JP2007253166A - Method for judging shape of nugget, spot welding method and equipment - Google Patents

Method for judging shape of nugget, spot welding method and equipment Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2007253166A
JP2007253166A JP2006077391A JP2006077391A JP2007253166A JP 2007253166 A JP2007253166 A JP 2007253166A JP 2006077391 A JP2006077391 A JP 2006077391A JP 2006077391 A JP2006077391 A JP 2006077391A JP 2007253166 A JP2007253166 A JP 2007253166A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
welding
spot welding
resistance value
spot
electrode
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2006077391A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP4978947B2 (en
Inventor
Hiroshi Abe
博司 阿部
Takashi Shinmyo
高史 新明
Ryo Kikuchi
陵 菊池
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd filed Critical Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd
Priority to JP2006077391A priority Critical patent/JP4978947B2/en
Priority to MYPI20080141A priority patent/MY164289A/en
Priority to PCT/JP2006/321841 priority patent/WO2007055130A1/en
Priority to US11/920,634 priority patent/US20090218323A1/en
Publication of JP2007253166A publication Critical patent/JP2007253166A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4978947B2 publication Critical patent/JP4978947B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Resistance Welding (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a spot welding method and equipment in which spot welding quality can be controlled in a spot welding process. <P>SOLUTION: In this method, at least as one of a pair of electrodes for performing spot welding, there is used an electrode which has substantially a convex electrode surface and which, at the center portion of the surface, has a recess set at a predetermined depth where a welding trace formed on the surface of a metallic body reaches a deepest part when a good nugget is formed by spot welding. Completion of spot welding is determined when a resistance value during the welding reaches a state of equilibrium. The spot welding equipment is provided with a resistance value detector for detecting a resistance value during the welding and a welding controller for completing spot welding on the basis that the resistance value reaches the state of equilibrium during the welding as detected by the resistance value detector. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2008,JPO&INPIT

Description

本発明はナゲットの形成判定方法、スポット溶接方法およびスポット溶接装置に関するものである。   The present invention relates to a nugget formation determination method, a spot welding method, and a spot welding apparatus.

スポット溶接は、ナゲット径でスポット溶接の品質の良否を評価することが知られている。具体的手法としては、スポット溶接された2枚の鋼板の間にタガネを圧入してスポット溶接部を剥がし、熱影響部を含む接合径を計測するタガネ検査や、スポット溶接部を切断してナゲット径を直接計測する切断検査などの個別破壊計測が行なわれている。   It is known that spot welding evaluates the quality of spot welding quality based on the nugget diameter. Specific methods include press inspection between two spot-welded steel plates, peeling off the spot welds, measuring the joint diameter including the heat affected zone, and cutting the spot welds to nugget Individual fracture measurement such as cutting inspection that directly measures the diameter is performed.

また、スポット溶接に関する非破壊計測技術としては超音波を利用したもの(特開昭62−119453号、特開平4−265854号)、振動を利用したもの(特開平9−171007号)、断続光照射に伴う音波を検出するもの(特開平3−2659号)、溶接電極から発した弾性波の反射波を検出するもの(特開平4−40359号)などが各種提案されている。また、特開2001−165911号公報には、スポット溶接部に磁力線を貫通させたときに測定されるスポット溶接部のナゲット周縁での環状高インダクタンス部分の直径と、前記高インダクタンス部分とナゲット中央部における低インダクタンス部分とのインダクタンス高低落差の2つの変数を用いて、ナゲット直径の予測値としての各変数を判別式で表し、ナゲット直径の良否を区別する閾値を設定するものが開示されている。
特開2001−165911号公報
Nondestructive measurement techniques relating to spot welding are those using ultrasonic waves (Japanese Patent Laid-Open Nos. 62-119453 and 4-265854), those using vibration (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 9-171007), and intermittent light. Various proposals have been made for detecting a sound wave accompanying irradiation (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 3-2659), detecting a reflected wave of an elastic wave emitted from a welding electrode (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 4-40359), and the like. Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2001-165911 discloses a diameter of an annular high inductance portion at the periphery of a nugget of a spot welded portion measured when a magnetic field line is passed through the spot welded portion, and the high inductance portion and the nugget central portion. Are used to express each variable as a predicted value of the nugget diameter with a discriminant and set a threshold value for discriminating whether the nugget diameter is good or bad.
JP 2001-165911 A

タガネ検査は、破壊計測したものについて、熱影響部を含む接合径の大小でスポット溶接の品質の良否を判定することができるが、破壊計測していないものはスポット溶接の品質の良否を直接評価することができない。また、近年、自動車のボディー等には軽量化を図るためハイテン(高張力鋼)材が多く用いられつつあるが、ハイテン材をスポット溶接した部位は通常の鋼板を溶接した部位に比べて硬いため、製造ラインで抜き打ちによるタガネ検査を行うには不向きであった。また、非破壊検査は特開2001−165911号公報などに開示されている。   In the vertical inspection, the quality of spot welding can be judged based on the size of the joint diameter including the heat affected zone, but the quality of spot welding can be directly evaluated for those not measured for fracture. Can not do it. In recent years, high-tensile (high-tensile steel) materials are often used to reduce the weight of automobile bodies, but the spot-welded part of high-tensile material is harder than the part welded with normal steel plates. It was unsuitable for performing an inspection by punching on the production line. Non-destructive inspection is disclosed in Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2001-165911.

しかしながら、これらはいずれもスポット溶接後にスポット溶接の品質の良否を判定するものである。これに対し、スポット溶接工程においてスポット溶接の品質の良否を判断できるものはなかった。スポット溶接工程においてスポット溶接の品質を管理できれば、スポット溶接を用いた製造工程の管理が容易になり、スポット溶接における溶接不良等の不具合の発生を低減させることができる。   However, all of these determine the quality of spot welding after spot welding. On the other hand, none of the quality of spot welding can be judged in the spot welding process. If the quality of spot welding can be managed in the spot welding process, the management of the manufacturing process using spot welding becomes easy, and the occurrence of defects such as poor welding in spot welding can be reduced.

そこで、本発明は、スポット溶接工程においてスポット溶接の品質を管理できるスポット溶接方法およびスポット溶接装置を提供することを解決課題としている。   Then, this invention makes it a solution subject to provide the spot welding method and spot welding apparatus which can manage the quality of spot welding in a spot welding process.

本発明に係るスポット溶接方法は、スポット溶接を行う一対の溶接電極のうち、少なくとも一方の溶接電極に、電極面が略凸曲面で、かつ、電極面中心部に、スポット溶接により良好にナゲットが形成された場合に、金属体表面に形成される溶接痕が最深部に到達する所定深さに設定した窪みを形成した溶接電極を用いてスポット溶接を行い、溶接時の抵抗値が平衡状態になったときに当該スポット溶接の終了判定をするものである。また、ナゲットの形成判定方法として、斯かるスポット溶接において、溶接時の抵抗値が平衡状態になったことに基づいて、当該スポット溶接部にナゲットが適正に形成されたことを判定してもよい。   In the spot welding method according to the present invention, at least one of the pair of welding electrodes that perform spot welding has a substantially convex curved surface, and the nugget is favorably formed by spot welding at the center of the electrode surface. When formed, spot welding is performed using a welding electrode formed with a depression set at a predetermined depth at which the welding mark formed on the surface of the metal body reaches the deepest part, and the resistance value during welding is in an equilibrium state. When this happens, the end of the spot welding is determined. Further, as the nugget formation determination method, in such spot welding, it may be determined that the nugget is properly formed in the spot welded portion based on the resistance value at the time of welding being in an equilibrium state. .

また、本発明に係るスポット溶接装置は、スポット溶接を行う一対の溶接電極のうち、少なくとも一方の溶接電極に、電極面が略凸曲面で、かつ、電極面中心部に、スポット溶接により良好にナゲットが形成された場合に、金属体表面に形成される溶接痕が最深部に到達する所定深さに設定した窪みを形成した溶接電極を用いてスポット溶接を行うスポット溶接装置において、溶接時の抵抗値を検出する抵抗値検出部と、抵抗値検出部で検出された溶接時の抵抗値が平衡状態になったことに基づいて当該スポット溶接の終了を判定する溶接制御装置とを備えたものである。   Further, the spot welding apparatus according to the present invention can be favorably obtained by spot welding at least one of the pair of welding electrodes for spot welding, the electrode surface is a substantially convex curved surface, and the center of the electrode surface. When a nugget is formed, in a spot welding apparatus that performs spot welding using a welding electrode formed with a depression set at a predetermined depth at which a welding mark formed on the surface of the metal body reaches the deepest portion, A resistance value detection unit that detects a resistance value, and a welding control device that determines the end of the spot welding based on the resistance value at the time of welding detected by the resistance value detection unit being in an equilibrium state It is.

このスポット溶接方法およびスポット溶接装置によれば、スポット溶接の品質を管理でき、スポット溶接を用いた製造工程の管理が容易になり、スポット溶接における溶接不良等の不具合の発生を低減させることができる。   According to this spot welding method and spot welding apparatus, the quality of spot welding can be managed, the manufacturing process using spot welding can be easily managed, and the occurrence of defects such as welding defects in spot welding can be reduced. .

以下、本発明の一実施形態に係るスポット溶接方法およびスポット溶接用電極を図面に基づいて説明する。   Hereinafter, a spot welding method and a spot welding electrode according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

図1に示すように、スポット溶接を行う一対の電極1、2のうち、一方の電極2に、電極面に窪み3を形成したものを用いてスポット溶接を行うと、図1、図2に示すように、電極1の電極面に形成した窪み3に対応して鋼板4、5(金属体)の表面に凸状の溶接痕6が形成される。本発明者らは、この凸状の溶接痕6に着目し、凸状の溶接痕6の高さと、ナゲット7の直径(ナゲット径)と、引張せん断強度(TSS)のそれぞれの相関関係を調べた。   As shown in FIG. 1, when spot welding is performed using one of the electrodes 1 and 2 to be spot welded and one electrode 2 having a depression 3 formed on the electrode surface, FIG. 1 and FIG. As shown, convex welding marks 6 are formed on the surfaces of the steel plates 4 and 5 (metal bodies) corresponding to the depressions 3 formed on the electrode surface of the electrode 1. The present inventors pay attention to the convex welding trace 6 and examine the correlation between the height of the convex welding trace 6, the diameter of the nugget 7 (nugget diameter), and the tensile shear strength (TSS). It was.

図3は、凸部の高さとナゲット径との相関関係を示すデータの一例を、図4は凸部の高さと引張せん断強度(TSS)との相関関係を示すデータの一例を、図5はナゲット径と引張せん断強度(TSS)との相関関係を示すデータの一例をそれぞれ示している。   FIG. 3 shows an example of data showing the correlation between the height of the convex portion and the nugget diameter, FIG. 4 shows an example of data showing the correlation between the height of the convex portion and the tensile shear strength (TSS), and FIG. One example of data indicating the correlation between the nugget diameter and the tensile shear strength (TSS) is shown.

ここでは、図1に示すように、上下一対の電極1,2のうち、上側の電極1の表面に窪みを形成した電極を用いており、かつ、窪みを形成した電極については、3mmの円筒形状の窪みを形成したものと、5mmの円筒形状の窪みを形成したものの2種類の電極を用いている。図3〜図5の相関関係図は、電極1の表面に形成した円筒形状の窪み3の直径が3mmのものと、5mmのもので2種類の電極を用いた場合で、それぞれデータを取った。それぞれ加圧力は250kgf(約2.45kN)と150kgf(約1.47kN)の2通り、また電流値は5kA〜13kAの間で変え、通電時間は4cycles〜10cyclesの間で変えてスポット溶接のエネルギーを変え、凸部の高さやナゲット径、引張せん断強度(TSS)が異なる試料を作成した。また異なる条件毎に複数個ずつ試料を作成した。なお、この実施形態では、周波数60Hzの交流電源でスポット溶接を行っており、cycleは通電時間を設定する単位であり、1cycleは1/60(秒)である。   Here, as shown in FIG. 1, of the pair of upper and lower electrodes 1 and 2, an electrode in which a depression is formed on the surface of the upper electrode 1 is used, and the electrode in which the depression is formed is a 3 mm cylinder. Two types of electrodes are used, one having a shape-like depression and one having a 5 mm cylindrical depression. The correlation diagrams of FIGS. 3 to 5 were obtained when two types of electrodes were used with a cylindrical depression 3 formed on the surface of the electrode 1 having a diameter of 3 mm and a diameter of 5 mm. . Each of the applied pressure is 250 kgf (about 2.45 kN) and 150 kgf (about 1.47 kN), the current value is changed between 5 kA and 13 kA, the energization time is changed between 4 cycles and 10 cycles, and the energy of spot welding Samples with different heights, nugget diameters, and tensile shear strength (TSS) were prepared. A plurality of samples were prepared for each different condition. In this embodiment, spot welding is performed with an AC power source having a frequency of 60 Hz, cycle is a unit for setting the energization time, and 1 cycle is 1/60 (second).

その結果、図3〜図5に示すように、これらには相関関係が見られ、凸状の溶接痕6の高さからナゲット径及び引張せん断強度(TSS)が推定できるとの知見を得た。斯かる知見に基づき、本発明者らは、図6(a)に示すように、スポット溶接を行う一対の溶接電極10、20のうち、少なくとも一方の溶接電極10に、電極面が略凸曲面で、かつ、電極面中心部に、スポット溶接により良好にナゲット13が形成された場合に、金属体表面に形成される溶接痕15が最深部16に到達する所定深さに設定した窪み12を形成した溶接電極(以下、「マーク電極」という。)を用いてスポット溶接を行うことを考えついた。   As a result, as shown in FIGS. 3 to 5, there is a correlation between them, and the knowledge that the nugget diameter and the tensile shear strength (TSS) can be estimated from the height of the convex welding mark 6 was obtained. . Based on such knowledge, the present inventors, as shown in FIG. 6A, have at least one welding electrode 10 out of a pair of welding electrodes 10 and 20 that perform spot welding, and the electrode surface is a substantially convex curved surface. In addition, when the nugget 13 is satisfactorily formed by spot welding at the center of the electrode surface, the depression 12 is set to a predetermined depth at which the welding mark 15 formed on the surface of the metal body reaches the deepest portion 16. It has been considered to perform spot welding using the formed welding electrode (hereinafter referred to as “mark electrode”).

マーク電極10には、図7(a)(b)に示すように、電極面11が略凸曲面で、かつ、電極面11の中心部に窪み12を形成した溶接電極10を用いる。このマーク電極10の電極面11に形成した窪み12は、予め試験を行うなどして、スポット溶接により良好にナゲット13が形成された場合に、金属体としての鋼板14の表面に形成される溶接痕15が最深部16に到達する所定深さに設定するとよい。この実施形態では、最深部16には、平坦面17が形成されており、図6(a)に示すように、溶接痕15の頂部には、これに対応して平坦面18が形成される。斯かる平坦面18は、溶接痕15がマーク電極10の窪み12の最深部16に到達したことを目視できるマークとして利用できる。なお、マーク電極10の窪み12の最深部16には、平坦部17に変えて、マーカーとなる所定の凹凸形状を設けてもよい。ただし、本発明に係るスポット溶接方法およびスポット溶接装置においては、斯かるマーカーは必ずしも必要ではない。   As the mark electrode 10, as shown in FIGS. 7A and 7B, a welding electrode 10 in which the electrode surface 11 is a substantially convex curved surface and a recess 12 is formed at the center of the electrode surface 11 is used. The depression 12 formed on the electrode surface 11 of the mark electrode 10 is welded to be formed on the surface of the steel plate 14 as a metal body when the nugget 13 is formed favorably by spot welding, for example, by performing a test in advance. It may be set to a predetermined depth at which the mark 15 reaches the deepest portion 16. In this embodiment, a flat surface 17 is formed at the deepest portion 16, and a flat surface 18 is formed at the top of the weld mark 15 as shown in FIG. 6A. . Such a flat surface 18 can be used as a mark for visually confirming that the welding mark 15 has reached the deepest portion 16 of the recess 12 of the mark electrode 10. Note that the deepest portion 16 of the depression 12 of the mark electrode 10 may be provided with a predetermined uneven shape serving as a marker instead of the flat portion 17. However, in the spot welding method and spot welding apparatus according to the present invention, such a marker is not necessarily required.

また、図6(a)に図示する例では、スポット溶接は、一方の電極にマーク電極10を用い、他方に通常のスポット溶接用電極20を用いているが、スポット溶接を行う一対の溶接電極10、20の両方にマーク電極をもちいてもよい。   In the example shown in FIG. 6A, spot welding uses the mark electrode 10 for one electrode and the normal spot welding electrode 20 for the other, but a pair of welding electrodes for spot welding is used. Mark electrodes may be used for both 10 and 20.

斯かるマーク電極10を用いてスポット溶接を行うと、図6(a)に示すように、鋼板14の表面には、マーク電極10に対応した凸状の溶接痕15が形成される。マーク電極10の電極面11に形成した窪み12は、スポット溶接により良好にナゲット13が形成された場合に、鋼板14の表面に形成される溶接痕15が最深部16に到達する所定深さに設定している。このため、スポット溶接により形成されるナゲット13が不十分な場合には、図6(b)に示すように、鋼板14の表面に形成される溶接痕15が最深部16に到達しない。これに対し、スポット溶接により良好にナゲット13が形成された場合には、図6(a)に示すように、鋼板14の表面に形成される溶接痕15が最深部16に到達する。斯かる窪み12の深さは、予め基礎実験を行うことにより、斯かる機能を奏するのに適切な深さを見出して設定するとよい。   When spot welding is performed using such a mark electrode 10, a convex welding mark 15 corresponding to the mark electrode 10 is formed on the surface of the steel plate 14 as shown in FIG. The depression 12 formed on the electrode surface 11 of the mark electrode 10 has a predetermined depth at which the welding mark 15 formed on the surface of the steel plate 14 reaches the deepest portion 16 when the nugget 13 is formed favorably by spot welding. It is set. For this reason, when the nugget 13 formed by spot welding is insufficient, the welding mark 15 formed on the surface of the steel plate 14 does not reach the deepest portion 16 as shown in FIG. On the other hand, when the nugget 13 is formed satisfactorily by spot welding, the welding mark 15 formed on the surface of the steel plate 14 reaches the deepest portion 16 as shown in FIG. The depth of the recess 12 may be set by finding a suitable depth for performing such a function by conducting a basic experiment in advance.

斯かるマーク電極10を用いてスポット溶接を行うと、図6(a)に示すように、鋼板14の表面には、マーク電極10に対応した所定の凸状の溶接痕15が形成されるか否かで、スポット溶接の品質の良否を判断することができる。すなわち、鋼板14の表面に、マーク電極10に対応した所定の凸状の溶接痕15が形成されていれば、溶接された鋼板14の内部には良好なナゲット13が形成されており、鋼板14の表面に、マーク電極10に対応した所定の凸状の溶接痕15が形成されていなければ、溶接された鋼板14の内部には良好なナゲット13が形成されていない可能性があるとの判断ができる。   When spot welding is performed using such a mark electrode 10, as shown in FIG. 6A, is a predetermined convex welding mark 15 corresponding to the mark electrode 10 formed on the surface of the steel plate 14? The quality of spot welding quality can be determined based on the result. That is, if a predetermined convex welding mark 15 corresponding to the mark electrode 10 is formed on the surface of the steel plate 14, a good nugget 13 is formed inside the welded steel plate 14. If a predetermined convex welding mark 15 corresponding to the mark electrode 10 is not formed on the surface of the steel sheet, it is determined that there is a possibility that a good nugget 13 may not be formed in the welded steel plate 14. Can do.

さらに、本発明者らは、マーク電極10を用いてスポット溶接を行った場合、マーク電極10の窪み12に対応した所定の凸状の溶接痕15が形成される過程において、抵抗値を観測しながら通電を行い、また通電時間のあらゆるタイミングについてサンプルを取り、ナゲット形成状況を調べた。その結果、本発明者らは、マーク電極10を用いてスポット溶接を行った場合、マーク電極10の窪み12に対応した所定の凸状の溶接痕15が形成される過程において、図8に示すように、溶接時の抵抗値Aが、通電時間が経過するにつれて徐々に低下し、そして、凸状の溶接痕15が形成された際には、その後、抵抗値が平衡状態になる傾向を発見した。溶接時の抵抗値Aが平衡状態になったときとは、換言すれば、溶接時の抵抗値の変化が一定時間ほとんど生じない状態をいう。このような傾向は、溶接する鋼板の種類や厚さに関係なく、図9に示すように、通電パターンを種々変更して試験をした場合においても観測することができた。なお、図8、図9において、Aは溶接時の抵抗値を示しており、Bは溶接時に一対の電極に通電する電流値を示している。ちなみに、図8は通電時間中の電流値が一定の値になるように電流値と通電時間を制御しており、図9は通電時間中の電流値が7段階に変化するように電流値と通電時間を制御している。   Furthermore, when spot welding is performed using the mark electrode 10, the inventors observe a resistance value in a process in which a predetermined convex welding mark 15 corresponding to the depression 12 of the mark electrode 10 is formed. The sample was taken at every timing of the energization time, and the nugget formation status was examined. As a result, when spot welding is performed using the mark electrode 10, the inventors show in FIG. 8 a process in which a predetermined convex welding mark 15 corresponding to the depression 12 of the mark electrode 10 is formed. Thus, the resistance value A at the time of welding gradually decreases as the energization time elapses, and when the convex welding mark 15 is formed, the resistance value tends to be in an equilibrium state thereafter. did. When the resistance value A during welding is in an equilibrium state, in other words, a state in which the resistance value during welding hardly changes for a certain period of time. Such a tendency was able to be observed even when the test was conducted with various changes in the energization pattern, as shown in FIG. 9, regardless of the type and thickness of the steel plate to be welded. 8 and 9, A indicates a resistance value at the time of welding, and B indicates a current value for energizing the pair of electrodes at the time of welding. Incidentally, FIG. 8 controls the current value and the energization time so that the current value during the energization time becomes a constant value, and FIG. 9 shows the current value and the current value so that the current value during the energization time changes in seven stages. The energization time is controlled.

このような傾向が事象として観測されるのは、次のような理由によるものと考えられる。すなわち、マーク電極10の窪み12に対応した所定の凸状の溶接痕15は、溶接時に、鋼板14の表面がジュール熱を受けて徐々に柔らかくなり、マーク電極10の窪み12に鋼板14が馴染むことで形成される。この際、溶接時の抵抗値Aは、マーク電極10の窪み12に鋼板14が徐々に馴染んでいく過程において、マーク電極10と鋼板14との接触面積が大きくなっていくにつれて徐々に小さくなると考えられる。そして、マーク電極10の窪み12に対応した所定の凸状の溶接痕15が形成された段階で、溶接時の抵抗値Aが平衡状態となるものと考えられる。   This trend is observed as an event for the following reasons. That is, the predetermined convex welding mark 15 corresponding to the depression 12 of the mark electrode 10 is gradually softened due to Joule heat on the surface of the steel plate 14 during welding, and the steel plate 14 is adapted to the depression 12 of the mark electrode 10. Is formed. At this time, it is considered that the resistance value A during welding gradually decreases as the contact area between the mark electrode 10 and the steel plate 14 increases in the process in which the steel plate 14 gradually adapts to the recess 12 of the mark electrode 10. It is done. And it is thought that the resistance value A at the time of welding will be in an equilibrium state in the stage where the predetermined convex welding trace 15 corresponding to the hollow 12 of the mark electrode 10 was formed.

本発明者らは、溶接時の抵抗値Aが平衡状態となったものについて、凸状の溶接痕15が適切に形成されており、良好なナゲット13が形成され、スポット溶接が良好に行われていることが確認した。また、溶接時の抵抗値Aが平衡状態となる前のものについては、凸状の溶接痕15が適切に形成されておらず、ナゲット13の形成が不十分な場合があることも確認した。このような試験から、溶接時の抵抗値Aが平衡状態となった場合には、マーク電極10の窪み12に対応した所定の凸状の溶接痕15が形成されたと判断できる。なお、平衡状態が続いた後、さらに通電を続けると、通電し過ぎにより塵が発生する場合がある。   The inventors of the present invention have properly formed the convex welding mark 15 for the resistance value A at the time of welding in an equilibrium state, formed a good nugget 13, and performed spot welding well. I confirmed that. Moreover, about the thing before resistance value A at the time of welding will be in an equilibrium state, it has also confirmed that the convex-shaped welding trace 15 was not formed appropriately and the formation of the nugget 13 might be inadequate. From such a test, when the resistance value A during welding is in an equilibrium state, it can be determined that a predetermined convex welding mark 15 corresponding to the depression 12 of the mark electrode 10 has been formed. If energization is continued after the equilibrium state continues, dust may be generated due to excessive energization.

本発明者らは、この発見に基づき、図7に示すように、スポット溶接を行う一対の溶接電極10、20のうち、少なくとも一方の溶接電極10に、マーク電極10を用いてスポット溶接を行い、溶接時の抵抗値Aが平衡状態になったときに、当該スポット溶接の終了判定をするスポット溶接方法、および、同様に溶接時の抵抗値Aが平衡状態になったときに、当該スポット溶接部にナゲットが適正に形成されたことを判定するナゲットの形成判定方法を考えつくに至った。   Based on this discovery, the inventors perform spot welding using at least one of the pair of welding electrodes 10 and 20 that perform spot welding using the mark electrode 10 as shown in FIG. The spot welding method for determining the end of the spot welding when the resistance value A during welding is in an equilibrium state, and the spot welding when the resistance value A during welding is also in an equilibrium state. The present inventors have come up with a nugget formation determination method for determining that a nugget has been properly formed in a part.

このスポット溶接方法によれば、図6(a)に示すように、スポット溶接を行う一対の溶接電極のうち、少なくとも一方の溶接電極に、マーク電極10を用いてスポット溶接を行い、溶接時の抵抗値Aが平衡状態になったときに当該スポット溶接の終了判定をするので、マーク電極10の窪み12に対応した部位に、適切に、所定の凸状の溶接痕15が形成された状態でスポット溶接の終了を判定することができる。このように、このスポット溶接方法によれば、溶接時の抵抗値Aを観測することにより、スポット溶接の終了判定をするので、例えば、個体差のある鋼板に対しても適切なスポット溶接を行うことができる。また、溶接時の抵抗値Aが平衡状態になったときに当該スポット溶接の終了判定をするので、通電し過ぎによる塵の発生も防止できる。   According to this spot welding method, as shown in FIG. 6A, spot welding is performed using at least one welding electrode among the pair of welding electrodes for spot welding using the mark electrode 10, and at the time of welding. Since the end of the spot welding is determined when the resistance value A is in an equilibrium state, a predetermined convex welding mark 15 is appropriately formed in a portion corresponding to the depression 12 of the mark electrode 10. The end of spot welding can be determined. Thus, according to this spot welding method, since the end determination of spot welding is determined by observing the resistance value A at the time of welding, for example, appropriate spot welding is performed even on steel plates having individual differences. be able to. In addition, since the end of the spot welding is determined when the resistance value A during welding reaches an equilibrium state, generation of dust due to excessive energization can also be prevented.

溶接時の抵抗値Aが平衡状態になったときとは、換言すれば、溶接時の抵抗値の変化が一定時間ほとんど生じない状態をいうが、溶接時の抵抗値Aは、例えば、スポット溶接を行う一対の溶接電極10、20間の抵抗値で判断するとよい。抵抗値Aが平衡状態になったと判断できる抵抗値Aは、厳密に一定の値で維持されることを意味するのではない。抵抗値Aが平衡状態になったと判断できる抵抗値Aは、一定の小さい変化幅で抵抗値Aが維持されることで判断するとよい。この際、抵抗値Aが平衡状態になったと判断できる抵抗値Aの変化の幅は、溶接する鋼板の種類や厚さによって異なる。このため、抵抗値Aがどのような変化をしたときに、抵抗値Aが平衡状態になったと判断するかについては、溶接を行う鋼板の種類や厚さによって、適切な基準を設ける必要がある。また、通電し過ぎによる塵の発生を防止するため、溶接時の抵抗値Aの変化がほとんど生じない状態が、どの程度の時間維持されたときに、溶接時の抵抗値Aが平衡状態になったと判断するかについても、溶接する鋼板の種類や厚さによって、適切な基準を設ける必要がある。これらは、予め試験を行って、抵抗値Aが平衡状態になったと判断するのに適切な基準を定めるとよい。   When the resistance value A at the time of welding is in an equilibrium state, in other words, the resistance value A at the time of welding hardly changes for a certain time, but the resistance value A at the time of welding is, for example, spot welding. It is good to judge with the resistance value between a pair of welding electrodes 10 and 20 which perform this. The resistance value A that can be determined that the resistance value A is in an equilibrium state does not mean that the resistance value A is maintained at a strictly constant value. The resistance value A that can be determined that the resistance value A is in an equilibrium state may be determined by maintaining the resistance value A with a constant small change width. At this time, the width of the change in the resistance value A that can be determined that the resistance value A is in an equilibrium state varies depending on the type and thickness of the steel plate to be welded. For this reason, when the resistance value A changes, it is necessary to set an appropriate standard depending on the type and thickness of the steel sheet to be welded. . In addition, in order to prevent generation of dust due to excessive energization, the resistance value A during welding is in an equilibrium state when the state in which the resistance value A hardly changes during welding is maintained for how long. It is necessary to set an appropriate standard depending on the type and thickness of the steel plate to be welded. These may be tested in advance to determine an appropriate standard for determining that the resistance value A has reached an equilibrium state.

また、斯かるスポット溶接方法を具現化するスポット溶接装置30の一実施形態は、図6(a)に示すように、スポット溶接を行う一対の溶接電極10、20のうち、少なくとも一方の溶接電極10に、マーク電極10を用い、溶接時の抵抗値Aを検出する抵抗値検出部31と、抵抗値検出部31で検出された溶接時の抵抗値Aが平衡状態になったことに基づいて当該スポット溶接の終了を判定する溶接制御装置32とを備えた構成とすることができる。斯かる抵抗値検出部31には、例えば、タイマーコンタクタなど、スポット溶接を行う一対の溶接電極10、20間の抵抗値を観測できる装置を用いるとよい。また、溶接制御装置32には、例えば、抵抗値検出部31で検出された溶接時の抵抗値Aが平衡状態になったことを条件に、スポット溶接の終了を判定する判定部を備えた構成とすることができる。さらに、斯かるスポット溶接の終了判定に基づいて、スポット溶接の終了処理を行う構成としては、スポット溶接を行う一対の溶接電極10、20に通電する通電装置33に対し、制御信号を送り、通電装置33による通電を制御する構成を付加した制御装置を用いるとよい。   In addition, as shown in FIG. 6A, an embodiment of a spot welding apparatus 30 that embodies such a spot welding method includes at least one welding electrode among a pair of welding electrodes 10 and 20 that perform spot welding. 10 based on the resistance value detection unit 31 that detects the resistance value A at the time of welding using the mark electrode 10 and the resistance value A at the time of welding detected by the resistance value detection unit 31 in an equilibrium state. It can be set as the structure provided with the welding control apparatus 32 which determines the completion | finish of the said spot welding. For the resistance value detection unit 31, for example, a device that can observe the resistance value between the pair of welding electrodes 10 and 20 that perform spot welding, such as a timer contactor, may be used. In addition, the welding control device 32 includes, for example, a determination unit that determines the end of spot welding on the condition that the resistance value A during welding detected by the resistance value detection unit 31 is in an equilibrium state. It can be. Furthermore, as a configuration for performing spot welding end processing based on such spot welding end determination, a control signal is sent to the energizing device 33 that energizes the pair of welding electrodes 10 and 20 that perform spot welding. A control device to which a configuration for controlling energization by the device 33 is added may be used.

このスポット溶接装置30によれば、抵抗値検出部31が溶接時の抵抗値Aを検出し、溶接制御装置32が、抵抗値検出部31で検出された溶接時の抵抗値Aが平衡状態になったことに基づいて、当該スポット溶接を終了させる。このため、例えば、通電が自動的に終了するように構成することができ、通電時間の設定を不要にすることも可能である。すなわち、このスポット溶接装置30によれば、通電時間の設定は行わず、予め通電パターン(通電時間中の経時的な電流値の変化)を設定しておくことで、その通電中において、当該スポット溶接の終了判定がなされたときに、自動的に当該スポット溶接を終了させる処理が行うようにしても、適切なスポット溶接を行せることができる。これにより、スポット溶接の溶接条件の設定作業にかかる労力を低減させることができる。また、スポット溶接を行う鋼板の個体差に合わせて、抵抗値検出部31で検出された溶接時の抵抗値Aが平衡状態になったことに基づいて当該スポット溶接を終了させるので、例えば、鋼板14が個体差のある場合でも適切なスポット溶接を行うことができ、スポット溶接に一定の品質を保持することが容易になる。   According to the spot welding device 30, the resistance value detection unit 31 detects the resistance value A during welding, and the welding control device 32 causes the resistance value A during welding detected by the resistance value detection unit 31 to be in an equilibrium state. Based on this, the spot welding is terminated. For this reason, for example, it can comprise so that electricity supply may be complete | finished automatically and it is also possible to make the setting of electricity supply time unnecessary. That is, according to the spot welding apparatus 30, the energization time is not set, and the spot is changed during the energization by setting an energization pattern (change in current value with time during the energization time) in advance. Appropriate spot welding can be performed even if a process of automatically ending the spot welding is performed when the end of welding is determined. Thereby, the labor concerning the setting operation | work of the welding conditions of spot welding can be reduced. Further, the spot welding is terminated based on the fact that the resistance value A at the time of welding detected by the resistance value detection unit 31 is in an equilibrium state in accordance with individual differences of the steel plates to be spot welded. Even when 14 has individual differences, appropriate spot welding can be performed, and it becomes easy to maintain a certain quality in spot welding.

また、溶接時の抵抗値Aが平衡状態になったときは、マーク電極10の窪み12に対応した部位に、適切に、所定の凸状の溶接痕15が形成された状態であるから、当該スポット溶接部にナゲットが適正に形成されたと判定することができる。このため、ナゲットの形成判定方法として、溶接時の抵抗値Aが平衡状態になったことに基づいて、当該スポット溶接部にナゲットが適正に形成されたことを判定するように構成してもよい。斯かるナゲットの形成判定方法によれば、スポット溶接中にナゲットが適正に形成されたことが判定できるようになる。   Further, when the resistance value A at the time of welding is in an equilibrium state, a predetermined convex welding mark 15 is appropriately formed in a portion corresponding to the depression 12 of the mark electrode 10. It can be determined that the nugget is properly formed in the spot weld. For this reason, as a nugget formation determination method, it may be configured to determine that the nugget is properly formed in the spot welded portion based on the fact that the resistance value A during welding has reached an equilibrium state. . According to such a nugget formation determination method, it can be determined that the nugget is properly formed during spot welding.

以上、本発明の一実施形態に係るスポット溶接方法およびスポット溶接装置を説明したが、本発明に係るスポット溶接方法およびスポット溶接装置は上記の実施形態に限定されない。   Although the spot welding method and the spot welding apparatus according to one embodiment of the present invention have been described above, the spot welding method and the spot welding apparatus according to the present invention are not limited to the above embodiment.

例えば、本発明に係るスポット溶接方法およびスポット溶接装置は、ダイレクトスポット溶接、インダイレクトスポット溶接、シリーズスポット溶接など、種々のスポット溶接に適用することができる。   For example, the spot welding method and spot welding apparatus according to the present invention can be applied to various spot weldings such as direct spot welding, indirect spot welding, and series spot welding.

電極面に窪みを形成した電極を用いてスポット溶接を行う基礎実験を示す概略図。Schematic which shows the basic experiment which performs spot welding using the electrode which formed the hollow in the electrode surface. 凸状の溶接痕の縦断面図。The longitudinal cross-sectional view of a convex welding trace. スポット溶接により形成される凸部の高さとナゲット径との相関関係の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of the correlation with the height of the convex part formed by spot welding, and a nugget diameter. スポット溶接により形成される凸部の高さと引張せん断強度(TSS)との相関関係の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of the correlation of the height of the convex part formed by spot welding, and tensile shear strength (TSS). ナゲット径と引張せん断強度(TSS)との相関関係の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of correlation with a nugget diameter and tensile shear strength (TSS). (a)はスポット溶接において凸状の溶接痕が形成された状態を示す図、(b)はスポット溶接において凸状の溶接痕が形成されていく過程を示す図。(A) is a figure which shows the state in which the convex welding trace was formed in spot welding, (b) is a figure which shows the process in which a convex welding trace is formed in spot welding. (a)は本発明の一実施形態に係るスポット溶接の良否判定用電極を示す部分縦断面図。(b)は本発明の一実施形態に係るスポット溶接の良否判定用電極の底面図。(A) is a fragmentary longitudinal cross-section which shows the electrode for quality determination of the spot welding which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. (B) is a bottom view of the electrode for quality determination of spot welding according to an embodiment of the present invention. 溶接時の抵抗値を示す図。The figure which shows the resistance value at the time of welding. 溶接時の抵抗値を示す図。The figure which shows the resistance value at the time of welding.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

10 マーク電極(溶接電極)
11 電極面
12 窪み
13 ナゲット
14 鋼板(金属体)
15 溶接痕
16 最深部
17 最深部の平坦面(マーカー)
18 溶接痕の平坦面(マーク)
20 スポット溶接用電極(溶接電極)
30 スポット溶接装置
31 抵抗値検出部
32 溶接制御装置
33 通電装置
10 Mark electrode (welding electrode)
11 Electrode surface 12 Dimple 13 Nugget 14 Steel plate (metal body)
15 welding mark 16 deepest part 17 deepest part flat surface (marker)
18 Flat surface (mark) of weld mark
20 Electrodes for spot welding (welding electrodes)
30 Spot Welding Device 31 Resistance Value Detection Unit 32 Welding Control Device 33 Energizing Device

Claims (3)

スポット溶接を行う一対の溶接電極のうち、少なくとも一方の溶接電極に、電極面が略凸曲面で、かつ、電極面中心部に、スポット溶接により良好にナゲットが形成された場合に、金属体表面に形成される溶接痕が最深部に到達する所定深さに設定した窪みを形成した溶接電極を用いてスポット溶接を行い、溶接時の抵抗値が平衡状態になったことに基づいて、当該スポット溶接部にナゲットが適正に形成されたことを判定するナゲットの形成判定方法。   The surface of the metal body when at least one of the pair of welding electrodes for spot welding has a substantially convex curved electrode surface and a good nugget is formed by spot welding at the center of the electrode surface. Spot welding is performed using a welding electrode formed with a depression set at a predetermined depth at which the welding mark formed at the deepest part reaches the deepest part, and the resistance value during welding is in an equilibrium state. A nugget formation determination method for determining that a nugget is properly formed in a weld. スポット溶接を行う一対の溶接電極のうち、少なくとも一方の溶接電極に、電極面が略凸曲面で、かつ、電極面中心部に、スポット溶接により良好にナゲットが形成された場合に、金属体表面に形成される溶接痕が最深部に到達する所定深さに設定した窪みを形成した溶接電極を用いてスポット溶接を行い、溶接時の抵抗値が平衡状態になったことに基づいて、当該スポット溶接の終了判定をするスポット溶接方法。   The surface of the metal body when at least one of the pair of welding electrodes for spot welding has a substantially convex curved electrode surface and a good nugget is formed by spot welding at the center of the electrode surface. Spot welding is performed using a welding electrode formed with a depression set at a predetermined depth at which the welding mark formed at the deepest part reaches the deepest part, and the resistance value during welding is in an equilibrium state. Spot welding method for determining the end of welding. スポット溶接を行う一対の溶接電極のうち、少なくとも一方の溶接電極に、電極面が略凸曲面で、かつ、電極面中心部に、スポット溶接により良好にナゲットが形成された場合に、金属体表面に形成される溶接痕が最深部に到達する所定深さに設定した窪みを形成した溶接電極を用いてスポット溶接を行うスポット溶接装置であって、
溶接時の抵抗値を検出する抵抗値検出部と、前記抵抗値検出部で検出された溶接時の抵抗値が平衡状態になったことに基づいて、当該スポット溶接の終了を判定する溶接制御装置とを備えたスポット溶接装置。
The surface of the metal body when at least one of the pair of welding electrodes for spot welding has a substantially convex curved electrode surface and a good nugget is formed by spot welding at the center of the electrode surface. A spot welding apparatus that performs spot welding using a welding electrode formed with a recess set at a predetermined depth at which a welding mark formed at the deepest part reaches,
A resistance value detection unit that detects a resistance value during welding, and a welding control device that determines the end of the spot welding based on the fact that the resistance value during welding detected by the resistance value detection unit is in an equilibrium state And spot welding equipment.
JP2006077391A 2005-11-09 2006-03-20 Nugget formation determination method, spot welding method and spot welding apparatus Active JP4978947B2 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006077391A JP4978947B2 (en) 2006-03-20 2006-03-20 Nugget formation determination method, spot welding method and spot welding apparatus
MYPI20080141A MY164289A (en) 2005-11-09 2006-11-01 Spot welding method, method for judging shape of nugget, spot welding machine, and spot welding electrode
PCT/JP2006/321841 WO2007055130A1 (en) 2005-11-09 2006-11-01 Spot welding method, method for judging shape of nugget, spot welding machine, and spot welding electrode
US11/920,634 US20090218323A1 (en) 2005-11-09 2006-11-01 Spot welding method, method for judging shape of nugget, spot welding machine and spot welding electrode

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006077391A JP4978947B2 (en) 2006-03-20 2006-03-20 Nugget formation determination method, spot welding method and spot welding apparatus

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2007253166A true JP2007253166A (en) 2007-10-04
JP4978947B2 JP4978947B2 (en) 2012-07-18

Family

ID=38627921

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2006077391A Active JP4978947B2 (en) 2005-11-09 2006-03-20 Nugget formation determination method, spot welding method and spot welding apparatus

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4978947B2 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101273380B1 (en) * 2012-09-28 2013-06-11 한국생산기술연구원 Electrode for resistance spot welding and method for resistance spot welding using the same
KR20160045897A (en) 2013-12-06 2016-04-27 신닛테츠스미킨 카부시키카이샤 Electrode for spot welding, and welding device and welding method employing same
CN113984837A (en) * 2021-10-27 2022-01-28 重庆理工大学 Resistance spot welding spot quality detection method based on welding spot characteristic information fusion

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0446684A (en) * 1990-06-13 1992-02-17 Toyota Motor Corp Spot resistance welding electrode
JPH0596382A (en) * 1991-06-27 1993-04-20 Honda Motor Co Ltd Manufacture of resistance welding electrode
JPH05305455A (en) * 1992-06-10 1993-11-19 Na Detsukusu:Kk Welding controller

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0446684A (en) * 1990-06-13 1992-02-17 Toyota Motor Corp Spot resistance welding electrode
JPH0596382A (en) * 1991-06-27 1993-04-20 Honda Motor Co Ltd Manufacture of resistance welding electrode
JPH05305455A (en) * 1992-06-10 1993-11-19 Na Detsukusu:Kk Welding controller

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101273380B1 (en) * 2012-09-28 2013-06-11 한국생산기술연구원 Electrode for resistance spot welding and method for resistance spot welding using the same
KR20160045897A (en) 2013-12-06 2016-04-27 신닛테츠스미킨 카부시키카이샤 Electrode for spot welding, and welding device and welding method employing same
US10668557B2 (en) 2013-12-06 2020-06-02 Nippon Steel Corporation Spot welding electrode and welding apparatus and welding method using same
CN113984837A (en) * 2021-10-27 2022-01-28 重庆理工大学 Resistance spot welding spot quality detection method based on welding spot characteristic information fusion
CN113984837B (en) * 2021-10-27 2024-02-23 重庆理工大学 Welding spot quality detection method for resistance spot welding based on welding spot characteristic information fusion

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4978947B2 (en) 2012-07-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP4919317B2 (en) Spot welding method
WO2007055130A1 (en) Spot welding method, method for judging shape of nugget, spot welding machine, and spot welding electrode
Summerville et al. Nugget diameter in resistance spot welding: a comparison between a dynamic resistance based approach and ultrasound C-scan
JP5622182B2 (en) Real-time welding quality judgment device and judgment method
JPH10314956A (en) Method and device for evaluating quality of resistance welded zone
KR101447955B1 (en) Method or evaluating welding quality of spot welding and record media recorded program for implement thereof
JP4978947B2 (en) Nugget formation determination method, spot welding method and spot welding apparatus
JP5801169B2 (en) One-side spot welding equipment
Thekkuden et al. Assessment of weld quality using control chart and frequency domain analysis
US20080237303A1 (en) Decision method for dressing of welding electrodes
JP6572515B2 (en) Ultrasonic bonding apparatus and control apparatus therefor
CN101927398A (en) Spot welding method
CN102343475A (en) Method for monitoring and maintaining a resistance welding apparatus
JP5504360B2 (en) Welding failure detection method and welding failure detection device
JP4380447B2 (en) Spot welding evaluation method and spot welding evaluation system
JP2011240368A (en) Method and system for determining weld quality
KR20190034734A (en) Apparatus of estimating welding quality
JP2018161659A (en) Strength test method for spot weld zone
JP5558771B2 (en) Axle manufacturing method and axle manufacturing system
JP3927190B2 (en) Ultrasonic welding equipment
Al-Sahib et al. Monitoring and quality control of stud welding
JP2015134359A (en) Welding quality inspection method, and welding quality inspection device
Wylie et al. NDE system for the quality control of spot welding in the automotive industry
JP7152895B2 (en) Evaluation method of joint point of spot welding
JP2010269337A (en) Method for discriminating quality of projection welding

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20081112

RD04 Notification of resignation of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7424

Effective date: 20091111

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20110817

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20111013

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20120411

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20120411

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20150427

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4978947

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250