GB2505378A - Operation rescheduling support system - Google Patents
Operation rescheduling support system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- GB2505378A GB2505378A GB1321826.8A GB201321826A GB2505378A GB 2505378 A GB2505378 A GB 2505378A GB 201321826 A GB201321826 A GB 201321826A GB 2505378 A GB2505378 A GB 2505378A
- Authority
- GB
- United Kingdom
- Prior art keywords
- warning
- timetable
- information
- link
- warning information
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 claims description 36
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 2
- 241000188250 Idas Species 0.000 description 1
- 101150057104 MCIDAS gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L27/00—Central railway traffic control systems; Trackside control; Communication systems specially adapted therefor
- B61L27/10—Operations, e.g. scheduling or time tables
- B61L27/12—Preparing schedules
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L27/00—Central railway traffic control systems; Trackside control; Communication systems specially adapted therefor
- B61L27/10—Operations, e.g. scheduling or time tables
- B61L27/16—Trackside optimisation of vehicle or train operation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/40—Business processes related to the transportation industry
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
This operation rescheduling support system solves the problem of it being difficult for a dispatcher to judge which of a plurality of indicated sites pertaining to a delay event causing train delay is to be handled first because of the dispatcher being unable to see the correlation between the indicated sites or indication marks. In the operation rescheduling support system, an indication pattern detection unit detects indicated sites where delay problems are occurring at predicted times calculated by a predicted time calculation unit, and an indication link generation unit generates indication link information by detecting a correlation between the indicated sites. When the dispatcher places a mouse cursor on an indication mark displayed on an output apparatus, a reception unit detects the positional relationship between the mouse cursor and the indicated site, and an indication display unit displays the order of handling for the indicated site to which the indication mark is allotted, on the basis of the indication link information.
Description
DESCRIPTION
Title of Invention
TIMETABLE RESCHEDULING SUPPORT SYSTEM
Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relaters to an timetable rescheduling support system that allows a user to easily recognize the relationship and priority of multiple warning sites that require timetable rescheduling in a train operation management system.
Background Art
[0002] When the train operation is disrupted due to vehicle failure, bad weather or other reasons, an operator who develops a plan for recovery from train delay performs timetable rescheduling by a train operation management system using a computer to change the timetable in order to quickly recover the timetable. Byusinganexpeccedoperationdiagramof future train operation expected based on the current running result, it is possible to previously deal with failure that may occur in the future and to achieve smooth train operation.
[0003] However, when train delay occurs in the predicted timetable, there is a large difference from the original operationplan, whichmayleadtoachainreactionof disruptions such as order inconsistency. In this case, timetable rescheduling must be done by the decision of the operator.
[0004] In the related art there is disclosed a plan correction system with good operability that provides information to support the decision of operator. For example, a plan correction system disclosed in Patent Literature 1 has a central processing unit including dispiay parts, such as a monitor display part for displaying a train operation plan, running rosult, and oporation prcdiction, a prodiction display part for displaying the prediction result of train operation, a mark display part for displaying the check result of the contents of the prediction, and a suggestion display part for displaying a suggestion of recovery plans, including a display mode, a proposal mode, a package proposal mode, and the like.
Citation List Patent Literature [0005] PIL 1: Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open Mo. HEI 6 (1994) -72333
Summary of Tnvention
Technical Problem [0006] In the technology described in Patent Literature 1, there is a problem in which the relationship and priority of various types of warning marks is not clear. Thus, it is difficult for the operator to determine which one of the warnings should be handled first.
[0007] The warning sites of the failure are very likely to be complexly intertwined with each other. In other words, if the warning sites and order to be handled by timetable rescheduling arc not apprcpriato, this canpotontially lcadto thc occurrcnco of additional warning sites and an increase in the number of timetablereschedulingtasks. Ontheotherhand, ifthewarning sites are handledby an appropriate procedure, a certainhandling can be used simultaneously for multiple failures, so that it is possible to effectively remove the failures by timetable rescheduling with a small number of steps. The present invention provides a system for extracting an operation failure site causing disruption of train operationbasedon the predicted time calculation result, registering the warning train number, the occurrence station name, the warning content, the related train number, and the like, in a database as warning site information, and displaying an warning mark at the location of the operation failure site on a screen by using the registered warning information.
Solution to Problem [0008] An aspect of the present invention is an timetable rescheduling support system including: a database including a diagram data table that stores previously planned operation plan data, timetable rescheduling data input from an external terminal, and predicted timetable in which future train running is expected based on the actual train running result; and a processing unit including a predicted time calculation part for calculating thc prodictod timo of train oporation, and a receiving part for receiving an timetable rescheduling input from the external terminal.
In the timetable rescheduling support system, the database also includes an warning code definition table for defining warning information about a delay event to be detected on the predicted time, and an warning information table that stores the warning information. The processing unit includes: an warning pattern detection part for detecting warning information about the warning site of failure that requires timetable rescheduling in the predicted timetable; an warning link generation part for finding the relationship of each of the detected warning information and adding warning link information to the warning information; and an warning dispiay part for outputting the warning information and the warning link information to the outside to display the data on a soreen.
[0009] Further, in the timetable rescheduling support system, the warning information has train number information.
[0010] Further, in the timetable rescheduling support system, the warning link generation part detects the relationship between the train number information held by each of the warning information, adding a common warning link ID to the related warning information, and registering and managing the related warninginformationasonolinkinthowarninginformationtablo.
[0011] Further, in the timetable rescheduling support system, the warning link generation part sets priorities for the related warning information in the order of the ocourrence of the warning information, and giving the warning link priority to the warning information, and registering and managing the related warning information in the warning information table.
[0012] Further, in the timetable rescheduling support system, the warning code definition table has at least one of the warning patterns of starting station train delay, approaching station train delay, crossing delay, and order inconsistency corresponding to each warning code.
[0013] Further, in the timetable rescheduling support system, the warning information table includes predicted time of failure occurrence, warning trainnumber, related trainnumber, warning code, occurrence station name, warning link ID, and warning link priority, for each of the warning information Its.
[0014] Further, the timetable rescheduling support system generates display data with warning marks from the plurality of warning information that are related and managed as a link, outputs the related warning mark and the warning link priority whcn thc mousc cursor is positioncd on a particular warning mark, and displays the related warning mark with the warning link priority.
Advantageous Effects of Invention [0015] In the timetable rescheduling support system according to the present invention, the database includes an warning code definition table for defining warning information about a delay event to be detected on a predicted time, and an warning informationtableforstoringthewarninginformation. Further, theprocessingunit includes: anwarningpatterndetectionpart for detecting warning information about an warning site where timetable rescheduling is reguired in an predicted timetable; an warnimg link generation part for fimding the relationship of each of the detected warning information and adding warning link imformation to the related warning information; and an warning display part for outputting the warning information and the warning link information to the outside to display the data on a screen. In this way, the timetable rescheduling support system clearly shows the relationship andpriority order of the warning information which is the delay event on the predictedtime shownbythewarmimgmark. This allows aoperator to easily recognize the order to be followed and to effectively remove the failure by handling the warning site in an appropriate procodurobytimotablcroschcdulingwithasmallnumbcrof stops.
Brief Description of Drawings
[0016] Figure 1 is a block diagram of an timetable rescheduling support system according to the present invention.
[0017] Figure 2 is a flow chart of the process of the timetable rescheduling support systemaccording to the present invention.
Figure 3 is a view showing the content of a diagram data table according to the present invention.
Figure 4 is a diagram generated based on the diagram data table shown in Figure 3.
B
Figure 5 is a view showing the content of an warning code definition table according to The present invention.
Figure 6 is a view showing the content of an warning information table according to the present invention.
Figure 7 is a diagram with warning marks based on the warning information table shown in Figure 6.
Figure 8 is a flow chart of the process of an warning link generation part according to the present invention.
Figure 9 is a diagram with warning link information displayed in an output terminal according to the present invention.
Doscription of Embodimonts [0018] Hereinafter, an er±odiment according to the present invention will be described with reference to Figures 1 to 9.
In the present embodiment, an timetable rescheduling support system in a railway operations management system will be described as an application target.
[System configuration] Figure 1 shows the configuration of an timetable rescheduling support system according to an embodiment of the present invention. An timetable rescheduling support system 1000 according to the present embodiment is implemented on a computer system and computer program. The timetable rescheduling support system 1000 includes a database 1100 for accumulating data such as diagram, a processing unit 1200 for executing a program, an input device 1300 for receiving an input from a user, an output device 1400 for displaying a diagram line and the like to the user, and a station device 1500 for understanding the train running state and sending resulted timetable information.
[0019] The database 1100 includes: a diagram data table 1110 in which time data such as the planned time, resulted time, and predicted time of train running are stored for each train, station, and arrival/departure classification; an warning code dofinition tablc 1120 for rogistoring an warning pattorn of the target to be detected from The delay events appearing on the predicted time; and an warning information table 1130 for storing extracted warning information.
[0020] The processing unit 1200 includes: a predicted time calculation part 1210 for calculating the predicted time of train running; an warning pattern detection part 1220 for detecting the warning pattern registered in the warning code definition table 1120 from the calculated predicted time; an warning link generation part 1230 for generating warning link information about the relationship of multiple warning informationdetectedbythewarningpatterndetectionpart 1220; 1 ci a receiving part 1240 for determining the position of the mouse cursor in the output device 1400 and issuing a display command to an warning display part when the mouse cursor is positioned on the generated warning mark; and an warning display part 1250 for displaying warning link information on the output device 1400 based on the display command from the receiving part 1240.
[0021] The input device 1300 is an input device such as a mouse and a keyboard, which is similar to a normal computer. The output device 1400 is an output device such as a display. The station device 1500 is a control device that is placed in a station to perform route control, and understands the train running stato in oach station to sond rosultod timotablo information to the upper device.
[Process flow of the timetable rescheduling support system] Figure 2 is a flow chart showing the entire process of the timetable rescheduling support system 1000 shown in Figure 1.
[0022] In step 52100, the diagram data table 1110 is updated based on the diagram change information received from the input device 1300 and on the resulted timetable information received from the station device 1500.
[0023] In step 52200, the predicted time is calculated by the predicted time calculation part 1210 and updates the diagram data table 1110 with the calculated predicted time.
[0024] In step 52300, the predicted time of the diagram data table 1110 is referred by the warning pattern detection part 1220, to perform matching to determine whether there is a site of a failure, such as a delay, corresponding to the warning pattern defined in the warning code definition table 1120. If the site of the failure matching the warning pattern is detected, warning information about the warning site of the failure is inputted into the warning information table 1130 to update the warning information table 1130.
[0025] In step S2400, warning link information of the relationship of each of the warning information is generated by the warning link generation part 1230. Then, the generated warning link information to the fields of the warning link ID and the warning link priority is written in the warning information table 1130.
[0026] In step 52500, whether the mouse cursor is present on the warning mark is judged by the input device 1300. when it is determined that the position of the mouse cursor is on the warning mark, an output command is issued to step 52600.
[0027] In step 52600, a display information is generated by referring to the warning information table 1130 within the database 1100, and the warning link is displayed on the output device 1400.
[Planned and resulted timetables] Figure 3 shows the data structure of the diagram data table 1110 shown in Figure 1. The data items include a number 3000 which is the serial number of the table, a train number 3100 which is the train identifier, a station name 3200 which is the ID of the station through which the train runs, arrival/departure 3300 which is the classification indicating arrival or departure of the train, a planned time 3400, a prodictod timo 3500, and an rosultod timo 3600.
[0028] The planned time is the time of the train running plan.
The predicted time is the time of the future train running that is predicted based on the actual running, which is the time generated by the predicted time calculation part 1210 shown in Figure 1. Further, the resulted time is the time of actual running. The planned time 3400 and the predicted time 3500 are constantly stored in the timetable rescheduling support system. However, with respect to the resulted time 3600, the timetable rescheduling support system only stores the diagram data of the resulted timetable received from the station device 1500 shown in Figure 1, and does not store the time information of other diagram data.
[0029] Figure 3 shows the diagram data of a train 1 at C and Dstations, aswellasthediagramdataofatrain2 L' atCstation.
Theresultedtime is greaterthantheplannedtime forthearrival and departure of 1 1' at and from S station as well as the arrival at the C station shown in the records 3710 to 3730, so that it is shown that 1 k was delayed when running from S station to C station. Further, the resulted time is not recorded for the departure from C station shown in the record 3740, so that it is shown that 1 is on rails in C station. Similar to 1 , the resulted time is greater than the planned time for the departure of 2 k from S station shown in the reoord 3750, so that it is shown that a delay ocours.
[0030] Figure 4 is a diagram showing planned and resulted timetables generated based on the diagram data. A line segment 4000isthecurrenttimeline. Thesolidlineshowsal L' planned diagram 4100, a 2 F' planned diagram 4300, a 3 F' planned diagram 4500, a4k planneddiagram4600, anda SF' planneddiagram4700.
The dotted line shows a 1 F' resulted timetable 4200 and a 2 F' resulted timetable 4400.
[0031] In Figure 4, the difference in the line segment position between the planned diagram 4100 and the resulted timetable 4200 shows that there is a delay in 1 H Further, the difference in the line segment position between the planned diagram 4300 and the resulted timetable 4400 shows that there is a delay in 2 1'. In the case of the train with the planned diagram but without the resulted timetable (for example, the scheduled diagram 4500, and the like) in the area before the current time, it is shown that the train is delayed and the resulted time is not obtained even at the current time.
[Scheduled and resulted timetables with warning marks] Figure 5 shows data of the warning code definition table 1120 shown in Figure 1. The warning code definition table 1120 defines the delay failure due to delay of other trains as an warning pattorn. Tho warning codo dofinition tablo 1120 includes anwarning code 5100 and anwarningpattern 5200 showing the occurrence pattern of the delay failure. The warning pattern can be expanded by adding data to the warning code definition table 1120.
[0032] For example, the warning code 1 "starting station train delay" shown in the record 5310 represents the delay pattern indicating that the departure of the particular train from the starting station is delayed due to delay of other preceding trains at the boundary station (hereinafter referred to as the approaching station) that the particular train approaches from theothertrainline. Further, the warning code 2 "approaching station train delay" shown by the record 5320 represents the delay pattern indicating that the departure of the approaching train from the approaching station is delayed due to delay of other preceding trains. In addition, the warning code 3 indicates "crossing delay (arrival) ", the warning code 4 indicates crossing delay (departure)", and the warning code indicates "order inconsistency", respectively.
[0033] Figure 6 shows data of the warning information table 1130 showninFigurel. Thedataitemsincludeanwarninginformation ID 6100 which is the serial number of the warning information table 1130, apredicted failure occurrence time 6200, anwarning train numbor 6300 whioh is thc train in which a dolay is oxpootod due to the occurrence of delay failure, a related train number 6400 that can cause a delay failure to the warning train number, an warning code 6500 which is the pattern matching the delay event of the warning train defined in the warning code definition table 1120, an occurrence station name 6600 which is the site where the failure occurs, an warning link ID 6700, and an warning link priority 6800.
[0034] In Figure 6, the warning information of the record 6910 is the warning information of the detection of the fact that the departure time of the 4 L' 4600 at B station shown in Figure 4 is delayed due to the delay of the preceding train 2 2 4300.
The warning information of the record 6920 is the warning information of the detection of the faot that the departure time of the 3k 4500 at C statioc is deiayed due to the deiay of the preceding train 1k 4100. The warning information of the record 6930 is the warning information of the detection of the fact that the departure time of the 5k 4700 at C station is detaiied due to the deiay of the preceding train 42 4600.
[0035] Figure 7 is a diagram of the actuai and predicted diagrams with warning marks. A ling segment 7000 shows the current time line. Dotted line segments 7100 and 7200 show the resulted timetables of 1 2 and 2 2, showing that each train is running with a dolay, which is similar to Figuro 4. solid lino sogmonts 7300, 7400, 7500, 7600, and 7700 are predicted diagrams of 2 2, 10, 30, 4k, and 5k, respectively. It displays 10 by two line segments of the resulted timetable 7100 and the predicted diagram 7400 on both sides of the current time line 7000. This shows that 1 0 is the train running and has already run to the point where the actual line segment is present.
[0036] Further, the warning display part 1250 shown in Figure 1 generates the pattern warning information registered in the warning information table 1130 to display on the output device 1400 as thewarningmark. Anwarningmark 7810 shows thewarning informationoftherecord69lowithamark, showingthatafailure occurs in the train 4k atBstation. Anwarningmark 7820 shows the warning information of the reoord 6920 with a mark, showing that a failure occurs in the train 3 k at C station. Further, an warning mark 7830 shows the warning information of the record 6930 with a mark, showing that a failure occurs in the train 5k at C station.
[Warning link generation process] Figure 8 is a flow chart of the process of an warning link generation part 2300.
[0037] First, an warning network is generated in step 58100.
The warning network is a directed graph showing the relationship of cach of tho warning information. Tho nodos forming tho warning network represent each of the warning information such as the record 6910 shown in Figure 6. A link is connected to the warning information (referred to as the warning information B) with the same related train number 6400 as the warning train number 6300 of the warning information (referred to as the warning informationA) . Thus, the link has a direction in which the warning information A as the sending end and the warning information B as the receiving end.
[0038] For example, in the case of the warning information table shown in Figure 6, the warning train number 6300 (40) of the warning information ID1 shown in the record 6910 is egual to the related train number 6400 (4 1/) of the warning information 11)3 shown in the record 6930, so that the link is conneoted to the reoord 6930 from the record 6910. Accordingly, in the diagram shown in Fignre 7, a link is connected to the warning mark 7830 from the warning mark 7810.
[0039] In step S8200, a unigue warning link ID is added to all the tip nodes on the generated warning network. Here, the tip node is thenodewithoutalinkas thereceivingend. Forexample, in the case of the warning information table shown in Figure 6, the warning information ID1 is the tip node because it does not have a link as the receiving end from any of the warning information, whilo connocting a link to tho warning information 11)3. Thus, the unit is added an warning link ID1 to the warning information 11)1. Similarly, in the diagram shown in Figure 7, the warning link ID1 is added to the warning mark 7810.
[0040] In step S8300, the same warning link ID is added as that of the tip node to all the related nodes, sequentially, in the linkdirecticnfromthetipnodetotheendnodethatareextracted in step S8200.
[0041] Each of the warning information can have multiple warning link IDs. When multiple tip ncdes and links are connected, the warning information also has the warning link ID of each tip node. For example, in the case of the warning information table shown in Figure 6, the warning information IDi which is the tip node has the warning link ID1, so that the same warning link ID1 is added to the warning information 1D3 that is linked tothewarninginformation 11)1. Similarly, inthediagramshown in Figure 7, the warning link ID1 held by the warning mark 78i0 is added to the warning mark 7830 that is linked to the warning mark 7810.
[0042] Finally, in step 88400, the warning link priorities is set from the tip node as the first place followed by the second place, the third place, and so onto the eridnode, sequentially, in thc nctwork in which thc warning link IDs addod in stops S8200 and 8300 are the same. For example, in the case of the warning information table shown in Figure 6, the warning link priority of the warning information IDi is set to the first place. Then, the warning link priority of the warning information 1D3, which is the next node with the same warning linkID, issettothesecondplace. Accordingly, inthediagram shown in Figure 7, the warning link priority of the warning mark78lOis set to the firstplace, andthewarninglinkpriority of the warning mark 7830 is se to the second place.
[0043] An example of the diagram in which warning marks are displayed is shown in Figure 9. At this time, it is assumed 20' that a mouse cursor 9010 is present on an warning mark 9820.
Here, warning link priority displays 9900, 9910, and the like, are displayed on the warning marks with the same warning link IDas thewarningmark928O. The smallerthevalueofthewarning mark of the warning link priority display, such as 9900, the higherthepriorityorderofthesourceofchain-reactionfailure.
Thus, the handling priorities of the failure sites are clear by the warning link priority displays 9900, 9910, and the like.
In this way, the operator can perform timetable rescheduling according to the priority order and can effectively remove the failure by the procedure with the smallest number of steps.
[0044] Whom tho mouso oursor 9010 is not prosont on any of tho warning marks 9800, 9810, 9820, and the like, the warning link priority displays 9900, 9910, and the like are not displayed.
In this way, it is possible to display omlymecessary information at the necessary time by determining the presence or absenoe of the warning link priority displays 9900, 9910, and the like.
Reference Signs List [0045] 1000: timetable rescheduling support system 1100: database 1110: diagram data table [0046] 1120: warning code definition table 1130: warning information table 1200: processing unit 1210: predicted time calculation part 1220: warning pattern detection part 1230: warning link generation part 1240: receiving part 1250: warning display part 1300: input device ic 1400: output device 1500: station device
Claims (7)
- CLAIMS1. An operation scheduling support system comprising: a database including a diagram data table that stores previouslyplanned operation plan data, timetable rescheduling data input from an external terminal, and predicted timetable in which future train running is expected based on the actual train running result; and a processing unit including a predicted time calculation part for calculating the predicted time of train operation, and a receiving part for receiving an timetable rescheduling input from the external terminal, whoroin tho databaso furthor includos an warning coda definition table for defining warning information about a delay event to be detected on the predicted time, and an warning information table for storing The warning information, wherein the processing unit includes: an warning pattern detection part for detecting warning information about the warning site of failure that requires timetable rescheduling in the predicted timetable; an warning link generation part for finding the relationship of each of the detected warning information and adding warning link information to the warning information; and an warning display part for outputting the warning information and the warning link information to the outside to display the data on a screen.
- 2. An timetable resoheduling support system aocording to claim 1, wherein the warning information has train number information.
- 3. An timetable rescheduling support system according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the warning link generation part detects the relationship between the train number information held by each of thc warning information, adds a common warning link ID to the related warning information, and stores and manages the related warning information in the warning information table as one link.
- 4. An timetable rescheduling support system according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the warning link generation part sets priorities of the related warning information in the order of the occurrence of the warning information, gives the warning link priority to the warning information, and stores and manages the related warning information in the warning information table.
- 5. An timetable rescheduling support system according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the warning oode definition tabie has at least one of the warning patterns of starting station train delay, approaching station train delay, crossing delay, and order inconsistency that correspond co each warning code.
- 6. An timetable rescheduling support system according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the warning information table includes a predicted failure occurrence time, an warning train nurftber, a related train number, an warning code, an occurrence station namo, an warning link ID, and an warning link priority.
- 7. An timetable rescheduling support system according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the timetable rescheduling support system generates display data with an warning mark from a plurality cf the warning information that are related to each other and managed as a link, whereinwhenthemousecursorispositionedonaparticular warningmark, the timetable rescheduling support systemoutputs and displays the related warning mark with the warning link priority.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2011129660A JP5731912B2 (en) | 2011-06-10 | 2011-06-10 | Driving arrangement support system |
| PCT/JP2012/062791 WO2012169333A1 (en) | 2011-06-10 | 2012-05-18 | Operation rescheduling support system |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| GB201321826D0 GB201321826D0 (en) | 2014-01-22 |
| GB2505378A true GB2505378A (en) | 2014-02-26 |
Family
ID=47295902
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| GB1321826.8A Withdrawn GB2505378A (en) | 2011-06-10 | 2012-05-18 | Operation rescheduling support system |
Country Status (3)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP5731912B2 (en) |
| GB (1) | GB2505378A (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2012169333A1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103935385A (en) * | 2014-04-18 | 2014-07-23 | 天津七一二通信广播有限公司 | Train dispatching operation method through data communication |
| EP2937258A1 (en) * | 2014-04-25 | 2015-10-28 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Traffic control system |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104835102B (en) * | 2015-05-05 | 2020-10-27 | 北京交通大学 | Train speed measurement scheme evaluation method and device |
| CN104943712B (en) * | 2015-06-25 | 2017-03-01 | 卡斯柯信号有限公司 | The automatic management method of shunting list in a kind of shunting monitoring system |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH06127391A (en) * | 1992-10-15 | 1994-05-10 | Hitachi Ltd | Plan preparation-correction system |
| JPH08244615A (en) * | 1995-03-08 | 1996-09-24 | Hitachi Ltd | Operation adjusting device |
| JP2003095108A (en) * | 2001-09-25 | 2003-04-03 | Hitachi Ltd | Object directional instruction input system of train travel instruction device |
| JP2009078573A (en) * | 2007-09-25 | 2009-04-16 | Railway Technical Res Inst | Program, information storage medium, operation arrangement proposal assessment device, and operation arrangement proposal preparation device |
| JP2010111156A (en) * | 2008-11-04 | 2010-05-20 | Railway Technical Res Inst | Program, operation analysis method, and operation analyzer |
Family Cites Families (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2008189272A (en) * | 2007-02-08 | 2008-08-21 | Hitachi Ltd | Operation arranging/assisting system and method |
-
2011
- 2011-06-10 JP JP2011129660A patent/JP5731912B2/en active Active
-
2012
- 2012-05-18 GB GB1321826.8A patent/GB2505378A/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2012-05-18 WO PCT/JP2012/062791 patent/WO2012169333A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH06127391A (en) * | 1992-10-15 | 1994-05-10 | Hitachi Ltd | Plan preparation-correction system |
| JPH08244615A (en) * | 1995-03-08 | 1996-09-24 | Hitachi Ltd | Operation adjusting device |
| JP2003095108A (en) * | 2001-09-25 | 2003-04-03 | Hitachi Ltd | Object directional instruction input system of train travel instruction device |
| JP2009078573A (en) * | 2007-09-25 | 2009-04-16 | Railway Technical Res Inst | Program, information storage medium, operation arrangement proposal assessment device, and operation arrangement proposal preparation device |
| JP2010111156A (en) * | 2008-11-04 | 2010-05-20 | Railway Technical Res Inst | Program, operation analysis method, and operation analyzer |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103935385A (en) * | 2014-04-18 | 2014-07-23 | 天津七一二通信广播有限公司 | Train dispatching operation method through data communication |
| EP2937258A1 (en) * | 2014-04-25 | 2015-10-28 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Traffic control system |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| WO2012169333A1 (en) | 2012-12-13 |
| JP2012254746A (en) | 2012-12-27 |
| JP5731912B2 (en) | 2015-06-10 |
| GB201321826D0 (en) | 2014-01-22 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Kecman et al. | Process mining of train describer event data and automatic conflict identification | |
| Goverde et al. | Advanced monitoring and management information of railway operations | |
| Azadi Moghaddam Arani et al. | A multi-commodity network flow model for railway capacity optimization in case of line blockage | |
| GB2505378A (en) | Operation rescheduling support system | |
| Golightly et al. | Use of scenarios and function analyses to understand the impact of situation awareness on safe and effective work on rail tracks | |
| JP2015061786A (en) | Operation arrangement support system and method of the same, and operation arrangement support device | |
| JP2008049853A (en) | Operation arrangement supporting system | |
| KR100831387B1 (en) | Train operation management system | |
| CN105574299A (en) | Safety pre-evaluation method for rail transit signal system | |
| JP5183535B2 (en) | Data input support device and data input support method | |
| JP5268808B2 (en) | Operation management system | |
| Clegg et al. | Analysis of a train-operating company's customer service system during disruptions: Conceptual requirements for gamifying frontline staff development | |
| Rangra et al. | Human reliability assessment under uncertainty–towards a formal method | |
| CN111476330B (en) | Remote monitoring and installation guidance system and method for manufacturing of electrical equipment of transformer substation | |
| Sharma et al. | Risk reduction and resilience buildup in railroad transport | |
| JP6498308B2 (en) | Operation status display system | |
| Suchkov et al. | Development of a real-time stringlines tool to visualize subway operations and manage service at New York City transit | |
| JP7122107B2 (en) | TRAFFIC OPERATION INFORMATION INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, TRAFFIC OPERATION INFORMATION INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT METHOD | |
| JP2007045216A (en) | Vehicle/crew operation restoration device | |
| JP2013035502A (en) | Operation arrangement support system and operation arrangement support method | |
| JP2017107261A (en) | Text data processing device, character broadcast display system, and character broadcast display program | |
| JP5386438B2 (en) | Track conflict detection device | |
| JP4672749B2 (en) | Train operation management system operation management system | |
| JP6082311B2 (en) | Wide area disaster recovery support system and monitoring center in this system | |
| JP4939852B2 (en) | Operation display screen test device |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| WAP | Application withdrawn, taken to be withdrawn or refused ** after publication under section 16(1) |