GB1569317A

GB1569317A - Lead alloys

Info

Publication number: GB1569317A
Application number: GB53291/76A
Authority: GB
Original assignee: Globe Union Inc
Current assignee: Globe Union Inc
Priority date: 1976-02-18
Filing date: 1976-12-21
Publication date: 1980-06-11
Also published as: DE2656876A1; BR7700470A; ZA767453B; CA1082493A; JPS5636857B2; JPS52100324A; IT1076896B; AR211289A1; FR2341660B1; BE850298A; AU505851B2; CH625834A5; AU2061276A; FR2341660A1

Abstract

In order to improve the strength, the lead alloy contains from 0.01 to 2.0 % by weight of strontium from 0.1 to 5.0 % by weight of tin from 0.005 to 0.1 % by weight of aluminium from 0.0 to 0.25 % by weight of copper, the remainder being lead.

Description

(54) IMPROVEMENTS IN LEAD ALLOYS (71) We, GLOBE-UNION INC., a corporation organised and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, United States of America, of P.O. Box 591, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201, United States of America, do hereby declare the invention, for which we pray that a patent may be granted to us, and the method by which it is to be performed, to be particularly descnbed in and by the following statement: Lead-acid storage batteries typically employ lead alloys containing antimony as a primary constituent due to the effect of antimony on the physical properties of the lead. Antimony is used to increase the strength and/or other physical properties of lead, facilitating various aspects of battery manufacture. In the case of lead-acid battery grids, this is particularly important in order for the grids to withstand normal handling during battery manufacturing and service.

Recently the battery industry began producing batteries which require little or no maintenance such as adding of water to maintain the electrolyte level during the service life of a battery. In such batteries it is the practice to either seal the battery or use vent plugs for the filling ports which are not easily removed by the ultimate battery user. Since the purpose of such batteries is to eliminate the need for filling, a lead alloy system must be selected in which the supply of electrolyte will not be significantly diminished over the intended life of the battery. The presence of antimony typically causes excessive gas generation in lead-acid batteries, especially during periods of charging or overcharging, which ultimately depletes the quantity of electrolyte. In addition, excessive gassing is unacceptable in reduced or no-maintenance batteries if they are of the completely sealed type. Conventional alloys for this type of battery contain calcium in place of antimony.

Calcium containing alloys reduce gas generation. Examples of lead-calcium alloys are seen in the following U.S. Patents: 3,920,473 issued November 18, 1975 to Sims; 3,881,953 issued May 6, 1975 to Turowski; 3,287,165 issued November 22, 1966 to Jensen; 2,794,707 issued June 4, 1957 to Walsh; 2,159,124 issued May 20, 1937 to Betterton et al; and 1,703,212 issued February 16, 1929 to Shoemaker.

A disadvantage of the lead-calcium system is that its alloys do not generally have mechanical properties comparable to lead-antimony alloys. Since the battery industry is continually striving to make battery grids with smaller cross-sections than previously used, the strength of the lead-calcium grid alloys becomes a limiting factor in grid design.

Lead-calcium systems also have a propensity to creep as is well known in the art. If creep becomes excessive within a battery, adjacent parts may short out, thereby disabling the battery or seriously reducing its capacity. Creep may become excessive with minor alloy compositional changes.

A further disadvantage of conventional alloys lies in the limitations on the re-use of lead scrap due to decreased pot stability. For example, melting of the scrap results in excessive drossing with a resultant loss of the calcium in the alloy. Adjustments must therefore be made in the re-melted scrap to bring the alloy composition back into a desired range prior to castings. Furthermore drossing of lead-calcium increases during mechanical agitation of the molten alloy both initially and for re-melted scrap thereby necessitating protective measures such as the use of shielded pots.

Strontium has been proposed for use in lead alloys by others. For example, U.S. Patent 1,158,672 issued November 2, 1915 to Frary et al, discloses a lead alloy containing a plurality of alkaline earths including calcium, barium, strontium and magnesium for use in bullets. U.S. Patent 2,013,487 issued June 7, 1934 to Canfield et al, discloses a lead-strontium-tin alloy for use in lead-acid battery grids, and U.S. Patent 2,040,078 issued May 12, 1936 to Canfield et al shows a lead-strontium alloy. Finally U.S. Patent 2,170,650 issued August 22, 1939 to Bouton et al shows a lead-calcium-barium-strontium alloy. These patents do not show lead alloys which have all the advantages displayed by applicant's invention however, such as dross protection, pot stability on re-melt and high strength.

The present invention consists in an alloy consisting of, by weight: Strontium 0.01% - 2.0% Tin 0.1% - 5.0% Aluminum 0.005% - 0.1% Copper 0.0% - 0.25% Lead Balance An alloy according to the present invention is suitable for use as a grid and/or top lead material in lead-acid storage batteries. However, alloys according to the invention may have high physical strength and other physical and/or electrochemical properties which make them suitable for use in other applications. The lead alloy may be re-melted without substantial change in its composition.

The alloy according to the invention may be made by conventional smelting procedures.

In the laboratory, research quantities of the desired alloys were prepared from master alloys which are higher in the desired constituents than the final composition. A tin-aluminum master alloy was made by dissolving the aluminum in either pure tin or a lead-tin binary alloy. Copper master alloys were prepared by dissolving elemental copper in corroding grade lead or lead-tin-aluminum ternary alloys. A lead-strontium binary alloy was purchased but conventional smelting techniques may be used to produce it. Specific compositions were made by adding proper amounts of the respective master alloys to corroding grade lead at temperatures up to 550do. When alloying was done in air, excessive oxidation was avoided by adding tin-aluminium master alloys first followed by the strontium master alloys. The order of addition is not important if a gas shield is used to protect the pot.

Table 1 illustrates the mechanical properties of typical lead-calcium and lead-antimony alloys for use in lead-acid battery grids. In the table Sy represents the yield strength in kilograms/mm2 at 0.2% offset. Su represents the ultimate tensile strength of the alloy in kilograms/mm2 and El represents the percentage of elongation at ultimate strength i.e. at the point of plastic instability of the alloy. The balance of the alloys comprises lead. The lead which makes up the balance of the alloy in Table 1 and in all succeeding examples, comprises primary or secondary corroding grade lead having trace impurities as is commerically available in the industry. Naturally, while pure lead may be the most desirable, it is not economically justifiable for use in lead-acid storage battery grids as those skilled in the art will understand.

Table 2 sets forth various compositions of lead alloys, some of which are made according to the invention. Again, the same criteria as used in Table 1 are set forth. It will be noted that in the majority of cases the lead-strontium alloys are equal to or exceed the strength of the calcium alloy. An examination of the Table 2 will also indicate that after ageing 24 hours and 14 days the strontium containing alloys are generally superior to the calcium containing alloy and approach the strength of the lead-antimony alloy shown in Table 1.

We have determined that an alloy made according to the invention lies within the following range of compositions by weight percent: Strontium 0.01% - 2.0% Tin 0.1 - 5.0% Aluminum 0.005% - 0.1% Copper 0 - 0.25% Lead Balance The strontium level has a maximum of 2 weight percent because greater quantities result in unreasonably high liquidus temperatures. Also with respect to lead acid batteries, higher percentages of strontium cause excessive precipitation of intermetallic compounds resulting in poor corrosion properties. At greater percentages of strontium, increased drossing results during air melting, and the alloy would also have an excessively high cost. A minimum of 0.01% strontium is required to impart the desired strength to the alloy.

With regard to tin, 5% is an upper limit since there is no gain in mechanical behavior over 5%. Additionally, accelerated drossing results at temperatures employed in battery grid casting and greater amounts render the alloy economically unfeasible. Below 0.1% tin, age hardening takes excessively long and dross protection is reduced.

Aluminium should be present in an amount of at least 0.005% since lesser amounts will not afford proper dross protection. At quantities greater than 0.1% no additional benefits are realized and potential processing difficulties arise due to the presence of primary aluminium in the alloy.

Copper may be added to accelerate the age hardening properties of the alloy. An upper limit of 0.25% provides the maximum at which copper affects the age hardening and also affects the liquidus temperature.

The preferred range of compositions of the alloy is set forth as follows in weight percent: Strontium Tin Aluminum Copper Lead 0.05% - 0.3% 0.25% - 1.0% 0.01% - 0.1% 0.0% - 0.25% Balance Within these preferred ranges it is preferred to include copper in an amount of 0.005 to 0.1%.

Alloys made according to the invention have exhibited a number of advantages over lead-calcium alloy. Such alloys have very low dross generation and excellent compositional stability, eliminating the need for frequent pot analysis and adjustment. They generally exhibit higher yield and creep strength combined with good ductility which improves processing as well as the vibration resistance under severe service conditions. The alloys typically age harden rapidly, allowing further processing of the grids such as pasting within 16 hours. The alloys typically can be cast at lower temperatures than lead-calcium alloys thereby reducing the frequency of mold coating and the alloy scrap may be directly re-melted and used for casting grids or battery straps of other parts. Electrochemical corrosion testing of the alloys indicates that they are superior to antimontial lead alloys and at least equal to calcium-lead alloys. Finally an alloy according to the invention is particularly well suited for cast-on-strap designs as described in U.S. Patent 3,087,005 issued April 23, 1963 to Sabatino et al.

While the alloy described is suitable for use in lead-acid batteries, other uses may occur to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is not to be limited by the foregoing description, but is to be taken solely by an interpretation of the claims which follow.

TABLE 1 Ageing Time Composition 1 Hour 24 Hours 14 Days Sn Ca Sy Su % El Sy Su % El Sy Su % El .5 .08 1.24 2.21 21.3 1.30 2.15 16.7 2.78 3.83 15.7 Sb Sn Cu As 4.75 .275 up to .275 2.00 5.85 31.6 2.78 6.39 29.0 4.50 6.37 15.6 TABLE 2 Composition Ageing Time (weight % balance Pb) I Hour 24 Hours 14 Days Sr Sn Al Cu Sy Su % El Sy Su % El Sy Su % El .2 - - - 1.80 - - 1.77 - - - - .07 3.05 - - 1.99 3.44 19.0 2.76 3.82 15.2 - - .14 .96 - - 3.04 3.86 10.9 3.97 4.54 11.7 - - - 1.05 .056 - - - - .74 - .052 .94 .1 - .96 1.95 28.6 1.37 2.12 14.4 2.76 3.45 13.2 .06 .31 .025 - .80 1.70 35.4 1.02 1.78 26.2 2.46 3.05 10.55 .062 .51 .05 - .89 1.95 41.0 1.30 2.27 36.8 3.02 3.72 15.2 .086 .94 .1 - 1.68 2.79 27.3 2.89 3.65 14.0 3.80 4.42 9.2 .09 .68 .075 - 1.65 2.50 18.6 3.44 4.13 11.5 3.70 4.22 7.30 .11 .52 .05 - 1.19 2.40 33.6 2.78 3.50 10.4 4.08 4.56 8.31 .11 .31 .025 - 1.02 1.91 22.4 1.49 2.20 12.8 3.47 4.04 11.00 .12 .25 .025 - 1.24 1.96 19.7 1.54 2.33 17.7 3.71 4.37 9.39 .12 .45 .05 - 1.22 2.38 23.4 3.07 3.60 7.0 3.50 3.82 5.10 .14 .5 .05 - 1.71 2.68 16.4 3.06 3.57 4.7 3.82 4.25 8.65 .14 .92 .1 - 3.91 4.69 8.92 3.67 3.80 2.25 4.25 4.49 3.8 .2 1.14 .06 - 3.02 - - 4.97 - - - - .2 - - .10 - - - 1.59 - - - - .2 .896 .05 .10 - - - 4.82 - - - - .2 .896 .05 .10 - - - 4.01 - - - - .2 1.14 .06 .057 4.13 - - 4.90 - - - - - WHAT WE CLAIM IS: 1. An alloy comprising, by weight: strontium 0.01% - 2.0% tin 0.1% - 5.0% aluminium 0.005% - 0.1% copper 0.0% - 0.25% and lead, the lead and impurities forming the balance of the alloy.

2. The alloy of claim 1 comprising, by weight: strontium 0.05% - 0.3% tin 0.25% - 1.0% aluminium 0.01% - 0.1% copper 0.0% - 0.25% and lead, the lead and impurities forming the balance of the alloy.

3. The alloy of claim 2 comprising, by weight: strontium 0.05% - 0.3% tin 0.25% - 1.0% aluminium 0.01% - 0.1% copper 0.005% - 0.1% and lead, the lead and impurities forming the balance of the alloy.

4. The alloy of claim 1 consisting of, by weight: strontium 0.01% - 2.0% tin 0.1% - 5.0% aluminium 0.005% - 0.1% copper 0.0% - 0.25% lead balance

**WARNING** end of DESC field may overlap start of CLMS **.

Claims

**WARNING** start of CLMS field may overlap end of DESC **. TABLE 2 Composition Ageing Time (weight % balance Pb) I Hour 24 Hours 14 Days Sr Sn Al Cu Sy Su % El Sy Su % El Sy Su % El .2 - - - 1.80 - - 1.77 - - - - .07 3.05 - - 1.99 3.44 19.0 2.76 3.82 15.2 - - .14 .96 - - 3.04 3.86 10.9 3.97 4.54 11.7 - - - 1.05 .056 - - - - .74 - .052 .94 .1 - .96 1.95 28.6 1.37 2.12 14.4 2.76 3.45 13.2 .06 .31 .025 - .80 1.70 35.4 1.02 1.78 26.2 2.46 3.05 10.55 .062 .51 .05 - .89 1.95 41.0 1.30 2.27 36.8 3.02 3.72 15.2 .086 .94 .1 - 1.68 2.79 27.3 2.89 3.65 14.0 3.80 4.42 9.2 .09 .68 .075 - 1.65 2.50 18.6 3.44 4.13 11.5 3.70 4.22 7.30 .11 .52 .05 - 1.19 2.40 33.6 2.78 3.50 10.4 4.08 4.56 8.31 .11 .31 .025 - 1.02 1.91 22.4 1.49 2.20 12.8 3.47 4.04 11.00 .12 .25 .025 - 1.24 1.96 19.7 1.54 2.33 17.7 3.71 4.37 9.39 .12 .45 .05 - 1.22 2.38 23.4 3.07 3.60 7.0 3.50 3.82 5.10 .14 .5 .05 - 1.71 2.68 16.4 3.06 3.57 4.7 3.82 4.25 8.65 .14 .92 .1 - 3.91 4.69 8.92 3.67 3.80 2.25 4.25 4.49 3.8 .2 1.14 .06 - 3.02 - - 4.97 - - - - .2 - - .10 - - - 1.59 - - - - .2 .896 .05 .10 - - - 4.82 - - - - .2 .896 .05 .10 - - - 4.01 - - - - .2 1.14 .06 .057 4.13 - - 4.90 - - - - - WHAT WE CLAIM IS:

1. An alloy comprising, by weight: strontium 0.01% - 2.0% tin 0.1% - 5.0% aluminium 0.005% - 0.1% copper 0.0% - 0.25% and lead, the lead and impurities forming the balance of the alloy.

5. The alloy of claim 4 consisting of, by weight: strontium 0.05% - 0.3% tin 0.25% - 1.0% aluminium 0.01% - 0.1% copper 0.0% - 0.25% lead balance

6. The alloy of claim 5 consisting essentially of, by weight: strontium 0.05% - 0.3% tin 0.25% - 1.0% aluminium 0.01% - 0.1% copper 0.005% - 0.1% lead balance

7. A battery plate grid for a lead-acid battery, produced from an alloy comprising, by weight: strontium 0.01% - 2.0% tin 0.1% - 5.0% aluminium 0.005% - 0.1% copper 0.0% - 0.25% and lead, the lead and impurities forming the balance of the alloy.

8. The battery plate grid of claim 7 produced from an alloy comprising, by weight: strontium 0.05% - 0.3% tin 0.25% - 1.0% aluminium 0.01% - 0.1% copper 0.0% - 0.25% and lead, the lead and impurities forming the balance of the alloy.

9. The battery plate grid of claim 8 produced from an alloy comprising, by weight: strontium 0.05% - 0.3% tin 0.25% - 1.0% aluminium 0.01% - 0.1% copper 0.005% - 0.1% and lead, the lead and impurities forming the balance of the alloy.

10. The battery plate grid of claim 7 produced from an alloy consisting of, by weight: strontium 0.01% - 2.0% tin 0.1% - 5.0% aluminium 0.005% - 0.1% copper 0.0% - 0.25% lead balance

11. The battery plate grid of claim 10 produced from an alloy consisting of, by weight: strontium 0.05% - 0.3% tin 0.25% - 1.0% aluminium 0.01% - 0.1% copper 0.0% - 0.25% lead balance

12. The battery plate grid of claim 11 produced from an alloy consisting of, by weight: strontium 0.05% - 0.3% tin 0.25% - 1.0% aluminium 0.01% - 0.1% copper 0.005% - 0.1% lead balance

13. The alloy of claim 1 comprising, by weight: strontium 0.05% - 0.3% tin 0.1% - 5.0% aluminium 0.005% - 0.1% copper 0.0% - 0.25% and lead, the lead and impurities forming the balance of the alloy.

14. The alloy of claim 13 comprising, by weight: strontium 0.05% - 0.3% tin 0.1% - 5.0% aluminium 0.01% - 0.1% copper 0.0% - 0.25% and lead, the lead and impurities forming the balance of the alloy.

15. The alloy of claim 4 consisting of, by weight: strontium 0.05 - 0.3% tin 0.1% - 5.0% aluminium 0.005% - 0.1% copper 0.0% - %0.25 lead balance - -

16. The alloy of claim 15 consisting of, by weight: strontium 0.05% - 0.3% tin 0.1% - 5.0% aluminium 0.01% - 0.1% copper 0.0% - 0.25% lead balance

17. The battery plate grid of claim 7 produced from an alloy comprising, by weight: strontium 0.05% - 0.3% tin 0.1% - 5.0% aluminium 0.005% - 0.1% copper 0.0% - 0.25% and lead, the lead and impurities forming the balance of the alloy.

18. The battery plate grid of claim 17 produced from an alloy comprising, by weight: strontium 0.05% - 0.3% tin 0.1% - 5.0% aluminium 0.01% - 0.1% copper 0.0% - 0.25% and lead, the lead and impurities forming the balance of the alloy.

19. The battery plate grid of claim 10 produced from an alloy consisting of, by weight: strontium 0.05% - 0.3% tin 0.1% - 5.0% aluminium 0.005% - 0.1% copper 0.0% - 0.25% lead balance

20. The battery plate grid of claim 19 produced from an alloy consisting of, by weight: strontium 0.05% - 0.3% tin 0.1% - 5.0% aluminium 0.01% - 0.1% copper 0.0% - 0.25% lead balance

21. The alloy comprising, by weight: strontium 0.05% - 0.3% tin 0.1% - 5.0% aluminium 0.005% - 0.1% copper 0.005% - 0.1% and lead, the lead and impurities forming the balance of the alloy.

22. The alloy of claim 21 consisting of, by weight: strontium 0.05% - 0.3% tin 0.1% - 5.0% aluminium 0.01% - 0.1% copper 0.005% - 0.1% lead balance

23. A battery plate grid for a lead-acid battery, produced from an alloy comprising, by weight: strontium 0.05% - 0.3% tin 0.1% - 5.0% aluminium 0.005% - 0.1% copper 0.005% - 0.1% and lead, the lead and impurities forming the balance of the alloy.

24. The battery plate grid of claim 23, produced from an alloy consisting of, by weight: strontium 0.05% - 0.3% tin 0.1% - 5.0% aluminium 0.01% - 0.1% copper 0.005% - 0.1% lead balance

25. An alloy as claimed in Claim 1 substantially as hereinbefore described and exemplified.