JP2003186975A - Adaptation evaluating system and method, program for executing the same method, information recording medium with its program recorded and adaptation evaluating device - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an adaptation evaluating system capable of acquiring results leading to clear judgement even at the time of searching for talents and desired fields by grasping the full pictures of persons from the judgement only by psychological inspection. <P>SOLUTION: A terminal 10 to be used by an individual, a terminal 20 to be use by a group, and an adaptation evaluating device 30 for evaluating the degree of the adaptation of an individual and group are communicatively connected through a network. The adaptation evaluating device 30 displays a picture for executing psychological inspection according to an access request from the terminal 10, and stores the inspection results in a storage region as first score information. Then, second score information obtained by gradually scoring the necessity of talents or fields required by the group is set in response to an access request from the terminal 20, and the second score information is collated with the first score information based on the access request from the terminal 20, and the adaptation corresponding to each individual is calculated, and the most adapted individual is extracted, and the adaptation is judged. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2003,JPO

Description

Detailed Description of the Invention

[0001]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a conformity evaluation system, a conformity evaluation method, a program for executing the method, an information recording medium having the program recorded therein, and a conformity evaluation apparatus. The present invention relates to matching between individuals, individuals and groups, individuals and fields, groups, groups and fields to evaluate the degree of matching.

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art In recent years, new industries and occupations continue to be born, and the opportunities for people to seek new ways of working, learning, and living are increasing, and the mobilization of human resources is accelerating. that time,
In the marriage information service industry and the human resource service industry, for example, a psychological test such as an aptitude test or a suitable job diagnostic test is used as a method for finding a person, environment, or profession that is suitable for oneself. Mutual or one way,
It was "they make their own decisions based on their own judgment."

[0003]

By the way, these days, in a group of companies or the like, human resources of the same type as existing employees cannot survive, and a new image of human resources is required for survival.

However, since the conventional psychological test cannot grasp the whole picture of a person,
It was difficult to find such a person.

That is, in the psychological test, a psychological concept "construction" is measured, and the construction concept includes "personality, attitude, values, behavior, desire, motivation, suitability, job satisfaction, There is "leadership, morale, achievement motive" etc., but the psychological test measures "construction concept".
Since it is done independently, it does not show the whole picture of the person.

[0006] In addition, the suitable job diagnostic test, in which the "construction concept" to be measured is suitable, is the most advanced application, but since it is bound by only one constructive concept "appropriate work", it is a human subjective aspect. Since it was not possible to go into the "values, desires, motivations, interests" and so on, which are the constructive concepts of "," it was not possible to make an accurate diagnosis, and it was difficult to find human resources with a new image, for example.

Further, in the case of the conventional paper inspection document, the work of collecting the answer sheet after the inspection, judging whether the answer result is correct or incorrect, totalizing the answer result, and diagnosing the suitability based on the total result are very complicated. Therefore, there is also a problem that the burden on the person who measures the test becomes excessive.

In addition, in the conventional inspection, there is a problem that it is not known how to express the human resource image desired by the company.

[0009] In other words, assuming that there is a demand for hiring a large number of over-the-counter sales personnel (parts) as human resources, although the personnel of the personnel personnel understand the desired human resources, Unless you actually have an interview and ask the person to ask various questions, it is often difficult to make a judgment based on the inspection alone. However, interviewing each and every one of them is terrible for the personnel manager,
There was also a problem that the cost was also burdened.

[0010] Further, people are searching for “own course” that leads to their own way of life, for example, “fields” such as subject, occupation, and qualification. In addition, people are hungry for communication and are seeking a place for new ways of life. As such a place, various communities and NPOs (Non-P
rofit-Organization: a non-profit organization)
Etc. are in the limelight. Due to the shortage of human resources at NPOs, the community conveys their characteristics to many people and wants the most suitable of them to participate.

However, when searching for a desired field,
Even in the case of finding the desired human resources, it has been difficult for the conventional inspection to obtain the results sufficient for making a clear judgment and finding the suitable human resources.

Further, in marketing, if the questionnaire and the attributes representing the characteristics of the subject are aggregated and analyzed, it is not possible to carry out marketing that goes into the psychology of the subject, and there is a problem of insufficient analysis.

Furthermore, in the case of a person and a person who directly meet each other to measure the matching, for example, the matching is performed by each other's personal judgment, and an appropriate matching result that goes into the psychology of the person cannot be obtained.

The present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, and an object of the present invention is to grasp the whole picture of a person only by a psychological examination so that a person who is looking for a person can find a person. Can be easily and inexpensively searched from a larger number of candidates, and whether you are searching for the field you want or the person you want, you can get a clear decision and the results that are sufficient to derive the right person. In addition, a conformity evaluation system, conformity evaluation method, and method that can solve the lack of analysis in marketing, etc. and can obtain appropriate conformance results even when making conformity judgments between people such as matchmaking. It is to provide a program to be executed, an information recording medium recording the program, and a conformity evaluation device.

[0015]

In order to achieve the above object, the invention according to claim 1 is one or a plurality of first terminals used by one individual, and one or a plurality of first terminals used by another group. A plurality of second terminals, and a conformity evaluation device capable of communicating with the first and second terminals respectively via a network and evaluating the degree of conformity between the one individual and the other group. A conformity evaluation system provided, wherein the conformity evaluation apparatus responds to an access request from the first terminal,
A first processing means for displaying a screen for performing a psychological test on the one individual and storing the first score information, which is a numerical value of the test result of the psychological test, in a specific storage area; Second processing means for setting the second score information in which the necessity of the human resources or fields required by the other group is scored stepwise in response to an access request from the second terminal; , Matching based on the access request from the second terminal, the second score information set by the second processing means and the first score information, and adapted according to each individual And a third processing means for calculating the degree of fitness and extracting the person having the highest degree of fitness from each degree of fitness to determine the degree of fitness.

Further, the invention according to claim 2 is characterized in that the psychological test includes a plurality of tests differentiated for each construct.
The third processing means is characterized by making a final determination of conformity by calculating the degree of conformity for each of the constituent concepts.

Further, in the invention according to claim 3, the psychological test includes a plurality of respective scales regarding the human resources, and the first score information is a first scale score according to each of the plurality of scales. And a first total of each first final scale score calculated on the basis of each first weighting coefficient obtained by weighting each scale score, respectively, and the second score information includes a plurality of A second total of each second final scale score calculated on the basis of each second scale score according to each scale and each first weighting factor that weights each second scale score. The second processing means sets each of the second scale scores from the second terminal and each of the second weighting factors, and the third processing means comprises: The adaptability is calculated by the absolute value of the difference between the first total sum and the second total sum. It is.

Further, in the invention according to claim 4, the inspection includes a plurality of respective scales regarding the human resources, and the first score information is a first scale score corresponding to each of the plurality of scales. , The first weighting coefficient obtained by weighting each of the scale scores, and the first subtotal obtained by calculating each first final scale score calculated for each of the examinations, and the second score information. Is each second scale score according to each scale, and
Each of the second scale scores is weighted with each of the first weighting factors, and each second final scale score calculated based on each of the second subtotals calculated for each of the examinations. The processing means sets each of the second scale scores from the second terminal and each of the second weighting factors, and the third processing means sets the first subtotal and the first subtotal. The conformity for each inspection is calculated by the absolute value of the difference between the two subtotals.

The invention according to claim 5 is the second aspect of the invention.
Processing means sets the respective second weighting factors weighted for each of the inspections from the second terminal, and the third processing means conforms to the respective second weighting factors. The feature is that final conformity is determined according to the degree.

The invention according to claim 6 is the second
The processing means is characterized in that the second score information is set as score information based on the inspection result of the successful person.

[0021] In the invention according to claim 7, the field is one area that is differentiated in human activity in any one of industry, occupation, qualification, department, and group department. The processing means is characterized in that the degree of suitability is calculated in accordance with any one of the areas of the field.

Further, in the invention according to claim 8, the group is a group of a plurality of persons selected from a community, a company, a school, a nursing home for the elderly, a hospital, and a non-profit organization. The means is characterized by calculating the degree of conformity according to any of the gatherings.

The invention according to claim 9 is characterized in that one or a plurality of first terminals used by one group and one or a plurality of second terminals used by the other group; A conformity evaluation system comprising: a conformity evaluation device capable of communicating with a second terminal via a network and evaluating the degree of conformity between the one group and the other group. In response to an access request from the first terminal, the device displays a screen for performing a psychological test on each member of the one group, and digitizes a test result of the psychological test. First processing means for storing the score information of the above in a specific storage area, and the necessity degree of the group required by the other group is graded in stages in response to an access request from the second terminal. Set the second score information Second processing means and the second score information set by the second processing means based on the access request from the second terminal, and the first score information is collated. Third processing means for calculating a fitness degree according to each of the groups, extracting the group having the most suitable fitness degree from each of the fitness degrees, and performing a determination process of the fitness.

The invention according to claim 10 is characterized in that the third processing means performs an averaging process on each test result of each psychological test for each member constituting the one group, and The feature is that the final matching between the groups is judged by calculating the matching degree.

Further, the invention according to claim 11 is characterized in that the third processing means carries out an analysis / judgment process at the time of carrying out a merger or an acquisition of each company based on the matching degree.

[0026] In the invention according to claim 12, one or a plurality of first terminals used by one individual, one or a plurality of second terminals used by the other individual, the first, Second
And a conformity evaluation device that evaluates the degree of conformity between the one individual and the other individual, the conformity evaluation device comprising: In response to an access request from the first terminal, a screen for performing a psychological test on the one individual is displayed, and first score information that digitizes the test result of the psychological test is specified. First processing means for performing storage processing in a storage area, and second score information in which the necessity of human resources required by the other individual is scored stepwise in response to an access request from the second terminal. Second processing means for setting processing, and second score information set by the second processing means based on an access request from the second terminal, and the first score information. To each of the individuals Flip was fit respectively calculated, and a third processing means for determining processing adapted to extract the personal best fit fit among the fit, comprising a.

Further, in the invention as set forth in claim 13, the third processing means carries out an analysis / determination process of the fitness in the marriage information service between the one and the other individuals based on the fitness. It has a feature.

The invention according to claim 14 is a conforming measurer for measuring one or a plurality of first terminals used by a person to be inspected who is psychologically examined and a person who conforms to the required personnel or field. A conformity evaluation method for evaluating the degree of conformity between the inspected person and the conforming measurer by a server capable of communicating with one or a plurality of second terminals used by The test result of the psychological test performed by the test subject using the first terminal is stored,
The conforming measurer uses the second terminal to set the required degree of the required human resources or fields, and based on the inspection result and the set degree of necessity, the inspected person And the degree of conformity of conformity with the conform measurer is calculated and evaluated.

[0029] Further, the invention according to claim 15 communicates with one or a plurality of first terminals used by one individual and one or a plurality of second terminals used by the other group via a network, respectively. A conformity evaluation method for evaluating the degree of conformity between the one individual and the other group by a possible server, which is a psychological test performed by the one individual using the first terminal. The inspection result is stored, the group uses the second terminal to set the necessity degree of the required human resources or fields, and based on the inspection result and the set necessity degree, It is characterized in that the degree of matching between the individual and the group is calculated and evaluated.

The invention according to claim 16 communicates with one or a plurality of first terminals used by one group and one or a plurality of second terminals used by the other group via a network. A conformity evaluation method for evaluating the degree of conformity between the one group and the other group by a possible server, wherein a member of the one group is the first group.
Stores each test result of each psychological test performed using the terminal, and the other group uses the second terminal to set the required degree of the required human resources or fields, Based on the result and the set need, while performing an averaging process on each test result of each psychological test for each member constituting the one group, the one individual and the group It is characterized by calculating the degree of conformity of conformity with and determining conformity between groups.

The invention according to claim 17 communicates with one or a plurality of first terminals used by one individual and one or a plurality of second terminals used by the other individual via a network. A conformity evaluation method for evaluating a degree of conformity between the one individual and the other individual by a server that is enabled, which is a psychological test performed by the one individual using the first terminal. The inspection result is stored, the other individual uses the second terminal to set the required degree of the required human resources, and based on the inspection result and the set need degree, the It is characterized in that the degree of matching between the individual and the individual is calculated and evaluated.

A claim 18 defines a program for causing a computer to execute any one of the conformity evaluation methods described above, and a claim 19 provides an information recording medium readable by the computer, in which the program is recorded. It is defined.

[0033] The invention according to claim 20 is one in which one or a plurality of first terminals used by a person to be psychologically examined and one or a plurality of second terminals used by a group are respectively connected via a network. A communication device capable of communicating, and a conformity evaluation device for evaluating the degree of conformity between the subject and the group,
First storage means for storing the inspection result of the psychological examination of the inspected person to be inspected together with the attribute information of the inspected person, and setting regarding the necessity of the required human resources or fields set by the group A second storage unit that stores information together with attribute information related to the group; and a calculation unit that calculates a matching degree between the inspected person and the group based on the inspection result and the setting information. It is characterized by including.

The invention described in claim 21 communicates with one or a plurality of first terminals used by one individual and a second terminal for setting a score relating to a field, respectively, via a network. A conformity evaluation device capable of evaluating the degree of conformity between the one person and the field,
In response to an access request from the first terminal, a screen for performing a psychological test on the one individual is displayed, and first score information in which the test result of the psychological test is digitized is stored in a specific memory. A first processing means for storing processing in the area, and a second processing means for setting processing of second score information in which the necessity degree of the field is scored stepwise according to an access request from the second terminal. And the second score information set by the first processing means on the basis of the access request from the first terminal and the second score information. Third processing means for extracting the degree of conformity with the field and determining the conformity.

Further, the invention according to claim 22 communicates with one or a plurality of first terminals used by one group and a second terminal for setting a score related to a field, respectively via a network. A conformity evaluation device capable of evaluating the degree of conformity between the one group and the field,
In response to an access request from the first terminal, first score information obtained by digitizing the necessity of human resources required by the group according to a psychological test scale is stored in a specific storage area. And a second processing means for setting processing of second score information in which the necessity of the field is graded stepwise in accordance with an access request from the second terminal,
On the basis of an access request from the first terminal, the first score information set by the first processing means is collated with the second score information, and the compatibility between the group and the field is checked. And a third processing means for extracting conformance and performing a matching determination process.

The invention according to claim 23 is one or more first terminals for setting a score relating to one field, and a second terminal for setting a score relating to the other field. A conformity evaluation device that is communicable via a network and that evaluates the degree of conformity between the one field and the other field, wherein the one of the one field is responsive to an access request from the first terminal. A first processing means for storing the first score information, which is obtained by digitizing the degree of necessity of the field according to a psychological test scale, in a specific storage area;
Second processing means for setting processing of second score information in which the degree of necessity of the other field is graded stepwise in response to an access request from the other terminal, and access from the first terminal. On the basis of the request, the first score information set by the first processing means and the second score information are collated to extract the degree of conformity between the one field and the other field. And a third processing means for determining conformity.

[0037]

BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION Hereinafter, an example of a preferred embodiment of the present invention will be specifically described with reference to the drawings.

[First Embodiment] (Overall Configuration of System) First, a feature of the present invention is that the terminal side on the inspected side of an individual or a group to be psychologically tested is prompted to carry out the psychological test. , The suitability of individuals or groups that measure the suitability of the required personnel or fields, prompts the terminal side on the side of the measurer to select and input the scale of the required personnel, and the results of the psychological test and the required personnel. By matching the results such as the scale scores of the above, the degree of conformity of both is diagnosed, and the information of the qualified personnel is provided to the qualified measurer, while it is also available to the inspected person as necessary. It is intended to provide information on suitable groups.

Prior to a specific description of such a characteristic configuration, the schematic configuration of the entire system, particularly its communication infrastructure and hardware configuration, on which the conformity evaluation system of the present invention is operated, will be described with reference to FIG. 2 will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram showing a schematic configuration of the entire system of the present embodiment.

The conformity evaluation system 1 of the present embodiment provides a predetermined conformity evaluation service, and as shown in FIG. 1, one or a plurality of terminals on the person (user) side to be inspected for psychological inspection. (Or a client (any name may be used)) 10 (10-1 to 10-M) (the “first terminal” in the present invention) and a side that searches for necessary personnel, One or a plurality of terminals 20 (20-1 to 20-L) used by a group on the side of the conforming measurer who measures a person who fits the required human resources or fields ("second terminal" in the present invention) And these terminals 10, 20 and network N
The conformity evaluation device 30 is provided so as to provide data communication by wireless or wired communication via a communication network such as 1 or N2.

As the network, for example, the Internet (a communication mode using the TCP / IP protocol), a network using various other communication protocols, a wireless (including a mobile phone network, satellite communication, etc.) network It doesn't matter. Further, it may be an intranet, LAN, WAN or the like in the company.

The terminal 10 (or 20) is used by a user (user) who desires to browse a homepage, for example, when the network is the Internet, and is a computer device that can access a web server or the like. Is. This terminal 10 (or 20)
Has a function related to a network (for example, the Internet, an intranet, a LAN, a WAN, and various other networks), a mobile phone terminal, a palm computer, a PDA, a desktop, a laptop computer, a mobile, a pager, etc. Any computer such as an information device having a wireless / wired communication function or a computer similar thereto may be used, and may be mobile or fixed.

Although not shown, the terminal 10 (or 20) is a display means (screen) for displaying various image information and the like, and an operation input means for inputting data on the display screen of this display means. , A transmission / reception means for transmitting / receiving data, a storage means (memory) for storing various data, and a control means for controlling these. The configuration of each of these means is configured to be realized by various hardware and software. The memory is physically inseparable, or a memory stick or similar memory.

The conformity assessment device 30 is a database 32 which is a first storage means for storing the examination result of the psychological examination of each individual, and a scale score and a weighting coefficient for each category set by various groups and for each scale. The second that stores the setting information
34, which is a storage means for storing the data, and a plurality of databases 36 (3
6-1 to 36-L), and one or a plurality of servers 40 that provide a Web page and perform conformity evaluation by calculating the degree of conformance.

The server 40 provides information to the user on the Web, for example, and is a commercially available server for the purpose of interactive Web page management or other Internet service provision or a dedicated server having a wireless / wired communication function. However, it is provided with a program for conformity evaluation according to the present invention.

Although not shown, the server 40 is connected to the terminals 10 and 20 and display processing means formed by, for example, a CGI program or the like, which prompts the user to display various screens such as a homepage menu screen. In addition, for example, a transmission / reception means for transmitting and receiving various data such as user information, a display means and an operation input means for a system administrator, a storage means for storing various control programs, service execution programs, etc. . The configuration of each of these means is configured to be realized by various hardware and software.

As a concrete example of the hardware configuration, although not shown, it controls a communication interface for controlling communication functions, a storage device such as a hard disk, an input / output interface for inputting / outputting data from / to a terminal, and controls them. A central processing unit (CPU) and the like can be mentioned.

As software, a standard web page authoring tool and HTML, XM for realizing this graphical user interface are used.
L, XHTML, SGML, CGI, Java, Java
It is programmed using a language such as asscript or ActiveX.

Further, the "server 40" includes not only a web server but also a database, a POP and SMTP server for sending and receiving electronic mail, and other DNS.
It is configured by including various servers such as servers, and functions as a generic term for systems including these.

In the conformity evaluation system 1 having the above-mentioned configuration, the information on the psychological examination input from the terminal 10 on the subject side is stored in the database 32.

The database 32 is a personal character diagnosis result, score data for each category, an individual A, an individual B, an individual C, and an individual attribute database.

On the other hand, the scale score information and the weight information input from the terminal 20 on the side of the conforming measurer are stored in each of the plurality of databases 36. Then, the format is converted and stored in the database 34.

Here, the database 34 is stored by scoring for each scale of the group or the field. In the case of both the group and the field, the scoring depends on the intention of the person who performs the scoring.
Basically you can do it freely.

For example, in the case of grading the “necessity” of a human resource needed in the future that has never existed before, the scoring may be performed on behalf of the human resource desired by the top of the organization, etc., or In the case of recruiting human resources for a new business, the personality diagnosis results of successful persons may be used.

Under such a premise, the HT from the terminal 20
Based on the TP request (access request), the server 40 evaluates the degree of conformity by acquiring information from each of these two databases.

A server, which is an evaluation device for evaluating the degree of conformity, measures to which group or field an individual conforms.

For example, when measuring the matching between individuals,
For example, when measuring the fit between groups, especially between communities, and the fit between fields.

Then, the category points of the both are matched with each other, and the degree of conformity (deviation degree) is calculated, and the optimum both are selected from the respective degree of conformity (deviation degree).

Although this result is supposed to be displayed on the terminal 20, it may be displayed on the terminal 10 side as necessary (in accordance with the aspect of screen development of the psychological examination). Good.

(Regarding Display Screen) (Display Screen on Subject Side) Next, in the conformity evaluation system 1 having the above-described configuration, the display screen (user interface) displayed on the terminal 10 or the terminal 20 ( 3 to 5 for an example of the aspect of screen development)
Also, description will be made with reference to FIGS.

First, the terminal 10 displays, for example, a screen shown in FIG. 3 for inputting attribute information about the person to be inspected, a screen for performing a psychological test shown in FIG. 4, a screen for displaying test results shown in FIG. Change screen. Hereinafter, an example of a display mode of each of these screens will be described.

In FIG. 3, on the display screen of the terminal 10 on the inspected person side, a user is formed in a predetermined hierarchy from an arbitrary homepage of this service site for psychological inspection, and the inspected person is a user related to the inspected person. A screen for registering information before and after inspection is formed.

As shown in the figure, the display screen 100 has a first name input field 1 for inputting the kanji of the name of the person to be inspected.
01, second name input field 10 for inputting katakana
2. Postal code input field 103 for inputting the zip code,
The prefecture name selection input field 104 for inputting the prefecture name which is the address of the inspected person, the city name input field 105 for inputting the city name, and the subsequent fields For example, an input field 10 for inputting the address building name, etc.
6, telephone number input field 107 for inputting a telephone number,
E-mail input field 108 for inputting an e-mail account, gender input field 109 for inputting gender, each input field 110 for inputting date of birth, etc., occupation input field 111 for selectively inputting occupation A hobby selection field 112 for selecting and inputting a hobby is displayed.

FIG. 4 discloses a display screen 120 displaying an example of the specific contents of a psychological test.

As shown in the figure, on the display screen 120,
For example, various questions of more than 600 items for each category examination included in the psychological examination are sequentially displayed according to the screen development. For example, specific contents are displayed in 15 questions of the examination 1, which is one of them. Question content display column 1
22 and the selective answer of the person according to the item of each question content displayed in the question content display field 122, for example, "totally different from my own idea", "somewhat different from my own idea", Selections 121a to 121e for making selections in five stages such as "neither can be said", "slightly close to one's thoughts", "very close to one's thoughts" are formed.

Whether these are to stop the examination after every predetermined number of questions or every examination, whether to end this examination on this page (only the question items displayed on the screen), whether to proceed to the next question, etc. Selection button 12 for selecting
3, 124, 125 can be selected.

FIG. 5 discloses an example of a display screen for notifying the subject side of the result of the psychological test.

As shown in the figure, on the display screen 130, the specific contents of the value diagnosis chart, which is the result of the psychological test of the subject to be inspected, are displayed. In the upper part of the display screen 130, A value type basic analysis selection unit 131a for displaying a basic analysis result of the value type of the person to be inspected, an action type analysis selection unit 131b for displaying an action type analysis result, and a value orientation A value-oriented analysis / selection unit 131c for displaying the analysis result, a value / working style analysis / selection unit 131d for analyzing the value of the working style, and a value working style analysis for displaying the analysis result. In addition, a personal information display field 132 displaying personal information is displayed.

Further, in the middle of the display screen 130, various types of sense of values, that is, "balance-oriented type", "current self-satisfaction pursuit type", "affection for others", etc. A basic analysis result graph display section 133 is formed that displays which of the molds is superior or inferior, for example, in the form of a graph in five stages. As a result, the inspected person
By referring to the graph, it becomes possible to self-analyze which type of value is the dominant type. In the example shown in the figure, for example, the inspected person is “human relations-oriented”, “everything is hard”, “self-growth pursuit”, “inner world enrichment”, “energetic activity”, “others support”. It will be understood that "type" etc. is superior.

Here, the examinee can recognize that, for example, the “human relationship-oriented type” is superior, but what does the “human relationship-oriented type” specifically mean? There may be cases in which it is not possible to understand what is happening. Therefore, in the lower part of the display screen 130, concrete explanations of values are displayed in order from the most dominant one. For example, the explanation about "human relations emphasis type", the explanation about "energetic activity type",
Each column 1 with explanations about "everything is hard"
34a, 134b, 134c and the like are formed on the display.

As a result of the psychological examination as described above, the display screen displayed on the terminal of the subject is as described above, but the data structure accumulated as the database is as shown in FIG. It will be stored in a rough format.

As shown in the figure, personal inspection result information 14
0 is associated with the psychological test construct 141, each scale 142 corresponding thereto, and the scale score 143 corresponding to each scale.

More specifically, the psychological test construct 14
1 is, for example, “inspection 1” 14 for inspecting values.
1a, "inspection 2" 141b for inspecting behavior type, "inspection 3" 141c for inspecting working type, "inspection 4" 141d for inspecting power to be exerted, "inspection 5" 141e for inspecting lifestyle (desire), There are various inspections such as "inspection 6" 141f for inspecting the degree of lifestyle clearance.

Among these, for example, in the value inspection result of the inspection 1, the scale-oriented score is 3 in the balance-oriented type which is one of the scales. In this way, by calculating and associating each scale score corresponding to each scale, the value-type inspection result graph and the like shown above can be calculated.

By the way, in the personal examination result information 140 of this embodiment, the subtotal of the scale score is calculated for each examination. For example, in "inspection 1", the subtotal point is "34" as indicated by reference numeral 145a, and in "inspection 2",
The subtotal point is "18" as shown by reference numeral 145b, the subtotal point is "14" as shown by reference numeral 145c in "Inspection 3", and the code 1 in "Inspection 4".
As shown in 45d, the subtotal point is "25",
In “Inspection 5”, the subtotal points are, as indicated by reference numeral 145e,
It is "37", and in the "inspection 6", reference numeral 145f
As shown in, the subtotal point is “10”. In this way, the subtotal for each inspection is calculated in advance, which facilitates extraction when calculating each scale score according to the necessity on the side of the conforming measurer described later. In other words, the suitability in each inspection unit can be calculated by the subtotal points of each inspection of the person to be inspected.

The total score is also calculated based on each subtotal score thus obtained. In the example of FIG. 6, the total point is “138” as indicated by reference numeral 146, for example.

In the personal inspection result information 140 which is the personal inspection result, the registration information (personal information) registered previously is associated as the personal attribute information 144.

Here, the personal attribute information 144 is, for example,
Information such as the name, age, address, etc. of the person A to be inspected.

Since these are associated,
The relevant human resources can be extracted by a search when searching for human resources according to a request from the conforming measurer side, which will be described later.

(Display screen on the conforming measurer side) An example of the display screen displayed on the terminal on the inspected person side has been described above, but the display screen on the conforming measurer side will be described below. The details of the display screen, particularly the screen for registering the scale for setting a desirable human resource, will be described.

Here, the “inspection 3, working type” in FIG. 6 will be described as an example. First, in FIG. 7, a display screen 200 for setting the desired human resources desired by the conforming measurer is displayed. Here, examples of the suitable measurer that is an individual or a group include companies, organizations, various communities, schools, NPOs, and the like.

On this display screen 200, a setting section for setting and inputting the setting registration information on the side of the conforming measurer, for example, "customer code", "customer name", "human resource candidate number", "human resource candidate name", etc. 201 is formed on the display.

Here, the human resource candidate number means what kind of human resources the conforming measurer specifically requires.
The section name is shown in Fig. 8, "1 New Business Standard Section",
While referring to the human resource candidate number display field 202 in which the correspondence between numbers such as “2 new business operation department” and department names is specified,
This is a number for selective input, and by this number, the desired department name can be clearly shown to the inspected person. Alternatively, the scale score and the weighting factor, which will be described later, may be automatically displayed and set by this number.

In the setting section 201, when the personnel candidate number is entered, the concrete name of the personnel candidate name is automatically displayed to reduce the burden of inputting the setting. Of course, "7" and others are selected. In the case of doing so, it is possible to arbitrarily input.

Further, on the display screen 200, the scale score and the weight coefficient for inputting the scale score and the weight coefficient corresponding to each scale of the working type, such as "Large company employment", "Small and medium enterprise", etc. The setting input unit 203 is configured.

Here, the scale score is, as disclosed in the list indicated by reference numeral 204, a score obtained by scoring five grades, for example, from "1: not suitable at all" to "5: quite suitable". . In the present embodiment, the case of five stages is illustrated, but it may be three stages, six stages, seven stages, or n stages, for example. Furthermore, these steps may be different depending on the type of the previous inspection (inspection 1 to inspection 6).

Further, the weighting coefficient refers to a numerical value or the like weighted to each scale, whereby the weight corresponding to each scale, for example, "Large company employment" and "Small and medium enterprises", is adapted. It can be set according to the wishes of the measurer. As the weighting factor, a first weighting factor indicating the weight of each scale and a second weighting factor indicating the weight of each inspection are configured,
You may be allowed to set each. Of course, this weighting coefficient is not limited to an integer, and may be expressed by a decimal point.

Then, in the scale score and weighting factor setting input unit 203, for example, in the scale of "enterprise large company", the scale score is input as "1" and the weighting factor is "1.4", and so on. Then, the scale score and the weighting factor are input for each scale.

Upon completion of inputting these settings, it is possible to perform a selective operation by the registration operation unit 206 or the reset operation unit 207 as to whether or not to perform registration with the input information.

In the same manner as described above, the scale score and the weighting coefficient are input for each scale of each inspection. Hereinafter, the “basic type” inspection will be described as an example.

FIG. 8 discloses an example of a display screen for registering a scale corresponding to the basic type examination. As shown in the figure, in the basic type scale registration screen 210, for example, a scale score setting unit 211 for setting and inputting a scale score for each scale such as “balance-oriented” and “hard work” is provided. Has been formed. Of course, although not shown, a weighting factor setting unit for setting a weighting factor for each scale may be formed. And if you enter these settings,
By operating the transmission operation unit 212 or the reset operation unit 213, for example, the next scale registration screen or the like can be displayed.

In addition, in the same manner as the above basic type inspection, "behavior type", "ability to exert", "lifestyle (desire)", "lifestyle-will", "lifestyle-comfort", etc. The setting is input on each setting screen (not shown) corresponding to each inspection for each of the five structural concepts.

FIG. 10 discloses an example of the data structure of the setting information of the desired human resources image thus set and input.

As shown in the figure, the setting information 280, which is a data structure stored as a database, is stored in a schematic format as shown in FIG.
81, the respective scales 282 corresponding thereto, for example, the scale score information 283 regarding the new business planner of the X company, and the scale score information 284 regarding the environmental measure personnel of the X company are associated with each other. Further, the scale score information 283 has a scale score 283a for each scale, a weighting coefficient 283b, a final scale score 283c obtained by multiplying the scale score by the weighting coefficient, etc., and is associated with each other according to the desired human resources. In other words, the scale score information 284 also includes the scale score 284a, the weight coefficient 284b, and the final scale score 284c for the environmental measure personnel of Company X. Although not shown, the second weighting factor may be associated with each examination. In this case, the final scale score is multiplied by the second weighting coefficient to calculate the subtotal of the final scale score.

More specifically, the concept of psychological examination 28
As 0, for example, "Examination 1" 28 for inspecting values
1a, "Examination 2" 281b for inspecting behavior type, "Examination 3" 281c for inspecting working type, "Examination 4" 281d for inspecting power to be exerted, "Examination 5" 281e for inspecting lifestyle (desire), There are various inspections such as "inspection 6" 281f for inspecting the degree of lifestyle clearance.

Of these, for example, in the test result of the sense of values of the test 1, in the hard-working type, which is one of the scales, the scale score is 4 and the weighting factor is 2. Therefore, the final scale score is Is 4 × 2 = 8. In this way, each scale score, each weighting coefficient, and each final scale score according to each scale are calculated and associated.

By the way, in the setting information 280 of this embodiment, the subtotal score of the scale score and the subtotal score of the final scale score are calculated for each examination. For example, in “Examination 1”, the subtotal score of the final scale score is “5” as indicated by reference numeral 286a.
8 ”, and in the“ inspection 2 ”, the subtotal score of the final scale score is“ 25 ”as indicated by reference numeral 286b.

In this way, by calculating the subtotal for each inspection in advance, extraction is performed when calculating each scale score of certain inspection 1 and inspection 4 according to the needs of the conforming measurer side, for example. Will be easier. In other words, the suitability in each inspection unit can be calculated by the subtotal points of each inspection of the person to be inspected.

The total score is also calculated based on the subtotal score of each subscale point and each final scale score thus obtained.
In the example of FIG. 10, the total point is “225” as indicated by reference numeral 287, for example.

The setting information 28, which is the information of the desired human resources image
In 0, the registration information of the previously registered conforming measurer is associated as the attribute information 285 of the group of conforming measurers.

Here, the group attribute information 285 is, for example, information on the treatment, annual income, employment form, etc. in the group, for example, company X.

Since these are associated with each other,
It is possible to perform a calculation for extracting human resources according to a request from the conforming measurer side.

In the present embodiment, after the psychological test is performed on the person to be inspected, the inspection result information is stored in the database, while the conforming measurer determines the scale score and weighting coefficient for the desired human resource image. The configuration information is registered according to the above, and the configuration is premised on that the conforming measurer side extracts human resources who are suitable for the psychological examination information performed in advance by searching, etc. Needless to say, the setting information regarding the image of human resources may be registered, and the psychological examination may be performed only on the necessary portions according to the setting information.

(Characteristic Configuration of the Present Embodiment) Here, a more specific configuration of the conformity evaluation apparatus, which is a characteristic of the present embodiment, will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram conceptually and functionally showing details of the conformity evaluation device.

For example, as shown in FIG. 2, the database 32 in which the information of the person to be inspected is stored has the individual inspection result information 32a. As the individual inspection result information 32, each scale score for each scale is included. The information 32b and the personal attribute (information) 32 as setting registration information of who this individual is
Including c and.

On the other hand, in the database 36 which stores the information on the side of the conforming measurer for measuring the conformity, the scale score information which is the setting information set according to each group and the attribute information of the group of whom the group is. The database 34 that has and manages these information formats in an integrated manner.
Includes the scale score information 34 of the group for measuring the conformity which is the setting information.
It is configured to include a.

In the server 40, in response to an access request from the terminal 10 on the inspected side, for example, a registration screen, a value diagnosis chart, etc. on the inspected side are displayed, and
With respect to the database 32, the subject side screen display processing means 41a that processes the registration information to perform setting registration.
Then, based on an access request from the terminal 20 on the side of the conforming measurer, the side of the conforming measurer performing processing so as to display various screens such as a scale input screen and a scale registration screen as necessary. The database 34 is created by converting the format of the information in the screen display processing means 41b and the database 36.
Of the "usage mode 1" that the individual mainly selects, the "usage mode 2" that the group side selects the person, and the "usage mode 3" that evaluates all two suitable users A usage pattern selection processing unit 41d that prompts the user to select one of the forms, and a first search unit 41e that searches the database 32 when a suitable human resource is extracted.
And second search means 41f for searching the database 34
And a first setting process for the matching result calculation means 43 according to the first and second weighting factors set on the scale setting screen or the like displayed by the matching measurer side screen display processing means 41b. A second weighting factor setting processing means 42a, an inspection set on the same scale registration screen, etc., an inspection for performing a setting process on the matching result calculation means 43 according to the scale item,
The scale item setting processing means 42b is included.

Further, the server 40 uses the first and second
Search results of the search means 41e and 41f, and the first and second
First and second weighting factors set by the weighting factor setting processing unit 42a, inspection / scale item setting processing unit 42
Based on the inspection item and the scale item set in b, the matching result calculating means 43 for calculating the matching degree between the person to be inspected and the human resource required by the matching measurer side, and this matching result calculating means 43. Based on the calculation result information storage means 44 for storing various calculation result information and the various calculation result information stored in the calculation result information storage means 44 and the information from the matching result calculating means 43, for example, The conformity measurement is performed by extracting conformity result output processing means 45a for outputting the conformity result so as to extract the high one (low deviation degree) and the conformity result information output by the conformance result output processing means 45a. The matching result display processing means 45b for processing so as to display on the terminal 20 on the person side, and the control means 46 for controlling these (for example, a CPU, an OS and a control program). When configured to include a.

The matching result calculation means 43 sets the first and second weighting factors set by the first and second weighting factor setting processing means 42a and the setting processing by the inspection and scale item setting processing means 42b. The final scale corresponding to the required scale item based on the inspection item and the scale item that are generated and the scale score corresponding to the scale item of the inspection item of the specific subject searched by the first search unit 41e. First final scale score calculation means 43a for calculating a score, and first and second weighting coefficients set by the first and second weighting coefficient setting processing means 42a,
An inspection item and a scale item that are set and processed by the inspection and scale item setting processing unit 42b, and a scale score corresponding to the scale item set by a group of specific matching measurers searched by the second searching unit 41f. Second final scale score calculating means 43b for calculating a final scale score corresponding to a required scale item, and a first final scale score calculated by the first final scale score calculating means 43a, First calculating means 43c for calculating the absolute value of the difference based on the second final scale score calculated by the second final scale score calculating means 43b.
And a second calculation means 43d for calculating a subtotal of the difference based on the calculation result calculated by the first calculation means 43c.
And a third calculation means 43e for calculating the total sum of each subtotal based on the calculation result calculated by the second calculation means 43e.

In the server 40 having the above-mentioned configuration, each scale is displayed and processed by the conforming measurer side screen display processing means 41b and set and input on the measure input screen of the terminal 20 on the conforming measurer side. Scale score information, first
The weighting coefficient information of each group, the second weighting coefficient information of each examination, the group attribute information of each group, and the like are stored in the database 3 corresponding to each group.
6, and the format is converted and stored in the database 34.

Next, when the input of the scale scores for all the necessary scales is completed, the usage pattern selection processing means 41d.
Prompts the user to select a required form, and when the required form is selected, instructs the matching result calculation means 43 to perform a calculation process according to the selected form.

Then, in response to the request for extracting the desired human resources from the terminal 20, the first searching means 41e extracts the inspection result information of a specific inspected person from the database 32, and extracts the inspection result information according to each scale. Extract scale score information.

First and second weighting factor setting processing means 42a
Then, since the set first and second weighting factors are extracted from the database 34, the first scale score calculating means 43a uses the scale score information extracted by the first searching means 41e. The first weighting factor is multiplied to compute the first final scale score for that scale item.

On the other hand, the second retrieving means 41f extracts scale score information, which is the setting information of the group for measuring the set suitability, with respect to a certain group from the database 34. In the first and second weighting factor setting processing means 42a, the first and second weighting factors set from the database 34 have been extracted, so the second scale score calculating means 43b is the second
The scale score information extracted by the searching means 41f is multiplied by the first weighting coefficient to calculate the second final scale score in the scale item.

Then, the first calculating means 43c calculates the absolute value of the difference between the first final scale score and the second final scale score, and the second calculating means 43d calculates the absolute value of the difference in one examination. Calculate the subtotal of each absolute value of each scale item,
The third calculation means 43e calculates the total sum of the calculation of each subtotal.

Here, the inspection and scale item setting processing means 42
In b, the inspection item and the scale item corresponding to the setting information corresponding to the necessary personnel are extracted from the database 34,
Control is performed so that each computing means can perform computation only on required inspection items and required scale items. Further, the calculation result of each calculation means is stored in the calculation result information storage means 44.

In this way, for example, when each total of the combinations of each group and each individual is calculated, the matching result output processing means 45a extracts the one having the highest matching degree (lowest deviation degree). Then, the counterparts of the corresponding combinations are output, and the conformance result display processing means 45b performs processing so as to display the conformance result information on the terminal 20 on the conformer side.

The consistency between the configuration of the present embodiment and the configuration of the present invention will be described. With the "inspection side screen display processing means 41a" and the "control means 46" of the present embodiment, the present invention is described. Can be configured as "first processing means", and "matching measurer side screen display processing means 41b",
The "first and second weighting factor setting means 42a", "inspection / scale item setting processing means 42b", "control means 46", etc. can constitute the "second processing means" of the present invention, and further The “matching result calculation means 43”, the “matching result output processing means 45 a”, the “calculation result information storage means 44” of the embodiment
The "control means 46" and the like can configure the "third processing means" according to the present invention. Further, in an aspect of the present invention, the database 32 corresponds to “first storage means”, the database 34 corresponds to “second storage means”, and the server 40 corresponds to “calculation means”.

Here, the first processing means displays a screen for conducting a psychological examination for one individual in response to an access request from the first terminal, and displays the examination result of the psychological examination as a numerical value. The converted first score information is stored in a specific storage area. Further, the second processing means grades the necessity of the human resources or fields required by the other group step by step in response to an access request from the second terminal.
Set the point information of. Further, the third processing means collates the second score information set by the second processing means with the first score information based on the access request from the second terminal. The suitability corresponding to each individual is calculated, and the individual having the best suitability is extracted from each suitability to determine the suitability. The third processing means can also determine the final conformity by calculating the conformance degrees for each of the categories.

The psychological test includes a plurality of scales related to the human resources, and the first score information weights each of the first scale scores according to each of the plurality of scales and each scale score. Each first weighting factor and a first grand total of each first final scale score calculated based on. The second score information includes second scale scores according to a plurality of scales and first weights obtained by weighting the second scale scores.
And a second grand total of each second final scale score calculated based on In this case, the second processing means includes each of the second scale scores from the second terminal,
Each of the second weighting factors is set and the third processing means calculates the suitability based on the absolute value of the difference between the first total sum and the second total sum.

Further, the inspection includes a plurality of scales relating to the human resources, and the first score information is such that each of the first scale scores corresponding to each of the plurality of scales and each of the scale scores is weighted. A first weighting factor and a first subtotal of each first final scale score calculated on the basis of each of the examinations. The second score information is calculated based on each second scale score corresponding to each of the plurality of scales and each first weighting coefficient obtained by weighting each of the second scale scores.
The final scale score of is comprised of a second subtotal calculated for each of the tests.

In this case, the second processing means sets each of the second scale scores from the second terminal and each of the second weighting factors, and the third processing means: The first
The suitability for each inspection is calculated based on the absolute value of the difference between the subtotal of 1 and the second subtotal.

Further, the second processing means can set the respective second weighting factors weighted for each of the inspections from the second terminal, and the third processing means can perform the setting processing of the respective second weighting factors. It is also possible to make a final determination of conformity by each degree of conformity according to the coefficient. Further, the second processing means includes the second
It is also possible to set and process the score information as score information based on the inspection result of the successful person.

[0124] In addition, when the field is one area that is differentiated in human activities such as business type, occupation, qualification, department, group department, etc., the third processing means may be any one of the above fields. It is possible to calculate the suitability according to

Further, when the group is a group of a plurality of people such as a community, a company, a school, a nursing home for the elderly, a hospital, a non-profit organization, the third processing means corresponds to one of the groups. It is also possible to calculate the goodness of fit.

In another aspect, the first processing means displays a screen for performing a psychological test on each member of the one group in response to an access request from the first terminal, and First digitized test result of the psychological test
The score information of is stored in a specific storage area. The second processing means sets, in response to an access request from the second terminal, second score information in which the necessity degree of the group required by the other group is scored stepwise. The third processing means collates the second score information set by the second processing means with the first score information on the basis of the access request from the second terminal, and compares them with each other. The suitability is calculated for each of the groups, and the group having the best suitability is extracted from the suitability to determine the suitability.

At this time, the third processing means, by performing an averaging process on each test result of each psychological test for each member constituting one group to calculate the degree of conformity, a final result is obtained. It is also possible to judge the suitability between groups. Further, the third processing means can also perform an analysis / judgment process at the time of carrying out a merger or an acquisition between companies based on the degree of conformity.

Furthermore, in another aspect, the first processing means displays a screen for performing a psychological test on the one individual in response to an access request from the first terminal, and the psychological test is performed. The first score information obtained by digitizing the inspection result is stored in a specific storage area. The second processing means sets the second score information in which the necessity degree of the human resources required by the other individual is scored stepwise according to the access request from the second terminal. The third processing means is
Based on the access request from the second terminal, the second score information set by the second processing means and the first score information are collated to determine the suitability corresponding to each individual. Each individual is calculated, and the individual having the best matching degree among the respective matching degrees is extracted to perform the matching determination process. At this time, the third processing means can also perform an analysis / determination process of the fitness in the marriage information service between the one and the other individuals based on the fitness.

In another aspect, the first storage means is
The inspection result of the psychological examination of the person to be psychologically examined is stored together with the attribute information of the person to be inspected, and the second storage means is set by the group and relates to the necessity of the required human resources or fields. The setting information is stored together with the attribute information about the group, and the calculating unit calculates the matching degree that the subject and the group match based on the inspection result and the setting information.

(Regarding Psychological Examination of Individual or Group) In the psychological examination, the psychological concept "constitutive concept (const
Ructs) ”is measured. This construct includes "personality, attitude, values, behavior, desire, motivation, suitability, job satisfaction, leadership, morale, achievement motive" and the like.

Corresponding to the constructive concept to be measured, there are many psychological tests such as the Y-G test, MPI, MMPI, and many other tests created by various organizations. Various types and combinations of psychological tests used in the present embodiment can be considered depending on the purpose, but in any case, the “test capable of scoring a scale” is targeted. Further, it is not necessary to limit to the cataloging method or the questionnaire method, but the cataloging method is suitable from the viewpoint that it is easy to make a scale score.

Here, the psychological test (personality diagnosis test) basically has, for example, questions of about 600 items. For example, “value”, “behavior type”, “working type”, “working type” It has an examination consisting of six constructs such as "power to exert", "lifestyle (desire)", "lifestyle allowance". Further, for example, as shown in FIG. 9, it is possible to additionally use a questionnaire scale using an interval scale by the questionnaire 150.

Further, there are various scale scores, such as 5 grades and 10 grades, which are digitized evaluation scores for the evaluation. Of these, which stage is not preferable, but in this embodiment, five stages are adopted. Then, a determination is made such that the one with the highest evaluation score is "type of ~". In addition, in this Embodiment, although it will perform about each of six inspections, the subtotal of a scale score is calculated for every inspection.

The measurement means applying a numerical value to an event according to a certain rule, and the scale means a measure when applying the numerical value. Further, the scale score is a numerical value attached to each scale, and is evaluated on a scale of 5 or 7 in the Y-G test, for example.

For example, as personal examination result information as a result of the psychological examination, for example, the information shown in FIG. 6 can be cited. As shown in the figure, for example, a score of 5 grades is given to each scale, a weighting coefficient is multiplied, and it is calculated as a final scale score.

On the other hand, the psychological test is carried out by, for example, 6 for each construct.
It is divided into each test, and the score in that test can be calculated by summing the final scale scores of the questions in each test.

FIG. 6 shows six types of psychological test scales for constructing a concept, and the 44 scales measure an individual. By statistically standardizing psychological tests, we focus on the important aspects of psychological tests, “living”, “work”, and “learning”, classify people by type based on Morris typology, and spranger's behavior pattern ( It has a view on life, a pattern of life, etc.

In addition to this, it is also possible to add and use a questionnaire scale using an interval scale, and for example, to add and use a psychological test scale such as "YG personality test". I don't mind.

In FIG. 6, the total score of the test can be calculated by summing the final scale scores of all the questions. Based on each of these calculated results (subtotal score of the inspection scale for each construct, combination of the subtotal points, total score of all inspections), it is examined what characteristics the individual has can do.

In this way, the psychological test (for example, the test 1 or the balance-oriented type) may be conducted at each of the cuts representing the human psychology and personality, and Form personal psychological test (diagnostic test)
The inspection result of can be stored as a database.

On the other hand, the service center having such a database mediates between the human resources having the above-mentioned psychological test results and the group or the individual seeking the required human resources.

As described above, in the psychological test of the individual, the test result such as what is suitable is obtained, and the diagnostic result is stored as a database.

On the other hand, the request side uses the terminal to make an input on the screen. For example, if a new business planner (who wants to recruit a person who would like to start a new business) is looking for human resources, pursue service. The items of each scale such as 1 for 1 and weight of 1 and for profit pursuit of 4 and 2 are input in advance. In the case of the desired personnel, weighting etc. can be freely set,
Any other method of scoring may be used. Furthermore, when inputting the scale scores one by one on the input screen, it is not necessary to input them individually, and even if it is a group of 10,000 companies, we want human resources of this type. If the policy has been decided, the management, personnel personnel, etc. may input. In this way, the measuring side is asked to input what kind of human resources they want, and accumulates it in the database.

Then, it is determined whether or not both of them match. In the present embodiment, all the inspection results can be scored by the scale score, and the weighting according to the desired personnel can be performed for matching. Here, in order to measure the degree of conformity between the request from the person seeking the human resource and the human resource, for example, a score using a scale score performed in the psychological test is used.

In the psychological test, the scale score is calculated from the individual test result. At this time, in the case of a group, the average value of the inspection results of a plurality of individuals may be used as the scale score.

As described above, the matching is performed by converting the scores into scores and comparing the scores with each other. It should be noted that it is arbitrary what kind of points are distributed.

As a conformity measurer for measuring conformity, for example, a recruiter in charge of a company, a community, a school, or the like can use it when he / she wants (desirs) such a human resource, or For example, the music department of a vocational school can be used in cases where a person with such an image of a person is requested, or in other cases such as when searching for a field or a suitable job. Here, a group consisting of a plurality of members means a group of individuals, for example, a community, a company, a school, a pay nursing home, a hospital, an NPO (No.
n Profit Organization: a non-profit organization) and the like. Furthermore, the field is, for example,
Business types, occupations, qualifications, departments, etc.

Here, for example, it is assumed that there is a demand for hiring a large number of store sales staff (parts) as human resources. Although such a human resource understands a desired human resource in the mind of a human resources manager, it is often difficult to make a judgment unless an actual interview is performed and a person is asked to ask various questions. However, there was a problem in that it was terrible for the personnel personnel to have an interview with all of those human resources, and it also imposes a cost burden. Therefore, it is possible to reinforce the part that can be understood through an interview, which cannot be understood with a background or resume, and use it as a judgment material for selection when narrowing down, and see the suitability of the desired human resource image.

It should be noted that, on the side of the inspected person, only the fact that a psychological examination is carried out is displayed, and the result of this psychological examination is used as an item for checking the suitability of the human resources image desired by other industries or groups. Notifying the user or not notifying is optional.

[0150] Also, since it is made possible to see each other's conditions on the site, people who take the above-mentioned psychological test,
Alternatively, an introduction or an intermediary service for introducing a job or a school can be provided to another person, and when the individual requests the information, information about a suitable group may be returned. At that time, for example, if you are currently unemployed or a student, when you are currently thinking about such a course, people in such a field,
It can be applied to the diagnosis of suitable groups, and can measure the organization and the degree of closeness that suits one's personality. Note that the conformity assessment is not limited to work, and various things such as matchmaking and fields are envisioned, and individuals and groups, groups and groups, hobby communities, individuals and individuals, fields and fields, and the like do not matter.

Further, it is also possible to determine the degree of conformity by a plurality of inspections of the inspection 1 and the inspection 2, or a combination of a plurality of selected scales. Further, by setting one of the weighting factors of each weighting factor of each scale of one inspection to be zero, it is possible to calculate the subtotal in a state where unnecessary scales are excluded and to determine the goodness of fit. As a result, it is possible to select human beings in various forms according to a certain purpose, diagnose human beings from various aspects, and perform matching processing using all kinds of inspections.

Furthermore, in the case where it is necessary to correct the difference in the stages for each diagnosis, or in the case of a diagnosis which is desired to be emphasized, the inspection may be weighted. For example, a certain test 1 has a scale score of 5 and a test 2 has a scale score of 10.
In the case of the stage, the weight may be set to 0.5 for the inspection 2 so as to correspond to other inspections.

(Regarding Processing Procedure) Next, the processing procedure of the conformity evaluation system having the above-mentioned configuration will be described with reference to FIGS. 11 to 13.

(Processing from the terminal on the inspected side) First, the processing from the terminal on the inspected side will be described with reference to FIG. At the terminal 10, the individual inputs an answer to the question of the psychological test (step, hereinafter “S” 101).
In this S101, when an answer is input to the psychological test, each individual makes an input from the terminal 10 toward the input screen.
It should be noted that other people may collectively input the answers answered on paper by the individual, or depending on the psychological test terminal used,
You may input in batch.

Here, as the input screen of the value test which is one of the constructive concepts of the psychological test, for example, the one shown in FIG. 4 described above can be mentioned, while the personal attribute stored in the database as a set with the test result. An example of the screen is shown in FIG. 3, for example.

Next, the scale score for each scale is calculated from the question answer of the psychological test (S102). In this S102, the scale score for each scale is calculated from the question answer of the psychological test,
Applicable psychological test mode (eg YG test, MP
I, MMPI, etc.), or the calculation method differs depending on the evaluation points of other multiple stages. In the present embodiment, it is preferable to provide various programs so that the calculation according to these various types of psychological tests can be performed.

Generally, a question item corresponding to a psychological test is collected and the numerical value of the answer is converted into a grade point,
Calculate the scale score. As an example of the scale of the value inspection and the scale score, an example as shown in FIG. 6 can be given.

Subsequently, the scale score is stored in the database 32.
(S103). The database 32 is a database that stores the scale score and individual attribute information for each scale in addition to the individual inspection result. In this S103,
The database 32 can be stored in LA
It may be via N or another medium.

Then, it is determined whether or not there is another psychological test (S104). In this determination process, if it is determined that there is a psychological test, the process returns to S101, and if it is determined that there is no psychological test, the process ends.

Incidentally, in S104, in the case of having the inspections 1 to 6 in the categories as shown in FIG. 6, six types of diagnostic loops occur. The contents of the database of Mr. A when the six kinds of inspections are performed include the contents shown in FIG.

(Processing from the terminal on the group side for measuring the conformity) Next, the processing from the terminal on the side of the conforming measurer will be described with reference to FIG.

First, in the terminal 20 used by a group such as a company, an NPO, and a community, a scale score, a weight coefficient (first weight coefficient, second weight coefficient), etc. Input is performed (S201). This S
In 201, a scale score, a weighting factor, and a group attribute for each scale of the psychological examination are input, and the input is performed by the manager himself or a person in charge of personnel from the terminal 20 toward the input screen.
It should be noted that what is written on the paper by the manager himself or a person in charge of personnel may be collectively input by another person, or may be batch-input depending on the psychological test to be used.

Here, for example, if an individual has undergone the six types of inspection 1 to inspection 6 shown in FIG.
It is expressed by 44 scale scores of the test 1 to the test 6 of the seed. Further, when using the input scale scores of a plurality of persons, it is preferable to use the average value of the scores of those persons for each scale. This average value may be an arithmetic mean or a geometric mean. Further, the weighting coefficient to be input does not necessarily have to be an integer value. As an input screen for inputting a scale score, a weighting factor, a group attribute, etc. of the value inspection, for example, FIGS.
The items shown in are listed.

Next, the input information is stored (S20).
2). FIG. 10 shows the human resources image “new business planner” and “environmental measure personnel” desired by Company X, which are scaled using the scale shown in FIG. In the case of a new business planner, each scale is given a "weight" to calculate the final scale score, and this weight and the final score are used for matching with individuals. Weighting may or may not be performed depending on the purpose.

Then, it is determined whether or not there is another psychological test (S203). In this determination process, when it is determined that there is another psychological test, the process returns to S201. On the other hand, when it is determined in the determination process that there is no other psychological test, the database 36 stores desirable scale scores and group attributes for each human resource for all psychological tests.

In this S203, it is necessary to select the same type of psychological test as that of the individual who is going to measure conformity. However, depending on the purpose, it is all right to measure the fit with less psychological tests.

Similarly, in the terminal 20 of a group such as a school, a vocational school, and various schools, the scale score and the attribute of each scale of the person who seems to be suitable for each qualification are input (S21).
1).

In S211, the scale score, the weighting coefficient, the attribute information and the like for each scale of the psychological test are input.
From the terminal 20, a person who can understand the person suitable for each qualification
Go to the input screen. Also, what is written on a paper by a person who can understand a person suitable for each qualification may be collectively input by another person, or may be batch input depending on a psychological test to be used.

Here, the individual has six types of inspections 1 to 1 shown in FIG.
If the person has undergone the inspection 6, the desired human resources are represented by 44 scale scores of the six types of inspection 1 to inspection 6.

Next, the input information is stored (S21).
2). The input screens for the scale of the value inspection and the attributes of the group are the same as those in FIGS. 7 to 11.

In this S212, for example, the qualifications "travel system" and "accounting system" of Y1 special training school are converted into scale scores using the scale of FIG. A "weighting coefficient" is attached to this scale to calculate the final scale score, and this weighting factor and final score are used for matching with an individual. The weighting may or may not be performed depending on the purpose.

Then, it is judged whether or not there is another psychological test (S213). In this determination process, when it is determined that there is another psychological test, the process returns to S211. On the other hand, if it is determined in the determination process that there is no other psychological test, the database 36 stores the scale score and the group attribute for each person who seems to be suitable for each qualification with respect to all psychological tests. Becomes

In this step S213, it is necessary to select the same psychological test as that of the individual who is going to measure the conformity, but depending on the purpose, it is suffice to measure the conformity with less psychological tests.

Similarly, on the terminal 20 of a group such as a school, a vocational school, and various schools, the scale score and the attribute of each scale of the person who seems to be suitable for each department are input (S22).
1).

Next, the input information is stored (S22).
2). Then, a determination process as to whether or not there is another psychological test is performed (S223). In this determination process, when it is determined that there is another psychological test, the process returns to S221. On the other hand, if it is determined in the determination process that there is no other psychological test, the database 36 stores the scale score and group attribute for each person that seems suitable for each department regarding all psychological tests. Becomes

Similarly, in the terminal 20 of a group such as a company, the scale score and the attribute of each scale of the person who seems to be suitable for each job type and business type are input (S231).

Next, the input information is stored (S23).
2). Then, a determination process as to whether or not there is another psychological test is performed (S233). In this determination process, when it is determined that there is another psychological test, the process returns to S231. On the other hand, when it is determined in the determination process that there is no other psychological test, the database 36 stores the scale score and the group attribute for each person who seems to be suitable for each occupation and industry for all psychological tests. The Rukoto.

On the other hand, on the terminal 10, people belonging to the group input answers to the questions of the psychological examination (S241).

Next, the scale score for each scale is calculated from the question answer of the psychological test (S242). Then, these are stored in the database 36.

Then, it is judged whether or not there is another psychological test (S243). In this determination process, if it is determined that there is a psychological test, the process returns to S241, and if it is determined that there is no psychological test, the process ends.

As described above, the format of the information stored in each database 36 is converted (S24
4) is stored in the database 34. Database 3
4 creates a database of “desired human resources” or qualifications of the group or scale scores such as departments, occupations, and industries that measure conformance corresponding to individual databases.

In S244, the format conversion to the database 34 is performed. At that time, when the input scale scores of a plurality of persons are used, the scores of those persons are also averaged for each scale. May be.

(Processing for evaluating conformity of server)
Next, regarding the processing regarding the evaluation of the conformity of the server,
This will be described with reference to FIG.

First, the usage pattern is selected (S30).
1). In other words, whether the individual selects the "usage form 1" as the subject, the group side selects the "usage form 2" that selects the person, or the "usage form 3" that evaluates all the two matching parties is selected. Select or.

Then, the database 32 and the database 34 are searched (S302). Subsequently, the matching calculation is performed using the scale scores of the matching target 1 and the matching target 2, specifically, the first final scale score is calculated by multiplying the scale score of the matching target 1 by the weighting factor (S303). Further, the second final scale score is calculated by multiplying the scale score of the matching target 2 by the weighting coefficient (S304).

Then, the absolute value of the difference between the first final scale score and the second final scale score is calculated (S305).
The calculation result is stored in the memory 44a included in the calculation result information storage means 44.

Next, a judgment process is carried out as to whether or not the scale of the inspection 1 is over (S306). In this judgment process,
If it is determined that the scale of examination 1 is not over, S
Return to 303. On the other hand, in the determination process, when it is determined that the scale of the inspection 1 is the end, the subtotal of the difference of the inspection 1 is calculated (S307). The calculation result is stored in the memory 44a included in the calculation result information storage means 44.

Subsequently, a judgment process is carried out as to whether or not the inspection and the questionnaire have been completed (S308). In this determination process, when it is determined that the inspection and the questionnaire are not over, the process returns to S303. On the other hand, in the judgment process, when it is judged that the inspection and the questionnaire are finished, the total of each subtotal is calculated (S309). The calculation result is stored in the memory 44a included in the calculation result information storage means 44.

In the above S303 to S309,
Calculate the difference between the scale scores of the "desired human resources" or qualifications, departments, occupations, industries, etc. Here, the degree of conformity is defined by "subscale", "subtotal of each difference of each scale within the examination", "subtotal of difference between examinations in all examinations and questionnaires, and total difference". It can be evaluated by "total score".

Then, the calculation shown in FIG. 14, for example, is shown as the calculation of the matching between the personnel “new business planner” desired by company X and individual A. Further, as an example of the calculation for matching the human resources “new business planner” desired by the company X and the individual B, there is the one shown in FIG. 15, for example. FIG. 16 shows an example of the matching calculation, and FIG. 17 shows an example of the matching calculation of the personnel “environmental measure personnel” desired by Company X and Mr. B.

Then, the calculation result is stored (S31).
0). This storage includes that performed on the memory 44a and that stored on the database 44b included in the calculation result information storage means 44. Both attributes of the matching calculation result are output and stored in the database 44b. In S310, the calculation result and attribute in S309 are stored in the database 44b.

Then, a judgment process is carried out as to whether or not the database 32 has other personal data, or whether or not the database 34 has other desired human resources (S).
311).

In S311, in the case of "usage form 2", is there any other personal data in the database 32?
In the case of "Usage form 1", other desired human resource data (or qualifications or departments or occupations or industries) in the database 32
If there is, or in the case of "Usage form 3", the database 32
And whether there is other data in the database 34.

If it is determined in the above determination process that there is any, the process returns to S302. On the other hand, when it is determined that there is none in the determination process, a process of outputting both matched results is performed (S312).
In this S312, the suitability is judged as a number in which the absolute value of the difference between the final scale scores is other than zero (the number of nonconforming scales), the sum of the absolute values of the differences, and the absolute value of the difference between the final scale scores is "3". If there is any of the above, it is not suitable, but it can be used freely depending on the purpose.

[0195] For example, in the case of "Usage form 1", output processing such as "a suitable recruiting image and a recruiting company is ...", "a vocational school that can be learned with a suitable qualification suitable for me is ..." To do.

In FIG. 14 and FIG. 16, it can be said that in the case of Mr. A, the “new business planner of company X” is suitable for all the perfect matching numbers of all scales, subtotals, and total absolute values of differences.

Next, in the case of "Usage form 2", the group side does not have the desired personnel, or who is suitable for our school,
For example, it is a usage pattern for selecting a person.

In FIG. 14 and FIG. 15, for the new business planner of Company X, Mr. A is more than Mr. B, the number of perfect matches of all scales, the subtotal,
It can be said that it is suitable for all the total absolute values of the differences.

Further, in the "usage form 3", all two matching parties are evaluated. It can be used for various analyzes between two populations. From FIG. 14, FIG. 15, FIG. 16, and FIG. 17, for example, a suitable set of a new business planner of X company and Mr. A, an environmental measure staff of X company and Mr. B, etc. is output.

Then, display processing is performed (S313). Here, in the display processing, for example, "use pattern 1" (S313) such as a human resource image suitable for you, a group or field suitable for you, a suitable qualification and school, a suitable subject and school, etc.
a), the desired human resources are, for example, "use form 2" (S313
b), it is possible to perform a display according to each mode of "usage mode 3" (S313c) of a list of matching two parties in the database of the two parties.

In S313, the result of S312 can be displayed and output on a paper medium. Further, the display may be via the Internet or LAN.

In the case of "Usage form 1," display processing is performed, such as "The recruiting image and recruiting company suitable for oneself is ...", "The qualification suitable for oneself is a specialized school where you can learn ...", and so on. In the case of comparing FIG. 14 and FIG. 16, for example, in the case of Mr. A, ““ New business planner of X company ”is suitable” is displayed. The contents of FIGS. 14 and 16 are also displayed at the same time.

In the case of "usage form 2", the group side performs a display process such as whether there is no desired human resource or who is suitable for our school. Then, when comparing FIG. 14 and FIG. 15, for example, “Mr. A is more suitable than Mr. B for new business planner of company X” is displayed. Also,
The contents of FIGS. 14 and 15 are also displayed at the same time.

In the case of "Usage form 3", all the evaluation results of the two matching parties are displayed. 14, 15, and 1
6. From FIG. 17, for example, a suitable set of a new business planner of company X and Mr. individual A, an environmental measure staff of company X and Mr. individual B, etc. is displayed. In addition, you may output only the high-order conformity.
Further, the attributes, the number of perfect matches of all scales, the subtotal, the sum of the absolute values of the differences, and the like may be output as necessary.

[0205] It should be noted that the "desired human resources" of individuals and groups, qualifications, departments, occupations, industries, and the like degree of conformity are evaluated by a scale score, but individuals and individuals, individuals and fields, groups and groups, groups and fields. It can also be applied to measure the degree of conformity of.

Further, steps S241 to S243 in FIG. 12 are the same as steps S101 to S103 in FIG. 11, and are methods of receiving a psychological examination and obtaining a scale score. When using the data of multiple people, use the average value for each scale score.
An average value may be used by considering the weight for each diagnostician.

The database 32 and the database 3
An example of the matching calculation will be described with reference to FIG. 14, which conceptually shows the data processing in the case where 4 and 4 are matched.

As shown in the figure, the information 300 for associating desired human resources with individual suitability is the concept 30 of the psychological test.
1. Each scale 302 corresponding thereto, for example, scale score information 303 regarding the new business planner of company X, scale score information 304 regarding Mr. A, and difference 3 between each final scale score.
08 are associated with each other. The scale score information 303 includes the scale score 303a and the weighting factor 30 for each scale.
3b, a final scale score 303c obtained by multiplying the scale score by a weighting factor, and the like, which are associated with each other according to the desired personnel. On the other hand, regarding the individual A, the scale score information 304 has a scale score 304a, a weight coefficient 304b, and a final scale score 304c.

Although not shown, the second weighting factor may be associated with each examination. In this case, the final scale score is multiplied by the second weighting coefficient to calculate the subtotal of the final scale score.

More specifically, the psychological test concept 30
1 is, for example, “Examination 1” 30 for inspecting values.
1a, "inspection 2" 301b for inspecting behavior type, "inspection 3" 301c for inspecting working type, "inspection 4" 301d for inspecting power to be exerted, "inspection 5" 301e for inspecting lifestyle (desire), There are various inspections such as "inspection 6" 301f for inspecting the degree of lifestyle clearance.

Of these, for example, in the test result of the sense of values of the test 1, in the self-growth pursuit type which is one of the scales, the scale score is 5 and the weighting factor is 3. Therefore, the final scale score is Is 5 × 3 = 15. In this way, each scale score, each weighting coefficient, and each final scale score according to each scale are calculated and associated.

On the other hand, regarding Mr. A, for example, in the test result of the sense of values of the test 1, in the self-growth pursuit type which is one of the scales, the scale score is 4 and the weight coefficient is the weight coefficient 3. Therefore, the score is 3, and thus the final scale score is 4 × 3 = 12.

Then, the absolute value of the difference between these final scale scores is calculated to be 3 in 15-12.

The absolute value of the difference between the final scale scores as described above is calculated using, for example, the scale score 303a regarding the new business planner of company X, the final scale score 303c, the scale score 304a regarding Mr. A, and the final scale score 304c. Similarly, the subtotal points are calculated for each inspection. For example, in “inspection 1”, the subtotal point of the absolute value of the difference is “10” as indicated by reference numeral 311a, and in “inspection 2”, the subtotal point of the absolute value of the difference is indicated as indicated by reference numeral 311b. Is "9". It should be noted that if the absolute value of the difference is other than 0, it means an incompatible item.

In this way, by calculating the subtotals for each inspection in advance, for example, a certain human resources image that requires certain inspections 1 and 4 according to the needs of the conforming measurer side can be obtained. Extraction becomes easy when calculating the goodness of fit.

It should be noted that the search in the subtotal portion set by the person,
It may be a diagnosis and it is not necessary to check all items.
In that case, the final judgment is not limited to the total sum, but depends on the selected inspection or purpose, and matching of the corresponding items is performed according to the set value.

The total score is also calculated based on each subtotal score thus obtained. In the example of FIG. 14, the total point, that is, the degree of conformity is “31” as indicated by reference numeral 312, for example.

In the information 300, the attribute information 309 of the group of conforming measurers, which is the registration information of the conforming measurer previously registered, and the attribute information 310 of the examinee, which is the registration information on the examinee side, are included. Associated.

The group attribute information 309 is, for example, information on treatment, annual income, employment form, etc. in the group, for example, company X, and the attribute information 310 is the name, age, address, etc. of the person to be inspected. .

Since these are associated,
It is possible to perform a calculation for extracting human resources according to a request from the conforming measurer side.

As described above, according to the present embodiment, a plurality of psychological tests are used to compare and match the psychological test scale scores (the scores for each category of the personality evaluation) to obtain the scale scores. By using the evaluation, one can clearly grasp the whole picture of a person by using psychological tests of multiple constructs. As a result, the company can easily extract matching human resources according to the demands of new image human resources for survival.

Since the desired human resource image is quantified as the scale score, the desired human resource image can be selected by various numerical values to clarify the desired human resource image. Furthermore, since the desired field as a scale score is quantified, the desired field can be selected from as many candidates as possible.

Moreover, since the degree of conformity is evaluated by matching the scale scores of the people who have undergone the same psychological test, it is possible to select the human resources having the desired human resource image from as many candidates as possible.

In addition, by utilizing a database or the Internet, it is possible to recruit human resources from a wide world, and it is possible to easily try suitability on a daily basis.

By using the scale score for evaluation, it is possible to simultaneously use psychological tests of a plurality of constructive concepts, and to evaluate the whole picture of a person's personality.

Also, it can be provided as a device, and the school can be used for career guidance. Furthermore, by using the scale scores for evaluation, it is possible to analyze both psychological tests and questionnaire results.

Further, from the individual side, it is possible to know which individual suits the job-seeking company, which school is suitable for him, NPOs and communities in which he can play an active role, more suitable occupations, qualifications, and departments. Also, when viewed from the group side, human resources suitable or desired for the group can be selected. In addition, existing school guidance and career guidance, job qualification, etc. can be reinforced at the fundamental level of human psychology and personality.

[Second Embodiment] Next, a second embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIG. Note that, in the following, description of substantially the same configuration as that of the first embodiment will be omitted, and only different portions will be described. FIG. 18 is an explanatory diagram showing the outline of the present embodiment.

In the present embodiment, the human resources desired by the group, the human resources desired by a plurality of people, or the psychological test results of sociology are
The example which uses after averaging processing is disclosed.

Specifically, as shown in FIG. 18, in the data structure 400 prepared in the database when the scale score of the desired personnel is calculated, for example, the average value of the average subject 1 and the average subject 2 is calculated. Is calculated, and the fitness is calculated using this average value.

That is, the average value (+) / 2 of the final scale score of the average subject 1 and the final scale score of the average subject 2
= (Reference numeral 402) is calculated, and the goodness of fit is calculated from the absolute value of the difference between this average value and the final scale score of the new business planner.

Further, by calculating the average value in this way, it is possible to calculate the personality and the like as a group of a certain group (for example, desired human resources) as a numerical value.

[Third Embodiment] Next, a third embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIG. Note that, in the following, description of substantially the same configuration as each of the above-described embodiments will be omitted, and only different portions will be described. FIG. 19 is an explanatory diagram showing the outline of the present embodiment.

In the above-described second embodiment, an example in which the inspection results of the human resources desired by a plurality of people are averaged and used is disclosed, but in the present embodiment, it is a case where groups are matched with each other. And discloses an example of averaging the community member data.

Specifically, as shown in FIG. 19, in the data structure 500 prepared in the database when the communities 1 and 2 are matched with each other, for example, the members A of the community 1 and the structure of the community 1 are configured. The average value with Mr. member B is calculated, the personality of the community 1 is calculated using this average value, and the personality of the community 1 is calculated in advance (the average value of each member of the community 2). Calculate the degree of compatibility with the character of community 2.

That is, the average value of the final scale score of Mr. A and the final scale score of Mr. B (+) / 2 = (reference numeral 50
2) is calculated, and this average value is used as the final scale score representing the character of community 1. Here, the final scale score is calculated by (scale score) × (weighting factor) for the member A, and similarly, the final scale score is (scale score) × (weighting factor) for the resisting member B. ) Is calculated.

On the other hand, also for Community 2, the average value of the final scale scores of each member is calculated in advance, and this average value is used as the final scale score representing the character of Community 2. Here, the average value is (first scale score) × (first weight coefficient) = (first final scale score) for a certain first member, as described in the first embodiment. Calculated and similarly for nth member (nth scale score) ×
When the (nth weighting coefficient) = (nth final scale score), it is calculated by dividing the sum of the first to nth final scale scores by n. Then, this average value becomes the final scale score of the community 2.

Then, the conformity between the personality of community 1 and the personality of community 2 is calculated from the absolute value of the difference between this average value and the average value.

By calculating the average value in this way, it is possible to evaluate the suitability between groups that require a certain population such as thousands of millions.

Although the apparatus and method according to the present invention have been described in accordance with some specific embodiments thereof,
Those skilled in the art can make various modifications to the embodiments described in the text of the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. For example, in each of the above-described embodiments, the case where the conformity evaluation is performed in the case of searching for human resources related to work by a psychological test in individuals and groups, group and groups, etc., is not limited to this, and the conformity evaluation is not limited to this. , For example, various things are assumed in the analysis of matchmaking, fields (qualifications, departments, occupations, industries, departments, etc.), marketing, applications in M & A and corporate mergers, and conformity in scholars and politics.
The two targets of conformity assessment are individuals and groups (corporates, schools (including special training schools, various schools), NPOs, nursing homes, etc.), groups and groups, hobby communities and individuals, individuals and individuals, fields. Fields, individuals and fields, groups and fields, etc. do not matter.

In this way, for example, when searching for "your course" that leads to one's way of life, for example, "fields" such as departments, occupations, qualifications, or when finding human resources desired by groups such as various communities or NPOs. Also, through the conformity assessment, it is possible to obtain the results that are sufficient to make a clear conformity judgment and to derive suitable human resources.

Further, in marketing, in addition to the attributes showing the characteristics of the questionnaire and the subject, it is possible to make a detailed analysis since the marketing can be performed by taking into consideration the psychology of the subject.

Furthermore, for example, in a marriage information service such as matchmaking, it is possible to obtain an appropriate matching result that goes into the psychology of a person.

The conformity evaluation system of each of the above-described embodiments, the conformity evaluation apparatus used for the conformity evaluation system, the server, the database, the terminal, the processing program processed in the information processing apparatus, the explained processing, and the data (for example, inspection result information). , Group and individual attribute information, various masters, screen data,
The configuration may be such that the entire setting information or the like or each part is recorded in an information recording medium. Further, it also includes a program in which the above-mentioned processing program is incorporated into an electronic mail software which can be operated by a general personal computer or a mobile terminal, or an information recording medium in which the incorporated electronic mail software is recorded.

As this information recording medium, for example, RO
Semiconductor memory such as M, RAM, flash memory and the like, integrated circuits, optical disks, magneto-optical disks, magnetic recording media and the like may be used, and further, CD-ROM, hard disk, CD, FD, DVDRAM, DVDROM, MO,
It may be recorded on a ZIP, a magnetic card, a magnetic tape, a non-volatile memory card, an IC card, or the like to be configured and used.

Furthermore, examples of the medium include a wireless or infrared transmission channel between a computer and another device, a computer-readable card such as PCMC.
IA card, network connection to another computer or device on the network, temporary storage of information downloaded via the Internet, intranet, etc., including information recorded on electronic mail transmission and websites, etc. To be

By using this information recording medium in a system or apparatus other than the system according to each of the above-mentioned embodiments, and reading out and executing the program code stored in this storage medium by the system or computer, the above-mentioned each The function equivalent to that of the embodiment can be realized, and the same effect can be obtained.

In addition, O running on the computer
S, when the RTOS or the like on the information processing device performs a part or all of the processing, or the program code read from the storage area is stored in the extended function board inserted into the computer or the extended function unit connected to the computer. Even when the CPU or the like provided in the extended function board or the extended function unit performs a part or all of the processing based on the instruction of the program code after being written in the provided memory, it is equivalent to each of the above embodiments. The function can be realized and the same effect can be obtained.

It should be noted that as the information processing apparatus in which the above-mentioned conformity evaluation system is mounted, and in which the methods of FIGS. 11 to 13 and the methods generally described in this specification and the information of various databases are mounted, May be a PC of
For example, not only a personal computer but also various servers, EWS (engineering workstation), etc., can be used as accessible terminals when used as a server, and other terminals can be portable information terminals, various types. The configuration may also be used from a mobile terminal, PDA, mobile phone, pager, or the like. Alternatively, improved applications displayed on these terminals can be included in the scope of the present invention.

Furthermore, the methods of FIGS. 11-13, the techniques generally described herein, and the information in various databases may be implemented using a general purpose computer system. When forming a network as a system as described above, it may be any of the Internet, an intranet, a local area LAN, a WAN, or the like. In such a system, it is achieved by instructions in software executed by a computer as software such as an application program executed in the computer system. The software may be divided into two separate parts, one for performing the method and one for managing the user interface between the computer and the user. The software may be stored in a computer-readable medium, including storage devices, for example. The software is loaded into the computer from the computer-readable medium and executed by the computer. A computer-readable medium having such software or computer program recorded on it is a computer program product. The use of computer program products in computers achieves convenient equipment.

The application program described in the present embodiment is preferably resident in the hard disk or the memory, and is read and controlled by the CPU during execution. Any data obtained from the intermediate storage area of the program and the network may be achieved using a semiconductor memory or with a hard disk drive. In some examples, the application program may be recorded on a CD-ROM or floppy disk and provided to the user for reading via a corresponding device or read by the user from a network via a modem device. May be. In addition, the software may include magnetic tape, ROM or integrated circuits, magneto-optical disks, wireless or infrared transmission channels between the computer module and another device, a PC.
It is also possible to load the computer system from other computer readable media, including computer readable cards such as MCIA cards and the Internet and intranets, including electronic mail transmissions and information recorded on websites and the like. . The foregoing description is merely exemplary of the associated computer-readable media. Other computer-readable media may be implemented without departing from the spirit of the invention.

Furthermore, it is apparent from the above that the embodiments of the present invention are applicable to the computer industry and data processing industry, as well as to a wide range of computer software applications that do not necessarily comply with a particular standard. . Further, the communication mode using the network is not limited to the HTTP protocol, and may be another protocol.

As a result, the person who wants to do what he / she wants, what his / her course is suitable for him / her, and what is comfortable for him / her are "I want to be as a group".
It is performed by a psychological test that uses a computer to measure the "temper, personality, and personality" of a person when matching both groups (including the community generally called) who have the task of "who wants in the future". You can evaluate the degree of relevance by comparing the two by using the scale score of constructive concepts such as [values, behavior type, desire type, motivation, power to exert, type of work] .

Furthermore, the above-described embodiment includes various stages, and various inventions can be extracted by appropriately combining a plurality of disclosed constituent elements. That is,
It goes without saying that the embodiments include the embodiments described above or a combination of any of them with any of the modifications. In this case, even if it is not particularly described in the present embodiment, as for the action and effect apparent from each configuration disclosed in each of the embodiments and the modifications, it is of course possible to obtain the action and effect in this example as well. . Further, it may be a configuration in which some of the constituent elements are deleted from all the constituent elements shown in the embodiment.

The above description discloses only one example of the embodiment of the present invention and can be appropriately modified and / or changed within a predetermined range, but each embodiment is illustrated. It is a thing, not a limitation.

[0256]

As described above, according to the present invention, a plurality of psychological tests of all kinds (personal psychology test) are utilized to compare and match the scale scores of the psychological tests to obtain a scale score. Through evaluation, it is possible to clearly grasp the whole picture of a person by using a psychological test of multiple constructs. As a result, the company can easily extract matching human resources according to the demands of new image human resources for survival.

Since the desired human resource image is digitized as the scale score, the desired human resource image can be selected by various numerical values to clarify the desired human resource image. Furthermore, since the desired field as a scale score is quantified, the desired field can be selected from as many candidates as possible.

Moreover, since the degree of conformity is evaluated by matching with the scale scores of people who have undergone the same psychological test, it is possible to select a human resource having a desired human resource image from as many candidates as possible.

In addition, by utilizing the database and the matching device or the Internet, it is possible to recruit human resources from a wide world, and it is possible to easily try the matching on a daily basis.

By using the scale score for evaluation, it is possible to simultaneously use psychological tests of a plurality of constructs.

Also, it can be provided as a device, and the school can be used for career guidance. Furthermore, by using the scale scores for evaluation, it is possible to analyze both psychological tests and questionnaire results.

[0262] Furthermore, "your course" that leads to one's way of life, for example, "field" such as subject, occupation, qualification, etc.
When searching for a desired field by searching for, or finding human resources desired by groups such as various communities and NPOs,
By the conformity assessment, it is possible to obtain the results that are sufficient for making a clear conformity judgment and deriving suitable human resources.

Further, in marketing, in addition to the attributes representing the characteristics of the questionnaire and the subject, the marketing can be performed by taking into consideration the psychology of the subject, so that detailed analysis is possible. Furthermore, for example, it is possible to obtain an appropriate matching result that goes into the psychology of a person in a matchmaking.

[Brief description of drawings]

FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of an overall schematic configuration of an information processing system of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram functionally showing the further detailed configuration of FIG.

FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of a display screen displayed on a terminal on the side of a subject who undergoes a psychological examination.

FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of a display screen displayed on a terminal on the side of a subject who undergoes a psychological examination.

FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of a display screen displayed on a terminal on the side of a subject who undergoes a psychological examination.

FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the content of the scale score on the subject side, which is the result information of the psychological test.

FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of a display screen displayed on a terminal on the side of a conforming measurer.

FIG. 8 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of a display screen displayed on a terminal on the side of a conforming measurer.

FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the content of a psychological test.

FIG. 10 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the content of a scale score on the side of a conforming measurer.

FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing an example of a processing procedure on the terminal side of the subject to be psychologically examined.

FIG. 12 is a flowchart showing an example of a processing procedure on the terminal side on the side of a conforming measurer.

FIG. 13 is a flowchart showing an example of a processing procedure on the server side of the information processing system of the present invention.

FIG. 14 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the contents of the scale score on the side of the conforming measurer and the scale score on the side of the subject to be inspected.

FIG. 15 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the contents of the scale score on the side of the conforming measurer and the scale score on the side of the subject to be inspected.

FIG. 16 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the contents of the scale score on the side of the conforming measurer and the scale score on the side of the subject to be inspected.

FIG. 17 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the contents of the scale score on the side of the conforming measurer and the scale score on the side of the subject to be inspected.

FIG. 18 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of contents in the case of calculating an average value of each scale score of a plurality of persons.

FIG. 19 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the contents of the scale score on the matching measurer side and the scale score in the case of the group on the inspected side.

[Explanation of symbols]

1 Compliance evaluation system 10 terminals 20 terminals 30 Compliance evaluation device 32 databases 34 Database 40 servers

Claims (23)

[Claims] 1. One or a plurality of first ones used by one individual
Terminal, one or a plurality of second terminals used by the other group, and the first and second terminals can be respectively communicated via a network, and the one individual and the other group A conformity evaluation system comprising: a conformity evaluation device for evaluating the degree of conformity; wherein the conformity evaluation device performs a psychological test on the one individual in response to an access request from the first terminal. In response to an access request from the second terminal, a first processing unit that displays a screen for performing the processing and stores the first score information, which is a numerical result of the psychological test, in a specific storage area. And second processing means for setting processing of second score information in which the necessity of the human resources or fields required by the other group is graded stepwise, and an access request from the second terminal. Based on the second The second score information set by the processing means is collated with the first score information to calculate the suitability corresponding to each individual, and the suitability of the best suitability among the suitability is calculated. And a third processing means for extracting an individual and performing a matching determination process. 2. The psychological test includes a plurality of tests that are differentiated for each of the constructs, and the third processing means calculates the suitability for each of the constructs to obtain a final match. The conformity evaluation system according to claim 1, wherein 3. The psychological test includes a plurality of scales relating to the human resources, and the first score information weights the respective first scale scores according to the plurality of scales and the scale scores. Each first done
And a first total of each first final scale score calculated based on, and the second score information is each second scale score according to each of a plurality of scales, A second total sum of the respective second final scale scores calculated on the basis of the respective first weighting factors weighting the respective second scale scores, and the second processing means, Each of the second scale scores from the second terminal and each of the second weighting factors are set, and the third processing means sets the first total sum and the second total sum. The suitability evaluation system according to claim 1, wherein the suitability is calculated based on the absolute value of the difference. 4. The inspection includes a plurality of scales related to the human resources, and the first score information weights each of the first scale scores according to each of the plurality of scales and each scale score. Each first
Of the first final scale score calculated on the basis of each of the weighting factors of the first subtotal calculated for each of the examinations, and the second score information includes each second subscale corresponding to each of the plurality of scales. And a second subtotal of each second final scale score calculated for each of the examinations, based on The second processing means sets each of the second scale scores from the second terminal and each of the second weighting factors, and the third processing means includes the first processing means. The suitability evaluation system according to claim 2, wherein the suitability for each inspection is calculated based on the absolute value of the difference between the subtotal and the second subtotal. 5. The second processing means sets each second weighting coefficient weighted for each inspection from the second terminal, and the third processing means sets each second weighting coefficient. The conformity evaluation system according to claim 4, wherein final conformity determination is performed based on each conformity degree according to the weighting factor of. 6. The second processing means sets the second score information as score information based on an inspection result of a successful person, and any one of claims 1 to 5. The conformity assessment system described in Section. 7. The field is a business type, occupation, qualification, subject,
It is one area that is differentiated in the activity of any one of the departments of the group, and the third processing means calculates the degree of suitability according to any area of the field. The conformity evaluation system described in 1. 8. The group is a group of a plurality of persons selected from a community, a company, a school, a nursing home for the elderly, a hospital, and a non-profit organization, and the third processing means responds to the group. 2. The conformity evaluation system according to claim 1, wherein the conformity degree is calculated. 9. One or a plurality of first groups used by one group
Terminal, one or a plurality of second terminals used by the other group, and the first and second terminals can be respectively communicated via a network, and the one group and the other group A conformity evaluation device that evaluates the degree of conformity, and a conformity evaluation system comprising: the conformity evaluation device for each member of the one group according to an access request from the first terminal. To display a screen for performing a psychological examination by using the first psychological examination and store the first score information, which is a numerical result of the psychological examination, in a specific storage area.
And a second means for setting processing of second score information, which is a stepwise grading of the necessity degree of the group required by the other group, in response to an access request from the second terminal. Processing means and the second score information set by the second processing means on the basis of an access request from the second terminal, and the first score information are collated to collate each of the groups. And a third processing means for calculating conformity according to the above, extracting the group of the most suitable conformity among the respective conformances, and performing conformity determination processing. 10. The third processing means performs an averaging process on each test result of each psychological test for each member constituting the one group to calculate the fitness, The conformity evaluation system according to claim 9, wherein the conformity evaluation is performed to determine conformity between the groups. 11. The conformity evaluation system according to claim 9, wherein the third processing means performs an analysis / judgment process at the time of merging or acquiring each company based on the conformity. 12. One or a plurality of first terminals used by one individual, one or a plurality of second terminals used by the other individual, and the first and second terminals via a network, respectively. A conformity evaluation system comprising: a conformity evaluation device that is communicable with each other and that evaluates the degree of conformity between the one individual and the other individual; In response to the access request from the user, a screen is displayed to perform a psychological test on the one individual, and the first score information in which the test result of the psychological test is digitized is stored in a specific storage area. A first processing unit, and a second processing unit for setting processing of second score information in which the necessity degree of the human resources required by the other individual person is scored stepwise in response to an access request from the second terminal. 2 processing means, and the second Based on the access request from the end, the second score information set by the second processing means is collated with the first score information to calculate the suitability for each individual. A third processing means for extracting the individual having the most suitable matching degree from the respective matching degrees and determining the matching, and a matching evaluation system. 13. The method according to claim 12, wherein the third processing means performs an analysis / determination process of the fitness in the marriage information service between the one and the other individuals based on the fitness. Conformity evaluation system. 14. One or a plurality of first terminals used by an inspected person to be psychologically tested and one or a plurality of second terminals used by a conforming measurer who measures a person who fits the required human resources or fields. Is a server capable of communicating with each of the terminals via a network, the conformity evaluation method for evaluating the degree of conformity between the person to be inspected and the conforming measurer, wherein the person to be inspected is the first terminal. Stores the test result of the psychological test performed by using the, the conforming measurer uses the second terminal to set the required degree of the required human resources or fields, and , Based on the set need level,
A conformity evaluation method, characterized in that the conformity of conformity between the inspected person and the conformable measurer is calculated and evaluated. 15. One of a plurality of first terminals used by one individual and one or a plurality of second terminals used by another group are respectively connected via a network to a server, and Is a conformity evaluation method for evaluating the degree of conformity between the individual and the other group, and stores the result of a psychological test performed by the one individual using the first terminal, wherein the group is Using the second terminal, the required degree of the required personnel or field is set, and based on the inspection result and the set degree of necessity,
A conformity evaluation method, characterized in that the conformity of conformity between the individual and the group is calculated and evaluated. 16. One of a plurality of first terminals used by one group and one or a plurality of second terminals used by the other group, respectively, by a server that is communicable via a network. Is a conformity evaluation method for evaluating the degree of conformity between the other group and the other group, and stores each test result of each psychological test performed by a member of the one group using the first terminal. However, the other group uses the second terminal to set the necessity of the required human resources or fields, based on the inspection result and the set need,
While performing averaging processing on each test result of each psychological test for each member that constitutes the one group, the fitness of the fitness between the one individual and the group is calculated and the fitness between the groups is matched. A conformity assessment method characterized by: 17. One of a plurality of first terminals used by one individual and one or a plurality of second terminals used by the other individual are respectively capable of communicating via a network by the server, Is a conformity evaluation method for evaluating the degree of conformity between the individual and the other individual, and stores the test result of a psychological test performed by the one individual using the first terminal, An individual uses the second terminal to set the required degree of the required human resources, and based on the inspection result and the set degree of necessity,
A conformity evaluation method, characterized in that the conformity of conformity between the individual and the individual is calculated and evaluated. 18. A program for causing a computer to execute the conformity evaluation method according to any one of claims 14 to 17. 19. A computer readable medium,
An information recording medium recording the program according to claim 18. 20. One or a plurality of first terminals used by an inspected person to be psychologically tested and one or a plurality of second terminals used by a group, each of which is communicable via a network, A matching evaluation device for evaluating the degree of matching between a person and the group, the first storage means storing the inspection result of the psychological test of the inspected person to be inspected together with the attribute information of the inspected person. A second storage unit configured to be set by the group and storing setting information relating to the degree of necessity of a required human resource or field together with attribute information relating to the group; and based on the inspection result and the setting information, A suitability evaluation device, comprising: a calculating unit that calculates a suitability between the inspector and the group. 21. One or more first terminals used by one individual and a second terminal for setting a score relating to a field.
It is possible to communicate with each terminal via each network,
A conformity evaluation device for evaluating the degree of conformity between the one individual and the field, wherein a screen is displayed to perform a psychological test on the one individual in response to an access request from the first terminal. In addition to the above, the first processing means for storing the first score information, which is a numerical value of the test result of the psychological test, in a specific storage area, and, in accordance with an access request from the second terminal, Second processing means for setting processing of second score information in which the necessity degree is scored stepwise; and set by the first processing means based on an access request from the first terminal. And a third processing unit for collating the first score information with the second score information to extract the degree of conformity between the individual and the field to determine conformity. Conformity assessment device. 22. One or a plurality of first terminals used by one group and a second terminal for setting a score relating to a field.
It is possible to communicate with each terminal via each network,
A conformity evaluation device that evaluates the degree of conformity between the one group and the field, wherein the degree of psychological examination is the degree of necessity of the human resources required by the group according to an access request from the first terminal. First processing means for storing the first score information quantified in accordance with the above in a specific storage area, and the degree of necessity of the field in stages according to an access request from the second terminal. Second processing means for setting the converted second score information, and first score information set by the first processing means based on an access request from the first terminal, And a third processing unit that collates with the second score information to extract the degree of conformity between the group and the field to determine conformity, and the conformity evaluation apparatus. 23. One or a plurality of first terminals for setting a score relating to one field and a second terminal for setting a score relating to the other field, each of which is communicable via a network. A conformity evaluation device that evaluates the degree of conformity between the one field and the other field, wherein the degree of necessity of the one field is a scale of a psychological test according to an access request from the first terminal. First processing means for storing the first score information, which is digitized according to the above, in a specific storage area, and the necessity degree of the other field is stepwise according to an access request from the second terminal. Second processing means for setting processing of the second score information converted into points, and the first score set by the first processing means based on an access request from the first terminal. Information and the second score information. And a third processing means for extracting conformity of the one field and the other field to judge conformity.