JP2005320577A - Aluminum alloy sheet for wide mouthed bottle can cap - Google Patents
Aluminum alloy sheet for wide mouthed bottle can cap Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP2005320577A JP2005320577A JP2004139019A JP2004139019A JP2005320577A JP 2005320577 A JP2005320577 A JP 2005320577A JP 2004139019 A JP2004139019 A JP 2004139019A JP 2004139019 A JP2004139019 A JP 2004139019A JP 2005320577 A JP2005320577 A JP 2005320577A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- mpa
- cap
- aluminum alloy
- plate
- ear
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Abstract
Description
本発明は、広口ボトル缶用のPP(pilfer proof)キャップに好適に使用されるAl−Mg(アルミニウム−マグネシウム)系合金板に関するものである。 The present invention relates to an Al—Mg (aluminum-magnesium) based alloy plate suitably used for a PP (pilfer proof) cap for a wide-mouth bottle can.
PPキャップは、一般に、素材であるアルミニウム合金板に塗装・印刷を施してから、複数の円筒状のカップを同時に成形し、各カップの耳部をトリミングした後、裾部にミシン目を加工するという工程で製造する。こうして成形されたキャップは、飲料容器に内容物を充填後、その容器のネジ部に巻締めされ、市場に出される。 PP caps are generally coated and printed on a material aluminum alloy plate, then formed into a plurality of cylindrical cups at the same time, trimmed at the ears of each cup, and then processed into perforations at the hem. It is manufactured by the process. The cap thus formed is filled in the beverage container, and then wound around the threaded portion of the container and put on the market.
これまで、直径28mm以下の小口のPPキャップには、主にAl−Mn系の3105合金(特許文献1参照)、あるいはAl−Fe系の8011合金が使われていた(非特許文献1参照)。一方、直径38mm等の広口キャップには、強度がより高い必要性があることから、Al−Mg系の5151合金が使われている。しかし、より高内圧のかかる内容物に対して、あるいはゲージダウン(板厚の減少)に対しては、5151合金でも強度が不十分であると考えられる。 Until now, Al-Mn 3105 alloy (see Patent Document 1) or Al-Fe 8011 alloy has been mainly used for PP caps with a diameter of 28 mm or less (see Non-Patent Document 1). . On the other hand, a wide mouth cap having a diameter of 38 mm or the like uses Al-Mg 5151 alloy because it needs to have higher strength. However, it is considered that the strength of 5151 alloy is insufficient for the contents with higher internal pressure or for gauge down (reduction in plate thickness).
本発明はかかる従来の問題点に鑑みてなされたもので、特に、成形性、耳率を損なわない範囲で高強度化することにより、製造したキャップにおけるネジ部の剛性向上と天面のドーミング防止が可能となるように耐圧強度を向上することができる、Al−Mg系の広口ボトル缶キャップ用アルミニウム合金板を提供しようとするものである。 The present invention has been made in view of such conventional problems, and in particular, by improving the strength within a range that does not impair the moldability and the ear rate, the rigidity of the screw portion in the manufactured cap is improved and the top surface is prevented from doming. Therefore, the present invention is to provide an Al—Mg-based aluminum alloy plate for a wide-mouth bottle can cap, which can improve the pressure strength so as to be possible.
本発明は、Mg:2.1%(重量%、以下同じ)超え、3.5%以下を含み、残部が不可避的不純物とアルミニウムからなる化学組成を有する広口ボトル缶キャップ用のアルミニウム合金板であって、
該アルミニウム合金板の元板の引張強さが210〜320MPa、耐力が160〜290MPaであり、
かつ、上記元板に対して、200℃の温度で10分間保持する熱処理を施した空焼板の引張強さが210〜320MPa、耐力が150〜280MPa、伸びが5%以上であることを特徴とする広口ボトル缶キャップ用アルミニウム合金板にある(請求項1)。
The present invention relates to an aluminum alloy plate for a wide-mouth bottle can cap having a chemical composition comprising Mg: exceeding 2.1% (weight%, the same shall apply hereinafter) and not more than 3.5%, the balance being inevitable impurities and aluminum. There,
The tensile strength of the base plate of the aluminum alloy plate is 210 to 320 MPa, the proof stress is 160 to 290 MPa,
And the tensile strength of the baked board which gave the heat processing hold | maintained for 10 minutes at the temperature of 200 degreeC with respect to the said base plate is 210-320 MPa, yield strength is 150-280 MPa, elongation is 5% or more, It is characterized by the above-mentioned. It is in the aluminum alloy plate for wide-mouth bottle can caps (claim 1).
まず、本発明における化学組成の限定理由について説明する。
Mgは、本発明の必須の成分であり、その含有量を2.1%超え、3.5%以下に限定することにより、強度および成形性を良好に保つことができる。
Mg含有量が2.1%以下の場合、高内圧の内容物対応あるいはゲージダウン対応には強度不足になるため、広口ボトル缶キャップ(以下、適宜、単にキャップという。)として所定の耐圧を得ることができない。また、成形したキャップにおけるネジ部の剛性向上と天面のドーミング防止効果が十分に得られないという問題もある。また、圧延方向に対し0°、90°、180°および270°方向の4箇所の耳が発達しやすくなるため、安定して低い耳率の材料を得ることが難しく、文字曲がりのしにくいキャップを量産していくことは容易ではない。そのため、後述するごとく、Mg含有量は2.5%以上であることが好ましい。
First, the reason for limiting the chemical composition in the present invention will be described.
Mg is an essential component of the present invention. By limiting its content to more than 2.1% and not more than 3.5%, strength and formability can be kept good.
When the Mg content is 2.1% or less, the strength is insufficient for handling high internal pressure contents or handling gauge down, so that a predetermined pressure resistance is obtained as a wide-mouth bottle can cap (hereinafter simply referred to as a cap). I can't. In addition, there is a problem that the rigidity of the threaded portion of the molded cap and the effect of preventing doming on the top surface cannot be sufficiently obtained. In addition, four ears in the 0 °, 90 °, 180 °, and 270 ° directions with respect to the rolling direction are easily developed, so it is difficult to stably obtain a material with a low ear rate, and it is difficult to bend characters. It is not easy to mass-produce. Therefore, as described later, the Mg content is preferably 2.5% or more.
なお、Mg含有量が多いほど結晶粒が細かくなる。そのため、Mg含有量を高めて結晶粒微細化効果を高めることにより、カップ成形時の肌荒れを抑制することができる。
また、Mg含有量が3.5%超えの場合、強度が高すぎて、開栓時に多大な力を要するため、開栓しにくくなってしまう。そのため、後述するごとく、Mg含有量は3.0%以下が好ましい。
As the Mg content increases, the crystal grains become finer. Therefore, rough skin at the time of cup molding can be suppressed by increasing the Mg content and enhancing the effect of crystal grain refinement.
Further, when the Mg content exceeds 3.5%, the strength is too high, and a great deal of force is required at the time of opening, so that it is difficult to open the plug. Therefore, as described later, the Mg content is preferably 3.0% or less.
また、耳率の発生状態及び強度特性は、Mgの含有量だけではなく、後述するごとくその他の製造条件などによって調整することができる。
また、上記文字曲がりとは、平板状態で印刷を施した後にカップ状に成形するキャップの製造方法の特性上、素材の変形の仕方によって、印刷した絵柄や文字等が曲がって表示される現象のことをいう。
Moreover, the generation | occurrence | production state and intensity | strength characteristic of an ear | edge ratio can be adjusted with other manufacturing conditions etc. not only as content of Mg but as mentioned later.
In addition, the above-mentioned character bending is a phenomenon in which a printed pattern or characters are bent and displayed depending on how the material is deformed due to the characteristics of the method of manufacturing a cap formed into a cup shape after printing in a flat state. That means.
また、上記元板とは、本発明のアルミニウム合金板そのもの、すなわち製造したままの状態であり、キャップ製造工程に供給される前の状態の板をいう。そして、上記空焼板とは、この元板に、上記の熱処理を施して、便宜上キャップ製造工程における印刷後の状態をある程度反映させた状態の板をいう。 The base plate refers to the aluminum alloy plate of the present invention itself, that is, the plate in the state as manufactured and before being supplied to the cap manufacturing process. The blank plate is a plate in which the base plate is subjected to the heat treatment as described above, and the state after printing in the cap manufacturing process is reflected to some extent for convenience.
上記元板の強度は、引張強さが210〜320MPa、耐力が160〜290MPaの範囲に限定する。そして、かつ、上記空焼板の強度は、引張強さが210〜320MPa、耐力が150〜280MPa、伸びが5%以上の範囲に限定する。
上記元板の引張強さ及び耐力が上記範囲にないと、空焼後に目的とする強度を得ることが困難となる。
上記空焼板の引張強さが210MPa未満の場合及び耐力が150MPa未満の場合には、成形したキャップにおいて所定の耐圧を得ることができない。一方、空焼板の引張強さが320MPaを超える場合及び耐力が280MPaを超える場合には、成形したキャップの開栓がしにくくなるという問題がある。
上記空焼板の伸びが5%未満の場合には、キャップ成形時に割れなどの成形不良が出やすくなるという問題がある。
The strength of the base plate is limited to a tensile strength of 210 to 320 MPa and a proof stress of 160 to 290 MPa. And the intensity | strength of the said baked board is limited to the range whose tensile strength is 210-320 MPa, proof stress is 150-280 MPa, and elongation is 5% or more.
If the tensile strength and proof stress of the base plate are not within the above ranges, it will be difficult to obtain the desired strength after baking.
When the tensile strength of the blank plate is less than 210 MPa and the proof stress is less than 150 MPa, a predetermined pressure resistance cannot be obtained in the molded cap. On the other hand, when the tensile strength of the blank plate exceeds 320 MPa and when the proof stress exceeds 280 MPa, there is a problem that it is difficult to open the molded cap.
When the elongation of the blank plate is less than 5%, there is a problem that molding defects such as cracks are likely to occur during cap molding.
本発明においては、得ようとするキャップの仕様に応じて、Mg含有量をより狭い範囲に限定して、より最適な強度特性に調整することができる。
すなわち、キャップの開栓しやすさを重視する場合には、Mg含有量は3.0%以下であり、かつ、上記元板の引張強さが210〜280MPa、耐力が160〜250MPaであると共に、上記空焼板の引張強さが210〜280MPa、耐力が150〜240MPa、伸びが5%以上であることが好ましい(請求項2)。
In the present invention, according to the specifications of the cap to be obtained, the Mg content can be limited to a narrower range and adjusted to a more optimal strength characteristic.
That is, when emphasizing the ease of opening the cap, the Mg content is 3.0% or less, the tensile strength of the base plate is 210 to 280 MPa, and the proof stress is 160 to 250 MPa. The empty fired plate preferably has a tensile strength of 210 to 280 MPa, a proof stress of 150 to 240 MPa, and an elongation of 5% or more.
また、キャップの耐圧を重視する場合には、Mg含有量は2.5%以上であり、かつ、上記元板の引張強さが250〜320MPa、耐力が200〜290MPaであると共に、上記空焼板の引張強さが250〜320MPa、耐力が190〜280MPa、伸びが5%以上であることが好ましい(請求項3)。 In the case where importance is attached to the pressure resistance of the cap, the Mg content is 2.5% or more, the tensile strength of the base plate is 250 to 320 MPa, the proof stress is 200 to 290 MPa, and the air baking is performed. The plate preferably has a tensile strength of 250 to 320 MPa, a proof stress of 190 to 280 MPa, and an elongation of 5% or more.
また、上記アルミニウム合金板は、その化学組成における上記アルミニウムの一部に代えて、さらにCu:0.01〜0.20%、Mn:0.01〜0.30%、Cr:0.01〜0.05%、Zn:0.01〜0.25%、Si:0.01〜0.20%、Fe:0.01〜0.30%、Ti:0.005〜0.05%のうち1種または2種以上を含むことが好ましい(請求項4)。 In addition, the aluminum alloy plate is replaced with a part of the aluminum in the chemical composition, Cu: 0.01 to 0.20%, Mn: 0.01 to 0.30%, Cr: 0.01 to 0.05%, Zn: 0.01 to 0.25%, Si: 0.01 to 0.20%, Fe: 0.01 to 0.30%, Ti: 0.005 to 0.05% It is preferable that 1 type or 2 types or more are included (Claim 4).
Cu:0.01〜0.20%;
Cuは、材料強度に影響を及ぼす元素である。0.01%未満の場合、その効果が得られないばかりでなく、純度の高い地金を使用する必要があり、コストアップとなる。0.20%を超えての添加は、本Al−Mg系合金においては、圧延加工しにくくなる。
Cu: 0.01 to 0.20%;
Cu is an element that affects the material strength. If it is less than 0.01%, not only the effect cannot be obtained, but it is necessary to use a high purity metal, resulting in an increase in cost. Addition in excess of 0.20% makes rolling difficult in the present Al-Mg alloy.
Mn:0.01〜0.30%、Cr:0.01〜0.05%、Zn:0.01〜0.25%、Fe:0.01〜0.30%;
Mn、Cr、Zn、Feは、結晶粒微細化による成形性に影響を及ぼす元素である。それぞれ上記下限未満の場合、その効果が得られないばかりでなく、純度の高い地金を使用する必要があり、コストアップとなる。一方、上記上限を超える場合、結晶粒微細化効果は飽和するため、添加に要するコストアップを考慮すると上記上限とすることが好ましい。
Mn: 0.01 to 0.30%, Cr: 0.01 to 0.05%, Zn: 0.01 to 0.25%, Fe: 0.01 to 0.30%;
Mn, Cr, Zn, and Fe are elements that affect the formability by crystal grain refinement. If each of these is less than the above lower limit, not only the effect cannot be obtained, but it is necessary to use a high purity metal, which increases the cost. On the other hand, when the above upper limit is exceeded, the crystal grain refining effect is saturated, and therefore the above upper limit is preferably taken into consideration in view of the cost increase required for addition.
Si:0.01〜0.20%;
Siは、MnやFeと化合物を形成し、鋳造時にAl−Mn−Fe−Si系やAl−Fe−Si系化合物等の晶出物を形成する元素である。0.01%未満の場合、純度の高い地金を使用する必要があり、コストアップとなる。0.20%を超える場合、前記晶出物が多くなり、キャップ成形性を劣化させる。
Si: 0.01-0.20%;
Si is an element that forms a compound with Mn and Fe and forms a crystallized product such as an Al-Mn-Fe-Si-based or Al-Fe-Si-based compound during casting. If it is less than 0.01%, it is necessary to use high purity metal, which increases costs. When it exceeds 0.20%, the crystallized matter increases and the cap moldability is deteriorated.
Ti:0.005〜0.05%;
Tiは、鋳塊組織微細化による成形性向上に影響を及ぼす元素である。0.005%未満の場合、その効果が得られない。0.05%を超えると、未固溶のAl−Ti系化合物が最終製品の表面欠陥として現れやすくなる。
なお、鋳塊組織微細化剤としてAl−Ti−B中間合金を添加する場合は、Bが含有されるが、Bは0.02%以下の範囲で添加されるのが好ましい。
Ti: 0.005 to 0.05%;
Ti is an element that affects the improvement of formability by refining the ingot structure. If it is less than 0.005%, the effect cannot be obtained. If it exceeds 0.05%, an insoluble Al—Ti compound tends to appear as a surface defect in the final product.
In addition, when adding an Al-Ti-B intermediate alloy as an ingot structure | tissue refiner, B contains, but it is preferable to add B in 0.02% or less of range.
次に、上記アルミニウム合金板は、上記元板又は上記空焼板の耳率試験に使用する絞りカップの開口部に発生する耳のうち、圧延方向に対し45°方向の4箇所(45°、135°、225°、315°方向の4箇所)、あるいは0°、90°、180°、270°方向の4箇所に発生する耳の耳率が2.0%以下であり、かつ圧延方向に対し0°と180°方向の2箇所に発生する耳の耳率が2.0%以下であることが好ましい(請求項5)。 Next, the aluminum alloy plate has four locations (45 °, 45 ° in the rolling direction) with respect to the rolling direction among the ears generated in the opening portion of the drawn cup used for the ear rate test of the base plate or the blank plate. 135 degrees, 225 degrees, 415 degrees directions), or the ear ratio of the ears occurring at 4 positions of 0 degrees, 90 degrees, 180 degrees, 270 degrees direction is 2.0% or less and in the rolling direction. On the other hand, it is preferable that the ear ratio of the ears generated at two locations in the 0 ° and 180 ° directions is 2.0% or less.
上記45°方向4箇所の耳の耳率が2.0%を超えた場合、成形したキャップの裾部の印刷文字等の曲がりは45°方向において顕著となり、防止が困難となる。耳率は小さければ小さい程、つまり下限は0%であるのがよいが、金属板の性質上困難である。実際のところ0.5%〜2.0%の耳率であればより好ましい。 When the ear rate of the four ears in the 45 ° direction exceeds 2.0%, the bending of printed characters or the like at the bottom of the molded cap becomes noticeable in the 45 ° direction and is difficult to prevent. The smaller the ear ratio, that is, the lower limit is preferably 0%, but it is difficult due to the nature of the metal plate. Actually, an ear rate of 0.5% to 2.0% is more preferable.
また、0°、90°、180°、270°方向の4箇所に発生する耳の耳率が2.0%を超えた場合においても、上記45°方向4箇所における耳率が2.0%を超えた場合と同様に、印刷文字等の曲がりが顕著になる。 Further, even when the ear rate of the ears occurring at the four locations in the 0 °, 90 °, 180 °, and 270 ° directions exceeds 2.0%, the ear rate at the four locations in the 45 ° direction is 2.0%. As in the case of exceeding, bending of printed characters or the like becomes remarkable.
さらに、圧延方向に対し0°と180°方向の2箇所に発生する耳の耳率が2.0%を超えた場合にも、成形したキャップ裾部の印刷文字等の曲がりを防止することが困難となる。Al−低Mg系合金の絞り加工の場合、圧延方向に対し特に0°と180°方向の耳が発生しやすく、この方向の耳を制御することがポイントとなる。そして、より確実に印刷文字等の曲がりを抑制するには、圧延方向に対し0°と180°に発生する耳の耳率を1.5%以下とすることが好ましい。 Furthermore, even when the ear-ear ratio occurring at two locations in the 0 ° and 180 ° directions with respect to the rolling direction exceeds 2.0%, it is possible to prevent bending of printed characters and the like on the molded cap hem portion. It becomes difficult. In the case of drawing of an Al-low Mg alloy, ears in the directions of 0 ° and 180 ° tend to occur particularly with respect to the rolling direction, and it is important to control the ears in this direction. In order to more reliably suppress the bending of printed characters and the like, it is preferable that the ear ratio of the ears generated at 0 ° and 180 ° with respect to the rolling direction is 1.5% or less.
ここで、上記絞りカップは、上記キャップ用Al−Mg系合金板より切り出したブランクを所定の条件で絞り加工して得られるカップ状の試験材である。この絞りカップの開口端において、軸方向に突出した部分を耳、耳と耳との間において最も窪んだ部分を谷という。そして、絞りカップの底から耳先端までの距離を耳高さとし、絞りカップの底から谷先端までを谷高さとする。そして耳率は、次のようにして算出することができる。 Here, the drawn cup is a cup-shaped test material obtained by drawing a blank cut out from the cap Al—Mg alloy plate under predetermined conditions. At the opening end of the throttle cup, the portion protruding in the axial direction is called an ear, and the most depressed portion between the ears is called a valley. The distance from the bottom of the squeeze cup to the tip of the ear is defined as the ear height, and the distance from the bottom of the squeeze cup to the tip of the valley is defined as the valley height. The ear rate can be calculated as follows.
<45°方向4箇所の耳の耳率>
45°耳高さ=A、135°耳高さ=B、225°耳高さ=C、315°耳高さ=D、
45°と135°の間の最小の谷高さ=E、
135°と225°の間の最小の谷高さ=F、
225°と315°の間の最小の谷高さ=G、
315°と45°の間の最小の谷高さ=H、
耳部の平均:M45=(A+B+C+D)/4、
谷部の平均:V45=(E+F+G+H)/4とすると、
耳率=〔(M45−V45)/{(M45+V45)/2}〕×100(%)
<Ear rate of ears at 45 points in 45 ° direction>
45 ° ear height = A, 135 ° ear height = B, 225 ° ear height = C, 315 ° ear height = D,
Minimum valley height between 45 ° and 135 ° = E,
Minimum valley height between 135 ° and 225 ° = F,
Minimum valley height between 225 ° and 315 ° = G,
Minimum valley height between 315 ° and 45 ° = H,
Ear average: M45 = (A + B + C + D) / 4,
Average valley: V45 = (E + F + G + H) / 4
Ear rate = [(M45−V45) / {(M45 + V45) / 2}] × 100 (%)
<0°、90°、180°、270°方向4箇所の耳の耳率>
0°耳高さ=A’、90°耳高さ=B’、180°耳高さ=C’、270°耳高さ=D’、0°と90°の間の最小の谷高さ=E’、
90°と180°の間の最小の谷高さ=F’、
180°と270°の間の最小の谷高さ=G’、
270°と0°の間の最小の谷高さ=H’、
耳部の平均:M’=(A’+B’+C’+D’)/4、
谷部の平均:V’=(E’+F’+G’+H’)/4とすると、
耳率=〔(M’−V’)/{(M’+V’)/2}〕×100(%)
<Ear rate of ears at 4 locations in 0 °, 90 °, 180 °, 270 ° direction>
0 ° ear height = A ′, 90 ° ear height = B ′, 180 ° ear height = C ′, 270 ° ear height = D ′, minimum valley height between 0 ° and 90 ° = E ',
Minimum valley height between 90 ° and 180 ° = F ′,
Minimum valley height between 180 ° and 270 ° = G ′,
Minimum valley height between 270 ° and 0 ° = H ′,
Ear average: M ′ = (A ′ + B ′ + C ′ + D ′) / 4
Average valley: V ′ = (E ′ + F ′ + G ′ + H ′) / 4
Ear rate = [(M′−V ′) / {(M ′ + V ′) / 2}] × 100 (%)
<0°と180°方向2箇所の耳の耳率>
カップの平均高さ=P(開口端の高さを1000点測定した平均高さ)、
0°耳高さ=Q、180°耳高さ=R、
耳部の平均:S=(Q+R)/2、
耳率={(S−P)/P}×100(%)
<Ear ratio of ears at two locations at 0 ° and 180 °>
Average height of cup = P (average height obtained by measuring the height of the open end at 1000 points),
0 ° ear height = Q, 180 ° ear height = R,
Ear average: S = (Q + R) / 2,
Ear rate = {(SP) / P} × 100 (%)
<カップ絞り成形条件>
ダイス径33.6mm、ポンチ径33mm、ポンチ肩R1.5mmの金型を用い、供試材ブランク径55mmとして、絞り比1.67でカップ絞りを実施。
<Cup drawing molding conditions>
Using a die with a die diameter of 33.6 mm, a punch diameter of 33 mm, and a punch shoulder R of 1.5 mm, a cup blank was carried out with a drawing material blank diameter of 55 mm and a drawing ratio of 1.67.
また、上記アルミニウム合金板は、その板厚が0.20〜0.25mmであることが好ましい(請求項6)。
すなわち、広口ボトル缶キャップ用アルミニウム合金板の板厚は、本発明の課題であるキャップの耐圧に影響を与える。板厚が厚いほど耐圧強度は大きくなるが、省資源の点からは板厚は薄い方が好ましい。本発明では、上記のごとく高強度化を図ることによって、所定の耐圧強度を保ちながら板厚を薄くすることが可能となる。従来は、0.25mm未満の板厚は耐圧の点から困難であったが、本発明では、0.20mm以上、0.25mm未満の板厚を適用しても十分な耐圧を得ることが可能である。さらに、0.25mmの場合は、高耐圧の要求に対してより高強度化を図ることが可能となる。板厚が0.20mm未満の場合には、現行のキャップ形状では所定の耐圧強度が得られないが、技術の進歩によってキャップ形状が改良された場合は、本発明材により実用化が可能となると考えられる。
The aluminum alloy plate preferably has a thickness of 0.20 to 0.25 mm.
That is, the thickness of the aluminum alloy plate for the wide-mouth bottle can cap affects the pressure resistance of the cap, which is the subject of the present invention. The thicker the plate, the greater the pressure resistance, but the thinner the plate is preferable from the viewpoint of resource saving. In the present invention, by increasing the strength as described above, it becomes possible to reduce the plate thickness while maintaining a predetermined pressure strength. Conventionally, a plate thickness of less than 0.25 mm has been difficult from the viewpoint of pressure resistance, but in the present invention, sufficient pressure resistance can be obtained even when a plate thickness of 0.20 mm or more and less than 0.25 mm is applied. It is. Further, in the case of 0.25 mm, it is possible to increase the strength with respect to the demand for a high breakdown voltage. When the plate thickness is less than 0.20 mm, the current cap shape does not provide a predetermined pressure strength. However, when the cap shape is improved by technological advancement, the material of the present invention can be put to practical use. Conceivable.
次に、本発明のアルミニウム合金板を得るための好ましい製造条件について説明する。
基本的な製造工程は、鋳塊を均質化熱処理した後、熱間圧延をして板を形成し、焼鈍、冷間圧延、焼鈍、冷間圧延を順次行って製品板厚とし、最後に強度の安定化のために安定化熱処理することである。なお、この安定化熱処理の前あるいは後において、脱脂、化成処理等の表面処理をすることが多い。
Next, preferable production conditions for obtaining the aluminum alloy plate of the present invention will be described.
The basic manufacturing process is to homogenize and heat the ingot, then hot-roll to form a plate, and then anneal, cold-roll, anneal, and cold-roll sequentially to obtain the product thickness, and finally strength In order to stabilize the heat treatment, stabilization heat treatment is performed. In many cases, surface treatment such as degreasing and chemical conversion treatment is performed before or after the stabilization heat treatment.
上記均質化熱処理は、鋳塊を450〜580℃の温度に1〜24時間保持する条件である。保持温度450℃未満あるいは保持時間が1時間未満であると耳の生成が不安定となり制御が困難となる。保持温度が580℃超えあるいは保持時間が24時間超えの場合、表面にMgが拡散しやすく、表面の酸化Mg層が厚くなり、面削量を過度に多くする必要があり非経済的である。 The said homogenization heat processing is the conditions which hold | maintain an ingot at the temperature of 450-580 degreeC for 1 to 24 hours. If the holding temperature is less than 450 ° C. or the holding time is less than 1 hour, the ear formation becomes unstable and control becomes difficult. When the holding temperature exceeds 580 ° C. or the holding time exceeds 24 hours, Mg easily diffuses on the surface, the Mg oxide layer on the surface becomes thick, and the amount of chamfering needs to be excessively increased, which is uneconomical.
続いて、例えば、熱間圧延−焼鈍1−冷間圧延1−焼鈍2−冷間圧延2−安定化熱処理を順次行う。この工程で、所定の強度と耳率を得ることができる。
上記焼鈍1、2では、300〜550℃の温度に保持する条件で行う。保持温度が300℃未満の場合、最終板で所定の耳率が得られず、また、強度が高くなりすぎて成形性に劣る。保持温度が550℃超えの場合、表面が酸化しやすくなり好ましくない。なお、保持時間は特に限定しないが、連続焼鈍ラインなどによる急速加熱・急速冷却の比較的高温での焼鈍の場合、保持0〜20秒、バッチ式焼鈍炉による比較的低温での焼鈍の場合保持30分〜5時間が適当である。
Subsequently, for example, hot rolling, annealing, cold rolling, annealing, cold rolling, and stabilizing heat treatment are sequentially performed. In this step, a predetermined strength and ear rate can be obtained.
In the said annealing 1 and 2, it carries out on the conditions hold | maintained at the temperature of 300-550 degreeC. When the holding temperature is less than 300 ° C., a predetermined ear ratio cannot be obtained with the final plate, and the strength becomes too high and the moldability is poor. When the holding temperature exceeds 550 ° C., the surface tends to be oxidized, which is not preferable. The holding time is not particularly limited, but when annealing at a relatively high temperature such as rapid heating / cooling using a continuous annealing line or the like, holding is performed for 0 to 20 seconds, holding when annealing at a relatively low temperature using a batch annealing furnace. 30 minutes to 5 hours is appropriate.
上記焼鈍2後の冷間圧延2は、30〜70%の範囲で行えばよい。圧延率が30%未満では所定の強度を得にくく、所定の耳率を得にくくなる。圧延率が70%超えでは、成形性が低下し強度が高すぎて開栓しにくくなり、また、圧延集合組織が発達しすぎて45°方向の耳が大きくなる。 What is necessary is just to perform the cold rolling 2 after the said annealing 2 in 30 to 70% of range. When the rolling rate is less than 30%, it is difficult to obtain a predetermined strength, and it becomes difficult to obtain a predetermined ear rate. If the rolling rate exceeds 70%, the formability is lowered, the strength is too high and it is difficult to open the plug, and the rolling texture is developed so much that the ears in the 45 ° direction become large.
キャップ用素材としての性能は冷間圧延のままでほぼ達成されるが、Al−Mg系合金の場合、冷間圧延のままの状態で室温放置すると、強度が次第に低下する現象が起こる。それを防止し強度を安定化させるために、100〜300℃の温度で30分以上加熱する熱処理(安定化熱処理)が必要である。100℃未満では強度が安定せず、上限の300℃を超えると、軟化が大きくなり所定の強度を得ることができない。 The performance as a cap material is almost achieved with cold rolling, but in the case of an Al-Mg alloy, when the cold rolling is left at room temperature, a phenomenon in which the strength gradually decreases occurs. In order to prevent this and stabilize the strength, a heat treatment (stabilized heat treatment) is required which is heated at a temperature of 100 to 300 ° C. for 30 minutes or more. If it is less than 100 ° C., the strength is not stable, and if it exceeds the upper limit of 300 ° C., softening increases and a predetermined strength cannot be obtained.
本発明の内容を具体的な実施例により説明するが、以下は本発明の一実施態様を示したものであり、本発明はこれに限定されるものではない。
(実施例1)
表1に示す化学成分を含有するアルミニウム合金鋳塊を半連続鋳造にて造塊し、表面の偏析層を切削後、500℃で8時間保持する均質化熱処理し、均質化熱処理炉から出してすぐに熱間圧延を開始した。熱間圧延は、板厚3mmで終了し、焼鈍を行うことで再結晶組織を得た後に、所定の板厚まで冷間圧延し、さらに中間焼鈍して再結晶組織とした後、50%の冷間加工度で、製品板厚まで冷間圧延し、安定化熱処理して供試材とした。
The content of the present invention will be described with reference to specific examples, but the following shows one embodiment of the present invention and the present invention is not limited thereto.
Example 1
Aluminum alloy ingots containing the chemical components shown in Table 1 are ingoted by semi-continuous casting, and after the surface segregation layer has been cut, homogenized heat treatment is maintained at 500 ° C. for 8 hours, and then removed from the homogenized heat treatment furnace. Hot rolling was started immediately. Hot rolling is finished at a sheet thickness of 3 mm, and after recrystallization is obtained by annealing, cold rolling is performed to a predetermined sheet thickness, and further intermediate annealing is performed to obtain a recrystallized structure. The specimens were cold-rolled to the product thickness at the cold working degree and subjected to stabilization heat treatment.
得られた5種類の供試材E1〜E5を用い、以下の評価試験をした。一部の試験片は、材料組織観察をした。
<機械的性質>
JIS5号試験片にて、引張試験した。
The following evaluation tests were performed using the obtained five types of test materials E1 to E5. Some specimens were observed for material structure.
<Mechanical properties>
A tensile test was performed using a JIS No. 5 test piece.
<耳率>
ダイス径33.6mm、ポンチ径33mm、ポンチ肩R1.5mmの金型を用い、供試材ブランク径55mmとして、絞り比1.67でカップ絞りを実施。
耳率は、前述の条件により成形したカップを、前述の式から、45°方向4箇所(A方向)の耳の耳率、あるいは0°、90°、180°、270°方向4箇所(B方向)の耳の耳率、及び0°と180°方向2箇所の耳の耳率を測定した。
<Ear rate>
Using a die with a die diameter of 33.6 mm, a punch diameter of 33 mm, and a punch shoulder R of 1.5 mm, a cup blank was performed with a drawing material blank diameter of 55 mm and a drawing ratio of 1.67.
The ear rate is calculated based on the above-mentioned conditions, and the ear rate of the ears at 45 locations in the 45 ° direction (A direction) or 4 locations at the 0 °, 90 °, 180 °, and 270 ° directions (B The ear rate of the ears in the direction) and the ear rates of the ears at two locations in the 0 ° and 180 ° directions were measured.
<結晶粒径>
供試材板面を電解研磨し、偏光顕微鏡で結晶粒を観察した。ASTMカードを用いて、比較法から、結晶粒径を求めた。
<Crystal grain size>
The plate surface of the test material was electropolished and the crystal grains were observed with a polarizing microscope. The crystal grain size was determined from the comparative method using an ASTM card.
<文字曲がり>
文字曲がりは、キャップ開口端部から3〜5mmの位置に文字が来るように、絞り前のブランクに10文字の印刷をし、直径38mmより絞り比が厳しい直径28mmPPキャップ用カップを絞り成形し、文字曲がりを目視観察して評価した。
<キャップ成形性>
成形後のキャップ用のカップの外観において、割れ、しわ、肌荒れ等の欠陥の有無を目視確認した。
<Character bending>
10 characters are printed on the blank before drawing so that the character comes to a position 3 to 5 mm from the cap opening end, and a 28 mm diameter PP cap cup with a drawing ratio stricter than the diameter 38 mm is drawn and formed. Character bending was visually observed and evaluated.
<Cap formability>
The appearance of the cap cup after molding was visually confirmed for the presence of defects such as cracks, wrinkles, and rough skin.
表2にこれらの評価結果を示す。本例の供試材E1〜E5は、機械的性質、耳率、結晶粒径、文字曲がり、キャップ成形性というすべての評価項目において、いずれも広口ボトル缶キャップ用のキャップ材として良好な結果を示した。 Table 2 shows the evaluation results. The test materials E1 to E5 of this example have good results as cap materials for wide-mouth bottle can caps in all the evaluation items of mechanical properties, ear ratio, crystal grain size, letter bending, and cap moldability. Indicated.
(比較例1)
表3に示すMgの含有量が本発明の請求範囲外である成分を有するアルミニウム合金鋳塊を、前述の実施例1と同じ条件で製造し、供試材C1、C2を得た。
(Comparative Example 1)
An aluminum alloy ingot having a component whose Mg content shown in Table 3 is outside the scope of the present invention was manufactured under the same conditions as in Example 1 to obtain specimens C1 and C2.
これらの評価結果を表4に示す。
表4から知られるように、供試材C1は、Mg量が本発明の下限未満であるので、高強度を得ることができず、高耐圧のかかる製品には適さない。
供試材C2は、Mg量が本発明の上限を超えるため、強度が高すぎ、開口力が高くなり、開栓しにくいキャップとなった。また、45°方向4箇所に発生する耳の耳率も2%を超え、文字曲がりが発生し、適さない。
These evaluation results are shown in Table 4.
As can be seen from Table 4, the sample material C1 has an Mg amount less than the lower limit of the present invention, so that high strength cannot be obtained and it is not suitable for a product with high pressure resistance.
Since the amount of Mg exceeded the upper limit of the present invention, the test material C2 had a strength that was too high, an opening force increased, and a cap that was difficult to open. In addition, the ear rate of the ears occurring at four positions in the 45 ° direction exceeds 2%, and the character is bent, which is not suitable.
Claims (6)
該アルミニウム合金板の元板の引張強さが210〜320MPa、耐力が160〜290MPaであり、
かつ、上記元板に対して、200℃の温度で10分間保持する熱処理を施した空焼板の引張強さが210〜320MPa、耐力が150〜280MPa、伸びが5%以上であることを特徴とする広口ボトル缶キャップ用アルミニウム合金板。 Mg: 2.1% (weight%, the same shall apply hereinafter), including 3.5% or less, the balance being an aluminum alloy plate for a wide-mouth bottle can cap having a chemical composition consisting of inevitable impurities and aluminum,
The tensile strength of the base plate of the aluminum alloy plate is 210 to 320 MPa, the proof stress is 160 to 290 MPa,
And the tensile strength of the baked board which gave the heat processing hold | maintained for 10 minutes at the temperature of 200 degreeC with respect to the said base plate is 210-320 MPa, yield strength is 150-280 MPa, elongation is 5% or more, It is characterized by the above-mentioned. Aluminum alloy plate for wide mouth bottle can cap.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2004139019A JP4246109B2 (en) | 2004-05-07 | 2004-05-07 | Aluminum alloy plate for wide-mouth bottle can cap |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2004139019A JP4246109B2 (en) | 2004-05-07 | 2004-05-07 | Aluminum alloy plate for wide-mouth bottle can cap |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JP2005320577A true JP2005320577A (en) | 2005-11-17 |
JP4246109B2 JP4246109B2 (en) | 2009-04-02 |
Family
ID=35468052
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP2004139019A Expired - Lifetime JP4246109B2 (en) | 2004-05-07 | 2004-05-07 | Aluminum alloy plate for wide-mouth bottle can cap |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP4246109B2 (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2007070711A (en) * | 2005-09-09 | 2007-03-22 | Furukawa Sky Kk | High-strength aluminum alloy for cap and method for producing the same |
JP2007092151A (en) * | 2005-09-29 | 2007-04-12 | Furukawa Sky Kk | Aluminum alloy for cap and method for producing the same |
JP2007224380A (en) * | 2006-02-24 | 2007-09-06 | Sumitomo Light Metal Ind Ltd | High-strength aluminum alloy sheet for cap of wide-mouthed bottle can |
CN108130455A (en) * | 2017-12-22 | 2018-06-08 | 江苏鼎胜新能源材料股份有限公司 | A kind of bottle cap aluminum foil special material manufacturing method |
-
2004
- 2004-05-07 JP JP2004139019A patent/JP4246109B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2007070711A (en) * | 2005-09-09 | 2007-03-22 | Furukawa Sky Kk | High-strength aluminum alloy for cap and method for producing the same |
JP2007092151A (en) * | 2005-09-29 | 2007-04-12 | Furukawa Sky Kk | Aluminum alloy for cap and method for producing the same |
JP4699850B2 (en) * | 2005-09-29 | 2011-06-15 | 古河スカイ株式会社 | Aluminum alloy for cap and method for producing the same |
JP2007224380A (en) * | 2006-02-24 | 2007-09-06 | Sumitomo Light Metal Ind Ltd | High-strength aluminum alloy sheet for cap of wide-mouthed bottle can |
CN108130455A (en) * | 2017-12-22 | 2018-06-08 | 江苏鼎胜新能源材料股份有限公司 | A kind of bottle cap aluminum foil special material manufacturing method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP4246109B2 (en) | 2009-04-02 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JP3913260B1 (en) | Aluminum alloy cold rolled sheet for bottle cans with excellent neck formability | |
JP6336434B2 (en) | Aluminum alloy plate for can body and manufacturing method thereof | |
JP2006265701A (en) | Cold-rolled aluminum alloy sheet superior in high-temperature property for bottle-shaped can | |
JPWO2015140833A1 (en) | Aluminum alloy plate for DR can body and manufacturing method thereof | |
JP4334979B2 (en) | Aluminum alloy plate for wide-mouth bottle can cap | |
JP4943714B2 (en) | High strength aluminum alloy plate for wide-mouth bottle can cap | |
JP4763976B2 (en) | Aluminum alloy plate for wide-mouth bottle can cap | |
JP4246109B2 (en) | Aluminum alloy plate for wide-mouth bottle can cap | |
JP4995494B2 (en) | High-strength aluminum alloy plate for wide-mouth bottle can cap and method for producing the same | |
JP4393949B2 (en) | High strength aluminum alloy plate for wide-mouth bottle can cap | |
JP2008248289A (en) | Aluminum alloy sheet for packaging container and manufacturing method therefor | |
JP4771726B2 (en) | Aluminum alloy plate for beverage can body and manufacturing method thereof | |
JP4846457B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of aluminum alloy plate for caps with excellent bending workability | |
JP5080150B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of aluminum alloy plate for high-strength cap with excellent openability and ear rate | |
JP2005048288A (en) | Aluminum alloy sheet for bottle can excellent in shape stability and strength of bottom part | |
JP5335189B2 (en) | Aluminum alloy plate for cap and method for producing the same | |
JP4750392B2 (en) | Aluminum alloy plate for bottle-shaped cans | |
JP2008144221A (en) | Aluminum alloy sheet for cap and manufacturing method therefor | |
JP2003328062A (en) | Al-Mg ALUMINUM ALLOY SHEET FOR CAP | |
JP2007100182A (en) | Aluminum alloy sheet for cap and method for producing the same | |
JP5498757B2 (en) | Aluminum alloy plate for cap | |
JP2017166052A (en) | Aluminum alloy sheet for packaging container tab | |
JP2005042195A (en) | Aluminum alloy sheet with excellent barrel cutting resistance for bottle can | |
JP5091415B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of aluminum alloy plate for bottle can | |
JP5289701B2 (en) | Aluminum alloy plate for cap and method for producing the same |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20070328 |
|
A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20080909 |
|
A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20080916 |
|
A521 | Written amendment |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20081111 |
|
TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20090106 |
|
A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 |
|
A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20090107 |
|
R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 4246109 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120116 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130116 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140116 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
S111 | Request for change of ownership or part of ownership |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313111 |
|
R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |