EP3511876A1 - Procédé et système pour une communauté de marqueurs pour accéder à des technologies de marquage agrégées - Google Patents

Procédé et système pour une communauté de marqueurs pour accéder à des technologies de marquage agrégées Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3511876A1
EP3511876A1 EP18160997.5A EP18160997A EP3511876A1 EP 3511876 A1 EP3511876 A1 EP 3511876A1 EP 18160997 A EP18160997 A EP 18160997A EP 3511876 A1 EP3511876 A1 EP 3511876A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
assessments
markers
assessment
marker
candidates
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
EP18160997.5A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Viral Prakash Shah
Annie Dhairiamani
Sangeeta Bora
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Tata Consultancy Services Ltd
Original Assignee
Tata Consultancy Services Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Tata Consultancy Services Ltd filed Critical Tata Consultancy Services Ltd
Publication of EP3511876A1 publication Critical patent/EP3511876A1/fr
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • G06Q10/06398Performance of employee with respect to a job function
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10Office automation; Time management
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10Office automation; Time management
    • G06Q10/105Human resources
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q20/00Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
    • G06Q20/22Payment schemes or models
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/01Social networking
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10Services
    • G06Q50/20Education

Definitions

  • the embodiments herein generally relates to the field of providing a platform to evaluate assessments of one or more candidates by aggregating different marking technologies, and, more particularly, to a method and system for providing access to an aggregated marking technologies to one or more private individuals belonging to an institution or one or more markers of a shared community.
  • Digital evolution has marked its presence in the field of assessments and this has resulted into a variety in the mode or channel of assessments that a candidate can undergo like online, pen/paper based, optical response sheets, recorded multimedia and so on.
  • the approach of marking also becomes different based on the mode of assessing the candidates.
  • Example, multiple choice question responses are marked with an automated intelligent technique, whereas subjective type or a recorded media response of online or offline assessments require a manual intervention of a marker with the required expertise in the subject or domain.
  • This platform provides an aggregated system of different marking / evaluation technologies such that the mode of access for the markers is singular irrespective of the channel of assessment.
  • the markers remain restricted to their institutions and do not have opportunities to participate beyond their affiliation.
  • This invention also concerns with creating communities of markers having expertise in their domain who can participate in marking process of a plurality of institutions conducting different modes of assessments on different channels and technologies. The institutions would be able to leverage expert markers from a marker pool thus making the platform as the largest marker sourcing hub in the world. Any educational institute or assessment conducting body can access the marker pool and the platform provides ability to aggregate the assessment channel and provide integrated marking platform.
  • an embodiment herein provides a system for evaluating one or more assessments of one or more candidates.
  • the system comprises a user interface, a platform, a memory and a processor.
  • the user interface provides a plurality of inputs.
  • the platform provided by a platform owner to facilitate a plurality of markers to register themselves for participating in the evaluation of assessments of one or more candidates.
  • the processor further comprises a digital representation module, a registration module, a selection module, an assignment module, and a publishing module.
  • the receiving module is configured to receive one or more assessments of one or more candidates for evaluation.
  • the one or more assessments includes a pen-paper based assessment, an online assessment, an optical response sheets, and a recorded multimedia.
  • the digital representation module is configured to generate a digital representation of each received one or more assessments of the one or more candidates.
  • the registration module is configured to register a plurality of markers for conducting evaluation of one of the generated digital representations, wherein the plurality of markers include one or more private individuals belonging to one or more institutions or one or more markers of a shared community available to all institutions or assessment conducting bodies.
  • the selection module is configured to select at least one marker from the registered plurality of markers based on a predefined set of parameters of selection, wherein the predefined set of parameters of selection includes education qualifications, previous experience and appreciations, and quality of work done by the marker.
  • the assignment module is configured to assign the generated digital representation with the selected set of markers for evaluating the received one or more assessment and finally the publishing module is configured to publish a result of assessment of each shared digital representations of each received one or more assessments of the one or more candidates.
  • the embodiment here provides a method for evaluating one or more assessments of one or more candidates. Initially the process receives one or more assessments of one or more candidates for evaluation.
  • the one or more assessments may include different channels of assessment like a pen-paper based assessment, an online assessment, an optical response sheets, and a recorded multimedia and so on.
  • the embodiment here provides a method for generating a digital representation of each received one or more assessments of the one or more candidates. Further, the platform provides to register the plurality of markers for conducting evaluation of one of the generated digital representations, wherein the plurality of markers include one or more private individuals belonging to one or more institutions or one or more markers of a shared community available to all institution.
  • the next step it selects at least one marker from the registered plurality of markers based on a predefined set of parameters of selection, wherein the predefined set of parameters of selection includes education qualifications, previous experience and appreciations, and quality of work done by the marker in previous evaluation. Further, it assigns the generated digital representation with the selected at least one marker for evaluating the received one or more assessment and finally it publishes a result of assessment of each shared digital representations of each received one or more assessments of the one or more candidates.
  • the process receives one or more assessments of one or more candidates for evaluation.
  • the one or more assessments may include different channels of assessment like a pen-paper based assessment, an online assessment, an optical response sheets, and a recorded multimedia and so on.
  • the embodiment here provides a method for generating a digital representation of each received one or more assessments of the one or more candidates.
  • the platform provides to register the plurality of markers for conducting evaluation of one of the generated digital representations, wherein the plurality of markers include one or more private individuals belonging to one or more institutions or one or more markers of a shared community available to all institution.
  • the platform selects at least one marker from the registered plurality of markers based on a predefined set of parameters of selection, wherein the predefined set of parameters of selection includes education qualifications, previous experience and appreciations, and quality of work done by the marker in previous evaluation.
  • it assigns the generated digital representation with the selected at least one marker for evaluating the received one or more assessment and finally it publishes a result of assessment of each shared digital representations of each received one or more assessments of the one or more candidates.
  • any block diagram herein represent conceptual views of illustrative systems embodying the principles of the present subject matter.
  • any flow charts, flow diagrams, state transition diagrams, pseudo code, and the like represent various processes which may be substantially represented in computer readable medium and so executed by a computing device or processor, whether or not such computing device or processor is explicitly shown.
  • a system 100 for evaluating one or more assessments of one or more candidates is shown in the block diagram of Fig. 1 .
  • the system 100 is configured to receive one or more assessments of one or more candidates for evaluations and further it generates digital representation of received one or more assessments.
  • a plurality of markers includes one or more private individuals belonging to one or more institutions or one or more markers of the shared community available to all institutions.
  • the private individual or one or more markers of the shared community can request for the marking of assessment in case the marking requires the skill set of the markers.
  • the system is configured to select at least one marker from the registered markers and assign the generated digital representation for evaluation.
  • the system 100 consists of a user interface 102, a platform 104, a memory 106 and a processor 108 as shown in the block diagram of Fig. 1 .
  • the processor 108 is in communication with the memory 106.
  • the processor 108 is configured to execute a plurality of algorithms stored in the memory 106.
  • the processor 108 further includes a plurality of modules for performing various functions.
  • the plurality of modules may include, but not limited to, a receiving module 110, a digital representation module 112, a registration module 114, a selection module 116, an assigning module 118, a publishing module 120, and a revenue management module 122.
  • the user interface 102 is configured to provide a plurality of inputs to the processor 108.
  • the user interface / input modules can include a variety of software and hardware interfaces, for example, a web interface, a graphical user interface, and the like and can facilitate multiple communications within a wide variety of networks N/W and protocol types, including wired networks, for example, LAN, cable, etc., and wireless networks, such as WLAN, cellular, or satellite.
  • the platform owner of the system 100 is responsible for providing the platform 104 and enabling the ecosystem for aggregating the one or more markers either the one more private individuals belonging to an institution or one or more markers from the shared community.
  • the platform owner is also providing the platform services like user interfaces, receiving assessments, generating digital representation of the received assessments, registration of a plurality of markers and publishing a result of assessment.
  • the platform is also responsible for providing interface to the institutions for the selection of markers before assigning assessments for marking. It would be appreciated that the platform also provides ability to the institutions to analyze separate requests from one or more markers to evaluate a specific assessment aligned with his skills.
  • the system 100 includes the receiving module 110 configured for receiving one or more assessments to evaluate for one or more candidates.
  • the received one or more assessments may include different channels of assessment for which evaluation is required by a marker like pen-paper based assessment, online assessment, optical response sheets, case studies, recorded multimedia and so on.
  • the system 100 includes the digital representation module 112 configured to generate a digital representation of each received one or more assessments of the one or more candidates.
  • the system 100 includes the registration module 114 configured for registering a plurality of markers for conducting evaluation of one or more digital representations of assessments.
  • the registration module 114 is configured to register each of the plurality of markers on the platform 104. It would be appreciated that the marker can improve the visibility of their profile to the institutions by adding their competencies, certifications and education qualifications at any point of time after registering on the platform.
  • an enterprise model wherein it will hold the structure of a single institution with its own one or more private markers with capability to assign assessment evaluation to one or more private belonging to the institution. In addition to this it has additional capability to outsource the one or more markers from a shared community.
  • the platform owner will enable one or more marking level configurations such as enable marking of digital assessments, enable marking of paper-pen assessments, message broadcast management, answer book management, bench marking and standardization capability to facilitate the evaluation of the plurality of markers and identify those who require improvement in their skill set, enabling marker sign up and enabling marker booking from a shared pool of plurality of markers.
  • a second a shared community model, wherein the platform owner enables registration from both the one or more private individuals belonging to an institution and the one or more markers of a shared community for evaluation of digital assessments. Institutions can also sign up in this model for configuring and managing the marking of assessments.
  • the system 100 also includes the selection module 116.
  • the selection module 116 is configured to select at least one marker from the registered plurality of markers on the platform 104.
  • the selection is based on a predefined set of parameters of selection such as education qualification of marker, previous experience and appreciation received by the marker and the quality of work he had delivered in previous works. Further, the selection is also based on the result of the evaluation of markers aligning to a set of predefined benchmarking parameters.
  • the one or more private individuals belonging to an institution or the one or more markers of the shared community can request for the marking of assessment in case the marking is aligned with the skill set of the marker.
  • the system 100 includes the assignment module 118.
  • the assignment module 118 is configured to assign one or more digital representation of the assessments for marking.
  • the system 100 includes the publishing module 120.
  • the publishing module 120 is configured to publish result of the marking of one or more digital representation of assessments shared with at least one marker by the platform.
  • the system 100 includes the revenue management module 122.
  • the platform provides institutions the capability to configure different payment options as remuneration to the markers participating in the assessment evaluation organized by the institutions. Remuneration may be in the form of tokens or credit points or actual money in the currency of the marker's geography. Multiple modes of revenue configuration are available to the institutions with a plurality of rules to determine how many tokens points or how much money is to be remitted to the marker based on some parameters.
  • the parameters which help in the rule creation includes marker performance, marker domain subject expertise level, experience, all other attributes of the marker as also attributes of the assessment conducted like scale of assessment, assessment channel, amount of question responses to be evaluated, complexity of the either subject or domain or assessment.
  • a flowchart 200 illustrating the steps involved for aggregating a plurality of marking technologies to evaluate one or more assessments of one or more candidates is shown in Fig. 2a & 2b .
  • the platform 104 is provided by the platform owner to support one or more business services involved in marking of one or more assessments.
  • one or more assessments of one or more candidates for evaluations are received at a receiving module 110.
  • the one or more assessments may include different channels of assessments for which marker evaluation is required like pen-paper based assessment, online assessment, optical response sheets, case studies, recorded multimedia and so on. It is to be noted that the list of assessment is not limited to the mentioned as above. It may include any type of assessment of a candidate for evaluation.
  • each of the plurality of markers are registered on the platform 104.
  • the plurality of markers include one or more private individuals belonging to an institution, one or more markers of the shared community.
  • the selection is based on a predefined set of parameters of selection such as education qualification of marker, previous experience and appreciation received by the marker and the quality of work he had delivered in previous works. Further, the selection is also based on the result of the evaluation of markers aligning to a set of predefined benchmarking parameters.
  • the one or more private individuals belonging to an institution or the one or more markers of the shared community can request for the marking of assessment in case the marking is aligned with the skill set of the marker.
  • the platform owner selects at least one marker from the registered plurality of markers at a selection module 116 based on a predefined set of parameters.
  • the predefined set of parameters of selection includes education qualifications, previous experience and appreciations, and quality of work done by the marker.
  • the one or more assessments are assigned to the selected at least one marker from the plurality of markers using an assigning module 118. It would be appreciated that each marker is eligible to raise a request for evaluating a specific assessment as displayed on the platform, if the markers believes his profile are matched with the given specific assessment.
  • the embodiments of present disclosure herein provides a system and method for evaluating one or more assessments of one or more candidates. It provides a platform to receive the assessments and registration of a plurality of markers. While registration, the marker must upload their credentials as asked by the system. Further, the platform has a predefined set of parameters to select markers from the list of registered markers to evaluate assessment. An interested marker may raise a request for a specific assessment of his interest, domain and availability as mentioned on the platform. The platform may provide capability to share/publish result of evaluation of assessments of each candidate.
  • the hardware device can be any kind of device which can be programmed including e.g. any kind of computer like a server or a personal computer, or the like, or any combination thereof.
  • the device may also include means which could be e.g. hardware means like e.g. an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), or a combination of hardware and software means, e.g.
  • ASIC application-specific integrated circuit
  • FPGA field-programmable gate array
  • the means can include both hardware means and software means.
  • the method embodiments described herein could be implemented in hardware and software.
  • the device may also include software means.
  • the embodiments may be implemented on different hardware devices, e.g. using a plurality of CPUs.
  • the embodiments herein can comprise hardware and software elements.
  • the embodiments that are implemented in software include but are not limited to, firmware, resident software, microcode, etc.
  • the functions performed by various modules described herein may be implemented in other modules or combinations of other modules.
  • a computer-usable or computer readable medium can be any apparatus that can comprise, store, communicate, propagate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
  • the medium can be an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system (or apparatus or device) or a propagation medium.
  • Examples of a computer-readable medium include a semiconductor or solid state memory, magnetic tape, a removable computer diskette, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), a rigid magnetic disk and an optical disk.
  • Current examples of optical disks include compact disk-read only memory (CD-ROM), compact disk-read/write (CD-R/W) and DVD.
  • a data processing system suitable for storing and/or executing program code will include at least one processor coupled directly or indirectly to memory elements through a system bus.
  • the memory elements can include local memory employed during actual execution of the program code, bulk storage, and cache memories which provide temporary storage of at least some program code in order to reduce the number of times code must be retrieved from bulk storage during execution.
  • I/O devices can be coupled to the system either directly or through intervening I/O controllers.
  • Network adapters may also be coupled to the system to enable the data processing system to become coupled to other data processing systems or remote printers or storage devices through intervening private or public networks. Modems, cable modem and Ethernet cards are just a few of the currently available types of network adapters.
  • a representative hardware environment for practicing the embodiments may include a hardware configuration of an information handling/computer system in accordance with the embodiments herein.
  • the system herein comprises at least one processor or central processing unit (CPU).
  • the CPUs are interconnected via system bus to various devices such as a random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), and an input/output (I/O) adapter.
  • RAM random access memory
  • ROM read-only memory
  • I/O input/output
  • the I/O adapter can connect to peripheral devices, such as disk units and tape drives, or other program storage devices that are readable by the system.
  • the system can read the inventive instructions on the program storage devices and follow these instructions to execute the methodology of the embodiments herein.
  • the system further includes a user interface adapter that connects a keyboard, mouse, speaker, microphone, and/or other user interface devices such as a touch screen device (not shown) to the bus to gather user input.
  • a communication adapter connects the bus to a data processing network
  • a display adapter connects the bus to a display device which may be embodied as an output device such as a monitor, printer, or transmitter, for example.

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
EP18160997.5A 2018-01-10 2018-03-09 Procédé et système pour une communauté de marqueurs pour accéder à des technologies de marquage agrégées Ceased EP3511876A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
IN201821001182 2018-01-10

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3511876A1 true EP3511876A1 (fr) 2019-07-17

Family

ID=61622370

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP18160997.5A Ceased EP3511876A1 (fr) 2018-01-10 2018-03-09 Procédé et système pour une communauté de marqueurs pour accéder à des technologies de marquage agrégées

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US20190213520A1 (fr)
EP (1) EP3511876A1 (fr)
JP (1) JP6808670B2 (fr)
CN (1) CN110020763A (fr)
TW (1) TWI738995B (fr)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6856800B1 (ja) * 2020-04-14 2021-04-14 VISITS Technologies株式会社 オンライン評価方法及び評価用オンラインサーバ

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2750063A1 (fr) * 2012-12-27 2014-07-02 Tata Consultancy Services Limited Procédés et systèmes de surveillance d'examens
WO2014207652A1 (fr) * 2013-06-24 2014-12-31 Varun Aggarwal Procédé et système de mise en correspondance de candidats pour une qualification professionnelle exigée
US20160189316A1 (en) * 2014-12-31 2016-06-30 Michael George Lenahan Native selling platform

Family Cites Families (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5987149A (en) * 1992-07-08 1999-11-16 Uniscore Incorporated Method for scoring and control of scoring open-ended assessments using scorers in diverse locations
US5862223A (en) * 1996-07-24 1999-01-19 Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership Method and apparatus for a cryptographically-assisted commercial network system designed to facilitate and support expert-based commerce
JP4892703B2 (ja) * 2009-12-28 2012-03-07 株式会社日本統計事務センター 採点者評価装置、採点者評価方法及びコンピュータプログラム
US20120005114A1 (en) * 2010-06-30 2012-01-05 International Business Machines Corporation Customized review system and method
KR20120022100A (ko) * 2010-09-01 2012-03-12 김영각 온라인 모의 시험 첨삭 관리 방법 및 시스템
US8655793B2 (en) * 2011-01-03 2014-02-18 Pugazendhi Asaimuthu Web-based recruitment system
AU2013205850A1 (en) * 2012-07-02 2014-01-16 Bliip Ip Pty Ltd Assessment method and apparatus
US9805614B2 (en) * 2012-09-17 2017-10-31 Crowdmark Inc. System and method for enabling crowd-sourced examination marking
US20140372329A1 (en) * 2013-06-18 2014-12-18 Krishnadas Menon Automated sourcing and screening of candidate profiles
US20150006422A1 (en) * 2013-07-01 2015-01-01 Eharmony, Inc. Systems and methods for online employment matching
US10706389B2 (en) * 2013-10-11 2020-07-07 Swipejobs, Inc. Employment related browsing and matching application, method and system
KR20150130666A (ko) * 2014-05-14 2015-11-24 주식회사 아이엠컴퍼니 멀티플랫폼 반응형 학생 행동 평가 점수 시스템 및 학생 행동 평가 방법
TWM516752U (zh) * 2015-06-03 2016-02-01 Yuan Dian Co Ltd 行銷專才適性測驗與管理平台
CN106295892A (zh) * 2016-08-12 2017-01-04 广州仕邦人力资源有限公司 一种企业佣金的计算方法及装置

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2750063A1 (fr) * 2012-12-27 2014-07-02 Tata Consultancy Services Limited Procédés et systèmes de surveillance d'examens
WO2014207652A1 (fr) * 2013-06-24 2014-12-31 Varun Aggarwal Procédé et système de mise en correspondance de candidats pour une qualification professionnelle exigée
US20160189316A1 (en) * 2014-12-31 2016-06-30 Michael George Lenahan Native selling platform

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP6808670B2 (ja) 2021-01-06
TW201931252A (zh) 2019-08-01
TWI738995B (zh) 2021-09-11
US20190213520A1 (en) 2019-07-11
JP2019121331A (ja) 2019-07-22
CN110020763A (zh) 2019-07-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Dixon et al. Using urban foresight techniques in city visioning: Lessons from the Reading 2050 vision
Mpofu et al. ICT Adoption and Development of E-business among SMEs in South Africa
Khanh The critical factors affecting E-Government adoption: A Conceptual Framework in Vietnam
Sonnenschein et al. Benefits of work-integrated learning: Perceptions held by Chinese international students enrolled in an Australian university and managers in the Chinese hotel industry
Lessa Sustainability framework for e-government success: Feasibility assessment
EP3511876A1 (fr) Procédé et système pour une communauté de marqueurs pour accéder à des technologies de marquage agrégées
US20150324747A1 (en) Talent acquisition portal, system, and method
Valk et al. Engaged and energized in the energy industry: Exploring engagement of rotational assignees through the four fundamental pillars of employee engagement
Gourova et al. Audit of Knowledge flows and Critical business processes
KR20200085997A (ko) 애플리케이션을 이용한 지식 공유 서비스 제공 방법
Eaton et al. State of Offices of Data Analytics (ODA) in the UK
Ahmad et al. Integrating CSF and change management for implementing campus ERP system
Adams Managing the challenges of leveraging technology and data advances to improve social protection
KR20130100590A (ko) 진학 진로 서비스 방법 및 장치와 그 서비스 방법을 실행하기 위한 프로그램이 기록된 기록 매체
Chaparro Mohamed The Impact of Human Resource Information Systems within Human Resources Practice
Ison Rapid appraisal techniques
OØien et al. A roadmap for engineering and technology education reform at The Norwegian University of Technology (NTNU)
Wambu et al. Consulting for Sustainability and Social Impact in Social Enterprises and Not for Profits: How Does Consultancy Work?
Sherin Optimizing demand management by leveraging call-center practices: a qualitative study
Burke Strengthening the M&E system of Peace Corps Colombia
Achim et al. THE INTERNSHIPS HELD THROUGH EUROPEAN PROJECTS–A POSSIBLE FIRST STEP IN MANAGING THE YOUTHS'OWN CAREER
JP2023167742A (ja) コミュニティ支援装置
Tylšar et al. Digital transformation in Erasmus Mobility Application Procedures: Transforming a paper-based workflow into an online system
Goodyear Smart City Technology and Civic Engagement in Ontario, Canada: Case Examples From Toronto and Barrie
US20200019895A1 (en) Systems and Methods for Capturing and Promoting Innovation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20200117

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20200717

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN REFUSED

18R Application refused

Effective date: 20221110