EP4217802A1 - Dispositif de surveillance et procédé de surveillance d'une installation de production - Google Patents

Dispositif de surveillance et procédé de surveillance d'une installation de production

Info

Publication number
EP4217802A1
EP4217802A1 EP21773060.5A EP21773060A EP4217802A1 EP 4217802 A1 EP4217802 A1 EP 4217802A1 EP 21773060 A EP21773060 A EP 21773060A EP 4217802 A1 EP4217802 A1 EP 4217802A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
data
production plant
check
monitoring device
digital representative
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
EP21773060.5A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Sebastian Schroeck
Chee Hung Koo
Johannes Richter
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Robert Bosch GmbH
Original Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Robert Bosch GmbH filed Critical Robert Bosch GmbH
Publication of EP4217802A1 publication Critical patent/EP4217802A1/fr
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
    • G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
    • G05B19/418—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM]
    • G05B19/4184—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM] characterised by fault tolerance, reliability of production system
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
    • B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
    • B25J9/00—Programme-controlled manipulators
    • B25J9/16—Programme controls
    • B25J9/1674—Programme controls characterised by safety, monitoring, diagnostic
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
    • G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
    • G05B19/04—Programme control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers
    • G05B19/042—Programme control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers using digital processors
    • G05B19/0428—Safety, monitoring
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30—Nc systems
    • G05B2219/31—From computer integrated manufacturing till monitoring
    • G05B2219/31481—Safety monitoring system, redundant display, print systems for process data
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30—Nc systems
    • G05B2219/40—Robotics, robotics mapping to robotics vision
    • G05B2219/40202—Human robot coexistence
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/02—Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for monitoring a production plant having the features of the preamble of claim 1, a monitoring device for monitoring a production plant according to claim 7, a computer program according to claim 11 and a machine-readable storage medium according to claim 12.
  • Security system for identifying safe areas in a three-dimensional workspace with motion-controlled equipment. Based on sensor data, safe actions of the assets are calculated in real time based on all detected relevant objects and the current state of the assets, with the actions being updated in each work cycle.
  • the production plant preferably has at least one plant module, in particular several plant modules.
  • the system module can be designed, for example, as a production machine and/or robot station. Several or all system modules can be arranged in series in a production line. Alternatively, one, several or all system modules can be operated independently of one another. Products can be manufactured using the production facility.
  • the at least one system module is used in particular by at least one user, the user being, for example, at least one machine operator or worker who is in the area of the system module and/or operates the system module.
  • the production plant preferably includes a safety system for protecting the production plant, in particular for safe operation of the production plant for people and machines.
  • the security system can include, for example, secured access doors to the production plant, light barriers in the area of the plant module, motion detectors, thermal imaging cameras, etc. as components.
  • Safety regulations can also be stored in the safety system, which, for example, regulate access and/or work authorizations of users, movement speeds of the system module, etc.
  • data from the production plant is recorded.
  • the data is preferably recorded mechanically, for example by means of software and/or a computer.
  • the detection of Data centrally, with the central collection for the entire production plant, in particular for several or all plant modules. It is particularly preferred within the scope of the method that the data of the production plant is recorded continuously and/or during operation of the production plant.
  • the data to be recorded and/or recorded is operating data and/or process data of the at least one system module.
  • the operating data include, for example, a self-description of the system modules.
  • Process data can, for example, be understood as data that are necessary and/or set to carry out the production, movement sequences and/or activities in the production plant.
  • process data can include a sequence of steps to be carried out for the production of the product.
  • the data to be recorded and/or recorded is user data, security system data, product data and/or environmental data of the production plant, in particular of the plant module.
  • the user data is in particular data about the at least one user. For example, they can include information about a level of knowledge, training courses that have been completed so far and/or that are still necessary, permissions to enter and/or work on and/or with the system module.
  • Safety system data is in particular data about the safe operation of the production plant for people and/or machines. For example, they may include values from safety regulations.
  • the security system data can optionally additionally include the type, time and/or frequency of activation of one, several or all components of the security system.
  • the product data is, for example, specific product data.
  • a temperature, charge, leakage of moisture, an external shape and/or contour, a condition, etc. can preferably be recorded as product data. Especially with batteries, inverters etc. as products, this can be of safety-related importance.
  • the security system includes at least one sensor for monitoring the products and/or product data.
  • the sensor can be integrated, for example, in a thermal imaging camera for monitoring the temperature of the products.
  • Environmental data is, for example, data on the room in which the production facility is located and/or on obstacles and/or geometries in the room.
  • environmental data can include information about walls and/or about the arrangement of the system modules in relation to one another.
  • a digital representative of the production facility is/is provided as part of the process.
  • the digital representative describes the production plant at least partially, preferably completely, in terms of safety and/or it depicts the production plant at least partially, preferably completely, in terms of safety.
  • the data are mapped at least partially, preferably completely, by means of the digital representative and/or they can be mapped at least partially, preferably completely, by it.
  • the digital representative can be, for example, a computer-aided simulation device which is designed to simulate the production plant and/or the data at least partially, preferably completely.
  • the method provides that the data which is/are mapped in the digital representative is subjected to a security check.
  • the security check of the data mapped in the digital representative is carried out continuously and/or during the operation of the production plant.
  • the security check preferably includes a plausibility check.
  • the data mapped by the digital representative are preferably checked for plausibility as part of the plausibility check.
  • the plausibility check of the data can be used to check and/or determine whether software for operating and/or controlling the production plant, in particular the at least one plant module and/or the security system, has been compromised, manipulated and/or hacked.
  • the plausibility check of the data can be used to check and/or determine whether changes and/or manipulations have been made to the production plant.
  • mapped data of at least one sensor device and at least one associated actuator of the production plant can be checked for plausibility as part of a data fusion.
  • an access door to the production plant or to the plant module is secured by a sensor-based door opening device and by a controllable door actuator.
  • a sensor device of the door opening device preferably detects an identity of the user, an evaluation device checks his access authorization and a control device activates the door actuator to actuate a door lock and open the door.
  • the operating data of the door opening device and the door actuator are recorded as part of the method and mapped in the digital representative. If the door actuator is destroyed by manipulation and the door is opened by force in particular, the result of the safety check, in particular the plausibility check, is implausible and/or contradictory data which indicate a deactivated door opening device and an activated door opener.
  • the plausibility check software content, in particular content of operating software for the at least one system module, and security regulations of the security system are described and/or mapped as data in the digital representative.
  • the data is checked for plausibility, in particular compared with one another. For example, a maximum permissible movement speed of a robot arm is reprogrammed as a system module, so that the robot arm moves faster than specified in the safety regulations is predetermined.
  • an inconsistency and/or discrepancy between the programmed software and the security system can be detected as part of the plausibility check.
  • the same can apply, for example, to the authorization stored in the safety regulations for the at least one user to work on or with the system module.
  • the software can, for example, be manipulated in such a way that a user who is not authorized according to the security regulations still has access and/or access to the system module.
  • the inconsistency between the software and the security system can be recognized in particular within the scope of the plausibility check.
  • the production facility which is/is described and/or depicted in the digital representative, is subjected to the security check.
  • the security check includes a fault check of the production plant. This means in particular that it is checked whether there is a malfunction or a defect in the production system described and/or depicted in the digital representative.
  • the fault check of the production plant described and/or depicted in the digital representative is preferably carried out at least partially, preferably completely, using and/or based on the data depicted in the digital representative, in particular the operating data, process data, security system data and/or product data.
  • the safety check also includes checking the production plant described and/or depicted in the digital representative for an unsafe state. This preferably includes checking whether the production system, in particular the at least one system module, has operating values and/or executes movement sequences that are unsafe and/or dangerous for the user, so that they can cause injuries to the user, for example.
  • the check for the unsafe state includes a check as to whether the described and/or illustrated production system has operating values and/or executes movement sequences that are unsafe for the system module, in particular are harmful, so that they can cause damage to the system module, for example.
  • the check for the unsafe state of the production plant described and/or depicted in the digital representative is preferably carried out at least partially, preferably completely, using and/or on the basis of the data depicted in the digital representative, in particular the operating data, process data, security system data, user data and/or or environmental data.
  • the security check includes a product check.
  • the products are preferably checked for deviations and/or defects as part of the product test.
  • the product check is carried out at least partially, preferably completely, using and/or based on the data described and/or depicted in the digital representative, e.g. the product data and/or security system data.
  • the fault and/or the unsafe state and/or a product state is/are recognized as at least one result of the safety check.
  • compromised and/or hacked and/or manipulated software used to control and/or operate the production system is/are recognized as at least one result of the security check.
  • Changes and/or manipulations made to the production plant can preferably be recognized as at least one result of the security check.
  • the disruption and/or the insecure state and/or the compromised, hacked and/or manipulated software and/or the changes and/or manipulations can preferably be detected as part of the plausibility check, particularly in the case of a lack of plausibility, as the result of the security check.
  • the at least one result of the security check is displayed and/or this/these are pointed out.
  • the result can, for example, be displayed visually and/or acoustically and/or it can be pointed out.
  • at least one safety measure is implemented and/or activated on the production plant on the basis of the result and/or as a reaction to it.
  • security measures such as an intervention, maintenance, repair, reprogramming of the software, etc. can be carried out, initiated and/or implemented by the user or a person responsible for the security measures.
  • one or more components of the security system and/or the system module can be controlled to independently take appropriate security measures based on the result, which implement and/or restore safe operation of the production system.
  • the safety measures can be, for example, a temporary or permanent emergency shutdown and/or a temporary or permanent speed reduction of moving parts of the system module.
  • a responsible person or system-technical (re)training can be arranged for the user of the system module. It is also possible for the user to be temporarily or permanently exchanged for another user and/or for access authorizations to the system module to be adapted or modified for one or more users. It is also possible within the scope of the method that the environment of the production plant is adapted or changed as a safety measure and/or that a deviating or faulty product is sorted out and/or post-processing is initiated.
  • a monitoring device for monitoring a production plant forms a further subject of the invention.
  • the monitoring device is preferably designed to carry out the method according to the previous description and/or according to one of claims 1 to 8.
  • the monitoring device includes a data acquisition device.
  • the data acquisition device is designed to acquire data of the production plant.
  • the data acquisition device is embodied as a computer, for example.
  • the data acquisition device can include software suitable for collecting the data.
  • the data acquisition device is preferably connected to at least one sensor device and/or to a sensor network, with the sensor device and/or the sensor network at least partially acquiring the data.
  • the sensor device and/or the sensor network can include a motion sensor, a temperature sensor, a speed sensor, a camera, etc., in particular depending on the data to be recorded.
  • the monitoring device has a digital representative.
  • the digital representative is designed to map the production plant and/or the recorded data at least partially, preferably completely.
  • the digital representative can include a computer-aided simulation device.
  • the monitoring device has an evaluation device.
  • the evaluation device is designed to carry out a security check on the data mapped in the digital representative. Provision is made for the security check to include a plausibility check, with the plausibility check being or including in particular a check for traceability, comprehensibility or inconsistency of the mapped data.
  • the evaluation device is designed to determine a fault and/or an unsafe state of the production plant and/or a product state as at least one result recognized by the security check.
  • the evaluation device is designed to recognize compromised and/or hacked and/or manipulated software, by means of which the production system, in particular the system module, is controlled and/or operated, as at least one result of the security check.
  • the evaluation device can optionally also recognize changes and/or manipulations made to the production plant as at least one result of the security check.
  • the monitoring device has a display device.
  • the display device is preferably designed to display the at least one result of the security check and/or to indicate this.
  • the display device can be embodied as a display or screen, for example.
  • the display device can comprise a lighting device for outputting a lighting signal, for example in at least one signal color.
  • the display device can include a loudspeaker for outputting an acoustic signal.
  • the result can be shown on the display or screen.
  • a specific signal color, e.g. red, and/or the acoustic signal in the form of a warning tone can be output if the result is conspicuous, e.g. implausible and/or negative. It is also possible that a different signal color, e.g. green, is output if the result is unremarkable and/or positive.
  • the monitoring device includes a control device.
  • the control device is preferably designed to activate at least one safety measure on the production plant, for example on the at least one plant module and/or on the safety system.
  • the at least one safety measure can include, for example, an emergency shutdown and/or a speed reduction of moving parts of the system module.
  • the at least one security measure is a temporary or permanent locking of a Includes access door to one or more system modules in the production plant.
  • at least one personalized indication to be output to the user's end device, whether and which further training is necessary, which access authorizations have been granted, etc.
  • a computer program forms a further subject matter of the invention.
  • the computer program is designed to carry out the method according to the previous description and/or according to one of Claims 1 to 8 when it is executed on a computer, a processor and/or a monitoring device.
  • the monitoring device is preferably designed according to the previous description and/or according to one of claims 9 to 12.
  • a further object of the invention is a machine-writable, in particular non-volatile machine-readable, storage medium.
  • the computer program according to the previous description and/or according to claim 13 is stored on the storage medium.
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic representation of a monitoring device for carrying out a method for monitoring a production plant.
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic representation of a monitoring device 1 .
  • the monitoring device 1 is designed to carry out a method for monitoring a production plant 2 .
  • the production plant 2 comprises at least one, preferably several, plant modules 11.
  • the plant modules 11 are designed as production machines and/or robot stations. In the production plant 2 are using the Plant modules 11 products 19 manufactured.
  • At least one, preferably several, users 13 work in the production system 2, e.g. on or with the system module 11.
  • the production plant 2 has the environment 14 in which the production plant 2 is arranged. Walkways, barriers and/or geometries can be arranged in the environment 14 .
  • the environment 14 also includes, for example, a relative arrangement of the system modules 11 and/or an order in which the system modules 11 are located.
  • the production plant 2 includes a safety system 12.
  • the safety system 12 includes safety regulations and safety-relevant components which are intended to ensure safe operation of the production plant 1.
  • the safety regulations regulate, for example, a maximum movement speed of the system modules 11 and/or access and work authorizations for the users 13 to or on the system modules, necessary training and/or advanced training for the users 13, necessary accessibility in the area 14 etc.
  • the components of the security system 12 are, for example, sensors, cameras, light barriers, safety mats, safety doors, etc.
  • the monitoring device 1 has a data acquisition device 3 which acquires data 4 of the production plant continuously and/or during operation of the production plant 2 .
  • the data acquisition device 3 is designed as a suitably programmed computer, in which the acquired data 4 is collected.
  • the data 4 recorded and/or to be recorded are operating data of the system modules 11, for example a self-description.
  • the data 4 recorded and/or to be recorded are process data from the system modules 11, for example production process, movement process and/or activity data.
  • the data 4 recorded and/or to be recorded are user data, security system data, product data and/or environmental data.
  • the data acquisition device 3 is connected to at least one sensor device and/or to a sensor network, which acquires at least part of the data 4 .
  • the at least one sensor device can be a camera, a temperature sensor, a motion sensor, a speedometer, etc., for example. It can be assigned to the production plant 2 or the monitoring device 1 and/or form part of the production plant 2 or the monitoring device 1 .
  • the monitoring device 1 includes a digital representative 5, which is embodied, for example, as a computer-aided simulation device.
  • the digital representative 5 at least partially describes the production plant 2 or at least partially depicts it.
  • the digital representative 5 simulates the production facility 2 at least partially.
  • the digital representative 5 thus includes an illustrated and/or simulated production facility 2'.
  • the digital representative 5 maps the acquired data 4 at least partially, in particular it simulates the acquired data 4.
  • the digital representative 5 thus includes the mapped and/or simulated data 4'.
  • the monitoring device 1 includes an evaluation device 6.
  • the evaluation device 6 carries out a safety check 7 of the mapped and/or simulated data 4' and/or the mapped and/or simulated production plant 2'.
  • the security check 7 is carried out continuously and/or during the operation of the production plant 2 .
  • the security check 7 includes a plausibility check 10 of the mapped and/or simulated data 4'. As part of the plausibility check 10, it is checked whether the mapped and/or simulated data 4' is understandable, comprehensible and/or consistent or whether it is incomprehensible, incomprehensible and/or contradictory.
  • mapped data 4′ for example from a sensor device and from an actuator controlled on the basis of sensor signals from the sensor device, are checked with one another for plausibility.
  • inconsistencies in the data 4' shown as part of the plausibility check 10 for example the data shown sensor data and the operating and/or process data, it can be assumed that the sensor device or the actuator has been manipulated and/or changed.
  • the inconsistency can result, for example, from the fact that the sensor signals indicate activation of the actuator, but it remains inactive.
  • Another example is software, e.g. for operating the production plant 2, according to which one or more plant modules 11 are operated in a manner that deviates from the safety regulations of the safety system 12. If the data 4' shown is contradictory as part of the plausibility check 10, in particular the operating, process and security system data 4' shown, it can be concluded that the software and/or the security system has been manipulated, compromised and/or hacked.
  • the safety check 7 includes a fault check 8, as part of which the illustrated and/or simulated production plant 2' is checked for a fault, in particular on the basis of the mapped and/or simulated data 4'.
  • the fault check 8 can optionally be carried out at least partially using the plausibility check 10 .
  • a fault in the production facility 2, in particular in the system modules 11 and/or in the security system 12, can be detected as a result 15 of the fault check 8.
  • the safety check 7 also includes a check for an unsafe state 9 of the depicted and/or simulated production plant 2', in particular on the basis of the depicted and/or simulated data 4'.
  • the check for the unsafe state 9 can optionally be carried out at least partially using the plausibility check 10 .
  • a risk to the security system 12, the user 13, the system modules 11, the products 19 and/or the environment 14 of the production system 2 can be detected.
  • the safety check 7 can alternatively or optionally additionally include a product check 20, by means of which the products 19 manufactured in the production plant 2 are checked for defects and/or malfunctions, in particular using the mapped and/or simulated data 4' that has been evaluated and/or checked for plausibility will.
  • Deviations and/or defects in the products 19 can be detected as a result 15 of the product test 20 .
  • the fault check 8, the check for the unsafe state 9 and/or the product check 20 can be carried out partially or completely as a function of or by means of the plausibility check 10. Alternatively, the fault check 8, the check for the unsafe state 9 and/or the product check 20 can also be carried out independently of the plausibility check 10.
  • the monitoring device 1 comprises a display device 16.
  • the result or results 15 of the safety check 7 are output, e.g. displayed, on the display device 16.
  • the display device 16 is designed, for example, as a display or screen of a computer, on which the result or results 15 are displayed, for example in text form.
  • the display device 16 can include a loudspeaker for outputting a warning tone, which sounds, for example, if a result 15 is conspicuous or negative.
  • the display device 16 can also include a signal light for outputting a light signal in one or more colors for warning and/or all-clear.
  • the monitoring device 1 has a control device 17 . Based on the result(s) 15, the control device 17 can implement at least one safety measure 18 on or in the production plant 2 head for.
  • a safety measure 18 can be, for example, the activation of a speed reduction of a movement or an emergency stop of one, several or all system modules 11 .
  • a further possible safety measure 10 can be the triggering of a sorting out of a product 19 which has been manufactured incorrectly in the production plant 2 .
  • Other possible security measures 18 are, for example, an order for training courses for one or more users 13 that is controlled or initiated by a responsible person, an access block or authorization for one or more users 13 that is controlled or implemented by the responsible person.
  • the responsible person can use additional security measures 18 also initiate or carry out a check of the software and/or the security system or removal of a barrier in the environment 14 etc.
  • the responsible person can belong to security personnel in the production plant 2, for example.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Robotics (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne un procédé de surveillance d'une installation de production (2). Au cours du procédé, des données (4) relatives à l'installation de production (2) sont acquises. Un représentant numérique (5) de l'installation de production (2) est fourni, celui-ci décrit et/ou représente au moins partiellement l'installation de production (2) pour ce qui est de la sécurité. Les données (4) sont au moins partiellement représentées par le représentant numérique (5). Les données (4') représentées dans le représentant numérique (5) sont soumises à un contrôle de sécurité (7), le contrôle de sécurité (7) comprenant de préférence un contrôle de vraisemblance (10).
EP21773060.5A 2020-09-23 2021-09-03 Dispositif de surveillance et procédé de surveillance d'une installation de production Pending EP4217802A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102020211920.1A DE102020211920A1 (de) 2020-09-23 2020-09-23 Überwachungsvorrichtung und Verfahren zur Überwachung einer Produktionsanlage
PCT/EP2021/074397 WO2022063546A1 (fr) 2020-09-23 2021-09-03 Dispositif de surveillance et procédé de surveillance d'une installation de production

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP4217802A1 true EP4217802A1 (fr) 2023-08-02

Family

ID=77821760

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP21773060.5A Pending EP4217802A1 (fr) 2020-09-23 2021-09-03 Dispositif de surveillance et procédé de surveillance d'une installation de production

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP4217802A1 (fr)
DE (1) DE102020211920A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2022063546A1 (fr)

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10018704A1 (de) * 2000-04-14 2001-10-18 Siemens Ag Verfahren und Werkzeug zur Modellierung und/oder Simulation einer technischen Anlage
DE102004033593A1 (de) * 2004-07-07 2006-02-02 Siemens Ag Verfahren zur Simulation einer technischen Anlage
DE102009011679A1 (de) * 2009-02-23 2010-08-26 Pilz Gmbh & Co. Kg Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Erstellen eines Anwenderprogrammes für eine Sicherheitssteuerung
US10882185B2 (en) 2017-02-07 2021-01-05 Veo Robotics, Inc. Dynamically determining workspace safe zones with speed and separation monitoring

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2022063546A1 (fr) 2022-03-31
DE102020211920A1 (de) 2022-03-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE69829403T2 (de) Methode und vorrichtung zur feststellung der betriebsfähigkeit einer sicherheitsvorrichtung
DE102010019650A1 (de) Verfahren und System zum Testen einer Sicherheits-Automatisierungslogik einer Fertigungszelle
DE102015012056A1 (de) Robotersteuerung zum Vermeiden eines Problems hinsichtlich des Roboters zum Zeitpunkt eines Not-Stopps
EP3591482B1 (fr) Surveillance d'une installation technique
EP3079028A1 (fr) Procédé de planification et d'ingénierie, outil de logiciel et outil de simulation pour une solution d'automatisation
DE112008003195T5 (de) Elektrischer Schaltkreis mit einem physikalischen Übertragungsschicht-Diagnosesystem
EP3379351A1 (fr) Procédé de fonctionnement d'un dispositif d'automatisation et procédé d'automatisation
DE10341325B4 (de) Testeinrichtung und Testverfahren zum Testen von Werkzeug- oder Produktionsmaschinen
DE4304215A1 (de) Elektronische Steuervorrichtung für einen elektromotorischen Antrieb, insbesondere Garagentorantrieb
EP3058425B1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé permettant de modifier les réglages opérationnels d'une installation technique
EP3397431A1 (fr) Robot et procédé permettant de faire fonctionner un robot
DE10354471A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Fehlerdiagnose in Steuereinrichtungen einer Brennkraftmaschine eines Kraftfahrzeugs
EP4217802A1 (fr) Dispositif de surveillance et procédé de surveillance d'une installation de production
DE102012011108A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Steuern einer Manipulatoranordnung
EP3139354B1 (fr) Procede de reglage d'un mode de fonctionnement d'un systeme de securite
WO2014198348A1 (fr) Console de commande portative à évaluation du signal combinée
DE112013006981T5 (de) Steuersystem Prüfmittel
EP1760558B1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé destinés à examiner la sécurité d'un dispositif technique
AT16425U1 (de) Verfahren zur Validierung von programmierten Ablaufsequenzen oder
WO2020249475A1 (fr) Procédé servant à faire fonctionner une installation de transport de personnes comprenant un dispositif de sécurité pouvant être scellé par voie électronique
EP3410260A2 (fr) Procédé d'essai haptique d'un objet
EP3553679A1 (fr) Procédé de diagnostic de panne assisté par ordinateur pour un système technique
KR102675278B1 (ko) 원자력발전소의 기기 사전진단시스템 및 그 운용방법
DE102021127029B3 (de) Verfahren, System und Computerprogrammprodukt zur Prädiktion von Undichtigkeiten an Dichtungsschnittstellen von verschraubten Bauteilkomponenten
DE10115897C2 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Bereitstellung von Informationen für die Analyse von Fehlern bei einer technischen Anlage

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20230424

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)