TECHNICAL FIELD
-
The present invention relates to a woven or knitted fabric having high droplet removability and being superior in motion comfort and texture.
BACKGROUND ART
-
Conventionally, woven or knitted fabrics having water repellency are used for various applications such as casual clothing, sports clothing, and uniform clothing, and high water repellency is required for all of them. Recently, not only water repellency but also texture and stretchability for imparting motion comfort during wearing are required from the viewpoint of imparting added value to these applications.
-
To impart water repellency to a woven or knitted fabric, it is widely used to subject the woven or knitted fabric to a water repellent treatment in which a water repellent agent containing a fluororesin, a silicone-based resin, or a paraffinic resin is attached to the fabric surface. In recent years, in consideration of the environment, a woven or knitted fabric using a fluorine-free (PFOA-free) water repellent agent using no compound that may affect living organisms (for example, perfluorooctanoic acid or perfluorooctanesulfonic acid) has been proposed. Meanwhile, woven or knitted fabrics obtained with a fluorine-free formulation cannot obtain sufficient water repellency in daily life, and the texture becomes harder unless an appropriate formulation is applied, and thus the use for applications requiring both water repellency and texture such as casual clothing and sports clothing has been greatly limited.
-
As a method for improving the water repellency other than the method involving attaching a water repellent agent to a fabric surface, proposals have been made so far on the cross-sectioning of atypical shapes of fibers or conjugated yarn formation aiming at the so-called "lotus effect" by controlling the surface form of a woven or knitted fabric (for example, Patent Documents 1, 2, and 3).
PRIOR ART DOCUMENT
PATENT DOCUMENTS
-
- Patent Document 1: Japanese Patent Laid-open Publication No. 2005-350828
- Patent Document 2: Japanese Patent Laid-open Publication No. 2015-098661
- Patent Document 3: WO 2021/215319 A
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
PROBLEMS TO BE SOLVED BY THE INVENTION
-
However, none of the woven or knitted fabrics described in Patent Documents 1 and 2 does not have stretchability for following strenuous motions during wearing casual clothing, sports clothing, or the like, and their motion comfort is insufficient. The fabric described in Patent Document 3 has stretchability owing to containing stretchable fibers in a conjugated yarn, but has insufficient texture because non-crimp fibers are recommended as ultrafine fibers that are contained together with stretchable fibers and form fine loop shape of fibers. For these reasons, there is a demand for the development of a woven or knitted fabric that achieves not only droplet removability but also motion comfort and good texture and can be applied to each application.
-
An object of the present invention is to solve the above problems of the prior art and provide a woven or knitted fabric having high droplet removability and being superior in motion comfort and texture.
SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEMS
-
In order to solve the above problems, the present invention has the following configuration.
- [1] A woven or knitted fabric including a combined-filament fiber including a fiber A having a multilobal shape cross section with protrusions on an outer peripheral portion and a fiber B having a cross section in a flat shape, and satisfying requirements below:
- (1) the number of the protrusions of the fiber A is 6 to 30;
- (2) the fiber B has a flatness of 1.1 to 5.0;
- (3) the fiber B is smaller in fineness than the fiber A;
- (4) the woven or knitted fabric has, on a surface thereof, crimps of the fiber B;
- (5) both the fiber A and the fiber B are crimped fibers having a bimetal structure containing two polymers; and
- (6) the woven or knitted fabric has, on a surface thereof, a water repellent agent.
- [2] The woven or knitted fabric according to the above [1], wherein a fabric surface has a water droplet sliding-down angle of 1 to 45 degrees.
- [3] The woven or knitted fabric according to the above [2], wherein the fabric surface has a water droplet sliding-down angle of 1 to 60 degrees after washing repeated 20 times.
- [4] The woven or knitted fabric according to any one of the above [1] to [3], wherein an elongation rate in a warp direction or a weft direction is 10 to 100%.
- [5] The woven or knitted fabric according to any one of [1] to [4], wherein the fiber A has a fineness of 0.5 to 5.0 dtex, and a fineness ratio represented by a fineness [dtex] of the fiber A/a fineness [dtex] of the fiber B is 2.0 or more.
- [6] The woven or knitted fabric according to any one of [1] to [5], wherein a number ratio represented by the number of the fibers B/the number of the fibers A is 2 or more.
- [7] The woven or knitted fabric according to any one of [1] to [6], wherein a surface occupancy of the combined-filament fiber per unit area is 20% or more.
EFFECTS OF THE INVENTION
-
According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a woven or knitted fabric having high droplet removability and being superior in motion comfort and texture.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
-
- Fig. 1 is a schematic illustration of a fiber cross-sectional structure of an islands-in-the-sea conjugated fiber produced in Example 1.
- Fig. 2 is a schematic sectional view of a composite spinneret for manufacturing the islands-in-the-sea conjugated fiber used in Example 1.
- Fig. 3 is a schematic view of a cross-sectional structure of a combined-filament fiber contained in the woven or knitted fabric of the present invention.
EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
-
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described in detail.
-
A woven or knitted fabric of the present invention is a woven or knitted fabric having a water repellent agent on a surface thereof, the woven or knitted fabric containing, as a constituent yarn, a combined-filament fiber including a fiber A having a multilobal shape cross section with protrusions on an outer peripheral portion and a fiber B having a cross section in a flat shape and being smaller in fineness than the fiber A, wherein both the fiber A and the fiber B are crimped fibers having a bimetal structure containing two polymers. With such a configuration, latent crimps are made apparent by heat treatment such as dyeing processing, whereby a crimp difference occurs between the fiber A and the fiber B having a fineness difference. In addition, the fine crimps of the fiber B form a lotus-shaped uneven structure having a fine air layer on the surface of the woven or knitted fabric, so that superior droplet removability can be obtained. At the same time, due to the effects of the bimetal crimp of the fiber A and the fiber B differing in fineness and the unevenness of the crimp difference, the woven or knitted fabric is also superior in motion comfort and spun-like texture. The effect of unevenness referred to herein refers to the effect of the irregularities of the combined-filament fiber itself, and indicates the formation of an uneven structure on the surface of the combined-filament fiber itself as a result of combining large crimps having a large fineness and fine crimps having a small fineness.
<Fiber A>
-
The fiber A is a crimped fiber having a multilobal shape cross section with protrusions on an outer peripheral portion in a combined-filament fiber including the fiber A and the fiber B.
-
Examples of the polymer constituting the fiber A include melt-moldable polymers such as polyethylene terephthalate, polyethylene naphthalate, polybutylene terephthalate, polytrimethylene terephthalate, polypropylene, polyolefin, polycarbonate, polyacrylate, polyamide, polylactic acid, thermoplastic polyurethane, and polyphenylene sulfide, and copolymers thereof. In particular, when the melting point of the polymer is 165°C or more, heat resistance is good, and thus it is preferable. In addition, it is also preferable to use a plant-derived biopolymer or a recycled polymer, and as the above-mentioned polymer, a recycled polymer recycled by any method among chemical recycling, material recycling, and thermal recycling can be used.
-
The fiber A is a crimped fiber in which those two polymers are combined in a bimetal structure (including a side-by-side type and an eccentric core-sheath type), and is a crimped fiber in which latent crimps are made apparent by heat treatment such as dyeing processing. When the fiber A is not a crimped fiber having a bimetal structure, there is no stretchability, so that when the fiber A is made into clothing, motion comfort cannot be obtained. When the fiber A has a bimetal structure, the woven or knitted fabric shrinks to cause a difference in crimp pitch with the fiber B described later, so that a more effective air layer and a more effective uneven structure can be formed on the surface of the woven or knitted fabric, and the droplet removability and the spun-like texture are further improved.
-
The fiber A may contain, in the polymers, various additives such as inorganic substances such as titanium oxide, silica, and barium oxide, carbon black, colorants such as dyes and pigments, flame retardants, fluorescent brighteners, antioxidants, and ultraviolet absorbers, as necessary.
-
The cross section of the fiber A has a multilobal shape with 6 to 30 protrusions on the outer peripheral portion. Owing to having the multilobal shape, not only spun-like texture can be obtained, but also a contact area between a water droplet and a fiber surface can be effectively reduced even in the fiber A having a relatively large fineness as described later, and a woven or knitted fabric superior in droplet removability can be obtained. The protrusions are preferably in a radial form in which the protrusions are arranged uniformly on the outer peripheral portion of the fiber surface in order to prevent unevenness in droplet removability. When the number of the protrusions is less than 6, spun-like texture cannot be obtained because the intervals between the protrusions are wide. From the viewpoint of increasing the contact area with water droplets and obtaining sufficient droplet removability, the number of the protrusions is preferably 8 or more. Meanwhile, when the number of the protrusions exceeds 30, not only the protrusions are easily broken by physical action such as friction at the time of wearing to cause fibrillation and deteriorate the quality, but also the intervals between the protrusions formed on the outer peripheral portion of the fiber surface are excessively small, so that the fiber has a shape approximate to a round section, and the effect on droplet removability is reduced. The number of the protrusions is more preferably less than 15. The number of the protrusions can be measured by the method described in Examples.
-
As described above, the fiber A preferably has a relatively large fineness as compared with the fiber B in a flat shape to be described later, and the fineness ratio of the fiber A to the fiber B represented by the following Equation 1 is preferably 2.0 or more (more preferably 2.0 to 2000.0, particularly preferably 5.0 to 200.0). When the fineness ratio of the fiber A to the fiber B is 2.0 or more, a crimp difference is likely to occur between the fiber A and the fiber B, fine irregularities or air layers are formed on the surface of the woven or knitted fabric, and sufficient droplet removability and spun-like texture can be obtained. The fineness ratio is more preferably 5.0 or more. Meanwhile, when the fineness ratio of the fiber A to the fiber B is 2000.0 or less, physical properties such as durability as a woven or knitted fabric can be sufficiently satisfied. The fineness ratio is more preferably 200.0 or less. Fineness ratio = fineness [dtex] of fiber A/fineness [dtex] of fiber B
-
The fineness of the fiber A is preferably 0.5 to 5.0 dtex. When the fineness of the fiber A is 0.5 dtex or more, the single yarn fineness is not excessively small, and physical properties such as tear resistance and durability can be sufficiently satisfied. The fineness of the fiber A is more preferably 1.0 dtex or more. Meanwhile, when the fineness of the fiber A is 5.0 dtex or less, a crimp difference from the fiber B effective for droplet removability is likely to be obtained, and a contact surface with water droplets is reduced, so that higher droplet removability can be obtained. The fineness of the fiber A is more preferably 2.5 dtex or less. The fineness can be measured by the method described in Examples.
<Fiber B>
-
The fiber B is a crimped fiber having a cross section in a flat shape in the combined-filament fiber including the fiber A and the fiber B.
-
Examples of the polymer constituting the fiber B include melt-moldable polymers such as polyethylene terephthalate, polyethylene naphthalate, polybutylene terephthalate, polytrimethylene terephthalate, polypropylene, polyolefin, polycarbonate, polyacrylate, polyamide, polylactic acid, thermoplastic polyurethane, and polyphenylene sulfide, and copolymers thereof. In particular, when the melting point of the polymer is 165°C or more, heat resistance is good, and thus it is preferable. In addition, it is also preferable to use a plant-derived biopolymer or a recycled polymer, and as the above-mentioned polymer, a recycled polymer recycled by any method among chemical recycling, material recycling, and thermal recycling can be used.
-
The fiber B is a crimped fiber in which those two polymers are combined in a bimetal structure (including a side-by-side type and an eccentric core-sheath type), and is a crimped fiber in which latent crimps are made apparent by heat treatment such as dyeing processing. When the fiber B is not a crimped fiber having a bimetal structure, the fiber B is not crimped, and spun-like texture described later cannot be obtained. In addition, owing to the fact that the fiber B has a bimetal structure, the droplet removability is further improved.
-
The fiber B may contain, in the polymers, various additives such as inorganic substances such as titanium oxide, silica, and barium oxide, carbon black, colorants such as dyes and pigments, flame retardants, fluorescent brighteners, antioxidants, and ultraviolet absorbers, as necessary.
-
The cross section of the fiber B has a flat shape having a difference in length between the major axis direction and the minor axis direction of the cross section, namely, having a flatness of 1.1 to 5.0. When such a flat shape is crimped, not only spun-like texture reproducing a twisted structure of cotton can be obtained, but also a contact area between a water droplet and a fiber surface can be effectively reduced, and a woven or knitted fabric superior in droplet removability can be obtained. Here, the "flatness" is defined to be a value obtained by calculating an average value of the flatness determined in accordance with the following Equation 2 for the fibers B contained in one combined-filament fiber sampled from the woven or knitted fabric of the present invention. When the flatness exceeds 5.0, a single yarn is excessively thin, and a repulsive feeling exhibited when the combined-filament fiber is bent is reduced, so that spun-like texture cannot be obtained. In addition, the flatness is preferably 4.0 or less to suppress a decrease in the effect on droplet removability caused by the fact that the contact surface between a water droplet and the fiber surface is excessively sharp and the water droplet cannot be supported and is grasped. In addition, it is possible to suppress the induction of quality deterioration due to fibrillation caused by a physical action such as friction at the time of wearing. Meanwhile, when the flatness is less than 1.1, the fiber B has a shape extremely similar to a round cross section, and the effects on droplet removability and spun-like texture are lost. Flatness = length [µm] in major axis direction of cross section of fiber B/length [µm] in minor axis direction of cross section of fiber B
-
As described above, the fiber B has a relatively small fineness as compared with the fiber A, and to develop a crimp difference with the fiber A, the fiber B preferably has the fineness such that the fineness ratio of the fiber A to the fiber B represented by the Equation 1 is 2.0 or more.
<Combined-filament fiber>
-
The woven or knitted fabric of the present invention contains a combined-filament fiber including the fiber A and the fiber B, and may contain a fiber other than the fibers A and B. When a fiber other than the fiber A and the fiber B are contained, the type and shape thereof are not particularly limited. As described above, both the fiber A and the fiber B are crimped fibers having a bimetal structure containing two polymers. Use of a bimetal yarn containing two polymers as the fiber other than the fiber A and the fiber B is preferable because each fiber is likely to develop crimp when used in a woven or knitted fabric.
-
Such a combined-filament fiber preferably has a total fineness within a range of 10 to 300 dtex (more preferably 20 to 240 dtex, particularly preferably 30 to 150 dtex).
-
In the combined-filament fiber, the number ratio of the fiber B to the fiber A represented by the following Equation 3 is preferably 2 or more. When the number ratio is 2 or more, the number of the fibers B exposed on the surface of the woven or knitted fabric is increased, and a better spun-like texture is obtained. In addition, a fine air layer and an uneven structure are likely to be formed due to the crimp difference with the fiber A effective for water repellency, so that higher droplet removability can be obtained. The number ratio is more preferably 5 or more. Meanwhile, by setting the number ratio to 50 or less, it is possible to suppress significant deterioration in quality such as fibrillation or pilling caused by the relatively thin fiber B exposed on the surface of the woven or knitted fabric. The number ratio is more preferably 15 or less. Number ratio = the number of the fibers B/the number of the fibers A
-
The combined-filament fiber is particularly preferably a non-twisted yarn, which is capable of obtaining a most-enlarged crimp difference between the fiber A and the fiber B, but may be twisted at a twist coefficient represented by the following Equation 4 of 35000 or less, as necessary. At this time, the number of twists is preferably within a range of 100 to 2000 T/M. Twist coefficient = the number of twists [T/M] × (fineness [de])1/2 where fineness [de] = fineness [dtex] × 0.9.
<Woven or knitted fabric>
-
The woven or knitted fabric in the present invention is a woven or knitted fabric containing the combined-filament fiber, and has crimps of the fiber B on the surface of the woven or knitted fabric. Here, the "crimp" means a three-dimensional twisted structure (including a coil shape) or a loop structure obtained by false-twisting processing, air processing (interlacing processing or Taslan processing), a fiber having a bimetal structure in which two polymers are bonded, or the like, and is not particularly limited. In addition, false-twisting a fiber having a bimetal structure in which two polymers are bonded together is preferable because crimps become finer. By heat treatment such as dyeing processing, latent crimps of the fiber A and the fiber B of the bimetal structure are made apparent, so that the woven or knitted fabric shrinks, and a stretchable woven or knitted fabric superior in motion comfort can be obtained. At the same time, a crimp difference is generated between the fiber A and the fiber B differing in fineness, so that the fiber A and the fiber B are separated, whereby a space is formed in the combined-filament fiber, and fine crimps of the relatively thin fiber B form a lotus-shaped uneven structure having a fine air layer on the woven or knitted fabric surface, so that superior droplet removability can be obtained. In addition, the fine uneven structure due to the crimp difference between the fiber A and the fiber B provides a fine spun-like texture like extra-long staple cotton on the surface of the woven or knitted fabric.
-
As the proportion of the combined-filament fiber contained in the woven or knitted fabric increases, better stretchability due to the bimetal structure is obtained, and better motion comfort in the case the fabric is made into clothing can be obtained. In particular, as a proportion of the combined-filament fiber exposed on the surface of the woven or knitted fabric increases, a fine air layer and an uneven structure are formed on the surface, so that superior droplet removability and spun-like texture can be obtained. Therefore, in such a woven or knitted fabric, the surface occupancy of the combined-filament fiber per unit area is preferably 20% or more (particularly preferably 100%). Here, the "surface occupancy" refers to a proportion occupied by the combined-filament fiber on the woven or knitted fabric surface. When the surface occupancy is equal to or more than such a value, for example, even in the case of a woven fabric, it is possible to form the uneven structure of the combined-filament fiber effective for higher droplet removability and a better spun-like texture on the woven fabric surface, and higher motion comfort can also be obtained. As a fiber to be combined with the combined-filament fibers in the formation of a woven or knitted fabric, a fiber subjected to false twisting processing or air processing (interlacing processing or Taslan processing), a fiber having a bimetal structure in which two polymers are bonded together, or a fiber obtained by combining the aforementioned fibers is preferable because the stretchability, crimp development, and spun-like touch of the combined-filament fiber are hardly inhibited.
-
The structure of the woven or knitted fabric of the present invention is not particularly limited, but a woven fabric, which is capable of particularly obtaining superior droplet removability, is preferable. When the woven or knitted fabric is a woven fabric, the weave structure is not particularly limited, and examples thereof include plain weave, twill weave, satin weave, modified plain weave, modified twill weave, modified satin weave, variable weave, Jacquard weave, katagasane-ori, double weave structure, multiple weave structure, warp pile weave, weft pile weave, and gauze weave. Further, when the woven or knitted fabric is a knitted fabric, the knitting structure is not particularly limited, and examples thereof include circular knitting, weft knitting, warp knitting (including tricot knitting and raschel knitting), pile knitting, plain knitting, jersey knitting, rib knitting, smooth knitting (interlock knitting), rib knitting, pearl knitting, denbigh structure, cord structure, atlas structure, chain structure, and inlay structure. Both the woven fabric and the knitted fabric may have any structure, but the combined-filament fiber is more easily shrunk and the fine air layer and the uneven structure on the surface are more easily formed when the structure is one in which unevenness is easily generated such as a twill weave is adopted rather than a plain weave. In the case of being mixed with other original yarns, a structure in which a large number of the combined-filament fibers appear on the surface is desirable.
-
Such a woven fabric preferably has a total cover factor (CF) of warps and wefts expressed by the following Equation 5 of 1000 to 3500. When the total cover factor (CF) is 1000 or more, the volume of voids formed at weave points decreases, and superior droplet removability can be obtained without allowing water droplets to drop into the voids. The total cover factor (CF) is more preferably 1500 or more. Meanwhile, when the total cover factor (CF) is 3500 or less, the fine air layer and the uneven structure of the combined-filament fiber described above are not lost by an excessive binding force due to the weave points, and superior droplet removability, motion comfort, and spun-like texture can be obtained. The total cover factor (CF) is more preferably 2800 or less. CF = (total fineness of warp [de])1/2 × weave density of warp [yarns/2.54 cm] + total fineness of weft [de])1/2 × weave density of weft [yarns/2.54 cm] where total fineness of warp [de] = total fineness of warp [dtex] × 0.9, and total fineness of weft [de] = total fineness weft [dtex] × 0.9.
-
The woven or knitted fabric of the present invention has a water repellent agent on the surface. The term "have a water repellent agent on the surface" as used herein means that the woven or knitted fabric is just required to substantially have water repellent performance, and examples of the water droplet sliding-down angle on the fabric surface of the woven or knitted fabric may be smaller than 90 degrees. A yarn having water repellent performance may be used, and a water repellent agent may be applied to the woven or knitted fabric at the time of dyeing processing. The type of the water repellent agent for imparting droplet removability to the woven or knitted fabric is not particularly limited, but it is environmentally preferable to use a water repellent agent having a concentration of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) of 5 ng/g or less in measurement using a high performance liquid chromatograph-mass spectrometer (LC-MS) (particularly preferably less than 1 ng/g). Examples of the water repellent agent include a C6 water repellent agent (also referred to as "C6-based water repellent agent", but herein referred to as "C6 water repellent agent") and a fluorine-free water repellent agent. The fluorine-free water repellent agent is particularly preferable from the viewpoint of recyclability.
-
The term "C6 water repellent agent" refers to a fluorine-based water repellent agent including a fluorine-based compound having a perfluoroalkyl group, where the perfluoroalkyl group has 6 or less carbon atoms. The term "perfluoroalkyl group" refers to a group in which two or more hydrogen atoms of an alkyl group are substituted with fluorine atoms.
-
The non-fluorine-based water repellent agent is a water repellent agent that does not contain a fluorine compound mainly composed of a perfluoroalkyl group. Examples of the non-fluorine-based water repellent agent include a silicone-based water repellent agent and a paraffin-based water repellent agent, and these water repellent agents may be mainly composed of a silicone-based compound or may be mainly composed of a paraffin-based compound.
-
The attachment concentration of the water repellent agent is preferably 0.1 to 1 mass% at which the spun-like texture due to the combined-filament fiber is not impaired and superior droplet removability can be obtained (more preferably 0.2 to 0.8 mass%, particularly preferably 0.3 to 0.5 mass%).
-
The woven or knitted fabric thus obtained contains the combined-filament fiber described above, so that fine crimps of the fiber B form an uneven structure having a fine air layer on the surface of the woven or knitted fabric. As a result, the woven or knitted fabric exhibits not only superior droplet removability like a lotus effect at the time when water droplets are dropped on the surface of the woven or knitted fabric and a superior spun-like texture, but also superior motion comfort due to the bimetal structure of the fiber A and the fiber B.
-
The water droplet sliding-down angle of the fabric surface of the woven or knitted fabric is preferably 1 to 45 degrees. When the water droplet sliding-down angle is 45 degrees or less, for example, in the case of use for clothing, water droplets are less likely to remain on the woven or knitted fabric during wearing, and superior droplet removability without feeling discomfort such as wet feel can be obtained. In particular, when the water droplet sliding-down angle is 15 degrees or less, extremely high droplet removability with which almost no water droplet remains on the woven or knitted fabric when worn can be obtained. Here, the "water droplet sliding-down angle" is defined in the following manner. That is, a water droplet is gently dropped onto the surface of a woven or knitted fabric attached in a planar shape to a horizontal plate, the plate is gently inclined at a constant speed, and the dropped water droplet starts to slide down at an angle, which is defined as a "water droplet sliding-down angle". The smaller the water droplet sliding-down angle, the better in droplet removability the woven or knitted fabric is indicated to be. A 20 µL water droplet is dropped onto the woven or knitted fabric surface using a fully automatic contact angle meter (DM-SA, manufactured by Kyowa Interface Science Co., Ltd.), and the woven or knitted fabric is gently inclined from 0° at a constant speed by 1° at a time. The angle at which the water droplet completely slides down from the woven or knitted fabric surface is measured to the water droplet sliding-down angle.
-
In the woven or knitted fabric of the present invention, the water droplet sliding-down angle on the fabric surface after repeated washing is preferably 1 to 60 degrees, and more preferably 1 to 45 degrees. By setting the water droplet sliding-down angle after washing and drying to the above value, it is possible to obtain superior droplet removability without feeling discomfort such as wet feel for a long period of time. The repeated washing as used herein refers to repeating 20 times washing in accordance with JIS L 1930:2014-C4M method and drying in accordance with Method A (hang drying).
-
When the woven or knitted fabric of the present invention is made into clothing, it is preferable that the woven or knitted fabric follows various motions during wearing to hardly allow a pressure called a clothing pressure from the woven or knitted fabric, such as a pressed feel or a tight feel, to be felt, and exhibit stretchability superior in motion comfort. The woven or knitted fabric of the present invention contains the combined-filament fiber described above, and the combined-filament fiber includes the fiber A and the fiber B both crimped by a bimetal structure, so that the woven or knitted fabric also has stretchability superior in motion comfort. As such stretchability, the elongation rate of the woven or knitted fabric in the warp direction or the weft direction is preferably 10 to 100%. Here, the stretchability refers to an elongation rate of the woven or knitted fabric in a warp direction or a weft direction measured in accordance with Method B or Method D of JIS L 1096:2010 8.16.1. The larger the elongation rate, the better the motion comfort is indicated to be. When the elongation rate is 10% or more, the clothing pressure from the woven or knitted fabric is not felt strongly, and the motion during wearing is less hindered. In particular, when the elongation rate is 20% or more, almost no clothing pressure from the woven or knitted fabric is felt, and further superior motion comfort can be obtained. Meanwhile, when the elongation rate is 100% or less, it is possible to prevent a significant decrease in elongation recoverability. In particular, when the elongation rate is 40% or less, a phenomenon such as knee drop, which is observed in clothing applications such as pants, can be made less prone to occur.
<Method for manufacturing woven or knitted fabric>
-
Next, one example of a preferred method for manufacturing the woven or knitted fabric of the present invention will be described.
-
First, a combined-filament fiber including a fiber A having a multilobal shape cross section with protrusions on an outer peripheral portion and a fiber B having a cross section in a flat shape is prepared by the following method.
-
The method for manufacturing the combined-filament fiber is not particularly limited. For example, an islands-in-the-sea conjugated fiber including the fiber A and the fiber B as island components may be mixed by eluting a sea component by alkali weight reduction treatment or the like during dyeing processing, or the fiber A and the fiber B may be aligned and air-mixed by air processing (interlacing processing or Taslan processing). Particularly preferably, the method is a method using an islands-in-the-sea conjugated fiber that can be mixed without being biased in the arrangement of the fiber A and the fiber B in a yarn bundle, and this method is also good from the viewpoint of productivity since yarn processing such as air processing is not required.
-
The method for weaving or knitting the woven or knitted fabric containing the combined-filament fiber of the present invention is not particularly limited, and the woven or knitted fabric can be woven or knitted by an ordinary method. When the woven or knitted fabric is a woven fabric, a water jet loom, an air jet loom, a rapier loom, or a jacquard loom may be used, for example. When the woven or knitted fabric is a knitted fabric, a circular knitting machine or a warp knitting machine may be used, for example.
-
The woven or knitted fabric obtained by such a weaving or knitting method can then be scoured and dyed by ordinary methods, and the latent crimps of the fiber A and the fiber B differing in fineness are made apparent by the heat treatment of these processes, and a fine air layer and an uneven structure of the fiber B due to the crimp difference are formed on the surface of the woven or knitted fabric. When the sea component is eluted from the islands-in-the-sea conjugated fiber to form the combined-filament fiber, preferred is a method in which the islands-in-the-sea conjugated fiber is woven or knitted as it is, the sea component is eluted by alkali weight reduction treatment or the like after scouring treatment, and thereby a woven or knitted fabric containing a combined-filament fiber is formed.
-
The woven or knitted fabric is to be subjected to water repellent finishing. If necessary, flame-retardant finishing, hygroscopic finishing, antistatic finishing, antibacterial finishing, flexible finishing, and other known post-processing (including resin coating, film lamination, processing for imparting other functions, and the like) can be used in combination, and it is possible to improve the washing durability of the functional processing agents such as a flame retardant, a hygroscopic agent, an antistatic agent, an antibacterial agent, and a fabric softener. The water repellent processing step is not particularly limited, and examples thereof include a padding method, a spraying method, and a coating method, but the padding method is preferable for allowing the processing agent to penetrate into the woven or knitted fabric. Meanwhile, when the woven or knitted fabric without using a yarn having water repellent performance is not subjected to the water repellent processing, water droplets easily enter the fine air layer formed of the combined-filament fiber on the surface, and thus droplet removability cannot be obtained.
EXAMPLES
-
Hereinafter, the woven or knitted fabric of the present invention will be specifically described with reference to Examples. The present invention is not limited thereby.
-
The following measurements and evaluations were performed for the examples and the comparative examples.
A. Fineness
A-1 Raw yarn
-
For each raw yarn to be used, about 1 m of the raw yarn is sampled, the mass per unit length is measured under an environment of a temperature of 20°C and a humidity of 65%RH, and the mass corresponding to 10,000 m is calculated from the value. This operation was repeated 10 times, and a simple average of the 10 values was obtained. The simple average was rounded off to the nearest whole number, and the obtained value was taken as the fineness of the yarn.
A-2 Fibers A and B constituting woven or knitted fabric
-
Fibers to be measured are collected from a woven or knitted fabric such that a total length is about 1 m, the mass per unit length is measured under an environment of a temperature of 20°C and a humidity of 65%RH, and the mass corresponding to 10,000 m is calculated from the value. This operation was repeated 10 times, and the simple average of the 10 values was obtained. The simple average was rounded off to one decimal place, and the obtained value was taken as the fineness of the fibers.
B. Fineness ratio
-
From the fineness of the fiber A and the fineness of the fiber B measured in A above, the fineness ratio was calculated using the following equation. Fineness ratio = fineness [dtex] of fiber A/fineness [dtex] of fiber B.
C. Number ratio of fiber A to fiber B
-
One combined-filament fiber was sampled from the obtained woven or knitted fabric and was cut perpendicularly to the fiber axis direction (longitudinal direction). The cross section was photographed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM, manufactured by Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation) (magnification: 500 times), and the number of the fibers A and the number of the fibers B were counted on the taken photograph. From the counted number of the fibers A and the counted number of the fibers B, the number ratio was calculated using the following equation. Number ratio = the number of the fibers B/the number of the fibers A.
D. Number of protrusions of fiber A
-
One combined-filament fiber was sampled from the obtained woven or knitted fabric and was cut perpendicularly to the fiber axis direction (longitudinal direction). The fiber A in this cross section was photographed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM, manufactured by Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation) (magnification: 3000 times), and the number of protrusions was counted on the taken photograph.
E. Flatness of fiber B
-
One combined-filament fiber was sampled from the obtained woven or knitted fabric and was cut perpendicularly to the fiber axis direction (longitudinal direction). All fiber of the fiber B in this cross section were photographed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM, manufactured by Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation) (magnification: 3000 times), and the maximum length of the cross section of each fiber B in the photograph taken using image processing software (ImageJ) was defined as the length in the major axis direction, the length in the direction perpendicular to the major axis direction was defined as the length in the minor axis direction, and simple average values of the lengths were calculated. Note that these values are calculated to two decimal places and rounded off to one decimal place. From the calculated lengths in the major axis direction and the minor axis direction, the flatness was calculated using the following equation. Flatness = length [µm] in major axis direction of cross section of fiber B/length [µm] in minor axis direction of cross section of fiber B.
F. Presence or absence of crimp of fiber B on woven or knitted fabric surface
-
The surface of each of the obtained woven or knitted fabrics is photographed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM, manufactured by Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation) (magnification: 50 times), and the three-dimensional twisted structure and the loop structure of the fiber B on the woven or knitted fabric surface is confirmed in the taken photograph. In the taken photograph, when there was one or more twisted structures or loop structures, it was counted as 1. This observation was repeated at 10 places, and when the number of the counts exceeded half, it was judged that there was a crimp.
G. Surface occupancy of combined-filament fiber per unit area
-
The surface of each of the obtained woven or knitted fabrics is photographed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM, manufactured by Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation) such that the surface of the woven or knitted fabric is displayed throughout the field of view (magnification: 100 times), the area of the entire photograph taken and the area occupied by materials other than the combined-filament fiber are extracted using image processing software (ImageJ), and the area ratio of the combined-filament fiber is calculated using the following equation. This measurement was repeatedly at 10 points, and a value obtained by rounding off the simple average value to the nearest whole number was taken as the surface occupancy of the combined-filament fiber. Surface occupancy [%] = (area of entire photograph [mm2] - area other than combined-filament fiber [mm2])/area of entire photograph [mm2] × 100.
H. Water droplet sliding-down angle
-
Using a fully automatic contact angle meter (DM-SA, manufactured by Kyowa Interface Science Co., Ltd.), a 20 µL water droplet was dropped onto the surface of the woven or knitted fabric attached in a planar shape to a horizontal plate, and the plate was gently inclined from 0° at a constant speed (about 1 degree/second) by 1° at a time. The angle at which the water droplet completely slid down from the woven or knitted fabric surface was measured. The smaller the value of the water droplet sliding-down angle was, the better the droplet removability was determined to be. When the water droplet does not slide down even at 90 degrees, it is determined as "no slide down".
-
For the water droplet sliding-down degree after repeated washing, the water droplet sliding-down angle was measured by the above-described method using, as a sample, a woven or knitted fabric obtained by repeating 20 times washing in accordance with JIS L 1930:2014-C4M method and drying in accordance with Method A (hang drying).
I. Elongation rate
-
For the obtained woven fabrics, the elongation rate was measured using JIS L 1096:2010 8.16.1 Method B. For the obtained knitted fabrics, the elongation rate was measured using JIS L 1096:2010 8.16.1 Method D.
J. Spun-like texture
-
The spun-like texture of the obtained woven or knitted fabrics was judged as follows, and in the evaluation by 10 randomly selected persons, the judgment with the most frequent evaluation result was used as a result. In a case where there were a plurality of most frequent judgement results, the intermediate evaluation thereof was adopted.
- o: A fine spun-like texture like an extra-long staple cotton is felt.
- △: A fine spun-like texture like an extra-long staple cotton is felt to some extent.
- ×: A fine spun-like texture like an extra-long staple cotton is not felt at all.
K. Droplet removability during wearing
-
An outer jacket for mountain climbing was made using each of the obtained woven or knitted fabrics. The outer jacket was worn in a laboratory (200 ml/10 min), which was assumed to be in a rainfall environment, and the following judgement was performed after rainfall. In the evaluation by 10 randomly selected persons, the judgement with the most frequent evaluation result was used as a result. In a case where there were a plurality of most frequent judgement results, the intermediate evaluation thereof was adopted. The size of the outer jacket to be worn was set to a size (S, M, L) suitable for each body type on the basis of JIS L 4004:2001 9.
- ∘: There are almost no water droplets on the surface, and droplet removability is good.
- △: There is no wetting on the surface, but some water droplets remain.
- ×: The surface is wet to some extent, and droplet removability is poor.
L. Motion comfort
-
The following judgment was made while the outer jacket described in K above was worn, and in the evaluation by 10 randomly selected persons, the judgment with the most frequent evaluation result was used as a result. In a case where there were a plurality of most frequent judgement results, the intermediate evaluation thereof was adopted. The size of the outer jacket worn by each person is the same as that described in K above.
- ∘: Almost no pressed feel or tight feel from the fabric is felt, and the motion comfort is good.
- △: Although a pressed feel or a tight feel from the fabric is felt to some extent, it cannot be said that the motion comfort is poor.
- ×: A pressed feel or a tight feel from the fabric is much felt, and the motion comfort is poor.
[Example 1]
-
Polyethylene terephthalate copolymerized with 5-sodium sulfoisophthalic acid in an amount of 8 mol% based on all dicarboxylic acid components and polyethylene glycol in an amount of 9 wt% based on the entire mass (SSIA-PEG-copolymerized PET, melt viscosity: 100 Pa·s [measurement conditions: a temperature of 290°C and a shear rate of 1216 s-1], melting point: 233°C) was prepared as Polymer A, polyethylene terephthalate copolymerized with 7 mol% of isophthalic acid (IPA-copolymerized PET, melt viscosity: 140 Pa·s [measurement conditions: a temperature of 290°C and a shear rate of 1216 s-1], melting point: 232°C) was prepared as Polymer B, and polyethylene terephthalate (PET, melt viscosity: 130 Pa·s [measurement conditions: a temperature of 290°C and a shear rate of 1216 s-1], melting point: 254°C) was prepared as Polymer C.
-
These polymers were separately melted at 290°C, then measured such that Polymer A/Polymer B/Polymer C was 10/45/45 in a mass ratio, and flowed into a spinning pack in which the composite spinneret depicted in Fig. 2 was incorporated, and the inflow polymers were ejected through ejection holes. At the time of ejecting the inflow polymers, the Polymer B and the Polymer C, which were hardly eluted components, were bonded to each other in a side-by-side manner, and an island component b1 (one) having an eight-lobe sectional structure radially having eight uniformly arranged protrusions and island components b2 (eight) each having a flat sectional structure were configured to be bonded to each other by a sea component a composed of the Polymer A composed of an easy-to-elute component. Fig. 2 is a schematic sectional view of the composite spinneret, in which the polymers A to C measured with the measuring plate 1 are controlled by a distribution plate 2 for their composite section in a section of a single fiber and a sectional shape thereof, and a composite polymer stream formed by the distribution plate 2 is compressed and ejected by an ejection plate 3. By such an ejection method, an islands-in-the-sea conjugated fiber having a circular sectional shape as illustrated in Fig. 1 was obtained.
-
The ejected composite polymer stream was cooled and solidified, then provided with an oil agent, wound at a spinning rate of 1500 m/min, and drawn between rollers heated to 90°C and 130°C, respectively, affording an islands-in-the-sea conjugated fiber of 84 dtex-24 filaments. It is noted that the island portion b1 after the elution of the sea component a corresponds to the fiber A, and the island portions b2 after the elution correspond to the fiber B.
-
Using the obtained islands-in-the-sea conjugated fiber as a warp and a weft in an air jet loom, a 2/1 twill fabric was obtained. The obtained woven fabric was continuously scoured, heated to 90°C with a 1% by mass aqueous sodium hydroxide solution using a jet dyeing machine to remove the sea component (weight reduction rate: 10%), relaxed at 130°C for 30 minutes using a jet dyeing machine, subjected to an intermediate setting at 180°C for 1 minute at a width extension ratio of 5%, and then subjected to normal dyeing processing. Next, the obtained workpiece was subjected to water repellent processing in which the workpiece was immersed in a treatment liquid prepared by mixing 4% by mass of "NEOSEED" (registered trademark) NR-158 (manufactured by Nicca Chemical Co., Ltd., fluorine-free (paraffinic) water repellent agent, solid content: 30%), 0.2% by mass of "BECKAMINE" (registered trademark) M-3 (manufactured by DIC Corporation), 0.15% by mass of Catalyst ACX (manufactured by DIC Corporation), 1% by mass of isopropyl alcohol, and 94.65% by mass of water, squeezed with a mangle at a squeezing rate of 60%, dried with a pin tenter at 130°C for 2 minutes, and cured with a pin tenter at 170°C for 1 minute. Thus, as illustrated in Fig. 3, a 2/1 twill fabric composed of combined-filament fibers in which the fiber A4 and the fibers B5 were separated, and having a warp density of 172 yarns/2.54 cm, a weft density of 143 yarns/2.54 cm, and a cover factor (CF) of 2598 was obtained. The evaluation results of the obtained woven fabric are shown in Table 2.
[Example 2]
-
A 2/1 twill fabric having a warp density of 104 yarns/2.54 cm, a weft density of 87 yarns/2.54 cm, and a cover factor (CF) of 2590 was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that an islands-in-the-sea conjugated fiber of 227 dtex-24 filaments was obtained by changing the method of ejecting an islands-in-the-sea conjugated fiber such that the fineness ratio of the fiber A to the fiber B of the combined-filament fiber to be obtained in Example 1 was 1.5. The evaluation results of the obtained woven fabric are shown in Table 2.
[Example 3]
-
A 2/1 twill fabric having a warp density of 102 yarns/2.54 cm, a weft density of 85 yarns/2.54 cm, and a cover factor (CF) of 2596 was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that an islands-in-the-sea conjugated fiber of 238 dtex-24 filaments was obtained by changing the number of each of the island components b1 and b2 to five sections in the islands-in-the-sea conjugated fiber having an elliptical sectional shape in Example 1. The evaluation results of the obtained woven fabric are shown in Table 2.
[Example 4]
-
A 4/1 twill fabric having a warp density of 172 yarns/2.54 cm, a weft density of 143 yarns/2.54 cm, and a cover factor (CF) of 2602 was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that round sectional multifilaments (76dtex-24 filaments) made of polyethylene terephthalate were arranged as warps and the islands-in-the-sea conjugated fiber of Example 1 was arranged as wefts when the woven fabric described in Example 1 was manufactured. The evaluation results of the obtained woven fabric are shown in Table 2.
[Example 5]
-
An 8-harness and 5-counts satin woven fabric having a warp density of 172 yarns/2.54 cm, a weft density of 142 yarns/2.54 cm, and a cover factor (CF) of 2594 was obtained in the same manner as in Example 4 except that the weave structure was changed to 8-harness and 5-counts satin weave in weaving the woven fabric described in Example 4. The evaluation results of the obtained woven fabric are shown in Table 2.
[Example 6]
-
A combined-filament fiber (222 dtex-72 filaments) was obtained by performing Taslan processing using the islands-in-the-sea conjugated fiber obtained in Example 1 as a sheath yarn, and multifilaments (138 dtex-48 filaments) having a round sectional shape formed of stretchable fibers in which polyethylene terephthalate and polytrimethylene terephthalate were combined into a side-by-side bimetal structure as a core yarn. A 2/1 twill fabric having a warp density of 103 yarns/2.54 cm, a weft density of 85 yarns/2.54 cm, and a cover factor (CF) of 2607 was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the yarn was changed to the combined-filament fiber. The evaluation results of the obtained woven fabric are shown in Table 2.
[Example 7]
-
An islands-in-the-sea conjugated fiber was manufactured in the same manner as in Example 1, and a knitted fabric having a smooth structure was obtained using the fiber using a 28G circular knitting machine. The obtained knitted fabric was continuously scoured, heated to 90°C with a 1% by mass aqueous sodium hydroxide solution using a jet dyeing machine to remove the sea component (weight reduction rate: 10%), relaxed at 130°C for 30 minutes using a jet dyeing machine, subjected to an intermediate setting at 180°C for 1 minute at a width extension ratio of 5%, and then subjected to normal dyeing processing. Next, the obtained workpiece was immersed in a treatment liquid prepared by mixing 4% by mass of "NEOSEED" (registered trademark) NR-158 (manufactured by Nicca Chemical Co., Ltd., fluorine-free (paraffinic) water repellent agent, solid content: 30%), 0.2% by mass of "BECKAMINE" (registered trademark) M-3 (manufactured by DIC Corporation, solid content: 80%), 0.15% by mass of Catalyst ACX (manufactured by DIC Corporation), 1% by mass of isopropyl alcohol, and 94.65% by mass of water, squeezed with a mangle at a squeezing rate of 60%, dried with a pin tenter at 130°C for 2 minutes, and cured with a pin tenter at 170°C for 1 minute, affording a smooth knitted fabric. The obtained evaluation results of the knitted fabric are shown in Table 2.
[Example 8]
-
A 2/1 twill fabric having a warp density of 172 yarns/2.54 cm, a weft density of 143 yarns/2.54 cm, and a cover factor (CF) of 2535 was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the islands-in-the-sea conjugated fiber obtained in Example 1 was false-twisted at a magnification of 1.05 to afford a false-twisted yarn of 80 dtex-24 filaments. The evaluation results of the obtained woven fabric are shown in Table 2.
[Comparative Example 1]
-
A 2/1 twill fabric having a warp density of 102 yarns/2.54 cm, a weft density of 85 yarns/2.54 cm, and a cover factor (CF) of 2596 was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that an islands-in-the-sea conjugated fiber of 238 dtex-24 filaments was obtained by changing the ejection method such that the island components b1 and b2 of the islands-in-the-sea conjugated fiber to be obtained in Example 1 were the same in fineness. The evaluation results of the obtained woven fabric are shown in Table 2.
[Comparative Example 2]
-
A 2/1 twill fabric having a warp density of 172 yarns/2.54 cm, a weft density of 143 yarns/2.54 cm, and a cover factor (CF) of 2598 was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that a 2/1 twill fabric was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 and then the water repellent treatment after the dyeing treatment was not performed. The evaluation results of the obtained woven fabric are shown in Table 2.
[Comparative Example 3]
-
A 2/1 twill fabric having a warp density of 172 yarns/2.54 cm, a weft density of 143 yarns/2.54 cm, and a cover factor (CF) of 2598 was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the islands-in-the-sea conjugated fiber of Example 1 having an elliptical sectional shape was changed to a circular section in which the island component b1 had no protrusions. The evaluation results of the obtained woven fabric are shown in Table 2.
[Comparative Example 4]
-
A 2/1 twill fabric having a warp density of 171 yarns/2.54 cm, a weft density of 143 yarns/2.54 cm, and a cover factor (CF) of 2590 was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that in the islands-in-the-sea conjugated fiber of Example 1 having an elliptical sectional shape, the island component b1 was changed to have a trilobal section having three protrusions uniformly arranged. The evaluation results of the obtained woven fabric are shown in Table 2.
[Comparative Example 5]
-
A 2/1 twill fabric having a warp density of 172 yarns/2.54 cm, a weft density of 143 yarns/2.54 cm, and a cover factor (CF) of 2598 was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the islands-in-the-sea conjugated fiber of Example 1 having an elliptical sectional shape was changed to a regular circular section in which the flatness of the island component b2 was reduced such that the flatness of the fiber B after elution was 1.0. The evaluation results of the obtained woven fabric are shown in Table 2.
[Comparative Example 6]
-
A 2/1 twill fabric having a warp density of 172 yarns/2.54 cm, a weft density of 143 yarns/2.54 cm, and a cover factor (CF) of 2598 was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the islands-in-the-sea conjugated fiber of Example 1 having an elliptical sectional shape was changed to a flat section in which the flatness of the island component b2 was increased such that the flatness of the fiber B after elution was 7.0. The evaluation results of the obtained woven fabric are shown in Table 2.
[Comparative Example 7]
-
A 2/1 twill fabric having a warp density of 172 yarns/2.54 cm, a weft density of 144 yarns/2.54 cm, and a cover factor (CF) of 2607 was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the ejection method was changed such that the island component b1 of the islands-in-the-sea conjugated fiber obtained in Example 1 was composed only of the Polymer B. The evaluation results of the obtained woven fabric are shown in Table 2.
[Comparative Example 8]
-
A 2/1 twill fabric having a warp density of 172 yarns/2.54 cm, a weft density of 143 yarns/2.54 cm, and a cover factor (CF) of 2598 was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the ejection method was changed such that the island component b2 of the islands-in-the-sea conjugated fiber obtained in Example 1 was composed only of the Polymer B. The evaluation results of the obtained woven fabric are shown in Table 2.
[Comparative Example 9]
-
A 2/1 twill fabric having a warp density of 171 yarns/2.54 cm, a weft density of 143 yarns/2.54 cm, and a cover factor (CF) of 2590 was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that modifications were made such that the woven fabric described in Example 1 was continuously scoured, then heat-set at 200°C for 1 minute at a width extension ratio of 2%, and heated to 90°C using a 1% by mass aqueous sodium hydroxide solution using a jet dyeing machine to remove the sea component (weight reduction rate: 10%), and no relaxation processing was performed. The evaluation results of the obtained woven fabric are shown in Table 2.
[Table 1-1] | | Combined-filament fiber |
| Fiber A | Fiber B |
| Component | Fineness [dtex] | Number of protrusions | Number of fibers | Component | Fineness [dtex] |
| Example 1 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 1.6 | 8 | 24 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 0.2 |
| Example 2 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 1.4 | 8 | 24 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 0.9 |
| Example 3 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 1.6 | 8 | 120 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 0.2 |
| Example 4 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 1.6 | 8 | 24 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 0.2 |
| Example 5 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 1.6 | 8 | 24 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 0.2 |
| Example 6 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 1.6 | 8 | 24 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 0.2 |
| Example 7 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 1.6 | 8 | 24 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 0.2 |
| Example 8 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 1.5 | 8 | 24 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 0.2 |
| Comparative Example 1 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 1.0 | 8 | 24 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 1.0 |
| Comparative Example 2 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 1.6 | 8 | 24 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 0.2 |
| Comparative Example 3 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 1.6 | 0 | 24 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 0.2 |
| Comparative Example 4 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 1.6 | 3 | 24 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 0.2 |
| Comparative Example 5 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 1.6 | 8 | 24 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 0.2 |
| Comparative Example 6 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 1.6 | 8 | 24 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 0.2 |
| Comparative Example 7 | Polymer B | 1.6 | 8 | 24 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 0.2 |
| Comparative Example 8 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 1.6 | 8 | 24 | Polymer B | 0.2 |
| Comparative Example 9 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 1.6 | 8 | 24 | Polymer B / Polymer C | 0.2 |
[Table 1-2] | | Combined-filament fiber |
| Fiber B | Other fibers | Fineness ratio A/B | Number ratio B/A |
| Major axis length [µm] | Minor axis length [µm] | Flatness | Number of fibers |
| Example 1 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 192 | Absent | 8.0 | 8 |
| Example 2 | 18.5 | 7.2 | 2.6 | 192 | Absent | 1.5 | 8 |
| Example 3 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 120 | Absent | 8.0 | 1 |
| Example 4 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 192 | Absent | 8.0 | 8 |
| Example 5 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 192 | Absent | 8.0 | 8 |
| Example 6 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 192 | Present | 8.0 | 8 |
| Example 7 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 192 | Absent | 8.0 | 8 |
| Example 8 | 5.2 | 1.3 | 4.0 | 192 | Absent | 7.5 | 8 |
| Comparative Example 1 | 20.5 | 8.0 | 2.6 | 192 | Absent | 1.0 | 8 |
| Comparative Example 2 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 192 | Absent | 8.0 | 8 |
| Comparative Example 3 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 192 | Absent | 8.0 | 8 |
| Comparative Example 4 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 192 | Absent | 8.0 | 8 |
| Comparative Example 5 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 1.0 | 192 | Absent | 8.0 | 8 |
| Comparative Example 6 | 6.3 | 0.9 | 7.0 | 192 | Absent | 8.0 | 8 |
| Comparative Example 7 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 192 | Absent | 8.0 | 8 |
| Comparative Example 8 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 192 | Absent | 8.0 | 8 |
| Comparative Example 9 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 192 | Absent | 8.0 | 8 |
[Table 2-1] | | Woven or knitted fabric |
| Form | Crimps by B | Surface occupancy [%] | Water repellent agent | Water droplet sliding-down angle [degree] |
| Example 1 | Woven fabric | Present | 100 | Fluorine-free | 10 |
| Example 2 | Woven fabric | Present | 100 | Fluorine-free | 20 |
| Example 3 | Woven fabric | Present | 100 | Fluorine-free | 17 |
| Example 4 | Woven fabric | Present | 21 | Fluorine-free | 15 |
| Example 5 | Woven fabric | Present | 12 | Fluorine-free | 27 |
| Example 6 | Woven fabric | Present | 100 | Fluorine-free | 12 |
| Example 7 | Knitted fabric | Present | 100 | Fluorine-free | 14 |
| Example 8 | Woven fabric | Present | 100 | Fluorine-free | 7 |
| Comparative Example 1 | Woven fabric | Present | 100 | Fluorine-free | 60 |
| Comparative Example 2 | Woven fabric | Present | 100 | Absent | Water absorption |
| Comparative Example 3 | Woven fabric | Present | 100 | Fluorine-free | 52 |
| Comparative Example 4 | Woven fabric | Present | 100 | Fluorine-free | 46 |
| Comparative Example 5 | Woven fabric | Present | 100 | Fluorine-free | 50 |
| Comparative Example 6 | Woven fabric | Present | 100 | Fluorine-free | 28 |
| Comparative Example 7 | Woven fabric | Present | 100 | Fluorine-free | 19 |
| Comparative Example 8 | Woven fabric | Present | 100 | Fluorine-free | 16 |
| Comparative Example 9 | Woven fabric | Absent | 100 | Fluorine-free | 72 |
[Table 2-2] | | Woven or knitted fabric | Clothing |
| Water droplet sliding-down angle after repeated washing [degree] | Elongation rate [%] | Spun-like texture | Droplet removability | Motion comfort |
| Warp direction | Weft direction |
| Example 1 | 16 | 22 | 30 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
| Example 2 | 27 | 23 | 28 | Δ | Δ | ○ |
| Example 3 | 23 | 20 | 27 | Δ | Δ | ○ |
| Example 4 | 21 | 5 | 31 | Δ | ○ | Δ |
| Example 5 | 40 | 5 | 35 | Δ | Δ | Δ |
| Example 6 | 17 | 21 | 28 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
| Example 7 | 20 | 52 | 100 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
| Example 8 | 12 | 25 | 32 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
| Comparative Example 1 | No sliding | 16 | 22 | × | × | ○ |
| Comparative Example 2 | Water absorption | 21 | 30 | ○ | × | ○ |
| Comparative Example 3 | 85 | 23 | 31 | × | × | ○ |
| Comparative Example 4 | 80 | 20 | 26 | × | × | ○ |
| Comparative Example 5 | 86 | 18 | 26 | × | × | ○ |
| Comparative Example 6 | 50 | 19 | 27 | × | Δ | ○ |
| Comparative Example 7 | 33 | 4 | 5 | Δ | Δ | × |
| Comparative Example 8 | 30 | 18 | 25 | × | Δ | ○ |
| Comparative Example 9 | No sliding | 4 | 4 | × | × | × |
-
As shown in Tables 1 and 2, it can be seen that the woven fabrics of Examples 1 to 6 and 8 or the knitted fabric of Example 7 are superior in spun-like texture, water repellency, and motion comfort. In particular, the woven fabrics of Examples 1 and 6 and the knitted fabric of Example 7 were extremely practical woven or knitted fabrics in which an uneven structure having a fine air layer formed of crimps of the fiber B is extremely effectively formed on the surface and which are superior in all of spun-like texture, droplet removability, and motion comfort owing to the fact that water-repellent processed woven or knitted fabrics were formed using only a combined-filament fiber containing a fiber A and a fiber B having bimetal structures differing in fineness and the number of fibers while controlling the number of protrusions of the fiber A and the flatness of the fiber B in a sectional shape within preferable ranges. In addition, the woven fabric of Example 8 was further superior in all of the spun-like texture, the droplet removability, and the motion comfort due to the addition of the effect of fine crimps by false twisting. Meanwhile, the woven fabric of Comparative Example 1 was a woven fabric inferior in texture and droplet removability because there was no difference in fineness between the fiber A and the fiber B and an uneven structure due to a crimp difference was not formed. The woven fabric of Comparative Example 2 was a woven fabric having no droplet removability because it absorbed water droplets owing to the fact that it had not been subjected to a water repellent treatment. The woven fabrics of Comparative Examples 3 and 4 were woven fabrics poor in texture and droplet removability, in which the number of protrusions of the fiber A was as small as 0 or 3. The woven fabric of Comparative Example 5 was a woven fabric poor in texture and droplet removability because the fiber B was in a regular circle shape with a flatness of 1.0. The woven fabric of Comparative Example 6 was a woven fabric poor in texture owing to the fact that the flatness of the fiber B was as large as 7.0 and the fiber B was excessively thin. The woven fabric of Comparative Example 7 had an elongation rate of 5%, which was not of a level that provides comfortable clothing when used for clothing due to the fact that the fiber A did not have a bimetal structure containing two polymers, and therefore it was a woven fabric poor in motion comfort. Since the woven fabric of Comparative Example 8 was a woven fabric in which the fiber B did not have a bimetal structure containing two polymers, the fiber B was not crimped and the woven fabric was poor in spun-like texture. The woven fabric of Comparative Example 9 was a woven fabric that had no uneven structure due to crimp difference or had no crimps of the fiber B on the woven fabric surface and was poor in all of texture, droplet removability, and motion comfort owing to the fact that latent crimps of the fiber A and the fiber B of the combined-filament fiber could not be developed by heat setting at a high temperature after continuous scouring.
INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY
-
The water-repellent woven or knitted fabric of the present invention has high water repellency due to containing a combined-filament fiber having the characteristics described above, and also is superior in stretchability comfortable to wear and spun-like texture, so that the use of the water-repellent woven or knitted fabric can provide clothing or textile products superior in functionality and texture. Such clothing and textile products can be extremely suitably applied to a wide variety of fields including general casual clothing such as down clothing, jackets, skirts, pants, T-shirts, and sweaters, various sports clothing such as clothing for mountain climbing, ski, golf, and running, outer clothing and dustproof clothing for works such as civil works, uniform clothing such as medical gowns, interior products such as sofas and curtains, and vehicle interior products such as car seats.
DESCRIPTION OF REFERENCE SIGNS
-
- a: Sea component
- b1: Island component
- b2: Island component
- 1: Measuring plate
- 2: Distribution plate
- 3: Ejection plate
- 4: Fiber A
- 5: Fiber B