GB2216380A - Cutter blade for reaping cutters of harvesting machines - Google Patents

Description

16380 Cutter BLacle for Reaping Cutters of Harvesting Machines

FieLd of the Invention

The inventi on reLates to a cutter bLade for reaping cutters of harvesting machines.

Prior Art

BLacles of this type have been known f.or a Long time, usuaLLy have a basic trianguLar shape and are riveted or screwed to a carrier rod, aLso caLLed a cutter raiL or cutter back, in varying numbers depending on the cutting width of the particuLar cutter bar.

The bLacles interact with reaping fingers functioning as counterknives. There are aLso known cutting systems in which the counterknives Likewise comprise reaping-cutter bLades which are either fastened rigidLy to the cutter bar or which are used as a second reaping cutter working in the opposite direction to a first reaping cutter. The Last-mentioned system is aLso known as a "doubLecutter reaping bar".

When the bLacles of such a reaping cutter are no Longer compLeteLy sharp, a cutting materiaL which is clifficuLt to cut properLy or the undergrowth contained in the harvesting materiaL is often drawn between the bLacle and the reaping fingers or the counterbLacles mounted or working on the second pLane as counterknives. It coLLects there and Lifts the reaping cutter off from the counterknives, with the resuLt that the cutting capacity decreases rapidLy and finaLLy the reaping cutter is bLocked.

Since it is not possibLe to prevent this difficuLt cutting materiaL from penetrating between the bLade and the counterknife, attempts have aLready been made to remove this materiaL by making cLeaning orifices in the bLacles.

German Patent Specification 2,451,106 makes known a bLade having an orif ice which has a basic trianguLar shape, but which does not reach to the base edge of the bLade.

A simiLar design is known frpm German Patent Specification 714,548 or German UtiLity ModeL 1,715,760, but this reaches to the base edge and is therefore open towards the base edge.

German OffenLegungsschrift 3,229,743 aLso describes various cLeaning systems which, in addition to the embodiments discussed above, afford possibiLities of providing cLeaning orifices and cLeaning edges.as a resuLt of an appropriate distance between two bLades or a cutout on the bLade fLanks.

FinaLLy, British Patent Specification 447,674 describes a bLade having, in the fLanks, sLit-shaped recesses which Likewise function as cLeaning orifices.

Since, in order to cLear away the cut materiaL which settLes mainLy at the connection points, the cLeaning orifice must extend up to and in front of the spacer wings, by means of which individuaL reaping fingers butt against one another, or up to and in front of the connecting web which, where doubLe fingers are concerned, joins together two particuLar individuaL fingers designed as a counterknife, the bLades according to the abovementioned pubLications, German Patent Specification 2,451,106, German Patent Specification 714,548 and British Patent Specification 447, 674, are highLy unstabLe. The horizontaL Loading capacity of the bLades is very Low and for the most part has to be absorbed by the bLade fastening rivets or screws. As a resuLt of the aLternating stresses caused by the osciLLating mode of operation, the bLades very often come Loose.

When the bLacles are fastened to the cutter bar at an appropriate distance from one another, thereby providing cLeaning edges, the bLacle fastenings are Likewise subjected to high Load, because the bLacles are not supported reLative to one another. ALso, too steep a cutting angLe is obtained because the bLacles have to be very much narrower, since the conventionaL spaging of three inches for the change point of the cutters moving to and fro has to be maintained.

A Soviet bLacle -construction having two orifices is described in the periodicaL "Agrartechnik", page 479, of 11th November 1955.

One orifice reaches to the base edge and is therefore open towards the base edge; and the other orifice is punched out of the bLade gap as a triangLe. A connecting web wh ich stabiLizes the.bLade in the horizontaL direction therefore remains between the orifice in the base edge and the trianguLar orifice in the bLade Leaf.

However, this cutter bLacle is greatLy w9akened in the verticaL direction as a resuLt of the reLativeLy Large orifice. It aLso has the disadvantage that stones, thrown up by the tips of the reaping fingers during cutting with earth contact, as is necessary, for exampLe, in the harvesting of soya beans, faLL into these orifices, are then jammed against the reaping fingers and destroy both the bLade and the reaping fingers. Furthermore, the cLeaning effect of the trianguLar orifice is not very good, because cutting materiaL which has penetrated into the orifice is pushed to and fro in this since one edge does not extend up to the mid-axis of the reaping finger.

In aLL the known embodiments in which appropriate orifices are provided in the bLacle Leaf in front of the cutter bar.. a further disadvantage is that the cutter pressure thumbs cannot be used efficientLy or are subject to very high wear because of the reLativeLy Large orifices.

Summary of the Invention

Starting from this known state of the art, the object of the present invention is to provide a blade which, as a result of an appropriate design of the orifices made in a cutter blade, on the on.e hand is reduced in terms of its mass moving to and fro and can therefore be used on all reaping systems with an oscillating mode of operation, at the same time also possessing virtuallythe same stability as a solid blade, having a comprehensive cleaning effect on all types of reaping fingers and other types of counterknives and being insensitive to loose stones thrown up.

According to the invention, this object is achieved by means of a cutter blade for reaping cutters of harvesting machines, with an orifice made or not made in the base edge, as appropriate, which is defined in that two or more orifices are provided in the blade leaf which reach up to-the cutter bar or are arranged before the cutter bar. Webs composed of blade material are obtained between these orifices, and these form additional cleaning edges and further stabilize the blade Leaf.

Since the orifices are smaller than in the known blades, stones which, because of their size, are capable of causing damage to the blade and abuttments cannot be jammed in them.

Furthermore, a blade, in which not only the orifices according to the invention in the blade leaf, but also the orifice already known for a long time in the base edge are provided, has proved especiaLLy advantageous.

The design of the orifice made in the blade Leaf can take many different forms. In addition to a circular orifice or a square orifice, for example one or more of these orifices can be made drop-shaped, rectangular, oval or crescent- shaped.

These abovementioned embodiments of the orifices made in the blade leaf have proved particularly expedient.

It has also been shown that it is especially advantageous if the web located between two orifices in the blade leaf widens towards the base edge.

The orifices according to the invention in the blade leaf are appropriately obtained by being punched out. Accordingly, the side walls, provided in the blade leaf, of these orifices, are arranged conventionally perpendicularly to the top side or under side of the blade leaf.

However, it has proved extremely expedient if the walls of the orifices made in the blade leaf are at least partially at an angle of less than 900 relative to the plane of the blade leaf on one side of the blade. As a result of such an embodiment, on the one hand the cleaning edge is designed as a cutting edge, and on the other hand at the same time a larger opening, through which material severed by the cleaning edge can fall out, is obtained in the orifice.

It has proved especially expedient if the walls of the orifices made in the blade leaf are at least partially at an angle of 30 to 450 relative to the plane of the blade leaf on one side of the blade.

Since the cleaning effect of the cleaning edges produced as a result of the orific.es according to the invention usually takes place in conjunction with the counterknives of the reaping fingers, it has proved particularly expedient if the walls of the orifices made in the blade leaf are at least partially at an angle of less than 900 relative to the plane of the blade leaf on the beveLLed side of the bLacle. The resuLt of this is that, on the one hand, the beveLLed knife is provided on the same side as the bLade, whiLst on the other hand, on the same side, the waLLs of the orifices made in the bLacle Leaf are Likewise at an angLe of Less than 900, and consequentLy the cLeaning edges produced thereby assume the form of cutting edges which interact with the counterknives of the reaping fingers.

ALthough onLy a partiaL beveLLing of the side waLL is conventionaLLy sufficient for this cutting and cLeaning effect of the orifices made in the bLade Leaf, nevertheLess it is preferabLe to beveL the side waLL of these orifices aLL-round, because thereby the orifice can be widened and the severed materiaL faLL out more easiLy.

In the preferred embodiment discussed above, in which not onLy the orifices according to the invention in the bLade Leaf, but aLso an orifice in the base edge are provided, this orifice in the base edge appropriateLy has the shape and size of the bLade tip. It is thereby possibLe, during production, to punch the bLacle tip of one bLade out of the base edge of the adjacent bLacle. The consumption of materiaL in the production of the bLades can thus be reduced substantiaLLy.

Brief Description of the Drawings

The invention is expLained particuLarLy in cletaiL beLow with reference to the exempLary embodiments iLLustrated in the accompanying drawings.

In the drawings: Figure 1 shows a part view of a cutter bar with reaping fingers and with reaping-cutter bLades according to the invention pLaced in the working position; Figure 2 shows an especiaLLy advantageous embodiment of a reaping-cutter bLacle according to the invention with two orifices and an additionaL orifice at the base edge; Figure 3 shows a further reaping-cutter bLacle according to the invention with two circuLar orifices and a third orifice directed towards the bLade tip; Figure 4 shows three reaping-cutter bLades according to the invention arranged next to one another and having orifices of different shapes; Figure 5 shows a verticaL section aLong the Line A-8 in Figure 2, iLLustrating an especiaLLy ad vantageous design of the reaping-cutter bLade according to the invention in respect of the waLL of the orifice.

Description of the preferred embodiments in Figure 1, the reaping fingers 2 are screwed by means of their rear end to the finger bar 1. The reaping finger 2 can be designed singLy or in one piece as cloubLe fingers or muLtipLe fingers. To keep the reaping finger LateraLLy stabLe, the individuaL reaping fingers butt against one another by means of spacer wings 3 and are thus supported reLative to one another. Moreover, these wings serve as guides for the cutter bar 4, to which the individuaL reaping-cutter bLacles 5 are screwed or riveted. Where doubLe or muLtipLe fingers are concerned, between any two reaping fingers there is, instead of the spacer wings, a corresponding connecting web which Likewise serves as a guide for the cutter bar 4.

The reaping-cutter bLacles 5 interact with the counterknives 6 of the reaping fingers. The counterknives 6 can be arranged either underneath or above the bLacles. There is aLso a known system in which both the Lower finger and the upper finger are designed as a counterknife, the bLacles being fastened aLternateLy to the cutter bar 4 on the one hand with the cutting edge upwards and on the other hand with the cutting edge downwards.

Figure 1 shows the bLades 5 at the change point occurring in most cutterbar constructions. During the to-and-fro movement, the bLacle tip foLLows a path extending from one particuLar reaping-finger axis to the next. This path therefore corresponds to the distance between the reapingfinger tips, and since the bLades butt against one another on the cutter bar it aLso corresponds to the bLacle width. ALthough there are aLso known systems in which the stroke is substantiaLLy Larger than the bLade width, systems of this type are nevertheLess quite rare.

It often happens, during the cutting operation, that harvesting materiaL clifficuLt to cut properLy is drawn over the counterknife and cannot fLow off rearwards because of the spacer wings 3 or, on cloubLe or muLtipLe fingers, the connecting webs arranged at the same point. This cut materiaL then buiLds up at the point designated by the reference symboL 8 in Figure 1 and bLocks the reaping cutter onLy after a short time. It is therefore necessary to carry out time-consuming cLeaning work which, if necessary, has to be repeated at very short intervaLs. Furthermore, the drive eLements of the reaping cutters are subjected to very high Load.

In the known embodiments, the most favorabLe seLf-cLeaning effect was obtained by means of an orifice in the reapingcutter bLade which cLeaned the criticaL region 8 of the reaping fingers. However, since this orifice has to be reLativeLy Large, the bLade is greatLy weakened thereby. Furthermore, when the bLade is Located between two particuLar reaping fingers, stones thrown up faLL into this orifice and are jammed in it.

In contrast to this, in the embodiment according to the invention, the bLacle is substantiaLLy more stabLe as a resuLt of the web 9. Moreover, this web 9 prevents corresponclingLy Large stones from being jammed in the orifices, and a particuLarLy decisive advantage is that additionaL cLeani.ng edges 10 are obtained in these orifices.

As aLready mentioned, different shapes of the orifices can be seLected, depending on the particuLar cutting materiaL to which a shape proves to be especiaLLy favorabLe. ALso, the shape of this orifice depends on the counterknife used.

Figures 3 and 4 iLLustrate preferred exempLary e.mbodiments of the reaping-cutter bLacles according to the invent ion. Of course, clifferentLy shaped orifices can aLso be made in one and the same bLade, and Likewise different bLades can be combined on one reaping cutter.

To provide a cLeaning orifice aLready far forward near the bLacle tip, especiaLLy for harvesting materiaL very clifficuLt to cut, such as, for exampLe, fLax, an additionaL orifice extending into the bLacle tip can be made., as shown in Figure 3.

A combination of two drop-shaped orifices 12 according to Figure 2 has proved-especiaLLy advantageous. in this embodiment, the part of the orifices which is Largest in terms of area is in the region in which stabiLity is impaired the Least. Moreover, the web 9 widens towards the cutter bar, as a resuLt of which stabiLity is Likewise increased and the cLeaning edges,10 extend obLiqueLy reLative to the reaping-finger axis, thereby having a beneficiaL infLuence on the cLeaning effect.

In the section shown in Figure 5, taken aLong the Line AS according to Figure 2, it can be seen that the waLLs of the orifices 12 made in the bLacle Leaf are at an angLe of Less than 900 reLative to the pLane of the bLade Leaf on one side of the bLacle, specificaLLy the top side of the bLacle. As a resuLt of such an embodiment, the cLeaning edges are shaped into cutting edges, and furthermore there is the additional effect that the orifices 12 widen downwards, so that the material severed by the cleaning edges can fall out downwards easily.

The bevelled side of the blade is likewise the top side of the reapingcutter blade shown in section in Figure 5.

Claims (12)

Patent Claims

1. A reaping-cutter blade for reaping cutters of harvesting machines, with an orifice made, if appropriate, in the base edge, wherein twe or more orifices (12, 13, 14, 15) are provided in the blade leaf in front of the cutter bar (4) or reaching up to the cutter bar (4).

2. A reaping-cutter blade as claimed in claim 1, with an orifice made in the base edge, wherein two or more orifices (12, 13, 14, 15) are provided in the blade leaf ---infront of the cutter bar (4).or reaching up to the cutter bar (4).

3. A reaping-cutter blade as claimed in cl-aim 1, wherein one or more of the orifices (12) are made dropshaped.

4. A reaping-cutter blade as claimed in claim 1, wherein one or more of the orifices (13) are made rectangular.

5. A reaping-cutter blade as claimed in claim 1, wherein one or more of the orifices (14) are made oval.

6. A reaping-cutter blade as claimed in claim 1, wherein one or more of the orifices (15) are made crescentshaped.

7. A reaping-cutter blade as claimed in one of claims 3 to 6, wherein the web located between two orifices widens towards the base edge.

8. A reaping-cutter blade as claimed in claim 1, wherein the walls of the orifices made in the blade leaf are at least partially at an angle of less than 900 relative to the plane of the blade leaf on one side of the blade.

9. A reaping-cutter blade as claimed in claim 8, wherein -1 a_ - the walls of the orifices made in the blade leaf are at least partially at an angle of 30 to 450 relative to the plane of the blade leaf on one side of the blade.

10. A reaping-cutter blade as claimed in-claim 8, wherein the walls of the orifices (12) made in the blade leaf are at least partially at an angle of less than 900 relative to the plane of the blade leaf on the bevelled side of the blade.

11. A reaping-cutter blade as claimed in claim 8, wherein the watts of the orifices made in the blade leaf are at an angle of less than 900 relative to the plane of the blade leaf on one side of the blade.

12. A reaping-cutter bla.de substancially as described with reference to and as illustrated in any one or more of the figures of the accompanying drawings.

Publisb9d. 1089 atThe Patent Offtce.StateRause.66/71 H1& HOIbOMLOndonWClR47?.FUrLher coples maybe obtainedfrom ThePatent(3flice. Sales Branch, St Mary Cray, Orpington, Kent BR5 3RD. Printed by Multiplex techniques itd, st mary Cray, Kent, Con- 1/87