EP3405730A1 - Refractory anchor for a furnace refractory tile - Google Patents

Refractory anchor for a furnace refractory tile

Info

Publication number
EP3405730A1
EP3405730A1 EP16819021.3A EP16819021A EP3405730A1 EP 3405730 A1 EP3405730 A1 EP 3405730A1 EP 16819021 A EP16819021 A EP 16819021A EP 3405730 A1 EP3405730 A1 EP 3405730A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
refractory
anchor
refractory anchor
parts
cone
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP16819021.3A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3405730B1 (en
Inventor
Florus Hermanus BEUKEMA
Paulus VAN BEURDEN
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Tata Steel Nederland Technology BV
Original Assignee
Tata Steel Nederland Technology BV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Tata Steel Nederland Technology BV filed Critical Tata Steel Nederland Technology BV
Priority claimed from PCT/EP2016/080460 external-priority patent/WO2017125206A1/en
Publication of EP3405730A1 publication Critical patent/EP3405730A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3405730B1 publication Critical patent/EP3405730B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F27FURNACES; KILNS; OVENS; RETORTS
    • F27DDETAILS OR ACCESSORIES OF FURNACES, KILNS, OVENS, OR RETORTS, IN SO FAR AS THEY ARE OF KINDS OCCURRING IN MORE THAN ONE KIND OF FURNACE
    • F27D1/00Casings; Linings; Walls; Roofs
    • F27D1/14Supports for linings
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F27FURNACES; KILNS; OVENS; RETORTS
    • F27DDETAILS OR ACCESSORIES OF FURNACES, KILNS, OVENS, OR RETORTS, IN SO FAR AS THEY ARE OF KINDS OCCURRING IN MORE THAN ONE KIND OF FURNACE
    • F27D1/00Casings; Linings; Walls; Roofs
    • F27D1/14Supports for linings
    • F27D1/141Anchors therefor

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a refractory anchor for a furnace refractory roof tile or wall tile as used in high temperature furnaces in for instance the steel industry as well as to a method for the manufacturing of such an refractory anchor.
  • furnace walls are provided with a lining of refractory material that is secured to the walls.
  • a known method to mount refractory material to the inside of furnace walls and roof is by means of anchoring.
  • a specific anchor is the so called ceramic refractory anchor, often a conical or shaped brick of a refractory material.
  • the refractory anchor is often used to suspend insulation material in the form of refractory tiles from a structural support. These refractory tiles are layered tiles with layers of different refractory materials.
  • the life time of refractory tiles used in for instance re-heat furnaces to re-heat steel slabs are in the order of 8 - 20 years.
  • the refractory anchor should have a life time that is at least equal to and preferably longer than that of the refractory tile to be sure that the refractory tiles remain suspended.
  • the refractory anchor is subjected to large stress variations. This requires a refractory anchor that can withstand these stress variations over a prolonged period of time, in particular for the refractory tiles with a life time of 15 - 20 years.
  • the refractory tiles need to have excellent insulation properties in order to safe on heating costs as much as possible and at the same time the manufacturing costs should be low to be able to recover the costs within a reasonable period of time. These requirements oppose each other and a suitable balance should be found.
  • the invention relates to a refractory anchor as defined in claims 1 -10, a method for the manufacturing of a refractory anchor as defined in claims 1 1-13 and a mould for the manufacturing of a refractory anchor as defined in claims 13-15.
  • one or more of the objectives of the invention are realized by providing a refractory anchor for a refractory tile for a high temperature furnace, wherein the refractory anchor has an overall truncated cone shape, characterised in that the refractory anchor is divided in three or more parts and wherein radial dividing planes run from bottom plane to top plane of the truncated cone shaped refractory anchor.
  • a furnace is meant wherein the temperature is such that the hot side of the refractory material should be able to withstand temperatures in the range of 1300-1400 °C.
  • a refractory anchor is subjected to stresses during heating and cooling cycles and depending on the temperature rate these stresses might increase up to and over 50% of the maximum stress that a refractory anchor can initially withstand (i.e., its strength). With normal temperature rates in steel slab re-heat furnaces the stresses will be in the order of 20 - 25 % of the strength. Repeated heating and cooling cycles wherein the refractory anchor is subjected to high stresses will be detrimental to the life time of the refractory anchor. It was found that by dividing the refractory anchor in three or more parts these stresses during the cooling cycles can be substantially lowered.
  • the refractory anchor should at least be divided in three parts with radial dividing planes. These dividing planes start from the centre line of the cone shape and extend in radial direction. It was found that dividing the refractory anchor in three or four parts resulted in a substantial decrease of the stresses occurring in the refractory anchor.
  • a two-part refractory anchor is disclosed in AT320701 which has a truncated cone shape with oval shaped bottom and top plane with a dividing plane through the centre and parallel to the smallest axis of the oval.
  • the refractory anchor is preferably divided in parts of the same size and shape to have the same stresses and stress effects in each of the parts. Further the centre line or axis of the truncated cone shape is at the right angles to the bottom plane and top plane wherein both the bottom plane and top plane are circular planes. Moreover, parts of the same size will facilitate the manufacturing of the refractory anchor.
  • the refractory anchor is preferably shaped with a first cone part and a second cone part each with a truncated cone shape, with a shoulder part as transition between the first and second cone parts.
  • the bottom plane of the second cone part is at the hot side when in use and wherein the diameter of the imaginary bottom plane of the first cone part is less than the diameter of the imaginary top plane of the second cone part.
  • the height of the first cone part is larger than the height of the second cone part.
  • the height of the second cone part is less than 65% of the height of the first cone part.
  • the height of the second cone part is between 35% and 50% of the height of the first cone part. It was found that lowering the shoulder part beyond that does not result in any further overall improvement.
  • the height ranges of the first and second cone part together with the height of the shoulder part form the total height of the refractory anchor.
  • the total height of the refractory anchor is in a range of 230 - 400mm, wherein the top plane diameter of the first cone part is in a range of 80 - 145 mm and the bottom plane diameter of the second cone part is in a range of 165 - 210 mm.
  • the diameters of the bottom and top plane may in general be taken larger to ensure mechanical stability.
  • the ranges for such three or four part refractory anchor will overlap with those of an undivided refractory anchor.
  • the shoulder part is concavely curved with a radius of curvature in the range of 5 - 30mm.
  • the curvature of the shoulder part results in lower stresses occurring in the shoulder part, however there is a limit to the curvature.
  • With a larger radius of curvature the area wherein the stresses associated with the shoulder part occur increases such that the effect of a larger radius of curvature is cancelled out. Good results in lowering the stresses are realized wherein the shoulder part is concavely curved with a radius of curvature in the range of 15 - 25mm.
  • the opening angle or cone angle of the first cone part and/or second cone part are in the range of 2 -15°. With such an opening angle the anchor provides good support for the refractory tile and the stresses occurring in the refractory anchor are kept within limits.
  • a method for the manufacturing of a refractory anchor for a refractory tile for a furnace comprising the steps of:
  • the filling of the mould is done under pressure such that the mould is completely filled with refractory moulding compound. Besides the filling under pressure the compound mass could further be stamped and/or the mould vibrated to get an optimal filling of the mould.
  • the parts are fixed to each other by applying a mortar between the parts of the refractory anchor.
  • a mortar between the parts of the refractory anchor.
  • an air curing mortar is used that is capable to withstand the temperatures to which it will be exposed in the furnace.
  • the mortar is applied in such a thickness that the finale refractory anchor has the dimensions as designed. These dimensions correspond with the internal dimensions of the mould. In this manner a perfect match with the anchor hole in the refractory tile can be realized.
  • the mortar has a strength that is less than the strength of each of the parts of the refractory anchor.
  • the mortar has a certain flexibility such that the refractory anchor can adapt to the complementary shaped recess provided in the refractory tile to receive the refractory anchor.
  • the method further includes that a shape is formed in the refractory anchor to receive an anchor bolt, which shape is complementary to the anchor bolt.
  • a mould for the manufacturing of a refractory anchor for a refractory tile for a furnace, wherein the refractory anchor has an overall truncated cone shape and wherein the refractory anchor is divided in at least three parts, and wherein the mould has an overall truncated cone shape which is open at one side and closed at the opposite side, a protrusion in the closed side which is shaped for the refractory anchor to receive an anchor bolt and one or more dividing plates which run from the closed side to the open side of the mould.
  • the dividing plates have a thickness in the range of 1 -5 mm, preferably 1 -3 mm and typically 1 -2mm.
  • the dividing plates have a thickness which corresponds with the thickness or the final thickness of the layer mortar that is applied between the parts of the refractory anchor.
  • Fig.1A,B show a side view of respectively a refractory anchor divided in three parts and a view of an undivided refractory anchor
  • Fig.2A-C show top view, side view and bottom view of a refractory anchor divided in four parts
  • Fig.3 shows a graph with the stresses a three different locations for a single part refractory anchor up to a 4 part refractory anchor.
  • a refractory anchor 1 is shown that is divided in three parts, with only the parts 2, 3 visible, wherein the darker shading is indicative of the maximum stresses occurring in the anchor when cooling down.
  • the stresses with a three-part anchor occur at the joining faces 6,7 of the three-part anchor 1 at or near the shoulder 8 between the first cone part 9 and the second cone part 10.
  • FIG.2A shows a top view of a refractory anchor 1 which is divided in four parts 2, 3, 4, 5 wherein the stresses as occur in the three-part anchor are far less and also less than in an anchor made in one piece.
  • the respective side view of fig.2B and the bottom view of fig.2C show the in this case symmetrical division of the refractory anchor in four parts.
  • the two-part anchor is the least favourable embodiment with the largest stresses occurring at the shoulder and the side face of the anchor. Only with regard to the bottom part the one-piece form is worse. This is related to the fact that in the two-part anchor an increased, but localized around the division plane, bending moment occurs which increases the stress intensity. This increased bending moment is less pronounced for the three and four-part anchors.
  • the three part form is clearly favourable over the one-piece and two-part form anchor with the largest decrease of the occurring stresses being at or near the shoulder part and a significant decrease of the stresses occurring at the bottom of the anchor.
  • the stresses at the side are less significant reduced with respect to the one piece form, but still there is a decrease.
  • the four part anchor shows even further decreased stresses and here the decrease of the stresses occurring at the side and the bottom are significantly reduced in comparison with the stresses occurring at the side and bottom of a three part anchor.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Furnace Housings, Linings, Walls, And Ceilings (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a refractory anchor for a refractory tile for a furnace and to a method to manufacture such a refractory anchor, wherein the refractory anchor has an overall truncated cone shape, wherein the refractory anchor is divided in at least two parts with one or more dividing planes between the parts which run from bottom plane to top plane of the truncated cone shaped refractory anchor.

Description

REFRACTORY ANCHOR FOR A FURNACE REFRACTORY TILE
Field of the invention
The invention relates to a refractory anchor for a furnace refractory roof tile or wall tile as used in high temperature furnaces in for instance the steel industry as well as to a method for the manufacturing of such an refractory anchor.
Background of the invention
With high temperature furnaces it is of importance to reduce heat losses as much as possible in order to be able to control the temperature in the furnace and to minimize the heating costs. To this end inside furnace walls are provided with a lining of refractory material that is secured to the walls.
A known method to mount refractory material to the inside of furnace walls and roof is by means of anchoring. A specific anchor is the so called ceramic refractory anchor, often a conical or shaped brick of a refractory material. The refractory anchor is often used to suspend insulation material in the form of refractory tiles from a structural support. These refractory tiles are layered tiles with layers of different refractory materials.
The life time of refractory tiles used in for instance re-heat furnaces to re-heat steel slabs are in the order of 8 - 20 years. The refractory anchor should have a life time that is at least equal to and preferably longer than that of the refractory tile to be sure that the refractory tiles remain suspended. However, due to the heating and cooling cycles the refractory anchor is subjected to large stress variations. This requires a refractory anchor that can withstand these stress variations over a prolonged period of time, in particular for the refractory tiles with a life time of 15 - 20 years.
The refractory tiles need to have excellent insulation properties in order to safe on heating costs as much as possible and at the same time the manufacturing costs should be low to be able to recover the costs within a reasonable period of time. These requirements oppose each other and a suitable balance should be found.
Objectives of the invention
It is an objective of the present invention to provide a refractory anchor that is capable to withstand variations in stress due to heating and cooling cycles over a prolonged period of time. It is another objective of the present invention to provide a refractory anchor with a life time that is at least equal to the lifetime of the refractory tile that is clamped or suspended by means of the anchor brick.
It is another objective of the present invention to provide a refractory anchor with a life time of 10-20 years.
It is another objective of the present invention to provide a refractory tile with excellent insulation properties.
It is another objective of the present invention to provide a refractory tile that can be manufactured against a cost price that can be recovered within a reasonable period of time.
Description of the invention
The invention relates to a refractory anchor as defined in claims 1 -10, a method for the manufacturing of a refractory anchor as defined in claims 1 1-13 and a mould for the manufacturing of a refractory anchor as defined in claims 13-15.
According to a first aspect of the invention one or more of the objectives of the invention are realized by providing a refractory anchor for a refractory tile for a high temperature furnace, wherein the refractory anchor has an overall truncated cone shape, characterised in that the refractory anchor is divided in three or more parts and wherein radial dividing planes run from bottom plane to top plane of the truncated cone shaped refractory anchor.
With a high temperature furnace a furnace is meant wherein the temperature is such that the hot side of the refractory material should be able to withstand temperatures in the range of 1300-1400 °C.
A refractory anchor is subjected to stresses during heating and cooling cycles and depending on the temperature rate these stresses might increase up to and over 50% of the maximum stress that a refractory anchor can initially withstand (i.e., its strength). With normal temperature rates in steel slab re-heat furnaces the stresses will be in the order of 20 - 25 % of the strength. Repeated heating and cooling cycles wherein the refractory anchor is subjected to high stresses will be detrimental to the life time of the refractory anchor. It was found that by dividing the refractory anchor in three or more parts these stresses during the cooling cycles can be substantially lowered.
It was found that dividing the refractory anchor in two parts resulted locally in an increase of the stresses to which the refractory anchor is subjected in comparison to the original one-part refractory anchor. For that reason the refractory anchor should at least be divided in three parts with radial dividing planes. These dividing planes start from the centre line of the cone shape and extend in radial direction. It was found that dividing the refractory anchor in three or four parts resulted in a substantial decrease of the stresses occurring in the refractory anchor.
A two-part refractory anchor is disclosed in AT320701 which has a truncated cone shape with oval shaped bottom and top plane with a dividing plane through the centre and parallel to the smallest axis of the oval.
The refractory anchor is preferably divided in parts of the same size and shape to have the same stresses and stress effects in each of the parts. Further the centre line or axis of the truncated cone shape is at the right angles to the bottom plane and top plane wherein both the bottom plane and top plane are circular planes. Moreover, parts of the same size will facilitate the manufacturing of the refractory anchor.
The refractory anchor is preferably shaped with a first cone part and a second cone part each with a truncated cone shape, with a shoulder part as transition between the first and second cone parts. The bottom plane of the second cone part is at the hot side when in use and wherein the diameter of the imaginary bottom plane of the first cone part is less than the diameter of the imaginary top plane of the second cone part. The advantage of this shape with a shoulder part is that it provides an improved support for the refractory tile.
According a further aspect the height of the first cone part is larger than the height of the second cone part. By lowering the shoulder part in the direction of the hot side the stresses occurring in the second cone part are decreased.
Preferably the height of the second cone part is less than 65% of the height of the first cone part. According to a further aspect the height of the second cone part is between 35% and 50% of the height of the first cone part. It was found that lowering the shoulder part beyond that does not result in any further overall improvement. The height ranges of the first and second cone part together with the height of the shoulder part form the total height of the refractory anchor. The total height of the refractory anchor is in a range of 230 - 400mm, wherein the top plane diameter of the first cone part is in a range of 80 - 145 mm and the bottom plane diameter of the second cone part is in a range of 165 - 210 mm.
With a three and four part refractory anchor the diameters of the bottom and top plane may in general be taken larger to ensure mechanical stability. The ranges for such three or four part refractory anchor will overlap with those of an undivided refractory anchor. According to a further aspect the shoulder part is concavely curved with a radius of curvature in the range of 5 - 30mm. The curvature of the shoulder part results in lower stresses occurring in the shoulder part, however there is a limit to the curvature. With a larger radius of curvature the area wherein the stresses associated with the shoulder part occur increases such that the effect of a larger radius of curvature is cancelled out. Good results in lowering the stresses are realized wherein the shoulder part is concavely curved with a radius of curvature in the range of 15 - 25mm.
According to a further aspect the opening angle or cone angle of the first cone part and/or second cone part are in the range of 2 -15°. With such an opening angle the anchor provides good support for the refractory tile and the stresses occurring in the refractory anchor are kept within limits.
Further a method is provided for the manufacturing of a refractory anchor for a refractory tile for a furnace, wherein the refractory anchor has an overall truncated cone shape and wherein the refractory anchor is divided in at least two parts, comprising the steps of:
- providing a mould for the refractory anchor divided in parts,
- filling the mould with a refractory moulding compound,
- firing the refractory anchor, and
- applying a mortar between the parts of the refractory anchor.
The filling of the mould is done under pressure such that the mould is completely filled with refractory moulding compound. Besides the filling under pressure the compound mass could further be stamped and/or the mould vibrated to get an optimal filling of the mould.
After the firing of the refractory anchor the parts are fixed to each other by applying a mortar between the parts of the refractory anchor. To this end an air curing mortar is used that is capable to withstand the temperatures to which it will be exposed in the furnace. The mortar is applied in such a thickness that the finale refractory anchor has the dimensions as designed. These dimensions correspond with the internal dimensions of the mould. In this manner a perfect match with the anchor hole in the refractory tile can be realized. The mortar has a strength that is less than the strength of each of the parts of the refractory anchor. Moreover, the mortar has a certain flexibility such that the refractory anchor can adapt to the complementary shaped recess provided in the refractory tile to receive the refractory anchor. Besides a division in a number of parts the method further includes that a shape is formed in the refractory anchor to receive an anchor bolt, which shape is complementary to the anchor bolt.
According to a further aspect a mould is provided for the manufacturing of a refractory anchor for a refractory tile for a furnace, wherein the refractory anchor has an overall truncated cone shape and wherein the refractory anchor is divided in at least three parts, and wherein the mould has an overall truncated cone shape which is open at one side and closed at the opposite side, a protrusion in the closed side which is shaped for the refractory anchor to receive an anchor bolt and one or more dividing plates which run from the closed side to the open side of the mould.
It is further provided that the dividing plates have a thickness in the range of 1 -5 mm, preferably 1 -3 mm and typically 1 -2mm. Preferably the dividing plates have a thickness which corresponds with the thickness or the final thickness of the layer mortar that is applied between the parts of the refractory anchor.
Brief description of the drawings
The invention will be further explained on hand of the example shown in the drawing, in which:
Fig.1A,B show a side view of respectively a refractory anchor divided in three parts and a view of an undivided refractory anchor,
Fig.2A-C show top view, side view and bottom view of a refractory anchor divided in four parts, and
Fig.3 shows a graph with the stresses a three different locations for a single part refractory anchor up to a 4 part refractory anchor.
Detailed description of the drawings
In fig.1A a refractory anchor 1 is shown that is divided in three parts, with only the parts 2, 3 visible, wherein the darker shading is indicative of the maximum stresses occurring in the anchor when cooling down. The stresses with a three-part anchor occur at the joining faces 6,7 of the three-part anchor 1 at or near the shoulder 8 between the first cone part 9 and the second cone part 10.
The side view of an undivided refractory anchor 1 of fig.1 B clearly shows that the stresses diminish in downward and upward direction from the shoulder 6.
These stresses with a three-part anchor only occur around the division because of the stress relieving effect of the joints. With an anchor in one piece these stresses occur over the entire anchor. Fig.2A shows a top view of a refractory anchor 1 which is divided in four parts 2, 3, 4, 5 wherein the stresses as occur in the three-part anchor are far less and also less than in an anchor made in one piece. The respective side view of fig.2B and the bottom view of fig.2C show the in this case symmetrical division of the refractory anchor in four parts.
In fig.3 a diagram is shown with the stresses occurring with the cooling down of and anchor divided in two, three and four parts. The stresses are given as occurring at or near the shoulder, the side and the bottom, wherein the side is the cone envelope of the second cone part 10 and the bottom is the part of the second cone part 10 that faces the interior of the re-heat furnace and which is subjected to the highest temperature differences over time.
Directly apparent from the diagram is that the two-part anchor is the least favourable embodiment with the largest stresses occurring at the shoulder and the side face of the anchor. Only with regard to the bottom part the one-piece form is worse. This is related to the fact that in the two-part anchor an increased, but localized around the division plane, bending moment occurs which increases the stress intensity. This increased bending moment is less pronounced for the three and four-part anchors.
The three part form is clearly favourable over the one-piece and two-part form anchor with the largest decrease of the occurring stresses being at or near the shoulder part and a significant decrease of the stresses occurring at the bottom of the anchor. The stresses at the side are less significant reduced with respect to the one piece form, but still there is a decrease.
The four part anchor shows even further decreased stresses and here the decrease of the stresses occurring at the side and the bottom are significantly reduced in comparison with the stresses occurring at the side and bottom of a three part anchor.

Claims

Refractory anchor for a refractory tile for a furnace, wherein the refractory anchor has an overall truncated cone shape, characterised in that the refractory anchor is divided in three or more parts and wherein radial dividing planes run from bottom plane to top plane of the truncated cone shaped refractory anchor.
Refractory anchor according to claim 1 , wherein the parts of the refractory anchor are identically shaped.
Refractory anchor according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the refractory anchor has a first cone part and a second cone part each with a truncated cone shape, with a shoulder part as transition between the first and second cone parts.
Refractory anchor according to claim 3, wherein the bottom plane of the second cone part is at the hot side when in use and wherein the diameter of the bottom plane of the first cone part is less than the diameter of the top plane of the second cone part.
Refractory anchor according to one or more of claims 1-4, wherein the height of the first cone part is larger than the height of the second cone part.
Refractory anchor according to claim 5, wherein the height of the second cone part is less than 65% of the height of the first cone part.
Refractory anchor according to claim 5, wherein the height of the second cone part is between 35% and 50% of the height of the first cone part.
Refractory anchor according to one or more of claims 1 -7, wherein the shoulder part is concavely curved with a radius of curvature in the range of 5 - 30mm. 9, Refractory anchor according to one or more of claims 1 -8, wherein the shoulder part is concavely curved with a radius of curvature in the range of 15 - 25mm.
Refractory anchor according to one or more of claims 1 -9, wherein the opening angle of the first cone part and or second cone part are in the range of 2-15°.
1 1. Method for the manufacturing of a refractory anchor for a refractory tile for a furnace, wherein the refractory anchor has an overall truncated cone shape and wherein the refractory anchor is divided in at least three parts, comprising the steps of:
- providing a mould for the refractory anchor divided in parts,
- filling the mould with a refractory moulding compound,
- firing the refractory anchor, and
- applying a mortar between the parts of the refractory anchor.
12. Method according to claim 1 1 , wherein the mortar is an air curing mortar.
13. Method according to claim 1 1 or 12, wherein a complementary shape to receive an anchor bolt is formed in the refractory anchor.
14. Mould for the manufacturing of a refractory anchor for a refractory tile for a furnace, wherein the refractory anchor has an overall truncated cone shape and wherein the refractory anchor is divided in at least two parts, wherein the mould has an overall truncated cone shape which is open at one side and closed at the opposite side, a protrusion in the closed side which is shaped for the refractory anchor to receive an anchor bolt and one or more dividing plates which run from the closed side to the open side of the mould.
15. Mould according to claim 14, wherein the dividing plates have a thickness in the range of 1-5 mm.
EP16819021.3A 2016-01-22 2016-12-09 Refractory anchor for a furnace refractory tile Active EP3405730B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP2016152404 2016-01-22
PCT/EP2016/080460 WO2017125206A1 (en) 2016-01-22 2016-12-09 Refractory anchor for a furnace refractory tile

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3405730A1 true EP3405730A1 (en) 2018-11-28
EP3405730B1 EP3405730B1 (en) 2020-10-07

Family

ID=63865743

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP16819021.3A Active EP3405730B1 (en) 2016-01-22 2016-12-09 Refractory anchor for a furnace refractory tile

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3405730B1 (en)
ES (1) ES2825874T3 (en)

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3405730B1 (en) 2020-10-07
ES2825874T3 (en) 2021-05-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN203956035U (en) The ingot mould of cast vanadium iron
JP2013112832A (en) Skid post and split block for skid post
JP2017514692A (en) Refractory ceramic casting nozzle
CA3008702C (en) Refractory anchor for a furnace refractory tile
CN103785820A (en) Ladle permanent lining and manufacturing method thereof
EP3405730B1 (en) Refractory anchor for a furnace refractory tile
CN101666147B (en) Construction method of mixed build furnace wall
CN205279716U (en) Plain rotary kiln lining that calcines of charcoal is with prefabricated brick
KR101574777B1 (en) firebrick liner unit
JP5907312B2 (en) Method for manufacturing lining structure of molten metal container
CN103788966A (en) High-temperature resistant expansion joint for dry quenching
JP6672986B2 (en) Lining structure of molten metal holding container and method of construction
CN105819713B (en) A kind of perpendicular wedge-shaped refractory brick of Limestone rotary kiln
CN203307449U (en) Lining structure of side part of refined aluminum groove
CN107619205B (en) Double-chamber lime shaft kiln fire-resistant lining combination device
JP6201704B2 (en) Amorphous refractory precast structure and manufacturing method thereof
CN204975309U (en) Heat preservation zirconium english brick
JP2016148466A (en) Composite heat insulating material and manufacturing method thereof
CN110822910A (en) Fireproof prefabricated brick for dynamic high-temperature furnace and building method thereof
CN104748551B (en) Embedded type silicon mullite brick
CN107560424B (en) Lime shaft kiln refractory lining composite brick
CN107560434B (en) Refractory lining combined brick for shaft kiln
CA2839175A1 (en) Lance for top injection in metallurgical vessels and method for the production of said lance
CN203949494U (en) Forge furnace fire door structure
CN103512359B (en) Sealing device fireproofing material construction method among technology sections of annealing furnace

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20180822

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20200420

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1321596

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20201015

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602016045502

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20201007

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210107

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201007

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210208

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210108

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201007

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2825874

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20210517

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210107

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201007

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201007

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210207

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201007

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201007

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201007

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602016045502

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201007

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201007

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201007

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201007

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201007

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201007

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201007

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201007

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20201231

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20210708

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201209

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201209

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201007

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201231

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201007

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201231

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210207

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201007

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201007

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201007

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201007

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201231

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: UEP

Ref document number: 1321596

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20201007

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230517

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20231227

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20231220

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20231227

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20231121

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20240102

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231229

Year of fee payment: 8