JP2006333710A - Automatic system for judging quality of cell - Google Patents

Automatic system for judging quality of cell Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2006333710A
JP2006333710A JP2005158499A JP2005158499A JP2006333710A JP 2006333710 A JP2006333710 A JP 2006333710A JP 2005158499 A JP2005158499 A JP 2005158499A JP 2005158499 A JP2005158499 A JP 2005158499A JP 2006333710 A JP2006333710 A JP 2006333710A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
cell
cells
analysis
quality
quality determination
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2005158499A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2006333710A5 (en
JP4852890B2 (en
Inventor
Nobuhiko Yonetani
信彦 米谷
Taijiro Kiyota
泰次郎 清田
Takayuki Uozumi
孝之 魚住
Hirobumi Shiono
博文 塩野
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nikon Corp
Original Assignee
Nikon Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nikon Corp filed Critical Nikon Corp
Priority to JP2005158499A priority Critical patent/JP4852890B2/en
Publication of JP2006333710A publication Critical patent/JP2006333710A/en
Publication of JP2006333710A5 publication Critical patent/JP2006333710A5/ja
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4852890B2 publication Critical patent/JP4852890B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Investigating Or Analysing Biological Materials (AREA)
  • Apparatus Associated With Microorganisms And Enzymes (AREA)
  • Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an automatic system for judging the quality of a cell designed to achieve the automation of judgment about the quality of the cell. <P>SOLUTION: An automatic apparatus 1 for culturing having the automatic system for judging the quality is provided with an analytical program 12. Furthermore, the analytical program 12 is designed to drive a program 13 for extracting a characteristic quantity that is an image processing program for extracting the characteristic (characteristic quantity) from a picked up image of the cell and extract the characteristic of the cell. The analytical program 12 is designed to drive a discrimination program 15 for judging the quality of the cell from the extracted characteristic or a combination of the plurality of characteristics and judge the quality of the cell. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2007,JPO&INPIT

Description

本発明は、細胞の良否を自動的に判定するシステムに関するものである。   The present invention relates to a system for automatically determining the quality of a cell.

従来の細胞培養装置は、細胞の画像から培養状態の良否を判断する自動画像解析機能を持っていない。したがって、実験者が自分自身で培養装置から培養容器を取出し、別に設置された顕微鏡を利用して細胞の発育状態を観察する必要があった。   The conventional cell culture apparatus does not have an automatic image analysis function for judging the quality of the culture state from the cell image. Therefore, it was necessary for the experimenter to take out the culture vessel from the culture apparatus by himself and observe the growth state of the cells using a separately installed microscope.

さらに、細胞を培養する際には、世代を経るに従い、培養細胞の特性が変化して行く場合(亜種が発生する場合)があり、亜種を増殖させてしまうということが注意点として知られている。これを防止するために細胞培養実験者は、自らの使用している細胞がその細胞の基本となる特性を失っていないか、形状を保っているかなどを、過去の文献で調べたり、細胞の購入先(細胞バンクなど)に問い合わせ、細胞の変化に注意しなければならなかった。また、それを防ぐために細胞バンクなどから入手した細胞をすぐに増殖しそれらを早い段階で冷凍保存し、数ヶ月ごとに新しい細胞を溶解・培養し、比較確認する必要があった。   In addition, when cultivating cells, it is known that the characteristics of the cultured cells may change as the generation progresses (when subspecies are generated), causing the subspecies to proliferate. It has been. In order to prevent this, cell culture experimenters have examined past cells to determine whether the cells they are using have lost their basic characteristics or have maintained their shape. I had to contact the supplier (cell bank, etc.) and pay attention to cell changes. In addition, in order to prevent this, it was necessary to immediately proliferate cells obtained from cell banks and the like, store them in a frozen state at an early stage, lyse and culture new cells every few months, and compare and confirm them.

近年、バイオテクノロジーの研究分野が多岐にわたるため、専門分野の教育に多くの時間が取られ、細胞培養に関する教育がおざなりにされており、培養細胞の良否を的確に判断できない研究者が増加している。又、大量の細胞や、多種類の細胞を培養している場合、個々の細胞の良否判定を実験者が実施するのに、多くの時間がさかれてしまう。また、判断基準が不明確であるため、実験者ごとに、培養細胞の品質にばらつきが発生し、培養細胞を用いた実験の再現性が問題となっている。   In recent years, biotechnology research fields have been diversified, so a lot of time has been spent in education in specialized fields, and there has been a lot of research on cell culture, and the number of researchers who cannot accurately judge the quality of cultured cells has increased. Yes. In addition, when a large number of cells or many types of cells are cultured, it takes a lot of time for the experimenter to determine the quality of each cell. In addition, since the criteria for determination are unclear, the quality of cultured cells varies for each experimenter, and the reproducibility of experiments using cultured cells is a problem.

本発明は、このような事情に鑑みてなされたもので、細胞の良否判定を自動化することを実現可能な細胞の自動良否判定システムを提供することを課題とする。   This invention is made | formed in view of such a situation, and makes it a subject to provide the automatic quality determination system of the cell which can implement | achieve automation of the quality determination of a cell.

前記課題を解決するための第1の手段は、撮像された細胞の画像の特徴を抽出する複数の特徴抽出手段と、
抽出された特徴又は、複数の特徴の組合せから、前記細胞の良否を判定する複数の良否判定手段と、
前記細胞の種類に応じて使用する、前記特徴抽出手段及び前記良否判定手段の組み合わせを解析レシピとして記憶する解析レシピ記憶手段と、
前記解析レシピ記憶手段から前記細胞の種類に対応する前記解析レシピを選択し、その解析レシピに記憶された前記特徴抽出手段を駆動して、細胞の特徴を抽出させ、続いて、その解析レシピに記憶された良否判定手段を駆動して、細胞の良否を判断させる解析手段
とを有することを特徴とする細胞の自動良否判定システムである。
The first means for solving the above-mentioned problem is a plurality of feature extraction means for extracting the features of the image of the captured cell,
A plurality of quality determination means for determining quality of the cell from the extracted features or a combination of a plurality of features;
An analysis recipe storage means for storing a combination of the feature extraction means and the pass / fail judgment means as an analysis recipe to be used according to the type of the cell;
The analysis recipe corresponding to the cell type is selected from the analysis recipe storage means, the feature extraction means stored in the analysis recipe is driven to extract the characteristics of the cell, and then the analysis recipe An automatic quality determination system for cells, comprising analysis means for driving the stored quality determination means to determine the quality of the cells.

前記課題を解決するための第2の手段は、撮像された細胞の画像の特徴を抽出する特徴抽出手段と、
抽出された特徴又は、複数の特徴の組合せから、前記細胞の良否を判定する複数の良否判定手段と、
前記細胞の種類に応じて、特徴抽出手段が抽出すべき特徴及び使用すべき前記良否判定手段の組み合わせを解析レシピとして記憶する解析レシピ記憶手段と、
前記解析レシピ記憶手段から前記細胞の種類に対応する前記解析レシピを選択し、その解析レシピに記憶された特徴抽出手段が抽出すべき特徴を前記特徴抽出手段に渡して、細胞の特徴を抽出させ、続いて、その解析レシピに記憶された良否判定手段を駆動して、細胞の良否を判断させる解析手段
とを有することを特徴とする細胞の自動良否判定システムである。
The second means for solving the above-mentioned problem is a feature extraction means for extracting the characteristics of the image of the imaged cell,
A plurality of quality determination means for determining quality of the cell from the extracted features or a combination of a plurality of features;
According to the type of the cell, an analysis recipe storage unit that stores a combination of the feature to be extracted by the feature extraction unit and the quality determination unit to be used as an analysis recipe;
The analysis recipe corresponding to the cell type is selected from the analysis recipe storage means, and the feature extraction means stored in the analysis recipe is passed to the feature extraction means to extract the features of the cells. Subsequently, an automatic quality determination system for cells, comprising: analysis means for driving the quality determination means stored in the analysis recipe to determine the quality of the cells.

前記課題を解決するための第3の手段は、前記第1の手段又は第2の手段であって、前記特徴が、生育状態、細胞の数、細胞のサイズ、細胞の外形の特徴、細胞間の接着性、隣接間結合性、核の数、核の形状、核の大きさ、核小体の数、核小体の大きさ、核小体の濃度、細胞質顆粒の量、細胞質顆粒の輝度、空胞の大きさ、空胞の数、細胞質突起の形状、占有面積、密集状況のうちいずれかであることを特徴とするものである。   A third means for solving the above-mentioned problem is the first means or the second means, wherein the characteristics are a growth state, the number of cells, a cell size, a feature of a cell outline, a cell-to-cell Adhesion, Adjacent Adhesion, Nucleus Number, Nucleus Shape, Nucleus Size, Nucleolus Number, Nucleolus Size, Nucleolus Concentration, Cytoplasmic Granule Amount, Cytoplasmic Granule Luminance The size of the vacuole, the number of vacuoles, the shape of the cytoplasm, the occupied area, and the crowded state.

本発明によれば、細胞の良否判定を自動化することを実現可能な細胞の自動良否判定システムを提供することができる。   ADVANTAGE OF THE INVENTION According to this invention, the automatic quality determination system of the cell which can implement | achieve automation of the quality determination of a cell can be provided.

以下、本発明の実施の形態である細胞の自動良否判定システムを、図を用いて説明する。図1は、本発明の実施の形態の1例である細胞の自動良否判定システムの概要を示す図である。なお、以下の説明で「特徴量」という語を用いる。多くの場合特徴は量で表されるのでこのようにするが、これらの「特徴量」は、量で表さないもの(例えば有無のようなもの)を含む概念である。   Hereinafter, an automatic quality determination system for cells according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an overview of an automatic quality determination system for cells, which is an example of an embodiment of the present invention. In the following description, the term “feature amount” is used. In many cases, the feature is represented by a quantity, and thus, this is done. However, these “feature quantities” are concepts including those not represented by a quantity (for example, presence or absence).

自動良否判定システムを有する自動培養装置1は、解析プログラム12を有する。解析プログラム12は、撮像された細胞の画像から、その特徴(特徴量)を抽出するための画像処理プログラムである特徴量抽出プログラム13を駆動して、細胞の特徴を抽出する。続いて、抽出された特徴又は、複数の特徴の組合せから細胞の良否を判定する識別プログラム15を駆動して、細胞の良否を判定する。   An automatic culture apparatus 1 having an automatic quality determination system has an analysis program 12. The analysis program 12 drives a feature amount extraction program 13 which is an image processing program for extracting the feature (feature amount) from the captured cell image to extract the feature of the cell. Subsequently, the identification program 15 that determines the quality of the cell from the extracted feature or a combination of a plurality of features is driven to determine the quality of the cell.

撮像された細胞の画像から抽出すべき特徴量は、細胞の種類に応じて、生育状態(単独、コロニー形成、シート状)、細胞の数、細胞のサイズ、細胞の外形の特徴(球形、泡立ち形状、ぎざぎざ形状),細胞間の接着性、隣接間結合性,
核の数、核の形状,核の大きさ、核小体の数、核小体の大きさ、核小体の濃度、細胞質顆粒の量、細胞質顆粒の輝度,空胞の大きさ、空胞の数、細胞質突起の形状(数、長さ、太さ)、占有面積、密集状況等がある。
The amount of features to be extracted from the captured cell image depends on the cell type, growth state (single, colony formation, sheet-like), number of cells, cell size, and features of cell outline (spherical, foaming). Shape, jagged shape), adhesion between cells, connectivity between adjacent areas,
Number of nuclei, shape of nuclei, size of nuclei, number of nucleolus, size of nucleolus, concentration of nucleolus, amount of cytoplasmic granules, brightness of cytoplasmic granules, size of vacuoles, vacuoles Number, length of cytoplasm projections (number, length, thickness), occupied area, crowded state, etc.

これらの特徴は、既存の画像処理プログラムを適宜使用することにより抽出される。例えば、核の大きさは、ラプラシアンによる画像のエッジ抽出や、ヒストグラム特徴量によるテクスチャ解析で抽出できる。又、核の数は、例えば、フーリエ変換を実施すると、核の内外で高周波成分のスペクトル振幅に違いが生じるので、これにより核の領域を抽出し、核の数を決定することができる。   These features are extracted by appropriately using existing image processing programs. For example, the size of the nucleus can be extracted by image edge extraction by Laplacian or texture analysis by histogram feature amount. For example, if the Fourier transform is performed on the number of nuclei, a difference occurs in the spectrum amplitude of the high-frequency component inside and outside the nuclei. Thus, the number of nuclei can be determined by extracting the region of the nuclei.

また、細胞質突起は、位相差光学系で観察すると、細胞質突起の部分が黒く浮き上がって観察される。従って、バックグラウンドの階調付近で2値化した後に、ごま塩ノイズの除去を実施すると、細胞質突起の部分のみを抽出することができる。その直線部分の長さの平均値を求めると、「細胞質突起の平均長」が計測できる。   In addition, when the cytoplasmic projection is observed with a phase difference optical system, the cytoplasmic projection portion is observed to be blackened. Therefore, if binarization is performed in the vicinity of the background gradation and then the sesame salt noise is removed, only the cytoplasmic protrusions can be extracted. When the average value of the lengths of the straight line portions is obtained, the “average length of cytoplasmic projections” can be measured.

また、ブライトコントラストの位相差光学系で観察すると、細胞とバックグラウンドの階調を分けることが可能になる。したがって、予め計測しておいたバックグラウンドの閾値で2値化した後に、ごま塩ノイズの除去を実施すると、細胞の輪郭を抽出できる。連結画像について、「複雑度」を計算し、それがある閾値よりも大きいものを、死細胞として除去する。また、基準となる大きさより、明らかに大きい連結画像(例えば3倍〜4倍)は、複数の細胞の塊とみなして、画像骨格を抽出し、そこを起点に画像を分割し、それを個々の細胞画像とみなす。最後に、連結画像の面積を求めれば、細胞サイズを求めることができる。   When observed with a bright contrast phase difference optical system, it is possible to separate the gradation of cells and background. Therefore, the cell outline can be extracted by removing the sesame salt noise after binarization with the background threshold value measured in advance. For the connected images, “complexity” is calculated, and those larger than a certain threshold are removed as dead cells. In addition, connected images that are clearly larger than the standard size (for example, 3 to 4 times) are regarded as a mass of multiple cells, and an image skeleton is extracted. Cell image. Finally, if the area of the connected image is obtained, the cell size can be obtained.

この実施の形態においては、これらの特徴ごとに、特徴量抽出プログラム13が用意されており、どの特徴量抽出プログラム13を使用するかが、レシピデータベース11内に格納された解析レシピ14に記憶されている。解析レシピ14は、細胞ごとに作成されている。すなわち、全ての細胞について、これらの全ての特徴を抽出する必要はなく、細胞の種類に応じて、良否判定に必要な特徴だけを抽出すればよい。解析レシピ14には、良否判定に必要な特徴量を抽出するための特徴量抽出プログラム13のみが記憶されている。   In this embodiment, a feature quantity extraction program 13 is prepared for each of these features, and which feature quantity extraction program 13 is used is stored in the analysis recipe 14 stored in the recipe database 11. ing. The analysis recipe 14 is created for each cell. That is, it is not necessary to extract all these features for all the cells, and only the features necessary for the pass / fail judgment need be extracted according to the cell type. The analysis recipe 14 stores only a feature quantity extraction program 13 for extracting feature quantities necessary for quality determination.

このようにすると、新しい細胞が判定の対象として追加されたり、良否判定の基準が新しくなった場合に、解析レシピ14を書き換えるだけで、抽出される特徴量を決定したり、更新したりすることができる。又、新しい特徴を抽出する必要が生じた場合には、特徴量抽出プログラム13を追加することにより対応することができる。   In this way, when a new cell is added as a determination target or when a criterion for pass / fail determination becomes new, the extracted feature amount is determined or updated only by rewriting the analysis recipe 14. Can do. Further, when it becomes necessary to extract a new feature, it can be dealt with by adding a feature amount extraction program 13.

このようにして、良否判定に必要な特徴(単独でよいこともあるが、多くの場合は複数の特徴の組合せである)が抽出されると、解析プログラム12は、解析レシピ14を参照して、そこに記憶されている識別プログラム15を起動する。識別プログラム15は、抽出された特徴又は、複数の特徴の組合せから、細胞の良否を判定するものであるが、通常、判定すべき細胞に対応して一つ定まるようになっている。但し、複数種の細胞に対して共通の識別プログラム15が使用できる場合も考えられる。この場合は、細胞ごとに識別プログラム15を作る必要が無く、それぞれの細胞に対する解析レシピ14に、共通の識別プログラム15を使用することが記憶されるだけである。   When the features necessary for the pass / fail judgment are extracted in this way (there may be a single feature, but in many cases, a combination of a plurality of features), the analysis program 12 refers to the analysis recipe 14. Then, the identification program 15 stored therein is started. The identification program 15 is for determining the quality of a cell from the extracted feature or a combination of a plurality of features, but usually one is determined corresponding to the cell to be determined. However, there may be a case where a common identification program 15 can be used for a plurality of types of cells. In this case, it is not necessary to create the identification program 15 for each cell, and only the use of the common identification program 15 is stored in the analysis recipe 14 for each cell.

識別プログラム15は、多変量解析などの統計解析手段や、ニューラルネットワークなどパターン認識アルゴリズムを用いて、その細胞の良否を判定する。   The identification program 15 determines the quality of the cell using a statistical analysis means such as multivariate analysis or a pattern recognition algorithm such as a neural network.

図2は、以上説明した細胞の自動良否判定システムの動作をまとめたフローチャートである。まず、ステップS1において細胞の種類を手動入力する。すると、自動良否判定システムは、ステップS2で細胞の種類に対応する解析レシピ14を選択する。そして、ステップS3で、解析レシピ中に記憶されている特徴量を一つ選択する。そして、ステップS4で、それに対応する特徴量抽出プログラム13を選択し、ステップS5で起動する。すると、特徴量抽出プログラム13は、特徴量を抽出して記録する(ステップS6)。ステップS7で、解析レシピ14に記憶されている特徴量を全て検出したかどうかを判断し、未検出のものがあればステップS3に戻る。   FIG. 2 is a flowchart summarizing the operation of the above-described cell automatic quality determination system. First, in step S1, the cell type is manually input. Then, the automatic quality determination system selects the analysis recipe 14 corresponding to the cell type in step S2. In step S3, one feature quantity stored in the analysis recipe is selected. In step S4, the feature quantity extraction program 13 corresponding to the selected program is selected and activated in step S5. Then, the feature quantity extraction program 13 extracts and records the feature quantity (step S6). In step S7, it is determined whether or not all the feature values stored in the analysis recipe 14 have been detected. If there are undetected ones, the process returns to step S3.

解析レシピ14に記憶されている全ての特徴量が抽出された場合、ステップS8に移行して、解析レシピ14に記憶されている識別プログラム15を選択し、ステップS9において起動する。すると、識別プログラム15の作用により、細胞の良否が判定される(ステップS10)。   When all the feature values stored in the analysis recipe 14 are extracted, the process proceeds to step S8, the identification program 15 stored in the analysis recipe 14 is selected, and activated in step S9. Then, the quality of the cell is determined by the action of the identification program 15 (step S10).

なお、以上の実施の形態においては、特徴量抽出プログラム13を、抽出すべき特徴量に対応させて作成していたが、特徴量抽出プログラム13を一つとして、全ての特徴量を抽出可能なようにしておき、その中で解析レシピ14に記憶されていなかった特徴量の抽出の処理をバイパスさせるようにしても、同じ効果が得られる。又、一つの特徴量抽出プログラム13が、複数のまとまった特徴量(例えば細胞の数と大きさ、空胞の数と大きさ)を同時に抽出するようにしてもよい。この場合には、解析レシピ14中に抽出されたもので実際に使用されるものを記憶しておき、特徴量抽出プログラム13にその情報を渡して、使用されない特徴量を良否判定に使用しないようにするか、対応する特徴量抽出プログラム13が、これらの情報を受け取らなかったり、使用しないようにしておくようにすればよい。また、同じ特徴量抽出プログラム13でも、内部での処理方法に複数の方法があり、それらを選択して使用するような場合には、同様に、解析レシピ14中にどの処理を使用するかを記憶しておいて、特徴量抽出プログラム13を起動する際に、その情報を識別プログラム15に渡すようにしてもよい。   In the above embodiment, the feature quantity extraction program 13 is created in correspondence with the feature quantity to be extracted. However, all feature quantities can be extracted by using the feature quantity extraction program 13 as one. In this way, the same effect can be obtained by bypassing the process of extracting feature amounts that are not stored in the analysis recipe 14. Further, one feature amount extraction program 13 may simultaneously extract a plurality of feature amounts (for example, the number and size of cells and the number and size of vacuoles). In this case, what is extracted in the analysis recipe 14 and actually used is stored, and the information is passed to the feature quantity extraction program 13 so that unused feature quantities are not used for quality determination. Alternatively, the corresponding feature amount extraction program 13 may not receive or use such information. Also, even in the same feature quantity extraction program 13, there are a plurality of internal processing methods, and when these are selected and used, similarly, which processing is used in the analysis recipe 14 is determined. The information may be stored and passed to the identification program 15 when the feature amount extraction program 13 is activated.

MK細胞(猿の腎臓の細胞)とPC12(ラット褐色細胞種由来の細胞)の、解析レシピ14に記憶される特徴量抽出用のレシピを表1に、起動する識別プログラム15を表2に示す。MKの場合、特徴量としては核の数、細胞のサイズ、空胞の数となっているが、核数と細胞のサイズは同じ特徴量抽出プログラム13であるプログラムAで抽出されるようになっている。空胞の数は、特徴量抽出プログラム13であるプログラムBで抽出される。そして、識別プログラム15としてはプログラムXが使用される。   Table 1 shows the recipe for extracting feature values stored in the analysis recipe 14 for the MK cells (monkey kidney cells) and PC12 (cells derived from rat brown cell types), and Table 2 shows the identification program 15 to be activated. . In the case of MK, the feature quantity is the number of nuclei, the size of the cell, and the number of vacuoles. However, the number of nuclei and the size of the cell are extracted by the program A which is the same feature quantity extraction program 13. ing. The number of vacuoles is extracted by the program B which is the feature quantity extraction program 13. The program X is used as the identification program 15.

PC12の場合、特徴量としては核の数、細胞のサイズ、細胞質突起の平均長、空胞の数となっているが、細胞質突起の平均長と空胞の数は同じ特徴量抽出プログラム13であるプログラムDで抽出されるようになっている。核の数は、特徴量抽出プログラム13であるプログラムEで抽出される。プログラムCは、検細胞のサイズを抽出する。そして、識別プログラム15としてはプログラムYが使用される。
(表1)
In the case of PC12, the feature quantity is the number of nuclei, the size of the cell, the average length of the cytoplasm, and the number of vacuoles. It is extracted by a certain program D. The number of nuclei is extracted by the program E which is the feature quantity extraction program 13. Program C extracts the size of the test cell. The program Y is used as the identification program 15.
(Table 1)

Figure 2006333710
Figure 2006333710

(表2) (Table 2)

Figure 2006333710
Figure 2006333710

識別プログラムは、抽出された特徴量に基づいて、表3、表4のような基準により、細胞の良否を判断する。
(表3)
The identification program determines the quality of the cell based on the extracted feature values according to the criteria shown in Tables 3 and 4.
(Table 3)

Figure 2006333710
Figure 2006333710

(表4) (Table 4)

Figure 2006333710
Figure 2006333710

本発明の実施の形態の1例である細胞の自動良否判定システムの概要を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the outline | summary of the automatic quality determination system of the cell which is an example of embodiment of this invention. 細胞の自動良否判定システムの動作をまとめたフローチャートである。It is the flowchart which put together the operation | movement of the automatic quality determination system of a cell.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1…自動培養装置、11…レシピデータベース、12…解析プログラム、13…特徴量抽出プログラム、14…解析レシピ、15…識別プログラム
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Automatic culture apparatus, 11 ... Recipe database, 12 ... Analysis program, 13 ... Feature quantity extraction program, 14 ... Analysis recipe, 15 ... Identification program

Claims (3)

撮像された細胞の画像の特徴を抽出する複数の特徴抽出手段と、
抽出された特徴又は、複数の特徴の組合せから、前記細胞の良否を判定する複数の良否判定手段と、
前記細胞の種類に応じて使用する、前記特徴抽出手段及び前記良否判定手段の組み合わせを解析レシピとして記憶する解析レシピ記憶手段と、
前記解析レシピ記憶手段から前記細胞の種類に対応する前記解析レシピを選択し、その解析レシピに記憶された前記特徴抽出手段を駆動して、細胞の特徴を抽出させ、続いて、その解析レシピに記憶された良否判定手段を駆動して、細胞の良否を判断させる解析手段
とを有することを特徴とする細胞の自動良否判定システム。
A plurality of feature extraction means for extracting features of the imaged cell image;
A plurality of quality determination means for determining quality of the cell from the extracted features or a combination of a plurality of features;
An analysis recipe storage means for storing a combination of the feature extraction means and the pass / fail judgment means as an analysis recipe to be used according to the type of the cell;
The analysis recipe corresponding to the cell type is selected from the analysis recipe storage means, the feature extraction means stored in the analysis recipe is driven to extract the characteristics of the cell, and then the analysis recipe An automatic quality determination system for cells, comprising: an analysis means for driving the stored quality determination means to determine the quality of the cells.
撮像された細胞の画像の特徴を抽出する特徴抽出手段と、
抽出された特徴又は、複数の特徴の組合せから、前記細胞の良否を判定する複数の良否判定手段と、
前記細胞の種類に応じて、特徴抽出手段が抽出すべき特徴及び使用すべき前記良否判定手段の組み合わせを解析レシピとして記憶する解析レシピ記憶手段と、
前記解析レシピ記憶手段から前記細胞の種類に対応する前記解析レシピを選択し、その解析レシピに記憶された特徴抽出手段が抽出すべき特徴を前記特徴抽出手段に渡して、細胞の特徴を抽出させ、続いて、その解析レシピに記憶された良否判定手段を駆動して、細胞の良否を判断させる解析手段
とを有することを特徴とする細胞の自動良否判定システム。
Feature extraction means for extracting features of the image of the imaged cell;
A plurality of quality determination means for determining quality of the cell from the extracted features or a combination of a plurality of features;
According to the type of the cell, an analysis recipe storage unit that stores a combination of the feature to be extracted by the feature extraction unit and the quality determination unit to be used as an analysis recipe;
The analysis recipe corresponding to the cell type is selected from the analysis recipe storage means, and the feature extraction means stored in the analysis recipe is passed to the feature extraction means to extract the features of the cells. Then, an automatic quality determination system for cells, comprising: analysis means for driving quality determination means stored in the analysis recipe to determine the quality of cells.
前記特徴が、生育状態、細胞の数、細胞のサイズ、細胞の外形の特徴、細胞間の接着性、隣接間結合性、核の数、核の形状、核の大きさ、核小体の数、核小体の大きさ、核小体の濃度、細胞質顆粒の量、細胞質顆粒の輝度、空胞の大きさ、空胞の数、細胞質突起の形状、占有面積、密集状況のうちいずれかであることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の細胞の自動良否判定システム。 The characteristics are growth state, number of cells, cell size, characteristics of cell outline, adhesion between cells, connectivity between adjacent cells, number of nuclei, shape of nucleus, size of nucleus, number of nucleolus Nucleolus size, nucleolus concentration, cytoplasmic granule amount, cytoplasmic granule brightness, vacuole size, number of vacuoles, shape of cytoplasm, occupied area, crowded state 2. The automatic quality determination system for cells according to claim 1, wherein
JP2005158499A 2005-05-31 2005-05-31 Automatic cell pass / fail judgment system Active JP4852890B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005158499A JP4852890B2 (en) 2005-05-31 2005-05-31 Automatic cell pass / fail judgment system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005158499A JP4852890B2 (en) 2005-05-31 2005-05-31 Automatic cell pass / fail judgment system

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2006333710A true JP2006333710A (en) 2006-12-14
JP2006333710A5 JP2006333710A5 (en) 2008-04-10
JP4852890B2 JP4852890B2 (en) 2012-01-11

Family

ID=37554794

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2005158499A Active JP4852890B2 (en) 2005-05-31 2005-05-31 Automatic cell pass / fail judgment system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4852890B2 (en)

Cited By (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2008212017A (en) * 2007-03-01 2008-09-18 Nikon Corp Apparatus for determining cell state, and method for determining cell state
JP2009027948A (en) * 2007-07-25 2009-02-12 Nikon Corp Culture device
JP2009063508A (en) * 2007-09-07 2009-03-26 Olympus Corp Cell image analyzer and cell image analysis software
WO2009157530A1 (en) * 2008-06-26 2009-12-30 株式会社ニコン Embryo-monitoring apparatus
WO2011004568A1 (en) * 2009-07-08 2011-01-13 株式会社ニコン Image processing method for observation of fertilized eggs, image processing program, image processing device, and method for producing fertilized eggs
JP2012152189A (en) * 2011-01-28 2012-08-16 Terumo Corp System for deciding sheet formation
US9047502B2 (en) 2007-12-13 2015-06-02 Nikon Corporation Automatic system for judging quality of cell
WO2015133193A1 (en) * 2014-03-05 2015-09-11 富士フイルム株式会社 Device, method, and program for cell image evaluation
WO2018073859A1 (en) * 2016-10-17 2018-04-26 ヤマハ発動機株式会社 Cell transfer apparatus and cell transfer method
WO2018124118A1 (en) * 2016-12-27 2018-07-05 住友化学株式会社 Evaluation method and selection method for induced pluripotent stem cells, and production method for induced pluripotent stem cells
JP2018116685A (en) * 2016-11-09 2018-07-26 エイエムキャド バイオメッド コーポレーションAmcad Biomed Corporation Cytological image processing device, and method for quantifying characteristics of cytological image
WO2018193718A1 (en) * 2017-04-20 2018-10-25 ヤマハ発動機株式会社 Cell handling device
WO2019146291A1 (en) * 2018-01-29 2019-08-01 ヤマハ発動機株式会社 Apparatus for treating biological material
WO2019163304A1 (en) * 2018-02-22 2019-08-29 株式会社ニコン Culturing assisting device, observation device, and program
WO2020054195A1 (en) * 2018-09-12 2020-03-19 Jsr株式会社 Organoid image analysis device, organoid image analysis method, and program
US10717962B2 (en) 2014-07-18 2020-07-21 Hitachi High-Tech Corporation Cell culture device and image analysis device
JP2021083431A (en) * 2019-11-29 2021-06-03 シスメックス株式会社 Cell analysis method, cell analysis device, cell analysis system and cell analysis program

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6097951B2 (en) 2013-08-22 2017-03-22 富士フイルム株式会社 Stem cell differentiation determination apparatus and method, and program
JP6071007B2 (en) 2013-08-22 2017-02-01 富士フイルム株式会社 Observation image photographing evaluation apparatus, method, and program
JP6066492B2 (en) 2013-08-22 2017-01-25 富士フイルム株式会社 Cell image evaluation apparatus and method, and program

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001211896A (en) * 1999-11-26 2001-08-07 Olympus Optical Co Ltd Image analysis method, device for it, and recording medium
JP2004301729A (en) * 2003-03-31 2004-10-28 Olympus Corp Fluorescence spectroscopic analyzer

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001211896A (en) * 1999-11-26 2001-08-07 Olympus Optical Co Ltd Image analysis method, device for it, and recording medium
JP2004301729A (en) * 2003-03-31 2004-10-28 Olympus Corp Fluorescence spectroscopic analyzer

Cited By (29)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2008212017A (en) * 2007-03-01 2008-09-18 Nikon Corp Apparatus for determining cell state, and method for determining cell state
JP2009027948A (en) * 2007-07-25 2009-02-12 Nikon Corp Culture device
JP2009063508A (en) * 2007-09-07 2009-03-26 Olympus Corp Cell image analyzer and cell image analysis software
US9047502B2 (en) 2007-12-13 2015-06-02 Nikon Corporation Automatic system for judging quality of cell
WO2009157530A1 (en) * 2008-06-26 2009-12-30 株式会社ニコン Embryo-monitoring apparatus
WO2011004568A1 (en) * 2009-07-08 2011-01-13 株式会社ニコン Image processing method for observation of fertilized eggs, image processing program, image processing device, and method for producing fertilized eggs
JP2012152189A (en) * 2011-01-28 2012-08-16 Terumo Corp System for deciding sheet formation
US10360676B2 (en) 2014-03-05 2019-07-23 Fujifilm Corporation Cell image evaluation device, method, and program
WO2015133193A1 (en) * 2014-03-05 2015-09-11 富士フイルム株式会社 Device, method, and program for cell image evaluation
JP2015170047A (en) * 2014-03-05 2015-09-28 富士フイルム株式会社 Cell image evaluation device and method as well as program
US20160335767A1 (en) * 2014-03-05 2016-11-17 Fujifilm Corporation Cell image evaluation device, method, and program
US10717962B2 (en) 2014-07-18 2020-07-21 Hitachi High-Tech Corporation Cell culture device and image analysis device
US11318463B2 (en) 2016-10-17 2022-05-03 Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha Cell transfer apparatus and cell transfer method
JPWO2018073859A1 (en) * 2016-10-17 2019-06-24 ヤマハ発動機株式会社 Cell transfer device and cell transfer method
WO2018073859A1 (en) * 2016-10-17 2018-04-26 ヤマハ発動機株式会社 Cell transfer apparatus and cell transfer method
JP2018116685A (en) * 2016-11-09 2018-07-26 エイエムキャド バイオメッド コーポレーションAmcad Biomed Corporation Cytological image processing device, and method for quantifying characteristics of cytological image
WO2018124118A1 (en) * 2016-12-27 2018-07-05 住友化学株式会社 Evaluation method and selection method for induced pluripotent stem cells, and production method for induced pluripotent stem cells
CN110114470A (en) * 2016-12-27 2019-08-09 住友化学株式会社 The preparation method of the multipotent stem cells of the evaluation method and selection method and induction of the multipotent stem cells of induction
JPWO2018124118A1 (en) * 2016-12-27 2019-10-31 住友化学株式会社 Method for evaluating and selecting induced pluripotent stem cells, and method for producing induced pluripotent stem cells
JP7141043B2 (en) 2016-12-27 2022-09-22 住友化学株式会社 Evaluation method and selection method for induced pluripotent stem cells, and method for producing induced pluripotent stem cells
US11572537B2 (en) 2017-04-20 2023-02-07 Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha Cell handling device
WO2018193718A1 (en) * 2017-04-20 2018-10-25 ヤマハ発動機株式会社 Cell handling device
WO2019146291A1 (en) * 2018-01-29 2019-08-01 ヤマハ発動機株式会社 Apparatus for treating biological material
JPWO2019146291A1 (en) * 2018-01-29 2021-01-07 ヤマハ発動機株式会社 Biological object processing device
EP3730598A4 (en) * 2018-01-29 2021-02-24 Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha Apparatus for treating biological material
WO2019163304A1 (en) * 2018-02-22 2019-08-29 株式会社ニコン Culturing assisting device, observation device, and program
WO2020054195A1 (en) * 2018-09-12 2020-03-19 Jsr株式会社 Organoid image analysis device, organoid image analysis method, and program
JP2021083431A (en) * 2019-11-29 2021-06-03 シスメックス株式会社 Cell analysis method, cell analysis device, cell analysis system and cell analysis program
US12020492B2 (en) 2019-11-29 2024-06-25 Sysmex Corporation Cell analysis method, cell analysis device, and cell analysis system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4852890B2 (en) 2012-01-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP4852890B2 (en) Automatic cell pass / fail judgment system
US7796815B2 (en) Image analysis of biological objects
JP2022180419A (en) Image analysis method, device, program, and method for manufacturing trained deep learning algorithm
AU2013214345B2 (en) System for detecting genes in tissue samples
CN113454733A (en) Multi-instance learner for prognostic tissue pattern recognition
JP6194791B2 (en) Image processing apparatus and program
Fuchs et al. Computational pathology analysis of tissue microarrays predicts survival of renal clear cell carcinoma patients
WO2014192184A1 (en) Image processing device, image processing method, program, and storage medium
CN109117703A (en) It is a kind of that cell category identification method is mixed based on fine granularity identification
Kelly et al. Quantification of neuronal density across cortical depth using automated 3D analysis of confocal image stacks
JP4864709B2 (en) A system for determining the staining quality of slides using a scatter plot distribution
KR101929669B1 (en) The method and apparatus for analyzing an image using an entropy
CN112329664A (en) Method for evaluating prokaryotic quantity of prokaryotic embryo
CN112750118B (en) Novel method and system for identifying cell number in single cell pore plate sequencing based on automatic visual detection
US9047502B2 (en) Automatic system for judging quality of cell
US20210264130A1 (en) Method and apparatus for training a neural network classifier to classify an image depicting one or more objects of a biological sample
CN112703531A (en) Generating annotation data for tissue images
JP4897488B2 (en) A system for classifying slides using a scatter plot distribution
TW201913565A (en) Evaluation method for embryo images and system thereof
Singh et al. Image segmentation for automatic particle identification in electron micrographs based on hidden Markov random field models and expectation maximization
CN113158996A (en) Two-step diatom identification and classification method based on scanning electron microscope images and artificial intelligence
JP6156137B2 (en) Image processing apparatus and program
Nandy et al. Automatic nuclei segmentation and spatial FISH analysis for cancer detection
CN118311010A (en) Exosome automatic scanning image analysis method, medium and system
JP2024078874A (en) Detection system, detection device, learning device, detection method, learning method, and program

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20080201

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20080221

RD02 Notification of acceptance of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7422

Effective date: 20080801

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20100630

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20101026

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20101222

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20110419

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20110715

A911 Transfer to examiner for re-examination before appeal (zenchi)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A911

Effective date: 20110726

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20110927

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20111010

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20141104

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4852890

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20141104

Year of fee payment: 3

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250