GB2108950A - Tank aeration installation and operation - Google Patents

Tank aeration installation and operation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2108950A
GB2108950A GB08228725A GB8228725A GB2108950A GB 2108950 A GB2108950 A GB 2108950A GB 08228725 A GB08228725 A GB 08228725A GB 8228725 A GB8228725 A GB 8228725A GB 2108950 A GB2108950 A GB 2108950A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
aeration
drip
feed unit
installation
tank
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
GB08228725A
Other versions
GB2108950B (en
Inventor
Botho Bohnke
Bernd Diering
Paul Diers
Arno Grau
Andreas Strohmeier
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of GB2108950A publication Critical patent/GB2108950A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of GB2108950B publication Critical patent/GB2108950B/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F3/00Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F3/02Aerobic processes
    • C02F3/12Activated sludge processes
    • C02F3/1205Particular type of activated sludge processes
    • C02F3/1215Combinations of activated sludge treatment with precipitation, flocculation, coagulation and separation of phosphates
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F3/00Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F3/02Aerobic processes
    • C02F3/04Aerobic processes using trickle filters
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F3/00Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F3/02Aerobic processes
    • C02F3/12Activated sludge processes
    • C02F3/1205Particular type of activated sludge processes
    • C02F3/121Multistep treatment
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02WCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
    • Y02W10/00Technologies for wastewater treatment
    • Y02W10/10Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage

Abstract

A process for the operation of a tank aeration installation having two aeration tanks, an initial drip-feed unit and a final clarification tank is improved by having the drip-feed unit adapted as a high-load unit with a space load in the range 2 to 12 kg/BOD5/m<3>. day, preferably around 5 kg BOD5/m<3>. day, and is so operated. The sewage input from the high-load drip-feed unit so operated to the aeration tanks is increased to a rate at least 1.5 times greater than the rate applied to conventional tank aeration installations.

Description

SPECIFICATION Tank aeration installation and operation This invention relates to a process for the operation of a tank aeration installation having aeration tanks, an initial drip-feed unit and a final clarification basin, which tank aeration installation has existing or planned aeration tanks with prescribed tank aeration indices and prescribed tank aeration capacity parameters (inhabitants or equivalent parameters) and is thus adapted to treat a prescribed throughput in cubic metres per day of sewage requiring tank aeration. It is usual to provide two aeration tanks operating in series.
The invention further relates to a tank aeration installation adapted to carrying out the said treatment process. In the context of the invention, the term "sewage" more particularly covers domestic wastes and discharges which can be decomposed similarly easily. The terms "tank aeration index" and "tank aeration capacity parameter" relate to the known art of disposal by tank aeration. The typical indices for conventional tank aeration installations having two aeration tanks and a single final clarification basin include a specific space requirement of about 3m3 per inhabitant or equivalent inhabitant and a specific area requirement of about 2m2 per inhabitant or equivalent inhabitant, these indices being minimum levels. The space load on the aeration tanks is about 309 BOD#m3. day.The normal tank aeration capacity parameter varies from 8,000 to 10,000 at the most of inhabitants or their equivalent served.
In known installations of this type, the drip-feed unit is operated as a low-load unit with a space load of the order of magnitude of 1 to 2 kg BOD#m3. day, and the low-load drip-feed unit operated under these conditions supplies the aeration tanks at the conventional rate corresponding to the capacity parameters quoted above. No difficulties arise up to the quoted capacity parameter of 8,000 to 10,000 inhabitants or their equivalent served. If the load ceiling is exceeded, both the area and the space requirements become excessive.The quoted limit applies both to tank aeration installations of the type having stationary compressed-air candles, as they are called, which are usually disposed at the midpoint of each aeration tank, and to those of the type having compressed-air candles which reciprocate across the aeration tanks and are usually disposed on the endfaces of the aeration tanks. The following detailed comments must however be made on the subject of the purification of discharges in general and domestic sewage in particular, with the aid of tank aeration installations.
There must be several hundred conventional tank aeration installations in operation in the German Federal Republic. They meet the current regulations and performance requirements, and to this extent they are well proven. They maintain highly stable treatment conditions and are environmentally favourable. On the one hand they have very high specific area and space requirements, but on the other hand they require very little attention. The capital cost per inhabitant or equivalent inhabitant served is very low.Their cost effectiveness with regard to capital outlay and maintenance charges can be attributed, among other factors, to the possibility in general of constructing this type of tank aeration installation by simple earth moving means, added to the fact that generous space and area provisions avoid the installation of special equipment in the form of sand traps, rakes and sludge handlers. The dwell period for treating sewage in the aeration tanks is in the range 10 to 15 days. The specific energy consumption per kg of substances destroyed (BOD5) is of the order of 1 kWh/kg BOD5, which corresponds to the value for oxidation ditches. As previously pointed out, tank aeration installations with ample space provisions need no rakes, sand traps or special sludge handling stages. The sludge settles on the floors of the aeration tanks.The permanently aerated water stream sweeps over the sludge and supplies oxygen to the topmost sludge layers, so that sludge never floats up and the topmost layer never putrefies. The lower sludge layers are decomposed anaerobically. Years elapse before the fully stabilised sludge need be pumped out.
The sewage itself is purified in the aerated tanks by very fine floccules floating in the water and by aerobic organisms attached to the floor.
One object of the invention is to provide a process whereby a tank aeration installation can be operated at higher tank aeration capacity parameters than those conventionally applied, so that a substantially increased throughput of sewage can be treated. Another object of the invention is to provide a tank aeration installation adapted to carrying out the said process.
According to the present invention, a process for the operation of a tank aeration installation has aeration tanks, an initial drip-feed unit, and a final clarification basin, which tank aeration installation has existing or planned aeration tanks with prescribed tank aeration indices and prescribed tank aeration capacity parameters and is thus adapted to treating a prescribed throughput of sewage requiring tank aeration, the drip-feed unit being adapted to be operated as a high-load unit with a space load in the range 2 to 12kg B0DWm3. day, preferably around 5kg B0D#m3., and that the aeration tanks are supplied with sewage from the high-load drip-feed unit operating under these conditions at a rate at least 1.5 times greater than the rate applied to conven#ional tank aeration installations.
Otherwise the aeration tanks are unchanged and are still operated in the conventional manner. The sludge settles as before on the floors of the aerated tanks. The permanently aerated water stream sweeps over the sludge and supplies oxygen to the topmost sludge layers, so that the sludge never floats up and as before there is no putrefaction. Years elapse before the fully stabilised sludge need be pumped out. The sewage itself is purified in the aeration tanks by very fine floccules floating in the water and by aerobic organisms attached to the floor.Thus the invention combines a drip-feed unit modified into a high-load unit with aeration tanks which are in no significant way, if at all, constructionally different from those included in conventional tank aeration installations, but this modification allows the installation as a whole to operate at capacity parameters at least 1.5 times, and possibly even 2 to 3 times greater, than for conventional tank aeration installations. For this reason, the invention is particularly significant when it is required to adapt or reinstate an existing tank aeration installation to operate at higher capacity parameters, or in other words to treat an increased volume of sewage. For this purpose, it is now sufficient to replace or modify the drip-feed unit. However, the significance of the invention is not confined to the modification of existing tank aeration installations.On the contrary, the invention is also relevant to newly constructed tank aeration installations, since the drip-feed unit can be adapted and operated as described above-while the aeration tanks remain as it were conventional.
Within the scope of the invention, there are numerous possibilities for further detailed improvement. In the case of a tank aeration installation having a coarse pre-clarification unit preceding the drip-feed unit, the coarse preclarification stage is preferably carried out in a cross-current circular basin, in which sand and coarse sludge settle out, and the sand and coarse sludge from the coarse pre-clarification unit is fed directly into the aeration tanks, bypassing the drip-feed unit, and there deposited. The drip-feed unit is preferably operated at a flushing rate of 5m/h or more, while the so-called biological turf formed in the drip-feed unit is flushed away for deposition again in the aeration tanks.
One embodiment of the invention of separate and independent significance relates to means whereby it is possible to operate a tank aeration installation constructed and operated on conventional lines at sewage throughput rates 2 or more times greater than for conventional tank aeration installations. For this purpose, an adsorption basin, also of the high-load type, is preferably interposed between the highly loaded drip-feed unit and the aeration tanks, the sludge from the adsorption basin being again fed into the aeration tanks and there deposited.The term adsorption basin refers in this case to a culture basin for the adsorptive, self-filtering and coagulating removal of carbon and nitrogen compounds which are relatively resistant to decomposition, which basin is aerated with atmospheric air and operated at a space load of about 10 kg BOD,"m3. day and a sludge load of at least 2 kg BOD$kg TS. day (cf. DE-AS 26 40 875, DE-AS 28 03 759).
It is within the scope of the invention to add precipitants, such as Fe (II) salts, for example, between the first and second high-load biological stages. On the one hand, this raises the purification performance of the culture stage, while on the other hand the phosphate content is absorbed for deposition with the sludge in the aeration tanks. In conjunction with phosphate reduction in the following tank aeration stages and in the moist biotope, phosphate reductions of 80 to 90% are reached by these means. It is also within the scope of the invention to add precipitants, such as Fe (II) salts, for example, between the first and second aeration tanks.
Again, it is within the scope of the invention to feed the purified effluent from the final clarification tank into a moist biotope and to purify if finally therein.
In the process of the invention, the aeration tanks in the tank aeration installation continue to function with their characteristic processing stability. As before, no separate sludge conditioning stages are required, and there is no need for rakes or the like. Nevertheless, the space or area requirement is substantially reduced, by a factory of up to 1/4, or in other words the volume of sewage treated can be correspondingly increased. The environmentally favourable tank aeration system can be applied to substantially higher capacity parameters, i.e., to serve 30,000 to 40,000 inhabitants or their equivalent. Little attention is required by either the drip-feed unit or the adsorption basin.The highly loaded culture can be aerated with the aid of compressed air or by surface aeration, but it is preferred to aerate with compressed air, using the air compressors already available in the tank aeration installation.
In the embodiment having an initial adsorption basin, a proportion of the easily destroyed organic compounds is decomposed in the drip-feed unit, at a very low specific energy consumption of only 0.25 to 0.30 kWh/kg BOD5 reduced. The rest is treated in the adsorption basin, which can be operated anaerobically or aerobically, at will, but is preferably operated anaerobically, thereby converting substances which resist decomposition to substances which are easily decomposed. These residual substances can be decomposed in the aeration tanks. The energy consumption is reduced by about 50% compared with conventional tank aeration. The investment charges for a given sewage treatment capacity are reduced significantly, i.e., by aout 30 to 40%.
The process of the invention, and tank aeration installations adapted to carrying it out, will now be described in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:~ Figure 1 is the flowsheet for a tank aeration installation having a high-load drip-feed unit and adapted to carrying out the process of the invention; and Figure 2 is the flowsheet for a tank aeration installation having a high-load drip-feed unit and an adsorption basin and adapted to carrying out the process of the invention.
Figure 1 shows a tank aeration installation having two aeration tanks 1 and 2, an initial drip feed unit 3 and a final clarification basin 4. The tanks 1 and 2 have prescribed tank aeration indices and prescribed tank aeration capacity parameters (inhabitants or their equivalent). This refers to the indices and parameters quoted initially in respect of the conventional art of aeration tank operation. In other words, it implies that the aeration tanks 1 and 2 are designed for a prescribed sewage throughput in cubic metres per day. However, the drip-feed unlt 3 is no longer a low-load unit, but is adapted as a high-load unit with a space load in the range 2 to 12 kg BOD5/m3. day. The installation as a whole is adapted to treat a sewage throughput at least 1.5 times greater than that for which the aeration tanks 1 and 2 were designed.The drip-feed unit 3 can be packed with plastics sprinkler material and designed so that biological turf build-up is prevented by maintaining a flushing rate of 5 m/h or more. Furthermore, an initial coarse preclarification unit 5 is provided. The arrangement is such that the sand and coarse sludge from the coarse pre-clarification unit 5 is fed into the aeration tanks 1 and 2 by means of a mammoth pump connected to the aerators 6 in the aeration tanks 1 and 2. The aerators 6 are constructed on conventional lines are moreover adapted for the conventional sewage throughput for tank aeration.
Figure 2 shows an embodiment having an adsorption basin 7 interposed between the highload drip-feed unit 3 and the aeration tanks 1 and 2, the aeration equipment for the adsorption basin 7 being also connected to the aerators 6 in the aeration tanks. The sludge from the adsorption basin 7 can be fed into the aeration tanks 1 and 2.
The provision of the initial high-load drip-feed unit 3 in the embodiment shown in Figure 1 has the result that before ever reaching the aerated tanks 1 and 2 some 30 to 50% of the organic substances dissolved in the sewage is converted to solid substances which will settle out. Provided the drip-feed unit 3 is operated at the specific space load, this degree of destruction will be reached with ease. As a result, one can save more than 1 2,000m3 in tank capacity by providing 1 70m3 for the coarse pre-clarification and dripfeed stages. In other words, a community of 12,000 inhabitants or their equivalent can be served at the same area requirement as would be sufficient in a conventional tank aeration installation for only 6,000 inhabitants or their equivalent.
In accordance with the invention, the drip-feed unit 3 is preceded by a conventional biological stage, but the latter is operated in a specific manner, i.e., as a high-load unit. Moreover, the sludge formed in this biological stage is not handled in the conventional manner for biological stages. On the contrary, it is fed into the aeration tanks 1 and 2 and caused to settle there. The permanently aerated water stream sweeps over this sludge and supplies oxygen to the topmost sludge layers, so that sludge never floats up and the topmost layer never putrefies. Years elapse, as before, before the fully stabilised sludge need be pumped out. The sewage is then purified in the aeration tanks 1 and 2, as before, by very fine floccules floating in the water and by aerobic organisms attached to the floor.With the initial coarse pre-clarification unit 5, the functions of raking, sand entrapment and coarse preclarification are combined, preferably with the aid of a circular cross-current basin or alternatively an elongated pre-clarification basin. The floating constitutents are retained in the coarse preclarification unit 5 and caused to settle out by continuous slight aeration. The sand and coarse sludge are transferred, preferably through a mammoth pump, into the drip-feed unit outflow and thence into the aeration tanks 1 and 2.
However, a similar transfer is made of the biological turf, which is flushed out of the dripfeed unit 3 by reason of the high flushing rate. It is finally deposited in the aeration tanks 1 and 2.
The energy costs are greatly reduced, since a half of the load is destroyed in the high-load drip-feed unit 3. For example, the specific energy consumption in a drip-feed unit 4m tall is about 0.25 kWh/kg BODs reduced. Compared with straightforward tank aeration installations having a specific energy consumption of 1.0 kWh/kg BOD5 reduced, the resulting energy saving is about 35%.
With the high-load adsorption basin 7 of the embodiment of Figure 2, disposed between the drip-feed unit 3 and the aeration tanks 1 and 2, even higher capacities can be attained without seriously affecting the specific area and space requirements. On the contrary, the specific space requirement can actually be reduced by thus interposing an adsorption basin. By providing the two intial high-load stages, viz., the drip-feed unit 3 and the adsorption basin 7, it is possible to remove approximately 75% of the organic load on the aeration tanks 1 and 2, so that they require only about 25% of the capacity previously needed, or in other words the sewage throughput can be increased by a factor of approximately 3. It is a surprising fact that the aerated tanks are in no way overloaded with a residue of substances which resist decomposition and cannot be dealt with adequately, if at all. Thus some 50% of the organic load is destroyed in the high-load dripfeed unit 3. In the high-load adsorption stage 7, which is preferably though not necessarily operated anaerobically, the substances which resist decomposition are broken down to substances more easily destroyed. Thus the effluent from the high-load adsorption stage 7 is easily destroyed biologically. It is purified completely satisfactorily in the aeration tanks 1 and 2 operating at the conventional space load of 20 to 30g BODl,/m3. day. Moreover, a final clarification period of 1 day is sufficient in this installation to treat domestic or similarly treatable discharges to final effluent values of 1 smug BOD5/1. These effluent values meet the latest legal requirements.

Claims (15)

Claims 1. A process for the operation of a tank aeration installation having aeration tanks, an initial drip-feed unit, and a final clarification basin, which tank aeration installation has existing or planned aeration tanks with prescribed tank aeration indices and prescribed tank aeration capacity parameters and is thus adapted to treating a prescribed throughput of sewage requiring tank aeration, the drip-feed unit being adapated to be operated as a high-load unit with a space load in the range 2 to 12kg BOD#m3. day, and that the aeration tanks are supplied with sewage from the high-load drip-feed unit operating under these conditions at a rate at least
1.5 times greater than the rate applied to conventional tank aeration installations.
2. A process as in Claim 1, wherein the space load is around 5kg BOD#m3. day.
3. A process as in Claim 1 or Claim 2, wherein a coarse pre-clarification unit preceds the dripfeed unit, the coarse pre-clarification stage is carried out in a cross-current circular basin or an elongated basin, in which sand and coarse sludge settle out, and the sand and coarse sludge from the coarse pre-clarification unit is fed directly into the aeration tanks, bypassing the drip-feed unit, and is there deposited.
4. A process as in any one of Claims 1 to 3, wherein the drip-feed unit is operated at a flushing rate of 5m/h or more, while the biological turf formed in the drip-feed unit is flushed away for deposition again in the aeration tanks.
5. A process as in any one of Claims 1 to 4, wherein an adsorption basin, also of the high-load type, is interposed between the highly loaded drip-feed unit and the aeration tanks, the sludge from the adsorption basin being again fed into the aeration tanks and there deposited.
6. A process as in any one of Claims 1 to 5, wherein precipitants are fed in before the first aeration tank is entered.
7. A process as in any one of Claims 1 to 6, wherein the purified effluent from the final clarification basin is fed into a moist biotope and therein finally purified.
8. A process as in any one of Claims 1 to 7, wherein precipitants are fed in between the first high-load drip-feed stage and the second highload culturing stage.
9. A process as in Claim 6 or Claim 8, wherein the precipitants are Fe(ll) salts.
10. An installation for carrying out the process as in any of Claims 1 to 9, having aeration tanks, an initial drip-feed unit and a final clarification basin, the drip-feed unit being designed as a highload unit with a space load in the range 8 to 12 kg BOD#m3. day and the installation as a whole being adapted to treat sewage at a rate at least 1.5 times greater than the rate applied to installations having aeration tanks of conventional dimensions.
1 An installation as in Claim 10, wherein the drip-feed unit is packed with plastics sprinkler material and kept free from biological turf by a flushing rate of 5m/h or more.
12. An installation as in Claim 10 or Claim 1 1, having an initial coarse pre-clarification unit in which sand and coarse sludge are removed, the sand and coarse sludge from the coarse preclarification unit being fed into the aeration tanks by means of a mammoth pump connected to the aerators in the aeration tanks.
13. An installation as in any one of Claims 10 to 12, having an interposed adsorption basin, the aeration equipment for the adsorption basin being connected to the aerators in the aeration tanks.
14. Process for the operation of a tank aeration installation substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to Figure 1 or Figure 2 of the accompanying drawings.
15. A tank aeration installation operated substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to Figure 1 or Figure 2 of the accompanying drawings.
GB08228725A 1981-10-22 1982-10-07 Tank aeration installation and operation Expired GB2108950B (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE3141889A DE3141889C2 (en) 1981-10-22 1981-10-22 Method for operating a pond aeration system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB2108950A true GB2108950A (en) 1983-05-25
GB2108950B GB2108950B (en) 1985-10-16

Family

ID=6144622

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB08228725A Expired GB2108950B (en) 1981-10-22 1982-10-07 Tank aeration installation and operation

Country Status (9)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS5881495A (en)
AT (1) AT385976B (en)
BE (1) BE894670A (en)
CH (1) CH661039A5 (en)
DE (1) DE3141889C2 (en)
ES (1) ES516684A0 (en)
FR (1) FR2515164B1 (en)
GB (1) GB2108950B (en)
NL (1) NL8204025A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2165831A (en) * 1984-10-18 1986-04-23 Boehnke Botho Effluent purification installation

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3146622C2 (en) * 1981-11-25 1985-01-03 Böhnke, Botho, Prof. Dr.-Ing., 5100 Aachen Plant for the purification of wastewater
DE3543432A1 (en) * 1985-12-09 1987-06-11 Fraunhofer Ges Forschung PLANT FOR THE BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CH285151A (en) * 1950-02-17 1952-08-31 Dorr Co Process and system for wastewater treatment.
DE1459453B2 (en) * 1963-11-20 1972-04-20 Asendorf, Knut Erich, 6380 Bad Horn bürg SEWAGE PURIFICATION SYSTEM
DE2640875C3 (en) * 1976-09-10 1983-01-20 Machinefabriek W. Hubert & Co. B.V., Sneek Two-stage activated sludge process for cleaning wastewater
DE2803759C3 (en) * 1978-01-28 1983-01-13 Böhnke, Botho, Prof. Dr.-Ing. Two-stage system for the treatment of wastewater according to the activated sludge process
DE2908134C2 (en) * 1979-03-02 1983-10-20 Böhnke, Botho, Prof. Dr.-Ing., 5100 Aachen Plant for the purification of wastewater

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2165831A (en) * 1984-10-18 1986-04-23 Boehnke Botho Effluent purification installation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE3141889C2 (en) 1984-05-30
ATA359182A (en) 1987-11-15
BE894670A (en) 1983-01-31
FR2515164B1 (en) 1989-12-29
GB2108950B (en) 1985-10-16
AT385976B (en) 1988-06-10
JPS5881495A (en) 1983-05-16
ES8306685A1 (en) 1983-06-16
FR2515164A1 (en) 1983-04-29
NL8204025A (en) 1983-05-16
CH661039A5 (en) 1987-06-30
DE3141889A1 (en) 1983-05-11
ES516684A0 (en) 1983-06-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2205003C (en) Wastewater treatment method and plant
CA1241773A (en) Process for purifying sewage in plants having adsorption stages
US3728253A (en) Accelerated biological-chemical wastewater treatment
US4487697A (en) Biological waste-water-treatment method
Chen et al. Full scale case studies of a simplified aerated filter (BAF) for organics and nitrogen removal
MXPA97003625A (en) Method and plant for the treatment of wastewater
CN102775025A (en) Municipal life wastewater treatment system with high efficiency and low energy consumption
AP329A (en) Treatment of wastewater.
EP0594623A1 (en) Method for purification of wastewater
JP3099839B2 (en) Wastewater treatment method by activated sludge method
GB1601036A (en) Closed loop waste treatment and water recycying toilet system
GB2108950A (en) Tank aeration installation and operation
CA1114964A (en) Plant for the treatment of waste water by the activated-sludge process
EP4159691A1 (en) Combined reactor for wastewater treatment
CN100402443C (en) Denitrification reactor with a fixed culture
US6592757B2 (en) Selector contact stabilization process and apparatus for wastewater treatment
Jin et al. Design and operation of a wastewater treatment plant treating low concentration of municipal wastewater
GB2113197A (en) Installation for purification of effluents, such as domestic sewage
KR100294863B1 (en) An oxidation ditch natural purification equipment
RU2743531C1 (en) Method of biological purification of liquid fractions containing a disinfectant quaternary ammonium salts (qac) and similar substances together with household and/or industrial wastewater close to them in composition
JP2843160B2 (en) Waste water tertiary treatment equipment
US4978445A (en) Aeration chamber for a sewage treatment system
Matsche et al. A new two stage activated sludge process for nitrification±denitrification
KR20010028800A (en) Process for Biological Treatment of Waste Water with Zeolite Powder
El-Awady et al. Agro-industry wastewater treatment

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PCNP Patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee