ES2387342A1 - Semi-submersible triangular platform for use in the open sea - Google Patents

Abstract

The invention relates to a semi-submersible platform (16) comprising: an inner column (15) designed to improve buoyancy and three outer columns (14), in which each of the inner and outer columns (14, 15) is made from reinforced concrete and comprises a resistant base (12), a shaft (5a, 5b, 6a, 6b) and a section (7) located at a pre-determined height and having greater resistance. The semi-submersible platform also comprises a plurality of beams (8) at the aforementioned pre-determined height, which connect each outer column (14) to the inner column (15) and to the other two outer columns, and a plurality of anchor lines (11) designed to be anchored to the more resistant section (7) of each outer column (14). The semi-submersible platform (16) also comprises a lower plate (9) on which the columns (14, 15) are secured and which is reinforced with a plurality of beams (13) that connect the base (12) of each outer column (14) to the base of the inner column (15) and to the base (12) of the other two outer columns. The invention relates to a method for the construction of a semi-submersible platform.

Description

TRIANGULAR SEMISUMERGIBLE PLATFORM FOR APPLICATIONS IN OPEN SEA FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention belongs to the naval construction and technology sector related to marine structures in the open sea, also called offshore structures and, more specifically, to the offshore floating structures of the semi-submersible type that serve to give physical support to the development of activities of industrial, energy, researcher, etc.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The design of floating structures in deep water (hereinafter offshore) is linked to the technological career developed in the last 60 years by the oil industry (Oil & Gas or O&G), and its effort to profitably exploit oil and gas deposits increasingly distant from the coast and in greater depth. At the time of
Identify what are the different technologies, it is worth mentioning the following large families:

one.

SP AR type platforms

2.

TLP (Tension Leg Platform) type platforms

3.

Semi-submersible or Semis Platforms

Four.

FPSO (Floating Production Storage & Offloading), which are characterized by the shape of a ship.

These structures are fixed to the bottom by means of systems composed mainly of funding lines formed by steel chain catenaries, fiber stakes, etc. or by anchorage lines with tense systems, also called TLP (Tension Leg Platform), composed of elastomers, tendons, steel cables, etc.

In recent years, companies with an interest in exploiting and exploiting the offshore offshore wind resource, as a renewable energy source (OjJshore Wind), have joined this technological career; being in all cases, designs that have inherited their characteristics and philosophy from those of the O&G industry adding the requirements of the terrestrial wind industry.

In general, they are smaller designs, scaled according to needs (lower load capacity requires less thrust) and in which the design and manufacturing characteristics of floating structures are repeated to a greater or lesser extent. The O&G industry.

one)

Semi submersible platform

2)

SP AR type platform

3)

TLP platform

4)

Concept SW A and (hybrid between an AR SP and a TLP)

The offshore floating structures that are currently being developed for the wind industry are, in general, expensive and have certain characteristics that make them less operational, flexible and safe. In most cases, they have excessively expensive anchoring or anchoring systems as they are inherited from the O&G industry, and their stability conditions are, in many cases, insufficient for the state of maximum operational load or extreme events. For floating offshore wind applications, the design and sizing process of the floating structures that support them is very different from that of platforms dedicated to drilling, extracting and producing crude oil. Platforms for offshore wind are subject to their own weight and to the loads induced by the waves, the current and the wind, to other loads of considerable magnitude that the O&G platforms do not have: the horizontal thrust and the torsor moment originated by the wind turbine and transmitted to the floating structure through the tower that supports it. Another major drawback presented by the current concepts for the offshore wind industry are slow and expensive construction methods, not adapted to the needs of this industry, as well as a logistic cost in towing, installation and anchoring too high.

The other types of structures, widely used in the offshore wind industry, are those composed of fixed offshore structures. These are structures directly fixed or piloted to the seabed and are used in waters whose depth makes them economically attractive. At present it is said that the fixed offshore structures of the monopiloted type, that is; those formed by a tower directly piloted to the seabed on which the wind turbine is installed, are used in shallow waters whose maximum depth is about 20 meters. Between 25 and 45 meters, the fixed Jacket-type structures, constituted by sections of joined steel lattices, are the ones that present the best technical-economic characteristics. It is from 45-50 meters when the floating structures begin to present better characteristics than the fixed structures mentioned above. These depths are referred to in the offshore wind industry as deep water.

Among all the concepts and designs that are currently under development, within the offshore floating systems for deep water, the following are worth mentioning:

HyWind, SPAR typology. An example of this type of offshore floating system for deep water is described in international patent application No. W02010 / 122316A 1. This structure has been designed in steel and has the handicap that it needs a large amount of ballast very deep to ensure the minimum stability and security conditions. Otherwise, the center of gravity (KG) of the whole set would be too high resulting in zero or even negative metacentric heights (GM) making the whole set unstable. This results in the minimum draft required of the submerged part of this structure being 100m to install a 2.3 MW wind turbine. What makes it unfeasible that it can operate at depths of 50m.

As for the response movements, the SP ARs are characterized by presenting vertical movements of altered (heave), more cushioned than the rest of the concepts. However, they have larger pitch movements (piteh) and balance (role!). They are, as described in the previous publication, technically unfeasible to operate in waters with a depth of around 45 meters and it is estimated that they can begin to be technically competitive from depths of around 120m. Another drawback presented by this structure, and in general those of the SP AR type, is that the towing and installation operation is excessively expensive and complex due to the logistic deployment it needs. Due to its high draft, they cannot leave the port either in an upright position or in a ballast condition and this prevents them from having the wind turbine installed, making it essential to install it on the high seas once the platform is already properly anchored and ballasted or prepared for receive the high weight of the wind turbine. This technically complicates the process of installation and commissioning of the system, but above all it increases the associated costs significantly.

Blue H, TLP typology. An example of this type of deepwater offshore floating system is described in US Patent Application No. US2012 / 0014752Al. This structure has also been designed in steel and is characterized by being a floating structure with a bottom anchoring system based on tense systems with steel cables and / or elastomers or tendons that rigidly connect the structure to the bottom anchor, mainly composed of A dead weight. This structure, and in general those of the TLP type, are characterized by having movements of response to the environmental loads and those of the wind turbine very buffered due to its special tense anchoring system, which by itself dampens all response movements. They do not present the stability problem derived from the variations of ballast and centers of gravity that the AR SPs already have, a priori, although in condition of port exit they may have some precariousness in their stability condition, they could take the wind turbine installed from port, which makes the trailer, installation and commissioning operation less expensive and complex. The main problem that these types of typologies have, and that makes them much less competitive, is their expensive and complex funding system; main handicap of TLP type structures. The installation of the funding system requires the use of very sophisticated and expensive means. Other drawbacks derived mainly from the funding system, is the more than possible coupling of the frequencies of the tendons used to join the structure to the bottom and the frequency of the structure that results in resonant phenomena that are very damaging to the operation of the system. In addition, maintenance of the funding system is very expensive.

SWAY Floating Tower, hybrid technology between SPAR and TLP. This structure is built in steel. This technology mixes the SP AR typology with the tense anchoring system characteristic of the TLP. The main drawback of this technology is that it is unfeasible at depths of 45m, by 10 already exposed for the SP AR typologies. It could start to be used after 80m. In addition, its towing, installation and anchoring costs are very high as it does not allow leaving the port either in an upright position or with the turbine mounted, as already explained for the AR SPs. In addition, the extremely expensive anchoring system to install and maintain, presenting the same problems as TLPs.

SEMISUMERGIBLE PLATFORMS. Within this family, several concepts stand out:

WindSea Floater. An example of this type of floating system is described in US Patent Application No. US2011 / 0006539Al. These are floating steel construction structures and triangular plant. This structure can operate in deep SOm waters and allows the installation of up to 3 turbines on the same platform. Composed of 3 large cylinders connected to each other. Its main feature is the anchoring system that is connected to the platform in the barycenter of the lower triangle. This may not be the most stable solution in terms of stiffness at a global torque. Another uniqueness of this design is to be a multi-turbine platform. Which has limitations depending on the size of the turbine installed, since due to the little separation between them the performance can be seriously affected by the effects of wake and turbulence derived from the operation of the wind turbines. This concept is, a priori, excessively large and with an inefficient funding system.

Trifloater Semisub ,. Steel construction structure and triangular plant. This type of structures can operate in 50m deep waters, its trailer and installation on the high seas being relatively simple. You can exit the port with the tower and turbine already installed and it has a correct stability in any condition. It is composed of 3 large cylinders connected to each other. The tower and the wind turbine are arranged in the barycenter of the triangular plant. The main problem it presents is that it has a structural weakness in the junction zone between the tower and the platform, an area especially sensitive to the stresses generated by the operating loads of the wind turbine itself. The dimensioning of this area of union between tower and platform requires the use of a lot of material, the guarantees necessary for its correct operation during a useful life of 20 or 25 years being very demanding.

WindFloater An example of this type of floating system is described in US Patent Application No. US2011l0037264Al. It is a structure designed in steel and triangular plan. This concept can operate in 50m deep waters, its trailer and installation on the high seas being relatively simple. You can leave port with the tower and turbine already installed. The main singularity of this concept is the fact of having the tower with the turbine, that is to say the most important weights and that are of the order of 850 tons, arranged at one end of the triangle that form the 3 main cylinders that make up the platform. This motivates a permanent heel that reduces its stability. Therefore, this design is required to have a special and automatic ballast control and transfer system between the tanks arranged in each column to permanently correct the different heels that are produced by the incorrect distribution of weights, environmental loads and wind turbine This system is especially sensitive to faults whose ongen is in the ballast system, which can significantly reduce its operability. It should be noted that the heel correction system must be adequately sized to move large amounts of water between the tanks in a very short time, which will result in an expensive water management and hedge correction system in acquisition, installation and over all in its maintenance throughout a useful life of 20 or 25 years.

It is worth highlighting certain negative aspects that all current designs of floating platforms for the offshore wind industry share, regardless of their structural typology, and especially semi-submersible platforms:

1) Being designs of considerable dimensions and made of steel, they need to be built in large land infrastructures especially dedicated to it, such as shipyards or large factories. This dependence makes it difficult to manufacture and makes investment costs more expensive by having to face the transport of the floating structure from these factories to the installation / operation site, generally hundreds of nautical miles away. When it comes to small floating structures with yields due to their exploitation of marginal or reduced character, this fact is enough to dismiss their manufacture.

2) The construction of all offshore floating structures is made of steel, which makes the final product more expensive due to the manufacturing process it requires. In addition, the price of steel is another variable factor that can make the final product more expensive at any given time without maneuverability for the promoter or manufacturer. 3) The manufacturing terms using steel are long, which also increases the total investment costs. In turn, the time to market is lengthened with the consequent loss of competitiveness. It is estimated that a platform of about 2,100 tons of steel requires about 84,000 hours of work in specialized factories such as shipyards.

4) The steel fabrication of this type of structures results in the need for a very demanding maintenance plan for the structures, since steel presents a very important corrosion problem in a marine environment. The maintenance cost of the steel structure is very high because it requires in most cases its removal from the place of operation and its transfer and dike for proper maintenance and cleaning of the hull, usually in a shipyard. The costs derived from this need can make the operation and maintenance costs high and unaffordable for the project as a whole.

5) For economic reasons, many of the current applications of offshore structures are limited to locations not far from the coast and with relatively low depths, in waters where the current technology of fixed platforms is no longer competitive, that is; about 45-50m deep. This causes that the typologies of the SP AR type cannot be used massively and competitively for technical reasons.

6) In general all semi-submersible platforms, and especially the WindFloat concept, are dependent on the ballast and ballast transfer systems necessary for the automatic correction of the heels that produce the uneven weight distributions and the actions of environmental loads and own. What makes them very sensitive to the failures of this system, in addition to increasing maintenance costs.

7) The SP AR and some TLP typologies cannot leave the port with the wind turbine already installed, which greatly increases the costs of towing, installation and commissioning on the high seas.

8) The typology of TLP platforms have costs derived from the installation and maintenance of its complex funding system that can make the investment unattainable.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention seeks to solve the aforementioned drawbacks by means of a semi-submersible platform and a method of construction thereof that does not need large infrastructures, such as shipyards or naval factories.

Specifically, in a first aspect of the present invention, a semi-submersible platform is provided comprising: an inner column configured to provide greater buoyancy to the platform and three outer columns, where each of the inner and outer columns comprise a sturdy base and a trunk, and where each column comprises a section of greater resistance at a certain height and a plurality of beams that join each outer column with the inner column and each outer column with the other two outer columns.

Preferably, the inner and outer columns are made of reinforced concrete.

Preferably, the semi-submersible platform further comprises a lower plate on which the inner and outer columns are fixed, configured to increase the damping of vertical movements. Preferably, that bottom plate is made of reinforced concrete. Also preferably, the bottom plate is reinforced by a plurality of beams that connect the base of each outer column with the base of the inner column and the base of each outer column with the base of the other two outer columns.

In a particular embodiment, the semi submersible platform further comprises a anchoring system comprising a plurality of anchoring lines configured to be anchored to the section of greatest resistance of each outer column.

In a particular embodiment, the inner column has at least one tower, a nacelle, a rotor and a plurality of blades mounted.

In another aspect of the present invention, a method of construction of a semi-submersible platform is provided, which comprises the steps of: placing an inner resistant base and three outer resistant bases on the basis of a floating dock; installation of a climbing formwork configured to build an inner column and three outer columns on resistant base paths; advance of the climb until reaching a level level, so that a trunk is built on each resistant base, simultaneously with which the floating dock is submerged; installation of formwork that cover the mouths of said trunks; placement of a plurality of bracing beams that join each outer trunk with the inner trunk and each outer trunk with the other two outer trunks; installation of vertical formwork to build areas of greater resistance; placement of reinforcements of said areas of greater resistance, honnigonado of the same and disassembly of the formwork; after the construction of the sections of greater resistance on each trunk: install climbing formwork on them, climb up to a certain level until building the trunks above the sections of greater resistance, simultaneously with which the floating dock is submerged, and disassembly of climbing formwork; top off of each trunk; sinking of the floating dock until the platform floats; transfer of the platform to the armament dock; vertical post-tensioning of the logs.

Preferably, the method further comprises, before placement of the resistant bases: placement of a plurality of reinforcement beams on the base of the floating dock; placement of a sturdy base armor on the base of the floating dock; formwork of said base; honnigonado of said base; disassembly of the formwork of the base.

In a particular embodiment, after the vertical post-tensioning of the logs, the installation of at least one equipment on the platform is installed on the dock. Preferably, the at least one equipment is a tower, a gondola, a wind turbine rotor or an auxiliary equipment.

The described invention has a remarkable, but not unique, application in the marine wind industry sector as a floating platform that supports and on which multi-megawatt wind turbines installed for the use of wind energy are installed in areas whose waters have a depth that makes the use of the invention technically and economically viable here proposed to the detriment of the use of other types of floating or fixed offshore structures directly piloted or fixed to the bottom.

The advantages of the invention will become apparent in the following description.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

In order to help a better understanding of the characteristics of the invention, in accordance with a preferred example of practical realization thereof, and to complement this description, a set of drawings is attached as an integral part thereof, whose character is Illustrative and not limiting. In these drawings:

Figure 1 illustrates a 3D perspective view of a scheme of a platform that has a tower and other equipment installed, in accordance with a possible embodiment of the invention.

Figure 2 illustrates an enlarged 3D perspective view of a schematic of the platform illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 3 illustrates a 3D perspective view of the structural ring of the platform of Figure 2, to which the anchoring lines are fixed to the platform.

Figure 4 illustrates a profile view of the platform that has a tower installed and

other equipment, of figure 1, with funding system without initial claim.

Figure 5 illustrates a profile view of the platform with a tower and other equipment installed, of Figure 1, with an anchoring system with initial claim.

Figure 6 illustrates a plan view of the platform and tower of Figure 1, in which the arrangement of the funding system is constituted by 6 funding lines.

Figure 7 illustrates a plan view of the platform and tower of Figure 1, in which the arrangement of the anchoring system consists of 3 anchoring lines.

Figure 8 illustrates a plan view of the platform and tower of Figure 1, in which the arrangement of the anchoring system consists of 4 anchoring lines.

Figure 9 shows the Amplitude in Response Operator (RAO) of the vertical displacements or degree of freedom HEA VE of the triangular concrete platform with exemplified heave plate.

Figure 10 shows the Amplitude in Response Operator (RAO) of the vertical displacements or degree of freedom ROLL and PITCH of the triangular platform of honnigón with exemplified heave plate.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In this text, the term "understands" and its variants should not be understood in an exclusive sense, that is, these terms are not intended to exclude other technical characteristics, additives, components or steps.

In addition, the terms "approximately", "substantially", "around", "ones", etc. they should be understood as indicating values close to which said terms

accompany, since due to calculation or measurement errors, it is impossible to achieve

those values with total accuracy.

The following preferred embodiments are provided by way of illustration, and are not

5

It is intended to be limiting of the present invention. In addition, the present invention

covers all possible combinations of particular and preferred embodiments here

indicated. For experts in the field, other objects, advantages and characteristics of the

invention will come off in part from the description and in part from the practice of

invention.

10

Figure 1 shows a structure formed by a semi submersible platform 16,

detailed below, on which is mounted a tower 3, a nacelle 1, a

rotor 10 And blades 2 that form the turbine or offshore wind turbine. The tower is

preferably steel. The equipment that is mounted on the platform (tower,

lS

nacelle, rotor, blades, etc.) are conventional and not subject to the invention.

The semi-submersible platform6, shown in detail in Figure 2, is shaped

triangular. This platform 16 is made up of three large vertical columns.

14, preferably cylindrical, closed at its coronation and arranged at the vertices

twenty

of the triangle that constitutes the plant, and by a fourth central column 15,

preferably cylindrical, which can be larger, equal or smaller in diameter than

three other columns 14. On this fourth central column 15 is mounted,

directly or by means of a transition piece 4 (illustrated in figure 1) the

tower 3, the nacelle 1, the rotor 10 and the blades 2 that form the turbine or wind turbine

25

offshore

The cylindrical columns 14 15 endow the assembly with the necessary thrust to be able to

withstand the weights derived from all installed equipment and systems, which are

normally, but not limited to, all or any of the following: weight

30

typical of columns 14 15, support structure, described below, tower

3, wind turbine or turbine 1 2 10, transition piece 4 if any, system of

ballast, electrical and electronic equipment, access, auxiliary platforms, etc.

The vertical columns 14 15 have a preferably hollow part (6a 6b in the external columns 14 and 5a 5b in the central column 15) and internally compartmentalized. The columns 14 15 have a resistant base 12 designed to provide more resistance to the assembly, which may be of greater, lesser or equal diameter and section (than those of the part mentioned above 5a 5b 6a 6b) on which the trunk is constructed or main part 5a 5b 6a 6b. At a certain height H of each column 14 15 a resistant section 7 is included. The objective of this is to increase the structural strength, improving the overall behavior of the structure since in this area the anchorages of the anchoring lines 11 are fixed ( illustrated schematically in figure 1) And they are the most requested areas of the entire structure. The height H may vary depending on the optimal anchoring position of the anchor lines 11 to the platform. The logs or preferably hollow portions 5a 5b 6a 6b of the columns 14 15 are preferably made of reinforced concrete. The reinforced concrete used must be suitable for marine environments, as one skilled in the art knows.

The resistant section 7 is produced at the same height in all the columns. In turn, these areas of greater resistance 7 are joined together by beams 8, preferably hollow. The section of these lines 8 can be, for example, square, rectangular or cylindrical. These beams 8 can be constructed both in reinforced concrete and in steel or in any other material or combination of materials. The beams 8 together with the areas of the column of greatest resistance 7 form a structural ring that gives the whole a great resistance. The assembly formed by the areas of the column of greatest resistance 7 and the beams 8 is illustrated in detail in Figure 3.

Preferably, the semi-submersible platform 16 further comprises a lower plate or altered plate (heave plate) 9 that increases the damping of vertical movements. The heave plate 9, located at the base of the platform, is in turn reinforced by VIgas 13, which can be hollow or macered, preferably solid, and whose section can be of various types, such as square or rectangular. These beams 13 can be constructed in various materials, such as steel or reinforced concrete, or others. The beams 13 are in solidarity with the heave plate 9 and are connected with the reinforced base 12 of the columns 14 15.

The heave plate 9, which functions as a damping device for vertical movement, is made of reinforced concrete and on it the four columns 14 15 are raised. The arrangement of this plate 9 improves the performance and response performance at sea of the platform . This plate 9 can be homogeneous or have holes.

As stated, the trunk or preferably hollow part 5a 5b 6a 6b of the columns 14 15 is internally compartmentalized and preferably these parts 5a 5b 6a 6b have ballast tanks, which are filled once the platform leaves the waters of the port , or backup zone where it has been built, in order to lower the center of gravity and increase its stability.

The funding system consists of several funding lines 11; for example, by 3,6 or 4 lines of anchorage in the form of catenaries made for example of chain of steel with link without contrete, of marine stake or combination of both. In addition, the anchoring lines 11 can be arranged with or without forced initial pretension by adding concrete blocks or elements 14 (see diagram of Figure 5) arranged at a variable distance L from the anchoring position on the platform. The anchoring system is specially adapted for this application, significantly reducing the resulting stresses and being especially recommended for shallow water, although not excluding its use in deep water. At one of its ends, the anchoring lines 11 are joined to the platform by means of a piece, for example of steel, or lug firmly connected to the concrete assembly at that height. At the other end, the anchoring lines 11 are firmly attached to the seabed by the use of an anchoring device that can be, for example: an anchor, a dead person, a pile or a suction pile.

Several possible funding systems are described below:

Figure 6 illustrates a possible embodiment of an anchoring system 11, formed by 6 catenaries, arranged two for each of the three outer columns 14. The lines are firmly connected to the platform at the height of the structural ring formed by the zones of greater strength 7 and the beams 8. In a specific example of this embodiment, the 4 leeward lines form 45 ° to each other and 22.5 ° with the local coordinate axes of each of the columns, as can be seen in figure 6. The 2 windward lines form 45 ° to each other and 67.5 ° with the coordinate axes of the column to which they are fixed. This anchoring system is recommended in especially severe seas, those where significant heights of greater waves are reached for the survival condition and in addition there is no direction or sector of predominant incidence thereof.

Figure 7 illustrates an alternative embodiment of anchoring system 11, consisting of 3 catenaries, providing a line for each of the outer columns 14. Lines 11 are firmly connected to the platform at the height of the structural ring formed by the zones of greater strength 7 and beams 8. In a specific example of this embodiment, the 2 leeward lines form 45 ° with the local coordinate axes of each of the columns and the windward line forms 90 ° with the coordinate axes premises of the column to which it is fixed, as can be seen in Figure 7. This anchoring system is recommended for areas with mild and / or severe maritime climates, where the design condition in survival is sufficiently mild as not to have to contemplate the installation of 6 catenaries.

Finally, Figure 9 illustrates another alternative embodiment of the anchoring system 11, consisting of 4 catenaries. This anchoring system is designed for those areas whose maritime climate, severe in conditions of survival, presents a direction or sector characteristic of the incidence of waves and wind; in such a way that it is necessary to increase the security of funding only in this direction or predominant sector of incidence. This results in a mixed resulting system of the two described above, forming a line for each of the outer columns 14 that are leeward from the predominant direction and two lines in the outer column 14 that are windward from the predominant direction. The lines are firmly connected to the platform at the height of the structural ring formed by the areas of greatest resistance 7 and the beams 8. In a specific example of this embodiment, the leeward lines form 45 ° with the local coordinate axes of each of the columns to which they are subject, while the windward lines form 45 ° to each other and 67.5 ° with the local coordinate axes of the column to which they are attached, as can be seen in the figure 8.

As one skilled in the art can appreciate, the semi-submersible platform has a series of advantageous features compared to the state of the art platforms. These characteristics are, among others:

•

The use of concrete as the main building material.

•

The arrangement of 4 vertical columns, 3 of them in the vertices forming a triangular and 1 central arrangement on which the equipment is mounted (for example, the tower and the wind turbine).

•

Preferably, a concrete plate at the base on which the whole assembly is constructed, which also serves to significantly dampen vertical displacements during operation and in any sea condition. This vertical plate causes, when moving vertically, an extra displacement of water around it, called added mass, which increases the period itself to heave, generates a damping effect on the structure and significantly reduces the amplitude of vertical displacements by increasing notably its operational performance compared to any other design.

•

The use of a structural ring located at an intermediate height (H) that serves as a stiffening element and that provides extraordinary structural resistance to the design. The anchoring lines are fixed to this structural ring, increasing the safety of the platform.

•

The concrete elements used to generate an initial claim on the anchoring lines and which allow to reduce the maximum dynamic stresses on them.

•

The use of joining beams that can be constructed in steel or concrete.

•

The separation achieved between the outer columns, located in the vertices of the set, gives the system a high stability in any situation by increasing, this separation, the inertia of the flotation and with it its restorative or adrizante pair.

•

This floating o.ffshore concrete structure with heave plate can, depending on the application to which it is intended, mount on the four main columns (exterior and central) a work deck or successive superstructure covers necessary for proper performance of its mission and that allow to install all the necessary equipment for this, for example: housing modules, substations, support equipment for offshore farms of all kinds, etc. This versatility distinguishes it, also, clearly from the rest of the solutions proposed by the state of the art.

and therefore:

•

The anchoring system is optimized to reduce the maximum tensions in the anchoring lines.

•

It has considerably lower maintenance needs than the rest of the state of the art designs, when using concrete as a construction material.

• The device is equipped with sufficient stability to allow 3 O to install in a port, afloat and with the minimum draft, the tower and the wind turbine;

so that it can be towed to the installation site with all

already installed equipment and systems.

The construction procedure of a semi-submersible platform of the previously described is described below. As indicated above, it has been observed that reinforced concrete, being an industrializable material, is a good alternative to steel for the construction of semi-submersible platforms. Among other advantages, the following can be pointed out: resistance and durability of concrete to the marine environment; speed of construction; cost of concrete versus steel. To ensure the non-opening of traction cracks, concrete post-tensioning can be performed.

In the construction method described below, the different stages of the construction process of a reinforced and post-tensioned concrete platform are detailed, which serves as a support, for example, to the tower of a wind turbine.

In the construction method described, the availability of a floating dock with similar characteristics to those used for the construction of reinforced concrete cellular drawers for maritime works is assumed, adapted to the dimensions and loads required for the construction of the platform . Since the construction method of the columns of the platform is by self-climbing formwork, it is not necessary to install the umbrella that characterizes the floating docks for concrete cell drawers. Lifting operations are carried out, for example, with a self-propelled ringer crane located on the dock, with sufficient capacity for the operations to be performed.

In addition to the floating dock, the following structures and infrastructure are necessary:

A pier with water depth greater than the platform's draft in

thread the strut of the base of the floating dock further.

An area of land near the dock of the floating dock for warehouses aggregates and concrete plant. An area of land near the dock of the floating dock for the workshop and storage of the ferralla. A nearby area on land for gathering prestressed reinforcing beams of the base and bracing. A dock in the same port for the armament of the platform and its equipment and the installation of the tower, gondola and rotor of the wind turbine. An area on land adjacent to the armament dock for collection and / or construction of the platform and wind turbine facilities.

STAGES OF THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS

Once the aggregate parks have been established (note that the concrete comprises aggregate, cement and passive and / or active reinforcement), the ferralla park and the plant concreting and moored to the dock the floating dock, the construction process of the platform follows the following stages:

ET AP A 1 -Construction of the platform base The base of the platform is built following the following stages:

1.1. In the ferralla workshop the different elements that constitute the base armor. In the event that the semi-floating platform under construction has been designed to include a heave plate 9 and also so that it is reinforced with beams 13:

1.2. Positioning of the prestressed beams 13 of reinforcement of the heave plate 9 of the platform based on the floating dock.

t .3. Positioning of the platform heave 9 armor on the base of the floating dock.

1.4. Construction of the platform heave 9 formwork. In the zone of the vertical trunks the drawers are left prepared for the reception of the

vertical post-tension cables of the logs.

1.5. Honnigonado of the plate of heave 9 of the platform.

1.6. Removal of heave plate formwork 9. Note that the stages intended to place the heave plate 9 and the reinforcement beams 13 are only made in case a semi-submersible platform has been designed That includes those elements.

STAGE 2 -Construction of the trunks of the trunks up to the level of the bracing beams. Once the base is honnigonada, the climbing formwork of the trunks 5 6 is installed and the climbing process begins until it reaches the level of the bracing beams 7. The stages of this phase are:

2.1. Construction of log trunks 5 6 in the ferralla workshop.

2.2. Installation of climbing formwork.

2.3. Advance of the climb, until reaching the level of support of the Bracing Beams 7 (that is, build 5b 6b). Accompanying the climbing process, the floating dock is submerged, so that part of the charges are taken by the hydrostatic thrusts on the platform.

2.4.

Dismantling of the climbing formwork.

ET AP A 3 -Construction of the bracing sections Once the climbing process has been carried out, the bracing sections 7 are built on the trunks 5b 6b following the following steps:

3.1.

Construction in the ferralla workshop of the bracing sections of the bracing sections 7. These lugs include the anchoring hooks of the platform to the anchoring lines 11.

3.2. Installation of auxiliary platforms for access to logs.

3.3. Installation of the horizontal formwork that cover the mouths of the trunks.

3.4. Placement of prestressed bracing beams 8.

3.5. Installation of the vertical formwork of the bracing sections, including the access block 7 that connects the upper trunks 5a 6a with the lower trunks 5b 6b And with the soul of the bracing beams 8, where the conduits that will facilitate the transfers of Ballast and personnel communications between cylinders.

3.6. Placement of the bracing sections reinforcements.

3.7. Concreting the bracing sections.

3.8. Disassembly of bracing sections

ET AP A 4 -Construction of the trunks of the trunks until the coronation (that is, build 5th 6th) Once the bracing sections 7 of the logs have been constructed, we proceed to continue the process of climbing the trunks 5 6 until their coronation (5a 6a). The stages of this phase are:

4.1. Construction of the reinforcement of the shafts in the ferralla workshop.

4.2. Installation of climbing formwork.

4.3. Advance the climb until reaching the support level of the upper part of the trunks 5a 6a. Accompanying the climbing process, the floating dock is submerged, so that part of the loads are taken by the hydrostatic thrusts on the platform.

4.4. Dismantling of the climbing formwork.

STAGE 5 - Top of the trunks finished The process of climbing the columns is finished, the sealing of the perimetral and central trunks is sealed. This phase has the following stages:

5.1. Construction in the ferralla park of the reinforcement of the sealing covers of the perimeter and central trunks. This reinforcement includes the threaded bars connecting to the base (for example, steel) of the wind turbine tower.

5.2. Installation of a work platform on the cylinder covers.

5.3. Placement of the horizontal and vertical formwork of the edge of the perimeter and central trunks 6a 5a. In the cover of the central trunk an access mouth is left for equipment and pipes.

5.4. Placing the reinforcement of the covers on the trunks.

5.5. Concreting of the tops of the logs.

5.6. Dismantling the formwork of the trunk covers.

ET AP A 6 - Transfer of the platform to the annamento dock Once the climbing process is finished, the platform is moved to the armament dock, where the wind turbine tower installation and other installations are carried out. This phase is divided into the following stages:

6.1. Sinking of the floating dock, until the platform floats.

6.2. Transfer with tug of the platform until the armament dock and tie of the same one to the dock.

ET AP A 7 - Vertical post-tensioning of the logs During the entire climbing process, construction of the bracing sections and tops of the vertical logs has maintained the continuity of the sheaths that will house the post-tensioning tendons. In this phase, the tendons are placed and tested, following the steps:

7.1. Threading the tendons in the post-tensioning sheaths

7.2. Placement at the base of the tendon fixation heads.

7.3. Tested from the top of the logs.

7.4. Sealing of the fixation heads of the tendons and sealing of the sheaths.

STAGE 8 -Installation of auxiliary equipment The auxiliary equipment of the platform can include ballast control systems in the perimeter and central cylinders (pumps and pipes), reserve energy equipment, communications, air conditioning and navigation aids.

ET AP A 9 -Installation of the wind turbine tower, gondola and rotor The wind turbine installation is carried out at the armament dock and includes the conventional installation stages of a wind turbine. The construction of the platform in the floating dock requires an approximate period of two months, sufficient time for the installation of equipment and wind turbine at the armament dock.

This means that through the process described above, each platform-wind turbine assembly can be completed in two months, except the first, which requires a somewhat longer period of 4 months.

Some advantages of these semi-submersible structures or platforms are indicated below.

The construction of semi-submersible floating concrete structures, compared to conventional steel structures, preferably with said vertical damping plate or heave plate, clearly and directly provides the following competitive advantages:

1) It allows the use of civil construction techniques and processes widely used in maritime and port works, based on the use of floating drawers. Through this construction technique, the use of large infrastructures dedicated especially for the steel construction of these devices, such as shipyards or naval factories, is no longer necessary. This fact is of vital importance to bring the construction of these units closer to the place of operation, and therefore, drastically reduce transport costs, substantially improving the profitability of the investment and therefore its attractiveness.

2) Manufacturing times are radically reduced. As an example say that an offshore floating unit of about 10,000 tons, built in reinforced concrete, has a manufacturing and delivery time of around 40 days. What supposes a reduction in the term of delivery, with respect to a similar unit constructed in steel, of about 3.5 months.

3) The price of concrete is relatively constant and is not affected, as clearly and directly by the pressure of market demand as in the case of steel. This allows more realistic and secure economic budgets and forecasts, as well as knowing more accurately

Actual investment costs. This makes safer, more profitable and attractive the

investment.

4) The use of the damping plate to heave, if used, drastically reduces the movements of the structure at sea, which allows to design less robust and therefore less expensive anchoring systems In addition to improving the operability of all set.

5) The operation and maintenance costs are lower than those of any marine steel structure, increasing the profitability of the operation.

6) This semi-submersible platform is not dependent on ballast systems) commonly used for automatic correction of heels on semi-submersible platforms that make up the state of the art.

7) The installation of all systems and equipment, including the tower and the wind turbine, can be carried out afloat at the place where the platform is built. This makes it possible to dramatically reduce the complexity of the towing, installation and commissioning operation of the platform, significantly reducing the costs associated with these operations.

8) The technology of construction of marine works in concrete is facilitated, developing the necessary methodology to carry out the construction of the platforms locally, or at least close to the target locations in conventional ports.

9) The price of concrete is significantly cheaper than that of steel. The use of concrete as a construction material allows the massive industrialization of this type of offshore platforms, which will undoubtedly contribute to the reduction of costs and therefore to a better competitiveness of the offshore wind industry.

An example of a semi-submerged platform according to the described embodiment is described below:

EXAMPLE

A device according to the described embodiment of the invention has been designed and simulated. To define the optimal dimensions of the proposed design, its direct application in the offshore wind industry has been considered. The main dimensions of the device depend on the characteristics of the equipment you install, 5 and especially the size of the wind turbine. A 5MW type wind turbine has been selected as an application example. It should be noted that the greater the installed power, the greater the weight of the wind turbine and the larger the diameter of the blades of the same. That is, as the technology and state of the art of offshore wind turbines progress, it will be necessary to resize the platform, to

10 optimize its design based on the new requirements for thrust, stability and behavior at sea derived from the new and higher loads caused by these new wind turbines.

Next, table 1 summarizes the weights and centers of gravity 15 considered in the example of the application developed.

Component

Weight (Tons) VCG (m)

Wind turbine (nacelle + rotor)

365 112

Tower

400 72.3

Equipment and Systems

180 30

Total

945 78.24

TABLE 1

Two other key features for this design is that the blades of this wind turbine have a diameter of 126 meters and the rotor HUB is at a height of 90m with respect to the floating design at rest, or what is the same: at 112 meters regarding the base of the platform.

For this 5MW wind turbine, the triangular concrete platform has the following main dimensions and weights, optimized the set for the horizontal thrust requirement of the wind turbine considered and which is 190 tons at 112m high in the worst calculation conditions. For other loading requirements, the platform may vary the dimensions described below:

Value Units Length 50 m Width 56 m Strut or Total Height 30 m Area of Heave Plate 716 m2 Draft below flotation 22 m Freeboard 8 m Displacement (draft of 22m) 1 1,219 ton Diameter of the 3 outer columns 12, 0 m Diameter of the central column 11.0 m Initial metacentric height (OMo) 5.4 m Maximum Adrifying Arm (GZ) 1.95 m to 19.5 °

TABLE 2

The maximum load capacity is 1,100 tons with the dimensions specified here. The platform has a minimum draft, with the tower and turbine mounted, 10 of 15.5 meters and an operation draft, after ballasting the tanks arranged in the lower part of the cylindrical columns, 22 meters with the center of gravity of the whole set located vertically 15.6 meters from the base and centered with the central cylinder. This design allows to leave with the condition of minimum ballast and minimum draft without any stability problem leading

15 installed the tower and the turbine.

to. Behavior at sea

The design has been technically evaluated by means of numerical simulations with coupling between the platform and its anchoring system, both in the domain of time and in the frequency, using numerical models

5 commercials widely used in the offshore industry as: WAMIT, W ADAM and SIMO-RIFLEX.

From the set of tests and simulations carried out, with different sea states, the following data have been found that characterize the semi-submersible platform of 10 triangular concrete:

(I) Own periods of the structure without coupling of the anchoring system and with heave plate:

Degree of Freedom Value Units

Own Period to Heave (Altered) 21, 6 s Own Period to Roll (Rolling) 26.3 s Own Period to Pitch (Pitch) 26.1 s

TABLE 3 15

(2) Response amplitude operator (RAO):

Next, in Figures 7 and 8, the structure response operators obtained from the hydrodynamic model W AMIT -W ADAM are shown. From them it can be concluded that the structure shows a more than remarkable behavior, not 20 showing resonance situations in the most common periods of the waves (T <20s)

(3) Movements with irregular waves:

The characterization of the most important responses of the semi-submersible triangular concrete platform with irregular waves is defined by the

following values:

Sea state

Middle value Minimum value Maximum value

SURGE (m)

Sea state of Operation (Hs = 2.4m, Tp = JOs, Vm = ¡2.5m / s, C = O.3m / s) Sea state Severe (Hs = llm, Tp = 16s, Vm = 12.5m / s , C = O.59m / s) Sea state Extreme Survival (Hs = 13m, Tp = 17s, Vm = 17m / s, C = O.8m / s)

-6.62 -9.8 -14.5 -8.9 -15 -24.2 -4.7 -6.4 -9.4

TABLE 6

Sea state

Middle value Minimum value Maximum value

HEAVE (m)

Operating sea state (Hs = 2.4m, Tp = \ Os, V m = 12 .5m / s, C = 0.3m / s) Severe sea state (Hs = llm, Tp = 16s, V m = 12.5m1s , C = 0.59m1s) Extreme Survival sea state (Hs = 13m, Tp = 17s, Vm = 17m / s, C = 0.8m / s)

-0.04 -0.1 -0.2 -1.59 -4.3 -5.4 1.5 4.89 4.4

TABLE 7

Sea state

Middle value Minimum value Maximum value

PITCH (0)

Sea state of Operation (Hs = 2.4m, Tp = 10s, Vm = 12.5m1s, C = 0.3m / s) Sea state Severe (Hs = llm, Tp = 16s, Vm = 12.5m1s, C = 0.59m1s) Extreme Survival sea state (Hs = 13m, Tp = 17s, V m = 17m / s, C = O.8m / s)

-5.56 -5.1 -9 -9.9 -7.9 -14.8 -2.6 -1.71 -3.75

BOARDS

Claims (10)

1. A semi-submersible platform (16) characterized by comprising: an inner column (15) configured to provide greater buoyancy and three outer columns (14), where each of said inner and outer columns (14, 15) comprise a sturdy base (12) and a trunk (5a, 5b, 6a , 6b), and where each column (14, 15) comprises a section of greater resistance (7) at a certain height and a plurality of beams (8) that join each outer column (14) with the inner column (15) and each outer column ( 14) with the other two outer columns.

2.

The semi submersible platform (16) of claim 1, wherein said inner column (15) and three outer columns (14) are made of reinforced concrete.

3.

The semi-submersible platform (16) of any one of claims 1 or 2, further comprising a lower plate (9) on which said inner column (15) and three outer columns (14) are fixed, configured to increase the damping of vertical movements

Four.

The semi submersible platform (16) of claim 3, wherein said bottom plate (9) is made of reinforced concrete.

5.

The semi-submersible platform (16) of any of claims 3 or 4, wherein said lower plate (9) is reinforced by a plurality of beams (13) connecting the base (12) of each outer column (14) with the base of the inner column

(15) and the base (12) of each outer column (14) with the base (12) of the other two outer columns. 6. The semi submersible platform (16) of any of the preceding claims, further comprising a anchoring system (11) comprising a plurality of anchoring lines configured to be anchored to the section of greatest strength (7) of each outer column (14).

7.

The semi-submersible platform (16) of any of the preceding claims, wherein said inner column (15) has at least one tower (3), a nacelle (1), a rotor (10) and a plurality of blades (2) mounted .

8.

A method of building a semi submersible platform, characterized by the stages of:

-

placement of a sturdy base (12) inside and three sturdy bases (12) outside on the base of a floating dock; -installation of a climbing formwork configured to build an interior column

(15) and three outer columns (14) on sturdy base bases (12); -avance of the climb until reaching a certain level, so that they remain built a log (5b, 6b) on each sturdy base (12), simultaneously with the which submerges the floating dock; - installation of formwork that covers the mouths of said trunks (5b, 6b); -location of a plurality of bracing beams (8) that join each trunk outer (6b) with the inner trunk (5b) And each outer trunk (6b) with the other two outer trunks; -installation of vertical formwork to build areas of greater resistance (7); -position of reinforcements of said areas of greater resistance (7), concreting of the same and disassembly of the formwork; -after the construction of the sections of greater resistance (7) on each trunk (5b, 6b): install climbing formwork on them, climb up to a certain level until build the logs (5th, 6th) above the sections of greatest resistance (7), simultaneously with which the floating dock is submerged, and disassembly of the climbing formwork; - top of each trunk (Sa, 6a);

- sinking of the floating dock until the platform floats; -transfer from the platform to the armament dock; - vertical trimming of the logs (Sa, Sb; 6a, 6b).

5 the

9. The method of claim 8, further comprising, before placement of the resistant bases (12): - placing a plurality of reinforcement beams (13) on the base of the floating dock; - placing a reinforcement of a resistant base (9) on the base of the floating dock; - formwork of said base (9); - crumbling from said base (9); - disassembly of the formwork of the base (9).

fifteen

10. The method of any of claims 8 or 9, comprising, after vertical post-tensioning of the logs (5a, 5b; 6a, 6b), the installation in the armament spring of at least one equipment on the platform.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein said at least one equipment is a tower, a gondola, a wind turbine rotor or an auxiliary equipment.

 FIGURE 1 16 ~ 6th FIGURE 2 FIGURE 4  FIGURES   \ ¡\ , ,, - "l. ,, ... í CT! Y / \ ":" ' ..., '1: - ~ :. "!') .. \. / ~ \ (r FIGURE 6 FIGURE 7 \ \. (~ / /// // // , . '  FIGURE 8   Response amplltude operator -Heave I I I i! i i i i! + J 'i I I I I I:: i --¡ - j ----- i --- ti - t ------: --- ¡--- t - t --- ¡--- + - ¡- + -f¡ i ¡l '¡ii I ¡i II ¡I ii 1 I i 1 I I I i I I! i i i i i

-

+ ---- l --- ~ ------ t-I - t - + --- +

1 --1 --- t - 11 - + ---- t - t ---- t --- I i I! I! ! i i i I I! i AND ! 1 I J and I! , i 1 I! I I 1 L '1

---

+ - + ---- t ------ 1 --- I --- T '--- t - + --- I ---- + --- 4 --- l-- - + _ ------- t--

~ 60 I i: i: i i:: i :: '1: S QI I I I J '! ! I 1 I I! ! I I! I > AC GI

-

--- j - t -, - +++ -, - H-t- ~ l ------- ~ -

: J: I! i! I i!  I I I I I I i I ¡¡I j j ¡j ¡ 20 --- t ----- ¡---- ¡---- 1 ----¡ --- ¡--- l --- í --H --- ¡-¡-¡- -T-j! i i i i! ,: i i i i, I¡ ! : ¡¡',',: ', J': ¡":" i!: :: '¡,!:,!, O 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40  T (s) FIGURE 9  Response amplitude operator -Pitch and Ro " 40 ~ - ~ - ~~ --_ T-- ~ - ~ - ~ - ~ - ~~ - ~ - ~ - ~ - ~: --- T-- ~ - ----, I ', I,

------

------- ¡----- ¡------ t --- r ----- ¡------¡ ------ 1 ---- ---- ¡----- f ------------ f ----- f ------ + ----- f ------- -Pitch i III i III! ! i i i i! I

---- t ---- i ---- i ----- t --- t ----- ¡----- i ----- t ------ f ----- t ------, ----- t ---- t ------- t ---- t --- t ----- t --- -  I I! ! ! ! I I! ! ! ! I! I I I I ': I I I I: I I I I:: I I ~ 25  --- T ---- l ----- r ----- r - T ---- ¡----- l ----- l ----- t --- --- r - I ----- t ----- r ----- t ---- l --- r ---- t ----- AND ~ 20 --- j ----- l ---- + ------ + ---- t ----- + ---- + ---- ~ ------- ~ ----- t ----- i ---- ~ -----_ i _------ t ----- ~ ----_ + ------ + - and... , I "'" I I',,, I ',' O ! i! i! ! ! I! I! ¡¡¡¡ o¡: 15 --- r - r --- ¡----- r ----¡ ---- r ---- T - l --- r ----, l --- ~ I ; --- t --- r ---- t ---- l --- r ---- r ---- J ::. ~ ,,,, I I, "1" ", --- j --- j --- t ----- t --- t ---- t ------ t ------ i ------- + - ---- t --- r ---- t ----- t ------ t ----- + ----- t ------ t ---- --- I! l! j! ! 1 I! i! ! ! i j ii: 10 I i ~ ¡i 1 ¡i i i i I ¡1 ¡i i  ------ t --- r - r-¡-1 ---- t-1 --- r T ---- ¡-t - t ---- r ---- T --- l ------ r - r - o! -__ ~! --- I ~~! - ~ i-- ~! - ~ I ~ = *! == ~! - - ~: ~~ --_ + i-- ~ - ~ '~ = 4! :: ~ ¡== ~: == ~ i ~~ 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 T (s) FIGURE 10 SPANISH OFFICE OF THE PATENTS AND BRAND Application no .: 201200759 SPAIN Date of submission of the application: 18.07.2012 Priority Date: REPORT ON THE STATE OF THE TECHNIQUE 51 Int. Cl.: B63B35 / 44 (2006.01) B63B9 / 06 (2006.01) RELEVANT DOCUMENTS

Category

56 Documents cited Claims Affected

X

US 2012103244 A1 (GONG LING ET AL.) 05/03/2012, figure 4, paragraphs [0009-0022]; 1-7

TO

8-11

TO

FR 2967642 A1 (NASS & WIND IND) 05/25/2012, pages 1-17; Figures 1 -3. 1-7

TO

WO 2009 067023 A1 (WINDSEA AS ET AL.) 05/28/2009, pages 1-9; Figures 1 -3. 1-7

TO

WO 2007096680 A1 (LILAS THEODOROS ET AL.) 08/30/2007, pages 1-2; Figures 1 -3. 1-7

TO

WO 2010096060 A1 (SRINIVASAN NAGAN) 08/26/2010, figures 1-2. & Summary of the basis of 1-7

WPI data Recovered from EPOQUE; AN 2010-K48306

TO

US 2004253060 A1 (HORTON EDWARD E) 12/16/2004, figures 1-12. paragraphs [0016-0034]; 8-11

TO

WO 2009131826 A2 (PRINCIPLE POWER INC ET AL.) 10/29/2009, page 2, line 25 -page 9, 8-11

line 29; Figures 1-24.

TO

GB 1488065 A (ARMERAD BETONG AB) 10/05/1977, figures 1-11. claims 1-5; 8-11

Category of the documents cited X: of particular relevance Y: of particular relevance combined with other / s of the same category A: reflects the state of the art O: refers to unwritten disclosure P: published between the priority date and the date of priority submission of the application E: previous document, but published after the date of submission of the application

This report has been prepared • for all claims □ for claims no:

Date of realization of the report 05.09.2012

Examiner M. R. Revuelta Pollán Page 1/4

REPORT OF THE STATE OF THE TECHNIQUE Application number: 201200759 Minimum documentation sought (classification system followed by classification symbols) B63B Electronic databases consulted during the search (name of the database and, if possible, terms of search used) INVENES, EPODOC, WPI, PAJ State of the Art Report Page 2/4  WRITTEN OPINION Application number: 201200759 Date of Written Opinion: 05.09.2012 Statement

Novelty (Art. 6.1 LP 11/1986)

Claims Claims 1-11 IF NOT

Inventive activity (Art. 8.1 LP11 / 1986)

Claims Claims 8-11 1-7 IF NOT

The application is considered to comply with the industrial application requirement. This requirement was evaluated during the formal and technical examination phase of the application (Article 31.2 Law 11/1986).  Opinion Base.- This opinion has been made on the basis of the patent application as published. State of the Art Report Page 3/4  WRITTEN OPINION Application number: 201200759 1. Documents considered.- The documents belonging to the state of the art taken into consideration for the realization of this opinion are listed below.

Document

Publication or Identification Number publication date

D01

US 2012103244 A1 (GONG LING et al.) 03.05.2012

D02

FR 2967642 A1 (NASS & WIND IND) 05.25.2012

D03

WO 2009 067023 A1 (WINDSEA AS et al.) 05/28/2009

D04

WO 2007096680 A1 (LILAS THEODOROS et al.) 08/30/2007

D05

WO 2010096060 A1 (SRINIVASAN NAGAN) 26.08.2010

D06

US 2004253060 A1 (HORTON EDWARD E) 16.12.2004

D07

WO 2009131826 A2 (PRINCIPLE POWER INC et al.) 10/29/2009

D08

GB 1488065 A (ARMERAD BETONG AB) 05.10.1977

2. Statement motivated according to articles 29.6 and 29.7 of the Regulations for the execution of Law 11/1986, of March 20, on Patents on novelty and inventive activity; quotes and explanations in support of this statement The patent under study describes in claims 1-7 a semi-submersible platform whose technical characteristics main ones are: -a inner column and 3 outer columns, all of them comprise a sturdy base and a larger section resistance at a certain height, at both points the columns are joined together by a plurality of beams. -a bottom plate on which the columns are fixed -a plurality of anchor lines anchored to the section of greatest resistance of each outer column. -the inner column has mounted a tower, a nacelle, a rotor and a plurality of blades. Document D01 shows a semi-submersible platform consisting of: -a inner column and 3 outer columns, all of them comprise a sturdy base. -a plurality of beams that join all the columns together at the bottom and top of the columns. -a plurality of anchor lines anchored to the resistant base of the outer columns. -the inner column has mounted a tower, a nacelle, a rotor and a plurality of blades. As we see in documents D01 to D04, platforms are widely known in the technical sector semi-submersible consisting of: -3 or 4 outer columns, with or without inner column. -with a resistant base and joined together by a plurality of beams -a plurality of configured anchor lines anchored to the resistant base of the columns. As we see in document D05, the use of a lower plate is also known in the art sector. The fact of reinforcing the columns at a certain height is considered within the scope of the usual practice followed by the person skilled in the art, especially since the advantages achieved are easily anticipated. In view of what is known from document D01 and the aforementioned, it is not considered to require any inventive effort for a person skilled in the art to develop a semi-submersible platform like the one described in the claims 1-7. Accordingly, claims 1-7 lack inventive activity. Claims 8-11 describe the platform construction method described in claims 1-7. Documents D01, D06, D07 and D08 describe methods of building semi-submersible platforms. None These cited documents disclose the construction method described in claims 8-11, so it is considered which has novelty and inventive activity in view of the cited documents. State of the Art Report Page 4/4