JP2005099906A - Work management system and its method and its program - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a work management system for adjusting the workloads of each staff according to the actual progress. <P>SOLUTION: As for a project selected this time, a CPU of a work management computer assigns works which can not be processed until the initial target time limit among works assigned to staffs belonging to the project to staffs belonging to the same project who afford more works, or when any work which can not be processed until the initial target time limit is left even after the works are assigned to the staffs belonging to the same project who afford more works, the CPU assigns those works to the staffs belonging to a project whose importance is lower than the project. Thus, a plan is corrected in order to finish the project within the initial target time limit, and when any work which can not be processed until the initial target time limit is finally left, the initial target time limit is extended for dealing with that (S300 to S360). <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2005,JPO&NCIPI

Description

  The present invention relates to a job management system, a method thereof, and a program thereof.

Some jobs in private companies and government offices are organized by projects and handled by multiple personnel. There are various kinds of such projects from easy to difficult, and from low to high priority. Before carrying out such a project, it is planned how many people and how long it will take before the execution, how to allocate the total work of the project to each person, etc. Along with the project. On the other hand, when a project starts, the actual progress often deviates from the original schedule, so it is necessary to manage work while taking this into consideration. As a system for managing such work, for example, a work management system of Patent Document 1 is known. In this work management system, as the work is processed in each process, the remaining work for each process is automatically calculated and displayed on the screen or printed out. Therefore, the administrator can accurately grasp the remaining work amount by looking at the output result.
JP-A-9-198434

  By the way, there are some people who belong to the same project whose actual progress is earlier or later than the original schedule, and there are projects whose actual progress is earlier than the original schedule when looking at multiple projects. Some projects are slow. For this reason, it is necessary to adjust the work amount of each person according to the actual progress, but the work management systems so far have not fully taken into account such circumstances.

  One of the objects of the work management system, the method thereof, and the program thereof according to the present invention is to be able to adjust the work amount of each person in accordance with the actual progress.

  In order to achieve at least one of the above objects, the work management system, method and program thereof according to the present invention employ the following means.

The work management system of the present invention is a work management system for managing the work of each person after assigning the work to each person and setting the initial target man-hour and the initial target deadline until the work is completed for each person. ,
Initial target man-hour storage means for storing an initial target man-hour for each person;
Actual man-hour storage means for storing the actual man-hours of each person input by the operator at an arbitrary management time;
Work achievement rate storage means for storing the work achievement rate of each person input by the operator at an arbitrary management time;
A performance-based remaining target man-hour calculating means for calculating a performance-based remaining target man-hour to be processed from the management time to the initial target deadline based on the actual man-hour and the work achievement rate for each person;
It is determined based on the initial target man-hours for each person whether or not the performance-based remaining target man-hours can be processed from the management time to the initial target deadline for each person. The man-hour adjusting means for allocating the unprocessable portion of the remaining performance-based man-hours to other personnel, and allocating the unmanageable portions of other personnel to the personnel when it is determined that the manpower can be processed with a margin,
It is equipped with.

  In this work management system, the initial target man-hour of each person is determined as to whether or not the performance-based remaining target man-hours calculated based on the actual man-hours and work achievement rate can be processed from the management time to the initial target deadline. Judge based. And when it is determined that it cannot be processed, the unprocessable part of the performance-based remaining target man-hour is allocated to other personnel, and when it is determined that it can be processed with a margin, the amount of other personnel that cannot be processed by that personnel is allocated. Allocate. For this reason, it is possible to appropriately reallocate the work to each person according to the actual progress, and as a result, there are many cases where the work initially assigned to each person is completed according to the initial target deadline.

  In the work management system of the present invention, the man-hour adjusting means determines whether or not the performance-based remaining target man-hours can be processed from the management time to the initial target deadline for each manpower by using the initial target man-hour for each manpower. In making the determination based on the comparison, the initial base remaining target man-hour calculated by subtracting the actual man-hour from the initial target man-hour for each person is compared with the actual base remaining target man-hour. If the former is larger than the latter, it may be determined that the work can be processed with a margin. By doing this, it is possible to appropriately determine whether or not the work is completed by the initial target deadline based on the magnitude relationship between the initial base remaining target man-hour and the actual base remaining target man-hour.

  In the work management system of the present invention, the performance-based remaining target man-hour calculating means calculates a work achievement rate per actual man-hour as a work achievement rate from the actual man-hour and the work achievement rate for each personnel, The actual achievement target remaining man-hour may be calculated by dividing the work achievement rate by the work achievement rate per one actual man-hour. In this way, the number of man-days required from the management period to the initial target deadline (actual base remaining target man-hours) is calculated in consideration of not only the actual man-hours but also the work achievement rate. .

  The work management system of the present invention includes work importance storage means for storing importance for each work, and the man-hour adjusting means calculates the performance-based remaining target man-hour from the management time to the initial target for each person. Whether or not processing is possible by the deadline is determined based on the initial target man-hours for each person, and when it is determined that processing is impossible, at least a part of the performance-based remaining target man-hours that cannot be processed is The less important job may be allocated to a person who can handle it with a margin. In this way, the more important work can be completed without delaying the initial target deadline. Here, the importance of work may be determined based on at least one of importance, priority, and urgency of work.

  The work management system of the present invention may include a time limit adjusting means for extending the initial target time limit for a work that could not be allocated by the man-hour adjusting means. In this way, work that could not be adjusted to be completed according to the initial target deadline can be dealt with by extending the deadline. Thus, it is preferable that the work for extending the deadline is less important. Alternatively, it may be provided with personnel increase adjusting means for adding new personnel to the work that could not be allocated by the man-hour adjusting means and allocating the work to the personnel. This will increase the number of cases where work initially assigned to each person is completed according to the initial target deadline.

  In the work management system of the present invention, the man-hour may be a work time. For example, the number of steps required to complete the work may be set as the man-hour. However, since the time required for each step is often different, it is easier to manage by setting the work time as the man-hour. Here, the unit of the number of working hours may be a unit representing time, and examples thereof include minutes, hours, days, weeks, months, and the like.

  The work management system of the present invention allocates all the work of the project to each person belonging to the project before the start of a predetermined project period, and sets the initial target man-hour and the initial target deadline until the project is completed for each person. After setting, it is also possible to manage the work of each person. This will ensure that many tasks in the project are completed on time. At this time, a project importance degree storage means for storing the importance degree for each project is provided, and the man-hour adjusting means can process the performance-based remaining target man-hours for each person from the management time to the initial target deadline. Is determined based on the initial target man-hours for each person, and when it is determined that processing is impossible, at least a part of the performance-based remaining target man-hours that cannot be processed is more important than the project. You may allocate the work of a low project to a person who can handle it with ease. In this way, projects with higher importance will be completed without delay to the initial target deadline. Here, the importance of the project may be determined based on at least one of the importance, priority, and urgency of the project.

The work management method of the present invention allocates a work to each person, sets an initial target man-hour and an initial target deadline until the work is completed for each person, and then stores an initial target man-hour for each person. Storage means, actual man-hour storage means for storing the actual man-hours input by the operator at an arbitrary management time, and work achievement rate storage means for storing the work achievement ratio of each manpower input by the operator at an arbitrary management time Is a work management method using computer software that manages the work of each person using
(A) a computer calculating a result-based remaining target man-hour to be processed from the management time to the initial target time limit based on the actual man-hour and the work achievement rate for each person;
(B) The computer determines whether or not the performance-based remaining target man-hours can be processed for each person from the management time to the initial target deadline based on the initial target man-hours for each person and cannot be processed. Allocating the unprocessable portion of the performance-based remaining target man-hour to other personnel when it is determined, and allocating the unmanageable portion of the other personnel to the personnel when it is determined that it can be processed with a margin; ,
Is included.

  In this work management method, the initial target man-hour of each person is determined whether or not the remaining performance-based target man-hour calculated based on the actual man-hours and work achievement rate can be processed from the management time to the initial target deadline. Judge based. And when it is determined that it cannot be processed, the unprocessable part of the performance-based remaining target man-hour is allocated to other personnel, and when it is determined that it can be processed with a margin, the amount of other personnel that cannot be processed by that personnel is allocated. Allocate. For this reason, it is possible to appropriately reallocate the work to each person according to the actual progress, and as a result, there are many cases where the work initially assigned to each person is completed according to the initial target deadline. The job management method may include a step of using various configurations provided in the job management system described before describing the method, and a step of realizing the function of the job management system. May be included.

  The program of the present invention is a program for causing one or more computers to execute each step of the above-described work management method. This program may be recorded on a computer-readable recording medium (for example, hard disk, ROM, FD, CD, DVD, etc.), or from a computer via a transmission medium (communication network such as the Internet or LAN). It may be distributed to another computer, or may be exchanged in any other form. If this program is executed by a single computer or if each step is shared and executed by a plurality of computers, each step of the above-described work management method is executed. Is obtained.

  Next, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a schematic configuration diagram of a work management computer 20 according to an embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram of data stored in a hard disk 25.

  As shown in FIG. 1, the work management computer 20 records data in a CPU 21 that executes various controls, a ROM 22 that stores various control programs, a RAM 23 that temporarily stores data, a hard disk 25, and data from the hard disk 25. Input via a hard disk controller (HDC) 24 for reading, a video controller 26 for controlling the screen display of the display 27 connected to the video input / output terminal, and an input device 29 such as a keyboard or mouse connected to the USB terminal And a USB controller 28 that captures instructions from the operator, and these are connected by a bus 30 so that data can be exchanged.

  The hard disk 25 stores an order of importance for a plurality of projects, and stores an initial target man-hour and initial target deadline for each project. The order of importance, initial target man-hours, and initial target deadline are input by the operator via the input device 29 and then stored in the hard disk 25. The initial target man-hours are the man-hours (working hours) of each person when work is allocated to each person who belongs to the project so that all work of the project is completed by the initial target deadline. It is planned before it is done. In the present embodiment, as shown in FIG. 2, the order of importance for the three projects A, B, and C is stored as project A> project B> project C. In this embodiment, the importance is determined based on the influence (importance) of the project on the business performance of the company. In addition, for Project A, a job with the degree of difficulty “simple” is allocated to personnel of the grade “general” for the initial target man-hour “20d” (d is the number of days, the same applies hereinafter), and the degree of difficulty is assigned to the personnel of the class “lead”. The “slightly difficult” job is assigned by the initial target man-hour “10d”, and the job of the difficulty “difficult” is assigned by the initial target man-hour “20d” to the personnel of the class “person in charge”. Projects B and C are allocated in the same manner. Further, all three projects A, B, and C have initial target deadlines set on the same day.

  Next, the operation of the work management computer 20 configured as described above will be described. The CPU 21 of the job management computer 20 reads out the job management program stored in the ROM 22 and executes it when the operator instructs the execution of the job management program via the input device 29. Hereinafter, this program will be described based on the flowchart of FIG. Note that the time for instructing the execution start of the work management program is referred to as a management time. This management time is arbitrarily determined by the operator or the supervisor of the operator.

  When the work management program is started, the CPU 21 of the work management computer 20 first designates a project to be managed, the actual man-hours for each person belonging to the project, and the work for each person belonging to the project. A screen urging input of the achievement rate is displayed on the display 27 (step S100). This screen is provided with a “Next” button that is clicked when input of each item is completed. Here, the job achievement rate represents the current job achievement rate, assuming that the job is completed as 100%. Subsequently, the CPU 21 determines whether or not the “next” button has been clicked (step S110). If the “next” button has not been clicked, the CPU 21 stands by, and when the “next” button has been clicked. , For each person who belongs to the project specified this time, the work achievement rate per actual man-hour (= work achievement rate ÷ actual man-hours), the remaining work achievement rate (= 100%-work achievement rate), the performance-based remaining A target man-hour (= remaining work achievement rate ÷ work achievement rate per one actual man-hour) and an initial base remaining man-hour (= initial target man-hour-actual man-hour) are calculated (step S120). Here, the performance-based remaining target man-hour refers to the remaining man-hour when it is assumed that work will continue at the same pace as the past results.

  Subsequently, the CPU 21 calculates a difference obtained by subtracting the actual base remaining target man-hour from the initial base remaining target man-hour for each person belonging to the project designated this time (step S130), and the difference is negative or positive. It is determined whether the number is zero or not (step S140), and when the difference is a negative number, that is, when the initial base remaining target man-hour is smaller than the actual base remaining target man-hour, the manpower is assigned to the work until the initial target deadline. The amount of work corresponding to the difference is stored in a predetermined area of the RAM 23 as a target to be allocated to other personnel (step S150). On the other hand, when the difference is a positive number, that is, when the initial base remaining target man-hour is larger than the actual base remaining target man-hour, the person can handle the work allocated to him by the initial target deadline. It is assumed that the work amount corresponding to the difference is stored in a predetermined area of the RAM 23 as an acceptable person (step S160). Further, when the difference is zero, that is, when the initial base remaining target man-hour and the actual base remaining target man-hour coincide with each other, it is considered that the work can be performed by the initial target deadline without excess or deficiency. Thereafter, it is determined whether or not an instruction to execute similar processing is input for another project by the operator (step S170), and an instruction to execute similar processing is input to another project. Sometimes go to step S100 again. On the other hand, when such an instruction is not input, a man-hour adjustment routine is executed (step S180, see FIG. 4), and then this program is terminated.

  Next, the man-hour adjustment routine will be described. When the man-hour adjustment routine is started, as shown in FIG. 4, the CPU 21 first selects the project having the highest importance among the projects for which man-hour adjustment is not performed (step S300). Here, the project in which the man-hour adjustment is not performed refers to a project in which the determination process in step S310 is not performed. Subsequently, with respect to the project selected this time, it is determined whether or not the work to be allocated to other personnel is stored in the RAM 23 (step S310). It is determined whether it is stored (step S320). Then, when such personnel are stored, the man-hour adjustment for allocating the work allocated to the other personnel to the personnel who can accept the job is executed (step S330). Thereafter, it is determined whether or not there is still work to be allocated to other personnel for the current project (step S340). When such a job still remains, it is determined whether or not there is a project having a lower importance than the current project (step S350), and when such a project exists, the steps after step S320 are performed again. The process is executed, and when such a project does not exist, the initial target deadline of the project selected in step S300 is extended (step S360). In other words, work that cannot be processed by the initial target deadline among the work assigned to personnel belonging to a project is assigned to those belonging to the same project that have sufficient work, or assigned to the same project. By assigning to those who have sufficient work, among those who belong to a project that is less important than the project when work that still cannot be processed remains by simply assigning it to those with enough work The plan is corrected so that the project is completed within the initial target deadline, but when the work that cannot be processed eventually remains, the initial target deadline is extended. The extension period is set according to the remaining work amount.

  Now, when it is determined in step S310 that there is no work assigned to other personnel in the current project, or when it is determined in step S340 that there is no work assigned to other personnel due to man-hour adjustment, or in step S360 the initial target After extending the deadline, it is determined whether or not there is an unprocessed project, that is, a project that has not been subjected to the determination process in step S310 (step S370). If there is such a project, the process returns to step S300 again. If there is no such project, the future target man-hours and target deadlines for all projects after man-hour adjustment are displayed on the display 27 (step S380), and this routine is terminated.

  Next, a specific example when the above-described work management program is executed will be described with reference to FIG. Here, it is assumed that the projects A, B, and C are previously stored in a predetermined area of the hard disk 25 with the importance, the initial target man-hour, and the initial target deadline as shown in FIG. It is assumed that the operator has executed the job management program with the management time as the time when elapses. After instructing the work management computer 20 to start execution of the work management program, the operator designates the project A as a project to be managed, the actual man-hours for each person belonging to the project A, and each of the members belonging to the project. Suppose that the work achievement rate for each person is entered. Here, it is assumed that the actual man-hours and work achievement rates shown in FIGS. 5B and 5C are input. When the actual man-hours and the job achievement rate are input, the CPU 21 of the job management computer 20 performs the job achievement rate per one-hour man-hour and the remaining jobs for each person, as shown in FIGS. The achievement rate, actual base remaining man-hours, and initial base remaining target man-hours are calculated, and the difference obtained by subtracting the actual base remaining target man-hours from the initial base remaining target man-hours is calculated. Then, as shown in FIG. The difference is stored in the RAM 23 as a comparison result of both remaining target man-hours of the project A. Here, a negative difference represents a work amount that cannot be processed by the initial target deadline, and a positive difference represents an acceptable work amount. Subsequently, the difference between the projects B and C is stored in the RAM 23 in the same manner.

  FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram collectively showing the comparison results of the remaining target man-hours of the projects A to C. As shown in the explanatory diagram of FIG. 6, for the project A, the work with the grade “chief” of “somewhat difficult” cannot be processed by the man-hour “10d”, and the work with the grade “person in charge” of “difficult” is the man-hour “ Only 6d "can be accepted. For this reason, the man-hour “6d” can be allocated to the class “person in charge” among the unprocessable portions of the work of the class “chief”, but the remaining man-hour “4d” cannot be allocated to the members of the project A. Therefore, in the case of Project B, which has a low importance level, it is impossible to process “simple” jobs with “general” grade by “1d”, and only “5d” jobs with “slightly difficult” grade “boss”. Acceptable. For this reason, the remaining man-hour “4d” is assigned to the job of the grade “Chief” of Project B among the jobs of the grade “Chief” of Project A. As a result, Project A is free from excess or shortage of work, and it is likely that it will be completed within the target deadline. Next, with regard to Project B, the grade “general” cannot process “simple” work by the man-hour “1d”, and the grade “boss” can accept “slightly difficult” work by “1d”. (Originally, the grade “Chief” was able to accept only the man-hour “5d”, but “4d” was accepted only for “1d” because the work of Project A was assigned). For this reason, the man-hour “1d”, which is the unprocessable part of the job of the class “general”, is allocated to the job of the class “chief”. As a result, Project B is free from overs and shorts of work, and is expected to be completed within the target deadline. Next, with regard to Project C, the grade “General” can accept “simple” work for the man-hour “1d”, and the grade “chief” can accept the work “slightly difficult” for the man-hour “1d”. is there. For this reason, there is no work to be allocated to other personnel in Project C, and there is a prospect of completion within the target deadline as it is. FIG. 7 shows the target man-hour after the man-hour adjustment is performed in this way. FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram that summarizes the target man-hours for the projects A to C after the current management period. For project C, for example, if the grade “general” cannot process a “simple” job by the man-hour “1d”, and the job of the grade “chief” “somewhat difficult” cannot be processed by the man-hour “1d”, Since these man-hours have no place to allocate, they will be dealt with by extending the initial target deadline.

  Here, the correspondence between the components of the present embodiment and the components of the present invention will be clarified. The hard disk 25 of the present embodiment corresponds to the initial target man-hour storage means, the actual man-hour storage means, the work achievement rate storage means, and the project importance degree storage means of the present invention, and the CPU 21 has a result-based remaining target man-hour calculation means, man-hour adjustment means, and It corresponds to a deadline adjusting means. In addition, since the job importance is determined according to the order of the project importance, it can be said that the hard disk 25 storing the project importance corresponds to a work importance storage means. In addition, this embodiment describes an example of the work management system of the present invention, and also describes an example of the work management method of the present invention and an example of a program that causes a computer to execute the work management method.

  According to the present embodiment described in detail above, it is possible to appropriately reallocate the work to each member belonging to each project according to the actual progress, and as a result, the work initially assigned to each person is the initial target deadline. More cases will be completed. Also, based on the size relationship between the initial base remaining man-hours and the actual base remaining man-hours, the work allocated to one person will not be completed by the initial target deadline, so a part of it should be allocated to other persons. Or, since the work assigned to the person is likely to be completed by the initial target deadline, it is possible to appropriately determine whether the person can accept another work. Furthermore, since the number of man-hours (result-based remaining target man-hours) required from the arbitrary management period to the initial target deadline is calculated in consideration of the work achievement rate as well as the actual man-hours, the validity of the remaining performance-based target man-hours becomes high. . Furthermore, a project with higher importance (the work of the project) can be completed without delaying the initial target deadline. And it is possible to deal with the project (work of the project) that could not be adjusted to complete according to the initial target deadline by extending the deadline.

  It should be noted that the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiment, and it goes without saying that the present invention can be implemented in various modes as long as it belongs to the technical scope of the present invention.

  For example, in the above-described embodiment, when work that could not be allocated to other personnel remained after man-hour adjustment was performed, the initial target deadline was extended, but a new personnel was added to the personnel. The remaining work may be allocated so that the project is completed within the initial target deadline.

  Further, in the man-hour adjustment in step S330 of the above-described embodiment, any job of “difficult”, “slightly difficult”, and “simple” can be assigned to personnel of the class “person in charge”, and personnel of the class “chief” can be assigned “ The man-hour adjustment may be performed on the assumption that either “slightly difficult” or “simple” work can be assigned, and only “simple” work can be assigned to personnel of the class “general”. In this way, when there is work to be assigned to other personnel, it is determined which grade of personnel should be assigned according to the difficulty level of the job, so for example, for personnel who are difficult to do difficult work due to low grade Therefore, the “difficult” work is never assigned.

  Further, in the above-described embodiment, the work management system of the present invention is configured by one computer. However, when the contents stored in the hard disk 25 are stored in the database server, for example, and the client computer executes the work management program. Alternatively, the processing may be executed while receiving the stored contents of the database server.

  Furthermore, in the above-described embodiment, when it is determined that a job assigned to a person belonging to a certain project cannot be processed by the initial target deadline, the person belonging to a project having a lower importance than that project. However, when selecting a project with low importance here, for example, a project with a lower rank than the current project, a project with a lower rank, and so on. Alternatively, the project with the lowest importance level, the project with the second lowest importance level,... May be selected in ascending order of importance.

  In the above-described embodiment, the process adjustment is performed so that work that cannot be processed in order from the project with the highest importance is completed within the initial target deadline. You may be able to adjust the man-hours between projects when a lot of work remains.

  Furthermore, in the above-described embodiment, the assignment of work for each project has been described. However, work for which no project is assembled can also be assigned in the same manner.

1 is a schematic configuration diagram of a work management computer 20. FIG. FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram of data stored in a hard disk 25. The flowchart of a work management program. The flowchart of a man-hour adjustment routine. Explanatory drawing of the specific example regarding the project A. FIG. Explanatory drawing showing the excess and deficiency of the work of each staff of Project AC. Explanatory drawing showing the target man-hour after this management time of project AC.

Explanation of symbols

20 work management computer, 21 CPU, 22 ROM, 23 RAM, 24 hard disk controller, 25 hard disk, 26 video controller, 27 display, 28 USB controller, 29 input device, 30 bus.

Claims (12)

A work management system for managing the work of each person after assigning work to each person and setting the initial target man-hour and initial target deadline until the work is completed for each person,
Initial target man-hour storage means for storing an initial target man-hour for each person;
Actual man-hour storage means for storing the actual man-hours of each person input by the operator at an arbitrary management time;
Work achievement rate storage means for storing the work achievement rate of each person input by the operator at an arbitrary management time;
A performance-based remaining target man-hour calculating means for calculating a performance-based remaining target man-hour to be processed from the management time to the initial target deadline based on the actual man-hour and the work achievement rate for each person;
It is determined based on the initial target man-hours for each person whether or not the performance-based remaining target man-hours can be processed from the management time to the initial target deadline for each person. The man-hour adjusting means for allocating the unprocessable portion of the remaining performance-based man-hours to other personnel, and allocating the unmanageable portions of other personnel to the personnel when it is determined that the manpower can be processed with a margin,
Work management system with   The man-hour adjusting means determines whether or not the performance-based remaining target man-hours can be processed from the management time to the initial target deadline for each person based on the initial target man-hours for each person. The initial base remaining target man-hour calculated by subtracting the actual man-hour from the initial target man-hour for each person is compared with the actual base remaining target man-hour, and when the former is smaller than the latter, it is determined that processing is impossible, and the former is larger than the latter The work management system according to claim 1, wherein it is determined that the work can be processed sometimes with a margin.   The performance-based remaining target man-hour calculating means calculates a work achievement rate per actual man-hour as a work achievement rate from the actual man-hour and the work achievement rate for each person, and the remaining work achievement rate is calculated as the one actual man-hour. The work management system according to claim 1 or 2, wherein a remaining performance-based target man-hour is calculated by dividing by a per-work achievement rate. The work management system according to any one of claims 1 to 3,
A job importance storage means for storing the importance for each job;
The man-hour adjusting means determines whether or not the performance-based remaining target man-hours can be processed from the management time to the initial target deadline for each person based on the initial target man-hours for each person and cannot be processed A work management system that allocates at least a portion of the performance-based remaining target man-hours that cannot be processed to a person who can process a job that is less important than the job with a margin.   The work management system according to claim 4, wherein the importance is determined based on at least one of work importance, work priority, and work urgency. The work management system according to claim 1,
A work management system comprising deadline adjusting means for extending the initial target deadline for work that could not be allocated by the man-hour adjusting means. The work management system according to any one of claims 1 to 6,
A work management system comprising: personnel increase adjustment means for adding a new person to a work that could not be assigned by the man-hour adjustment means and assigning the work to the person.   The work management system according to claim 1, wherein the man-hour is the number of work hours. The work management system according to claim 1,
Prior to the start of a given project period, all the work of the project is allocated to each person belonging to the project, the initial target man-hours and the initial target deadline for completion of the project are set for each person, and Work management system that performs management. The work management system according to claim 9,
Project importance storage means for storing importance for each project,
The man-hour adjusting means determines whether or not the performance-based remaining target man-hours can be processed from the management time to the initial target deadline for each person based on the initial target man-hours for each person and cannot be processed A work management system for allocating at least a part of the performance-based remaining target man-hours that cannot be processed to a person who can process the work of a project having a lower importance than the project with a margin when it is determined. An initial target man-hour storage means for storing an initial target man-hour for each person, after assigning a work to each person and setting an initial target man-hour and initial target deadline for the completion of the work for each person, at an arbitrary management time Each person's work using the actual man-hour storage means for storing the actual man-hours input by the operator and the work achievement ratio storage means for storing the work achievement ratio of each person input by the operator at an arbitrary management time A work management method using computer software,
(A) a computer calculating a result-based remaining target man-hour to be processed from the management time to the initial target time limit based on the actual man-hour and the work achievement rate for each person;
(B) The computer determines whether or not the performance-based remaining target man-hours can be processed for each person from the management time to the initial target deadline based on the initial target man-hours for each person and cannot be processed. Allocating the unprocessable portion of the performance-based remaining target man-hour to other personnel when it is determined, and allocating the unmanageable portion of the other personnel to the personnel when it is determined that it can be processed with a margin; ,
Including work management methods.   A program for causing one or more computers to execute each step of the work management method according to claim 11.

Images