EP3224174A1 - Lift system having a plurality of cars and a decentralised safety system - Google Patents
Lift system having a plurality of cars and a decentralised safety systemInfo
- Publication number
- EP3224174A1 EP3224174A1 EP15791305.4A EP15791305A EP3224174A1 EP 3224174 A1 EP3224174 A1 EP 3224174A1 EP 15791305 A EP15791305 A EP 15791305A EP 3224174 A1 EP3224174 A1 EP 3224174A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- car
- cars
- assigned
- safety
- security
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 26
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 claims description 69
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims description 21
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000035484 reaction time Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002457 bidirectional effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
- B66B5/0006—Monitoring devices or performance analysers
- B66B5/0018—Devices monitoring the operating condition of the elevator system
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
- B66B5/0006—Monitoring devices or performance analysers
- B66B5/0018—Devices monitoring the operating condition of the elevator system
- B66B5/0031—Devices monitoring the operating condition of the elevator system for safety reasons
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B1/00—Control systems of elevators in general
- B66B1/34—Details, e.g. call counting devices, data transmission from car to control system, devices giving information to the control system
- B66B1/3415—Control system configuration and the data transmission or communication within the control system
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B1/00—Control systems of elevators in general
- B66B1/34—Details, e.g. call counting devices, data transmission from car to control system, devices giving information to the control system
- B66B1/3492—Position or motion detectors or driving means for the detector
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B11/00—Main component parts of lifts in, or associated with, buildings or other structures
- B66B11/02—Cages, i.e. cars
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B11/00—Main component parts of lifts in, or associated with, buildings or other structures
- B66B11/04—Driving gear ; Details thereof, e.g. seals
- B66B11/0407—Driving gear ; Details thereof, e.g. seals actuated by an electrical linear motor
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
- B66B5/02—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators responsive to abnormal operating conditions
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B9/00—Kinds or types of lifts in, or associated with, buildings or other structures
- B66B9/003—Kinds or types of lifts in, or associated with, buildings or other structures for lateral transfer of car or frame, e.g. between vertical hoistways or to/from a parking position
Definitions
- the invention relates to an elevator installation comprising a plurality of cars, a shaft system enabling circulating operation of the cars, at least one drive system for moving the cars within the shaft system and a safety system having a plurality of safety nodes.
- the safety system of the elevator system is designed to detect normal operation
- the elevator cars of the elevator installation, the shaft system of the elevator installation and the at least one drive system of the elevator installation each form at least one functional unit.
- Publication EP 1 562 848 B1 discloses an elevator installation with at least one shaft in which at least two cars can be moved along a common roadway.
- the cars are each assigned a control unit, a drive and a brake.
- the distance between adjacent cars is monitored in each case. If a predetermined minimum critical distance is exceeded, it is provided that an emergency stop of the corresponding car is triggered.
- an elevator installation with an improved safety system is to be provided.
- the elevator system should enable a security concept which utilizes a distributed system architecture and advantageously enables short reaction times.
- the communication load occurring to ensure the safe operation of an elevator installation should preferably be reduced in comparison to previously known elevator installations.
- an elevator system comprising a plurality of cars, a circulation system of the car enabling shaft system, at least one drive system for moving the cars and a security system with a plurality of security nodes, which is formed upon detection of a deviating from normal operation of the elevator system proposed to convert the elevator system into a safe operating state.
- the shaft system and the at least one drive system each form at least one functional unit.
- At least one of the security nodes is assigned to one of the functional units.
- Each functional unit thus advantageously has at least one security node.
- the security nodes are each connected to at least one of the further security nodes via at least one interface for transmitting data.
- the security nodes each comprise at least one sensor for detecting an operating parameter of the corresponding assigned functional unit.
- the security nodes each comprise at least one control unit, which is designed to detect the one of the at least one sensor of the respective security node
- Data transmitted by a security node are, in particular, operating parameters of that functional unit assigned to the security node, preferably already evaluated operating parameters.
- the elevator installation according to the invention thus enables a decentralized monitoring of functional units of the elevator installation.
- operating parameters detected with regard to a functional unit need advantageously not first be transmitted to a central control unit but can be evaluated directly by the control unit of the safety node assigned to the functional unit. This advantageously reduces the amount of data to be transmitted and thus the communication load.
- the at least one drive system can be operated bay-wise, advantageously such that the cars can be moved independently of one another in defined sections of the shaft system, wherein preferably each of the defined sections forms a functional unit of the
- Drive system preferably comprises at least one linear motor.
- the elevator installation preferably has rails as part of the linear drive, along which the cars can be moved separately.
- the rails are advantageously partially energized so that the drive system is formed bay portion operable.
- the rails of the elevator system can advantageously be moved independently of one another by the rails which can be supplied in sections.
- such an energizable rail section is a defined section of the shaft system which as such forms a respective functional unit of the drive system.
- the drive system as a functional unit thus advantageously again has a multiplicity of functional units, to which a safety node is advantageously assigned in each case.
- such an energizable rail section of the linear drive in each case forms a functional unit.
- a security node is assigned to each power-supplyable rail section or to a group of power-supplyable rail sections in each case as a functional unit. Sensors of this security node check advantageously for the
- Rail sections relevant operating parameters in particular whether a rail section is working properly and / or whether a car of the elevator system along a rail section is moved.
- control unit of such a safety node is advantageously designed to switch off different linear motor segments, in particular the aforementioned rail sections of the linear drive, depending on the current positions of the elevator cars, in particular to eliminate possible sources of error and, if necessary, the elevator system or the corresponding functional unit of the drive system into one to transfer safe operating state.
- control unit of a safety node assigned to a functional unit of the drive system can influence the control of the linear motor segments. It is particularly envisaged that one on one
- Linear motor segment moved car can be braked, if this
- Security node is signaled a collision hazard.
- the security nodes are advantageously linked to one another via a communication interface, for example via a communication bus or an air interface, in particular using WLAN (WLAN: Wireless Local Area Network).
- WLAN Wireless Local Area Network
- a further particularly advantageous embodiment of the elevator installation according to the invention provides that the shaft system of the elevator installation has at least two vertically extending transport paths along which the cars can be moved vertically, and at least two conversion means for converting the cars between the transport routes comprises.
- Each of the transfer devices is included
- a functional unit of the shaft system which is assigned in each case a security node.
- the cars can advantageously be moved in particular between shafts of the shaft system of the elevator system.
- a shaft can each represent a transport route.
- a shaft may also comprise a plurality of transport paths, preferably such that a plurality of cars can be moved simultaneously next to one another and behind one another in the shaft.
- a possibility for a circulation operation of the elevator cars of the elevator installation is provided by the conversion device.
- a circulation operation provides that the cars are moved along at least one transport path of the shaft system exclusively in one direction, for example upwards, and along at least one further transport path of the shaft system exclusively in another direction, for example downwards.
- the individual transfer means or a group of transfer means is assigned in each case a security node, advantageously monitoring of the proper function of the transfer means is provided directly to the transfer means. As a result, the amount of data to be transmitted is advantageously further reduced. If there is an error in a conversion device, so that they are no longer in the
- Normal operation can be operated, but is transferred to a safe operating state, this is advantageously communicated to other other functional units assigned security nodes.
- the elevator installation is advantageously designed in such a way that the elevator system can continue to be operated while the defective or inoperable converter is no longer approached by the cars.
- the transport paths of the shaft system rails are along which the cars are moved by means of at least one linear drive as a drive system.
- Each rail is advantageously formed with at least one rotatable to the vertical transport segment segment as a conversion device, said rotatable segments can be aligned with each other so that a car of the elevator system along the segments between the rails can be moved.
- the functional units of the elevator installation each have at least one safety device.
- This at least one safety device can advantageously convert the respective functional unit into a safe operating state by triggering.
- the at least one safety device can be triggered directly by the control unit of the safety node assigned to the respective functional unit for triggering.
- Safety device of a car is in particular a brake or a safety gear intended .
- a safety device of a functional unit of the drive system in particular, a switching unit is provided, for example, a contactor circuit, which can set the functional unit de-energized.
- a security device of a converter as a functional unit of the shaft system in particular a locking mechanism is provided, which can fix the transfer device in a defined position.
- the security nodes are arranged on the functional units, preferably such that the control unit, the at least one sensor and the at least one securing device are arranged together on a functional unit.
- decisions to transfer a functional unit and thus the elevator installation to a safe operating state can advantageously be made locally and decentrally. This advantageously leads to an increased robustness of the security system.
- security-relevant decisions can advantageously be made simultaneously. For example, a car can be brought to a halt by triggering the brake of the car and at the same time the corresponding functional unit of the drive system, which was responsible for a method of this car, are disabled.
- a high scalability of the system is achieved by the proposed elevator system. Adjustments to the safety system, for example, to a larger number of cars, thereby advantageously comparatively small.
- a further particularly advantageous embodiment of the elevator installation according to the invention provides that a plurality of monitoring rooms is defined for the shaft system of the elevator installation, each monitoring room being assigned a plurality of functional units, the safety nodes of the functional units located in a monitoring room being connected via at least one interface to the elevator system Transferring data is connected.
- the interstices are not structurally or constructively separate areas but rather defined with respect to the security system
- Elevator system advantageously subdivided into subsystems, each subsystem is advantageously monitored with respect to an operating mode deviating from normal operation.
- Surveillance space is advantageously assigned at least one car, at least one functional unit of the shaft system and at least one functional unit of the drive system.
- Particularly preferred are a monitoring room also directly adjacent to a car
- a car is advantageously assigned in each case at least two monitoring rooms, namely once as a car, which is surrounded by two adjacent cars and once as to a car adjacent car.
- interstitial spaces are assigned spatially fixed, preferably via spatial coordinates that represent positions within the shaft system of the elevator system.
- the shaft system by a permanently assigned Raster are represented.
- a basically suitable grid is for example from the
- a specific area containing a car is defined as a monitoring space, so that this monitoring space is quasi moved together with the car. If a further car is moved into this monitoring space, it is advantageously monitored with respect to a deviation from a normal operation.
- the monitoring space in this embodiment are always associated with at least one functional unit of the shaft system and at least one functional unit of the drive system, the associated functional units can change when moving the car.
- each of one of the elevator cars of the elevator system approachable shaft area of the
- the elevator installation is designed to be partially deactivatable, in particular in such a way that individual functional units or groups of functional units, in particular individual cars and / or functional units of the drive system, can be deactivated, the elevator installation being not further developed deactivated functional units continue to operate.
- a section of the shaft system having at least one shaft door is a functional unit to which at least one security node is assigned.
- the security node is advantageously designed to monitor whether this functional unit is working properly.
- the safety node advantageously has sensors for detecting operating parameters of this functional unit.
- Security node of a control unit for evaluating the operating parameters and for the evaluation of data received from security nodes of other functional units data, for example
- the safety node assigned to the at least one shaft door section of the shaft system has at least one sensor which is designed as a functional unit and deviates from normal operation
- the elevator installation Preferably, the security system of the elevator installation, in particular of the security node of the security system assigned to this functional unit, is designed to deactivate this functional unit when detecting such an operating mode deviating from normal operation.
- the elevator installation preferably the safety system of the elevator system, is advantageously further designed to move the elevator cars of the elevator system exclusively outside this section of the shaft system which has at least one landing door.
- an opening of the shaft doors deviating from normal operation is provided as such an operating state deviating from normal operation.
- a sensor which monitors the opening and closing of the shaft doors is provided. Since, for example, a method of a car in a shaft section with open shaft doors represents a danger potential for the users of the car, this section is advantageously deactivated.
- the elevator system is advantageously designed to move the cars no longer within this section of the shaft, but to bring the cars maximally up to this shaft section.
- the control unit of a safety node assigned to a car as a functional unit is configured to predict a first stop point for a first direction of travel of the car and / or to predict a second stop point for a second direction of travel of the car.
- the respective stop point indicates the position at which the car in the respective direction of travel stop if necessary, that is, stop, can.
- the stopping points are thereby predicted by evaluation of operating parameters detected by the sensors.
- the prediction is advantageously based on a predictor model executed by means of a computer, in particular a computer of the control unit.
- operating parameters detected by the sensor are evaluated, which are the same
- Security node heard.
- operating parameters transmitted to the security node are likewise taken into account in the evaluation.
- Operating parameters taken into account in the evaluation are, in particular, the speed of the car, the position of the car in the shaft system, the acceleration of the car, the load of the car and the state of the brakes of the car.
- These operating parameters and the predicted stop points are preferably determined in predefined discrete time intervals of, for example, 5 ms to 50 ms (ms: milliseconds). As a result, an ongoing prediction of the stopping points is made possible.
- the safety node assigned to a driving node is thus configured to run for this car, that is to say essentially continuously, to calculate the stop point for the first direction of travel and the stop point for the second direction of travel.
- this stop point provides information about where this car would come to a stop or a stop in the event of braking, in particular emergency braking.
- Operating parameters of the other cars in particular
- the safety node assigned to a car as a functional unit is also designed to transmit the predicted first stop points via the interface in each case at least to the safety node assigned to the car adjacent in the first direction of travel, and predicted to transmit second stop points via the interface in each case at least to the security node, which is assigned to the car adjacent in the second direction of travel.
- the security node assigned to a car advantageously also knows, in addition to the stop points of this car, the stop points of the cars adjacent to this car in the respective direction of travel of this car.
- control unit of a safety node assigned to a car as a functional unit is designed to determine the distance from the first stop point of this car to the second stop point of the car adjacent in the first direction of travel. Furthermore, this control unit is advantageously designed to reduce the distance from the second stop point of this car to the first stop point in the second
- the safety system of the elevator system is advantageously designed to transfer the elevator system at a determined negative distance in a safe operating condition.
- a current stop point for a direction of travel of a car is based on the current position of the car in particular the distance that the car needs in this direction to stop.
- the distance is about a safety distance, preferably a fixed
- the minimum distance that two adjacent cars can assume relative to each other is dependent on a plurality of operating parameters, in particular the current position of the cars in the shaft system, the speeds of the cars, the accelerations of the cars, the payloads of the cars and / or the states of the brakes of the cars ,
- these operating parameters are preferably recorded individually only for each car in order to determine from these operating parameters for each car for the car at least one direction of travel to determine the respective stop point.
- the elevator system is advantageously in a negative distance
- Safety mode transferred in particular in which the corresponding adjacent cars whose stopping points have a negative distance, braked and thus stopped, in particular by triggering safety devices of these cars.
- negative distance refers to the case where the stop point of a considered car is farther from this considered car than the stop point of an adjacent car, in particular a preceding or following car
- the meaning of a negative number depends on the reference system used, for example, a "negative distance" for a corresponding reference system can also be expressed by a positive number.
- both horizontal and vertical movements of the cars are taken into account and corresponding stopping points are predicted.
- rapid detection of possible collisions is provided.
- the stop point of each car is predicted in each case assuming the at least one safety device of the elevator system at the latest taking place stops the respective car.
- the prediction is thus advantageously conservative.
- the distance between adjacent cars is thereby sometimes larger than absolutely necessary, but a collision of adjacent cars is reliably prevented.
- Safety devices of the elevator system are in particular
- Braking devices such as the safety gear of the car and / or on the part of
- Drive system provided braking devices. If the drive system of the elevator installation comprises at least one linear drive, in particular also the partial disconnection of a line of the linear drive is provided as the intervention of at least one safety device.
- a further advantageous embodiment of the invention provides that the stopping points are each predicted on the assumption of a worst-case scenario in order to reliably prevent a collision of adjacent cars in each case.
- the stop point of each car is predicated on the additional assumption that the respective car is accelerated before the intervention of the at least one safety device of the elevator system with the maximum possible acceleration by the elevator system.
- the stop point in the direction of travel "up” under the Assumption predicts that the car is first accelerated maximally in the direction of travel "upwards” and then brought to a halt by intervention of at least one safety device in the direction of travel "below” is advantageously predicted the stop point in the direction of travel "below” on the assumption that the car is first accelerated maximally in the direction of travel "down” and then brought to a stop by intervention of at least one safety device.
- the distance of the stop point in the direction of travel "up" to the upper end of the car is less than the distance of the stop point in the direction of travel "down” to the lower end of the car.
- an upper stop point and a lower stop point are predicted for each car.
- all the cars have an upper adjacent car and a car adjacent to one another.
- the distance of the upper stop point of a car to the lower stop point of the upper adjacent car is determined.
- the distance of the lower stop point of a car to the upper stop point of the lower adjacent car is further determined.
- the stopping points are advantageously defined via a grid permanently assigned to the shaft system.
- a grid suitable for this purpose is known, for example, from document EP 1 719 727 B1.
- the lowest point that a car can approach via the shaft system is preferably assigned the value 0.
- the highest point that a car can approach via the shaft system is preferably assigned a corresponding maximum value.
- the stopping points can be represented in particular as coordinates (x, y) or (x, y, z). In this case, only the corresponding coordinate is preferably taken into account for a current direction of travel, for example, only the coordinate x for the direction of travel x.
- the elevator system is in this case transferred to a safety mode, in particular by at least one of the two cars is brought to a stop.
- a safety mode in particular by at least one of the two cars is brought to a stop.
- Possible collision risks of a car with an upper adjacent car and / or a lower adjacent car are thus reliably detected, namely by checking whether a determined distance is negative, so have the intersected stop points have an overlap area. If a negative distance is determined, the elevator installation is advantageously transferred from normal operation into a safety mode, in particular by the affected cars being stopped.
- the other cars will advantageously continue in limited operation process, the stopped cars define a restricted area to which the further operated cars may only approach to a predefined distance.
- the cars stopped in a safety mode as part of the transfer of the elevator system receive fixed assigned
- Stop points so that in particular a collision of cars with the stopped cars with the application of the same method continues to be prevented.
- Each control unit associated with a car advantageously calculates the stop points for the at least one direction of travel of this car, in particular an upper and a lower stop point, and exchanges these with those of the control units of the adjacent cars.
- the stopping points are advantageously compared with each other, as already explained above. As long as the stop points do not overlap, ie the negative distance is determined, there is no danger of collision.
- the control unit of a car triggers a safety device of this car when determining a negative distance of the stop points, wherein it is provided in particular that a triggering of the safety device brings the car to stop.
- a triggering of the safety device brings the car to stop.
- the actuation of a brake of the car is provided as triggering a safety device of the car.
- the control device associated with a car is in terms of the triggering of
- Safety devices only responsible for the safety device of this car and advantageously does not have to slow down other cars. As a result, is to be transferred
- the stopping points are each predicted from current operating parameters of the respective car.
- stop points are predefined for all the quantized combinations of operating parameters.
- An assignment of the stop points to such a combination of operating parameters is carried out according to an advantageous embodiment via lookup table.
- such an allocation is provided as a plausibility check of stop points predicted by real-time calculations.
- the elevator system is also converted into a safety mode upon detection of a predefined deviation from associated stop points and predicted stop points.
- the elevator installation according to the invention in particular the respective components of the elevator installation, is designed to carry out method steps described in connection with the invention.
- FIG. 1 in a simplified schematic representation of an exemplary embodiment of a
- Fig. 2 shows in a simplified schematic representation an exemplary embodiment for an assignment of security nodes to the functional units in a design variant of an elevator installation according to the invention
- Fig. 3 is a simplified schematic representation of a section of an exemplary embodiment of an elevator installation according to the invention.
- FIG. 4 in a simplified schematic representation of a further embodiment of a
- Fig. 5 shows in a simplified schematic representation an exemplary embodiment of a car for use in an elevator system shown in FIG. 4, with examples shown
- Fig. 1 shows a lift installation 1 with a plurality of cars 2 and a shaft system 3 in simplified form.
- the cars 2 can be separated from each other in a first direction of travel. 6
- the cars 2 each form a functional unit of the elevator installation 1.
- the shaft system 3 of the elevator installation 1 is designed in such a way that a circulation operation of the elevator cars 2 is made possible. This means that the cars 2 can be moved in particular all in the first direction of travel 6 or all in the second direction of travel 7.
- the in Fig. 1 illustrated elevator system 1 has for the process of moving the car 2 to a linear drive with a plurality of linear motor segments 4, wherein the linear motor segments 4 are each a functional unit of the drive system of the elevator system 1.
- the drive system of the elevator system 1 is advantageously designed bay sections operable, in particular such that the cars 2 can be moved independently of each other in defined sections of the shaft system, each of the Linear motor segments 4 forms such a defined section and is each a functional unit of the drive system.
- the shaft system 3 of the elevator installation 1 comprises a plurality of shaft doors 5, the sections of the shaft system 3 comprising a shaft door 5 each having a functional unit
- the in Fig. 1 also includes a security system (not explicitly shown in FIG. 1) with a plurality of security nodes (not explicitly shown in FIG. 1). At least one of the security nodes is in each case one of the functional units, that is to say one each in particular
- the security nodes are advantageously each connected to at least one of the further security nodes via at least one interface for transmitting data, for example a communication bus or wirelessly via an air interface.
- the security nodes each comprise at least one sensor (not explicitly illustrated in FIG.
- Detecting an operating parameter of the corresponding assigned functional unit For example, it is provided that the position, the speed, the acceleration and the payload of a
- the security nodes in each case comprise at least one control unit (not explicitly illustrated in FIG. 1) which is designed to evaluate the operating parameter detected by the at least one sensor of the respective security node.
- the control unit is
- the security system of the elevator system 1 is advantageously designed to convert the elevator system into a safe operating state upon detection of a deviating from normal operation operating state of the elevator system 1.
- the normal operation is in particular a fault-free operation.
- a safe operating state of the elevator installation 1 is an operating condition in which the elevator installation 1 is transferred in the event of a fault and / or danger.
- it is provided in such a safe operating state that at least one of the functional units of the elevator installation 1 is deactivated.
- at least one linear motor segment 4 can be switched off here and / or at least one car 2 can be stopped by triggering emergency braking and / or a shaft section of the shaft system 3 comprising at least one shaft door 5 can no longer be approached by the cars 2.
- FIG. 2 shows schematically a plurality of cars 2 as functional units of the elevator installation, a plurality of manhole sections 8, which each form a functional unit of the manhole system, and a plurality of conversion devices 9, which are used for transferring of cars 2 between different transport routes, in particular different shafts of the shaft system are formed, shown as further functional units of the shaft system.
- the functional units 2, 8, 9 each have a security node 10, 10 ', 10 ", these security nodes 10, 10', 10" being part of the security system of the elevator installation.
- the safety nodes 10, 10 ', 10 "respectively comprise sensors for detecting operating parameters of the respective functional unit, operating parameters detected by the sensors 12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21 of a safety node 10, 10', 10"
- data transmitted to a security node to other security nodes is sent to a control unit (not explicitly shown in FIG.
- the control unit for example, a suitably programmed
- Microcontroller circuit evaluates the data. Furthermore, the control unit is designed to trigger a safety device associated with the respective functional unit 2, 8, 9, and thus to transfer the elevator installation to a safe operating state.
- the transmission of data occurring in a functional unit 2, 8, 9 is shown symbolically in FIG. 2 by the arrows 27.
- Data transmission can also be bidirectional, ie also counter to the arrow direction of the arrows 27th
- the safety components in particular safety devices and the control units triggering the safety devices, are placed locally on the functional units 2, 8, 9, preferably directly on the actuators and sensors. This is advantageously a
- security nodes in particular are distributed in vertical and horizontal shafts of the shaft system of an elevator installation. These advantageously record the states of the shaft components. With respect to the functional unit shaft section 8, which each one
- Security node 10 is assigned, for example by means of sensors 15, the states of the
- the safety devices 18 provide a so-called "Safe Toque Off” (STO) functionality that switches the drive powerless
- Safety devices 18 'advantageously provide a functionality that shuts off the drive by a motor protection.
- Security nodes assigned to functional units of the shaft system are preferably wired directly to the shaft components.
- a conversion device 9 is provided. Such a conversion device 9 is advantageously monitored by a security node 10 "assigned to the respective conversion device 9.
- Position limit switches 19 devices for detecting the state of a locking mechanism 20 and an absolute position sensor 21 detect in the embodiment as sensors of the
- one of the conversion devices 9 associated safety devices is advantageously triggered, preferably a service brake 17 with a coupled one
- STO Safe Toque Off
- the security nodes 10 assigned to the cars 2 comprise in particular sensors 12, 13, 14 for detecting operating parameters with regard to the respective car 2, in particular a sensor 12 for detecting the position of the car, a sensor 13 for detecting the state of the car doors, in particular the states " closed “/" open “, a sensor 14 for detecting the payload of the car 2. Further operating parameters are advantageously transmitted from other security nodes to the respective security node 10 of a car. By evaluating the operating parameters, the security node 10 makes a determination with regard to a different operating state from normal operation. If a mode of operation deviating from normal operation is detected, then advantageously this is done by the safety node 10 or the control unit
- Security node 10 safety devices 16, 16 'of the car 2 triggered. As a result, the elevator system is transferred to a safe operating state.
- the security nodes 10, 10 ', 10 are advantageously designed to make decisions, in particular decisions regarding the triggering of a security device, locally and to transmit the corresponding results, states and / or decisions to the other security nodes.
- the safety nodes 10, 10 ', 10 "of the functional units 2, 8, 9 are each provided with at least the following information or operating parameters.
- the security node 10 of the elevator car 2 advantageously has access to the following
- this information is preferably provided by the security node 10 'of the functional unit 8 of the manhole system;
- Operating parameters are provided by security nodes 10 of adjacent cars 2, preferably stop points (as explained above and below with reference to FIGS. 4 and 5); and
- security nodes in particular of security nodes within a defined monitoring space (as explained above), is explained in more detail below with reference to two examples.
- Each security node 10 assigned to a car 2 as a functional unit based on its own sensors 12, 13, 14, provides information regarding a possible collision and distributes this information via the interface 11 to all other security nodes assigned to a car as a functional unit are.
- the security node 10 which is assigned to a car 2 as a functional unit, gives permission to all safety nodes, which are assigned to a functional unit 4 of the drive system, to activate the corresponding functional units 4 of the drive system , Activating functional units 4
- the drive system can be, for example, an energizing of the corresponding linear motor segments.
- the safety node 10 allocated to this car 2 advantageously notifies all safety nodes assigned to the functional units 4 of the drive system that the functional units 4 of the drive system responsible for this car 2 are to be deactivated
- the corresponding linear motor segments are to be turned off.
- All security nodes assigned to functional units 4 of the propulsion system check their responsibility for that car 2 based on the information transmitted by the security node 10 assigned to the car 2 via the interface 11. Depending on the result of this check, they deactivate or activate them the corresponding functional units 4 of the
- Each security node 10 " which is assigned to a transfer device 9 as a functional unit of the shaft system, generates on the basis of own sensors 19, 20, 21 the information about the current state of the transfer device 9 and transmits it to all other security nodes 10, the car 2 assigned as a functional unit.
- assigned to the car 2 security node 10 gives all security nodes that are assigned to a functional unit 4 of the drive system, the permission to activate the corresponding functional units 4 of the drive system, so for example in a linear drive as a drive unit the permission to energize the linear motor segments.
- the safety node 10 assigned to the car 2 transmits to all safety nodes, which are assigned to a functional unit 4 of the drive system, the information to deactivate the functional units 4 of the drive system responsible for this car 2 , In a linear drive as a drive unit thus, for example, the information is transmitted to turn off the linear motor segments. All safety nodes assigned to a functional unit 4 of the drive system use the information to check their responsibility for this car 2 and disable the corresponding functional unit 4 of the drive system, for example the linear motor segment, or allow the corresponding functional unit 4 of the drive system, So for example that
- a safety device 17, 17 ' is activated, which prevents a change in state of the transfer device 9.
- Safety device 17 ' is in particular a locking mechanism.
- the shaft system 3 in this case has a shaft door 5 having section 8 of the shaft system 3 as a functional unit.
- a safety node (not explicitly shown in FIG. 3) is assigned to this shaft section 8.
- This safety node comprises a sensor (not explicitly shown in FIG. 3), which is designed to detect an operating mode deviating from normal operation of this functional unit 8, the elevator system 1 being designed to detect this functional unit 8 when detecting such an operating state deviating from normal operation disable and the cars 2 of the elevator system 1 advantageously
- a sensor with respect to the shaft section 8 monitors in particular the proper opening and closing of the shaft doors. If, as exemplified in Fig. 3, detected by the sensor as an operating parameter not a successful closing the shaft door 5 to the safety node or to the control unit of the safety node of the shaft section 8, the control unit advantageously disables this shaft section 8. This has the consequence that this shaft section 8 no longer the cars 2 can be approached.
- the elevator installation 1 or the safety system of the elevator installation 1 is in fact advantageously set up in such a way that all security nodes located therein exchange information with one another in a defined monitoring space.
- 3 corresponding monitoring rooms are defined for the entire shaft system.
- the elevator car 2 traveling in the upward direction of travel 6 can approach maximum to the lower limit region of the section 8 marked by the line 29.
- the driving in the downward direction of travel 7 car 2 can maximum until approaching the upper limit region of the section 8 marked by the line 29 '.
- the elevator system 41 includes a plurality of cars 43 (in FIG. 4 by way of example eight cars), which are moved separately in the shaft system 42 in a subsequent operation can, that is, a plurality of cars 43 can be moved in a slot 412 or a shaft 413.
- the cars 43 can be moved upwards in the shafts 412 in a first direction of travel 44 (shown symbolically in FIG. 4 by the arrow 44) and moved downwards in a second direction of travel 45 (symbolically in FIG. 4 by the arrow 45) shown).
- a third direction 410 shown symbolically in FIG. 4 by the arrow 410
- a fourth direction 411 in FIG symbolically represented by the arrow 411) can be moved.
- the elevator installation comprises as drive system at least one linear motor (not explicitly shown in FIG. 4) by means of which the cars 43 are moved within the shaft system 42.
- the in Fig. 4 elevator system 41 is operated such that for each car 43 continuously for the first possible direction of travel, a first stop point 46 and for the second possible direction of travel, a second stop point 47 is predicted.
- a stop point is predicted for each car 43 at least for one direction of travel.
- an upper stop point is predicted as the first stop point 46 for cars 43 located in the vertical shafts 412
- a lower stop point is predicted as the second stop point 47.
- a stop point 46 'located in the direction of travel of the respective car 43 is predicted as the stop point 46' and a second stop point located opposite the direction of travel of the respective car 43 as the stop point 47 '.
- the stopping points can be defined by means of coordinates (x, y), whereby lateral stopping points are defined via the x-coordinates and stop points lying vertically above the y-coordinates.
- the point A in FIG. 4 can be assigned the coordinate (0, 0) as an example.
- the two stop points 46, 47 and 46 ', 47' indicate starting from the current position of the respective car 43 for each of the possible directions of travel 44, 45 or 410, 411 respectively the point at which the car 43 assuming a worst case Case scenarios can stop at the latest.
- an upper stop point 46 predicts, that is, predetermined, where the car 43 'would stop when the Car 43 'would accelerate maximally in the direction of travel and would then slowed down.
- the lower stop point 47 of the car 43 ' is predicated on the worst-case assumption that the drive fails, the car 43' due to which sags and the car 43 'would only be slowed down.
- the cars 43 each advantageously have a respective control unit, for example a microcontroller circuit designed as a control unit (not explicitly shown in FIG. 4).
- the distance from the first stop point 6 of this car to the second stop point 47 of the second car is determined.
- the distance from the second stop point 47 of this car to the first stop point 46 of the second car is determined for each car 43, which has an adjacent second car in the second direction.
- the distance 48 from the upper stop point 46 of the car 43' to the lower stop point 47 of the car 43" determined.
- the lower stop point 47 of the car 43 " is advantageously transmitted to a control unit (not explicitly shown in Figure 4) of the car 43.
- the determined distance 48 is positive in this example risk of collision.
- the car 43 ' also has an adjacent car 43 "' in the further direction of travel 45. Therefore, for the car 43 ', the distance 49 is also determined from the lower stop point 47 of the car 43' to the upper stop point 46 of the car 43" ' ,
- the upper stop point 46 of the car 43 "' is advantageously transmitted to a control unit (not explicitly shown in Figure 4) of the car 43.
- the determined distance 49 is negative in this example, ie the upper stop point 46 of the car 43". 'is above the lower stop point 47 of the car 43'. There is thus a danger of collision with respect to the cars 43 'and 43 "' due to the negative distance 49 of the lower stop point 46 of the
- Safety mode transferred in particular by car-side brakes of these cars are activated, preferably triggered by the respective cars 43 'and 43 "' associated control units.
- FIG. 5 shows a car 43 with a total car height 417 and an entry threshold 420.
- movable car 43 is for each direction 44, 45 each by way of example predicted stop point 46, 47.
- movable car 43 is for each direction 44, 45 each by way of example predicted stop point 46, 47.
- the upper stop point 46 indicates the point where the car 43 can stop with the upper end of the car 421 starting from current operating parameters and assuming a worst-case scenario at the latest in the direction of travel 44. The distance between the stop point 46 and the upper car end
- the lower stop point 47 indicates the point where the car 43 with the lower end of the car
- the distance between the stop point 47 and the lower end of the car 422 results in the illustrated embodiment from the sum of an optional predeterminable minimum distance 416 to the lower end of the car 422, which must not be fallen below, and one of the current driving parameters assuming a worst case Scenarios predicted braking distance 419.
- the positions of the stop points vary depending on the current driving parameters. When the car is parked, the stop points will move closer to the car. If the car is traveling at high speed, ie in the direction of travel 44, the upper stop point will be higher. In this case, in particular even at very high speed, the case may occur that the lower stop point 47 is determined lying at the position 414, since in this case a movement in the direction of travel 45 can be excluded even in the worst case scenario.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Elevator Control (AREA)
- Types And Forms Of Lifts (AREA)
- Maintenance And Inspection Apparatuses For Elevators (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP19189843.6A EP3599208B8 (en) | 2014-11-27 | 2015-11-10 | Lift system having a plurality of cars and a decentralised safety system |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102014017486.7A DE102014017486A1 (en) | 2014-11-27 | 2014-11-27 | Elevator installation with a plurality of cars and a decentralized security system |
PCT/EP2015/076140 WO2016083114A1 (en) | 2014-11-27 | 2015-11-10 | Lift system having a plurality of cars and a decentralised safety system |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP19189843.6A Division EP3599208B8 (en) | 2014-11-27 | 2015-11-10 | Lift system having a plurality of cars and a decentralised safety system |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3224174A1 true EP3224174A1 (en) | 2017-10-04 |
EP3224174B1 EP3224174B1 (en) | 2019-08-07 |
Family
ID=54478038
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP19189843.6A Active EP3599208B8 (en) | 2014-11-27 | 2015-11-10 | Lift system having a plurality of cars and a decentralised safety system |
EP15791305.4A Active EP3224174B1 (en) | 2014-11-27 | 2015-11-10 | Lift system having a plurality of cars and a decentralised safety system |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP19189843.6A Active EP3599208B8 (en) | 2014-11-27 | 2015-11-10 | Lift system having a plurality of cars and a decentralised safety system |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US10464782B2 (en) |
EP (2) | EP3599208B8 (en) |
KR (1) | KR102006558B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN107000985B (en) |
DE (1) | DE102014017486A1 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2891002T3 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2016083114A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (21)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102014017486A1 (en) * | 2014-11-27 | 2016-06-02 | Thyssenkrupp Ag | Elevator installation with a plurality of cars and a decentralized security system |
DE102014017487A1 (en) * | 2014-11-27 | 2016-06-02 | Thyssenkrupp Ag | Method for operating an elevator installation and elevator installation designed for carrying out the method |
WO2016096763A1 (en) * | 2014-12-17 | 2016-06-23 | Inventio Ag | Damper unit for a lift |
US10829342B2 (en) * | 2015-02-05 | 2020-11-10 | Otis Elevator Company | Operational modes for multicar hoistway systems |
WO2016126627A1 (en) * | 2015-02-05 | 2016-08-11 | Otis Elevator Company | Out-of-group operations for multicar hoistway systems |
WO2016206757A1 (en) * | 2015-06-26 | 2016-12-29 | Kone Corporation | Elevator with linear motor |
DE102015218025B4 (en) * | 2015-09-18 | 2019-12-12 | Thyssenkrupp Ag | elevator system |
EP3257799B1 (en) * | 2016-06-17 | 2022-02-23 | KONE Corporation | Redundant safety circuit |
DE102016216369A1 (en) * | 2016-08-31 | 2018-03-01 | Thyssenkrupp Ag | Method for operating an elevator installation |
US10494229B2 (en) | 2017-01-30 | 2019-12-03 | Otis Elevator Company | System and method for resilient design and operation of elevator system |
DE102017205354A1 (en) * | 2017-03-29 | 2018-10-04 | Thyssenkrupp Ag | Multi-cabin elevator system and method for operating a multi-car elevator system |
DE102017109727A1 (en) * | 2017-05-05 | 2018-11-08 | Thyssenkrupp Ag | Control system for an elevator installation, elevator installation and method for controlling an elevator installation |
DE102018202549A1 (en) * | 2018-02-20 | 2019-08-22 | Thyssenkrupp Ag | Collision prevention for a guide device of an elevator installation |
DE102018202557A1 (en) * | 2018-02-20 | 2019-08-22 | Thyssenkrupp Ag | Collision prevention between cars |
DE102018202551A1 (en) * | 2018-02-20 | 2019-08-22 | Thyssenkrupp Ag | Collision prevention between a guide device and a car |
DE102019201376A1 (en) * | 2019-02-04 | 2020-08-06 | Thyssenkrupp Ag | Elevator system |
DE102019212726A1 (en) * | 2019-08-26 | 2021-03-04 | Thyssenkrupp Elevator Innovation And Operations Ag | Elevator system that converts a car into a safety operating state depending on a closed state signal and a position of the car |
WO2021083889A1 (en) * | 2019-10-31 | 2021-05-06 | Inventio Ag | Elevator system with simplified power supply for shaft door assemblies |
CN113636427B (en) * | 2021-08-19 | 2022-11-01 | 西南科技大学 | Elevator and emergency escape elevator device |
DE102022113871A1 (en) | 2022-06-01 | 2023-12-07 | Tk Elevator Innovation And Operations Gmbh | Safety device for a car of an elevator system with a sensor device |
DE102022124567A1 (en) * | 2022-09-23 | 2024-03-28 | Tk Elevator Innovation And Operations Gmbh | Method for operating an elevator system |
Family Cites Families (35)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB1393669A (en) | 1971-07-07 | 1975-05-07 | Trebron Holdings Ltd | Transport systems |
JP2736176B2 (en) * | 1991-02-14 | 1998-04-02 | 株式会社東芝 | Control device for linear motor driven elevator |
JP2618138B2 (en) | 1991-11-06 | 1997-06-11 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Low-press elevator equipment |
EP0556595B1 (en) | 1992-02-17 | 1996-03-27 | Inventio Ag | Passenger transport system |
DE59610869D1 (en) * | 1995-10-17 | 2004-01-29 | Inventio Ag | Safety device for multimobile elevator groups |
US5660675A (en) | 1995-10-19 | 1997-08-26 | Transprint Usa | Method and apparatus for splicing heat transfer printing paper |
US6173814B1 (en) | 1999-03-04 | 2001-01-16 | Otis Elevator Company | Electronic safety system for elevators having a dual redundant safety bus |
US20030000778A1 (en) | 2001-06-14 | 2003-01-02 | Rory Smith | Drive system for multiple elevator cars in a single shaft |
JP4358747B2 (en) | 2002-11-09 | 2009-11-04 | ティッセンクルップ エレバートル アーゲー | Elevator system |
EP1618059B1 (en) | 2003-04-30 | 2007-01-03 | ThyssenKrupp Elevator AG | Elevator system and method for controlling said elevator system |
SG112018A1 (en) | 2003-11-11 | 2005-06-29 | Inventio Ag | Elevator installation and monitoring system for an elevator installation |
JP4657794B2 (en) | 2005-05-06 | 2011-03-23 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Elevator group management system |
CN101511717B (en) * | 2006-06-07 | 2011-05-04 | 奥蒂斯电梯公司 | Elevator system and operation method |
EP2022742B1 (en) * | 2007-08-07 | 2014-06-25 | ThyssenKrupp Elevator AG | Lift system |
BRPI0923522B1 (en) | 2008-12-23 | 2019-08-06 | Inventio Aktiengesellschaft | LIFT INSTALLATION |
CN102256885B (en) * | 2008-12-26 | 2016-11-02 | 因温特奥股份公司 | The elevator control gear of lift facility |
JP5523443B2 (en) * | 2009-03-25 | 2014-06-18 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Elevator signal transmission device |
JP5404907B2 (en) * | 2010-03-01 | 2014-02-05 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Multi-car elevator control device |
KR101481568B1 (en) * | 2010-09-13 | 2015-01-13 | 오티스 엘리베이터 컴파니 | Elevator safety system and method |
GB201016023D0 (en) | 2010-09-24 | 2010-11-10 | Godwin Adrian M | Transportation system |
EP2607282A1 (en) | 2011-12-23 | 2013-06-26 | Inventio AG | Safety device for a lift with multiple cabins |
DE112012006233B4 (en) * | 2012-04-16 | 2021-10-14 | Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | Multiple cabin elevator |
CN203143855U (en) | 2012-12-12 | 2013-08-21 | 重庆厚齐科技有限公司 | Elevator safety monitoring system |
CN203450982U (en) * | 2013-09-17 | 2014-02-26 | 深圳市希之光科技有限公司 | System structure for monitoring running state of elevator |
FI125875B (en) * | 2014-08-22 | 2016-03-15 | Kone Corp | Method and arrangement for closing doors of an elevator |
US10745243B2 (en) * | 2014-10-21 | 2020-08-18 | Inventio Ag | Elevator comprising a decentralized electronic safety system |
DE102014017486A1 (en) * | 2014-11-27 | 2016-06-02 | Thyssenkrupp Ag | Elevator installation with a plurality of cars and a decentralized security system |
DE102014017487A1 (en) * | 2014-11-27 | 2016-06-02 | Thyssenkrupp Ag | Method for operating an elevator installation and elevator installation designed for carrying out the method |
US9758347B2 (en) * | 2014-12-02 | 2017-09-12 | ThyssenKrupp Elevator AG; ThyssenKrupp AG | Arrangement and method to move at least two elevator cars independently in at least one hoistway |
BR112017010771B1 (en) * | 2014-12-10 | 2022-02-22 | Inventio Ag | elevator system |
AU2016231585B2 (en) * | 2015-09-25 | 2018-08-09 | Otis Elevator Company | Elevator component separation assurance system and method of operation |
CN109071164B (en) * | 2016-05-04 | 2020-06-09 | 因温特奥股份公司 | Personnel transport system comprising a central control unit and a plurality of field devices with optimized fault detection |
US10554443B2 (en) * | 2016-06-09 | 2020-02-04 | Inventio Ag | Passenger transport system with central control unit and multiple field devices which communicate with data telegrams prioritized by waiting periods |
PL3519338T3 (en) * | 2016-09-29 | 2021-07-05 | Inventio Ag | Elevator safety supervising entity with two units having an option for e.g. autonomous passenger evacuation |
ES2844381T3 (en) * | 2017-05-17 | 2021-07-22 | Kone Corp | A procedure and system for generating maintenance data for an elevator door system |
-
2014
- 2014-11-27 DE DE102014017486.7A patent/DE102014017486A1/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2015
- 2015-11-10 US US15/529,999 patent/US10464782B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2015-11-10 CN CN201580064099.4A patent/CN107000985B/en active Active
- 2015-11-10 EP EP19189843.6A patent/EP3599208B8/en active Active
- 2015-11-10 EP EP15791305.4A patent/EP3224174B1/en active Active
- 2015-11-10 WO PCT/EP2015/076140 patent/WO2016083114A1/en active Application Filing
- 2015-11-10 ES ES19189843T patent/ES2891002T3/en active Active
- 2015-11-10 KR KR1020177017448A patent/KR102006558B1/en active IP Right Grant
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN107000985A (en) | 2017-08-01 |
EP3599208B8 (en) | 2021-07-28 |
CN107000985B (en) | 2019-12-06 |
US10464782B2 (en) | 2019-11-05 |
WO2016083114A1 (en) | 2016-06-02 |
KR20170087947A (en) | 2017-07-31 |
ES2891002T3 (en) | 2022-01-25 |
DE102014017486A1 (en) | 2016-06-02 |
KR102006558B1 (en) | 2019-10-08 |
EP3599208B1 (en) | 2021-06-23 |
EP3599208A1 (en) | 2020-01-29 |
EP3224174B1 (en) | 2019-08-07 |
US20170327345A1 (en) | 2017-11-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP3224174B1 (en) | Lift system having a plurality of cars and a decentralised safety system | |
EP3224175B1 (en) | Method for operating an elevator system and elevator system designed for performing the method | |
EP2022742B1 (en) | Lift system | |
EP3230189B1 (en) | Elevator system with safety monitoring system provided with a master-slave hierarchy | |
EP2284110B1 (en) | Electronic safety system for a lift | |
EP1423326B1 (en) | Situation-dependent reaction in the case of a fault in the vicinity of a door in a lift system | |
EP3436384B1 (en) | Method for operating a lift system and lift system designed for carrying out the method | |
EP3145787B1 (en) | Rail vehicle | |
EP3124350B1 (en) | Door control system and methods for the joint control of vehicle and platform doors | |
DE112013007449T5 (en) | winder | |
EP3452397B1 (en) | Installation for transporting persons with central control unit and a plurality of field devices with optimized malfunction detection method | |
EP1404603A1 (en) | Lift installation having a virtual protection area at the bottom and/or the top of the lift shaft, and method for controlling the same | |
DE102017205354A1 (en) | Multi-cabin elevator system and method for operating a multi-car elevator system | |
DE112012006233T5 (en) | Multi-car elevator | |
EP2337723B1 (en) | Controller for platform doors | |
WO2019201685A1 (en) | Brake device and method for operating a car of a lift system | |
WO2022136504A1 (en) | Elevator, method for controlling an elevator | |
EP3730440A1 (en) | Control device for controlling an operation of a person transport installation | |
DE102015118434A1 (en) | Method for operating at least two hoists in a group operation and arrangement with at least two hoists | |
DE102004048993A1 (en) | Method for controlling a railway system has trackside sensors to monitor the braking and acceleration and determine the grip of the track wheels in order to set the optimum braking and acceleration programmes | |
WO2015090937A1 (en) | Method for distributed braking and acceleration control for a train, control system, and corresponding train device | |
EP4126733A1 (en) | Safety monitoring device, and method for monitoring the safety of an elevator system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE |
|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20170502 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR AG Owner name: THYSSENKRUPP AG |
|
DAV | Request for validation of the european patent (deleted) | ||
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: THYSSENKRUPP AG Owner name: THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR AG |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: B66B 9/00 20060101ALI20190409BHEP Ipc: B66B 11/04 20060101ALI20190409BHEP Ipc: B66B 5/00 20060101AFI20190409BHEP Ipc: B66B 1/34 20060101ALI20190409BHEP |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20190516 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1163543 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20190815 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502015009924 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: JACOBACCI AND PARTNERS S.P.A., CH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20190807 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191209 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191107 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191107 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191108 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191207 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200224 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 |
|
RAP2 | Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred) |
Owner name: THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR INNOVATION AND OPERATIONS AG |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502015009924 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG2D | Information on lapse in contracting state deleted |
Ref country code: IS |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20191110 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20200603 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20191130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20191110 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20191110 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20191110 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20191130 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20191130 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 502015009924 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR INNOVATION AND OPERATION, DE Free format text: FORMER OWNERS: THYSSENKRUPP AG, 45143 ESSEN, DE; THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR AG, 45143 ESSEN, DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20151110 Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 1163543 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20201110 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20201110 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230526 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Payment date: 20231121 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20231121 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20231201 Year of fee payment: 9 |