GB2147434A

GB2147434A - Smooth stop control system

Info

Publication number: GB2147434A
Application number: GB08423815A
Authority: GB
Inventors: Koji Takata; Masato Yoshino
Original assignee: Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd
Current assignee: Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd
Priority date: 1983-09-21
Filing date: 1984-09-20
Publication date: 1985-05-09
Also published as: GB2147434B; JPS6068409A; JPH07107653B2; DE3434793A1; GB8423815D0; US4760529A; DE3434793C2

Description

1 GB 2 147 434A 1

SPECIFICATION

Smooth stop control system BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to a system for automatically controlling the deceleration of a moving object in such a manner as to gently stop the object and, more particularly, to a smooth stop control system. The system of the present invention is applicable to any type of machines or devices which must be stopped in a smooth manner, and particularly suitable for use in a machine, such as an automobile, which is designed to carry people and can decelerate more than 3 meters/second 2.

In the throughout specification, the term deceleration is used to represent a negative of a differentiated value (a) of a speed (v) of an object with respect to the time (t), as given below:

i 65 deceleration = - a = - dv/dt.

2. Description of the Prior Art

According to the prior art, the deceleration control is dependent mostly on a manual operation. For example, a skilled driver con trols the degree of deceleration such that the deceleration is relatively high while the speed of the object is still high and becomes low as the speed is reduced, i.e., at the end of a stop.

There are some control systems which auto matically control the deceleration until the speed of the object is reduced to a certain low speed, but for the further deceleration, it is 105 controlled manually. Accordingly, this type of control system cannot be called a full auto matic deceleration control system.

Some other control systems may automati cally control the deceleration until the object completely stops. But generally in this case, the level of deceleration is relatively low and no serious problem arises. In some systems aimed to have a higher deceleration, it is so controlled as to decelerate the object until the speed of the object is reduced to some slow speed, and thereafter, the deceleration is re duced to a very low level. But if the decelera tion starts from a fairly high level, there will be an undesirable shock when the decelera tion is switched to said low level.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides an improved system for automatically controlling the decel- 125 eration of a moving object in such a manner as to gently stop the object within a distance as short as possible.

According to the present invention, a smooth stop control system for effecting the 130 smooth stop of an object comprises, means for detecting an actual speed and deceleration of the object, mean ' s for calculating a degree of target deceleration which changes continu- ously until the complete stop of the object, means for comparing the actual deceleration with the calculated target deceleration, and means for controlling the brake arrangement so as to render the actual deceleration sub- stantially equal to the calculated target deceleration.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other objects and features of the present invention will become apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with preferred embodiments thereof with reference to the accompanying drawings, throughout which like parts are designated by like reference numerals, and in which:

Figure 1 is a graph wherein abscissa and ordinate represent time and deceleration, respectively; Figure 2 is a graph wherein abscissa and ordinate represent deceleration and speed, respectively; Figure 3 is a graph wherein abscissa and ordinate represent normalized time and normalized deceleration, respectively; Figure 4 is a graph wherein abscissa and ordinate represent normalized time and normalized speed, respectively; Figure 5 is a graph wherein abscissa and ordinate represent normalized speed and nor100 malized deceleration, respectively; Figure 6 is a graph wherein abscissa and ordinate represent normalized time and rate of change of deceleration with respect to time expressed with the use of initial speed and initial deceleration, respectively; Figure 7 is a graph wherein abscissa and ordinate represent normalized time and rate of change of deceleration with respect to time expressed with the use of present speed and 110 initial deceleration, respectively; Figure 8 is a graph wherein abscissa and ordinate represent normalized speed and rate of change of deceleration with respect to time expressed with the use of present speed and 115 initial deceleration, respectively; Figure 9 is a graph wherein abscissa and ordinate represent normalized speed and normalized deceleration, respectively, and particularly showing a range for interrupting the 120 smooth stop control; Figure 10 is a block diagram showing an arrangement of a system for automatically controlling the deceleration, according to one embodiment; and Figures 11, 12 and 13 are flowchart showing the steps for automatically controlling the deceleration according to the present invention under different modes of operations.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODI-

2 GB 2 147 434A 2 MENT 1. Deceleration Lines Referring to Fig. 1, line Ll shows a case wherein an object is decelerated at a constant level until the object stops completely. In this case, when the object stops, a person or a thing carried in the object receives a shock, because the deceleration suddenly changes from some amount to Zero. Such a shock will become great and uncomfortable when the constant level of deceleration is greater than 0.05G, wherein G represents acceleration of gravity.

Line L2 shows a case wherein a differenti- ated value of the deceleration, i.e., da/dt is constant and, therefore, the deceleration does not change suddenly but changes continuously. However, the person or thing in the object receives a shock at points X and Y where the line L2 is bent, that is, where the differentiated value of the deceleration, i.e., da/dt suddenly changes. Generally, the person in the object will learn the constant change of deceleration, i.e., da/dt and, there- fore, he or she will ge ready for such a change. However, if the rate of change of deceleration, i.e., da/dt changes suddenly at points X and Y, the person will receive a shock before he can make himself ready for such a sudden change of da/dt. Accordingly, he will receive an uncomfortable shock.

Line L3 shows a case wherein the deceleration changes gradually along a cosine curve or a similar curve thereto. When the object is decelerated in accordance with line L3, there will be no sudden change of da/dt. Thus, the object can be gently stopped without giving any uncomfortable shock to the person or thing in the object.

After a number of tests, the present inventors found that the deceleration control according to line L3 provides the least shock to the person and/or thing in the object. In fact, a highly skilled driver controls the automobile along a line similar to line L3 so as to stop the automobile very gently. Therefore, the deceleration control system according to the present invention is so programmed as to control the debeleration of an object in accordance with line L3.

2. Means for Realizing the Smooth Stop Control As apparent from the above, if a moving object is controlled to decelerate in accordance with line L3, the moving object can be stopped gently. Such a control is referred to as a smooth stop control.

In order to realize a smooth stop control, according to the present invention, there are provided:

a) a brake device to provide a braking effect in different levels to the object in accordance with a brake signal applied thereto from an external controller; b) a detector for detecting the speed and deceleration of the object; and c) a calculator for calculating a degree of target deceleration which changes continu- ously until the complete stop of the objecL, and d) a controller for controlling the brake device so as to render the actual deceleration substantially equal to the calculated target deceleration upon comparison between the actual deceleration with the calculated target deceleration.

whereby da/dt of the object is changed continuously without any sudden change, such as bent indicated at points X and Y, at the start of the smooth stop control and also during the smooth stop control until the cornpiete stop of the object.

3. Detection of When to Start the Smooth Stop Control One of the simplest method to detect when to start the smooth stop control is to compare the actual speed of the object with a predeter- mined speed, and when the actual speed is reduced to the predetermined speed, the smooth stop control may be started.

However, it is preferable to start the smooth stop control from the relatively high speed when the deceleration is high, and the relatively low speed when the deceleration is low. For example, according to a preferred embodiment, the smooth stop control is started when the actual speed is reduced to a speed shown by a line L4 in Fig. 2. Curve L4 can be expressed as: v. = (C,a. + CA/(a,, + K) wherein (v.) is a speed for entering the smooth stop control, (aJ is a deceleration for entering the smooth stop control, and (C,), (C2) and (K) are constants. (C2) can be equal to zero.

Instead of providing the above given equation, a relationship between the speed (v) and deceleration (a.) can be given by a table storing various combinations of (v.) and (a.). In this case, the relationship therebetween need not be the same as line L4 shown in Fig. 2.

4. Control after the start of the Smooth Stop Control When the smooth stop control starts, the deceleration changes along a cosine curve, such as curve L5 shown in Fig. 3. The curve L5 can be given by an equation as follows:

a = aJ2(1 + cos -.rt/t.) wherein (a) is an actual deceleration, (a.) is a deceleration for entering the smooth stop control, (t) is a time, and (t.) is a required. time period from the start of the smooth stop control to the complete stop of the object.

Instead of the equation given above, the 3 GB 2 147 434A 3 relationship between the deceleration (a) and time (t) can be given by a table which is stored with various combinations of (a) and (t). In this case, the relationship therebetween need not be the same as line L5 shown in Fig.

3. As understood from the graph of Fig. 3, it is preferable that the abscissa represents (t/t,,), instead of (t), and ordinate represents (a/a.), instead of (a), thereby providing di mensioniess (no unit) abscissa and ordinate. 75 When the above relationship, such as line L5, is employed, the error may be undesirably accumulated, resulting in the error of control, such that the object may be stopped before or after the time (tJ. In order to eliminate such an error, the object can preferably be con trolled by a curve L7, shown in Fig. 5. Curve L7 is obtained in the following manner. Curve L5, which is in relation to the deceleration, is integrated to obtain a curve L6, which is in relation to the speed. Then, by using curves L5 and L6, curve L7 is obtained. Curve L7 can be expressed by a certain formula:

a/a.=f(v/v.) or by a table having various combinations of (a/a,,) and (v/vJ. Either as a formula or a table, curve L7 is stored in a memory device.

When curve L7 or a similar relationship is employed, the deceleration is controlled such that the actual speed (v) is detected at a regular interval, and the actual deceleration is controlled to be equal to the calculated result of a target deceleration as follows:

a = aJ (v /v.).

5. Control immediately before the start of the Smooth Stop Control If the object has been controlled in a so called constant deceleration system immedi ately before the start of the smooth stop control, the smooth stop control can be started without any problem. However, if the object has been controlled under a system based on a certain formula dependent on the manipulated amount or manipulated strength by a driver, the deceleration (a) at the time when the speed is (vo) may possibly be such that:

da/dt = 0.

In such a case, the deceleration curve will be bent to provide an angle at the starting mo ment of the smooth stop control, resulting in an uncomfortable shock. To eliminate such a shock at the start of the smooth stop control, the actual da/dt should be compared, at a predetermined time interval, with a calculated da/dt according to the smooth stop control formula such as a = a.f (v/v.), after the start of the smooth stop control. The smooth stop control is carried out only when the actual 130 da/dt fails within a predetermined range determined by the calculated da/dt. To facilitate the comparison, the following analysis should be made. 70 First, curve L5 of Fig. 3 is differentiated to obtain curve L8 of Fig. 6. In this case, the abscissa should preferably represent v,Ja 02 da/dt instead of da/dt, so that the abscissa is made dimensionless.

Next, by the use of curves L5 (Fig. 3), L6 (Fig. 4) and L8 (Fig. 6), curve L9 is.obtained through the following calculation:

v/v. X a 02 /a 2 X vo/a 02 da/dt which is substantially equal to v/a 2 da/dt.

Accordingly, the result of calculation v/ a 2 da/dt using the parameters (v), (a) and (da/dt) detected while the object is being controlled and following curve L5, will fail along line L9 shown in Fig. 7. According to a preferred embodiment, the abscissa should preferably represent v/vo rather than t/t,, and, for this purpose, curve L1 0 (Fig. 8) is obtained using curves L6 (Fig. 4) and L9 (Fig.

7). Curve L1 0 can be expressed by a certain formula:

v/a 2 da/dt = g(v/v.) or by a table having various combinations of (v/a2 da/dt) and (v/vJ. Either as a formula or a table, curve L1 0 is stored in a memory device.

6. Process for Starting Smooth Stop Control Before starting the smooth stop control, the speed (v) and deceleration (a) of the object is regularly detected at a predetermined time interval. The smooth stop control will be started if two requirements are satisfied.

The first requirement to start the smooth stop control is related to the speed of the object. If the detected result (a, v) is plotted above curve L4, that is, if the detected speed (v) is greater than (v.) with respect to the detected deceleration (a,,), it is not permitted to enter the smooth stop control. On the other hand, if the detected result is plotted on or below curve L4, that is, if the detected speed (v) is equal to or less than (vo) for the detected deceleration (a.), the first requirement is met. The values v. and a. obtained when the first requirement is met are stored. The smooth stop control, however, is still suppressed until the second requirement is met.

The second requirement is related to the deceleration of the object. By the use of the detected and stored value v, a value g(v/vo) is calculated. Also, a value v/a 2 da/dt is calculated. If the calculated value v/a 2 da/dt GB 2 147 434A 4 fails above curve L1 0, that is, if the calculated value v/a 2 da/dt is greater than g(v/v.), it is not permitted to release the suppression and, therefore, the smooth stop control is not yet actually carried out. On the other hand, if the calculated value v/a 2 da/dt is plotted on or below curve L1 0, that is, if the calculated value v/a 2 da/dt is equal to or less than 9(v/v.), the smooth stop control is started.

The smooth stop control can be carried out in two different procedures, as described below.

The first procedure for the smooth stop control is carried out in accordance with line L7 shown in Fig. 5. In this case, in order to reduce or eliminate any error in the deceleration (a.), the deceleration (a.) is found on line L7 through an inverse operation:

a.=a/[f(v/v.)] using values (a) and (v) which represent the actual (a) and (v), respectively, at the beginning of carrying out of, i.e., releasing the suppression of, the smooth stop control. Thereupon the object is under the smooth stop control such that its deceleration (a) follows line L7 upon calculation of:

a = a. X f (v/v.) using the obtained deceleration (a) and speed NO) Another procedure for the smooth stop control is carried out in accordance with line Ll 0 shown in Fig. 8. According to this procedure, the target deceleration (a) at the very near future (after time period At) is calculated using the present data in accordance with the fol- lowing formula:

a,,,, = a, + (a t2/V2) X q(V t /V.) X &t wherein (a,) and (v,) represent deceleration and speed at a certain time (t), respectively, (a,J 110 represents target deceleration at a time (t + At), and (At) represents a very short period of time. According to this procedure, it is necessary to store only one formula g, instead of two formulas f and g. Therefore, it is possible to arrange the system with a small storing means.

In the formula g, if da/dt = o at v = v., we obtain g(l) = o. Also, since da/dt = 0 at v = 0, we obtain g(O)>J. Furthermore, if the 120 deceleration (a) can be given by:

a = a./2(1 + COS 'rt/te) we obtain g(O) = 2/3..

From the above, the formula g can be expressed, for example, as follows:

9(v/v.) = K(II - V/VJn wherein K>J, and (n) being a constant.

7. Termination of Smooth Stop Control before the Complete Stop In some occasions, such as when the ir.en tion to stop the object lasts no longer, or at an emergency when it is necessary to suddenly stop the object within a very short distance even with the shock, it is necessary to termi- nate the smooth stop control before the complete stop of the object.

In the case where the control before the smooth stop control is a programmed control (one of the simplest example of the pro- grammed control is the constant deceleration control), the order for the termination of the smooth stop control needed at the above occasions will be automatically given to the programmed control system and, therefore, the termjination can be accomplished without any problem.

On the contrary, in the case where the control before the smooth stop control is a deceleration control based on a certain for- mula dependent on the manipulated amount or manipulated strength by a driver, it is necessary to further detect the intended amount of deceleration of the object even after the start of the smooth stop control.

Based on the detected result, it is further detected whether or not the intention to stop the object lasts no longer, or whether or not it is necessary to suddenly stop the object. For this purpose, the following procedure is taken.

In the case where the detected result of the driver's intention indicates that he does not require to stop the object, that is when the target deceleration required by the driver is less than the target deceleration obtained in accordance with the smooth stop control, it is understood that the driver does not have, any longer, the intention to stop the object. (in the above sentence, the comparison between the target decelerations is carried out by taking absolute values thereof. It is understood to those skilled in the art that in the description herein, the term of, or the symbol for, the absolute value is omitted for the sake of brevity.) In such a case, the smooth stop control terminates, and the control is carried out in accordance with the driver's intended control.

On the other hand, when the detected result of the driver's intention indicates that the driver's intention is to immediately stop the object, that is when the absolute value of the deceleration required by the driver is greater than the absolute value of the deceleration obtained at the beginning of the releasing point of the smooth stop control, it is understood that the case is in emergency. Therefore, the smooth stop control terminates, and the object stops immediately in accordance with the driver's intended control. Here, the absolute value of the deceleration obtained at GB 2 147 434A 5 the suppression releasing point or the beginning point of the smooth stop control means an absolute value of (a) when the equation:

v/a2 da/dt = g(v/v.) is satisfied at first time. This value of a is designated as (a).

If the above control for the termination is employed without any improvement, the smooth stop control can be terminated when the driver's intended control of the deceleration is much higher than the target deceleration in accordance with the smooth stop con- trol, resulting in an unexpected large increase of deceleration at the moment of the termination of the smooth stop control. To this end, an improvement is made.

Referring to Fig. 9, line L7, which is the same line as that of Fig. 5 is shown. Furthermore, at upper left corner thereof, a hatched section enclosed by a dotted curve is shown, which is spaced from line L7. When it is assumed that the suppression is released at a point, or the smooth stop control begins from a point, (v/v., a/a.), the smooth stop control will be continued until the speed (v) is reduced to 0. According to the improvement, the smooth stop control will not be termined unless the driver's control deviates from line L7 and enters into the hatched section. The line defining the hatched section can be given by a suitable formula or by a suitable table tion (a) before the SSC, is controlled to be constant, for example, by a programmed schedule. Accordingly, when a line representing the deceleration under the first type control system and a line, such as fine L5 in Fig. 3, representing the smooth stop curve are considered, these two lines can be connected without any bent. In other words, these two lines have the same gradient (da/dt = 0) at the connecting point therebetween. Next, the steps are described in detail.

At step #1, an object is under the normal driving mode, which is in this case the first type control system. At step #2, thq decelera- tion (a,) for the normal driving mode is obtained through a calculation or reading from a program of the normal driving mode. Then, at step #3, the actual (v), (a) and (da/dt) at present are detected or calculated. At step #4, a check is made whether the SSC is already started or not. In the first cycle of the operation through the flow chart of Fig. 11, it is understood that the SSC is not yet started. Accordingly, in the first cycle, the program goes to step #5 at which a decision is made stored in a memory means.

8. Application of Smooth Stop Control System of the Present Invention Referring to Fig. 10, a block diagram of a brake system is shown. A moving object 1 is diagrammatically shown by a circle. Provided to the moving object 1 are brake arrangement 4 and a detector 5 for detecting the speed of the moving object 1. The brake arrangement 4 is connected to a controller 2 for controlling the degree of braking effect by the brake arrangement 4. Controller 2 is coupled to a calculator 6 and also to a lever 3 which can be operated manually. In the calculator 6, the actual deceleration (a) of the object 1 is calcu- lated by differentiating the detected speed (v). 115 Instead, the actual deceleration (a) can be detected directly by a deceleration detector (not shown) provided to the object 1. Furthermore, the change of deceleration da/dt is also calculated in the calculator 6.

Referring to Figs. 11, 12 and 13, three different flow charts are shown for the three different types of control systems. In the flow charts and the description hereinbelow, the abbreviation SSC represents the term smooth stop control.

Referring to Fig. 11, a flow chart for effecting the SSC under the first type of control system is shown. The first type of the control system has a feature such that the decelera- whether the SSC is required or not. This decision is done by a comparison between the actual speed (v) and a certain speed (v.) at a certain deceleration (a.) given by line L4 shown in Fig. 2. If the actual speed (v) is reduced equal to or below the certain speed (v.), the SSC is required and, therefore, the program goes to step #6 so as to start the SSC. If not, the program goes to step #8 at which the obtained deceleration (a,,), which is based on the program for the normal driving mode, is picked as a target deceleration. Then at step #11, the actual deceleration (a) is controlled and made substantially equal to the target deceleration, which is in this case (a,). Then, the program returns to step #2.

When the SSC starts at step #6, the speed (v.) and deceleration (ao) obtained at the starting moment of the SSC is stored at step #7. Then, the deceleration (aJ for the SSC is obtained through the calculation at step #9. The deceleration (as) can be obtained in two different ways which are already explained in the above under the item 6 with a subtitle -Process for Starting Smooth Stop Control---. Then, at step #10, the obtained deceleration (%) is picked and used as a target deceleration. Then at step #11, the actual deceleration (a) is controlled and made substantially equal to the target deceleration, which is in this case (as). Then, the program returns to step #2.

Once the SSC is started at step #6, the program procedure in the succeeding cycles follows the steps of #2, #3, #4, #9 and #10 so as to control the deceleration (a) in a manner shown by curve L5 of Fig. 3.

As understood from the foregoing, under this control system, the SSC starts without any delay after the SSC is required.

6 GB 2 147 434A 6 Referring to Fig. 12, a flow chart for effecting the SSC under the second type of control system is shown. The second type of the control system has a feature such that the rate of change of the deceleration da/dt before the SSC, is controlled to be variant. Accordingly, under this control system, even when the SSC is required, sometimes the SSC starts not immediately after the requirement, but with some delay. The case when the delay takes place is when the rate of change of the deceleration da/dt before the SSC is not zero, such as indicated by a dotted line in Fig. 3 representing the programmed deceleration (%) under the normal driving mode. In such a 80 case, even when the SSC is required, the SSC is temporarily suppressed until the gradient of the dotted line in Fig. 3, i.e., daM/dt coincides with the gradient of the smooth stop curve, such as L5. Accordingly, during the suppression, the object is controlled under the normal drive mode using the deceleration a, as the target deceleration. When these two gradients coincides with each other, the suppression is released, and immediately thereafter, the SSC starts. Next, the flow chart of the SSC under the second type of the control system is described in detail in connection with Fig. 12 in which the step numbers with an underline are the steps which are different from the flowchart of Fig. 11.

In the same manner described above, the deceleration (a,) is obtained (#102), and the actual (v), (a) and (da/dt) at present are detected or calculated (#103). Then, at step # 104, a check is made whether or not the SSC is entered or not. Here, the term---entercovers both -required and start- and---required but not yet started---. In the first cycle, the SSC is not entered and, therefore, the program goes to the next step #105 to decide whether or not the SSC is required. If the SSC is required, the program goes step #106 at which the SSC is entered. At this point, the SSC is not yet started, but the preparation for 110 the SSC, such as to store (v.), (a.) as carried out in the next step #107, starts. Immediately therafter, the SSC is suppressed at step #108; whereby the actual start of the SSC is delayed. As understood from the further steps 115 #109 and #15, the object is still under the control of the normal driving mode, using (%) as the target deceleration.

If step #106 has been passed in the previ- ous cycle, the program goes from step #104 to step #110 in the next cycle of the procedure. At step #110, a check is made whether the SSC is suppressed or not. If yes, the program goes to step #111 at which a de- cision is made whether it is necessary to release the supression or not. This decision is done by the comparison between the abovementioned two gradients. If the two gradients are different from each other, the program follows steps #109 and #115, thereby fur- ther delaying the actual start of the SSC. On the other hand,when the two gradients coincide with each other, the program goes to step #112 to actually start the SSC.

Then, the deceleration (as) for the SSC is obtained through the calculation at step #113, and at step #114, the obtained deceleration (as) is picked and used as a target deceleration, Then at step #115, the actual deceleration (a) is controlled and made sub- stantially equal to the target deceleration, which is in this case (a,). Then, the program returns to step #102. Thereafter, the procedure through steps #102,#103,#104,#110,#113,#114 and #115 is repeated, thereby controlling the object to make a smooth stop in accordance with a programmed deceleration, such as shown by line L5. 85 Referring to Fig. 13, a flow chart for effecting the SSC under the third type of control system is shown. The third type of the control system has a feature such that the target deceleration is calculated according to the manual operation, such as by a brake pedal (not shown). Accordingly, during the normal driving mode, the deceleration is dependent on the driver's will, but once the SSC is started, the object decelerates according to the program, such as along line L5. In the case where the driver wishes, during the SSC, to stop the object more quickly or not to stop the object, the SSC is immediately terminated and the object is brought under the control of manual operation in the normal driving mode. Next, the flow chart of the SSC under the third type of the control system is described in connection with Fig. 13 in which the step numbers with an underline are the steps which are different from the flow chart of Fig. 12.

At step #202, a manipulated amount is detected. For example, if the deceleration is manually controlled by a brake pedal, the degree of depression of the brake pedal is detected. Then, at step #203, using the detected manipulated amount, the deceleration (%) for the normal driving mode is calculated. The SSC enters, the start of the SSC is temporarily suppressed in the same manner as described above. Then, after step #213 at which the SSC is started, the speed (v) and deceleration (a) are stored. As understood from the foregoing description, (v) and (a) represent, respectively, the speed and deceleration at the start of the SSC, for example, those obtained at a point where the dotted line in Fig. 3 touching line L5. Then, after step #215, a decision is made whether or not it is necessary to terminate the SSC. This decision is done by the detection whether the deceleration amount obtained by the manual operation fails within the shaded portions shown in Fig. 9, or not. If it does not fall within the shaded portion, the program goes 7 GB2147434A 7 to step #218 to continue the SSC. On the contrary, if it fails within the shaded portion, the program goes to step #217 to immediately terminate the SSC and to start again the deceleration control based on the normal driving mode, which in this case is dependent on the manual operation.

Although the present invention has been fully described with reference to a preferred embodiment, many modifications and variations thereof will now be apparent to those skilled in the art, and the scope of the present invention is therefore to be limited not by the details of the preferred embodiment described above, but only by the terms of appended claims.

Claims

1. A smooth stop control system for ef- fecting the smooth stop of an object having a controllable brake arrangement comprising:

means for detecting an actual speed and an actual deceleration of said object; means for calculating a degree of target deceleration in such a manner that it changes smoothly until the complete stop of said object; means for comparing said actual deceleration with said calculated target deceleration; and means for controlling said brake arrange ment so as to render the actual deceleration substantially equal to said calculated target deceleration.

2. A method for carrying out a smooth stop control of an object having a controllable brake arrangement comprisng the steps of:

detecting an actual speed and an actual deceleration of said object; calculating a degree of target deceleration 105 in such a manner that it changes smoothly until the complete stop of said object; comparing said actual deceleration with said calculated target deceleration; and controlling said brake arrangement so as to 110 render the actual deceleration substantially equal to said calculated target deceleration.

3. A method for carrying out a smooth stop control as claimed in Claim 2, further comprising a step for comparing the said actual speed with a predetermined speed, whereby said controlling step enters the smooth stop control when said actual speed is reduced down to said predetermined speed.

4. A method for carrying out a smooth stop control as claimed in Claim 3, wherein said predetermined speed is constant regard less of the deceleration.

5. A method for carrying out a smooth stop control as claimed in Claim 3, wherein said predetermined speed increases with respect to the increase of the deceleration.

6. A method for carrying out a smooth stop control as claimed in Claim 2, wherein said calculated target deceleration changes with respect to the time along a cosine curve or a similar curve thereto.

7. A method for carrying out a smooth stop control as claimed in Claim 2, wherein said calculated target deceleration (a) is calculated by a formula 1 given by an equation:

a = ao X f (v/vJ 1 wherein (aJ and (vJ are deceleration and speed, respectively, at the enter of the smooth stop control, and f(v/vJ is a function with a variant (v/v.).

8. A method for carrying out a oth stop control as claimed in Claim 7 ' wherein various combinations of (v/vo) and corresponding f(v/v.) are stored in a table.

9. A method for carrying out a smooth stop control as claimed in Claim 2, further comprising the steps of:

comparing the said actual speed with a predetermined speed, whereby, when said actual speed is reduced down to said predetermined speed, said smooth stop control step enters and stores the values (v.) and (a,,), which present deceleration and speed, respectively, at the enter of the smooth stop control, but suppresses the actual start of the smooth stop control; calculating v/a2 da/dt calculating 9(v/v.) which is a function with a variant (v/vJ; and comparing said v/a2 da/dt with said g(v/v.), whereby said controlling step releases said suppression and actually starts the smooth stop control when said v/a 2 da/dt becomes equal to or smaller than said g(v/v.).

10. A method for carrying out a smooth stop control as claimed in Claim 9, wherein various combinations of (v/v,) and corresponding q(v/vo) are stored in a table.

11. A method for carrying out a smooth stop control as claimed in Claim 9, wherein said function g is given as follows: g(v/v.) = K(1 - V^,)n wherein K>, and (n) being a constant.

12. A method for carrying out a smooth stop control as claimed in claim 2, wherein said calculated target deceleration (a) is calcu- lated by a formula 11 given by an equation:

a,,,, = a, + a t2 /v, X g(v,/vo) X At 11 wherein (a,) and (v,) represent actual decelera- tion and speed at a certain time (t), respectively, (a,+,,,) represents target deceleration at a time (t + At), and (At) represents a very short period of time.

13. A method for carrying out a smooth stop control as claimed in Claim 2, wherein, during a normal control system before the entry of the smooth stop control, a target deceleration is calculated based on a certain formula dependent on the manipulated amount or manipulated strength by a driver.

8 GB 2 147 434A 8

14. A method for carrying out a smooth stop control as claimed in Claim 13, further comprising the step of:

detecting an absolute value of deceleration (%) according to the driver's intention during 70 the smooth stop control; detecting an absolute value of the calcu lated target deceleration (as) according to the smooth stop control during the smooth stop control; comparing the two detected absolute values; and terminating the smooth stop control when said absolute value of target deceleration (%) according to the driver's intention fails down less than said absolute value of the calculated target deceleration (as), whereupon the smooth stop control is terminated and the control is returned to the normal control based on the certain formula dependent on the manipulated amount or manipulated strength by a driver.

15. A method for carrying out a smooth stop control as claimed in Claim 13, further comprising the step of:

detecting an absolute value of deceleration (%) according to the driver's intention during the smooth stop control; detecting an absolute value of the calcu lated target deceleration (a) at which the smooth stop control actually starts; comparing the two detected absolute values; and terminating the smooth stop control when said absolute value of target deceleration (%) according to the driver's intention exceeds said absolute value of the calculated target deceleration (a) at which the smooth stop cotrol starts, whereupon the smooth stop con trol is terminated and the control is returned to the normal control based on the certain formula dependent on the manipulated amount or manipulated strength by a driver.

16. A method for carrying out a smooth stop control as claimed in Claim 13, further comprising the step of:

detecting an absolute value of deceleration (am) according to the driver's intention during the smooth stop control; detecting an absolute value of a predetermined threshold deceleration which is greater than the absolute value of the calculated target deceleration (as) according to the smooth stop control during the smooth stop control; comparing the two detected absolute values; and terminating the smooth stop control when said absolute value of target deceleration (am) according to the driver's intention exceeds the predetermined threshold value which is greater than said absolute value of the calculated target deceleration (as), whereupon the smooth stop control is terminated and the control is returned to the normal control based on the certain formula dependent on the manipulated amount or manipulated strength by a driver.

17. A method for carrying out a smooth stop control according to claim 2 substantially as described herein.

18. Equipment for use in carrying out a smooth stop control according to any one of the preceding claims, comprising means for executing the steps described therein.

Printed in the United Kingdom for Her Majesty"s Stationery Office, Dd 8818935. 1985. 4235. Published at The Patent Office. 25 Southampton Buildings, London. WC2A IlAY, from which copies may be obtained