JP2006194813A - Pneumatic tire-testing method and tester - Google Patents

Pneumatic tire-testing method and tester Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2006194813A
JP2006194813A JP2005008756A JP2005008756A JP2006194813A JP 2006194813 A JP2006194813 A JP 2006194813A JP 2005008756 A JP2005008756 A JP 2005008756A JP 2005008756 A JP2005008756 A JP 2005008756A JP 2006194813 A JP2006194813 A JP 2006194813A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
mounting table
tire
test
protrusion
test tire
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2005008756A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP4561371B2 (en
Inventor
Toshiro Oyama
俊郎 大山
Toshio Ochiai
敏男 落合
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd filed Critical Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd
Priority to JP2005008756A priority Critical patent/JP4561371B2/en
Publication of JP2006194813A publication Critical patent/JP2006194813A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4561371B2 publication Critical patent/JP4561371B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Tires In General (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a pneumatic tire-testing method and a tester for efficiently reproducing tearing similar to the tearing of a tread coming into existence in the market and evaluating tear resistance of a tire. <P>SOLUTION: A test tire 1 combined with a rim is given a prescribed inner pressure. Prescribed load is loaded thereon to bring a tread into contact with a planar surface of a mounting table. A rod-like projection 2 fixed on the surface of the mounting table is brought to a state where it is covered with a circumferential groove 1b of the test tire 1 extending over a grounding area with the mounting table for the test tire 1 and a non-grounding area. The mounting table is turned centering around a rotation axis P substantially coinciding with a direction normal to the surface thereof to give an external force to a rib 1a by means of the rod-like projection 2. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2006,JPO&NCIPI

Description

本発明は、空気入りタイヤの試験方法および試験装置に関し、さらに詳しくは、市場で発生するトレッドのティアを効率よく的確に再現して、タイヤの耐ティア性を評価することができる空気入りタイヤの試験方法および試験装置に関するものである。   The present invention relates to a test method and a test apparatus for a pneumatic tire. More specifically, the present invention relates to a pneumatic tire that can efficiently and accurately reproduce the tread tier generated in the market and evaluate the tire tear resistance. The present invention relates to a test method and a test apparatus.

従来、トラック、トレーラ等に使用される重荷重用タイヤ、特にステア軸に装着される空気入りタイヤには、トレッドのリブやブロックが引きちぎられるいわゆるティアが発生していたが、その発生原因は明確になっていなかった。   Conventionally, tires for heavy loads used for trucks, trailers, etc., especially pneumatic tires attached to steer shafts, have had so-called tiers where the tread ribs and blocks have been torn off. It wasn't.

そのため、タイヤの耐ティア性を評価するには実車に装着されたタイヤのティア発生率を調査する評価方法を採用するしかなく、この方法では評価精度を向上させるために大量のタイヤを評価する必要があり、時間もコストもかかり効率的ではなかった。   Therefore, the only way to evaluate the tear resistance of tires is to use an evaluation method that investigates the rate of tire tears in actual vehicles. In this method, it is necessary to evaluate a large number of tires in order to improve the evaluation accuracy. It was time consuming and costly and was not efficient.

また、この方法ではティアの発生原因が明確にならないので、スペックの異なるタイヤを比較するには、ティアの発生の有無でしか評価できず、発生するティアの程度の比較ができないという問題があった。   In addition, this method does not clarify the cause of tiers, so comparing tires with different specifications can only be evaluated by the presence or absence of tiers, and the level of tiers that occur cannot be compared. .

空気入りタイヤのショルダーエッジに設けた細リブに発生するクラックや欠けを再現する評価装置としては、基盤上を試験タイヤを円軌跡を描くように走行させて、その円軌跡上に突起物を配置して、試験タイヤを乗り上げさせるものが提案されている(特許文献1参照)。   As an evaluation device that reproduces cracks and chips generated in the thin ribs provided on the shoulder edge of a pneumatic tire, the test tire is run on the base in a circular path, and the protrusions are placed on the circular path. And what makes a test tire get on is proposed (refer patent document 1).

しかしながら、この装置は市場での縁石や轍の乗り越えの繰り返しによるクラック等を再現するだけで、市場で発生するティアを再現することはできなかった。
実開平7−36038号公報
However, this device could not reproduce the tier generated in the market only by reproducing cracks and the like due to repeated curbstones and overpasses in the market.
Japanese Utility Model Publication No. 7-36038

本発明の目的は、市場で発生するトレッドのティアと類似したティアを効率よく再現でき、タイヤの耐ティアを評価できる空気入りタイヤの試験方法および試験装置を提供することにある。   An object of the present invention is to provide a test method and a test apparatus for a pneumatic tire that can efficiently reproduce a tier similar to a tread tier generated in the market and can evaluate a tire tier resistance.

上記目的を達成するため本発明の空気入りタイヤの試験方法は、トレッドに周方向溝を有する試験タイヤをリム組みして所定の内圧にし、所定の荷重を負荷して載置台の平面状表面にトレッドを接地させるとともに、前記載置台の表面に固定された棒状の突起を前記試験タイヤの前記載置台との接地領域と非接地領域とにまたがって前記周方向溝で覆った状態にして、前記試験タイヤと前記載置台との少なくとも一方を前記載置台の表面と略法線方向となる回転軸を中心として回転させることを特徴とするものである。ここで、略法線方向とは法線方向に対して±5度の範囲を意味する。   In order to achieve the above object, the pneumatic tire testing method of the present invention is to assemble a test tire having a circumferential groove on a tread to a predetermined internal pressure, apply a predetermined load to the planar surface of the mounting table. The tread is grounded, and the rod-like protrusion fixed to the surface of the mounting table is covered with the circumferential groove across the grounding region and the non-grounding region of the testing tire with the mounting table, At least one of the test tire and the mounting table is rotated about a rotation axis that is substantially normal to the surface of the mounting table. Here, the substantially normal direction means a range of ± 5 degrees with respect to the normal direction.

また、本発明の空気入りタイヤの試験装置は、リム組みした試験タイヤを保持するタイヤ保持装置と、前記保持した試験タイヤのトレッドを接地させる平面状表面を有し、該表面に棒状の突起を固定した載置台とを備え、前記保持した試験タイヤと前記載置台との少なくとも一方を前記保持した試験タイヤのトレッドを前記載置台の表面に接地させる方向に移動可能として、該方向に荷重を負荷できるようにするとともに、前記保持した試験タイヤと前記載置台との少なくとも一方を前記載置台の表面と略法線方向となる回転軸を中心として回転可能としたことを特徴とするものである。   The pneumatic tire testing device of the present invention has a tire holding device for holding a rim-assembled test tire, and a flat surface for grounding the tread of the held test tire, and a rod-like protrusion on the surface. A fixed mounting table, and at least one of the held test tire and the mounting table is movable in a direction in which the tread of the held test tire is brought into contact with the surface of the mounting table, and a load is applied in that direction. In addition to being able to do so, at least one of the held test tire and the mounting table can be rotated around a rotation axis that is substantially in a direction normal to the surface of the mounting table.

本発明の空気入りタイヤの試験方法によれば、トレッドに周方向溝を有する試験タイヤをリム組みして所定の内圧にし、所定の荷重を負荷して載置台の平面状表面にトレッドを接地させるとともに、載置台の表面に固定された棒状の突起を試験タイヤの載置台との接地領域と非接地領域とにまたがって周方向溝で覆った状態にして、試験タイヤと載置台との少なくとも一方を載置台の表面と略法線方向となる回転軸を中心として回転させることで、突起がトレッドに外力を与えて市場で発生するティアと類似したティアを再現でき、また発生したティアの程度を把握することができる。これによって、耐ティア性を効率よく評価でき、スペックの異なるタイヤの耐ティア性の比較評価も可能となる。   According to the test method for a pneumatic tire of the present invention, a test tire having a circumferential groove is assembled on the tread to obtain a predetermined internal pressure, and a predetermined load is applied to ground the tread on the planar surface of the mounting table. And at least one of the test tire and the mounting table in a state where the rod-like protrusion fixed to the surface of the mounting table is covered with a circumferential groove across the grounding region and the non-grounding region of the testing tire mounting table. Rotating the center of rotation about the surface of the mounting table and a rotation axis that is approximately normal, the projections can reproduce the tier similar to the tier generated in the market by applying external force to the tread, and the degree of the tier generated I can grasp it. As a result, the tear resistance can be evaluated efficiently, and a comparative evaluation of the tear resistance of tires having different specifications is also possible.

本発明の空気入りタイヤの試験装置によれば、リム組みした試験タイヤを保持するタイヤ保持装置と、保持した試験タイヤのトレッドを接地させる平面状表面を有し、この表面に棒状の突起を固定した載置台とを備え、保持した試験タイヤと載置台との少なくとも一方を前記保持した試験タイヤのトレッドを前記載置台の表面に接地させる方向に移動可能として、この方向に荷重を負荷できるようにしたので、試験タイヤの載置台との接地領域と非接地領域とにまたがって試験タイヤの周方向溝で載置台表面の棒状の突起を覆って、所定の荷重を負荷することができる。そして、この状態で保持した試験タイヤと載置台との少なくとも一方を載置台の表面と略法線方向となる回転軸を中心として回転可能としたので、この回転によって突起が試験タイヤのトレッドに外力を与えて市場で発生するティアと類似したティアを再現でき、また発生したティアの程度を把握することができる。これによって、耐ティア性を効率よく評価でき、スペックの異なるタイヤの耐ティア性の比較評価も可能となる。   According to the pneumatic tire testing apparatus of the present invention, the tire holding device that holds the rim-assembled test tire and the planar surface that contacts the tread of the held test tire are fixed, and the rod-shaped protrusion is fixed to the surface. A mounting table, and at least one of the held test tire and the mounting table can be moved in a direction in which the tread of the held test tire contacts the surface of the mounting table, so that a load can be applied in this direction. Therefore, a predetermined load can be applied by covering the rod-shaped protrusion on the surface of the mounting table with the circumferential groove of the test tire across the grounding region and the non-grounding region with the mounting table of the test tire. Since at least one of the test tire and the mounting table held in this state can be rotated around a rotation axis that is substantially normal to the surface of the mounting table, the rotation causes an external force to be applied to the tread of the test tire. It is possible to reproduce a tier similar to the tier generated in the market and to grasp the degree of the generated tier. As a result, the tear resistance can be evaluated efficiently, and a comparative evaluation of the tear resistance of tires having different specifications is also possible.

以下、本発明の空気入りタイヤの試験方法および試験装置を図に示した実施形態に基づいて説明する。図1に試験装置の全体概要を正面図で示す。この図において、線分CLはタイヤ幅方向中心線、線分HLはタイヤ軸線を示している。試験タイヤ1は、リム組みされて、所定の内圧にされた状態でタイヤ保持装置5の保持アーム6に取り付けられている。   Hereinafter, a test method and a test apparatus for a pneumatic tire according to the present invention will be described based on the embodiments shown in the drawings. FIG. 1 is a front view showing an overall outline of the test apparatus. In this figure, the line segment CL indicates the center line in the tire width direction, and the line segment HL indicates the tire axis. The test tire 1 is attached to a holding arm 6 of a tire holding device 5 in a state where a rim is assembled and a predetermined internal pressure is applied.

保持アーム6は上下方向に移動可能であり、所定の高さで固定できる構造となっている。保持アーム6はアームの長手方向に移動可能としてもよく、長手方向に移動させることによって試験タイヤ1に対する棒状の突起2の回転軸の位置を容易に変えることができる。   The holding arm 6 is movable in the vertical direction and has a structure that can be fixed at a predetermined height. The holding arm 6 may be movable in the longitudinal direction of the arm, and by moving in the longitudinal direction, the position of the rotation axis of the rod-shaped protrusion 2 with respect to the test tire 1 can be easily changed.

保持アーム6に取り付けられた試験タイヤの下方には回転昇降装置4が配置され、その上部には表面に縦断面矩形状で棒状の突起2を有する平板状の載置台3が固定されている。   Below the test tire attached to the holding arm 6, a rotary elevating device 4 is arranged, and a flat plate-like mounting table 3 having a bar-like protrusion 2 having a rectangular vertical cross section on the surface is fixed to the upper part thereof.

回転昇降装置4は、油圧機構等によって昇降可能であり、載置台3の表面の法線方向を回転軸として駆動モータ等で回転可能となっており、昇降位置、回転角度、回転速度等は図示しない制御装置によってコントロールされる。棒状の突起2は着脱可能で試験条件に応じて選択された棒状の突起2が載置台3の表面に装着固定される。   The rotary elevating device 4 can be raised and lowered by a hydraulic mechanism or the like, and can be rotated by a drive motor or the like with the normal direction of the surface of the mounting table 3 as a rotation axis. Not controlled by the control device. The rod-like protrusion 2 is detachable, and the rod-like protrusion 2 selected according to the test conditions is mounted and fixed on the surface of the mounting table 3.

試験の実施に際して、まず、試験タイヤ1および棒状の突起2のセッティングをする。試験タイヤ1と棒状の突起2は、載置台3の表面に試験タイヤ1のトレッドが接地した時に、周方向溝1bで棒状の突起2を覆うように位置決め、固定される。その後に回転昇降装置4を上昇させ、試験タイヤ1が周方向溝1bで棒状の突起2を覆って載置台3に接地して、所定の負荷荷重になる位置で上昇を止めて載置台3の高さ位置が固定される。   In carrying out the test, first, the test tire 1 and the rod-shaped protrusion 2 are set. When the tread of the test tire 1 contacts the surface of the mounting table 3, the test tire 1 and the rod-shaped protrusion 2 are positioned and fixed so as to cover the rod-shaped protrusion 2 with the circumferential groove 1b. Thereafter, the rotating / lifting device 4 is raised, the test tire 1 covers the rod-shaped protrusion 2 with the circumferential groove 1b, contacts the mounting table 3, and stops rising at a position where a predetermined load is applied. The height position is fixed.

試験タイヤ1への荷重の負荷は、回転昇降装置4を固定しておき、保持アーム6を下降させて与えることもでき、回転昇降装置4と保持アーム6の少なくとも一方が互いに近接する方向に移動して負荷を与えるようにすればよい。   The load applied to the test tire 1 can be given by fixing the rotary lifting device 4 and lowering the holding arm 6, and at least one of the rotary lifting device 4 and the holding arm 6 moves in a direction close to each other. Then, a load may be applied.

載置台3に試験タイヤ1が接地した状態を図2、図3に示す。図2に示すように、正面方向において棒状の突起2は周方向溝1bに覆われた状態となっている。この棒状の突起2の幅は周方向溝1bの幅以下となっており、突起高さHは試験条件によって周方向溝1bの溝深さDに応じて設定される。   The state where the test tire 1 is grounded on the mounting table 3 is shown in FIGS. As shown in FIG. 2, the rod-like protrusion 2 is covered with the circumferential groove 1b in the front direction. The width of the rod-like protrusion 2 is equal to or less than the width of the circumferential groove 1b, and the protrusion height H is set according to the groove depth D of the circumferential groove 1b depending on the test conditions.

図3に示すように、側面方向において棒状の突起2は試験タイヤ1の接地領域Cと非接地領域Tとをまたがる位置に配置される。接地領域Cでは、リブ1aは圧縮状態となっていて棒状の突起2を回転させて外力を与えてもティアが発生しにくく、棒状の突起2を接地領域Cと非接地領域Tとをまたがせてリブ1aが引張り状態となっている部分に配置することでティアが発生しやすくなる。棒状の突起2の長さは接地領域Cと非接地領域Tとをまたがるように適宜、決定することができる。   As shown in FIG. 3, the rod-like protrusion 2 is disposed at a position across the grounding region C and the non-grounding region T of the test tire 1 in the side surface direction. In the grounding area C, the rib 1a is in a compressed state, and even if an external force is applied by rotating the rod-shaped protrusion 2, tearing hardly occurs, and the rod-shaped protrusion 2 straddles the grounding area C and the non-grounding area T. By arranging the rib 1a in the portion where the rib 1a is in the tensioned state, tearing is likely to occur. The length of the rod-shaped protrusion 2 can be appropriately determined so as to straddle the grounding region C and the non-grounding region T.

以上のセッティングが完了した後は、回転昇降装置4を所定速度で所定角度まで回転させる。図4(a)、(b)に載置台3とともに回転する棒状の突起2と接地している試験タイヤ1の状態を平面方向に示す。この図における線分HLは、タイヤ軸線の載置台3への垂直投影線を示しているが、以下、タイヤ軸線HLとして説明に用いる。図4(a)に示すように、当初、試験タイヤ1の周方向溝1bに覆われていた棒状の突起2が、図4(b)に示すように所定の回転角度Rになるまで、タイヤ幅方向中心線CLとタイヤ軸線HLの交点を通り、載置台3の表面と法線方向の回転軸Pを中心に回転する。図4(b)では棒状の突起2とリブ1aが重なって図示されているが、実際はこの部分のリブ1aが変形してティアが発生することになる。   After the above setting is completed, the rotary lifting device 4 is rotated at a predetermined speed to a predetermined angle. 4 (a) and 4 (b) show the state of the test tire 1 in contact with the rod-shaped protrusion 2 that rotates together with the mounting table 3 in the plane direction. A line segment HL in this figure indicates a vertical projection line of the tire axis line on the mounting table 3, and is hereinafter used as the tire axis line HL in the description. As shown in FIG. 4 (a), the tire is initially maintained until the rod-like protrusion 2 covered by the circumferential groove 1b of the test tire 1 reaches a predetermined rotation angle R as shown in FIG. 4 (b). It passes through the intersection of the width direction center line CL and the tire axis HL, and rotates about the surface of the mounting table 3 and the rotation axis P in the normal direction. In FIG. 4B, the rod-like protrusion 2 and the rib 1a are shown overlapping each other, but in reality, this portion of the rib 1a is deformed to generate a tear.

この実施形態では、昇降回転装置4によって棒状の突起2を回転させてティアを発生させる外力を与えているが、タイヤ保持装置5に回転機能を持たせて、試験タイヤ1を回転させて外力を与えるようにすることもできる。即ち、棒状の突起2を固定した載置台3と試験タイヤ1とのいずれか一方を回転させてティアを発生させる外力をリブ1aに与えるようにすればよい。   In this embodiment, the lifting / lowering rotation device 4 rotates the rod-shaped protrusion 2 to apply an external force that generates a tear. However, the tire holding device 5 has a rotation function to rotate the test tire 1 to apply the external force. It can also be given. That is, an external force for generating a tear may be applied to the rib 1a by rotating either the mounting table 3 to which the rod-shaped protrusion 2 is fixed or the test tire 1.

また、回転軸Pを載置台3の表面の法線方向としているが、この法線方向から±5度の範囲であれば、ティアの再現性に影響がないので許容される。   Further, although the rotation axis P is set as the normal direction of the surface of the mounting table 3, the range of ± 5 degrees from the normal direction is allowed because the reproducibility of the tier is not affected.

回転軸Pの位置は、図4に示すようなタイヤ幅方向中心線CLとタイヤ軸線HLの交点を通過する位置に限定されない。ステア軸に装着されたタイヤの市場でのティアを効率よく再現をするには、回転軸Pが試験タイヤ1の載置台3との接地領域内にあればよい。   The position of the rotation axis P is not limited to a position passing through the intersection of the tire width direction center line CL and the tire axis HL as shown in FIG. In order to efficiently reproduce the market tier of the tire mounted on the steer shaft, it is only necessary that the rotating shaft P be in the contact area with the mounting table 3 of the test tire 1.

図4では、棒状の突起2の数が1つであるが、例えば、回転軸Pと載置台3との交点に対して点対称となる位置に2つの棒状の突起2を設けることもできる。   In FIG. 4, the number of the bar-shaped protrusions 2 is one. However, for example, two bar-shaped protrusions 2 may be provided at positions that are point-symmetric with respect to the intersection of the rotation axis P and the mounting table 3.

本発明の試験においては、棒状の突起2の突起高さHは、棒状の突起2を覆う周方向溝1bの溝深さDの30%以上120%以下とすることが好ましい。この範囲にすると市場で発生するティアとの類似性を高めてティアを再現することができる。   In the test of the present invention, the protrusion height H of the rod-like protrusion 2 is preferably 30% or more and 120% or less of the groove depth D of the circumferential groove 1b covering the rod-like protrusion 2. Within this range, the tier can be reproduced with increased similarity to the tier generated in the market.

棒状の突起2の縦断面形状は矩形で、両縁角部2aの角度は90度以上120以下とすることが好ましい。この角度が90度未満であると、棒状の突起2で外力を与えた際に、角部2aがリブ1aに食い込みすぎ、120度を超えるとリブ1aが変形して逃げやすくなり、いずれも市場と類似したティアを再現しにくくなる。   It is preferable that the longitudinal cross-sectional shape of the rod-shaped protrusion 2 is a rectangle, and the angle of both edge corners 2a is 90 degrees or more and 120 or less. When this angle is less than 90 degrees, when an external force is applied by the rod-shaped protrusion 2, the corner 2a bites into the rib 1a too much, and when it exceeds 120 degrees, the rib 1a is deformed and easily escapes. It becomes difficult to reproduce the same tier.

試験タイヤ1の負荷荷重は市場で想定される使用条件に対応させてタイヤの規格最大荷重の70%以上130%以下とするのが好ましい。   The load load of the test tire 1 is preferably 70% or more and 130% or less of the standard maximum load of the tire corresponding to the use conditions assumed in the market.

タイヤサイズが11R22.5(規格最大荷重26.73kN、規格最大空気圧700kPa)のリブパターンの空気入りタイヤを用いて、負荷荷重26.73kN、空気圧700kPa、回転角度Rを45°、回転速度を50deg/min、載置台上の棒状の突起の長さを150mm、縦断面形状を矩形としてその両縁角部の角度を90度とし、棒状の鋼材にしたことを共通条件として、突起の高さのみを表1に示すように5通り(実施例1〜5)に変えて、ティアに対する耐久性を評価した。その評価結果を表1に示す。評価項目は、ティアの発生有無と、発生したティアと市場で発生するティアとの類似性である。   Using a pneumatic tire with a rib pattern of 11R22.5 (standard maximum load 26.73 kN, standard maximum air pressure 700 kPa), load load 26.73 kN, air pressure 700 kPa, rotation angle R 45 °, rotation speed 50 deg. / Min, the length of the bar-shaped protrusion on the mounting table is 150 mm, the vertical cross-sectional shape is rectangular, the angle of both edges is 90 degrees, and the common condition is that the bar-shaped steel material is used, only the height of the protrusion As shown in Table 1, the durability against tiers was evaluated by changing to 5 types (Examples 1 to 5). The evaluation results are shown in Table 1. The evaluation items are the presence / absence of a tier and the similarity between the tier that occurs and the tier that occurs in the market.

尚、表中のHは、突起高さを示しており、Dは棒状の突起を覆う周方向溝の溝深さを示している。したがって、H/Dが20%であれば突起が周方向溝の底面に接していない状態であり、H/Dが140%であれば突起が周方向溝の底面に接して食い込んでいる状態となる。   In the table, H indicates the protrusion height, and D indicates the groove depth of the circumferential groove that covers the rod-shaped protrusion. Therefore, if H / D is 20%, the protrusion is not in contact with the bottom surface of the circumferential groove, and if H / D is 140%, the protrusion is in contact with the bottom surface of the circumferential groove. Become.

[ティアの発生]
トレッドのリブに何らかの引きちぎられたような故障が生じた場合は丸印で示した。
[Tear occurrence]
If any kind of torn failure occurs on the tread rib, it is indicated by a circle.

[市場ティアとの類似性]
試験によって発生したティアを市場で発生するティアと比較して、ほぼ類似している場合を丸印で示し、非常に類似している場合を二重丸印で示した。
[Similarity with market tier]
The tiers generated by the test were compared with the tiers generated in the market, the cases that are almost similar are indicated by circles, and the cases that are very similar are indicated by double circles.

Figure 2006194813
Figure 2006194813

実施例1〜5のすべてにおいてティアが発生し、発生したティアは市場で発生するティアと類似性を有するものであった。とくに、H/Dを30〜120%とすると非常に類似したティアを再現することができた。
この結果から効率よく市場で発生するティアを再現でき、発生するティアの程度も把握することができるので、時間およびコストを削減するとともに、スペックが異なるタイヤについても耐ティア性の比較評価ができることが確認できた。
In all of Examples 1 to 5, tiers were generated, and the generated tiers were similar to tiers generated in the market. In particular, when H / D was 30 to 120%, very similar tiers could be reproduced.
From this result, it is possible to efficiently reproduce the tiers that occur in the market, and to understand the degree of tiers that occur, so it is possible to reduce time and cost and to compare and evaluate tier resistance for tires with different specifications. It could be confirmed.

本発明の試験装置の全体概要を示す説明図である。It is explanatory drawing which shows the whole outline | summary of the testing apparatus of this invention. 本発明の試験方法において、試験タイヤのトレッドが載置台に接地した状態を示す縦断面図である。In the test method of this invention, it is a longitudinal cross-sectional view which shows the state which the tread of the test tire grounded on the mounting base. 図2の一部拡大側面図である。FIG. 3 is a partially enlarged side view of FIG. 2. 本発明の試験方法において、試験タイヤを棒状の突起を有する載置台に接地させて棒状の突起を回転させる状態を平面方向で示す説明図である。In the test method of this invention, it is explanatory drawing which shows the state which makes a test tire contact ground to the mounting base which has a rod-shaped protrusion, and rotates a rod-shaped protrusion in a plane direction.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1 試験タイヤ
1a リブ
1b 周方向溝
2 棒状の突起
2a 棒状の突起の両縁の角部
3 載置台
4 回転昇降装置
5 タイヤ保持装置
6 保持アーム
C 接地領域
T 非接地領域
P 回転軸
R 回転角度
CL タイヤ幅方向中心線
HL タイヤ軸線
1 Test tire
1a rib
1b Circumferential groove 2 Rod-shaped protrusion
2a Corners on both edges of rod-shaped protrusions
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 3 Mounting stand 4 Rotation raising / lowering device 5 Tire holding device 6 Holding arm C Grounding area
T non-contact area P rotation axis R rotation angle CL tire width direction center line HL tire axis

Claims (7)

トレッドに周方向溝を有する試験タイヤをリム組みして所定の内圧にし、所定の荷重を負荷して載置台の平面状表面にトレッドを接地させるとともに、前記載置台の表面に固定された棒状の突起を前記試験タイヤの前記載置台との接地領域と非接地領域とにまたがって前記周方向溝で覆った状態にして、前記試験タイヤと前記載置台との少なくとも一方を前記載置台の表面と略法線方向となる回転軸を中心として回転させる空気入りタイヤの試験方法。   A test tire having a circumferential groove on the tread is assembled with a rim to a predetermined internal pressure, a predetermined load is applied, the tread is grounded on the planar surface of the mounting table, and a rod-shaped fixed to the surface of the mounting table is provided. A protrusion is covered with the circumferential groove across a grounding region and a non-grounding region of the test tire with the mounting table, and at least one of the test tire and the mounting table is a surface of the mounting table. A test method for a pneumatic tire that rotates about a rotation axis that is substantially in the normal direction. 前記回転軸が前記試験タイヤの前記載置台表面との接地領域内にある請求項1に記載の空気入りタイヤの試験方法。   The method for testing a pneumatic tire according to claim 1, wherein the rotation shaft is in a contact area with the surface of the mounting table described above. 前記突起の高さが該突起を覆う周方向溝の溝深さの30%以上120%以下である請求項1または2に記載の空気入りタイヤの試験方法。   The method for testing a pneumatic tire according to claim 1 or 2, wherein a height of the protrusion is 30% or more and 120% or less of a groove depth of a circumferential groove covering the protrusion. 前記突起の縦断面形状が矩形であり、その両縁角部の角度を90度以上120度以下とした請求項1〜3のいずれかに記載の空気入りタイヤの試験方法。   The method for testing a pneumatic tire according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein a vertical cross-sectional shape of the protrusion is rectangular, and an angle between both corners of the protrusion is 90 degrees or more and 120 degrees or less. 前記試験タイヤに負荷する負荷荷重を該試験タイヤの規格最大荷重の70%以上130%以下とする請求項1〜4のいずれか記載の空気入りタイヤの試験方法。   The test method for a pneumatic tire according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein a load applied to the test tire is 70% to 130% of a standard maximum load of the test tire. リム組みした試験タイヤを保持するタイヤ保持装置と、前記保持した試験タイヤのトレッドを接地させる平面状表面を有し、該表面に棒状の突起を固定した載置台とを備え、前記保持した試験タイヤと前記載置台との少なくとも一方を前記保持した試験タイヤのトレッドを前記載置台の表面に接地させる方向に移動可能として、該方向に荷重を負荷できるようにするとともに、前記保持した試験タイヤと前記載置台との少なくとも一方を前記載置台の表面と略法線方向となる回転軸を中心として回転可能とした空気入りタイヤの試験装置。   A tire holding device that holds a test tire assembled with a rim, and a mounting table that has a flat surface for grounding the tread of the held test tire and has a rod-like protrusion fixed to the surface, and holds the test tire The tread of the test tire that holds at least one of the mounting table and the mounting table can be moved in a direction to make contact with the surface of the mounting table so that a load can be applied in the direction. A testing apparatus for a pneumatic tire, wherein at least one of the mounting table is rotatable about a rotation axis that is substantially normal to the surface of the mounting table. 前記突起を着脱可能とした請求項6に記載の空気入りタイヤの試験装置。   The pneumatic tire testing device according to claim 6, wherein the protrusion is detachable.
JP2005008756A 2005-01-17 2005-01-17 Pneumatic tire testing method and testing apparatus Expired - Fee Related JP4561371B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005008756A JP4561371B2 (en) 2005-01-17 2005-01-17 Pneumatic tire testing method and testing apparatus

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005008756A JP4561371B2 (en) 2005-01-17 2005-01-17 Pneumatic tire testing method and testing apparatus

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2006194813A true JP2006194813A (en) 2006-07-27
JP4561371B2 JP4561371B2 (en) 2010-10-13

Family

ID=36801002

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2005008756A Expired - Fee Related JP4561371B2 (en) 2005-01-17 2005-01-17 Pneumatic tire testing method and testing apparatus

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4561371B2 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2012251833A (en) * 2011-06-01 2012-12-20 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Rubber chipping-resisting performance evaluation method
JP2014506674A (en) * 2011-02-11 2014-03-17 ブリヂストン アメリカズ タイヤ オペレイションズ エルエルシー Tire tip and tear test apparatus and method
JP2017129467A (en) * 2016-01-20 2017-07-27 横浜ゴム株式会社 Simulation method and evaluation method of pneumatic tire
JP2017128229A (en) * 2016-01-20 2017-07-27 横浜ゴム株式会社 Simulation method of pneumatic tire and evaluation method
JP2020026257A (en) * 2018-08-17 2020-02-20 住友ゴム工業株式会社 Test method for tire and test device for tire

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4028937A (en) * 1972-09-11 1977-06-14 The General Tire & Rubber Company Nondestructive testing of tire wear
US5289718A (en) * 1992-12-10 1994-03-01 Ford Motor Company Apparatus and method for measuring tire force
JPH0736038U (en) * 1993-12-20 1995-07-04 横浜ゴム株式会社 Tire durability evaluation device
US5610329A (en) * 1995-03-10 1997-03-11 The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company Low-cost runout sensor with high frequency response and negligible stiction in the direction of travel
JP2000227387A (en) * 1999-02-08 2000-08-15 Ohtsu Tire & Rubber Co Ltd :The Rubber destructive testing machine
US6439043B1 (en) * 2000-08-30 2002-08-27 Daimlerchrysler Corporation Static tire test fixture and related method
JP2004340823A (en) * 2003-05-16 2004-12-02 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Detecting method for tire and tire distinguished thereby

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4028937A (en) * 1972-09-11 1977-06-14 The General Tire & Rubber Company Nondestructive testing of tire wear
US5289718A (en) * 1992-12-10 1994-03-01 Ford Motor Company Apparatus and method for measuring tire force
JPH0736038U (en) * 1993-12-20 1995-07-04 横浜ゴム株式会社 Tire durability evaluation device
US5610329A (en) * 1995-03-10 1997-03-11 The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company Low-cost runout sensor with high frequency response and negligible stiction in the direction of travel
JP2000227387A (en) * 1999-02-08 2000-08-15 Ohtsu Tire & Rubber Co Ltd :The Rubber destructive testing machine
US6439043B1 (en) * 2000-08-30 2002-08-27 Daimlerchrysler Corporation Static tire test fixture and related method
JP2004340823A (en) * 2003-05-16 2004-12-02 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Detecting method for tire and tire distinguished thereby

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2014506674A (en) * 2011-02-11 2014-03-17 ブリヂストン アメリカズ タイヤ オペレイションズ エルエルシー Tire tip and tear test apparatus and method
JP2012251833A (en) * 2011-06-01 2012-12-20 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Rubber chipping-resisting performance evaluation method
JP2017129467A (en) * 2016-01-20 2017-07-27 横浜ゴム株式会社 Simulation method and evaluation method of pneumatic tire
JP2017128229A (en) * 2016-01-20 2017-07-27 横浜ゴム株式会社 Simulation method of pneumatic tire and evaluation method
JP2020026257A (en) * 2018-08-17 2020-02-20 住友ゴム工業株式会社 Test method for tire and test device for tire
JP7155741B2 (en) 2018-08-17 2022-10-19 住友ゴム工業株式会社 Tire testing method and tire testing apparatus

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4561371B2 (en) 2010-10-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8196462B2 (en) Lateral position control for tire tread wear test machine
JP4561371B2 (en) Pneumatic tire testing method and testing apparatus
JP2003532890A (en) Rolling test equipment
EP3063522B1 (en) Device for sensor placement within a tire
ATE470845T1 (en) CHECKING THE UNIFORMITY OF TIRES
JP5066858B2 (en) Tire groove crack laboratory test method
US9796225B2 (en) Method of preparing a tire for mounting
JP2008197023A (en) Vehicle centering device
JP4561367B2 (en) Pneumatic tire testing method and testing apparatus
JP4561372B2 (en) Pneumatic tire testing method and testing apparatus
KR100774062B1 (en) The Measuring Equipment of Tire with Camber Angle
JP7155741B2 (en) Tire testing method and tire testing apparatus
KR100782124B1 (en) Tire of multi-part fatigue tester
JP2006047251A (en) Method and device for measuring ground contact conditions of on-vehicle tire
KR20010061149A (en) Testing apparatus for protecting the overturn of vehicles
CN113498379B (en) Assembly for placing a sensor within a tire
KR102589846B1 (en) Tire stiffness measuring device
KR19990025319U (en) Wheel and Tire Matching System
JP2020115088A (en) Test method of tire
KR200189950Y1 (en) a jack for the car
KR100527828B1 (en) Apparatus for measuring fitting pressure of pneumatic tire
JP6496162B2 (en) Tire vibration characteristics evaluation method
KR20180050023A (en) Apparatus for evaluating tire through piezoelectric thin-film
JP2019116212A (en) Testing method of tire
KR20120000594U (en) Sidewall Crack tester of tire with controlling load position

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20071226

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20091217

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20100706

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20100719

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130806

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130806

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130806

Year of fee payment: 3

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees