JP2003085257A - Evaluation/guarantee system for building - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To revitalize a secondhand housing market by improving the mortgage value of a secondhand house. SOLUTION: This system comprises an inspection process for attaching a picture obtained by picking up image of the part to be inspected of a building to inspection picture 121C data read from a server 10 to a portable terminal 20 in order to prepare inspected result data, and for storing the inspected result data in a server 10, an evaluation process for reading the inspected result data of various inspection items and evaluation format 121F data of the building from the server 10 to a third party evaluating organization side terminal 40, and for inputting an evaluated result evaluated based on the inspected result data to the evaluation format 121F data in order to prepare evaluation data, and for storing the evaluation data in the server 10, and a guaranteeing process for reading certificate format 123F data of the building from the server 10 to the third party evaluating organization side terminal 40 when the evaluated result is successful, and for preparing guarantee certificate.

Description

Detailed Description of the Invention

[0001]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a building evaluation / guarantee system used for evaluating and guaranteeing a building.

[0002]

[Prior Art] The general life of a Japanese house (rebuilding period) is
About 26 to 27 years, 1/2 to 1 compared to Western countries
It was a short period of / 3. Here, many buyers usually make a mortgage (35-year long-term repayment) to purchase the house, and a 35-year long-term mortgage loan for such a short-lived house. However, considering the housing life and repayment period, it is somewhat out of proportion.

In order to improve such imbalance, conventionally, maintenance such as repair is performed on the house,
It was a good idea to extend the durability even a little. However, since the maintenance is expensive, it is burdensome to ask the owner of the house to pay for the maintenance of all defects. Therefore, a builder such as a house maker (hereinafter referred to as a "builder"), for example, gives an initial guarantee (defect guarantee) of a predetermined period for a predetermined item when issuing a new house (issues a warranty). And
Under the company's rules, we will provide free periodic inspection services several times during the defect warranty period, and if the owner wishes to renew the warranty after the defect warranty period has expired, it will be guaranteed on condition that paid inspection and maintenance are performed. Is being updated. still,
The performance level of a house such as earthquake resistance and fire resistance is based on the builder's own standard, and the above-mentioned guarantee items and inspection items are based on the builder's own rules based on the performance level standard.

[0004]

[Problems to be Solved by the Invention] Here, a person who wants to purchase a house compares the basic performances such as design, functionality, and durability of houses of a plurality of builders, and decides the house to buy. To one of. However, the materials for comparison and judgment are provided by the builder as its own information as described above, and the criteria are different for each builder, so such purchase applicants cannot make a general comparison judgment. In particular, regarding basic performance, there is no unified standard for judgment in spite of the skeleton of a house, so it is a little unreasonable to use it as a material for comparative judgment of purchase applicants.

Further, the guarantee items and inspection items of the house after purchase are also defined by the builder's own rules, and although the life of the house can be extended by the maintenance of the defective part, the owner of the house is actually concerned. It is difficult to judge whether the life has really been extended.

[0006] As described above, basic performance and inspection items of a house without a unified evaluation standard are reliable for purchase applicants, owners, and those related to the housing market except builders (for example, financial institutions). This is one of the factors that leaves a little uneasy factor in terms of terms and causes the house (above) property value to decline sharply despite the fact that maintenance is performed appropriately or the builder guarantees it. One of them is. For example, a house (above) generally has an asset value of zero in about 10 years from the time of new construction. And even if such houses with no asset value are distributed in the second-hand housing market, it is still difficult for those who want to buy them to extend their tentacles. Furthermore, the disproportionate point that a long-term mortgage loan of 35 years is provided for a house that loses its asset value in about 10 years, leaving a large amount of debt at the time of resale of that house, at least not a little. It can be said that this is a frequent cause of bankruptcies related to mortgages.

[0007] The Ministry of Construction (currently the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism), which came into effect on April 1, 2000, defines the grade as a common rule for measuring the level of performance of a house. The Japanese Housing Performance Indication System (hereinafter referred to as the "Performance Indication System") has been started under the "Act on Promotion, etc." This performance indication system is a rating system for so-called new houses, which can objectively evaluate the performance of the house, and in the unlikely event of trouble with the house, between the builder and the owner of the house. This system has strong implications for the consumer's protective factors, such as swift resolution of disputes. For example, there is a possibility that tax incentives and financing will be given in the future. In addition, this performance labeling system requires much higher level than the performance level (for example, earthquake resistance level) of the revised Building Standards Law which came into effect on June 1, 2000. Items are represented by grades.

By providing a house based on such a performance display system (performance evaluation house), that is, a house based on a highly reliable and unified evaluation standard defined by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, the builder mentioned above. It is hoped that the anxiety factor will be removed, and various environmental problems such as global warming and environmental destruction due to wastes will be pointed out, and the life of a house whose life will be extended in an unsuitable short period will be prolonged.

However, since the performance display system serves as an index for judgment at the time of new construction, it is not effective as an evaluation standard for used houses having different usage environments. Therefore, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism will implement a system (hereinafter referred to as "evaluation system for pre-owned houses") that sets evaluation standards for pre-owned houses in order to stimulate the distribution of the pre-owned house market from 2002. For example, if the evaluation system for used homes comes into effect,
A unified evaluation (in other words, asset value) of used homes will be clarified, and it will be one of the criteria for the buyer to purchase used homes.

However, those related to the housing market excluding purchasers and owners, as well as the builders, are houses that have been constructed, evaluated or maintained based on the performance display system and the evaluation system of used houses. However, there are cases in which the reliability of the evaluation remains uncertain, which hinders the activation of the second-hand housing market. The reason is that the evaluation and guarantee are not made by an impartial evaluation organization that ensures the reliability desired by many purchasers. In addition, financial institutions are reluctant to lend due to lack of reliability and a sharp drop in the collateral value of used houses, which also hinders the activation of the used houses market.

The present invention improves the inconveniences of the conventional example, in particular, improves the collateral value of used houses, and evaluates the buildings that can activate the used house market.
Its purpose is to provide a warranty system.

[0012]

[Means for Solving the Problems] To achieve the above object,
According to the first aspect of the present invention, the reading is performed on the inspection screen data in which the predetermined inspection items among the various inspection items based on the predetermined inspection standard of the building read from the server to the mobile terminal via the Internet are described. The inspection result data is created by pasting the image of the inspection target part of the building corresponding to the inspection item in the inspection screen data, and the inspection result data is transmitted from the mobile terminal to the server to Evaluation process format data in which the inspection process stored in the storage unit and the terminal of the third-party evaluation institution describe the inspection result data of the various inspection items and various evaluation items based on the predetermined evaluation standard of the building And is read from the server via the Internet, and the evaluation result evaluated based on the read inspection result data is input to the evaluation form data to obtain the evaluation data. And an evaluation step of transmitting the evaluation data from the terminal of the third-party evaluation institution to the server and storing the evaluation report data in the storage unit of the server; The guarantee certificate format data of the building is read from the server to the terminal of the evaluation agency side via the Internet, and the guarantee certificate data is created by inputting predetermined items into the read guarantee certificate format data. The building evaluation / assurance system having a guarantee process of transmitting the guarantee data from the terminal to the server and storing the guarantee data in the storage unit of the server.

According to a second aspect of the present invention, in the building evaluation / assurance system according to the first aspect, the inspection related to the inspection step and the evaluation related to the evaluation step are performed when the building is newly constructed, and New build evaluation / guarantee process that creates warranty data with new build defect warranty in the guarantee process,
An inspection process that performs the inspection related to the inspection process at the prescribed inspection described in the warranty with the new building defect warranty, an inspection related to the inspection process and an evaluation related to the evaluation process at the time of renewing the guarantee of the building. , A guarantee renewal evaluation / guarantee process for creating renewal guarantee data in the guarantee process.

According to a third aspect of the present invention, in the building evaluation / assurance system according to the above-mentioned second aspect, the evaluation process of the assurance renewal evaluation / assurance process is the new construction evaluation / assurance process and inspection process. The inspection result data are also used.

According to a fourth aspect of the invention, in the building evaluation / assurance system according to the second or third aspect, the result of the evaluation at the guarantee renewal evaluation / assurance step,
When it is determined that maintenance is required, the warranty is renewed on the condition that the maintenance is pointed out.

According to a fifth aspect of the present invention, in the building evaluation / assurance system according to the first, second, third or fourth aspect, the inspection related to the inspection step and the evaluation related to the evaluation step are used for the used building. It has a used building inspection / evaluation process that is performed when buying and selling goods.

According to a sixth aspect of the present invention, in the building evaluation / assurance system according to the second, third or fourth aspect, the inspection related to the inspection step and the evaluation related to the evaluation step are performed on the used building. It has a used building inspection / evaluation process performed at the time of sale. The evaluation process of the used building inspection / evaluation process is also performed using the inspection result data of the new construction evaluation / assurance process, the inspection process, and the warranty renewal evaluation / assurance process.

[0018]

BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION [First Embodiment] FIGS. 1 to 1 show a first embodiment of an evaluation / assurance system according to the present invention.
A description will be given based on 0.

First, the configuration of the evaluation / assurance system of this embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. This evaluation / assurance system includes a server 10 installed on the builder side, and a building such as a detached house or a condominium regardless of whether it is under construction or after construction (hereinafter, simply " A portable terminal (hereinafter referred to as "mobile terminal") 20 used by a person who performs an inspection (hereinafter referred to as "building") (hereinafter referred to as "inspector") and a terminal 40 installed at the evaluation institution side. Configured and each connected via the Internet 50. Here, the inspector also carries an imaging device (for example, a digital camera) 30 that images the inspection target and sends it to the mobile terminal 20. The imaging device 30 may be provided integrally with the mobile terminal 20. Further, it is desirable that the evaluation institution is, for example, an institution officially approved by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, etc. Hereinafter referred to as "third party evaluation organization"). Therefore, in the following description, the terminal 40 is referred to as a third-party evaluation institution terminal 40. Hereinafter, each of these configurations will be described in detail.

The server 10 is a storage unit 1 for storing a program 11 of this system and various databases described later.
2, a control unit 13 that performs various processes described below according to the program 11, and an input unit and a display unit (not shown).

The storage section 12 will be described below.
As shown in FIG. 1, the storage unit 12 of the present embodiment stores a system screen database 12a in which screen data related to the system such as a system initial screen is stored, and a person who is authorized to use the system (for example, a building. A licensed person database 12b in which data of inspectors of objects and third-party evaluation institutions is stored, and data of a plurality of inspection screens in which inspection items regarding a building under construction (at the time of new construction) are described are stored. Of the first inspection screen database 12c, the second inspection screen database 12d that stores data of a plurality of inspection screens in which inspection items related to the building after construction are stored, and an inspection result and an evaluation result of the customer's building A customer building database 12e in which data and the like are stored, and a format data in which format data of an evaluation certificate and a guarantee certificate in which an evaluation result based on the inspection result is input is stored. A base 12f, and customer building performance database 12g to the data of the performance information of the building according to the performance indication system described above is stored is provided. It is assumed that the performance information data is stored by the builder after being evaluated based on the performance display system as described later.

Specifically, although not shown, the system initial screen data in the system screen database 12a is a button to be clicked to start an ID / password input field described later, an inspection function, an evaluation function, etc. described later. Screen data provided by the server 10, the mobile terminal 2
0 or the display unit of the third-party evaluation institution terminal 40. For example, as will be described later, the ID and password are entered in the input fields on the display unit of the mobile terminal 20 or the third-party evaluation institution terminal 40, and the button related to the desired function is clicked to send to the server 10. The server 10
After it is determined whether or not the user is a licensed user of this system, the screen relating to the selected function is displayed on the mobile terminal 20 or the third-party evaluation institution terminal 40.

Here, the screen relating to the function means the initial screen for the administrator when the administrator of the server 10 uses this system, the new screen used when the inspector starts the inspection or the inspection. Inspection initial screen, evaluation initial screen at the time of new construction used when a third-party evaluation organization starts evaluation or at the time of warranty renewal (including used buildings not related to renewal of warranty), third-party evaluation organization This is an initial screen for creating a warranty, which is used when creating a warranty. Each of these initial screens is provided with an identification code input field for inputting an identification code corresponding to each building of the customer and a transmission button to be clicked for transmitting the data of the identification code. The data of these initial screens are stored in the system screen database 12a. The identification code input fields for each of these initial screens may be provided in the system initial screen described above, and these may be integrated into one initial screen.

Next, the above-mentioned authorized user database 12b is used for the information such as the names or names of persons authorized to use this system and third-party evaluation institutions, and a dedicated ID and password assigned to each. Is a database formed by storing the data of. Here, the licenser database 12b is preferably a database in which data is stored according to the type of licenser (that is, the type of inspector, third-party evaluation institution, etc.).

Next, the inspection screen data in the above-mentioned first and second inspection screen databases 12c and 12d will be described. This inspection screen data is stored in plural for each inspection item, and after the inspection result and the like are input based on the inspection screen data as described later, it is stored in the customer building database 12e as inspection result data. Here, the inspection items provided in the data of each inspection screen are
The first inspection screen database 12c refers to the items according to the performance display system described above and the items specified by the builder, and the second inspection screen database 12d conforms to the evaluation system for used houses described above. And items that comply with the builder's own rules. Also, the data of the inspection screen in the second inspection screen database 12d is inspected at the time of inspection during the defect warranty period, at the time of inspection at the time of expiration of the defect warranty period, or at the time of inspection at the time of renewal warranty expiration, as will be described later. Since items may be different, in such a case, inspection screen data may be sorted and stored according to each period.

For example, as shown in FIG. 2, in the data of the inspection screen 121C in the first inspection screen database 12c of the present embodiment, the inspection item number column 121C ₁ in which the number of each inspection item is described, and the customer's data. A customer identification field 121C ₂ for inputting an identification code assigned to each building, an inspection target field 121C ₃ in which an inspection target is described, an inspection item field 121C ₄ in which an inspection item related to the inspection target is described, An inspection information input field 121C ₅ for inputting information such as an inspection value (for example, a measured value) for the inspection item, and an image pasting unit 121C for pasting the image picked up by the image pickup apparatus 30 described above.
₆ and an end button 121C ₇ to be clicked after the inspection of the inspection item is completed.

Further, the data of this inspection screen 121C
Is a customer at a later date (for example, after an inspection and after a predetermined period has passed)
Inspection items that can be deleted from the building database 12e (example
For example, it is an item that meets the builder's own regulations,
(This information will not be used after valuation)
Data deletion check box 121C₈And this data
New construction evaluation check to indicate that is used for evaluation at new construction
Column 121C₉And this data is evaluated after passing the building
121C for the evaluation check box at the time of inspection at a later date to indicate that it will be used
₁₀And are provided. Data can be deleted in this way
Check column 121C ₈Organize unnecessary data by providing
Therefore, it is possible to prevent the increase of data volume and transfer data.
It is possible to reduce the working time of time. In addition, in the image
If the test item can be understood only by the test result,
It is not necessary to provide an inspection result input field in the inspection screen data.
Yes.

The inspection screen data in the second inspection screen database 12d of this embodiment is basically the same as the data of the inspection screen 121C in the first inspection screen database 12c. is is not necessary to provide equivalent at the time of evaluation check column 121C _9.

Next, the customer building database 12e described above is a database in which data for each customer building is stored in accordance with the above-mentioned identification code. For example, as the data, the inspection result as described above, The data such as the created evaluation certificate and warranty is stored. Further, the customer building database 12e also stores data such as the location, owner name and structure name of the building.

Subsequently, the above-mentioned format database 12f
The evaluation form data and warranty form data in the above are explained. Here, as the evaluation form data, the data of the evaluation form 121F at the time of new construction and the data of the evaluation form 122F at the time of guarantee renewal (including the case of a used building not related to the renewal of the guarantee) are included. There is.

First, as shown in, for example, FIG.
The data in the form 121F of the new construction evaluation report
Issue date column 121F for entering the issue date₁And registered
Enter the identification code mentioned above for the building
Power column 121F_TwoAnd where to enter the location of the building
Ground field 121F_ThreeAnd the owner (guarantee) name of the building
Enter the registered building owner field 121F_FourAnd the warranty
Guarantee registration number field 121F to enter the registration number₅And its
Warranty start date field 121F for entering the warranty start date ₆And criticism
121F of evaluator column to enter the name of the valuator₇Have and. Further
The data of this evaluation form 121F enumerate the examination sites.
Examination site column 121F₈And corresponding to the inspection site
Inspection content column 121F listing inspection contents (inspection items)₉
And the inspection method of the inspection content (visual, measurement or other
Etc.) in the inspection method column 121F₁₀And the test result
Pass / Fail to enter the pass / fail evaluation result determined based on
Column 121F₁₁And outside the frame of the evaluation form 121F
End button 121F to be clicked after the evaluation is completed₁₂With
To do.

Further, as shown in FIG. 4, for example, the data in the form 122F of the guarantee renewal evaluation form of this embodiment has the same issue date column 122F ₁ and identification code as the data of the new construction evaluation form 121F. Input field 122F ₂ , Location field 1
22F ₃ , registered building owner column 122F ₄ , renewal guarantee guarantee registration number column 122F ₅ , renewal guarantee guarantee start date column 122F ₆ , evaluator column 122F ₇ , inspection site column 12
2F ₈ , inspection content column 122F ₉ , inspection method column 122F
₁₀ , pass / fail column 122F ₁₁ , and evaluation form 122F
Has an end button 122F ₁₄ provided outside the frame. Furthermore, the data of the form 122F of this evaluation report is the pass / fail column 122F.
_{When 11} is “fail”, the maintenance content is input 122F ₁₂ shown in FIG. 5 and the image pasting section 122F ₁₃ shown in FIG. 5 for pasting images of the maintenance location, and the re-evaluation result of the maintenance location And the re-evaluation result column 122F ₁₅ shown in FIG. Here, the maintenance content column 122F ₁₂ and the image pasting unit 122F ₁₃ are shown as separate figures from the evaluation form 122F of FIG. 4, but the evaluation form 1 of FIG.
It may be provided in 22F.

Further, as shown in FIG. 6, for example, the data of the form 123F of the guarantee certificate of the present embodiment is the identification code input field 123F ₁ for inputting the above-mentioned identification code of the registered building, and the building. Location field 123F ₂ for entering the location of the building, registered building owner field 123F ₃ for entering the owner (guarantee) name of the building, and structure field 123F ₄ for entering the structure name of the building. , A warranty registration number field 123F ₅ for entering the registration number of this warranty, a warranty start date field 123F ₆ for entering the start date of the warranty, a warranty period field 123F ₇ for entering the warranty period, and the address of the guarantor. It has a guarantor field 123F ₈ for inputting a name, a name and the like, and an end button 123F ₉ provided outside the frame of the warranty form 123F and clicked after the creation.

Next, the control unit 13 of the server 10 described above will be described. The control unit 13 has various processing functions that the above-described program 11 causes a central processing unit (hereinafter, referred to as “CPU”), not shown, to perform. As the processing functions, for example, a mobile terminal at the time of inspecting a building. An inspection function for performing processing with the third party, an evaluation function for performing processing with the third party evaluating organization terminal 40 when the third party evaluating organization evaluates the building, and a third The third-party evaluation institution terminal 40 when the inspector evaluates the guarantee of the building
It is a function to create a guarantee certificate for processing between and.

Next, although not shown, the portable terminal 20 and the third-party evaluation institution terminal 40 described above are provided with an input unit used for inputting the above-mentioned ID and password, and various screens received from the server 10. A display unit for displaying, a central processing unit (hereinafter, referred to as “CPU”) that performs various processes such as displaying the reception screen on the display unit, and a memory for storing data of the reception screen and reception information as necessary. And a section.

[Evaluation and Guarantee by Evaluation / Assurance System of this Embodiment] Next, the evaluation and guarantee procedure of the evaluation / guarantee system of this embodiment configured as described above will be described.
In the present embodiment, the server 10 is installed on the builder side, and the inspector who uses the mobile terminal 20 or the like is exemplified as an employee on the builder side or a person designated by the builder side.

In this embodiment, an inspection / assurance system as shown in FIG. 7 is shown as an example. Specifically, the builder first inspects the customer's building (step ST1), stores the inspection result in the server 10, and requests the third party evaluation institution to evaluate the building (step ST).
2). Next, the third-party evaluation organization that received the evaluation request evaluates the building (step ST3) and stores the evaluation result in the server 10. If the result of the evaluation is that the result is acceptable, a third-party evaluation institution issues a guarantee certificate, for example, with a 10-year flaw guarantee at the time of new construction for predetermined items such as structural frame, waterproof and ant-proof (step ST4). It is stated in the warranty that the inspection will be performed after the lapse of a predetermined period until the expiration of the warranty period, and the builder performs a predetermined inspection (step ST5) and stores the result in the server 10.

Next, when the guarantee period of 10 years has expired, the builder conducts an inspection (step ST6) and stores the inspection result in the server 10, and then the third-party evaluation institution uses the above-mentioned pre-owned house at the customer's request. The evaluation based on the evaluation system (step ST7) is performed and the evaluation result is stored in the server 10.
When the builder requires maintenance as a result of the evaluation, the builder performs maintenance of the indicated portion (step ST8) and stores the result in the server 10. Then, a third-party evaluation organization evaluates the maintenance location (step ST9) and stores the evaluation result in the server 10. If the result is acceptable, the third-party evaluation institution issues a 10-year renewal guarantee, for example (step ST10).

Next, when the renewed warranty period of 10 years expires, the builder is inspected (step ST11) and the evaluation by a third-party evaluation institution (step ST12) is carried out in accordance with the customer's request in the same manner as above. The builder performs the maintenance of the pointed out point (step ST13) as necessary. Then, the third-party evaluation organization evaluates the maintenance location (step ST14), and if the result is acceptable, issues a 3-year renewal guarantee, for example (step ST15). After that, the process is repeated according to the customer's request until a predetermined period has passed since the new construction. It should be noted that the warranty is not renewed if the customer wishes to renew the warranty but does not perform maintenance.

The evaluation and guarantee of this embodiment will be described in detail below.

[Evaluation and Guarantee in New Construction] First, the inspection in step ST1 described above will be described with reference to FIG. First, the inspector goes to the location of the building and goes to the mobile terminal 2
The system initial screen described above is displayed on the display unit of 0.
Next, when the inspector inputs the above-mentioned ID and password from the input section of the mobile terminal 20 into the input field on the system initial screen and clicks the inspection start button for new construction on the system initial screen, the mobile terminal 20 The CPU sends the ID and password data and the inspection start command data to the server 10 (step ST100).

In this server 10, the CPU collates the received ID and password data with the plurality of ID and password data in the authorized user database 12b to determine whether there is matching data. . If they do not match, in order to display on the display unit of the mobile terminal 20, a message regarding the instruction to re-enter the ID and password,
The data related to that is transmitted to the mobile terminal 20. Also,
If they match, the CPU determines that the system screen database 1
The data of the new construction inspection initial screen described above is read from 2a and transmitted to the mobile terminal 20 (step ST101).

Subsequently, the inspector inputs the identification code of the building in the identification code input field on the initial inspection screen for new construction displayed on the display unit of the mobile terminal 20, and clicks the send button to enter the server 10. (Step ST102). As a result, the CPU of the server 10 reads the data of the inspection screen 121C shown in FIG. 2 from the first inspection screen database 12c, inputs the received identification code data into the customer identification column 121C ₂ , and transmits it to the mobile terminal 20. Yes (step ST103). The identification code does not necessarily have to be entered in the customer identification field 121C ₂ according to the program 11, and may be entered by the inspector after the mobile terminal 20 receives the data of the inspection screen 121C.

Next, the inspection screen 1 is displayed on the display unit of the portable terminal 20.
When 21C is displayed, the inspector determines that the inspection target column 121C is displayed.
₃ and the inspection item column 121C ₄ read the inspection target and its inspection item, and after performing the inspection such as measurement of such item, input the information such as the measured value into the inspection information input column 121C ₅ if necessary. At the same time, the image of that portion is picked up by the image pickup device 30 and transmitted to the mobile terminal 20 (step ST104). In this mobile terminal 20, the CPU
But it adhered to be displayed on the display unit the data of the received image to the image pasting unit 121C ₆ data examination screen 121C. Then, the inspector selects the end button 1 on the inspection screen 121C.
21C ₇ is clicked, and the CPU of the mobile terminal 20 causes the server 10 to transmit the inspection result data in which the necessary information (in the present embodiment, the inspection result and the image information) is input (step ST105).

In this server 10, the CPU determines whether or not the required information data is included in the received inspection result data (step ST106). If it is determined that there is no required information, the necessary information is not input. Data to that effect is transmitted to the mobile terminal 20. In such a case, a message to that effect is displayed on the display unit of the mobile terminal 20 (step ST107), so the inspector who sees it inputs the non-input information and transmits the inspection result data to the server 10 again. . Further, when it is determined that there is, the CPU of the server 10 stores the data of the inspection result in the customer building database 12e (step ST108), and determines whether or not all the inspection screen data has been transmitted (step ST108). ST109). If all the inspection screen data has not been transmitted, the next inspection screen data is transmitted to the mobile terminal 20. Then, based on the new inspection screen, the inspection is performed in the same manner as the case of the inspection screen 121C. When all the inspection screen data has been transmitted, the inspection ends.

Here, the inspection result data is stored in the customer building database 12e, for example, organized by the identification code of the customer identification column 121C ₂ described above. The transmission order of each inspection screen data of the first inspection screen database 12c is, for example, the above-mentioned inspection item number column 121.
This is done in the order of C ₁ . Hereinafter, the inspection process as described above is repeated for all inspection items.

As described above, unless the predetermined inspection is surely performed, it is impossible to proceed to the next inspection process, that is, the inspection screen data is the next inspection screen data unless one inspection is completed. Since it is not transmitted, it is possible to effectively prevent unexpected inconvenience such as omission of inspection.

The inspection screen data does not necessarily have to be transmitted one by one, and may be transmitted by appropriately determining the number of transmissions, for example, two each. However, even in such a case,
It is desirable not to transmit the next inspection screen data unless the inspection is completed for the plurality of transmitted inspection screen data.

Here, the inspection at the time of new construction shown above is, for example, after the foundation work, the roof work, the interior work,
It will be done separately at the time of completion. For this reason, it is desirable for the efficiency of data transfer that the inspection screen data in the first inspection screen database 12c is sorted at each inspection time and stored as having inspection items corresponding to each inspection time.

Next, when the inspection is completed for all the inspection items as described above, the steps ST2 and ST described above are performed.
An evaluation by a third-party evaluation organization related to 3 will be performed. This evaluation will be described with reference to FIG. First of all, the builder, together with the information on the identification code corresponding to each customer's building,
For example, an e-mail or the like is used to request a third-party evaluation institution to evaluate the building (step ST200). This allows
The operator on the side of the third-party evaluation institution who has received the request displays the aforementioned system initial screen on the display unit of the third-party evaluation institution terminal 40. Then, the operator inputs the above-mentioned ID and password into the input field on the system initial screen from the input section of the third-party evaluation institution terminal 40, and clicks the evaluation start button on the system initial screen. Thereafter, the CPU of the third-party evaluation institution terminal 40 transmits the ID and password data and the evaluation start command data to the server 10 (step ST201).

In this server 10, the CPU collates the received ID and password data with the plurality of ID and password data in the authorized user database 12b and determines whether there is matching data. . If they do not match, the data related to that is transmitted to the third-party evaluation institution terminal 40 in order to display on the display unit of the third-party evaluation institution terminal 40 that the re-input instruction of the ID and password is displayed. To do.

If they coincide with each other, the data of the above-mentioned initial evaluation screen for new construction is read from the system screen database 12a and transmitted to the third-party evaluation institution terminal 40 (step ST202). Then, the operator inputs the identification code in the identification code input field on the new construction evaluation initial screen displayed on the third-party evaluation institution terminal 40, and clicks the send button to send it to the server 10 (step ST20).
3). As a result, the CPU of the server 10 that receives the identification code data reads the data of the form 121F of the new construction evaluation document shown in FIG. 3 from the format database 12f and transmits it to the third party evaluation institution terminal 40 (step ST20).
4). At that time, the CPU of the server 10 also includes the inspection result data in the customer building database 12e corresponding to the received identification code and the performance information data in the customer building performance database 12g corresponding to the identification code. It transmits to the terminal 40 for person evaluation organizations. Here, the data of the inspection result of this embodiment is the above-mentioned evaluation check box 1 for new construction.
Only those with 21C ₉ checked are sent.

In such a case, the CPU of the server 10
Identification code input field 121F _2, the location field 121F ₃ and registration building owner field 121F _4, is a respective identification code read from the customer building database 12e (to the identification code from the third party evaluation organization terminal 40 You may use the sent one), the address and the owner's name, and then send the data of the evaluation form 121F.
The identification code and the like do not necessarily have to be entered in the identification code input field 121F ₂ according to the program 11, and the third-party evaluation institution terminal 40 uses the evaluation form 121F.
After receiving the data, the operator may input the data.

The CPU of the third-party evaluation institution terminal 40 which has received the above-mentioned data stores the respective data in the storage unit and also displays the screen of the evaluation form 121F on the display unit. Then, at the third-party evaluation organization, the evaluation report format 1
21F and information relating to the inspection screen 121C and performance information are compared to evaluate the building, and the operator forms 1 of the evaluation document.
Input the evaluation result in the pass / fail column 121F _{11 of} 21F. Subsequently, the operator selects the issue date column 121F ₁ , the warranty registration number column 121F ₅ , the warranty start date column 121F ₆ , and the evaluator column 1.
To 21F _7, the date of issue of this assessment, and input guarantee registration number, warranty start date, and the evaluation's name (step ST205),
The end button 121F ₁₂ is clicked, and the CPU of the third-party evaluation institution terminal 40 transmits the data of the evaluation document in which the evaluation result and the like are input to the server 10 (step ST20
6). Then, in the server 10, the received building certificate data is associated with the identification code, and the customer building database 1
2e (step ST207). Here, the warranty registration number and the warranty start date entered in step ST205 can be known after the issuance of the guarantee certificate described later. For this reason, it is desirable to create a warranty once the inspection result is found to be acceptable.

Next, when all the evaluation items pass, the third-party evaluation organization issues the guarantee certificate in step ST4 described above. This guarantee issuance will be described with reference to FIG. First, the operator on the side of the third-party evaluation institution inputs the above-mentioned ID and password in the input section on the system initial screen from the input section of the terminal 40 for the third-party evaluation institution, and clicks the warranty creation button on the initial screen. Click to transmit to the server 10 (step ST300). Here, it is assumed that the ID and password match any of the plurality of IDs and passwords in the authorized user database 12b. Then, the CPU of the server 10 reads the above-mentioned warranty creation initial screen data from the system screen database 12a and transmits it to the third-party evaluation institution terminal 40 (step ST301).

Next, the operator on the side of the third-party evaluation organization inputs the identification code in the identification code input field on the warranty creation initial screen displayed on the display unit, and clicks the send button to send it to the server 10. Yes (step ST302). As a result, the CPU of the server 10 reads the data of the guarantee form 123F from the form database 12f and sends it to the third-party evaluation institution terminal 40 (step ST303). In such a case, the CPU of the server 10 causes the identification code input field 123
F ₁ , location column 123 F ₂ , registered building owner column 123
In F ₃ and structure field 123F _4, and transmits each identification code read from the customer building database 12e, location, after entering the owner name and structure name. The identification code and the like do not necessarily have to be entered in the identification code input field 123F ₁ according to the program 11, and may be entered after it is received by the operator on the side of the third-party evaluation institution.

Subsequently, the operator on the side of the third-party evaluation organization, in the warranty registration number column 123F ₅ , the warranty start date column 123F ₆ , the warranty period column 123F ₇ and the guarantor column 123F ₈ , the warranty certificate registration number and guarantee. The start date, the warranty period, the address and name of the guarantor (builder) are input (step ST304) to create a warranty. Then, the operator operates the end button 1
23F ₉ Click to send the created warranty data to the server 10 (step ST 305). In this case, for example, the storage unit 12 of the server 10 is provided with a warranty registration number database (not shown) that stores the registration numbers of the guarantees regarding the buildings of the plurality of registered customers, and the server 10 is provided when the registration numbers are given. The CPU 11 may construct a program 11 in which a registration number that is not in the guarantee registration number database is assigned to a newly guaranteed building.

Next, the CPU of the server 10 is as described above.
The warranty data created as
It is stored in the memory 12e (step ST306). And
The operator of the third-party evaluation organization prints the warranty and
Guarantor field 123F ₈To the third party
Mark and issue to the customer. Here, the guarantor column 123
F₈Can be a joint name with the builder, in which case a third-party evaluation
After imprinting on the institution side, send the warranty to the builder
Good. Note that electronic signatures will be effective due to legal revisions, etc.
If this happens, sign at step ST304.
U In such a case, the terminal on the builder side (in this embodiment,
Is it the server 10) or the customer building database 12e?
Guarantee data is read from and the signature is stamped.

[Operation of Evaluation System during Inspection] As described above, it is stated that the inspection will be performed after the lapse of a predetermined period until the expiration of the guarantee period. Hereinafter, the inspection at the step ST5 described above will be described.

First, as in the case of the above-mentioned inspection at the time of new construction, the inspector goes to the location of the building and inspects the system initial screen displayed on the display unit of the portable terminal 20 as shown in FIG. Click the inspection start button for. Then, the CPU of the mobile terminal 20 is caused to transmit the data of the ID and password and the data relating to the inspection start command to the server 10 (step ST100), and the data of the inspection initial screen during inspection transmitted from the server 10 (step ST101). ) Is displayed on the display unit of the mobile terminal 20. Note that, here, "data of the inspection initial screen at new construction" in step ST101 shown in FIG. 8 is replaced with "data of the inspection initial screen at inspection".

Then, the inspector inputs the identification code of the building in the identification code input field on the inspection initial screen for inspection, and clicks the send button to send it to the server 10 (step ST102). As a result, the CPU of the server 10
Reads the above-described inspection screen data from the second inspection screen database 12d, inputs the received identification code data into the customer identification field, and transmits the data to the mobile terminal 20 (step ST103). Even at the time of this inspection, the identification code does not necessarily have to be input by the CPU of the server 10. Thereafter, the inspection is performed in the same manner as the above-mentioned inspection at the time of new construction, and the data of the inspection results regarding all the inspection items at the time of inspection are stored in the customer building database 12e of the server 10.

[Evaluation and Guarantee after Completion of Warranty Guarantee and Renewal Guarantee] Next, the evaluation and guarantee of the building after the flaw guarantee and the renewal guarantee of steps ST6 to ST14 will be described in detail. If there is concern about the accuracy of the inspection content (eg, image resolution), a third-party evaluation organization may accompany the inspection. Further, the inspection is performed in the same manner as the above-described inspection at the time of inspection, and therefore the description thereof is omitted here. Furthermore, since the creation of the renewal warranty is performed in the same manner as the creation of the above-mentioned warranty for new construction, a description thereof will be omitted here.

Here, the evaluation by the third-party evaluation organization is shown in FIG.
This will be described using 1. Incidentally, step ST4 shown in FIG.
Since 00 to ST403 are performed in substantially the same manner as the evaluation at the time of new construction in steps ST200 to ST203 shown in FIG. 9, the description thereof will be omitted. In that case, the "new evaluation evaluation initial screen" is read as "guarantee renewal evaluation initial screen".

After step ST403, the identification code
The CPU of the server 10 that receives the data
12f to form 122 of the guarantee renewal evaluation document shown in FIG.
Read the data of F and send to the terminal 40 for the third-party evaluation organization
(Step ST404). At that time, the server 10
The CPU displays the customer building data corresponding to the received identification code.
Data of the inspection results in the database 12e (for new construction and inspection
Historical data such as time and data at the time of this inspection)
It is transmitted to the terminal 40 for the three-party evaluation institution. Here, this embodiment
The data of the inspection results of the state are
Column 121C ₁₀Only those checked in
Believed

In this case, as in the case of new construction, the CPU of the server 10 reads the identification code input field 122F ₂ , the location field 122F ₃ and the registered building owner field 122F ₄ from the customer building database 12e. After inputting the identification code (this identification code may be the one sent from the terminal 40 for the third-party evaluation organization), the location and the owner's name, the data of the evaluation form 122F is sent. To do.

The CPU of the third-party evaluation institution terminal 40 which has received the above-mentioned data stores the respective data in the storage unit and also displays the screen of the evaluation form 122F on the display unit. Then, at the third-party evaluation organization, the evaluation report format 1
22F and the received data of each inspection result are compared to evaluate the building, and the operator inputs the evaluation result into the pass / fail column 122F ₁₁ of the form 122F of the evaluation document, and the issue date column 122F
₁ and the evaluator column 122F ₅ enter the date of issue of this evaluation document and the evaluator's name (step ST405).

Next, a third-party evaluation organization determines whether maintenance is required (step ST406). Specifically, when the pass / fail column 122F ₁₁ has a “failed” portion, the operator of the third-party evaluation institution checks the maintenance content column 1
The maintenance content is input to 22F ₁₂ and the image of the maintenance location is pasted to the image pasting section 122F ₁₃ (step ST407). For example, by inputting the number of the inspection item number column 121C ₁ of the inspection result data of this time, the image pasting unit 12 of the inspection result data
The image pasted on 1C ₆ may be pasted on the image pasting section 122F ₁₃ of the data of the evaluation form 122F, whereby the work efficiency can be improved.

Then, the operator of the third-party evaluation institution makes a predetermined
When you enter the item, end button 122F ₁₄Click
Then, the CPU of the terminal 40 for the third-party evaluation institution gives the evaluation result.
Send the data of the evaluation document in which the fruits etc. are input to the server 10.
(Step ST408). Here, step ST40
If there is no "fail" portion in step 6, step ST40
Go to 8. Then, in the server 10, the received evaluation report
Correspond the data to the identification code and
It is stored in the memory 12e (step ST409).

If no maintenance is required, the renewal guarantee is issued, and if maintenance is required, the builder side performs maintenance (step ST41).
0). For example, a third-party evaluation organization gives a builder a maintenance instruction using e-mail or the like (step ST
411). The builder who has received the maintenance instruction causes the CPU of the server 10 to read the data of the warranty update evaluation document from the customer building database 12e and display it on the display unit, and the maintenance content column 122F ₁₂ and the image pasting unit 12 are displayed.
Necessary maintenance is performed by looking at the 2F ₁₃ , the inspection of the maintenance location is performed, and then the evaluation request is made again (step ST412). The inspection in such a case is carried out in the same manner as the first inspection at the time of renewal of guarantee.

For re-evaluation of the maintenance portion, first, the operator of the third-party evaluation institution performs C on the terminal 40 for the third-party evaluation institution.
The server 10 issues an instruction to read the evaluation report data at the time of warranty update to the PU.
(Step ST413), the data of the warranty renewal evaluation document stored in the customer building database 12e is read and displayed on the display section (step ST4).
14). Then, the inspection result data related to the above maintenance is also read, and the result of the re-evaluation performed based on the data (here, passed) is re-evaluation result column 122F.
₁₅ , and the warranty registration number and warranty start date are entered in the warranty registration number column 122F ₅ and warranty start date column 122F ₆ (step ST415). Then, the end button 122F
₁₄ Click the CP of the third-party evaluation institution terminal 40
The data of the evaluation document in which the re-evaluation result and the like are input by U is transmitted to the server 10 (proceeding to step ST408) and stored in the customer building database 12e. After the evaluation in this way, if all are acceptable, a renewal guarantee is issued.

[Evaluation at the time of resale of building] Next, the evaluation at the time of resale of the building will be described. What is the evaluation here?
It refers to the evaluation when a third-party evaluation institution is requested by the seller or buyer of the building, the builder or the intermediary of the building. Since the evaluation at the time of resale is performed in substantially the same manner as the process from step ST400 to ST409 shown in FIG. 11 at the time of evaluation of the building after the expiration of the defect guarantee or the expiration of the renewal guarantee, the detailed description will be given here. Is omitted. It should be noted that whether or not to carry out maintenance or re-evaluation after step ST409 shown in FIG. 11 may be determined by selection of an evaluation requester (especially seller or buyer). In the description in that case, "at the time of guarantee renewal" is read as "at the time of resale". Here, a warranty such as a renewal warranty is not issued within the warranty period, but a certificate such as an evaluation certificate may be issued in order to make the reliability of the evaluation certificate more reliable, for example. Further, when the expiration date of the warranty period is approaching, the renewal warranty may be issued in the same manner as after the renewal warranty expires.

According to the evaluation / assurance system of the present embodiment described above, since the evaluation and assurance are performed by a third-party evaluation institution that is fair and fair, and is publicly approved, its reliability is ensured. be able to. In particular, since the inspection for the evaluation and the standard of the evaluation itself are based on the performance display system and the evaluation system of used houses by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, its reliability is solid. Further, in addition to pre-establishing such an established system, it is possible to carry out the evaluation at a place desired by the user without burden, so that the participation of a third-party evaluation institution can be promoted. Furthermore, since inspection information and evaluation information based on images from the time of new construction can be stored in a database, it is possible to judge deterioration over time in time series when evaluating a building that has been built for a long time. When selling an item, it can be used to calculate the collateral value. Furthermore, after inspection and evaluation, the warranty is updated on the premise that maintenance of inconvenient parts will be performed, so it is possible to maintain the performance of such buildings.
It is possible to prevent a sharp drop in the collateral value.

With the above-mentioned various effects, since the financial institution can enter the housing market, especially the second-hand housing market, it can be activated. In addition, since it is possible to prevent the collateral value of a building from dropping sharply, it is not necessary to leave a large amount of debt at the time of resale of the building, and it is possible to protect consumers from self-bankruptcy and the like. Furthermore, since there is an image history in particular, a nonlife insurance company or the like can use the history or the evaluation document as an index for determining the durability of the building. Therefore, the basic rate of insurance premiums can be discounted and special contracts can be set, and the burden on the insured can be reduced.

The server 10 may be installed on the side of the third-party evaluation organization, and the inspector may be an employee of the third-party evaluation organization or a designated person. For example, in the case of an inspector on the side of a third-party evaluation organization, the builder first requests the third-party evaluation organization to evaluate the customer's building. Next, the third-party evaluation organization that received the evaluation request inspects the building and stores the inspection result in the server 10, then evaluates the building and stores the evaluation result in the server 10. As a result of the evaluation, if the result is acceptable, a third-party evaluation institution issues a warranty with a guarantee of flaws when newly built for 10 years, for example. Here, the proof may be issued by a builder or a third-party evaluation institution in step ST4 shown in FIG.

Next, when the guarantee period of 10 years has expired, a third-party evaluation institution carries out an inspection and evaluation based on the evaluation system of the used house according to the customer's request, and stores the evaluation result in the server 10. If the builder requires maintenance based on the evaluation result, the builder performs maintenance on the pointed out part and notifies the third party evaluation institution, and the third party evaluation inspects and evaluates the maintenance part, and sends the evaluation result to the server 10. Store. In case of passing here, the third-party evaluation institution, for example, 10
Issue annual renewal guarantee.

Next, at the expiration of the renewed 10-year warranty period, a third-party evaluation institute performs an inspection and evaluation based on the evaluation system of a used house according to the customer's request in the same manner as described above, and the builder points out. Perform site maintenance. Then, the third-party evaluation organization inspects and evaluates the maintenance site, and if the result is acceptable, issues a 3-year renewal guarantee, for example.
After that, the process is repeated according to the customer's request until a predetermined period has passed since the new construction. Even in this case, the warranty is not renewed if the maintenance is not performed though the renewal of the warranty is desired.

Further, in the above-described first embodiment, the guarantee certificate is issued by a third-party evaluation organization, but it may be issued by a builder, for example. In such a case, when the builder becomes the administrator of the server 10 as in the above-described first embodiment, the builder creates a guarantee certificate button on the initial screen data for the administrator in the system screen database 12a. Is provided. First, the builder receives the result of the evaluation document data received by the server 10 at the time of new construction or at the time of renewal of the warranty (here, it is assumed that all evaluation items have passed).
To issue a warranty. First, the server administrator (operator) on the builder side uses a predetermined ID from the input unit of the server 10.
And, the password is entered and the CPU verifies the password. Here, it is assumed that the ID and password match any of the plurality of IDs and passwords in the authorized user database 12b. Then, the CPU of the server 10
Displays the above-mentioned initial screen data for administrator from the system screen database 12a and displays it on the display unit.

The server administrator inputs the identification code into the identification code input field on the initial screen for the administrator and clicks the warranty creation button, and the CPU of the server 10 receives the data of the warranty form 123F from the form database 12f. Read and display on the display. At that time, the CPU of the server 10 respectively sets the identification code input field 123F ₁ , the location field 123F ₂ , the registered building owner field 123F ₃ and the structure field 123F ₄ in the same manner as in the case of the third-party evaluation institution described above. The identification code, location, owner name and structure name read from the customer building database 12e are input and then displayed. The identification code and the like are not necessarily the server 10
It is not necessary to input by the CPU of, and the server administrator may input.

Next, the server administrator gives the warranty registration number field.
123F₅, Warranty start date column 123F ₆, Warranty period column 12
3F₇And guarantor column 123F₈The warranty registration number,
Warranty start date, warranty period and guarantor (builder) address
Enter the name, name, etc. and press the end button 123F₉Click.
Next, the CPU of the server 10 is created as described above.
The data of the written guarantee is stored in the customer building database 12e.
Pay. After that, in the same way as in the case of a third-party evaluation agency,
The certificate is issued to the customer.

If the builder has the status of an officially approved institution, that builder may perform the work of the evaluation institution.

Second Embodiment Next, a second embodiment of the evaluation / assurance system of the present invention will be described. The difference between this embodiment and the above-described first embodiment is that a terminal of a third-party depository company is connected to the server 10 via the Internet 50 in the above-described system of FIG. 1 although not shown.
The third-party escrow company is a third-party escrow business relating to housing (building) transactions, for example, a business where a buyer of a house deposits a loan from a financial institution that applied for a mortgage and pays the seller of the house. It is a credit company that performs and guarantees the housing by appraising it.

The terminal of the third-party escrow company has the same configuration as the portable terminal 20 and the third-party evaluation institution terminal 40 described above, and is an input unit used when inputting an ID, a password and the like. And a display unit that displays various screens received from the server 10, and a central processing unit (hereinafter, “CPU”) that performs various processes such as displaying the reception screens on the display unit.
And a storage unit that stores data of a reception screen and reception information as needed.

Further, in the server 10, the ID and password for the third-party depository company are stored in the authorized user database 12b, and the data of the deposit initial screen having the house identification code input field in the system screen database 12a. Is stored.

Housing transactions using this system will be described below.

For example, a buyer of a home determined through a real estate company (including a builder) applies for a mortgage to a financial institution and requests a third-party deposit company to deposit the home purchase price. After that, the financial institution makes an appraisal request for the house to a third-party depositary company, and the third-party depositary company that receives the appraisal request receives information on the identification code of the house (for example, the information is obtained from the real estate company). At the same time, a request for evaluation of the house is made to a third-party evaluation institution by e-mail or the like. This third-party evaluation institution performs the inspection based on the evaluation system of the used house and the evaluation shown in FIG. 11 in the same manner as the above-mentioned warranty renewal of the first embodiment, and the data of the evaluation result is used for the customer building. Store in the database 12e. Note that, in the present embodiment, the inspection is performed by a third-party evaluation organization, so the mobile terminal 20 and the imaging device 30 are also owned by the third-party evaluation organization.

Then, the operator of the third-party depository company displays the above-mentioned system initial screen on the display section of the terminal. Then, the operator inputs the ID and password into the input field on the system initial screen from the input unit and clicks the deposit start button on the system initial screen. After that, the CPU of the terminal for the third-party depository company transmits the data of the ID and the password and the data relating to the depositing start command to the server 10. Here, it is assumed that the ID and password match any of the plurality of IDs and passwords in the authorized user database 12b. Then, the CPU of the server 10 reads the data of the above-mentioned deposit initial screen from the system screen database 12a and transmits it to the terminal for the third party depository company.

Next, the operator of the third-party deposit company inputs the identification code of the house into the identification code input field on the initial deposit screen displayed on the terminal for the third-party deposit company, and clicks the send button. And sends it to the server 10. As a result, the CPU of the server 10 that has received the identification code data reads the evaluation result data from the customer building database 12e and sends it to the third-party depository company terminal. At that time, server 1
The CPU of 0 also stores the data of the history (performance evaluation at the time of new construction, inspection result and evaluation result at the time of inspection such as inspection, maintenance history, etc.) of the house in the customer building database 12e in the terminal for the third-party depository company. Can be sent. The third-party depository company appraises the house (determines the collateral value) based on the received evaluation result, and transmits the appraisal result to the financial institution. For example, the communication may be performed by e-mail,
Alternatively, the appraisal result may be stored as a database in the storage unit 12 of the server 10 and read by the financial institution from the server 10.

Subsequently, the financial institution determines whether or not to provide the loan based on the appraisal result, and if the loan is possible, deposits the loan to a third-party depository company. Here, a loan contract is concluded between the financial institution and the buyer of the house, and the third-party deposit company pays the selling price to the seller of the house.

According to this system, as shown in the first embodiment, the history of the house (building) to be traded (performance evaluation at the time of new construction, inspection result and evaluation result at inspection such as inspection,
Since the maintenance history etc.) is clear and it is through a third-party escrow company, it becomes easier for financial institutions to enter the second-hand housing market, and in addition to the effects of the first embodiment described above, the second-hand housing market becomes more active. Can be realized.

In this embodiment, the third-party depository company is independently set in the system, but the invention is not limited to this. For example, a third-party evaluation institution can perform the business of a third-party depository company to perform the appraisal based on its own evaluation, so not only the business but also the efficiency of the system can be achieved, which is extremely useful. It will be

[0091]

Since the building evaluation / assurance system according to the present invention is evaluated and assured by a fair third party evaluation organization, its reliability can be ensured. In addition, since inspection information and evaluation information based on images from the time of new construction can be stored in a database, it is possible to grasp the situation such as deterioration over time in time series when evaluating such a building, and the current or future It can be used to judge the collateral value. Furthermore, in addition to pre-establishing such an established system, the evaluation can be performed at a place desired by the user without burden, so that entry of a third-party evaluation institution can be promoted. Furthermore, since the guarantee is renewed on the assumption that maintenance is performed on the inconvenient part, it is possible to maintain the performance of the building and prevent the collateral value from dropping sharply. As described above, according to the present invention, since it is possible to improve the collateral value of a building while ensuring the reliability of inspections and evaluations, it is easy to take a loan from a financial institution and to activate the used building market. It is possible to plan. In addition, since non-life insurance companies can use historical data such as images as an index for determining the durability of buildings, it is possible to set a discount or basic contract on the basic rate of insurance, thus reducing the burden on the insured. Can be planned.

[Brief description of drawings]

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a first embodiment of a building evaluation / assurance system according to the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of an inspection screen according to the present embodiment.

FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of a format of a new construction evaluation document according to the present embodiment.

FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of a format of a warranty renewal evaluation document according to the present embodiment.

5 is a diagram showing a continuation of the format of the guarantee renewal evaluation document shown in FIG. 4;

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of a format of a guarantee certificate according to the present embodiment.

FIG. 7 is a diagram showing an example of a flow of evaluation / assurance according to the present embodiment.

FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing an inspection procedure according to the present embodiment.

FIG. 9 is a flowchart showing an evaluation procedure at the time of new construction according to the present embodiment.

FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing a guarantee issuing procedure according to the present embodiment.

FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing an evaluation procedure at the time of guarantee renewal according to the present embodiment.

[Explanation of symbols]

10 servers 12 Memory 13 Control unit 20 mobile terminals 30 Imaging device 40 Third-party evaluation organization 50 Internet 121C inspection screen 121F New construction evaluation form 122F Guarantee Renewal Evaluation Form 123F Guarantee format

   ─────────────────────────────────────────────────── ─── Continued front page    (72) Inventor Yuji Kurose             3-13-14 Sakainancho, Musashino City, Tokyo Stock             Ceremony company Iida Sangyo F-term (reference) 5B046 AA03 BA01 CA06 GA01 JA01                       KA05

Claims (6)

[Claims] 1. The inspection screen data in which predetermined inspection items among various inspection items based on a predetermined inspection standard of a building read from a server to a portable terminal via the Internet are described in the read inspection screen data. The inspection result data is created by pasting the image of the inspection target part of the building corresponding to the inspection item in the data, and the inspection result data is transmitted from the mobile terminal to the server and stored in the storage unit of the server. The inspection process to be stored, and the terminal on the side of the third-party evaluation server, the inspection result data of the various inspection items and the evaluation form data in which the various evaluation items based on the predetermined evaluation criteria of the building are described. From the Internet via the Internet, and inputs the evaluation result evaluated based on the read inspection result data to the evaluation form data to create the evaluation data. An evaluation step of transmitting the evaluation report data from the terminal on the side of the personal evaluation institution to the server and storing it in the storage unit of the server, and a terminal on the side of the third-party evaluation institution if the evaluation result is acceptable in this evaluation step. In the above, the guarantee form data of the building is read from the server via the Internet, and the guarantee form data is created by inputting predetermined items to the read guarantee form data, and the guarantee form data is generated from the terminal of the third-party evaluation institution side. And a guarantee process for transmitting the information to a server and storing it in a storage unit of the server, and a building evaluation / assurance system. 2. An evaluation / assurance process at the time of new construction, in which an inspection related to the inspection process and an evaluation related to the evaluation process are performed at the time of new construction of the building, and the guarantee process creates warranty data with a defect guarantee at new construction. , An inspection process for performing an inspection related to the inspection process at a predetermined inspection described in the guarantee certificate with a defect warranty for new construction, and an inspection related to the inspection process and an evaluation related to the evaluation process at the time of renewal of the guarantee of the building. The building evaluation / assurance system according to claim 1, further comprising: an assurance / renewal evaluation / assurance step of performing an update guarantee data in the assurance step. 3. The building evaluation according to claim 2, wherein the guarantee renewal evaluation / guarantee process evaluation process is also performed by using the inspection result data of the new construction evaluation / guarantee process and inspection process. / Warranty system. 4. The warranty is renewed on the condition that the maintenance is pointed out when it is determined that the maintenance is required as a result of the evaluation at the time of warranty renewal / evaluation by the assurance process. The building evaluation / assurance system described in 3. 5. A used building inspection / evaluation process for performing an inspection related to the inspection process and an evaluation related to the evaluation process at the time of buying and selling a used building.
Or the building evaluation / assurance system according to 4. 6. A used building inspection / evaluation process for performing an inspection related to the inspection process and an evaluation related to the evaluation process at the time of buying and selling a used building, wherein the used building inspection / evaluation process includes: 5. The building evaluation / assurance system according to claim 2, wherein the evaluation / assurance process at the time of new construction, the inspection process, and the inspection result data of the evaluation / assurance process at the time of guarantee renewal are also used.