JP2006053119A - Method and apparatus for diagnosing degradation of laminated structure having embedded magnetic object - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for diagnosing degradation of laminated structure having embedded magnetic object Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2006053119A
JP2006053119A JP2004326704A JP2004326704A JP2006053119A JP 2006053119 A JP2006053119 A JP 2006053119A JP 2004326704 A JP2004326704 A JP 2004326704A JP 2004326704 A JP2004326704 A JP 2004326704A JP 2006053119 A JP2006053119 A JP 2006053119A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
laminated structure
embedded
delamination
magnetic material
magnetic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2004326704A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP4399342B2 (en
Inventor
Tadashi Goshima
匡 五嶋
Kiyoshi Naganuma
清 長沼
Hiroshi Yamazaki
浩 山崎
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hitachi Building Systems Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Hitachi Building Systems Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hitachi Building Systems Co Ltd filed Critical Hitachi Building Systems Co Ltd
Priority to JP2004326704A priority Critical patent/JP4399342B2/en
Publication of JP2006053119A publication Critical patent/JP2006053119A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4399342B2 publication Critical patent/JP4399342B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Active legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a method and an apparatus for diagnosing the degradation of a laminated structure having an embedded magnetic object, capable of diagnosing the presence or absence of delamination and a progress state of the delamination occurring in the laminated structure having the embedded magnetic object. <P>SOLUTION: An alternate magnetic field 9 is applied to the laminated structure 1 having the embedded magnetic object from the outside, thereby exciting a tensile body 10 in the laminated structure 1 having the embedded magnetic object, and then a characteristic frequency F of sound which is generated by the above excitation at a delamination section in the laminated structure 1 having the embedded magnetic object, is detected, and length values T of continuing time when the characteristic frequency F exists, are measured, and length values L1, L2 and L3 of delamination obtained by reductions on the basis of the length values T1, T2 and T3 of continuing time are compared with judging thresholds L0-L5 being set beforehand. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2006,JPO&NCIPI

Description

本発明は、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断方法及びその方法に用いられる劣化診断装置に関するものである。   The present invention relates to a deterioration diagnosis method for a laminated structure in which a magnetic material is embedded, and a deterioration diagnosis apparatus used in the method.

従来の磁性体が埋設された積層構造体100は、図8から図9に示すように、ゴム材からなる表面帆布層101とゴム材からなる中間ゴム層102とゴム材からなる中心ゴム層103とを積層させる積層構造にすると共に、その中間ゴム層102と中心ゴム層103との間に、複数本のスチールコードなどの磁性体からなる線状の抗張体104を、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体100の長手方向に沿って均等に配設する構造とし、しかも、表面帆布層101と中間ゴム層102との間を、空隙が生じないようにゴムなどの接着剤で接着すると共に、中間ゴム層102と中心ゴム層103との間を、複数本の抗張体104があっても、空隙が生じないようにゴムなどの接着剤性の充填部材によって接着することにより、抗張体104が、中間ゴム層102と中心ゴム層103の間で移動して寄れることがないようにしている。   As shown in FIGS. 8 to 9, a conventional laminated structure 100 in which a magnetic material is embedded includes a surface canvas layer 101 made of a rubber material, an intermediate rubber layer 102 made of a rubber material, and a central rubber layer 103 made of a rubber material. And a linear tensile body 104 made of a magnetic material such as a plurality of steel cords is embedded between the intermediate rubber layer 102 and the central rubber layer 103. The laminated structure 100 is disposed evenly along the longitudinal direction, and the surface canvas layer 101 and the intermediate rubber layer 102 are bonded with an adhesive such as rubber so as not to generate a gap. The intermediate rubber layer 102 and the central rubber layer 103 are bonded to each other by an adhesive filling member such as rubber so that no gap is generated even if there are a plurality of tensile bodies 104. Body 104 is intermediate So that never Yoreru move between beam layer 102 and the central rubber layer 103.

ところが、上記従来の磁性体が埋設された積層構造体100は、長時間使用して、中間ゴム層102と中心ゴム層103との間の充填部材の劣化が進展すると、中間ゴム層102と抗張体104の間と、中心ゴム層103と抗張体104の間の、いずれか一方若しくは両方が剥離する現象が発生してしまうものであつた。この現象のことを、以下、層間剥離と称することとする。   However, when the laminated structure 100 in which the conventional magnetic material is embedded is used for a long time and the deterioration of the filling member between the intermediate rubber layer 102 and the central rubber layer 103 progresses, the intermediate rubber layer 102 and the anti-magnetic structure There was a phenomenon in which one or both of the tension members 104 and between the central rubber layer 103 and the tension member 104 were peeled off. This phenomenon is hereinafter referred to as delamination.

上記中間ゴム層102と中心ゴム層103との間の充填部材の劣化が進展して層間剥離の長さ(以下、層間剥離長と称する)Lが長くなると、図10の(a)、(b)に示すように、中間ゴム層102と中心ゴム層103の間に大きな空隙105ができ、この空隙105内を抗張体104が移動してその抗張体104が寄れるために、中心ゴム層103が外方に向かって膨らんで膨出部103Aを形成したり、複数本の抗張体104同士が接触したりするようになって、中心ゴム層103の外周面(背面)の異常摩耗及び抗張体104の破断が生じていた。   When deterioration of the filling member between the intermediate rubber layer 102 and the central rubber layer 103 progresses and the length of delamination (hereinafter referred to as delamination length) L increases, (a) and (b) of FIG. ), A large gap 105 is formed between the intermediate rubber layer 102 and the center rubber layer 103, and the tensile body 104 moves in the gap 105 so that the tensile body 104 approaches, so that the central rubber layer 103 bulges outward to form a bulging portion 103A, or a plurality of tensile members 104 come into contact with each other, and abnormal wear on the outer peripheral surface (back surface) of the central rubber layer 103 and The tensile body 104 was broken.

なお、ここで、寄れとは、複数本の抗張体104が、中間ゴム層102と中心ゴム層103の間で移動して、部分的に片寄って配設された状態になることをいう。   Here, the offset means that a plurality of tensile bodies 104 move between the intermediate rubber layer 102 and the central rubber layer 103 and are partially offset.

そこで、従来は、中心ゴム層103の摩耗状況の診断をする場合には、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体100をガイドから取り外して、中心ゴム層103の外周面(背面)を目視で確認するようにしていた。また、抗張体104の破断の有無を診断する場合には、抗張体104の破断部からの漏洩磁束を検出することで抗張体104の破断の有無を検出するようにしたものが知られていた(例えば、特許文献1を参照)。   Therefore, conventionally, when diagnosing the wear state of the central rubber layer 103, the laminated structure 100 in which the magnetic material is embedded is removed from the guide, and the outer peripheral surface (back surface) of the central rubber layer 103 is visually confirmed. I was trying to do it. Further, when diagnosing the presence or absence of breakage of the tensile body 104, it is known that the presence or absence of breakage of the tensile body 104 is detected by detecting the leakage magnetic flux from the broken portion of the tensile body 104. (For example, refer to Patent Document 1).

また、複数本の抗張体104が中間ゴム層102と中心ゴム層103の間で移動して寄れている状況を診断する場合には、抗張体104の寄れに伴う磁束変化を検出することで、その寄れの状態を判定するようにしたもの(例えば、特許文献2を参照)や、X線透視画像により磁性体が埋設された積層構造体100内の抗張体104の状態を判定するようにしたものが知られていた(例えば、特許文献3を参照)。
特開平6−316394号公報(段落番号0005〜段落番号0007、図1) 特開平2002−80185号公報(段落番号0042〜段落番号0055、図6〜図8) 特開平10−10060号公報(段落番号0012及び段落番号0016、図10〜図11)
Further, when diagnosing a situation in which a plurality of tensile bodies 104 move and move between the intermediate rubber layer 102 and the central rubber layer 103, a change in magnetic flux accompanying the movement of the tensile body 104 is detected. Thus, the state of the offset is determined (see, for example, Patent Document 2), and the state of the tensile body 104 in the laminated structure 100 in which the magnetic body is embedded is determined by an X-ray fluoroscopic image. What was made was known (for example, refer patent document 3).
JP-A-6-316394 (paragraph number 0005 to paragraph number 0007, FIG. 1) Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2002-80185 (paragraph number 0042 to paragraph number 0055, FIGS. 6 to 8) JP-A-10-10060 (paragraph numbers 0012 and 0016, FIGS. 10 to 11)

上述した特開平6−316394号公報に記載の損傷検出装置では、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の抗張体の破断の有無を診断することができるが、抗張体が破断になる以前に生じるところの層間剥離の有無及びその層間剥離の進展状態を診断することができなかった。また、特開平2002−80185号公報に記載の異常診断装置及び特開平10−10060号公報に記載のX線探傷装置では、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の抗張体の寄れの状態を診断することができるが、その寄れの状態になる以前に生じるところの層間剥離の有無及びその層間剥離の進展状態を診断することができなかった。   In the damage detection apparatus described in JP-A-6-316394 described above, it is possible to diagnose the presence or absence of breakage of the tensile body in the laminated structure in which the magnetic body is embedded, but before the tensile body breaks. It was not possible to diagnose the presence or absence of delamination and the progress of delamination. Moreover, in the abnormality diagnosis apparatus described in Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2002-80185 and the X-ray flaw detection apparatus described in Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 10-10060, the state of the tensile member in the laminated structure in which the magnetic material is embedded is detected. Although it was possible to diagnose, it was not possible to diagnose the presence or absence of delamination and the progress of delamination that occurred before the approaching state.

本発明は、上述した従来技術における実状からなされたもので、その目的は、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内における抗張体との間に生じる層間剥離の有無及びその層間剥離の進展状態を診断することのできる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断方法及びその方法に用いられる劣化診断装置を提供するにある。   The present invention has been made from the above-described prior art, and its purpose is to determine the presence or absence of delamination and the progress of delamination that occur between the laminate in the laminated structure in which the magnetic material is embedded. It is an object of the present invention to provide a deterioration diagnosis method for a laminated structure in which a magnetic material that can be diagnosed is embedded and a deterioration diagnosis device used in the method.

上記目的を達成するために、本発明の磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断方法は、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の外部より磁界を印加することで、抗張体として磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の磁性体を励振させた後、この励振させることによって磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の層間剥離部分で発生する音響の特徴周波数を検出し、この特徴周波数の発生で、層間剥離を検知し、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の劣化を判定することを特徴とする。   In order to achieve the above object, the deterioration diagnosis method for a laminated structure in which a magnetic material is embedded according to the present invention applies a magnetic field from the outside of the laminated structure in which the magnetic material is embedded, thereby providing magnetic properties as a tensile body. After exciting the magnetic body in the laminated structure in which the body is embedded, the excitation detects the characteristic frequency of the sound generated at the delamination portion in the laminated structure in which the magnetic body is embedded. In the generation, delamination is detected, and deterioration in the laminated structure in which the magnetic material is embedded is determined.

また、本発明の磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断方法は、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の外部より磁界を印加することで、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の抗張体を励振させた後、その励振させることによって磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の層間剥離部分で発生する音響の特徴周波数を検出し、この特徴周波数の発生継続時間の長さを測定すると共に、その発生継続時間の長さを基に換算して得られる層間剥離長と予め設定した判定閾値とを比較することにより、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の劣化進展状況を判定するようにしたことを特徴とする。   In addition, the degradation diagnosis method for a laminated structure in which a magnetic material is embedded according to the present invention applies a magnetic field from the outside of the laminated structure in which the magnetic material is embedded, so that the resistance in the laminated structure in which the magnetic material is embedded is reduced. After the tension body is excited, the characteristic frequency of the sound generated at the delamination portion in the laminated structure in which the magnetic material is embedded is detected, and the length of the generation time of the characteristic frequency is measured. At the same time, by comparing the delamination length obtained by conversion based on the length of the generation duration and a predetermined determination threshold, the deterioration progress in the laminated structure in which the magnetic body is embedded is determined. It is characterized by that.

また、本発明の磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断方法は、前記発生継続時間の長さを基に換算して得られる層間剥離長が前記判定閾値に満たない長さとして判定された2個の層間剥離同士間の距離が、予め設定させた限界距離よりも小さい若しくは限界距離LSに等しい場合には、その2個の層間剥離を同一の層間剥離と判定することを特徴とする。   Further, in the deterioration diagnosis method for a laminated structure in which the magnetic body of the present invention is embedded, the delamination length obtained by conversion based on the length of the generation duration is determined as a length that does not satisfy the determination threshold. When the distance between the two delaminations is smaller than the preset limit distance or equal to the limit distance LS, the two delaminations are determined as the same delamination. .

また、本発明の磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断方法は、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の外部より磁界を印加する場合、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の上面上方から隙間を隔てて抗張体として磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の抗張体に磁界を印加させてその抗張体を励振させるようにしたことを特徴とする。   Further, in the degradation diagnosis method for a laminated structure in which a magnetic material is embedded according to the present invention, when a magnetic field is applied from the outside of the laminated structure in which the magnetic material is embedded, the upper surface of the laminated structure in which the magnetic material is embedded. A magnetic field is applied to the tensile body in the laminated structure in which the magnetic body is embedded as a tensile body with a gap from the magnetic field, thereby exciting the tensile body.

また、本発明の磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断装置は、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の外部より磁界を印加することで磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の磁性体を励振させて音響を発生させる音響発生手段と、この音響発生手段により発生した音響のうち、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の層間剥離部分で発生する音響の特徴周波数を検出する検出手段とを少なくとも具備し、前記特徴周波数の発生で、層間剥離を検知し、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の劣化を判定する構成にしたことを特徴する。   In addition, the degradation diagnosis apparatus for a laminated structure in which a magnetic body is embedded according to the present invention is a magnetic body in the laminated structure in which the magnetic body is embedded by applying a magnetic field from the outside of the laminated structure in which the magnetic body is embedded. Sound generating means for generating sound by exciting the sound, and detecting means for detecting a characteristic frequency of the sound generated in the delamination portion in the laminated structure in which the magnetic material is embedded, among the sounds generated by the sound generating means, At least when the characteristic frequency is generated, the delamination is detected, and the deterioration in the laminated structure in which the magnetic material is embedded is determined.

また、本発明の磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断装置は、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の外部より磁界を印加することで磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の磁性体を励振させて音響を発生させる音響発生手段と、この音響発生手段により発生した音響のうち、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の層間剥離部分で発生する音響の特徴周波数を検出する検出手段とを少なくとも具備し、前記検出手段で検知した特徴周波数の発生継続時間の長さを測定すると共に、その発生継続時間の長さを基に換算して得られる層間剥離長と予め設定した判定閾値とを比較することにより、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の劣化進展状況を判定する構成にしたことを特徴とする。   In addition, the degradation diagnosis apparatus for a laminated structure in which a magnetic body is embedded according to the present invention is a magnetic body in the laminated structure in which the magnetic body is embedded by applying a magnetic field from the outside of the laminated structure in which the magnetic body is embedded. Sound generating means for generating sound by exciting the sound, and detecting means for detecting a characteristic frequency of the sound generated in the delamination portion in the laminated structure in which the magnetic material is embedded, among the sounds generated by the sound generating means, A delamination length obtained by conversion based on the length of the generation duration and a predetermined determination threshold, and measuring the length of the generation duration of the characteristic frequency detected by the detection means By comparing the above, it is characterized in that the deterioration progress status in the laminated structure in which the magnetic body is embedded is determined.

本発明によれば、層間剥離の有無及びその層間剥離の進展状態を簡単に確認し得る磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断方法が得られた。また、本発明によれば、層間剥離の有無及びその層間剥離の進展状態を診断し得る磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断装置が得られた。   According to the present invention, a method for diagnosing deterioration of a laminated structure in which a magnetic material that can easily confirm the presence / absence of delamination and the progress of delamination is obtained. In addition, according to the present invention, a deterioration diagnosis apparatus for a laminated structure in which a magnetic body capable of diagnosing the presence / absence of delamination and the progress of delamination is obtained.

以下、本発明に磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断方法の一実施形態を図1〜図7に基づいて説明する。   Hereinafter, an embodiment of a degradation diagnosis method for a laminated structure in which a magnetic material is embedded in the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS.

図1は、本発明の一実施形態に係わる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断方法に用いられる劣化診断装置の概略構造説明図である。図2は、本発明の一実施形態に係わる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断方法の説明図である。図3は、本発明の一実施形態に係わる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断方法により得られた音響の音圧と周波数との特性図(音圧スペクトル図)である。図4は、本発明の一実施形態に係わる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断方法により得られる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体一周分の音圧推移特性図(音圧波形図)である。図5の(a)(b)は、本発明の一実施形態に係わる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の層間剥離状況を示し、(a)は、層間剥離部分が2箇所できた状態の要部構造説明図であり、(b)は、2箇所にできた層間剥離部分が繋がった状態の要部構造説明である。図6は、本発明の一実施形態に係わる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断方法において、層間剥離同士間の距離を、層間剥離の長さと判定する条件を説明する図である。図7は、本発明の一実施形態に係わる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断方法に用いられる劣化進展度と劣化内容と判定閾値の関係を示す図である。   FIG. 1 is a schematic structural explanatory diagram of a deterioration diagnosis device used in a deterioration diagnosis method for a laminated structure in which a magnetic material according to an embodiment of the present invention is embedded. FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram of a degradation diagnosis method for a laminated structure in which a magnetic material according to an embodiment of the present invention is embedded. FIG. 3 is a characteristic diagram (sound pressure spectrum diagram) of acoustic sound pressure and frequency obtained by the deterioration diagnosis method for a laminated structure in which a magnetic material according to an embodiment of the present invention is embedded. FIG. 4 is a sound pressure transition characteristic diagram (sound pressure waveform diagram) for one round of the laminated structure embedded with the magnetic material obtained by the deterioration diagnosis method of the laminated structure embedded with the magnetic material according to one embodiment of the present invention. ). (A) and (b) of FIG. 5 show the delamination situation of the laminated structure in which the magnetic material according to one embodiment of the present invention is embedded, and (a) shows a state in which two delamination portions have been made. It is principal part structure explanatory drawing, (b) is principal part structure description of the state which the delamination part made in two places was connected. FIG. 6 is a diagram for explaining conditions for determining the distance between delaminations as the delamination length in the degradation diagnosis method for a laminated structure in which a magnetic material according to an embodiment of the present invention is embedded. FIG. 7 is a diagram showing the relationship between the degree of deterioration progress, the deterioration content, and the determination threshold value used in the deterioration diagnosis method for a laminated structure in which a magnetic material according to an embodiment of the present invention is embedded.

図1において、本発明の一実施形態に係わる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1の劣化診断方法に用いられる劣化診断装置2は、音響発生手段3と、検出手段4と、これら音響発生手段3及び検出手段4を収納したケース5とを、少なくとも具備している。音響発生手段3は、図1に示すように、鉄心6と、この鉄心6に巻き付けたコイル7とを、少なくとも備えており、コイル7に100Vの交流電源8を接続してコイル7に交流電流を流すことで、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1内の複数本の抗張体10に交番磁界9を印加させることにより、複数本の抗張体10を、矢印Pのように、励振させて音響を発生させる機能を少なくとも有している。   In FIG. 1, a deterioration diagnosis device 2 used for a deterioration diagnosis method of a laminated structure 1 in which a magnetic material according to an embodiment of the present invention is embedded includes an acoustic generation means 3, a detection means 4, and these acoustic generation means. 3 and a case 5 in which the detection means 4 are housed. As shown in FIG. 1, the sound generating means 3 includes at least an iron core 6 and a coil 7 wound around the iron core 6. A 100 V AC power supply 8 is connected to the coil 7, and an AC current is supplied to the coil 7. Is applied to the plurality of tensile bodies 10 in the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic bodies are embedded, thereby exciting the plurality of tensile bodies 10 as indicated by arrows P. And at least a function of generating sound.

図1に示す検出手段4は、音響発生手段3により発生した音響のうち、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1内の層間剥離部分で発生する音響の特徴周波数F(2200〜2800Hz)を検出する音響センサー11を、少なくとも具備しており、検知した特徴周波数Fの発生継続時間の長さTを測定すると共に、その測定した発生継続時間の長さTを基に換算して得られる層間剥離長Lと予め設定した後述する判定閾値H0〜H5と比較することにより、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1内の劣化進展状況(後述する劣化進展度0〜5)を判定する機能を有している。   The detection means 4 shown in FIG. 1 detects the characteristic frequency F (2200 to 2800 Hz) of the sound generated at the delamination portion in the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded, among the sounds generated by the sound generation means 3. And at least an acoustic sensor 11 for measuring, and measuring the length T of the detected generation frequency T of the characteristic frequency F and delamination obtained by conversion based on the measured length T of the generation duration By comparing the length L with predetermined threshold values H0 to H5, which will be described later, there is a function for determining the deterioration progress state (deterioration progress degree 0 to 5 described later) in the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded. is doing.

本発明の一実施形態に係わる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1は、例えば、モーターとプーリを連結するベルト等として使用される。前記、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1は、ゴム材からなる表面帆布層1Aとゴム材からなる中間ゴム層1Bとゴム材からなる中心ゴム層1Cとを積層させると共に、その中間ゴム層1Bと中心ゴム層1Cとの間に、磁性体であるスチールコードからなる複数本の抗張体10を均等に配設する構造としてある。複数本の抗張体10は、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1の長手方向に沿って並行に配設させてある。しかも、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1は、表面帆布層1Aと中間ゴム層1Bとの間を、空隙が生じないようにゴムなどの接着剤で接着すると共に、中間ゴム層1Bと中心ゴム層1Cとの間を、複数本の抗張体10があっても、空隙が生じないようにゴムなどの接着剤性の充填部材で接着することで、抗張体10が中間ゴム層1Bと中心ゴム層1Cとの間で移動して寄れることがないようにしてある(図1を参照)。   The laminated structure 1 in which a magnetic body according to an embodiment of the present invention is embedded is used as, for example, a belt that connects a motor and a pulley. In the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded, the surface canvas layer 1A made of a rubber material, the intermediate rubber layer 1B made of a rubber material, and the central rubber layer 1C made of a rubber material are laminated, and the intermediate rubber layer Between the 1B and the center rubber layer 1C, a plurality of tensile bodies 10 made of a steel cord, which is a magnetic body, are arranged uniformly. The plurality of tensile bodies 10 are arranged in parallel along the longitudinal direction of the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic body is embedded. In addition, the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded is bonded to the surface canvas layer 1A and the intermediate rubber layer 1B with an adhesive such as rubber so that no gap is generated, Even if there are a plurality of tensile bodies 10 between the rubber layer 1C, the tensile body 10 is bonded to the intermediate rubber layer 1B by an adhesive filling member such as rubber so that no gap is generated. And the center rubber layer 1C so as not to move and come close (see FIG. 1).

磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1は、抗張体10と中間ゴム層1B若しくは中心ゴム層1Cとの間に層間剥離が生じていない場合には、劣化診断装置1により、抗張体10を励振させるようにしても、その抗張体10が振動しないので、抗張体10の振動による音響を発生させないが、抗張体10と中間ゴム層1B若しくは中心ゴム層1Cとの間に層間剥離が生じている場合には、抗張体10が振動してその抗張体10の振動部分が中間ゴム層1B及び中心ゴム層1Cに衝突(接触)して音響を発生させる。   In the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded, the delamination diagnosis device 1 causes the tensile body 10 to be peeled off when no delamination occurs between the tensile body 10 and the intermediate rubber layer 1B or the central rubber layer 1C. However, since the tensile body 10 does not vibrate, no sound is generated due to the vibration of the tensile body 10, but an interlayer is formed between the tensile body 10 and the intermediate rubber layer 1B or the central rubber layer 1C. When peeling occurs, the tensile body 10 vibrates and the vibration part of the tensile body 10 collides (contacts) with the intermediate rubber layer 1B and the central rubber layer 1C to generate sound.

劣化診断装置2は、図2に示すように、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1の上面上方に、約10mmの隙間Gを隔てて保持させ、かつ、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1内の複数本の抗張体10に交番磁界9を印加させた状態で、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1を、矢印Q方向に一定速度で一周回転させて、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1の抗張体10の振動に基づき発生するところの音響の発生箇所及びその音響の発生継続時間を、検出手段4で測定することにより、層間剥離の発生箇所及び層間剥離の長さを判定するようにしたものである。   As shown in FIG. 2, the deterioration diagnosis apparatus 2 is configured to hold a laminated structure 1 in which a magnetic material is embedded, with a gap G of about 10 mm above the upper surface of the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded. In a state where an alternating magnetic field 9 is applied to a plurality of tensile bodies 10 in 1, the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded is rotated at a constant speed in the arrow Q direction so that the magnetic material is embedded. The location where the sound is generated based on the vibration of the tensile body 10 of the laminated structure 1 and the duration of the generation of the sound are measured by the detection means 4 so that the location where the delamination occurs and the length of the delamination This is a judgment.

すなわち、音響発生手段3により磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1内の抗張体10を励振させると、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1内に層間剥離がある場合には、その層間剥離部分に位置する抗張体10の部分が振動して中間ゴム層1B及び中心ゴム層1Cに衝突(接触)して音響を発生させる。したがって、その音響の特徴周波数F(2200〜2800H)の有無を、図3に示すように、音響の音圧と周波数との特性図(音圧スペクトル図)を作成して確認することにより、層間剥離の有無を確認することができる。   That is, when the tensile body 10 in the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded is excited by the sound generating means 3, if there is delamination in the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded, the interlayer The portion of the tensile body 10 located at the peeled portion vibrates and collides (contacts) with the intermediate rubber layer 1B and the central rubber layer 1C to generate sound. Therefore, the presence or absence of the acoustic characteristic frequency F (2200 to 2800H) is confirmed by creating a characteristic diagram (sound pressure spectrum diagram) of acoustic sound pressure and frequency as shown in FIG. The presence or absence of peeling can be confirmed.

さらに、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1の抗張体10の振動に基づき発生するところの層間剥離の発生箇所及び長さは、音響発生手段3により磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1内の抗張体10を励振させつつ磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1を一定速度で一周させながら、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1内の層間剥離部分で発生する音響を、音響センサー11で検出して、図4に示す音圧推移特性図(音圧波形図)を作成することによって、確認することができる。すなわち、図4において、音圧閾値Cを越えている部分X1、X2、X3が、層間剥離の発生箇所を表していると共に、音圧閾値Cを越えている部分X1、X2、X3の横幅が、発生継続時間の長さT1、T2、T3を表している。   Furthermore, the generation | occurrence | production location and length of the delamination generate | occur | produced based on the vibration of the tensile body 10 of the laminated structure 1 with which the magnetic body was embedded are the laminated structure 1 with which the magnetic body was embedded by the sound generation means 3. The sound generated at the delamination portion in the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded is generated while the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded is rotated at a constant speed while exciting the tensile body 10 in the inside. It can be confirmed by detecting with the sensor 11 and creating a sound pressure transition characteristic diagram (sound pressure waveform diagram) shown in FIG. That is, in FIG. 4, the portions X1, X2, and X3 exceeding the sound pressure threshold C represent the occurrence of delamination, and the widths of the portions X1, X2, and X3 exceeding the sound pressure threshold C are , The generation duration times T1, T2, and T3 are shown.

この発生継続時間の長さT1、T2、T3を基に換算することで、層間剥離の各発生箇所の層間剥離長L1、L2、L3を得ることができる。そして、これら層間剥離長L1、L2、L3のうち、一番長い層間剥離長(最大層間剥離長)と、後述する判定閾値H0〜H5とを比較することにより、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1内の劣化進展状況を判定することができる。   By converting on the basis of the lengths T1, T2, and T3 of the generation durations, the delamination lengths L1, L2, and L3 at the respective delamination locations can be obtained. And among these delamination lengths L1, L2, and L3, the longest delamination length (maximum delamination length) is compared with the determination threshold values H0 to H5 described later, so that a laminated structure in which a magnetic material is embedded. The progress of deterioration in the body 1 can be determined.

磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1内の劣化進展状況を判定する場合、発生継続時間の長さT1、T2、T3を基に換算して得られる層間剥離長T1、T2、T3が判定閾値H0〜H5に満たない長さとして判定された2個の層間剥離同士間の距離LKが、予め設定させた限界距離LSよりも小さい若しくは限界距離LSに等しい場合には、2個の層間剥離を同一の層間剥離とみなして判定するようにしている。その理由を、図5の(a)(b)及び図6に基づき、次に、説明する。   When determining the progress of deterioration in the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded, the delamination lengths T1, T2, and T3 obtained on the basis of the generation durations T1, T2, and T3 are the determination threshold values. When the distance LK between the two delaminations determined as a length less than H0 to H5 is smaller than or equal to the preset limit distance LS, the two delaminations are performed. Judgment is based on the same delamination. The reason will be described next with reference to FIGS. 5A and 5B and FIG.

磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1内の劣化に伴い、図5の(a)に示すように、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1内には2個の層間剥離部B1、B2が磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1の長手方向に並んで発生し、その後、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1内の劣化がさらに進むと、図5の(b)に示すように、層間剥離部B1と層間剥離部B2とが繋がって層間剥離部B3となる。したがって、層間剥離部B1と層間剥離部B2との間が近いと、層間剥離部B1及び層間剥離部B2の層間剥離長LM、LNが短くても、短時間で長い層間剥離長LGが形成される層間剥離部B0となってしまう。   Along with the deterioration in the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded, as shown in FIG. 5A, the two laminated layers B1 and B2 are formed in the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded. As shown in (b) of FIG. 5, when the deterioration occurs in the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic body is embedded, and then the deterioration in the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic body is embedded further proceeds, The delamination part B1 and the delamination part B2 are connected to form an delamination part B3. Therefore, if the distance between the delamination part B1 and the delamination part B2 is close, even if the delamination lengths LM and LN of the delamination part B1 and the delamination part B2 are short, a long delamination length LG is formed in a short time. It will become the delamination part B0.

そこで、図6に示すように、層間剥離部B1と層間剥離部B2との間の距離LKが、予め設定させた限界距離LSよりも小さい若しくは限界距離LSに等しい場合には、層間剥離部B1と層間剥離部B2とを同一の層間剥離とみなして劣化判定すると共に、層間剥離部B1と層間剥離部B2との間の距離LKが予め設定させた限界距離LSより大きい場合には、層間剥離部B1と層間剥離部B2をそれぞれ別個の層間剥離とみなして劣化判定する機能を、劣化診断装置2に持たせることで、より実際の劣化進展状況に見合った判定ができるようにしている。   Therefore, as shown in FIG. 6, when the distance LK between the delamination part B1 and the delamination part B2 is smaller than or equal to the preset limit distance LS, the delamination part B1 When the distance LK between the interlayer peeling part B1 and the interlayer peeling part B2 is larger than the preset limit distance LS, the interlayer peeling is considered. By providing the deterioration diagnosis device 2 with a function of determining deterioration by regarding the part B1 and the delamination part B2 as separate delaminations, it is possible to make a determination that is more suitable for the actual progress of deterioration.

本発明の一実施形態に係わる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1の劣化進展状況の判定は、劣化進展度0〜5の6段階で行われる。それら劣化進展度0〜5の劣化内容とそれら劣化進展度0〜5を判定するための判定閾値H0〜H5との関係を、図7に基づいて説明する。   The determination of the progress of deterioration of the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic body according to the embodiment of the present invention is embedded is performed in six stages of the degree of deterioration progress 0-5. The relationship between the deterioration contents of the deterioration progress degrees 0 to 5 and the determination threshold values H0 to H5 for determining the deterioration progress degrees 0 to 5 will be described with reference to FIG.

劣化進展度0の場合は、図7の劣化内容の欄に示すように、「劣化なし」として、層間剥離の長さの判定閾値をH0とする。劣化進展度1の場合は、図7の劣化内容の欄に示すように、「抗張体10を拘束する充填部材が劣化して亀裂が発生している」として、層間剥離の長さの判定閾値をH1とする。劣化進展度2の場合は、図7の劣化内容の欄に示すように、「磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1の抗張体10と中間ゴム層1B若しくは中心ゴム層1Cとの間に空隙1Dができて層間剥離が進展中」として、層間剥離の長さの判定閾値をH2とする。劣化進展度3の場合は、図7の劣化内容の欄に示すように、「磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1の抗張体10と中間ゴム層1B若しくは中心ゴム層1Cとの間に発生した層間剥離が磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1の長手方向に大きく進展している」として、層間剥離の長さの判定閾値をH3とする。劣化進展度4の場合は、図7の劣化内容の欄に示すように、「抗張体10が、中間ゴム層1Bと中心ゴム層1Cの間にできた層間剥離による空隙1D内を移動して寄れている」として、層間剥離の長さの判定閾値をH4とする。劣化進展度5の場合は、図7の劣化内容の欄に示すように、「中心ゴム層1Cに膨出部が発生したり、複数本の抗張体10同士のフレッティング摩耗が発生したりしている」として、層間剥離の長さの判定閾値をH5とする。   When the degree of deterioration progress is 0, as shown in the column of deterioration content in FIG. 7, “no deterioration” is set, and the determination threshold for the length of delamination is set to H0. When the degree of deterioration is 1, as shown in the column of deterioration content in FIG. 7, the length of delamination is determined as “the filling member that restrains the tensile body 10 has deteriorated and cracks have occurred”. Let the threshold be H1. In the case of the degree of deterioration progress 2, as shown in the column of deterioration content in FIG. 7, “between the tensile body 10 of the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic body is embedded and the intermediate rubber layer 1B or the central rubber layer 1C. The determination threshold value of the length of delamination is set to H2 as “the gap 1D is formed and delamination is progressing”. In the case of the degradation progress degree 3, as shown in the column of degradation content in FIG. 7, “between the tensile body 10 of the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic body is embedded and the intermediate rubber layer 1B or the central rubber layer 1C. The generated delamination is greatly progressing in the longitudinal direction of the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded, and the determination threshold for the delamination length is set to H3. In the case of the degradation progress degree 4, as shown in the column of degradation content in FIG. 7, “the tensile body 10 moves in the gap 1D due to delamination formed between the intermediate rubber layer 1B and the central rubber layer 1C. The threshold value for determining the length of delamination is H4. In the case of the degree of deterioration progress 5, as shown in the column of deterioration content in FIG. 7, “a bulging portion occurs in the center rubber layer 1C, or fretting wear between a plurality of tensile bodies 10 occurs. "Determining", the determination threshold for the length of delamination is set to H5.

なお、劣化進展度0〜5にそれぞれ対応する層間剥離の長さの判定閾値H0〜H5や音圧閾値C及び限界距離LSは、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1の劣化進展実験等を行うことにより、予め設定して、劣化診断装置2に取り込めるようにしてある。   Note that the delamination length determination thresholds H0 to H5, the sound pressure threshold value C, and the limit distance LS respectively corresponding to the degradation progress degrees 0 to 5 are the degradation progress experiments of the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded. By doing so, it is set in advance and can be taken into the deterioration diagnosis device 2.

次に、本発明の一実施形態に係わる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1の劣化診断方法を行う場合の手順を、説明する。   Next, a procedure for performing the deterioration diagnosis method of the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material according to the embodiment of the present invention is embedded will be described.

始めに、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1をガイドから外すことなく、図2に示すように、ターミナル部12側に位置するところの、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1の水平部分の上方に劣化診断装置2を設置する。その場合、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1の上面と劣化診断装置2の下面との隙間Gが、10mm以内に保持されるように、劣化診断装置2が磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1に設置される。   First, as shown in FIG. 2, the horizontal portion of the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded is located on the terminal portion 12 side without removing the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded from the guide. Deterioration diagnosis device 2 is installed above. In that case, the degradation diagnosis device 2 has a laminated structure in which the magnetic material is embedded so that the gap G between the upper surface of the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded and the lower surface of the deterioration diagnosis device 2 is maintained within 10 mm. Installed on the body 1.

次いで、劣化診断装置2のコイル7に交流電流を流して磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1内の複数本の抗張体10に交番磁界9を印加させた状態で、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1を一定速度で一周させることにより、音響センサー11によって、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1の抗張体10の振動に基づき発生するところの音響の発生箇所、大きさ及び発生継続時間を図4に示す音圧推移特性図のように、測定する。   Next, the magnetic material is embedded in a state where an alternating current 9 is applied to the plurality of tensile members 10 in the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded by flowing an alternating current through the coil 7 of the deterioration diagnosis device 2. When the laminated structure 1 is made to make a round at a constant speed, the acoustic sensor 11 generates the acoustic generation location, the size, and the sound generated based on the vibration of the tensile body 10 of the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded. The generation duration is measured as in the sound pressure transition characteristic diagram shown in FIG.

次いで、図4において、測定した発生継続時間の長さT1、T2、T3を基に層間剥離の各発生箇所X1、X2、X3の層間剥離長L1、L2、L3を換算して得た後、これら層間剥離長L1、L2、L3のうち、一番長い層間剥離長L1と判定閾値H0〜H5を比較することにより、その層間剥離長L1が判定閾値H0〜H5のうちいずれの判定閾値を超えているか否かを判定することで、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1内の劣化進展状況を判定する。例えば、層間剥離長L1が判定閾値H3を超えている場合には、図7に示すように、「磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1の抗張体10と中間ゴム層1B若しくは中心ゴム層1Cとの間に発生した層間剥離が磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1の長手方向に大きく進展している」とされて、劣化進展度3と判定される。また、層間剥離長L1が、判定閾値H2より大きく、かつ、判定閾値H3を超えていない場合には、図7に示すように、「磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1の抗張体10と中間ゴム層1B若しくは中心ゴム層1Cとの間に空隙1Dができて層間剥離が進展中」とされて、劣化進展度2と判定される。   Next, in FIG. 4, after obtaining the delamination lengths L1, L2, and L3 of the delamination locations X1, X2, and X3 based on the measured generation duration lengths T1, T2, and T3, Of these delamination lengths L1, L2, and L3, by comparing the longest delamination length L1 with the determination thresholds H0 to H5, the delamination length L1 exceeds any determination threshold among the determination thresholds H0 to H5. It is determined whether or not the deterioration progress in the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded is determined. For example, when the delamination length L1 exceeds the determination threshold value H3, as shown in FIG. 7, “the tensile body 10 and the intermediate rubber layer 1B or the central rubber layer of the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded” It is determined that the degree of deterioration progress is 3 because the delamination that occurs between 1C and 1C has greatly progressed in the longitudinal direction of the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded. Further, when the delamination length L1 is larger than the determination threshold value H2 and does not exceed the determination threshold value H3, as shown in FIG. 7, “the tensile body 10 of the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded”. And the intermediate rubber layer 1B or the center rubber layer 1C has a gap 1D and delamination is in progress ”, and the degree of deterioration progress is determined to be 2.

以上のように、一実施形態に係わる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1の劣化診断方法によれば、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1をガイドから外すことなく、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1内の層間剥離の有無及びその層間剥離の進展状態、すなわち、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1内の劣化進展状況を、簡単に確認することができ、劣化診断作業を効率よく短時間で行うことを可能にする。   As described above, according to the method for diagnosing degradation of the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic body according to the embodiment is embedded, the magnetic body is embedded without removing the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic body is embedded from the guide. The presence / absence of delamination in the laminated structure 1 and the progress of the delamination, that is, the progress of deterioration in the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded can be easily checked, and deterioration diagnosis work can be performed. It can be performed efficiently and in a short time.

さらに、一実施形態に係わる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1の劣化診断方法によれば、定期的に劣化診断作業を行うことにより、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1の抗張体10が破断する前の状態を確認することができ、抗張体10が破断する前に修理・交換などの対策を行うことができるので、抗張体10が破断してその抗張体10が磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1の表面に飛び出すなどの事故の発生を阻止できる。   Furthermore, according to the deterioration diagnosis method for the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic body according to the embodiment is embedded, the tensile body of the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic body is embedded by performing the deterioration diagnosis work periodically. 10 can be checked before it breaks, and measures such as repair and replacement can be taken before the tensile body 10 breaks. Therefore, the tensile body 10 breaks and the tensile body 10 The occurrence of an accident such as jumping out onto the surface of the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic material is embedded can be prevented.

さらに、一実施形態に係わる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体1の劣化診断方法によれば、層間剥離部B1と層間剥離部B2との間の距離LKが、予め設定させた限界距離LSよりも小さい若しくは限界距離LSに等しい場合には、層間剥離部B1と層間剥離部B2とを同一の層間剥離とみなして劣化判定するので、より実際の劣化の進展状況に見合った判定を行うことができる。   Furthermore, according to the deterioration diagnosis method of the laminated structure 1 in which the magnetic body according to the embodiment is embedded, the distance LK between the delamination part B1 and the delamination part B2 is more than a preset limit distance LS. If it is smaller or equal to the limit distance LS, the delamination part B1 and the delamination part B2 are regarded as the same delamination, and the deterioration determination is made. Therefore, a determination that is more suitable for the actual progress of deterioration can be performed. it can.

なお、図4に示す音圧推移特性図(音圧波形図)は、劣化診断装置2に画像表示装置を設けて、その画像表示装置の表示画面に表示するようにしてもよいし、劣化診断装置2に印刷装置を設けて、その印刷装置で紙に印刷するようにしてもよい。   Note that the sound pressure transition characteristic diagram (sound pressure waveform diagram) shown in FIG. 4 may be displayed on the display screen of the image display device by providing an image display device in the deterioration diagnosis device 2. The apparatus 2 may be provided with a printing apparatus, and the printing apparatus may print on paper.

本発明の一実施形態に係わる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断方法に用いられる劣化診断装置の概略構造説明図である。It is a schematic structure explanatory drawing of the degradation diagnostic apparatus used for the degradation diagnostic method of the laminated structure with which the magnetic body concerning one Embodiment of this invention was embed | buried. 本発明の一実施形態に係わる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断方法の説明図である。It is explanatory drawing of the degradation diagnostic method of the laminated structure with which the magnetic body concerning one Embodiment of this invention was embed | buried. 本発明の一実施形態に係わる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断方法により得られる音圧と周波数との特性図(音圧スペクトル図)である。FIG. 4 is a characteristic diagram (sound pressure spectrum diagram) of sound pressure and frequency obtained by a degradation diagnosis method for a laminated structure in which a magnetic material according to an embodiment of the present invention is embedded. 本発明の一実施形態に係わる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断方法により得られる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体一周分の音圧推移特性図(音圧波形図)である。FIG. 6 is a sound pressure transition characteristic diagram (sound pressure waveform diagram) for one round of a laminated structure embedded with a magnetic material obtained by a deterioration diagnosis method for a laminated structure with embedded magnetic material according to an embodiment of the present invention. 本発明の一実施形態に係わる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の層間剥離状況を示し、(a)は、層間剥離部分が2箇所できた状態の要部断面図であり、(b)は、2箇所にできた層間剥離部分が繋がった状態の断面図である。The interlayer peeling state of the laminated structure with which the magnetic body concerning one Embodiment of this invention was embed | buried is shown, (a) is principal part sectional drawing of the state in which two delamination parts were made, (b) It is sectional drawing of the state which the delamination part made in two places was connected. 本発明の一実施形態に係わる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断方法おいて、層間剥離同士間の距離を、層間剥離の長さと判定する条件を説明する図である。It is a figure explaining the conditions which judge the distance between delaminations as the length of delamination in the degradation diagnostic method of the laminated structure with which the magnetic body concerning one Embodiment of this invention was embed | buried. 本発明の一実施形態に係わる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断方法に用いられる劣化進展度と劣化内容と判定閾値の関係を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the relationship between the deterioration progress used for the deterioration diagnostic method of the laminated structure with which the magnetic body concerning one Embodiment of this invention was embedded, deterioration content, and a determination threshold value. 従来例に係わる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の要部斜視図である。It is a principal part perspective view of the laminated structure in which the magnetic body concerning a prior art example was embed | buried. 従来例に係わる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の要部拡大断面図である。It is a principal part expanded sectional view of the laminated structure in which the magnetic body concerning a prior art example was embed | buried. 従来例に係わる磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の層間剥離状態を示し、(a)は、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の長手方向に沿って層間剥離した部分の状態説明図であり、(b)は、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の長手方向に対して直角方向に沿って層間剥離した部分の状態説明図である。The state of delamination of a laminated structure in which a magnetic body according to a conventional example is embedded is shown, (a) is a state explanatory diagram of a portion where delamination is performed along the longitudinal direction of the laminated structure in which a magnetic body is embedded. (B) is a state explanatory drawing of the part which carried out delamination along the direction orthogonal to the longitudinal direction of the laminated structure with which the magnetic body was embed | buried.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1 磁性体が埋設された積層構造体
1A 表面帆布層
1B 中間ゴム層
1C 中心ゴム層
1D 層間剥離による空隙
2 劣化診断装置
3 音響発生手段
4 検出手段
5 ケース
6 鉄心
7 コイル
8 交流電源
9 交番磁界
10 抗張体
11 音響センサー
12 ターミナル部
G 隙間
F 特徴周波数
T 発生継続時間の長さ
C 音圧閾値
L 層間剥離長
H0〜H5 判定閾値
LK 層間剥離同士間の距離
LS 限界距離
X1、X2、X3 層間剥離の発生箇所
T1、T2、T3 発生継続時間の長さ
L1、L2、L3 換算して得られる層間剥離長
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Laminated structure with embedded magnetic body 1A Surface canvas layer 1B Intermediate rubber layer 1C Central rubber layer 1D Air gap due to delamination 2 Deterioration diagnostic device 3 Sound generating means 4 Detection means 5 Case 6 Iron core 7 Coil 8 AC power supply 9 Alternating magnetic field DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 10 Tensile body 11 Acoustic sensor 12 Terminal part G Gap F Characteristic frequency T Length of generation duration C Sound pressure threshold L Delamination length H0-H5 Determination threshold LK Distance between delamination LS Limit distance X1, X2, X3 Location of occurrence of delamination T1, T2, T3 Length of generation duration L1, L2, L3 Delamination length obtained by conversion

Claims (6)

抗張体として磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の外部より磁界を印加することで、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の磁性体を励振させた後、この励振させることによって磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の層間剥離部分で発生する音響の特徴周波数を検出し、この特徴周波数の発生で、層間剥離を検知し、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の劣化を判定することを特徴とする磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断方法。   By applying a magnetic field from the outside of the laminated structure in which the magnetic body is embedded as a tensile body, the magnetic body in the laminated structure in which the magnetic body is embedded is excited, and then the magnetic body is embedded by this excitation. The characteristic frequency of the sound generated at the delamination part in the laminated structure is detected, the delamination is detected by the generation of the characteristic frequency, and the deterioration in the laminated structure in which the magnetic material is embedded is judged. A degradation diagnosis method for a laminated structure in which a magnetic material is embedded. 磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の外部より磁界を印加することで、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の磁性体を励振させた後、この励振させることによって磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の層間剥離部分で発生する音響の特徴周波数を検出し、この特徴周波数の発生継続時間の長さを測定すると共に、その発生継続時間の長さを基に換算して得られる層間剥離長と予め設定した判定閾値とを比較することにより、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の劣化進展状況を判定することを特徴とする磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断方法。   By applying a magnetic field from the outside of the laminated structure in which the magnetic material is embedded, the magnetic material in the laminated structure in which the magnetic material is embedded is excited, and then the laminated structure in which the magnetic material is embedded by this excitation. The characteristic frequency of the sound generated at the delamination part in the body is detected, the length of the generation duration of this characteristic frequency is measured, and the delamination length obtained by conversion based on the length of the generation duration and A deterioration diagnosis method for a laminated structure embedded with a magnetic material, characterized by determining a progress of deterioration in the laminated structure with a magnetic material embedded by comparing with a predetermined determination threshold value. 前記発生継続時間の長さを基に換算して得られる層間剥離長が前記判定閾値に満たない長さとして判定された2個の層間剥離同士間の距離が、予め設定させた限界距離よりも小さい若しくは限界距離に等しい場合には、その2個の層間剥離を同一の層間剥離と判定することを特徴とする請求項2記載の磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断方法。   The distance between two delaminations determined as a length where the delamination length obtained by conversion based on the length of the generation duration is less than the determination threshold is greater than a preset limit distance 3. The method for diagnosing deterioration of a laminated structure in which a magnetic body is embedded according to claim 2, wherein when the distance is smaller or equal to the limit distance, the two delaminations are determined as the same delamination. 磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の外部より磁界を印加する場合、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の上面上方から隙間を隔てて磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の抗張体に磁界を印加させたことを特徴とする請求項1もしくは2記載の磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断方法。   When applying a magnetic field from the outside of the laminated structure in which the magnetic material is embedded, a magnetic field is applied to the tensile body of the laminated structure in which the magnetic material is embedded with a gap from above the upper surface of the laminated structure in which the magnetic material is embedded. 3. A method for diagnosing deterioration of a laminated structure in which a magnetic material according to claim 1 or 2 is embedded. 磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の外部より磁界を印加することで磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の磁性体を励振させて音響を発生させる音響発生手段と、この音響発生手段により発生した音響のうち、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の層間剥離部分で発生する音響の特徴周波数を検出する検出手段とを少なくとも具備し、前記特徴周波数の発生で、層間剥離を検知し、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の劣化を判定する構成にしたことを特徴する磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断装置。   A sound generating means for generating a sound by exciting a magnetic body in the laminated structure in which the magnetic body is embedded by applying a magnetic field from the outside of the laminated structure in which the magnetic body is embedded, and the sound generating means At least detecting means for detecting a characteristic frequency of sound generated at a delamination portion in the laminated structure in which the magnetic material is embedded, and detecting the delamination by the generation of the characteristic frequency, A deterioration diagnosis device for a laminated structure in which a magnetic material is embedded, characterized in that the deterioration is determined in the laminated structure in which the magnetic material is embedded. 磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の外部より磁界を印加することで磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の抗張体を励振させて音響を発生させる音響発生手段と、この音響発生手段により発生した音響のうち、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の層間剥離部分で発生する音響の特徴周波数を検出する検出手段とを少なくとも具備し、前記検出手段で検知した特徴周波数の発生継続時間の長さを測定すると共に、その発生継続時間の長さを基に換算して得られる層間剥離長と予め設定した判定閾値とを比較することにより、磁性体が埋設された積層構造体内の劣化進展状況を判定する構成にしたことを特徴とする磁性体が埋設された積層構造体の劣化診断装置。   A sound generating means for generating sound by exciting a tensile body in the laminated structure in which the magnetic material is embedded by applying a magnetic field from the outside of the laminated structure in which the magnetic material is embedded, and generated by the sound generating means At least a detection means for detecting a characteristic frequency of the sound generated at the delamination portion in the laminated structure in which the magnetic material is embedded, and the generation time of the characteristic frequency detected by the detection means is long. Degradation progress in the laminated structure in which the magnetic material is embedded by measuring the thickness and comparing the delamination length obtained by conversion based on the length of the generation duration and a predetermined threshold value A deterioration diagnosis device for a laminated structure in which a magnetic body is embedded, characterized in that the structure is determined.
JP2004326704A 2004-07-15 2004-11-10 Deterioration diagnosis method and deterioration diagnosis apparatus for laminated structure in which magnetic material is embedded Active JP4399342B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004326704A JP4399342B2 (en) 2004-07-15 2004-11-10 Deterioration diagnosis method and deterioration diagnosis apparatus for laminated structure in which magnetic material is embedded

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004208680 2004-07-15
JP2004326704A JP4399342B2 (en) 2004-07-15 2004-11-10 Deterioration diagnosis method and deterioration diagnosis apparatus for laminated structure in which magnetic material is embedded

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2006053119A true JP2006053119A (en) 2006-02-23
JP4399342B2 JP4399342B2 (en) 2010-01-13

Family

ID=36030692

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2004326704A Active JP4399342B2 (en) 2004-07-15 2004-11-10 Deterioration diagnosis method and deterioration diagnosis apparatus for laminated structure in which magnetic material is embedded

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4399342B2 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101083205B1 (en) 2009-02-20 2011-11-11 고려대학교 산학협력단 Method for calculating thermal stability parameter of nanostructured cell of synthetic ferrimagnet
WO2016003553A1 (en) * 2014-07-02 2016-01-07 Schlumberger Canada Limited Magnetic property characterization of motor lamination material
JP5942059B1 (en) * 2016-03-15 2016-06-29 株式会社エッチアンドビーシステム Nondestructive inspection method and nondestructive inspection device

Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS50145178A (en) * 1974-05-11 1975-11-21
JPH04190174A (en) * 1990-11-22 1992-07-08 Showa Electric Wire & Cable Co Ltd Device for detecting damage to strand
JPH06316394A (en) * 1993-05-07 1994-11-15 Hitachi Building Syst Eng & Service Co Ltd Damage detector for escalator handrail
JPH08278287A (en) * 1995-04-05 1996-10-22 Babcock Hitachi Kk Method and device for diagnosing steel material heat history
JPH1010060A (en) * 1996-06-27 1998-01-16 Hitachi Building Syst Co Ltd X-ray inspection device for handrail for man conveyor
JPH1164099A (en) * 1997-08-12 1999-03-05 Ohbayashi Corp Method for controlling quality of laminated rubber
JPH1164098A (en) * 1997-08-12 1999-03-05 Ohbayashi Corp Quality control system for laminated rubber
JP2001021541A (en) * 1999-07-09 2001-01-26 Shikoku X Sen Kk Inspection method of multilayer member
JP2002080185A (en) * 2000-07-03 2002-03-19 Hitachi Building Systems Co Ltd Diagnosing method, diagnostic device and detecting device for abnormality in steel cord for handrail
WO2002040959A1 (en) * 2000-11-17 2002-05-23 Amic Co.,Ltd. Device and method for acoustic diagnosis and measurement by pulse electromagnetic force
JP2005148059A (en) * 2003-10-22 2005-06-09 Hitachi Building Systems Co Ltd Diagnostic method for laminate belt
JP2006008385A (en) * 2004-06-29 2006-01-12 Hitachi Building Systems Co Ltd Deterioration diagnosing method for handrail of escalator

Patent Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS50145178A (en) * 1974-05-11 1975-11-21
JPH04190174A (en) * 1990-11-22 1992-07-08 Showa Electric Wire & Cable Co Ltd Device for detecting damage to strand
JPH06316394A (en) * 1993-05-07 1994-11-15 Hitachi Building Syst Eng & Service Co Ltd Damage detector for escalator handrail
JPH08278287A (en) * 1995-04-05 1996-10-22 Babcock Hitachi Kk Method and device for diagnosing steel material heat history
JPH1010060A (en) * 1996-06-27 1998-01-16 Hitachi Building Syst Co Ltd X-ray inspection device for handrail for man conveyor
JPH1164099A (en) * 1997-08-12 1999-03-05 Ohbayashi Corp Method for controlling quality of laminated rubber
JPH1164098A (en) * 1997-08-12 1999-03-05 Ohbayashi Corp Quality control system for laminated rubber
JP2001021541A (en) * 1999-07-09 2001-01-26 Shikoku X Sen Kk Inspection method of multilayer member
JP2002080185A (en) * 2000-07-03 2002-03-19 Hitachi Building Systems Co Ltd Diagnosing method, diagnostic device and detecting device for abnormality in steel cord for handrail
WO2002040959A1 (en) * 2000-11-17 2002-05-23 Amic Co.,Ltd. Device and method for acoustic diagnosis and measurement by pulse electromagnetic force
JP2005148059A (en) * 2003-10-22 2005-06-09 Hitachi Building Systems Co Ltd Diagnostic method for laminate belt
JP2006008385A (en) * 2004-06-29 2006-01-12 Hitachi Building Systems Co Ltd Deterioration diagnosing method for handrail of escalator

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101083205B1 (en) 2009-02-20 2011-11-11 고려대학교 산학협력단 Method for calculating thermal stability parameter of nanostructured cell of synthetic ferrimagnet
WO2016003553A1 (en) * 2014-07-02 2016-01-07 Schlumberger Canada Limited Magnetic property characterization of motor lamination material
JP5942059B1 (en) * 2016-03-15 2016-06-29 株式会社エッチアンドビーシステム Nondestructive inspection method and nondestructive inspection device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4399342B2 (en) 2010-01-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP2008214037A (en) Wire rope inspecting device for elevator, and rope outer diameter measuring method
US9731939B2 (en) Elevator cord health monitoring
TWI489105B (en) Apparatus for wire rope inspection, apparatus, method, and program for wire rope damage determination
KR101120703B1 (en) Rope
WO2015068322A1 (en) Elevator diagnosing device
US20190202666A1 (en) Method and arrangement for condition monitoring of a rope of a hoisting apparatus
JP4399342B2 (en) Deterioration diagnosis method and deterioration diagnosis apparatus for laminated structure in which magnetic material is embedded
JP5279856B2 (en) Degradation diagnosis device for oil-filled transformer
JP5377769B2 (en) Elevator rope
JP2010014659A (en) Flaw detector of wire rope
JP2006242628A (en) Method of diagnosing degradation of stacked layer with embedded tension member consisting of magnetic substance
KR20140117619A (en) Method for detecting degradation of resin film and apparatus for detecting degradation of resin film
JP2007271607A (en) Abnormality detection device
JP2006008385A (en) Deterioration diagnosing method for handrail of escalator
JP6419305B2 (en) Insulation inspection device for electric motor and insulation inspection method for electric motor
JPH06316394A (en) Damage detector for escalator handrail
JP2009300250A (en) Method of inspecting excitation winding
JP2007115512A (en) Diagnostic method of fuel cell and fuel cell system with means for executing sane
JP4436744B2 (en) Laminate strip diagnostic method
JP2000313583A (en) Diagnosing method and magnetic flux change inspection device for steel cord for handrail
JP2006298510A (en) Deterioration diagnostic method for handrail of escalator
JP7143690B2 (en) Magnetic material inspection system, magnetic material inspection apparatus, and magnetic material inspection method
US10656208B2 (en) Method of assessing the risk of a stator failure
JP6813105B2 (en) Magnetic material inspection equipment and magnetic material inspection method
JP2005098782A (en) Rotor inspection device and method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20070226

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20090929

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20091013

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20091026

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121030

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4399342

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121030

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20151030

Year of fee payment: 6

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350