JP2004073886A - Make-up oil absorbing paper and manufacturing method thereof - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide make-up oil absorbing paper for allowing sebum to be more easily removed because after-use transparency is higher than that by make-up oil absorbing paper simply formed by foliation and, furthermore, smoothness can be made lower than one made by high pressure treatment and density is made higher than that in a case of being subjected to only folitation treatment. <P>SOLUTION: Micro-talc (1.2 μm of average particle diameter, 14.5 BETm<SP>2</SP>/g of surface area) of 20 pts.wt. is mixed with 100 pts. wt. abaca fiber (beaten down to SR 30°) and evenly dispersed and fixed on the fiber using a fixing agent into stock, and then the stock is made into paper by a cylinder machine. The cylinder machine using 16 mesh wire cloth with wire diameter 0.2 mm is used to form uneven layer paper with 22 g/m<SP>2</SP>of basis weight in one vat to obtain the paper containing moisture of 18%. The paper is treated under high pressure by a supercalender and, after that, foliation is applied to obtain absorptive make-up paper with a density of 0.965 g/cm<SP>3</SP>and a smoothness of 96 (sec). <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2004,JPO

Description

{Circle over (1)} The present invention relates to a cosmetic oil-absorbing paper excellent in characteristics in which transparency is developed sharply in response to sebum absorption and sebum absorbs quickly, and a method for producing the same.

The human face, especially between the nose, cheeks, forehead, and eyebrows, tends to become greasy due to the secretion of sebum, and thus the makeup tends to be lost in that part. In general, when makeup is applied while sebum is floating, the cosmetic does not fit into the skin. Therefore, makeup is applied after removing the sebum on the face with a cosmetic oil removing paper. This is the same in the case of makeup correction. Foil stamping paper has long been used as conventional fat removing paper for cosmetics, and famous salt paper is famous. This paper is made from the famous salt of Nishinomiya City, and is made of a special mixture of mitsumata, mulberry, and goose, such as a white one called Higashikubo Soil for gold foil and a brown one called Snake Bean Soil for silver foil. It is a piece of paper.

箔 Foil stamping paper does not have the function of extending the stamping when the foil stamping is used about 15 times, and this is used as a grease-absorbing decorative paper for women. The above-mentioned paper made by Nao salt (Nao salt paper) has a high density after foiling, and if this is used as a grease-removing decorative paper, the sebum on the face will be removed and it will be like taking a bath. It has been used as a newspaper for a long time.

By the way, the results of measuring the density, smoothness, opacity, and surface roughness in the case of manufacturing only by conventional foil stamping are shown in Table 1 below. In this case, various conditions such as a raw material for producing the foil stamped paper are the same as those for the production of Example 2 described later, except that the super calender treatment is not performed.

　なお、特性／条件の欄において、「（Ａ１）生原紙」は、箔打ちを行なっていない場合、すなわち、抄紙しただけのものをいう。又、「（Ｂ）１／１０」、「（Ｃ）１／４ 」、「（Ｄ）１／２ 」、「（Ｅ）３／４ 」、「（Ｆ）１ 」、「（Ｇ）２ 」、「（Ｈ）３ 」の中の数字は、下記の箔打ちの条件中の「箔打ち時間」にその数字を倍数にした時間で箔打ちを行なった場合のものを示している。又、平滑度の欄で、Ａ面とは、紙の２面の内、面がツルツルの方をいい、Ｂ面とは、ザラザラの方をいう。

In the column of properties / conditions, “(A1) raw paper” refers to a case where foiling is not performed, that is, a paper that has just been made. "(B) 1/10", "(C) 1/4", "(D) 1/2", "(E) 3/4", "(F) 1", "(G) 2 The numbers in "" and "(H) 3" indicate the case where foiling is performed in a time that is a multiple of "foiling time" in the following foiling conditions. In the column of smoothness, the surface A refers to the smooth surface of the two surfaces of the paper, and the surface B refers to the rough surface.

(Foiling conditions)
Paper size: about 21 cm square, foiling machine: belt hammer machine, weight of hammer: 16 kg, cradle: stone or iron, impact speed: about 500 times / minute, foiling time: 105 seconds, under the above conditions Is performed in a state where 300 to 350 sheets of paper are stacked. From the above measurement results (Table 1), it was confirmed that when the foiling time was extended, the density did not change to a certain extent. Then, the foil beating time prior conditions: Changing to 3 times (current condition 105 seconds), the magnitude of an impact, Japanese paper will be torn, it is impossible to issues a density 0.80 g / cm ³ or more I understand.

The oil removing paper for makeup has a higher density, a lower smoothness, a larger surface area (rough surface), and a lower opacity, the function of easily removing sebum increases.
However, it has been found that there is a limit in increasing the density of the conventional oil-absorbing paper formed only by foil stamping.

On the other hand, in order to increase the density, high pressure treatment such as a super calender, a heat calender or a high pressure press may be considered.
However, when the high-pressure treatment is performed, there is a problem that the smoothness of the paper surface is too high and the method of removing sebum is deteriorated.

The present invention provides higher transparency after use than a cosmetic oil blotting paper formed simply by foil stamping, and can achieve a lower smoothness than that obtained by high-pressure treatment, and has a lower density. An object of the present invention is to provide a cosmetic oil-absorbing paper and a method for producing the same, which can improve the method of removing sebum because the size is larger than when only the foiling treatment is performed.

In order to achieve the above object, the invention of claim 1 is a decorative oil removing paper which is made of a raw material mainly composed of vegetable fiber, and is subjected to high pressure treatment and then foil stamping. The gist is that the high-pressure treatment is performed on paper having a water content of 16 to 21%.

It should be noted that the term “foil punching” in this specification refers to hitting a sheet of paper irrespective of whether or not there is a purpose to spread a metal foil.
The plant fiber in the present invention refers to at least one selected from bast fiber or wood pulp made of manila hemp (abaca), flax, jute, sisal, kenaf, ganp, mulberry, banana fiber, or mitsumata. Means that the plant fiber is contained in an amount of 50% by weight or more.

The paper made has a high paper density when subjected to high pressure treatment. High paper density has the advantage of high oil absorption and increased transparency after use. On the other hand, the smoothness of the high-pressure treatment is too high, and therefore, if the foiling is performed after the high-pressure treatment, the smoothness of the paper surface decreases. If the smoothness of the paper surface is too high, the method of removing sebum will be poor because the surface area will be very small, but if the smoothness is reduced, the method of removing sebum will be good.

Further, when the water content is 22% or more, the paper cannot be completely dried when subjected to the high-pressure treatment, and after the high-pressure treatment, troubles such as slack and wrinkles are likely to occur. In such a case, the density cannot be increased.

According to a second aspect of the present invention, the cosmetic oil blotting paper according to the first aspect has a paper density of 0.8 to 1.2 g / cm ³ and an opacity of 40.6 to 33.6%. That is the gist. When the paper density is in the range of 0.8 to 1.2 g / cm ³ , the oil absorption is high, and the transparency is very high after use. If the paper density is less than 0.8 g / cm ³ , the transparency after use becomes poor, and if it exceeds 1.2 g / cm ³ , production becomes difficult, which is not preferable. Further, the lower the opacity, the higher the function of easily removing sebum.

The invention according to claim 3 is a method for producing a cosmetic oil blotting paper, characterized in that, after high-pressure processing of paper made from a raw material mainly composed of vegetable fiber by a paper machine, the paper is further foiled, A gist of the present invention is a method for producing decorative oil removing paper, wherein the high-pressure treatment is performed on paper having a water content of 16 to 21%.

The invention according to claim 4 is that the raw material mainly composed of vegetable fiber is subjected to high pressure treatment after papermaking by a paper machine and further foiling, so that the paper density of the cosmetic oil removing paper is 0.8 to 1.2 g. / Cm ³ and an opacity of 40.6 to 33.6%.

According to a fifth aspect of the present invention, in the method for manufacturing a cosmetic oil blotting paper according to the third or fourth aspect, the foil punching is performed by stacking 300 to 350 sheets of the high-pressure treated paper, and the weight of the hammer is reduced. The gist is to use a 16 kg belt hammer, set the impact speed to about 500 times / min, and perform the foiling time in the range of 10.5 seconds to 315 seconds.

The invention according to claim 1 or 2 is characterized in that the property after use is higher than that of a cosmetic oil blotting paper formed by simply performing foil stamping, and that the smoothness is lower than that obtained by performing high-pressure treatment. And the density is higher than when only the foiling treatment is performed, so that the method of removing sebum can be improved. Furthermore, it can be dried well when subjected to high-pressure treatment, and can be used as a cosmetic oil-absorbing paper without sagging or wrinkles.

According to the third to fifth aspects of the invention, it is possible to efficiently obtain the decorative oil removing paper of the first or second aspect.

Hereinafter, an example of the manufacturing method will be described, but the present invention is not limited thereto.
(Production method)
As the raw material, it is preferable to use 50% by weight or more of at least one kind selected from manila hemp (abaka), flax, jute, sisal, kenaf, ganpi, kozo, banana fiber or bast fiber made of mitsumata or wood pulp. . If the amount is less than 50% by weight, the strength is weak, and it is easy to break when used, which is not preferable.

The mixture is prepared to a predetermined degree of beating by a beating machine such as Bee-Bee, and 0.5 to 40 parts by weight of an inorganic filler such as talc is mixed and uniformly dispersed with respect to 100 parts by weight of a raw material such as vegetable fiber. . Then, if the paper is made as it is, the fixation of the filler to the fiber is poor, and the problem of drainage and the contamination of the process occur. Therefore, Filex RC104 and Filex M (both manufactured by Meisei Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.) are used as fixing agents. And improve the fixing property to the fiber. Thereafter, one layer is made with a paper net such as a round net paper machine, a short net paper machine, or a long net paper machine.

Further, in the case of two layers, two sheeting tanks are formed on the surface layer and the back layer as in the case of one layer. In the case of two-layer papermaking, the first papermaking tank uses a wire mesh of 60 to 120 mesh to form a layer (smooth layer) without an uneven layer, and the second papermaking tank also uses a wire mesh of 60 to 120 mesh. Is used to form a layer having no uneven layer (smooth layer), and paper having a basis weight of 15 to 25 g / m ² is formed.

When the grammage is less than 15 g / m ² , the paper has no strength and tends to be torn during use. When the grammage exceeds 25 g / m ² , the paper loses its flexibility, and when used it has a poor fit with the skin and gives a sense of incongruity. Is preferably 25 g / m ² or less to increase transparency during use.

When a single layer is to be formed as an uneven layer, it is a net for a round net paper machine, a short net paper machine, a long net paper machine or the like, and has a wire diameter of 0.1-1. A layer of uneven paper is formed in a mesh pattern using a mesh having a mesh of 0 to 5 mm, or a mesh is partially filled with a metal mesh to form a layer of uneven paper in which the raw material does not ride. Can be formed.

Further, in the case of two layers, the uneven layer 20 is formed on the surface layer and the back layer as shown in FIG. In the case of two-layer laminating, the first lamina uses a wire mesh of 60 to 120 mesh to form a layer (smooth layer) 22 having no uneven layer, and the second lamina has a wire diameter of 0.2 mm. 1-1. The uneven layer 21 is formed by using 5 mm or 40 mesh at 0 mm or partially filling the mesh of the wire mesh, and paper having a basis weight of 15 to 25 g / m ² is formed (see FIG. 1B).

The inorganic filler used may be selected from clay, talc, kaolin, calcium carbonate, titanium oxide and white carbon.However, in order to increase the oil absorption of sebum, use micro talc. It is desirable that the particles have a particle diameter of 2.5 μ or less and a surface area of 13.0 BETm ² / g or more.

In order to increase the transparency after use, it is necessary to increase the density to 0.8 to 1.2 g / cm ^3, and after setting to a predetermined size, use a super calender, a heat calender or a high-pressure press such as a high-pressure press. Perform processing. Then, in order to prevent the smoothness (smoothness) from being too high due to the high-pressure treatment, the foiling step is performed several hundred to several thousand times.

Hereinafter, examples will be described.
(Example 1)
In Example 1, the following stock, inorganic filler, and fixing agent were used.

Manila hemp beating degree SR30 ゜ 100 parts Microtalc Average particle size 1.2μ 20 parts Surface area 14.5 BETm ² / g
Fixing agent Filex RC-104 0.5%
Filex M 0.3%
That is, Manila hemp was prepared to a predetermined beating degree by a beater, and 20.0 parts by weight of micro talc was mixed to obtain a uniform dispersion. After that, using Firex RC-104 and Firex M (both manufactured by Meisei Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.) as fixing agents, the fibers are fixed to the fiber, and thereafter, a single mesh vat is used in a round mesh paper machine. A smooth paper was made at an amount of 22 g / m ² .

In the next step, those having water contents (ratio) of 14%, 16%, 18% and 21% were subjected to high pressure treatment by a super calender. Table 2 shows the results.
In addition, Table 2 shows "(A2) raw paper" and "(N)" as conventional products for comparison.

　なお、特性／条件の欄において、「（Ｉ）１４％ 」、「（Ｊ）１６％ 」、「（Ｋ）１８％」、「（Ｌ）２１％」の中の数字は、水分量を表す。

In the column of characteristics / conditions, the numbers in “(I) 14%”, “(J) 16%”, “(K) 18%”, and “(L) 21%” represent the water content. .

(conditions)
High pressure treatment method: Super calender Super calender conditions: 13 nips at 14 stages Line pressure: 300 kg / cm, Temperature: 80 ° C
Speed: 200 m / min In Table 2 above, “(A2) raw paper” is one that has not been subjected to any of high-pressure treatment and foil stamping treatment. “(N)” is obtained by performing only the foiling treatment under the same foiling conditions as “(F)” in Table 1 in place of the super calender (high-pressure treatment) (note that the conventional condition was not applied). The water content is 7 ± 0.5%.)
From the above, when high-pressure treatment is performed only with the super calender, the density can be higher than that of the foil stamped product. On the other hand, with the super calender only ((I) to (L)), it is difficult to reduce the smoothness to 100 or less, unlike the foil stamped product (F).

When the water content was 22% or more, the paper could not be completely dried, and after the high-pressure treatment, problems such as slack and wrinkles were likely to occur. Further, it was found that a density of 0.80 g / cm ³ or more could not be obtained with a water content of 14%. Therefore, it was found that the water content of the paper during the high-pressure treatment was desirably 16% to 21%.

Next, after the high-pressure treatment of the water content of 18% by the super calender as described above, the foil stamping treatment was performed. The foiling treatment conditions at this time are the same as the conventional foiling conditions (conventional conditions).

The density, smoothness, opacity, and surface roughness of the product subjected to high pressure treatment and foil stamping by a super calender (Example product) and “(A2) raw paper” and “Foil stamped product” (N) Table 3 shows the results.

　上記のことから、実施例１の品では、スーパーキャレンダーにて高圧処理を行なった後、箔打ち処理を行なったために、箔打ち品（従来品である（Ｎ））に比較して、０．９ｇ／ｃｍ^３以上の高密度とすることができた。又、平滑度（Ａ面Ｂ面の平均平滑度）は、スーパーキャレンダー処理後の紙（Ｋ）の平滑度が１７３９（秒）と高くなっていたものが、箔打ち後の実施例１では９６（秒）と１／１０以下に低くなることが確認できた。

From the above, the product of Example 1 was subjected to high-pressure treatment in a super calender and then to foiling treatment, so that it was 0 in comparison with the foiled product (conventional product (N)). A high density of 0.9 g / cm ³ or more could be obtained. In addition, the smoothness (average smoothness of side A and side B) was such that the smoothness of the paper (K) after the super calender processing was as high as 1739 (seconds). It was confirmed that it was 96 (seconds), which was 1/10 or less.

As a result, the product of Example 1 had an extremely large average surface roughness of 2.80 μm, so that the oil absorbency of sebum was very good, and the oil seizure was removed, so that the transparency of the oil removing paper was high. It has been confirmed that it has become.

In the case of the cosmetic oil blotting paper (K) formed only with a super calender, the smoothness (degree) is too high and the average surface roughness is extremely small at 1.65 μm. , How to remove sebum became worse.

Further, in the case of the foil stamped product (N), a product having a density of 0.8 g / cm ³ or more was not obtained.
(Example 2)
Next, in Example 2, the following stock, inorganic filler, and fixing agent were used.

Manila hemp (abaka) Beating degree SR30ＳＲ 100 parts Microtalc Average particle size 1.2μ 20 parts Surface area 14.5 BETm ² / g
Fixing agent Filex RC-104 0.5%
Filex M 0.3%
That is, Manila hemp (abaka) was prepared with a beater to a predetermined beating degree, and 20.0 parts by weight of micro talc was mixed to obtain a uniform dispersion. Then, using Firex RC-104 and Firex M (both manufactured by Meisei Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.) as fixing agents, the fibers were fixed to the fibers, and then the paper was formed by a round mesh paper machine.

The round mesh paper machine used was a mesh having a wire diameter of 0.2 mm and a mesh of 16 mesh, and an uneven layer was formed on one side with a basis weight of 22 g / m ² using a single bat.
In the next step, high-pressure treatment was performed with a super calender under the same conditions as in Example 1, and thereafter, foiling was performed with the foiling time varied based on the following foiling conditions.

(Foiling conditions)
Paper size: about 21 cm square, foiling machine: belt hammer machine, weight of hammer: 16 kg, cradle: stone or iron, impact speed: about 500 times / minute, foiling time: 105 seconds, under the above conditions Is performed in a state where 300 to 350 sheets of paper are stacked. The results of measuring the density, smoothness, opacity and surface roughness in that case, as well as the raw paper (A1) and the super calendered paper (M) are shown in Table 4 below.

　なお、特性／条件の欄において、「（Ａ１）生原紙」は、スーパーキャレンダー加工及び箔打ちを行なっていない場合、すなわち、抄紙しただけのものをいい、表１に記載したものと同じものである。スーパーキャレンダー加工紙（Ｍ）は、上記の方法で抄造して、スーパーキャレンダー加工は行うが、箔打ちは行なっていないものである。

In the column of properties / conditions, “(A1) raw paper” refers to a paper that has not been subjected to super calendering and foil stamping, that is, a paper that has just been made, and is the same as that described in Table 1. It is. The super calendered paper (M) is a paper made by the above-mentioned method and subjected to super calendering, but not to foiling.

Also, "(a) 1/10", "(b) 1/4", "(c) 1/2", "(d) 3/4", "(e) 1", "(f) 2 The numbers in "" and "(g) 3" indicate the case where the foiling is performed in a time obtained by multiplying the number by the "foiling time" in the above-described foiling conditions.

{Circle around (4)} and FIGS. 2 to 6 show those of Table 4 and Table 1. 2 is a characteristic diagram showing the relationship between the density and the foiling time, FIG. 3 is a characteristic diagram showing the relationship between the opacity and the foiling time, and FIG. 4 is a characteristic showing the relationship between the smoothness on the A-side and the foiling time. FIG. 5 and FIG. 5 are characteristic diagrams showing the relationship between the smoothness on the B side and the foiling time.

From FIG. 2, it can be understood that even if the foiling time is longer than the conventional one (double or triple), a density of 0.9 g / cm ³ or more can be obtained. That is, the density of (a) to (g) is higher than that of the comparative examples (A1) to (H) in which raw paper or foil stamping alone is used.

In FIG. 3, the vertical axis represents the opacity (%), so that the lower the opacity, the higher the transparency. Therefore, the transparency is higher in (a) to (g) of Example 2. A higher raw material than the comparative examples of (A1) to (H) in which raw paper or foil stamping alone is obtained.

FIGS. 4 and 5 show the smoothness of the A surface and the B surface, respectively. From this, it can be understood that when foiling is performed after the super calendering, the smoothness is rapidly lost even with a relatively short foiling time (such as (a) of 1/10). Further, it can be understood that even if foiling is performed for a relatively long time after the super calendering, the smoothness is reduced to a certain level, but the smoothness is higher than that obtained by performing only foiling.

Then, as shown in FIG. 6, the average surface roughness (on the surface A) is smaller than that of the comparative example in which the super calendering is not performed. It can be understood that the longer the hitting time (in the case of (f)), the closer to the average surface roughness of the comparative example.

Thus, in Example 2, when the super calendering was performed and then the foiling was performed, the average surface roughness was close to the case where only the foiling was performed, and the density was obviously higher than that of the comparative example. And larger.

As a result, in the product of Example 2, the average surface roughness was as large as 1.9 to 2.7 μm, and the density was higher than that in the case of performing only the foil stamping. In addition, it was confirmed that the transparency of the oil removing paper was increased by the removed sebum. In particular, better results were obtained by increasing the foiling time after super calendering. In other words, when the foiling time is longer for (b) than for (a), for (c) than for (b), a better sebum absorption effect can be obtained. I understood. It should be noted that, between (f) and (g), the one with (f) shows a better tendency to absorb sebum, but the one with (g) does not show much difference in average surface roughness from (e). Therefore, the sebum absorbency was about the same as (e).

The present invention is not limited to the above embodiment, and can be arbitrarily changed without departing from the present invention.

(A) is a cross-sectional view of a cosmetic fat removing paper provided with an uneven layer on both surfaces, and (b) is a cross-sectional view of a cosmetic fat removing paper provided with an uneven layer on one side. FIG. 4 is a characteristic diagram showing a relationship between density and foiling time. FIG. 4 is a characteristic diagram showing a relationship between opacity and foiling time. FIG. 4 is a characteristic diagram showing a relationship between smoothness and foiling time on the A side. FIG. 6 is a characteristic diagram showing a relationship between smoothness and foiling time on the B side. FIG. 4 is a characteristic diagram showing a relationship between average surface roughness (in the CD direction) and foiling time.

Explanation of reference numerals

# 20: an uneven layer, 21: an uneven layer, 22: a smooth layer.

Claims (5)

A cosmetic oil-absorbing paper, which is made of a raw material mainly composed of vegetable fiber, is subjected to high-pressure treatment, and is characterized by being foiled,
The high-pressure treatment is performed on paper having a water content of 16% to 21%. The oil-absorbing cosmetic paper, with the paper density of 0.8~1.2g / cm ^3, cosmetic according to claim 1, opacity characterized in that it is a 40.6 to 33.6% Oil blotting paper. A method for producing a cosmetic oil-absorbing paper, characterized in that, after high-pressure processing of paper made of a raw material mainly composed of vegetable fiber by a paper machine, further foiling is performed,
A method for producing decorative oil removing paper, wherein the high-pressure treatment is performed on paper having a water content of 16 to 21%. The raw material mainly composed of vegetable fiber is made into paper by a paper machine, then subjected to high pressure treatment, and further subjected to foiling to make the paper density of the cosmetic oil blotting paper 0.8 to 1.2 g / cm ³ and to improve the density. A method for producing a cosmetic oil blotting paper, wherein the transparency is 40.6 to 33.6%. The foiling is performed by stacking 300 to 350 sheets of paper subjected to the high-pressure treatment, using a belt hammer machine with a hammer weight of 16 kg, using a hammering speed of about 500 times / min, and setting a foiling time of 10. The method for producing a cosmetic oil blotting paper according to claim 3 or 4, wherein the method is performed in a range of 5 seconds to 315 seconds.

Images