EP3535739A1 - Securing device for monitoring the position of a wing - Google Patents
Securing device for monitoring the position of a wingInfo
- Publication number
- EP3535739A1 EP3535739A1 EP17798229.5A EP17798229A EP3535739A1 EP 3535739 A1 EP3535739 A1 EP 3535739A1 EP 17798229 A EP17798229 A EP 17798229A EP 3535739 A1 EP3535739 A1 EP 3535739A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- wing
- state
- signal
- securing device
- fitting
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 title description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 claims description 43
- 230000001788 irregular Effects 0.000 claims description 32
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 235000014676 Phragmites communis Nutrition 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 11
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 9
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000009849 deactivation Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000009420 retrofitting Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007123 defense Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006735 deficit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001771 impaired effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008054 signal transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 125000006850 spacer group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
- G08B13/02—Mechanical actuation
- G08B13/08—Mechanical actuation by opening, e.g. of door, of window, of drawer, of shutter, of curtain, of blind
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B29/00—Checking or monitoring of signalling or alarm systems; Prevention or correction of operating errors, e.g. preventing unauthorised operation
- G08B29/18—Prevention or correction of operating errors
- G08B29/185—Signal analysis techniques for reducing or preventing false alarms or for enhancing the reliability of the system
- G08B29/188—Data fusion; cooperative systems, e.g. voting among different detectors
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B25/00—Alarm systems in which the location of the alarm condition is signalled to a central station, e.g. fire or police telegraphic systems
- G08B25/008—Alarm setting and unsetting, i.e. arming or disarming of the security system
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a safety device for securing the sash of a window, a door or the like against improper opening.
- an alarm device may be provided.
- an alarm may comprise an optical and / or audible signal emitted in the event of an alarm at or near the point of unauthorized opening, in order to have a deterrent effect and to alert people to the unauthorized opening.
- an alarm may additionally or alternatively also include the transmission of an alarm signal to a remote entity, eg: to the police and / or a security service.
- suitable defense measures are initiated in response to the alarm, preferably automatically.
- a safety device for securing the sash is therefore advantageously designed to detect a respective state of the sash, wherein a closed state of the sash is to be distinguished from an open state of the sash.
- the closed state and the open state are not necessarily fixed to concrete positions of the wing. Rather, it can become the wings are in various positions in the closed state and in various other positions in the open state.
- the closed state preferably comprises such positions of the wing in which penetration through the respective window or the respective door is not possible, and the open state includes those positions of the wing in which penetration is possible.
- the closed state may include the fully closed position as well as all tilt open positions of the wing, provided that the latter does not allow easy entry through the respective window or door.
- the open state can then include all others, ie in particular all rotationally open positions.
- the tilted open positions can also be assigned to the open state.
- the closed state may in particular comprise only the fully closed position of the wing. If it can be detected by means of the securing device whether the wing is in the open state or in the closed state, an opening can be recognized by the fact that the open state is detected after the closed state of the wing was previously detected.
- the safety device can be designed to output a respective state signal in dependence on the detected respective state of the wing.
- a respective state signal may also depend on a detected respective state of the wing insofar as it depends on a respective change of the state, for example by taking into account one or more previously detected respective states in addition to the respectively last detected respective state of the wing.
- the respective status signal can in particular be output to an alarm device, which then, for example, as described above, depending on the reception genem condition signal can trigger an alarm.
- an alarm device is provided separately from the security device.
- the alarm device may be provided at a central location within a building, especially when the alarm device is a central unit of an alarm system.
- the alarm device is an alarm siren, a location from which the alarm is widely audible may be advantageous.
- the alarm device is integrally formed with the securing device.
- an alarm should also be triggered.
- the wing can then be opened in an inadmissible manner without this being detected by the security device or receiving a corresponding status signal from the alarm device.
- the reliability of the safety of the sash in such a system is therefore also dependent on the attention of the respective user.
- the fact that the user also has to consider when opening and closing the wing, whether the backup device and / or the alarm device is activated, and they may need to enable or disable, comfort is also impaired.
- the securing device is in particular designed to detect, in addition to the respective state of the wing, also a respective position of a fitting arrangement of the wing, which is adjustable between an unlocking position and one or more locking positions, wherein the wing is completely apparent, in particular rotatable, if the Unlocked position of the fitting assembly is present, and wherein the wing only limited apparent, for example, tiltable open, or is locked against opening when one of the locking positions of the fitting assembly is present.
- the securing device can not only distinguish the state of the wing between the open state and the closed state, but in particular simultaneously, but at least in a timely manner, detect what position the Fitting arrangement of the wing occupies.
- the respective position of the fitting arrangement can then be used in particular as a criterion for whether a detected opening of the wing has occurred in a permissible or impermissible manner. For if the fitting arrangement is currently in any of its locking positions in which the wing can not actually be fully opened, but opening of the wing is detected by means of a transition from the closed state to the open state, this can be taken as a clear indication be that the opening is inadmissible, in particular bypassing locking means such as the fitting arrangement occurred. Conversely, an impermissible opening of the wing can be excluded by detecting the unlocking of the fitting assembly, since the wing is already fully apparent in the presence of unlocking anyway.
- the securing device is further adapted to output the respective status signal not only in dependence on the detected respective state of the wing, but in additional dependence on the respective position of the fitting arrangement.
- the respective state signal is preferably dependent on the last detected state of the wing and the respectively last detected position of the fitting arrangement. In this case, depending on the respective state of the wing and / or on the respective position of the fitting arrangement, it may depend in particular on whether a respective status signal is output at all and / or what content the respective status signal has.
- the additional detection of the position of the fitting arrangement and its consideration in the output state signal can in particular be an activation or deactivation of the safety device or an alarm device, which receives the status signal and if necessary respond to it, make unnecessary. Because it no longer needs to be set manually by activating or deactivating when an opening of the sash leads to an alarm and when not. Instead, by deactivating the fitting arrangement into the unlocking position, the securing device or the alarm device can be deactivated as it were. Conversely, the securing device or the alarm device is automatically activated by offsetting the fitting arrangement in one of the locking positions. A real activation or deactivation need not be done at all. Because it may be sufficient to be able to distinguish a permissible from an impermissible opening of the wing based on the respective state signal.
- the comfort in the operation of a secured with a security device invention wing of a window, a door or the like is improved because when opening and closing of the wing only in the usual way, the fitting assembly must be operated, but not additionally the activation or deactivation of the security device or the alarm device must be considered. Therefore, such activation or deactivation can not be forgotten, so that false alarms can be avoided and the security device or the alarm device can basically remain active throughout. In this way, the safety device contributes to an improved reliability of the safety of the wing.
- the security device can in particular be designed to cooperate with known alarm devices or entire alarm systems, in particular, at least in the transmission direction, to be in communication connection, so that respective state signals can be transmitted from the security device.
- the signal transmission takes place by radio.
- the security device can also be regarded as a sensor within a larger alarm system, which may include a plurality of further sensors for detecting respective other, in particular safety-relevant, parameters.
- One or more common protocols can be supported for the communication connection in order to be flexibly compatible with different systems.
- the respective status signal can basically be output continuously by the security device. However, it may also be sufficient if the safety device outputs respective state signals discontinuously in time.
- the status signal can be output at regular time intervals or according to a predetermined or predefinable time pattern.
- a respective status signal may be a raw signal insofar as it is simply the information about the detected respective state of the wing and the detected respective position of the Be - impact arrangement comprises.
- the safety device itself no evaluation must be made to determine which state of the wing or which position occupies the fitting arrangement or whether the respective state or the respective position or a change of state or position gives rise to the triggering of an alarm.
- the evaluation can be done downstream, such as in an alarm device, which the receives respective status signals from the security device and independently determines on the basis of the state signals, whether an alarm or other reaction is triggered or not.
- an embodiment may be preferred in which the securing device is designed to output the respective status signal continuously or repeatedly, in particular regularly.
- an evaluation of the condition of the wing and the position of the fitting arrangement takes place completely or at least partially already in the securing device.
- the securing device independently determines whether the detected respective state of the wing and the detected respective position of the fitting arrangement indicate the presence of an irregular state, to which then in particular would respond by means of an alarm.
- the security device may be configured to emit a particular signal in the case of a condition judged to be irregular, and otherwise to send out no or other specific signal. From a downstream device, which receives the respective state signals, the respective state signal need not be further evaluated, but it is sufficient if it is reacted to the respective state signal in a suitable manner.
- the security device is designed to output the respective state signal only when the open state of the wing is present. If the condition of the wing is not detected continuously, the most recently detected condition of the wing is decisive. In such an embodiment, therefore, no status signal is output in the closed state of the wing. This can be dispensable, as an inadmissible opening of the wing can not have taken place anyway, as long as the wing is in the closed state.
- the securing device is designed to output the respective status signal only if one of the locking positions of the fitting arrangement is present. In this embodiment, therefore, no status signal is output when the fitting assembly is in the unlocked position.
- the securing device is designed to output the respective status signal only when the open state of the wing is present and also if one of the locking positions of the fitting arrangement is present. Because if the fitting arrangement is in a locked position, the wing should not actually be allowed to open. Therefore, if in a locking position of the fitting arrangement the open state of the wing is detected, this is an indication that an inadmissible opening of the wing has occurred.
- the respective state signal is output only in this case, the state signal corresponds to an alarm signal, which then need not be further evaluated. Because that the state signal is sent out at all, then is sufficient as an indication already to determine that the wing was opened in an inadmissible manner, and if necessary to respond with an alarm.
- the absence of a signal can be interpreted as an indication that an irregular state, in particular an impermissible opening of the wing, is present, whereas the mere presence of a signal can then be regarded as a sign of a regular state ,
- Such an embodiment may be advantageous insofar as a failure of the security device, eg in case of damage, is emptied Batteries or a power interruption, then does not appear as a regular state, but can be recognized as an irregular state.
- an embodiment may be advantageous in which the securing device is designed to output the respective status signal only when the closed state of the wing is present and / or the unlocking position of the fitting arrangement is present.
- the securing device is designed to output the respective status signal only when the closed state of the wing is present and / or the unlocking position of the fitting arrangement is present.
- the security device is designed to output the respective state signal in response to a received interrogation signal.
- the respective status signal is output only when the security device has previously received an interrogation signal.
- a transmission of a respective status signal triggered by a query can also be supplementary to a regular transmission of respective status signals and / or automatic transmission of respective status signals, for example, if respective status signals are otherwise emitted when a change in the state of the wing and / or the position the fitting arrangement was detected.
- Such an external requesting of a status signal may be particularly useful in embodiments in which a respective status signal is otherwise transmitted only when an irregular state has been detected, ie when in particular the open state of the wing and at the same time one of the locking positions of the fitting arrangement. In such an embodiment, the absence of the status signal can therefore be regarded as a sign that everything is in order.
- a failure of the security device could then lead to an irregular state being incorrectly not recognized as such, since the respective state signal is missing, although it would have to be sent out. Therefore, it may be useful if an external device, such as an alarm device, occasionally or regularly, requests a respective status signal to check the operability of the security device. If the status signal remains in spite of the query, a failure of the security device can be detected.
- an external device such as an alarm device
- the securing device itself need not be configured to evaluate whether a regular or an irregular state exists based on the detected state of the wing and the detected position of the fitting assembly. Rather, in these embodiments it may be sufficient if the output respective state signal contains both information in such a way that a device receiving the respective state signal can carry out the evaluation.
- Such security devices need in this respect have no logic or logic that only decides whether ever a respective status signal is sent out. However, an evaluation can also be made entirely or partially by the security device itself.
- a status signal output by the security device to be a regular signal or a regular signal Irregular signal, in particular only either a regular signal or an irregular signal, may be, wherein preferably exactly one regular signal and exactly one irregular signal are provided. If this is the case, in other words, the security device can only ever output two different signals. Which of these two signals is output as the respective state signal, then still depends both on the (last) detected state of the wing and the (last respectively) detected position of the fitting arrangement. However, it may be that it is not possible to unambiguously deduce from the output signal which state of the blade exists and which position of the fitting arrangement is present.
- the regular signal or the irregular signal is emitted accordingly. It is signaled by the regular signal that everything is OK, without it should be apparent, in which position the fitting arrangement is or whether the wing is open or closed.
- the irregular signal indicates that an irregular state is present, in particular that the wing has been opened inadmissibly, again without it having to be apparent in which position the fitting arrangement is or whether the wing is open or closed.
- the irregular signal may be interpreted as an alarm signal in response to which, for example, an alarm may trigger an alarm.
- more than one regular signal and / or more than one irregular signal are provided, of which the safety device emits one each as a respective status signal.
- the safety device emits one each as a respective status signal.
- the securing device is designed to output a regular signal, in particular only when the closed state of the wing is present and / or the unlocking position of the fitting arrangement is present.
- a regular signal it is not absolutely necessary for both conditions to be met, since one of the conditions can already be used to rule out unauthorized opening of the sash. In principle, however, it may be provided that one or more additional conditions must be fulfilled for the output of a regular signal.
- the securing device can advantageously be designed to then output an irregular signal, in particular only when the open state of the blade is present and one of the locking positions of the fitting arrangement is present.
- an irregular signal in particular only when the open state of the blade is present and one of the locking positions of the fitting arrangement is present.
- the securing device is designed according to a further embodiment, for detecting the position of the fitting arrangement to detect a position of a transmission, a drive rod or arranged thereon element of the fitting assembly.
- the securing device may comprise a sensor or be designed as a sensor which is provided on the transmission, which is typically effective between a handle and a drive rod of the fitting assembly to divert actuations of the handle to displace the drive rod and thus, in particular, dislocate lock pins provided on the drive rod.
- the detection of the position of the fitting arrangement can also take place directly on the drive rod or an element connected to it for common movement, such as the mentioned locking pin.
- the locking pin does not necessarily have to be a pin, which also interacts concretely for locking the blade with a closing part. Rather, the pin can also be borrowed borrowed in the manner of such a locking pin.
- the securing device comprises at least one or more distance-dependent switching devices, in particular for the unlocking position and for each of the locking positions of the fitting arrangement depending on a distance-dependent switching device, in particular in the manner of a reed contact to detect the respective position of the fitting assembly.
- the movement of respective elements of the fitting arrangement is typically narrow and only one-dimensional, ie only along a path (back and forth) possible. Therefore, can be suitable for detecting the respective position of the fitting arrangement distance-dependent switching devices, which are arranged in particular along said movement path of a respective element, with which they cooperate.
- a distance-dependent switching device is preferably arranged such that the respective element interacting with it moves relative to the switching device when the position of the fitting arrangement to be detected changes.
- the distance to the switching device and consequently its switching state can change, so that the change in position can be recognized by it.
- a distance-dependent switching devices are particularly suitable reed contacts, since they can be reliable, cheap, compact and robust. Instead of such magnetic switching devices but switching devices may be provided, the distance dependence is based on a mechanical, electrical or other interaction.
- the distance-dependent switching device can occupy exactly two switching states, which can be referred to as closed or switched or open or unswitched. Therefore, a single distance-dependent device can each be limited to detecting whether or not a specific position of the fitting arrangement is present (within the scope of the accuracy or range of the respective switching device). Depending on how exactly the respective position of the fitting arrangement is to be detected, in particular how many different positions of the fitting arrangement can be distinguished, a corresponding number of distance-dependent switching devices can be provided.
- Distance-dependent switching devices can advantageously not only be used to detect the respective position of the fitting arrangement, but also the respective state of the wing.
- at least one respective distance-dependent switching device is used to detect both the respective position of the fitting arrangement and the respective state of the wing or in any case contribute to each. This may be possible in particular by suitable arrangement of the respective switching device.
- the respective state signal in particular exclusively, depends on the respective switching states of the distance-dependent switching devices and / or on a change in the respective switching states of the distance-dependent switching devices.
- the security device can have a comparatively low complexity.
- each change in the state of the wing or the position of the fitting arrangement leads to a change in the switching state of at least one distance-dependent switching device, so that it can be provided that only when a change in a switching state, an evaluation and / or a respective state signal is emitted.
- the securing device comprises a frame part for frame-side arrangement, in particular in the fold of the respective window or door, wherein the frame part has the at least one distance-dependent switching device and is adapted to a arranged on a drive rod of the fitting arrangement element, in - A special locking pin, cooperate to detect the respective position of the fitting assembly.
- the element arranged on the drive rod is an element which is not specifically provided for the safety device but, like a lock pin, would otherwise be provided, it may be necessary to use the element for interaction with the device distance-dependent switching device in a suitable manner modify.
- the element can be provided with a permanent magnet, which can interact with a switching device designed as a reed contact.
- the securing device comprises a, in particular permanently magnetic, wing part, which is designed to be arranged on the drive rod of the fitting arrangement or on an element arranged thereon, in particular a locking pin, in order to engage with the at least one distance-dependent one Switching device cooperate to detect the respective position of the fitting assembly.
- the securing device can be designed such that it can be easily retrofitted to conventional windows or doors.
- the frame part has a plurality, in particular at least three, distance-dependent switching devices whose arrangement respective positions of the element arranged on the drive rod, in particular of the locking pin corresponds, so that at least in the closed state of the wing depending on the respective position of the fitting arrangement, a respective other of the distance-dependent switching devices is switched and the others are not switched, or vice versa, and preferably also in the open state of the wing regardless of the respective position of the fitting arrangement no or all distance-dependent switching devices are connected.
- the securing device is designed as a frame side to be arranged closing part, in which a locking pin of the fitting arrangement engages such that the wing is thereby locked against complete opening, if one of the locking positions of the fitting assembly is present.
- the safety device then has a double function. It not only serves to detect the respective state of the wing and the respective position of the fitting arrangement and the transmission of a corresponding respective state signal, but also contributes to the locking of the wing to the respective frame. In this respect, it can be provided instead of a conventional closing part. Then, no additional locking pin or other additional element for the interaction with the distance-dependent switching devices needs to be provided on the drive rod.
- a locking pin which is provided anyway for engagement in a closing part for locking the wing, which possibly only has to be provided with a permanent magnet, can cooperate with the securing device on the one hand as with an ordinary closing part and on the other hand with the switching devices of the securing device for the Detecting the respective position of the fitting arrangement together act.
- the fitting arrangement according to the invention for a window, a door or the like comprises a securing device as described above, which is designed in particular according to one of the embodiments described above.
- the advantages of such a fitting arrangement correspond to each because at least substantially those of the respective security device and also include that retrofitting an ordinary fitting assembly is not required in each case and that the securing device can be particularly well matched to the rest of the fitting assembly.
- a fitting arrangement which is adjustable between an unlocked position and one or more locking positions, wherein the wing completely apparent, in particular rotatable, is when the unlocked position of Fitting arrangement is present, and wherein the wing only partially limited, especially tiltable open, or is locked against opening when one of the locking positions of the fitting assembly is present.
- the method comprises that a respective state of the wing, which may be in a closed state or in an open state, and a respective position of the fitting arrangement are detected and that depending on both the detected respective state of the wing and the detected respective position of the fitting arrangement, a respective state signal, in particular to an alarm device, is output.
- Fig. 1 shows an embodiment of a securing device according to the invention in a plan view and a side view.
- Fig. 2 shows the same embodiment arranged in the fold of a window frame.
- 3 to 6 show the same embodiment together with a detail of a respective fitting arrangement, which has a pin cooperating with distance-dependent switching devices of the securing device, in different positions of the fitting arrangement.
- a securing device according to the invention 1 1 in a view from the side (in Fig. 1 above) and a view from above (in Fig. 1 below) is shown.
- the securing device 1 1 has a flat elongated shape, which makes it possible to arrange the securing device 1 1 in the fold between a window frame 13 of a window or a door and the wing of the window or the door.
- the attachment of the securing device 1 1 can be effected in particular by screwing the securing device 1 1 on the frame 13, which is shown by way of example in Fig. 2, in which the frame 13 in cross section and the embodiment shown in Fig. 1 of the securing device. 1 1 from the front (which corresponds in Fig. 1 a viewing direction from left to right) is shown.
- the securing device 1 1 For screwing, the securing device 1 1 four holes 15, which are provided in a central portion 17 of the securing device 1 1, but in principle may be provided in other numbers at other respective locations.
- a provided at one end of the longitudinal extension of the securing device 1 1 sensor portion 19 is compared to the middle portion 17, in particular with respect to the rest of the securing device 1 1 thinner, ie formed with a lesser height.
- this sensor section 19 are a total of three distance-dependent switching devices 21 in the form of a respective reed Contacts are arranged, which are not visible from the outside (see Figures 3 to 6, in which the reed contacts are still shown, as if the housing of the securing device 1 1 would be transparent).
- the distance-dependent switching devices 21 are connected to an electronics, which is arranged in the interior of the securing device 1 1, in particular in the central portion 17.
- the electronics are designed to transmit respective status signals by radio depending on the respective switching states of the switching devices 21 or of changes in these switching states.
- the safety device 1 1 may be designed in particular according to ISO / IEC 14543-3-10, so that the emission of respective state signals can basically be done battery-free.
- the securing device has a battery compartment 23 for receiving batteries as a voltage source for the safety device 11 at the end of its longitudinal extension opposite the sensor section 19.
- the securing device 1 1 is formed so thin that it (as shown in Fig. 2) in the fold between the frame 13 and an associated wing (not shown) can be attached to the frame 13.
- the securing device 1 1 shown in FIG. 1 is a frame part.
- the arrangement shown in Fig. 2 is purely exemplary. In principle, the securing device 1 1 can be arranged on different frame 13 with different cross sections, which may provide spacers between individual holes 15 and the frame if necessary, if the frame 13 does not provide a sufficiently wide area for the arrangement of the securing device 1 1.
- the securing device 11 is preferably arranged on the respective frame 13 in such a way that the securing device 11 and one on the respective one Wing provided fitting assembly 25, in particular an espagnolette, each other with the wing closed straight, so in particular are arranged parallel to each other substantially adjacent to each other.
- the distance between the securing device 11 and the fitting arrangement 25 is then preferably such that a permanent magnet 27 provided on the fitting arrangement 25, that is to say on the wing, can interact with the distance-dependent switching devices 21.
- the permanent magnet 27 represents a wing part of the securing device 11. This interaction is illustrated with reference to FIGS. 3 to 6, in each of which the securing device 11 and a part of a fitting arrangement 25 are shown.
- FIGs. 3 and 5 differ from Figs. 4 and 6 with respect to a respective offset between the securing device 1 1 and the fitting assembly 25 transversely to the respective longitudinal extent, which in the figures a different distance between the securing device 1 1 and Be - impact assembly 25 corresponds.
- the figures are to be understood such that in Figs. 3 and 5, the securing device 1 1 and the fitting assembly 25 are at least substantially flush or congruent to each other, so there is no offset transverse to the respective longitudinal extent.
- FIGS. 4 and 6 show such an offset, which can occur, in particular, when the wing is not completely flush with the frame 13. directed, that is not completely closed.
- the offset is not necessarily parallel (as shown), but the securing device 1 1 and the fitting assembly 25 may also be angled offset to each other in particular at a rotational opening of the wing.
- the closed state of the wing at least in the embodiment shown, only the state in which the wing is at least substantially completely closed, as in FIGS. 3 and 5, is considered.
- FIGS. 3 to 6 differ with regard to the respective position of a pin 29, which is similar to an ordinary locking pin, and which has the permanent magnet 27.
- the pin 29 may for this purpose in principle at least partially, in particular in a head region, also be formed even permanent magnetic.
- the pin 29 is at a
- Driving rod 31 of the fitting assembly 25 attached so that it moves along movements of the drive rod 31.
- the drive rod 31 is largely covered by a faceplate 33 of the fitting assembly 25, which has a slot 35 through which the pin 29 extends so that the pin 29 can move in the longitudinal direction in the slot 35 when the fitting assembly is adjusted.
- the fitting arrangement 25 shown has three defined positions, each of which corresponds to a position of the pin 29 in the slot 35.
- the fitting assembly 25 assumes a rotational opening position which is an unlocking position in that the sash is fully rotatable when the fitting assembly 25 is in the rotational opening position.
- the pin 29 is located within the slot 35 in the middle position shown in Figs. 3 and 4.
- the fitting arrangement 25 assumes a closed position, which is a locking position of the fitting arrangement 25, since the wing is in this position of the fitting arrangement 25 in itself is usually blocked by the fitting assembly 25 against opening.
- the pin 29 is located within the slot 35 in the right position shown in Figs. 5 and 6.
- the pin 29 is located within the slot 35 on the left.
- This position of the fitting arrangement 25 is a tilting opening position in which the wing can be tilted to a limited extent to a defined gap. However, since in this position, a full opening of the wing is prevented, this position is defined as a further locking position of the fitting assembly 25. In principle, however, the tilt opening position could also be considered as an unlocking position.
- Figs. 3 to 6 respectively below the three distance-dependent switching devices 21 of the securing device 1 1, the respective switching state of the individual switching devices 21 indicated by a respective symbol, wherein a cross (x) the open switching state and a circle (o) the closed Switching state of the respective switching device 21 represents.
- a respective other distance-dependent switching device 21 is closed. Because depending on the position of the fitting assembly 25, the permanent magnet 27 is located on the pin 29 in the vicinity of a respective other switching device 21st (In intermediate positions of the fitting arrangement 25, two switching devices 21 can also be closed in each case if their ranges overlap, or none if the ranges are disjoint.) In this way, the safety device 1 1 can detect the switching states of the distance-dependent switching devices 21 Which of the positions of the fitting assembly 25 is present.
- the open state can be distinguished if necessary, characterized in that in the open state all Wegvorrich- tions 21 longer than a certain minimum duration are open because the intermediate positions of the fitting assembly 25 in
- the fuse device 1 1 the detected switching states of the respective distance-dependent switching devices 21 at least substantially unchanged, so for example only combined with each other and / or in any Encoded way, output as a respective state signal.
- Such a status signal can then be received by an external device, for example an alarm device, and evaluated for the presence of a regular or an irregular state. However, such an evaluation can also be made in the security device 1 1 itself.
- the safety device 1 1 can then output a regular signal or an irregular signal as the respective state signal, by means of which it can be detected in each case without further evaluation whether a regular or an irregular state is present.
- FIG. 4 A regular state is shown in particular in FIG. 4.
- the fitting assembly 25 is in the unlocked position and the wing in the open state. This is permissible because the wing is released in the unlocked position of the fitting assembly 25 for full opening.
- FIG. 6 shows an example of an irregular state. Because it is the open state of the wing, although the fitting assembly 25 assumes a locked state in which the wing should not be open. This can be interpreted as an indication of an inadmissible opening, eg prying open the sash.
- a detected open state may be considered irregular, namely, when the securing device is mounted on the side of the tilting axis on the frame 13, where the wing should not move away from the frame 13 when tilting.
- the switching states in the state shown in FIG. 4 are not different from those in the state shown in FIG. 6.
- a change in the switching states from the switching states of the switching devices 21 shown in FIG. 5 to the switching states shown in FIG. 6 represents a transition which is inadmissible, since in the latching position of the fitting arrangement 25 assumed in FIG should be locked in the open position of the wing shown in FIG. 6.
- a security device 11 according to the invention can be easily arranged both on existing windows, doors or the like and also be integrated into existing alarm systems. and allows reliable detection of respective regular or irregular conditions. Compared to a sensor that detects only the respective position of the fitting assembly 25, the safety device 1 1 also has the advantage of improved comfort, since automatically based on the additional detection of the respective state of the wing between an allowable opening and an inadmissible opening of the wing can be distinguished.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Burglar Alarm Systems (AREA)
- Power-Operated Mechanisms For Wings (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PL17798229.5T PL3535739T5 (en) | 2016-12-06 | 2017-11-16 | Security device for monitoring the position of a wing |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102016123574.1A DE102016123574A1 (en) | 2016-12-06 | 2016-12-06 | safety device |
PCT/EP2017/079476 WO2018104024A1 (en) | 2016-12-06 | 2017-11-16 | Securing device for monitoring the position of a wing |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3535739A1 true EP3535739A1 (en) | 2019-09-11 |
EP3535739B1 EP3535739B1 (en) | 2020-10-28 |
EP3535739B2 EP3535739B2 (en) | 2023-07-05 |
Family
ID=60331630
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP17798229.5A Active EP3535739B2 (en) | 2016-12-06 | 2017-11-16 | Security device for monitoring the position of a wing |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP3535739B2 (en) |
DE (1) | DE102016123574A1 (en) |
PL (1) | PL3535739T5 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2018104024A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR3116672B1 (en) | 2020-11-25 | 2022-11-25 | Somfy Activites Sa | Method of energy management, for a position detector of a mobile door frame fitting part |
Family Cites Families (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB9025907D0 (en) | 1990-11-28 | 1991-01-09 | Higgins Andrew | Alarm arrangements |
DE19518527A1 (en) | 1995-05-19 | 1996-11-21 | Winkhaus Fa August | Monitorable locking arrangement for a window or a door or the like |
DE19815768C2 (en) * | 1998-04-08 | 2000-11-30 | Richard Ross | Tilt window lock of an object security system |
DE10017182C2 (en) | 2000-04-07 | 2003-10-16 | Seca Gmbh | alarm device |
US6567708B1 (en) | 2000-07-25 | 2003-05-20 | Gentex Corporation | System to interconnect, link, and control variable transmission windows and variable transmission window constructions |
DE20017433U1 (en) | 2000-10-10 | 2001-03-29 | SeCa GmbH, 77933 Lahr | Device for detecting the opening state of a door, a window or the like. |
DE10056119B4 (en) | 2000-11-13 | 2005-12-15 | Stobbe, Anatoli, Dipl.-Ing. | Electronically codable lock system |
WO2005066440A1 (en) | 2003-12-31 | 2005-07-21 | SCHÜCO International KG | Monitoring device for window handles |
EP1700284B1 (en) * | 2003-12-31 | 2011-10-19 | SCHÜCO International KG | Window and window handle |
DE502006002881D1 (en) | 2005-02-25 | 2009-04-02 | Weru Ag | MONITORING DEVICE FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS |
DE102005018826B3 (en) | 2005-04-22 | 2006-10-05 | Robert Seuffer Gmbh & Co. Kg | Closing unit e.g. window sash, position e.g. opening, detecting device, has latch whose respective position within fitting are detected with magnetic field strength of permanent magnetic field measured in two space perpendicular directions |
DE102005000182A1 (en) | 2005-12-13 | 2007-06-21 | Aug. Winkhaus Gmbh & Co. Kg | Monitorable locking arrangement for e.g. window, has transponder that is assigned to closure bolt, and sensor cooperating with transponder and assigned to locking plate, where engagement of bolt in plate is detectable |
DE202008000919U1 (en) * | 2008-01-23 | 2008-04-10 | Carl Fuhr Gmbh & Co. Kg | Locking system for a double leaf door having a moving leaf and a passive leaf |
DE102008017479A1 (en) | 2008-04-03 | 2009-10-15 | Moresens Gmbh | Device for magnetic position monitoring |
WO2012054942A1 (en) * | 2010-10-25 | 2012-05-03 | Helmut Katherl | Arrangement for monitoring the opening state of a window or of a door |
DE102013220176A1 (en) | 2013-10-07 | 2015-04-23 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Device and method for determining a state of an object to be monitored |
DE102014201130A1 (en) | 2014-01-22 | 2015-07-23 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Method and device for determining an unauthorized intrusion on a door |
DE102014008058A1 (en) | 2014-05-28 | 2015-12-03 | Heike Bedoian | Device and system for home and building automation |
DE202014006760U1 (en) | 2014-08-22 | 2015-11-24 | Siegenia-Aubi Kg | Device for monitoring the closed position of a locking device |
DE102014115187A1 (en) | 2014-09-22 | 2016-03-24 | ABUS Seccor GmbH | Door locking system |
DE112016000618T5 (en) | 2015-02-06 | 2017-11-02 | Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | Semiconductor element and method of manufacturing the same |
DE102015011299A1 (en) | 2015-09-02 | 2017-03-02 | Siegenia-Aubi Kg | Arrangement for closure monitoring |
DE102015220139A1 (en) | 2015-10-16 | 2017-04-20 | Aug. Winkhaus Gmbh & Co. Kg | Monitoring device of an espagnolette fitting for a wing lockable in a frame |
-
2016
- 2016-12-06 DE DE102016123574.1A patent/DE102016123574A1/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2017
- 2017-11-16 PL PL17798229.5T patent/PL3535739T5/en unknown
- 2017-11-16 WO PCT/EP2017/079476 patent/WO2018104024A1/en active Search and Examination
- 2017-11-16 EP EP17798229.5A patent/EP3535739B2/en active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP3535739B1 (en) | 2020-10-28 |
DE102016123574A1 (en) | 2018-06-07 |
PL3535739T5 (en) | 2023-10-30 |
WO2018104024A1 (en) | 2018-06-14 |
PL3535739T3 (en) | 2021-05-31 |
EP3535739B2 (en) | 2023-07-05 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1490284B1 (en) | Shaft monitoring system for an elevator | |
EP2831356B1 (en) | Motor vehicle door lock | |
EP2574718B1 (en) | Safety system for safeguarding a moving, guided motion element against unwanted collisions | |
EP1801328B1 (en) | Window with a monitored locking device and the like, and method of using such a window | |
EP2728093B1 (en) | Safety system with an accident detection sensor | |
DE69710881T2 (en) | LOCKING SYSTEM FOR VEHICLE DOOR | |
EP2924202A1 (en) | Lock for a door or window | |
DE4024689C2 (en) | ||
EP2539525B1 (en) | Electronic mortise lock | |
EP1873334A2 (en) | Door lock | |
EP3535739B1 (en) | Security device for monitoring the position of a wing | |
EP0642623B1 (en) | Security arrangement for access-closing means | |
EP3156567B1 (en) | Monitoring device of a drive rod fitting for a sash lockable in a frame | |
EP3765688B1 (en) | Fitting assembly for a leaf frame of a window, corresponding window, method for operating a fitting assembly, method for installing a fitting assembly, and sensor device | |
EP1088950A2 (en) | Latch mechanism | |
DE20308579U1 (en) | Switching unit for activating and deactivating burglary alarm has housing in form of covering that accommodates sprue-lock protection disk, which includes a control surface and control part that cooperates with signal transmitter | |
EP2107191B1 (en) | Lock with a selector element for changing the operational properties of the lock | |
EP3511490B1 (en) | Handle for a window or a door and an alarm installation system with multiple handles | |
EP4080102A1 (en) | Safety switch with tumbler | |
DE3823276A1 (en) | THEFT PROTECTION DEVICE | |
DE102019107282A1 (en) | Door lock operating device for operating a door lock and alarm system with such a door lock operating device | |
EP1405974B1 (en) | Locking mechanism for turn and tilt window or door | |
EP1338733B1 (en) | Lock cylinder | |
EP1640933A1 (en) | Mechanism for arming and disarming of an alarm system | |
DE19518491C2 (en) | Arrangement of two locking cylinders for access areas to be secured |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE |
|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20190606 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
DAV | Request for validation of the european patent (deleted) | ||
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20200507 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502017007970 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1328992 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20201115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20201028 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210128 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210129 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201028 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210301 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201028 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201028 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210128 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201028 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210228 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201028 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201028 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201028 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R026 Ref document number: 502017007970 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20201116 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201028 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201028 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201028 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201028 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201028 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201028 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201028 |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
PLAX | Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20201130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20201130 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20201130 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201028 |
|
26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: ROTO FRANK FENSTER- UND TUERTECHNOLOGIE GMBH Effective date: 20210723 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201028 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20201116 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201028 |
|
PLBB | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210228 Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201028 Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201028 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201028 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201028 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20211116 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20201130 |
|
PLBP | Opposition withdrawn |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009264 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211116 |
|
PUAH | Patent maintained in amended form |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED |
|
27A | Patent maintained in amended form |
Effective date: 20230705 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B2 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R102 Ref document number: 502017007970 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20231124 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20231120 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20231121 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20231121 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Payment date: 20231102 Year of fee payment: 7 |