EP3833730B1 - Detergent - Google Patents

Detergent Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3833730B1
EP3833730B1 EP19748851.3A EP19748851A EP3833730B1 EP 3833730 B1 EP3833730 B1 EP 3833730B1 EP 19748851 A EP19748851 A EP 19748851A EP 3833730 B1 EP3833730 B1 EP 3833730B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
polyethyleneimine
composition
epei
composition according
ethoxylation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP19748851.3A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3833730A1 (en
Inventor
Julie Bennett
Robert John Carswell
Andrew David Green
Alyn James Parry
Holger Michael TUERK
Thomas Wesley HOLCOMBE III
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Unilever Global IP Ltd
Unilever IP Holdings BV
Original Assignee
Unilever Global IP Ltd
Unilever IP Holdings BV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=63209313&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP3833730(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Unilever Global IP Ltd, Unilever IP Holdings BV filed Critical Unilever Global IP Ltd
Publication of EP3833730A1 publication Critical patent/EP3833730A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3833730B1 publication Critical patent/EP3833730B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16Organic compounds
    • C11D3/37Polymers
    • C11D3/3703Macromolecular compounds obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
    • C11D3/3723Polyamines or polyalkyleneimines
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/02Anionic compounds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/66Non-ionic compounds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D17/00Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties
    • C11D17/0008Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties aqueous liquid non soap compositions
    • C11D2111/12

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to liquid laundry detergents comprising ethoxylated polyethyleneimine (EPEI) for an improved product viscosity profile without impairing cleaning performance.
  • EPEI ethoxylated polyethyleneimine
  • EPEI ethoxylated polyethyleneimine
  • US 2006/234895 A1 discloses laundry detergent compositions comprising EPEI, regarding its grease and oil cleaning benefits when combined with lipase enzymes.
  • WO 00/00580 A1 discloses laundry detergent compositions comprising EPEI, which display enhanced fragrance endurance of ⁇ -ketoester pro-fragrance compounds.
  • EPEI may reduce the viscosity of the resulting liquid, leading to reduced consumer acceptability and hence the need to include additional viscosity-boosting technology.
  • the present invention addresses this problem.
  • the present invention provides a liquid laundry detergent composition comprising ethoxylated polyethyleneimine (EPEI) for an improved product viscosity profile without impairing cleaning performance; the detergent composition comprising:
  • EPEI Ethoxylated polyethyleneimine
  • the ethoxylated polyethyleneimine (EPEI) for use in the invention includes inter alia a polyethyleneimine backbone made up of repeating -[(CH 2 CH 2 )N]- subunits.
  • the backbone derives from a polyethyleneimine starting material (as defined above) which is ethoxylated to produce EPEI.
  • the polyethyleneimine starting material (prior to ethoxylation) has an average molecular weight (M w ) ranging from 1800 to 2400 g/mol, and most preferably from 1800 to 2200 g/mol, such as from 1900 to 2100 g/mol, determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) with 1.5% by weight aqueous formic acid as eluent and cross-linked poly-hydroxyethyl methacrylate as stationary phase (TSKgel GMPWXL column) and by using an RI detector and Pullulan standards (PSS GmbH, Mainz, Germany) for calibration.
  • M w average molecular weight
  • a suitable polyethyleneimine starting material in the context of this invention may, for example, be a homopolymer of ethyleneimine conforming to the (empirical) formula -(CH 2 -CH 2 -NH) n - ; in which n ranges from about 40 to about 120. Preferably n ranges from about 40 to about 60.
  • the polyethyleneimine starting material can vary in shape, including for example linear, branched, dendritic (hyperbranched) or comb-like structures, depending on the method of manufacture. Methods for the manufacture of such materials are generally acid-catalyzed reactions to open the ring of ethyleneimine, also known as aziridine.
  • Suitable polyethyleneimine starting materials for use in the invention have a branched structure comprising three types of subunits, which may be randomly distributed.
  • the subunits which make up the polymer are primary amine units having the formula:
  • Branches may be ethyleneamino groups such as - CH 2 CH 2 -NH 2 groups; or longer groups such as -(CH 2 CH 2 )-N(CH 2 CH 2 NH 2 ) 2 or -(CH 2 CH 2 )-N(H)CH 2 CH 2 NH 2 groups.
  • the mixture of primary, secondary, and tertiary amine units respectively may be in any molar ratio, including for example in a molar ratio of about 1:1:1 to about 1:2:1.
  • the molar ratio of primary, secondary, and tertiary amine units respectively may for example be determined by 13 C-NMR or 15 N-NMR spectroscopy, preferably in D 2 O.
  • D dendritic
  • L linear
  • T terminal
  • DB ranges from 0.25 to 0.95, preferably from 0.30 to 0.80, and more preferably from 0.5 to 0.8.
  • each primary or secondary amine hydrogen atom represents a reactive site for subsequent ethoxylation.
  • Preferably most or all of such hydrogen atoms are replaced by polyoxyethylene side chains, to form the ethoxylated polyethyleneimine for use in the invention.
  • the polyoxyethylene side chains may suitably correspond to the formula R-(EO) n -, in which (EO) n represents an ethylene oxide block; n is a number from 25 to 40, preferably from 25 to 35; and R is hydrogen.
  • Preferred polyethyleneimine starting materials in the context of this invention have a primary amine value in the range of from 1 to 1000 mg KOH/g, preferably from 10 to 500 mg KOH/g, most preferred from 50 to 300 mg KOH/g.
  • the primary amine value can be determined according to ASTM D2074-07.
  • Preferred polyethyleneimine starting materials in the context of this invention have a secondary amine value in the range of from 10 to 1000 mg KOH/g, preferably from 50 to 500 mg KOH/g, most preferred from 50 to 500 mg KOH/g.
  • the secondary amine value can be determined according to ASTM D2074-07.
  • Preferred polyethyleneimine starting materials in the context of this invention have a tertiary amine value in the range of from 1 to 300 mg KOH/g, preferably from 5 to 200 mg KOH/g, most preferred from 10 to 100 mg KOH/g.
  • the tertiary amine value can be determined according to ASTM D2074-07.
  • the polyethyleneimine starting material may be pretreated (for example with a combination of water removal and degassing) before commencement of the ethoxylation stage.
  • a standard procedure for the ethoxylation stage involves reacting the polyethyleneimine starting material with at least sufficient ethylene oxide to provide 2-hydroxyethyl groups at each reactive site (i.e. 1 ethylene oxide (EO) group per primary or secondary amine hydrogen atom in the polyethyleneimine molecule).
  • the reaction product so obtained is then condensed with the remaining amount of ethylene oxide, typically in the presence of a basic catalyst.
  • a preferred procedure for the ethoxylation stage is a two-step procedure requiring the adjustment of the amount of ethylene oxide which is added in the first (and second) step to a certain range.
  • This preferred procedure involves reacting, in a first step (1), the polyethyleneimine starting material with ethylene oxide in a quantity of significantly less than one molar equivalent, such as in an amount of 0.01 to 0.85, preferably 0.1 to 0.7, more preferably 0.1 to 0.6 and most preferably from 0.1 to 0.5 EO groups per primary or secondary amine hydrogen atom in the polyethyleneimine molecule.
  • step (1) is carried out in the absence of a catalyst and in an aqueous solution (which may be a solution of from 50 to 99%, preferably from 75 to 99% by weight of the polyethylene starting material in water).
  • Step (1) may also be carried out in the absence of a catalyst and in the absence of water.
  • the temperature during step (1) is normally in the range of about 90° to 180°C, preferably 100° to 170°C, more preferably 110° to 160°C and most preferably 120° to 145°C.
  • a second step (2) the reaction product obtained from step (1), i.e. partially ethoxylated polyethyleneimine, is reacted with the remaining amount of ethylene oxide in the presence of a basic catalyst.
  • the second step (2) is preferably carried out at a temperature from 100° to 250 °C, and more preferably 120° to 180° C.
  • Suitable basic catalysts include alkali metal (e.g. sodium or potassium) hydroxides; alkali metal (e.g. sodium or potassium) alkoxides such as potassium methylate (KOCH3), potassium tert-butoxide, sodium ethoxide and sodium methylate (NaOCH3); alkali metal or alkaline earth metal hydrides such as sodium hydride and calcium hydride, and alkali metal (e.g. sodium or potassium) carbonates. such as sodium carbonate and potassium carbonate. Potassium hydroxide is preferred.
  • EPEI ethoxylated polyethyleneimine
  • the total degree of ethoxylation per reactive site can be determined according to the following formula: E/(AR), in which E is the total number of moles of ethylene oxide condensed (including hydroxyethylation), A is the number of moles of the polyethyleneimine starting material, and R is the number of reactive sites for the polyethyleneimine starting material.
  • Ethoxylated polyethyleneimines (EPEI) for use in the invention may generally have a weight average molecular weight (M w ) of 25000 to 120000 g/mol, preferably 30000 to 100000 g/mol, more preferably 35000 to 90000 g/mol and most preferably from 40000 to 50000 g/mol, determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) with 0.05 % by weight potassium trifluoroacetate in hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP) as eluent and cross-linked polystyrene/divinylbenzene as stationary phase (PL HFIPGel column; MALLS detector).
  • M w weight average molecular weight
  • Preferred ethoxylated polyethyleneimines for use in the invention correspond to the following general formula (I): [E 2 N-CH 2 CH 2 ] w [N(E)CH 2 CH 2 ] x [N(B)CH 2 CH 2 ] y -NE 2 (I) in which E represents a polyoxyethylene side chain corresponding to the formula R-(EO) n - as described above; B represents a continuation of the chain structure by branching; w,x and y are each independently from about 1 to 100 and (w + x + y) ranges from about 40 to about 120. Preferably (w + x + y) ranges from about 40 to about 60.
  • the subunits making up the polymer of formula (I) may be randomly distributed. Generally, w:x:y ranges from about 1:1:1 to about 1:2:1.
  • Particularly preferred ethoxylated polyethyleneimines for use in the invention and corresponding to the above general formula (I) may be produced using the strong under-ethoxylation process as is further described above.
  • the level of EPEI (b) preferably ranges from 0.5 to 10%, more preferably from 0.7 to 5% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition).
  • laundry detergent in the context of this invention denotes formulated compositions intended for and capable of wetting and cleaning domestic laundry such as clothing, linens and other household textiles.
  • the term “linen” is often used to describe certain types of laundry items including bed sheets, pillow cases, towels, tablecloths, table napkins and uniforms.
  • Textiles can include woven fabrics, non-woven fabrics, and knitted fabrics; and can include natural or synthetic fibres such as silk fibres, linen fibres, cotton fibres, polyester fibres, polyamide fibres such as nylon, acrylic fibres, acetate fibres, and blends thereof including cotton and polyester blends.
  • liquid laundry detergents include heavy-duty liquid laundry detergents for use in the wash cycle of automatic washing machines, as well as liquid fine wash and liquid colour care detergents such as those suitable for washing delicate garments (e.g. those made of silk or wool) either by hand or in the wash cycle of automatic washing machines.
  • liquid laundry detergents include heavy-duty liquid laundry detergents for use in the wash cycle of automatic washing machines, as well as liquid fine wash and liquid colour care detergents such as those suitable for washing delicate garments (e.g. those made of silk or wool) either by hand or in the wash cycle of automatic washing machines.
  • liquid in the context of this invention denotes that a continuous phase or predominant part of the composition is liquid and that the composition is flowable at 15°C and above. Accordingly, the term “liquid” may encompass emulsions, suspensions, and compositions having flowable yet stiffer consistency, known as gels or pastes.
  • the viscosity of the composition may suitably range from about 200 to about 10,000 mPa.s at 25°C at a shear rate of 21 sec -1 . This shear rate is the shear rate that is usually exerted on the liquid when poured from a bottle.
  • Pourable liquid detergent compositions generally have a viscosity of from 200 to 2,500 mPa.s, preferably from 200 to 1500 mPa.s.
  • Liquid detergent compositions which are pourable gels generally have a viscosity of from 1,500 mPa.s to 6,000 mPa.s, preferably from 1,500 mPa.s to 2,000 mPa.s.
  • a composition of the invention may generally comprise from 5 to 95%, preferably from 10 to 90%, more preferably from 15 to 85% water (by weight based on the total weight of the composition).
  • the composition may also incorporate non-aqueous carriers such as hydrotropes, co-solvents and phase stabilizers.
  • Such materials are typically low molecular weight, water-soluble or water-miscible organic liquids such as C1 to C5 monohydric alcohols (such as ethanol and n- or i-propanol); C2 to C6 diols (such as monopropylene glycol and dipropylene glycol); C3 to C9 triols (such as glycerol); polyethylene glycols having a weight average molecular weight (M w ) ranging from about 200 to 600; C1 to C3 alkanolamines such as mono-, di- and triethanolamines; and alkyl aryl sulfonates having up to 3 carbon atoms in the lower alkyl group (such as the sodium and potassium xylene, toluene, ethylbenzene and isopropyl benzene (cumene) sulfonates).
  • C1 to C5 monohydric alcohols such as ethanol and n- or i-propanol
  • Non-aqueous carriers when included, may be present in an amount ranging from 0.1 to 20%, preferably from 1 to 15%, and more preferably from 3 to 12% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition).
  • the composition of the invention preferably has a pH in the range of 5 to 9, more preferably 6 to 8, when measured on dilution of the composition to 1% using demineralised water.
  • composition of the invention comprises from 6 to 50% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition) of one or more detersive surfactants (a) selected from non-soap anionic surfactants, nonionic surfactants and mixtures thereof.
  • detersive surfactants selected from non-soap anionic surfactants, nonionic surfactants and mixtures thereof.
  • detersive surfactant in the context of this invention denotes a surfactant which provides a detersive (i.e. cleaning) effect to laundry treated as part of a domestic laundering process.
  • Non-soap anionic surfactants for use in the invention are typically salts of organic sulfates and sulfonates having alkyl radicals containing from about 8 to about 22 carbon atoms, the term "alkyl” being used to include the alkyl portion of higher acyl radicals. Examples of such materials include alkyl sulfates, alkyl ether sulfates, alkaryl sulfonates, alphaolefin sulfonates and mixtures thereof.
  • the alkyl radicals preferably contain from 10 to 18 carbon atoms and may be unsaturated.
  • the alkyl ether sulfates may contain from one to ten ethylene oxide or propylene oxide units per molecule, and preferably contain one to three ethylene oxide units per molecule.
  • the counterion for anionic surfactants is generally an alkali metal such as sodium or potassium; or an ammoniacal counterion such as monoethanolamine, (MEA) diethanolamine (DEA) or triethanolamine (TEA). Mixtures of such counterions may also be employed.
  • a preferred class of non-soap anionic surfactant for use in the invention includes alkylbenzene sulfonates, particularly linear alkylbenzene sulfonates (LAS) with an alkyl chain length of from 10 to 18 carbon atoms.
  • LAS linear alkylbenzene sulfonates
  • Commercial LAS is a mixture of closely related isomers and homologues alkyl chain homologues, each containing an aromatic ring sulfonated at the "para" position and attached to a linear alkyl chain at any position except the terminal carbons.
  • the linear alkyl chain typically has a chain length of from 11 to 15 carbon atoms, with the predominant materials having a chain length of about C12.
  • Each alkyl chain homologue consists of a mixture of all the possible sulfophenyl isomers except for the 1-phenyl isomer.
  • LAS is normally formulated into compositions in acid (i.e. HLAS) form and then at least partially neutralized in-situ.
  • alkyl ether sulfates having a straight or branched chain alkyl group having 10 to 18, more preferably 12 to 14 carbon atoms and containing an average of 1 to 3EO units per molecule.
  • a preferred example is sodium lauryl ether sulfate (SLES) in which the predominantly C12 lauryl alkyl group has been ethoxylated with an average of 3EO units per molecule.
  • alkyl sulfate surfactant may be used, such as non-ethoxylated primary and secondary alkyl sulphates with an alkyl chain length of from 10 to 18.
  • a preferred mixture of non-soap anionic surfactants for use in the invention comprises linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (preferably C 11 to C 15 linear alkyl benzene sulfonate) and alkyl ether sulfate (preferably C 10 to C 18 alkyl sulfate ethoxylated with an average of 1 to 3 EO).
  • the total level of non-soap anionic surfactant may suitably range from 5 to 30% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition).
  • Nonionic surfactants for use in the invention are typically polyoxyalkylene compounds, i.e. the reaction product of alkylene oxides (such as ethylene oxide or propylene oxide or mixtures thereof) with starter molecules having a hydrophobic group and a reactive hydrogen atom which is reactive with the alkylene oxide.
  • Such starter molecules include alcohols, acids, amides or alkyl phenols. Where the starter molecule is an alcohol, the reaction product is known as an alcohol alkoxylate.
  • the polyoxyalkylene compounds can have a variety of block and heteric (random) structures. For example, they can comprise a single block of alkylene oxide, or they can be diblock alkoxylates or triblock alkoxylates.
  • the blocks can be all ethylene oxide or all propylene oxide, or the blocks can contain a heteric mixture of alkylene oxides.
  • examples of such materials include aliphatic alcohol ethoxylates such as C 8 to C 18 primary or secondary linear or branched alcohol ethoxylates with an average of from 2 to 40 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol.
  • a preferred class of nonionic surfactant for use in the invention includes aliphatic C 8 to C18, more preferably C 12 to C 15 primary linear alcohol ethoxylates with an average of from 3 to 20, more preferably from 5 to 10 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol.
  • the total level of nonionic surfactant may suitably range from 0 to 25% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition).
  • a preferred mixture of non-soap anionic and nonionic surfactants for use in the invention comprises linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (preferably C 11 to C 15 linear alkyl benzene sulfonate), sodium lauryl ether sulfate (preferably C 10 to C 18 alkyl sulfate ethoxylated with an average of 1 to 3 EO) and ethoxylated aliphatic alcohol (preferably C 12 to C 15 primary linear alcohol ethoxylate with an average of from 5 to 10 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol).
  • linear alkylbenzene sulfonate preferably C 11 to C 15 linear alkyl benzene sulfonate
  • sodium lauryl ether sulfate preferably C 10 to C 18 alkyl sulfate ethoxylated with an average of 1 to 3 EO
  • ethoxylated aliphatic alcohol preferably C 12 to C 15 primary linear alcohol eth
  • composition of the invention may contain further optional ingredients to enhance performance and/or consumer acceptability, as follows:
  • a composition of the invention may contain one or more cosurfactants (such as amphoteric (zwitterionic) and/or cationic surfactants) in addition to the non-soap anionic and/or nonionic detersive surfactants described above.
  • cosurfactants such as amphoteric (zwitterionic) and/or cationic surfactants
  • Specific cationic surfactants include C8 to C18 alkyl dimethyl ammonium halides and derivatives thereof in which one or two hydroxyethyl groups replace one or two of the methyl groups, and mixtures thereof.
  • Cationic surfactant when included, may be present in an amount ranging from 0.1 to 5% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition).
  • amphoteric (zwitterionic) surfactants include alkyl amine oxides, alkyl betaines, alkyl amidopropyl betaines, alkyl sulfobetaines (sultaines), alkyl glycinates, alkyl carboxyglycinates, alkyl amphoacetates, alkyl amphopropionates, alkylamphoglycinates, alkyl amidopropyl hydroxysultaines, acyl taurates and acyl glutamates, having alkyl radicals containing from about 8 to about 22 carbon atoms, the term "alkyl” being used to include the alkyl portion of higher acyl radicals.
  • Amphoteric (zwitterionic) surfactant when included, may be present in an amount ranging from 0.1 to 5% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition).
  • a composition of the invention may contain one or more builders.
  • Builders enhance or maintain the cleaning efficiency of the surfactant, primarily by reducing water hardness. This is done either by sequestration or chelation (holding hardness minerals in solution), by precipitation (forming an insoluble substance), or by ion exchange (trading electrically charged particles).
  • Builders for use in the invention can be of the organic or inorganic type, or a mixture thereof.
  • Suitable inorganic builders include hydroxides, carbonates, sesquicarbonates, bicarbonates, silicates, zeolites, and mixtures thereof. Specific examples of such materials include sodium and potassium hydroxide, sodium and potassium carbonate, sodium and potassium bicarbonate, sodium sesquicarbonate, sodium silicate and mixtures thereof.
  • Suitable organic builders include polycarboxylates, in acid and/or salt form.
  • alkali metal e.g. sodium and potassium
  • alkanolammonium salts are preferred.
  • Specific examples of such materials include sodium and potassium citrates, sodium and potassium tartrates, the sodium and potassium salts of tartaric acid monosuccinate, the sodium and potassium salts of tartaric acid disuccinate, sodium and potassium ethylenediaminetetraacetates, sodium and potassium N(2-hydroxyethyl)-ethylenediamine triacetates, sodium and potassium nitrilotriacetates and sodium and potassium N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-nitrilodiacetates.
  • Polymeric polycarboxylates may also be used, such as polymers of unsaturated monocarboxylic acids (e.g. acrylic, methacrylic, vinylacetic, and crotonic acids) and/or unsaturated dicarboxylic acids (e.g. maleic, fumaric, itaconic, mesaconic and citraconic acids and their anhydrides).
  • unsaturated monocarboxylic acids e.g. acrylic, methacrylic, vinylacetic, and crotonic acids
  • unsaturated dicarboxylic acids e.g. maleic, fumaric, itaconic, mesaconic and citraconic acids and their anhydrides
  • Specific examples of such materials include polyacrylic acid, polymaleic acid, and copolymers of acrylic and maleic acid.
  • the polymers may be in acid, salt or partially neutralised form and may suitably have a molecular weight (Mw) ranging from about 1,000 to 100,000, preferably from about 2,000 to about 85,000, and more
  • Preferred builders for use in the invention may be selected from polycarboxylates (e.g. citrates) in acid and/or salt form and mixtures thereof.
  • Builder when included, may be present in an amount ranging from about 0.1 to about 20%, preferably from about 0.5 to about 15%, more preferably from about 1 to about 10% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition).
  • Transition metal ion chelating agents
  • a composition of the invention may contain one or more chelating agents for transition metal ions such as iron, copper and manganese. Such chelating agents may help to improve the stability of the composition and protect for example against transition metal catalysed decomposition of certain ingredients.
  • Suitable transition metal ion chelating agents include phosphonates, in acid and/or salt form.
  • alkali metal e.g. sodium and potassium
  • alkanolammonium salts are preferred.
  • Specific examples of such materials include aminotris(methylene phosphonic acid) (ATMP), 1-hydroxyethylidene diphosphonic acid (HEDP) and diethylenetriamine penta(methylene phosphonic acid (DTPMP) and their respective sodium or potassium salts.
  • HEDP is preferred. Mixtures of any of the above described materials may also be used.
  • Transition metal ion chelating agents when included, may be present in an amount ranging from about 0.1 to about 10%, preferably from about 0.1 to about 3% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition).
  • a composition of the invention may in some cases contain one or more fatty acids and/or salts thereof.
  • Suitable fatty acids in the context of this invention include aliphatic carboxylic acids of formula RCOOH, where R is a linear or branched alkyl or alkenyl chain containing from 6 to 24, more preferably 10 to 22, most preferably from 12 to 18 carbon atoms and 0 or 1 double bond.
  • R is a linear or branched alkyl or alkenyl chain containing from 6 to 24, more preferably 10 to 22, most preferably from 12 to 18 carbon atoms and 0 or 1 double bond.
  • saturated C12-18 fatty acids such as lauric acid, myristic acid, palmitic acid or stearic acid
  • fatty acid mixtures in which 50 to 100% (by weight based on the total weight of the mixture) consists of saturated C12-18 fatty acids.
  • Such mixtures may typically be derived from natural fats and/or optionally hydrogenated natural oils (such as coconut oil, palm kernel oil or tallow).
  • the fatty acids may be present in the form of their sodium, potassium or ammonium salts and/or in the form of soluble salts of organic bases, such as mono-, di- or triethanolamine.
  • Fatty acids and/or their salts when included, may be present in an amount ranging from about 0.25 to 5%, more preferably from 0.5 to 5%, most preferably from 0.75 to 4% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition).
  • fatty acids and/or their salts are not included in the level of surfactant or in the level of builder.
  • a composition of the invention will preferably include one or more soil release polymers (SRPs) which help to improve the detachment of soils from fabric by modifying the fabric surface during washing.
  • SRPs soil release polymers
  • the adsorption of a SRP over the fabric surface is promoted by an affinity between the chemical structure of the SRP and the target fibre.
  • SRPs for use in the invention may include a variety of charged (e.g. anionic) as well as non-charged monomer units and structures may be linear, branched or star-shaped.
  • the SRP structure may also include capping groups to control molecular weight or to alter polymer properties such as surface activity.
  • the weight average molecular weight (M w ) of the SRP may suitably range from about 1000 to about 20,000 and preferably ranges from about 1500 to about 10,000.
  • SRPs for use in the invention may suitably be selected from copolyesters of dicarboxylic acids (for example adipic acid, phthalic acid or terephthalic acid), diols (for example ethylene glycol or propylene glycol) and polydiols (for example polyethylene glycol or polypropylene glycol).
  • the copolyester may also include monomeric units substituted with anionic groups, such as for example sulfonated isophthaloyl units.
  • oligomeric esters produced by transesterification/oligomerization of poly(ethyleneglycol) methyl ether, dimethyl terephthalate (“DMT”), propylene glycol (“PG”) and poly(ethyleneglycol) (“PEG”); partly- and fully-anionic-end-capped oligomeric esters such as oligomers from ethylene glycol ("EG”), PG, DMT and Na-3,6-dioxa-8-hydroxyoctanesulfonate; nonionic-capped block polyester oligomeric compounds such as those produced from DMT, Me-capped PEG and EG and/or PG, or a combination of DMT, EG and/or PG, Me-capped PEG and Na-dimethyl-5-sulfoisophthalate, and copolymeric blocks of ethylene terephthalate or propylene terephthalate with polyethylene oxide or polypropylene oxide terephthalate
  • cellulosic derivatives such as hydroxyether cellulosic polymers, C 1 -C 4 alkylcelluloses and C 4 hydroxyalkyl celluloses
  • Preferred SRPs for use in the invention include copolyesters formed by condensation of terephthalic acid ester and diol, preferably 1,2 propanediol, and further comprising an end cap formed from repeat units of alkylene oxide capped with an alkyl group.
  • Examples of such materials have a structure corresponding to general formula (I): in which R 1 and R 2 independently of one another are X-(OC 2 H 4 ) n -(OC 3 H 6 ) m;
  • n, n and a are not necessarily whole numbers for the polymer in bulk.
  • a composition of the invention will generally comprise from 0.1 to 10%, preferably from 0.3 to 7%, more preferably from 0.5 to 5% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition) of one or more SRPs (such as, for example, the copolyesters of general formula (I) as are described above).
  • SRPs such as, for example, the copolyesters of general formula (I) as are described above.
  • a composition of the invention may comprise one or more rheology modifiers.
  • materials include polymeric thickeners and/or structurants such as hydrophobically modified alkali swellable emulsion (HASE) copolymers.
  • HASE copolymers for use in the invention include linear or crosslinked copolymers that are prepared by the addition polymerization of a monomer mixture including at least one acidic vinyl monomer, such as (meth)acrylic acid (i.e. methacrylic acid and/or acrylic acid); and at least one associative monomer.
  • associative monomer in the context of this invention denotes a monomer having an ethylenically unsaturated section (for addition polymerization with the other monomers in the mixture) and a hydrophobic section.
  • a preferred type of associative monomer includes a polyoxyalkylene section between the ethylenically unsaturated section and the hydrophobic section.
  • Preferred HASE copolymers for use in the invention include linear or crosslinked copolymers that are prepared by the addition polymerization of (meth)acrylic acid with (i) at least one associative monomer selected from linear or branched C 8 -C 40 alkyl (preferably linear C 12 -C 22 alkyl) polyethoxylated (meth)acrylates; and (ii) at least one further monomer selected from C 1 -C 4 alkyl (meth) acrylates, polyacidic vinyl monomers (such as maleic acid, maleic anhydride and/or salts thereof) and mixtures thereof.
  • the polyethoxylated portion of the associative monomer (i) generally comprises about 5 to about 100, preferably about 10 to about 80, and more preferably about 15 to about 60 oxyethylene repeating units.
  • a composition of the invention will preferably comprise from 0.1 to 5% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition) of one or more polymeric thickeners such as, for example, the HASE copolymers which are described above.
  • compositions of the invention may also have their rheology modified by use of one or more external structurants which form a structuring network within the composition.
  • external structurants include hydrogenated castor oil, microfibrous cellulose and citrus pulp fibre.
  • the presence of an external structurant may provide shear thinning rheology and may also enable materials such as encapsulates and visual cues to be suspended stably in the liquid.
  • a composition of the invention may comprise an effective amount of one or more enzyme selected from the group comprising, pectate lyase, protease, amylase, cellulase, lipase, mannanase and mixtures thereof.
  • the enzymes are preferably present with corresponding enzyme stabilizers.
  • a composition of the invention may contain further optional ingredients to enhance performance and/or consumer acceptability.
  • additional optional ingredients include foam boosting agents, preservatives (e.g. bactericides), polyelectrolytes, anti-shrinking agents, anti-wrinkle agents, anti-oxidants, sunscreens, anti-corrosion agents, drape imparting agents, anti-static agents, ironing aids, colorants, pearlisers and/or opacifiers, and shading dye.
  • foam boosting agents e.g. bactericides
  • preservatives e.g. bactericides
  • polyelectrolytes e.g. bactericides
  • anti-shrinking agents e.g. bactericides
  • anti-wrinkle agents e.g. bactericides
  • anti-oxidants e.g. s, sunscreens, anti-corrosion agents, drape imparting agents, anti-static agents, ironing aids, colorants, pearlisers and/or opacifiers, and shading dye.
  • a composition of the invention may be packaged as unit doses in polymeric film soluble in the wash water.
  • a composition of the invention may be supplied in multidose plastics packs with a top or bottom closure.
  • a dosing measure may be supplied with the pack either as a part of the cap or as an integrated system.
  • a method of laundering fabric using a composition of the invention will usually involve diluting the dose of detergent composition to obtain a wash liquor, and washing fabrics with the wash liquor so formed.
  • the method of laundering fabric may suitably be carried out in a top-loading or front-loading automatic washing machine, or can be carried out by hand.
  • the dose of detergent composition is typically put into a dispenser and from there it is flushed into the machine by the water flowing into the machine, thereby forming the wash liquor.
  • Dosages for a typical front-loading washing machine (using 10 to 15 litres of water to form the wash liquor) may range from about 10 ml to about 100 ml, preferably about 15 to 75 ml.
  • Dosages for a typical top-loading washing machine (using from 40 to 60 litres of water to form the wash liquor) may be higher, e.g. 100 ml or more.
  • Lower dosages of detergent e.g. 50 ml or less
  • hand washing methods using about 1 to 10 litres of water to form the wash liquor).
  • a subsequent aqueous rinse step and drying the laundry is preferred.
  • Viscosity measurements were made using an Anton Paar rheometer at room temperature (25 °C).
  • Liquid laundry detergent formulations were prepared having ingredients as shown in Table 1.
  • Table 1 Ingredient wt.% (active ingredient) Control Example A C 12-15 alcohol ethoxylate (7EO) 2.04 2.04 Triethanolamine 3.52 3.52 C 12-14 linear alkylbenzene sulfonic acid (LAS) 2.72 2.72 Fatty acids, C 12-18 0.4 0.4 1-hydroxyethane-1,1-diphosphonic acid (HEDP) 0.7 0.7 SLES (3EO) 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 Polyester SRP 0.47 0.47 HASE copolymer 1.05 1.05 EPEI (Sokalan ® HP20, ex BASF) - 1.00 Water, minors q.s. to 100
  • Liquid laundry detergent formulations were prepared using different grades of EPEI in a HASE thickened liquid detergent base. The formulations are shown in Table 3. Table 3 Example F 9 10 11 12 C 12-15 alcohol (7EO) 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 Triethanolamine 3.52 3.52 3.52 3.52 LAS 2.72 2.72 2.72 2.72 2.72 Fatty acids, C12-18 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 SLES (3EO) 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 HASE copolymer 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 EPEI (Sokalan ® HP20,ex BASF) 1.45 - - - - EPEI (9) - 1.45 - - - EPEI (10) - - 1.45 - - EPEI (11) - - - 1.45 - EPEI (12) - - - - 1.45 Water, minors q.s.
  • Example 10 using EPEI prepared by the preferred ethoxylation process provides particularly good results, with a viscosity performance which is superior to that of Example 9 which uses an EPEI of equivalent backbone size and degree of ethoxylation, but prepared by a standard process.
  • Example 12 using EPEI prepared by the preferred ethoxylation process provides particularly good results, with a viscosity performance which is superior to that of Example 11 which uses an EPEI of equivalent backbone size and degree of ethoxylation, but prepared by a standard process.
  • Liquid laundry detergent formulations were prepared using different grades of EPEI in a salt thickened detergent base. The formulations are shown in Table 4 .
  • Table 4 Formulation Control G 13 Ingredient wt.% (active ingredient) Fluorescer 0.1 0.1 0.1 Triethanolamine 1 1 1 NaOH 0.34 0.34 0.34 Citric acid 0.27 0.27 0.27 LAS 3 3 3 SLES (3EO) 9 9 9 CAPB 3.15 3.15 3.15 Polyester soil release polymer 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 EPEI (Sokalan ® HP20, ex BASF) - 1.55 - EPEI (5) - - 1.55 NaCl 1.25 1.25 1.25 Fragrance, preservative, water q.s. to 100
  • Example 13 has a superior product viscosity compared to both the control and Example G (not according to the invention).
  • Liquid laundry detergent formulations were prepared using different grades of EPEI in a salt thickened detergent base. The formulations are shown in Table 5.
  • Example 15 using EPEI prepared by the preferred ethoxylation process provides particularly good results, with a viscosity performance which is superior to that of Example 14 which uses an EPEI of equivalent backbone size and degree of ethoxylation, but prepared by a standard process.
  • Example 17 using EPEI prepared by the preferred ethoxylation process provides particularly good results, with a viscosity performance which is superior to that of Example 15 which uses an EPEI of equivalent backbone size and degree of ethoxylation, but prepared by a standard process.
  • Liquid laundry detergent formulations were prepared having ingredients as shown in Table 6.
  • Table 6 Formulation I 18 Ingredient wt.% (active ingredient) MPG 4 4 Citric acid 1 1
  • Triethanolamine 8 8 C 12-15 alcohol (7EO) 7.5 7.5 LAS 10 10 SLES (3EO) 7.5 7.5 Fatty acids, C 12-18 3 3
  • EPEI Sokalan ® HP20, ex BASF
  • the cleaning performance of the above formulations was evaluated across a variety of stains on white test cloths of cotton or polyester.
  • the stained test cloths were washed using a 30ml dosage of test formulation in the 40°C cotton cycle of an automatic washing machine with a water supply of 26°FH.
  • After-wash SRI 100 - ⁇ E where ⁇ E is the difference in colour of the stained test cloth compared to an unstained control cloth. A higher SRI value indicates cleaner cloths.
  • Table 6a Stain and fabric SRI for Example I SRI for Example 18 95% CL red pottery clay on polyester 76.0 76.2 2.9 red pottery clay on cotton 66.5 66.1 2.7 garden soil on cotton 79.5 80.0 2.7 yellow pottery clay on polyester 80.9 83.4 5.4
  • Example 18 is at least equivalent to that of Example I (not according to the invention).

Description

    Field of the Invention
  • The present invention relates to liquid laundry detergents comprising ethoxylated polyethyleneimine (EPEI) for an improved product viscosity profile without impairing cleaning performance.
  • Background and Prior Art
  • There is a continuing need to improve the cleaning performance of laundry liquids as consumers move to lower wash temperatures and seek products with improved environmental credentials. One route to improving the environmental profile of liquid laundry detergents is the addition of highly weight efficient or multi-functional materials to replace traditional materials such as surfactants resulting in a lower overall chemicals usage.
  • One such ingredient is ethoxylated polyethyleneimine (EPEI) which is known to improve particulate soil removal from fabrics. US 2006/234895 A1 discloses laundry detergent compositions comprising EPEI, regarding its grease and oil cleaning benefits when combined with lipase enzymes. WO 00/00580 A1 discloses laundry detergent compositions comprising EPEI, which display enhanced fragrance endurance of β-ketoester pro-fragrance compounds.
  • However, the inclusion of EPEI may reduce the viscosity of the resulting liquid, leading to reduced consumer acceptability and hence the need to include additional viscosity-boosting technology.
  • The present invention addresses this problem.
  • Summary of the Invention
  • The present invention provides a liquid laundry detergent composition comprising ethoxylated polyethyleneimine (EPEI) for an improved product viscosity profile without impairing cleaning performance; the detergent composition comprising:
    1. a) from 6 to 50% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition) of one or more detersive surfactants selected from non-soap anionic surfactants, nonionic surfactants and mixtures thereof, and
    2. b) from 0.5 to 10% of an ethoxylated polyethyleneimine (EPEI) having a polyethyleneimine backbone made up of repeating -[(CH2CH2)N]- subunits; and one or more polyoxyethylene side chains which are bonded to internal and/or terminal nitrogen atoms in the polyethyleneimine backbone;
    in which the polyethyleneimine backbone is derived from a polyethyleneimine starting material which is ethoxylated to produce EPEI;
    in which the polyethyleneimine starting material has an average molecular weight (Mw) ranging from 1800 to 5000 g/mol (prior to ethoxylation), and the polyoxyethylene side chains have an average of from 25 to 40 ethoxy units per side chain bonded to the polyethyleneimine backbone. Detailed Description and Preferred Embodiments Ethoxylated polyethyleneimine (EPEI)
  • The ethoxylated polyethyleneimine (EPEI) for use in the invention includes inter alia a polyethyleneimine backbone made up of repeating -[(CH2CH2)N]- subunits. The backbone derives from a polyethyleneimine starting material (as defined above) which is ethoxylated to produce EPEI.
  • More preferably the polyethyleneimine starting material (prior to ethoxylation) has an average molecular weight (Mw) ranging from 1800 to 2400 g/mol, and most preferably from 1800 to 2200 g/mol, such as from 1900 to 2100 g/mol, determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) with 1.5% by weight aqueous formic acid as eluent and cross-linked poly-hydroxyethyl methacrylate as stationary phase (TSKgel GMPWXL column) and by using an RI detector and Pullulan standards (PSS GmbH, Mainz, Germany) for calibration..
  • A suitable polyethyleneimine starting material in the context of this invention may, for example, be a homopolymer of ethyleneimine conforming to the (empirical) formula -(CH2-CH2-NH)n- ; in which n ranges from about 40 to about 120. Preferably n ranges from about 40 to about 60.
  • The polyethyleneimine starting material can vary in shape, including for example linear, branched, dendritic (hyperbranched) or comb-like structures, depending on the method of manufacture. Methods for the manufacture of such materials are generally acid-catalyzed reactions to open the ring of ethyleneimine, also known as aziridine.
  • Examples of suitable polyethyleneimine starting materials for use in the invention have a branched structure comprising three types of subunits, which may be randomly distributed. The subunits which make up the polymer are primary amine units having the formula:
    • [H2N-CH2CH2]- and -NH2
    • which terminate the polymer main chain and any branching chains;
    • secondary amine units having the formula
    • -[N(H)CH2CH2]-
    • and tertiary amine units having the formula
    • -[N(B)CH2CH2]-
    • which are the branching points of the polymer, B representing a continuation of the chain structure by branching.
  • Branches may be ethyleneamino groups such as - CH2CH2-NH2 groups; or longer groups such as -(CH2CH2)-N(CH2CH2NH2)2 or -(CH2CH2)-N(H)CH2CH2NH2 groups. The mixture of primary, secondary, and tertiary amine units respectively may be in any molar ratio, including for example in a molar ratio of about 1:1:1 to about 1:2:1. The molar ratio of primary, secondary, and tertiary amine units respectively may for example be determined by 13C-NMR or 15N-NMR spectroscopy, preferably in D2O. The degree of branching can be defined as follows: DB = D+T/D+T+L with D (dendritic) corresponding to the fraction of tertiary amine units, L (linear) corresponding to the fraction of secondary amine units and T (terminal) corresponding to the fraction of primary amine units. Suitably DB ranges from 0.25 to 0.95, preferably from 0.30 to 0.80, and more preferably from 0.5 to 0.8.
  • In the above polyethyleneimine starting material, each primary or secondary amine hydrogen atom represents a reactive site for subsequent ethoxylation. Preferably most or all of such hydrogen atoms are replaced by polyoxyethylene side chains, to form the ethoxylated polyethyleneimine for use in the invention. The polyoxyethylene side chains may suitably correspond to the formula R-(EO)n-, in which (EO)n represents an ethylene oxide block; n is a number from 25 to 40, preferably from 25 to 35; and R is hydrogen.
  • Preferred polyethyleneimine starting materials in the context of this invention display a polydispersity Q = Mw/Mn of 3.4 at most, for example in the range of from 1.1 to 3.0, more preferably in the range of from 1.3 to 2.5 and most preferably from 1.5 to 2.0.
  • Preferred polyethyleneimine starting materials in the context of this invention have a primary amine value in the range of from 1 to 1000 mg KOH/g, preferably from 10 to 500 mg KOH/g, most preferred from 50 to 300 mg KOH/g. The primary amine value can be determined according to ASTM D2074-07.
  • Preferred polyethyleneimine starting materials in the context of this invention have a secondary amine value in the range of from 10 to 1000 mg KOH/g, preferably from 50 to 500 mg KOH/g, most preferred from 50 to 500 mg KOH/g. The secondary amine value can be determined according to ASTM D2074-07.
  • Preferred polyethyleneimine starting materials in the context of this invention have a tertiary amine value in the range of from 1 to 300 mg KOH/g, preferably from 5 to 200 mg KOH/g, most preferred from 10 to 100 mg KOH/g. The tertiary amine value can be determined according to ASTM D2074-07.
  • The polyethyleneimine starting material may be pretreated (for example with a combination of water removal and degassing) before commencement of the ethoxylation stage.
  • A standard procedure for the ethoxylation stage involves reacting the polyethyleneimine starting material with at least sufficient ethylene oxide to provide 2-hydroxyethyl groups at each reactive site (i.e. 1 ethylene oxide (EO) group per primary or secondary amine hydrogen atom in the polyethyleneimine molecule). The reaction product so obtained is then condensed with the remaining amount of ethylene oxide, typically in the presence of a basic catalyst.
  • A preferred procedure for the ethoxylation stage is a two-step procedure requiring the adjustment of the amount of ethylene oxide which is added in the first (and second) step to a certain range. This preferred procedure (hereinafter termed "strong under-ethoxylation process") involves reacting, in a first step (1), the polyethyleneimine starting material with ethylene oxide in a quantity of significantly less than one molar equivalent, such as in an amount of 0.01 to 0.85, preferably 0.1 to 0.7, more preferably 0.1 to 0.6 and most preferably from 0.1 to 0.5 EO groups per primary or secondary amine hydrogen atom in the polyethyleneimine molecule.
  • Preferably step (1) is carried out in the absence of a catalyst and in an aqueous solution (which may be a solution of from 50 to 99%, preferably from 75 to 99% by weight of the polyethylene starting material in water). Step (1) may also be carried out in the absence of a catalyst and in the absence of water. The temperature during step (1) is normally in the range of about 90° to 180°C, preferably 100° to 170°C, more preferably 110° to 160°C and most preferably 120° to 145°C.
  • In a second step (2), the reaction product obtained from step (1), i.e. partially ethoxylated polyethyleneimine, is reacted with the remaining amount of ethylene oxide in the presence of a basic catalyst. The second step (2) is preferably carried out at a temperature from 100° to 250 °C, and more preferably 120° to 180° C.
  • Examples of suitable basic catalysts include alkali metal (e.g. sodium or potassium) hydroxides; alkali metal (e.g. sodium or potassium) alkoxides such as potassium methylate (KOCH3), potassium tert-butoxide, sodium ethoxide and sodium methylate (NaOCH3); alkali metal or alkaline earth metal hydrides such as sodium hydride and calcium hydride, and alkali metal (e.g. sodium or potassium) carbonates. such as sodium carbonate and potassium carbonate. Potassium hydroxide is preferred.
  • The final product obtained is ethoxylated polyethyleneimine (EPEI). The total degree of ethoxylation per reactive site can be determined according to the following formula: E/(AR), in which E is the total number of moles of ethylene oxide condensed (including hydroxyethylation), A is the number of moles of the polyethyleneimine starting material, and R is the number of reactive sites for the polyethyleneimine starting material.
  • Ethoxylated polyethyleneimines (EPEI) for use in the invention may generally have a weight average molecular weight (Mw) of 25000 to 120000 g/mol, preferably 30000 to 100000 g/mol, more preferably 35000 to 90000 g/mol and most preferably from 40000 to 50000 g/mol, determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) with 0.05 % by weight potassium trifluoroacetate in hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP) as eluent and cross-linked polystyrene/divinylbenzene as stationary phase (PL HFIPGel column; MALLS detector).
  • Preferred ethoxylated polyethyleneimines for use in the invention correspond to the following general formula (I):

            [E2N-CH2CH2]w[N(E)CH2CH2]x[N(B)CH2CH2]y-NE2     (I)

    in which E represents a polyoxyethylene side chain corresponding to the formula R-(EO)n- as described above; B represents a continuation of the chain structure by branching; w,x and y are each independently from about 1 to 100 and (w + x + y) ranges from about 40 to about 120. Preferably (w + x + y) ranges from about 40 to about 60. The subunits making up the polymer of formula (I) may be randomly distributed. Generally, w:x:y ranges from about 1:1:1 to about 1:2:1.
  • Particularly preferred ethoxylated polyethyleneimines for use in the invention and corresponding to the above general formula (I) may be produced using the strong under-ethoxylation process as is further described above.
  • Mixtures of any of the above described materials may also be used.
  • In the composition of the invention, the level of EPEI (b) preferably ranges from 0.5 to 10%, more preferably from 0.7 to 5% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition).
  • Liquid laundry detergents
  • The term "laundry detergent" in the context of this invention denotes formulated compositions intended for and capable of wetting and cleaning domestic laundry such as clothing, linens and other household textiles. The term "linen" is often used to describe certain types of laundry items including bed sheets, pillow cases, towels, tablecloths, table napkins and uniforms. Textiles can include woven fabrics, non-woven fabrics, and knitted fabrics; and can include natural or synthetic fibres such as silk fibres, linen fibres, cotton fibres, polyester fibres, polyamide fibres such as nylon, acrylic fibres, acetate fibres, and blends thereof including cotton and polyester blends.
  • Examples of liquid laundry detergents include heavy-duty liquid laundry detergents for use in the wash cycle of automatic washing machines, as well as liquid fine wash and liquid colour care detergents such as those suitable for washing delicate garments (e.g. those made of silk or wool) either by hand or in the wash cycle of automatic washing machines.
  • The term "liquid" in the context of this invention denotes that a continuous phase or predominant part of the composition is liquid and that the composition is flowable at 15°C and above. Accordingly, the term "liquid" may encompass emulsions, suspensions, and compositions having flowable yet stiffer consistency, known as gels or pastes. The viscosity of the composition may suitably range from about 200 to about 10,000 mPa.s at 25°C at a shear rate of 21 sec-1. This shear rate is the shear rate that is usually exerted on the liquid when poured from a bottle. Pourable liquid detergent compositions generally have a viscosity of from 200 to 2,500 mPa.s, preferably from 200 to 1500 mPa.s. Liquid detergent compositions which are pourable gels generally have a viscosity of from 1,500 mPa.s to 6,000 mPa.s, preferably from 1,500 mPa.s to 2,000 mPa.s.
  • A composition of the invention may generally comprise from 5 to 95%, preferably from 10 to 90%, more preferably from 15 to 85% water (by weight based on the total weight of the composition). The composition may also incorporate non-aqueous carriers such as hydrotropes, co-solvents and phase stabilizers. Such materials are typically low molecular weight, water-soluble or water-miscible organic liquids such as C1 to C5 monohydric alcohols (such as ethanol and n- or i-propanol); C2 to C6 diols (such as monopropylene glycol and dipropylene glycol); C3 to C9 triols (such as glycerol); polyethylene glycols having a weight average molecular weight (Mw) ranging from about 200 to 600; C1 to C3 alkanolamines such as mono-, di- and triethanolamines; and alkyl aryl sulfonates having up to 3 carbon atoms in the lower alkyl group (such as the sodium and potassium xylene, toluene, ethylbenzene and isopropyl benzene (cumene) sulfonates).
  • Mixtures of any of the above described materials may also be used.
  • Non-aqueous carriers, when included, may be present in an amount ranging from 0.1 to 20%, preferably from 1 to 15%, and more preferably from 3 to 12% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition).
  • The composition of the invention preferably has a pH in the range of 5 to 9, more preferably 6 to 8, when measured on dilution of the composition to 1% using demineralised water.
  • The composition of the invention comprises from 6 to 50% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition) of one or more detersive surfactants (a) selected from non-soap anionic surfactants, nonionic surfactants and mixtures thereof.
  • The term "detersive surfactant" in the context of this invention denotes a surfactant which provides a detersive (i.e. cleaning) effect to laundry treated as part of a domestic laundering process.
  • Non-soap anionic surfactants for use in the invention are typically salts of organic sulfates and sulfonates having alkyl radicals containing from about 8 to about 22 carbon atoms, the term "alkyl" being used to include the alkyl portion of higher acyl radicals. Examples of such materials include alkyl sulfates, alkyl ether sulfates, alkaryl sulfonates, alphaolefin sulfonates and mixtures thereof. The alkyl radicals preferably contain from 10 to 18 carbon atoms and may be unsaturated. The alkyl ether sulfates may contain from one to ten ethylene oxide or propylene oxide units per molecule, and preferably contain one to three ethylene oxide units per molecule. The counterion for anionic surfactants is generally an alkali metal such as sodium or potassium; or an ammoniacal counterion such as monoethanolamine, (MEA) diethanolamine (DEA) or triethanolamine (TEA). Mixtures of such counterions may also be employed.
  • A preferred class of non-soap anionic surfactant for use in the invention includes alkylbenzene sulfonates, particularly linear alkylbenzene sulfonates (LAS) with an alkyl chain length of from 10 to 18 carbon atoms. Commercial LAS is a mixture of closely related isomers and homologues alkyl chain homologues, each containing an aromatic ring sulfonated at the "para" position and attached to a linear alkyl chain at any position except the terminal carbons. The linear alkyl chain typically has a chain length of from 11 to 15 carbon atoms, with the predominant materials having a chain length of about C12. Each alkyl chain homologue consists of a mixture of all the possible sulfophenyl isomers except for the 1-phenyl isomer. LAS is normally formulated into compositions in acid (i.e. HLAS) form and then at least partially neutralized in-situ.
  • Also suitable are alkyl ether sulfates having a straight or branched chain alkyl group having 10 to 18, more preferably 12 to 14 carbon atoms and containing an average of 1 to 3EO units per molecule. A preferred example is sodium lauryl ether sulfate (SLES) in which the predominantly C12 lauryl alkyl group has been ethoxylated with an average of 3EO units per molecule.
  • Some alkyl sulfate surfactant (PAS) may be used, such as non-ethoxylated primary and secondary alkyl sulphates with an alkyl chain length of from 10 to 18.
  • Mixtures of any of the above described materials may also be used. A preferred mixture of non-soap anionic surfactants for use in the invention comprises linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (preferably C11 to C15 linear alkyl benzene sulfonate) and alkyl ether sulfate (preferably C10 to C18 alkyl sulfate ethoxylated with an average of 1 to 3 EO).
  • The total level of non-soap anionic surfactant may suitably range from 5 to 30% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition).
  • Nonionic surfactants for use in the invention are typically polyoxyalkylene compounds, i.e. the reaction product of alkylene oxides (such as ethylene oxide or propylene oxide or mixtures thereof) with starter molecules having a hydrophobic group and a reactive hydrogen atom which is reactive with the alkylene oxide. Such starter molecules include alcohols, acids, amides or alkyl phenols. Where the starter molecule is an alcohol, the reaction product is known as an alcohol alkoxylate. The polyoxyalkylene compounds can have a variety of block and heteric (random) structures. For example, they can comprise a single block of alkylene oxide, or they can be diblock alkoxylates or triblock alkoxylates. Within the block structures, the blocks can be all ethylene oxide or all propylene oxide, or the blocks can contain a heteric mixture of alkylene oxides. Examples of such materials include aliphatic alcohol ethoxylates such as C8 to C18 primary or secondary linear or branched alcohol ethoxylates with an average of from 2 to 40 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol.
  • A preferred class of nonionic surfactant for use in the invention includes aliphatic C8 to C18, more preferably C12 to C15 primary linear alcohol ethoxylates with an average of from 3 to 20, more preferably from 5 to 10 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol.
  • Mixtures of any of the above described materials may also be used.
  • The total level of nonionic surfactant may suitably range from 0 to 25% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition).
  • A preferred mixture of non-soap anionic and nonionic surfactants for use in the invention comprises linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (preferably C11 to C15 linear alkyl benzene sulfonate), sodium lauryl ether sulfate (preferably C10 to C18 alkyl sulfate ethoxylated with an average of 1 to 3 EO) and ethoxylated aliphatic alcohol (preferably C12 to C15 primary linear alcohol ethoxylate with an average of from 5 to 10 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol).
  • Optional ingredients
  • A composition of the invention may contain further optional ingredients to enhance performance and/or consumer acceptability, as follows:
  • Cosurfactants
  • A composition of the invention may contain one or more cosurfactants (such as amphoteric (zwitterionic) and/or cationic surfactants) in addition to the non-soap anionic and/or nonionic detersive surfactants described above.
  • Specific cationic surfactants include C8 to C18 alkyl dimethyl ammonium halides and derivatives thereof in which one or two hydroxyethyl groups replace one or two of the methyl groups, and mixtures thereof. Cationic surfactant, when included, may be present in an amount ranging from 0.1 to 5% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition).
  • Specific amphoteric (zwitterionic) surfactants include alkyl amine oxides, alkyl betaines, alkyl amidopropyl betaines, alkyl sulfobetaines (sultaines), alkyl glycinates, alkyl carboxyglycinates, alkyl amphoacetates, alkyl amphopropionates, alkylamphoglycinates, alkyl amidopropyl hydroxysultaines, acyl taurates and acyl glutamates, having alkyl radicals containing from about 8 to about 22 carbon atoms, the term "alkyl" being used to include the alkyl portion of higher acyl radicals. Amphoteric (zwitterionic) surfactant, when included, may be present in an amount ranging from 0.1 to 5% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition).
  • Mixtures of any of the above described materials may also be used.
  • Builders
  • A composition of the invention may contain one or more builders. Builders enhance or maintain the cleaning efficiency of the surfactant, primarily by reducing water hardness. This is done either by sequestration or chelation (holding hardness minerals in solution), by precipitation (forming an insoluble substance), or by ion exchange (trading electrically charged particles).
  • Builders for use in the invention can be of the organic or inorganic type, or a mixture thereof.
  • Suitable inorganic builders include hydroxides, carbonates, sesquicarbonates, bicarbonates, silicates, zeolites, and mixtures thereof. Specific examples of such materials include sodium and potassium hydroxide, sodium and potassium carbonate, sodium and potassium bicarbonate, sodium sesquicarbonate, sodium silicate and mixtures thereof.
  • Suitable organic builders include polycarboxylates, in acid and/or salt form. When utilized in salt form, alkali metal (e.g. sodium and potassium) or alkanolammonium salts are preferred. Specific examples of such materials include sodium and potassium citrates, sodium and potassium tartrates, the sodium and potassium salts of tartaric acid monosuccinate, the sodium and potassium salts of tartaric acid disuccinate, sodium and potassium ethylenediaminetetraacetates, sodium and potassium N(2-hydroxyethyl)-ethylenediamine triacetates, sodium and potassium nitrilotriacetates and sodium and potassium N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-nitrilodiacetates. Polymeric polycarboxylates may also be used, such as polymers of unsaturated monocarboxylic acids (e.g. acrylic, methacrylic, vinylacetic, and crotonic acids) and/or unsaturated dicarboxylic acids (e.g. maleic, fumaric, itaconic, mesaconic and citraconic acids and their anhydrides). Specific examples of such materials include polyacrylic acid, polymaleic acid, and copolymers of acrylic and maleic acid. The polymers may be in acid, salt or partially neutralised form and may suitably have a molecular weight (Mw) ranging from about 1,000 to 100,000, preferably from about 2,000 to about 85,000, and more preferably from about 2,500 to about 75,000
  • Mixtures of any of the above described materials may also be used. Preferred builders for use in the invention may be selected from polycarboxylates (e.g. citrates) in acid and/or salt form and mixtures thereof.
  • Builder, when included, may be present in an amount ranging from about 0.1 to about 20%, preferably from about 0.5 to about 15%, more preferably from about 1 to about 10% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition).
  • Transition metal ion chelating agents
  • A composition of the invention may contain one or more chelating agents for transition metal ions such as iron, copper and manganese. Such chelating agents may help to improve the stability of the composition and protect for example against transition metal catalysed decomposition of certain ingredients.
  • Suitable transition metal ion chelating agents include phosphonates, in acid and/or salt form. When utilized in salt form, alkali metal (e.g. sodium and potassium) or alkanolammonium salts are preferred. Specific examples of such materials include aminotris(methylene phosphonic acid) (ATMP), 1-hydroxyethylidene diphosphonic acid (HEDP) and diethylenetriamine penta(methylene phosphonic acid (DTPMP) and their respective sodium or potassium salts. HEDP is preferred. Mixtures of any of the above described materials may also be used.
  • Transition metal ion chelating agents, when included, may be present in an amount ranging from about 0.1 to about 10%, preferably from about 0.1 to about 3% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition).
  • Fatty Acid
  • A composition of the invention may in some cases contain one or more fatty acids and/or salts thereof.
  • Suitable fatty acids in the context of this invention include aliphatic carboxylic acids of formula RCOOH, where R is a linear or branched alkyl or alkenyl chain containing from 6 to 24, more preferably 10 to 22, most preferably from 12 to 18 carbon atoms and 0 or 1 double bond. Preferred examples of such materials include saturated C12-18 fatty acids such as lauric acid, myristic acid, palmitic acid or stearic acid; and fatty acid mixtures in which 50 to 100% (by weight based on the total weight of the mixture) consists of saturated C12-18 fatty acids. Such mixtures may typically be derived from natural fats and/or optionally hydrogenated natural oils (such as coconut oil, palm kernel oil or tallow).
  • The fatty acids may be present in the form of their sodium, potassium or ammonium salts and/or in the form of soluble salts of organic bases, such as mono-, di- or triethanolamine.
  • Mixtures of any of the above described materials may also be used.
  • Fatty acids and/or their salts, when included, may be present in an amount ranging from about 0.25 to 5%, more preferably from 0.5 to 5%, most preferably from 0.75 to 4% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition).
  • For formula accounting purposes, in the formulation, fatty acids and/or their salts (as defined above) are not included in the level of surfactant or in the level of builder.
  • Soil release polymers
  • A composition of the invention will preferably include one or more soil release polymers (SRPs) which help to improve the detachment of soils from fabric by modifying the fabric surface during washing. The adsorption of a SRP over the fabric surface is promoted by an affinity between the chemical structure of the SRP and the target fibre.
  • SRPs for use in the invention may include a variety of charged (e.g. anionic) as well as non-charged monomer units and structures may be linear, branched or star-shaped. The SRP structure may also include capping groups to control molecular weight or to alter polymer properties such as surface activity. The weight average molecular weight (Mw) of the SRP may suitably range from about 1000 to about 20,000 and preferably ranges from about 1500 to about 10,000.
  • SRPs for use in the invention may suitably be selected from copolyesters of dicarboxylic acids (for example adipic acid, phthalic acid or terephthalic acid), diols (for example ethylene glycol or propylene glycol) and polydiols (for example polyethylene glycol or polypropylene glycol). The copolyester may also include monomeric units substituted with anionic groups, such as for example sulfonated isophthaloyl units. Examples of such materials include oligomeric esters produced by transesterification/oligomerization of poly(ethyleneglycol) methyl ether, dimethyl terephthalate ("DMT"), propylene glycol ("PG") and poly(ethyleneglycol) ("PEG"); partly- and fully-anionic-end-capped oligomeric esters such as oligomers from ethylene glycol ("EG"), PG, DMT and Na-3,6-dioxa-8-hydroxyoctanesulfonate; nonionic-capped block polyester oligomeric compounds such as those produced from DMT, Me-capped PEG and EG and/or PG, or a combination of DMT, EG and/or PG, Me-capped PEG and Na-dimethyl-5-sulfoisophthalate, and copolymeric blocks of ethylene terephthalate or propylene terephthalate with polyethylene oxide or polypropylene oxide terephthalate
  • Other types of SRP for use in the invention include cellulosic derivatives such as hydroxyether cellulosic polymers, C1-C4alkylcelluloses and C4 hydroxyalkyl celluloses; polymers with poly(vinyl ester) hydrophobic segments such as graft copolymers of poly(vinyl ester), for example C1-C6 vinyl esters (such as poly(vinyl acetate)) grafted onto polyalkylene oxide backbones; poly(vinyl caprolactam) and related co-polymers with monomers such as vinyl pyrrolidone and/or dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate; and polyester-polyamide polymers prepared by condensing adipic acid, caprolactam, and polyethylene glycol.
  • Preferred SRPs for use in the invention include copolyesters formed by condensation of terephthalic acid ester and diol, preferably 1,2 propanediol, and further comprising an end cap formed from repeat units of alkylene oxide capped with an alkyl group. Examples of such materials have a structure corresponding to general formula (I):
    Figure imgb0001
    in which R1 and R2 independently of one another are X-(OC2H4)n-(OC3H6)m;
    • in which X is C1-4 alkyl and preferably methyl;
    • n is a number from 12 to 120, preferably from 40 to 50;
    • m is a number from 1 to 10, preferably from 1 to 7; and
    • a is a number from 4 to 9.
  • Because they are averages, m, n and a are not necessarily whole numbers for the polymer in bulk.
  • Mixtures of any of the above described materials may also be used.
  • When included, a composition of the invention will generally comprise from 0.1 to 10%, preferably from 0.3 to 7%, more preferably from 0.5 to 5% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition) of one or more SRPs (such as, for example, the copolyesters of general formula (I) as are described above).
  • Rheology modifiers
  • A composition of the invention may comprise one or more rheology modifiers. Examples of such materials include polymeric thickeners and/or structurants such as hydrophobically modified alkali swellable emulsion (HASE) copolymers. Exemplary HASE copolymers for use in the invention include linear or crosslinked copolymers that are prepared by the addition polymerization of a monomer mixture including at least one acidic vinyl monomer, such as (meth)acrylic acid (i.e. methacrylic acid and/or acrylic acid); and at least one associative monomer. The term "associative monomer" in the context of this invention denotes a monomer having an ethylenically unsaturated section (for addition polymerization with the other monomers in the mixture) and a hydrophobic section. A preferred type of associative monomer includes a polyoxyalkylene section between the ethylenically unsaturated section and the hydrophobic section. Preferred HASE copolymers for use in the invention include linear or crosslinked copolymers that are prepared by the addition polymerization of (meth)acrylic acid with (i) at least one associative monomer selected from linear or branched C8-C40 alkyl (preferably linear C12-C22 alkyl) polyethoxylated (meth)acrylates; and (ii) at least one further monomer selected from C1-C4 alkyl (meth) acrylates, polyacidic vinyl monomers (such as maleic acid, maleic anhydride and/or salts thereof) and mixtures thereof. The polyethoxylated portion of the associative monomer (i) generally comprises about 5 to about 100, preferably about 10 to about 80, and more preferably about 15 to about 60 oxyethylene repeating units.
  • Mixtures of any of the above described materials may also be used.
  • When included, a composition of the invention will preferably comprise from 0.1 to 5% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition) of one or more polymeric thickeners such as, for example, the HASE copolymers which are described above.
  • Compositions of the invention may also have their rheology modified by use of one or more external structurants which form a structuring network within the composition. Examples of such materials include hydrogenated castor oil, microfibrous cellulose and citrus pulp fibre. The presence of an external structurant may provide shear thinning rheology and may also enable materials such as encapsulates and visual cues to be suspended stably in the liquid.
  • Enzymes
  • A composition of the invention may comprise an effective amount of one or more enzyme selected from the group comprising, pectate lyase, protease, amylase, cellulase, lipase, mannanase and mixtures thereof. The enzymes are preferably present with corresponding enzyme stabilizers.
  • Further Optional Ingredients
  • A composition of the invention may contain further optional ingredients to enhance performance and/or consumer acceptability. Examples of such ingredients include foam boosting agents, preservatives (e.g. bactericides), polyelectrolytes, anti-shrinking agents, anti-wrinkle agents, anti-oxidants, sunscreens, anti-corrosion agents, drape imparting agents, anti-static agents, ironing aids, colorants, pearlisers and/or opacifiers, and shading dye. Each of these ingredients will be present in an amount effective to accomplish its purpose. Generally, these optional ingredients are included individually at an amount of up to 5% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition).
  • Packaging and dosing
  • A composition of the invention may be packaged as unit doses in polymeric film soluble in the wash water. Alternatively, a composition of the invention may be supplied in multidose plastics packs with a top or bottom closure. A dosing measure may be supplied with the pack either as a part of the cap or as an integrated system.
  • A method of laundering fabric using a composition of the invention will usually involve diluting the dose of detergent composition to obtain a wash liquor, and washing fabrics with the wash liquor so formed. The method of laundering fabric may suitably be carried out in a top-loading or front-loading automatic washing machine, or can be carried out by hand.
  • In automatic washing machines, the dose of detergent composition is typically put into a dispenser and from there it is flushed into the machine by the water flowing into the machine, thereby forming the wash liquor. Dosages for a typical front-loading washing machine (using 10 to 15 litres of water to form the wash liquor) may range from about 10 ml to about 100 ml, preferably about 15 to 75 ml. Dosages for a typical top-loading washing machine (using from 40 to 60 litres of water to form the wash liquor) may be higher, e.g. 100 ml or more. Lower dosages of detergent (e.g. 50 ml or less) may be used for hand washing methods (using about 1 to 10 litres of water to form the wash liquor).
  • A subsequent aqueous rinse step and drying the laundry is preferred.
  • The invention will now be further described with reference to the following non-limiting Examples.
  • EXAMPLES
  • All weight percentages are by weight based on total weight of the formulation, unless otherwise specified. Examples according to the invention are indicated by a number; whereas comparative examples (not according to the invention) are indicated by a letter.
  • Viscosity measurements were made using an Anton Paar rheometer at room temperature (25 °C).
  • Liquid laundry detergent formulations were prepared having ingredients as shown in Table 1. Table 1
    Ingredient wt.% (active ingredient)
    Control Example A
    C12-15 alcohol ethoxylate (7EO) 2.04 2.04
    Triethanolamine 3.52 3.52
    C12-14 linear alkylbenzene sulfonic acid (LAS) 2.72 2.72
    Fatty acids, C12-18 0.4 0.4
    1-hydroxyethane-1,1-diphosphonic acid (HEDP) 0.7 0.7
    SLES (3EO) 2.04 2.04
    Polyester SRP 0.47 0.47
    HASE copolymer 1.05 1.05
    EPEI (Sokalan®HP20, ex BASF) - 1.00
    Water, minors q.s. to 100
  • The viscosities of the control formulation and the Example A formulation are shown in Table 1a. It can be seen how inclusion of the EPEI in Example A triggers a drop in formulation viscosity compared to the control. Table 1a
    Formulation Viscosity at 21s-1 (mPa.s)
    Control 1230
    Example A 537
  • A series of further formulations were prepared using a series of different grades of EPEI in an equivalent detergent base to that shown in Table 1. The formulations are shown in Table 2. Table 2
    Example B C D E 4 5 6 7 8
    Ingredient wt.% (active ingredient)
    C12-15 alcohol (7EO) 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04
    Triethanolamine 3.52 3.52 3.52 3.52 3.52 3.52 3.52 3.52 3.52
    LAS 2.72 2.72 2.72 2.72 2.72 2.72 2.72 2.72 2.72
    Fatty acids, C12-18 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
    HEDP 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7
    SLES (3EO) 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04
    Polyester SRP 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47
    HASE copolymer 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
    EPEI (B) 1.00 - - - - - - - -
    EPEI (C) - 1.00 - - - - - - -
    EPEI (D) - - 1.00 - - - - - -
    EPEI (E) - - - 1.00 - - - - -
    EPEI (4) - - - - 1.00 - - -
    EPEI (5) - - - - - 1.00 - - -
    EPEI (6) - - - - - - 1.00 - -
    EPEI (7) - - - - - - - 1.00 -
    EPEI (8) - - - - - - - - 1.00
    Water, minors q.s. to 100
    (B) EPEI with polyethyleneimine backbone derived from a polyethyleneimine starting material having an average molecular weight (Mw) of 800 g/mol (prior to ethoxylation), and polyoxyethylene side chains having an average of 15 ethoxy units per side chain bonded to the polyethyleneimine backbone;
    (C) EPEI with polyethyleneimine backbone derived from a polyethyleneimine starting material having an average molecular weight (Mw) of 1300 g/mol (prior to ethoxylation), and polyoxyethylene side chains having an average of 25 ethoxy units per side chain bonded to the polyethyleneimine backbone;
    (D) EPEI with polyethyleneimine backbone derived from a polyethyleneimine starting material having an average molecular weight (Mw) of 2000 g/mol (prior to ethoxylation), and polyoxyethylene side chains having an average of 15 ethoxy units per side chain bonded to the polyethyleneimine backbone;
    (E) EPEI with polyethyleneimine backbone derived from a polyethyleneimine starting material having an average molecular weight (Mw) of 2000 g/mol (prior to ethoxylation), and polyoxyethylene side chains having an average of 20 ethoxy units per side chain bonded to the polyethyleneimine backbone;
    (4) EPEI with polyethyleneimine backbone derived from a polyethyleneimine starting material having an average molecular weight (Mw) of 2000 g/mol (prior to ethoxylation), and polyoxyethylene side chains having an average of 25 ethoxy units per side chain bonded to the polyethyleneimine backbone;
    (5) EPEI with polyethyleneimine backbone derived from a polyethyleneimine starting material having an average molecular weight (Mw) of 2000 g/mol (prior to ethoxylation), and polyoxyethylene side chains having an average of 30 ethoxy units per side chain bonded to the polyethyleneimine backbone;
    (6) EPEI with polyethyleneimine backbone derived from a polyethyleneimine starting material having an average molecular weight (Mw) of 5000 g/mol (prior to ethoxylation), and polyoxyethylene side chains having an average of 20 ethoxy units per side chain bonded to the polyethyleneimine backbone;
    (7) EPEI with polyethyleneimine backbone derived from a polyethyleneimine starting material having an average molecular weight (Mw) of 5000 g/mol (prior to ethoxylation), and polyoxyethylene side chains having an average of 25 ethoxy units per side chain bonded to the polyethyleneimine backbone;
    (8) EPEI with polyethyleneimine backbone derived from a polyethyleneimine starting material having an average molecular weight (Mw) of 5000 g/mol (prior to ethoxylation), and polyoxyethylene side chains having an average of 30 ethoxy units per side chain bonded to the polyethyleneimine backbone;
  • The viscosities of the above formulations are shown in Table 2a. Table 2a
    Formulation Viscosity at 21s-1 (mPa.s)
    Example B 389
    Example C 726
    Example D 542
    Example E 746
    Example 4 851
    Example 5 933
    Example 6 802
    Example 7 939
    Example 8 977
  • It can be seen how Examples 4 to 8 (according to the invention) have a superior product viscosity compared to either Example A or Examples B to E(not according to the invention).
  • Liquid laundry detergent formulations were prepared using different grades of EPEI in a HASE thickened liquid detergent base. The formulations are shown in Table 3. Table 3
    Example F 9 10 11 12
    C12-15 alcohol (7EO) 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04
    Triethanolamine 3.52 3.52 3.52 3.52 3.52
    LAS 2.72 2.72 2.72 2.72 2.72
    Fatty acids, C12-18 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
    SLES (3EO) 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04
    HASE copolymer 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75
    EPEI (Sokalan®HP20,ex BASF) 1.45 - - - -
    EPEI (9) - 1.45 - - -
    EPEI (10) - - 1.45 - -
    EPEI (11) - - - 1.45 -
    EPEI (12) - - - - 1.45
    Water, minors q.s. to 100
    (9) EPEI with polyethyleneimine backbone derived from a polyethyleneimine starting material having an average molecular weight (Mw) of 2000 g/mol (prior to ethoxylation), and polyoxyethylene side chains having an average of 32.5 ethoxy units per side chain bonded to the polyethyleneimine backbone (prepared by standard ethoxylation process);
    (10) EPEI with polyethyleneimine backbone derived from a polyethyleneimine starting material having an average molecular weight (Mw) of 2000 g/mol (prior to ethoxylation), and polyoxyethylene side chains having an average of 32.5 ethoxy units per side chain bonded to the polyethyleneimine backbone (prepared by preferred ethoxylation process);
    (11) EPEI with polyethyleneimine backbone derived from a polyethyleneimine starting material having an average molecular weight (Mw) of 5000 g/mol (prior to ethoxylation), and polyoxyethylene side chains having an average of 30 ethoxy units per side chain bonded to the polyethyleneimine backbone (prepared by standard ethoxylation process);
    (12) EPEI with polyethyleneimine backbone derived from a polyethyleneimine starting material having an average molecular weight (Mw) of 5000 g/mol (prior to ethoxylation), and polyoxyethylene side chains having an average of 30 ethoxy units per side chain bonded to the polyethyleneimine backbone (prepared by preferred ethoxylation process);
  • The viscosities of the above formulations are shown in Table 3a. Table 3a
    Formulation Viscosity at 21s-1 (mPa.s)
    Example F 185
    Example 9 316
    Example 10 356
    Example 11 352
    Example 12 373
  • It can be seen how Examples 9 to 12 (according to the invention) have a superior product viscosity compared to Example F (not according to the invention).
  • It can also be seen how Example 10 using EPEI prepared by the preferred ethoxylation process (described above) provides particularly good results, with a viscosity performance which is superior to that of Example 9 which uses an EPEI of equivalent backbone size and degree of ethoxylation, but prepared by a standard process.
  • It can also be seen how Example 12 using EPEI prepared by the preferred ethoxylation process (described above) provides particularly good results, with a viscosity performance which is superior to that of Example 11 which uses an EPEI of equivalent backbone size and degree of ethoxylation, but prepared by a standard process.
  • Liquid laundry detergent formulations were prepared using different grades of EPEI in a salt thickened detergent base. The formulations are shown in Table 4. Table 4
    Formulation Control G 13
    Ingredient wt.% (active ingredient)
    Fluorescer 0.1 0.1 0.1
    Triethanolamine 1 1 1
    NaOH 0.34 0.34 0.34
    Citric acid 0.27 0.27 0.27
    LAS 3 3 3
    SLES (3EO) 9 9 9
    CAPB 3.15 3.15 3.15
    Polyester soil release polymer 0.5 0.5 0.5
    EPEI (Sokalan®HP20, ex BASF) - 1.55 -
    EPEI (5) - - 1.55
    NaCl 1.25 1.25 1.25
    Fragrance, preservative, water q.s. to 100
  • The viscosities of the above formulations are shown in Table 4a. Table 4a
    Formulation Viscosity at 21s-1 (mPa.s)
    Control 5325
    Example G 4866
    Example 13 5683
  • It can be seen how Example 13 (according to the invention) has a superior product viscosity compared to both the control and Example G (not according to the invention). Liquid laundry detergent formulations were prepared using different grades of EPEI in a salt thickened detergent base. The formulations are shown in Table 5. Table 5
    Example H 14 15 16 17
    Triethanolamine 1 1 1 1 1
    NaOH 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34
    LAS 3 3 3 3 3
    Citric acid 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27
    SLES (3EO) 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04
    CAPB 2 2 2 2 2
    EPEI (Sokalan®HP20, ex BASF) 1.55 - - -
    EPEI (9) - 1.55 - -
    EPEI (10) - - 1.55 - -
    EPEI (11) - - - 1.55 -
    EPEI (12) - - - - 1.55
    Water, minors q.s. to 100
  • The viscosities of the above formulations are shown in Table 5a. Table 5a
    Formulation Viscosity at 21s-1 (mPa.s)
    Example H 236
    Example 14 328
    Example 15 402
    Example 16 339
    Example 17 392
  • It can be seen how Examples 14 to 17 (according to the invention) have a superior product viscosity compared to Example H (not according to the invention).
  • It can also be seen how Example 15 using EPEI prepared by the preferred ethoxylation process (described above) provides particularly good results, with a viscosity performance which is superior to that of Example 14 which uses an EPEI of equivalent backbone size and degree of ethoxylation, but prepared by a standard process.
  • It can also be seen how Example 17 using EPEI prepared by the preferred ethoxylation process (described above) provides particularly good results, with a viscosity performance which is superior to that of Example 15 which uses an EPEI of equivalent backbone size and degree of ethoxylation, but prepared by a standard process.
  • Cleaning performance
  • Liquid laundry detergent formulations were prepared having ingredients as shown in Table 6. Table 6
    Formulation I 18
    Ingredient wt.% (active ingredient)
    MPG 4 4
    Citric acid 1 1
    Triethanolamine 8 8
    C12-15 alcohol (7EO) 7.5 7.5
    LAS 10 10
    SLES (3EO) 7.5 7.5
    Fatty acids, C12-18 3 3
    EPEI (Sokalan®HP20, ex BASF) 2.5 -
    EPEI (5) - 2.5
    Water, minors q.s. to 100
  • The cleaning performance of the above formulations was evaluated across a variety of stains on white test cloths of cotton or polyester. The stained test cloths were washed using a 30ml dosage of test formulation in the 40°C cotton cycle of an automatic washing machine with a water supply of 26°FH.
  • Following the wash, the cloths were rinsed, dried and then the colour measured by a reflectometer and expressed as the After-wash SRI, which is After-wash SRI = 100 - ΔE where ΔE is the difference in colour of the stained test cloth compared to an unstained control cloth. A higher SRI value indicates cleaner cloths.
  • Each experiment was repeated 6 times and the statistical difference calculated using a Tukey test. The results are shown in Table 6a. Table 6a
    Stain and fabric SRI for Example I SRI for Example 18 95% CL
    red pottery clay on polyester 76.0 76.2 2.9
    red pottery clay on cotton 66.5 66.1 2.7
    garden soil on cotton 79.5 80.0 2.7
    yellow pottery clay on polyester 80.9 83.4 5.4
  • It can be seen that the cleaning performance of Example 18 (according to the invention) is at least equivalent to that of Example I (not according to the invention).

Claims (9)

  1. A liquid laundry detergent composition comprising ethoxylated polyethyleneimine (EPEI) for an improved product viscosity profile without impairing cleaning performance; the detergent composition comprising:
    a) from 6 to 50% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition) of one or more detersive surfactants selected from non-soap anionic surfactants, nonionic surfactants and mixtures thereof, and
    b) from 0.5 to 10% of an ethoxylated polyethyleneimine (EPEI) having a polyethyleneimine backbone made up of repeating -[(CH2CH2)N]-
    subunits; and one or more polyoxyethylene side chains which are bonded to internal and/or terminal nitrogen atoms in the polyethyleneimine backbone; in which the polyethyleneimine backbone is derived from a polyethyleneimine starting material which is ethoxylated to produce EPEI; in which the polyethyleneimine starting material has an average molecular weight (Mw) ranging from 1800 to 5000 g/mol (prior to ethoxylation), and the polyoxyethylene side chains have an average of from 25 to 40 ethoxy units per side chain bonded to the polyethyleneimine backbone.
  2. A composition according to claim 1, in which the polyethyleneimine starting material has an average molecular weight (Mw) ranging from 1800 to 2200 g/mol and preferably from 1900 to 2100 g/mol (prior to ethoxylation).
  3. A composition according to claim 1 or claim 2, in which the polyoxyethylene side chains have an average of from 25 to 35 ethoxy units per side chain bonded to the polyethyleneimine backbone.
  4. A composition according to claim 1, in which the EPEI (b) corresponds to the following general formula (I):

            [E2N-CH2CH2]w[N(E)CH2CH2]x[N(B)CH2CH2]y-NE2     (I)

    which E represents a polyoxyethylene side chain corresponding to the formula R-(EO)n- in which (EO)n represents an ethylene oxide block; n is a number from 25 to 40, and R is hydrogen; B represents a continuation of the chain structure by branching; w,x and y are each independently from 1 to 100 and (w + x + y) ranges from 40 to 120.
  5. A composition according to claim 4, in which (w + x + y) ranges from 40 to 60.
  6. A composition according to any one of claims 1 to 5, in which the level of EPEI (b) ranges from 0.7 to 7.5% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition).
  7. A composition according to any preceding claim, in which the total level of non-soap anionic surfactants ranges from 5 to 30% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition); and the total level of nonionic surfactant ranges from 0 to 25% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition).
  8. A composition according to any preceding claim, further comprising from 0.1 to 5% (by weight based on the total weight of the composition) of one or more soil release polymers (SRPs) selected from copolyesters of dicarboxylic acids, diols and polydiols.
  9. A method of laundering fabric using a composition according to any one of claims 1 to 8, the method comprising diluting a dose of the composition to obtain a wash liquor and washing fabrics with the wash liquor so formed.
EP19748851.3A 2018-08-10 2019-08-08 Detergent Active EP3833730B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP18188543 2018-08-10
PCT/EP2019/071369 WO2020030760A1 (en) 2018-08-10 2019-08-08 Detergent

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3833730A1 EP3833730A1 (en) 2021-06-16
EP3833730B1 true EP3833730B1 (en) 2022-02-16

Family

ID=63209313

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19748851.3A Active EP3833730B1 (en) 2018-08-10 2019-08-08 Detergent

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3833730B1 (en)
CN (1) CN112567011B (en)
BR (1) BR112021001856A2 (en)
ES (1) ES2910348T3 (en)
WO (1) WO2020030760A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA202100792B (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2022122425A1 (en) 2020-12-07 2022-06-16 Unilever Ip Holdings B.V. Composition
CN113773917A (en) * 2021-08-26 2021-12-10 广东湛丰精细化工有限公司 Refining degreaser based on modified nano argil and preparation method thereof
WO2023198434A1 (en) * 2022-04-14 2023-10-19 Basf Se Compositions, their manufacture and use
EP4321604A1 (en) 2022-08-08 2024-02-14 The Procter & Gamble Company A fabric and home care composition comprising surfactant and a polyester

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2017174251A1 (en) 2016-04-08 2017-10-12 Unilever Plc Laundry detergent composition
WO2017174252A1 (en) 2016-04-08 2017-10-12 Unilever Plc Laundry detergent composition
WO2019238350A1 (en) 2018-06-14 2019-12-19 Unilever Plc Detergent

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0112593B1 (en) * 1982-12-23 1989-07-19 THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY Detergent compositions containing ethoxylated amines having clay soil removal/anti-redeposition properties
US4597898A (en) * 1982-12-23 1986-07-01 The Proctor & Gamble Company Detergent compositions containing ethoxylated amines having clay soil removal/anti-redeposition properties
PE6995A1 (en) * 1994-05-25 1995-03-20 Procter & Gamble COMPOSITION INCLUDING A PROPOXYLATED POLYKYLENE OAMINE POLYKYLENE OAMINE POLYMER AS DIRT SEPARATION AGENT
AR019192A1 (en) * 1998-06-30 2001-12-26 Procter & Gamble COMPOSITION FOR THE SUPPLY OF FRAGRANCE, DETERGENT COMPOSITION FOR WASHING OF CLOTHES THAT UNDERSTANDS IT AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING A FRAGRANCER TO A FABRIC WITH THE SAME.
MX292760B (en) * 2005-04-15 2011-11-28 Procter & Gamble Liquid laundry detergent compositions with modified polyethyleneimine polymers and lipase enzyme.
WO2009153184A1 (en) * 2008-06-16 2009-12-23 Unilever Plc Improvements relating to fabric cleaning
GB0810881D0 (en) * 2008-06-16 2008-07-23 Unilever Plc Improvements relating to fabric cleaning
ES2600159T3 (en) * 2012-11-29 2017-02-07 Unilever N.V. Thickened aqueous detergent liquids
US9617502B2 (en) * 2014-09-15 2017-04-11 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent compositions containing salts of polyetheramines and polymeric acid
JP6623234B2 (en) * 2015-05-22 2019-12-18 ザ プロクター アンド ギャンブル カンパニーThe Procter & Gamble Company Detergent composition containing surfactant and ethoxylated glycerin
EP3170882A1 (en) * 2015-11-19 2017-05-24 The Procter and Gamble Company Liquid laundry detergent composition comprising a polymer system

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2017174251A1 (en) 2016-04-08 2017-10-12 Unilever Plc Laundry detergent composition
WO2017174252A1 (en) 2016-04-08 2017-10-12 Unilever Plc Laundry detergent composition
WO2019238350A1 (en) 2018-06-14 2019-12-19 Unilever Plc Detergent

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ZA202100792B (en) 2022-08-31
CN112567011B (en) 2022-04-15
ES2910348T3 (en) 2022-05-12
WO2020030760A1 (en) 2020-02-13
EP3833730A1 (en) 2021-06-16
BR112021001856A2 (en) 2021-05-04
CN112567011A (en) 2021-03-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3833730B1 (en) Detergent
EP4157978B1 (en) A liquid laundry composition
US11739286B2 (en) Soil release polymers and laundry detergent compositions containing them
EP4133042B1 (en) Laundry detergent composition
CN112236508B (en) Detergent composition
EP3921401A1 (en) Improvements relating to fabric cleaning
EP3861092B1 (en) Detergent compositions
EP3947616B1 (en) Detergent compositions
EP3650525A1 (en) Detergent compositions
EP3650526A1 (en) Detergent compositions
BR112020009590B1 (en) POLYMER PROVIDING DIRT RELEASE PROPERTIES, LAUNDRY DETERGENT COMPOSITION AND FABRIC WASHING METHOD
WO2023031328A1 (en) Bleach catalysts, bleach systems and cleaning compositions

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20210115

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RAP3 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: UNILEVER IP HOLDINGS B.V.

Owner name: UNILEVER GLOBAL IP LIMITED

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20210930

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602019011721

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1468884

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20220315

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2910348

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20220512

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 602019011721

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: UNILEVER GLOBAL IP LIMITED, WIRRAL, GB

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: UNILEVER IP HOLDINGS B.V., ROTTERDAM, NL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20220216

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1468884

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20220216

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220616

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220516

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220516

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220517

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220617

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 602019011721

Country of ref document: DE

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: HENKEL AG & CO. KGAA

Effective date: 20221115

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220808

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220831

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220831

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230428

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220808

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20230804

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230822

Year of fee payment: 5

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230828

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230821

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20230821

Year of fee payment: 5

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20231027

Year of fee payment: 5