GB2095131A - Low molecular weight copolymers as depressants in mineral ore flotation - Google Patents

Low molecular weight copolymers as depressants in mineral ore flotation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2095131A
GB2095131A GB8204784A GB8204784A GB2095131A GB 2095131 A GB2095131 A GB 2095131A GB 8204784 A GB8204784 A GB 8204784A GB 8204784 A GB8204784 A GB 8204784A GB 2095131 A GB2095131 A GB 2095131A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
depressant
molecular weight
depressants
range
flotation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
GB8204784A
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Wyeth Holdings LLC
Original Assignee
American Cyanamid Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by American Cyanamid Co filed Critical American Cyanamid Co
Publication of GB2095131A publication Critical patent/GB2095131A/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00Flotation
    • B03D1/02Froth-flotation processes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00Flotation
    • B03D1/001Flotation agents
    • B03D1/004Organic compounds
    • B03D1/01Organic compounds containing nitrogen
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00Flotation
    • B03D1/001Flotation agents
    • B03D1/004Organic compounds
    • B03D1/016Macromolecular compounds
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D2201/00Specified effects produced by the flotation agents
    • B03D2201/02Collectors
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D2201/00Specified effects produced by the flotation agents
    • B03D2201/06Depressants
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D2203/00Specified materials treated by the flotation agents; Specified applications
    • B03D2203/02Ores
    • B03D2203/04Non-sulfide ores
    • B03D2203/10Potassium ores

Landscapes

  • Separation Of Suspended Particles By Flocculating Agents (AREA)
  • Addition Polymer Or Copolymer, Post-Treatments, Or Chemical Modifications (AREA)

Abstract

Low molecular weight copolymers of the general structure: <IMAGE> where R1 and R2 are hydrogen or methyl, X is hydrogen, alkali metal or ammonium ion, and a, m and n are such that the degree of hydrolysis is from 5 to 66% and the total molecular weight of the copolymer is between 200 and 85,000, are used to depress sylvinite minerals in a flotation system. These copolymers can be combined with other known depressing agents for non-sulfide ores, such as starch, dextrin, gum and the like, to obtain equivalent or improved selectivity and recovery than would be obtained using these depressants alone. <IMAGE>

Description

SPECIFICATION Low molecular weight copolymers as depressants in mineral ore flotation Background of the invention In mineral ore flotation, depression comprises steps taken to prevent the flotation of a particular mineral. In one-mineral flotation systems, it is commonly practiced to hold down both the gangue materials and low-assay middlings. In differential flotation systems, it is used to hold back one or more of the materials normally flotable by a given collector.
Depression is conventionally accomplished through the use of reagents known as depressing agents or, more commonly, depressants. When added to the flotation systems, the depressing agents exert a specific action upon the material to be depressed thereby preventing that material from floating.
The exact mode of this action remains open to speculation. Various theories have been put forth to explain this action; some of which include: that the depressants react chemically with the mineral surface to produce insoluble protective films of a wettable nature which fail to react with collectors; that the depressants by various physical-chemical mechanisms, such as surface adsorption, massaction effects, complex formation, or the like, prevent the formation of the collector film; that the depressants act as solvents for an activating film naturally associated with the mineral; that the depressants act as solvents for the collecting film; and the like. These theories appear closely related and the correct theory may ultimately prove to involve elements from several, if not all, of them.
Currently, non-sulfide flotation systems have utilized depressants derived from natural substances such as starches, dextrins, gums and the like. See U.S. Patent No. 3,292,780 to Frommer et al. and U.S. Patent No. 3,371,778 to Iwasaki. However, from an ecological vantage point, the presence of residual depressants such as these in the waste waters increase the biodegradeable oxygen demand and the chemical oxygen demand, thereby creating a pollution problem in the disposal of these waste waters. From a commercial vantage point, there are an ever-increasing number of countries in which use of reagents having a food value, such as starch, is prohibited in commercial applications.Furthermore, the starch-type depressants require a complex preparation of the reagent solution involving a cooking stage prior to solution and the resultant reagent is susceptible to bacterial decomposition thereby requiring storage monitoring.
Accordingly, there exists the need for a synthetic depressant which can at once overcome the drawbacks of the conventional depressants currently utilized and yet perform in an equivalent or superior manner.
Summary of the invention The present invention provides a process for depressing sylvinite minerals in a flotation system.
The process comprises adding to the flotation system, as a selective depressant, an effective amount of a low molecular weight copolymer or water-soluble salts thereof of the general structure:
wherein R1 and R2 are individually hydrogen or a methyl radical, X is hydrogen, alkali metal or ammonium ion, n and m are whole numbers such that the degree of hydrolysis is within the range from 5 to 6% and n, m and a have a numerical value such that the total molecular weight of the polymer or copolymer is within the range from 200 to 85,000. The process of the instant invention depresses sylvinite minerals as well as comparable processes employing depressants derived from natural substances, such as starch, at approximately one-tenth the dosage, calculated on active ingredient of depressant.The instant process, besides overcoming the deficiencies attributable to employing nonsynthetic depressants as set forth earlier, does not result in flocculation of the depressed mineral values.
Detailed description of the invention In accordance with the instant invention there is provided a process for depressing sylvinite minerals in a flotation system. The process comprises adding to the flotation system a synthetic depressant during the flotation stage. The synthetic depressant employed in this process is a low molecular weight copolymer of general structure I. The molecular weight of the synthetic depressant should be within the range from 200 to 85,000 and preferably within the range from 7,000 to 85,000.
The degree of hydrolysis of the synthetic depressant should be from 5% to 66%, preferably from 20% to 55%, and more preferably, from 40 to 45%. The hydrolyzed polyacrylamide can be prepared by first polymerizing acrylamide and then hydrolyzing some of the amide groups, or concurrent polymerization and hydrolysis or it may be made by other means, including copolymerization of acrylic acid or methacrylic acid and acrylamide, or hydrolysis of polyacrylonitrile, etc. In any event, there are the proper proportions of amide groups and the remainder being carboxyl groups, usually in the form of an alkali metal salt. The term hydrolyzed polyacrylamide is used as convenient understandable terminology rather than to limit the process of manufacture.Reagents wihch have been found particularly useful for hydrolysis include Na0H, KOH and NH4OH.
The resulting low-molecular weight copolymer when employed as a depressant in the flotation system has exhibited improved selectivity and recovery over conventional depressants at substantially lower dosages of depressant. The synthetic depressant is easily diluted with water to provide a reagent solution that, due to its non-susceptibility to bacterial decomposition, can be stored almost indefinitely.
The synthetic depressants should be added in an effective amount to obtain the desired degree of depression. Although this amount will vary depending upon the ore being processed, the flotation collector being employed, and other variables, it is generally on the order of 0.01 to 0.20 pound of depressant calculated on active ingredient per long ton of ore. This value is from one-sixth to onefourth that dosage normally required to obtain equivalent recovery with starch depressants.
Additionally, the instant process is capable of employing a combination of the synthetic depressants with a conventional, naturally derived depressant, such as starch, modified starch derivatives, and guar gums to arrive at substantially equivalent or improved performance to that obtained when employing the conventional depressant alone.
The following specific examples illustrate certain aspects of the present invention and, more particularly, point out methods of evaluating the process for depressing sylvinite minerals in a flotation system. However, the examples are set forth for illustration only and are not to be construed as limitations on the present invention except as set forth in the appended claims. All parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise specified.
Experimental procedure I Step 1: Scrub two separate samples each of 800 parts of sylvinite in 370 parts of a brine solution for two minutes at 800 r.p.m. and thereafter combine the two samples into one containing at least 1 600 parts of sylvinite.
Step 2: Condition the sample of Step 1 in a flotation cell at 1 400 r.p.m. with 20 parts of a nonionic polyacrylamide flocculant for 1 5 seconds and 2 parts of a cationic surfactant collector for 1 5 additional seconds.
Step 3: Transfer the sample of Step 2 to a flotation bowl. Flotation is then conducted for two minutes at 1 600 r.p.m. which results in a slime froth and underflow. The underflow portion is screened on a 20 mesh screen resulting in +20 mesh and -20 mesh fractions.
Step 4: The +20 mesh portion of Step 3 is conditioned at 800 r.p.m. with 8 parts of starch for 15 seconds followed by 10 parts of an amine for 1 5 seconds and 4 drops of a hydrocarbon oil for 1 5 more seconds.
Step 5: The -20 mesh portion of Step 3 is conditioned at 1100 r.p.m. with 8 parts of starch for 30 seconds followed by 5 parts of an amine for 30 seconds.
Step 6: The +20 and -20 mesh portions are recombined in a flotation cell and conditioned at 1100 r.p.m. with 2 drops of a frother for 1 5 seconds. Flotation is conducted at 1400 r.p.m. for two minutes resulting in a concentrate and a tail.
Comparative example A The Experimental Procedure set forth above is followed in every material detail employing as the depressant 0.52 pound of dry starch per long ton of sylvinite in the flotation steps. Test results are set forth in Table I.
Example 1 The Experimental Procedure set forth above is followed in every material detail employing as the depressant 0.52 pound of a 45% hydrolyzed polyacrylamide solution (12.3% active) having a molecular weight of 30,000 per long ton of sylvinite in place of the starch used during the flotation steps. Test results are set forth in Table I.
Examples 2-5 The Experimental Procedure set forth above is followed in every material detail employing 0.26 pound of a copolymer depressant solution (46.055.3% active) per long ton of sylvinite in place of the starch used during the flotation steps. Test results and details are set forth in Table I.
Table Evaluation of synthetic depressants Reagents Assays Conc. Distribution Conc.
Example % COOH MWt. % Solids K20 Insol. K20 Comp. A None Starch 100.0 55.3 2.8 72.7 1 45 30,000 12.3 55.4 2.7 70.7 2 43 7,000 55.3 57.7 2.2 68.4 3 66 7,000 55.3 55.7 3.2 68.5 4 45 2,500 46.0 56.2 4.4 54.9 5 23 7,000 54.8 54.5 3.0 71.7 Examples 6-19 The Experimental Procedure set forth above is followed in every material detail employing as the depressant those materials detailed in Table II. The dosage listed in Table II is calculated on synthetic depressant solutions, having active ingredients range from 25.0 to 27.7%, whereas the starch is based on solid starch. Test results are set forth in Table II as well.
Table II Reagents Assays Conc. Distribution Conc.
(Ib/ton) Example % COOH MWt. % Solids Dosage K20 Insol. K20 Comp. B None Starch 100.0 0.396 57.9 1.2 74.70 6 45 32,000 26.6 0.198 59.0 0.8 78.48 Comp. C None Starch 100.0 0.242 54.4 1.8 68.92 Comp. D None Starch 100.0 0.363 55.5 1.7 73.62 7 45 32,000 26.6 0.182 55.5 2.0 71.44 8 45 68,000 26.0 0.182 54.0 1.8 73.68 Comp. E 45 200,000 22.7 0.182 53.8 1.7 71.38 9 45 32,000 26.6 0.091 56.9 2.1 64.22 10 25 68,000 25.0 0.182 55.4 3.6 71.55 11 45 68,000 26.0 0.182 55.8 4.7 76.40 12 66 68,000 25.0 0.182 55.1 4.8 62.28 13 25 32,000 26.5 0.182 56.3 5.5 73.2 14 66 32,000 27.7 0.182 57.2 4.0 67.58 Comp.F None Starch 100.0 0.330 57.1 2.6 70.96 15 45 68,000 26.0 0.165 52.9 3.6 67.75 16 45 68,000 26.0 0.111 53.7 3.6 69.15 17 45 68,000 26.0 0.054 56.2 3.7 66.95 18 45 32,000 26.6 0.165 54.6 2.8 80.65 19 45 32,000 26.6 0.111 53.8 3.6 69.92 Experimental procedure II 800 Parts of sylvinite are placed in a flotation cell which is then filled to the lip with a brine solution. The sylvinite is scrubbed for 5 minutes and thereafter transferred to a 5 liter cylinder where it is stirred for 1 minute and allowed to settle for an additional minute. The slimes are decanted to within 1/2 inch of the settled sylvinite.
The sylvinite is combined with 300 parts of brine. 0.34 Pound per ton of guar is mixed in and then agitated for 1 0-20 seconds. Next 0.10 pound per ton of an amine collector is mixed and thereafter agitated for 10 seconds. To this is then added 4 drops of a hydrocarbon oil followed by 5 seconds of agitation and finally 4 drops of methyl isobutyl carbinol followed by 5 seconds of agitation.
The mixture is transferred to a flotation cell and filled to the lip with brine. A two-minute float follows: The concentrate is dried and weighed.
Examples 20-23 The Experimental Procedure II set forth above is followed in every material detail employing a copolymer depressant in the flotation step in place of guar. The dosage listed in Table Ill is calculated on synthetic depressant solutions, having active ingredients range from 26.0 to 26.6%, whereas the guar is based on solid guar. Test results are detailed in Table Ill.
Table Ill Reagent Concentrate (#/ton) Example % COOH MWt. % Solids Dosage % K20 Insol. % K20 Recovery 20 45 7,000 55.3 0.19 55.84 1.22 41.0 21 45 32,000 26.6 0.18 54.87 1.38 57.9 22 45 68,000 26.0 0.18 54.41 1.59 58.7 23 45 68,000 26.0 0.09 53.05 1.76 54.7 Comp. G Guar 0.34 53.56 1.21 59.0

Claims (8)

Claims
1. A process for depressing sylvinite minerals in a flotation system which comprises adding to the flotation system, as a selective depressant, an effective amount of a copolymer or water soluble salts thereof of the general structure:
wherein R, and R2 are individually hydrogen or a methyl radical, X is a hydrogen, alkali metal or ammonium ion, n and m are whole numbers such that the degree of hydrolysis is within the range from 5 to 66% and n, m and a have a numerical value such that the total molecular weight of copolymer is within the range from 200 to 85,000.
2. The process of Claim 1 wherein the molecular weight is within the range from 7,000 to 85,000.
3. The process of Claim 1 wherein the degree of hydrolysis is within the range from 20% to 66%.
4. The process of Claim 3 wherein the degree of hydrolysis is within the range from 40 to 45%.
5. The process of Claim 1 wherein said depressant is a mixture of a naturally derived depressant and said copolymer or water-soluble salt thereof.
6. The process of Claim 5 wherein said naturally derived depressants selected from the group consisting of starch and guar gum.
7. The process of Claim 1 wherein said synthetic depressant is a 45% hydrolyzed polyacrylamide having a molecular weight on the order of 45,000.
8. The process of Claim 1 wherein the effective amount of the active ingredient of synthetic depressant is 0.01 to 0.20 pound per long ton of sylvinite ore.
GB8204784A 1981-03-23 1982-02-18 Low molecular weight copolymers as depressants in mineral ore flotation Withdrawn GB2095131A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US24652181A 1981-03-23 1981-03-23

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB2095131A true GB2095131A (en) 1982-09-29

Family

ID=22931033

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB8204784A Withdrawn GB2095131A (en) 1981-03-23 1982-02-18 Low molecular weight copolymers as depressants in mineral ore flotation

Country Status (6)

Country Link
AU (1) AU548246B2 (en)
DE (1) DE3210633A1 (en)
ES (1) ES510640A0 (en)
FR (1) FR2502028A1 (en)
GB (1) GB2095131A (en)
SE (1) SE8201816L (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU669917B2 (en) * 1992-08-24 1996-06-27 Life-Air (Pty) Ltd Breathing apparatus

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2525494A1 (en) * 1982-04-26 1983-10-28 American Cyanamid Co SYLVITY CONCENTRATION PROCESS IN A SYLVINITE ORE FLOTATION SYSTEM

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2740522A (en) * 1953-04-07 1956-04-03 American Cyanamid Co Flotation of ores using addition polymers as depressants
DE1267631B (en) * 1967-08-16 1968-05-09 August Rosterg Haus Process for the flotation of potash crude salts containing clay and other insoluble solids
US3805951A (en) * 1972-04-07 1974-04-23 American Cyanamid Co Selective flocculation and flotation of slimes from sylvinite ores
GB1452605A (en) * 1973-03-01 1976-10-13 Allied Colloids Ltd Materials and processes for flotation of mineral substances
AU5856080A (en) * 1979-06-01 1980-12-04 Calgon Corporation Flotation circuit additive
US4289613A (en) * 1979-11-19 1981-09-15 American Cyanamid Company Low molecular weight hydrolyzed polymers or copolymers as depressants in mineral ore flotation

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU669917B2 (en) * 1992-08-24 1996-06-27 Life-Air (Pty) Ltd Breathing apparatus

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE3210633A1 (en) 1982-10-28
ES8306332A1 (en) 1983-06-16
ES510640A0 (en) 1983-06-16
AU548246B2 (en) 1985-12-05
SE8201816L (en) 1982-09-24
AU8175882A (en) 1982-09-30
FR2502028A1 (en) 1982-09-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4360425A (en) Low molecular weight copolymers and terpolymers as depressants in mineral ore flotation
CA1157585A (en) Crosslinked starches as depressants in mineral ore flotation
US4289613A (en) Low molecular weight hydrolyzed polymers or copolymers as depressants in mineral ore flotation
EP0662865A1 (en) Coal flotation process.
US4141691A (en) Use of water soluble polymers in coal flotation circuits
US4902764A (en) Polymeric sulfide mineral depressants
US4533465A (en) Low molecular weight copolymers as depressants in sylvinite ore flotation
GB2095131A (en) Low molecular weight copolymers as depressants in mineral ore flotation
CA2222996C (en) Method of depressing non-sulfide silicate gangue minerals
AU606242B2 (en) Flotation depressants
CN1032744C (en) Method for clarifying tailing water
van Dolah et al. The distribution of pelagic tars and plastics in the South Atlantic Bight
Somasundaran et al. Applications of biological processes in mineral processing
US3933625A (en) Electrical preconditioning in a selective flotation of sulfide ores
Narvekar et al. Behaviour of boron, calcium and magnesium in a polluted estuary
US4157296A (en) Flotation process for fluoride minerals
CN106824544B (en) Hematite reverse flotation inhibitor and use method thereof
EP0830209B1 (en) Method of depressing non-sulfide silicate gangue minerals
Ludwig et al. Evaluation of the standard elutriate test as an estimator of contaminant release at dredging sites
CN114904661B (en) Sphalerite inhibitor for lead-zinc sulfide ore flotation separation process, application of sphalerite inhibitor and lead-zinc sulfide ore flotation separation method
US2766883A (en) Process of deoiling phosphate concentrate by means of finely divided solids
Paillès et al. Effect of experimental conditions on phosphorus extracted from estuarine and marine sediments
US2416909A (en) Froth flotation of phosphate ore
Hammerton et al. The design and interpretation of marine pollution surveys
AU663411C (en) Coal flotation process

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WAP Application withdrawn, taken to be withdrawn or refused ** after publication under section 16(1)