day or more for the pretreatment operation. Further, when filtering with a 0.45 μm filter paper, if a large filter paper is used or if it is not centrifuged in advance, rapid filtration is often difficult due to clogging. Furthermore, in the analysis, there is a problem that it is necessary to use advanced techniques and to use expensive analytical instruments.

一方、土壌汚染調査の契機としては、土壌汚染対策法や地方自治体の条例で指定されている特定有害物質を取り扱っていた工場等を廃止する場合、都道府県知事等が健康被害の恐れがあると認めた場合、大規模な土地改変をする場合の他、現在操業中の事業所で汚染の疑いが生じた場合や定期調査、宅地売買等に絡む汚染有無を把握したい場合など、法律に定められた範囲外の測定機会も多数存在する。   On the other hand, as an opportunity for soil contamination investigations, prefectural governors, etc., may have a health hazard when abolishing factories that handle specified hazardous substances specified in the Soil Contamination Countermeasures Law or local government regulations. If approved, in addition to making large-scale land changes, or when there is a suspicion of contamination at a business site that is currently in operation, or when it is necessary to grasp the presence or absence of contamination related to periodic surveys, residential land sales, etc. There are also many measurement opportunities outside the range.

また、法律や条令で調査が定められた範囲では、公定法に則って汚染状況を把握する必要があるが、法律の枠外での調査や法律で指定された範囲を補足する目的においては、時間がかかり、分析にも技術や資金が必要となる公定試験分析法が必ずしも適当であるとは言えない。
例えば、汚染の可能性が発生した工事現場などでは、極力迅速な判断が求められる。また、操業中の工場敷地内や宅地売買における自主調査では、簡易かつ安価な測定方法が望まれている。
In addition, it is necessary to grasp the pollution status in accordance with the official law within the scope specified by the laws and regulations, but for the purpose of investigating outside the legal framework and supplementing the scope specified by the law, Therefore, the official test analysis method that requires technology and funding for analysis is not necessarily appropriate.
For example, at a construction site where there is a possibility of contamination, determination as quickly as possible is required. In addition, a simple and inexpensive measurement method is desired in the self-investigation in the factory premises and the residential land trading in operation.

さらに、法律の範囲で汚染調査を行う場合においても、その調査を効率的に行うためには、現場で汚染実態の概略を把握し、公定試験分析法の実施地点を定めることなど、簡易・迅速な試験方法が望まれている。
そのため、これまでにも多くの分析前処理(試験)方法や分析方法が提案されている。
Furthermore, even when conducting a pollution survey within the scope of the law, in order to conduct the survey efficiently, it is easy and quick to grasp the outline of the actual pollution situation at the site and determine the implementation point of the official test analysis method. Test methods are desired.
Therefore, many analysis pretreatment (test) methods and analysis methods have been proposed so far.

土壌試験における溶出過程を促進した方法として、酸抽出溶出促進金属測定法が提案されている。この方法は、通常純水で行う溶出操作を塩酸溶液で行い、土壌中の重金属を短時間で抽出して分析する簡易迅速分析法であって、公定法を補完する方法として用いることができるとされている(非特許文献1参照)。   As a method for accelerating the elution process in soil tests, an acid extraction elution accelerating metal measurement method has been proposed. This method is a simple rapid analysis method in which elution operation usually performed with pure water is performed with hydrochloric acid solution and heavy metals in the soil are extracted and analyzed in a short time, and can be used as a method to complement the official method. (See Non-Patent Document 1).

一方、「土壌汚染域の確定方法」として、土壌試料をマイクロ波あるいは超音波を利用した分解装置により処理し、含有されている重金属を加速溶出させ、ICP質量分析装置により分析する方法が開示されている(特許文献1参照)。
また、「重金属抽出方法及び重金属溶出量の測定方法」として、汚染土壌や廃棄物など重金属を高濃度に含有する試料に対して、液固比1以下となるよう水を混合した後、遠心ろ過してろ液中の重金属濃度を分析する重金属溶出量の測定方法が知られている(特許文献2参照)。
On the other hand, as a “determination method of soil contaminated area”, a method is disclosed in which a soil sample is processed by a decomposition apparatus using microwaves or ultrasonic waves, and the contained heavy metals are accelerated and eluted and analyzed by an ICP mass spectrometer. (See Patent Document 1).
In addition, as a “heavy metal extraction method and heavy metal elution measurement method”, water is mixed to a sample containing heavy metals such as contaminated soil and waste at a high concentration so that the liquid-solid ratio is 1 or less, and then centrifugal filtration is performed. And the measuring method of the heavy metal elution amount which analyzes the heavy metal density | concentration in a filtrate is known (refer patent document 2).

さらに、秤量した土壌試料に硝酸とフッ化水素酸及び過酸化水素水を加えて密閉し、マイクロ波による加圧酸分解により分解し、これに蒸留水を加えて重量調整をした後、多元素同時分析装置により重金属濃度を分析し、試料の秤量値に基づいて土壌試料中の有害重金属量を求める土壌含有重金属の測定方法が開示されている(特許文献3参照)。
また、「土壌含有金属の溶出方法」として、秤量した土壌試料に蒸留水又は希塩酸等を加え、30〜40KHzの超音波を照射して、乾燥試料1gあたり5〜15cm2の範囲に浮遊分散させた土壌試料から重金属を溶出させ、これをろ過して得た試料液を多元素同時分析装置で分析し、土壌中の有害重金属量を求める方法が開示されている(特許文献4参照)。
Furthermore, nitric acid, hydrofluoric acid and hydrogen peroxide water were added to the weighed soil sample, sealed, decomposed by pressure acid decomposition using microwaves, and distilled water was added thereto to adjust the weight. There is disclosed a method for measuring soil-containing heavy metals by analyzing the concentration of heavy metals with a simultaneous analyzer and determining the amount of harmful heavy metals in a soil sample based on the measured value of the sample (see Patent Document 3).
In addition, as a “soil-containing metal elution method”, distilled water or dilute hydrochloric acid or the like was added to a weighed soil sample, and ultrasonic waves of 30 to 40 KHz were irradiated to float and disperse in a range of 5 to 15 cm 2 per 1 g of the dried sample. A method is disclosed in which a heavy metal is eluted from a soil sample and a sample solution obtained by filtering the heavy metal is analyzed with a multi-element simultaneous analyzer to determine the amount of harmful heavy metal in the soil (see Patent Document 4).

さらに、土壌中金属等の新しい分析方法を示したものとして、特許文献5には、「土壌に含まれる重金属類の溶出量分析方法及び分析装置、並びにこれに用いる試料」として、土壌から作成した検液に所定の割合でキレート剤を加え、このキレート剤に検液中の測定対象物質を吸着させる手順と、その検液をろ過し、測定対象物質を吸着したキレート剤を回収する手順と、蛍光X線分析装置により、回収したキレート剤に吸着された対象物質濃度を定量し、この結果から検液中の測定対象物質の溶出量に換算する手順について記載されている。   Furthermore, as a new analysis method for metals in soil and the like, Patent Document 5 describes a method for analyzing the amount of elution of heavy metals contained in soil and an analysis apparatus, and a sample used therefor. A procedure for adding a chelating agent at a predetermined ratio to the test solution, and adsorbing the measurement target substance in the test solution to this chelating agent, a procedure for filtering the test solution and collecting the chelating agent adsorbing the measurement target substance, A procedure is described in which the concentration of the target substance adsorbed on the collected chelating agent is quantified by an X-ray fluorescence analyzer, and this result is converted into the elution amount of the target substance in the test solution.

また、土壌中金属等の試験分析方法に関するものとしては、特許文献6に、「土壌分析方法とそれに用いる蛍光X線土壌分析装置」として、土壌を粉砕・撹拌した後、その一部をプレスして円盤状のペレット試料を作成し、エネルギー分散型蛍光X線分析装置を用いて入射X線の照射スポットをその円盤状の異なる領域に移動させつつ検出データを蓄積し、統計的な処理を加えて分析するようにした重金属等の含有量測定方法が開示されている。   In addition, as for a test analysis method for metals and the like in soil, Patent Document 6 describes as “Soil analysis method and fluorescent X-ray soil analysis device used therefor”, after crushing and stirring the soil, a part thereof is pressed. Disk-shaped pellet sample, and using an energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometer, the detection data is accumulated while moving the incident X-ray irradiation spot to a different disk-shaped area, and statistical processing is added. A method for measuring the content of heavy metals and the like, which is analyzed in this manner, is disclosed.

そして、土壌汚染の試験方法に関する特許文献7には、凝集剤を添加することによって、土壌と抽出液の混合液からの被抽出液の分離を促進することが開示され、重金属等の土壌溶出簡易試験方法に関する特許文献8には、未風乾土壌に有機溶媒を加えて1分間の手振とう後、30分静置し、遠心分離ののち、0.45μmのメンブレンフィルターにより減圧ろ過して得られたろ液をICP発光分析装置等により分析する方法が開示されている。
環境省大気・水・環境負荷分野の環境影響評価技術検討会「大気・水・環境負荷分野の環境影響評価技術(III)<環境保全措置・評価・事後調査の進め方>」 特開2002−214199号公報 特開2001−293454号公報 特開2004−198324号公報 特開2004−245579号公報 特開2004−294329号公報 特開2005−049205号公報 特開平09−072898号公報 特開2005−331409号公報
Patent Document 7 relating to a soil contamination test method discloses that the separation of a liquid to be extracted from a mixture of soil and an extract is promoted by adding a flocculant. In Patent Document 8 concerning the test method, an organic solvent is added to undried soil, shaken for 1 minute, allowed to stand for 30 minutes, centrifuged, and then filtered under reduced pressure using a 0.45 μm membrane filter. A method for analyzing a liquid with an ICP emission analyzer or the like is disclosed.
Environmental impact assessment technology study group in the atmosphere, water, and environmental impact field of the Ministry of the Environment “Environmental impact assessment technology in the air, water, and environmental impact field (III) <Procedure for Environmental Conservation Measures / Evaluation / Post-Investigation>” JP 2002-214199 A JP 2001-293454 A JP 2004-198324 A JP 2004-245579 A JP 2004-294329 A Japanese Patent Laying-Open No. 2005-049205 Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 09-072898 JP 2005-331409 A

しかしながら、上記非特許文献1、特許文献1、特許文献2、特許文献3及び特許文献4に記載の方法では、土壌中の金属等の含有量を相対的に把握することが可能であるが、公定法との相関が得られていないため、結果から何らかの判断を行うことが困難であり、実用範囲はかなり制限されることになる。
また、上記特許文献5に記載の方法は、キレート剤での選択的吸着が可能な成分については有効であるものと考えられるが、対象物質以外の多種多様な金属等を含有する土壌について適用することが困難で、広い対象物質に適用できるものではない。
However, in the methods described in Non-Patent Document 1, Patent Document 1, Patent Document 2, Patent Document 3 and Patent Document 4, it is possible to relatively grasp the content of metals and the like in the soil, Since no correlation with the official method is obtained, it is difficult to make some judgment from the result, and the practical range is considerably limited.
The method described in Patent Document 5 is considered to be effective for components that can be selectively adsorbed by a chelating agent, but is applied to soil containing various metals other than the target substance. It is difficult to apply to a wide range of target substances.

さらに、上記特許文献6に記載の方法は、簡易で、多くの金属種についてスクリーニングが可能であるが、原理的に土壌中に存在する金属等の一部しか溶出してこない公定法試験よりも数倍高い濃度を示すことがあり、相対比較や明らかに汚染がないことの判定にのみしか使用できないと考えられる。   Furthermore, although the method described in Patent Document 6 is simple and can be screened for many metal species, in principle, it is more than an official method test in which only a part of metals and the like existing in soil are eluted. Concentrations may be several times higher and can only be used for relative comparisons and for determining that there is clearly no contamination.

また、上記特許文献7に記載の方法は、試験方法のごく一部を迅速化したものに過ぎなく、試験方法全体からみた場合には、簡易化、迅速化にはほど遠いものといわざるを得ない。
そして、特許文献8に記載の方法は、比較的迅速ではあるものの、有機溶媒を使用する点、模擬的に調製した土壌でのデータが主であるため、実用上の測定精度が不明確である点、拡散溶出及び固液分離を目的とした静置時間が長い点、さらに試験サイズが大きくて廃液が多くなり、また多地点の現場調査を行う際に手間がかかる点に問題がある。
Further, the method described in Patent Document 7 is only a part of the test method that has been accelerated, and when viewed from the whole test method, it can be said that the method is far from being simplified and quicker. Absent.
And although the method of patent document 8 is comparatively quick, since the data in the point which uses an organic solvent and the soil prepared by simulation are mainly, the practical measurement precision is unclear. However, there are problems in that the standing time for the purpose of diffusion elution and solid-liquid separation is long, the test size is large and the waste liquid is increased, and it takes time to conduct a multi-site field survey.

本発明は、従来の土壌中有害物質の分析、測定方法における上記題に着目してなされたものであって、その目的とするところは、有機溶媒を使用することなく、多数の検体について、公定試験方法と比較して十分に短い時間で、簡易に公定試験方法に相当する濃度を推計することができ、土壌汚染調査のスクリーニングとして、汚染の有無の一次確認や高濃度汚染地点の探索などに利用することができる土壌中有害物質の溶出量及び含有量の簡易試験方法を提供することにある。   The present invention has been made by paying attention to the above-mentioned problems in conventional methods for analyzing and measuring harmful substances in soil, and the object of the present invention is the official determination of a large number of specimens without using an organic solvent. Concentration equivalent to the official test method can be estimated easily in a sufficiently short time compared to the test method, and as a soil contamination survey screening, such as primary confirmation of the presence of contamination and search for high-concentration contamination points The object is to provide a simple test method for the amount and content of toxic substances in soil that can be used.

本発明者らは、上記目的を達成すべく鋭意検討を重ねた結果、公定試験方法に較べて十分に短い時間でも相当量の有害物質が水や酸水溶液などの溶媒中に溶出することから、各有害物質の溶出挙動を把握することによって、試験サイズを縮小し、検液の調製時間を短縮したとしても、公定試験方法による測定値を推算することができ、上記目的が達成されることを見出し、本発明を完成するに到った。   As a result of intensive studies to achieve the above-mentioned object, the present inventors have found that a considerable amount of harmful substances are eluted in a solvent such as water or an acid aqueous solution even in a sufficiently short time compared to the official test method. By knowing the elution behavior of each harmful substance, even if the test size is reduced and the preparation time of the test solution is shortened, the measured value by the official test method can be estimated, and the above objective can be achieved. The headline and the present invention have been completed.

すなわち、本発明は上記知見に基づくものであって、本発明の土壌中有害物質の簡易溶出量試験方法においては、50g未満の質量の土壌を採取し、これに採取した土壌質量の5倍以上の水を加え、360分未満の時間振とうさせた後にろ過し、得られた溶出量試験用検液の分析値から、公定溶出量試験濃度を推計するようにしており、本発明の土壌中有害物質の簡易含有量試験方法においては、6g未満の質量の土壌を採取し、これにpH2以下の酸水溶液又はpH10以上のアルカリ水溶液を採取した土壌質量の5倍以上加え、120分未満の時間振とうさせた後にろ過し、得られた含有量試験用検液の分析値から、公定含有量試験濃度を推計することを特徴とする。   That is, the present invention is based on the above knowledge, and in the simple method for testing the amount of toxic substances in soil of the present invention, soil having a mass of less than 50 g is sampled and at least five times the mass of soil sampled therein. In addition, water was shaken for less than 360 minutes, filtered, and the official dissolution rate test concentration was estimated from the analytical value of the obtained dissolution rate test solution. In the method for testing the simple content of harmful substances, a soil with a mass of less than 6 g is collected, and an acid aqueous solution having a pH of 2 or lower or an alkaline aqueous solution having a pH of 10 or higher is added to the soil at least five times, and the time is less than 120 minutes After shaking, it is filtered, and the official content test concentration is estimated from the analysis value of the obtained test liquid for content test.

このとき、上記簡易溶出量試験方法及び簡易含有量試験方法におけるろ過操作においては、孔径0.45μmのろ紙の上に、孔径1μm以上のろ紙を重ねて成る複層ろ紙によりろ過することが望ましい。   At this time, in the filtration operation in the simple dissolution amount test method and the simple content test method, it is desirable to filter with a multilayer filter paper in which a filter paper with a pore diameter of 1 μm or more is stacked on a filter paper with a pore diameter of 0.45 μm.

そして、本発明の土壌中有害物質の簡易試験キットは、上記した土壌中有害物質の簡易試験方法に好適に用いられるものであって、少なくとも、土壌試料を溶媒と共に振とうする蓋付容器と、孔径0.45μmのろ紙の上に、孔径1μm以上のろ紙を重ねて成り、上記蓋付容器内の上澄み液をろ過するための複層ろ紙と、上記複層ろ紙によるろ液を収納する検液容器を備えたことを特徴としている。
さらに、本発明の分析装置は、上記方法において得られる溶出量試験用検液あるいは含有量試験用検液の分析値から、公定試験濃度を推計する演算処理プログラムを備えたことを特徴とする。
And the simple test kit for harmful substances in soil of the present invention is preferably used in the above-described simple test method for harmful substances in soil, and at least a container with a lid for shaking a soil sample with a solvent, A filter paper having a pore diameter of 0.45 μm overlaid with a filter paper having a pore diameter of 1 μm or more, a multi-layer filter paper for filtering the supernatant liquid in the lidded container, and a test solution for storing the filtrate from the multi-layer filter paper It is characterized by having a container.
Furthermore, the analyzer of the present invention is characterized by comprising an arithmetic processing program for estimating the official test concentration from the analysis value of the dissolution test solution or content test solution obtained in the above method.

本発明によれば、50g未満の比較的少量の土壌に、その5倍以上の質量の水を加えて360分未満の任意の時間振とうさせたり、6g未満の比較的少量の土壌に、その5倍以上の質量の酸水溶液(pH2以下)を加えて(但し、Cr6+の場合にはpH10以上のアルカリ水溶液)、120分未満の任意の時間振とうさせたりした後、ろ過するようにしているので、比較的短時間で、容易に土壌中有害物質の溶出量や含有量の試験用検液を調製することができ、このような検液の分析値から公定試験方法による溶出量や含有量を推計するようにしていることから、公定試験方法よりも短時間で、簡易に公定試験方法に相当する土壌中有害物質の濃度をかなりの精度で把握することができる。
また、ろ過操作において、孔径0.45μmのろ紙の上に孔径1μm以上のろ紙を重ねてなる複層ろ紙によりろ過を行うことで、さらに迅速、簡易に試験することを可能とした。
According to the present invention, a relatively small amount of soil of less than 50 g is added with a mass of water five times or more and shaken for an arbitrary time of less than 360 minutes, or a relatively small amount of soil of less than 6 g Add an acid aqueous solution (pH 2 or less) having a mass of 5 times or more (however, in the case of Cr 6+ , an alkaline aqueous solution of pH 10 or more), shake for an arbitrary time of less than 120 minutes, and filter. Therefore, it is possible to easily prepare test solutions for the amount and content of toxic substances in soil in a relatively short period of time. Since the amount is estimated, the concentration of harmful substances in the soil corresponding to the official test method can be easily grasped with considerable accuracy in a shorter time than the official test method.
Moreover, in the filtration operation, it was possible to test more quickly and easily by performing filtration with a multilayer filter paper in which a filter paper having a pore diameter of 1 μm or more is superimposed on a filter paper having a pore diameter of 0.45 μm.

以下、本発明について、その実施形態などと共に、さらに詳細に説明する。なお、本明細書において、「%」は特記しない限り質量百分率を表すものとする。   Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail together with embodiments thereof. In the present specification, “%” represents mass percentage unless otherwise specified.

本発明の土壌中有害物質の簡易溶出量試験方法において、試験用検液を調製するには、まず、調査対象である土壌試料を秤量し、50g未満の質量を採取し、これにその5倍以上の質量の水を加え、360分未満の任意の時間振とうさせ、土壌中物質を溶媒(この場合は水)中に溶出させる。
このとき、土壌試料の採取量としては、少な過ぎれば測定精度が悪化し、多すぎると後述するように水の量も多くなることから、振とう容器の大型化、重量増に繋がり、採取現場における手操作による振とう作業が困難になることから、3〜10g程度とすることが望ましい。
In the simple dissolution amount test method for harmful substances in soil of the present invention, in order to prepare a test solution, first, a soil sample to be investigated is weighed, a mass of less than 50 g is collected, and this is five times as much. Water having the above mass is added and shaken for an arbitrary time of less than 360 minutes to elute the substance in the soil into the solvent (in this case, water).
At this time, if the amount of the soil sample collected is too small, the measurement accuracy will deteriorate, and if it is too large, the amount of water will increase as will be described later, leading to an increase in the size and weight of the shaking container. Since it is difficult to perform a shaking operation by manual operation, it is desirable that the amount be about 3 to 10 g.

土壌中物質を溶出させる溶媒としての水については、通常脱イオン水や蒸留水を用いるが、調査対象である被検出成分の分析値に影響を及ぼすものが含有されていなければ、特に限定されない。   About water as a solvent which elutes the substance in soil, deionized water or distilled water is usually used, but it is not particularly limited as long as it does not contain anything that affects the analysis value of the component to be detected.

このときの水の添加量については、採取した土壌試料に対して余りに多過ぎると検出感度が低下し、少な過ぎると土壌中物質が十分に溶出せず、また、固液分離(ろ過)が困難となることから、採取した土壌試料の8〜15倍の質量とすることが望ましい。
なお、溶出量の単位はmg/Lで表わされ、公定試験分析法では、採取土壌の10倍の液固比としているため、このような液固比に換算することが必要となる。したがって、本発明の簡易試験方法においても、採取した土壌試料の10倍の水を加えるようにすることがより望ましく、換算の手間を省くことができる。
If the amount of water added is too much for the collected soil sample, the detection sensitivity will decrease, and if it is too small, substances in the soil will not be sufficiently eluted, and solid-liquid separation (filtration) will be difficult. Therefore, the mass is preferably 8 to 15 times that of the collected soil sample.
In addition, since the unit of the elution amount is expressed in mg / L and the official test analysis method has a liquid-solid ratio 10 times that of the collected soil, it is necessary to convert to such a liquid-solid ratio. Therefore, also in the simple test method of the present invention, it is more desirable to add 10 times as much water as the collected soil sample, and the conversion labor can be saved.

土壌試料を含む水の振とう時間、すなわち土壌中物質の溶出時間については、余りに短いと土壌中物質が溶媒中に十分溶出しない反面、長すぎると簡便法としてのメリットがなくなる。また、簡便法として、現地での検液調製を考えれば、手操作による振とう作業を続けるには限界がある。
このような観点から、振とう時間としては、30分以内、例えば1分程度とすることができる。なお、本発明は、動力を用いた機械的振とうを排除するものではなく、状況に応じて機械による振とうを採用し、溶出時間をさらに延長することによって、検出精度が向上する可能性もある。
As for the shaking time of water containing the soil sample, that is, the elution time of the substance in the soil, if it is too short, the substance in the soil will not be sufficiently eluted in the solvent, but if it is too long, there will be no merit as a simple method. As a simple method, considering the preparation of the test solution at the site, there is a limit in continuing the manual shaking operation.
From such a viewpoint, the shaking time can be within 30 minutes, for example, about 1 minute. It should be noted that the present invention does not exclude mechanical shaking using power, and the possibility of improving detection accuracy by adopting mechanical shaking according to the situation and further extending the elution time. is there.

このようして得られた土壌試料と水との懸濁液は、ろ過され、これによって溶出量試験用検液が得られる。なお、ろ過には、孔径0.45μmのろ紙の上に、孔径1μm以上のろ紙を重ねて成る複層ろ紙を用いることが望ましい。   The suspension of the soil sample and water thus obtained is filtered, thereby obtaining a test solution for the elution amount test. For filtration, it is desirable to use a multilayer filter paper in which a filter paper having a pore diameter of 1 μm or more is stacked on a filter paper having a pore diameter of 0.45 μm.

このとき、所定時間の振とうを終えた懸濁液を数分間静置した後、例えばシリンジなどを用いて採取した上澄み液を上記複層ろ紙に通すことによってろ過することができ、上記のような複層ろ紙を用いることによって、土壌中の比較的粗粒の粒子が上層側の粗い孔径のろ紙によって捕捉されることから、ろ過操作の大幅な迅速化と小型化を図ることができる。
なお、複層ろ紙については、孔径の異なる複数のろ紙を成形したものも市販されており、このような市販品の中から、上記孔径に一致するものを選択して使用することもできる。
At this time, after the suspension after shaking for a predetermined time is allowed to stand for several minutes, the supernatant collected using, for example, a syringe can be filtered by passing through the multilayer filter paper, as described above. By using such a multilayer filter paper, relatively coarse particles in the soil are captured by the filter paper having a coarse pore diameter on the upper layer side, so that the filtration operation can be greatly speeded up and downsized.
In addition, about the multilayer filter paper, what shape | molded the several filter paper from which a hole diameter differs is marketed, The thing which corresponds to the said hole diameter from such a commercial item can also be selected and used.

一方、本発明の土壌中有害物質の含有量試験用検液の調製方法においては、まず、調査対象である土壌試料を秤量し、6g未満の質量を採取し、これにその5倍以上の質量の溶媒、すなわちpH2以下の酸水溶液、又はpH10以上のアルカリ溶液(Cr6+の場合)を加え、120分未満の任意の時間振とうさせ、土壌中物質を酸水溶液中に溶出させる。
このとき、土壌試料の採取量としては、少な過ぎれば測定精度が悪化し、多すぎると後述するように溶媒の量も多くなることから、振とう容器の大型化、重量増に繋がり、採取現場における手操作による振とう作業が困難になり、廃液も多くなることから、1〜3g程度とすることが望ましい。
On the other hand, in the method for preparing a test solution for the content test of harmful substances in soil of the present invention, first, a soil sample to be investigated is weighed, and a mass of less than 6 g is collected, and a mass more than 5 times its mass is collected. The above-mentioned solvent, that is, an acid aqueous solution having a pH of 2 or lower, or an alkaline solution having a pH of 10 or higher (in the case of Cr 6+ ) is shaken for an arbitrary time of less than 120 minutes, and the substances in the soil are eluted into the aqueous acid solution.
At this time, if the amount of the collected soil sample is too small, the measurement accuracy deteriorates. If the amount is too large, the amount of the solvent increases as described later, leading to an increase in the size of the shaking container and an increase in weight. Since the shaking operation by manual operation becomes difficult and the amount of waste liquid increases, it is preferably about 1 to 3 g.

土壌中物質を溶出させる溶媒としての酸水溶液としては、土壌そのものの陽イオン交換容量と抽出能力の観点からpH2以下のものを使用するが、具体的には0.5または1モル/L程度の塩酸の水溶液を用いることができる。なお、塩酸に代えて、硫酸や硝酸等の他の酸を用いることも可能である。
一般的な土壌の陽イオン交換容量は、数十から400meq/kg程度であることから、土壌と溶媒を混合後に酸性を維持するためには、それ以上の酸が必要となる。すなわち、400meq/kgの土壌1gを中和するためにはXmeq/L×33mL/gより、12meq/L(pH1.9)の酸が33mL必要となる。上記のようにほとんどの土壌の陽イオン交換容量が400meq/kg以下であることから、pH2以下であれば酸性を維持することができるものと考えられる。
As the acid aqueous solution as a solvent for eluting the substances in the soil, those having a pH of 2 or less are used from the viewpoint of the cation exchange capacity and extraction ability of the soil itself, and specifically, about 0.5 or 1 mol / L. An aqueous solution of hydrochloric acid can be used. Instead of hydrochloric acid, other acids such as sulfuric acid and nitric acid can be used.
Since the cation exchange capacity of a general soil is about several tens to 400 meq / kg, more acid is required to maintain the acidity after mixing the soil and the solvent. That is, in order to neutralize 1 g of 400 meq / kg of soil, 33 mL of 12 meq / L (pH 1.9) acid is required from Xmeq / L × 33 mL / g. As described above, since the cation exchange capacity of most soils is 400 meq / kg or less, it is considered that the acidity can be maintained if the pH is 2 or less.

また、当該酸水溶液の添加量については、採取した土壌試料に対して余りに多過ぎると検出感度が低下し、少な過ぎると土壌中物質が十分に溶出しない可能性があることから、採取した土壌試料の20〜40倍、さらには33倍程度の質量とすることが望ましい。   As for the amount of the acid aqueous solution added, the detection sensitivity decreases if it is too much relative to the collected soil sample, and if it is too small, the substance in the soil may not be sufficiently eluted. It is desirable that the mass be about 20 to 40 times, more preferably about 33 times that of the above.

本発明の土壌中有害物質の含有量試験用検液の調製方法において、PbやCd、As等の物質を溶出させる溶媒としては、上記のように酸水溶液を使用するが、Cr6+(六価クロム)については、pH10以上の弱アルカリ性水溶液を用いることが必要であるが、pH10程度のものを用いることが望ましい。
なお、上記のような弱アルカリ性を示す水溶液である限り、用いる試薬について特に限定されないが、公定試験分析法において規定されているように、0.005モルの無水炭酸ナトリウムと0.01モルの炭酸水素ナトリウムを1Lの純水中に溶解させたものを用いることが望ましい。
In the method for preparing a test solution for content test of harmful substances in soil of the present invention, an acid aqueous solution is used as a solvent for eluting substances such as Pb, Cd, As, etc., but Cr 6+ (hexavalent) is used. As for chromium, it is necessary to use a weakly alkaline aqueous solution having a pH of 10 or more, but it is desirable to use a solution having a pH of about 10.
The reagent used is not particularly limited as long as it is an aqueous solution exhibiting weak alkalinity as described above, but as specified in the official test analysis method, 0.005 mol of anhydrous sodium carbonate and 0.01 mol of carbonic acid are used. It is desirable to use a solution obtained by dissolving sodium hydride in 1 L of pure water.

土壌試料を含む酸水溶液の振とう時間、120分未満とすることによって、公定試験方法よりも迅速化を図ることができるが、上記した溶出量試験用検液の場合と同様に、30分以内とすることが望ましく、1分程度とすることも可能である。また、状況に応じて動力による機械振とうを採用してもよい。   By setting the shaking time of the acid aqueous solution containing the soil sample to less than 120 minutes, it can be speeded up more than the official test method, but within 30 minutes as in the case of the above-described elution test solution. Desirably, it can be set to about 1 minute. Moreover, you may employ | adopt mechanical vibration by motive power according to a condition.

このようして得られた土壌試料の懸濁液は、同様に孔径0.45μmのろ紙の上に、孔径1μm以上の粗い孔を有するろ紙を1枚以上重ねて成る複層ろ紙を用いてろ過することが望ましく、このような複層ろ紙を用いることによって、溶出量試験用検液を速やかに得ることができ、ろ過操作の迅速化を図ることができる。このとき、上記したような複数のろ紙から成る市販の成形品を用いることもできる。   The suspension of the soil sample thus obtained is similarly filtered using a multilayer filter paper in which one or more filter papers having coarse pores with a pore diameter of 1 μm or more are stacked on a filter paper with a pore diameter of 0.45 μm. Desirably, by using such a multilayer filter paper, a test solution for elution amount test can be obtained quickly, and the filtration operation can be speeded up. At this time, a commercially available molded product composed of a plurality of filter papers as described above can also be used.

上記したように、本発明においては、土壌のサンプリング量や溶媒量を少なくしたり、振とう時間を短くしたりすることによって、検液の調製に要する時間を大幅に短縮できると共に、手作業による振とうも可能になることから、土壌のサンプリング現場において、溶出量及び含有量試験用の検液を調製することができ、検液調製の迅速化、簡便化が可能になり、土壌汚染調査全体の迅速化、簡易化に繋がる。   As described above, in the present invention, it is possible to significantly reduce the time required for preparing the test solution by reducing the sampling amount of the soil and the amount of the solvent, or shortening the shaking time, and by manual work. Since shaking is also possible, it is possible to prepare test solutions for elution and content tests at the site of soil sampling, making it possible to speed up and simplify the preparation of test solutions, and to investigate soil contamination as a whole. Leads to faster and easier operation.

本発明の土壌中有害物質の簡易溶出量試験方法及び簡易含有量試験方法においては、それぞれ上記調製方法によって得られた溶出量試験検液及び含有量試験検液の分析値から、公定溶出量試験濃度を推計することができる。   In the simple dissolution amount test method and the simple content test method for harmful substances in soil of the present invention, the official dissolution rate test from the analysis values of the dissolution test solution and the content test solution obtained by the above preparation methods, respectively. The concentration can be estimated.

すなわち、本発明者らは、上記のように試験サイズを小さくした簡易試験方法における振とう時間と土壌中有害物質の溶媒への溶出濃度との関係を求めたところ、表1及び表2に示すように、振とう時間、すなわち溶出時間さえ公定試験方法と一致させれば(溶出量試験:360分、含有量試験:120分)、試験サイズを小さくした場合でも公定試験方法による溶出濃度とほぼ一致することが確認された。   That is, when the present inventors calculated | required the relationship between the shaking time in the simple test method which made test size small as mentioned above, and the elution density | concentration to the solvent of the harmful substance in soil, it shows in Table 1 and Table 2. Thus, if the shaking time, that is, the elution time is matched with the official test method (elution amount test: 360 minutes, content test: 120 minutes), even if the test size is reduced, the elution concentration by the official test method is almost the same. It was confirmed that they matched.

Figure 2007285707
Figure 2007285707

Figure 2007285707
Figure 2007285707

また、溶出濃度を公定試験方法に規定された振とう時間(溶出時間)における溶出濃度を「1」とする溶出率で表した場合、土壌の種類や有害物質の含有量に拘らず、一部の例外を除いて、概ね同様の溶出挙動を示し、各物質の溶出率は、時間を変数とする1つの指数関数でそれぞれ表わされることを見出した。   In addition, when the elution concentration is expressed as an elution rate with an elution concentration of 1 at the shaking time (elution time) specified in the official test method, regardless of the type of soil and the content of harmful substances, some It was found that the dissolution behavior of each substance was expressed by one exponential function with time as a variable.

この知見を利用することによって、各有害物質の溶出率曲線(時間を対数で表示すれば直線となる)に基づいて、振とう時間に対応する溶出率を求め、得られた分析値を当該溶出率で除することによって、公定試験方法に相当する溶出濃度を推計することが可能となる。
この場合、土壌と汚染金属等の種類によって、関数のパラメーターが多少異なることが想定されるが、現実の汚染土壌での最小溶出率を用いることで安全側の判定を行うことが可能となる。
By using this knowledge, the elution rate corresponding to the shaking time is obtained based on the elution rate curve of each toxic substance (it becomes a straight line if the time is displayed in logarithm), and the obtained analytical value is used as the elution rate. By dividing by the rate, the elution concentration corresponding to the official test method can be estimated.
In this case, although it is assumed that the parameters of the function are slightly different depending on the types of soil and contaminated metals, it is possible to make a determination on the safe side by using the minimum elution rate in the actual contaminated soil.

一方、公定試験分析法においては、風乾土壌をそれぞれ50g以上(溶出量試験)及び6g以上(含有量試験)採取するよう規定されているが、採取した土壌を風乾するには、少なくとも3日を要し、試料を採取した現場での検液調製が不可能となって、簡易法としての迅速性が著しく損なわれることになる。
表3及び表4は、現場で採取したままの湿潤土壌と、これに4日間の風乾処理を施して成る風乾土壌を用いて、溶出量試験(表3)と含有量試験(表4)をそれぞれ実施し、溶媒中への溶出濃度に及ぼす土壌の乾燥状態の影響を調査した結果を示すものである。なお、表中の溶出濃度は、それぞれの含水率に基づいて、乾燥土壌50g当たり(溶出量試験)及び6g(含有量試験)当たりの溶出濃度に換算してある。
On the other hand, the official test analysis method stipulates that 50 g or more (elution amount test) and 6 g or more (content test) of air-dried soil are collected, but at least 3 days are required to air-dry the collected soil. In short, the preparation of the test solution at the site where the sample is collected becomes impossible, and the rapidity as a simple method is significantly impaired.
Tables 3 and 4 show the elution test (Table 3) and the content test (Table 4) using wet soil as collected at the site and air-dried soil obtained by subjecting it to air-drying treatment for 4 days. Each of the results is shown, and the results of investigating the influence of the dry state of the soil on the elution concentration in the solvent are shown. In addition, the elution density | concentration in a table | surface is converted into the elution density | concentration per 50g of dry soil (elution amount test) and 6g (content amount test) based on each moisture content.

Figure 2007285707
Figure 2007285707

Figure 2007285707
Figure 2007285707

各表から明らかなように、風乾土壌を用いた場合も、現場で採取したままの湿潤土壌を用いた場合も、質量当たりに換算すれば、溶出量についても、含有量についても、溶出濃度は概ね同一とみなすことができる。
このことから、本発明においては、数日間かけて風乾処理を行う必要は必ずしもなく、検液調製用の土壌試料を採取するに際して、含水量測定用の試料を同時にサンプリングさえしておけば、現場で採取した湿潤土壌を用いて、その場で溶出量及び含有量試験用の検液を調製したとしても、同時にサンプリングされた試料の含水率に基づいた測定値の補正を最終的に行なう限り、何ら問題なく、含有物質の分析に供することができる。また、多少精度は低下するものの、目視等により土壌の含水率を定めて試験を行うことも可能である。
As is clear from each table, when air-dried soil is used, or when wet soil is used as it is collected at the site, the concentration of elution is about the amount of elution and the amount of content when converted to mass. It can be regarded as almost the same.
Therefore, in the present invention, it is not always necessary to perform the air drying treatment over several days. When collecting a soil sample for preparing a test solution, if the sample for measuring the water content is sampled at the same time, Even if the elution amount and the test solution for the content test are prepared on the spot using the wet soil collected in step 3, as long as the measurement value correction based on the moisture content of the sample sampled at the same time is finally performed, It can be used for analysis of contained substances without any problems. In addition, although the accuracy is somewhat lowered, it is possible to determine the moisture content of the soil by visual inspection or the like and perform the test.

なお、状況が許す限り、風乾土壌や、現地に持ち込んだ適当な乾燥装置によって乾燥した土壌の試料を用いて検液を調製することが可能であることは言うまでもない。   Needless to say, the test solution can be prepared using air-dried soil or a soil sample dried by an appropriate drying apparatus brought to the site as long as the situation permits.

このように、本発明の土壌中有害物質の簡易溶出量試験方法及び簡易含有量試験方法は、簡便法であって、極めて迅速かつ容易に有害物質の溶出量及び含有量レベルを把握することができることから、土壌汚染調査のスクリーニングに利用することができる。すなわち、適宜公定試験方法と組み合わせながら、明らかに汚染されていないことの確認や、高濃度地点の探索、公定法による調査の実施が必要な地点の絞り込み、明らかな汚染地域の把握、大まかな汚染レベルの把握などに広く適用することができる。
なお、土壌中有害物質の分析には、これら有害物質の種類に応じて、例えば吸光光度法、イオン電極法、ICP発光分析法、イオンクロマトグラフ法などを適用することができる。
Thus, the simple dissolution amount test method and the simple content test method for harmful substances in soil of the present invention are simple methods, and it is possible to grasp the dissolution amount and content level of harmful substances very quickly and easily. It can be used for screening soil contamination surveys. In other words, by combining with official test methods as appropriate, it is confirmed that there is no obvious contamination, search for high concentration points, narrow down the points that need to be investigated by official methods, grasp of clear contaminated areas, rough contamination It can be widely applied to grasp the level.
For the analysis of harmful substances in soil, for example, an absorptiometric method, an ion electrode method, an ICP emission analysis method, an ion chromatographic method, or the like can be applied depending on the type of these harmful substances.

本発明の土壌中有害物質の簡易試験キットは、土壌試料を溶媒と共に振とうする蓋付容器、孔径0.45μmのろ紙の上に、孔径1μm以上のろ紙を重ねて成り、上記蓋付容器内の上澄み液をろ過するための複層ろ紙、上記複層ろ紙によるろ液を収納する検液容器を備え、例えばこれらをバッグなどの可搬容器に収納しておけば、調査現場で速やかに土壌中有害物質の溶出量及び含有量試験用の検液を調製することができる。
さらに、当該試験キットには、振とう後の土壌と溶媒との懸濁液の上澄み液を採取するためのシリンジや、これに接続されるろ紙ホルダーや、溶媒、すなわち溶出量試験用の水や、含有量試験用として所定濃度に調製した酸(またはアルカリ)水溶液、さらには検液調製が済み、不要となった溶媒廃液を保管する廃液容器や、このような廃液を中和するために用いるアルカリ(または酸)などの中和剤を組み込むようにすることができる。
The simple test kit for toxic substances in soil of the present invention comprises a container with a lid for shaking a soil sample together with a solvent, a filter paper with a pore diameter of 0.45 μm and a filter paper with a pore diameter of 1 μm or more, A multi-layer filter paper for filtering the supernatant liquid, and a test container for storing the filtrate from the multi-layer filter paper. For example, if these are stored in a portable container such as a bag, the soil can be promptly It is possible to prepare a test solution for the amount of toxic substance elution and content test.
In addition, the test kit includes a syringe for collecting the supernatant of the suspension of the soil and solvent after shaking, a filter paper holder connected to the syringe, water for the elution amount test, , An acid (or alkali) aqueous solution prepared to a predetermined concentration for the content test, and a waste liquid container for storing a solvent waste liquid which has been prepared and the test liquid is no longer needed, and is used to neutralize such a waste liquid. A neutralizing agent such as an alkali (or acid) can be incorporated.

そして、本発明の土壌中有害物質の分析装置には、当該装置によって得られた分析値から、公定試験濃度を推計するための演算処理プログラム、例えば上記のようにして得られた各成分ごとに求められた、振とう時間と溶出率の関係式による演算プログラムを搭載しておくことが望ましく、これによって本発明の簡易法によって求めた分析値から、公定試験法による分析値へ換算した値が極めて容易に得られるようになる。   And in the analytical apparatus for harmful substances in soil of the present invention, an arithmetic processing program for estimating the official test concentration from the analytical value obtained by the apparatus, for example, for each component obtained as described above It is desirable to have a calculation program based on the relationship between the obtained shaking time and dissolution rate, so that the value converted from the analytical value obtained by the simplified method of the present invention into the analytical value by the official test method is obtained. It can be obtained very easily.

以下、本発明を実施例により更に詳述するが、本発明はこれらの実施例に限定されるものではない。   Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to examples, but the present invention is not limited to these examples.

(1)予備試験(溶出時間と各成分の溶出率の関係把握)
(1)−1 Asの溶出量試験
黒ボク土や関東ローム土などから成る各種汚染土壌のうち、サンプルBの風乾土壌を5g採取して、100mLのポリエチレン容器に入れ、これに50mLの脱イオン水を加え、卓上振とう器によって1分〜360分の各時間それぞれ振とうした。
(1) Preliminary test (Understanding the relationship between dissolution time and dissolution rate of each component)
(1) -1 As elution amount test Among various contaminated soils such as black soil and Kanto loam soil, sample 5g of sample B air-dried soil, put it in a 100mL polyethylene container, and add 50mL of deionized water to it. Water was added, and each time was shaken for 1 minute to 360 minutes using a tabletop shaker.

所定の振とう時間を終えた各容器を5分間静置したのち、各容器の上澄み液をシリンジによってそれぞれ20mL程度採取し、これを直径47mmの孔径0.45μmのろ紙の上に、孔径2.7μmのろ紙を重ねた複層ろ紙とろ紙ホルダーを用いてろ過することによって、振とう時間の異なる溶出量試験用検液を得た。   After leaving each container for a predetermined shaking time for 5 minutes, about 20 mL of the supernatant of each container was collected with a syringe, and this was placed on a filter paper having a diameter of 47 mm and a hole diameter of 0.45 μm. Elution amount test solutions with different shaking times were obtained by filtering using a multilayer filter paper on which 7 μm filter paper was stacked and a filter paper holder.

得られた検液を適宜希釈し、水素化物発生ICP発光分析装置を用いてそれぞれ分析し、振とう時間に対するAsの溶出濃度を測定した。
その結果、振とう時間を360分とした時の溶出濃度が6.9mg/Lとなり、公定試験分析法による値とほぼ等しくなることが確認された。
The obtained test solution was appropriately diluted and analyzed with a hydride generation ICP emission spectrometer, and the elution concentration of As with respect to the shaking time was measured.
As a result, it was confirmed that the elution concentration when the shaking time was 360 minutes was 6.9 mg / L, which was almost equal to the value obtained by the official test analysis method.

また、時間ごとの溶出濃度を360分における上記溶出濃度6.9mg/Lを「1」とする溶出率に換算し、時間軸に対してプロットした結果、図1に示す溶出曲線が得られた。
そして、これの両軸を対数表示にすると、図2に示すように、良好な直線関係が得られ、Asの溶出率yが次式で表わされることが判った。
y=0.455x0.136(式中のxは振とう時間(分))
Moreover, as a result of converting the elution concentration for each time into an elution rate with the above elution concentration of 6.9 mg / L at 360 minutes being “1” and plotting it with respect to the time axis, the elution curve shown in FIG. 1 was obtained. .
Then, when these two axes are logarithmically displayed, as shown in FIG. 2, a good linear relationship is obtained, and it has been found that the elution rate y of As is expressed by the following equation.
y = 0.455x 0.136 (where x is the shaking time (minutes))

(1)−2 Cdの溶出量試験
各種汚染土壌のうち、サンプルAの風乾土壌を用い、Cdの分析にICP発光分析装置を用いたこと以外は、上記同様の操作を繰り返すことによって、図3に示すようなCdの溶出直線を得た。
図に示すように、Cdの場合には、溶出速度が速く、1分程度の振とう時間でも360分経過後でも、溶出濃度に相違がなく、ほとんど公定試験法による値に一致することから、試験サイズを縮小した簡易法による分析値をそのまま利用しても差し支えないことが確認された。ただし、汚染の有無を判断する際などに基準値に近い値が分析された場合には、現実の汚染土壌での最小溶出率を用いることで安全側の推計値を得ることも可能である。
(1) -2 Cd elution amount test By using the air-dried soil of sample A among various contaminated soils and using the ICP emission analysis apparatus for the analysis of Cd, the same operation as described above was repeated, so that FIG. A Cd elution line as shown in FIG.
As shown in the figure, in the case of Cd, the elution rate is fast, and there is no difference in the elution concentration even after a shaking time of about 1 minute or after 360 minutes, and it almost matches the value by the official test method. It was confirmed that the analysis value obtained by the simplified method with a reduced test size can be used as it is. However, when a value close to the reference value is analyzed when determining the presence or absence of contamination, it is possible to obtain an estimated value on the safe side by using the minimum elution rate in the actual contaminated soil.

(1)−3 Bの溶出量試験
各種汚染土壌のうち、サンプルFの風乾土壌を用いたこと以外は、上記同様の操作を繰り返すことによって、図4に示すように、Bの溶出直線を得た。
その結果、振とう時間を360分とした時のBの溶出濃度は20.2mg/Lとなり、公定試験分析法による値とほぼ等しくなると共に、Bの溶出率yが次式によって表わされることが判明した。
y=0.524x0.108(式中のxは振とう時間(分))
(1) -3 Elution amount test of B As shown in FIG. 4, an elution line of B is obtained by repeating the same operation except that the air-dried soil of sample F is used among various contaminated soils. It was.
As a result, when the shaking time is 360 minutes, the elution concentration of B is 20.2 mg / L, which is almost equal to the value obtained by the official test analysis method, and the elution rate y of B can be expressed by the following equation. found.
y = 0.524x 0.108 (where x is the shaking time (minutes))

(1)−4 Cr6+の溶出量試験
各種汚染土壌のうち、サンプルDの風乾土壌を用いると共に、分析に吸光光度計を用いたこと以外は、上記同様の操作を繰り返すことによって、図5に示すように、Cr6+の溶出直線を得た。
その結果、振とう時間を360分とした時のCr6+の溶出濃度が13.4mg/Lとなり、公定試験分析法による値とほぼ等しくなると共に、Cr6+の溶出率yが次式によって表わされることが判明した。
y=0.647x0.076(式中のxは振とう時間(分))
(1) -4 Cr 6+ elution amount test Among the various contaminated soils, while using the air-dried soil of sample D and using an absorptiometer for the analysis, the same operation as described above was repeated to obtain FIG. As shown, an elution line of Cr 6+ was obtained.
As a result, when the shaking time is 360 minutes, the elution concentration of Cr 6+ is 13.4 mg / L, which is almost equal to the value obtained by the official test analysis method, and the elution rate y of Cr 6+ is expressed by the following equation. It has been found.
y = 0.647x 0.076 (where x is the shaking time (minutes))

(1)−5 Fの溶出量試験
各種汚染土壌のうち、サンプルEの風乾土壌を用いると共に、分析装置としてイオンクロマトグラフを用いたこと以外は、上記同様の操作を繰り返すことによって、図6に示すようなFの溶出直線が得られた。
その結果、振とう時間を360分とした時のFの溶出濃度は134mg/Lとなり、公定試験分析法による値とほぼ等しくなると共に、Fの溶出率yが次式によって表わされることが確認された。
y=0.677x0.069(式中のxは振とう時間(分))
(1) -5 F elution amount test By using the air-dried soil of sample E among various contaminated soils and repeating the same operation as above except that an ion chromatograph was used as an analyzer, FIG. An elution line of F as shown was obtained.
As a result, it was confirmed that the elution concentration of F when the shaking time was 360 minutes was 134 mg / L, almost equal to the value obtained by the official test analysis method, and the elution rate y of F was expressed by the following equation. It was.
y = 0.677x 0.069 (where x is the shaking time (minutes))

(1)−6 Asの含有量試験
各種汚染土壌のうち、サンプルGの風乾土壌を1.5g採取して、100mLのポリエチレン容器に入れ、これに1モル/Lの濃度の塩酸水溶液を50mL加え、卓上振とう器によって1分〜120分の各時間それぞれ振とうした。
このように、土壌試料の採取量、溶媒、振とう時間の上限を変えたこと以外は、上記同様の操作を繰り返すことによって、振とう時間の異なる含有量試験用検液を得た。
(1) -6 Content test of As Among various contaminated soils, 1.5 g of sample G air-dried soil was sampled and placed in a 100 mL polyethylene container, and 50 mL of 1 mol / L hydrochloric acid aqueous solution was added thereto. Each shake was performed for 1 minute to 120 minutes using a tabletop shaker.
In this way, by repeating the same operation except that the upper limit of the collected amount of the soil sample, the solvent, and the shaking time was changed, content test solutions with different shaking times were obtained.

得られた検液を適宜希釈し、水素化物発生ICP発光分析装置を用いてそれぞれ分析し、振とう時間に対するAsの溶出濃度を測定した。
その結果、振とう時間を120分とした時の溶出濃度が0.06mg/Lとなり、公定試験分析法による値とほぼ等しくなることが確認された。
The obtained test solution was appropriately diluted and analyzed with a hydride generation ICP emission spectrometer, and the elution concentration of As with respect to the shaking time was measured.
As a result, when the shaking time was 120 minutes, the elution concentration was 0.06 mg / L, which was confirmed to be substantially equal to the value obtained by the official test analysis method.

また、時間ごとの溶出濃度を120分における上記溶出濃度0.06mg/Lを「1」とする溶出率に換算し、対数表示の両軸に対してプロットした結果、図7に示す溶出直線が得られ、含有量試験におけるAsの溶出率yが次式で表わされることが判った。
y=0.789x0.051(式中のxは振とう時間(分))
Moreover, the elution concentration for each hour was converted into an elution rate with the elution concentration of 0.06 mg / L at 120 minutes as “1” and plotted against both axes of the logarithmic display. As a result, the elution line shown in FIG. As a result, it was found that the dissolution rate y of As in the content test is expressed by the following equation.
y = 0.789x 0.051 (where x is the shaking time (minutes))

(1)−7 Cdの含有量試験
各種汚染土壌のうち、サンプルAの風乾土壌を用い、分析にICP発光分析装置を用いたこと以外は、上記同様の操作を繰り返すことによって、図8に示すようなCdの溶出直線を得た。
図に示すように、Cdの場合には、溶出速度が速く、1分程度の振とう時間でも120分経過後でも、溶出濃度に相違がなく、ほとんど公定試験分析法による値に一致することから、試験サイズを縮小した簡易法による分析値をそのまま利用しても差し支えないことが確認された。
(1) -7 Cd content test By using the air-dried soil of sample A among various contaminated soils and using an ICP emission analyzer for analysis, the same operation as described above is repeated, and the results are shown in FIG. Cd elution line was obtained.
As shown in the figure, in the case of Cd, the elution rate is fast, and there is no difference in the elution concentration even after a shaking time of about 1 minute or after 120 minutes, and it almost agrees with the value according to the official test analysis method. It was confirmed that the analysis value obtained by the simplified method with a reduced test size can be used as it is.

(1)−8 Pbの含有量試験
各種汚染土壌のうち、サンプルIの風乾土壌を用いたこと以外は、上記同様の操作を繰り返すことによって、図9に示すようなPbの溶出直線が得られた。
その結果、振とう時間を120分とした時のPbの溶出濃度は0.25mg/Lとなり、公定試験分析法による値とほぼ等しくなることが確認されると共に、含有量試験におけるAsの溶出率yが次式によって表わされることが判明した。
y=0.670x0.084(式中のxは振とう時間(分))
(1) -8 Pb Content Test A Pb elution line as shown in FIG. 9 is obtained by repeating the same operation as above except that the air-dried soil of Sample I is used among various contaminated soils. It was.
As a result, when the shaking time was 120 minutes, the elution concentration of Pb was 0.25 mg / L, which was confirmed to be almost equal to the value obtained by the official test analysis method, and the dissolution rate of As in the content test. It was found that y is represented by the following equation.
y = 0.670x 0.084 (where x is the shaking time (minutes))

(1)−9 Bの含有量試験
各種汚染土壌のうち、サンプルFの風乾土壌を用いたこと以外は、上記同様の操作を繰り返すことによって、図10に示すように、Bの溶出直線を得た。
その結果、振とう時間を120分とした時のBの溶出濃度は122mg/Lとなり、公定試験方法による値とほぼ等しくなると共に、含有量試験におけるBの溶出率yが次式によって表わされることが判明した。
y=0.776x0.059(式中のxは振とう時間(分))
(1) -9 B Content Test As shown in FIG. 10, an elution line of B was obtained by repeating the same operation as above except that the air-dried soil of Sample F was used among various contaminated soils. It was.
As a result, when the shaking time is 120 minutes, the elution concentration of B is 122 mg / L, which is almost equal to the value obtained by the official test method, and the elution rate y of B in the content test is expressed by the following equation. There was found.
y = 0.776x 0.059 (where x is the shaking time (minutes))

(1)−10 Cr6+の含有量試験
各種汚染土壌のうち、サンプルDの風乾土壌を用い、溶媒として0.005モルの無水炭酸ナトリウムと0.01モルの炭酸水素ナトリウムを1Lの純水中に溶解させた弱アルカリ性水溶液(pH=10.06)を用いると共に、分析に吸光光度計を用いたこと以外は、上記同様の操作を繰り返すことによって、図11に示すように、Cr6+の溶出直線を得た。
その結果、振とう時間を120分とした時のCr6+の溶出濃度は8.7mg/Lとなり、公定試験方法による値とほぼ等しくなると共に、含有量試験におけるCr6+の溶出率yが次式によって表わされることが判明した。
y=0.593x0.116(式中のxは振とう時間(分))
(1) -10 Cr 6+ content test Using air-dried soil of sample D among various contaminated soils, 0.005 mol of anhydrous sodium carbonate and 0.01 mol of sodium hydrogen carbonate as solvents were used in 1 L of pure water. As shown in FIG. 11, elution of Cr 6+ was performed by repeating the same operation as described above except that a weak alkaline aqueous solution (pH = 10.06) dissolved in 1 was used and an absorptiometer was used for the analysis. A straight line was obtained.
As a result, the elution concentration of Cr6 + when the shaking time shaking was 120 minutes 8.7 mg / L, and the with approximately equal to the value by official testing method, dissolution rate y of Cr 6+ in the content tested by the following equation Turned out to be represented.
y = 0.593x 0.116 (where x is the shaking time (minutes))

(1)−11 Fの含有量試験
各種汚染土壌のうち、サンプルEの風乾土壌を用いると共に、溶媒として1モル/Lの塩酸水溶液を用い、さらにFの分析装置としてイオンクロマトグラフを用いたこと以外は、上記同様の操作を繰り返すことによって、図12に示すようなFの溶出直線が得られた。
図に示すように、Cdの場合と同様に、酸水溶液への溶出速度が速く、1分程度の振とう時間でも120分経過後でも、溶出濃度に相違がなく、試験サイズを縮小した簡易法による分析値をそのまま利用しても差し支えないことが確認された。
(1) -11 F content test Among the various contaminated soils, the air dry soil of sample E was used, a 1 mol / L hydrochloric acid aqueous solution was used as a solvent, and an ion chromatograph was used as an F analyzer. Except for the above, by repeating the same operation as described above, an F elution line as shown in FIG. 12 was obtained.
As shown in the figure, as in the case of Cd, the elution rate into the acid aqueous solution is fast, and there is no difference in the elution concentration even after a shaking time of about 1 minute or after 120 minutes, and a simple method in which the test size is reduced. It was confirmed that the analysis value by can be used as it is.

(2)本発明による土壌中有害物質の簡易試験
(2)−1 簡易溶出量試験
各種汚染土壌のうちから、湿潤状態のサンプルB、G、L、M、Nの各土壌試料をそれぞれ乾燥重量で5gとなるように採取し、100mLのポリエチレン容器に入れ、この中に50mLの脱イオン水を加え、手作業によって1分間振とうした後、5分間静置し、容器内の上澄み液をシリンジによって20mL程度採取し、これを直径47mmの孔径0.45μmのろ紙の上に、孔径2.7μmのろ紙を重ねた複層ろ紙とろ紙ホルダーを用いてろ過することによって、溶出量試験検液を調製した。
(2) Simplified test for harmful substances in soil according to the present invention (2) -1 Simple dissolution test Each of the soil samples B, G, L, M, and N in wet state is dry weight from various contaminated soils. Into a 100 mL polyethylene container, add 50 mL of deionized water, shake manually for 1 minute, let stand for 5 minutes, and add the supernatant in the container to the syringe. About 20 mL was collected by filtration, and this was filtered using a multilayer filter paper in which a filter paper with a pore size of 2.7 μm was superimposed on a filter paper with a pore size of 0.45 μm and a filter paper holder. Prepared.

得られた溶出量試験用検液を適宜希釈し、Asについては水素化物発生ICP発光分析装置、Pb、Cd及びBについてはICP発光分析装置、Cr6+については吸光光度計、Fについてはイオンクロマトグラフによってそれぞれ分析し、各成分の溶媒(水)中への溶出濃度を測定した。
そして、上記予備試験によって求めた各成分の溶出式において、x=1に相当する溶出量yを求め、得られた溶出濃度をそれぞれの溶出率yで除した結果、表5に示すように、公定試験分析法による溶出濃度と概ね一致する結果となった。
The obtained test solution for dissolution test is appropriately diluted. As for hydride generation ICP emission analyzer for As, ICP emission analyzer for Pb, Cd and B, Absorptiometer for Cr 6+ , Ion chromatograph for F Each was analyzed by a graph, and the elution concentration of each component in the solvent (water) was measured.
And in the elution formula of each component calculated | required by the said preliminary test, as a result of calculating | requiring the elution amount y equivalent to x = 1 and dividing the obtained elution concentration by each elution rate y, as shown in Table 5, The result was almost consistent with the elution concentration obtained by the official test analysis method.

Figure 2007285707
Figure 2007285707

(2)−2 簡易含有量試験
各種汚染土壌のうちから、湿潤状態のサンプルB、L、M、N、Oの各土壌試料をそれぞれ乾燥重量で1.5gとなるように採取し、100mLのポリエチレン容器に入れ、この中に、Cr6+については、0.005モルの無水炭酸ナトリウムと0.01モルの炭酸水素ナトリウムを1Lの純水中に溶解させた弱アルカリ性水溶液を50mL、これ以外については、1モル/Lの濃度の塩酸水溶液を50mL加え、手作業によって1分間振とうし、5分間静置したのち、容器内の上澄み液を同様にシリンジによって20mL程度採取し、これを直径47mmの孔径0.45μmのろ紙の上に、孔径2.7μmのろ紙を重ねた複層ろ紙とろ紙ホルダーを用いてろ過することによって、含有量試験検液を調製した。
(2) -2 Simple content test From various contaminated soils, each of the soil samples B, L, M, N, and O in a wet state was collected to a dry weight of 1.5 g. Put in a polyethylene container, and for Cr 6+ , add 50 mL of weak alkaline aqueous solution in which 0.005 mol of anhydrous sodium carbonate and 0.01 mol of sodium hydrogen carbonate are dissolved in 1 L of pure water. Add 50 mL of 1 mol / L hydrochloric acid aqueous solution, shake manually for 1 minute, let stand for 5 minutes, and then collect about 20 mL of the supernatant in the container with a syringe in the same manner. A content test solution was prepared by filtering using a filter paper holder and a multilayer filter paper in which a filter paper having a pore size of 2.7 μm was superimposed on a filter paper having a pore size of 0.45 μm.

得られた含有量試験用検液を適宜希釈し、上記同様の分析装置を用いて各成分をそれぞれ分析し、各成分の溶媒(塩酸水溶液又はアルカリ水溶液)中への溶出濃度を測定した。
そして、同様に、予備試験によって求めた各成分の溶出式からそれぞれ溶出量yを求め、得られた溶出濃度をそれぞれの溶出率yで除すした結果、表6に示すように、公定試験分析法による溶出濃度と概ね一致する結果となった。
The obtained test solution for content test was appropriately diluted, each component was analyzed using the same analyzer as described above, and the elution concentration of each component in the solvent (aqueous hydrochloric acid solution or alkaline aqueous solution) was measured.
Similarly, the elution amount y is obtained from the elution formula of each component obtained by the preliminary test, and the obtained elution concentration is divided by the respective elution rate y. As shown in Table 6, official test analysis The result was almost consistent with the elution concentration obtained by the method.

なお、含有量試験結果については、本来、上記溶出濃度から乾燥土壌1kg当たりの含有量(mg)に換算表示するものであるが、この実施例においては、換算前のデータとして溶出濃度を示した。   In addition, about a content test result, although it converts and displays originally from the said elution density | concentration to content (mg) per 1 kg of dry soil, the elution density | concentration was shown as data before conversion in this Example. .

Figure 2007285707
Figure 2007285707

なお、この実施例においては、土壌中有害物質の代表例として、Pb、Cd、As、B、Cr6+及びFの分析例について説明したが、Pbの溶出量やこれら以外の有害物質であるSe、Hg、シアンの溶出量及び含有量についても、同様の操作によって試験することができる。
さらに、推計に用いる各式については、今後さらに集積されるデータに基づいて式の係数を変更していくことによってより精度の高い推計が可能になるものと考えられる。
In this embodiment, the analysis examples of Pb, Cd, As, B, Cr 6+ and F have been described as representative examples of harmful substances in the soil. However, the amount of Pb eluted and Se, which is a harmful substance other than these, are described. The elution amount and content of Hg, cyan can also be tested by the same operation.
Furthermore, for each formula used for estimation, it is considered that estimation with higher accuracy is possible by changing the coefficient of the formula based on further accumulated data.

溶出量試験におけるAsの水中への溶出率に及ぼす振とう時間の影響を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the influence of the shaking time which acts on the elution rate in the water in the elution amount test. 図1の両軸を対数表示したグラフである。It is the graph which displayed both axes | shafts of FIG. 1 logarithmically. 溶出量試験におけるCdの水中への溶出率に及ぼす振とう時間の影響を示す対数グラフである。It is a logarithmic graph which shows the influence of the shaking time on the dissolution rate of Cd in water in the dissolution amount test. 溶出量試験におけるBの水中への溶出率に及ぼす振とう時間の影響を示す対数グラフである。It is a logarithmic graph which shows the influence of the shaking time on the dissolution rate of B in water in the dissolution amount test. 溶出量試験におけるCr6+の水中への溶出率に及ぼす振とう時間の影響を示す対数グラフである。It is a logarithmic graph which shows the influence of the shaking time on the elution rate in the water of Cr6 + in the elution amount test. 溶出量試験におけるFの水中への溶出率に及ぼす振とう時間の影響を示す対数グラフである。It is a logarithmic graph which shows the influence of the shaking time on the dissolution rate of F in water in the dissolution amount test. 含有量試験におけるAsの酸水溶液中への溶出率に及ぼす振とう時間の影響を示す対数グラフである。It is a logarithmic graph which shows the influence of the shaking time which acts on the elution rate in the acid aqueous solution of As in a content test. 含有量試験におけるCdの酸水溶液中への溶出率に及ぼす振とう時間の影響を示す対数グラフである。It is a logarithmic graph which shows the influence of the shaking time on the elution rate in the acid aqueous solution of Cd in a content test. 含有量試験におけるPbの酸水溶液中への溶出率に及ぼす振とう時間の影響を示す対数グラフである。It is a logarithmic graph which shows the influence of the shaking time on the elution rate in the acid aqueous solution of Pb in a content test. 含有量試験におけるBの酸水溶液中への溶出率に及ぼす振とう時間の影響を示す対数グラフである。It is a logarithmic graph which shows the influence of the shaking time on the elution rate in the acid aqueous solution of B in a content test. 含有量試験におけるCr6+のアルカリ水溶液中への溶出率に及ぼす振とう時間の影響を示す対数グラフである。It is a logarithmic graph which shows the influence of the shaking time which acts on the elution rate in the alkaline aqueous solution of Cr6 + in a content test. 含有量試験におけるFの酸水溶液中への溶出率に及ぼす振とう時間の影響を示す対数グラフである。It is a logarithmic graph which shows the influence of the shaking time which acts on the elution rate in the acid aqueous solution of F in a content test.

Claims (9)

50g未満の質量の土壌を採取し、これに採取した土壌質量の5倍以上の水を加え、360分未満の時間振とうさせた後、ろ過して検液を得、得られた検液の分析値から、公定溶出量試験濃度を推計することを特徴とする土壌中有害物質の簡易溶出量試験方法。   Collect soil with a mass of less than 50 g, add water more than 5 times the mass of the collected soil, shake for less than 360 minutes, filter to obtain a test solution, and A simple elution test method for toxic substances in soil characterized by estimating the official elution test concentration from the analysis value. 上記ろ過操作に際して、孔径0.45μmのろ紙の上に孔径1μm以上のろ紙を重ねて成る複層ろ紙を用いることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の土壌中有害物質の簡易溶出量試験方法。   2. The method for simply testing the amount of toxic substances in soil according to claim 1, wherein a multi-layer filter paper in which a filter paper having a pore diameter of 1 μm or more is superimposed on a filter paper having a pore diameter of 0.45 μm is used in the filtration operation. 6g未満の質量の土壌を採取し、これにpH2以下の酸水溶液又はpH10以上のアルカリ水溶液を採取した土壌質量の5倍以上加え、120分未満の時間振とうさせた後、ろ過して検液を得、得られた検液の分析値から、公定含有量試験濃度を推計することを特徴とする土壌中有害物質の簡易含有量試験方法。   Collect soil with a mass of less than 6 g, add an aqueous acid solution with a pH of 2 or less or an alkaline aqueous solution with a pH of 10 or more to the soil mass of 5 times or more, shake for a period of less than 120 minutes, filter and test A simple content test method for harmful substances in soil, characterized in that the official content test concentration is estimated from the analysis value of the obtained test solution. 上記ろ過操作に際して、孔径0.45μmのろ紙の上に孔径1μm以上のろ紙を重ねて成る複層ろ紙を用いることを特徴とする請求項3に記載の土壌中有害物質の簡易含有量試験方法。   4. The method for testing a simple content of harmful substances in soil according to claim 3, wherein a multilayer filter paper in which a filter paper having a pore diameter of 1 μm or more is stacked on a filter paper having a pore diameter of 0.45 μm is used in the filtration operation. 土壌試料を溶媒と共に振とうする蓋付容器と、
孔径0.45μmのろ紙の上に、孔径1μm以上のろ紙を重ねて成り、上記蓋付容器内の上澄み液をろ過するための複層ろ紙と、
上記複層ろ紙によるろ液を収納する検液容器を備えたことを特徴とする土壌中有害物質の簡易試験キット。
A container with a lid for shaking a soil sample with a solvent;
A filter paper having a pore diameter of 0.45 μm overlaid with a filter paper having a pore diameter of 1 μm or more, and a multilayer filter paper for filtering the supernatant liquid in the lidded container;
A simple test kit for toxic substances in soil, comprising a test container for storing filtrate from the multilayer filter paper.
上記蓋付容器内の上澄み液を取り出すシリンジと、該シリンジに接続可能なろ紙ホルダーを備えたことを特徴とする請求項5に記載の土壌中有害物質の簡易試験キット。   The simple test kit for toxic substances in soil according to claim 5, comprising a syringe for taking out the supernatant in the lidded container, and a filter paper holder connectable to the syringe. 溶媒を備えたことを特徴とする請求項5又は6に記載の土壌中有害物質の簡易試験キット。   The simple test kit for harmful substances in soil according to claim 5 or 6, further comprising a solvent. 使用済みの溶媒を保管する廃液容器と、当該容器内の廃液を中和するための中和剤を備えたことを特徴とする請求項5〜7のいずれか1つの項に記載の土壌中有害物質の簡易試験キット。   The waste liquid container for storing a used solvent, and a neutralizing agent for neutralizing the waste liquid in the container, the harmful in the soil according to any one of claims 5 to 7, Simple test kit for substances. 請求項1〜4のいずれかに記載の方法において得られる検液の分析値から、公定試験濃度を推計する演算処理プログラムを備えたことを特徴とする土壌中有害物質の分析装置。   5. An apparatus for analyzing harmful substances in soil, comprising an arithmetic processing program for estimating an official test concentration from an analysis value of a test solution obtained by the method according to claim 1.
JP2006109718A 2006-04-12 2006-04-12 Simple test method for leaching amount of harmful substances in soil Active JP4956037B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006109718A JP4956037B2 (en) 2006-04-12 2006-04-12 Simple test method for leaching amount of harmful substances in soil

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006109718A JP4956037B2 (en) 2006-04-12 2006-04-12 Simple test method for leaching amount of harmful substances in soil

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2011247526A Division JP5425864B2 (en) 2011-11-11 2011-11-11 Simple test method for content of harmful substances in soil

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2007285707A true JP2007285707A (en) 2007-11-01
JP4956037B2 JP4956037B2 (en) 2012-06-20

Family

ID=38757642

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2006109718A Active JP4956037B2 (en) 2006-04-12 2006-04-12 Simple test method for leaching amount of harmful substances in soil

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4956037B2 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR100991597B1 (en) 2010-07-02 2010-11-04 서울대학교산학협력단 Measurement method for pollution index using analysis of element reducing a toxicity
JP2010271247A (en) * 2009-05-22 2010-12-02 Taisei Kiso Sekkei Kk Method for simultaneously analyzing multielement component such as heavy metal or the like in soil

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108344823A (en) * 2018-02-11 2018-07-31 浙江安联检测技术服务有限公司 A kind of characterization processes of Organochlorine Pesticides In Soil

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2005229956A (en) * 2004-02-23 2005-09-02 Kikkoman Corp Method for detecting microorganism in drink
JP2005331409A (en) * 2004-05-20 2005-12-02 Tokyo Soil Research Co Ltd Simplified soil elution test method for heavy metal or the like

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2005229956A (en) * 2004-02-23 2005-09-02 Kikkoman Corp Method for detecting microorganism in drink
JP2005331409A (en) * 2004-05-20 2005-12-02 Tokyo Soil Research Co Ltd Simplified soil elution test method for heavy metal or the like

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2010271247A (en) * 2009-05-22 2010-12-02 Taisei Kiso Sekkei Kk Method for simultaneously analyzing multielement component such as heavy metal or the like in soil
KR100991597B1 (en) 2010-07-02 2010-11-04 서울대학교산학협력단 Measurement method for pollution index using analysis of element reducing a toxicity

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4956037B2 (en) 2012-06-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Baig et al. Arsenic fractionation in sediments of different origins using BCR sequential and single extraction methods
Radke et al. Analysis of arsenic species in environmental samples
JP5583362B2 (en) Simultaneous analysis method for multi-element components in soil
Shah et al. Switchable dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for lead enrichment: a green alternative to classical extraction techniques
Peralta et al. Heavy metal availability assessment using portable X-ray fluorescence and single extraction procedures on former vineyard polluted soils
Melquiades et al. Quantification of metals in river water using a portable EDXRFsystem
Válega et al. Determination of organic mercury in biota, plants and contaminated sediments using a thermal atomic absorption spectrometry technique
Tsuda et al. A method for quantitative analysis of aquatic humic substances in clear water based on carbon concentration
Cleveland et al. A comparison of four porewater sampling methods for metal mixtures and dissolved organic carbon and the implications for sediment toxicity evaluations
Naeemullah et al. Cloud point extraction and flame atomic absorption spectrometric determination of cadmium and nickel in drinking and wastewater samples
Perez-Santana et al. Total and partial digestion of sediments for the evaluation of trace element environmental pollution
Rodrigues dos Santos et al. Evaluation of metal release from battery and electronic components in soil using SR‐TXRF and EDXRF
JP5425864B2 (en) Simple test method for content of harmful substances in soil
JP2005331409A (en) Simplified soil elution test method for heavy metal or the like
Ochsenkühn-Petropoulou et al. Comparison of inductively coupled plasma–atomic emission spectrometry, anodic stripping voltammetry and instrumental neutron-activation analysis for the determination of heavy metals in airborne particulate matter
JP4956037B2 (en) Simple test method for leaching amount of harmful substances in soil
Seval et al. Silica nanoparticle-covered Graphene Oxide as solid-phase extraction sorbent coupled with FAAS for the determination of some of heavy metals in water sample
Ridošková et al. Prediction of cadmium, lead and mercury availability to plants: a comparison between diffusive gradients measured in a thin films technique and soil grown plants.
Vasile et al. An experimental design for the optimization of the extraction methods of metallic mobile fractions from environmental solid samples
Tora et al. Screening of some transition metal ions and quantitative determination of copper, cadmium and zinc by solid phase derivative spectrophotometry
Teran-Baamonde et al. Isotope dilution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry to measure the bioaccessible fraction of chromium in sediments
RU2695705C1 (en) Method of preparing samples for determining content of heavy metals in suspended substances of natural water by atomic absorption method
Kagiliery et al. Portable X-ray fluorescence analysis of water: Thin film and water thickness considerations
Sahraoui et al. Determination of trace elements in mine soil samples using a portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer: A comparative study with ICP-OES
Zheng et al. Cloud point extraction procedure for flame atomic absorption spectrometric determination of heavy metals in surface sediments of Chaohu lake, China.

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20090313

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20090407

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20110912

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20111111

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20111209

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20120207

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20120301

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20120316

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4956037

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20150323

Year of fee payment: 3

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250