JP2005170334A - Car body inclination controlling method and device - Google Patents

Car body inclination controlling method and device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2005170334A
JP2005170334A JP2003416888A JP2003416888A JP2005170334A JP 2005170334 A JP2005170334 A JP 2005170334A JP 2003416888 A JP2003416888 A JP 2003416888A JP 2003416888 A JP2003416888 A JP 2003416888A JP 2005170334 A JP2005170334 A JP 2005170334A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
vehicle
vehicle body
information
determination
tilt control
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2003416888A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP4396255B2 (en
Inventor
Hisashi Negoro
尚志 根来
Osamu Goto
修 後藤
Toshiaki Matsui
敏明 松井
Jun Kosakata
潤 小坂田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd filed Critical Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd
Priority to JP2003416888A priority Critical patent/JP4396255B2/en
Publication of JP2005170334A publication Critical patent/JP2005170334A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4396255B2 publication Critical patent/JP4396255B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Vehicle Body Suspensions (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To simplify the system constitution likely to become complicated very much according to the runaway preventive countermeasure of a CPU in the conventional car body inclination control. <P>SOLUTION: Controllers for controlling the car body inclination are installed one by one on cars S1, ..., Sn-1, Sn coupled together so that the place information and the speed information are acquired. The judging index for the car body inclination at the time of passing a curve is determined on the basis of those pieces of information obtained by the respective controllers. After determining the judging index, the obtained judging indices of the cars S1, ..., Sn-1, Sn are compared with one another to judge whether a failure exists in the cars S1, ..., Sn-1, Sn, and if any failure occures, the inclination controls of all cars compared are stopped. Accordingly the control for other cars is stopped in the event of failure occurrence, and controllers may be provided one on each car, and it is possible to perform the car body inclination control in a simple system constitution and with a high reliability. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2005,JPO&NCIPI

Description

本発明は、運転走行中の、特に曲線通過走行時における車体の傾斜制御方法、及び、この傾斜制御方法を実施する傾斜制御装置に関するものである。   The present invention relates to a vehicle body inclination control method during driving, particularly when traveling through a curve, and to an inclination control device that implements the inclination control method.

鉄道車両では、曲線通過時、超過遠心力によって乗心地が悪くなる場合がある。特に曲線通過時の速度が高速の場合には、超過遠心力が増大してさらなる乗心地の悪化を招く。そこで、曲線通過時、車体を傾斜させることにより超過遠心力を抑制して乗心地の悪化を防ごうとした車体の傾斜制御が各種開発されている。   In a railway vehicle, riding comfort may deteriorate due to excessive centrifugal force when passing a curve. In particular, when the speed at the time of passing through the curve is high, the excess centrifugal force increases to cause further deterioration in riding comfort. Therefore, various types of vehicle body tilt control have been developed to suppress excessive centrifugal force and prevent deterioration of riding comfort by tilting the vehicle body when passing a curve.

この車体の傾斜方式としては、空気ばねの高さを制御することで傾斜させる方式や、空気ばねと並列状に配置された油圧シリンダによって傾斜させる方式などがあるが、いずれの傾斜方式であっても、地点情報を得るために、図3に示したように、特定車両、例えば先頭車両S1の車体傾斜制御装置1aでのみ、地点検知を行うようにしていた。   As a tilting method of the vehicle body, there are a tilting method by controlling the height of the air spring and a tilting method by a hydraulic cylinder arranged in parallel with the air spring. However, in order to obtain the point information, as shown in FIG. 3, the point detection is performed only by the specific vehicle, for example, the vehicle body tilt control device 1a of the leading vehicle S1.

そして、この地点情報及び速度情報をもとに、目標とする車体傾斜角を求めて先頭車両S1の車体傾斜を行い、他の車両S2…Snの車体傾斜装置1bにはこの先頭車両S1の演算値を送信することで、各車両S2…Snの車体傾斜を行っていた。   Then, based on the point information and the speed information, the target vehicle body inclination angle is obtained and the vehicle body of the head vehicle S1 is tilted. The vehicle body tilting device 1b of the other vehicles S2. By transmitting the value, the vehicle body of each vehicle S2... Sn was tilted.

また、上記の車体傾斜制御では、CPUの暴走等に起因するコントローラの異常を監視するために、各々の車両内に、主系となるメインコントローラと、従系となるサブコントローラを二重に設置し、メインコントローラが異常を検知した場合には、隣接車両のメインコントローラから傾斜目標角信号を当該車両のサブコントローラに送り、サブコントローラで制御を続行させるように構成していた。
坂上啓他3名「新幹線で初めての車体傾斜システムの実用化へ」JREA 2003年 VOL46 No.10
In addition, in the above-mentioned vehicle body tilt control, in order to monitor controller malfunctions caused by CPU runaway, etc., a main controller as a main system and a sub controller as a sub system are installed in each vehicle. When the main controller detects an abnormality, the tilt target angle signal is sent from the main controller of the adjacent vehicle to the sub controller of the vehicle, and the sub controller continues the control.
Kei Sakagami et al. “Toward the Practical Use of the First Body Inclination System on the Shinkansen” JREA 2003 VOL46 No. 10

しかしながら、上記のコントローラを二重に設置する構成は、CPUの暴走防止対策としての信頼性向上は図れるものの、コスト高になり、システムの構成も大変複雑になる。   However, the configuration in which the above-described controllers are installed twice can improve the reliability as a measure for preventing the CPU from running away, but increases the cost and makes the system configuration very complicated.

解決しようとする問題点は、従来の車体傾斜制御におけるCPUの暴走防止対策では、システムの構成が大変複雑になるという点である。   The problem to be solved is that the system configuration becomes very complicated by the CPU runaway prevention measures in the conventional vehicle body tilt control.

本発明の車体傾斜制御方法は、従来の複雑なシステム構成を簡略化するため、
連結された各車両に1つずつ設けた車体傾斜制御のためのコントローラそれぞれで地点情報及び速度情報を得るか、或いは、軌道の傾斜情報を求め、
これらそれぞれのコントローラで得た、或いは、求めた前記情報をもとに、曲線通過時、車体傾斜の判断指標を求めた後、
(1)求めた各車両の前記判断指標を、複数車両で比較することで車両における傾斜制御の異常の有無を判断し、異常と判断した場合には、比較した車両全ての傾斜制御を停止させる、
或いは、
(2)車両ごとに求めた前記判断指標のうちの、任意の2つの車両の判断指標の差が、予め定めた値より小さいときにこれらの値は正常と判断し、この任意の2つの車両の内の何れかの前記判断指標と他の車両の前記判断指標の差が、予め定めた値より大きいときに異常ありと判断し、異常ありと判断した車両の傾斜制御を停止させる、
ことを最も主要な特徴としている。
The vehicle body tilt control method of the present invention simplifies the conventional complicated system configuration.
Obtain point information and speed information with each controller for vehicle body tilt control provided one for each connected vehicle, or obtain trajectory tilt information,
Obtained by each of these controllers, or based on the obtained information, after obtaining the judgment index of the vehicle body tilt when passing the curve,
(1) By comparing the obtained determination index of each vehicle with a plurality of vehicles, it is determined whether there is an abnormality in the inclination control in the vehicle, and when it is determined that there is an abnormality, the inclination control of all the compared vehicles is stopped. ,
Or
(2) Among the above-described determination indexes obtained for each vehicle, when the difference between the determination indexes of any two vehicles is smaller than a predetermined value, these values are determined to be normal, and these arbitrary two vehicles Determining that there is an abnormality when the difference between the determination index of any of the above and the determination index of another vehicle is greater than a predetermined value, and stopping the tilt control of the vehicle determined to be abnormal.
This is the main feature.

上記の(1)の本発明において、前記異常の有無の判断は、具体的には、
(a)車両ごとに求めた車体傾斜の判断指標のうちの、任意の2つの車両の前記判断指標の差が、予め定めた値より大きいときに異常ありと判断する、
(b)車両ごとに求めた車体傾斜の判断指標のうちの、任意の2つの車両のうちの一方の車両が、他方の車両における車体傾斜の判断指標と予め定めた閾値とを比較し、当該閾値を外れたときに異常ありと判断する、
(c)車両ごとに求めた車体傾斜の判断指標の全てが、予め定めた閾値内のとき以外は異常ありと判断する、
ことにより行う。
In the present invention of (1) above, the determination of the presence or absence of abnormality is specifically,
(A) It is determined that there is an abnormality when the difference between the determination indexes of any two vehicles among the determination indexes of the vehicle body inclination determined for each vehicle is larger than a predetermined value.
(B) One vehicle out of any two vehicles out of the vehicle body tilt determination index obtained for each vehicle compares the vehicle body tilt determination index of the other vehicle with a predetermined threshold, Judge that there is an abnormality when the threshold is exceeded,
(C) It is determined that there is an abnormality except when all the vehicle body tilt determination indexes obtained for each vehicle are within a predetermined threshold value.
By doing.

また、本発明の車体傾斜制御装置は、
連結された各車両に1つずつ設けられ、地点情報及び速度情報を得、或いは、軌道の傾斜情報を求める車体傾斜制御のためのコントローラと、
これらそれぞれのコントローラで得るか、或いは、求めた前記情報をもとに、曲線通過時、車体傾斜の判断指標を求めた後、求めた各車両の前記判断指標を、複数車両で比較することで車両の異常の有無を判断する判定器を備え、
これらコントローラと判定器を備えた各車両の傾斜制御装置は、判定器で異常と判断した場合には、比較した車両の傾斜制御を停止可能なような回路で接続されていることを最も主要な特徴としている。
The vehicle body tilt control device of the present invention
A controller for vehicle body tilt control that is provided for each connected vehicle, obtains point information and speed information, or obtains track inclination information;
Obtained by each of these controllers, or after obtaining a judgment index for vehicle body inclination when passing a curve based on the obtained information, and comparing the obtained judgment indices for each vehicle with a plurality of vehicles. Equipped with a determinator for judging whether there is an abnormality in the vehicle,
It is most important that the inclination control device of each vehicle provided with these controllers and the determination device is connected by a circuit capable of stopping the compared vehicle inclination control when the determination device determines that there is an abnormality. It is a feature.

上記の本発明において、車体傾斜の判断指標とは、車体の傾斜制御が正常か否かを判断できる指標であれば特に限定されるものではなく、例えば、車体の目標傾斜角や、この目標傾斜角の演算に必要となる曲線半径RやカントC、或いは、演算している現在位置などでも良い。   In the above-described present invention, the vehicle body inclination determination index is not particularly limited as long as it is an index that can determine whether or not the vehicle body tilt control is normal. For example, the vehicle body target inclination angle or the target vehicle inclination is not limited. The curve radius R and cant C required for calculating the corner, or the current position being calculated may be used.

本発明によれば、異常が発生した場合には、他の車両が対象車両の制御を停止させることで、コントローラは各車両に1つずつ設置するだけで、各車両のコントローラがお互いに監視し合って擬似的に二重の形をとることになるので、簡易なシステム構成で、しかも高い信頼性で車体傾斜制御が行えるようになる。   According to the present invention, when an abnormality occurs, the other vehicle stops the control of the target vehicle, so that the controller of each vehicle can monitor each other only by installing one controller in each vehicle. As a result, a pseudo-double shape is formed, so that the vehicle body tilt control can be performed with a simple system configuration and high reliability.

以下、本発明を実施するための最良の形態について図1及び図2を用いて説明する。
図1は本発明の一例を説明する図、図2は本発明に係る車体傾斜制御装置における動作のフロー図である。
The best mode for carrying out the present invention will be described below with reference to FIGS.
FIG. 1 is a diagram for explaining an example of the present invention, and FIG. 2 is a flow chart of operations in a vehicle body tilt control apparatus according to the present invention.

図1において、11は先頭車両S1を始めとする各車両S2…Sn−1,Snにそれぞれ設置された同一構成の車体傾斜制御装置であり、これら車体傾斜制御装置11には、例えば地点情報及び速度情報を得るコントローラと、このコントローラで得た前記情報をもとに、曲線通過時、車両の異常の有無を判断する判定器をそれぞれ備えている。   In FIG. 1, reference numeral 11 denotes a vehicle body tilt control device having the same configuration installed in each vehicle S2... Sn-1, Sn including the leading vehicle S1, and these vehicle body tilt control devices 11 include, for example, point information and A controller that obtains speed information and a determiner that determines whether there is an abnormality in the vehicle when passing through a curve based on the information obtained by the controller.

そして、コントローラと判定器を備えた各車両S1…Sn−1,Snのそれぞれの傾斜制御装置11では、コントローラで、例えば車両情報を一括して制御する車両情報制御装置から地点情報や速度情報を得、判定器で、各傾斜制御器か、予め記憶している曲線情報(ある地点における曲線半径RやカントCなどの情報)と照らし合わせながら、各車両S1…Sn−1,Snの車体の、例えば目標傾斜角θ1…θn−1,θnを演算する。これら各車両S1…Sn−1,Snで演算した目標傾斜角θ1…θn−1,θnは、前記車両情報制御装置などの伝送ラインに乗せて、各車両S1…Sn−1,Snで情報が受け取れるように構成されている。   And in each inclination control apparatus 11 of each vehicle S1 ... Sn-1 and Sn provided with the controller and the determination device, a point information and speed information are obtained from the vehicle information control apparatus which controls vehicle information collectively, for example by a controller. The determination unit determines whether the vehicle body of each vehicle S1... Sn-1, Sn is compared with each inclination controller or the previously stored curve information (information such as the curve radius R and cant C at a certain point). For example, target inclination angles θ1... Θn−1, θn are calculated. The target inclination angles θ1... Θn−1 and θn calculated by these vehicles S1... Sn-1, Sn are put on a transmission line such as the vehicle information control device, and information is obtained by the vehicles S1. It is configured to receive.

なお、前記目標傾斜角θは、車両の最大傾斜角までは、車両の速度V、曲線半径R、重力加速度g、カントC、軌間Gから、θ=(V2/gR)−(C/G)で得ることができる。 Note that the target inclination angle θ is θ = (V 2 / gR) − (C / G) from the vehicle speed V, curve radius R, gravitational acceleration g, cant C, and gauge G up to the maximum inclination angle of the vehicle. ).

他の車両の前記目標傾斜角θを受け取った後は、各車両S1…Sn−1,Snは、自車両の目標傾斜角θと他車両の目標傾斜角θを判定器で比較し、傾斜制御が正常か異常かの判断を行う。そして、異常と判定した場合は、自車両と他車両の傾斜制御を停止させるのである。以上の傾斜制御の流れを示したのが図2である。   After receiving the target inclination angle θ of the other vehicle, each of the vehicles S1... Sn-1, Sn compares the target inclination angle θ of the own vehicle and the target inclination angle θ of the other vehicle with a determiner, and performs inclination control. Determine whether is normal or abnormal. And when it determines with it being abnormal, the inclination control of the own vehicle and other vehicles is stopped. FIG. 2 shows the flow of the above tilt control.

以下、自車両の目標傾斜角θと他車両の目標傾斜角θの比較により、傾斜制御が正常か異常かの判断を行う場合について、さらに詳細に説明する。
例えば、各車両S1…Sn−1,Snごとに求めた車体の目標傾斜角θ1…θn−1,θnのうちの、任意の2つの車両S1,S2の前記目標傾斜角θ1,θ2の差、例えばθ1−θ2が、予め定めた値、例えば0.2度よりも大きければ、異常ありと判断する。この場合、どちらの車両が正しいという判断が困難であることから、本発明では、両車両S1,S2とも傾斜制御を停止する。
In the following, the case where it is determined whether the tilt control is normal or abnormal by comparing the target tilt angle θ of the host vehicle and the target tilt angle θ of the other vehicle will be described in more detail.
For example, the difference between the target inclination angles θ1 and θ2 of any two vehicles S1 and S2 among the target inclination angles θ1 to θn−1 and θn of the vehicle body determined for each of the vehicles S1. For example, if θ1-θ2 is larger than a predetermined value, for example, 0.2 degrees, it is determined that there is an abnormality. In this case, since it is difficult to determine which vehicle is correct, in the present invention, both the vehicles S1 and S2 stop the tilt control.

或いは、上記の判断に代えて、各車両S1…Sn−1,Snごとに求めた各車体の目標傾斜角θ1…θn−1,θnのうちの、任意の2つの車両S1,S2のうちの一方の車両S1が、他方の車両S2における車体の目標傾斜角度θ2と予め定めた閾値β、例えば2.0度とを比較し、当該閾値よりも大きいときに異常ありと判断する。この場合も、上記と同様、両車両S1,S2とも傾斜制御を停止する。   Alternatively, instead of the above determination, of any two vehicles S1 and S2 among the target inclination angles θ1 to θn−1 and θn of the respective vehicle bodies obtained for the respective vehicles S1 to Sn−1 and Sn. One vehicle S1 compares the target vehicle body inclination angle θ2 of the other vehicle S2 with a predetermined threshold value β, for example, 2.0 degrees, and determines that there is an abnormality when it is larger than the threshold value. In this case as well, the tilt control is stopped for both the vehicles S1 and S2.

以上は、任意の2つの車両の目標傾斜角を比較して判断した場合の例であるが、比較する車両は3つ以上であっても良いことは言うまでもない。
例えば、n両の目標傾斜角θ1…θn−1,θnを比較する場合は、nC2通りの結果が得られる。従って、この場合、全ての車両S1…Sn−1,Snについて求めた車体の目標傾斜角θ1…θn−1,θnの全てが、予め定めた閾値αよりも小さいときのみ正常と判断し、傾斜制御を続行する。一方、一つでも予め定めた閾値αよりも大きい場合は、異常ありと判断し、全ての車両S1…Sn−1,Snの傾斜制御を停止させるのである。
The above is an example in the case where the determination is made by comparing the target inclination angles of any two vehicles, but it goes without saying that the number of vehicles to be compared may be three or more.
For example, when comparing the n target inclination angles θ1... Θn−1, θn, nC2 results are obtained. Accordingly, in this case, it is determined that the vehicle body is normal only when all of the vehicle body target inclination angles θ1... Θn-1, θn obtained for all the vehicles S1... Sn-1, Sn are smaller than a predetermined threshold value α. Continue control. On the other hand, if even one is larger than the predetermined threshold value α, it is determined that there is an abnormality, and the inclination control of all the vehicles S1... Sn-1, Sn is stopped.

或いは、上記に代えて、車両S1…Sn−1,Snごとに求めた車体の目標傾斜角度θ1…θn−1,θnのうちの、任意の2つの車両S1,S2の前記目標傾斜角度θ1,θ2の差θ1−θ2が、予め定めた値γより小さいときにこれらの値は正常と判断する。   Alternatively, instead of the above, the target inclination angle θ1, of any two vehicles S1, S2 among the target inclination angles θ1,..., Θn-1, θn of the vehicle body determined for each of the vehicles S1,. These values are determined to be normal when the difference θ1−θ2 of θ2 is smaller than a predetermined value γ.

そして、前記正常と判断した任意の2つの車両S1,S2の内の何れかの前記目標傾斜角度θ1又はθ2と他の車両S3…Sn−1,Snの前記目標傾斜角度θ3…θn−1,θnの差が、予め定めた値γより大きいときは異常ありと判断する。この場合は、上記と異なり、異常ありと判断した車両のみの傾斜制御を停止する。   The target inclination angle θ1 or θ2 of any two vehicles S1, S2 determined to be normal and the target inclination angle θ3 of the other vehicles S3, Sn-1, Sn, θn-1, When the difference in θn is larger than a predetermined value γ, it is determined that there is an abnormality. In this case, unlike the above, the tilt control of only the vehicle determined to be abnormal is stopped.

以上の例では、車体傾斜の判断指標として目標傾斜角度を使用したものについて説明したが、前述のように、曲線半径RやカントCなどを判断指標として用いても良いことは言うまでもない。   In the above example, the target inclination angle is used as the determination index of the vehicle body inclination. However, as described above, it is needless to say that the curve radius R, cant C, or the like may be used as the determination index.

また、上記の例では、車両情報制御装置から地点情報や速度情報を得て、目標傾斜角を決定するものについて説明したが、各車両S2…Sn−1,Snに設置された例えばジャイロセンサーによって、車両進行方向に向かってヨー方向の速度値ωを測定し、走行速度Vを利用して求めた曲線半径R=V/ωを用いて、目標傾斜角を決定しても良い。この場合、これらの値を、車両の伝送ライン、もしくは、車体傾斜装置同士の伝送等を利用して各車両で比較できるようにしておく。   In the above example, the point information and the speed information are obtained from the vehicle information control device and the target inclination angle is determined. However, for example, the gyro sensor installed in each vehicle S2 ... Sn-1, Sn is used. Alternatively, the yaw direction speed value ω may be measured toward the vehicle traveling direction, and the target inclination angle may be determined using the curve radius R = V / ω obtained using the traveling speed V. In this case, these values can be compared for each vehicle using a transmission line of the vehicle or transmission between the vehicle body tilting devices.

本発明は上記の例に限らず、本発明の各請求項に記載された技術的思想の範囲内で、適宜実施の形態を変更しても良いことは、言うまでもない。   It goes without saying that the present invention is not limited to the above-described example, and the embodiments may be appropriately changed within the scope of the technical idea described in each claim of the present invention.

以上の本発明は、空気ばねの高さを制御させることで、車体を傾斜させるものや、空気ばねと並列状に配置した油圧シリンダによって車体を傾斜させるものに限らず、各種の駆動源によって車体を傾斜させるものにも適用できる。   The present invention described above is not limited to the one in which the vehicle body is inclined by controlling the height of the air spring or the one in which the vehicle body is inclined by a hydraulic cylinder arranged in parallel with the air spring, and the vehicle body is driven by various drive sources. It can also be applied to those that incline.

本発明の車体傾斜制御を説明する図である。It is a figure explaining the vehicle body tilt control of this invention. 本発明の車体傾斜制御のフロー図である。It is a flowchart of the vehicle body tilt control of this invention. 従来の車体傾斜制御を説明する図である。It is a figure explaining the conventional vehicle body tilt control.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

S1…Sn−1,Sn 車両
11 車体傾斜制御装置
S1 ... Sn-1, Sn vehicle 11 body tilt control device

Claims (6)

車体の傾斜制御を行う方法であって、
連結された各車両に1つずつ設けた車体傾斜制御のためのコントローラそれぞれで地点情報及び速度情報を得るか、或いは、軌道の傾斜情報を求め、
これらそれぞれのコントローラで得た、或いは、求めた前記情報をもとに、曲線通過時、車体傾斜の判断指標を求めた後、求めた各車両の前記判断指標を、複数車両で比較することで車両における傾斜制御の異常の有無を判断し、
異常と判断した場合には、比較した車両全ての傾斜制御を停止させることを特徴とする車体傾斜制御方法。
A method for controlling the tilt of a vehicle body,
Obtain point information and speed information with each controller for vehicle body tilt control provided one for each connected vehicle, or obtain trajectory tilt information,
Based on the information obtained by each of these controllers or the obtained information, after obtaining the judgment index of the vehicle body tilt when passing the curve, the obtained judgment index of each vehicle is compared with a plurality of vehicles. Judge whether there is an abnormality in tilt control in the vehicle,
A vehicle body tilt control method characterized by stopping the tilt control of all the compared vehicles when it is determined to be abnormal.
前記異常の有無の判断は、車両ごとに求めた車体傾斜の判断指標のうちの、任意の2つの車両の前記判断指標の差が、予め定めた値より大きいときに異常ありと判断することを特徴とする請求項1記載の車体傾斜制御方法。   The determination of the presence / absence of the abnormality is to determine that there is an abnormality when the difference between the determination indexes of any two vehicles among the determination indexes of the vehicle body inclination determined for each vehicle is larger than a predetermined value. The vehicle body tilt control method according to claim 1, wherein: 前記異常の有無の判断は、車両ごとに求めた車体傾斜の判断指標のうちの、任意の2つの車両のうちの一方の車両が、他方の車両における車体傾斜の判断指標と予め定めた閾値とを比較し、当該閾値を外れたときに異常ありと判断することを特徴とする請求項1記載の車体傾斜制御方法。   The determination of the presence / absence of the abnormality is performed by determining whether one of two arbitrary vehicles out of the vehicle body tilt determination indexes obtained for each vehicle has a vehicle body tilt determination index for the other vehicle and a predetermined threshold value. The vehicle body tilt control method according to claim 1, further comprising: determining that there is an abnormality when the threshold value is exceeded. 前記異常の有無の判断は、車両ごとに求めた車体傾斜の判断指標の全てが、予め定めた閾値内でないときは異常ありと判断することを特徴とする請求項1記載の車体傾斜制御方法。   2. The vehicle body tilt control method according to claim 1, wherein the determination of the presence / absence of abnormality is determined as abnormal when all of the vehicle body tilt determination indexes obtained for each vehicle are not within a predetermined threshold. 車体の傾斜制御を行う方法であって、
連結された各車両に1つずつ設けた車体傾斜制御のためのコントローラそれぞれで地点情報及び速度情報を得るか、或いは、軌道の傾斜情報を求め、
これらそれぞれのコントローラで得た、或いは、求めた前記情報をもとに、曲線通過時、車体傾斜の判断指標を求めた後、車両ごとに求めた前記判断指標のうちの、任意の2つの車両の判断指標の差が、予め定めた値より小さいときにこれらの値は正常と判断し、この任意の2つの車両の内の何れかの前記判断指標と他の車両の前記判断指標の差が、予め定めた値より大きいときに異常ありと判断し、異常ありと判断した車両の傾斜制御を停止させることを特徴とする車体傾斜制御方法。
A method for controlling the tilt of a vehicle body,
Obtain point information and speed information with each controller for vehicle body tilt control provided one for each connected vehicle, or obtain trajectory tilt information,
Based on the information obtained or obtained by each of these controllers, any two vehicles out of the judgment indices obtained for each vehicle after obtaining a judgment index for vehicle body tilt when passing a curve These values are determined to be normal when the difference between the determination indices is smaller than a predetermined value, and the difference between any one of the two arbitrary vehicles and the determination index of the other vehicle is A vehicle body tilt control method comprising: judging that there is an abnormality when greater than a predetermined value, and stopping the vehicle tilt control that is judged to be abnormal.
請求項1〜5の何れかに記載の車体の傾斜制御方法を実施する装置であって、
連結された各車両に1つずつ設けられ、地点情報及び速度情報を得るか、或いは、軌道の傾斜情報を求める車体傾斜制御のためのコントローラと、
これらそれぞれのコントローラで得た、或いは、求めた前記情報をもとに、曲線通過時、車体傾斜の判断指標を求めた後、求めた各車両の前記判断指標を、複数車両で比較することで車両の異常の有無を判断する判定器を備え、
これらコントローラと判定器を備えた各車両の傾斜制御装置は、判定器で異常と判断した場合には、比較した車両の傾斜制御を停止可能なような回路で接続されていることを特徴とする車体傾斜制御装置。
An apparatus for performing the vehicle body tilt control method according to any one of claims 1 to 5,
A controller for vehicle body tilt control that is provided for each connected vehicle to obtain point information and speed information, or to obtain track inclination information;
Based on the information obtained by each of these controllers or the obtained information, after obtaining the judgment index of the vehicle body tilt when passing the curve, the obtained judgment index of each vehicle is compared with a plurality of vehicles. Equipped with a determinator for judging whether there is an abnormality in the vehicle,
The vehicle tilt control device including the controller and the determination device is connected by a circuit capable of stopping the compared vehicle inclination control when the determination device determines that an abnormality has occurred. Body tilt control device.
JP2003416888A 2003-12-15 2003-12-15 Vehicle body tilt control method and apparatus Expired - Lifetime JP4396255B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2003416888A JP4396255B2 (en) 2003-12-15 2003-12-15 Vehicle body tilt control method and apparatus

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2003416888A JP4396255B2 (en) 2003-12-15 2003-12-15 Vehicle body tilt control method and apparatus

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2005170334A true JP2005170334A (en) 2005-06-30
JP4396255B2 JP4396255B2 (en) 2010-01-13

Family

ID=34735964

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2003416888A Expired - Lifetime JP4396255B2 (en) 2003-12-15 2003-12-15 Vehicle body tilt control method and apparatus

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4396255B2 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007131125A (en) * 2005-11-10 2007-05-31 Central Japan Railway Co Method of detecting abnormal condition of vehicle body inclination device
JP2008296872A (en) * 2007-06-04 2008-12-11 Fuji Electric Systems Co Ltd Vehicle door driving control device and door opening/closing control signal monitoring device
WO2012147195A1 (en) * 2011-04-28 2012-11-01 日本車輌製造株式会社 Railway vehicle body tilting system
JP2018095146A (en) * 2016-12-15 2018-06-21 日本車輌製造株式会社 Railway vehicle

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007131125A (en) * 2005-11-10 2007-05-31 Central Japan Railway Co Method of detecting abnormal condition of vehicle body inclination device
JP2008296872A (en) * 2007-06-04 2008-12-11 Fuji Electric Systems Co Ltd Vehicle door driving control device and door opening/closing control signal monitoring device
WO2012147195A1 (en) * 2011-04-28 2012-11-01 日本車輌製造株式会社 Railway vehicle body tilting system
JPWO2012147195A1 (en) * 2011-04-28 2014-07-28 日本車輌製造株式会社 Railway car body tilt system
JP5584359B2 (en) * 2011-04-28 2014-09-03 日本車輌製造株式会社 Railway car body tilt system
KR101447406B1 (en) 2011-04-28 2014-10-06 니뽄샤료세이조우 가부시키가이샤 Railway vehicle body tilting system
US9090267B2 (en) 2011-04-28 2015-07-28 Nippon Sharyo, Ltd. Railway vehicle body tilting system
JP2018095146A (en) * 2016-12-15 2018-06-21 日本車輌製造株式会社 Railway vehicle

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4396255B2 (en) 2010-01-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
ES2638941T3 (en) Method to execute a vehicle safety function and system to implement it
CN104742957B (en) The method for detecting the deviation of vehicle running path
JP2018500220A (en) Method and apparatus for operating a vehicle
CN105121266A (en) Method and device for detecting a maintenance situation in a two-wheeled vehicle
US20110316685A1 (en) Method and apparatus for controlling lane keeping and apparatus for warning of escape from lane
JP2015162228A (en) vehicle control device
JP2013258689A (en) Fail-safe controller
US20190382034A1 (en) Systems and methods for active tire performance monitoring
JP4396255B2 (en) Vehicle body tilt control method and apparatus
KR20170118409A (en) Alarm system and control method of alignment failure for vehicle
JP2007131125A (en) Method of detecting abnormal condition of vehicle body inclination device
US20160163128A1 (en) Vehicle control device
US11560126B2 (en) Method for emergency response to a transportation vehicle tire pressure loss and transportation vehicle
US7455140B2 (en) Method for guaranteeing reliability of emergency operating conditions of a motor vehicle tyres
JP4265995B2 (en) Behavior monitoring apparatus and behavior monitoring method
JPH07509320A (en) Misfire detection method and device
KR100759886B1 (en) A offset correction and trouble detection method of yaw rate sensor
KR20170007007A (en) Active roll stabilizer apparatus for vehicle and method of diagnosing trouble thereof
JP4278845B2 (en) Vehicle vibration suppression device
KR101221038B1 (en) A tilting device of train
KR20200074701A (en) Vehicle for preventing roll-over and method thereof
JP2004009895A (en) Fail detecting device of vehicle body inclination control and railway vehicle
JP2006321436A (en) Vehicle rolling detection system
KR20190125928A (en) Driving control apparatus and method for a truck system using a plurality of linear position sensors
KR102334039B1 (en) Apparatus for evalutating adaptive cruise control system for vehicle

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20051220

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20080827

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20090106

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20090219

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20090317

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20090514

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20090929

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20091012

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121030

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4396255

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131030

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131030

Year of fee payment: 4

S111 Request for change of ownership or part of ownership

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313111

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131030

Year of fee payment: 4

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350