JP2001247949A - Hot dip galvannealed steel sheet excellent in press formability - Google Patents

Hot dip galvannealed steel sheet excellent in press formability

Info

Publication number
JP2001247949A
JP2001247949A JP2000110003A JP2000110003A JP2001247949A JP 2001247949 A JP2001247949 A JP 2001247949A JP 2000110003 A JP2000110003 A JP 2000110003A JP 2000110003 A JP2000110003 A JP 2000110003A JP 2001247949 A JP2001247949 A JP 2001247949A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
steel sheet
flat portion
area ratio
plating
groove
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2000110003A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP3575391B2 (en
Inventor
Shinya Okude
進也 奥出
Kaoru Sato
馨 佐藤
Shoichiro Taira
章一郎 平
Yoshiharu Sugimoto
芳春 杉本
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Engineering Corp
Original Assignee
NKK Corp
Nippon Kokan Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by NKK Corp, Nippon Kokan Ltd filed Critical NKK Corp
Priority to JP2000110003A priority Critical patent/JP3575391B2/en
Publication of JP2001247949A publication Critical patent/JP2001247949A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3575391B2 publication Critical patent/JP3575391B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Coating With Molten Metal (AREA)

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a hot dip galvannealed steel sheet capable of stably obtaining excellent press formability because of its small sliding resistance and excellent powdering resistance in press forming. SOLUTION: In this hot dip galvannealed steel sheet, the surface of plating is provided with a flat part, and grooves with a depth of 0.1 to 5.0 μm are present in 0.1 to 30.0% by area ratio. Moreover, the area ratio of the flat part in the surface of the plating is 10 to 90%. In the case the flat part on the surface of the steel sheet is formed, a die is directly contacted with the flat part at the time of press forming. When the above grooves are formed on the flat part, lubricating oil infiltrates into the grooves and is retained, so that its slidability improves.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】この発明は、プレス成形性に
優れた合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板に関するものである。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a galvannealed steel sheet having excellent press formability.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板は、亜鉛めっ
き鋼板と比較して塗装性及び溶接性に優れることから、
自動車や家電製品等に広く利用されている。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheets have better paintability and weldability than galvanized steel sheets.
Widely used for automobiles and home appliances.

【0003】このような合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板は、
プレス成形を施されて目的の用途に供される。しかし、
合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板は、冷延鋼板に比べてプレス
成形性が劣るという欠点を有する。これは合金化溶融亜
鉛めっき鋼板とプレス金型との摺動抵抗が、冷延鋼板の
場合に比較して大きいことが原因である。即ち、ビード
と亜鉛系めっき鋼板との摺動抵抗が著しく大きい部分
で、合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板がプレス金型に流入しに
くくなり、鋼板の破断が起こりやすい。
[0003] Such an alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet is
It is subjected to press molding and used for the intended use. But,
The alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet has a drawback that press formability is inferior to cold-rolled steel sheet. This is because the sliding resistance between the alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet and the press die is greater than that of the cold-rolled steel sheet. That is, in a portion where the sliding resistance between the bead and the galvanized steel sheet is extremely large, the galvannealed steel sheet hardly flows into the press die, and the steel sheet is easily broken.

【0004】亜鉛系めっき鋼板のプレス成形性を向上さ
せる方法としては、一般に高粘度の潤滑油を塗布する方
法が広く用いられている。しかしこの方法では、潤滑油
の高粘性のために、塗装工程で脱脂不良による塗装欠陥
が発生したり、またプレス時の油切れにより、プレス性
能が不安定になる等の問題がある。前記問題を解決する
には、潤滑油の塗布量を極力低減できることが必要であ
り、そのためには、合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板のプレス
成形性を改善することが必要となる。
[0004] As a method for improving the press formability of a galvanized steel sheet, a method of applying a high-viscosity lubricating oil is generally widely used. However, in this method, there are problems such as the occurrence of coating defects due to poor degreasing in the coating process due to the high viscosity of the lubricating oil, and the unstable press performance due to running out of oil during pressing. In order to solve the above problem, it is necessary to minimize the amount of lubricating oil applied, and for that purpose, it is necessary to improve the press formability of the galvannealed steel sheet.

【0005】上述した問題を解決する方法として、特開
昭53−60332号公報および特開平2−19048
3号公報は、亜鉛系めっき鋼板の表面に電解処理、浸漬
処理、塗布酸化処理、または加熱処理を施すことによ
り、ZnOを主体とする酸化膜を形成させて溶接性、ま
たは加工性を向上させる技術を開示している。
As a method for solving the above-mentioned problem, Japanese Patent Laid-Open Publication No. Sho 53-60332 and Japanese Patent Laid-Open Publication No. 2-19048
No. 3 discloses that an oxide film mainly composed of ZnO is formed by subjecting a surface of a galvanized steel sheet to electrolytic treatment, immersion treatment, coating oxidation treatment, or heat treatment to improve weldability or workability. Disclosure technology.

【0006】特開平4−88196号公報は、亜鉛系め
っき鋼板の表面に、リン酸ナトリウム5〜60g/lを
含みpH2〜6の水溶液中にめっき鋼板を浸漬するか、
電解処理、また、上記水溶液を散布することによりP酸
化物を主体とした酸化膜を形成して、プレス成形性及び
化成処理性を向上させる技術を開示している。
JP-A-4-88196 discloses that a galvanized steel sheet is immersed in an aqueous solution containing 5 to 60 g / l of sodium phosphate and having a pH of 2 to 6 on the surface of a galvanized steel sheet.
There is disclosed a technique of forming an oxide film mainly composed of P oxide by spraying the aqueous solution and electrolytic treatment to improve press formability and chemical conversion treatment.

【0007】特開平3−191093号公報は、亜鉛系
めっき鋼板の表面に電解処理、浸漬処理、塗布処理、塗
布酸化処理、または加熱処理により、Ni酸化物を生成
させることによりプレス成形性および化成処理性を向上
させる技術を開示している。
[0007] Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. Hei 3-191093 discloses a press-formability and a chemical conversion by forming a Ni oxide on a surface of a galvanized steel sheet by electrolytic treatment, dipping treatment, coating treatment, coating oxidation treatment, or heating treatment. A technique for improving processability is disclosed.

【0008】特開平7−18402号公報は、合金化溶
融亜鉛めっき鋼板の表面に凹部を形成させることで、潤
滑油を鋼板表面に保持しやすくし、プレス成形性を向上
させる技術を開示している。
Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 7-18402 discloses a technique for forming a concave portion on the surface of an alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet so that lubricating oil can be easily held on the steel sheet surface and press formability is improved. I have.

【0009】[0009]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかしながら、上述し
た表面酸化膜を付与するという先行技術を合金化溶融亜
鉛めっき鋼板に適用した場合、プレス成形性の改善効果
を安定して得ることはできない。発明者らは、この原因
について詳細な検討を行った。その結果、合金化溶融め
っき鋼板はAl酸化物が不均一に存在することにより表
面の反応性が不均一であること、及び表面の凹凸が大き
いことが原因であることを見出した。即ち、上述した先
行技術を合金化溶融めっき鋼板に適用した場合、表面の
反応性が不均一であるため、電解処理、浸漬処理、塗布
酸化処理及び加熱処理等を行っても所定の皮膜を表面に
均一に形成することは困難であり、反応性の低い部分
(Al酸化物量が多い部分)では酸化物層の膜厚が薄く
なってしまう。また、表面の凹凸が大きいため、プレス
成型時にプレス金型と直接接触するのは表面の凸部とな
るが、凸部のうち酸化物層の膜厚の薄い部分と金型との
接触部での摺動抵抗が大きくなり、プレス成形性の改善
効果が十分には得られない。
However, when the above-described prior art of providing a surface oxide film is applied to an alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet, the effect of improving press formability cannot be obtained stably. The inventors have studied in detail the cause. As a result, it has been found that the alloyed hot-dip coated steel sheet is caused by non-uniform surface reactivity due to non-uniform Al oxide, and large surface irregularities. That is, when the above-described prior art is applied to an alloyed hot-dip coated steel sheet, the reactivity of the surface is non-uniform. It is difficult to form the oxide layer uniformly, and the thickness of the oxide layer becomes thin in a portion having low reactivity (a portion having a large amount of Al oxide). In addition, since the surface irregularities are large, the direct contact with the press mold at the time of press molding is the convex part of the surface, but in the convex part, the contact part between the thin part of the oxide layer and the mold. , The sliding resistance is increased, and the effect of improving press formability cannot be sufficiently obtained.

【0010】また、凹部を形成させる技術についても、
これだけでは十分なプレス成形性が得られないことがわ
かった。これは、凹部には潤滑油が溜まり易いが、逆
に、摺動性に与える影響が大きい凸部には潤滑油が溜ま
りにくいという問題があるためと考えられる。
[0010] Further, regarding the technique for forming the concave portion,
It turned out that sufficient press moldability cannot be obtained by this alone. This is considered to be because lubricating oil easily accumulates in the concave portion, but conversely, lubricating oil hardly accumulates in the convex portion, which has a large effect on slidability.

【0011】この発明は上記の問題点を解決するために
なされたもので、プレス成形性に優れた合金化溶融めっ
き鋼板を提供することを目的とする。
The present invention has been made to solve the above problems, and has as its object to provide an alloyed hot-dip coated steel sheet having excellent press formability.

【0012】[0012]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明者らは、上述した
目的を達成すべく、鋭意研究を重ねた結果、合金化溶融
亜鉛めっき鋼板のめっき表面に平坦部を形成し、さらに
平坦部に溝を形成することで、安定して優れたプレス成
形性が得られることを知見した。
Means for Solving the Problems The inventors of the present invention have conducted intensive studies in order to achieve the above-mentioned object, and as a result, have formed a flat portion on the galvannealed steel sheet and further formed a flat portion on the flat surface. It has been found that by forming the groove, excellent press formability can be obtained stably.

【0013】合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板のめっき表面の
上記平坦部は、周囲と比較すると凸部として存在する。
めっき表面の電子顕微鏡写真を図1に示す。図1で黒い
コントラストで見える部分が平坦部である。プレス成形
時に実際にプレス金型と接触するのは、この黒いコント
ラストで見える平坦部が主体となるため、この平坦部に
おける摺動抵抗を小さくすれば、プレス成形性を安定し
て改善することができる。
The flat portion on the surface of the galvannealed steel sheet exists as a convex portion as compared with the surroundings.
An electron micrograph of the plating surface is shown in FIG. In FIG. 1, the portion seen with black contrast is the flat portion. The actual contact with the press mold during press molding is mainly due to the flat part that can be seen with this black contrast, so if the sliding resistance in this flat part is reduced, the press formability can be stably improved. it can.

【0014】この平坦部における摺動抵抗を小さくする
には、めっき層と金型との凝着を防ぐのが有効であり、
そのためには、めっき層表面のすべり性を改善すること
が有効である。これに基づき検討を進めた結果、平坦部
に溝を形成させるが有効であることを見出した。
In order to reduce the sliding resistance in the flat portion, it is effective to prevent adhesion between the plating layer and the mold.
For that purpose, it is effective to improve the slipperiness of the plating layer surface. As a result of study based on this, it was found that it is effective to form a groove in a flat portion.

【0015】本発明は、以上の知見に基いてなされたも
のであり、第1発明は、めっき表面に平坦部を有し、そ
の平坦部に、0.1μm以上、5.0μm以下の深さの
溝が面積率にして0.1%以上、30.0%以下存在し
ていることを特徴とする合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板を提
供する。
The present invention has been made based on the above findings. The first invention has a flat portion on a plating surface, and the flat portion has a depth of 0.1 μm or more and 5.0 μm or less. The present invention provides an alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet characterized in that the grooves are present in an area ratio of 0.1% or more and 30.0% or less.

【0016】第2発明は、第1発明において、めっき表
面における上記平坦部の面積率が10%以上、90%以
下であることを特徴とする合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板を
提供する。
According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided the galvannealed steel sheet according to the first aspect, wherein an area ratio of the flat portion on the plating surface is 10% or more and 90% or less.

【0017】[0017]

【発明の実施の形態】合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板は、合
金化処理時の鋼板−めっき界面の反応性の差により、め
っき表面に凹凸が存在する。本発明では、合金化溶融亜
鉛めっき鋼板に調質圧延を施す。調質圧延を施すことに
よって、めっき表面の凹凸を緩和し表面を平滑にすると
同時にめっき表面の凸部を平坦にする。前記で形成され
た合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板表面の平坦部は、プレス成
形時に金型が直接接触する部分であるため、この部分の
すべり性を良くすることが摺動性の向上には重要であ
る。
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION An alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet has irregularities on the plating surface due to the difference in reactivity between the steel sheet and the plating interface during the alloying treatment. In the present invention, temper rolling is performed on the galvannealed steel sheet. By performing the temper rolling, the unevenness of the plating surface is alleviated and the surface is smoothed, and at the same time, the projections on the plating surface are flattened. The flat part of the surface of the alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet formed as described above is a part where the mold is in direct contact at the time of press forming, so it is important to improve the slipperiness of this part in improving the sliding property. is there.

【0018】この観点から検討した結果、平坦部に溝を
形成させることが、摺動性の向上に有効であることがわ
かった。これは、この溝に潤滑油が浸透して保持される
ことによるものと考えられる。図2は、本発明の実施の
形態に係る合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板のめっき表面の平
坦部の電子顕微鏡写真の例である。図2において、黒い
コントラストで見える部分(図中、矢印の先端部分)が
平坦部に存在する溝である。
As a result of examination from this viewpoint, it was found that forming a groove in the flat portion was effective for improving the slidability. This is considered to be because lubricating oil permeates and is retained in the groove. FIG. 2 is an example of an electron micrograph of a flat portion of a galvannealed steel sheet according to an embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 2, a portion that is seen in black contrast (the end of the arrow in the figure) is a groove existing in the flat portion.

【0019】上記の溝としては、0.1μm以上、5.
0μm以下の深さの溝を平坦部のうち面積率にして0.
1%以上、30.0%以下とすることにより、良好な摺
動性を示す合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板が得られる。溝の
深さを0.1μm以上に限定した理由は、0.1μm未
満では摺動性の改善効果が少なく、十分なプレス成形性
が得られないためである。面積率を0.1%以上に限定
した理由も同じである。また、溝の深さを5.0μm以
下、面積率30.0%以下に限定した理由は、これを超
えると皮膜が脆くなり耐パウダリング性が劣化するため
である。
The above-mentioned groove has a diameter of 0.1 μm or more.
A groove having a depth of 0 μm or less is defined as an area ratio of 0.
When the content is 1% or more and 30.0% or less, an alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet exhibiting good sliding properties can be obtained. The reason why the depth of the groove is limited to 0.1 μm or more is that if the depth is less than 0.1 μm, the effect of improving the slidability is small and sufficient press moldability cannot be obtained. The reason for limiting the area ratio to 0.1% or more is the same. The reason for limiting the depth of the groove to 5.0 μm or less and the area ratio to 30.0% or less is that if it exceeds this, the film becomes brittle and the powdering resistance deteriorates.

【0020】なお、本発明において、平坦部の溝とは、
表面から見た形状が細長い所謂溝状のくぼみだけでな
く、表面から見た形状が多角形のくぼみ(図2参照)な
ど、平坦部に存在するくぼみを広く指しており、溝の深
さは、連続したくぼみ部分の平均深さを指している。
In the present invention, the groove in the flat portion is
The shape as viewed from the surface refers not only to an elongated so-called groove-shaped depression, but also to a depression existing in a flat portion, such as a polygonal depression (see FIG. 2), as viewed from the surface. , Refers to the average depth of the continuous depression.

【0021】溝の深さや面積率は、原子間力顕微鏡や3
次元観察用走査型電子顕微鏡などにより測定できる。
The depth and area ratio of the groove can be determined by using an atomic force microscope or 3
It can be measured by a scanning electron microscope for dimensional observation.

【0022】また、めっき表面における上記平坦部の面
積率は、10%以上90%以下とするのが望ましい。1
0%未満では、実際に金型に接触する面積のうち、平坦
部を除く部分(凹部)と金型との接触面積が大きくな
り、溝による摺動性改善効果を発揮できる平坦部と金型
との接触面積が小さくなるため、プレス成形性の改善効
果が小さくなる。また、平坦部を除く部分も、プレス成
型時に潤滑油を保持する役割を持つ。平坦部を除く部分
の面積率が10%未満になる(平坦部の面積率が90%
を超える)とプレス成形時に油切れを起こしやすくな
り、プレス成形性の改善効果が小さくなる。このなかで
も、平坦部の面積率は20%以上80%以下の範囲が望
ましく、30%以上70%以下の範囲がより望ましい。
The area ratio of the flat portion on the plating surface is desirably 10% or more and 90% or less. 1
If it is less than 0%, of the area that actually contacts the mold, the contact area between the part (recess) excluding the flat part and the mold becomes large, and the flat part and the mold that can exhibit the slidability improvement effect by the groove. Therefore, the effect of improving press formability is reduced. Also, the portion excluding the flat portion has a role of retaining lubricating oil during press molding. The area ratio of the portion excluding the flat portion is less than 10% (the area ratio of the flat portion is 90%
), The oil tends to run out during press molding, and the effect of improving press formability is reduced. Among these, the area ratio of the flat portion is preferably in the range of 20% to 80%, more preferably in the range of 30% to 70%.

【0023】なお、めっき表面の平坦部は、光学顕微鏡
あるいは走査型電子顕微鏡等で表面を観察することで容
易に識別可能である。めっき表面における平坦部の面積
率は、上記顕微鏡写真を画像解析することにより求める
ことができる。
The flat portion of the plating surface can be easily identified by observing the surface with an optical microscope or a scanning electron microscope. The area ratio of the flat portion on the plating surface can be determined by image analysis of the micrograph.

【0024】本発明において、合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼
板のめっき皮膜のFe濃度及びAl濃度については特に
規定しないが、めっき層としては、主としてδ相からな
り、更にζ相を含んでいる構造が理想的である。Fe濃
度の低いζ相あるいはη相が主体となると、めっき皮膜
が低融点で軟質となるため、プレス成型時にいわゆるフ
レーキングとなってめっき皮膜が金型に堆積し、押しキ
ズによる製品歩留まりの低下や金型手入れの頻度増によ
る生産能率の低下をもたらすことがある。また、Fe濃
度の高いΓ相、Γ相が主体となると、プレス加工時に
めっき皮膜がはく離するパウダリングが生じやすくな
り、はく離粉による押しキズが発生しやすい。従って、
めっき皮膜としてはδ相主体が有利である。
In the present invention, although the Fe concentration and the Al concentration of the plating film of the galvannealed steel sheet are not particularly specified, the structure of the plating layer mainly composed of δ phase and further containing ζ phase is ideal. It is a target. If the ζ phase or η phase with a low Fe concentration is the main component, the plating film becomes soft with a low melting point, so-called flaking during press molding, the plating film is deposited on the mold, and the product yield decreases due to press scratches. In addition, the production efficiency may decrease due to the increase in the frequency of mold and mold care. Further, when the Γ phase and Γ 1 phase having a high Fe concentration are mainly used, powdering in which the plating film peels off during press working is apt to occur, and pressing scratches due to flaking are liable to occur. Therefore,
The δ phase is mainly used as the plating film.

【0025】本発明に係る合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板を
製造するには、亜鉛めっき浴でめっきし、合金化処理を
行い、更に調質圧延を行う。亜鉛めっき浴中にはAlが
添加されていることが必要であるが、Al以外の添加元
素成分は特に限定されない。すなわち、Alの他にF
e,Pb,Sb,Si,Sn,Mg,Mn,Ni,T
i,Li,Cuなどが含有または添加されていても、本
発明の効果が損なわれるものではない。合金化処理で
は、合金化処理条件を調整してめっき皮膜を主としてδ
相からなり、更にζ相を含んでいる構造にする。次いで
調質圧延でめっき表面に平坦部を形成する。その際、圧
延条件を調整し、平坦部の面積率を前記で説明した範囲
にすることが望ましい。
In order to manufacture the galvannealed steel sheet according to the present invention, plating is performed in a galvanizing bath, alloying treatment is performed, and temper rolling is further performed. It is necessary that Al is added to the galvanizing bath, but additional element components other than Al are not particularly limited. That is, in addition to Al, F
e, Pb, Sb, Si, Sn, Mg, Mn, Ni, T
Even if i, Li, Cu, etc. are contained or added, the effects of the present invention are not impaired. In the alloying treatment, the plating film is mainly adjusted to δ by adjusting the alloying treatment conditions.
The structure consists of a phase and further contains a phase. Next, a flat portion is formed on the plating surface by temper rolling. At that time, it is desirable that the rolling conditions be adjusted so that the area ratio of the flat portion is in the range described above.

【0026】次いで、めっき表面の平坦部に溝を形成す
る。溝の形成方法としては、特に限定されるものではな
く、酸性溶液への浸漬や電解処理、表面研削などの方法
を採用できる。
Next, a groove is formed in the flat portion of the plating surface. The method for forming the grooves is not particularly limited, and methods such as immersion in an acidic solution, electrolytic treatment, and surface grinding can be employed.

【0027】[0027]

【実施例】次に、本発明を実施例により更に詳細に説明
する。板厚0.8mmの冷延鋼板上に、常法の合金化溶
融亜鉛めっき法により、Alを添加した亜鉛めっき浴で
めっき、合金化処理して、めっき付着量60g/m
所定のFe濃度のめっき皮膜を形成し、更に調質圧延を
行った。この際、調質圧延の圧下荷重を変化させること
で、表面における平坦部の面積率を変化させた。引き続
き、平坦部に溝を形成するため、上記合金化溶融めっき
鋼板をpH3.0、浴温50℃の塩酸溶液中に浸漬し
た。ここで、濃度および処理時間を種々の所定値に変化
させて、平坦部における0.1μm以上、5.0μm以
下の深さの溝の面積率を調整した。
Next, the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to examples. On a cold-rolled steel sheet having a thickness of 0.8 mm, plating and alloying are performed in a galvanizing bath containing Al by an ordinary galvannealing method, and the coating weight is 60 g / m 2 ,
A plating film having a predetermined Fe concentration was formed, and further temper rolling was performed. At this time, the area ratio of the flat portion on the surface was changed by changing the rolling load of the temper rolling. Subsequently, in order to form a groove in the flat part, the alloyed hot-dip coated steel sheet was immersed in a hydrochloric acid solution having a pH of 3.0 and a bath temperature of 50 ° C. Here, the density and the processing time were changed to various predetermined values, and the area ratio of the groove having a depth of 0.1 μm or more and 5.0 μm or less in the flat portion was adjusted.

【0028】次いで、以上の様に作製した供試体(試験
材NO.2〜11)について、平坦部における溝の深さ
と面積率、平坦部の面積率の測定、プレス成形性試験お
よび耐パウダリング性試験を行なった。溝の深さと面積
率の測定、プレス成形性試験および耐パウダリング性試
験は以下のようにして行った。
Next, with respect to the test pieces (test materials Nos. 2 to 11) prepared as described above, measurement of the depth and area ratio of the groove in the flat portion, the measurement of the area ratio of the flat portion, press formability test, and powdering resistance A sex test was performed. The measurement of the depth and area ratio of the groove, the press formability test and the powdering resistance test were performed as follows.

【0029】また、比較のために、調質圧延、アルカリ
処理、突起物形成処理の何れも施してない合金化亜鉛め
っき鋼板を作製(試験材No.1)し、同様の調査を行
った。
Further, for comparison, an alloyed galvanized steel sheet which was not subjected to any of the temper rolling, the alkali treatment, and the projection forming treatment was prepared (test material No. 1), and the same investigation was conducted.

【0030】(1)溝の深さと面積率の測定 原子間力顕微鏡(Digital Instrumen
t社製Nanoscope2)を用いて、溝の平均深
さ、溝の平均深さが0.1〜5.0μmの範囲にある溝
の面積率を測定した。なお、溝の深さは、溝に隣接する
平坦部の上面を基準面とし、この位置を基準として溝の
平均深さ(n=5)を求めた。
(1) Measurement of Groove Depth and Area Ratio Atomic Force Microscope (Digital Instrument)
The average depth of the groove and the area ratio of the groove where the average depth of the groove was in the range of 0.1 to 5.0 μm were measured using Nanoscope 2) manufactured by t Company. The depth of the groove was determined by using the upper surface of the flat portion adjacent to the groove as a reference surface, and using this position as a reference, the average depth of the groove (n = 5).

【0031】(2)プレス成形性評価試験 「摩擦係数測定試験」プレス成形性を評価するために、
各供試体の摩擦係数を、以下のようにして測定した。
(2) Evaluation test for press formability "Test for measuring friction coefficient" In order to evaluate press formability,
The friction coefficient of each specimen was measured as follows.

【0032】図3は、摩擦係数測定装置を示す概略正面
図である。同図に示すように、供試体から採取した摩擦
係数測定用試料1が試料台2に固定され、試料台2は、
水平移動可能なスライドテーブル3の上面に固定されて
いる。スライドテーブル3の下面には、これに接したロ
ーラ4を有する上下動可能なスライドテーブル支持台5
が設けられ、これを押上げることにより、ビード6によ
る摩擦係数測定用試料1への押付荷重Nを測定するため
の第1ロードセル7が、スライドテーブル支持台5に取
付けられている。上記押付力を作用させた状態でスライ
ドテーブル3を水平方向へ移動させるための摺動抵抗力
Fを測定するための第2ロードセル8が、スライドテー
ブル3の一方の端部に取付けられている。なお、潤滑油
として、日本パーカライジング社製ノックスラスト55
0HNを試料1の表面に塗布して試験を行った。
FIG. 3 is a schematic front view showing a friction coefficient measuring device. As shown in the figure, a sample 1 for measuring a coefficient of friction collected from a specimen is fixed to a sample table 2, and the sample table 2 is
It is fixed to the upper surface of the horizontally movable slide table 3. On the lower surface of the slide table 3, a vertically movable slide table support 5 having rollers 4 in contact therewith
The first load cell 7 for measuring the pressing load N of the bead 6 against the friction coefficient measurement sample 1 by being pushed up is attached to the slide table support 5. A second load cell 8 for measuring a sliding resistance force F for moving the slide table 3 in the horizontal direction while the pressing force is applied is attached to one end of the slide table 3. As a lubricating oil, Noxlast 55 manufactured by Nippon Parkerizing Co., Ltd. was used.
The test was performed by applying 0HN to the surface of Sample 1.

【0033】図4および図5は、使用したビードの形状
・寸法を示す概略斜視図である。ビード6の下面が試料
1の表面に押しつけられた状態で摺動する。図4に示す
ビード6の形状は、幅10mm、試料の摺動方向長さ1
2mm、摺動方向両端の下部は曲率4.5mmRの曲面
で構成され、試料が押付けられるビード下面は幅10m
m、摺動方向長さ3mmの平面を有する。図5に示すビ
ード6の形状は、幅10mm、試料の摺動方向長さ69
mm、摺動方向両端の下部は曲率4.5mmRの曲面で
構成され、試料が押付けられるビード下面は幅10m
m、摺動方向長さ60mmの平面を有する。
FIGS. 4 and 5 are schematic perspective views showing the shapes and dimensions of the beads used. The bead 6 slides while being pressed against the surface of the sample 1. The shape of the bead 6 shown in FIG.
The lower part of both ends in the sliding direction is a curved surface with a curvature of 4.5 mmR, and the lower surface of the bead on which the sample is pressed is 10 m in width.
m, a plane having a length of 3 mm in the sliding direction. The shape of the bead 6 shown in FIG. 5 has a width of 10 mm and a length 69 in the sliding direction of the sample.
mm, the lower part at both ends in the sliding direction is a curved surface with a curvature of 4.5 mmR, and the lower surface of the bead on which the sample is pressed is 10 m in width.
m, a plane having a length of 60 mm in the sliding direction.

【0034】摩擦係数測定試験は、以下に示す2条件で
行い、供試体とビードとの間の摩擦係数μは、式:μ=
F/Nで算出した。
The friction coefficient measurement test was performed under the following two conditions. The friction coefficient μ between the specimen and the bead was calculated by the equation: μ =
It was calculated by F / N.

【0035】[条件1] 図4に示すビードを用い、押
付荷重N:400kgf、試料の引き抜き速度(スライ
ドテーブル3の水平移動速度):100cm/minと
した。この時、評価は、摩擦係数により行ない、◎:
0.135未満、○:0.135以上、0.15未満、
△:0.15以上、0.17未満、×:0.17以上、
とした。
[Condition 1] Using the bead shown in FIG. 4, the pressing load N was 400 kgf, and the sample withdrawing speed (horizontal moving speed of the slide table 3) was 100 cm / min. At this time, the evaluation was performed based on the coefficient of friction.
Less than 0.135, ○: 0.135 or more, less than 0.15,
Δ: 0.15 or more, less than 0.17, ×: 0.17 or more,
And

【0036】[条件2] 図5に示すビードを用い、押
付荷重N:400kgf、試料の引き抜き速度:20c
m/minとした。この時、評価は、摩擦係数により行
ない、◎:0.18未満、○:0.18以上、0.20
未満、△:0.20以上、0.23未満、×:0.23
以上、とした。
[Condition 2] Using the bead shown in FIG. 5, the pressing load N: 400 kgf, the withdrawal speed of the sample: 20 c
m / min. At this time, the evaluation was performed based on the coefficient of friction, ◎: less than 0.18, :: 0.18 or more, 0.20
Less than, Δ: 0.20 or more, less than 0.23, ×: 0.23
That is all.

【0037】(3)耐パウダリング性試験 耐パウダリング性については、ドロービード試験を行な
い、単位面積当たりの皮膜の剥離量を測定した。皮膜剥
離量10g/m未満を合格とした。ここで、ドロービ
ード試験とは、潤滑油を塗布した鋼板を、ビードとダイ
スで挟んだ状態で引き抜き、その後テープ剥離試験を行
ない、試験前後の重量差から、めっき皮膜の剥離量を評
価する試験方法である。ビードは先端角度90°の三角
ビードを用い、成形高さは4mm、ビードとダイスの押
し付け荷重は500kgfとした。
(3) Powdering resistance test For the powdering resistance, a draw bead test was performed to measure the amount of peeling of the film per unit area. A film peeling amount of less than 10 g / m 2 was regarded as acceptable. Here, the draw bead test is a test method in which a steel plate coated with a lubricating oil is pulled out while being sandwiched between a bead and a die, and then a tape peeling test is performed, and a peeling amount of the plating film is evaluated from a weight difference before and after the test. It is. The bead used was a triangular bead having a tip angle of 90 °, the molding height was 4 mm, and the pressing load between the bead and the die was 500 kgf.

【0038】更に、前記で得た摩擦係数測定試験結果及
び耐パウダリング性試験に基づいて、以下のように総合
評価した。 ×:条件1,2の摩擦係数の劣る方の評点が×のもの △:条件1,2の摩擦係数の劣る方の評点が△のもの、
またはドロービード試験の皮膜剥離量が10g/m
上で摩擦係数の劣る方の評点が○〜◎のもの ○:ドロービード試験の皮膜剥離量が10g/m未満
で、条件1,2の摩擦係数の劣る方の評点が○のもの ◎:ドロービード試験の皮膜剥離量が10g/m未満
で、条件1,2の摩擦係数の評点が何れも◎のもの 試験結果を表1に示す。
Further, based on the friction coefficient measurement test results obtained above and the powdering resistance test, comprehensive evaluation was made as follows. ×: The rating of the poorer coefficient of friction under the conditions 1 and 2 was ×. Δ: The rating of the poorer coefficient of friction under the conditions 1 and 2 was Δ,
Or, when the peeling amount of the film in the draw bead test is 10 g / m 2 or more and the coefficient of friction is inferior, the evaluation is 〜 to ○. ○: The peeling amount of the film in the draw bead test is less than 10 g / m 2 ,劣: The peeling amount of the film in the draw bead test was less than 10 g / m 2 , and the friction coefficients of the conditions 1 and 2 were all ◎. The test results are shown in Table 1.

【0039】[0039]

【表1】 [Table 1]

【0040】この試験結果から、下記事項が明らかであ
る。 (1)比較例1は、調質圧延が施されていないため平坦
部がないので、摩擦係数が高く、摺動性に劣る。 (2)比較例2,3は、溝の面積率が本発明範囲外であ
るため、皮膜剥離量が多く、耐パウダリング性に劣る。 (3)本発明例1〜8は、溝の面積率が本発明範囲内で
あり、摩擦係数が低下しており、摺動性が改善されてお
り、また耐パウダリング性も優れている。本発明例3〜
8は、更に平坦部の面積率が10〜90%の範囲内にあ
るため、摩擦係数が更に低下しており、摺動性の改善効
果がより優れる。
From the test results, the following matters are clear. (1) Comparative Example 1 has no flat portion because it has not been subjected to temper rolling, and thus has a high friction coefficient and poor slidability. (2) In Comparative Examples 2 and 3, since the area ratio of the groove is out of the range of the present invention, the amount of film peeling is large and the powdering resistance is poor. (3) In Examples 1 to 8 of the present invention, the area ratio of the groove is within the range of the present invention, the coefficient of friction is reduced, the slidability is improved, and the powdering resistance is excellent. Invention Examples 3 to
In No. 8, since the area ratio of the flat portion is in the range of 10 to 90%, the coefficient of friction is further reduced, and the effect of improving the slidability is more excellent.

【0041】[0041]

【発明の効果】本発明の合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板は、
プレス成形時の摺動抵抗が小さく、また更に耐パウダリ
ング性にも優れるので、安定して優れたプレス成形性が
得られる。
The alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet of the present invention comprises:
Since the sliding resistance at the time of press molding is small and the powdering resistance is also excellent, stable and excellent press moldability can be obtained.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板のめっき表面の走査
型二次電子顕微鏡写真である。
FIG. 1 is a scanning secondary electron microscope photograph of the galvannealed steel sheet.

【図2】本発明の実施の形態に係る合金化溶融亜鉛めっ
き鋼板において、めっき表面の平坦部に存在する溝を示
す走査型二次電子顕微鏡写真である。
FIG. 2 is a scanning secondary electron micrograph showing grooves existing in a flat portion of a galvanized surface of a galvannealed steel sheet according to an embodiment of the present invention.

【図3】摩擦係数測定装置を示す概略正面図である。FIG. 3 is a schematic front view showing a friction coefficient measuring device.

【図4】図3中のビード形状・寸法を示す概略斜視図で
ある。
FIG. 4 is a schematic perspective view showing a bead shape and dimensions in FIG. 3;

【図5】図3中の別のビード形状・寸法を示す概略斜視
図である。
FIG. 5 is a schematic perspective view showing another bead shape and size in FIG. 3;

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

1 摩擦係数測定用試料 2 試料台 3 スライドテーブル 4 ローラ 5 スライドテーブル支持台 6 ビード 7 第1ロードセル 8 第2ロードセル 9 レール N 押付荷重 F 摺動抵抗力 P 引張荷重 DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Sample for coefficient of friction measurement 2 Sample stand 3 Slide table 4 Roller 5 Slide table support 6 Bead 7 1st load cell 8 2nd load cell 9 Rail N Pressing load F Sliding resistance force P Tensile load

───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 平 章一郎 東京都千代田区丸の内一丁目1番2号 日 本鋼管株式会社内 (72)発明者 杉本 芳春 東京都千代田区丸の内一丁目1番2号 日 本鋼管株式会社内 Fターム(参考) 4K027 AA02 AA05 AA22 AB02 AB09 AB13 AB28 AB36 AB37 AB44 AC32 AC73 AC82 AC86 AC87 AE25  ──────────────────────────────────────────────────続 き Continuing from the front page (72) Inventor Shoichiro Hira 1-2-1, Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo Nihon Kokan Co., Ltd. (72) Yoshiharu Sugimoto 1-2-1, Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo Sun 4K027 AA02 AA05 AA22 AB02 AB09 AB13 AB28 AB36 AB37 AB44 AC32 AC73 AC82 AC86 AC87 AE25

Claims (2)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 めっき表面に平坦部を有し、その平坦部
に、0.1μm以上、5.0μm以下の深さの溝が面積
率にして0.1%以上、30.0%以下存在しているこ
とを特徴とする合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板。
1. A flat portion is provided on a plating surface, and a groove having a depth of 0.1 μm or more and 5.0 μm or less exists in the flat portion in an area ratio of 0.1% or more and 30.0% or less. An alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet.
【請求項2】 めっき表面における平坦部の面積率が1
0%以上、90%以下であることを特徴とする請求項1
に記載の合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板。
2. An area ratio of a flat portion on a plating surface is 1
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the amount is not less than 0% and not more than 90%.
2. A galvannealed steel sheet according to claim 1.
JP2000110003A 2000-03-07 2000-03-07 Galvannealed steel sheet with excellent press formability Expired - Fee Related JP3575391B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2000110003A JP3575391B2 (en) 2000-03-07 2000-03-07 Galvannealed steel sheet with excellent press formability

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2000110003A JP3575391B2 (en) 2000-03-07 2000-03-07 Galvannealed steel sheet with excellent press formability

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2001247949A true JP2001247949A (en) 2001-09-14
JP3575391B2 JP3575391B2 (en) 2004-10-13

Family

ID=18622594

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2000110003A Expired - Fee Related JP3575391B2 (en) 2000-03-07 2000-03-07 Galvannealed steel sheet with excellent press formability

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3575391B2 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2010077480A (en) * 2008-09-25 2010-04-08 Nippon Steel Corp Hot-dip zincing steel sheet, and method for manufacturing the same
KR101568525B1 (en) * 2013-12-24 2015-11-11 주식회사 포스코 Galvanized steel sheet having good formability and method for manufacturing the same

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2010077480A (en) * 2008-09-25 2010-04-08 Nippon Steel Corp Hot-dip zincing steel sheet, and method for manufacturing the same
KR101568525B1 (en) * 2013-12-24 2015-11-11 주식회사 포스코 Galvanized steel sheet having good formability and method for manufacturing the same

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3575391B2 (en) 2004-10-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5522185B2 (en) Galvanized steel sheet
JP3608519B2 (en) Method for producing alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet and alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet
WO2015129283A1 (en) Galvanized steel sheet and method for manufacturing same
JP3613195B2 (en) Alloy hot-dip galvanized steel sheet
WO2014112347A1 (en) Manufacturing method for zinc-plated steel sheet
JP2010077456A (en) Hot-dip galvanized steel sheet and method for manufacturing the same
JP5540459B2 (en) Alloy hot-dip galvanized steel sheet
JP2007231375A (en) Galvannealed steel sheet
JP5347295B2 (en) Zinc-based plated steel sheet and method for producing the same
JP3575391B2 (en) Galvannealed steel sheet with excellent press formability
JP3644402B2 (en) Alloy hot-dip galvanized steel sheet
JP5386842B2 (en) Zinc-based plated steel sheet and method for producing the same
JP5648308B2 (en) Zinc-based plated steel sheet with excellent slidability
JP5593601B2 (en) Alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet and method for producing the same
US20240052495A1 (en) Aluminum alloy-plated steel sheet having excellent workability and corrosion resistance and method for manufacturing same
JP3149801B2 (en) Alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet and method for producing the same
JP4826486B2 (en) Method for producing galvannealed steel sheet
JP2001247948A (en) Hot dip galvannealed steel sheet excellent in press formability
JP3368847B2 (en) Galvanized steel sheet with excellent press formability and adhesion
JP5163218B2 (en) Method for producing galvanized steel sheet
JP2008285706A (en) Galvannealed steel sheet
KR20110083682A (en) Galvanized steel sheet and method for manufacturing the same
JP4826017B2 (en) Alloy hot-dip galvanized steel sheet
JP2003138362A (en) Galvannealed steel sheet
JP2002256406A (en) Galvannealed steel sheet

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20031202

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20040130

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20040302

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20040427

A911 Transfer of reconsideration by examiner before appeal (zenchi)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A911

Effective date: 20040511

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20040615

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20040628

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 3575391

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080716

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090716

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100716

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100716

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110716

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110716

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120716

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120716

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130716

Year of fee payment: 9

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees