JP2003194728A - Flaw inspection method for steel plate - Google Patents
Flaw inspection method for steel plateInfo
- Publication number
- JP2003194728A JP2003194728A JP2001397397A JP2001397397A JP2003194728A JP 2003194728 A JP2003194728 A JP 2003194728A JP 2001397397 A JP2001397397 A JP 2001397397A JP 2001397397 A JP2001397397 A JP 2001397397A JP 2003194728 A JP2003194728 A JP 2003194728A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- steel plate
- dead zone
- steel sheet
- inspection
- flaw
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Landscapes
- Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】
【0001】
【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、鋼板の形状不良部
の蛇行走行に起因する過検出を防止することができ、更
には未検出範囲を極力少なくして精度よく疵の検出を行
うことができる鋼板の疵検査方法に関するものである。
【0002】
【従来の技術】従来から、コイルの生産に際し疵のない
一定品質の製品を保証するために、鋼板の疵検査を実施
している。この疵検査方法としては、溶接点で連結され
て連続的に搬送される鋼板の表面疵を、該鋼板のエッジ
部に不感帯領域を設定して画像処理手段により行うこと
が普通である。ここで、エッジ部に不感帯領域を設定す
るのは以下の理由による。即ち、鋼板の形状が厳密には
一定の板体でなく僅かに幅や厚み等のバラツキがあった
り、特に溶接点において平面視した場合くの字状に屈曲
していることがあって、走行中に蛇行を生じることがあ
る。このように蛇行が生じると、エッジ部を画像処理し
た場合に、鋼板の水平方向への急激なズレをヘゲと称さ
れる縦長の疵と同様の映像として認識する(以下、過検
出という)ため、不良品扱いとなってしまう。そこで、
鋼板のエッジ部に一種のマスキング作用をするように、
一定幅の不感帯領域を設定して、前記のような過検出発
生の防止を図るのである。そして、この不感帯領域は特
に蛇行幅の大きい鋼板の溶接点もカバーできるように十
分な幅をもって設定されているのが普通である。
【0003】しかしながら、前記不感帯領域の設定によ
り過検出発生の防止を図ることができるものの、不感帯
領域内に存在する疵等の欠陥は全く検出することができ
なくなってしまうため、鋼板エッジ部の欠陥を未検出の
まま出荷するという問題点があった。このように、過検
出発生の防止を確実にするには不感帯領域の幅を大きく
する必要があり、一方、鋼板エッジ部の欠陥を検出する
には不感帯領域の幅を小さくする必要があって、このよ
うに相反する両者を共に満足できる不感帯領域の設定方
法は解決されていないのが現状であった。
【0004】
【発明が解決しようとする課題】本発明は上記のような
従来の問題点を解決して、鋼板の形状不良部の蛇行走行
に起因する過検出を確実に防止することができるととも
に、鋼板エッジ部の未検出範囲を極力少なくしてエッジ
部の欠陥も可能な限り検出することができ、全体として
の検出精度を著しく高めることができる鋼板の疵検査方
法を提供することを目的として完成されたものである。
【0005】
【課題を解決するための手段】上記の課題を解決するた
めになされた本発明の鋼板の疵検査方法は、溶接点で連
結されて連続的に搬送される鋼板の表面疵を、該鋼板の
エッジ部に不感帯領域を設定して検査するようにした鋼
板の疵検査方法において、前記鋼板の溶接点から一定距
離については検査機の不感帯領域を幅方向に大きくと
り、それ以降については検査機の不感帯領域を狭めて検
査することを特徴とするものである。
【0006】
【発明の実施の形態】以下に、図面を参照しつつ本発明
の好ましい実施の形態を示す。図面は、連続的に搬送さ
れる鋼板の疵を検査する工程を概念的に説明するための
平面図であり、図中1は連続的に搬送される鋼板、2は
一対の鋼板の端面どうしを連結する溶接点、3は鋼板の
中央部および両端部を画像処理して欠陥の有無を検出す
るための検査機である。そして、前記鋼板1のエッジ部
には不感帯領域が設定されており、連続的に搬送される
鋼板1の表面疵を、該鋼板のエッジ部では不感帯領域に
よりマスキングしながら画像処理手段により検査するよ
う構成されている点は、従来の鋼板の疵検査方法と基本
的に同じである。
【0007】本発明では、前記検査機3の不感帯領域と
して、鋼板1の溶接点2から一定距離については不感帯
領域を幅方向に大きくとり、それ以降については不感帯
領域を幅方向に狭めたものとして検査するようにした点
に特徴的構成を有するものである。即ち、従来は一定幅
の不感帯領域を設定するものとしていたが、本発明では
被検査物である鋼板の移動量(ウォーク量)に応じて不
感帯領域の幅を変化させることとし、過検出発生の防止
と鋼板エッジ部欠陥の最大限の検出という相反する目的
を共に満足するようにしたものである。これは本発明者
の解析によれば、鋼板の蛇行現象は溶接点から一定距離
の間のみ大きく現れ、それを過ぎれば安定走行に収束す
る習性があることを見出し、前記一定距離のみについて
不感帯領域を幅方向に大きくとれば過検出の発生を十分
に防止することができるとの知見に基づくものである。
このように鋼板のウォーク量に応じて不感帯領域の幅を
可変制御するという考え方は従来にない全く新規なもの
であり、本発明の特徴をなすものである。
【0008】鋼板1の溶接点2からの一定距離は、鋼板
1の蛇行現象が安定走行に収束するまでの鋼板1の移動
量を意味し、鋼板の種類や形状等に基づいて個別に設定
される。また、幅の広い不感帯領域4は、鋼板1が蛇行
しても検査機3の画像処理画面内に鋼板1のエッジ部が
影響を及ぼさないように十分なマスキング作用を確保し
て、過検出を防止することができる幅を意味する。一
方、幅の狭い不感帯領域5は、鋼板1の安定走行時にお
いて鋼板1のエッジ部が影響を及ぼさないようにマスキ
ング作用を確保する最小限の幅を意味し、未検出範囲を
可能な限り削減するものである。なお、前記不感帯領域
は検査機3の画像処理画面内に電気的な信号の入力によ
って、任意の幅および長さに設定可能なものである。
【0009】一例として、幅が1000mm、厚みが
0.24mmのクロムメッキ鋼板をラインスピード15
0mpmで走行した時の、溶接点からの通板長さとエッ
ジ不感帯領域の量、および過検出の有無との関係を調査
した結果は表1に示されるとおりであった。なお評価
は、連続的に過検出があった場合を×、時々過検出があ
った場合を△、過検出がない場合を○とした。不感帯領
域が35mmというのは、従来から経験則的に求められ
た数値であり、従来は鋼板の全長にわたって35mmの
不感帯領域を設定していた。しかしながら、溶接点から
の通板長さが長くなるに従って不感帯領域を狭くしても
過検出を発生させることはなくなることが確認され、こ
の鋼板の場合には401m以上移動後においては不感帯
領域を25mmに設定しても、過検出を発生させること
がないことが判明した。この結果、401m以降の鋼板
についてはエッジ部の検査を幅方向に10mm大きい領
域で検査可能となり、従来未検査であった領域での欠陥
もチェック可能となり検査精度の大幅な向上を図ること
ができた。
【0010】
【表1】
【0011】このように本発明では、鋼板1の溶接点2
から一定距離については検査機3の不感帯領域4を幅方
向に大きくとり、それ以降については検査機3の不感帯
領域5を狭めて検査するようにすることで、過検出発生
の防止と鋼板エッジ部欠陥の最大限の検出という相反す
る課題を共に解決できたのである。そして、このように
検査精度を上げることにより、不良品を出荷してしまう
ことを回避することができ、更には鋼板を再検査する作
業もなくなり、生産性を著しく向上させることができる
こととなる。
【0012】
【発明の効果】以上の説明からも明らかなように、本発
明は鋼板の形状不良部の蛇行走行に起因する過検出を確
実に防止することができるとともに、鋼板エッジ部の未
検出範囲を極力少なくしてエッジ部の欠陥も可能な限り
検出することができ、全体としての検出精度を著しく高
めることができるものである。よって本発明は従来の問
題点を一掃した鋼板の疵検査方法として、産業の発展に
寄与するところは極めて大である。Description: BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention can prevent overdetection caused by meandering running of a defective shape portion of a steel sheet, and further reduce the undetected range as much as possible. The present invention relates to a method for inspecting flaws on a steel sheet, which can detect flaws with high accuracy. 2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, a steel plate has been inspected for flaws in order to guarantee a product of constant quality without flaws in coil production. As this flaw inspection method, it is common to perform a surface flaw of a steel sheet connected at a welding point and continuously conveyed by an image processing means by setting a dead zone at an edge portion of the steel sheet. Here, the dead zone is set at the edge for the following reason. In other words, the shape of the steel plate is not strictly a fixed plate, but has a slight variation in width, thickness, and the like. May meander inside. When such meandering occurs, when the edge portion is image-processed, a sharp shift in the horizontal direction of the steel sheet is recognized as an image similar to a vertically long flaw called a heddle (hereinafter, referred to as overdetection). Therefore, it is treated as a defective product. Therefore,
As a kind of masking action on the edge of the steel plate,
This is to prevent the occurrence of overdetection as described above by setting a dead zone region having a fixed width. The dead zone is usually set to have a sufficient width so as to cover a welding point of a steel plate having a particularly large meandering width. [0003] However, although the setting of the dead zone can prevent the occurrence of over-detection, defects such as flaws existing in the dead zone cannot be detected at all, so that the defect at the edge portion of the steel plate can be prevented. There is a problem of shipping without detection. As described above, it is necessary to increase the width of the dead zone in order to reliably prevent the occurrence of overdetection, while it is necessary to reduce the width of the dead zone in order to detect a defect at the edge of the steel sheet. At the present time, a method of setting a dead zone that can satisfy both of these conflicting conditions has not been solved. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention solves the above-mentioned conventional problems and can reliably prevent overdetection caused by meandering running of a defective shape portion of a steel plate. An object of the present invention is to provide a steel sheet flaw inspection method capable of detecting a defect of an edge part as much as possible by minimizing a non-detection range of an edge part of a steel sheet as much as possible and significantly improving detection accuracy as a whole. It is completed. [0005] A method for inspecting the flaws of a steel sheet according to the present invention, which has been made to solve the above-mentioned problems, comprises the steps of: In the method for inspecting flaws of a steel sheet, in which a dead zone is set at an edge portion of the steel sheet for inspection, a certain distance from a welding point of the steel sheet is set such that the dead zone of the inspection machine is made large in the width direction, and thereafter, The inspection is performed by narrowing the dead zone of the inspection machine. Preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. The drawings are plan views for conceptually explaining the process of inspecting the flaws of a continuously conveyed steel sheet, where 1 is a continuously conveyed steel sheet, and 2 is an end face of a pair of steel sheets. The welding point 3 is an inspection machine for detecting the presence or absence of a defect by performing image processing on the central part and both ends of the steel sheet. A dead zone is set at the edge of the steel plate 1, and the surface flaws of the continuously conveyed steel plate 1 are inspected by the image processing means while masking by the dead zone at the edge of the steel plate. The configuration is basically the same as the conventional method for inspecting flaws on a steel sheet. In the present invention, as the dead zone of the inspection machine 3, the dead zone is made larger in the width direction for a certain distance from the welding point 2 of the steel sheet 1, and after that, the dead zone is made narrower in the width direction. The inspection apparatus has a characteristic configuration in that the inspection is performed. In other words, in the past, a dead band region having a fixed width was set, but in the present invention, the width of the dead band region is changed in accordance with the movement amount (walk amount) of the steel plate to be inspected, and the occurrence of overdetection is determined. It is intended to satisfy both conflicting objectives of prevention and maximum detection of a steel plate edge defect. According to the analysis of the present inventor, it has been found that the meandering phenomenon of the steel sheet appears only during a certain distance from the welding point, and has a habit of converging to stable running after that, and the dead zone area only for the certain distance. Is made large in the width direction, it is based on the finding that overdetection can be sufficiently prevented from occurring.
The concept of variably controlling the width of the dead zone in accordance with the amount of walk of the steel sheet as described above is a completely novel thing which has not been heretofore, and is a feature of the present invention. The fixed distance from the welding point 2 of the steel sheet 1 means the amount of movement of the steel sheet 1 until the meandering phenomenon of the steel sheet 1 converges to stable running, and is individually set based on the type and shape of the steel sheet. You. In addition, the wide dead zone region 4 secures a sufficient masking action so that the edge portion of the steel plate 1 does not affect the image processing screen of the inspection device 3 even if the steel plate 1 meanders. Means the width that can be prevented. On the other hand, the narrow dead zone 5 means the minimum width for ensuring the masking action so that the edge of the steel sheet 1 does not affect the stable running of the steel sheet 1, and the undetected range is reduced as much as possible. Is what you do. The dead zone can be set to an arbitrary width and length by inputting an electric signal into the image processing screen of the inspection machine 3. As an example, a chrome-plated steel sheet having a width of 1000 mm and a thickness of 0.24 mm is produced at a line speed of 15 mm.
The results of investigating the relationship between the threading length from the welding point, the amount of the edge dead zone, and the presence or absence of overdetection when traveling at 0 mpm were as shown in Table 1. The evaluation was evaluated as x when there was continuous overdetection, Δ when there was occasional overdetection, and ○ when there was no overdetection. The fact that the dead zone is 35 mm is a value that has been empirically determined from the past, and a dead zone of 35 mm was conventionally set over the entire length of the steel sheet. However, it has been confirmed that overdetection does not occur even if the dead zone is narrowed as the passing length from the welding point increases, and in the case of this steel plate, the dead zone becomes 25 mm after moving over 401 m. It has been found that no over-detection occurs even if the value is set to. As a result, for a steel plate of 401 m or more, the inspection of the edge portion can be performed in a region 10 mm larger in the width direction, and a defect in a region that has not been conventionally inspected can be checked, so that the inspection accuracy can be greatly improved. Was. [Table 1] As described above, according to the present invention, the welding point 2
For a certain distance from, the dead zone region 4 of the inspection device 3 is made large in the width direction, and after that, the dead zone region 5 of the inspection device 3 is narrowed to perform inspection, thereby preventing overdetection and preventing steel sheet edge portions. The conflicting task of maximizing defect detection was solved together. By increasing the inspection accuracy in this way, it is possible to avoid shipping a defective product, and further to eliminate the work of re-inspecting the steel sheet, thereby significantly improving the productivity. As is apparent from the above description, the present invention can reliably prevent overdetection caused by meandering of a defective shape portion of a steel sheet, and can detect undetected edges of a steel sheet. The range can be made as small as possible, and the edge defect can be detected as much as possible, so that the detection accuracy as a whole can be significantly improved. Therefore, the present invention is extremely significant as a method for inspecting flaws on a steel sheet that has eliminated the conventional problems and contributes to industrial development.
【図面の簡単な説明】
【図1】鋼板の疵を検査する工程を概念的に説明するた
めの平面図である。
【符号の説明】
1 鋼板
2 溶接点
3 検査機
4 幅の広い不感帯領域
5 幅の狭い不感帯領域BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a plan view for conceptually explaining a process of inspecting a steel plate for flaws. [Explanation of Signs] 1 Steel plate 2 Welding point 3 Inspection machine 4 Wide dead zone 5 Wide dead zone
Claims (1)
鋼板の表面疵を、該鋼板のエッジ部に不感帯領域を設定
して検査するようにした鋼板の疵検査方法において、前
記鋼板の溶接点から一定距離については検査機の不感帯
領域を幅方向に大きくとり、それ以降については検査機
の不感帯領域を狭めて検査することを特徴とする鋼板の
疵検査方法。Claims 1. A flaw inspection of a steel sheet in which a surface flaw of a steel sheet connected and continuously conveyed at a welding point is inspected by setting a dead zone region at an edge of the steel sheet. A method for inspecting a flaw of a steel sheet, wherein a dead zone area of the inspection machine is increased in a width direction at a certain distance from a welding point of the steel sheet, and thereafter, the inspection area is narrowed and inspected.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2001397397A JP2003194728A (en) | 2001-12-27 | 2001-12-27 | Flaw inspection method for steel plate |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2001397397A JP2003194728A (en) | 2001-12-27 | 2001-12-27 | Flaw inspection method for steel plate |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JP2003194728A true JP2003194728A (en) | 2003-07-09 |
Family
ID=27603214
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP2001397397A Pending JP2003194728A (en) | 2001-12-27 | 2001-12-27 | Flaw inspection method for steel plate |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP2003194728A (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2010025652A (en) * | 2008-07-17 | 2010-02-04 | Nippon Steel Corp | Surface flaw inspection device |
JP2011232324A (en) * | 2010-04-09 | 2011-11-17 | Nippon Steel Corp | Surface defect inspection device, surface defect inspection method, and program |
-
2001
- 2001-12-27 JP JP2001397397A patent/JP2003194728A/en active Pending
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2010025652A (en) * | 2008-07-17 | 2010-02-04 | Nippon Steel Corp | Surface flaw inspection device |
JP2011232324A (en) * | 2010-04-09 | 2011-11-17 | Nippon Steel Corp | Surface defect inspection device, surface defect inspection method, and program |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
KR101757019B1 (en) | Thermographic test method and testing device for carrying out the test method | |
JP7452737B2 (en) | surface inspection equipment | |
FR2761475B1 (en) | METHOD FOR INSPECTING THE SURFACE OF A SCROLLING STRIP BY IMAGE SEGMENTATION IN SUSPECTED AREAS | |
JP2009216539A (en) | Detector for hole/crack defect of belt-shaped object | |
JP2008275424A (en) | Surface inspection device | |
JP2010223597A (en) | Surface flaw inspecting device and surface flaw inspecting method | |
JP2003194728A (en) | Flaw inspection method for steel plate | |
FR2761476B1 (en) | METHOD FOR INSPECTING THE SURFACE OF A TRAVELING STRIP BY PRIOR CLASSIFICATION OF DETECTED SURFACE IRREGULARITY | |
KR101935979B1 (en) | Plate glass inspection device, plate glass inspection method, plate glass manufacturing device, and plate glass manufacturing method | |
JP6219075B2 (en) | 疵 Detection method | |
JP7411441B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of composite sheet | |
JP2008190921A (en) | Method and apparatus for detecting surface flaw of thick steel plate | |
JP4018962B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for inspecting surface wrinkles of band-like body | |
JP2001343331A (en) | System and method for inspecting defect | |
JPS6396547A (en) | Detecting device for defect of band-shaped metallic plate | |
JPH09145638A (en) | Method and device for detecting surface defect | |
JP2005003574A (en) | Method and device for inspecting surface flaw | |
JP4344312B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for inspecting surface flaw of strip or column | |
JP2006218504A (en) | Method of manufacturing metallic strip | |
JP2003337012A (en) | Inspection apparatus for flap interval of corrugated fiberboard | |
JP3697578B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for detecting cracks in strips | |
JP7342908B2 (en) | Edge detection method and surface inspection device | |
JP7343781B2 (en) | Metal plate surface defect inspection equipment | |
JPH0989800A (en) | Surface defect inspection apparatus | |
JPH0882604A (en) | Method for inspecting surface defect of steel plate |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
A977 | Report on retrieval |
Effective date: 20051121 Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 |
|
A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20051125 |
|
A521 | Written amendment |
Effective date: 20060120 Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 |
|
A02 | Decision of refusal |
Effective date: 20060210 Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02 |