EP3495542B1 - Warp knitting machine, method for monitoring the quality of a warp knit and system therefore - Google Patents

Warp knitting machine, method for monitoring the quality of a warp knit and system therefore Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3495542B1
EP3495542B1 EP19164265.1A EP19164265A EP3495542B1 EP 3495542 B1 EP3495542 B1 EP 3495542B1 EP 19164265 A EP19164265 A EP 19164265A EP 3495542 B1 EP3495542 B1 EP 3495542B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
warp
yarn
processing unit
data processing
knitting machine
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP19164265.1A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3495542A3 (en
EP3495542A2 (en
Inventor
Frank Harmeling
Klaus Brandl
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Karl Mayer Stoll R&D GmbH
Original Assignee
Karl Mayer Stoll R&D GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Karl Mayer Stoll R&D GmbH filed Critical Karl Mayer Stoll R&D GmbH
Priority to EP19164265.1A priority Critical patent/EP3495542B1/en
Publication of EP3495542A2 publication Critical patent/EP3495542A2/en
Publication of EP3495542A3 publication Critical patent/EP3495542A3/en
Priority to CN201911164872.0A priority patent/CN111719233B/en
Priority to TW109104355A priority patent/TWI740373B/en
Priority to KR1020200030849A priority patent/KR102387218B1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3495542B1 publication Critical patent/EP3495542B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D04BRAIDING; LACE-MAKING; KNITTING; TRIMMINGS; NON-WOVEN FABRICS
    • D04BKNITTING
    • D04B35/00Details of, or auxiliary devices incorporated in, knitting machines, not otherwise provided for
    • D04B35/10Indicating, warning, or safety devices, e.g. stop motions
    • D04B35/20Indicating, warning, or safety devices, e.g. stop motions responsive to defects, e.g. holes, in knitted products
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D04BRAIDING; LACE-MAKING; KNITTING; TRIMMINGS; NON-WOVEN FABRICS
    • D04BKNITTING
    • D04B27/00Details of, or auxiliary devices incorporated in, warp knitting machines, restricted to machines of this kind
    • D04B27/10Devices for supplying, feeding, or guiding threads to needles
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D04BRAIDING; LACE-MAKING; KNITTING; TRIMMINGS; NON-WOVEN FABRICS
    • D04BKNITTING
    • D04B35/00Details of, or auxiliary devices incorporated in, knitting machines, not otherwise provided for
    • D04B35/10Indicating, warning, or safety devices, e.g. stop motions
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D04BRAIDING; LACE-MAKING; KNITTING; TRIMMINGS; NON-WOVEN FABRICS
    • D04BKNITTING
    • D04B35/00Details of, or auxiliary devices incorporated in, knitting machines, not otherwise provided for
    • D04B35/10Indicating, warning, or safety devices, e.g. stop motions
    • D04B35/14Indicating, warning, or safety devices, e.g. stop motions responsive to thread breakage
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D04BRAIDING; LACE-MAKING; KNITTING; TRIMMINGS; NON-WOVEN FABRICS
    • D04BKNITTING
    • D04B37/00Auxiliary apparatus or devices for use with knitting machines
    • D04B37/06Auxiliary apparatus or devices for use with knitting machines with warp knitting machines

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a warp knitting machine with a knitting area in which the warp knitting machine produces a knitted fabric during a knitting process, with a thread feed area in which warp threads run during operation of the warp knitting machine before they are subjected to the knitting process in the knitting area, and with a system for monitoring a Goods quality of the knitted goods produced, the system for monitoring the quality of the knitted goods produced having an optical scanning device and a data processing unit, and the data processing unit being set up to generate an evaluation signal relating to the quality of the knitted goods.
  • Warp knitting machines have knitting tools that process the warp threads in a knitting process into a textile material, a so-called knitted fabric. This takes place in a knitting area of the warp knitting machine.
  • the warp threads pass through a thread feed area beforehand.
  • the knitted fabric is produced by a loop-forming process.
  • Warp knitting machines have several bars, a plurality of knitting tools being arranged on each bar. Since a large number of knitting tools can be moved simultaneously by means of a bar, a large number of loops are formed at the same time during the knitting process. Herein lies is the reason for the particularly high production output of warp knitting machines.
  • drop stirrups are occasionally used in warp knitting machines. During operation, each drop bracket rests against a single thread in the thread feed area. If the thread breaks, the drop stirrup assigned to it can lower, which triggers an error signal. Since each warp thread is assigned its own drop bracket, this approach is structurally very complex.
  • a system with a light barrier is out of the DE 34 01 582 A1 known.
  • a The warp thread breaks, then it is usually thrown out of the effective area and passes a monitoring area of the light barrier.
  • not all thread breakage errors can be detected by means of the light barrier, since not every broken warp thread necessarily passes through the monitoring area of the light barrier.
  • a fan should be provided during operation of the light barrier in order to blow the warp threads out of the thread feed area in the direction of the light barrier.
  • the invention is therefore based on the object of providing a warp knitting machine that reliably detects knitting errors such as thread breaks and interlacing errors, but also other quality deficits in the knitted fabric produced.
  • the object is achieved by providing a warp knitting machine of the type described at the outset, in which the optical scanning device is arranged so that it can capture a moving image of at least one warp thread in the thread feed area, the data processing unit being set up to determine a thread running speed from the moving image to determine at least one warp thread, the thread running speed in one Evaluate evaluation step and generate the evaluation signal as a function of an evaluation result of the evaluation step.
  • the thread running speed is evaluated.
  • the thread running speed is sometimes also referred to as the thread delivery speed. It describes the speed at which the warp thread is moved in the direction of the knitting area.
  • the thread running speed can also be negative for a short time in special cases.
  • the thread running speed of the warp thread permanently deviates from an expected thread running speed.
  • the data processing unit it is possible for the data processing unit to classify the quality of the knitted fabric as defective if the thread running speed of a warp thread deviates from a previously measured average thread running speed of the warp thread.
  • the optical scanning device preferably detects the warp threads in an area of the warp knitting machine which is arranged directly in front of the knitting area.
  • the optical scanning device is preferably a camera or a moving image camera.
  • the camera can be a line camera.
  • a laser scanning system can be provided for optical scanning of the warp yarn.
  • the data processing unit is responsible for assessing the quality of the knitted fabric.
  • the assessment can be carried out in different ways depending on the embodiment of the invention. It is thus possible according to the invention for a quality measure to be output with the evaluation signal. On the basis of the quality index, an operator can decide whether it is necessary to stop the warp knitting machine in order to make corrections.
  • the quality measure can be output at regular intervals. Alternatively, it can be provided that the Evaluation signal is only output if the quality falls below a predefined quality threshold. According to the invention, it is also possible for the warp knitting machine to be set up in such a way that it stops the knitting process when the quality falls below a predefined quality threshold.
  • the data processing unit is preferably set up to compare a time profile of the thread running speed of the at least one warp thread in the thread feed area with a movement profile stored in the data processing unit.
  • the course of the thread running speed over time reflects the measured thread running speed of the warp thread during operation at different points in time.
  • the movement profile reflects a desired course of the thread running speed of the warp thread over time.
  • the desired course of the thread running speed over time can have been determined by a measurement or else have been calculated. Too great a deviation of the course of the thread running speed over time from the movement profile indicates poor quality of the knitted fabric or a fabric defect.
  • the data processing unit can be designed in such a way that it generates an evaluation result that indicates a reduced quality of the knitted fabric or a defect in the fabric if a difference between the temporal course of the thread running speed and the stored movement profile exceeds a predefined limit value at one or more times .
  • a separate movement profile can be stored for different warp threads.
  • the data processing unit uses a synchronization signal from the warp knitting machine in order to compare the movement profile with the actually measured temporal course of the movement speed of the warp thread.
  • the knitting process is a cyclical process.
  • the synchronization signal can always be generated when this process starts again.
  • the synchronization signal can be determined by means of a measurement at different points on the warp knitting machine, but a measurement is preferably carried out on the main shaft.
  • the main shaft is a drive shaft arranged in a machine bed of the warp knitting machine, which drives the bars of the warp knitting machine.
  • the data processing unit is set up to receive patterning information via a data interface or an input means of the warp knitting machine, to calculate the movement profile from the patterning information and to store the movement profile in the data processing unit.
  • a desired pattern can be entered via an input means such as a keyboard or a touchscreen.
  • the patterning information can also be transmitted to the data processing unit via a data interface, for example a network interface or a reader for a data carrier.
  • the patterning information defines how guide bars of the warp knitting machine should move during operation.
  • the movement of the guide bars determines the pattern created in the knitted fabric during the knitting process.
  • the data processing unit calculates a time-dependent warp thread consumption and thus also a time-dependent thread running speed of the warp threads. This results in an ideal movement profile that is stored in the data processing unit.
  • the data processing unit is preferably set up to learn the movement profile of the at least one warp thread by analyzing the moving image of the at least one warp thread and to store the movement profile in the data processing unit. This is preferably done in such a way that the thread running speed of the at least one warp thread is determined during a complete pattern laying cycle. This results in the movement profile. According to the invention, measurements can be made and averaged over several pattern laying cycles in order to obtain the movement profile.
  • the data processing unit is set up to evaluate a speed difference between two warp threads in the evaluation step. For this purpose, a speed of a first warp thread and a speed of a second warp thread are measured in the thread feed area. The speed difference is calculated from this.
  • the procedure can be as follows: If the speed difference exceeds a predefined limit value, then this indicates a reduction in quality or a defect in the goods, and a An evaluation result is generated that indicates a reduced quality of the knitted fabric or a fabric defect.
  • speed differences of several pairs of warp threads are determined by the data processing unit.
  • the resulting speed differences can be averaged or added.
  • the data processing unit determines according to the invention whether the result of the averaging or the addition exceeds a predefined limit value.
  • the data processing unit is preferably set up to filter out an interference spectrum from a time profile of the thread running speed of the at least one warp thread, to isolate at least one frequency peak from the interference spectrum and to compare a frequency and / or an amplitude of the at least one frequency peak with reference data.
  • Measurements have shown that the course of the thread running speed of the warp thread over time is not exclusively dependent on the pattern of the knitted fabric. Vibrations in components of the warp knitting machine can have a strong influence on the thread running speed of the warp threads. The action of the knitting tools - which are themselves subject to vibrations - on the warp threads influences the course of the thread running speed over time.
  • the quality of the knitted fabric can be determined by analyzing the frequencies that occur.
  • an interference spectrum is filtered out from the course of the thread running speed over time. This can be done, for example, by means of a Fourier analysis or in another suitable manner respectively.
  • the interference spectrum includes frequencies that typically lead to product defects.
  • the interference spectrum differs from machine to machine and can be determined by measurements. Individual frequency peaks are isolated from the interference spectrum and then compared with reference data.
  • the reference data describe properties of at least one frequency peak that is typical for the occurrence of a specific product defect. If there is sufficient correspondence between the reference data and an isolated frequency peak, then the data processing unit generates an evaluation signal which indicates a defect in the knitted fabric or a reduced quality of the knitted fabric.
  • the invention also relates to a method for checking the quality of a knitted fabric in a warp knitting machine.
  • the method has the following steps: acquisition of a moving image of at least one warp thread in a thread feed area of the warp knitting machine, determination of a thread running speed of at least one warp thread in the thread feed area, evaluation of the thread running speed in an evaluation step and generation of an evaluation signal relating to the quality of the knitted fabric as a function of one Evaluation result of the evaluation step.
  • This method can be applied to the warp knitting machine described above.
  • a time profile of the thread running speed of the at least one warp thread in the thread feed area is preferably compared with a movement profile. It is advantageous if the movement profile is calculated from pattern design information before the evaluation step. Alternatively, it can However, before the evaluation step, the movement profile can also be learned by analyzing the moving image of the at least one warp thread.
  • a speed difference between two warp threads can be evaluated in the evaluation step.
  • an interference spectrum is filtered out from the temporal course of the movement speed of the at least one warp thread, at least one frequency peak is isolated from the interference spectrum and a frequency and / or an amplitude of the at least one frequency peak is compared with reference data.
  • the invention also relates to a system for monitoring the quality of a knitted fabric produced by a warp knitting machine, the system for monitoring the quality of the knitted fabric having an optical scanning device and a data processing unit, and the data processing unit being set up to issue an evaluation signal relating to the quality of the fabric to produce the knitted fabric.
  • This system can be used in the warp knitting machine according to the invention.
  • the optical scanning device is provided in this system to capture a moving image of at least one warp thread in a thread feed area of the warp knitting machine and the data processing unit is set up to determine a thread running speed of the at least one warp thread from the moving image, to evaluate the thread running speed in an evaluation step and to generate the evaluation signal as a function of an evaluation result of the evaluation step.
  • the data processing unit of the system for monitoring the quality of the goods is preferably set up to evaluate a speed difference between two warp threads in the evaluation step in order to determine the evaluation result. It is also advantageous if the data processing unit is set up in the evaluation step to filter out an interference spectrum from a time profile of the thread running speed of the at least one warp thread, to isolate at least one frequency peak from the interference spectrum and to include a frequency and / or an amplitude of the at least one frequency peak Compare reference data.
  • Fig. 1 shows a warp knitting machine 1 with a system for monitoring a fabric quality of a knitted fabric 2.
  • the warp knitting machine 1 has a thread feed area 3 in which warp threads 4 run when the warp knitting machine is in operation before they are subjected to a knitting process.
  • a knitting area 5 of the warp knitting machine 1 the knitted fabric 2 is fastened to bars 6 by knitting tools are generated.
  • the warp knitting machine 1 has three optical scanning devices 7, which are moving image cameras.
  • the optical scanning devices 7 are directed at the warp threads 4.
  • the warp threads 4 have a variable thread running speed.
  • the optical scanning device 7 records a moving image of the warp threads 4 and forwards this to a data processing unit (not shown).
  • the data processing unit analyzes the moving image and derives an evaluation result relating to the quality of the knitted fabric 2 from the thread running speeds of the warp threads 4.
  • the data processing unit then outputs the evaluation result via an evaluation signal.
  • Fig. 2 shows a time-speed diagram 8 with a movement profile curve 9 of a warp thread and with a movement profile curve 10.
  • the time-speed diagram 8 has a time axis 11 and a speed axis 12.
  • the movement curve 9 shows a measured thread running speed of the warp thread at different times.
  • the movement curve 9 is represented by a dotted line.
  • the movement profile curve 10 reproduces a temporal course of the thread running speed which is to be expected from the warp thread when the warp knitting machine is operating correctly.
  • the movement profile curve 10 is represented by a dashed line.
  • the data processing unit of the warp knitting machine determines a difference between the movement profile curve 9 and the movement profile curve 10. If the difference is too great, the data processing unit outputs an evaluation signal which informs the warp knitting machine that a defective knitted fabric is produced. The warp knitting machine then stops the knitting process.
  • Fig. 3 shows a frequency diagram 13 with a frequency peak 14 and with a reference peak 15.
  • the frequency diagram 13 has a frequency axis 16 and an amplitude axis 17.
  • the frequency peak 14 was determined from a measured time profile of a thread running speed of a warp thread.
  • the frequency peak 14 is represented by a dotted line.
  • the reference point 15 is expected when there is a certain type of defect in the warp knitting machine.
  • the reference tip 15 is represented by a dashed line.
  • the frequency peak 14 is compared with the reference peak 15 by the data processing unit of the warp knitting machine.
  • the data processing unit If a frequency and an amplitude of the frequency peak 14 and the reference peak 15 deviate only slightly, the data processing unit outputs an evaluation signal which informs the warp knitting machine that a defective knitted fabric is being produced. The warp knitting machine then stops the knitting process.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Textile Engineering (AREA)
  • Knitting Machines (AREA)
  • Treatment Of Fiber Materials (AREA)

Description

Die Erfindung betrifft eine Kettenwirkmaschine mit einem Wirkbereich, in dem die Kettenwirkmaschine bei einem Wirkprozess eine Wirkware erzeugt, mit einem Fadenzuführungsbereich, in dem beim Betrieb der Kettenwirkmaschine Kettfäden verlaufen, bevor sie dem Wirkprozess in dem Wirkbereich unterworfen werden, und mit einem System zur Überwachung einer Warenqualität der erzeugten Wirkware, wobei das System zur Überwachung der Warenqualität der erzeugten Wirkware eine optische Abtastvorrichtung und eine Datenverarbeitungseinheit aufweist, und wobei die Datenverarbeitungseinheit dazu eingerichtet ist, ein Bewertungssignal betreffend die Warenqualität der Wirkware zu erzeugen.The invention relates to a warp knitting machine with a knitting area in which the warp knitting machine produces a knitted fabric during a knitting process, with a thread feed area in which warp threads run during operation of the warp knitting machine before they are subjected to the knitting process in the knitting area, and with a system for monitoring a Goods quality of the knitted goods produced, the system for monitoring the quality of the knitted goods produced having an optical scanning device and a data processing unit, and the data processing unit being set up to generate an evaluation signal relating to the quality of the knitted goods.

Kettenwirkmaschinen weisen Wirkwerkzeuge auf, die die Kettfäden bei einem Wirkprozess zu einem textilen Material, einer sogenannten Wirkware, verarbeiten. Dies geschieht in einem Wirkbereich der Kettenwirkmaschine. Die Kettfäden durchlaufen zuvor einen Fadenzuführungsbereich. Die Wirkware wird durch einen Maschenbildungsvorgang hergestellt. Kettenwirkmaschinen weisen mehrere Barren auf, wobei an einer Barre jeweils eine Vielzahl von Wirkwerkzeugen angeordnet sind. Da mittels einer Barre eine Vielzahl von Wirkwerkzeugen gleichzeitig bewegt werden können, werden bei dem Wirkprozess eine Vielzahl von Maschen gleichzeitig gebildet. Hierin liegt die besonders hohe Produktionsleistung von Kettenwirkmaschinen begründet.Warp knitting machines have knitting tools that process the warp threads in a knitting process into a textile material, a so-called knitted fabric. This takes place in a knitting area of the warp knitting machine. The warp threads pass through a thread feed area beforehand. The knitted fabric is produced by a loop-forming process. Warp knitting machines have several bars, a plurality of knitting tools being arranged on each bar. Since a large number of knitting tools can be moved simultaneously by means of a bar, a large number of loops are formed at the same time during the knitting process. Herein lies is the reason for the particularly high production output of warp knitting machines.

Aus dem Stand der Technik sind Systeme zur Überwachung der Warenqualität einer erzeugten Wirkware bekannt. So zeigt die DE 37 33 791 C2 ein System, das mittels einer optischen Abtastvorrichtung die Qualität einer Wirkware überwacht. Die optische Abtastvorrichtung ist auf die erzeugte Wirkware gerichtet. Auf diese Weise können Warenfehler erkannt werden. Im Randbereich der Wirkware ist es aber sehr schwierig, mittels Bildverarbeitungsverfahren Fehler bei der Maschenbildung zuverlässig zu erkennen. Dies ist unter anderem dadurch bedingt, dass der Randbereich der Wirkware häufig eine unregelmäßige, ausgefranste Struktur aufweist und dazu neigt, sich einzurollen. Die erzeugte Wirkware weist außerdem ein Einsprungverhalten auf, das heißt sie wird in Richtung einer Warenaufrollvorrichtung der Kettenwirkmaschine zunehmend schmaler. Auch dies erschwert die Fehlererkennung. Insbesondere Fadenbrüche lassen sich deshalb nicht zuverlässig erkennen.Systems for monitoring the quality of a knitted fabric produced are known from the prior art. So shows the DE 37 33 791 C2 a system that monitors the quality of a knitted fabric by means of an optical scanning device. The optical scanning device is aimed at the knitted fabric produced. In this way, faults in the goods can be detected. In the edge area of the knitted fabric, however, it is very difficult to reliably identify errors in the formation of the loop by means of image processing methods. This is due, among other things, to the fact that the edge area of the knitted fabric often has an irregular, frayed structure and tends to curl up. The knitted fabric produced also has a spring-in behavior, that is to say it becomes increasingly narrow in the direction of a fabric winding device of the warp knitting machine. This also makes error detection more difficult. In particular, thread breaks can therefore not be reliably detected.

Um Fadenbrüche auch im Randbereich der Wirkware zuverlässig festzustellen, kommen bei Kettenwirkmaschinen gelegentlich Fallbügel zum Einsatz. Jeder Fallbügel liegt im Betrieb an einem einzelnen Faden im Fadenzuführungsbereich an. Wenn der Faden reißt, dann kann sich der ihm zugeordnete Fallbügel absenken, wodurch ein Fehlersignal ausgelöst wird. Da jedem Kettfaden ein eigener Fallbügel zuzuordnen ist, ist dieser Ansatz konstruktiv sehr aufwändig.In order to reliably detect thread breaks in the edge area of the knitted fabric, drop stirrups are occasionally used in warp knitting machines. During operation, each drop bracket rests against a single thread in the thread feed area. If the thread breaks, the drop stirrup assigned to it can lower, which triggers an error signal. Since each warp thread is assigned its own drop bracket, this approach is structurally very complex.

Es ist ferner bekannt, eine Lichtschranke vor dem Wirkbereich anzuordnen. Ein System mit einer Lichtschranke ist aus der DE 34 01 582 A1 bekannt. Wenn bei dem Wirkprozess ein Kettfaden reißt, dann wird dieser in der Regel aus dem Wirkbereich geschleudert und passiert einen Überwachungsbereich der Lichtschranke. Mittels der Lichtschranke können jedoch nicht alle Fadenbruchfehler erfasst werden, da nicht jeder gerissene Kettfaden zwangsläufig den Überwachungsbereich der Lichtschranke passiert. Darüber hinaus sollte beim Betrieb der Lichtschranke ein Gebläse vorgesehen werden, um die Kettfäden aus dem Fadenzuführungsbereich in Richtung der Lichtschranke zu blasen.It is also known to arrange a light barrier in front of the effective area. A system with a light barrier is out of the DE 34 01 582 A1 known. When in the knitting process a The warp thread breaks, then it is usually thrown out of the effective area and passes a monitoring area of the light barrier. However, not all thread breakage errors can be detected by means of the light barrier, since not every broken warp thread necessarily passes through the monitoring area of the light barrier. In addition, a fan should be provided during operation of the light barrier in order to blow the warp threads out of the thread feed area in the direction of the light barrier.

Häufig kommen alle vorhergehend beschriebenen Systeme in Kombination zum Einsatz. Trotzdem können selbst dann gewisse Wirkfehler nicht erkannt werden. Wenn beispielsweise ein Kettfaden im Randbereich der Wirkware falsch vermascht wird, dann fällt dies nicht auf, da es hierbei nicht zu einem Fadenbruch kommt. Bei einem Vermaschungsfehler wird ein Kettfaden in eine Masche eingehängt, der er gemäß dem Legungsplan nicht zugeordnet ist.All of the systems described above are often used in combination. Nevertheless, even then, certain operating errors cannot be recognized. If, for example, a warp thread is intermeshed incorrectly in the edge area of the knitted fabric, this is not noticeable, since the thread does not break. In the event of a meshing fault, a warp thread is hooked into a stitch to which it is not assigned according to the laying plan.

Der Erfindung liegt deshalb die Aufgabe zu Grunde, eine Kettenwirkmaschine bereitzustellen, die Wirkfehler wie Fadenbrüche und Vermaschungsfehler, aber auch sonstige Qualitätsdefizite der erzeugten Wirkware zuverlässig erkennt.The invention is therefore based on the object of providing a warp knitting machine that reliably detects knitting errors such as thread breaks and interlacing errors, but also other quality deficits in the knitted fabric produced.

Die Aufgabe wird gelöst durch die Bereitstellung einer Kettenwirkmaschine der eingangs beschriebenen Art, bei der die optische Abtastvorrichtung so angeordnet ist, dass sie ein Bewegtbild von mindestens einem Kettfaden in dem Fadenzuführungsbereich erfassen kann, wobei die Datenverarbeitungseinheit dazu eingerichtet ist, aus dem Bewegtbild eine Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit des mindestens einen Kettfadens zu ermitteln, die Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit in einem Bewertungsschritt auszuwerten und in Abhängigkeit von einem Auswertungsergebnis des Bewertungsschritts das Bewertungssignal zu erzeugen.The object is achieved by providing a warp knitting machine of the type described at the outset, in which the optical scanning device is arranged so that it can capture a moving image of at least one warp thread in the thread feed area, the data processing unit being set up to determine a thread running speed from the moving image to determine at least one warp thread, the thread running speed in one Evaluate evaluation step and generate the evaluation signal as a function of an evaluation result of the evaluation step.

Erfindungsgemäß wird die Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit ausgewertet. Die Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit wird gelegentlich auch als Fadenliefergeschwindigkeit bezeichnet. Sie bezeichnet eine Geschwindigkeit, mit der der Kettfaden in Richtung des Wirkbereichs bewegt wird. Die Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit kann in besonderen Fällen kurzzeitig auch negativ sein. Durch die Auswertung der Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit des Kettfadens gelingt es, Fehlerarten wie Fadenrisse, Vermaschungsfehler aber auch sonstige Qualitätseinschränkungen wie beispielsweise ein Absinken der Spannung in der hergestellten Wirkware festzustellen. Die Fehler können frühzeitig erkannt werden, sodass die Maschine im Fehlerfall schnell gestoppt werden kann. Die Auswertung wird erst dadurch ermöglicht, dass die optische Abtastvorrichtung auf die Kettfäden in dem Fadenzuführungsbereich anstatt auf die erzeugte Wirkware gerichtet ist. Alternative Mittel zur Fehlerkennung wie beispielsweise Fallbügel oder Lichtschranken können vollständig entfallen. Auch eine Vielzahl von Fehlern, die bisher nur durch eine Beobachtung der fertigen Wirkware aufgefunden werden konnten, können durch die Auswertung der Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit der Kettfäden erkannt werden.According to the invention, the thread running speed is evaluated. The thread running speed is sometimes also referred to as the thread delivery speed. It describes the speed at which the warp thread is moved in the direction of the knitting area. The thread running speed can also be negative for a short time in special cases. By evaluating the thread running speed of the warp thread, it is possible to determine types of defects such as thread breaks, interlacing defects, but also other quality restrictions such as a drop in tension in the knitted fabric produced. The errors can be detected early so that the machine can be stopped quickly in the event of an error. The evaluation is only made possible by the fact that the optical scanning device is aimed at the warp threads in the thread feed area instead of on the knitted fabric produced. Alternative means of error detection such as drop bars or light barriers can be completely omitted. A large number of errors, which previously could only be found by observing the finished knitted fabric, can also be recognized by evaluating the thread running speed of the warp threads.

Fällt die Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit eines Kettfadens beispielsweise stark ab, so kann davon ausgegangen werden, dass ein Fadenriss vorliegt. Fällt die Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit eines Kettfadens geringfügig ab, dann kann dies darin begründet sein, dass der Kettfaden falsch vermascht wurde. Eine falsche Vermaschung kann auch zu einem unerwarteten Anstieg der Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit führen.If the thread running speed of a warp thread drops sharply, for example, it can be assumed that there is a thread break. If the thread running speed of a warp thread drops slightly, this may be due to the fact that the warp thread was incorrectly intermeshed. Incorrect meshing can also lead to an unexpected increase in the thread running speed.

Häufig setzt sich eine einmal falsch durchgeführte Vermaschung über mehrere Maschenreihen fort, sodass die Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit des Kettfadens dauerhaft von einer erwarteten Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit abweicht. Gemäß einer möglichen Ausführungsform der Erfindung ist es möglich, dass die Datenverarbeitungseinheit die Qualität der Maschenware als fehlerhaft einstuft, wenn die Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit eines Kettfadens von einer zuvor gemessenen durchschnittlichen Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit des Kettfadens abweicht. Es ist erfindungsgemäß auch möglich, die Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit mehrerer Kettfäden auszuwerten.Often, once incorrectly performed meshing continues over several rows of stitches, the thread running speed of the warp thread permanently deviates from an expected thread running speed. According to a possible embodiment of the invention, it is possible for the data processing unit to classify the quality of the knitted fabric as defective if the thread running speed of a warp thread deviates from a previously measured average thread running speed of the warp thread. According to the invention, it is also possible to evaluate the thread running speed of several warp threads.

Die optische Abtastvorrichtung erfasst die Kettfäden bevorzugt in einem Bereich der Kettenwirkmaschine, der dem Wirkbereich unmittelbar vorgeordnet ist. Bei der optischen Abtastvorrichtung handelt es sich vorzugsweise um eine Kamera beziehungsweise um eine Bewegtbildkamera. Es kann sich bei der Kamera gemäß einer möglichen Ausführungsform der Erfindung um eine Zeilenkamera handeln. Alternativ kann zur optischen Abtastung des Kettgarns ein Laserabtastungssystem vorgesehen sein.The optical scanning device preferably detects the warp threads in an area of the warp knitting machine which is arranged directly in front of the knitting area. The optical scanning device is preferably a camera or a moving image camera. According to one possible embodiment of the invention, the camera can be a line camera. Alternatively, a laser scanning system can be provided for optical scanning of the warp yarn.

Die Datenverarbeitungseinheit ist dafür zuständig, die Qualität der Maschenware zu beurteilen. Die Beurteilung kann je nach Ausführungsform der Erfindung in unterschiedlicher Weise durchgeführt werden. So ist es erfindungsgemäß möglich, dass mit dem Bewertungssignal eine Qualitätsmaßzahl ausgegeben wird. Anhand der Qualitätsmaßzahl kann eine Bedienperson entscheiden, ob es notwendig ist, die Kettenwirkmaschine anzuhalten, um Korrekturen vorzunehmen. Die Qualitätsmaßzahl kann erfindungsgemäß in regelmäßigen Abständen ausgegeben werden. Es kann alternativ vorgesehen sein, dass das Bewertungssignal nur ausgegeben wird, falls eine vordefinierte Qualitätsschwelle unterschritten wird. Es ist erfindungsgemäß auch möglich, dass die Kettenwirkmaschine so eingerichtet ist, dass sie den Wirkprozess anhält, wenn eine vordefinierte Qualitätsschwelle unterschritten wird.The data processing unit is responsible for assessing the quality of the knitted fabric. The assessment can be carried out in different ways depending on the embodiment of the invention. It is thus possible according to the invention for a quality measure to be output with the evaluation signal. On the basis of the quality index, an operator can decide whether it is necessary to stop the warp knitting machine in order to make corrections. According to the invention, the quality measure can be output at regular intervals. Alternatively, it can be provided that the Evaluation signal is only output if the quality falls below a predefined quality threshold. According to the invention, it is also possible for the warp knitting machine to be set up in such a way that it stops the knitting process when the quality falls below a predefined quality threshold.

Vorzugsweise ist die Datenverarbeitungseinheit dazu eingerichtet, bei dem Bewertungsschritt einen zeitlichen Verlauf der Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit des mindestens einen Kettfadens in dem Fadenzuführungsbereich mit einem in der Datenverarbeitungseinheit hinterlegten Bewegungsprofil zu vergleichen. Der zeitliche Verlauf der Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit gibt die gemessene Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit des Kettfadens im Betrieb zu unterschiedlichen Zeitpunkten wieder.In the evaluation step, the data processing unit is preferably set up to compare a time profile of the thread running speed of the at least one warp thread in the thread feed area with a movement profile stored in the data processing unit. The course of the thread running speed over time reflects the measured thread running speed of the warp thread during operation at different points in time.

Das Bewegungsprofil gibt einen gewünschten zeitlichen Verlauf der Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit des Kettfadens wieder. Der gewünschte zeitliche Verlauf der Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit kann durch eine Messung ermittelt worden sein oder aber berechnet worden sein. Eine zu hohe Abweichung des zeitlichen Verlaufs der Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit von dem Bewegungsprofil weist auf eine schlechte Qualität der Wirkware beziehungsweise auf einen Warenfehler hin. Die Datenverarbeitungseinheit kann erfindungsgemäß so ausgebildet sein, dass sie ein Auswertungsergebnis erzeugt, das auf eine verminderte Warenqualität der Wirkware beziehungsweise auf einen Warenfehler hinweist, falls eine Differenz zwischen dem zeitlichen Verlauf der Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit und dem hinterlegten Bewegungsprofil einen vordefinierten Grenzwert zu einem oder zu mehreren Zeitpunkten überschreitet. Erfindungsgemäß kann zu unterschiedlichen Kettfäden jeweils ein eigenes Bewegungsprofil hinterlegt sein.The movement profile reflects a desired course of the thread running speed of the warp thread over time. The desired course of the thread running speed over time can have been determined by a measurement or else have been calculated. Too great a deviation of the course of the thread running speed over time from the movement profile indicates poor quality of the knitted fabric or a fabric defect. According to the invention, the data processing unit can be designed in such a way that it generates an evaluation result that indicates a reduced quality of the knitted fabric or a defect in the fabric if a difference between the temporal course of the thread running speed and the stored movement profile exceeds a predefined limit value at one or more times . According to the invention, a separate movement profile can be stored for different warp threads.

Es ist bevorzugt, wenn die Datenverarbeitungseinheit ein Synchronisationssignal der Kettenwirkmaschine nutzt, um das Bewegungsprofil mit dem tatsächlich gemessenen zeitlichen Verlauf der Bewegungsgeschwindigkeit des Kettfadens abzugleichen. Bei dem Maschenbildungsprozess handelt es sich um einen zyklischen Vorgang. Somit kann beispielsweise das Synchronisationssignal immer dann erzeugt werden, wenn dieser Vorgang von neuem beginnt. Das Synchronisationssignal kann mittels einer Messung an unterschiedlichen Stellen der Kettenwirkmaschine ermittelt werden, bevorzugt erfolgt jedoch eine Messung an der Hauptwelle. Bei der Hauptwelle handelt es sich um eine in einem Maschinenbett der Kettenwirkmaschine angeordnete Antriebswelle, die Barren der Kettenwirkmaschine antreibt.It is preferred if the data processing unit uses a synchronization signal from the warp knitting machine in order to compare the movement profile with the actually measured temporal course of the movement speed of the warp thread. The knitting process is a cyclical process. Thus, for example, the synchronization signal can always be generated when this process starts again. The synchronization signal can be determined by means of a measurement at different points on the warp knitting machine, but a measurement is preferably carried out on the main shaft. The main shaft is a drive shaft arranged in a machine bed of the warp knitting machine, which drives the bars of the warp knitting machine.

Es ist vorteilhaft, wenn die Datenverarbeitungseinheit dazu eingerichtet ist, Musterlegungsinformationen über eine Datenschnittstelle oder ein Eingabemittel der Kettenwirkmaschine zu erhalten, aus den Musterlegungsinformationen das Bewegungsprofil zu berechnen und das Bewegungsprofil in der Datenverarbeitungseinheit zu hinterlegen. So kann eine gewünschte Musterlegung erfindungsgemäß über ein Eingabemittel wie eine Tastatur oder einen Touchscreen eingegeben werden. Die Musterlegungsinformationen können aber auch über eine Datenschnittstelle, beispielsweise eine Netzwerkschnittstelle oder ein Lesegerät für einen Datenträger, auf die Datenverarbeitungseinheit übertragen werden.It is advantageous if the data processing unit is set up to receive patterning information via a data interface or an input means of the warp knitting machine, to calculate the movement profile from the patterning information and to store the movement profile in the data processing unit. Thus, according to the invention, a desired pattern can be entered via an input means such as a keyboard or a touchscreen. However, the patterning information can also be transmitted to the data processing unit via a data interface, for example a network interface or a reader for a data carrier.

Durch die Musterlegungsinformationen wird definiert, wie sich Legebarren der Kettenwirkmaschine im Betrieb bewegen sollen. Die Bewegung der Legebarren bestimmt das beim Wirkprozess erzeugte Legungsmuster in der Wirkware. Aus den Musterlegungsinformationen berechnet die Datenverarbeitungseinheit einen zeitabhängigen Kettfadenverbrauch und somit auch eine zeitabhängige Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit der Kettfäden. Hieraus ergibt sich ein ideales Bewegungsprofil, das in der Datenverarbeitungseinheit hinterlegt wird.The patterning information defines how guide bars of the warp knitting machine should move during operation. The movement of the guide bars determines the pattern created in the knitted fabric during the knitting process. From the patterning information, the data processing unit calculates a time-dependent warp thread consumption and thus also a time-dependent thread running speed of the warp threads. This results in an ideal movement profile that is stored in the data processing unit.

Die Datenverarbeitungseinheit ist vorzugsweise dazu eingerichtet, das Bewegungsprofil des mindestens einen Kettfadens durch eine Analyse des Bewegtbilds des mindestens einen Kettfadens zu erlernen und das Bewegungsprofil in der Datenverarbeitungseinheit zu hinterlegen. Dies erfolgt bevorzugt so, dass die Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit des mindestens einen Kettfadens während eines vollständigen Musterlegungszyklus ermittelt wird. Daraus ergibt sich das Bewegungsprofil. Erfindungsgemäß können Messungen über mehrere Musterlegungszyklen hinweg vorgenommen und gemittelt werden, um das Bewegungsprofil zu erhalten.The data processing unit is preferably set up to learn the movement profile of the at least one warp thread by analyzing the moving image of the at least one warp thread and to store the movement profile in the data processing unit. This is preferably done in such a way that the thread running speed of the at least one warp thread is determined during a complete pattern laying cycle. This results in the movement profile. According to the invention, measurements can be made and averaged over several pattern laying cycles in order to obtain the movement profile.

Gemäß einer besonderen Ausführungsform der Erfindung ist die Datenverarbeitungseinheit dazu eingerichtet, bei dem Bewertungsschritt eine Geschwindigkeitsdifferenz zwischen zwei Kettfäden auszuwerten. Dazu wird eine Geschwindigkeit eines ersten Kettfadens und eine Geschwindigkeit eines zweiten Kettfadens in dem Fadenzuführungsbereich gemessen. Daraus wird die Geschwindigkeitsdifferenz gebildet. Gemäß Ausführungsformen der Erfindung kann wie folgt vorgegangen werden: Überschreitet die Geschwindigkeitsdifferenz einen vordefinierten Grenzwert, dann weist dies auf eine Qualitätsminderung oder einen Warenfehler hin, und es wird ein Auswertungsergebnis erzeugt, das auf eine verminderte Qualität der Wirkware beziehungsweise auf einen Warenfehler hinweist.According to a particular embodiment of the invention, the data processing unit is set up to evaluate a speed difference between two warp threads in the evaluation step. For this purpose, a speed of a first warp thread and a speed of a second warp thread are measured in the thread feed area. The speed difference is calculated from this. According to embodiments of the invention, the procedure can be as follows: If the speed difference exceeds a predefined limit value, then this indicates a reduction in quality or a defect in the goods, and a An evaluation result is generated that indicates a reduced quality of the knitted fabric or a fabric defect.

Gemäß einer weiteren Ausführungsform der Erfindung werden durch die Datenverarbeitungseinheit Geschwindigkeitsdifferenzen mehrerer Paare von Kettfäden ermittelt. Die sich ergebenden Geschwindigkeitsdifferenzen können erfindungsgemäß gemittelt oder addiert werden. In einem nachfolgenden Schritt bestimmt die Datenverarbeitungseinheit erfindungsgemäß, ob das Ergebnis der Mittlung beziehungsweise der Addition einen vordefinierten Grenzwert überschreitet.According to a further embodiment of the invention, speed differences of several pairs of warp threads are determined by the data processing unit. According to the invention, the resulting speed differences can be averaged or added. In a subsequent step, the data processing unit determines according to the invention whether the result of the averaging or the addition exceeds a predefined limit value.

Vorzugsweise ist die Datenverarbeitungseinheit dazu eingerichtet, bei dem Bewertungsschritt aus einem zeitlichen Verlauf der Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit des mindestens einen Kettfadens ein Störspektrum herauszufiltern, aus dem Störspektrum mindestens eine Frequenzspitze zu isolieren und eine Frequenz und/oder eine Amplitude der mindestens einen Frequenzspitze mit Referenzdaten zu vergleichen. Bei Messungen hat es sich herausgestellt, dass der zeitliche Verlauf der Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit des Kettfadens nicht ausschließlich von der Musterlegung der Wirkware abhängig ist. Schwingungen von Komponenten der Kettenwirkmaschine können die Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit der Kettfäden stark beeinflussen. Auch durch die Einwirkung der Wirkwerkzeuge - welche selbst Schwingungen unterliegen - auf die Kettfäden wird der zeitliche Verlauf der Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit beeinflusst.In the evaluation step, the data processing unit is preferably set up to filter out an interference spectrum from a time profile of the thread running speed of the at least one warp thread, to isolate at least one frequency peak from the interference spectrum and to compare a frequency and / or an amplitude of the at least one frequency peak with reference data. Measurements have shown that the course of the thread running speed of the warp thread over time is not exclusively dependent on the pattern of the knitted fabric. Vibrations in components of the warp knitting machine can have a strong influence on the thread running speed of the warp threads. The action of the knitting tools - which are themselves subject to vibrations - on the warp threads influences the course of the thread running speed over time.

Mittels einer Analyse der auftretenden Frequenzen kann die Qualität der Wirkware bestimmt werden. Erfindungsgemäß wird aus dem zeitlichen Verlauf der Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit ein Störspektrum herausgefiltert. Dies kann beispielsweise mittels einer Fourieranalyse oder auf eine andere geeignete Weise erfolgen. Das Störspektrum umfasst Frequenzen, die typischerweise zu Warenfehlern führen. Das Störspektrum unterscheidet sich von Maschine zu Maschine und kann durch Messungen ermittelt werden. Einzelne Frequenzspitzen werden aus dem Störspektrum isoliert und anschließend mit Referenzdaten verglichen. Die Referenzdaten beschreiben Eigenschaften von mindestens einer Frequenzspitze, die für ein Auftreten eines bestimmten Warenfehlers typisch ist. Ergibt sich eine ausreichende Übereinstimmung zwischen den Referenzdaten und einer isolierten Frequenzspitze, dann generiert die Datenverarbeitungseinheit ein Bewertungssignal, das auf einen Warenfehler in der Wirkware oder auf eine verminderte Qualität der Wirkware hinweist.The quality of the knitted fabric can be determined by analyzing the frequencies that occur. According to the invention, an interference spectrum is filtered out from the course of the thread running speed over time. This can be done, for example, by means of a Fourier analysis or in another suitable manner respectively. The interference spectrum includes frequencies that typically lead to product defects. The interference spectrum differs from machine to machine and can be determined by measurements. Individual frequency peaks are isolated from the interference spectrum and then compared with reference data. The reference data describe properties of at least one frequency peak that is typical for the occurrence of a specific product defect. If there is sufficient correspondence between the reference data and an isolated frequency peak, then the data processing unit generates an evaluation signal which indicates a defect in the knitted fabric or a reduced quality of the knitted fabric.

Die Erfindung betrifft ferner ein Verfahren zur Überprüfung einer Qualität einer Wirkware bei einer Kettenwirkmaschine. Das Verfahren weist folgende Schritte auf: Erfassung eines Bewegtbilds von mindestens einem Kettfaden in einem Fadenzuführungsbereich der Kettenwirkmaschine, Ermittlung einer Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit von mindestens einem Kettfaden in dem Fadenzuführungsbereich, Auswertung der Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit in einem Bewertungsschritt und Erzeugung eines Bewertungssignals betreffend die Qualität der Wirkware in Abhängigkeit von einem Auswertungsergebnis des Bewertungsschritts. Dieses Verfahren kann bei der vorhergehend beschriebenen Kettenwirkmaschine angewendet werden.The invention also relates to a method for checking the quality of a knitted fabric in a warp knitting machine. The method has the following steps: acquisition of a moving image of at least one warp thread in a thread feed area of the warp knitting machine, determination of a thread running speed of at least one warp thread in the thread feed area, evaluation of the thread running speed in an evaluation step and generation of an evaluation signal relating to the quality of the knitted fabric as a function of one Evaluation result of the evaluation step. This method can be applied to the warp knitting machine described above.

Vorzugsweise wird bei dem Bewertungsschritt ein zeitlicher Verlauf der Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit des mindestens einen Kettfadens in dem Fadenzuführungsbereich mit einem Bewegungsprofil verglichen. Es ist vorteilhaft, wenn vor dem Bewertungsschritt das Bewegungsprofil aus Musterlegungsinformationen berechnet wird. Alternativ kann das Bewegungsprofil vor dem Bewertungsschritt jedoch auch durch eine Analyse des Bewegtbilds des mindestens einen Kettfadens erlernt werden.In the evaluation step, a time profile of the thread running speed of the at least one warp thread in the thread feed area is preferably compared with a movement profile. It is advantageous if the movement profile is calculated from pattern design information before the evaluation step. Alternatively, it can However, before the evaluation step, the movement profile can also be learned by analyzing the moving image of the at least one warp thread.

Erfindungsgemäß kann bei dem Bewertungsschritt eine Geschwindigkeitsdifferenz zwischen zwei Kettfäden ausgewertet werden. Es ist jedoch auch vorteilhaft, wenn bei dem Bewertungsschritt aus dem zeitlichen Verlauf der Bewegungsgeschwindigkeit des mindestens einen Kettfadens ein Störspektrum herausgefiltert wird, aus dem Störspektrum mindestens eine Frequenzspitze isoliert wird und eine Frequenz und/oder eine Amplitude der mindestens einen Frequenzspitze mit Referenzdaten verglichen werden.According to the invention, a speed difference between two warp threads can be evaluated in the evaluation step. However, it is also advantageous if, in the evaluation step, an interference spectrum is filtered out from the temporal course of the movement speed of the at least one warp thread, at least one frequency peak is isolated from the interference spectrum and a frequency and / or an amplitude of the at least one frequency peak is compared with reference data.

Die Erfindung betrifft ferner ein System zur Überwachung einer Warenqualität einer Wirkware, die durch eine Kettenwirkmaschine erzeugt wird, wobei das System zur Überwachung der Warenqualität der Wirkware eine optische Abtastvorrichtung und eine Datenverarbeitungseinheit aufweist, und wobei die Datenverarbeitungseinheit dazu eingerichtet ist, ein Bewertungssignal betreffend die Warenqualität der Wirkware zu erzeugen. Dieses System kann bei der erfindungsgemäßen Kettenwirkmaschine zum Einsatz kommen. Erfindungsgemäß ist bei diesem System die optische Abtastvorrichtung dafür vorgesehen, ein Bewegtbild von mindestens einem Kettfaden in einem Fadenzuführungsbereich der Kettenwirkmaschine zu erfassen und die Datenverarbeitungseinheit ist dazu eingerichtet, aus dem Bewegtbild eine Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit des mindestens einen Kettfadens zu ermitteln, die Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit in einem Bewertungsschritt auszuwerten und in Abhängigkeit von einem Auswertungsergebnis des Bewertungsschritts das Bewertungssignal zu erzeugen. Die Datenverarbeitungseinheit des Systems zur Überwachung der Warenqualität ist vorzugsweise dazu eingerichtet, bei dem Bewertungsschritt eine Geschwindigkeitsdifferenz zwischen zwei Kettfäden zu auszuwerten, um das Auswertungsergebnis zu ermitteln. Es ist ferner vorteilhaft, wenn die Datenverarbeitungseinheit dazu eingerichtet ist, bei dem Bewertungsschritt aus einem zeitlichen Verlauf der Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit des mindestens einen Kettfadens ein Störspektrums herauszufiltern, aus dem Störspektrum mindestens eine Frequenzspitze zu isolieren und eine Frequenz und/oder eine Amplitude der mindestens einen Frequenzspitze mit Referenzdaten zu vergleichen.The invention also relates to a system for monitoring the quality of a knitted fabric produced by a warp knitting machine, the system for monitoring the quality of the knitted fabric having an optical scanning device and a data processing unit, and the data processing unit being set up to issue an evaluation signal relating to the quality of the fabric to produce the knitted fabric. This system can be used in the warp knitting machine according to the invention. According to the invention, the optical scanning device is provided in this system to capture a moving image of at least one warp thread in a thread feed area of the warp knitting machine and the data processing unit is set up to determine a thread running speed of the at least one warp thread from the moving image, to evaluate the thread running speed in an evaluation step and to generate the evaluation signal as a function of an evaluation result of the evaluation step. The data processing unit of the system for monitoring the quality of the goods is preferably set up to evaluate a speed difference between two warp threads in the evaluation step in order to determine the evaluation result. It is also advantageous if the data processing unit is set up in the evaluation step to filter out an interference spectrum from a time profile of the thread running speed of the at least one warp thread, to isolate at least one frequency peak from the interference spectrum and to include a frequency and / or an amplitude of the at least one frequency peak Compare reference data.

Die Zeichnungen stellen bevorzugte Ausführungsformen der Erfindung dar. Dabei zeigt:

  • Fig. 1 eine Kettenwirkmaschine mit einem System zur Überwachung einer Warenqualität einer Wirkware,
  • Fig. 2 ein Zeit-Geschwindigkeit-Diagramm mit einem gemessenen zeitlichen Verlauf einer Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit eines Kettfadens und mit einem vordefinierten Bewegungsprofil und
  • Fig. 3 ein Frequenzdiagramm mit eine gemessenen Frequenzspitze bei einem zeitlichen Verlauf einer Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit eines Kettfadens und mit einer Referenzspitze.
The drawings represent preferred embodiments of the invention.
  • Fig. 1 a warp knitting machine with a system for monitoring the quality of a knitted fabric,
  • Fig. 2 a time-speed diagram with a measured time profile of a thread running speed of a warp thread and with a predefined movement profile and
  • Fig. 3 a frequency diagram with a measured frequency peak in the course of a thread running speed of a warp thread over time and with a reference peak.

Fig. 1 zeigt eine Kettenwirkmaschine 1 mit einem System zur Überwachung einer Warenqualität einer Wirkware 2. Die Kettenwirkmaschine 1 weist einen Fadenzuführungsbereich 3 auf, in dem beim Betrieb der Kettenwirkmaschine Kettfäden 4 verlaufen, bevor sie einem Wirkprozess unterworfen werden. In einem Wirkbereich 5 der Kettenwirkmaschine 1 wird die Wirkware 2 durch Wirkwerkzeuge, die an Barren 6 befestigt sind, erzeugt. Die Kettenwirkmaschine 1 weist drei optische Abtastvorrichtungen 7 auf, bei denen es sich um Bewegtbildkameras handelt. Die optischen Abtastvorrichtungen 7 sind auf die Kettfäden 4 gerichtet. Beim Betrieb der Kettenwirkmaschine 1 weisen die Kettfäden 4 eine veränderliche Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit auf. Die optische Abtastvorrichtung 7 nimmt ein Bewegtbild der Kettfäden 4 auf und leitet dieses an eine nicht dargestellte Datenverarbeitungseinheit weiter. Die Datenverarbeitungseinheit analysiert das Bewegtbild und leitet aus den Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeiten der Kettfäden 4 ein Auswertungsergebnis betreffend die Qualität der Wirkware 2 ab. Anschließend gibt die Datenverarbeitungseinheit das Auswertungsergebnis über ein Bewertungssignal aus. Fig. 1 shows a warp knitting machine 1 with a system for monitoring a fabric quality of a knitted fabric 2. The warp knitting machine 1 has a thread feed area 3 in which warp threads 4 run when the warp knitting machine is in operation before they are subjected to a knitting process. In a knitting area 5 of the warp knitting machine 1, the knitted fabric 2 is fastened to bars 6 by knitting tools are generated. The warp knitting machine 1 has three optical scanning devices 7, which are moving image cameras. The optical scanning devices 7 are directed at the warp threads 4. When the warp knitting machine 1 is in operation, the warp threads 4 have a variable thread running speed. The optical scanning device 7 records a moving image of the warp threads 4 and forwards this to a data processing unit (not shown). The data processing unit analyzes the moving image and derives an evaluation result relating to the quality of the knitted fabric 2 from the thread running speeds of the warp threads 4. The data processing unit then outputs the evaluation result via an evaluation signal.

Fig. 2 zeigt ein Zeit-Geschwindigkeit-Diagramm 8 mit einer Bewegungsverlaufkurve 9 eines Kettfadens und mit einer Bewegungsprofilkurve 10. Das Zeit-Geschwindigkeit-Diagramm 8 weist eine Zeitachse 11 und eine Geschwindigkeitsachse 12 auf. Die Bewegungsverlaufkurve 9 gibt eine gemessene Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit des Kettfadens zu unterschiedlichen Zeitpunkten wieder. Die Bewegungsverlaufkurve 9 wird durch eine gepunktete Linie dargestellt. Die Bewegungsprofilkurve 10 gibt einen zeitlichen Verlauf der Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit wieder, der von dem Kettfaden beim fehlerfreien Betrieb der Kettenwirkmaschine zu erwarten ist. Die Bewegungsprofilkurve 10 wird durch eine gestrichelte Linie dargestellt. Die Datenverarbeitungseinheit der Kettenwirkmaschine ermittelt eine Differenz zwischen der Bewegungsverlaufkurve 9 und der Bewegungsprofilkurve 10. Falls die Differenz zu groß ist, dann gibt die Datenverarbeitungseinheit ein Bewertungssignal aus, das der Kettenwirkmaschine mitteilt, dass eine fehlerhafte Wirkware produziert wird. Die Kettenwirkmaschine hält daraufhin den Wirkprozess an. Fig. 2 shows a time-speed diagram 8 with a movement profile curve 9 of a warp thread and with a movement profile curve 10. The time-speed diagram 8 has a time axis 11 and a speed axis 12. The movement curve 9 shows a measured thread running speed of the warp thread at different times. The movement curve 9 is represented by a dotted line. The movement profile curve 10 reproduces a temporal course of the thread running speed which is to be expected from the warp thread when the warp knitting machine is operating correctly. The movement profile curve 10 is represented by a dashed line. The data processing unit of the warp knitting machine determines a difference between the movement profile curve 9 and the movement profile curve 10. If the difference is too great, the data processing unit outputs an evaluation signal which informs the warp knitting machine that a defective knitted fabric is produced. The warp knitting machine then stops the knitting process.

Fig. 3 zeigt ein Frequenzdiagramm 13 mit einer Frequenzspitze 14 und mit einer Referenzspitze 15. Das Frequenzdiagramm 13 weist eine Frequenzachse 16 und eine Amplitudenachse 17 auf. Die Frequenzspitze 14 wurde aus einem gemessenen zeitlichen Verlauf einer Fadenlaufgeschwindigkeit eines Kettfadens ermittelt. Die Frequenzspitze 14 wird durch eine gepunktete Linie dargestellt. Die Referenzspitze 15 wird erwartet, wenn eine bestimmte Fehlerart der Kettenwirkmaschine vorliegt. Die Referenzspitze 15 wird durch eine gestrichelte Linie dargestellt. Die Frequenzspitze 14 wird von der Datenverarbeitungseinheit der Kettenwirkmaschine mit der Referenzspitze 15 verglichen. Falls eine Frequenz und eine Amplitude der Frequenzspitze 14 und der Referenzspitze 15 nur eine geringe Abweichung aufweisen, dann gibt die Datenverarbeitungseinheit ein Bewertungssignal aus, das der Kettenwirkmaschine mitteilt, dass eine fehlerhafte Wirkware produziert wird. Die Kettenwirkmaschine hält daraufhin den Wirkprozess an. Fig. 3 shows a frequency diagram 13 with a frequency peak 14 and with a reference peak 15. The frequency diagram 13 has a frequency axis 16 and an amplitude axis 17. The frequency peak 14 was determined from a measured time profile of a thread running speed of a warp thread. The frequency peak 14 is represented by a dotted line. The reference point 15 is expected when there is a certain type of defect in the warp knitting machine. The reference tip 15 is represented by a dashed line. The frequency peak 14 is compared with the reference peak 15 by the data processing unit of the warp knitting machine. If a frequency and an amplitude of the frequency peak 14 and the reference peak 15 deviate only slightly, the data processing unit outputs an evaluation signal which informs the warp knitting machine that a defective knitted fabric is being produced. The warp knitting machine then stops the knitting process.

B E Z U G S Z E I C H E N L I S T EB E Z U G S Z E I C H E N L I S T E

  1. 1. Kettenwirkmaschine1. Warp knitting machine
  2. 2. Wirkware2. Knitwear
  3. 3. Fadenzuführungsbereich3. Thread feed area
  4. 4. Kettfaden4. Warp thread
  5. 5. Wirkbereich5. Effective range
  6. 6. Barre6. Barre
  7. 7. Optische Abtastvorrichtung7. Optical scanning device
  8. 8. Zeit-Geschwindigkeit-Diagramm8. Time-speed diagram
  9. 9. Bewegungsverlaufkurve9. Movement curve
  10. 10. Bewegungsprofilkurve10. Motion profile curve
  11. 11. Zeitachse11. Timeline
  12. 12. Geschwindigkeitsachse12. Speed axis
  13. 13. Frequenzdiagramm13. Frequency diagram
  14. 14. Frequenzspitze14. Frequency peak
  15. 15. Referenzspitze15. Reference tip
  16. 16. Frequenzachse16. Frequency axis
  17. 17. Amplitudenachse17. Amplitude axis

Claims (15)

  1. Warp knitting machine (1) with a knitting area (5) in which the warp knitting machine (1) produces a warp knit (2) during a knitting process, with a yarn feed area (3) in which warp yarns (4) run during operation of the warp knitting machine (1) before they are subjected to the knitting process in the knitting area (5), and with a system for monitoring a fabric quality of the produced warp knit (2), wherein the system for monitoring the fabric quality of the produced warp knit (2) has an optical scanning device (7) and a data processing unit, and wherein the data processing unit is configured to produce an evaluation signal relating to the fabric quality of the warp knit (2), characterised in that the optical scanning device (7) is arranged in such a way that it can capture a moving image of at least one warp yarn (4) in the yarn feed area (3), the data processing unit being configured to determine a yarn running speed of the at least one warp yarn (4) from the moving image, to evaluate the yarn running speed in an evaluation step and to produce the evaluation signal as a function of an evaluation result of the evaluation step.
  2. Warp knitting machine (1) according to claim 1, characterised in that the data processing unit is adapted to compare, during the evaluation step, a behaviour of the yarn running speed of the at least one warp yarn (4) in the yarn feed area (3) over time with a movement profile stored in the data processing unit.
  3. Warp knitting machine (1) according to claim 2, characterised in that the data processing unit is adapted to receive patterning information via a data interface or an input means of the warp knitting machine (1), to calculate the movement profile from the patterning information and to store the movement profile in the data processing unit.
  4. Warp knitting machine (1) according to claim 2, characterised in that the data processing unit is adapted to learn the movement profile of the at least one warp yarn (4) by analysis of the moving image of the at least one warp yarn (4) and to store the movement profile in the data processing unit.
  5. Warp knitting machine (1) according to claim 1, characterised in that the data processing unit is adapted to evaluate, during the evaluation step, a speed difference between two warp threads (4).
  6. Warp knitting machine (1) according to claim 1, characterised in that the data processing unit is adapted to filter out, during the evaluation step, an interference spectrum from a behaviour of the yarn running speed of the at least one warp yarn (4) over time, to isolate at least one frequency peak (14) from the interference spectrum and to compare a frequency and/or an amplitude of the at least one frequency peak (14) with reference data.
  7. Method for monitoring a quality of a warp knit (2) in a warp knitting machine (1), comprising the steps:
    - detecting a moving image of at least one warp yarn (4) in a yarn feed area (3) of the warp knitting machine (1),
    - determining a yarn running speed of at least one warp yarn (4),
    - evaluating the yarn running speed in an evaluation step,
    - producing an evaluation signal relating to the quality of the warp knit (2) as a function of an evaluation result of the evaluation step.
  8. Method according to claim 7, characterised in that, in the evaluation step, a behaviour of the yarn running speed of the at least one warp yarn in the yarn feed area (3) over time is compared with a movement profile.
  9. Method according to claim 8, characterised in that, before the evaluation step, the movement profile is calculated from patterning information.
  10. Method according to claim 8, characterised in that, before the evaluation step, the movement profile is learned by analysis of the moving image of the at least one warp yarn (4).
  11. Method according to claim 7, characterised in that in the evaluation step a speed difference between two warp yarns (4) is evaluated.
  12. Method according to claim 7, characterised in that, in the evaluation step, an interference spectrum is filtered out of a behaviour of the yarn running speed of the at least one warp yarn (4) over time, at least one frequency peak (14) is isolated from the interference spectrum and a frequency and/or an amplitude of the at least one frequency peak (14) is compared with reference data.
  13. System for monitoring a fabric quality of a warp knit (2) produced by a warp knitting machine (1), the system for monitoring the fabric quality of the warp knit (2) having an optical scanning device (7) and a data processing unit, and the data processing unit being adapted to produce an evaluation signal relating to the fabric quality of the warp knit (2), characterised in that the optical scanning device (7) is provided for the purpose of capturing a moving image of at least one warp yarn (4) in a yarn feed area (3) of the warp knitting machine (1), and wherein the data processing unit is adapted to determine a yarn running speed of the at least one warp yarn (4) from the moving image, to evaluate the yarn running speed in an evaluation step and to produce the evaluation signal as a function of an evaluation result of the evaluation step.
  14. System according to claim 13, characterised in that the data processing unit is adapted to evaluate, in the evaluation step, a speed difference between two warp threads (4).
  15. System according to claim 13, characterised in that the data processing unit is adapted, during the evaluation step, to filter out an interference spectrum from a behaviour of the yarn running speed of the at least one warp yarn (4) over time, to isolate at least one frequency peak (14) from the interference spectrum and to compare a frequency and/or an amplitude of the at least one frequency peak (14) with reference data.
EP19164265.1A 2019-03-21 2019-03-21 Warp knitting machine, method for monitoring the quality of a warp knit and system therefore Active EP3495542B1 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP19164265.1A EP3495542B1 (en) 2019-03-21 2019-03-21 Warp knitting machine, method for monitoring the quality of a warp knit and system therefore
CN201911164872.0A CN111719233B (en) 2019-03-21 2019-11-25 Warp knitting machine
TW109104355A TWI740373B (en) 2019-03-21 2020-02-12 Warp knitting machine and method and system for warp knitting machine
KR1020200030849A KR102387218B1 (en) 2019-03-21 2020-03-12 Warp knitting machine

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP19164265.1A EP3495542B1 (en) 2019-03-21 2019-03-21 Warp knitting machine, method for monitoring the quality of a warp knit and system therefore

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3495542A2 EP3495542A2 (en) 2019-06-12
EP3495542A3 EP3495542A3 (en) 2019-10-09
EP3495542B1 true EP3495542B1 (en) 2021-05-19

Family

ID=65904163

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19164265.1A Active EP3495542B1 (en) 2019-03-21 2019-03-21 Warp knitting machine, method for monitoring the quality of a warp knit and system therefore

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3495542B1 (en)
KR (1) KR102387218B1 (en)
CN (1) CN111719233B (en)
TW (1) TWI740373B (en)

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3401582C2 (en) 1984-01-18 1986-11-13 Christoph 7341 Wernau Ludwig Method and device for shutting down knitting machines when faults occur in the thread feed
DE3733791A1 (en) * 1987-10-06 1989-04-27 Herbst Protechna Gmbh METHOD AND DEVICE FOR THE OPTICAL MONITORING OF A KNITWEAR
DE3909013A1 (en) * 1989-03-18 1990-09-20 Mayer Textilmaschf METHOD FOR PRODUCING A FLORAL-FITTED CHAIN-KNITTED GOODS AND RELATED CHAIN-KNITTING MACHINE
SE9900792D0 (en) * 1999-03-03 1999-03-03 Iro Patent Ag Method for monitoring run / stop conditions of a yarn
DE102008008211B4 (en) * 2007-12-06 2012-01-26 Sipra Patententwicklungs- Und Beteiligungsgesellschaft Mbh Method and knitting machine for producing a knit fabric from an untwisted fiber material
CN101270544B (en) * 2008-04-29 2011-05-11 上海好力纺织机电制造有限公司 Parameter detecting device and method for textile weaving process
CN101515166B (en) * 2009-03-19 2012-07-04 杭州嘉拓科技有限公司 Device for monitoring yarn moving state and monitoring method for same
US20130186055A1 (en) * 2010-09-25 2013-07-25 Vladimir Bram System and method for the management of the flow rate of a feed line
CN102493123B (en) * 2011-12-28 2013-09-25 长乐迈耶经编配件制造有限公司 Remote monitoring automatic thread stop system for textile tricot machine
CN202809176U (en) * 2012-08-30 2013-03-20 无锡信捷电气股份有限公司 Visual broken line detection system for warp knitting machine
CN203683859U (en) * 2013-11-01 2014-07-02 福建省尤溪县正泉布业有限公司 Yarn breakage detection device
CN204803513U (en) * 2015-05-22 2015-11-25 苏州三立自动化设备有限公司 Tricot machine with broken string detects function
EP3333292B1 (en) * 2016-12-12 2019-01-30 Karl Mayer Textilmaschinenfabrik GmbH Method and auxiliary device for the adjustment of a warp knitting machine

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3495542A3 (en) 2019-10-09
CN111719233A (en) 2020-09-29
TW202035818A (en) 2020-10-01
EP3495542A2 (en) 2019-06-12
TWI740373B (en) 2021-09-21
KR102387218B1 (en) 2022-04-15
CN111719233B (en) 2021-08-17
KR20200112688A (en) 2020-10-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0530492B1 (en) Method for detecting flaws in a textile web
EP1943380B1 (en) Device for separating threads from a layer of threads, and method for operating and using the device
DE102014110647B4 (en) Yarn feeding apparatus and method for feeding yarns to a circular knitting machine with stripers
EP0644282B1 (en) Procedure for quality control during fabrication of a plurality of yarns
EP2092100B1 (en) Method and apparatus for needle monitoring
EP3672895A1 (en) Method and device for texturing a synthetic thread
EP1006225B1 (en) Method and device for evaluating the effect of yarn characteristics on the looks of textile surfaces
EP3495542B1 (en) Warp knitting machine, method for monitoring the quality of a warp knit and system therefore
DE19534114A1 (en) Method for testing automatic thread processing machine
DE4335459A1 (en) Spinning station fault notifier and qualifier
WO2000073565A1 (en) Light-scanning head for knitting-machine needles, a corresponding light-scanning system and method for checking knitting-machine needles, using said light-scanning system
DE102019109426A1 (en) Method and device for determining an operating state of a loop-forming machine
DE4213842C2 (en) Method and device for monitoring the function of the needles of a textile machine
DE10223754A1 (en) Circular knitting machine for textile mesh products with fault sensor and optical or acoustic fault warning
EP4115009B1 (en) Method and device for monitoring machinery for the production or treatment of synthetic fibres
EP3075690B1 (en) A method and a device for monitoring the production of a knitting machine, and a knitting machine
EP0728857B1 (en) Process and device for winding a sheet of yarns
WO2022194643A1 (en) Method for monitoring a process of manufacture of a synthetic thread
EP0570836B1 (en) Method and apparatus for the on-line identification of badly set or defective drawframes on ring spinning machines
DE102020004467A1 (en) Process and device for monitoring a machine plant for the production or treatment of synthetic fibers
DE19628319C2 (en) Device for measuring the repeat length of a plastic sample
WO2017194730A1 (en) Device and method for image-based shed monitoring
EP1013814A1 (en) Shuttle thread monitoring
DE19524664A1 (en) Appts. to monitor irregularities in yarn supply - in a knitting machine has light source emitting light rays directly above knitted product
EP3798340A1 (en) Thread drawing-in method for warp beam replacement in a knitting machine and knitting machine with a thread drawing-in function for warp beam replacement

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: HARMELING, FRANK

Inventor name: BRANDL, KLAUS

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: D04B 35/10 20060101AFI20190903BHEP

Ipc: D04B 35/20 20060101ALI20190903BHEP

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: KARL MAYER R&D GMBH

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20200114

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: KARL MAYER STOLL R&D GMBH

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

GRAJ Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20210204

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: BRANDL, KLAUS

Inventor name: HARMELING, FRANK

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTC Intention to grant announced (deleted)
GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20210325

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502019001432

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1394051

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20210615

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20210519

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210519

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210519

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210519

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210819

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210519

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210519

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210819

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210519

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210920

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210519

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210919

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210820

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210519

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210519

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210519

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210519

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210519

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210519

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210519

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210519

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502019001432

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20220222

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210919

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210519

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210519

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20220331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220321

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220331

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220321

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220331

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220331

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20230307

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20230321

Year of fee payment: 5

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230705

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20230321

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230321

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230321

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20190321

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210519

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210519

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240328

Year of fee payment: 6