EP3244239A1 - Optical article comprising a substrate with an antireflective coating - Google Patents

Optical article comprising a substrate with an antireflective coating Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3244239A1
EP3244239A1 EP16305552.8A EP16305552A EP3244239A1 EP 3244239 A1 EP3244239 A1 EP 3244239A1 EP 16305552 A EP16305552 A EP 16305552A EP 3244239 A1 EP3244239 A1 EP 3244239A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
optical article
coating
polymer coating
article according
refractive index
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP16305552.8A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3244239B1 (en
Inventor
William TROTTIER-LAPOINTE
Oleg Zabeida
Ludvik Martinu
Jolanta SAPIEHA
Karin Scherer
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
EssilorLuxottica SA
Original Assignee
Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
Essilor International Compagnie Generale dOptique SA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, Essilor International Compagnie Generale dOptique SA filed Critical Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
Priority to EP16305552.8A priority Critical patent/EP3244239B1/en
Priority to PCT/EP2017/061289 priority patent/WO2017194657A1/en
Priority to US16/300,379 priority patent/US10877182B2/en
Priority to CN201780029027.5A priority patent/CN109196389B/en
Publication of EP3244239A1 publication Critical patent/EP3244239A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3244239B1 publication Critical patent/EP3244239B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B1/00Optical elements characterised by the material of which they are made; Optical coatings for optical elements
    • G02B1/10Optical coatings produced by application to, or surface treatment of, optical elements
    • G02B1/11Anti-reflection coatings
    • G02B1/111Anti-reflection coatings using layers comprising organic materials
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B1/00Optical elements characterised by the material of which they are made; Optical coatings for optical elements
    • G02B1/10Optical coatings produced by application to, or surface treatment of, optical elements
    • G02B1/14Protective coatings, e.g. hard coatings

Abstract

The invention concerns an optical article comprising a substrate with two main surfaces, at least one of which is covered by a polymer coating having an outer surface, said coating comprising a first superficial layer beneath the outer surface having a first refractive index n1 and a second layer beneath the first superficial layer having a second refractive index n2, with n2 < n1 and having the lowest refractive index of said polymer coating, and said coating exhibiting antireflective properties due to the difference between refractive indexes n1 and n2, said refractive index difference within the coating resulting from a plasma , corona, and/or an ion beam treatment of an initial polymer coating, through the outer surface.
The invention concerns also a method for manufacturing this optical article.

Description

  • The present invention concerns an optical article, in particular an ophthalmic lens, comprising an antireflective polymer coating and a method for manufacturing such an optical article.
  • A typical optical article construction, such as an ophthalmic lens construction, comprises a substrate, preferably made of an organic glass, at least a main surface of which is usually coated with polymeric coatings to improve the impact and/or abrasion and/or scratch resistance of the organic glass.
  • In order to impart antireflecting properties to the optical article, whether or not coated with the above polymer coatings, it is usual to form on the substrate or the polymer coatings an antireflective coating. Typically, such an antireflective coating is made of a stack of inorganic layers having alternatively low and high refractive indexes.
  • Besides the fact that the deposition of such an antireflective coating implies an additional manufacturing step, the presence of this antireflective coating of inorganic nature is detrimental to the mechanical properties of the article.
  • It has also been proposed to impart antireflecting properties to an optical article by controlling the roughness of the surface of a polymeric coating formed on a main surface of the substrate of the article. This roughness control can be obtained by submitting the outer surface of the coating to a plasma etching. See for example:
    1. 1. J. Hsu, P. Wang, Y. Lin, and H. Chen, "Anti-reflective effect of transparent polymer by plasma treatment with end-hall ion source and optical coating," Opt. Rev. 17, 1-4 (2010)
    2. 2. U. Schulz and N. Kaiser, "Antireflective Coating with Nanostructured Organic Top-Layer," Opt. Interf. Coatings 1, WA2 (2010)
    3. 3. U. Schulz, P. Munzert, R. Leitel, I. Wendling, N. Kaiser, and a Tünnermann, "Antireflection of transparent polymers by advanced plasma etching procedures.," Opt. Express 15, 13108-13 (2007)
    4. 4. G. S. Oehrlein, R. J. Phaneuf, and D. B. Graves, "Plasma-polymer interactions: A review of progress in understanding polymer resist mask durability during plasma etching for nanoscale fabrication," J. Vac.
  • However, the superficial nanostructures, thus created, are mechanically weak and are easily altered by external mechanical action, such as rubbing, wiping, etc., therefore resulting in a decrease and even a loss of the antireflective properties.
  • Thus, the aim of the present invention is to provide an optical article having antireflecting properties without the drawbacks of the known prior art.
  • More specifically, the aim of the present invention is to provide an optical article having antireflective properties which does not comprise an antireflective coating made of a stack of inorganic material layers and does not exhibit the mechanical weaknesses of a coating with a roughened surface.
  • The above goals are achieved by the invention which provides an optical article comprising a substrate with two main surfaces, at least one of which is covered by a polymer coating having an outer surface, said coating comprising a first superficial layer beneath the outer surface having a first refractive index n1 and a second layer beneath the first superficial layer having a second refractive index n2, with n2 < n1, and having the lowest refractive index of said polymer coating, and said coating exhibiting antireflective properties due to the difference between refractive indexes n1 and n2, said refractive index difference within the coating resulting from a plasma, a corona and/or an ion beam treatment of an initial polymer coating, through the outer surface.
  • Without being linked by a particular theory, it seems that the plasma, corona and/or ion beam treatment is partially eliminating the organic material of the coating in a subsurface of this coating, creating a porosity that involves a decrease of the refractive index in a certain depth of the coating. A layer having a lower porosity is then created. As an alternative, a profile of porosity and/or refractive index from the outer surface of the coating is created within the depth of the coating until reaching a minimum and thereafter the refractive index increases again while progressing in the depth of the coating up to achieving the refractive index of the polymer coating before any treatment.
  • At the same time, the surface roughness of the coating is not or slightly affected by the treatment and a densification of the polymeric material can happen in a thin layer. In certain cases, it might increase superficially the refractive index of the coating.
  • Corresponding structures of the coating will be detailed hereafter.
  • In the present specification, the expression "outer surface" [of a coating] means the surface of the coating that is the farthest from the substrate.
  • When a layer A is positioned beneath a layer B, it means that the layer B is farther from the outer surface.
  • Although otherwise stated the refractive indexes are measured at 25°C at a wavelength of 550 nm.
  • A layer of the organic coating is defined as a layer wherein the refractive index is homogeneous and can be measured.
  • It is considered that a layer having 1 - 5 nm thickness is homogeneous.
  • In an embodiment, the first superficial layer and the second layer are adjacent.
  • In another embodiment, the first layer and the second layer are not adjacent and the refractive index within the polymer coating can vary in a continuous or a discontinuous manner from the first superficial layer to the second layer, in particular the variation of the refractive index within the polymer coating can be a gradient.
  • The thickness of the first superficial layer, second and third layer might typically range from 1 to 55 nm. In one embodiment they are preferably thin (typically from 1 to 5 nm).
  • Preferably, the difference n1-n2 of the refractive indexes is higher than or equal to 0.05, more preferably higher than or equal to 0.10, better higher than or equal to the following values: 0.15, 0.20, 0.25, 0.30 and the refractive index n2 of the second layer exhibits the lowest refractive index of the polymer coating after plasma, corona and/or ion beam treatment.
  • In general, the refractive index n1 in the first superficial layer ranges from 1.45 to 1.65 and the refractive index n2 in the second layer ranges from 1.25 to less than 1.45.
  • Typically, the second layer has a higher porosity than the first layer. The porosity measurement is the ellipsometry method utilising the Lorentz-Lorentz equation expressed in the case of a blend of 2 materials wherein the second material is air. It is necessary to introduce in the formula the refractive index of the dense material (e.g. the coating material). The maximum porosity of the second layer ranges from 10 to 70%, preferably from 20 to 60% and more preferably from 20 to 40%..A typical value for the porosity of the second layer is 30%.
  • Also, preferably, the outer surface of the polymer coating exhibits a greater hardness after the plasma and/or ion beam treatment than initially.
  • The polymer coating has in general a thickness ranging from 1 to 10 microns, preferably from 2 µm to 4 µm.
  • Usually, the second layer is located 15 nm to 55 nm beneath the outer surface of the polymer coating.
  • In an embodiment, the coating comprises a third layer located beneath said second layer and having a refractive index n3>n2.
  • In another embodiment, the refractive index within the polymer coating can vary in a continuous or a discontinuous manner from the second layer to the third layer, in particular the variation of the refractive index within the polymer coating can be a gradient.
  • In another embodiment, the refractive index of the third layer is the same as the initial refractive index of the polymer coating before plasma, corona or ion beam treatment.
  • In another embodiment n3<n1.
  • In general, the outer surface of the polymer coating has a low roughness. Typically, said outer surface of the coating has a roughness Ra lower than 10 nm, preferably lower than 5 nm, more preferably lower than 2 nm, Ra being determined by Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM).
  • Ra is defined classically as the arithmetic average of absolute values of the vertical deviations of the roughness profile from the mean line.
  • In an embodiment, the polymer coating comprises a matrix comprising organic groups. Organic groups (groups containing carbon atoms).
  • In another embodiment, the polymer coating comprises -(Si-O)- units and is preferably a polysiloxane.
  • Preferably, the polymer coating comprises at least one epoxysilane polymer and optionally at least one colloid.
  • Preferably, the polymer coating comprises an abrasion resistant and/or anti-scratch coating.
  • Preferred epoxysilane polymers are epoxyalkoxysilane polymers and in particular epoxytrialkoxysilane polymers such as α-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane and α-glycidoxypropyltriethoxysilane polymers.
  • Preferably, said epoxysilane has the following formula:

             RnYmSi(X)4-n-m     (I)

  • Wherein R groups, identical or different, are monovalent organic groups linked to the Si atom by a carbon atom and comprising at least one, preferably one epoxy function; X groups, identical or different, are hydrolyzable groups; Y is a monovalent organic group that does not contain an epoxy group and which is linked to the Si atom by a carbon atom, n and m being integers such as n = 1 and m=0 or 1.
  • The preferred R groups have the following formulas V and VI:
    Figure imgb0001
    Figure imgb0002
    wherein R2 is an alkyl group, preferably a methyl group or a hydrogen atom, more preferably a hydrogen atom ; a and c are integers ranging from 1 to 6 and b is representing 0, 1 or 2.
  • Most preferred epoxysilanes are those wherein, in formula I, n=1, m =0 and X is a C1-C5 alkoxy group, preferably OCH3.
  • Many epoxy-functional alkoxysilanes are suitable as hydrolysis precursors, including epoxydialkoxysilanes such as γ-glycidoxypropylmethyldimethoxysilane, γ-glycidoxypropylmethyldiethoxysilane, γ-glycidoxypropyl-methyl-diisopropenoxysilane, and γ-glycidoxyethoxypropylmethyldimethoxysilane;
  • Epoxytrialkoxysilane such as glycidoxymethyl-trimethoxysilane, glycidoxymethyltriethoxysilane, glycidoxymethyl-tripropoxysilane, glycidoxymethyl-tributoxysilane, beta-glycidoxyethyltrimethoxysilane, beta-glycidoxyethyltriethoxysilane, beta-glycidoxyethyl-tripropoxysilane, beta-glycidoxyethyl-tributoxysilane, beta-glycidoxyethyltrimethoxysilane, alpha-glycidoxyethyl-triethoxysilane, alpha-glycidoxyethyl-tripropoxysilane, alpha-glycidoxyethyltributoxysilane, gamma-glycidoxypropyl-trimethoxysilane, gamma-glycidoxypropyl-triethoxysilane, gamma-glycidoxypropyl-tripropoxysilane, gamma-glycidoxypropyltributoxysilane, beta-glycidoxypropyl-trimethoxysilane, beta-glycidoxypropyl-triethoxysilane, beta-glycidoxypropyl-tripropoxysilane, beta-glycidoxypropyltributoxysilane, alpha-glycidoxypropyl-trimethoxysilane, alpha-glycidoxypropyl-triethoxysilane, alpha -glycidoxypropyl-tripropoxysilane, alpha-glycidoxypropyltributoxysilane, gamma-glycidoxybutyl-trimethoxysilane, delta-glycidoxybutyl-triethoxysilane, delta-glycidoxybutyl-tripropoxysilane, delta-glycidoxybutyl-tributoxysilane, delta-glycidoxybutyl-trimethoxysilane, gamma-glycidoxybutyl-triethoxysilane, gamma-glycidoxybutyl-tripropoxysilane, gamma-propoxybutyl-tributoxysilane, delta-glycidoxybutyl-trimethoxysilane, delta-glycidoxybutyl-triethoxysilane, delta-glycidoxybutyl-tripropoxysilane, alpha-glycidoxybutyl-trimethoxysilane, alpha-glycidoxybutyl-triethoxysilane, alpha-glycidoxybutyl-tripropoxysilane, alpha-glycidoxybutyl-tributoxysilane, (3,4-epoxycyclohexyl)-methyl-trimethoxysilane, (3,4-epoxycyclohexyl)methyl-triethoxysilane, (3,4-epoxycyclohexyl)methyl-tripropoxysilane, (3,4-epoxycyclohexyl)-methyl-tributoxysilane, (3,4-epoxycyclohexyl)ethyl-triethoxysilane, (3,4-epoxycyclohexyl)ethyl-triethoxysilane, (3,4-epoxycyclohexyl)ethyl-tripropoxysilane, (3,4-epoxycyclohexyl)-ethyl-tributoxysilane, (3,4-epoxycyclohexyl)propyl-trimethoxysilane, (3,4-epoxycyclohexyl)propyl-triethoxysilane, (3,4-epoxycyclohexyl)propyl-tripropoxysilane, (3,4-epoxycyclohexyl)propyl-tributoxysilane, (3,4-epoxycyclohexyl)butyl-trimethoxysilane, (3,4-epoxycyclohexy)butyl-triethoxysilane, (3,4-epoxycyclohexyl)-butyl-tripropoxysilane, and (3,4-epoxycyclohexyl)butyl-tributoxysilane.
  • Preferably, epoxysilanes are chosen within the group consisting of γ-glycidoxypropyl triethoxysilane, γ-glycidoxypropyl trimethoxysilane, 2-(3,4-epoxycyclohexyl) ethyl trimethoxysilane and 2-(3,4-epoxycyclohexyl) ethyltriethoxysilane or a mixture of two or more thereof.
  • One preferably uses γ-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane (GLYMO).
  • According to one aspect of this invention, the epoxysilane is hydrolyzed, preferably before being mixed to the other components of the composition.
  • The hydrolysis may be performed as known in the art, by using acidic catalysts (hydrochloric acid, acetic acid), in presence of water.
  • Hydrolysis of the alkoxy groups liberates the associated alcohol to form silanol groups which will condense spontaneously. Preferably, the alkoxysilane is reacted with a stoichiometric amount of water to hydrolyze the hydrolysable groups, typically the alkoxy groups.
  • In an embodiment, the coating comprises colloids. The colloids that can be used are preferably chosen between silica and high index oxides such as TiO2, ZrO2, Sb2O5, WO3.
  • In an embodiment, coating compositions of the polymeric coating contain at least 30%, preferably 30% to 60% by weight of solid material (inorganic colloid) and more preferably 40 to 55 % by weight in the dry content of the coating.
  • Preferred colloid is colloidal silica.
  • Preferred abrasion resistant coatings are those comprising an epoxysilane polymer and a colloid and in particular those disclosed in EP-0.614.957 .
  • The substrate may be any classical substrate used in the optical field such as a mineral or an organic glass, for example an organic glass made of a thermoplastic or thermocurable plastic.
  • To be mentioned as especially preferred classes of substrate materials are polycarbonates, polyamides, polyimides, polysulfones, copolymers of polyethylene therephthalate and polycarbonate, polyolefins such as polynorbornenes, resins resulting from polymerization or (co)polymerization of alkylene glycol bis allyl carbonates such as polymers and copolymers of diethylene glycol bis(allylcarbonate) (marketed, for instance, under the trade name CR-39® by the PPG Industries company, the corresponding marketed lenses being referred to as ORMA® lenses from ESSILOR), polycarbonates such as those derived from bisphenol A, (meth)acrylic or thio(meth)acrylic polymers and copolymers such as polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), urethane and thiourethane polymers and copolymers, epoxy polymers and copolymers, episulfide polymers and copolymers.
  • In an embodiment, a low surface energy hydrophobic material such as fluorinated resins or fluorinated polymers can be applied as a top coat on the surface of the article having a coating according to the invention.
  • Preferably the surface energy of such a top coat is lower than or equal to 14 mJ/m2, preferably lower than or equal to 12 mJ/m2. In general, such a low surface energy coating comprises at least one of a fluoropolymer or a fluorosilane. Such fluoropolymers or fluorosilanes include, but are not limited to, Teflon® and commercially available fluorosilanes such as Dow Corning 2604, 2624 and 2634; Daikin Optool DSX®, Shinetsu OPTRON®, heptadecafluorosilane (manufactured, for example, by GELEST), FLUOROSYL® (manufactured, for example, by CYTONIX); FAS13, CYTOP™ (from ASAHI) etc. Such coatings can be applied to the nanostructured surface of the article by dipping, vapor coating, spraying, application with a roller, and other suitable method known in the art.
  • Compositions containing fluorosilanes recommended for the preparation of hydrophobic and/or oleophobic top-coats are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,183,872 . They contain fluoropolymers with organic groups carrying silicon-based groups represented by the following general formula and with a molecular weight of 5.102 to 1.105:
    Figure imgb0003
  • in which RF represents a perfluoroalkyl group; Z represents a fluoro or trifluoromethyl group; a, b, c, d and e each representing, independently from each other, 0 or an integer greater than or equal to 1, provided that the sum a+b+c+d+e is not less than 1 and that the order of the repeated units between the brackets indexed under a, b, c, d and e are not limited to the one given; Y represents H or an alkyl group comprising from 1 to 4 carbon atoms; X represents an atom of hydrogen, bromine or iodine;
    R1 represents an hydroxyl group or a hydrolysable group; R2 represents an atom of hydrogen or a monovalent hydrocarbon group; m represents 0, 1 or 2; n represents 1, 2 or 3; and p represents an integer equal to at least 1, preferably equal to at least 2.
  • Particularly preferred are perfluoropolyethers of formula:
    Figure imgb0004
    wherein Y, R1, m and p are as defined above and a is an integer from 1 to 50.
  • A formulation containing a fluorosilane given by the previous formula (1) is marketed by DAIKIN INDUSTRIES with the name OPTOOL DSX®.
  • The document JP 2005 187936 describes fluorinated compounds of silane suitable for forming anti-smudge coatings and particularly compounds given by the formula:
    Figure imgb0005
    wherein
    • R'F is a linear chain divalent perfluoropolyether radical,
    • R' is an alkyl radical in C1-C4 or a phenyl radical,
    • X' is a hydrolysable group,
    • a' is an integer from 0 to 2,
    • b' is an integer from 1 to 5, and
    • m' and n' are integers equal to 2 or 3.
  • A fluorosilane compound given by the formula (2) above is marketed by SHIN-ETSU CHEMICAL CO, Ltd with the name KY-130®.
  • Fluorosilane compounds given by the formula (2) and methods for preparing them are also described in the patent application EP 1 300 433 .
  • According to the invention, the coating of the present invention has antireflective properties, i.e. the outer surface of said polymer coating exhibits a Rv value lower than 2.5%, preferably lower than one of the following values: 2.4%, 2.3%, 2.2%, 2.1%, 2%, 1.9%, 1.8%, 1.7%, 1.6%, 1.5% at 15°incidence and better lower than 2.5% at 15° and 45°incidence. Luminous reflection Rv, is such as defined in the ISO 13666:1998 Standard, and measured in accordance with the ISO 8980-4 Standard (for an angle of incidence lower than 17°, typically of 15°).
  • The present invention also concerns a method of manufacturing an optical article as disclosed above which comprises treating with a plasma and/or an ion beam a polymer coating, through its outer surface, of an optical article comprising a substrate with two main surfaces at least one of which is covered by a polymer coating having an outer surface, to create a first superficial layer beneath the outer surface having a first refractive index n1 and a second layer beneath the first superficial blayer having a second refractive index n2, with n2 < n1, thereby imparting antireflective properties to the coating.
  • Preferably, the plasma treatment comprises submitting the outer surface of the polymer coating to an oxygen plasma, preferably under a pressure ranging from 10 milliTorrs to 150 milliTorrs, during a period ranging from 5 minutes to 80 minutes, preferably 15 to 40 minutes, better 15 to 25 minutes..
  • Also, preferably, the dioxygen plasma is generated using a radiofrequency source with a tension ranging from 100 to 600 V, preferably 100 to 300 V and an applied power ranging from 10 W to 250 W, preferably 20 to 100 W. The applied surface power density is preferably ranging from 0.05 to 1.5 W/cm2, more preferably from 0.1 to 0.55 W/cm2.
  • In an embodiment, the optical article is treated by a plasma, preferably a dioxygen plasma, obtained by a radiofrequency source with a power ranging from 10 to 50 watts.
  • The following parts of the description are made in reference with the enclosed Figures which represent:
    • Figure 1: Graphs of the light transmission of optical articles according to the invention in comparison with a similar optical article not treated according to the invention;
    • Figure 2: Graphs of the reflectivity Rv (%) in function of the incident angle for optical articles according to the invention and a similar optical article not treated according to the invention;
    • Figure 3: Graphs of the wiping resistance of an optical article according to the invention;
    • Figure 4: Graphs of the refractive indexes of different optical article of the invention in function of the depth from the outer surface of the polymer coating; and
    • Figure 5: Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) pictures of both the outer surface of the polymer coating of an article according to the invention and of the same optical article before plasma treatment, and
    • Figure 6: is a graph of the nanoindentation hardness of the outer surface of an optical article according to the invention and of a same optical article before treatment (control).
    EXAMPLES 1. Initial optical articles
  • The initial optical articles used in the following examples are ORMA® ophthalmic lenses of organic glass constituted by a diethylene glycol di(allylcarbonate) polymer with a central thickness of 2 mm which were dip coated in a polymer coating composition according to example 3 of EP-0.614.957 and then precured for 15 minutes at 60°C. They were then placed in an oven at 100°C for 3 hours.
  • The thickness of the resulting coating was 3 µm.
  • These initial optical articles are identified A in the following examples.
  • 2. Plasma treatment
  • The plasma treatment of the initial optical article A has been effected in a vacuum chamber equipped with a metallic electrode of 15 cm diameter. The samples (4 at the same time) were mounted on the electrode which was fed with a RF power (13.56 MHz).
  • The plasma was a dioxygen plasma under a pressure of 100 mTorr, a RF power of 26 W and a tension of 120 V or 270 V. Treatment was effected on either one side (coating side) or both sides for different durations.
  • The following samples were obtained:
    Sample Tension (V) Duration (minutes) Sides treated
    A1 120 20 Both
    A2 120 40 One side
    A3 120 40 One side
    A4 120 20 One side
    A5 120 20 One side
    A6 270 20 One side
    A7 270 20 One side
    A8 270 20 One side
  • 3. Transmission test
  • The light transmission of samples A1 to A5 has been determined using standard method by measurement with a spectrometer. Results are shown in Figure 1 which clearly shows that the optical articles according to the invention have superior light transmission than the initial optical article.
  • 4. Reflection test
  • The reflection of samples A6 to A8 has been determined according to standard ISO 8980-4 2006.
  • Results are given on Figure 2 which shows that optical articles according to the invention have a reflectivity Rv of at most 2.5 % up to an incident angle of 45° whereas the initial optical article A has a reflectivity of more than 3 % up to 5 % for the incident angle of 45°. It is to be noted that reflection tests have been made on several exemplaries of samples A6 to A8 and that they were made on either the concave face (Cc) or the convex face (Cx).
  • 5. Resistance to wiping
  • Sample A6 is subjected to a wiping test using a tribometer Pin-On-Disk Tribometer (TRB) from the CSM company.
  • For this test, the reflection spectrum of the sample A6 is first measured, and then sample A6 is subjected to wiping using a silicone pin (8 shore 0) which bears on a Cemoi® cloth placed on the sample.
  • The sample is then moved under the cloth.
  • Ten circular turns (radius 15 mm) are effected at a speed of 1 cm/s, with increasing strengths (1 N, 2N, 5N and 10N). Thereafter, the reflection spectrum is again measured.
  • Contact areas are depending on the bearing strength and are 0.3 cm2 for 1 N, 0.5 cm2 for 2N, 0.65 cm2 for 5N and 1.1 cm2 for 10N.
  • Figure 3 shows that the reflection spectrum of the sample does not change after the test which means that the antireflective properties of the polymer coating are not altered.
  • 6. Determination of the refractive indexes
  • The refractive indexes have been determined by spectro-ellipsometry on samples similar to samples A1-A6 but with further measurements for intermediate times of treatment.
  • Results are shown on Figure 4.
  • It can be seen on Figure 4 that the refractive index of the polymer coating before treatment is the same throughout the coating (about 1.49) whereas after a treatment according to the invention
    1. 1)the polymer coating comprises a superficial layer having a refractive index which is measured as being higher than the refractive index of the coating before treatment,
    2. 2)the refractive index of the polymer coating continuously decreases within the polymer coating.up to reaching a layer whose refractive index is corresponding to a minimum value (2nd layer) and the refractive index further increases up to a third layer having the refractive index of the initial value of the polymer coating value (before plasma treatment).(None of the thin 3 layers (1-5 nm thickness) are represented).
    7. Surface roughness
  • Figure 5 shows images obtained by atomic force microscopy of the outer surface of a lens sample A obtained as described in 1.above (control) and a sample according to the invention: same lens sample obtained as described in 1) above is treated by a dioxygen plasma at 250 W, 20 minutes. The obtained sample has 2.5% increase in transmission and clearly, the roughness of the outer surface of the sample according to the invention is less than that of the control sample. This means that the antireflective property of the optical articles of the invention is not a result of an increase of the roughness of the coating outer surface.
  • 8. Surface hardness
  • The surface hardness was measured by nanoindentation on a sample A (control) and, a sample according to the invention (sample treated by a dioxygen plasma at 26, W, 270 V)..
  • Hardness H has been determined by nanoindentation as described in WO2015166144 .
  • Also, to assure that result is not due to annealing, a sample A has been annealed at a temperature of 120°C during 1 hour in atmospheric conditions.
  • Results are shown in Figure 6 which are graphs of the hardness H(GPA) in function of the ratio h/e (e= thickness of the coating, h = depth under the surface of the coating) in the polymer coating.
  • It can be seen that there is a coating hardening close to the outer surface for the sample according to the invention.

Claims (17)

  1. Optical article comprising a substrate with two main surfaces, at least one of which is covered by a polymer coating having an outer surface, said coating comprising a first superficial layer beneath the outer surface having a first refractive index n1 and a second layer beneath the first superficial layer having a second refractive index n2, with n2 < n1 and having the lowest refractive index of said polymer coating, and said coating exhibiting antireflective properties due to the difference between refractive indexes n1 and n2, said refractive index difference within the coating resulting from a plasma , corona, and/or an ion beam treatment of an initial polymer coating, through the outer surface.
  2. Optical article according to claim 1, wherein the coating comprises a third layer located beneath said second layer and having a refractive index n3>n2.
  3. Optical article according to claim 1 or 2, wherein n1 -n2 is higher than or equal to 0.05, preferably higher than or equal to 0.10.
  4. Optical article according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the first and the second layer are not adjacent and the refractive index within the polymer coating varies in a continuous or discontinuous manner from the first to the second layer.
  5. Optical article according to claim 4, wherein the variation of the refractive index is a gradient.
  6. Optical article according to any of claims 1 to 5, wherein said second layer has a higher porosity than said first layer.
  7. Optical article according to any of claims 1 to 6, wherein said said outer surface of the coating exhibits a greater hardness after the plasma, corona, and/or ion beam treatment.
  8. Optical article according to any of claims 1 to 7, wherein the polymer coating has a thickness ranging from 2 micrometers to 4 micrometers.
  9. Optical article according to any of claims 1 to 8, wherein the second layer is located from 15 nanometers to 55 nanometers from said outer surface of the polymer coating.
  10. Optical article according to any of claims 1 to 9, wherein said outer surface of the coating has a roughness Ra lower than 10 nm, preferably lower than 5 nm, more preferably lower than 2 nm.
  11. Optical article according to any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein the polymer coating comprises at least one inorganic colloid.
  12. Optical article according to any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the polymer coating comprises a matrix comprising organic groups.
  13. Optical article according to any of claims 1 to 12, wherein the polymer coating comprises at least one epoxysilane polymer.
  14. Optical article according to any of claims 1 to 13, wherein the polymer coating is an abrasion resistant and/or anti-scratch coating.
  15. Optical article according to any one of claims 1 to 14, wherein the outer surface of said polymer coating exhibits a Rv value lower than 2.5% at 15° and 45°incidence.
  16. Method for manufacturing an optical article according to any of claims 1 to 15, which comprises treating with a plasma, a corona and/or an ion beam the initial polymer coating, through its outer surface of an optical article comprising a substrate with two main surfaces, at least one of which is covered by a polymer coating having an outer surface, to create first and second layers within the polymer coating, thereby conferring antireflective properties to the polymer coating.
  17. Method according to claim 16, wherein the optical article is treated by a plasma, preferably a dioxygen plasma, obtained by a radiofrequency source with a surface power density ranging from 0.05 to 1.5 W/cm2.
EP16305552.8A 2016-05-11 2016-05-11 Optical article comprising a substrate with an antireflective coating Active EP3244239B1 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP16305552.8A EP3244239B1 (en) 2016-05-11 2016-05-11 Optical article comprising a substrate with an antireflective coating
PCT/EP2017/061289 WO2017194657A1 (en) 2016-05-11 2017-05-11 Optical article comprising a substrate with an antireflective coating
US16/300,379 US10877182B2 (en) 2016-05-11 2017-05-11 Optical article comprising a substrate with an antireflective coating
CN201780029027.5A CN109196389B (en) 2016-05-11 2017-05-11 Optical article comprising a substrate with an antireflection coating

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP16305552.8A EP3244239B1 (en) 2016-05-11 2016-05-11 Optical article comprising a substrate with an antireflective coating

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3244239A1 true EP3244239A1 (en) 2017-11-15
EP3244239B1 EP3244239B1 (en) 2022-05-04

Family

ID=56098186

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP16305552.8A Active EP3244239B1 (en) 2016-05-11 2016-05-11 Optical article comprising a substrate with an antireflective coating

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US10877182B2 (en)
EP (1) EP3244239B1 (en)
CN (1) CN109196389B (en)
WO (1) WO2017194657A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111247458B (en) 2017-08-31 2022-06-07 康宁股份有限公司 Hybrid gradient interference hard coating
US11630243B2 (en) * 2017-08-31 2023-04-18 Corning Incorporated Hybrid gradient-interference hardcoatings
EP3845933B1 (en) * 2019-12-31 2022-09-07 Essilor International Computer-implemented method for designing an interferential stack for an optical component

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0614957A1 (en) 1993-03-08 1994-09-14 ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL Compagnie Générale d'Optique Abrasion-resistant coating compositions containing hydrolised silanes and aluminium compounds; coated articles resistant to abrasion and shocks
US6183872B1 (en) 1995-08-11 2001-02-06 Daikin Industries, Ltd. Silicon-containing organic fluoropolymers and use of the same
EP1300433A2 (en) 2001-10-05 2003-04-09 Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. Perfluoropolyether-modified silane, surface treating agent, and antireflection filter
JP2005187936A (en) 2003-12-02 2005-07-14 Seiko Epson Corp Thin film manufacturing method, optical component manufacturing method, and film deposition apparatus
US20130271842A1 (en) * 2011-10-12 2013-10-17 Tamron Co., Ltd. Anti-Reflection Film and Method for Manufacturing Anti-Reflection Film
US20150309214A1 (en) * 2014-04-28 2015-10-29 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. Method for Producing an Antireflection Layer on a Silicone Surface and Optical Element
WO2015166144A1 (en) 2014-04-28 2015-11-05 Corporation De L'ecole Polytechnique De Montreal Article having optimised thermomechanical properties, comprising a layer of titano-organic nature

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5508368A (en) 1994-03-03 1996-04-16 Diamonex, Incorporated Ion beam process for deposition of highly abrasion-resistant coatings
JP3905035B2 (en) * 2000-08-29 2007-04-18 独立行政法人科学技術振興機構 Method for forming optical thin film
US20030054117A1 (en) * 2001-02-02 2003-03-20 Brewer Science, Inc. Polymeric antireflective coatings deposited by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition
DE202012013052U1 (en) * 2011-02-23 2014-09-29 Schott Ag Sapphire glass disc with antireflection coating and its use
US20130215513A1 (en) * 2012-01-30 2013-08-22 Guardian Industries Corp. Method of making coated article including anti-reflection coating with porosity differences in two layers, and products containing the same
US20140009834A1 (en) * 2012-07-05 2014-01-09 Intermolecular, Inc. Novel antireflective coatings with graded refractive index
US9703011B2 (en) * 2013-05-07 2017-07-11 Corning Incorporated Scratch-resistant articles with a gradient layer
DE102014003922B3 (en) 2014-03-19 2015-05-28 Rodenstock Gmbh Process for the hydrophobization of hardcoat surfaces and hard-lacquered substrate with hydrophobized surface

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0614957A1 (en) 1993-03-08 1994-09-14 ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL Compagnie Générale d'Optique Abrasion-resistant coating compositions containing hydrolised silanes and aluminium compounds; coated articles resistant to abrasion and shocks
US6183872B1 (en) 1995-08-11 2001-02-06 Daikin Industries, Ltd. Silicon-containing organic fluoropolymers and use of the same
EP1300433A2 (en) 2001-10-05 2003-04-09 Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. Perfluoropolyether-modified silane, surface treating agent, and antireflection filter
JP2005187936A (en) 2003-12-02 2005-07-14 Seiko Epson Corp Thin film manufacturing method, optical component manufacturing method, and film deposition apparatus
US20130271842A1 (en) * 2011-10-12 2013-10-17 Tamron Co., Ltd. Anti-Reflection Film and Method for Manufacturing Anti-Reflection Film
US20150309214A1 (en) * 2014-04-28 2015-10-29 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. Method for Producing an Antireflection Layer on a Silicone Surface and Optical Element
WO2015166144A1 (en) 2014-04-28 2015-11-05 Corporation De L'ecole Polytechnique De Montreal Article having optimised thermomechanical properties, comprising a layer of titano-organic nature

Non-Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
CINDY STEINER ET AL: "Vacuum plasma treatment and coating of fluoropolymer webs - challenges and applications", 14 June 2016 (2016-06-14), XP055311007, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http://www.aimcal.org/uploads/4/6/6/9/46695933/steiner_abstract.pdf> [retrieved on 20161014] *
G. S. OEHRLEIN; R. J. PHANEUF; D. B. GRAVES: "Plasma-polymer interactions: A review of progress in understanding polymer resist mask durability during plasma etching for nanoscale fabrication", J. VAC
J. HSU; P. WANG; Y. LIN; H. CHEN: "Anti-reflective effect of transparent polymer by plasma treatment with end-hall ion source and optical coating", OPT. REV., vol. 17, 2010, pages 1 - 4
U. SCHULZ; N. KAISER: "Anti reflective Coating with Nanostructured Organic Top-Layer", OPT. INTERF. COATINGS, vol. 1, 2010, pages WA2
U. SCHULZ; P. MUNZERT; R. LEITEL; WENDLING, N. KAISER; A TÜNNERMANN: "Antireflection of transparent polymers by advanced plasma etching procedures.", OPT. EXPRESS, vol. 15, 2007, pages 13108 - 13, XP002532644, DOI: doi:10.1364/OE.15.013108

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20190121000A1 (en) 2019-04-25
US10877182B2 (en) 2020-12-29
CN109196389A (en) 2019-01-11
WO2017194657A1 (en) 2017-11-16
CN109196389B (en) 2021-04-30
EP3244239B1 (en) 2022-05-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2718750B1 (en) Method for obtaining optical articles having superior abrasion resistant properties, and coated articles prepared according to such method
US7854508B2 (en) Plastic lens and manufacturing method of plastic lens
JP5120192B2 (en) Optical article
US20090169859A1 (en) Article Comprising a Mesoporous Coating Having a Refractive Index Profile and Methods for Making Same
US10401536B2 (en) Item coated with a silicon/organic layer improving the performances of an outer coating
US10877182B2 (en) Optical article comprising a substrate with an antireflective coating
CN107923995B (en) Article having optimized adhesion properties and comprising a silicone organic layer
KR20150103244A (en) Anti-fog nanotextured surfaces and articles containing the same
JP2009175500A (en) Method for manufacturing optical member
CN110431451B (en) Optical article comprising a wear-and/or scratch-resistant coating with low crack sensitivity
JP2008046264A (en) Optical article
EP2939061B1 (en) Method for the production of an optical article with improved anti-fouling properties
KR101681964B1 (en) Preparation method of ophthalmic lens with low reflection coating by wet process and ophthalmic lens using it
US20050227085A1 (en) Process for producing hard-coated optical materials
CN109791220B (en) Articles comprising nanolaminate coatings
EP3287818B1 (en) Ophthalmic lens having increased resistance to hot and humid environment
US20230184999A1 (en) Method and apparatus thereof for providing improved abrasion resistance to optical lenses
KR102315194B1 (en) Item coated with a silicon/organic layer improving the performances of an outer coating
WO2017126300A1 (en) Spectacle lens
JP2009173787A (en) Water-repelling material, manufacturing method of optical member using the same, optical member, and spectacle plastic lens

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: CORPORATION DE L'ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTREAL

Owner name: ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20180515

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20191018

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20211214

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1489650

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20220515

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602016071708

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20220504

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1489650

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20220504

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220905

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220804

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220805

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220804

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220904

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20220531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220511

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220531

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220531

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602016071708

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20230207

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220511

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220531

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230525

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230530

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230529

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220504

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20160511