EP2337723B1 - Controller for platform doors - Google Patents
Controller for platform doors Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2337723B1 EP2337723B1 EP09783017A EP09783017A EP2337723B1 EP 2337723 B1 EP2337723 B1 EP 2337723B1 EP 09783017 A EP09783017 A EP 09783017A EP 09783017 A EP09783017 A EP 09783017A EP 2337723 B1 EP2337723 B1 EP 2337723B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- doors
- train
- platform
- controller
- door
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 22
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007257 malfunction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009760 functional impairment Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61B—RAILWAY SYSTEMS; EQUIPMENT THEREFOR NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B61B1/00—General arrangement of stations, platforms, or sidings; Railway networks; Rail vehicle marshalling systems
- B61B1/02—General arrangement of stations and platforms including protection devices for the passengers
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method and a system for controlling platform screen doors which are arranged at a distance which corresponds to that of train doors of a train to be entered from the platform, as well as a platform door system.
- Such a method or system as for example from the DE 196 25 193 C1 is known, is used in particular on platforms with high traffic and in stations with driverless means of transport.
- doors are installed on the platform side to prevent passengers from getting onto the tracks as long as no train is standing on the platform. After entering a train, the doors are opened simultaneously with the train doors and closed again before the departure of the train.
- the function thus corresponds to the function of inner and outer elevator door.
- the functions of the doors used here can be subdivided into safety-relevant functions and non-safety-relevant functions.
- a safety function which prevents inadvertent opening of the door, as long as no train is on the platform
- a safety function while, for example, the realization of a specific travel curve when opening the door only contributes to the acceleration of the processes and thus could be referred to as comfort function.
- an inadvertent attempt of the door operator which could be caused by a malfunction of the same, no security risk, as long as an additional safety function - such as the lock described above - the actual opening of the door is prevented.
- the safety-relevant and non-safety-relevant functions are advantageously divided so that the drive control or the inverter for the door motor Only a few safety functions - such as limiting the force when closing - must be realized.
- a component or function can then be considered highly available if the intended purpose of the function or the function of the component is still guaranteed even after failure of a single component or a part thereof.
- a system can be considered highly available if a single failure of a component of the system does not prevent the overall functioning of the system.
- the implementation of the safety-relevant functions can be achieved, for example, by means of suitable redundancies or other (eg also mechanical) Measures should be carried out so that a failure of individual components does not lead to safety-critical conditions. This could be realized, for example, by the redundancy of the controller itself (CPU), the transmission media for the control signals (eg PROFIBUS / PROFINET / individual I / O signals) and the actuators (eg interlocks on each door).
- the invention has for its object to easily control platform doors in such a way that the door system of a platform is highly available.
- the platform doors are divided into a number of at least two groups, adjacent platform doors are assigned to different groups, at least two controls are provided, each group via one transmission medium in each case with at least one controller is connected, that also each controller is connected to at least one group, and control signals are transmitted via the transmission media to the platform screen doors.
- the trains to be entered such as subways and trams have several doors or - if the trains have train segments (eg "cars” on trains or “compartments” of subways) - usually also over several doors per train segment, so that in normal operation a quick entry and exit to short clock cycles at the stations can contribute.
- Neighboring doors therefore represent at least some redundancy with respect to a train segment of the train to be entered (or relative to the train to be entered if it does not have separate segments, this distinction not being explicitly mentioned in the following) failure of individual doors not allowed the same passenger throughput as without failure, but which is usually sufficient to maintain normal operation (which can also be recognized by the fact that often subways operate with individual defective doors).
- the resulting system for controlling the platform screen doors is highly available, because a highly available door system can be considered as such, if the availability of the station is not endangered by the failure of a single component of the door system.
- each group is connected via at least one transmission medium to at least one second controller, and in the event of failure of a controller, the functions of the failed controller are transmitted to the at least second controller.
- the resulting door system is completely immune to the failure of a controller, since in case of failure, the (respective) at least second control so that no group of platform doors fails due to the failure of a controller.
- the train to be entered has at least two train segments, each with a number of train doors, and the number of groups equal to the number of train doors per train segment is selected. In this way, only one door per segment fails in the event of a malfunction, whereby the additional expense of additional transmission media nevertheless remains limited to an acceptable level.
- FIG. 1 shows a door system with four platform screen door T1-T4, which are connected via a transmission medium M1 with two controllers S1, S2.
- the controllers S1, S2 are redundant, so that if one controller S1, S2 fails, the safety-relevant functions can be taken over by the second controller S1, S2.
- the realization of the "comfort functions” can take place without redundancy, since a failure of such functions does not lead directly to unsafe states.
- a non-redundant design of the transmission medium M1 and the actuators in the doors T1-T4 is therefore sufficient at first.
- FIG. 2 shows a door system similar to the one in FIG. 1 in which, however, the platform screen doors T1-T4 are subdivided into two groups G1, G2 and both groups G1, G2 are each connected via a transmission medium M1, M2 to the respective two (redundant) controllers S1, again by means of a respective left L1, L2. S2 are connected, so that a failure of a controller S1, S2 does not affect the operation.
- the doors T1 and T3 of the first group G1 and the doors T2 and T4 of the second group G2 are assigned, so that adjacent platform screen door T1-T4 belong to different groups G1, G2.
- FIG. 3 shows a further example of a door system according to the invention, in which the two illustrated groups G1, G2 of platform screen doors T1-T4 are each connected via a transmission medium M1, M2 to only one controller S1, S2.
- the links L1, L2 eg, Y coupler
- the invention relates to a method for controlling platform screen doors, which are arranged at a distance corresponding to that of train doors of a train to be entered from the platform, and a platform door system.
- the platform screen doors be divided into a number of at least two groups, adjacent platform screen doors be assigned to different groups, each group connected to at least two controllers via one transmission medium each is transmitted control signals from at least one controller via the transmission media to the platform screen doors and in case of failure of a controller, the functions of the failed control of the at least second control are transmitted.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Transportation (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)
- Platform Screen Doors And Railroad Systems (AREA)
- Power-Operated Mechanisms For Wings (AREA)
Description
Die Erfindung betrifft ein Verfahren und ein System zum Steuern von Bahnsteigtüren, die in einem Abstand zueinander angeordnet sind, der dem von Zugtüren eines vom Bahnsteig zu betretenden Zuges entspricht, sowie ein Bahnsteigtürsystem.The invention relates to a method and a system for controlling platform screen doors which are arranged at a distance which corresponds to that of train doors of a train to be entered from the platform, as well as a platform door system.
Ein derartiges Verfahren bzw. System, wie es beispielsweise aus der
Die Funktionen der hierbei eingesetzten Türen können in sicherheitsrelevante Funktionen und nicht-sicherheitsrelevante Funktionen unterteilt werden. Z.B. stellt eine Verriegelungsfunktion der Tür, die ein unbeabsichtigtes Öffnen der Tür verhindert, solange kein Zug am Bahnsteig steht, eine Sicherheitsfunktion dar, während beispielsweise die Realisierung einer bestimmten Fahrkurve beim Öffnen der Tür lediglich zur Beschleunigung der Abläufe beiträgt und somit als Komfortfunktion bezeichnet werden könnte. Auch stellt z.B. ein unbeabsichtigter Versuch des Türantriebs, der durch eine Fehlfunktion desselben hervorgerufen werden könnte, kein Sicherheitsrisiko dar, solange über eine zusätzliche Sicherheitsfunktion - wie die oben beschriebene Verriegelung - das tatsächliche Öffnen der Tür verhindert wird.The functions of the doors used here can be subdivided into safety-relevant functions and non-safety-relevant functions. For example, provides a locking function of the door, which prevents inadvertent opening of the door, as long as no train is on the platform, a safety function, while, for example, the realization of a specific travel curve when opening the door only contributes to the acceleration of the processes and thus could be referred to as comfort function. Also, e.g. an inadvertent attempt of the door operator, which could be caused by a malfunction of the same, no security risk, as long as an additional safety function - such as the lock described above - the actual opening of the door is prevented.
Bei Aufzugstüren sind die sicherheitsrelevanten und nicht-sicherheitsrelevanten Funktionen vorteilhaft so aufgeteilt, dass die Antriebssteuerung oder der Umrichter für den Türmotor nur wenige Sicherheitsfunktionen - wie z.B. die Begrenzung der Kraft beim Schließen - realisieren muss.In the case of elevator doors, the safety-relevant and non-safety-relevant functions are advantageously divided so that the drive control or the inverter for the door motor Only a few safety functions - such as limiting the force when closing - must be realized.
Beim Einsatz von Türen auf Bahnsteigen kann aber nicht davon ausgegangen werden, dass - wie bei Aufzügen - der sichere Zustand der Tür der geschlossene Zustand ist, weil:
- 1. Aufzüge in hohen Gebäuden in der Regel redundant ausgeführt sind, diese Möglichkeit aber bei Bahnsteigen aufgrund der hierfür erforderlichen zusätzlich notwendigen Investitionen ausscheidet,
- 2. als Redundanz zu Aufzügen schon aus Gründen des Brandschutzes üblicherweise Treppen vorhanden sind und
- 3. die Möglichkeit, eine Bahnsteigtür von Hand (mechanisch) wie bei einem Aufzug zu entriegeln, einen Bahnsteigausfall bis zur Wartung/Wiederinbetriebnahme der Tür zur Folge hat.
- 1. Lifts in tall buildings are usually designed to be redundant, but eliminates this possibility in the case of platforms because of the additional investment required for this purpose,
- 2. as redundancy to elevators already for reasons of fire protection usually stairs are present and
- 3. The possibility of manually unlocking a platform door by hand (mechanically), as in the case of a lift, will result in a platform failure until maintenance / re-commissioning of the door.
Bei Ausfall eines Aufzugs bleibt das Gebäude als Ganzes betriebsbereit, wenngleich ggf. mit eingeschränkter Performance. Bei Ausfall einer Bahnsteigtür bleibt auch ein betroffener Bahnsteig funktionsbereit. Bei Ausfall eines Bahnsteigs hingegen kommt (zumindest im U-Bahn-Betrieb) in der Regel der Bahnbetrieb zum Erliegen.If a lift fails, the building as a whole remains operational, albeit possibly with limited performance. If a platform door fails, an affected platform remains operational. In the event of a platform failure, on the other hand, railway operations generally come to a standstill (at least in subway operation).
Insofern ist zusätzlich zur Unterscheidung von sicherheitsrelevanten und nicht-sicherheitsrelevanten Funktionen eine Betrachtung der Verfügbarkeit einzelner Komponenten sinnvoll. Eine Komponente oder Funktion kann dann als hochverfügbar gelten, wenn der beabsichtigte Zweck der Funktion bzw. die Funktion der Komponente auch nach Ausfall einer einzelnen Komponente oder eines Teils davon noch gewährleistet ist. Ein System kann als hochverfügbar betrachtet werden, wenn ein einzelner Ausfall einer Komponente des Systems die Gesamtfunktion des Systems nicht unterbindet.In this respect, in addition to the distinction between safety-related and non-safety-relevant functions, it makes sense to consider the availability of individual components. A component or function can then be considered highly available if the intended purpose of the function or the function of the component is still guaranteed even after failure of a single component or a part thereof. A system can be considered highly available if a single failure of a component of the system does not prevent the overall functioning of the system.
Die Realisierung der sicherheitsrelevanten Funktionen kann z.B. durch geeignete Redundanzen oder sonstige (z.B. auch mechanische) Maßnahmen so ausgeführt werden, dass ein Ausfall einzelner Komponenten nicht zu sicherheitskritischen Zuständen führt. Dies könnte beispielsweise dadurch realisiert werden, dass die Steuerung selbst (CPU), die Übertragungsmedien für die Steuersignale (z.B. PROFIBUS / PROFINET / einzelne I/O-Signale) und die Aktoren (z.B. Verriegelungen an jeder Tür redundant ausgeführt werden.The implementation of the safety-relevant functions can be achieved, for example, by means of suitable redundancies or other (eg also mechanical) Measures should be carried out so that a failure of individual components does not lead to safety-critical conditions. This could be realized, for example, by the redundancy of the controller itself (CPU), the transmission media for the control signals (eg PROFIBUS / PROFINET / individual I / O signals) and the actuators (eg interlocks on each door).
Die Realisierung der "Komfortfunktionen" kann auch ohne Redundanz erfolgen, da ein Ausfall solcher Funktionen nicht unmittelbar zu unsicheren Zuständen führt. Eine nicht-redundante Ausführung der Übertragungsmedien und der Aktoren ist also zunächst ausreichend. Allerdings fallen hier bei einer Störung z.B. des Übertragungsmediums gleich alle Bahnsteigtüren aus.The realization of the "comfort functions" can also take place without redundancy, since a failure of such functions does not lead directly to unsafe states. A non-redundant design of the transmission media and the actuators is therefore sufficient initially. However, in case of a disturbance, e.g. the transmission medium equal to all platform screen doors.
Ein solcher Ausfall kann jedoch auch indirekt zu unsicheren Zuständen führen - wie dem Ausbrechen von Panik in einem überfüllten U-Bahnhof. Zudem kann die Vermeidung eines derartigen Totalausfalls der Bahnsteigtüren im Hinblick auf gehobene Verfügbarkeitsanforderungen aufgrund mangelnder Redundanzen in Bahnhöfen (da Bahnsteige in der Regel nicht redundant vorhanden sind) gefordert sein.However, such a failure can also indirectly lead to unsafe conditions - such as the onset of panic in a crowded subway station. In addition, the avoidance of such a total failure of the platform screen doors in terms of increased availability requirements due to lack of redundancy in stations (since platforms are usually not redundant available) may be required.
Der Erfindung liegt die Aufgabe zugrunde, Bahnsteigtüren auf einfache Weise derart anzusteuern, dass das Türsystem eines Bahnsteigs hochverfügbar ist.The invention has for its object to easily control platform doors in such a way that the door system of a platform is highly available.
Diese Aufgabe wird bei einem Verfahren der eingangs genannten Art dadurch gelöst, dass die Bahnsteigtüren in eine Anzahl von zumindest zwei Gruppen unterteilt werden, benachbarte Bahnsteigtüren verschiedenen Gruppen zugeordnet werden, zumindest zwei Steuerungen vorgesehen werden, jede Gruppe über je ein Übertragungsmedium derart mit zumindest einer Steuerung verbunden wird, dass auch jede Steuerung mit zumindest einer Gruppe verbunden ist, und Steuersignale über die Übertragungsmedien an die Bahnsteigtüren übermittelt werden.This object is achieved in a method of the type mentioned in that the platform doors are divided into a number of at least two groups, adjacent platform doors are assigned to different groups, at least two controls are provided, each group via one transmission medium in each case with at least one controller is connected, that also each controller is connected to at least one group, and control signals are transmitted via the transmission media to the platform screen doors.
Die Aufgabe wird weiter gelöst durch ein Bahnsteigtürsystem mit den in Anspruch 4 angegebenen Merkmalen.The object is further achieved by a platform door system having the features specified in claim 4.
Die zu betretenden Züge wie beispielsweise U-Bahnen und Straßenbahnen verfügen über mehrere Türen bzw. - wenn die Züge Zugsegmente (z.B. "Waggons" bei Zügen oder "Abteile" bei U-Bahnen) aufweisen - in der Regel auch über mehrere Türen pro Zugsegment, damit im Normalbetrieb ein schnelles Ein- und Aussteigen zu kurzen Taktzyklen an den Bahnhöfen beitragen kann. Benachbarte Türen stellen deshalb bezogen auf ein Zugsegment des zu betretenden Zuges (bzw. bezogen auf den zu betretenden Zug, falls dieser keine separaten Segmente aufweist, wobei diese Unterscheidung im Folgenden nicht in jedem Fall explizit genannt wird) zumindest eine gewisse Redundanz dar, die zwar beim Ausfall einzelner Türen nicht denselben Passagierdurchsatz erlaubt wie ohne Ausfall, die aber in der Regel ausreicht, um einen Normalbetrieb aufrechtzuerhalten (was auch daran erkannt werden kann, dass des öfteren U-Bahnen mit einzelnen defekten Türen verkehren).The trains to be entered such as subways and trams have several doors or - if the trains have train segments (eg "cars" on trains or "compartments" of subways) - usually also over several doors per train segment, so that in normal operation a quick entry and exit to short clock cycles at the stations can contribute. Neighboring doors therefore represent at least some redundancy with respect to a train segment of the train to be entered (or relative to the train to be entered if it does not have separate segments, this distinction not being explicitly mentioned in the following) failure of individual doors not allowed the same passenger throughput as without failure, but which is usually sufficient to maintain normal operation (which can also be recognized by the fact that often subways operate with individual defective doors).
Werden die Türen an einem Bahnsteig in eine Anzahl von n Gruppen unterteilt, wobei n <= Anzahl der Türen innerhalb eines Zugsegments, müssen zur Ausbildung einer durchgängigen Redundanz lediglich (n-1) redundante Übertragungsmedien ergänzt werden. Fällt nun ein Übertragungsmedium aus, das beispielsweise die erste und dritte Bahnsteigtür mit der Steuerung verbunden hat, so bleibt z.B. die zweite und vierte Bahnsteigtür funktionsfähig. Da die Aufteilung der Türen so gewählt wird, dass benachbarte Türen verschiedenen Gruppen zugeordnet werden, bleibt - wenn z.B. die erste und zweite bzw. die dritte und vierte Tür zu je einem Segment des zu betretenden Zuges gehört - jedes Segment des Zuges trotz Ausfalls einer einzelnen Komponente benutzbar.If the doors are subdivided at a platform into a number of n groups, where n <= number of doors within a train segment, only (n-1) redundant transmission media must be added to form a continuous redundancy. Now fails a transmission medium, for example, has connected the first and third platform door with the controller, it remains. the second and fourth platform door is operational. Since the division of the doors is chosen so that adjacent doors are assigned to different groups, - if e.g. the first and second or the third and fourth door belongs to a segment of the train to be entered - each segment of the train despite failure of a single component usable.
Somit ist das resultierende System zur Steuerung der Bahnsteigtüren hochverfügbar, denn ein hochverfügbares Türsystem kann als solches gelten, wenn die Verfügbarkeit des Bahnhofs durch den Ausfall einer einzelnen Komponente des Türsystems nicht gefährdet ist.Thus, the resulting system for controlling the platform screen doors is highly available, because a highly available door system can be considered as such, if the availability of the station is not endangered by the failure of a single component of the door system.
Darüber hinaus wird durch geschickte Identifikation natürlicher Redundanzen (= mehrere Türen pro Zug / Zugsegment) der erforderliche Mehraufwand auf ein Minimum beschränkt.In addition, clever identification of natural redundancies (= several doors per train / train segment) minimizes the additional work required.
Weitere Ausführungsbeispiele können durch Variation der Anzahl von Gruppen n erreicht werden, wobei gilt, dass mit steigendem n die Funktionsbeeinträchtigungen bezogen auf den ganzen Bahnhof bei Ausfall einer Komponente geringer werden.Further exemplary embodiments can be achieved by varying the number of groups n, with the proviso that as n increases, the functional impairments relative to the entire station become smaller if one component fails.
In einer vorteilhaften Form der Ausgestaltung wird jede Gruppe über je ein Übertragungsmedium mit zumindest einer zweiten Steuerung verbunden, und es werden bei Ausfall einer Steuerung die Funktionen der ausgefallenen Steuerung der zumindest zweiten Steuerung übertragen. Auf diese Weise ist das resultierende Türsystem vollständig immun gegen den Ausfall einer Steuerung, da im Störungsfall die (jeweilige) zumindest zweite Steuerung einspringt, so dass keine Gruppe von Bahnsteigtüren aufgrund des Ausfalls einer Steuerung ausfällt.In an advantageous embodiment of the invention, each group is connected via at least one transmission medium to at least one second controller, and in the event of failure of a controller, the functions of the failed controller are transmitted to the at least second controller. In this way, the resulting door system is completely immune to the failure of a controller, since in case of failure, the (respective) at least second control so that no group of platform doors fails due to the failure of a controller.
In einer weiteren vorteilhaften Ausführungsform weist der zu betretende Zug zumindest zwei Zugsegmente mit jeweils einer Anzahl von Zugtüren auf, und es wird die Anzahl von Gruppen gleich der Anzahl von Zugtüren je Zugsegment gewählt. Auf diese Weise fällt im Falle einer Störung nur eine Tür je Segment aus, wobei dennoch der Mehraufwand an zusätzlichen Übertragungsmedien auf ein erträgliches Maß beschränkt bleibt.In a further advantageous embodiment, the train to be entered has at least two train segments, each with a number of train doors, and the number of groups equal to the number of train doors per train segment is selected. In this way, only one door per segment fails in the event of a malfunction, whereby the additional expense of additional transmission media nevertheless remains limited to an acceptable level.
Im Folgenden wird die Erfindung anhand der in den Figuren dargestellten Ausführungsbeispiele näher beschrieben und erläutert. Es zeigen:
- FIG 1
- eine schematische Darstellung eines Türsystems mit redundanter Steuerung,
- FIG 2
- eine schematische Darstellung eines hochverfügbaren Türsystems gemäß der Erfindung und
- FIG 3
- eine weitere Ausführungsform eines erfindungsgemäßen Türsystems.
- FIG. 1
- a schematic representation of a door system with redundant control,
- FIG. 2
- a schematic representation of a highly available door system according to the invention and
- FIG. 3
- a further embodiment of a door system according to the invention.
Da ein Zugsegment (z.B. Waggon bzw. Abteil) eines Zuges gewöhnlich über zumindest zwei Zugtüren verfügt, ist auf diese Weise eine Aufrechterhaltung eines Normalbetriebes des Bahnsteigs - wenn auch mit verminderter Performance - möglich. Dabei kann durch die Nutzung der in Zügen natürlicherweise vorhandenen Redundanz (= mehrere Zugtüren je Segment) der erforderliche Mehraufwand auf ein Minimum reduziert werden, da nicht jede Bahnsteigtür T1-T9 redundant angesteuert werden muss und auch die in den Türen T1-T4 vorhandenen Aktoren nicht redundant ausgeführt werden müssen.Since a train segment (eg wagon or compartment) of a train usually has at least two train doors, is in this way a maintenance of normal operation of the platform - although with reduced performance - possible. It can be reduced to a minimum by using the inherent redundancy in trains (= multiple train doors per segment), since not every platform door T1-T9 must be controlled redundantly and not present in the doors T1-T4 actuators must be executed redundant.
Zusammenfassend betrifft die Erfindung ein Verfahren zum Steuern von Bahnsteigtüren, die in einem Abstand zueinander angeordnet sind, der dem von Zugtüren eines vom Bahnsteig zu betretenden Zuges entspricht, sowie ein Bahnsteigtürsystem. Um Bahnsteigtüren auf einfache Weise derart anzusteuern, dass das Türsystem eines Bahnsteigs hochverfügbar ist, wird vorgeschlagen, dass die Bahnsteigtüren in eine Anzahl von zumindest zwei Gruppen unterteilt werden, benachbarte Bahnsteigtüren verschiedenen Gruppen zugeordnet werden, jede Gruppe über je ein Übertragungsmedium mit zumindest zwei Steuerungen verbunden wird, Steuersignale von zumindest einer Steuerung über die Übertragungsmedien an die Bahnsteigtüren übermittelt werden und bei Ausfall einer Steuerung die Funktionen der ausgefallenen Steuerung der zumindest zweiten Steuerung übertragen werden.In summary, the invention relates to a method for controlling platform screen doors, which are arranged at a distance corresponding to that of train doors of a train to be entered from the platform, and a platform door system. In order to easily control platform screen doors such that the platform's door system is highly available, it is proposed that the platform screen doors be divided into a number of at least two groups, adjacent platform screen doors be assigned to different groups, each group connected to at least two controllers via one transmission medium each is transmitted control signals from at least one controller via the transmission media to the platform screen doors and in case of failure of a controller, the functions of the failed control of the at least second control are transmitted.
Claims (6)
- Method for controlling platform doors (T1-T4) which are arranged at a distance from one another which corresponds to the distance between train doors of a train to be entered from the platform,
characterized in that- the platform doors (T1-T4) are subdivided into a total of at least two groups (G1, G2),- adjacent platform doors (T1-T4) are associated with different groups (G1, G2),- at least two controllers (S1, S2) are provided,- each group (G1, G2) is connected via a respective transmission medium (M1, M2) to at least one controller (S1, S2) such that each controller (S1, S2) is also connected to at least one group (G1, G2), and- control signals are transmitted via the transmission media (M1, M2) to the platform doors (T1-T4). - Method according to Claim 1,
wherein each group (G1, G2) is connected via a respective transmission medium (M1, M2) to at least one second controller (S1, S2) and, if one controller (S1, S2) fails, the functions of the failed controller (S1, S2) are transferred to the at least one second controller (S1, S2). - Method according to Claim 1 or 2,
wherein the train to be entered has at least two train segments which each have a number of train doors, and the number of groups (G1, G2) is chosen to be equal to the number of train doors in each train segment. - Platform doors system having platform doors (T1-T4) which are arranged at a distance from one another which corresponds to the distance between train doors of a train to be entered from the platform,
characterized in that- the platform doors (T1-T4) are subdivided into a total of at least two groups (G1, G2), adjacent platform doors (T1-T4) are associated with different groups (G1, G2),- the system has at least two controllers (S1, S2), each group (G1, G2) is connected via a respective transmission medium (M1, M2) to at least one controller (S1, S2) such that each controller (S1, S2) is also connected to at least one group (G1, G2), and- control signals can be transmitted via the transmission media (M1, M2) to the platform doors (T1-T4). - Platform doors system according to Claim 4,
wherein each group (G1, G2) is connected via a respective transmission medium (M1, M2) to at least one second controller (S1, S2) and, if one controller (S1, S2) fails, the functions of the failed controller (S1, S2) can be transferred to the at least one second controller (S1, S2). - Platform doors system according to Claim 4 or 5,
wherein the train to be entered has at least two train segments which each have a number of train doors, and the number of groups (G1, G2) is equal to the number of train doors in each train segment.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102008052665A DE102008052665B4 (en) | 2008-10-22 | 2008-10-22 | Control of platform screen doors |
PCT/EP2009/061924 WO2010046184A1 (en) | 2008-10-22 | 2009-09-15 | Controller for platform doors |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2337723A1 EP2337723A1 (en) | 2011-06-29 |
EP2337723B1 true EP2337723B1 (en) | 2012-10-17 |
Family
ID=41397051
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP09783017A Active EP2337723B1 (en) | 2008-10-22 | 2009-09-15 | Controller for platform doors |
Country Status (9)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8405937B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2337723B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN102177060B (en) |
BR (1) | BRPI0919729A2 (en) |
DE (1) | DE102008052665B4 (en) |
DK (1) | DK2337723T3 (en) |
MX (1) | MX2011003005A (en) |
RU (1) | RU2505433C2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2010046184A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102008052665B4 (en) | 2008-10-22 | 2012-09-27 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Control of platform screen doors |
CN102221822B (en) * | 2011-05-04 | 2013-08-14 | 南车株洲电力机车有限公司 | Urban rail transit vehicle failure door rapid identification method based on hardwire control |
JP5800583B2 (en) * | 2011-06-09 | 2015-10-28 | 日本信号株式会社 | Home fence system |
JP6527017B2 (en) * | 2015-05-18 | 2019-06-05 | 日本信号株式会社 | Home fence and home fence opening and closing control method |
CN105715139B (en) * | 2015-12-09 | 2017-10-24 | 重庆川仪自动化股份有限公司 | A kind of platform door controller of full redundancy control |
JP7061467B2 (en) * | 2018-01-15 | 2022-04-28 | 日本信号株式会社 | Home gate control system and individual control device |
TWI674211B (en) * | 2018-11-08 | 2019-10-11 | 高雄捷運股份有限公司 | Platform door system and method for controlling the same |
CN111305683B (en) * | 2020-03-02 | 2021-08-24 | 杭州市地铁集团有限责任公司运营分公司 | Platform door electric control system |
JP7523981B2 (en) | 2020-07-20 | 2024-07-29 | ナブテスコ株式会社 | Platform door device, platform door device control method, and platform door device control program |
CN115562219B (en) * | 2022-08-18 | 2024-08-13 | 南京康尼电子科技有限公司 | Platform door plug-in type intelligent diagnosis dynamic communication monitoring server and monitoring method |
Family Cites Families (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
SU991014A1 (en) * | 1980-12-26 | 1983-01-23 | Мытищинский Ордена Октябрьской Революции И Ордена Отечественной Войны 1-Ой Степени Машиностроительный Завод | Apparatus for controlling opening of doors of railway train |
RU2009059C1 (en) * | 1989-06-16 | 1994-03-15 | Михаил Григорьевич Имянитов | Safety device for railway station platform |
US5295441A (en) * | 1991-07-31 | 1994-03-22 | Kawasaki Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Sliding door apparatus for platform |
GB2291636A (en) * | 1994-07-26 | 1996-01-31 | Westinghouse Brake & Signal | Vehicle gap bridge |
US6904717B2 (en) * | 1995-07-12 | 2005-06-14 | Valeo Electrical Systems, Inc. | Method for controlling a power sliding van door |
DE19625193C1 (en) * | 1996-06-24 | 1997-12-11 | Siemens Ag | Method and device for the automatic control of corresponding doors of a traffic system |
WO1998001964A1 (en) * | 1996-07-05 | 1998-01-15 | Clifford Harris | Modular transmission system and method |
IL121120A (en) * | 1997-06-19 | 2000-12-06 | Sensotech Ltd | Door opening control apparatus |
US6564721B2 (en) * | 2001-03-26 | 2003-05-20 | Robert L. Stiles | Rail transport system |
JP4762430B2 (en) * | 2001-04-06 | 2011-08-31 | ナブテスコ株式会社 | Platform door device and control method thereof |
JP4167481B2 (en) * | 2002-12-16 | 2008-10-15 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | Platform door equipment |
JP4312074B2 (en) * | 2004-02-18 | 2009-08-12 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Platform door equipment |
DE102004025514A1 (en) * | 2004-04-13 | 2005-11-03 | Thyssenkrupp Transrapid Gmbh | Device for controlling a platform door arranged on the track of a track-bound vehicle |
DE102004045558B3 (en) * | 2004-09-15 | 2005-09-08 | Siemens Ag | Coordinated drive system for doors on railway vehicles and doors on platform edge controls train movement to halt train on correct spot to align doors and has central control system for platform |
US7802251B2 (en) * | 2005-11-09 | 2010-09-21 | Hitachi, Ltd. | System for resource allocation to an active virtual machine using switch and controller to associate resource groups |
DE102008052665B4 (en) | 2008-10-22 | 2012-09-27 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Control of platform screen doors |
-
2008
- 2008-10-22 DE DE102008052665A patent/DE102008052665B4/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2009
- 2009-09-15 RU RU2011120335/11A patent/RU2505433C2/en active
- 2009-09-15 EP EP09783017A patent/EP2337723B1/en active Active
- 2009-09-15 WO PCT/EP2009/061924 patent/WO2010046184A1/en active Application Filing
- 2009-09-15 BR BRPI0919729A patent/BRPI0919729A2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2009-09-15 CN CN200980140437.2A patent/CN102177060B/en active Active
- 2009-09-15 DK DK09783017.8T patent/DK2337723T3/en active
- 2009-09-15 US US12/998,464 patent/US8405937B2/en active Active
- 2009-09-15 MX MX2011003005A patent/MX2011003005A/en active IP Right Grant
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN102177060A (en) | 2011-09-07 |
DK2337723T3 (en) | 2013-02-11 |
RU2011120335A (en) | 2012-11-27 |
US20110197514A1 (en) | 2011-08-18 |
MX2011003005A (en) | 2011-04-11 |
DE102008052665B4 (en) | 2012-09-27 |
EP2337723A1 (en) | 2011-06-29 |
BRPI0919729A2 (en) | 2015-12-08 |
RU2505433C2 (en) | 2014-01-27 |
DE102008052665A1 (en) | 2010-05-27 |
CN102177060B (en) | 2014-04-09 |
WO2010046184A1 (en) | 2010-04-29 |
US8405937B2 (en) | 2013-03-26 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2337723B1 (en) | Controller for platform doors | |
EP3599208B1 (en) | Lift system having a plurality of cars and a decentralised safety system | |
EP2022742B1 (en) | Lift system | |
EP3145787B1 (en) | Rail vehicle | |
EP1719688A1 (en) | Data communication system for railway vehicles | |
AT501893B1 (en) | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR EXTERIOR OPERATION OF DEFECTIVE DOORS | |
EP3661819B1 (en) | Control system for a motor vehicle, motor vehicle, method for controlling a motor vehicle, computer program product, and computer-readable medium | |
DE102005014804A1 (en) | On-board network system for a motor vehicle and control unit and intelligent power supply unit for a vehicle electrical system of a motor vehicle | |
EP2874857B1 (en) | Operating a rail vehicle by means of an etcs device, railvehicle and apparatus | |
EP3956190B1 (en) | Brake shut-off arrangement and method for operating a brake shut-off arrangement | |
EP3046817B1 (en) | Rail vehicle combination | |
EP3233698A1 (en) | Method for operating an electronic safety system with temporary subscribers | |
DE102005023296B4 (en) | Train Control System | |
DE102015211587A1 (en) | Control arrangement for a vehicle | |
WO2007076939A2 (en) | Apparatus for controlling at least one machine | |
DE102004041672B4 (en) | Emergency braking device and braking system for a rail vehicle and method for ensuring an emergency braking function in rail vehicles | |
EP3400161B1 (en) | Track installation and method for operating a track installation | |
DE102004035901B4 (en) | Device for controlling a safety-critical process | |
EP3730440A1 (en) | Control device for controlling an operation of a person transport installation | |
EP3565752A1 (en) | Switchover between element controllers in railway operation | |
WO2018033438A1 (en) | Ethernet network for security-related applications | |
EP3860898A1 (en) | Method for preventing the deactivation of an impermissible number of components of a rail vehicle of the same type | |
WO2024061655A1 (en) | Brake system and method for controlling a brake system | |
DE102020109545A1 (en) | Procedure for operating a safety controller | |
EP3591478A1 (en) | Safety switch assembly |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20110307 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA RS |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 579757 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20121115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502009005142 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20121206 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NO Ref legal event code: T2 Effective date: 20121017 |
|
RAP2 | Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred) |
Owner name: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20121017 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121017 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130217 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121017 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121017 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121017 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121017 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130128 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121017 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121017 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130118 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130218 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121017 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121017 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130117 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121017 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121017 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121017 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20130718 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502009005142 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20130718 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121017 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20131010 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121017 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: EBP Effective date: 20130930 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130930 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130930 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130930 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130915 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130930 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121017 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121017 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140930 Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121017 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121017 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130915 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20090915 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 579757 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20140915 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140915 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20230920 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20230918 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20231009 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20231120 Year of fee payment: 15 |